WHEN YOU KNOW BETTER YOU DO BETTER! WHY VOTE EMAIL UPDATE TO DEMOCRATIC JUDGES KEEPING SILENT ON HOW ALLEGED KU KLUX KLAN JUDGES ACTING AS IF THEY ARE IN THE SOUTH
HOW IS VICE-PRESIDENT KAMALA HARRIS ANY DIFFERENT FROM CHICAGO DEMOCRATS?
Can anyone explain why being a Black Democrat means you have to be cowardly, spineless and go along with any and all racial injustices or help racist white Political Machine Operatives steal homes in the guise of foreclosure.
The following are how Democrats admitted to a plethora of crimes as so many closed their eyes to White Supremacy and injustices on so many levels but are the first ones to enter a church and beg for your vote either keeping them in office or to put them in a office when in fact Chicago Democrats only service and support corruption and racism here is the factual evidence.
Mon, Jul 29 at 12:00 PMAttention Clerk for Judge Maritiza Martinez:It's time for people to see and realize that Black Democrats in Chicago have no authority over Caucasians and surprisingly Judge Chavira and Martinez acted like Black women, or racist or sexist Hispanics and they are the first Hispanic women to get intertwined in this sick incest scandal.If you are Black and a Democrat, they must do whatever they are told and this is how so many have achieved their status within the Political Machine, you won't find a half of a Black person denouncing any of the injustices noted in any of the documents vocally because they are only servants or figureheads for the party, but Judge Arce made it clear and corroborated what has been asserted to me for years that no Black or Irish judges (aka the Good ol Boys) will ever rule in my favor, but they made it clear there are some good white judges who will do right by me where the law is concerned, I just have to get in front of one of them..If I was fortunate to get a Spanish sister, they helped their ethnic groups when we were at 32 West Randolph, Que las negras no me ayudan en este caso mujeres! Many told the Black Clerks what was being done to me was wrong because none of them saw where the money was going because, I never owed any money for child support and when they took my money from welfare for payments while in front of judge David Haracz, they always gave me a receipt that said suspense!I have had women whose fathers are racist as HELL, try and help me but not a Black person now look at all of the Blacks involved and ask them why did so many go along with this sick ass Bullshit? If you want to know the answer just watch DJANGO UNCHAINED featuring Jaime Foxx and Samuel L. Jackson as Stephen many of the Black men in the Democratic Party are just like him as well as the women.This is how the Democratic Party keeps Freemen or Freewomen disenfranchised from society by oppressing them if not by imprisoning them unlawfully for 25-35 years before DNA finally says oops he didn't do it or in the worst-case scenario how they recruited so many inferior negros and certain Hispanics wanting to be accepted to take part in JIM CROW ACTS that the Ku Klux Klan perfected in the South Mississippi etc. and using the same formula showing their true hate for people of Color fighting racism and injustices.This Paternity case is going on 40 years old Nov 21, 2024, and this is how long the Democrats have been profiting off of the misery and injustices levied at me and my family not wanting me to work go to school but pay a bill via extortion that was never my bill in the first place.To further amplify the MENTAL ILLNESS of this case Francoise much rather lie and live with me being a DEADBEAT FATHER, with never any attachment to her child now a woman rather that ADMIT her DAUGHTER IS HER SISTER AND HER FATHER IS THE GRANDFATHER/FATHER.Ask any Caucasian if what, I have recorded on paper is true?Legally the State has already admitted to all of my pleadings as being true and correct.Please find the proposed court order for the August Hearing at 9:00 am:Zoom Link
Meeting ID: 98569320525
Password: 080942
Dial In Number: 312-626-67991.) MOTION TO VACATE COURT ORDER BEING VOID/A NULLITY (MARCH 27, 2024) DUE TO JUDGE MARITZA MARTINEZ NOT HAVING JURISDICTION AND INVOKING THE JURISDICTION OF THE STATE POLICE/JUDICIAL COMMISSION TO FORCIBLY REMOVE JUDGE (S) INSTANTER FROM THEIR POSITIONS DUE TO ADMISSIONS OF SUMMARY JUDGMENT (FILED DEC 4, 2023) Local Rule 56.1 The rule is very clear that "all material facts set forth in the statement required of the moving party will be deemed admitted unless controverted by the statement of the opposing party." Local Rule 56.1(b)(3)(B).WITH AFFIDAVIT2.) RESPONDENT’S MOTION FOR DISQUALIFICATION OF JUDGE MARITZA MARTINEZ INSTANTER FOR “CAUSE” HATE BIAS PREJUDICE PURSUANT to S.H.A. 735 ILCS 5/2 ---1001 (a) (2,3)
AS A “PRIVATE CITIZEN” SHE IS ENGAGING IN PRIMAE FACIE SHOWING
OF AN ORGANIZED CRIMINAL CONSPIRACY CIVIL RIGHTS VIOLATIONS “FRAUD” TRESPASSING UPON THE LAWS ENGAGING IN TREASON OFFENSES MAKING HER ORDER VOID/NULLITY DUE TO PETITIONER & ASSISTANT STATES ATTORNEYS ADMITTING/CORROBORATING THEIR ROLES IN SAID CONSPIRACY AND JUDGE CHAVIRA BEING A FORMER ASSISTANT STATES ATTORNEY USED HER UNLAWFUL AUTHORITY WITH FORMER ASSISTANT STATES ATTORNEY THOMAS KANTAS IN COVERING-UP CRIMES OF OTHER ASSISTANT STATES ATTORNEYS UNLAWFUL INVOLVEMENT IN MANUFACTURING DOCUMENTS CAUSING AN EMANCIPATED ADULT TYCEE HIGHTOWER TO APPEAR AS A MINOR SO AS TO EXTORT MONEY FROM THE RESPONDENT JUDGE NEVER HAD JURISDICTION OR AUTHORITY TO PRESIDE OVER CASE TO DISQUALIFY CHAVIRA AND THE ASSISTANT STATES ATTORNEY IS SHOWING AS A CAUCASIAN SHE CAN VIOLATE ANY LAWS WHERE RESPONDENT IS CONCERNED AND ADMITTED REPRESENTING CHICAGO POLICE OFFICER DUE TO BLACK DEMOCRATS HAVING NO AUTHORITY OVER CERTAIN CAUCASIANS & VACATE ALL ORDERS AND RULE TO SHOW CAUSE REMANDING ALL PARTIES INTO CUSTODY INSTANTER W /BODY ATTACHEMENT w/AFFIDAVIT3.) MOTION TO RECUSE THE ENTIRE COOK COUNTY JUDICIARY AND APPOINT A SPECIAL PROSECUTOR PURSUANT TO THE CASE OF 2 EX-COOK COUNTY ASSISTANT STATE’S ATTORNEY’S (NICHOLAS TRUTENKO, ANDREW HORVAT) DUE TO FORMER ASSISTANT’S STATES ATTORNEY IRIS Y. CHIVIRA ALLEGEDLY TOOK PART IN THE FALSIFICATION OF BACKDATING RECORDS MAKING HER A MINOR FOR POLICE OFFICER FRANCOISER HIGHTOWER FOR HER EMANCIPATED DAUGHTER TYCEE LAQITA HIGHTOWER CAUSING RESPONDENT TO BE REMANDED INTO CUSTODY FOR ALLEGEDLY OWING CHILD SUPPORT 5 TIMES THAT WAS NEVER OWED AND NOT HIS CHILD AND THEY HAVE ADMITTED TO THE VERACITY OF THIS VIA SUMMARY JUDGMENT/DEFAULT BUT COOK COUNTY JUDGES ARE TRYING TO CONTINUOUSLY COVER-UP THE MAYHEM & EGREGIOUS INJUSTICES BECAUSE OF HIS SKIN COLOR COVERING UP A PLETHORA OF CRIMES ASSOCIATED IN THIS MATTER WHERE THE MAY 29TH EMAIL WAS SENT TO PRESIDING JUDGE REGINA SCANNICCHIO TO VACATE COURT ORDER BEING VOID/A NULLITY (MARCH 27, 2024) DUE TO JUDGE MARITZA MARTINEZ NOT HAVING JURISDICTION AND INVOKING THE JURISDICTION OF THE STATE POLICE/JUDICIAL COMMISSION TO FORCIBLY REMOVE JUDGE (S) INSTANTER FROM THEIR POSITIONS DUE TO ADMISSIONS OF SUMMARY JUDGMENT (FILED DEC 4, 2023) Local Rule 56.1 The rule is very clear that "all material facts set forth in the statement required of the moving party will be deemed admitted unless controverted by the statement of the opposing party." Local Rule 56.1(b)(3)(B).
