Wikipedia Racial Injustice in Chicago Courts

Search results

Tuesday, September 24, 2013


POLITICAL WARFARE AND APARTHEID OPPRESSION IS HOW THE DEMOCRATIC POLITICAL MACHINE CONTROL CHICAGO

IN CHICAGO NO MAN OF COLOR IS DEEMED INNOCENT OR FREE IN ACCORDANCE TO THE LAWS OF THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION THOSE MEN THAT ARE NOT IMPRISONED BEHIND BARS BY THE MACHINE RAN LEGAL SYSTEM.

MEN OF COLOR ARE IMPRISONED ECONOMICALLY AS IN THIS CASE

THESE MEN HAVE FOUND A WAY IN WHICH TO UNDERMINE THE INTEGRITY OF THE LAWS AND USE THEIR SKIN COLOR IN WHICH TO COMMIT SOME OF THE MOST HORRENDOUS CRIMES EVER RECORDED

IN IRAQ SADAM HUSSAIN OPPRESSED HIS PEOPLE WHERE THE MILITARY WAS SENT LOOKING FOR WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION.

IN SYRIA THIS PRESIDENT USED POISON GAS IN WHICH TO EXTERMINATE HIS OWN PEOPLE.

IN GERMANY HITLER PLACED JEWS IN CONCENTRATION CAMPS COMMITTING GENOCIDE ON JEWS.

GENOCIDE IS DONE IN A MORE PROFITABLE MANNER THE IRISH AND POLISH ETHNIC GROUPS UNDER THE ORIGINAL REGIME MACHINE HATE PEOPLE OF COLOR UNLESS THEY CAN CONTRIBUTE TO THEIR CAUSE IN OPPRESSING THEIR OWN PEOPLE, THE MOVIE "DJANGO" GAVE AN EXCELLENT DEPICTION IN SAMUEL JACKSON'S CHARACTER THIS IS HOW MANY OF THE BLACKS IN POWER WEARING ROBES ARE THEY DESTROY THEIR OWN PEOPLE SO AS TO BE ACCEPTED BY THE VERY PERSONS WHO HAVE NO LOVE FOR THEM.

THIS CASE WAS "FIXED" MANUFACTURED BY CORRUPT WHITE MEN OF THE POLITICAL MACHINE.

WILLIAM STEWART BOYD WHO WAS MY FORMER ATTORNEY ON CASE 88 D 079012 FOUND OUT THE CASE WAS IN FACT FILLED WITH CORRUPTION INVOLVING POLITICALLY CONNECTED JUDGES WERE MEMBERS OF THE POLITICAL MACHINE WAS ABLE TO NEGOTIATE A POSITION AS AN ASSOCIATE JUDGE UNDER EDWARD BURKE BUT WAS NOT VOTED IN AS A REAL JUDGE BY CITIZENS OF CHICAGO; INSTEAD HIS SON CARL BOYD WAS ELECTED JUDGE.

ANOTHER AFRICAN AMERICAN MORGAN HAMILTON FEMALE SAMUEL JACKSON PLAYED HER ROLE PERFECTLY IN DJANGO SHE KNEW THIS CASE WAS BOGUS DID EVERYTHING IN HER POWERS TO SAVE HER WHITE GODS OF THE POLITICAL MACHINE.

SHE ASSISTED AS A SUPERVISING JUDGE TRYING TO TELL THE COOK COUNTY SHERIFF I WAS NOT A CTA EMPLOYEE WHEN THE DEPUTIES INFORMED THE AUTHORITIES OF THE PLETHORA OF CORRUPTION SURROUNDING ME WITH THE CTA CASE BADGE 26115--ED BURKE APPOINTED A WORKMAN'S COMPENSATION ATTORNEY FROM CTA RONALD BARTKOWICZ TO ISSUE A BOGUS WARRANT FOR CONTEMPT OF COURT ON FRANCOISE HIGHTOWER WHO WAS A POLICE OFFICER, KEEP IN MIND I WAS OFF WORK WITH A WORK RELATED INJURY, CTA GOT MAD BECAUSE I WOULD NOT FALSIFY DOCUMENTS HOW MY INJURY WAS SUSTAINED SO I COULD GO TO PUBLIC AID AND LET PUBLIC AID ABSORB THE MEDICAL COSTS FOR MY WORK-RELATED INJURY.

