Wikipedia Racial Injustice in Chicago Courts

Search results

Tuesday, November 28, 2017


ANOTHER GROUP OF COOK COUNT JUDGES TRYING TO TERRORIZE A WOMAN AS THEY TRESPASSED UPON THE LAWS ENGAGED IN TREASON KEEPING HER FROM HAVING CUSTODY OF HER CHILD.

THE EX HUSBAND HAD HIS ATTORNEY TO CIRCUMVENT A JUDGES COURT ORDER BY FILING BOGUS MOTIONS AS THE JUDGE OVERTURNED ANOTHER JUDGES COURT ORDER RETURNING THE SON BACK TO THE MOM.

THIS FEDERAL JUDGE DID NOT ACT COWARDLY OR TURN HER BACK ON HER JURISDICTION LIKE HER COLLEAGUE SHARON JOHNSON COLEMAN, SHE EXPEDITIOUSLY ENTERED AN ORDER WITHIN 7 DAYS WHEN THE COMPLAINT WAS FILED SEEKING 6.9 MILLION DOLLARS SETTING A STATUS DATE FOR JAN OF 2018.

EVERY COMPLAINT FILED BY PROSE LITIGANTS THAT IS FILED NAMING CORRUPT RACIST WHITE MEN FRATERNALLY CONNECTED "ORGANIZED IN ANY CONSPIRACY" THE DEMOCRATIC JUDGES FIND ALL TYPE OF WAYS TO TRESPASS UPON THE LAWS ENGAGE IN TREASON BY DISMISSING ANY AND COMPLAINTS THAT INVOLVES SAID DEMOCRATIC WHITE MEN VALIDATING THE VERITY OF JIM CROW LAWS STILL BEING ENFORCED IN ILLINOIS COURTS.

DEMOCRATS DEMONSTRATE THEIR RACIAL HATRED FOR PERSONS OF COLOR IN HOW THEY ENFORCED THE LAWS AGAINST THEM PRETENDING TO EMBRACE EQUAL RIGHTS AND CIVIL RIGHTS WHEN IT IS A FARCE.

DEMOCRATS HAVE BEEN TRESPASSING UPON THE LAWS FOR YEARS NOT ONE OF THEM HAD THE LEGAL APTITUDE TO KNOW THAT THEY WERE COMMITTING TREASON.   


 IN THE 
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
EASTERN DIVISION

 April Redeaux                                                              Civil Action #17-cv-08060

                                                                                       Hon: Virginia M. Kendall
  Plaintiff
                                                                                       Magistrate: Judge Susan E. Cox
    V

Karen Bowes, Gordon Nelson, Steve Wasko
Clarence Parker, Grace Dickler, Debra B. Walker
Gregory Emmett Ahern, Jr.                               
                                      
 Defendants

                                                                      NOTICE OF
               PETITION FOR RULE TO SHOW CAUSE REMANDING  DEBRA B. WALKER et. al. & ATTORNEYS “TRESPASSING UPON THE LAWS” CORROBORATION IN AN ORGANIZED CHAIN CONSPIRACY  “TREASON” “FRAUD OF ALL SORTS” /CONTEMPT OF  COURT OTHER IRREGULARITIES
                   REMAND/BODY ATTACHMENT INSTANTER    
        MANDATORY INJUNCTION PROHIBITING STATE AND COUNTY COURTS FROM ENTERING ANY JUDGMENTS INSTANTER AND VACATE ALL ORDERS VOID IN NATURE AGAINST THE PLAINTIFF
                                                                                   
To the most Honorable Judge of the United States District Court for the Northern District:

Moving Party,  April Redeaux, hereby respectfully represents as Pro Se shows this court with an affidavit the noted reasons why this matter should be entertained within this courts Jurisdiction; {Pursuant to the provisions of the United States Constitution}
           
That on Nov. 30, 2017, Plaintiff shall present this Motion at 9:00 am before Honorable Virginia Kendall or any judge sitting in her stead in room 2319, 219 S. Dearborn Street, Chicago, IL. 60604;

 To   Karen Bowes 50 West Washington, Chg, IL 60601 Room 1902 ;
       Gordon Nelson 100 N. LaSalle, Suite 800, Chicago, IL 60602, 
       Steve Wasko 1440 Renaissance Dr. Suite 230, Park Ridge, IL. 60068;
       Clarence Parker, 205 Atwood, Dr. HollySprings NC, 27540
       Grace Dickler 50 West Washington, Chg, IL 60601 Room 1905;
       Gregory E. Ahern, Jr. 50 West Washington, Chg IL 60601 Room 1508      


                PLEASE BE ADVISED that on November 21, 2017 A Petition for Rule to Show Cause et al have been filed with all attachments before the United States District Courts. 

                                     
                                                                             Respectfully Submitted

                                                                            _______________________   
                                                                                                April Redeaux
                                                                                            1414 W. Welland Court
                                                                                                Roselle, IL 60172
























Certificate of Service
The undersigned hereby certifies that the above Petition with attachments was caused to be delivered by regular mail to the above named parties.

                                                                               ______________________
                                                                                   April Redeaux     



































IN THE 
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
EASTERN DIVISION

 April Redeaux                                                              Civil Action #17-cv-08060

                                                                                       Hon: Virginia M. Kendall  
  Plaintiff
                                                                                       Magistrate Judge Susan E. Cox
    V

Karen Bowes, Gordon Nelson, Steve Wasko
Clarence Parker, Grace Dickler, Debra B. Walker
Gregory Emmett Ahern, Jr.                               
                                      
 Defendants


                                                                      NOTICE OF
               PETITION FOR RULE TO SHOW CAUSE REMANDING  DEBRA B. WALKER et. al. & ATTORNEYS “TRESPASSING UPON THE LAWS” CORROBORATION IN AN ORGANIZED CHAIN CONSPIRACY  “TREASON” “FRAUD OF ALL SORTS” /CONTEMPT OF  COURT OTHER IRREGULARITIES
                   REMAND/BODY ATTACHMENT INSTANTER   
        MANDATORY INJUNCTION PROHIBITING STATE AND COUNTY COURTS FROM ENTERING ANY JUDGMENTS INSTANTER AND VACATE ALL ORDERS VOID IN NATURE AGAINST THE PLAINTIFF
                                                          
                                                                    
    Now comes April Redeaux., Pro Se in this cause respectfully represents to this court her Petition for Rule to Show Cause Remanding Debra Walker et al. & Attorneys “Trespassing upon the Laws” Corroboration in an Organized Chain Conspiracy “Treason” “Fraud of all sorts” Contempt of Court other Irregularities, Remand/Body Attachment Instanter Mandatory Injunction prohibiting State County courts from entering any judgments Instanter and Vacate all orders Void in nature against the Plaintiff.


