Wikipedia Racial Injustice in Chicago Courts

Search results

Wednesday, April 25, 2018


CHICAGO DEMOCRATS ESPOUSES TERRORISTS HATE AT PERSONS OF COLOR SURPASSING HUMAN IMAGINATION NO REPUBLICANS EVER ATTEMPTED:

THIS CASE DEMONSTRATES WHAT COLORED PEOPLE ARE WILLING TO DO TO BE ACCEPTED BY MEMBERS OF THE TERRORIST POLITICAL DEMOCRATIC MACHINE.

FOR STARTERS IN MANY INSTANCES THE BLACK MAN IS THE NEW BLACK WOMAN THAT ARE INTERTWINED IN THESE DIABOLICAL ACTS; MOREOVER, IT IS UNFATHOMABLE AS TO WHY IS IT WHEN BLACK MEN ARE GAY AND IS SLEEPING WITH WHITE MEN THEY VERY VERY RUDE AND NASTY?

IN THIS CASE THEIR ARE SO MANY MEN AS JUDGES AND CITY OFFICIALS WHO HAPPENS TO HAVE WIVES AND CHILDREN ARE LIVING IN THE CLOSET ENGAGING IN SOME OF THE PSYCHOTIC ACTS EVER RECORDED.

 NOT ONE MAN INVOLVED IN THESE ACTS TOOK A STAND AND ADMONISHED ANYONE FOR THE FOREGOING, IN THAT THEY HAVE ADMITTED EVERYTHING PROPERLY ASSERTED IN THE POST DATED DECEMBER 12, 2017.

CHICAGO DEMOCRATS DO NOT WANT ANY MEN OF COLOR TO WORK PROVIDE FOR THEIR FAMILIES IN ANY CAPACITY IN THAT MANY OF THE MALES IN POWER WHO HAPPENS TO BE BLACK, NEGROID, AFRICAN AMERICAN ARE SADLY SOME OF THE WORSE JUDGES ANYBODY OF COLOR WOULD EVER WANT TO GO BEFORE AND THE BLACK WOMAN IS NEXT.

WHEN ANY ETHNIC GROUP READ THIS THEY CAN NOW UNDERSTAND WHY CHICAGO IS A CITY FILLED WITH HATE AND DESPAIR AND NOT A PLACE TO REAR ANY FAMILY OF COLOR LET THIS CASE SERVE AS AN EXAMPLE AND LESSON ON INNOCENT MEN OF COLOR ARE CRIMINALIZED OR WORSE CASE SCENARIOS HOW THEY LANGUISH IN PRISONS FOR A MULTIPLE NUMBER OF YEARS BEFORE DNA FINALLY EXCLUDE THEM OF ANY CRIMES ACCUSED OF.

THIS CASE IS VERY SIMILAR TO WHAT @Redbilla Lee Oties Love, Jr. EXPERIENCED WITH JUDGE LOZA IN THAT, SHE ACTED LIKE A MALE OPPRESSOR REALIZING NOBODY HAD ENOUGH INTEGRITY OR TESTICLES TO ADMONISH HER FOR HER RACIST TRESPASSING ACTS UPON HIM.

THE ONLY DIFFERENCE HERE IS THAT EVERY JUDGE WHO HAVE TRESPASSED UPON THE LAWS AND HAS RECEIVED THEIR APPOINTMENTS ALLEGEDLY SLEPT WITH THE RIGHT PRESIDING JUDGE OR POLITICIAN, ALLEGEDLY PAID$20,000.00 + TO ED BURKES CAMPAIGN OR OTHER DESIGNATED POLITICAL CAMPAIGN.

JUDGES LIKE VALDERRAMA HAPPENS TO BE TOTALLY IGNORANT NOT WORTHY OF WEARING A BLACK ROBE IN ANY CAPACITY UNLESS IT IS A BATHROBE

ALLEGEDLY, VALDERRAMA WAS INFORMED ON HOW TO HANDLE MY CASE, HE ASSURED THEM HE COULD TAKE CAR OF ME .

