Wikipedia Racial Injustice in Chicago Courts

Search results

Thursday, July 18, 2024

 

Justice Jackson Enlightens On The 14th Amendment In Supreme Court Debut

Justice Jackson reminded all of us that the 14th Amendment “was drafted to give a constitutional foundation for a piece of legislation that was designed to make people who had less opportunity, and less rights, equal to white citizens.”

The Democrats in Illinois have found a way to still institute Jim Crow Laws and violate the United States Constitution and circumvent all U.S. Supreme Court Rulings by systematically violating all laws and employ persons of Color or Appoint certain Blacks who will embrace white supremacy and go along with the continuous degradation of injustices on Black and Colored People within the Judiciary of the Cook County and Illinois Courts.

Corrupt or racist attorneys are able to feed their families or take vacations or send their children to the finest school's money can buy off of the misery and injustices of Black and Colored People and not one Black Democrat has the authority to say anything if they are planning on keeping that position.


IT IS CLEAR WHILE SO MANY ARE COMPLAINING ABOUT FORMER PRESIDENT DONALD TRUMP---MOST DEMOCRATS WHO HAPPENS TO BE JUDGES NONE OF THEM SEEMS TO UNDERSTAND THE RULES OF LAW AND THE U.S. CONSTITUTION AS IT APPLIES TO THIS VERY CASE.


"THE KU KLUX KLAN ACT WAS ENACTED FOR THIS VERY REASON"


That Pursuant to Section 2 (42 U.S.C.) In the House of Representatives.

       “Congressional Debate of the second section of the Ku Klux Klan Act was more extensive and enduring than that of Section 1; As originally presented, Sec. 2 made it a felony for any “two or more persons” to conspire to commit certain enumerated crimes “in violation of the rights and privileges, or immunities of any person, to which he is entitled under the Constitution and laws of the United States.

          “Throughout the debates, supporters of the Act made repeated references to the depredations of the Ku Klux Klan; Victims of these atrocities included not only blacks but white Republicans as well. The crimes that were perpetrated, therefore, were not viewed as isolated occurrences, but as part of an “Organized Conspiracy….Political in its origin and aims”, “crimes perpetrated by concert and agreement, by men in large numbers acting with a common purpose for the injury of a certain class of citizens entertaining certain political principles, id, at 457 (remarks of Rep. Coburn). See also e.g., id. At 437 (remarks of Rep. Cobb) (“None but Democrats belong or can belong to these societies”) et al.

          “Where these gangs of Assassins show themselves the rest of the people look on, if not with sympathy, at least with forbearance. The boasted courage of the South is not courage in their presence. Sheriffs, having eyes to see, see not; judges, having ears to hear, hear not; witnesses conceal the truth or falsify it; grand or petit juries act as if they might be accomplices. In the presence of these gangs all the apparatus and machinery of civil government, all the processes of justice, skulk away as if government and justice were crimes and feared detection. Among the most dangerous things an injured party can do is to appeal to justice. Of the uncounted scores and hundreds of atrocious mutilations and murders it is credibly stated that not one has been punished. Cong. Globe, supra note 2, app. At 78 (remarks of Rep. Perry). (“While murder is stalking abroad in disguise, while whippings and lynching’s and banishment have been visited upon unoffending American citizens, the local administrations have been found inadequate or unwilling to apply the proper corrective”) et al., …. And the State made no successful effort to bring the guilty to punishment or afford protection or redress to the outraged and innocent.”)     

 

4.)   That Under Section 4 of the Ku Klux Klan Act of 1871: the law is clear, “Whenever in any State or part of a State………unlawful combinations…….shall be organized and armed, and so numerous and powerful et al…………and whenever, by reason of either or all of the causes aforesaid, the conviction of such offenders and the preservation of the public safety shall become…..Impracticable, in every such case such combinations shall be deemed a rebellion against the Government of the United States…..”

The Hate of the Ku Klux Klan within the Democratic Party has Black and Colored People now emulating that behavior and is killing, destroying and committing genocide on their own ethnic groups so as to be accepted within the Political Machine.

This case was presented to Judge Edward Arce on July 9, he refused to go along with whatever the Hispanic women Chavira and Martinez did, so he sent the case to the Presiding Judge Regina Scannicchio who in turn signed a Court Order for the first time sending the case to Judge Maritza Martinez court date is scheduled for August 8, via Zoom.