            
     Said reasons are recorded in the attached affidavit;

                                                                                




                                                                               Respectfully Submitted

                                                                            _______________________  

                                                                                                  April Redeaux
                                                                                            1414 W. Welland Court
                                                                                                Roselle, IL 60172

































                                                AFFIDAVIT

{Pursuant to 28 U.S.C.A. 1446 (a)}

    I  April Redeaux. being first duly sworn on oath depose and states in support of Petition for Rule to Show Cause Remanding Judge Debra Walker et al. & Attorneys “Trespassing upon the Laws” Corroboration in an Organized Chain Conspiracy “Treason” “Fraud of all sorts” Contempt of Court other Irregularities, Remand/Body Attachment Instanter Mandatory Injunction prohibiting State County courts from entering any judgments Instanter and Vacate all orders Void in nature against the Plaintiff.
            
{Pursuant to the Rules of Federal Civil Procedure & U.S. Constitution}
         Section 1983 of U.S.C.S., S.H.A. Criminal Ch. 38, 33-3, Civil Rights Act of 1964, Canon 3D (1) Reporting Judicial Misconduct, 3D (2) Reporting Lawyer Misconduct;

1.)  The 7th Cir. Held that the Cook County Courts were a Criminal enterprise. U.S. v. Murphy, 768 F. 2d 1518, 1531 where precedent was enacted by Judges Frank H. Easterbrook, Richard D. Cudahy and former Chief judge Luther Merritt Swygert;
TRESPASSERS OF THE LAW
The Illinois Supreme Court has held that "if the magistrate has not such jurisdiction, then he and those who advise and act with him, or execute his process, are trespassers." Von Kettler et.al. v. Johnson, 57 Ill. 109 (1870)
Under Federal law which is applicable to all states, the U.S. Supreme Court stated that if a court is "without authority, its judgments and orders are regarded as nullities. They are not voidable, but simply void; and form no bar to a recovery sought, even prior to a reversal in opposition to them. They constitute no justification; and all persons concerned in executing such judgments or sentences, are considered, in law, as trespassers." Elliot v. Piersol, 1 Pet. 328, 340, 26 U.S. 328, 340 (1828)

The Illinois Supreme Court held that if a court "could not hear the matter upon the jurisdictional paper presented, its finding that it had the power can add nothing to its authority, - it had no authority to make that finding." The People v. Brewer, 128 Ill. 472, 483 (1928). 

A-    In addition, when judges act when they do not have jurisdiction to act, or they enforce a void order (an order issued by a judge without jurisdiction), they become trespassers of the law, and are engaged in treason (see below).

The Court in Yates v. Village of Hoffman Estates, Illinois, 209 F. Supp. 757 (N.D. Ill. 1962) held that "not every action by a judge is in exercise of his judicial function. ... It is not a judicial function for a judge to commit an intentional tort even though the tort occurs in the courthouse." When a judge acts as a trespasser of the law, when a judge does not follow the law, the judge loses subject-matter jurisdiction and the judge’s orders are void, of no legal force or effect.

That Pursuant to Sup Ct. Rule 272 “if at the time of announcing final judgment the judge requires the submission of a form of written judgment to be signed by the judge et al” the judgment becomes final only when the signed judgment is filed— Judges are bound by this rule before their court orders are valid; 


Under Section 4 of the Ku Klux Klan Act of 1871:

The President had additional power in case of rebellion within a state to suspend the writ of habeas corpus and to declare and enforce marital law. Cong. Globe, supra note 1, at 317. With respect to a definition of rebellion, Section 4 provided;

“Whenever in any State or part of a State……unlawful combinations……..shall be organized and armed, and so numerous and powerful as to be able, by violence, to either overthrow or set at defiance the constituted authorities of such State, or when the constituted authorities are in complicity with or shall connive at the unlawful purposes of such powerful and armed combinations; and whenever, by reason of either or all of the causes aforesaid, the conviction of such offenders and the preservation of the public safety shall become…. Impracticable, in every such case such combinations shall be deemed a rebellion against the Government of the United States….”  
2.)  Said Judge aided and assisted attorneys and in an elaborate criminal conspiracy “Trespassing upon the Laws” using the laws unjustly in which to advance her criminal agenda;

3.)  That on June 11, 2017, judge Debra B. Walker certified said court order, ordering the “That A. shall remain in North Carolina with the Petitioner until July 31, 2017, where he shall be returned to Illinois ---at the expense of Mr. Parker”

4.)  That the Petitioner with vexatious contempt for the judges court order had his attorney to circumvent said directive by filing a frivolous untimely motion, hereto attached Ex A, file stamped July 28, 2017;
A-   That attorney Gordon Nelson Induced Reliance upon the court engaging in “Fraudulent Acts” filed an Emergency Motion to Vacate July 10, 2017 Order in Part;

B-   That attorney Gordon Nelson methodically had his client to submit an affidavit not notarized but the Plaintiff has properly certified her documents with a Notary;


A-   That to further validate the verity of “Jim Crow laws still being enforced and judges “Trespassing upon the Laws” in Chicago courts by members of the Democratic Machine.

B-     The Law is CLEAR: Properly alleged facts within an affidavit that are not contradicted by counter affidavit are taken as true, despite the existence of contrary averments in the adverse party’s pleadings. Professional Group Travel, Ltd. v. Professional Seminar Consultants Inc., 136 ILL App 3d 1084, 483 N.E. 2d 1291; Buzzard v. Bolger, 117 ILL App 3d 887, 453 N.E. 2d 1129 et al.

