Wikipedia Racial Injustice in Chicago Courts

Search results

Tuesday, December 29, 2015


JUDGES & POLICE HATE AFRICAN AMERICAN MEN AND WILL DO ANYTHING TO DESTROY THEM EITHER WITH BULLETS OR UNJUST LAWS WHILE THEY UNLAWFULLY ENFORCE THE LAWS:

THE LAST TIME, I HAVE SEEN MY DAUGHTER KAYLEE WAS LAST THANKSGIVING 11-27-14

TAKE A LOOK AT HOW CORRUPT JUDGES ARE PIMPING GREAT FATHERS USING UNLAWFUL RACIST APPLICATIONS OF THE LAWS CREATING INCOME OPPORTUNITIES FOR ATTORNEYS:

THE WHITES IN THIS CITY WANT PEOPLE TO THINK AFRICAN AMERICAN MEN ARE DEADBEAT DADS NIGGERS OR THUGS THIS IS NOT TRUE LOOK AT WHAT THEY ARE DOING TO ME JUST FOR TRYING TO BE IN MY DAUGHTERS LIFE!

1.)   THIS CASE HAS COSTED ME OVER $30,000.00 ON MY 3RD ATTORNEY!

Now Heather Widely. lawyers Ruth Ramirez 2nd  Keith L. Spence Retainer I had to pay $7,500. Total $25,000 paid for all court fees.Plus just paid $4,500 for trumped up charges filed by the child mother Natasha

2.)   Judge Pamela Elizabeth Loza known as the gate keeper rules with a iron fist.Violated my civil,human and father rights since first court date 10/21/13 not letting me exercise my freedom of speech to speak or defend myself or speak up for myself and tell my side of the story? Just ordered me pay child support and had me to only have 4 hours only on Mondays after school visitations with my daughter from 3pm -7pm every week!

3.)   Judge Loza demonstrated an obvious sexist racist attitude towards me and was remarkably unprofessional and ignorant of the laws and cruel. She used her robe to incite her racial hatred at me and rulings having no respect ,concern or compassion for my daughter's safety,or development or life. Why because my daughter was an black baby .Judge Loza believes because my daughter was African American child she wasn't worthy or deserve a proper custody with a responsible father in myself because of my skin color! 

4.)   I filed a motion to vacate order of protection against 5 yr old daughter since 11/29/14. My lawyer Keith L. Spence and I been in front of Judge Pamela Loza 11 times to vacate order of protection so I can see and touch, my daughter to take her to chuckey cheese,the park, etc.

5.)   The sad and worse part of this is that the mother Natasha an AKA member of a college sorority has perjured her self in court filed bogus charges against saying their was domestic abuse when she knows dam well, I have never touched her in any way!

6.)  Because I have filed charges against Judge Loza racist corrupt prosecutors under Anita Alvarez went along with trumped up charges that my daughters mother filed against me criminally so as to keep me from my daughter, judge (Luciano Pacini) Markam courthouse heard all of the inconsistencies and perjured statements of Natasha ignored them causing me to have to file an unnecessary appeal spend more money.

7.)   If I was a white man they probably would have locked up Natasha long time ago but because of my skin color and standing up to these racist acts these corrupt judges have taken a personal racial hatred in trying to protect one another so as to prove WHITE POWER IS SUPREME IN CHICAGO JIM CROW LAWS ARE IN EFFECT!  

 ATTENTION CHIEF JUDGE TIMOTHY C. EVANS. 

 I am emailing  you my complaints of my child custody  case with judge loza presiding. I understand the law and it takes time for custody battles. I was raised with my father and took an oath to love,support and raise my kids. I am the petitioner and only want what's right for my 5 year old daughter Kaylee. I have did every possible thing as far as filing and petitioning the court with lawyer and without. Judge Loza knows better and is not thinking or caring about the growth and development of my child.My daughter  is 5yr old innocent and vulnerable somebody  has to care.

Judge Loza took away my visitation rights in February. .Black History Month!I petition  the court bi
weekly for a year. 50 TIMES JUDGE Loza seen me ?My child is use to seeing me everyday. Then every Monday.Then I fought every Monday after school to 6pm,Wednesday after school to 7pm.Then every other weekend Friday after school  to Sunday  at 6pm

JUST IMAGINE MY DAUGHTER EMOTIONAL AND MENTAL STATE. NOW NO VISITATION. PUT YOUR SELF AS A DEVOTED FATHER?How would  you feel?Wouldn't  you fight  for what's right and your civil, and constitutional  rights.Judge Loza is just being sexist, racist and ignorant  and cruel. All children  should be free and see there parents.I am asking for your help .

 PLEASE LOOK INTO MY CASE! I want to build and have a strong bond with my child.Judge Loza doesn't care about the well being of my child and Kaylee Safety?

 IF SO
KAYLEE WAS WHITE SHE WOULD CARE? I PROMISE  YOU I AM BEING RACIALLY PROFILED AND VIOLATED OF MY FATHERS RIGHTS. I WOULD LIKE TO HAVE A MEETING AND HEARING ON THE INVESTIGATION OF UNETHICAL  AND ILLEGAL CONDUCT OF JUDGE LOZA.  

 JUDGE Loza needs to be reprimanded,fined,brought  up on racial discrimination charges Judge Evans.                                         Sincerly,Lee Otis Love Jr.