THE LAST TIME A BLACK JUDGE SAID THEY COULD HANDLE ME WAS ASSOCIATE JUDGE MORGAN HAMILTON WHO WAS PERMANENTLY ASSIGNED AS AN ASSOCIATE BY BURKE.

THE CHOICE WAS BETWEEN JEANNE BERNSTEIN WHO DID'NT REALLY CARE FOR HISPANICS AT AL AND MORGAN HAMILTON STATED LOUDLY IN FRONT OF DEPUTIES AND OTHER JUDGES "YALL STILL HAVING PROBLEMS WITH THAT NIGGER? GIVE HIM TO ME"

KEEP IN MIND A MOTION FOR DISQUALIFICATION OF JUDGE BOYD WAS ON THE TABLE (WHO CAME WELL RECOMMENDED BY ONE OF THE MOST INTELLECTUAL MEN IN LAW WITH IMPECCABLE INTEGRITY JAMES MONTGOMERY) BOYD WAS MY ATTORNEY WHEN ALL OF THE CROOKED SHIT WAS GOING ON DEFENDED ME WELL BUT ALL OF SUDDEN STOPPED AND WAS APPOINTED JUDGE ACTED LIKE HE DID NOT KNOW ME TRIED TO KEEP ME FROM HAVING CUSTODY OF MY CHILDREN WHERE MY EX WIFE HAD A HISTORY OF MENTAL DEPRESSION AFFECTING THE CHILDREN.   

MY CAUCASIAN COLLEAGUES TOLD ME THEIR IS NOT ONE BLACK JUDGE YOU MAY THINK IS A BROTHER OR ANY IRISH JUDGE WILL EVER RULE IN YOUR FAVOR, THEY WERE ABSOLUTELY CORRECT, I HAVE NEVER HAD ANY SUCCESS FROM ANY BLACK DEMOCRATIC JUDGE MALE OR FEMALE NOT EVEN DOROTHY BROWN AS THE CLERK WHO KNEW THE PATERNITY CASE WAS BOGUS.

IF A DIVIDED HOUSE CAN NOT STAND, HOW CAN A DOUBLE MINDED MAN MARRIED TO A WOMAN WITH A FAMILY HAVE A MAN ON THE SIDE AND SLEEP WITH HIM AS LONG AS HE IS IN A RELATIONSHIP WITH HIS WIFE?

HOW CAN THESE TYPE OF MEN BE IN POWER ADMONISH ANYONE ENGAGED IN TRESPASSING ACTS OF TREASON WHEN THEY ARE LIVING A LIE?

BECAUSE CROOK COUNTY IS GOVERNED BY A MILITIA LIVING IN THE CLOSET AS THE LAWS STATE WHEN A JUDGE VIOLATES HIS OATH HE BECOMES AND IS ACTING AS A "PRIVATE CITIZEN" A THUG, A HOODLUM IN A ROBE, TERRORIST--BECAUSE NOBODY OBJECTED OR DENIED ANYTHING THAT WAS PROPERLY RECORDED, THEY HAVE ADMITTED ALL PLEADINGS AS BEING TRUE AND IS HOPING THAT THIS CASE NOT LAND IN THE HANDS OF A QUALIFIED HETEROSEXUAL WITH IMPECCABLE INTEGRITY TO RECOGNIZE THE TYPE OF FRATERNAL INDIVIDUALS THAT ARE INVOLVED.

MANY THANKS TO EVERYONE ON TWITTER FOR YOUR SUPPORT AND RETWEETS, MANY THANKS TO ALL OF THE MEMBERS OF LAW ENFORCEMENT, COOK COUNTY SHERIFFS AND CLERKS UNDER THE JURISDICTION OF DOROTHY BROWN LAST BUT DEFINITELY NOT LEAST THOSE JUDGES WHO SURPRISINGLY BELIEVED IN ME AND APPLIED THE LAWS IN MY FAVOR NOT JUDGING MY SKIN COLOR.

