Wikipedia Racial Injustice in Chicago Courts

Search results

Thursday, June 29, 2017



I want to report my hearing today before Judge John C. Griffin (a well-connected son of former Cook County Judge James L. Griffin;  nephew of Joseph P. Griffin, former commissioner  of the court of claims and Madigan's Treasurer; and Helen Griffin, a former employee of the Chief Judge of the Circuit Court of Cook County) who once again proved to be a cheap liar who continues to obstruct justice and  defraud me from the bench. Case 14-L-3632, Fedorova v. Chicagoland Community Managementet.al
 
First, the positive news from today’s hearing – it appears that Judge John C. Griffin partially recovered from his chronic episodes of amnesia and finally recalled that he was his largest election donor, along with amounts donated. But Griffin still claimed that he did not know that his family also gave him money for election. 
 
Maybe I do not donate to judges directly, but I pay for Judge Griffin’s health insurance and I demand  him to see a doctor immediately.  Griffin’s repetitive memory failures about loved ones and friends could be a sign of Alzheimer decease, which not only destroys Griffin’s remembrance but also other important mental functions, like personal integrity for example, if he actually ever had any, which  I really doubt.
 
I once again respectfully but firmly demand Illinois Board of Election to stop placing generations of corrupt cronies  on our benches, while unjustly deprive honest and ethical lawyers from the opportunity to serve Illinois public as judges with integrity, honesty, candor , pride and ethics.
 
My today’s hearing again  assured me that Judge Griffin not only a highly corrupt judge and an accomplished liar, but provided additional confidence that Griffin  received a bribe from my defendants (with whom he is definitely closely connected)  for his favorable judicial services . 

Worth to mention that his father, judge James L. Griffin, who was appointed a magistrate of the Circuit Court in 1971, became an associate judge and then a full judge in 1976, was a zealous fighter for judicial benefits (just like Judge Harold Sullivan, father of Hinshaw &Culbertson’s lawyer Peter Sullivan, who played a key role in attaining salary and benefit improvements  for judges).
 
Judge James L. Griffin in 1981 even filed a lawsuit challenging the constitutionality of a ban on state judges earning outside income  Though it was later dismissed, the suit did bring attention to the fact that the law prohibiting judges from moonlighting did not apply to legislators and executive officers.  Judge Griffin called this discriminatory. 
 
I court  hardly imagine which particular moonlighting intended to do a full-time State employee like Judge James L. Griffin, who apparently struggled with his  judicial paycheck and military benefits, but based on my experience in  Judge John C. Griffin’s Court , I guess he also does  some moonlighting  from his chambers, and receives extra income  fixing cases in favor of his parties of interests.
 
No need to say,  John C. Griffin’s father's political affiliations;  Helen Griffin’s long time work (25 years) for a Chief Judge;  as  well as his uncle  Joseph Griffin active work for Democratic party and then-Secretary of State Edward Bennett;  and as appointed commissioner of the court of claims by Gov. Otto Kerner in 1963,  had absolutely no relationship neither to James L. Griffin or John C. Griffin’s way to the bench. Only merits. 
 
Back to the hearing today. Judge Griffin completely ignored all my arguments regarding his personal conflict of interests and his total lack of jurisdiction due to appeals in both cases 14-L-3632 and 14-CH-11573, and concentrated on his family connections with Joseph W. Griffin, partner for Hinshaw &Culbertson LLP; and his previous statements that he does not know who are his donors.
 
Judge Griffin once again confirmed  that he did not know who are his donors until he learned about them for the first time from …ME!  when I mentioned  them  in my pleadings where I challenged his connections with lawyers who represent defendants in my case and his personal interests.
 
In October 2014  Griffin said that he “do not even remember who are my donors”; in January 2016 he said that “I do not know who are my donors!”; and today, June 28th 2017 he said that he actually knew that he was his largest donor but insisted that   he  did not know that his family donated to him because he  did not even looked at his donations list!  
 
Moreover, Griffin  claimed that he has nothing to do with Administrative Case 10 AP 064 filed by The Board of elections  because it was filed against his Election Committee (family members) and not against him personally. So Griffin basically blamed his family members, particularly Carole Griffin  for defrauding IL Board of Election, while clearing himself from deception, which demonstrated  that Griffin is not only an accomplished liar but also Judas for his own family.  
 
I am not surprised. John C. Griffin’s family corruption has very deep roots in Cook County Court and he is absolutely confident that all his lies and deception will be overlooked and unpunished, thanks to connections.  
 