 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY ILLINOIS

DOMESTIC RELATIONS DIVISIO1N

 

 

IN RE                                                              )

                                                                         )

 Francoise Hightower                                      )        Judge Iris Y. Chivira                     

        Petitioner                                                 )

                                                                         )        Cal 41 

          VS                                                          )                                 

                                                                         )        No. 88 D 079012                         

 Joe Louis Lawrence                                        )        

        Respondent                                              )        Room CL-12

                                                                                                                                                                                               

       RESPONDENT’S MOTION FOR DISQUALIFICATION OF JUDGE MARITZA MARTINEZ INSTANTER FOR “CAUSE” HATE BIAS PREJUDICE PURSUANT to S.H.A. 735 ILCS 5/2 ---1001 (a) (2,3)

AS A “PRIVATE CITIZEN” SHE IS ENGAGING IN PRIMAE FACIE SHOWING

 OF AN ORGANIZED CRIMINAL CONSPIRACY  CIVIL RIGHTS VIOLATIONS “FRAUD” TRESPASSING UPON THE LAWS ENGAGING IN TREASON OFFENSES MAKING HER ORDER  VOID/NULLITY DUE TO PETITIONER & ASSISTANT STATES ATTORNEYS ADMITTING/CORROBORATING THEIR ROLES IN SAID CONSPIRACY AND JUDGE CHAVIRA BEING A FORMER ASSISTANT STATES ATTORNEY USED HER UNLAWFUL AUTHORITY WITH FORMER ASSISTANT STATES ATTORNEY THOMAS KANTAS IN COVERING-UP CRIMES OF OTHER ASSISTANT STATES ATTORNEYS UNLAWFUL INVOLVEMENT IN MANUFACTURING DOCUMENTS CAUSING AN EMANCIPATED ADULT TYCEE HIGHTOWER TO APPEAR AS A MINOR SO AS TO EXTORT MONEY FROM THE RESPONDENT JUDGE NEVER HAD JURISDICTION OR AUTHORITY TO PRESIDE OVER CASE TO DISQUALIFY CHAVIRA AND THE ASSISTANT STATES ATTORNEY IS SHOWING AS A CAUCASIAN SHE CAN VIOLATE ANY LAWS WHERE RESPONDENT IS CONCERNED AND ADMITTED REPRESENTING CHICAGO POLICE OFFICER DUE TO BLACK DEMOCRATS HAVING NO AUTHORITY OVER CERTAIN CAUCASIAN & VACATE ALL ORDERS AND RULE TO SHOW CAUSE REMANDING ALL PARTIES INTO CUSTODY INSTANTER W /BODY ATTACHEMENT  w/AFFIDAVIT

   Now comes Respondent Joe Louis Lawrence, Counsel Pro Se in this cause respectfully represents to this court the reasons and files herewith his Affidavit in support of Respondent’s Motion for Disqualification Instanter et al;

1.)    That unbeknown to said “Private Citizens” impersonating Cook County judges, the State of Illinois Division of Child Support sent the Respondent a Letter June 13, 2024 (HFS)  for the first time in over 30 years, ASA Harris acknowledged having a Court Order from a Judge in 2007 where Tycee Hightower was emancipated in 2002, before judge Chavira  hereto attached as a Gr Ex 1 and the Respondent replied expeditiously July 1, 2024 via email to every Democratic Person in the legal profession,

A-    That a Child Support representative called the Respondent August 31st 2023 of 312 793-2526 23 minutes 40 seconds, stating she received a referral from Springfield to ZERO out child support et al. hereto attached as Gr Ex 2 Respondent asked her a question in Spanish, she did not answer because it was learned that she was of Polish ethnicity.

 

B-    That on June 26, 2020, ref as Gr Ex 3, Respondent sent Governor Pritzker an Official Complaint against Employers in the Illinois Department of Child Support et al.

 

C-    That the letter on its face corroborates how racism and corruption played a major role against the Respondent when Chavira was allegedly the Assistant States Attorney during the years 2002-2007, the Illinois Dept of Public Aid Div of Child Support had the Respondent in court illegally him and his family were on Public Aid as well and he was taking his family to therapy at UIC 3-4 days out of the week and Public Aid had to provide him additional monies so that he could get his family to their appointments for the help that was needed coping with depression etc.

 

D-    That the Political Machine rewarded every Black or Colored person who participated in the creation or falsification of any documents or kept their mouths shut or snitched on those trying to help him against the Respondent for the alleged Ku Klux Klan judges and attorneys Lester Barclay is the President of the CTA, William Stewart Boyd became a judge and a monster!, Iris Chavira allegedly received a judicial position not qualified one bit, etc. but as long as Black and certain Hispanics destroy their own ethnic groups, they will be rewarded a position in the Democratic Party. 


                                    RE NOTICE OF FILING

                         MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT OF FRAUD

                                      OF $50 Million Dollars

 

Please be advised that on July 15, 2024 Defendant has filed before this Circuit Court, his Re Notice Motion for Default Judgment of $50 Million Dollars; and will present said legally sufficient instrument before the proper Judge who is presiding on this matter August 8, at 9:00 am via Zoom. Respondent appeared before Judge Andrea Webber via Zoom on March 21, 2024 at 9:30 am, 2024, but never received a court order.       