MY INJURY WAS SUSTAINED WHILE STANDING STILL A POLICE OFFICER WAS DRUNK RAN HIS VAN INTO THE BACK OF MY BUS TOTALING HIS VAN, I HAD A BACK SPRAIN IN MY LOWER BACK.

THE NEXT TIME AMERICA GOES OVERSEAS TO FIGHT OTHERS IN THEIR COUNTRY REMEMBER THERE ARE THOSE IN THIS COUNTRY SUFFERING WORSE WHERE ARE THE TROOPS?    





Illinois Department of Healthcare and Family Services
Division of Child Support Enforcement
P.O. Box 191119 HFS 2766
Springfield, Ill. 62794-9119
                                                                                                         September 23, 2013
Joe Louis Lawrence
                                                       4th Request NEVER A REPLY
                                                       W/Affidavit
                                                                                                   88 D079012
                                                                                                   C 01240217
I Joe Louis Lawrence Promise and swear to the following: Notice dated September 30, 2013, which was received September 17, 2013.

SEE THE JULY 12, 2012 POST OF unlawful1.blogspot.com letter from Oct, 2, 2009, Affidavit regarding this same issue nobody ever responded or submitted any reply!
1.)    This is a deliberate attempt to extort money!

2.)    I never impregnated this woman never was there a court order to pay any child support;

3.)    There was never was there any paternity (DNA) tests never ordered to appear in any court.

4.)    This case was DISMISSED September 17, 1987 85D 068184 by then States Attorney Richard Daley via Stacey Berman and Obrietta Scott, Assistant States Attorneys;

5.)    Under the Richard J Daley’s watch both paternity tests excluded me from paternity but Cook County Director Dr. Boon layangoor and Dr. Oscar Behzad of American Red Cross recorded paternity was in favor of myself but left the factors that demonstrated exclusion in one test the child had something in their blood I did not have in my blood and in another test something was undetected see July 10, 2012 Post unlawful1.blogspot.com;

6.)    Because Alderman Edward Burke owns and controls the appointment of all judges appointed had certain Irish and Polish judges personally assigned to “FIX” and racially intimidate and violate every aspect of my Civil Rights for standing up to the Democratic Racist Bullies of the Political Machine had me placed in Contempt of Court and remanded into custody for “Allegedly” owing child support! See Post 8-30-2012, Chronology of unlawful Contempt Charges.

7.)    Dorothy Brown’s Clerks were aware of all unlawful irregularities said take this matter to the Media and FBI because they have judges in their back pockets signing court orders illegally “ You don’t any child support the court order for 1988 has no signature on it and does not order you to pay any child support”





1.)    So that many won’t feel this is an isolated error or typographical error here is another African American man contemplated suicide for going through the same experience for 19 years CHANNEL 2 NEWS REPORTER DOROTHY TUCKER AIRED A STORY WHERE A MAN THREATEN SUICIDE--- Man Hounded For Child Support For 20 Years, But It’s Not His Kid « CBS Chicago http://cbsloc.al/MMxCOA  
A-    CTA destroyed my personnel records to protect the Irish judge who signed a court order allowing my wages to be garnisheed CTA knew the document was in fact an unlawful court order because there was no legal seal on the order many in personnel who was familiar with my case made it clear, “if this shit ever got out a lot of people were going to jail per CTA employee”
B-    These men of the Democratic Political Machine are worse than the Ku KLUX KLAN of the South, Syria Iran have nothing on the type of Mayhem that these Terrorist have lodged on me and others as United States Citizens.

This mess has never been on my Credit Report and was illegally assigned to a politically connected collection agency who attached it to said credit report in Feb. 2007, only after an Assistant States Attorney Brian Volkman illegally obtained my credit report without my permission or the courts authority learned I had excellent credit and no judgments on the credit report.  

Credit scores was 856 after Racism got a hold of my report all of my good standing remarks were mysteriously deleted and a series of convoluted errors were in the report.

Everyone in authority knew of the atrocities lodged in said matter did nothing because the individuals behind these crimes were Caucasian men with clout in the City with incredible connections and most of the people in authority who could have effected a change before this matter got out of hand did nothing!!!
   