Monday, December 28, 2015

COOK COUNTY JUDGES COMMITTING CRIMINAL ACTS BEHIND THEIR ROBES

SEE HOW JUDGE USED HER ROBE & UNLAWFUL AUTHORITY TO KEEP ME FROM SEEING MY DAUGHTER WITH NO CRIMINAL HISTORY


 Please review. I'm fighting for my father Rights for my daughter Kaylee

  I went to court earlier this month on the 9th and go back on the 19th with Judge Loza. My attorney Keith L. Spence presented Judge Loza with the official transcripts of both Queen of Peace and Salvation Army Family Services both accredited by Court.Both I paid for intake evaluation and assement sessions from 4/12-5/12/15 and also 1/15/15  .Plus have letter to probation officer Lillian Jackson. The first orientation was for Partner Abuse Intervention Program. THE AUTHORIZATION  IS VALID UNTIL 1/15/2016?

Judge Loza didn't even look at the official transcripts. Showing I've took the proper steps for court order.Plus 2 college educated accredited administrator and counselor did a thorough investigation and background intake.Both determined I don't need to take the classes .So they typed me letter and gave me all paperwork to show proof of purden.Judge Loza didn't except this with all proof in court presented by my lawyer Keith L.Spence.My daughter GAL Sharon McRoberts testified in court that Kaylee MI Love wants to see her father and has a strong bound with her father. 

Judge Loza knows I have never been charged or commited domestic violence or have a criminal history? Judge Loza cannot keep me from having visitation with my 5yr old daughter. JUDGE LOZA is violating my civil and fathers rights? I have all the evidence.Judge Loza is sexiest, raciest and prejudice in my case#13D080423. Judge Pamela Elizabeth Loza has a vendetta against me .Why because I keep fighting for my rights.I am the petitioner .I haven't seen my daughter since November 2014.Judge Loza ignorance and stupidity will not be tolerated.Finally to prove everything I said is true.After paying for 2 different court order domestic violence classes.

GAL Sharon McRoberts called up Paula King director of domestic violence classes @1350 W.103rd. To get me to go and register for the 3rd time and spend money again?I called and spoke to Paula King for a 30 minute confidential conference call today at 10am. I explained to Paula my situation and she told me.That if I been to 2 separate accredited domestic violence classes.Then was present in court with my attorney and he showed proof to Judge Loza. Meaning proof of payment,assessment, intake and letter of evaluation to Judge Loza. WHY WOULD I COME IN AND TAKE THE SAME STEPS A THIRD TIME. If I was never convicted or charged by both judges?

Paula King explained you have to have a criminal background or charge and conviction for domestic violence classes.Also if I wasn't charged or convicted why is my visitation revoked. STATE LAW STATES THAT IF I WAS CONVICTED OR CHARGED.I AM SUPPOSED TO STILL SEE MY KIDS?

Judge Loza didn't even grant me this .This is my father and civil right. I PAY TAXES AND CHILD SUPPORT? I go back to court in front of Judge Loza on motion to vacate order of protection against my daughter on July 19,2015. KEITH my lawyer filed and petition the court to vacate order of protection. I went today to Queen of Peace 813 S. Western to speak with Yolanda Estrada office and events manager. I GOT THE OFFICIAL Domestic Violence Assessment  and Intake Notification from my counselor  Maria Cisneros. I HAVE CERTIFICATION TRANSCRIPTS. Stating Client  did not meet our admission criteria due to.Client reports that he had never been violent or abusive towards anyone.Including the mother of his child Natasha Broomfield?

Therefore,he cannot be enrolled in our program since he reports.He is not accountable for any type of violent behaviors. Signed and dated Maria Cisneros 5/12/15. Contact Yolanda Estrada  (312)265-0206 cell 773-946-6210. Paula King 773-881-1711 ext.1159  Joel Paez,MA 773-735-6773. 5045W.47th Street. FAMILY AND COMMUNITY SERVICES SALVATION ARMY. Sharon McRoberts Attorney Domestic Relations Division 69 Washington St.Suite 700. CONTACT  312-603-0800.

 As you can see I've did everything I was supposed to do not once but three times and paid. JUDGE PAMELA ELIZABETH LOZA is treating me and my helpless daughter Kaylee unjust .I will not stop fighting for my daughter rights and custody.Kaylee my daughter needs her daughter so now. Legal actions have been filed by AARP, Judicial Review Board and Racial Discrimination .Violation of Civil Rights. On July 19,2015 at 9:30am.I will have my lawyer present this official intake assessment evaluation form.I went and got today stating everything .Sincerly, Petitoner Lee Oties Love Jr.

Tuesday, December 1, 2015


TERRORISM IN CHICAGO WORSE THAN EVER PART III OF III

THAT BECAUSE THIS IS A MACHINE DEMOCRAT CITY MANY SEEMS TO THINK AND ACCEPT RACIAL OPPRESSION TYRANNY IS THE NORM BECAUSE THE IRISH AND POLISH CONTROL EVERY ASPECT OF THE GOVERNMENT PUTTING BLACKS IN CHARGE IS FUTILE BECAUSE MANY OF THEM ARE WORSE THAN WHITES ADDRESSING RACIST ISSUES THEY ARE WHAT ALEX HALEY CALLED THEM IN ROOTS "HOUSE NIGGERS"

NOT ONE PERSON OF COLOR STOOD UP AND DENOUNCED THE RACIST ACTS PERPETRATED AT ME AND MY FAMILY THEY KEPT THEIR MOUTHS SHUT!