 

Zoom Link for Maritza Martinez
Meeting ID: 985 6932 0525
Password: 080942

                   Dial In Number: 312-626-6799 

 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY ILLINOIS

DOMESTIC RELATIONS DIVISION

IN RE                                                              )

                                                                         )

 Francoise Hightower                                      )        Judge Iris Y. Chivira                     

        Petitioner                                                 )

                                                                         )        Cal 41 

          VS                                                          )                                  

                                                                         )        No. 88 D 079012                         

 Joe Louis Lawrence                                        )        

        Respondent                                              )        Room CL-12

 

MOTION TO RECUSE THE ENTIRE COOK COUNTY JUDICIARY AND APPOINT A SPECIAL PROSECUTOR PURSUANT TO THE CASE OF 2 EX-COOK COUNTY ASSISTANT STATE’S ATTORNEY’S (NICHOLAS TRUTENKO, ANDREW HORVAT) DUE TO FORMER ASSISTANT’S STATES ATTORNEY IRIS Y. CHIVIRA ALLEGEDLY TOOK PART IN THE FALSIFICATION OF BACKDATING RECORDS MAKING HER A MINOR FOR POLICE OFFICER FRANCOISER HIGHTOWER FOR HER EMANCIPATED DAUGHTER TYCEE LAQITA HIGHTOWER CAUSING RESPONDENT TO BE REMANDED INTO CUSTODY FOR ALLEGEDLY OWING CHILD SUPPORT 5 TIMES THAT WAS NEVER OWED AND NOT HIS CHILD AND THEY HAVE ADMITTED TO THE VERACITY OF THIS VIA SUMMARY JUDGMENT/DEFAULT BUT COOK COUNTY JUDGES ARE TRYING TO CONTINUOUSLY COVER-UP THE MAYHEM & EGREGIOUS INJUSTICES BECAUSE OF HIS SKIN COLOR COVERING UP A PLETHORA OF CRIMES ASSOCIATED IN THIS MATTER WHERE THE MAY 29TH EMAIL WAS SENT TO PRESIDING JUDGE REGINA SCANNICCHIO TO VACATE COURT ORDER BEING VOID/A NULLITY (MARCH 27, 2024) DUE TO JUDGE MARITZA MARTINEZ NOT HAVING JURISDICTION AND INVOKING THE JURISDICTION OF THE STATE POLICE/JUDICIAL COMMISSION TO FORCIBLY REMOVE JUDGE (S) INSTANTER FROM THEIR POSITIONS DUE TO ADMISSIONS OF SUMMARY JUDGMENT (FILED DEC 4, 2023) Local Rule 56.1  The rule is very clear that "all material facts set forth in the statement required of the moving party will be deemed admitted unless controverted by the statement of the opposing party." Local Rule 56.1(b)(3)(B).

WITH AFFIDAVIT

 

A-    The Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals held that the Circuit Court   of Cook County is a criminal enterprise. U.S. v. Murphy, 768 F.2d 1518,    1531 (7th Cir. 1985)”.

 

2.           That Fed Rule Civ P. 8 and 9 require plaintiffs to particularize their allegations of "fraud on the court" in as short, plain, and direct a way as is reasonable. To comply with these rules, Plaintiff in specific detail outlined each judicial proceeding complained of, alleged specific facts that make those proceedings "fraudulent" or otherwise improper, and named the particular judges, parties and other individuals involved and the extent of their involvement in each claim of "fraudulent" or otherwise improper conduct. 

 

I am Joe Louis Lawrence, Counsel  Pro Se, Respondent Movant in this cause, being first duly sworn on oath deposes and states, as follows;

 

1.)   That Pursuant to Steinbrecher v. Steinbrecher, 197 Ill. 2d 514, 528 (2001) “Pro Se litigants are presumed to have full knowledge of applicable court rules and procedures”

 

2.)    That Respondent filed Oct 26, 2023, Re Noticed (Nov. 15, 2023) a Petition to ZERO OUT Child Support due to Assistant States Attorneys Prosecutorial Misconduct as He Illegally Acted as an Enforcement Official for Public Aid on behalf of Police Officer Francoise L.B. Hightower, Induced Reliance on judges Fraudulently to Remand Respondent into Custody 5 times for Allegedly Owing Child Support on a case Dismissed Sept.17, 1987 and Judge Entered a Final Judgment Default May 18, 1988 on Defective Service Never Vacated and Never Ordered Respondent to Pay Child Support Making any and all Orders after the above date Void, with an Affidavit, Petitioner nor the States Attorneys never DENIED OR OBJECTED to the VERACITY of said Pleadings.

A-    That Page 16 of the Re Noticed Motion, PLEASE BE ADVISED that on Nov. 15, 2023 said RE Notice of Motion was hereby filed with the Petition to Zero Out Child Support et al. with the attachments and emailed to all parties recorded in said notice via electronic service along with the requested documents per court directive showing that the States Attorney was in fact the last attorney of record.