WITH AFFIDAVIT4.) MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT OF FRAUD OF $50 Million Dollars
Illinois
Department of Human Services
JB Pritzker, Governor · Grace
B. Hou, Secretary
Fax 312 793-2060
April 19, 2021
Dear Madam Secretary
I have been advised to
forward this information to you due, to your integrity and so many others on
alleged payrolls engaging in special favors covering up illegal activities in
the Child Support Division.
88 D079012
C 01240217
I have been informed by many representatives in Springfield
Chicago is a mess many have tried ascertaining information in the past on
similar cases like mine, but had no success as a result to my due-diligence and
prior communication with a representative from Springfield on March 17 and
April 1, was my birthday is the first time a person has given me a person’s
name to forward this communication to.
Keep in mind
Springfield, has issued 2 escalation Directives in June and July with nobody
ever responding and after March 17 so, I have been directed to forward all of
my documents showing that the emancipated child is not my daughter and the
court orders showing, I was never ORDERED TO PAY CHILD SUPPORT.
For the Record: Springfield has informed me that,
they have no records in their database of me owing any child support and no
knowledge of me being LOCKED UP 5 TIMES for ALLEGEDLY OWING CHILD SUPPORT.
PLEASE DON’T PUT THIS INFORMATION IN THE HANDS OF ANYONE
BLACK, THEY WILL NOT DO ANYTHING! BLACK
LIVES DON’T MATTER TO ALL BLACKS
Emails, Court
Transcript, Court Orders etc. hereto
attached
1.) May 27, 2020 Letter to the Accounting Dept.
No Reply
2.)
Feb. 8,
1988 Court Transcript (Proves Service was never had)
3.)
Feb 23, 1988
Falsified Affidavit describing an elderly person not my Grandmother and
false description of the building but indicates SERVICE WAS HAD.
A- Copies
of building 7911 South Clyde demonstrating no REAR UNIT.
4.)
May 2, 1988 Court Transcript Demonstrating an
Associate Black Judge COLLUDING with and aiding and abetting in a CRIMINAL
CONSPIRACY w/the STATES ATTORNEY, where the Judge knew Francoise ADMITTED
HAVING SEX WITH HER FATHER. (POLICEMAN)
5.)
May 18, 1988 Court Transcript, Judge River found
me in DEFAULT, never ORDERED ME TO PAY ANY CHILD SUPPORT.
6.)
August 3,
1988 Court Order of Judge Rivers VACATING FEB. 24TH ORDER OF
SERVICE which was the WRONG DATE it should have been FEB 23RD.
A- Because
Judge Rivers was a Good Ni+@er doing what he was told FRAMING AN INNOCENT MAN
FOR A CORRUPT PEDIPHILE POLICE OFFICER, he was APPOINTED TO SUPERVISOR on Woods
near Chicago Ave.
7.)
This case was DISMISSED
September 17, 1987 85D 068184 by then States Attorney Richard Daley via
Stacey Berman and Obrietta Scott, Assistant States Attorneys;
8.)
Dorothy Brown’s Clerks were aware of all unlawful
irregularities said take this matter to the Media and FBI because they have
judges in their back pockets signing court orders illegally “ You don’t owe any child support the court
order for 1988 has no signature on it and does not order you to pay any child
support”
9.)
So that many won’t feel this is an isolated error or
typographical error here is another African American man contemplated suicide
for going through the same experience for 19 years CHANNEL 2 NEWS
REPORTER DOROTHY TUCKER AIRED A STORY WHERE A MAN THREATEN SUICIDE--- Man
Hounded For Child Support For 20 Years, But It’s Not His Kid « CBS Chicago
http://cbsloc.al/MMxCOA
A-
CTA destroyed my personnel records to protect the Irish
judge who signed a court order allowing my wages to be garnisheed CTA knew the
document was in fact an unlawful court order because there was no legal seal on
the order many in personnel who was familiar with my case made it clear, “if this shit ever got out a lot of
people were going to jail per CTA employee”
B-
A lot of BLACK PEOPLE helped RACIST WHITE MEN get away
with these crimes making me LEGALLY HOMELESS AND ON WELFARE this very day for
fighting back complaining about these wrongful injustices.
Gov Pritzker Ordered the
Office of the Inspector General to investigate this matter per my Complaint,
they realized my Complaint was in fact valid on Nov. 6, 2020, referred the
Illinois Dept. of Child Support to answer the Complaint to this date nobody has
ever responded in spite of repeated emails and phone calls.
I NEED YOUR HELP BECAUSE MY LIFE IS IN RUINS
AND PASSPORT IS BEING HELD HOSTAGE, due to false repeated lies saying, I owe
CHILD SUPPORT PER United States Department of State, I have until May 24, 2021
to provide information proving, a ZERO BALANCE.
That Black or Colored Judges are now working with racist Political Machine Operatives for favor or appointments within the Democratic Party where the laws prohibit such behavior many have used their ethnicities to cover-up and protect said parties if they were of the Ku Klux Klan or Nazi Fraternal Orders, unequivocally corroborating Jim Crow Laws are still being enforced in spite of the United States Supreme Court outlawing this Terrorist Group and all of its illegal rulings.
1.