I do not  believe  that Judge John C.  Griffin, who in January –February 2010 enthusiastically solicited votes on Facebook;  bragged about those who already endorsed him; as well as remembered all  his supporters  in the questionnaire, was surprisingly absolutely  disinterested in those who provided him financial support, and not even said them  “thank you” for the money. He merely did not know about them, according to his words!
 
On 19 января 2010 г. Griffin said:
Did you know that Judge John C. Griffin has been endorsed by : The Chicago Federation of Labor, The Chicago and Cook County Building & Construction Trades Council, Independent Voters of Illinois Independent Precinct Organization, Chicago Firefighters Union Local #2, Chicago F.O.P. #'s 4 and 7, and the Chicago Tribune.... spread the word!” 

In the questionnaire Griffin said:  I received the endorsement of the Chicago Federation of Labor and positive evaluations for the position of Circuit Court Judge from every bar association which has reviewed my candidacy. To date, the following are the results I have received: Chicago Bar Association, Qualified Illinois State Bar Association, Qualified Decalogue Society of Lawyers, Recommended Asian American Bar Association, Recommended I have been extremely active in my community”

So, I consider Judge Griffin’s words “I do not know who are my donors” because he never looked for his own election records  as a cheap lie with intent to cover for his previous lies; and obstruction of  justice.
 
Similarly, I consider that Judge Griffin’s words that he has absolutely no relationship to Joseph W. Griffin who was a partner at Hinshaw &Culbertson LLP,  was also a false statement, especially taking into consideration  the size (James Griffin had 8 siblings)  and connections of John C. Griffin’s family. I believe that Joseph W. Griffin was a well-known relative to  Judge Griffin. 

Judge John C. Griffin’s words that he does not know Dan Webb (former US Attorney General and partner of Griffin’s friend Daniel J. Pierce) – while  his father and uncle both were heavily politically involved for decades – are also not trustworthy.

Furthermore, I am absolutely confident that John C. Griffin knew Peter Sullivan and his  father, judge Harold Sullivan; who was likely a family friend. According to Gino DiVito, a former appellate judge who worked with Judge Harold Sullivan, "If you were a judge, it was likely you knew Judge Sullivan” who “was the heart and soul of the Illinois Judges Association.",  I am absolutely confident that Judges James L. Griffin and Harold Sullivan, both Navy officers graduated from DePaul law school (where  Joseph W. Griffin was a lecturer) knew each other for years; and John Griffin and Peter Sullivan probably shared toys as the  kids. 

Bear to repeat, my argument about Judge Griffin’s  lack of jurisdiction due to two pending Appeals was ignored entirely. 

He refused to leave my case either, and suggested to bring it to Appeal, where his well-connected judicial cronies will turn it into one of the most dangerous and damaging precedents which will severely harm Chicago homeowners who already have no protection against predatory HOAs.

While Griffin only cares about his personal interests, I recognize my responsibility to the community and will NOT  bring my case to Appeal since I am absolutely confident  it will be immediately fixed by Justices; so, predatory lawyers will rely on this decision and cite it in their pleadings as a “valid”  favorable ruling for predatory HOAs who can defraud anyone from anything and walk away unpunished, thanks to judicial corruption. 

I will report that further legal steps will be taken in this situation. 

In the meanwhile I demand removal of John C. Griffin from the bench, regardless of all his connections; and investigate for obstruction of justice; fraud; corruption and bribery.
 
Best regards,

Elena Fedorova

Tuesday, June 20, 2017

I continue to report rampant judicial corruption in IL Courts and how judges fix cases in favor of their parties of interests.  Please see attached information related to Cook County Court Judge,Irwin J. Solganick (crony of Edward Vdrolyak and Gov. Rod Blagojevich), as well as my personal experience in Judge Irwin J. Solganick Court on or about October 20, 2014.
 
I appeared before judge Solganick to present my Motion to Sever case 14-CH-11573 from case 14-L-3632, which was filed against certain Homeowners Associations and their Management Companies. The property in question was 1360 N. Sandburg Terrace, Chicago IL 60610; its HOA, Carl Sandburg Village Condo Association #1; as well as Carl Sandburg Village Master HOA who manage about 7 properties in this area, including James Kilmer building, 1560 N. Sandburg Terrace.
 
My case 14-L-3632 was corruptly consolidated on October 1, 2014 with frivolous “defamation” claim filed by Chicagoland Community Management, 14-CH-11573, by Law Division Judge Thomas L. Hogan who concealed his personal connections and financial interests with my Defendant’s lawyers, Hinshaw &Culbertson, LLP who donated Hogan at least $4,550.00 for his election campaign. 