5.)    That allegedly Plaintiff’s ex-husband paid off certain judges so as to receive favor from them in that he has been able to use his money and influence to try and harass and punish the Plaintiff for not being in his life, because of the judges ability to “trespass upon the laws and Deny every legally sufficient Motion with Affidavits filed in the courts validates their removal from the bench; Scott, 377 Mass. 364, 386 N.E. 2d 218, 220 (1979) See Lopez-Alexander, Unreported Order No. 85-279 (Colo. May 3, 1985) (Judge removed for, inter alia, a persistent pattern of abuse of the contempt power. The Mayor of Denver accepted the findings of the Denver County Court Judicial Qualification Commission that the judge’s conduct could not be characterized as mere mistakes or errors of law and that the conduct constituted willful misconduct in office and conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice that brings the judicial office into disrepute). Canon Ethics where there is a pattern of disregard or indifference, which warrant discipline.
A-    Plaintiff has not seen her son due to controlling Ex-husband ablity to buy and control judges’ influence and do whatever it takes to try and hurt her.

 Section 1983 of U.S.C.S. contemplates the depravation of Civil Rights through the Unconstitutional Application of a Law by conspiracy or otherwise. Mansell v. Saunders (CA 5 F 1A) 372 F 573, especially if the conspiracy was actually carried into effect, where an action is for a conspiracy to interfere with Civil Rights under 42 U.S.C.S. 1985 (3), or for the depravation of such rights under 42 U.S.C.S. 1983, if the conspiracy was actually carried into effect and plaintiff was thereby deprived of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the United States Constitution and Laws, the gist of the action maybe treated as one for the depravation of rights under 42 U.S.C.S. 1983, Lewis v. Brautigam (CA 5 F 1a) 227 F 2d 124, 55 Alr 2d 505, John W. Strong, 185, 777-78 (4 the ed. 1992).    

6.)    That said Judges in the Democratic party and the likes of their kinds cowardly prey on the helpless, the indigent, and  has legally demonstrated the extent they are willing to exhaust criminalizing innocent men of color to achieve their goals not respecting any person of color with authority;    

7.)    In Furtherance to the above, said individuals that can best be described as “Organized Terrorists” have used their positions and authority to oppress and destroy other persons lives recorded in said complaint by stealing homes in the guise of foreclosure, extort monies from men of color in the guise of child support, due in part to the many components of this facet of Domestic Terrorism.

8.)    In that, Judge Debra B. Walker, Karen J. Bowes, Steve Wasko, Gordon Nelson and Gregory E. Ahern, Jr. Grace Dickler has admitted engaging in “Trespassing upon the Laws” committing “Treason” when they received Notice and Knowledge of the Motion for Disqualification of judge for “Cause” et al. hereto attached, as Gr Ex A, when they colluded with one another and Denied said Motion.

9.)    In that, Plaintiff’s cousin a retired FBI agent informed her mother to notify the States Attorney of the noted allegations, hereto attached, Gr Ex B, Oct 18, 2017 letter to Kim Foxx States Attorney she never replied to any of the allegations.

Supreme Court Rule [137] provides in pertinent part:

            If a pleading, motion, or other paper is signed in violation of this Rule, the court, upon motion or upon its own initiative, may impose upon the person who signed it , a represented party, or both, an appropriate sanction, which may include an order to pay to the other party or parties the amount of reasonable expenses incurred because of the filling of the pleading, motion, or other paper, including a reasonable attorney fee. Not only will the courts consider an award of sanctions for active false statements: failures to disclose material facts to the court can also justify an award of sanctions. BRUBAKKEN v. Morrison, No. 1-9-1670, 1992 Ill App. LEXIS 2144 (1st Dist. Dec. 30, 1992). Additionally, the fact that a false statement or omission is the result of an honest mistake is no defense to entry of a sanction. ID. To the extent that an individual lawyer has engaged in sanction able conduct, that lawyer’s firm can also be jointly and severally liable with the lawyer.

10.)     That because Judge Debra B. Walker  and a plethora of other Democratic Terrorist judges in the political machine are exercising laws outside of their immunity (oath) and jurisdiction and in accordance to other Political/Fraternal laws makes every Court order signed by all Judges in this matter, State levels  Void Orders a “Nullity” due to “Treason”;    

That because of the above; Fraud admissibility great latitude is permitted in proving fraud C.J.S. Fraud 104 ET Seg. Fraud 51-57. where a question of fraud and deceit is the issue involved in a case,  great latitude is ordinarily permitted in the introduction of evidence, and courts allow the greatest liberality in the method of examination and in the scope of inquiry Vigus V. O’Bannon, 1886 8 N.E 788, 118 ILL 334. Hazelton V. Carolus, 1907 132 ILL. App. 512.
               INDUCING RELIANCE
To prevail in a cause of action for fraud, plaintiff must prove that defendant made statement of material nature which was relied on by victim and was made for purposes of inducing reliance, and that victim’s reliance led to his injury. Parsons V. Winter, 1986, 1 Dist., 491 N.E. 2d 1236, 96 ILL Dec. 776, 142 ILL App 3d 354, Appeal Denied.
     In Carter V. Mueller 457 N.E. 2d 1335 ILL. App. 1 Dist. 1983 The Supreme Court has held that: “The elements of a cause of action for fraudulent misrepresentation (sometimes referred to as “fraud and deceit” or deceit) are: (1) False statement of material fact; (2) known or believed to be false by the party making it; (3) intent to induce the other party to act; (4) action by the other party in reliance on the truth of the statement; and (5) damage to the other party resulting from such reliance.
  
11.)      That Judges in the Sup Ct and Judge Debra B. Walker et al. have corroborated/admitted beyond all legal standards of the law engaging in an “Organized Criminal Conspiracy” “Trespassing upon the Laws” engaging in “Treason” closing their eyes to the plethora of “terrorist acts” of many judges engaging in destroying families stealing homes and extorting homes in the guise of foreclosure.  