I WANT TO PERSONALLY THANK THE STATES ATTORNEYS AND DETECTIVES ON AN ADMIRABLE JOB BRINGING THE CASE TOGETHER ON THE BROTHERS RESPONSIBLE FOR KILLING MY BROTHER TIMOTHY DAVID LAWRENCE (CITY EMPLOYEE).       

 IN THE 
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
EASTERN DIVISION

 Joe Louis Lawrence                                                      Civil Action #16 CV 7434

                                                                                       Hon:  Robert M. Dow, Jr. 
  Plaintiff

    V

420 East Ohio, Chicago Housing Authority  
345 East Ohio, K2 Apartments, City of Chicago,
Commission on Human Relations Supreme Court
 of Illinois, Alderman Edward Burke,                           
 Franklin U. Valderrama, Mary Lane Mikva                                    

 Defendants
                                                                                                                                                                                               
MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE w/AFFIDAVIT
   Now comes Petitioner, Joe Louis Lawrence, Counsel Pro Se in this cause respectfully represents to this court the reasons and files herewith his Affidavit in support of Motion for Summary Judgment et al;



                                                                 Respectfully Submitted,

By:   _________________         


                                                                            Joe Louis Lawrence
                                                                                                        Counsel Pro Se
                                                                                                       P. O. Box 490075
                                                                                                        312 965-6455
                                                                                               Joelouis565@yahoo.com
                                                                                                    @joelouis7




                                                               IN THE 
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
                                               EASTERN DIVISION

                                                         AFFIDAVIT
                                                                                                                                                               
IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE w/AFFIDAVIT


1.    I am Joe Louis Lawrence, Counsel Pro Se, Petitioner in this cause, being first duly sworn on oath deposes and states, as follows;

2.      That on December 18, 2017 Judge Robert M. Dow, Jr. entered a “Minute Order” hereto attached, “Plaintiff’s motion to reinstate the case is taken under advisement. The court will issue a ruling by mail after it has taken an opportunity to review the motion and the prior history of the case, …..et al. Notice of motion date of 12/21/2017 is stricken and no appearances are necessary on that date.”

3.      That pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure RULE 8 (1) In General. In responding to a pleading, a party must:
(A) State in short and plain terms its defenses to each claim asserted against it; and
(B)  Admit or Deny the allegations asserted against it by an opposing party.

(2) Denials—Responding to the Substance. A denial must fairly respond to the substance of the allegation.
(3) General and Specific Denials. A party that intends in good faith to deny all the allegations of a pleading—including the jurisdictional grounds—may do so by a general denial. A party that does not intend to deny all the allegations must either specifically deny designated allegations or generally deny all except those specifically admitted.
(4) Denying Part of an Allegation. A party that intends in good faith to deny only part of an allegation must admit the part that is true and deny the rest.
(5) Lacking Knowledge or Information. A party that lacks knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief about the truth of an allegation must so state, and the statement, has the effect of a denial.
(6) Effect of Failing to Deny. An allegation –other than one relating to the amount of damages –is admitted if a responsive pleading is required and the allegation is not denied. If a responsive pleading is not required an allegation is considered denied or avoided.
      
4.      That said Defendants Defaulted in the same like manner in the Cook County Court and relied on a Negroe judge inferior in nature to “Trespass upon the Laws” and commit all sorts of infamous crimes, trying to save the perpetrators guilty of Housing Discrimination and Voucher Discrimination along with various acts of Civil Rights violations hereto attached, Brief before the Seventh Circuit filed March 14, 2018;  (Lee Oties Love, Jr. v Supreme Court of IL. Et al.)
A-    Said Brief unequivocally demonstrate the magnitude African American Democrats are willing to do to destroy their own ethnic group so as to be accepted by “White Nationalist” controlling the Democratic party “Political Machine” by embracing “Jim Crow Laws” by denying any and all claims put before the courts by persons of color against Caucasian racist Irish and other Democrats. 

B-    That no Defendant denied or responded to the merits of the Brief at the time of this Motion being filed validating the verity of all acts by members of the Democratic Political Machine in it’s entirety.