#JUDICIALCORRUPTION #JIMCROW #DEMOCRATICTERRORISM #CHIRAQ




A-    That because this matter is now before a judge with “Contempt Power” it is necessary to establish a precedent in the laws imposing applicable laws that would discourage and prohibit this area of Racial Genocide, Racial Apartheid ethnic cleansing of persons of color from Equal access to the laws and Public Housing, unlawful incarcerations by a racial majority seizing a City and legal system is why Remands are necessary with Body attachments;

B-   Petitioner served Rahm Emmanuel via Police Personnel, he ignored the issues simply because Black and Brown people lives simply don’t matter where racial Discrimination or Segregation is concerned,  Chicago Reader, Feb. 5, 2015, Steve Bogira and Mike Dumke, The Chicago agency charged with investigating complaints of housing discrimination is the Commission on Human Relations. In recent years, it has seldom punished landlords for discriminating racially. The commission's modest $1.9 million budget has grown yet more modest since Rahm Emanuel became mayor: he's cut it to $1.1 million. It's one of the things we would have liked to have discussed with him, but he declined to talk with us about segregation.

C-   That the Mayor’s true color on how he feels about people of color is indicative to how policies are enforced under his jurisdiction Racism and Racial Hatred is how Chicago is presently governed;

D-   That many blacks and certain Hispanics have excepted their roles as inferior people and have personified themselves as slaves allowing certain whites to live in a grandiose manner as “slave masters” or “tyrants” likened to Hitler making Chicago, Illinois a city that works if you are a racist or person of color with no backbone, the movie  Django starring Jamie Foxx depicting him as a free man is parallel today to the very Negroes applicable to this very case;
  
The Mis education of the Negroe, Carter G. Woodson 1933

“History shows that it does not matter who is in power or what revolutionary forces take over the government, those who have not learned to do for themselves and have to depend solely on others never obtain any more rights or privileges in the end than they had in the beginning.” 

“When you control a man's thinking you do not have to worry about his actions. You do not have to tell him not to stand here or go yonder. He will find his 'proper place' and will stay in it. You do not need to send him to the back door. He will go without being told. In fact, if there is no back door, he will cut one for his special benefit. His education makes it necessary.” 

10.)        That many Defendants white and Hispanic not racist and not a part of the political machine tried to help Plaintiff, stated “he needed a court order from a judge not connected because there are too many judges Burke owns and is involved and nobody wants to lose their job doing what is right to help you”

               A-) That because Ed Burke is the Finance Chairman and is responsible for who receives payment from the City, allegedly stated “As long as he is Chairman the Nigger referencing Petitioner will never be reinstated to CTA and receive his back wages” To this date no one has ever objected to the veracity of said assertions recorded in said affidavits.

          B-)   That Petitioner under the FBI’s directorship ascertained the necessary corroboration from every legal tribunal and State Agencies demonstrating and recording it in all affidavits how cases are fixed and judges are used as weapons of “Mass Destruction” against citizens of color as demonstrated in this matter attorneys are free to ask the Feds;

         C-) That all parties were properly noticed that the FBI was in fact receiving courtesy copies basically presented a middle finger to the Feds and every respected legal representative of the laws challenging them to exercise their authority and necessary force removing them from office, the FBI will not get involved directly until the case is disposed of because it is still a private civil matter;  

Section 2 (42 U.S.C.) In the House of Representatives.
        “Congressional Debate of the second section of the Ku Klux Klan Act was more extensive and enduring than that of Section 1; As originally presented, Sec. 2 made it a felony for any “two or more persons” to conspire to commit certain enumerated crimes “in violation of the rights and privileges, or immunities of any person, to which he is entitled under the Constitution and laws of the United States.
           “Throughout the debates, supporters of the Act made repeated references to the depredations of the Ku Klux Klan; Victims of these atrocities included not only blacks but white Republicans as well. The crimes that were perpetrated, therefore, were not viewed as isolated occurrences, but as part of an “Organized Conspiracy….Political in its origin and aims”, “crimes perpetrated by concert and agreement, by men in large numbers acting with a common purpose for the injury of a certain class of citizens entertaining certain political principles, id, at 457 (remarks of Rep. Coburn). See also e.g., id. At 437 (remarks of Rep. Cobb) (“None but Democrats belong or can belong to these societies”) et al.

           “Where these gangs of Assassins show themselves the rest of the people look on, if not with sympathy, at least with forbearance. The boasted courage of the South is not courage in their presence. Sheriffs, having eyes to see, see not; judges, having ears to hear, hear not; witnesses conceal the truth or falsify it; grand or petit juries act as if they might be accomplices. In the presence of these gangs all the apparatus and machinery of civil government, all the processes of justice, skulk away as if government and justice were crimes and feared detection. Among the most dangerous things an injured party can do is to appeal to justice. Of the uncounted scores and hundreds of atrocious mutilations and murders it is credibly stated that not one has been punished. Cong. Globe, supra note 2, app. At 78 (remarks of Rep. Perry). (“While murder is stalking abroad in disguise, while whippings and lynching’s and banishment have been visited upon unoffending American citizens, the local administrations have been found inadequate or unwilling to apply the proper corrective”) et al., …. And the State made no successful effort to bring the guilty to punishment or afford protection or redress to the outraged and innocent.”)    