A-    That the defendants have met and fulfilled the requirements of the aforementioned for the relief being sought;

   Agreement to commit an unlawful act, which constitutes the essence of a conspiracy, is a distinct evil that exist and be punished whether or not the substantive crime ensues,-id.
   Conspiracy poses a threat to the public over and above the threat of the commission of the relevant substantive crime, both because the combination in crime makes more likely the commission of other crimes and because it decreases the part from their path of criminality-id;

12.)     REPORTING JUDICIAL MISCONDUCT
            CANON 3D (1)

    Under Section 3D (1), a judge who receives information that indicates “a substantial likelihood that another judge “ has violated the Code of Judicial “should take appropriate action”. The Canon does not require the judge to hold a hearing and make a definitive decision that a violation has occurred before the reporting requirement is triggered and at least one state’s judicial ethics committee has advised that the reporting requirement is triggered when the judge has “sufficient information” to conclude that a “substantial issue” has been raised that a violation has occurred, Mass. Comm. On Judicial Ethics, Op. 2002-04 (2002)

    “Appropriate action” may include direct communication with the judge who has committed the violation and reporting the violation to the appropriate or other agency or body. See Commentary to Canon 3D (1). “Appropriate authority” is the authority with responsibility for initiation of disciplinary proceedings with respect to the violation reported. Some jurisdictions’ rules specify to whom a judge must report misconduct. For instance, Massachusetts Rule 3D (1) provides that if a judge becomes aware of another judge’s unprofessional conduct he must report his knowledge to the Chief Justice of the Massachusetts Supreme Court and the court of which the judge in question is a member.

    Note that the term “knowledge”, as defined in the Terminology Section, denotes actual knowledge of the fact in question and as such, a person’s knowledge may be inferred from circumstances. In drafting Section 3D (1), the Committee rejected the suggestion that the criteria of raising substantial question as to honesty or trustworthiness be applied in the context of reporting judicial misconduct as well, on the grounds that those criteria are implicit in the present criterion of raising a substantial question as to a judge’s fitness for office.
             
 U. S Sup Court Digest 24(1) General Conspiracy

U.S. 2003. Essence of a conspiracy is an agreement to commit an unlawful act.—U.S. v. Jimenez Recio, 123 SCt. 819, 537 U.S. 270, 154 L.Ed.2d 744, on remand 371F.3d 1093

         Agreement to commit an unlawful act, which constitutes the essence of a conspiracy, is a distinct evil that exist and be punished whether or not the substantive crime ensues.-Id.
         Conspiracy poses a threat to the public over and above the threat of the commission of the relevant substantive crime, both because the combination in crime makes more likely the commission of other crimes and because it decreases the part from their path of criminality.-Id.
 
CONSPIRACY
Fraud maybe inferred from nature of acts complained of, individual and collective interest of alleged conspirators, situation, intimacy, and relation of parties at time of commission of acts, and generally all circumstances preceding and attending culmination of claimed conspiracy Illinois Rockford Corp. V. Kulp, 1968, 242 N.E. 2d 228, 41 ILL. 2d 215.
 
      Conspirators to be guilty of offense need not have entered into conspiracy at same time or have taken part in all its actions. People V. Hardison, 1985, 911 Dec. 162, 108. Requisite mens rea elements of conspiracy are satisfied upon showings of agreement of offense with intent that offense be committed; Actus reas element is satisfied of act in furtherance of agreement People V. Mordick, 1981, 50 ILL, Dec. 63
         
 A judge’s disrespect for the rules of court demonstrates disrespect for the law. Judges are disciplined under Canon 2 A for violating court rules and procedures. Judged ignored mandated witness order in attempt to accommodate witnesses’ schedules; Citing Canon 2A the court noted, “[a] court’s indifference to clearly stated rules breeds disrespect for and discontent with our justice system. Government can not demand respect of the laws by its citizens when its tribunals ignore those very same laws”)

Civil Rights Act of 1866- first section, enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled. That all persons born in the United States and not subject to any foreign power, excluding Indians not taxed, are hereby declared to be citizens of the United States; and such citizens of every race and color, without regard to any previous condition of slavery or involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall have the same right, in every State and Territory in the United States, to make and enforce contracts, to sue, be parties, and give evidence, to inherit, purchase, lease, sell, hold and convey real and personal property, and to full and equal benefit of the laws and proceedings for the security of person and property, as is enjoyed by white citizens, and shall be subject to like punishment, pains, and penalties, and to none other, any law, statute, ordinances, regulation, or custom, to the contrary notwithstanding, Act of April 9, 1866, ch. 31, 1, 14 Stat. 27, 42 U.S.C.A. 1981 (a).

Wherefore the foregoing stated within Defendant Respectfully Prays for the Relief:

1.)    That this Most Honorable Court Remand Judge  Debra B. Walker et al, attorneys  and all conspirators into custody Instanter for “Trespassing upon the Laws”;

2.)    Order the Grand Jury to investigate and Indict all other parties associated in said Conspiracy and the persons responsible for additional charges;

3.)    Order the Removal of every Public Official named and ignored the Oath and Constitution of their duties as an elected/appointed official in this matter, who has “trespassed upon the laws”;

4.)    Issue an Injunction Prohibiting the County judges, City or State Officials from issuing any judgments against the Plaintiff;

5.)    Order Sanctions against all parties and have them to absorb all legal expenses and costs for the enforcement of this matter;

6.)    Order a Moratorium on all Child Support’ Custody matters ascertaining other men or women victimized by the same unjust matters;

7.)    Let the Gavel and Jurisdiction of this Honorable Court Invoke any other remedy this courts deems just; 

                      FURTHER AFFIANTH SAYETH NAUGHT








                                                                                                          Respectfully Submitted

                                                                              
                                                                            _______________________  

                                                                                                       April Redeaux


Notary 

COOK COUNTY JUDGE ENGAGING IN TERRORIST ACTS OF TREASON HELPING AN EX JUDGE NOW CHILD REP (MICHAEL IAN BENDER) TRYING TO EXTORT MONEY FROM THE MOTHER WHERE THE JUDGE TOOK THIS WOMEN'S CHILD AND GAVE IT TO HER BROTHER UNLAWFULLY.

JUDGE PAMELA ELIZABETH LOZA HAS A HEART OF POISONOUS VENOM SHE IS FULL OF HATE!

SHE HAS BULLIED AND INTIMIDATED MANY ATTORNEYS MANY MEN HAVE BROKE DOWN IN TEARS PROFUSELY AS SHE SEPARATED THEM FROM THEIR CHILDREN NOW SHE IS TAKING CHILDREN FROM MOTHERS ALLEGEDLY FOR A NICE KICK BACK NOT FEARING ANY REPRISALS FROM ANY BLACK OFFICIAL IN AUTHORITY DUE TO HER UNTOUCHABLE PERSONA IN THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY.