Every Inferior Negro
who had titles in the Democratic Party looked at Burke as if he was their White
Jesus and would commit any crime unimaginable so that their racist Political Machine
Gods would love and accept them but the Irish and Polish ethnic judges were
described as “the Good ol boys” or “White Trash” never feared Black authority
and laughed at it and was aware that
numerous judges engaged in “Racist Terrorist Conspiracies where Respondent
was concerned falsified an entire case 88 D 079012 under the authority and
leadership of former Police Officer Alderman Edward Burke assigned all judges
to enter corrupt unlawful orders on a Paternity Case that was DISMISSED
September 17, 1987,” but because these were RACIST WHITE MEN IN THE
DEMOCRATIC MACHINE, this was a norm violating the Civil Rights of men of color;
2.
That Chief Judge Timothy Calvin Evans was aware of all the egregious HATEFUL KU KLUX KLAN ACTS as
well as the Attorney General Lisa Madigan and States Attorney Anita Alvarez was
aware said judges committing TREASON OFFENSES, but Anita Alvarez was the only
person who told the TRUTH that Defendant never owed any Child Support but
because Defendant was termed a “Ni**er Nobody” the Irish and
Polish had “Legal Orgasms” frolicking as “Private Citizens” using their
positions to flaunt their real Hate for Black and Brown Men as so many Negros
acted as House Ni**ers on a Plantation went along with everything to please
their “White Masters” in the Democratic Political Machine.
STATE OF ILLINOIS )
)
COUNTY OF COOK )
AFFIDAVIT
I Monzella Y. Johnson, being first duly sworn on
oath depose and states as follows:
.
FURTHER AFFIANTH SAYETH NOT
Under penalties as provided by law pursuant to 735 1265 5/1
-109, the undersigned certifies that the statements set forth in this
instrument are true and correct, except as to matters therein stated to be on
information and belief and as to such matters, the undersigned certifies as
aforesaid that he verily believes the same to be true.
Respectfully submitted,
_______________________
5217 S. Ingleside Ave
Chicago, Il 60615
773 835-5849
NOTARY
________________________________________________________________________
IN THE
SUPREME COURT OF ILLINOIS
________________________________________________________________________
U.S. Bank National Association, As Trustee Under)
Pooling and
Servicing Agreement Dated as of )
Case
# 130902
December 1, 2006
Mastr Asset–Backed Securities )
Trust 2006-NC3
Mortgage Pass-Through
) Case # 2008 CH
33616
Certificates,
Series 2006-NC3 ) Appeal from the Circuit Court
) of Cook
County
) Chancery
Division
Plaintiff-Appellees ) Gen No. 2008-33616
)
) Hon James T.
Derico
)
Monzella Y.
Johnson, A/K/A Monzella
)
Johnson; Marcia E. Johnson A/K/A Marcia )
Johnson: Mortgage Electronic Registration )
Systems, Inc. As
Nominee for New Century )
Mortgage
Corporation; Monzella Y. Johnson
)
( C ) Cestui Que
Trust; Discover Bank;
)
Unknown Owners and
Non-Record Claimants
)
)
V.
)
Defendant- Appellant )
1st District App Judges )
Nathaniel R. Howse, Jr. )
David W. Ellis
)
Margaret S. McBride )
MOTION TO SUPPLEMENT WRIT OF MANDAMUS OR IN THE
ALTERNATIVE SUPERVISORY ORDER WHICH CORROBORATES “FRAUD” ON THE COURT AND US
BANK OFFICERS NOT HAVING ANY KNOWLEDGE OF THE FOREGOING & CONSUMER
FINANCIAL PROTECTION BUREAU ORDERED US BANK TO RESPOND WHERE PHH MORTGAGE NOT
HAVING ANY KNOWLEDGE & DISQUALIFY ALL AFRICAN AMERICAN JUDGES WITH THE DEMOCRATIC
JUDGES DUE TO ADMITTING WITH COMPLICITY AND COLLUSION OF ALL NEGRO, AFRICAN
AMERICAN JUDGES TAKING PART IN ALL OF THE
MORTGAGE FRAUDS AND “TRESPASSING UPON THE LAWS” “TREASON” OFFENSES ACTING AS “PRIVATE
CITIZENS” IN THIS ILLEGAL FORECLOSURE w/AFFIDAVIT
_______________________________________________________________________
To the Honorable
Justices of the Supreme Court of the State of Illinois.
Now comes Defendant –Appellant, Monzella Y. Johnson, a
United States Citizen through herself
Pro se your Petitioner, the people of the State of Illinois, a Citizen,
a resident and an Elector of the City of Chicago, County of Cook, and State of
Illinois, respectfully represents and shows to your Honors the following:
1.)
That said Appellant have provided Notice and Knowledge that Appellant had been fighting a
Criminal Enterprise in the Illinois Court system of US Bank trying to steal
said home in an elaborate Mortgage Foreclosure Fraudulent scheme and
communicated via a Complaint to the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau who
Ordered a reply in 15 days, hereto attached, Gr Ex A, July 5, 2024, Official
Complaint Where US Bank has admitted taking part in an Illegal Foreclosure et
al. .
A-
That the law firm Potestivo & Associates P.C. of
231 Diversion Street, Rochester, MI 48307, Phone (312) 263—0003 seems to be the
Master Minds of this vicious scheme and is aware of all corrupt judges and
Clerks to make this Criminal Enterprise a success.
2.) That US Mortgage Research emailed a letter,
July 22, 2024 stating as Gr Ex B, Par 2, “We researched the above
referenced address and have determined that U.S. Bank is the trustee for the
mortgage-backed-securitization trust (the “MBS Trust”) that owns this property.
Please note that U.S. Bank, in its corporate capacity, does not own this
property. A company named PHH Mortgage (“PHH”)
is the mortgage servicer, and it is the party with the authority and
responsibility to make decisions and take actions regarding individual
properties in the MBS Trust, et al.”
3.) That on July 31, 2024 PHH
Mortgage emailed to the Appellant, Gr Ex C, Par 3, “Due to the
delinquency of this account, on February 10, 2009, foreclosure proceedings were
initiated. At the time of the referral, the account was past due for the June
1, 2008, payment. As of the date of this letter, the account is still past due
for the June 1, 2008, contractual payment. Based on our review, the foreclosure
proceedings are valid.
4.) That the Appellate Court Negro
Nathaniel R. Howse, Jr. is using his judicial robe to help facilitate Appellees
trying to steal Appellants home with two other Democrats GRANTED the Motion of the Attorneys who are
not legally before the court (June 17, 2024), knowing that what was being
attempted was criminal and illegal.
A-
That the
signed Court Order as of June 2, 2010, by Cook County Judge Gillespie “THIS
COURT ON Its OWN MOTION VACATES THE JUDGMENT OF FORECLOSURE FOR LACK OF A
PROPER AFFIDAVIT IN SUPPORT”
B-
The Affidavit that the Appellees presented to the Court
of Cook County was an AFFIDAVIT CERTIFICATION FROM THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
accompanied with the Motion Vacating the Court Order of June 20, 2024 et al.
C-
That the Appellate
Court AFFIRMED, Judge Gillespie’s Ruling “That Defendant filed
an Appeal with due-diligence trying emphatically to save their family home and
was before another group of judges and the APPELLATE COURT- AFFIRMED
Judge Gillespie’s Court Order, hereto attached, Gr Ex B August 30, 2012,
Judges Nathaniel R. Howse, Jr., Joseph Gordon, James R. Epstein”.
