Mass exoneration: Convictions of 15 men, tied to tainted CPD officer, overturned
CHICAGO (WLS) --
In what's being called the first mass exoneration in the history of Cook County, criminal charges against 15 former inmates were officially thrown out by a judge Thursday morning.The men petitioned the court in September, seeking to have 1 convictions overturned and set aside. They found out Wednesday that their request had been granted.
Ten of the 15 defendants appeared in court Thursday at the Leighton Criminal Courthouse to have their slates wiped clean.
"I feel like I have the opportunity to do whatever I want to do now. It's like a new life for me. I'm 36 years old. I mean, I can do whatever I want to do right now," said Leonard Gipson, one of the exonerated men.
"Now I have vindication. It's very sad to think that we as a people, and I mean all of us, in the United States, have to go through this type of stuff," said Philip Thomas, another exonerated man.
The 18 overturned convictions, from 2003 to 2008, were tied to ex-Chicago Police Sergeant Ronald Watts, who was accused of manufacturing evidence during investigations. The defendants claimed Watts and his team of officers framed them for drug crimes.
"Everyone knew, pay Watts or go to jail. That's just the way it was going to go. If you're not going to pay him, you're going to jail. Everyone knew what he was doing," Gipson said.
"In these cases, we concluded that unfortunately, the police were not being truthful. We couldn't have confidence in the integrity of their reports and their testimony. So in good conscience, we could not see these convictions stand," said Mark Rotert, director of the Cook County State's Attorney's Office's Conviction Integrity Unit.
"I am just extraordinarily heartened by today. I think it's an extraordinary sign of what's going on in this country and this city," said Joshua Tepfer, the attorney representing the group of exonerated men.
Watts was convicted of extorting money from drug dealers in 2013 and served a federal sentence of 22 months. Observers said the mass exoneration marks a historic day in Cook County.
"I think there is potential that this will emerge, when it comes into full view, as perhaps the biggest scandal in the history of the police department," said independent journalist Jamie Kalven.
Frank and Alexa Saunders have since moved out of state to try to escape what they called the culture of corruption at the Chicago Police Department.
"I just feel like this can be put behind us now because voice-their voices, our voices are being heard," Alexa Saunders said.
Chicago police spokesman Anthony Guglielmi said Thursday night that six officers and a sergeant will be placed on desk duty pending an investigation into whether they committed any wrongdoing while working under Watts.
IN THE
UNITED STATES
COURT OF APPEALS
FOR
THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT
219 South Dearborn
CHICAGO, ILLINOIS 60604
U.S. BANK N.A. AS TRUSTEE FOR SECURITIZED
TRUST MASTR ASSET BACKED SECURITIES TRUST 2006-NC3; UBS REAL ESTATE
SECURITIES INC.; MORTGAGE ASSET SECURITIZATION TRANSACTIONS, INC.; WELLS
FARGO BANK, N.A.; MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEM,
DUTTON & DUTTON, PC,
POSTESTIVO & ASSC.
Plaintiffs,
MONZELLA JOHNSON AND MARCIA
JOHNSON
Defendants. |
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
) ) ) ) ) )
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
|
Civil
Action No. ______________________
Hon.Samuel
Der-Yeghiayan
Magistrate M.
