Wikipedia Racial Injustice in Chicago Courts

Search results

Wednesday, June 18, 2014




COURT ORDER THAT CORROBORATES CHICAGO LEGAL SYSTEM UNDER SIEGE BY TERRORIST DEMOCRATIC MACHINE OPERATIVES

UNDER THE ALLEGED AUTHORITY OF ALDERMAN EDWARD BURKE WHO CONTROLS THE APPOINTMENT OF ALL JUDGES AND PERSONALLY ASSIGNED IRISH AND POLISH ETHNIC JUDGES TO CASE 88 D 079012 TO CIRCUMVENT THIS COURT ORDER AND CREATE THEIR OWN ORDERS SO AS TO EXTORT MONEY FROM ME IN THE GUISE OF CHILD SUPPORT.

WHAT IS SAD SO MANY AFRICAN AMERICANS AND HISPANIC BROTHERS HAVE BEEN FRAMED INCARCERATED FROM CRIMES THEY NEVER COMMITTED AND SUBJECTED TO THE SAME HEINOUS CONSPIRACIES USED TO PROMOTE POWERFUL CORRUPT WHITE MEN INTO THE VARIOUS POSITIONS OF JUDGES, STATES ATTORNEYS, ALDERMAN'S ETC. THAT THEY DON'T DESERVE TO BE IN.

ANY NEWS REPORTER WHO MAYBE COMPETENT TO RETRIEVE INFORMATION FROM THE COMPUTER THAT ESTABLISHES FRAUD AND CORRUPTION ON THE PART OF COOK COUNTY JUDGES WILL NOT BE ABLE TO ASCERTAIN DOCUMENTATION BECAUSE A COOK COUNTY CLERK HAVE DELETED THE MICROFICHE NUMBERS OFF THE DATABASE;

FOR EXAMPLE, #8700113626 ON THE COURT ORDER IS WHAT ENABLES THE CLERK TO PRINT THE DESIRED INFORMATION FROM THE COMPUTER.

NOBODY IN THE CITY OF CHICAGO OR STATE OF ILLINOIS HAVE BEEN ABLE TO LOCATE THE COURT FILE WITH THE HARD COPIES!

 





Monday, June 9, 2014


WHEN YOU STAND UP TO RACIAL INJUSTICE AND IS ACADEMICALLY PROFICIENT THIS IS HOW CORRUPT WHITE MEN IN POWER DISCRIMINATE AND KEEP QUALIFIED LITIGATORS OUT OF THE LEGAL SYSTEM.

“About 86 percent of the people in our jail are black and brown. Unless you believe that black people and Latinos are much more likely criminal than white people, there’s something weird happening here,” Preckwinkle said. Cook County Board President