5.      That under the authority of Alderman Edward Burke he has recruited Ronald Bartkowicz former CTA workman’s compensation attorney to “Trespass upon the Laws” in that said judge issued a Bogus warrant against the Petitioner on a Bogus paternity case where he was unlawfully arrested his CTA Badge was removed from his body so as to protect the racist individuals responsible for stealing his wages while off work injured on duty where a drunk police officer totaled his van on Petitioners bus while he was standing still;
A-    Hereto attached, per subpoena Cook County judge not connected to the Democratic Machine of Racist and inferior Terrorists ordered the production of said CTA records, demonstrating Petitioner still being a CTA employee;

B-    That because ATU 241 Secretary Michael Simmons was having and alleged intimate relationship with former Chief attorney Kent Stephan Ray and other men in the closet of the union obstructed his reinstatement, in that no heterosexual man of any competent or erect authority demonstrated any integrity only total impotency at the Petitioner for taking a stand at so many of them in their cowardly fraternal order;  
 
6.      That under the authority of Alderman Edward Burke he recruited the other aforementioned judges David Haracz, Timothy P. Murphy, see unlawful1.blogspot.com Chronology of Unlawful Contempt Charges by the Democratic Political Machine, August 30, 2012, demonstrating how racist Democrats “Trespass upon the Laws” engaging in “Treason.”

7.      That because so many black men Negroe or African American are the new black women for these Cacausion men with wives and children none of them opened their mouths; moreover, there is a person in prominent authority been married to his wife for 10, 20 or 30 years had a man in his life almost the same time of his marriage so it is these type of individuals who are not at all what they appear to be but is using their political, racist and sexual cowardice at the Petitioner for being what he was born to be a man, a man’s man.

8.      Allegedly, Edward Burke had Judge John T. Carr to aid and assist his ex-wife by having the court reporter to allegedly leave the court as he aided her by allowing her to manufacture allegations of domestic abuse on his children DCFS got involved asserting he was a black belt in martial arts using it to discipline his children, by her going along with these sick acts she was promised welfare in her name. (none of it was true) they tried getting the Police involved “Desk Sargent   told DCFS not to bring that shit back up in here!”
A-    To further amplify the horrors of hate Edward Burke and his regime of judges using their robes to “Trespass upon the Laws” Petitioner was taking his family to family psychiatrist at least 2 and 3 times a week behind the episodes of what he was going through in the courts.

9.      Allegedly, Edward Burke and other Democrats incur profits off of judges “Trespassing upon the laws” where injustice is present, in that, hereto attached, Monthly Billing Statement of Child Support Account, manufactured by the Illinois Dept. of Healthcare and Family Services asserting Petitioner owes $228.00 on a case Democratic Judges have used their robes as “Private Citizens” aiding and abetting in “Treason” and a plethora of diabolical criminal conspiracies seeking money in an unlawful manner.
A-    “Private Citizen” Valderrama having cognizance of the plethora of criminal acts of what other judges engaged in against the Petitioner demonstrated untouchable arrogance because nothing happened to the other judges, thought he could profit off the Petitioner but what he was too ignorant to realize none of the judges signed any court orders on the 88 D 079012 case, he has signed every court order and has agreed to everything by not denying anything.
      
Defendants have not raised any affirmative defenses.

Summary judgment is appropriate when the pleadings, depositions, admissions and affidavits, viewed in a light most favorable to the movant or non-movant fail to establish a genuine issue of material fact, thereby    
1.      Entitling the moving party to judgment as a matter of law.

The purpose of summary judgment is not to try a question of fact, but simply to                 
Determine whether one exists.

When the party moving for summary judgment supplies evidentiary facts which,
 If not contradicted, would entitle him to judgment, the opposing party cannot
 Rely upon his complaint or answer alone to raise issues of material fact. A counter
 Affidavit is necessary to refute evidentiary facts properly asserted by affidavit
 Supporting the motion or else the facts are deemed admitted.

Here, Plaintiff has supplied affidavits, Certified Court transcripts and other evidentiary material that establishes all of the elements necessary to entitle it to recovery under the parties’ agreements, including the amount of damages. Defendants have failed to submit any evidence in opposition to the Motion or Order to raise any genuine issues of material fact. Thus summary judgment is proper.