   
                                          FURTHER AFFIANT SAYETH NOT

                     
Notary





                                                                                        Joe Louis Lawrence

Saturday, September 14, 2013


STANDING YOUR GROUND AGAINST RACISM BULLISHNESS FROM THE DEMOCRATIC POLITICAL MACHINE

Huffington Post declared Chicago as the most corrupt City in America.

This is how Chicago Corrupt Judges circumvent the laws in America recognized as a Super Power Country and destroy United States citizens with corrupt applications of the laws they are the weapons of mass destruction.

Because other countries like Syria do not have the personnel or members of a political machine to destroy it's people like Chicago Corrupt Democrats they resort to what is accessible poison gas to eliminate their own citizens.

Anytime a Government be it Syria or cities in America like Chicago ( their are others) exercise Terror or any type of political abuse to oppress innocent citizens, these acts should be classified as a threat against National Security where either the United Nations, Congress expedite the applicable military resources eradicating those responsible for the threats against National Security and the welfare of the citizens of the United States.




IN THE 
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
EASTERN DIVISION

Joe Louis Lawrence
            Plaintiff                                                              CIVIL ACTION NO: 13 CV 2852  
                                                                                        Honorable Judge                  
            V
                                                                                        Edmond E. Chang                                                            
Craig Fulton, Section 8, HUD, Cook County Sheriff,
Clerk of Circuit Court, Attorney General,
States Attorney, City of Chicago                                 
            Defendants                                           
                                                                      NOTICE OF
            MOTION TO SUPPLEMENT (JUNE 27, 2013) PETITION FOR RULE TO SHOW CAUSE REMANDING  JUDGES THOMAS HOFFMAN, OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE LEONARD MURRAY, GEORGE SCULLEY, JR. CRAIG FULTON ET AL
       
To the Most Honorable Edmond Chang, Judge of the United States District Court for the Northern District:

Moving Party, Joe Louis Lawrence, Counsel Pro Se hereby respectfully represents to this court with an affidavit the noted reasons why this matter should be entertained within this courts Jurisdiction; {Pursuant to the provisions of the United States Constitution}

      COMMANDER & CHIEF PRESIDENT BARACK OBAMA (Courtesy Copy)
                          WHITE HOUSE
                       1600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW
                      Washington, DC 20500


 To:  Dir. Mueller FBI Washington D.C.
         Corey Nelson, FBI 2111 West Roosevelt Road, Chicago, Ill. 60612
         U.S. Attorney, Gary S. Shapiro, 219 S. Dearborn, Suite 500


 TO AAG Tyler Roland     Chief Judge Timothy Evans, Daley Center, Chg., Ill. 60601
         General Law Bureau       Presiding Judge Jacobius, Daley Center, Chg. Ill. 60601
        100 West Randolph Street Suite 1300
        Chicago, Ill. 60601  

       Clerk of Circuit Court Dorothy Brown, Suite 1001, Chg. Ill.                                             
       States Attorney, Anita Alvarez, Daley Center, Chg. Ill. 60601
       Atty Gen Lisa Madigan, 100 West Randolph, Suite 1300 Chg. Ill. 60601
           
Sec of State                                                  Asst Deputy Dir Candace Cheffin
Asst Gen Counsel Terrence McConville     60 East Van Buren, 8th floor
100 West Randolph, Suite 500                       Chicago, Ill. 60601
Chicago, Ill. 60601     

CHA Mobility                                             CHA Mobility, HCP Counselors
Chris Klepper, Executive Dir                     Tracey Robinson/Joann Harris
28 East Jackson Blvd.                                    4859 S. Wabash, Suite 2nd Floor 
Chicago, Ill 60604                                          Chicago, Ill. 60615    
                                                                   
CHA Mobility, Real Estate Specialist               Recorder of Deeds
Jessie McDaniel                                                   Karen Yarbrough    
4859 S. Wabash                                                    118 N. Clark, Room 120
Chicago, Ill. 60615                                                Chicago, Ill. 60602

City of Chicago, Department of Buildings       Sabre Investments
Christopher Lynch                                               120 West Madison Street
121 North LaSalle, Room 900                                Chicago, Ill 60601
Chicago, Ill. 60601

Courtesy Copies:
Mayor                                            Deputy Regional Adm., Field Office Dir.
Rahm Emanuel                                       Beverly E. Bishop
City Hall                                              77 West Jackson Boulevard
Chicago, Ill. 60601                              Chicago, Ill. 60604