Judge dismisses DePaul law school grad’s second suit seeking law license

Holderman
Holderman
A law school graduate who passed the Illinois bar exam more than a decade ago, but has not been admitted to the state bar will not be allowed to proceed with his federal lawsuit claiming that his “fundamental right to practice law” was violated.
U.S. District Court Judge James F. Holderman last week granted requests from defendants Lawrence Hill, president of the Illinois Board of Admissions to the Bar, and Illinois Attorney General Lisa Madigan to dismiss the suit that John Joseph Otrompke brought against them late last year.
The case came to Chicago’s federal court in November 2013, in what was largely a reprise of a previously dismissed legal battle between Otrompke and the Board of Admissions dating back about a decade.
Otrompke graduated from DePaul University College of Law in 2000, and subsequently passed the bar exam and other necessary tests, including the Multi-state Professional Responsibility Exam.
But, his application for admission to the state bar remained pending until 2003, delayed for proceedings in the Committee on Character and Fitness for the First Judicial District.
In October 2003, Otrompke sued, arguing “the defendants’ failure to approve his admission to the bar and their delay in granting him a hearing” violated several of his constitutional rights.
In two years of arguments that followed, a federal court eventually dismissed all of his complaints, indicating it believed the case should have been brought in state courts, as the Illinois Supreme Court stands as “the final arbiter of attorney admissions in Illinois” and therefore, the defendants were also entitled to “absolute immunity from suits for damages.”
At the time, Otrompke did not appeal because he said he was assisting his fiancĂ©e who was battling a terminal illness. Likewise, he said he did not reapply for admission to the bar because “it could cost thousands of dollars even to complete the bar application.”
However, almost 10 years after filing his first lawsuit and eight years after a federal judge dismissed his final counts, Otrompke filed suit against Hill and Madigan, again asking the federal courts to force the board to admit him and let him to practice law.
Otrompke again argued that his constitutional rights were violated, but this time, also alleged that the rules governing attorney admissions in Illinois, both as they exist now and as they existed a decade ago, were unconstitutional.
Specifically, he asserted, among other points, that the rules “imply that the Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination [does] not apply to bar admissions proceedings,” and also interfere “with his fundamental right to practice law,” which he said violated the Fourteenth Amendment.
In response, Hill and Madigan moved to dismiss the suit, arguing that Otrompke’s failure to raise the issues in state court a decade ago preclude the case from being heard in federal court now. They also claimed Otrompke failed to raise a legitimate claim for relief.
Holderman agreed in a 17-page, March 20 opinion that dismissed the case.
Holderman’s opinion does not explain the reasoning behind the committee’s delay or the board’s decision not to admit him to the bar, but Otrompke’s 2003 suit blames it on his July 4, 2000 arrest.
In his original suit, Otrompke claimed he observed Chicago police searching a vehicle as he was “leaving a meeting space operated and used for the propagation of political dissent” and was arrested after he asked an officer for his badge number and told him he planned to file a complaint with the Office of Professional Standards.
Otrompke stated in his 2003 suit, which was dismissed in 2005, that the charges that led to his arrest were thrown out.
In dismissing the 2013 suit, Holderman explained that the federal court “does not have subject-matter jurisdiction over Otrompke’s claims” over the state bar admission rules.
Holderman found that the board is not constitutionally prohibited by the Fifth Amendment from enacting moral standards for lawyers and would-be lawyers to abide by.
And he further held that Otrompke had simply manufactured his “fundamental right to practice law,” cobbling together an argument using U.S. Supreme Court precedents, including the District of Columbia vs. Heller and McDonald vs. Chicago decisions, the Constitution’s Bill of Attainder provisions, the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, and even the Magna Carta.
“Otrompke’s assertion that he has a fundamental right to practice law absent a felony conviction or adjudication of insanity has no basis in law,” Holderman wrote.







The third section of Otrompke’s Amended Complaint, titled “New Paragraphs First
Amended Complaint,”
includes a number of facts apparently intended to prove Otrompke’s good
moral character. These
facts include Otrompke’s c
ooperation with
federal
authorities
investigating a mail bomber named the “Bishop,” (Am. Compl. ¶ 59), Otrompke’s cooperation
with a state prosecutor in an unrelated case (Am. Compl. ¶ 66), and a lengthy explanation of
Otrompke’s involvement with a group c
alled Anti
-
Racist Action (Am. Compl. ¶¶ 60
-
65, 73).
This section of Otrompke’s Amended Complaint contains no
discernible claim
s.
Otrompke
appears instead to be seeking a finding from this court that he has good moral character in light
of acts
undertaken
since
the conclusion of
his first federal lawsuit.

Thursday, June 5, 2014


CHICAGO IS VIOLENT AND CORRUPT BECAUSE NEGROE BLACKS IN CHARGE DO NOT EXERCISE THEIR POSITIONS TO HELP BUT OPPRESS SO AS TO BE ACCEPTED BY THE OPPRESSORS

THERE IS A SAYING "IF BLACKS KNEW HOW TO READ THEY WOULD BE DANGEROUS"

THIS IS WHY CHICAGO IS SEGREGATED AND RACIST BECAUSE OF THE VERY PEOPLE AFFECTED BY VIOLENCE AND MAYHEM IN AUTHORITY HAVE EMULATED THE SAME PEOPLE WHO DON'T ACCEPT THEM AND NEVER WILL BUT WILL APPOINT THEM TO VARIOUS CITY AND JUDICIAL POSITIONS BECAUSE THEIR OWN SELF-HATE OF THEMSELVES.