When my attempt to reverse Hogan’s order did not succeed, I filed a  Motion to Sever cases, which Law Division Presiding Judge James P. Flannery, Jr.  passed to Judge Irwin J. Solganick to decide. 

On or about October 20, 2014  Judge Irwin J. Solganick denied my Motion and  undermined this case in favor of the defense.   Judge Solganick struck all of my arguments without reading them. Judge Solganick was ignorant of the factual issues; he did not read my Motion, even did not opened it  before he struck it in the entirety, without giving a single word of explanation of his decision.  All Judge Solganick saw before him was a solo ProSe litigant  going against several well-connected large law firms, including insurance defense lawyers, who are co-accidentally were generous donors to many judicial campaigns and even had several family members serving as judges in the same Court – Judges Thomas R. Mulroy, Jr.;  James Snyder and Sharon Sullivan. 

Moreover, based on my recent finding, Judge Irwin J. Solganick also had a glaring conflict of interests to be a judge in my case since it appears that he is/was directly related to my Defendants. According to public records, one of the addresses associated with Judge Irwin J. Solganick is/was  1560 N. Sandburg Terrace Unit 2502, Chicago IL 60610, which is  James Kilmer HOA located in Carl Sandburg Village Master Condo Association, who is a Defendant in my case. 

Inline image

Of course, none of this information was disclosed to me, as well as Judge Hogan’s and Judge Griffin’s financial and personal connections with my Defendants’ lawyers.

I am not surprised.  Judge Irwin J. Solganick has a long-time public history of corruption. I did find out that Judge Solganick used to be a law partner with Ed Vrdolyak.  Ed Vrdolyak was sentenced to prison for sophisticated fraud, kickbacks and/or related activity. 

On January 3, 1986 The Chicago Council of Lawyers Thursday asked state agencies that investigate allegations of misconduct on the part of lawyers and judges to look into possible collusion between Circuit Judge Robert Sulski and the lawyer who became a candidate to succeed Sulski on the bench. The council asked the Illinois Judicial Inquiry Board to investigate Sulski, a judge for 17 years and a former Chicago alderman. It also asked the Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission to investigate Irwin Solganick, a member of the law firm operated by Ald. Edward Vrdolyak (10th).   Referring to what he called the ``the Sulski-Solganick stunt,`` Perkins said Sulski, whose latest six-year term as a Cook County Circuit Court judge expires in November, notified the Illinois secretary of state`s office Dec. 2 that he would seek retention.

But at 2 p.m. Dec. 15, [1985] the last day for filing nominating petitions to become a candidate to fill a judicical vacancy, Sulski delivered a letter to the secretary of state`s office saying he would not seek retention.

At 3:17 p.m. the same day, Solganick filed petitions in Springfield with the Illinois Election Board seeking to be listed on the March 18 primary ballot as a candidate to fill Sulski`s vacancy. The petitions contained 500 citizens` signatures, as required by law. Solganick is the only Democrat seeking to succeed Sulski. The judgeship is a Chicago-only seat in which the Democratic candidate`s election in November is considered certain. Sulski, reached at his Chicago home about noonThursday, declined to comment, except to say that he has no plans to leave the bench before his term expires. Attempts to reach Solganick for comment were unsuccessful.

According to public records, the Committee to Retain Judge Soganick was created on January 22, 1986. The treasurer for his Committee was lawyer Sheldon Sorosky who represented Rod Blagojevich in his corruption trial. 

Inline image
 

According to Solganick’s own  words, his judicial election was a result of his luck. However, based on Rod Blagojevich testimony, his job as a young Associate for Vdrolyack’s law Firm was to sign Petitions for his colleague, Irvin J. Solganick to help him to be a judge. So, obviously Solganick knew about judge Sulski retirement in advance[1].

According to public records, Irwin Solganick twice “retired” from election runs – first in 1992 and second in 1998, but apparently he continued to operate as a Judge in Cook County Court. 

Between 2004 – 2016 Solganick regularly made substantial contributions to Committee for Retention of Judges in Cook County Court, just before 2004, 2010 and 2016 re-elections; and was allowed to keep his judicial seat. 

Notably, Solganick made his identical $900.00 “donation” on the same day as Judges Griffin, Sullivan and Pierce  – August 29, 2016. 

Inline image

 
During his career as a Judge Solganick was previously  criticized for corruption and bribery. For example, in 2008 case Scott George v. Maria George, Defendant’s lawyer Ducote paraphrased to the jurors what Mr. George is said to have told his wife. “I can bribe the judge. That’s what he used to tell her”.