Cook County President                               Cook County Sheriff
Toni Preckwinkle                                            Thomas J. Dart
118 N. Clark, Room 517                         Richard J. Daley Center, Room 701
Chicago, Ill. 60602                                        Chicago, Ill. 60602

Illinois State Police                                President David Lowery
Director Hiram Grau                            Living & Driving While Black Foundation     
801 South 7th Ave                                  P O Box 333, Oak Forest, IL 60452
Springfield, Ill. 62703


                PLEASE BE ADVISED that on September 4, 2013, A Motion to Supplement (June 27, 2013) Rule to Show Cause et al has been filed before the United States District Court. 


                                                             Respectfully Submitted


                                                                 Joe Louis Lawrence Counsel Pro Se
                                                                           PO Box 490075
                                                                      Chicago, Ill. 60649-0075
                                                                          312 927-4210
                                                                      joelouislaw@yahoo.com
                                                                         @joelouis7                    


























Certificate of Service
The undersigned hereby certifies that the above Petition with attachments was caused to be delivered by regular mail to the above named parties

                                                                               ______________________
                                                                                  Joe Louis Lawrence      




IN THE 
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
EASTERN DIVISION

Joe Louis Lawrence
            Plaintiff                                                              CIVIL ACTION NO: 13 CV 2852  
                                                                                       Honorable Judge:
                  
            V                                                                        Edmond E. Chang
                                                                            
Craig Fulton, Section 8, HUD, Cook County Sheriff,
Clerk of Circuit Court, Attorney General,
States Attorney, City of Chicago                                 
            Defendants                                           
                                                                     
         MOTION TO SUPPLEMENT JUNE 27, 2013 PETITION FOR RULE TO SHOW CAUSE REMANDING  JUDGES THOMAS HOFFMAN, OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE LEONARD MURRAY, GEORGE SCULLEY, JR. & CRAIG FULTON ET AL OTHERS   
       
IN ACCORDANCE TO THE FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE:
    Now comes Joe Louis Lawrence, Counsel Pro Se in this cause respectfully represents to this court said Motion to Supplement Petition for Rule to Show Cause Remanding Judges Thomas Hoffman, Leonard Murray, George Sculley, Jr., & Craig Fulton others et al Corroboration in an Organized Chain Conspiracy “Perjury” “Fraud of all sorts” Contempt of Court other Irregularities, Remand/Body Attachment with FBI’s Jurisdiction & Authority Instanter.
            
     Said reasons are recorded in the attached affidavit;
                                                                 Respectfully Submitted

                                                         Joe Louis Lawrence Counsel Pro Se
                                                                           PO Box 490075
                                                                      Chicago, Ill. 60649-0075
                                                                          312 927-4210
                                                                      joelouislaw@yahoo.com
                                                                         @joelouis7




                    
IN THE 
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
EASTERN DIVISION

                                                AFFIDAVIT
                                                        In support of
Motion to Supplement June 27, 2013 Petition for Rule to Show Cause Remanding Judges Thomas Hoffman, Obstruction of Justice Leonard Murray, George Sculley, Jr. & Craig Fulton others et al., Corroboration in an Organized Chain Conspiracy “Perjury” “Fraud of all sorts” Contempt of Court other Irregularities, Remand/Body Attachment with FBI’s Jurisdiction and Authority Instanter.
            
{Pursuant to the Rules of Federal Civil Procedure & U.S. Constitution}
         Section 1983 of U.S.C.S., S.H.A. Criminal Ch. 38, 33-3, Civil Rights Act of 1964, Canon 3D (1) Reporting Judicial Misconduct, 3D (2) Reporting Lawyer Misconduct States Attorneys, Attorney Generals ignoring all applicable noted unlawful acts;

Under Section 4 of the Ku Klux Klan Act of 1871:

The President had additional power in case of rebellion within a state to suspend the writ of habeas corpus and to declare and enforce marital law. Cong. Globe, supra note 1, at 317. With respect to a definition of rebellion, Section 4 provided;

“Whenever in any State or part of a State……unlawful combinations……..shall be organized and armed, and so numerous and powerful as to be able, by violence, to either overthrow or set at defiance the constituted authorities of such State, or when the constituted authorities are in complicity with or shall connive at the unlawful purposes of such powerful and armed combinations; and whenever, by reason of either or all of the causes aforesaid, the conviction of such offenders and the preservation of the public safety shall become…. Impracticable, in every such case such combinations shall be deemed a rebellion against the Government of the United States….”  