1.)
Pursuant to Supreme
Court Rule 71, Sufficient for Removal, conduct which does not constitute a
criminal offense maybe sufficiently violative of the Judicial Canons to warrant
removal for cause. Napolitano v. Ward,
457 F 2d 279 (7th Cir)
2.)
The 7th Cir. Held that the Cook
County Courts were a Criminal enterprise. U.S.
v. Murphy, 768 F. 2d 1518, 1531 where precedent was enacted by Judges Frank H.
Easterbrook, Richard D. Cudahy and former Chief judge Luther Merritt Swygert;
3.)
. ILL. App. (1st
Dist. 2000). A “VOID JUDGEMENT OR ORDER” is one that is entered by a court
lacking jurisdiction over the parties or the subject matter, or lacking the
inherent power to enter the particular order of judgment, or where the order
was procured by FRAUD- in re Adoption of E.L., 248 ILL. Dec. 171, 733 N.E. 2d
846, 315 ILL. App. 3d 137- Judgm 7, 16, 375.
Properly alleged facts
within an affidavit that are not contradicted by counter affidavit are taken as
true, despite the existence of contrary averments in the adverse party’s pleadings. Professional
Group Travel, Ltd. v. Professional Seminar Consultants Inc., 136 ILL App 3d
1084, 483 N.E. 2d 1291; Buzzard v. Bolger, 117 ILL App 3d 887, 453 N.E. 2d 1129
et al.
That because of the above; Fraud admissibility great latitude is permitted in proving fraud C.J.S. Fraud
104 ET Seg. Fraud 51-57. where a question of fraud and deceit is the issue
involved in a case, great latitude is
ordinarily permitted in the introduction of evidence, and courts allow the
greatest liberality in the method of examination and in the scope of inquiry Vigus
V. O’Bannon, 1886 8 N.E 788, 118 ILL 334. Hazelton V. Carolus, 1907 132 ILL.
App. 512. See Gr Ex D, Letter to Gov Pritzker Secretary Grace B.
Hou, how so many Blacks went along with racist judges and Assistant States
Attorneys in a plethora of sordid criminal acts framing an innocent man as a
Police Officer impregnated his daughter as he was REMANDED into Custody 5 times
for allegedly owing child support, he never owed to the Mother who is a Police
Officer using her badge and fathers influence to Extort money from him for her
fathers child.
INDUCING RELIANCE
To prevail in a cause of action for
fraud, plaintiff must prove that defendant made statement of material nature
which was relied on by victim and was made for purposes of inducing reliance,
and that victim’s reliance led to his injury. Parsons V. Winter, 1986, 1 Dist., 491 N.E.
2d 1236, 96
In Carter V. Mueller 457
N.E. 2d 1335 ILL. App. 1 Dist. 1983 The Supreme
Court has held that: “The elements of a cause of action for fraudulent
misrepresentation (sometimes referred to as “fraud and deceit” or deceit) are:
(1) False statement of material fact; (2) known or believed to be false by the
party making it; (3) intent to induce the other party to act; (4) action by the
other party in reliance on the truth of the statement; and (5) damage to the
other party resulting from such reliance.
U. S Sup Court Digest 24(1)
General Conspiracy
U.S. 2003. Essence of a conspiracy is
an agreement to commit an unlawful act.—U.S. v. Jimenez Recio, 123 S Ct. 819,
537 U.S. 270, 154 L.Ed.2d 744, on remand 371F.3d 1093
Agreement to commit an unlawful act, which
constitutes the essence of a conspiracy, is a distinct evil that exist and be
punished whether or not the substantive crime ensues.-Id.
Conspiracy poses a threat to the public over
and above the threat of the commission of the relevant substantive crime, both
because the combination in crime makes more likely the commission of other
crimes and because it decreases the part from their path of criminality.-Id.
U.S 2003. Essence of a conspiracy is an
agreement to commit an unlawful act.-U.S. v. Jimenez Recio; 123 S Ct. 819, 537
U.S. 270, 154, L. Ed.2d 744, on remand 371 F.3d 1093;
Agreement to commit an unlawful act, which
constitutes the essence of a conspiracy, is a distinct evil that exist and be
punished whether or not the substantive crime ensues,-id.
Conspiracy poses a threat to the public over
and above the threat of the commission of the relevant substantive crime, both
because the combination in crime makes more likely the commission of other
crimes and because it decreases the part from their path of criminality-id;
Conspirators to be guilty of
offense need not have entered into conspiracy at same time or have taken part
in all its actions. People V. Hardison, 1985, 911 Dec. 162, 108. Requisite
mens rea elements of conspiracy are
satisfied upon showings of agreement of offense with intent that offense be committed; Actus reas element is satisfied of act in
furtherance of agreement People V. Mordick, 1981, 50 ILL, Dec. 63.
A-
Section
1983 of U.S.C.S. contemplates the depravation of Civil Rights through the
Unconstitutional Application of a Law by conspiracy or otherwise. Mansell v.
Saunders (CA 5 F 1A) 372 F 573, especially if the conspiracy was actually
carried into effect, where an action is for a conspiracy to interfere with
Civil Rights under 42 U.S.C.S. 1985 (3), or for the depravation of such rights
under 42 U.S.C.S. 1983, if the conspiracy was actually carried into effect and
plaintiff was thereby deprived of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured
by the United States Constitution and Laws, the gist of the action may be
treated as one for the depravation of rights under 42 U.S.C.S. 1983, Lewis
v. Brautigam (CA 5 F 1a) 227 F 2d 124, 55 Alr 2d 505, John W.
Strong, 185, 777-78 (4 th ed. 1992).
Finally, this document is best closed by a jurist who has stated”;
Citing Canon 2A the court noted, “[a] court’s indifference to clearly stated
rules breed disrespect for and discontent with our justice system. Government
cannot demand respect of the laws by its citizens when its tribunals ignore
those very same laws”)
Judge stated in Federal
Court FEDERAL JUDGE GETTLEMAN: stated, Tuesday March 10, 2009, where he found
Superintendent of police Jody Weiss in Contempt of Court and Ordered the City
to Pay $100,000.00, “No one is above the Law”, he cited a
1928 decision by Supreme Court Justice Louis Brandeis, that said, “If the
Government becomes the law breaker, it breeds Contempt for the Law, It invites
everyman to become a law unto himself. It invites Anarchy.”
4.)
That Black or Colored Judges are now working with
racist Political Machine Operatives for favor or appointments within the
Democratic Party where the laws prohibit such behavior many have used their
ethnicities to cover-up and protect said parties if they were of the Ku Klux
Klan or Nazi Fraternal Orders, unequivocally corroborating Jim Crow Laws are
still being enforced in spite of the United States Supreme Court outlawing this
Terrorist Group and all of its illegal rulings.