David
Weisman
16-cv- 08628
|
MOTION TO REINSTATE CASE DUE TO JUDGE FREDRENNA LYLE &
NUMEROUS JUDGES TRESPASSING UPON THE LAWS COMMITTING TREASON MAKING THE DISTRICT
COURT ORDER “VOID” A “NULLITY” SAID JUDGES PRESIDED OVER THIS CASE HAD NO
JURISDICTION ACTING AS PRIVATE CITIZENS RULE TO SHOW CAUSE REMANDING HER/THEM
INTO CUSTODY & MANDATORY INJUNCTION PROHIBITING ALL LEGAL ACTIONS PENDING
BEFORE THE COURTS TRYING TO STEAL HOME w/AFFIDAVIT
MOTION TO REINSTATE DISQUALIFICATION OF JUDGE –PERSONAL BIAS OR
PREJUDICE {28 USCA 144, 455 (B) (1) VACATE ORDERS OF November 9, 2016 &
November 2, Pursuant to Rule 60 Due to FRAUD/ERROR and CORRUPTION DUE JUDGES
TRESPASSING UPON THE LAWS CORROBORATING THEIR ROLES ENGAGING IN TREASON (07-16-90079)
& TRANSFER THIS MATTER TO ANOTHER CIRCUIT PURSUANT TO RULE 26
Now
comes Defendant Monzella Y. Johnson Pro Se hereby respectfully Moves this court
with corroboration and affidavit the noted reasons herewith her Affidavit in
support of Motion for Reinstate case et al;
Respectfully submitted,
Monzella Y. Johnson, Pro Se
5217
S. Ingleside Ave
Chicago, Il 60615
773
835-5849
JUDGES IN THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT ARE THE TERRORIST CELL PROTECTING JUDGES IN THE COOK COUNTY CRIMINAL ENTERPRISE.
IT IS GOING TO TAKE THE MILITARY OR JUDGES FROM ANOTHER CIRCUIT TO RESTORE LAW AND ORDER BACK INTO THE COURTS
IT IS GOING TO TAKE THE MILITARY OR JUDGES FROM ANOTHER CIRCUIT TO RESTORE LAW AND ORDER BACK INTO THE COURTS
IN THE
UNITED STATES
COURT OF APPEALS
FOR
THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT
219 South Dearborn
CHICAGO, ILLINOIS
60604
AFFIDAVIT
IN
SUPPORT OF MOTION TO REINSTATE CASE DUE TO JUDGE FREDRENNA LYLE & NUMEROUS
JUDGES TRESPASSING UPON THE LAWS COMMITTING TREASON MAKING THE DISTRICT COURT ORDER
“VOID” A “NULLITY” SAID JUDGES PRESIDED OVER THIS CASE HAD NO
JURISDICTION ACTING AS PRIVATE CITIZENS RULE TO SHOW CAUSE REMANDING HER/THEM
INTO CUSTODY & MANDATORY INJUNCTION PROHIBITING ALL LEGAL ACTIONS PENDING
BEFORE THE COURTS TRYING TO STEAL HOME w/AFFIDAVIT.
MOTION TO REINSTATE DISQUALIFICATION OF JUDGE –PERSONAL BIAS OR
PREJUDICE {28 USCA 144, 455 (B) (1) VACATE ORDERS OF November 9, 2016 &
November 2, Pursuant to Rule 60 Due to FRAUD/ERROR and CORRUPTION DUE JUDGES
TRESPASSING UPON THE LAWS CORROBORATING THEIR ROLES ENGAGING IN TREASON (07-16-90079)
& TRANSFER THIS MATTER TO ANOTHER CIRCUIT PURSUANT TO RULE 26
1.
I am Monzella Y. Johnson, Respondent in this cause, being first duly sworn on
oath deposes and states, as follows;
- That
The court ignored the valid certified court order demonstrating Cook
County Circuit Court judge vacated the Foreclosure judgment June 2, 2010;
A- Unbeknown
to Samuel
Der-Yeghiayan he had “Trespassed upon the Laws” and became a
“Private Citizen” in this cause
engaging in “Treason”;
B- Said
judge used his position and authority corroborating his roles as a “Private Citizen” assisting the Cook
County Criminal Enterprise in stealing the Defendant’s home by remanding the
case back to their jurisdiction unlawfully;
3.
That said Judge participated in an “Organized Conspiracy” became a “Private Citizen” prevented jurisdiction so as to conceal and
cover-up an elaborate scheme of judges engaging in a criminal enterprise of
stealing Respondents home in the guise of foreclosure.
A- Pursuant
to 210 Ill. 2d R. 13(c) (1); Cir. Ct.
R. 1.4(a) Appearance Required: Other than petitions to intervene, no
motion may be presented unless an appearance has been filed with the Clerk of
Cook County.