 

B-    That a Cook County judge who tried helping the Defendant while in CONTEMPT OF COURT ORDERED him Dec 20, 1994, “to continue his efforts being reinstated by the CTA” “He is ordered to produce all names and documents which may help the court determine his employment status with the CTA” via Ex H, said judge was removed immediately from the case

 

Former CCSA Thomas Kantas was the point person in the hierarchy of the States Attorney’s office who had Carolyn Kennedy, Amy Bernard and Brian Volkman representing Police Officer Francoise Hightower when her daughter was 21 years old receiving numerous unlawful court orders, whereby; Defendant had been REMANDED into CUSTODY 5 times for ALLEGEDLY OWING CHILD SUPPORT, see the Notice of Petition filed Nov 1, 2005 and all related documents demonstrating the States Attorneys representing Police Officer Francoise Louise Barbara Hightower-Belmer (totaling 17 pages).

September 21, 2023, the Supreme Court of Illinois entered an order striking Thomas Alexander Kantas’s name from the roll of attorneys licensed to practice law in Illinois amid allegations of fraud and deception. Posted by AlabNews Staff Writer | Oct 24, 2023 | NewsIllinoisState Level

 

C-      Pursuant to Page 9, Par 18, Page 8 Line1-2, Judge Rivers seemed to have been in receipt of documents only he and Francoise were cognizant of he asked her, “Did you also file answer interrogatories, which were sworn to under oath by you, on April 4, 1986”?

 

Francoise Line 3, “Yes, I did”.

 

Judge Rivers Lines 4-6, “And that indicated, exactly, the time you lived with Mr. Hightower and had intercourse with him, is that correct”?

 

Francoise Line 7, “Yes, it did”.

 

 

3.)    That on week of June 13, 2024, Respondent received a letter from the Illinois Dept of Healthcare and Family services Division of Child Support Services, Monthly Billing Statement et al hereto attached as Gr Ex 1, Support for Children TYCEE HIGHTOWER an adult 39 years of age.

 

4.)    That Page 10, Par 20 of the aforementioned Par 2, Page 2 Page 9 Lines 5-14, Unequivocally corroborate no judge in Cook County or the State of Illinois ever had jurisdiction on the Defendant in any capacity, in that Judge Rivers stated, “Well, counsel, in reference to the instant case, 88 D079012, there has not been no blood test ordered in this case. Now, your client, the plaintiff here, has testified that the blood test results were tendered to the court. That is not in this particular case. A previous case having been nonsuited, as you have indicated in your complaint on September 17, 1987. So, this is a new cause of action against the defendant, although it involves the same parties and subject matter.”

 

A- That Page 10. Pars A, B That Jeanne Sprietsma who was the Supervisor of all Court Reporters rallied all of her court reporters to prepare transcripts of Francoise and her attorney appearing before Judge Rivers without Defendant’s knowledge.

 

D-   Because Jeanne mysteriously died on a boat drowning it was not sure if it was the result of “FOUL PLAY” due to this paternity case (she was very sweet and an outspoken critic of the injustices in this case her court reporters complained to her about what was going on in court), so the Cook County Sheriff and certain members of the Police department advised the Defendant not to name any person helping him not even them because everybody knew Francoise’s father William Jenkins Hightower was sleeping with his daughters, but couldn’t understand the kind of muscle he had staying on the Police force as a Pedophile.

 

E-   That Ex 11, of the Motion to Zero Out Child Support et al dated Nov. 1, 2005 Tycee Hightower was 21 years old emancipated but Judge Chavira as an Assistant States Attorney along with Thomas Kantas who is the brother of Nick Kantas in the Criminal Court allegedly orchestrated this entire extortion scheme trying to steal any type of lump sum monies coming from any possible settlements via IBC/wonder bread or the CTA.

 

F-   Nick Kantas in no way did he take part in any of the vicious racist episodes, he provided to the Respondent excellent advice and to this day his words of wisdom still is being heeded to this very day.

 

5.)    Plaintiff Francoise Hightower incited racial egregious hatred at the innocent Respondent fabricated every account slandering him an attempt to cover-up the fact, she was fucking her biological father and conceived his child it was easy to defame his character by feeding into the racist stereotypes of Black Men impregnating women and abandoning them and claiming he was disgruntled being divorced from her sick as shit, they were never married, Francoise’s mother Lydia Praxelle was a Caucasian and used this to her advantage making sure he did not divulge the secret of William Jenkins Hightower having sex with his daughters, she didn’t give a fuck as long as he wasn’t sleeping with her, that’s why  Respondent was ordered never to go near Tycee or see her via Irish Drunk judge James Meehan and to this day they never spoke or had any type of dialogue.

 

6.)    That entry date of Order of Support 11/28/23, hereto attached, Ex 2, Court Order Nov. 28, 2023, no where is it indicated in said order of any child support orders entered corroborating a “Prima Facie” showing of judicial corruption fraud.

