Wikipedia Racial Injustice in Chicago Courts

Search results

Wednesday, October 9, 2013


ALDERMAN EDWARD BURKE COULD NOT TALK HIS WAY OUT OF A PAPER BAG IN THIS CASE

FEDERAL JUDGE HAD SAID COMPLAINT BEFORE HIM SINCE APRIL 16, 2013.

IT WAS NOT UNTIL SEPTEMBER 17, 2013, HE DISMISSED THE ENTIRE CASE ONLY BECAUSE JUNE 27, 2013, PETITION FOR RULE TO SHOW CAUSE ET AL., WITH AFFIDAVIT WAS FILED DEMONSTRATING ALDERMAN ED BURKE'S CONTROL AND INFLUENCE OVER ALL COURTS;

    A-)   SEPTEMBER 4, 2013, MOTION TO SUPPLEMENT THE PETITION FOR RULE TO SHOW CAUSE;

    B-)    SAID AFFIDAVITS DEMONSTRATED BEYOND THE PREPONDERANCE OF EVIDENCE LEGAL STANDARD RACIAL DISCRIMINATION WAS BEING EXERCISED AND LODGED AT THE APPELLANT FOR STANDING UP TO THE DEMOCRATIC POLITICAL MACHINE;

    C-)   SAID JUDGE CITED AN ERRONEOUS CASE ROOKER-FELDMAN AND THAT THE CASE WAS FRIVOLOUS AND THAT JUDGES HAD ABSOLUTE IMMUNITY;

    D-)   THE JUDGES LEGAL CITATIONS WERE IN FACT PROPERLY IMPEACHED ON MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION ET AL;

JUDGE EDMOND E. CHANG IN AN ATTEMPT TO SAVE ALL PARTIES COMPLICIT IN TERRORIST ACTS DISMISSED THE COMPLAINT BECAUSE NO ONE WAS ABLE TO LEGALLY REFUTE ANY OF THE FACTS PUT BEFORE THE COURT;

APPELLANT HAD TO FILE THE PROPER MOTION (OCTOBER 1, 2013) FOR RECONSIDERATION VACATE ORDERS DUE TO CIVIL RIGHTS VIOLATIONS, TERRORISTS ACTS, BIAS, CORROBORATION OF FRAUD, PERJURY, CONSPIRACY BY STATE & COUNTY DEMOCRATIC JUDGES REMAND/BODY ATTACHMENT INSTANTER ET AL., 
     A-)    COURT DATE WAS SCHEDULED OCTOBER 8, 2013 AT 8:30AM, JUDGE CHANG EXPEDITIOUSLY DENIED THE MOTION SO AS TO PREVENT THE APPELLANT FROM APPEARING BEFORE HIM IN COURT EMBARRASSING ED BURKE AND HIS LEGAL TEAM OF CONFEDERATE TERRORISTS;

     B-)    JUDGE CHANG DISMISSED THE MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION WHICH CLEARLY UNEQUIVOCALLY DEMONSTRATED UNDER THE JURISDICTION OF MAYOR RAHM EMMANUEL, COMMISSION ON HUMAN RELATIONS CHARGING 420 EAST OHIO WITH RACIAL DISCRIMINATION AND SOURCE OF INCOME DISCRIMINATION;

     C-)     JUDGE CHANG DISMISSED THE MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION WHICH CLEARLY UNEQUIVOCALLY DEMONSTRATED UNDER THE JURISDICTION OF MAYOR RAHM EMMANUEL, COMMISSION ON HUMAN RELATIONS CHARGING 345 EAST OHIO WITH SOURCE OF INCOME DISCRIMINATION;
     D-)     SAID JUDGE WAS IN RECEIPT OF BOTH DOCUMENTS WHICH ACCOMPANIED THE MOTION;

THAT ON OCTOBER 3, 2013, JUDGE CHANG DISMISSED SAID MOTION SAYING IT WAS FRIVOLOUS IGNORING THE HUMAN RIGHTS RELATIONS CHARGES;

HERE ARE TWO RACIST IMPLICATIONS:

1.)   IS JUDGE CHANG SAYING APPELLANT'S COMPLAINT IS FRIVOLOUS ONLY BECAUSE OF HIS SKIN COLOR IN THAT WHITE ATTORNEYS WERE AUTHORIZED NEVER TO RESPOND TO THE APPELLANT HE WAS OUT OF THEIR LEAGUES LET THE JUDGES HANDLE HIM" THIS CAME FROM AN IRISH ATTORNEY WHO HAD NO BEEF WITH THE APPELLANT WHO HAD A WIFE AND A MORTGAGE BUT WAS WILLING TO HELP HIM BUT JUST NEVER MENTION HIS NAME";

2.)    IS JUDGE CHANG SAYING RAHM EMMANUEL IS FRIVOLOUS BECAUSE HE IS A JEW? OR HIS ADMINISTRATION BECAUSE THEY DEMONSTRATED INTEGRITY FILING THE PROPER CHARGES WHERE WARRANTED?