     Fraud admissibility great latitude is permitted in proving fraud C.J.S. Fraud 104 ET Seg. Fraud 51-57. where a question of fraud and deceit is the issue involved in a case, great latitude is ordinarily permitted in the introduction of evidence, and courts allow the greatest liberality in the method of examination and in the scope of inquiry Vigus V. O’Bannon, 1886 8 N.E 788, 118 ILL 334. Hazelton V. Carolus, 1907 132 ILL. App. 512.
  
                INDUCING RELIANCE
To prevail in a cause of action for fraud, plaintiff must prove that defendant made statement of material nature which was relied on by victim and was made for purposes of inducing reliance, and that victim’s reliance led to his injury. Parsons V. Winter, 1986, 1 Dist., 491 N.E. 2d 1236, 96 ILL Dec. 776, 142 ILL App 3d 354, Appeal Denied.

     In Carter V. Mueller 457 N.E. 2d 1335 ILL. App. 1 Dist. 1983 The Supreme Court has held that: “The elements of a cause of action for fraudulent misrepresentation (sometimes referred to as “fraud and deceit” or deceit) are: (1) False statement of material fact; (2) known or believed to be false by the party making it; (3) intent to induce the other party to act; (4) action by the other party in reliance on the truth of the statement; and (5) damage to the other party resulting from such reliance.

Properly alleged facts within an affidavit that are not contradicted by counter affidavit are taken as true, despite the existence of contrary averments in the adverse party’s pleadings. Professional Group Travel, Ltd. v. Professional Seminar Consultants Inc., 136 ILL App 3d 1084, 483 N.E. 2d 1291; Buzzard v. Bolger, 117 ILL App 3d 887, 453 N.E. 2d 1129 et al.

            
 U. S Sup Court Digest 24(1) General Conspiracy

U.S. 2003. Essence of a conspiracy is an agreement to commit an unlawful act.—U.S. v. Jimenez Recio, 123 SCt. 819, 537 U.S. 270, 154 L.Ed.2d 744, on remand 371F.3d 1093

         Agreement to commit an unlawful act, which constitutes the essence of a conspiracy, is a distinct evil that exist and be punished whether or not the substantive crime ensues.-Id.
         Conspiracy poses a threat to the public over and above the threat of the commission of the relevant substantive crime, both because the combination in crime makes more likely the commission of other crimes and because it decreases the part from their path of criminality.-Id.
 
CONSPIRACY
Fraud maybe inferred from nature of acts complained of, individual and collective interest of alleged conspirators, situation, intimacy, and relation of parties at time of commission of acts, and generally all circumstances preceding and attending culmination of claimed conspiracy Illinois Rockford Corp. V. Kulp, 1968, 242 N.E. 2d 228, 41 ILL. 2d 215.
 
      Conspirators to be guilty of offense need not have entered into conspiracy at same time or have taken part in all its actions. People V. Hardison, 1985, 911 Dec. 162, 108. Requisite mens rea elements of conspiracy are satisfied upon showings of agreement of offense with intent that offense be committed; Actus reas element is satisfied of act in furtherance of agreement People V. Mordick, 1981, 50 ILL, Dec. 63

       Supreme Court Rule [137] provides in pertinent part:

            If a pleading, motion, or other paper is signed in violation of this Rule, the court, upon motion or upon its own initiative, may impose upon the person who signed it, a represented party, or both, an appropriate sanction, which may include an order to pay to the other party or parties the amount of reasonable expenses incurred because of the filling of the pleading, motion, or other paper, including a reasonable attorney fee. Not only will the courts consider an award of sanctions for active false statements: failures to disclose material facts to the court can also justify an award of sanctions.

BRUBAKKEN v. Morrison, No. 1-9-1670, 1992 Ill App. LEXIS 2144 (1st Dist. Dec. 30, 1992). Additionally, the fact that a false statement or omission is the result of an honest mistake is no defense to entry of a sanction. ID. To the extent that an individual lawyer has engaged in sanctionable conduct, that lawyer’s firm can also be jointly and severally liable with the lawyer.
  
11.)             That because of the Directed Evidence and admissions in the aforementioned recorded within Complainant is seeking all parties be REMANDED into CUSTODY Instanter regardless to their Racial Political Fraternal Affiliations for their respective roles in said Criminal Housing Conspiracies;
A-  That all parties have demonstrated in their respective roles that they are not capable of DISCHARGING their duties in accordance to the Laws of Professional Ethics, Rules of Illinois Supreme Court or United States Constitution with any integrity; therefore, a COURT’S ORDER is needed to MANDATE THE PARTIES TO act within their obligations;

                                     


                                       FURTHER AFFIANTH SAYETH NAUGHT

Under penalties as provided by law pursuant to 735 1265 5\1-109, the undersigned certifies that the statements set forth in this instrument are true and correct, except as to matters therein stated to be on information and belief and as to such matters, the undersigned certifies as aforesaid that he verily believes the same to be true.