PREAMBLE & SCOPE
[1] An independent, fair, and impartial judiciary is
indispensable to our system of justice. The United States legal system is based
upon the principle that an independent, impartial, and competent judiciary,
composed of judges with integrity, will interpret and apply the law. Thus, the
judiciary plays a central role in preserving justice and the rule of law.
Inherent in the Rules contained in the Code of Judicial Conduct (Code) are the
precepts that judges, individually and collectively, must respect and honor the
judicial office as a public trust and strive to maintain and enhance confidence
in the legal system.
[2] Judges should maintain the dignity of judicial office and
avoid both impropriety and the appearance of impropriety in their professional
and personal lives. They should aspire at all times to conduct that ensures the
greatest possible public confidence in their independence, impartiality,
integrity, and competence.
[3] The Code establishes standards for the ethical conduct of
judges and judicial candidates. The Code is intended to guide and assist judges
in maintaining the highest standards of judicial and personal conduct and to
provide a basis for regulating their conduct through the Illinois Judicial
Inquiry Board and the Illinois Courts Commission.
[4] The Code governs a judge’s personal and judicial activities
conducted in person, on paper, and by telephone or other electronic means. A
violation of the Code may occur when a judge uses the Internet, including
social networking sites, to post comments or other materials such as links to
websites, articles, or comments authored by others, photographs, cartoons,
jokes, or any other words or images that convey information or opinion.
Violations may occur even if a judge’s distribution of a communication is
restricted to family and friends and is not accessible to the public. Judges
must carefully monitor their social media accounts to ensure that no
communication can be reasonably interpreted as suggesting a bias or prejudice;
an ex parte communication;
the misuse of judicial power or prestige; a violation of restrictions on
charitable, financial, or political activities; a comment on a pending or
impending case; a basis for disqualification; or an absence of judicial
independence, impartiality, integrity, or competence.
[5] The Code consists of four Canons, numbered Rules under each
Canon, and Comments that generally follow and explain each Rule. The Policy and
Scope and Terminology sections provide additional guidance in interpreting and
applying the Code. The numbering of the Code is patterned on the American Bar
Association Model Code of Judicial Conduct (rev. 2010), reserving numbers for
provisions not incorporated in Illinois.
[6] The Canons state principles of judicial ethics that all
judges must observe. Although a judge may be disciplined only for violating a
Rule, the Canons provide important guidance in interpreting the Rules. Where a
Rule contains a permissive term, such as “may” or “should,” the conduct being
addressed is committed to the personal and professional discretion of the judge
or candidate in question, and no disciplinary action should be taken for action
or inaction within the bounds of such discretion.
[7] The Comments that accompany the Rules serve two functions.
First, they provide guidance regarding the purpose, meaning, and proper
application of the Rules. They contain explanatory material and, in some
instances, provide examples of permitted or prohibited conduct. Comments
neither add to nor subtract from the binding obligations set forth in the
Rules. Therefore, when a Comment contains the terms “must” or “shall,” it does
not mean that the Comment itself is binding or enforceable; it signifies that the
Rule in question, properly understood, is obligatory as to the conduct at
issues.
[8] Second, the Canons combined with the Comments identify
aspirational goals for judges. To implement fully the principles of this Code
as articulated in the Canons, judges should strive to exceed the standards of
conduct established by the Rules, holding themselves to the highest ethical
standards and seeking to achieve those aspirational goals, thereby enhancing
the dignity of the judicial office.
[9] The Rules of the Code are rules of reason that should be
applied consistent with constitutional requirements, statutes, other court
rules, and decisional law and with due regard for all relevant circumstances.
The Rules should not be interpreted to impinge upon the essential independence
of judges in making judicial decisions.
[10] Although the black letter of the Rules is binding and
enforceable, it is not contemplated that every transgression will result in the
imposition of discipline. Whether discipline is imposed should be determined
through a reasonable and reasoned application of the Rules and should depend
upon factors such as the seriousness of the conduct, the facts and
circumstances that existed at the time of the conduct, the extent of any
pattern of improper conduct, whether there have been previous violations, and the
effect of the conduct upon the judicial system or others.
[11] The Code is not designed or intended as a basis for civil
or criminal liability. Nor is it intended to be the basis for litigants to seek
collateral remedies against each other or to obtain tactical advantages in
proceedings before a court.
Effective January 1, 2023.
5.) That
every Black and certain Hispanic Judges with all attorneys and mostly of the
Democratic Party systematically demonstrates how all of the attorneys all have
violated all Ethics
All
RPC
3.3, entitled “Conduct Before a Tribunal,” sets forth the
standards to be followed by the trial lawyer during “battle.” Section (a) of
that rule states:
(a) In appearing in a professional capacity before a tribunal, a
lawyer shall not:
(1) make a statement of
material fact or law to a tribunal which the lawyer knows or reasonably should
know is false;
(2) fail to disclose to a
tribunal a material fact known to the lawyer when disclosure is necessary to
avoid assisting a criminal or fraudulent act by the client;
(3) fail to disclose to the
tribunal legal authority in the controlling jurisdiction known to the lawyer to
be directly adverse to the position of the client and not disclosed by opposing
counsel;
(4) Offer evidence that the
lawyer knows to be false. If a lawyer has offered material evidence and comes
to know of its falsity, the lawyer shall take reasonable remedial measures;
(5) participate in the creation
or preservation of evidence when the lawyer knows or reasonably should know the
evidence is false ;
(6) counsel or assist the
client in conduct the lawyer knows to be illegal of fraudulent;
(7) engage in other illegal
conduct or conduct in violation of these Rules;
(8) fail to disclose the
identities of the clients represented and of the persons who employed the
lawyer unless such information is privileged or irrelevant;
(9) intentionally degrade a
witness or other person by stating or alluding to personal facts concerning
that person which are not relevant to the case;
(10) in trial, allude to any
matter that the lawyer does not reasonably believe is relevant or that will not
be supported by admissible evidence, assert personal knowledge of facts in
issue except when testifying as a witness, or state a personal opinion as to
the justness of a cause, the credibility of a witness, the culpability of a
civil litigant or the guilt or innocence of and accused, but a lawyer may
argue, on analysis of evidence, for any position or conclusion with respect to
the matter stated herein;
6.)
That said judges and attorneys have satisfied the legal
standard Preponderance of the Evidence have exhausted a plethora of unlawful
acts using their robes upholding criminal acts being a part of an “Organized Conspiracy” trying to
steal Defendant’s home;
7.)
In the wake of extensive investigations by Federal Law
enforcement authorities revealing widespread corruption in the Illinois court
system (“Operation Greylord”) and elsewhere, indicating not only that
significant professional misconduct was occurring but also that the requirement
to report misconduct was frequently ignored, particularly in the cases of
judges with regard to the conduct of other judges. Lisa
L. Milord, The Development of the ABA,
Judicial
Code 24-25 (1992)
8.)
Furthermore, when testing for the “appearance of
impropriety” the Court has a criteria
that must be met, Commentary Canon 2, 2A 2C, this Commentary in Canon 2C clearly and
unequivocally demonstrate the Court’s posture towards the membership no judge
in any of the lower courts were able to lawfully Dismiss or Deny any of the,
Motions presented in a Legally upright manner, in that, they had to act outside
of judicial discretion, and outside of the judicial immunity provisions
afforded to them denying the Defendants claims;
9.)