A-   That on August 27, 2013, Appellate Court Judge Thomas E. Hoffman entered his signature and two stamped signatures were used to unlawfully dismiss Motion to Vacate Order of (August 14, 2013)
 Although some trial judges may not review the orders of other judges, because that would not be consistent with the orderly administration of justice or with our judicial system People ex rel. Kelly, Ketting Furth, Lnc. V. Epstein, 61 ILL 2d, 229, 335 N.E. 2d 430 (1974) (Appeal of order as proper remedy); Cruz v. Columbus-Cuneo-Cabrini Medical Center, 194 ILL App. 3d 1037, 551 N.E. 2d 1345, 141. Dec. 817 (1st Dist. 1990)

ILL. App. (1st Dist. 2000). A “VOID JUDGEMENT OR ORDER” is one that is entered by a court lacking jurisdiction over the parties or the subject matter, or lacking the inherent power to enter the particular order of judgment, or where the order was procured by FRAUD- in re Adoption of E.L., 248 ILL. Dec. 171, 733 N.E. 2d 846, 315 ILL. App. 3d 137- Judgm 7, 16, 375.  

    Review of the orders of one judge by another in the same case is not consistent with effective judicial administration. W. R. Grace & Co. v. Baker Industries, Inc., 128 ILL. App. 3d 215, 470 N.E. 2d 577, 83 ILL. Dec. 451 (1st Dist. 1984).
     Although the chancery division of the County Department of the Circuit Court and the Municipal Department of the Circuit Court have concurrent jurisdiction of actions to demolish buildings, where the municipal department first acquired jurisdiction of the subject matter and entered an order of demolition, the county department could not properly assume jurisdiction and enter an order preventing municipal departments from entering an order of demolition. Pepin v. City of Chicago, 79 ILL. App. 2d 295, 224 N.E. 587 (1st Dist. 1967).             

1.)  That because of the nature of the crimes and additional counts of criminal activities being exercised by judge Hoffman;
2.)  That it is now time for the FBI agents to immediately invoke jurisdiction so as to determine whether Joy V. Cunningham & Mathias W. Delort allowed their stamp signatures to be used in this unlawful manner or did judge Hoffman obtain the stamp signatures and recorded them on the court order himself;
3.)  Judge Thomas Hoffman realized he had no legal grounds to Deny any of the Motions accompanied with affidavits by the Appellant had to act outside of the confines of his jurisdiction and judicial immunity committed a plethora of additional criminal Civil Rights violations so as to demonstrate to this Honorable Court and FBI he and the political machine is above the law! Ex. A his certified signature court order of august 27, 2013;
A-   The Law is CLEAR: Properly alleged facts within an affidavit that are not contradicted by counter affidavit are taken as true, despite the existence of contrary averments in the adverse party’s pleadings. Professional Group Travel, Ltd. v. Professional Seminar Consultants Inc., 136 ILL App 3d 1084, 483 N.E. 2d 1291; Buzzard v. Bolger, 117 ILL App 3d 887, 453 N.E. 2d 1129 et al.

That Judge Hoffman is using his robe as a pass key to aid and assist all criminals in this manner by Dismissing said case from the docket in an attempt to cover-up the number of judges involved in housing scams stealing from Section 8 hud programs and unlawfully stealing United States citizens homes in the name of foreclosure; Scott, 377 Mass. 364, 386 N.E. 2d 218, 220 (1979) See Lopez-Alexander, Unreported Order No. 85-279 (Colo. May 3, 1985) (Judge removed for, inter alia, a persistent pattern of abuse of the contempt power. The Mayor of Denver accepted the findings of the Denver County Court Judicial Qualification Commission that the judge’s conduct could not be characterized as mere mistakes or errors of law and that the conduct constituted willful misconduct in office and conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice that brings the judicial office into disrepute). Canon Ethics where there is a pattern of disregard or indifference, which warrant discipline.