DEMOCRATIC FEDERAL JUDGE SHARON JOHNSON COLEMAN (BLACK WOMAN) CLOSED HER EYES TO THE PLETHORA OF CRIMINAL ACTS LEVIED BY THIS JUDGE AND OTHERS AS THEY VIOLATED LEE'S CIVIL RIGHTS AS THEY TRESPASSED UPON THE LAWS CORROBORATED THEIR ROLES ENGAGING IN TREASON  DENIED HIS MOTIONS CLAIMING SHE DID NOT HAVE JURISDICTION.

BUT A REPUBLICAN JUDGE VIRGINIA KENDALL ACCEPTED JURISDICTION OF ANOTHER WOMEN'S CASE EXPERIENCING THE SAME TYPE OF CORRUPTION AND TRESPASSING OF THE LAWS BY COOK COUNTY JUDGES. (CASE #17-CV-08060).

COOK COUNTY JUDGES IN THE DOMESTIC RELATIONS AND CHANCERY IS BY FAR SOME OF THE WORSE UNQUALIFIED CORRUPT RACIST SEXIST JUDGES IN AMERICA.

LEE OTIES LOVE, JR. @Redbilla HAS BEEN THROUGH HELL WITH THIS JUDGE BUT BECAUSE OF PRAYER AND ALL OF THE SUPPORT FROM THE TWITTER FAMILY +Linda Lee King @LisaMRomano AND SO MANY OTHERS HAVE MADE IT POSSIBLE FOR LEE TO GET WITH HIS DAUGHTER.

LET'S HELP THIS MOM GET REUNITED WITH HER SON. 


 IN THE 
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
EASTERN DIVISION

 Carlen Colbert                                                              Civil Action #17-cv-08467

                                                                                       Hon: Charles R. Norgle, Sr.
  Plaintiff
                                                                                       Magistrate: Judge Susan E. Cox
    V

Pamela E. Loza, Michael I. Bender, Timothy
C. Evans, Grace Dickler, Anton Colbert, Debra B. Walker                               
                                      
 Defendants

                                                                      NOTICE OF
               PETITION FOR RULE TO SHOW CAUSE REMANDING  PAMELA E. LOZA et. al. & ATTORNEYS “TRESPASSING UPON THE LAWS” CORROBORATION IN AN ORGANIZED CHAIN CONSPIRACY  “TREASON” “FRAUD OF ALL SORTS” /CONTEMPT OF  COURT OTHER IRREGULARITIES
                   REMAND/BODY ATTACHMENT INSTANTER   
        MANDATORY INJUNCTION PROHIBITING STATE AND COUNTY COURTS FROM ENTERING ANY JUDGMENTS INSTANTER AND VACATE ALL ORDERS VOID IN NATURE AGAINST THE PLAINTIFF
                                                                                   
To the most Honorable Judge of the United States District Court for the Northern District:

Moving Party,  Carlen Colbert, hereby respectfully represents as Pro Se shows this court with an affidavit the noted reasons why this matter should be entertained within this courts Jurisdiction; {Pursuant to the provisions of the United States Constitution}
           
That on Dec. 01, 2017, Plaintiff shall present this Motion at 9:30 am before Honorable Charles R. Norgle, Sr. in room 2338A, 219 S. Dearborn Street, Chicago, IL. 60604;

 To    To:  Pamela E. Loza 50 West Washington, Chicago, IL 60601 Room 3009;
       Michael I. Bender, 70 West Madison, Suite 2222 Chg. IL 60602, 
       Timothy C. Evans 50 West Washington, Chg. IL. 60601 Room 2600;
       Anton Colbert, 140 Percy Julian Sq., Oak Park, IL. 60302-2619
       Grace Dickler 50 West Washington, Chg, IL 60601 Room 1905;
       Debra B. Walker, 50 West Washington, Chg. Il 60601 Room 2108     


                PLEASE BE ADVISED that on November 27, 2017 A Petition for Rule to Show Cause et al have been filed with all attachments before the United States District Courts. 

                                     
                                                                             Respectfully Submitted

                                                                            _______________________   
                                                                                                 Carlen Colbert
                                                                                               1805 Jamestown Cir.
                                                                            Hoffman Estates, IL. 60169

                                                                                             
























Certificate of Service
The undersigned hereby certifies that the above Petition with attachments was caused to be delivered by regular mail to the above named parties.

                                                                               ______________________
                                                                                          Carlen Colbert



































IN THE 
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
EASTERN DIVISION

  Carlen Colbert                                                              Civil Action #17-cv-08467

                                                                                       Hon: Charles R. Norgle, Sr.
  Plaintiff
                                                                                       Magistrate: Judge Susan E. Cox
    V

Pamela E. Loza, Michael I. Bender, Timothy
C. Evans, Grace Dickler, Anton Colbert, Debra B. Walker                               
                                      
 Defendants


                                                                   
               PETITION FOR RULE TO SHOW CAUSE REMANDING  PAMELA E. LOZA et. al. & ATTORNEYS “TRESPASSING UPON THE LAWS” CORROBORATION IN AN ORGANIZED CHAIN CONSPIRACY  “TREASON” “FRAUD OF ALL SORTS” /CONTEMPT OF  COURT OTHER IRREGULARITIES
                   REMAND/BODY ATTACHMENT INSTANTER   
        MANDATORY INJUNCTION PROHIBITING STATE AND COUNTY COURTS FROM ENTERING ANY JUDGMENTS INSTANTER AND VACATE ALL ORDERS VOID IN NATURE AGAINST THE PLAINTIFF
                                                          
                                                                    
    Now comes Carlen Colbert., Pro Se in this cause respectfully represents to this court her Petition for Rule to Show Cause Remanding Pamela E. Loza et al. & Attorneys “Trespassing upon the Laws” Corroboration in an Organized Chain Conspiracy “Treason” “Fraud of all sorts” Contempt of Court other Irregularities, Remand/Body Attachment Instanter Mandatory Injunction prohibiting State County courts from entering any judgments Instanter and Vacate all orders Void in nature against the Plaintiff.