                                                                                                                                   Respectfully Submitted

                                                                              Joe Louis Lawrence
                                                                                      Complainant                                                        
                                                                                        Counsel Pro se
















____________________________________________________________________
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT
OF
COOK COUNTY, ILLNOIS
CHANCERY DIVISION
)
In Re Racial Discrimination                          )                            2015 CH 01670
/Source Income Violations                            )
Housing Matters:                                           )                            Hon. F. U. Valderrama     
Joe Louis Lawrence                                      )                            Room 2305    
            Petitioner                                            )                                      
                                                                       )                      
            V
420 East Ohio, Chicago Housing Authority
345 East Ohio, City of Chicago, Commission on Human Relations,
K2 Apartments                                                                                             
           Respondents                                                                                                
 ________________________________________________________________________

In Accordance to all of The Cook County Circuit Court Rules

MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN SUPPORT OF THE RELIEF REQUESTED

            The canons of ethic in the Rules of Professional Conduct constitute a safe guide for professional conduct, and attorneys may be disciplined for not observing them. In re Himmel, 125 Ill.2d 531, 533 N.E.2d 790, 127 Ill. Dec 708 (1988). Although they represent the best thoughts of the organized bar, it has been held that these canons are non-enforceable other than through the disciplinary proceedings. Ettinger v. Rolewick, 140 Ill.App.3d 295, 488 N.E.2d 598, 94 Ill.Dec.599 (1st Dist. 1986). Disciplinary proceedings and sanctions are strictly within the province of the Supreme Court. Reed Yates Farms, Inc. v. Yates, 172 Ill.App.3d 519, 526 N.E2d 1115, 122 Ill. Dec 576 (4th Dist.), appeal denied, the Illinois Supreme Court, through its disciplinary arm, the Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission, is the only forum for exacting such punishment. Beale v. Edgemark Financial Corp., 297 Ill. App. 3d 999, 697 N.E.2d 820, 232 Ill. Dec. 78 (1st Dist. 1998). The ultimate authority to regulate and define the practice of law rests with the Supreme Court. Perto v. Board of Review, Illinois Department of Employment Security, 274 Ill. App.3d 485, 654 N.E.2d 232, 210 Ill. Dec. 933 (2d Dist.), appeal denied, 164 Ill. 2d 581 (1995).

Ethics
            All Illinois lawyers must be familiar with the Illinois Rules of Professional Conduct, and trail lawyers must be particularly familiar with the rules that apply specially to them.

            RPC 3.3, entitled “Conduct Before a Tribunal,” sets forth the standards to be followed by the trial lawyer during “battle.” Section (a) of that rule states:
(a)   In appearing in a professional capacity before a tribunal, a lawyer shall not:
(1)   make a statement of material fact or law to a tribunal which the lawyer knows or reasonably should know is false;

(2)   fail to disclose to a tribunal a material fact known to the lawyer when disclosure is necessary to avoid assisting a criminal or fraudulent act by the client;

(3)   fail to disclose to the tribunal legal authority in the controlling jurisdiction known to the lawyer to be directly adverse to the position of the client and not disclosed by opposing counsel;

(4)   Offer evidence that the lawyer knows to be false. If a lawyer has offered material evidence and comes to know of its falsity, the lawyer shall take reasonable remedial measures;

(5)   participate in the creation or preservation of evidence when the lawyer knows or reasonably should know the evidence is false ;

(6)   counsel or assist the client in conduct the lawyer knows to be illegal of fraudulent;

(7)   engage in other illegal conduct or conduct in violation of these Rules;

(8)   fail to disclose the identities of the clients represented and of the persons who employed the lawyer unless such information is privileged or irrelevant;

(9)   intentionally degrade a witness or other person by stating or alluding to personal facts concerning that person which are not relevant to the case;

(10) in trial, allude to any matter that the lawyer does not reasonably believe is relevant or that will not be supported by admissible evidence, assert personal knowledge of facts in issue except when testifying as a witness, or state a personal opinion as to the justness of a cause, the credibility of a witness, the culpability of a civil litigant or the guilt or innocence of and accused, but a lawyer may argue, on analysis of evidence, for any position or conclusion with respect to the matter stated herein;


Acts constituting direct, criminal contempt
          A wide variety of acts may constitute a direct, criminal contempt. And act may be criminal contempt even though it is also an indictable crime. Beattie v. People, 33 Ill. App 651, 1889 WL 2373 (1st Dist. 1889). As is making false representations to the court. People v. Katelhut, 322 Ill. App. 693, 54 N.E.2d 590 (1st Dist. 1944). Misconduct of an officer of the court is punishable as contempt. People ex rel. Rusch v. Levin, 305 Ill. App. 142, 26 N.E. 2d 895 (1st Dist. 1939).

Official misconduct is a criminal offense; and a public officer or employee commits misconduct, punishable by fine, imprisonment, or both, when, in his official capacity, he intentionally or recklessly fails to perform any mandatory duty as required by law; or knowingly performs an act which he knows he is forbidden by law to perform; or with intent to obtain a personal advantage for himself or another, he performs an act in excess of his lawful authority ….S.H.A. Ch 38 33-3.