B- Pursuant
to a response letter of Oct. 21, 2008, from Judge Carolyn Quinn, hereto attached,
Gr Ex A, Judge Carolyn Quinn cc’d
communication to Dutton & Dutton law firm;
C- That
said judge was in cahoots with said law firm in that said law firm never filed
an appearance in said matter but was receiving correspondence from an Associate
Judge which corroborates said judge “Trespassing
upon the Laws” becoming a “Private
Citizen” lost subject matter jurisdiction due to the aforementioned acts.
D-
That Respondent filed a Notice of Filing –
Refused for Fraud MERS request to extend, Jan. 28, 2009, law firm Dutton
& Dutton is named in the document, hereto attached, Gr Ex B.
E-
4.
That the Appellate Court judges from the 5th Div. (No. 1-10-3019)
became incorporated by the Inducement of said judge and attorneys, “Trespassing Upon the Laws” issued a “Void Order” a “Nullity”
5.
That pursuant to Page
5 Par 14 and Page 6, of Gr Ex C “When defendants filed their “emergency” 2-1401 petition, the June 2009
foreclosure judgment and the February 2010 final order approving the
foreclosure sale had already been vacated by the trial court’s June 2010 order.
The court’s decision to vacate the June 2009 foreclosure judgment and
subsequent foreclosure sale was actually based on one of the issues defendants
raise here, namely that the affidavit plaintiff was required to file in order
to support the foreclosure judgment was “wholly insufficient” We
affirm the trial court’s order.
Under Federal law which is
applicable to all states, the U.S. Supreme Court stated that if a court is
"without authority, its judgments and orders are regarded as nullities.
They are not voidable, but simply void; and form no bar to a recovery sought,
even prior to a reversal in opposition to them. They constitute no
justification; and all persons concerned in executing such judgments or
sentences, are considered, in law, as trespassers." Elliot
v. Piersol, 1 Pet. 328, 340, 26 U.S. 328, 340 (1828)
When judges act when they do not
have jurisdiction to act, or they enforce a void order (an order issued by a
judge without jurisdiction), they become trespassers of the law, and are
engaged in treason (see below).
The U.S. Supreme Court, in Scheuer
v. Rhodes, 416 U.S. 232, 94 S. Ct. 1683, 1687 (1974) stated that
"when a state officer acts under a state law in a manner violative of the
Federal Constitution, he "comes into conflict with the superior authority
of that Constitution, and he is in that case stripped of his official or
representative character and is subjected in his person to the
consequences of his individual conduct. The State has no power to impart to him
any immunity from responsibility to the supreme authority of the United
States." [Emphasis supplied in original].
By law, a judge is a state
officer as in this case Federal officers.
The judge then acts not as a
judge, but as a private individual (in his person).
6.
That pursuant to the aforementioned laws by the United
States Supreme Court every order entered against the Respondent are deemed a “Nullity” simply “Void”
Hereto attached Gr Ex D, a Computer printout of Dutton
& Dutton, 10325 W. Lincoln Hwy. Frankfort, IL. 60423 (815) 806-8200 is
recorded on Clerk of the Circuit Court database.
A- That
said printout, states Page 1 of 31,
in that certain clerks during and around that time working for the Criminal
Enterprise of Cook County altered and deleted Dutton & Dutton’s name from
the database.
7.
That Judge Lyles had Notice and knowledge that she was
in fact “Trespassing Upon the Laws”
taking part in an “Organized Conspiracy”
corroborating her role engaging in “Treason” as a “Private Citizen” by
violating her oath by ignoring Gr Ex E,
Respondent’s Motion for Reconsideration Vacate (September 1st Order
due to Error “Fraud” Trespassing Upon the Laws Making the Order a Nullity
w/Affidavit;
A-
That because Lyle has pledged her allegiance to a
Terrorist Cell operated by Democrats within the Democratic Party, Trespassed upon
the Laws; whereby, Page 1 Par 1, is
clear “That Plaintiffs having admitted to
all facts recorded in said Respondent’s Response Motion Striking &
Objecting Plaintiff’s Motion filed July 7, 2017 et al. via affidavit and
transcripts”;
B-
“Court having
no jurisdiction ignored Defendants valid Summary judgment demonstrating
Prejudice & Bias behavior pursuant to S.H.A. 735 ILCS 5/2---1001 (a) (3);
Sup Ct. Rule 63 (c) (1)”
C- That
said judge further corroborating her role as a “Private Citizen” has demonstrated a wanton and wilful contempt for
the laws of the United States Constitution ignored Gr Ex F, Respondent’s Response Motion Reply Objecting Judge Lyle’s
Court Order Due to Her & Plaintiff’ Attorneys “Trespassing Upon the Laws”
Judge acting as a “Private Citizen” Entering Court Orders Void a Nullity
w/Affidavit
8.