            
     Said reasons are recorded in the attached affidavit;

                                                                                




                                                                               Respectfully Submitted

                                                                            _______________________  
                                                                                                   Carlen Colbert
                                                                                               1805 Jamestown Cir.
                                                                            Hoffman Estates, IL. 60169

































                                                AFFIDAVIT

{Pursuant to 28 U.S.C.A. 1446 (a)}

    I  Carlen Colbert. being first duly sworn on oath depose and states in support of Petition for Rule to Show Cause Remanding Judge Elizabeth E. Loza et al. & Attorneys “Trespassing upon the Laws” Corroboration in an Organized Chain Conspiracy “Treason” “Fraud of all sorts” Contempt of Court other Irregularities, Remand/Body Attachment Instanter Mandatory Injunction prohibiting State County courts from entering any judgments Instanter and Vacate all orders Void in nature against the Plaintiff.
            
{Pursuant to the Rules of Federal Civil Procedure & U.S. Constitution}
         Section 1983 of U.S.C.S., S.H.A. Criminal Ch. 38, 33-3, Civil Rights Act of 1964, Canon 3D (1) Reporting Judicial Misconduct, 3D (2) Reporting Lawyer Misconduct;

1.)  The 7th Cir. Held that the Cook County Courts were a Criminal enterprise. U.S. v. Murphy, 768 F. 2d 1518, 1531 where precedent was enacted by Judges Frank H. Easterbrook, Richard D. Cudahy and former Chief judge Luther Merritt Swygert;
TRESPASSERS OF THE LAW
The Illinois Supreme Court has held that "if the magistrate has not such jurisdiction, then he and those who advise and act with him, or execute his process, are trespassers." Von Kettler et.al. v. Johnson, 57 Ill. 109 (1870)
Under Federal law which is applicable to all states, the U.S. Supreme Court stated that if a court is "without authority, its judgments and orders are regarded as nullities. They are not voidable, but simply void; and form no bar to a recovery sought, even prior to a reversal in opposition to them. They constitute no justification; and all persons concerned in executing such judgments or sentences, are considered, in law, as trespassers." Elliot v. Piersol, 1 Pet. 328, 340, 26 U.S. 328, 340 (1828)

The Illinois Supreme Court held that if a court "could not hear the matter upon the jurisdictional paper presented, its finding that it had the power can add nothing to its authority, - it had no authority to make that finding." The People v. Brewer, 128 Ill. 472, 483 (1928). 

A-    In addition, when judges act when they do not have jurisdiction to act, or they enforce a void order (an order issued by a judge without jurisdiction), they become trespassers of the law, and are engaged in treason (see below).

The Court in Yates v. Village of Hoffman Estates, Illinois, 209 F. Supp. 757 (N.D. Ill. 1962) held that "not every action by a judge is in exercise of his judicial function. ... It is not a judicial function for a judge to commit an intentional tort even though the tort occurs in the courthouse." When a judge acts as a trespasser of the law, when a judge does not follow the law, the judge loses subject-matter jurisdiction and the judge’s orders are void, of no legal force or effect.

That Pursuant to Sup Ct. Rule 272 “if at the time of announcing final judgment the judge requires the submission of a form of written judgment to be signed by the judge et al” the judgment becomes final only when the signed judgment is filed— Judges are bound by this rule before their court orders are valid; 


Under Section 4 of the Ku Klux Klan Act of 1871:

The President had additional power in case of rebellion within a state to suspend the writ of habeas corpus and to declare and enforce marital law. Cong. Globe, supra note 1, at 317. With respect to a definition of rebellion, Section 4 provided;

“Whenever in any State or part of a State……unlawful combinations……..shall be organized and armed, and so numerous and powerful as to be able, by violence, to either overthrow or set at defiance the constituted authorities of such State, or when the constituted authorities are in complicity with or shall connive at the unlawful purposes of such powerful and armed combinations; and whenever, by reason of either or all of the causes aforesaid, the conviction of such offenders and the preservation of the public safety shall become…. Impracticable, in every such case such combinations shall be deemed a rebellion against the Government of the United States….”  
1.)  Said Judge aided and assisted attorneys and in an elaborate criminal conspiracy “Trespassing upon the Laws” using the laws unjustly in which to advance her criminal agenda;

2.)    That former  judge (Michael  I Bender) filed a "Fraudulent Emergency Ex Parte Motion  et al., hereto attached, as Ex A  Gr Ex C from Motion to Disqualify et al.;
A-     That Par  4 states "In May of 2012 DCFS opened an investigation et a!"., this is an egregious falsehood, in that there was never an investigation opened against  the Respondent for any reason;

3.)       That the aforementioned parties colluded in an “Organized Conspiracy” and abducted Plaintiffs child and giving him to her brother in an unlawful bizarre manner!

4.)       That Gr Ex B, hereto attached, Motion to Return Minor back into Custody of Mother (Defendant) Instanter Due to “Fraud” “Kidnapping” et al. That no one DENIED or objected to any of the pleadings properly asserted thereby admitting to the veracity of every pleading.

5.)    Hereto attached as Gr Ex A, In Re The Parentage of Clarence Parker v. April Redeaux, Motion for Disqualification of judge for “Cause” Due to “Fraud” (Civil Rights Violations) and or Prejudice pursuant to S.H.A. 735 ILCS 5/2--- 1001 (a) (2,3) and to Vacate all Orders due to “Trespassing upon the Laws” Court never had jurisdiction et al. Page 10, Par 10, states “That judge Karen J. Bowes satisfied the Preponderance of Evidence Standard by taking part in an “Organized Conspiracy” by interfering and unlawfully obstructing with Respondents parental responsibility keeping her from having custody per judge Walker’s order, in an attempt to keep black families stressed oppressed exercising terrorist tactics thereby, validating the veracity of colluding with said parties in said conspiracy where “Fraud” and “Perjury” was apparent in reference to all attachments; “

6.)    That in addition to the aforementioned acts of “Treason Offenses” former judge now Child Rep (Michael I. Bender) attorney is now trying to EXTORT money from the Plaintiff hereto attached, Gr Ex C Petition for Rule to Show Cause for Indirect Civil Contempt (Filed September 14 and Motioned for September 15, 2017)    
A-    Plaintiff had her fees waived but Michael Bender being a former judge knew how to “Trespass upon the Laws” by colluding with Judge Loza, she became a law unto herself by acting as a Private citizen and not as a Judicial Officer of the State of Illinois violating her oath in every way.