Under Federal law which is applicable to all states, the U.S. Supreme Court stated that if a court is "without authority, its judgments and orders are regarded as nullities. They are not voidable, but simply void; and form no bar to a recovery sought, even prior to a reversal in opposition to them. They constitute no justification; and all persons concerned in executing such judgments or sentences, are considered, in law, as trespassers." Elliot v. Piersol, 1 Pet. 328, 340, 26 U.S. 328, 340 (1828)
When judges act when they do not have jurisdiction to act, or they enforce a void order (an order issued by a judge without jurisdiction), they become trespassers of the law, and are engaged in treason (see below).
The U.S. Supreme Court, in Scheuer v. Rhodes, 416 U.S. 232, 94 S. Ct. 1683, 1687 (1974) stated that "when a state officer acts under a state law in a manner violative of the Federal Constitution, he "comes into conflict with the superior authority of that Constitution, and he is in that case stripped of his official or representative character and is subjected in his person to the consequences of his individual conduct. The State has no power to impart to him any immunity from responsibility to the supreme authority of the United States." [Emphasis supplied in original].
By law, a judge is a state officer as in this case Federal officers.
The judge then acts not as a judge, but as a private individual (in his person).



             FURTHER AFFIANT SAYETH NOT

                                                                            Joe Louis Lawrence

                                                                           __________________
                                                                                                        Counsel Pro Se
                                                                                                       P. O. Box 490075
                                                                                         312 965-6455
                                                                                               joelouislaw@yahoo.com
                                                                                          @joelouis7


                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            
                                                                                                                                      
WHEREFORE the aforementioned reasons Plaintiff respectfully Prays for the Relief


1.    For an Order  Granting Summary Judgment Instanter.

2.    For an Order issuing a Rule to Show Cause Remanding Franklin U. Valderrama into Custody Instanter.

3.    For an Order appointing a Special Prosecutor who understands the jurisdiction of their profession to investigate and ascertain all other parties complicit in these Terrorist Treason Offenses of all cases noted within;

4.    For an Order staying any and all legal enforcements of all parties noted within due to the plethora of Felonies enacted by “Private Citizens” perpetrating roles as judges Trespassing upon the Laws”

5.    For an Order on bond be not less than one million dollars for any and all parties charged in these crimes in warring against the United States Constitution.

6.    For an Order removing the Chief Judge of Cook County and Presiding judges of all Circuits who as Public Servants failed to investigate remove or report any judge in accordance to their oath and Public Duty.

7.    For an Order setting a Hearing Date for all attorneys who sat by in an idle manner and did not exercise his or her duties pursuant to the Ethics of R.P.C 3.3 and speak up or report the terrorist acts perpetrated by “Private Citizens” violating their oaths as judges.

8.    For the entry of an Order awarding to your Petitioner for such other relief and any other relief necessary as equity may require of which this court may deem overwhelmingly just;










































IN THE 
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
EASTERN DIVISION

 Joe Louis Lawrence                                                      Civil Action #16 CV 7434

                                                                                       Hon:   Robert M. Dow, Jr.    
  Plaintiff

    V

420 East Ohio, Chicago Housing Authority  
345 East Ohio, K2 Apartments, City of Chicago,
Commission on Human Relations Supreme Court
 of Illinois, Alderman Edward Burke,                          
 Franklin U. Valderrama, Mary Lane Mikva                                    

 Defendants
                                                                                                                                                                                                    NOTICE OF      
 MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE w/AFFIDAVIT


Please be advised that on, April 24, 2018 Plaintiff has filed before this District Court, Motion for Summary Judgment et al; and will present said legally sufficient instrument before  any Judge in  judge Robert M. Dow’s stead May 2 , 2018, at 9:15am in room 1919.       