That Page 6
Par 28c and Page 7 Par D states,
“That said document purported to being a
properly e filed document was a “Fraud” it states in the upper right hand
corner ELECTRONICALLY FILED 9/29/2017
6:29 pm
A- That
an additional FRAUDULENT DOCUMENT WAS E
FILED, hereto attached, another ELECTRONICALLY
FILED document 9/29/2017 6:22 pm Page
1 of 44 but at the bottom CERTIFICATE
OF SERVICE, I Artapong Sriratana an attorney certify---depositing the same
in the U.S. mail at 223 W. Jackson Street---before the hour of 5:00 pm on
February 5, 2015 with proper postage prepaid.
B- That
the transcript from the Dec. 6, 2017 hearing will be available at a later date
due to an unforeseen emergency said transcript could not be prepared in a
timely manner due to court reporter had to go out of town on an emergency.
9.
That said judges are likened to Weapons of Mass Destruction in that said individuals have
deluded themselves into believing there is not a Federal judge with any
Academic skills or knowledge of the laws to ascertain how they have been able
to make an Ass out of the legal system where there are competent judges by
Inducing Reliance upon any and all individuals within the legal arena by “Trespassing upon the Laws”
10. “Private Citizen” Lyle validated the
verity of her corroborated her role engaging in “Treason Offenses” by “Trespassing
upon the Laws” Denied Defendants Motions as Gr
Ex G, Court Order Dec. 6, 2017, the egregious aspect of this said “Private Citizen” conspired with said attorneys
went along with Order of Default, Order for Appointing of Selling
Officer, Judgment for Foreclosure and Sale did not sign any of the
orders; Gr Ex H, Court Order Oct.
23, 2017 further demonstrating her role as a Domestic Terrorist taking part
violating her oath stealing homes.
11. That
because of the number of judges under Judicial Complaint within the Seventh
Circuit Case # 07-16-90074 demonstrates
an impossibility of any integrity in this matter is all the reasons why this
matter belongs before another circuit.
- The request for a transfer may be
made at any stage of the proceeding before a reference to the Judicial
Conference under Rule 20 (b) (1)
(C) or 20 (b) (2) or a Petition for Review is filed under Rule 22:
- Rule
26, it
implements the Breyer Committee’s recommended use of transfers. Breyer Committee Report, 239 F.R.D.
at 214-15.
14. Rule
26 authorizes the
transfer of a complaint proceeding to another judicial council selected by the
Chief Justice. Such transfers may be appropriate, for example, in the case of a
serious complaint where there are multiple disqualifications among the original
council, where the issues are highly visible and a local disposition may weaken
public confidence in the process, where internal tensions arising in the
council as a result of the complaint render disposition by a less involved
council appropriate, or where a complaint calls into question policies or
governance of the home court of appeals et al.
15. That
in furtherance to the above hereto attached, Gr Ex G, Motion to Reinstate Case due to Judge Valderrama Trespassing
upon the Laws Committing Treason making the District Court Order “Void” a “Nullity”
said judge Presided over a case He had no Jurisdiction Acting as a “Private
Citizen” Rule to Show Cause Remanding Him into Custody w/Affidavit.
16. That
because there is not one Democratic
representative within the confines of the City or State of Illinois government
with a scintilla of integrity or competency within the laws to avail themselves
and uphold the doctrines of the United States Constitution and admonish said
diabolical heinous acts of Treason against the citizens of the United States
warrants this matter being transferred to a Circuit of integrity and of the
legal aptitude to enforce the laws in accordance to the United States
Constitution.