B-    Because the dad did not want to pay child support he stood by passively and allowed these diabolical events to manifest;

C-    That out of alleged desperation and fear said father (Robert Strattford) mysteriously filed for custody only after this matter had been filed in Federal court;

7.)    Plaintiff has not seen her child due to this sophisticated operation of child abduction and extortion, hereto attached, Gr Ex D Nov. 15. 2017 court order not signed seeking to have Plaintiff in Contempt hearing set for Dec. 6, 2017 at 2pm;

A-   That to further validate the verity of “Jim Crow laws still being enforced and judges “Trespassing upon the Laws” in Chicago courts by members of the Democratic Machine.

B-     The Law is CLEAR: Properly alleged facts within an affidavit that are not contradicted by counter affidavit are taken as true, despite the existence of contrary averments in the adverse party’s pleadings. Professional Group Travel, Ltd. v. Professional Seminar Consultants Inc., 136 ILL App 3d 1084, 483 N.E. 2d 1291; Buzzard v. Bolger, 117 ILL App 3d 887, 453 N.E. 2d 1129 et al.

C-    That allegedly Plaintiff’s son’s father Robert Stratford has colluded with the Defendants so as to receive favor by not paying the Plaintiff any child support for the minor and because of the judges ability to “trespass upon the laws and Deny every legally sufficient Motion with Affidavits filed in the courts validates their removal from the bench; Scott, 377 Mass. 364, 386 N.E. 2d 218, 220 (1979) See Lopez-Alexander, Unreported Order No. 85-279 (Colo. May 3, 1985) (Judge removed for, inter alia, a persistent pattern of abuse of the contempt power. The Mayor of Denver accepted the findings of the Denver County Court Judicial Qualification Commission that the judge’s conduct could not be characterized as mere mistakes or errors of law and that the conduct constituted willful misconduct in office and conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice that brings the judicial office into disrepute). Canon Ethics where there is a pattern of disregard or indifference, which warrant discipline.
D-    Plaintiff has not seen her son or attended his 8th grade graduation due to judges engaging in Terrorist Acts committing Treason on the bench.

 Section 1983 of U.S.C.S. contemplates the depravation of Civil Rights through the Unconstitutional Application of a Law by conspiracy or otherwise. Mansell v. Saunders (CA 5 F 1A) 372 F 573, especially if the conspiracy was actually carried into effect, where an action is for a conspiracy to interfere with Civil Rights under 42 U.S.C.S. 1985 (3), or for the depravation of such rights under 42 U.S.C.S. 1983, if the conspiracy was actually carried into effect and plaintiff was thereby deprived of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the United States Constitution and Laws, the gist of the action maybe treated as one for the depravation of rights under 42 U.S.C.S. 1983, Lewis v. Brautigam (CA 5 F 1a) 227 F 2d 124, 55 Alr 2d 505, John W. Strong, 185, 777-78 (4 the ed. 1992).    

E-     That said Judges in the Democratic party and the likes of their kinds cowardly prey on the helpless, the indigent, and  has legally demonstrated the extent they are willing to exhaust criminalizing innocent men of color to achieve their goals not respecting any person of color with authority;    

F-     In Furtherance to the above, said individuals that can best be described as “Organized Terrorists” have used their positions and authority to oppress and destroy other persons lives recorded in said complaint by stealing homes in the guise of foreclosure, extort monies from men of color in the guise of child support, and take babies from the mom’s unlawfully, due in part to the many components of this facet of Domestic Terrorism.

G-    In that, Judge Pamela Elizabeth Loza, Michael I. Bender, Timothy C. Evans, Grace Dickler, Anton Colbert and Debra Walker has admitted engaging in “Trespassing upon the Laws” committing “Treason” when they received Notice and Knowledge of the Motion for Disqualification of judge for “Cause” et al. hereto attached, as Gr Ex A, when they colluded with one another and Denied said Motion.


Supreme Court Rule [137] provides in pertinent part:

            If a pleading, motion, or other paper is signed in violation of this Rule, the court, upon motion or upon its own initiative, may impose upon the person who signed it , a represented party, or both, an appropriate sanction, which may include an order to pay to the other party or parties the amount of reasonable expenses incurred because of the filling of the pleading, motion, or other paper, including a reasonable attorney fee. Not only will the courts consider an award of sanctions for active false statements: failures to disclose material facts to the court can also justify an award of sanctions. BRUBAKKEN v. Morrison, No. 1-9-1670, 1992 Ill App. LEXIS 2144 (1st Dist. Dec. 30, 1992). Additionally, the fact that a false statement or omission is the result of an honest mistake is no defense to entry of a sanction. ID. To the extent that an individual lawyer has engaged in sanction able conduct, that lawyer’s firm can also be jointly and severally liable with the lawyer.

H-    That because Judge Pamela Elizabeth Loza  and a plethora of other Democratic Terrorist judges in the political machine are exercising laws outside of their immunity (oath) and jurisdiction and in accordance to other Political/Fraternal laws makes every Court order signed by all Judges in this matter, State levels  Void Orders a “Nullity” due to “Treason”;    

That because of the above; Fraud admissibility great latitude is permitted in proving fraud C.J.S. Fraud 104 ET Seg. Fraud 51-57. where a question of fraud and deceit is the issue involved in a case,  great latitude is ordinarily permitted in the introduction of evidence, and courts allow the greatest liberality in the method of examination and in the scope of inquiry Vigus V. O’Bannon, 1886 8 N.E 788, 118 ILL 334. Hazelton V. Carolus, 1907 132 ILL. App. 512.
               INDUCING RELIANCE
To prevail in a cause of action for fraud, plaintiff must prove that defendant made statement of material nature which was relied on by victim and was made for purposes of inducing reliance, and that victim’s reliance led to his injury. Parsons V. Winter, 1986, 1 Dist., 491 N.E. 2d 1236, 96 ILL Dec. 776, 142 ILL App 3d 354, Appeal Denied.
     In Carter V. Mueller 457 N.E. 2d 1335 ILL. App. 1 Dist. 1983 The Supreme Court has held that: “The elements of a cause of action for fraudulent misrepresentation (sometimes referred to as “fraud and deceit” or deceit) are: (1) False statement of material fact; (2) known or believed to be false by the party making it; (3) intent to induce the other party to act; (4) action by the other party in reliance on the truth of the statement; and (5) damage to the other party resulting from such reliance.
  