 

7.)    That on May 28th, 2024, Respondent appeared before judge Zellner in error and was courteously redirected to Judge Chavira’s call, hereto attached, Gr Ex 3, Email (May 29, 2024) to Presiding Judge Regina Scannicchio and cc’d to others in competent jurisdiction nobody replied to any of the concerns noted in the email.

 

8.)    That Respondent, he has never filed a frivolous motion in any court but is up against a plethora  “Private Citizens” who are upholding Tyranny, Racism, Corruption and Prima Facie Hate at him for understanding the laws and its applications than so many of them due to their Political or Fraternal or sexual Orientation him being a Heterosexual Freeman.   

 

9.)     That on Jan. 2, 2024 Judge Chivira was in receipt of said Summary Judgment and was never legally recused from this matter upon Motion to Disqualify her (filed Dec. 26, 2024)

 

10.)                        That Clerks and judges demonstrated a malingering attempt to undermine the Respondent or Judge by emailing to him a blank court order from the Presiding judge Regina Scannicchio (Feb. 20, 2024) not signed, hereto attached, Ex A.

 

11.)               That Judge Maritza Martinez was unaware of Rule 23.6 Substitution of Judge of the Illinois Rules of Civil Procedure (C) Orders granting a substitution of judge shall be accompanied by an order transferring the case to the presiding judge of the division or district in which the case is then pending for reassignment.

 

 

12.)                        Judge Martinez became a willing participant in this “Organized Conspiracy” by assuming jurisdiction on said matter becoming now a defacto attorney and coconspirator, “Private Citizen” for the State Officials who have already admitted to taking part in a plethora of Criminal Civil Rights Violations.

A-    Judge Martinez stated “they asked me to preside over this matter on your request to get a new judge” March 27 at 10:10 am via Zoom and had me to swear in to her clandestine hearing.

 

B-    It is clear Judge Martinez was operating under the authority of another alleged Terrorist cell within the Democratic Party/Political Machine

 

C-   She honestly admitted not having Judicial Authority but a Personal Fraternal Authority on the behest of doing what “THEY” told her to do.

 

 

Seventh Circuit Overturns $44.7 Million Jury Verdict Against City in Shooting Incident

  Wednesday, February 24, 2021    Julie Tappendorf

The Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals recently overturned a jury verdict against the City of Chicago awarding $44.7 million in damages relating to a shooting involving an off-duty police officer. First Midwest Bank as Guardian v. City of Chicago.

According to the court opinion, the plaintiff claimed that a Chicago police officer shot his friend during an argument when the two had been drinking. The friend suffered traumatic brain and other injuries. The friend sued the City of Chicago seeking damages for the shooting, arguing that the City was responsible for the officer's conduct. Specifically, the plaintiff claimed that the City's failure to have an "early warning system" to identify officers who might engage in misconduct, failure to adequately investigate and discipline officers who engage in misconduct, and the "code of silence" among police officers contributed to the shooting incident. The City argued that the officer was off duty and not acting under "color of state law" at the time of the shooting, so the City was not liable under Section 1983 of the Civil Rights Act. The case made its way to a jury which found the City of Chicago liable and awarded $44.7 million in damages to the plaintiff. The jury found that two of the City's policies - its failure to maintain an adequate early warning system and failure to adequately investigate and discipline officers - caused the officer to shoot his friend. 

The City appealed to the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals, which reversed the jury verdict and award. The appeals court found that although the injuries suffered by plaintiff from the shooting incident were grievous, the City was not responsible for the officer's actions, where the officer was acting as a private citizen and not as a City police officer. The Seventh Circuit noted that Section 1983 imposes liability only when a municipality has violated a federal right. Since none of the plaintiff's federal rights were violated, the court of appeals overturned the jury verdict against the City of Chicago.    

 

13.)                         That on April 16, 2024, Judge Chivira appeared on the 9:00 call and acknowledged the Respondent and stated she was going to call his case at 9:30 am but she had him sitting frivolously knowing Francoise nor the Assistant States Attorney were going to appear.

 

14.)                        She stated, “that the Clerk’s did not file said Motion in the Database” even though, I had a file stamped copy she stated for me to return to the 8th floor and let them know that it was not filed.

A-    Judge Chivira made it clear she was continuing the case until next Tuesday April 23rd at 9:05.

 

B-    The computer reflects that Judge Chivira continued this matter to May 28, 2024 on State’s Attorney Motion/Continuances at 9:05 am, hereto attached, Gr Ex B, a Printout from the Electronic Docket

 

C-    FOR THE RECORD PER GR EX B, Respondent never had MANILOW AND GOLDMAN as his attorneys they were made up to make it look like he had legal representation when all of these unlawful acts were taking place on behalf of Police Officer Francoise and when her biological Police officer father was alive.

 

15.)                        She appeared not to either understand what she was looking at or was pretending via zoom because it was filed as she said under the Notice of Filing.

 

16.)                        Respondent emailed (April 17, 2024, 11:08 am) Judge Chivira and Chief Judge hereto attached, Ex C explaining he never received a Court Order nobody responded.