17. How can a man acting as a “Private Citizen”
no longer a judge being appointed or elected to their positions after “Trespassing upon the Laws” have
subject matter jurisdiction over an officer of the court be it Pro se or
licensed attorney as they prosecute the laws in accordance to the laws of the
United States Constitution and not arbitrary to political or sexual orientation
values notwithstanding any unlawful fraternal affiliations?
A- The
answer is the judge cannot because so many have purchased their law licenses
for a nominal fee or slept their way with powerful white men “Organized in
Politics”, politically appointed is all the reasons why the courts are in
the shapes they are in because the Democrats have demonstrated a machine
application of allowing judges to “Trespass
upon the Laws” systematically circumvent the United States Constitution by
enforcing “Jim Crow” laws
outlawed by the United States Constitution as a normal practice.
A-
To show fraud upon the court, the complaining party must establish
that the alleged misconduct affected the integrity of the judicial process,
either because the court itself was defrauded or because the misconduct was
perpetrated by officers of the court. Alexander v. Robertson, 882, F. 2d
421,424 (9th Cir. 1989);
B-
A void judgment does not create any binding obligation.
Kalb v. Feuerstein (1940) 308 US 433, 60 S Ct 343, 84 L, Ed 370.
A judge’s disrespect for the rules of court demonstrates
disrespect for the law. Judges are disciplined under Canon 2A for violating
court rules and procedures. Judge ignored mandated witness order in attempt to
accommodate witnesses’ schedules; Citing Canon 2A the court noted, “[a] court’s
indifference to clearly stated rules breeds disrespect for and discontent with
our justice system. Government cannot demand respect of the laws by its
citizens when its tribunals ignore those very same laws”)
A-
Fraud upon the court is a basis for equitable relief. Luttrell v.
United States, 644 F. 2d 1274, 1276 (9th Cir. 1980); see Abatti v.
C.I.R. , 859 F 2d 115, 118 (9th Cir. 1988) “it is beyond question
that a court may investigate a question as to whether there was fraud in the
procurement of a judgment” Universal Oil Products Co. v. Root Refining Co., 328
U.S. 575, 66 S. Ct. 1176, 90 L. Ed. 1447. The power of the court to unearth
such a fraud is the power to unearth it effectively. See Hazel-Atlas Glass Co.
v. Hartford-Empire Co., 322 U.S. 238, 64 S. Ct. 997, 88 L. Ed. 1250; Sprague v.
Ticonic National Bank, 1184 and United States v. Throckmorton, 98 U.S. (8 Otto)
61, 25 L. Ed. 93.
B-
“A judge is an officer of the court, as are all members of the Bar. A
judge is a judicial officer, paid by the Government to act impartially and
lawfully”. People v. Zajic, 88 Ill. App 3d 477, 410 N.E. 2d 626. “A void judgment is regarded as a
nullity, and the situation is the same as it would be if there were no
judgment. It has no legal or binding force or efficacy for any purpose or at
any place….It is not entitled to enforcement. 30A Am Judgments 43, 44,
45. Henderson v Henderson 59 S.E. 2d
227-232
C-
“A Void Judgment from
its inception is and forever continues to be absolutely null, without legal
efficacy, ineffectual to bind parties or support a right, of no legal force and
effect whatever, and incapable of confirmation, ratification, or enforcement in
any manner or to any degree. “A void judgment, order or decree may be attacked
at any time or in any court, either directly or collaterally” Oak Park Nat Bank v.
Peoples Gas Light & Coke Col, 46 Ill. App. 2d 385, 197 N.E. 3d 73, 77, (1st
Dist. 1964)
A- “The Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals held
that the Circuit Court of Cook County
is a criminal enterprise. U.S.
v. Murphy, 768 F.2d 1518,
1531 (7th Cir. 1985)”.
Since judges who do not report the criminal activities of other
judges they become principals in the criminal activity, 18 U.S.C. Section 2, 3
& 4, and since no judges have reported the criminal activity of the judges
who have been convicted, the other judges are The criminal activities that the
Federal Courts found in the Circuit Court of Cook County still exist, and are
today under the care, custody and control of Judge Timothy C. Evans (Chief
Judge). The Circuit Court of Cook County remains a criminal enterprise.