          Section 1983 of U.S.C.S. contemplates the depravation of Civil Rights through the Unconstitutional Application of a Law by conspiracy or otherwise. Mansell v. Saunders (CA 5 F 1A) 372 F 573, especially if the conspiracy was actually carried into effect, where an action is for a conspiracy to interfere with Civil Rights under 42 U.S.C.S. 1985 (3), or for the depravation of such rights under 42 U.S.C.S. 1983, if the conspiracy was actually carried into effect and plaintiff was thereby deprived of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the United States Constitution and Laws, the gist of the action maybe treated as one for the depravation of rights under 42 U.S.C.S. 1983, Lewis v. Brautigam (CA 5 F 1a) 227 F 2d 124, 55 Alr 2d 505, John W. Strong, 185, 777-78 (4 the ed. 1992).    

See that is why, the Ku Klux Klan Act of 1871 (was enacted) - Section 1 (42 U.S.C.) 1983.
       “Of all the Civil Rights legislation enacted in the aftermath of the Civil War, none has had a greater contemporary impact than the Ku Klux Klan Act of 1871. The Act grew out of a special one-paragraph message sent to the 42d Congress on March 23, 1871, by President Ulysses S. Grant, urgently requesting the enactment of legislation”.

Section 2 (42 U.S.C.) In the House of Representatives.
        “Congressional Debate of the second section of the Ku Klux Klan Act was more extensive and enduring than that of Section 1; As originally presented, Sec. 2 made it a felony for any “two or more persons” to conspire to commit certain enumerated crimes “in violation of the rights and privileges, or immunities of any person, to which he is entitled under the Constitution and laws of the United States.
           “Throughout the debates, supporters of the Act made repeated references to the depredations of the Ku Klux Klan; Victims of these atrocities included not only blacks but white Republicans as well. The crimes that were perpetrated, therefore, were not viewed as isolated occurrences, but as part of an “Organized Conspiracy….Political in its origin and aims”, “crimes perpetrated by concert and agreement, by men in large numbers acting with a common purpose for the injury of a certain class of citizens entertaining certain political principles, id, at 457 (remarks of Rep. Coburn). See also e.g., id. At 437 (remarks of Rep. Cobb) (“None but Democrats belong or can belong to these societies”) et al.,
           “Where these gangs of Assassins show themselves the rest of the people look on, if not with sympathy, at least with forbearance. The boasted courage of the South is not courage in their presence. Sheriffs, having eyes to see, see not; judges, having ears to hear, hear not; witnesses conceal the truth or falsify it; grand or petit juries act as if they might be accomplices. In the presence of these gangs all the apparatus and machinery of civil government, all the processes of justice, skulk away as if government and justice were crimes and feared detection. Among the most dangerous things an injured party can do is to appeal to justice. Of the uncounted scores and hundreds of atrocious mutilations and murders it is credibly stated that not one has been punished. Cong. Globe, supra note 2, app. At 78 (remarks of Rep. Perry). (“While murder is stalking abroad in disguise, while whippings and lynching’s and banishment have been visited upon unoffending American citizens, the local administrations have been found inadequate or unwilling to apply the proper corrective”) et al., …. And the State made no successful effort to bring the guilty to punishment or afford protection or redress to the outraged and innocent.”)    
                  
4.)    That said judges and the likes of the Democratic Machine are demonstrating to this court and FBI, they will violate any and all laws necessary so as to achieve their racist agenda in the courts and is not about to change or comply with any Federal laws or laws of this court; 

5.)     That said judge and members of their fraternal order are challenging the integrity and fabric of the Federal jurisprudence, in that this Honorable Court and FBI have the resources and to eradicate all of their brethren from their positions;

Supreme Court Rule [137] provides in pertinent part:

            If a pleading, motion, or other paper is signed in violation of this Rule, the court, upon motion or upon its own initiative, may impose upon the person who signed it, a represented party, or both, an appropriate sanction, which may include an order to pay to the other party or parties the amount of reasonable expenses incurred because of the filling of the pleading, motion, or other paper, including a reasonable attorney fee. Not only will the courts consider an award of sanctions for active false statements: failures to disclose material facts to the court can also justify an award of sanctions.
BRUBAKKEN v. Morrison, No. 1-9-1670, 1992 Ill App. LEXIS 2144 (1st Dist. Dec. 30, 1992). Additionally, the fact that a false statement or omission is the result of an honest mistake is no defense to entry of a sanction. ID. To the extent that an individual lawyer has engaged in sanction able conduct, that lawyer’s firm can also be jointly and severally liable with the lawyer.