 

A-    “A Void Judgment from its inception is and forever continues to be absolutely null, without legal efficacy, ineffectual to bind parties or support a right, of no legal force and effect whatever, and incapable of confirmation, ratification, or enforcement in any manner or to any degree. “A void judgment, order or decree may be attacked at any time or in any court, either directly or collaterally” Oak Park Nat Bank v. Peoples Gas Light & Coke Col, 46 Ill. App. 2d 385, 197 N.E. 3d 73, 77, (1st Dist. 1964)          

 

 

U. S Sup Court Digest 24(1) General Conspiracy

 

U.S. 2003. Essence of a conspiracy is an agreement to commit an unlawful act. —U.S. v. Jimenez Recio, 123 S. Ct. 819, 537 U.S. 270, 154 L.Ed.2d 744, on remand 371F.3d 1093

 

         Agreement to commit an unlawful act, which constitutes the essence of a conspiracy, is a distinct evil that exist and be punished whether or not the substantive crime ensues. -Id.

         Conspiracy poses a threat to the public over and above the threat of the commission of the relevant substantive crime, both because the combination in crime makes more likely the commission of other crimes and because it decreases the part from their path of criminality. -Id.

 

CONSPIRACY

Fraud maybe inferred from nature of acts complained of, individual and collective interest of alleged conspirators, situation, intimacy, and relation of parties at time of commission of acts, and generally all circumstances preceding and attending culmination of claimed conspiracy Illinois Rockford Corp. V. Kulp, 1968, 242 N.E. 2d 228, 41 ILL. 2d 215.

 

     Conspirators to be guilty of offense need not have entered into conspiracy at same time or have taken part in all its actions. People V. Hardison, 1985, 911 Dec. 162, 108. Requisite mens rea elements of conspiracy are satisfied upon showings of agreement of offense with intent that offense be committed; Actus reas element is satisfied of act in furtherance of agreement People V. Mordick, 1981, 50 ILL, Dec. 63

 

                INDUCING RELIANCE

To prevail in a cause of action for fraud, plaintiff must prove that defendant made statement of material nature which was relied on by victim and was made for purposes of inducing reliance, and that victim’s reliance led to his injury. Parsons V. Winter, 1986, 1 Dist., 491 N.E. 2d 1236, 96 ILL Dec. 776, 142 ILL App 3d 354, Appeal Denied.

 

    In Carter V. Mueller 457 N.E. 2d 1335 ILL. App. 1 Dist. 1983 The Supreme Court has held that: “The elements of a cause of action for fraudulent misrepresentation (sometimes referred to as “fraud and deceit” or deceit) are: (1) False statement of material fact; (2) known or believed to be false by the party making it; (3) intent to induce the other party to act; (4) action by the other party in reliance on the truth of the statement; and (5) damage to the other party resulting from such reliance.

 

 

17.)                        The United States Supreme Court acknowledged the judicial corruption in Cook County, when it stated that Judge "Maloney was one of many dishonest judges exposed and convicted through 'Operation Greylord', a labyrinthine federal investigation of judicial corruption in Chicago". Bracey v. Gramley, case No. 96-6133 (June 9, 1997).

Since judges who do not report the criminal activities of other judges become principals in the criminal activity, 18 U.S.C. Section 2, 3 & 4, and since no judges have reported the criminal activity of the judges who have been convicted, the other judges are as guilty as the convicted judges.        

Under Federal law which is applicable to all states, the U.S. Supreme Court stated that if a court is "without authority, its judgments and orders are regarded as nullities. They are not voidable, but simply void; and form no bar to a recovery sought, even prior to a reversal in opposition to them. They constitute no justification; and all persons concerned in executing such judgments or sentences, are considered, in law, as trespassers." Elliot v. Piersol, 1 Pet. 328, 340, 26 U.S. 328, 340 (1828)

The Illinois Supreme Court held that if a court "could not hear the matter upon the jurisdictional paper presented, its finding that it had the power can add nothing to its authority, - it, had no authority to make that finding." The People v. Brewer, 128 Ill. 472, 483 (1928). The judges listed below had no legal authority (jurisdiction) to hear or rule on certain matters before them. They acted without any jurisdiction.

When judges act when they do not have jurisdiction to act, or they enforce a void order (an order issued by a judge without jurisdiction), they become trespassers of the law, and are engaged in treason.

 

A-  The Seventh Circuit failed to institute a law stating to EXECUTE, or LIFE IN PRISON or any other related penalty for those who are complicit in these said crimes, so many who are the majority in control and controlling inferior people have put Blacks on the front line as PAWNS, in the event the government learns of this successful coup, they will apprehend all Inferior Blacks first.

 

B-   That every person regardless to their color, sexuality or Political/Fraternal associations who became complicit in any enumerated acts should be sentenced/executed in the same like manner as if they were the original perpetrators

 

History shows that it does not matter who is in power... those who have not learned to do for themselves and have to depend solely on others never obtain any more rights or privileges in the end than they did in the beginning.