Chicago Housing Authority             Wilson Elser Moskowitz Edelman & Dicker LLP
Office of the General Counsel                     Christian T. Novay
Asst Gen Counsels                                  55 West Monroe, Street, Suite 3800  
Maria Sewell Joseph   T.B. King                 Chicago, Il 60603
60 East Van Buren
Chicago, Ill 60605                                                                          
                                                                       Seyfarth & Shaw
                                                   Jeffrey K. Ross, Kyle A. Petersen & Anne Harris        
                                                                  Willis/Sears Tower
                                                                  Chicago, Ill. 60603

Stephan R. Patton, Mary E. Reuther, Rey A. Phillip Santos, S. Atty. Martha Diaz
Corp Counsel, Deputy Corp. Counsel, Asst Corp Counsel
30 N. LaSalle Street, Suite 800
Chicago, Ill 60602

Cary G. Schiff & Associates                    Gordon & Rees LLP
Christopher R. Johnson                           Goli Rahimi
Yuleida Joy                                               1 North Franklin, Suite 800
134 N. LaSalle Street, Suite 1720             Chicago, Illinois 60606
Chicago, Ill. 60602                                    

Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith, LLP
Christian Novay
550 West Adams Street, Suite 300
Chicago, IL. 60661


      Chief Judge Timothy C. Evans, Daley Center, Chg., Ill. 60601
      Presiding Judge Moche Jacobius, Room 2403, Daley Center, Chg. Ill. 60601
      Assc. Judge Franklin U. Valderrama, Room 2402, Daley Center, Chg. Ill. 60601  
    Clerk of Circuit Court Dorothy Brown, Suite 1001, Chg Ill. 60601                                           
       
      States Attorney, Kim Foxx, Room 500 Daley Center, Chg. Ill. 60601
      Atty Gen Lisa Madigan, 100 West Randolph, Suite 1300 Chg. Ill. 60601
           
CHA Mobility                                             CHA Mobility, HCP Counselors
Chris Klepper, Executive Dir                     Tracey Robinson/Joann Harris
28 East Jackson Blvd.                                    4859 S. Wabash, Suite 2nd Floor  
Chicago, Ill 60604                                          Chicago, Ill. 60615     
                                                                   
CHA Mobility, Real Estate Specialist               
Jessie McDaniel                                                        
4859 S. Wabash                                                    
Chicago, Ill. 60615                                                

Courtesy Copies:
US Attorney                                                FBI  Dir. Chris Wray   
John R. Lausch, Jr.                               2111 West Roosevelt Road
219 S. Dearborn, 5th floor                              Chicago, Ill. 60612
Chicago, Ill. 60604

Governor                                                Hon Mark Kirk
Bruce Rauner                                         607 East Adams, Suite 1520
100 West Randolph, Suite                       Springfield, Ill. 62701
Chicago, Ill. 60601

Mayor                                            Deputy Regional Adm., Field Office Dir.
Rahm Emanuel                                       Beverly E. Bishop
City Hall                                              77 West Jackson Boulevard
Chicago, Ill. 60601                              Chicago, Ill. 60604

Hon Dick Durbin                                             Judge
525 South 8th St.                                             Frederick Bates
Springfield, Ill. 62703                               50 West Washington Room
                                                                     Chicago, Ill. 60601
Judge                                                           
Celia C. Gamrath                                            Judge
50 West Washington Room 2508             Neil Cohen
                                                                50 West Washington Room 2308

                                        Alderman David Moore
                                        Alderman Ed Burke  
                                      Alderwoman Carrie Austin
                                       Alderwoman Emma Mitts

Cook County President                               Cook County Sheriff
Toni Preckwinkle                                            Thomas J. Dart
118 N. Clark, Room 517                         Richard J. Daley Center, Room 701
Chicago, Ill. 60602                                        Chicago, Ill. 60602

                                           
               PLEASE BE ADVISED that on April 24, 2018, A Motion for Summary Judgment et al. has been filed with the Northern District of Illinois and said copies being served on said applicable parties via hand delivery or regular mail;


                                                                                 Respectfully, Submitted,

                                                                                   Joe Louis Lawrence
                                                                                   Counsel Pro Se
                                                                                  Chicago, Ill 60649
                                                                                   312 965-6455
                                                                                   joelouis565@yahoo.com
                                                                                     @joelouis