I-        That said Judges and the related conspirators have corroborated/admitted beyond all legal standards of the law engaging in an “Organized Criminal Conspiracy” “Trespassing upon the Laws” engaging in “Treason” closing their eyes to the plethora of “terrorist acts” of many judges engaging in destroying families removing children from homes unlawfully as they pad the pockets of child rep attorneys via extortion, stealing homes and in the guise of foreclosure.  

A-    That the defendants have met and fulfilled the requirements of the aforementioned for the relief being sought;

   Agreement to commit an unlawful act, which constitutes the essence of a conspiracy, is a distinct evil that exist and be punished whether or not the substantive crime ensues,-id.
   Conspiracy poses a threat to the public over and above the threat of the commission of the relevant substantive crime, both because the combination in crime makes more likely the commission of other crimes and because it decreases the part from their path of criminality-id;

J-      REPORTING JUDICIAL MISCONDUCT
            CANON 3D (1)

    Under Section 3D (1), a judge who receives information that indicates “a substantial likelihood that another judge “ has violated the Code of Judicial “should take appropriate action”. The Canon does not require the judge to hold a hearing and make a definitive decision that a violation has occurred before the reporting requirement is triggered and at least one state’s judicial ethics committee has advised that the reporting requirement is triggered when the judge has “sufficient information” to conclude that a “substantial issue” has been raised that a violation has occurred, Mass. Comm. On Judicial Ethics, Op. 2002-04 (2002)

    “Appropriate action” may include direct communication with the judge who has committed the violation and reporting the violation to the appropriate or other agency or body. See Commentary to Canon 3D (1). “Appropriate authority” is the authority with responsibility for initiation of disciplinary proceedings with respect to the violation reported. Some jurisdictions’ rules specify to whom a judge must report misconduct. For instance, Massachusetts Rule 3D (1) provides that if a judge becomes aware of another judge’s unprofessional conduct he must report his knowledge to the Chief Justice of the Massachusetts Supreme Court and the court of which the judge in question is a member.

    Note that the term “knowledge”, as defined in the Terminology Section, denotes actual knowledge of the fact in question and as such, a person’s knowledge may be inferred from circumstances. In drafting Section 3D (1), the Committee rejected the suggestion that the criteria of raising substantial question as to honesty or trustworthiness be applied in the context of reporting judicial misconduct as well, on the grounds that those criteria are implicit in the present criterion of raising a substantial question as to a judge’s fitness for office.
             
 U. S Sup Court Digest 24(1) General Conspiracy

U.S. 2003. Essence of a conspiracy is an agreement to commit an unlawful act.—U.S. v. Jimenez Recio, 123 SCt. 819, 537 U.S. 270, 154 L.Ed.2d 744, on remand 371F.3d 1093

         Agreement to commit an unlawful act, which constitutes the essence of a conspiracy, is a distinct evil that exist and be punished whether or not the substantive crime ensues.-Id.
         Conspiracy poses a threat to the public over and above the threat of the commission of the relevant substantive crime, both because the combination in crime makes more likely the commission of other crimes and because it decreases the part from their path of criminality.-Id.
 
CONSPIRACY
Fraud maybe inferred from nature of acts complained of, individual and collective interest of alleged conspirators, situation, intimacy, and relation of parties at time of commission of acts, and generally all circumstances preceding and attending culmination of claimed conspiracy Illinois Rockford Corp. V. Kulp, 1968, 242 N.E. 2d 228, 41 ILL. 2d 215.
 
      Conspirators to be guilty of offense need not have entered into conspiracy at same time or have taken part in all its actions. People V. Hardison, 1985, 911 Dec. 162, 108. Requisite mens rea elements of conspiracy are satisfied upon showings of agreement of offense with intent that offense be committed; Actus reas element is satisfied of act in furtherance of agreement People V. Mordick, 1981, 50 ILL, Dec. 63
         
 A judge’s disrespect for the rules of court demonstrates disrespect for the law. Judges are disciplined under Canon 2 A for violating court rules and procedures. Judged ignored mandated witness order in attempt to accommodate witnesses’ schedules; Citing Canon 2A the court noted, “[a] court’s indifference to clearly stated rules breeds disrespect for and discontent with our justice system. Government can not demand respect of the laws by its citizens when its tribunals ignore those very same laws”)

Civil Rights Act of 1866- first section, enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled. That all persons born in the United States and not subject to any foreign power, excluding Indians not taxed, are hereby declared to be citizens of the United States; and such citizens of every race and color, without regard to any previous condition of slavery or involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall have the same right, in every State and Territory in the United States, to make and enforce contracts, to sue, be parties, and give evidence, to inherit, purchase, lease, sell, hold and convey real and personal property, and to full and equal benefit of the laws and proceedings for the security of person and property, as is enjoyed by white citizens, and shall be subject to like punishment, pains, and penalties, and to none other, any law, statute, ordinances, regulation, or custom, to the contrary notwithstanding, Act of April 9, 1866, ch. 31, 1, 14 Stat. 27, 42 U.S.C.A. 1981 (a).

Wherefore the foregoing stated within Plaintiff Respectfully Prays for the Relief:

1.)    That this Most Honorable Court Remand Judge Pamela E. Loza et al, attorneys  and all conspirators into custody Instanter for “Trespassing upon the Laws”;

2.)    Order that minor child be returned to the Plaintiff Instanter;

3.)    Order the Grand Jury to investigate and Indict all other parties associated in said Conspiracy and the persons responsible for additional charges;

4.)    Order the Removal of every Public Official named and ignored the Oath and Constitution of their duties as an elected/appointed official in this matter, who has “trespassed upon the laws”;

5.)    Issue an Injunction Prohibiting the County judges, City or State Officials from issuing any judgments against the Plaintiff;

6.)    Order Sanctions against all parties and have them to absorb all legal expenses and costs for the enforcement of this matter;

7.)    Order a Moratorium on all Child Support’ Custody matters ascertaining other men or women victimized by the same unjust matters;

8.)    Let the Gavel and Jurisdiction of this Honorable Court Invoke any other remedy this courts deems just; 

                      FURTHER AFFIANTH SAYETH NAUGHT





                                                                                                          Respectfully Submitted

                                                                              
                                                                            _______________________  

                                                                                                        Carlen Colbert