JUDICIAL
IMMUNITY
Judges
have given themselves judicial immunity for their judicial functions. Judges
have no judicial immunity for criminal acts, aiding, assisting, or conniving
with others who perform a criminal act, or for their administrative/
ministerial duties. When a judge has a duty to act, he does not have discretion - he is then not performing a judicial act, he is performing a ministerial act.
ministerial duties. When a judge has a duty to act, he does not have discretion - he is then not performing a judicial act, he is performing a ministerial act.
Judicial immunity does not exist
for judges who engage in criminal activity, for judges who connive with, aid
and abet the criminal activity of another judge, or to a judge for damages
sustained by a person who has been harmed by the judge's connivance with,
aiding and abetting, another judge's criminal activity.
TRESPASSERS OF THE LAW
By law, a judge is a state
officer.
The judge then acts not as a
judge, but as a private individual (in his person).
That
because of the above; Fraud
admissibility great latitude is
permitted in proving fraud C.J.S. Fraud 104 ET Seg. Fraud 51-57. where a
question of fraud and deceit is the issue involved in a case, great
latitude is ordinarily permitted in the introduction of evidence, and courts
allow the greatest liberality in the method of examination and in the scope of
inquiry Vigus V. O’Bannon, 1886 8 N.E 788, 118 ILL 334. Hazelton V.
Carolus, 1907 132 ILL. App. 512.
D- In Reference to Case # 17-CV-05482, In the matter of Lee Oties Love, Jr. v. Sup. Ct. of
Ill. Pamela E. Loza, Luciano Panici, James P. Murphy, Joshua P. Haid. Page 6, Par.4 Judge Thomas Panici had charged Plaintiff with a DUI case et
al…….Plaintiff never appeared before this judge and he does not drink., in that
Judge Sharon Coleman a Black female Democrat closed her eyes to the plethora of
heinous Civil Rights violations demonstrating where judges had “Trespassed
upon the Laws” judge Coleman stated, “she
had no jurisdiction”;
She trespassed
upon the Laws saying the Plaintiff dismissed his own case when in fact she
dismissed his case without prejudice.
Plaintiff
Appealed to the 7th Cir. Case
#17-2731 judges William J. Bauer, Michael S. Kanne, Diane S. Sykes entered
an order requesting Plaintiff submit a Brief Memorandum stating why this appeal
should not be dismissed.
The
aforementioned judges dismissed the appeal for lack of jurisdiction said judges
closed their eyes to the plethora of violations demonstrating Cook County
judges acting as “Private Citizens” Trespassing
upon the Laws”.
Plaintiff
filed a Motion for Reconsideration Vacate (August 8, 2017) Order due to
Error Trespassing upon the Laws Making the Order Void a Nullity w/Affidavit
& Reinstate Complaints.
That
said matter was in fact properly noticed for Nov. 1, 2017 at 8:45 am, in that
said judge did not entertain the Motion because her deputy clerk stated, “that it was not properly noticed”.
That
Plaintiff having Re Noticed the matter to Nov. 14, 2017 at 8:45 am, no attorney
appeared to rebut any of the allegations in the motion said judge dismissed the
motion with prejudice claiming she had no jurisdiction said judge made a
disturbing remark on the record demonstrating black judges are only figureheads
Rather
than uphold the laws of the
United States Constitution Judge Coleman said she needed permission from the
judges upstairs on whether she had jurisdiction
E- In
Reference to Case # 17-CV-08060, In
the matter of April Redeaux v Karen Bowes, Gordon Nelson, Steve Wasko, Clarence
Parker, Grace Dickler, Debra B. Walker, Gregory Emmett Ahern, Jr. judge entered
a minute order Nov. 14, 2017 setting a status Hearing for Jan. 11, 2018, Lead
counsel is directed to appear at this status hearing.
When the judge learned of the
Plaintiffs ethnicity being black non white she dismissed her case called her
complaint frivolous fanciful etc. whereby said Federal judge closed her eyes to
the Cook County judges Trespassing upon the laws engaging in Domestic
Terrorist Acts of Treason.