The Chicago Daily Law
Bulletin, Wednesday April 26, 2006, Page 1, Illinois Political Machines
help breed corruption, Associated Press writer Deanna Bellandi states, “Illinois
is apparently a Petri dish for corruption. It is a real breeding ground”.
10.) That Chicago is the most Corrupt City in America,
Huffington Post, Internet Newspaper, February 23, 2012; University of Illinois
Professor Dick Simpson, “The two worst crime zones in Illinois are the
governor’s mansion….and the City Council Chambers in Chicago.” Simpson a former
Chicago Alderman told the AP “no other State can match us.”
WHEREAS,
your Petitioner Prays that this Honorable Court to enter an Order on the Writ
of Mandamus /Issuance of a Supervisory for
a Writ of Mandamus /Issuance of a Supervisory Order, How does the Appellate
Court who had Jurisdiction in 2011, (Judges Nathaniel Howse, Jr., Caucasian
Judges Joseph Gordon, James R. Epstein) Affirming Circuit Courts Decision
Vacating Foreclosure and Sale Same Parties, Appellees never Appealed the Order
never filed an Appearance in the Present Matter Appellate Court but Same Judge
(Nathaniel Howse, Jr., Caucasians Margaret S. McBride, David W. Ellis) now change
his mind and collude with other Caucasian Judges and Rule they Don’t Have
Jurisdiction when the Appellees Admitted to all Pleadings of Mortgage Fraud via
Summary Judgment, “Trespassing Upon the Laws” “Treason Offenses” in this
Illegal Foreclosure w/Affidavit
Respectfully submitted,
_______________________
Monzella Y. Johnson, Pro Se
5217 S. Ingleside Ave
Chicago, Il 60615
773 835-5849
A
judge’s disrespect for the rules of court demonstrates disrespect for the law.
Judges are disciplined under Canon 2A for violating court rules and procedures.
Judge ignored mandated witness order in attempt to accommodate witnesses’
schedules; Citing Canon 2A the court noted, “[a] court’s indifference to
clearly stated rules breed disrespect for and discontent with our justice
system. Government cannot demand respect of the laws by its citizens when its
tribunals ignore those very same laws”)
A- Fraud upon the court is
a basis for equitable relief. Luttrell v. United States, 644 F. 2d 1274, 1276
(9th Cir. 1980); see Abatti v. C.I.R. , 859 F 2d 115, 118 (9th
Cir. 1988) “it is beyond question that a court may investigate a question as to
whether there was fraud in the procurement of a judgment” Universal Oil
Products Co. v. Root Refining Co., 328 U.S. 575, 66 S. Ct. 1176, 90 L. Ed.
1447. The power of the court to unearth such a fraud is the power to unearth it
effectively. See Hazel-Atlas Glass Co. v. Hartford-Empire Co., 322 U.S. 238, 64
S. Ct. 997, 88 L. Ed. 1250; Sprague v. Ticonic National Bank, 1184 and United
States v. Throckmorton, 98 U.S. (8 Otto) 61, 25 L. Ed. 93.
B- “A judge is an officer of
the court, as are all members of the Bar. A judge is a judicial officer, paid
by the Government to act impartially and lawfully”. People v. Zajic, 88
Ill. App 3d 477, 410 N.E. 2d 626. “A
void judgment is regarded as a nullity, and the situation is the same as it
would be if there were no judgment. It has no legal or binding force or
efficacy for any purpose or at any place….It is not entitled to enforcement.
30A Am Judgments 43, 44, 45. Henderson v Henderson 59 S.E. 2d 227-232
C- “A Void Judgment from its inception is and forever continues to be
absolutely null, without legal efficacy, ineffectual to bind parties or support
a right, of no legal force and effect whatever, and incapable of confirmation,
ratification, or enforcement in any manner or to any degree. “A void judgment,
order or decree may be attacked at any time or in any court, either directly or
collaterally” Oak Park Nat Bank v. Peoples Gas Light & Coke Col, 46 Ill.
App. 2d 385, 197 N.E. 3d 73, 77, (1st Dist. 1964)
D- To show fraud upon the
court, the complaining party must establish that the alleged misconduct
affected the integrity of the judicial process, either because the court itself
was defrauded or because the misconduct was perpetrated by officers of the court.
Alexander v. Robertson, 882, F. 2d 421,424 (9th Cir. 1989);
E- A
void judgment does not create any binding obligation. Kalb v. Feuerstein
(1940) 308 US 433, 60 S Ct 343, 84 L, Ed 370.
That under 18 U.S.C. 242 and 42
U.S.C. 1985 (3) (b). A judge does not have the discretion on whether or not
to follow Supreme Ct. Rules, but a duty to follow. People v. Gersh, 135 Ill. 2d
384 (1990).
REPORTING JUDICIAL MISCONDUCT
I.
Sup Ct. Rule 71, Sufficient
for Removal, conduct which does not constitute a criminal offense may be
sufficiently violative of the Judicial canons to warrant removal for cause. Napolitano
v. Ward, 457 F 2d 279 (7th Cir.), cert denied, 409
U.S. 1037, 93 S. Ct. 512, 34 L. Ed. 2d 486 (1972).
Sup Ct. Rule 63 (C) (1). S.H.A. 735 ILCS
5/2-----1001 (a) (3);
In Re Marriage of O’Brien
912 N.E. 2d 729 (Ill App. 2 Dist. 2009),
When a party moves for
substitution of the trial judge for cause based upon an alleged violation of
rule setting forth mandatory bases for recusal, the movant need only show the
existence of that factor and that an objective, reasonable person would conclude
that the judge’s impartiality might reasonably be questioned, and need not show
actual prejudice.
Canon
3
D (2) Reporting Lawyer Misconduct
Fravel v. Haughey, 727
So. 2d 1033 (
Acts constituting direct, criminal
contempt
A wide variety of acts may constitute a direct, criminal
contempt. And act may be criminal contempt even though it is also an indictable
crime. Beattie v. People, 33
Official
misconduct is a criminal offense; and a public officer or employee commits
misconduct, punishable by fine, imprisonment, or both, when, in his official
capacity, he intentionally or recklessly fails to perform any mandatory duty as
required by law; or knowingly performs an act which he knows he is forbidden by
law to perform; or with intent to obtain a personal advantage for himself or
another, he performs an act in excess of his lawful authority ….S.H.A. Ch 38
33-3.
False statements
Censure was recommended sanction for
attorney who engaged in conduct involving dishonesty, made statement of
material fact or law to tribunal which she knew or reasonably should have known
to be false, and failed to disclose to tribunal a material fact known to her
when disclosure was necessary to avoid assisting criminal or fraudulent at by
client, given that attorney’s misconduct was not result of dishonest or corrupt
motive, but of misguided attempt to accommodate clients. 99 Ill.Atty.Reg. & Disc.Comm. SH11
Three-year suspension was
recommended sanction for attorney who engaged in conduct involving dishonesty
and fraud, made statement of material fact to tribunal which he knew or
reasonably should have known was false, and offered evidence that he knew to be
false and failed to take reasonable remedial measures. 96 Ill.Atty.Reg. &
Disc.Comm. SH 358.