BLACK PEOPLE ARE THE ONLY PEOPLE WHO CAN SAVE THEMSELVES MANY ARE CONTENT WHERE THEY ARE!!





HAD TO RE POST THIS ARTICLE, I HOPE MY FB PALS WILL READ IT AND
LEARN FROM THERE MISTAKE
Once you finished reading this....you will see why i post the things I do... ‪#‎ILOVEMYPPL‬
This article was read on a New York radio station having been written by a Caucasian male. I know it might not apply to you but it makes you think a little bit and is very hard to swallow, but, to some extent this man is right. Please read his write up to the end.
"We can continue to reap profits from the Blacks without the effort of physical slavery. Look at the current methods of containment that they use on themselves: IGNORANCE, GREED, and SELFISHNESS.

Their IGNORANCE is the primary weapon of containment. A great man once said, "The best way to hide something from Black people is to put it in a book." We live now in the Information Age. They have gained the opportunity to read any book on any subject through the efforts of their fight for freedom, yet they refuse to read. There are numerous books readily available at Borders, Barnes & Noble, and Amazon.com, not to mention their own Black Bookstores that provide solid blueprints to reach economic equality (which should have been their fight all along), but few read consistently, if at all.

GREED is another powerful weapon of containment.
Blacks, since the abolition of slavery, have had large amounts of money at their disposal. Last year they spent 10 billion dollars during Christmas, out of their 450 billion dollars in total yearly income (2.22%). Any of us can use them as our target market, for any business venture we care to dream up, no matter how outlandish, they will buy into it. Being primarily a consumer people, they function totally by greed. They continually want more, with little thought for saving or investing. They would rather buy some new sneaker than invest in starting a business. Sometimes even neglect their children to have the latest Tom Ford or Polo. And they still think that having a Mercedes, and a big house gives the "Status" or that they have achieved the American Dream. They are fools! The vast majority of their people are still in poverty because their greed holds them back from collectively making better communities. With the help of BET, and the rest of their Black media that often broadcasts destructive images into their own homes, we will continue to see huge profits like those of Tom Ford and Nike. (Tommy Hilfiger and Eddie Bauer along with Ralph Lauren has even jeered them, saying they don't want their money, and look at how the fools spend more with them than ever before!). They'll continue to show off to each other while we build solid communities with the profits from our businesses that we market to them.

SELFISHNESS, ingrained in their minds through slavery, is one of the major ways we can continue to contain them. One of their own, W. E. B. Dubois said that there was an innate division in their culture. A "Talented Tenth" he called it. He was correct in his deduction that there are segments of their culture that has achieved some "form" of success. However, that segment missed the fullness of his work. They didn't read that the "Talented Tenth" was then responsible to aid the Non-Talented Ninety Percent in achieving a better life. Instead, that segment has created another class, a Buppie(wanting to fit in rather than see the truth for what it is) class that looks down on their people or aids them in a condescending manner. They will never achieve what we have. Their selfishness does not allow them to be able to work together on any project or endeavor of substance. When they do get together, their selfishness lets their egos get in the way of the goal. Their so-called help organizations seem to only want to promote their name without making any real change in their community. They are content to sit in conferences and conventions in our hotels, and talk about what they will do, while they award plaques to the best speakers, not the best doers. Is there no end to their selfishness?

They steadfastly refuse to see that "TOGETHER EACH ACHIEVES MORE (TEAM)! They do not understand that they are no better than each other because of what they own. In fact, most of those Buppies are but one or two paychecks away from poverty. All of which is under the control of our pens in our offices and our boardrooms.
Yes, we will continue to contain them as long as they refuse to read, continue to buy anything they want, and keep thinking they are "helping" their communities by paying dues to organizations which do little other than hold lavish conventions in our hotels. By the way, don't worry about any of them reading this letter, remember, 'THEY DON'T READ!!!!"
.