3.)     APPELLANT HAS BEEN UP AGAINST ALL OF ED BURKE'S HAND PICKED ATTORNEYS EVEN HIS HAND PICKED LAW PROFESSORS WHEN JUDGE TERRANCE EVANS OF THE 7TH CIRCUIT HAD A CLERK TO INFORM APPELLANT IF HE WANTED TO CHANGE LAWS AND MAKE A DIFFERENCE PRESENT US A BRIEF NOT MOTIONS BRIEFS ARE WHAT CHANGES THE LAWS EVER SINCE APPELLANT PRESENTED SAID BRIEF IN THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT AS LAWYERS LIED THROUGHOUT NO JUDGE HAS EVER ORDERED ANY ATTORNEY TO BRIEF AGAINST THE APPELLANT IN FEDERAL COURT EVER AGAIN.

I AM WONDERING HOW MUCH DID JUDGE CHANG RECEIVE IN DOLLARS TRYING TO "FIX" THIS CASE?

JUDGE CHANG IS WEARING THE JUDGES ROBE MERELY AS A HALLOWEEN COSTUME BECAUSE IT IS IMPOSSIBLE HOW PRESIDENT OBAMA APPOINTED HIM TO THE BENCH HE LACKS ANY INTEGRITY ASIANS ARE NOTED FOR HAVING.

THIS CASE IS BEING READ IN OVER 64 COUNTRIES CAN "YOU" IDENTIFY WHAT IS WRONG IN THIS CASE?  















Tuesday, October 1, 2013



THE DEMOCRATIC POLITICAL MACHINE IN CHICAGO HAS DECLARED WAR ON THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT PURSUANT TO A TEXT BOOK PRECEDENT THE KU KLUX KLAN ACT OF 1871 ENACTED BU GOP PRESIDENT ULYSSES S. GRANT.

THE DEMOCRATIC POLITICAL MACHINE IS NOTHING MORE THAN A TERRORIST GROUP OF RACIST POLITICALLY CONNECTED MEN WHO HAVE ORGANIZED THEMSELVES BETTER THAN THAT OF THE KU KLUX KLAN OF MISSISSIPPI.

PAGE 13 HAS BEEN INADVERTENTLY SCANNED UPSIDE DOWN, I APOLOGIZE.

PRESIDENT LINCOLN FREED THE SLAVES IN ORDER THAT THEY HAD TO FIGHT THE CONFEDERATE SOLDIERS IN THE SOUTH FOR THE ENFORCEMENT OF THESE VERY TERRORIST ACTS BY THE MACHINE DEMOCRATS OF THIS ERA.

READ HOW THE HOLOCAUST HAS A GENOCIDE APPROACH ON PERSONS OF COLOR AND POLITICAL PARTIES HAVE CLOSED THEIR EYES BUT IS WILLING TO FIGHT OTHER COUNTRIES FOR THE SAME CRIMES PERPETRATED ON CITIZENS OF THE UNITED STATES BUT WILL GO TO WAR WITH OTHER COUNTRIES FOR THE SAME CRIMES ALLOWED IN THEIR COUNTRIES ON THERE PEOPLE CAN ANYONE EXPLAIN WHY THIS IS SO?  

PLEASE FIND COMPLAINT FILED BY JEWISH MAYOR RAHM EMMANUEL'S ADMINISTRATION CITY OF CHICAGO COMMISSION ON HUMAN RELATIONS AGAINST 345 EAST OHIO AGAINST CHICAGO HOUSING AUTHORITY AND 345 EAST OHIO.

UNDER THE POLITICAL MACHINE THEY RECRUIT INFERIOR BLACKS AND RACIST BLACKS TO CREATE PROGRAMS TO SCREEN AND EXCLUDE ANY AND ALL AFRICAN AMERICANS AND HISPANICS FROM AFFORDABLE HOUSING EVEN WITH A VOUCHER.

IN ORDER TO LIVE IN OPPORTUNITY AREAS LIKE DOWNTOWN YOU HAVE TO PAY OFF CERTAIN CITY HALL OFFICIALS AND VOUCHERS ARE ALLEGEDLY SOLD FOR $1000-$1300.

FEDERAL JUDGE EDMOND CHANG IGNORED THESE CHARGES BECAUSE RAHM EMMANUEL AS MAYOR IS JEWISH AND THE IRISH AND POLISH CONTROLLING THE DEMOCRATIC MACHINE DON'T RESPECT ANYONE OUTSIDE THEIR ETHNICITY AND LAWS ARE DISPENSED OR RULED IN ACCORDANCE TO YOUR ETHNIC BACKGROUND AND CHANG FOLLOWED ORDERS HE USED HIS ROBE UNLAWFULLY TO DISMISS A COMPLAINT THIS MOTION WAS THE KEY TO AVAIL HIM OF CONSPIRACY CHARGES;

 HOW CAN JUSTICE BE RECEIVED WHEN JUDGES ARE SO CORRUPT, INCOMPETENT OR RACIST THE ONLY WAY VICTORY CAN BE OBTAINED IN CHICAGO LAWYERS HAVE TO PAY OFF THE PIPER.

WHAT COUNTRY OR CITY OR STATE DOES AN ALDERMAN PICK JUDGES HE WANTS ON THE BENCH AND ORDERS JUDGES TO RENDER VERDICTS HE WANTS? ISN'T THIS DICTATORSHIP? IF THIS IS A DEMOCRATIC SOCIETY HOW CAN A DICTATOR RESIDE IN AMERICA?