Disbarment was recommended sanction
for attorney who engaged in conduct involving dishonesty, made false statements
of material fact or law to tribunal which she knew were false and engaged in
conduct which tended to defeat administration of justice. 95 Ill Atty.Reg. & Disc.Comm. CH 877.
Censure was recommended sanction for
attorney who made statements of material fact or law known was false, and
engaged in conduct which was prejudicial to the administration of justice. 95
Ill Atty.Reg. & Disc.Comm. CH 504
One-year suspension was recommended sanction for attorney who made
statement of material fact which he knew was false in appearing in professional
capacity before tribunal, made a statement of material fact which he knew to be
false in course of representing client, and engaged in conduct involving
dishonesty. 95 Ill Atty.Reg. &
Disc.Comm. CH 191.
Disbarment was recommended sanction
for attorney who engaged in serious misconduct by making misrepresentation
during his divorce proceedings and who was a recidivist. 94 Ill. Atty. Reg. & Disc.Comm. SH469
Fraud on court
Two-year suspension, retroactive to beginning of interim
suspension, was recommended sanction for attorney who made statement of
material fact or law to tribunal which lawyer knew or reasonably should have
known to be false, instituted criminal charges as prosecutor when he knew or
reasonably should have known that charges were not supported by probable cause,
committed criminal act that reflected adversely upon lawyer ‘s honesty,
trustworthiness, or fitness as lawyer, engaged in conduct involving dishonesty,
fraud, deceit, or misrepresentation, engaged in conduct prejudicial to
administration of justice, and engaged in conduct which tended to bring courts
or legal profession into disrepute. 96
Jim Crow Laws are still being enacted and enforced in Chicago,
Illinois Courts Black and Brown lives simply don’t matter and it is clear now
in these proceedings being elderly is worse because the laws are used against
said parties to destroy or displaced them in society unless you are in a
position to pay off certain politicians or abide by their rules and doctrines
of Corrupt politicians or Terrorists operating behind the scenes making sure
the events recorded never come to “Light”
exposing the truth how the courts are under siege by so many judges closing
their eyes to the realities of injustice, being perpetrated on the innocent and
indigent.
In the 20th century,
the Supreme Court began to overturn Jim Crow laws on constitutional grounds. In
Buchanan v. Warley 245 US 60 (1917), the court held that a Kentucky law could not require residential
segregation. The Supreme Court in 1946, in Irene Morgan v. Virginia ruled segregation in interstate transportation to be unconstitutional,
in an application of the commerce clause of the Constitution. It was not until 1954 in Brown v.
Board of Education of Topeka 347 US 483 that the court held that separate
facilities were inherently unequal in the area of public schools, effectively
overturning Plessy v. Ferguson, and outlawing Jim Crow in other areas of
society as well. This landmark case consisted of complaints filed in the states
of Delaware (Gebhart v. Belton); South Carolina (Briggs
v. Elliott); Virginia (Davis v. County School Board of Prince Edward County); and Washington, D.C. (Spottswode Bolling v.
C. Melvin Sharpe). These decisions, along
with other cases such as McLaurin v.
Oklahoma State Board of Regents 339 US 637
(1950), NAACP v. Alabama 357 US 449 (1958), and Boynton
v. Virginia 364 US 454 (1960), slowly
dismantled the state-sponsored segregation imposed by Jim Crow laws.
Respectfully submitted,
_______________________
Monzella Y. Johnson.
Monzella Y. Johnson, Pro Se
5217 S. Ingleside Ave
Chicago, Il. 60615
________________________________________________________________________
IN THE
SUPREME COURT ILLINOIS
________________________________________________________________________
U.S. Bank National Association, As Trustee Under)
Pooling and Servicing Agreement
Dated as of ) Case
# 130902
December 1, 2006 Mastr
Asset–Backed Securities )
Trust 2006-NC3 Mortgage
Pass-Through ) Case # 2008 CH 33616
Certificates, Series 2006-NC3 ) Appeal
from the Circuit Court
) of Cook
County
) Chancery
Division
Plaintiff-Appellees ) Gen No. 2008-33616
)
) Hon James T.
Derico
)
Monzella Y. Johnson, A/K/A
Monzella )
Johnson; Marcia E. Johnson A/K/A Marcia )
Johnson: Mortgage Electronic Registration )
Systems, Inc. As Nominee for
New Century )
Mortgage Corporation; Monzella
Y. Johnson )
( C ) Cestui Que Trust;
Discover Bank; )
Unknown Owners and Non-Record
Claimants )
)
V.
)
Defendant- Appellant )
1st
District App Judges
)
Nathaniel R.
Howse, Jr.
)
David W.
Ellis
)
Margaret S. McBride )
DRAFT ORDER
MOTION
TO SUPPLEMENT WRIT OF MANDAMUS OR IN THE
ALTERNATIVE SUPERVISORY ORDER WHICH CORROBORATES “FRAUD” ON THE COURT AND US
BANK OFFICERS NOT HAVING ANY KNOWLEDGE OF THE FOREGOING & CONSUMER
FINANCIAL PROTECTION BUREAU ORDERED US BANK TO RESPOND WHERE PHH MORTGAGE NOT
HAVING ANY KNOWLEDGE & DISQUALIFY ALL AFRICAN AMERICAN JUDGES WITH THE DEMOCRATIC
JUDGES DUE TO ADMITTING WITH COMPLICITY AND COLLUSION OF ALL NEGRO, AFRICAN
AMERICAN JUDGES TAKING PART IN ALL OF THE
MORTGAGE FRAUDS AND “TRESPASSING UPON THE LAWS” “TREASON” OFFENSES ACTING AS “PRIVATE
CITIZENS” IN THIS ILLEGAL FORECLOSURE w/AFFIDAVIT
It is HEREBY Ordered that Motion to
Supplement Writ of Mandamus or in the
Alternative/Issuance of a Supervisory Order which Corroborates Fraud et
al. Granted / Denied
________________________________
Justice
________________________________
Justice
_________________________________
Justice
_________________________________
Justice
_________________________________
Justice
_________________________________
Justice
_________________________________
Justice
_______________________________________________________________________
IN THE
SUPREME COURT OF ILLINOIS
________________________________________________________________________
U.S. Bank National
Association, As Trustee Under)
Pooling and Servicing Agreement Dated as of ) Case
# 130902
December 1, 2006 Mastr Asset–Backed Securities )
Trust 2006-NC3 Mortgage Pass-Through ) Case # 2008 CH 33616
Certificates, Series 2006-NC3 ) Appeal from the Circuit
Court
) of Cook
County
) Chancery
Division
Plaintiff-Appellees ) Gen No. 2008-33616
)
) Hon James T.