F- In
Reference to Case # 17-CV- 08467, In
the matter of Carlen Colbert v Pamela E. Loza, Michael I. Bender, Timothy C.
Evans, Grace Dickler, Anton Colbert, Debra B. Walker. Plaintiff in this matter
had her child abducted by judges and given to her brother where ex judge
Michael I. Bender had falsified documents alleging she abused her child to
justify Loza granting her child to her brother.
In that on Dec 6, 2017 Michael
Bender tried having the above Plaintiff remanded into custody for not paying
him legal (extortion) fees, in that she had a fee waiver 298, he eloquently
fabricated inducing reliance on the court judge Loza surprisingly refused but
it was gleaned that the sons father was being garnisheed by Bender at $800.00 a
month.
The above Plaintiff lost her job
(Dec 6, 2017) due to excessive absences reporting to court seeking to get her
son and is now indigent.
G- In
Reference to 16-cv- 08628, In the
matter of U S Bank National Association et al. v Monzella Y. Johnson et al. A
plethora of attorneys working for certain banks tried stealing elderly
Plaintiffs home in the unlawful disguise as foreclosure.
Democratic judge Samuel
Der-Yeghiyan closed his eyes to the Terrorists acts perpetrated by Judges and
attorneys “Trespassing upon the Laws” refused to allow summons be issued
upon the Plaintiffs returned the case back to the “Criminal Enterprise”
That under Case # 2008 CH 33616 former Alderwoman now
judge demonstrated her allegiance as a Domestic Terrorist Trespassed upon the
laws September 1, 2017 accepting false documents from the law firm Potestivo as
they all corroborated their roles engaging in Treason trying to steal said home.
That on Dec 6, 2017 Fredrrenna
Lyle as a “Private Citizen” granted
U.S. Bank Summary judgment to the aforementioned Plaintiffs home.
H-
“That
because many are aware Chief judge being a Negroe realized he had no real authority caused
many ethnic groups to come along and “Trespass
upon the Laws” destroy black and brown families, use the laws as Ropes
and Water hoses as they “Lynched” innocent men or women who stood
up to their Terrorist Acts of injustices in the courts;”
I-
That said
cases demonstrates in multitudes how Judges in Chancery taking part in various
extortion schemes as “Private Citizens” helping banks steal the homes of the
elderly, covering up Housing Discrimination, Section 8 “Fraud” and theft, other
judges as “Private Citizens” in the Domestic Relations Division unlawfully abduct
children from mothers helping child rep attorneys accrue fees in this extortion
operation etc. working for Domestic Terrorist in this cell operation.
I affirm the aforementioned as being true.
Respectfully
submitted,
Monzella Y. Johnson, Pro Se
5217
S. Ingleside Ave
Chicago, Il 60615
773
835-5849
WHEREFORE the aforementioned
reasons Defendant respectfully Prays for the Relief
1.
For an Order Reinstating the Motion
to Disqualify et al due to all court orders entered by this Federal Circuit
deemed a Nullity void, due to judges Trespassing upon the Laws;
2.
For an Order Transferring this matter to another Circuit not
affiliated to the Terrorist cell of the Seventh Circuit pursuant to Rule 26
3.
For an Order issuing a Rule to Show Cause Remanding Freddrenna Lyle into
Custody Instanter and every other judge complicit in this operation.
4.
For an Order appointing a
Special Prosecutor who understands the jurisdiction of their profession to
investigate and ascertain all other parties complicit in these Terrorist
Treason Offenses of all cases noted within;
5.
For an Order upon conviction of all
parties that military personnel be deployed to eradicate all personnel Trespassing
upon the Laws be treated as Hostile Terrorists and eliminated accordingly;
6.
For an Order staying any and all legal
enforcements of all parties noted within due to the plethora of Felonies
enacted by “Private Citizens” perpetrating roles as judges Trespassing upon the
Laws”
7.
For an Order appointing Federal judges
and Public Officials to replace all incompetent judges and officials who have
closed their eyes violated their oaths in allowing Terrorist to take seize of
the legal system.
8.
For an Order on bond be
not less than one million dollars for any and all parties charged in these
crimes in warring against the United States Constitution.