False statements
            Censure was recommended sanction for attorney who engaged in conduct involving dishonesty, made statement of material fact or law to tribunal which she knew or reasonably should have known to be false, and failed to disclose to tribunal a material fact known to her when disclosure was necessary to avoid assisting criminal or fraudulent at by client, given that attorney’s misconduct was not result of dishonest or corrupt motive, but of misguided attempt to accommodate clients.   99 Ill.Atty.Reg. & Disc.Comm. SH11
            Three-year suspension was recommended sanction for attorney who engaged in conduct involving dishonesty and fraud, made statement of material fact to tribunal which he knew or reasonably should have known was false, and offered evidence that he knew to be false and failed to take reasonable remedial measures. 96 Ill.Atty.Reg. & Disc.Comm. SH 358.
            Disbarment was recommended sanction for attorney who engaged in conduct involving dishonesty, made false statements of material fact or law to tribunal which she knew were false and engaged in conduct which tended to defeat administration of justice.  95 Ill Atty.Reg. & Disc.Comm. CH 877.
            Censure was recommended sanction for attorney who made statements of material fact or law known was false, and engaged in conduct which was prejudicial to the administration of justice. 95 Ill Atty.Reg. & Disc.Comm. CH 504
          One-year suspension was recommended sanction for attorney who made statement of material fact which he knew was false in appearing in professional capacity before tribunal, made a statement of material fact which he knew to be false in course of representing client, and engaged in conduct involving dishonesty.  95 Ill Atty.Reg. & Disc.Comm. CH 191.
            Disbarment was recommended sanction for attorney who engaged in serious misconduct by making misrepresentation during his divorce proceedings and who was a recidivist.   94 Ill.Atty.Reg. & Disc.Comm. SH469

Fraud on court
            Two-year suspension, retroactive to beginning of interim suspension, was recommended sanction for attorney who made statement of material fact or law to tribunal which lawyer knew or reasonably should have known to be false, instituted criminal charges as prosecutor when he knew or reasonably should have known that charges were not supported by probable cause, committed criminal act that reflected adversely upon lawyer ‘s honesty, trustworthiness, or fitness as lawyer, engaged in conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit, or misrepresentation, engaged in conduct prejudicial to administration of justice, and engaged in conduct which tended to bring courts or legal profession into disrepute.  96 Ill. Atty. Reg. & Disc. Comm. CH 118. 
   
WHEREFORE the aforementioned reasons Respondent respectfully Prays for the Relief

1.)  For an Order Remanding all attorneys related Respondents found in Contempt who did not report any improprieties to proper authorities demonstrating their non- involvement in Civil Rights Violations, Terrorist Acts et al.

2.)  Pursuant to Smith V. Wade, 461 U.S. 30, 35. 103 S. Ct. 1625, 1629 75 L Ed 2d 632 (1983) that because of the noted depraved acts of all parties For an Order to pay PUNITIVE damages of $25 Million Dollars to the Petitioner and bond be set for all parties from the above demand;
  
3.)  For an Order Recommending a Special Prosecutor outside of States Attorney Anita Alvarez, Attorney General Lisa Madigan jurisdiction (more importantly attorney Kent Stephan Ray who committed numerous Civil Rights violations as General attorney of the CTA is now a States Attorney; Attorney General Lisa Madigan, when confronted with numerous documents alleging “FRAUD on numerous Judges and States Attorneys her reply, “The Civil Rights Bureau of the Attorney General is in receipt of the correspondence you delivered to our offices on 10/26/06. Unfortunately, your file was closed because we do not have jurisdiction over child support related matters”); outside of States Attorney Anita Alvarez, Attorney General Lisa Madigan’s jurisdiction due to the political influence involved and them ignoring the criminal acts perpetrated by “Powerful” White Men in authority; due to Murder of brother (Timothy D. Lawrence) a City employee of 17 years;

4.)  For an Order Compelling Defendants to provide documentation of all persons living in the named units that excluded the Petitioner a 3 bedroom voucher;  


5.)  For an Order issuing an Injunction against the City of Chicago, Commission on Human Relations to ascertain the number of cases “Fixed” that were disposed of without signatures or dismissed;    

6.)  For an Order seeking Federal Jurisdiction in the applicable statutes prohibiting the Respondent CHA from removing any families from the Voucher program and reinstate all families who were removed during the last years Petitioner complained of Racial Housing Discrimination that went ignored;

7.)  For an Order Imposing Sanctions against all attorneys and law firms to absorb any and all attorney fees and costs for the prosecution and enforcement of these matters;

8.)  For an Order auditing all tenants for ZRS Management, Riverstone Management and K2 Management and the Streeter to determine the ethnicity of all tenants with vouchers and income criteria with said vouchers;

9.)  For an Order Remanding every Party complicit in said Criminal Conspiratory acts ignoring and covering-up said unlawful acts of all parties and participants at the City of Chicago, Commission on Human Relations responsible for mailing fraudulent documents to Petitioner ;

10.)     For an Order Compelling  all Parties to appear before a Court with jurisdiction to determine who should be REMANDED into Custody for their part in said Terrorist Conspiracies perpetrated at Plaintiff;

11.)     For the entry of an Order awarding to your Respondent for such other relief and any other relief necessary as equity may require of which this court may deem overwhelmingly just;