Derico
)
Monzella Y. Johnson, A/K/A Monzella )
Johnson; Marcia E. Johnson A/K/A Marcia )
Johnson: Mortgage Electronic Registration )
Systems, Inc. As Nominee for New Century )
Mortgage Corporation; Monzella Y. Johnson )
( C ) Cestui Que Trust; Discover Bank; )
Unknown Owners and Non-Record Claimants )
)
V.
)
Defendant- Appellant )
1st District App Judges )
Nathaniel R. Howse, Jr. )
David W. Ellis
)
Margaret S. McBride )
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED that Defendant-Appellant
Appeals to the Illinois Supreme Court,
for an Order on MOTION TO SUPPLEMENT WRIT OF MANDAMUS OR IN THE
ALTERNATIVE SUPERVISORY ORDER WHICH CORROBORATES “FRAUD” ON THE COURT AND US
BANK OFFICERS NOT HAVING ANY KNOWLEDGE OF THE FOREGOING & CONSUMER
FINANCIAL PROTECTION BUREAU ORDERED US BANK TO RESPOND WHERE PHH MORTGAGE NOT
HAVING ANY KNOWLEDGE & DISQUALIFY ALL AFRICAN AMERICAN JUDGES WITH THE DEMOCRATIC
JUDGES DUE TO ADMITTING WITH COMPLICITY AND COLLUSION OF ALL NEGRO, AFRICAN
AMERICAN JUDGES TAKING PART IN ALL OF THE
MORTGAGE FRAUDS AND “TRESPASSING UPON THE LAWS” “TREASON” OFFENSES ACTING AS “PRIVATE
CITIZENS” IN
THIS ILLEGAL FORECLOSURE w/AFFIDAVIT
,
I Monzella Y. Johnson in this cause hereby
certify that, I Have caused the following on said service list to receive the Motion
et al., and all of its attachments by emailing and/ depositing them in a Post
Office via regular mail, July 31, 2024 to the following:
Respectfully submitted,
_______________________
Monzella Y. Johnson,
Monzella Y. Johnson, Pro Se
5217 S. Ingleside Ave
Chicago, Il 60615
Email
Service List:
Courtesy Copies
TO: THE following
By
Email
Homeland
Security ITTF.Web@illinois.gov
Capital
News Illinois jnowicki@capitolnewsillinois.com
Bureau
Chief Jerry Nowiki mownbey@illinoistimes.com
Judicial
Inquiry Board Michael Deno Michael.Deno@illinois.gov
Cook County State’s Attorney
Chief Judge Timothy C. Evans
Kim
Foxx
50 West Washington, Suite 2600
50 West Washington, Suite 500 Chicago, Ill.
60602
Chicago, Ill. 60601
statesattorney@cookcountyil.gov Presiding
Judge Sophia Hall timothy.evans@cookcountyil.gov ccc.mfmlcalendar12@cookcountyil.gov
Cook
County Sheriff’s
Tom Dart
50 West Washington, Suite
702 email CCSO@ccsheriff.org
Chg. IL 60601
President/CEO Rick Aneshansel
US Bank Natl. Assoc. rick.aneshansel@usbank.com
Registered
Agent: Grace A. Gorka US Bank Natl.
Assoc.
190 S. LaSalle,
grace.gorka@usbank.com ggorka@usbank.com
Chg. IL 60603
JSC_General@atgf.com Pamela Murphy-Boylan President CEO of the
(TJSC)
RPerdew@lockelord.com Lord & Locke Law Firm
simon.feng@lockelord.com Lord & Locke Law Firm
pmal@potestivolaw.com Potestivo Law Firm
chicagodocket@lockelord.com Lord & Locke Law Firm
Hon Mayor Brandon
Johnson Special Agent in Charge (FBI)
City Hall 7th
floor Wes Wheeler, Jr. .
Chicago, IL.
60601 2111 West
Roosevelt Road
Chicago, Il 60608
Illinois
Courts Commission
555 West
Monroe, 15th floor
Chicago Ill.
60661
info@IllinoisCourtsCommission.gov
Illinois Court
Commission Members
Justice P.
Scott Neville, Jr. Chairman
Justice Thomas
M. Harris
Justice
Margaret Stanton McBride
Judge Lewis
Nixon
Judge Sheldon
Sobol
Judge Aurora
Abella-Austriaco
Madam Paula
Wolf
Chicago Police Superintendent, 3510 S. Michigan Ave, Chicago Ill. 60653
Email CLEARPATH@chicagopolice.org
Clerk of the
Circuit Court
Iris Y.
Martinez
Attorney General
50 West
Washington, Suite 1001 Kwame
Raoul alexandrina.shrove@ilag.gov
Chicago, Ill.
60601
555 West Monroe Suite 1300
Chicago, Ill. 60601
Potestivo & Ass., PC
Bryan G. Thompson, Poulami Mal
bthompson@potestivolaw.com
223 West Jackson, Blvd, Suite
610
Chicago, IL. 60606
Under penalties as provided by law pursuant to 735 1265 5/1 -109, the undersigned
certifies that the statements set forth in this instrument are true and
correct, except as to matters therein stated to be on information and belief
and as to such matters, the undersigned certifies as aforesaid that he verily
believes the same to be true.
_________________________________
Monzella Y. Johnson,
5217 S. Ingleside Ave
Chicago, Il 60615
773 835-5849
_______________________________________________________________________
IN THE
SUPREME COURT OF ILLINOIS
________________________________________________________________________
U.S. Bank National Association, As Trustee Under)
Pooling and Servicing Agreement
Dated as of ) Case
# 130902
December 1, 2006 Mastr
Asset–Backed Securities )
Trust 2006-NC3 Mortgage
Pass-Through ) Case # 2008 CH 33616
Certificates, Series 2006-NC3 ) Appeal
from the Circuit Court
) of Cook
County
) Chancery
Division
Plaintiff-Appellees ) Gen No. 2008-33616
)
) Hon James T.
Derico
)
Monzella Y. Johnson, A/K/A
Monzella )
Johnson; Marcia E. Johnson A/K/A Marcia )
Johnson: Mortgage Electronic Registration )
Systems, Inc. As Nominee for
New Century )
Mortgage Corporation; Monzella
Y. Johnson )
( C ) Cestui Que Trust;
Discover Bank; )
Unknown Owners and Non-Record
Claimants )
)
V.
)
Defendant- Appellant )
1st
District App Judges
)
Nathaniel R.
Howse, Jr.
)
David W.
Ellis
)
Margaret S. McBride )
EXHIBIT LIST
1.)
Gr. Ex. A- Consumer Financial Protection Complaint.
2.) Gr. Ex. B, Email from US Bank Mortgage
Research Group
3.)
Gr. Ex. C Email from PHH Mortgage Services.
4.)
Gr. Ex D Fax sent to Gov Pritzker Secretary
Grace B. Hou. Requesting no African Americans be assigned to review the case.
Respectfully submitted,
_______________________
Monzella Y. Johnson, Pro Se
5217 S. Ingleside Ave
Chicago, Il 60615
No comments:
Post a Comment