9.
For an Order to deploy Special
Military Personnel to forcibly remove and eradicate every “Private Citizen” perpetrating as judges Trespassing upon the Laws
and warring against the United States Constitution.
10. For an Order removing the Chief Judge of Cook County and Presiding
judges of all Circuits who as Public Servants failed to investigate remove or
report any judges in accordance to their oath and Public Duty.
11. For an Order setting a Hearing Date for all attorneys who sat by
in an idle manner and did not exercise his or her duties pursuant to the Ethics
of R.P.C 3.3 and speak up or report the terrorist acts perpetrated by “Private
Citizens” violating their oaths as judges.
12. For the entry of an Order
awarding to your Petitioner for such other relief and any other relief
necessary as equity may require of which this court may deem overwhelmingly
just;
IN THE
UNITED STATES
COURT OF APPEALS
FOR
THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT
219 South Dearborn
CHICAGO, ILLINOIS 60604
U.S. BANK N.A. AS TRUSTEE FOR SECURITIZED
TRUST MASTR ASSET BACKED SECURITIES TRUST 2006-NC3; UBS REAL ESTATE
SECURITIES INC.; MORTGAGE ASSET SECURITIZATION TRANSACTIONS, INC.; WELLS
FARGO BANK, N.A.; MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEM,
DUTTON & DUTTON, PC,
POSTESTIVO & ASSC.
Plaintiffs,
MONZELLA JOHNSON AND MARCIA
JOHNSON
Defendants. |
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
) ) ) ) ) )
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
|
Civil
Action No. ______________________
Hon.Samuel
Der-Yeghiayan
Magistrate M.
David
Weisman
16-cv- 08628
|
NOTICE OF
MOTION TO REINSTATE CASE DUE TO JUDGE FREDRENNA LYLE &
NUMEROUS JUDGES TRESPASSING UPON THE LAWS COMMITTING TREASON MAKING THE DISTRICT
COURT ORDER “VOID” A “NULLITY” SAID JUDGES PRESIDED OVER THIS CASE HAD NO
JURISDICTION ACTING AS PRIVATE CITIZENS RULE TO SHOW CAUSE REMANDING HER/THEM
INTO CUSTODY & MANDATORY INJUNCTION PROHIBITING ALL LEGAL ACTIONS PENDING
BEFORE THE COURTS TRYING TO STEAL HOME w/AFFIDAVIT
MOTION TO REINSTATE DISQUALIFICATION OF JUDGE –PERSONAL BIAS OR
PREJUDICE {28 USCA 144, 455 (B) (1) VACATE ORDERS OF November 9, 2016 &
November 2, Pursuant to Rule 60 Due to FRAUD/ERROR and CORRUPTION DUE JUDGES
TRESPASSING UPON THE LAWS CORROBORATING THEIR ROLES ENGAGING IN TREASON (07-16-90079)
& TRANSFER THIS MATTER TO ANOTHER CIRCUIT PURSUANT TO RULE 26
CERTIFICATE
OF SERVICE
I Monzella Y. Johnson, certify that I have on
this day filed said Notice of Motion to Reinstate Motion for Disqualification
of judge et al. Before the Seventh Circuit United States Court of Appeals and
noted parties.
To:
Dir. Chris Wray FBI 601 4th Street Washington D.C. 20535
US Attorney, John
R. Lausch, Jr. 219 S. Dearborn, Suite
500
Clerk of Circuit
Court, Dorothy Brown, Daley Center Chg. IL. 60601, Suite 1001
Locke & Locke
Attn: Simon Feng, 111 South Wacker Drive, Chg. IL 60606
Judicial Conference Committee on Judicial and Disability
Attn: Office of
General Counsel
Administrative Office of the United States Courts
One Columbus Circle, NE
Washington, D.C. 20544
PLEASE BE ADVISED that on January 2, 2018, A Motion to Reinstate Motion to Disqualify et al. has been
mailed or hand delivered to the aforementioned.
Respectfully
Submitted,
_____________________
Monzella Y. Johnson
5217 S. Ingleside Ave.
Chicago, IL. 60615
No comments:
Post a Comment