12.)     For an Order Remanding all CHA & related Respondents Section 8 employees who had knowledge and closed their eyes to said injustices or persons in authority absorb any and all related expenses costs relating to Plaintiff vacating home which was an abandoned building CHA paid an illegal person money who never owned the property and Judge Scully was involved as an attorney and Judge Leonard Murray had Sheriff to break into home locking Plaintiff out 10058 South Vernon Instanter and being homeless, and has no income and is on welfare receiving FOOD STAMPS only due to said parties RETALIATING and OPPRESSING him and family EXHAUSTING TERRORISTS TACTICS PLACING HIM IN THAT STATE;
Pursuant to Smith V. Wade, 461 U.S. 30, 35. 103 S. Ct. 1625, 1629 75 L Ed 2d 632 (1983) that because of the noted depraved acts of all parties pay punitive damages, of $30 Million Dollars Appellant and family has endured in these matters;
  

13.)     For an Order REVERSING the Commission’s order for failing to follow Supreme Court rules and procedures;

14.)     For an Order Imposing Sanctions Fining CHA and all attorneys and law firms $20,000.00 - $30, 000.00 day until Appellant receives his law license and is admitted to the bar.

15.)     Prohibit any Attorney from delaying prosecution of this matter with frivolous continuances due to Plaintiff and family suffering behind said acts;

16.)     For an Order Remanding every Party and attorneys disbarring them complicit in said Criminal Conspiratory acts ignoring and covering-up said unlawful acts of all parties;

17.)     For an Order Compelling  all Parties to appear before a Court or Grand Jury to determine who should be INDICTED for their part in said Conspiracy;

18.)     For an Order Appointing an Independent Examiner to ascertain all persons removed from the CHA section 8 program in the last 4 years where the City of Chicago, Human Relations Commission and Hearing Officers under CHA’s authority dismissed their complaints unlawfully;

19.)     For the entry of an Order awarding to your Appellant for such other relief and any other relief necessary as equity may require of which this court may deem overwhelmingly just;

20.)     For an Order removing Judge Franklin Ulysses Valderrama from presiding over said matter for his role in threatening the Plaintiff and applicable charges filed before the Judicial Inquiry Board and ascertain the identity of the person responsible for calling A. R. Leak Oct. 3, saying the family cancelled the Memorial Service which was a lie! Fining 420 East Ohio, City of Chicago ,K2 apartments, 345 East Ohio, CHA et al  $20,000.00 - $30,000.00 a day to the City of Chicago until Plaintiff is expeditiously housed;

21.)     Prohibit any Attorney from delaying prosecution of this matter with frivolous continuances due to Plaintiff and family suffering behind said acts;

22.)     For an Order Remanding every Party complicit in said Criminal Terrorist Conspiratory acts ignoring and covering-up said unlawful acts of all parties because of the ethnicity of Plaintiff skin color; (Black and Brown lives don’t matter)

23.)     For an Order Compelling  all Parties to appear before a Court with jurisdiction to determine who should be REMANDED into Custody for their part in said Murder Conspiracies of brother (city employee Timothy David Lawrence);

24.)     For the entry of an Order awarding to your Plaintiff for such other relief and any other relief necessary as equity may require of which this court may deem overwhelmingly just;

Under penalties as provided by law pursuant to 735 1265 5\1-109, the undersigned certifies that the statements set forth in this instrument are true and correct, except as to matters therein stated to be on information and belief and as to such matters, the undersigned certifies as aforesaid that he verily believes the same to be true.

                                                                                                                                   Respectfully Submitted

                                                                              Joe Louis Lawrence
                                                                                      Complainant                                                        
                                                                                        Counsel Pro se































IN THE CIRCUIT COURT
OF
COOK COUNTY, ILLNOIS
CHANCERY DIVISION
                                                                )
In Re Racial Discrimination                          )                            2015 CH 01670
/Source Income Violations                            )
Housing Matters:                                           )                            Hon. F. U. Valderrama     
Joe Louis Lawrence                                      )                            Room 2305     
            Plaintiff                                               )                                      
                                                                       )                     
            V                                                        )        
420 East Ohio, Chicago Housing Authority  )
345 East Ohio, City of Chicago, Commission)
 On Human Relations, K2 Apt.                      )                                                       
           Defendants                                           )                                                        
________________________________________________________________________
                           
                                                     NOTICE OF FILING                                
    YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED that on Nov. 30, 2015, Plaintiff has filed a 2nd Amended Complaint Request for Review due to “Fraud” & Terrorist Acts et al. …. w/Affidavit.
   
 Commander & Chief                            Attorney General of United States
President Barack Obama                                 Loretta Lynch
The White House                           U.S. Department of Justice
1600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW            950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20500                         Washington, DC 20530-0001

Chief Judge Timothy Evans                              Judge Moshe Jacobius
50 West Washington, Suite 2600                           50 West Washington, Suite 2403
Chicago, Illinois 60601                                          Chicago, Ill. 60601

 Judge Mary Lane Mikva                                   Clerk of Circuit Court, Dorothy Brown
50 West Washington, Suite                                    50 West Washington, Suite 1000
Chicago, Ill 60601                                                 Chicago, Ill. 60601

Atty. Gen, Lisa Madigan                                     Asst. Atty. Gen Tyler Roland
100 West Randolph, Suite 1200                              100 West Randolph, Suite 1200
Chicago, Ill. 60601                                                  Chicago, Ill. 60601