 

"When you control a man's thinking you do not have to worry about his actions. You do not have to tell him not to stand here or go yonder. He will find his 'proper place' and will stay in it. You do not need to send him to the back door. He will go without being told. In fact, if there is no back door, he will cut one for his special benefit. His education makes it necessary." Carter G. Woodson, 1933

 

a.       To show fraud upon the court, the complaining party must establish that the alleged misconduct affected the integrity of the judicial process, either because the court itself was defrauded or because the misconduct was perpetrated by officers of the court. Alexander v. Robertson, 882, F. 2d 421,424 (9th Cir. 1989);

 

b.      A void judgment does not create any binding obligation. Kalb v. Feuerstein (1940) 308 US 433, 60 S Ct 343, 84 L, Ed 370.

 

18.)                That the word Political Machine is a buzz word for Ku Klux Klan or any Racist Insurrectionist Order and an excuse Justifying the unlawful applications of Jim Crow Laws still being ENFORCED which are Outlawed by the United States Supreme Court but the Apartheid Racist Terrorist Applications of those laws have been systematically circumvented by recruiting the necessary inferior Blacks and Hateful Anglo-Saxons or any other ethnic race willing to continually inflict GENOCIDE, TYRANNY, MASS DESTRUCTION on any ethnic group they deem inferior as demonstrated throughout all documents.  

 

19.)                 Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. once said, "He who passively accepts evil is as much involved in it as he who helps to perpetrate it. He who accepts evil without protesting against it is really cooperating with it

 

WHEREFORE the aforementioned reasons Defendant respectfully Prays for the Relief

 

1.    For an Order Disqualifying Judge Chavira Judge Martinez and the entire Cook County Judiciary Instanter for the Criminal Acts of Trespassing upon the Laws and being “Private Citizens” upholding racism Terrorism and a plethora of Criminal Frauds at the Defendant.

 

2.    For an Order transferring certain parts of this matter to a Judge in the Federal  venue due to Corruption and Fraud;

 

3.    For an Order reimbursing all fees and costs to the Defendant for the enforcement of this matter;

 

4.    For an Order issuing a Mandatory Injunction of HFS/Child Support Enforcement to Prohibit said unit from prosecuting any more cases until an investigation is had ascertaining all parties involved in said Criminal Enterprise.

A-   That said ASA Harris and the Caucasian ASA on the Nov 14, 2023 be referred for Law License be REVOKED INSTANTER for violations of Ethics RPC 3.3 and every other ASA involved.

 

5.    For an Order investigating the Clerks who was responsible for ascertaining the names of other Attorneys not Recommended to be judges who bypassed the proper legal requirements and finagled their way to the Cook County Ballot.

 

6.    For an Order on Rule to Show Cause of Sanctions Remands and Disbarments of all Assistant States Attorneys, Clerks and State employees involved in this matter;    

 

7.    For an Order assigning this matter away from the Cook County judges and Special Prosecutor to enforce any and all proceedings

 

8.    For the entry of an Order awarding to your Petitioner for such other relief and any other relief necessary as equity may require of which this court may deem overwhelmingly just;

 

“No one is above the Law”, citing a 1928 decision by Supreme Court Justice Louis Brandeis Olmstead v. United States, 277 U.S. 438 (1928),

“We must subject government officials to the same rules of conduct that we expect of the citizen. The very existence of the government is imperiled if it fails to observe the law scrupulously. As Brandeis puts it, "if the government becomes a lawbreaker, it breeds contempt for law; it invites every man to become a law unto himself; it invites anarchy. To declare that in the administration of the criminal law the end justifies the means—to declare that the government may commit crimes in order to secure the conviction of a private criminal—would bring terrible retribution. Against that pernicious doctrine this court should resolutely set its face."         

 

                                                                             _________________________________

                                                                                Joe Louis Lawrence, Counsel Pro Se

  


IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY ILLINOIS

DOMESTIC RELATIONS DIVISION

IN RE                                                              )

                                                                         )

 Francoise Hightower                                      )        Judge Iris Y. Chivira                     

        Petitioner                                                 )

                                                                         )        Cal 41 

          VS                                                          )                                  

                                                                         )        No. 88 D 079012                         

 Joe Louis Lawrence                                        )        

        Respondent                                              )        Room CL-12

                                                  

 