Ms. George’s case related to her high-profile divorce from investment banker Scott George. In a Dec. 12, 2008 letter to U.S. Attorney Patrick Fitzgerald, she said her husband “boasted that he was ‘protected’ by his ‘friends.’ These individuals included the mayor [Richard Daley], the governor [Rod Blagojevich] (to whom he had made sizable political contributions), Joseph Cari (recently indicted in the Rezko fiasco, as well as Scott George’s former business partner), Ed Vrdolyak (indicted in May 2007 on charges of bribery and mail fraud) and Connie Xinos (‘godfather’ of Scott George and a criminal defense attorney in Chicago who ‘guaranteed’ his acquittal).”

She next explained how her husband “laughed that the litigation was ‘fixed’ and that the judge assigned to the divorce (Michele Lowrance) was none other than a Vrdolyak relative. Prior to this ruling, Ms. George—still undaunted—dropped another bombshell by mailing a scathing three page letter in November 2004 to over 3,000 members of the banking and investment community, business leaders, elected officials, media sources, legal and family advocates and acquaintances. This document served as a catalyst to completely unleash an array of retaliatory forces within the “machine.”

A libel trial ensued in September 2006, and again Ms. George detailed to Patrick Fitzgerald what took place. Her lawyer, “Mr. Ducote presented to Judge Irwin Solganick (a longtime friend of the ‘godfather’) Scott George’s own notes detailing his discussions with Bankers Trust, admitting to receiving a ‘payoff’ that was structured to evade paying taxes, and specifically noting that he was paid to ‘not file a reverse discrimination lawsuit.’”

The judge refused to admit these notes, or any other testimony pertaining to them, into the court proceedings. He also redacted large portions of her “letter.” No tax returns or other financial information substantiating Mr. George’s work history were allowed either.


I am not surprised. According to Lawyer Lanre Amy words, his  experience in Judge Irwin J. Solganick’s Court in 2009 was identical to Maria George in 2008, and included but not limited to:
December 9, 2010 pleading, Respondent made the following statements with regard to Judge Solganick's June 5, 2009 order:
"Judge Irwin J. Solganick engaged in corrupt ruling that undermined this case in favor of the defense . . ."
"Judge Solganick struck all of plaintiff's requests to admit without reading them. . . . I now allege that it was a corrupt ruling."
"Judge Solganick . . . was ignorant of the medical issue in the medical malpractice case; he did not read the requests to admit before he struck them in the entirety."
"I did find out that Judge Solganick used to be a law partner with Ed Vrdolyak. . . Ed Vrdolyak was recently sentenced to prison for sophisticated fraud, kickbacks and/or related activity. Generally, birds of the same feather flock together."
"All Judge Solganick saw before him was a black lawyer (one of only two black lawyers in courtroom 2005 at the time) going against several insurance defense lawyers, in a sea of white lawyers in courtroom 2005."
"This is a corrupt use of judicial power under the guise of judicial discretion. It was like nothing I said really mattered to Judge Solganick. I was simply being disarmed and railroaded to a trial."
"Plaintiff is however entitled to a fair and an impartial trial. Corruption within the system prevented that from happening."

In other words, in Maria George Case in 2008; Lanre Amu case in 2009 and my case in 2014 Judge Irwin J. Solganick acted equally corrupt.

No need to say, his way to the bench was beyond questionable;  and he was able to keep his seat solely due to his beneficial connections and sizable contributions of Committee on Judicial Retention, which appears to  collect substantial amounts of money  to keep corrupt judges at the bench. 

I respectfully demand an independent investigation into this matter, as well as investigation of Judge Irwin J. Solganick Court practices and his possible collusion with my Defendants.

Regards,
Elena Fedorova
 




[1] https://www.highbeam.com/doc/1P2-3750637.htmlTo hear Irwin J. Solganick tell it, he has a lot of luck.
A record number of people are running to fill judicial vacancies in the March 18 primary, but Solganick is running in a slot without opposition. Having no opponent, but plenty of brass, he's holding a fund-raising event anyway. Invitations have gone out for the Feb. 24 bash, $50 a head, at Harry's Cafe. That's close to Solganick's "bar association," Sweetwater, the Rush Street saloon he credits for his "luck" in running for Circuit Court judge in the first place.Solganick works for the law firm of Ald. Edward R. Vrdolyak, the county Democratic Party chairman. But Solganick insists his boss had nothing to do with his incredible good fortune