States Attorney, Anita Alvarez, Daley Center, Chg. Ill. 60601
Sec of State                                                  Asst Deputy Dir. Candace Cheffin

Asst Gen Counsel Terrence McConville     60 East Van Buren, 8th floor
100 West Randolph, Suite 500                       Chicago, Ill. 60601
Chicago, Ill. 60601      

CHA Mobility                                             CHA Mobility, HCP Counselors
Chris Klepper, Executive Dir.                     Tracey Robinson/Joann Harris
28 East Jackson Blvd.                                    4859 S. Wabash, Suite 2nd Floor 
Chicago, Ill 60604                                          Chicago, Ill. 60615    
                                                                   
CHA Mobility, Real Estate Specialist               Recorder of Deeds
Jessie McDaniel                                                    Karen Yarbrough
4859 S. Wabash                                                     118 N. Clark, Room 120
Chicago, Ill. 60615                                                  Chicago, Ill. 60602

City of Chicago, Department of Buildings       Sabre Investments
Christopher Lynch                                               120 West Madison Street
121 North LaSalle, Room 900                                Chicago, Ill 60601
Chicago, Ill. 60601

Seyfarth & Shaw
Anne D. Harris, Jeffrey K. Ross, Kyle A. Petersen, Suite 2400
131 South Dearborn
Chicago, IL. 60603

Chicago Housing Authority
Office of the General Counsel, Maria Sewell Joseph, Thomas B. King
60 East Van Buren
Chicago, IL. 60605

Cary G. Schiff & Associates                   Gordon & Rees LLP
Christopher R. Johnson, Yuleida Joy        Lindsay Watson, Christian T. Novay
134 N. LaSalle Street, Suite 1720             1 North Franklin, Suite 800
Chicago, Ill. 60602                                    Chicago, Illinois 60606

Stephan R. Patton, Mary E. Reuther, Rey A. Phillip Santos
Corp Counsel, Deputy Corp. Counsel, Asst Corp Counsel
30 N. LaSalle Street, Suite 800
Chicago, Ill 60602

Wilson Elser Moskowitz Edelman & Dicker LLP
Christian Novay
55 West Monroe, Street, Suite 3800
Chicago, Ill. 60603
Jessica Mallon, Gen Counsel CHA                    Roy Martinez Manager 420 East Ohio
60 East Van Buren                                                  420 East Ohio
Chicago, Ill 60601                                                   Chicago, Ill. 60611


Eve Aywaz, Sales Consultant                                   Sarah Aredia, Leasing Consultant
345 East Ohio                                                        420 East Ohio
Chicago, Ill. 60611                                                   Chicago, Ill. 60611  

John-Paul Loseto, Executive Manager                    
345 East Ohio                                                      Leo High School Terra London 
Chicago, Ill. 60611                                                  7901 S. Sangamon
                                                                                Chicago, Ill. 60620                                                                                                                   
Courtesy Copies:

 US Attorney                                            FBI Robert J. Holley
 Zachary T. Fardon                                2111 West Roosevelt Road
219 S. Dearborn, 5th floor                         Chicago, Ill. 60612
Chicago, Ill 60604
                                                       Superintendent of Police
                                                                        Garry F. McCarthy
Hon Judge Neil Cohen                           3510 S. Michigan
50 West Washington, Suite 2308                Chicago, Ill 60653
Chicago, Ill 60601

Mayor                                            Deputy Regional Adm., Field Office Dir.
Rahm Emanuel                                       Beverly E. Bishop
City Hall                                              77 West Jackson Boulevard
Chicago, Ill. 60601                              Chicago, Ill. 60604

Governor                                                 Hon Mark Kirk                                
525 South 8th St.                                       607 East Adams, Suite 1520
Springfield, Ill. 62703                               Springfield, Ill. 62701
                                                                    
Bruce Rauner                                           Media Personnel  
100 West Randolph
Chicago, Ill. 60601

Cook County President                               Cook County Sheriff
Toni Preckwinkle                                            Thomas J. Dart
118 N. Clark, Room 517                         Richard J. Daley Center, Room 701
Chicago, Ill. 60602                                        Chicago, Ill. 60602

Hon Dick Durbin                                 Hearing Officer CHA
525 South 8th St.                                       Frederick Bates
Springfield, Ill. 62703                           60 East Van Buren, Suite 900
                                                                Chicago, Ill. 60605




Father Pfleger                                         Alderman David Moore 17th ward
St. Sabina                                                  Chicago, IL. 60620
1210 West 78th Pl.
Chicago, IL. 60620

Alderman Ed Burke
2650 West 51st Street 302
Chicago, Il 60632



CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned hereby certifies that the above notice and all attachments were caused to be personally delivered, emailed or via facsimile or deposited in the U.S. mail to the above parties at the addresses provided before 5:00 pm on Nov. 30, 2015.




                   PLEASE BE ADVISED that on Nov. 30, 2015 said 2nd Amended Complaint with the attachments was mailed, emailed hand delivered to all parties recorded in said notice via regular mail.


                                                                         _________________________________
                                                                                Joe Louis Lawrence, Counsel Pro Se












Name              Joe Louis Lawrence
Attorney for   Pro Se
Address          P.O. Box 490075
City, State       Chicago, Illinois 60649-0075
Phone              (312) 927-4210
Email               joelouislaw@yahoo.com

Twitter             @joelouis7