                                                         NOTICE OF

 MOTION TO RECUSE THE ENTIRE COOK COUNTY JUDICIARY AND APPOINT A SPECIAL PROSECUTOR PURSUANT TO THE CASE OF 2 EX-COOK COUNTY ASSISTANT STATE’S ATTORNEY’S (NICHOLAS TRUTENKO, ANDREW HORVAT) DUE TO FORMER ASSISTANT’S STATES ATTORNEY IRIS Y. CHIVIRA ALLEGEDLY TOOK PART IN THE FALSIFICATION OF BACKDATING RECORDS MAKING HER A MINOR FOR POLICE OFFICER FRANCOISER HIGHTOWER FOR HER EMANCIPATED DAUGHTER TYCEE LAQITA HIGHTOWER CAUSING RESPONDENT TO BE REMANDED INTO CUSTODY FOR ALLEGEDLY OWING CHILD SUPPORT 5 TIMES THAT WAS NEVER OWED AND NOT HIS CHILD AND THEY HAVE ADMITTED TO THE VERACITY OF THIS VIA SUMMARY JUDGMENT/DEFAULT BUT COOK COUNTY JUDGES ARE TRYING TO CONTINUOUSLY COVER-UP THE MAYHEM & EGREGIOUS INJUSTICES BECAUSE OF HIS SKIN COLOR COVERING UP A PLETHORA OF CRIMES ASSOCIATED IN THIS MATTER WHERE THE MAY 29TH EMAIL WAS SENT TO PRESIDING JUDGE REGINA SCANNICCHIO TO VACATE COURT ORDER BEING VOID/A NULLITY (MARCH 27, 2024) DUE TO JUDGE MARITZA MARTINEZ NOT HAVING JURISDICTION AND INVOKING THE JURISDICTION OF THE STATE POLICE/JUDICIAL COMMISSION TO FORCIBLY REMOVE JUDGE (S) INSTANTER FROM THEIR POSITIONS DUE TO ADMISSIONS OF SUMMARY JUDGMENT (FILED DEC 4, 2023) Local Rule 56.1  The rule is very clear that "all material facts set forth in the statement required of the moving party will be deemed admitted unless controverted by the statement of the opposing party." Local Rule 56.1(b)(3)(B).

WITH AFFIDAVIT

 

 

 

Please be advised that on June 21, 2024 Respondent has filed before this  Domestic Relations Division Motion to Recuse the Entire Cook County Judiciary et al; and will present said legally sufficient instrument before any Judge          2024  in her stead at 9:30 am in room via Zoom       

 

Zoom Link
Meeting ID: 84376080114
Password: 086627
Dial In Number: 312-626-6799

 

 I  Joe Louis Lawrence, Counsel Pro Se Defendant, certify that I have on this day deposited said Notice and Motion to all parties recorded in said Notice via regular mail/electronic delivery.

               

Governor JB Pritzker gov.casework@illinois.gov   

 

To:   Hon.  Iris Y. Chivira CCC.DomRelCRCL12@cookcountyil.gov

  sao.csed@cookcountyil.gov 

 

Judge Derico mfmlcalendar56@cookcountyil.gov

Jaime Barcus jaime.barcas@cookcountyil.gov

ccc.domrelcr3006@cookcountyil.gov

 

 Francoise L.B. Hightower-Belmer 1152 West 102nd Street Chg. Il. 60643-2353   

 

Cook County State’s Attorney                               Chief Judge Timothy C. Evans

           Kim Foxx                                                     timothy.evans@cookcountyil.gov            

 statesattorney@cookcountyil.gov     

 

     Attorney General                                              Cook County Sheriff’s

 Kwame Raoul alexandrina.shrove@ilag.gov                Tom Dart                                                                                                                                    

                                                                              email CCSO@ccsheriff.org

Potestivo & Ass., PC                                              

Bryan G. Thompson, Poulami Mal  pmal@potestivolaw.com                                     

ipleadings@potestivolaw.com                              

press@cookcountyil.gov bthompson@potestivolaw.com 

ilrb.filing@illinois.gov,
alexandrina.shrove@ilag.gov,
oig.referrals@illinois.gov
                  
rwillis@laboradvocates.com,
jodi.mar@illinois.gov,
helen.j.kim@illinois.gov,
lashonda.channel@illinois.gov,
brianna.klein@illinois.gov,
kimberly.stevens@illinois.gov,
anna.hamburg-gal@illinois.gov,
khill@atu241chicago.org,
frogishtwo65@gmail.com,

                                                                           

The Crusader Newspaper Group

Managing Editor Sharon Fountain

sfountain@chicagocrusader.com

                                                        State Police isp.contact@illinois.gov 

                                                                                Illinois State Police                                           

 

 

                                          AFFIDAVIT

 

 

I Joe Louis Lawrence, Counsel Pro Se being duly sworn on oath states the aforementioned pleadings enumerated within said motion pursuant to 735 1265 5/1-109, the undersigned certifies that the statements set forth in this instrument are true and correct, except as to matters therein stated to be on information and belief and as to such matters, the undersigned certifies as aforesaid that he verily believes the same to be true.

 

 

 

 

 

Respectfully Submitted  

                                                                                                    Notary

                                                                       

____________________

 

Joe Louis Lawrence

Counsel Pro Se

 

 

 

                                           

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


No comments:

Post a Comment