A-    That the Terrorist issues in Chicago, Illinois is far more draconian than the issues in Syria innocent United states citizens are being tortured to death killed in their neighborhoods behind the well-orchestrated criminal acts by judges protecting corruption and criminals.
B-    That said judges are a threat to National Security and safety and welfare to  the citizens of the United States of America 
That because of the above; Fraud admissibility great latitude is permitted in proving fraud C.J.S. Fraud 104 ET Seg. Fraud 51-57. where a question of fraud and deceit is the issue involved in a case,  great latitude is ordinarily permitted in the introduction of evidence, and courts allow the greatest liberality in the method of examination and in the scope of inquiry Vigus V. O’Bannon, 1886 8 N.E 788, 118 ILL 334. Hazelton V. Carolus, 1907 132 ILL. App. 512.
               INDUCING RELIANCE
To prevail in a cause of action for fraud, plaintiff must prove that defendant made statement of material nature which was relied on by victim and was made for purposes of inducing reliance, and that victim’s reliance led to his injury. Parsons V. Winter, 1986, 1 Dist., 491 N.E. 2d 1236, 96 ILL Dec. 776, 142 ILL App 3d 354, Appeal Denied.
     In Carter V. Mueller 457 N.E. 2d 1335 ILL. App. 1 Dist. 1983 The Supreme Court has held that: “The elements of a cause of action for fraudulent misrepresentation (sometimes referred to as “fraud and deceit” or deceit) are: (1) False statement of material fact; (2) known or believed to be false by the party making it; (3) intent to induce the other party to act; (4) action by the other party in reliance on the truth of the statement; and (5) damage to the other party resulting from such reliance.
  
6.)     That all Judges and Related Conspirator’s, have corroborated/admitted beyond all legal standards of the law engaging in a criminal conspiracy and implicating numerous “powerful corrupt white men” in  office covering up for the Political machine operatives; and how they use inferior ethnic groups outside their ethnicity to enforce their doctrines on innocent non-white men like the Petitioner as noted throughout all documents;
A-    That a Federal Court is suppose to view a complaint’s allegations in a light most favorable to the plaintiff, draws all reasonable inferences in favor of the plaintiff, and takes as true all well-pleaded facts and allegations in the complaint. Reger Dev., LLC v. Nat’l City Bank, 592 F. 3d 759, 764 (7th Cir. 2010). Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 8(a) (2) requires “a short and plain statement of the claim showing that the pleader is entitled to relief” in order to provide the defendant with fair notice of the plaintiff’s claims and the grounds upon which they rest. Bell Atl. V. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 555 (2007) (Twombly). To survive a motion to dismiss, the plaintiff’s claim must be plausible and the factual allegations of the complaint must be “enough to raise a right to relief above the speculative level.” Brooks v. Ross, 578 F. 3d 574, 581 (7th Cir. 2009) (quoting Twombly, 550 U.S. at 555).
B-    That Petitioner has met and fulfilled the requirements of the aforementioned for the relief being sought;
   Agreement to commit an unlawful act, which constitutes the essence of a conspiracy, is a distinct evil that exist and be punished whether or not the substantive crime ensues,-id.
   Conspiracy poses a threat to the public over and above the threat of the commission of the relevant substantive crime, both because the combination in crime makes more likely the commission of other crimes and because it decreases the part from their path of criminality-id;

7.)    REPORTING JUDICIAL MISCONDUCT
            CANON 3D (1)

    Under Section 3D (1), a judge who receives information that indicates “a substantial likelihood that another judge “has violated the Code of Judicial “should take appropriate action”. The Canon does not require the judge to hold a hearing and make a definitive decision that a violation has occurred before the reporting requirement is triggered and at least one state’s judicial ethics committee has advised that the reporting requirement is triggered when the judge has “sufficient information” to conclude that a “substantial issue” has been raised that a violation has occurred, Mass. Comm. On Judicial Ethics, Op. 2002-04 (2002)

    “Appropriate action” may include direct communication with the judge who has committed the violation and reporting the violation to the appropriate or other agency or body. See Commentary to Canon 3D (1). “Appropriate authority” is the authority with responsibility for initiation of disciplinary proceedings with respect to the violation reported. Some jurisdictions’ rules specify to whom a judge must report misconduct. For instance, Massachusetts Rule 3D (1) provides that if a judge becomes aware of another judge’s unprofessional conduct he must report his knowledge to the Chief Justice of the Massachusetts Supreme Court and the court of which the judge in question is a member.

    Note that the term “knowledge”, as defined in the Terminology Section, denotes actual knowledge of the fact in question and as such, a person’s knowledge may be inferred from circumstances. In drafting Section 3D (1), the Committee rejected the suggestion that the criteria of raising substantial question as to honesty or trustworthiness be applied in the context of reporting judicial misconduct as well, on the grounds that those criteria are implicit in the present criterion of raising a substantial question as to a judge’s fitness for office.
             
 U. S Sup Court Digest 24(1) General Conspiracy

U.S. 2003. Essence of a conspiracy is an agreement to commit an unlawful act.—U.S. v. Jimenez Recio, 123 SCt. 819, 537 U.S. 270, 154 L.Ed.2d 744, on remand 371F.3d 1093

         Agreement to commit an unlawful act, which constitutes the essence of a conspiracy, is a distinct evil that exist and be punished whether or not the substantive crime ensues.-Id.
         Conspiracy poses a threat to the public over and above the threat of the commission of the relevant substantive crime, both because the combination in crime makes more likely the commission of other crimes and because it decreases the part from their path of criminality.-Id.
 
CONSPIRACY
Fraud maybe inferred from nature of acts complained of, individual and collective interest of alleged conspirators, situation, intimacy, and relation of parties at time of commission of acts, and generally all circumstances preceding and attending culmination of claimed conspiracy Illinois Rockford Corp. V. Kulp, 1968, 242 N.E. 2d 228, 41 ILL. 2d 215.
 
      Conspirators to be guilty of offense need not have entered into conspiracy at same time or have taken part in all its actions. People V. Hardison, 1985, 911 Dec. 162, 108. Requisite mens rea elements of conspiracy are satisfied upon showings of agreement of offense with intent that offense be committed; Actus reas element is satisfied of act in furtherance of agreement People V. Mordick, 1981, 50 ILL, Dec. 63
         
 A judge’s disrespect for the rules of court demonstrates disrespect for the law. Judges are disciplined under Canon 2 A for violating court rules and procedures. Judged ignored mandated witness order in attempt to accommodate witnesses’ schedules; Citing Canon 2A the court noted, “[a] court’s indifference to clearly stated rules breeds disrespect for and discontent with our justice system. Government can not demand respect of the laws by its citizens when its tribunals ignore those very same laws”)

Civil Rights Act of 1866- first section, enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled. That all persons born in the United States and not subject to any foreign power, excluding Indians not taxed, are hereby declared to be citizens of the United States; and such citizens of every race and color, without regard to any previous condition of slavery or involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall have the same right, in every State and Territory in the United States, to make and enforce contracts, to sue, be parties, and give evidence, to inherit, purchase, lease, sell, hold and convey real and personal property, and to full and equal benefit of the laws and proceedings for the security of person and property, as is enjoyed by white citizens, and shall be subject to like punishment, pains, and penalties, and to none other, any law, statute, ordinances, regulation, or custom, to the contrary notwithstanding, Act of April 9, 1866, ch. 31, 1, 14 Stat. 27, 42 U.S.C.A. 1981 (a).

Wherefore the foregoing stated within Petitioner Respectfully Prays for the Relief:

1.)    That this Most Honorable accept this motion and supplement it to the June 27, 2013 Petition for Rule to show cause et al;  

2.)    Order the FBI to invoke jurisdiction Instanter to ascertain judges participation on the August 27, 2013 court order et al; 

3.)    Order the Removal of every Public Official named and ignored the Oath and Constitution of their duties as an elected/appointed official;

4.)    Issue an Injunction Prohibiting said judges from presiding over any more cases to determine additional cases being fixed by members of the democratic political machine;  

5.)    Let the Gavel and Jurisdiction of this Honorable Court Invoke any other remedy this courts deems just; 

                      FURTHER AFFIANTH SAYETH NAUGHT

                                                                                                                         Respectfully Submitted

                                                                  Joe Louis Lawrence, Counsel Pro se                                                                                                                        
                                                                                                          PO Box 490075

                                                                                                       Chicago, Ill 60649-0075