Kennedy accuses Emanuel of 'strategic gentrification plan' to force blacks out of Chicago
Democratic governor candidate Chris Kennedy on Wednesday accused Mayor Emanuel of leading a “strategic gentrification plan” aimed at forcing African-Americans and other minorities out of Chicago to make the city “whiter” and wealthier.
“I believe that black people are being pushed out of Chicago intentionally by a strategy that involves disinvestment in communities being implemented by the city administration, and I believe Rahm Emanuel is the head of the city administration and therefore needs to be held responsible for those outcomes,” Kennedy said during a news conference about gun violence in North Lawndale.
“This is involuntary. That we’re cutting off funding for schools, cutting off funding for police, allowing people to be forced to live in food deserts, closing hospitals, closing access to mental health facilities. What choice do people have but to move, to leave?” Kennedy added. “And I think that’s part of a strategic gentrification plan being implemented by the city of Chicago to push people of color out of the city. The city is becoming smaller, and as it becomes smaller, it’s become whiter.”
The mayor’s office responded by trying to link Kennedy to two Republican politicians who enjoy little popularity in Chicago — President Donald Trump and Gov. Bruce Rauner, whom Kennedy wants to replace.
“It’s sad to see Chris Kennedy joining President Trump and Gov. Rauner in using cynical, politically motivated attacks about Chicago’s communities for his own personal gain,” Emanuel spokesman Matt McGrath said in a statement. “His divisive comments today are a direct assault on one of this city’s greatest strengths — our diversity.”
McGrath also said Kennedy’s attack on Emanuel “ignored work being done in neighborhoods across the city” to “improve the quality of life for everyone who calls Chicago home.”
Kennedy, an heir to the iconic Massachusetts political family, has sought to appeal to African-American voters, focusing on the issue of gun violence and questioning the fairness of educational opportunities and property taxation in black neighborhoods. The names of his uncle, the late President John F. Kennedy, and father, the late U.S. Sen. Robert Kennedy, still carry resonance among older black voters from the family’s leadership in the struggle for civil rights during the 1960s
RAHM EMMANUEL HAS THE CONTROL AND BENEFIT OF HAVING A LEGAL SYSTEM UNDER HIS AUTHORITY AND
CONTROL OF DEMOCRATIC TERRORIST WHO ONLY INSTALL AND APPOINT THOSE JUDGES THAT UPHOLDS JIM CROW LAWS AND TREASON.
THIS IRISH CONTROLLED GOVERNMENT ESPOUSES HATRED SEGREGATION & TERRORIST CONTROL BY ANY MEANS NECESSARY.
IN THE
UNITED STATES
COURT OF APPEALS
FOR
THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT
April Redeaux Civil
Action #17-cv- 08060
:
Plaintiff Hon. Virginia M.
Kendall
V
Karen Bowes, Gordon Nelson, Steve Wasko
Clarence Parker, Grace Dickler,
Gregory Emmett Ahern, Jr
MOTION DISQUALIFICATION
OF JUDGE--PERSONAL BIAS OR PREJUDICE {28 USCA 144, 455 (B) (1)} VACATE ORDERS DUE TO ORDERS BEING VOID A NULLITY “TRESPASSING
UPON THE LAWS” “TREASON” & TRANSFER THIS
MATTER TO ANOTHER CIRCUIT PURSUANT TO RULE 26
To the Honorable Justices
of the Seventh Circuit of the United States Court of Appeals and Judicial Council:
Complainant
a United States Citizen, April Redeaux, hereby respectfully represents as Pro
Se shows this court with corroboration/admissions and affidavit the noted
reasons why this matter should be within this Court’s Jurisdiction; {Pursuant to Fed Rules of Civil Procedure
and LR40.1 (b) (d) (e3)} with and transferred to another circuit with Affidavit.
The request
for a transfer may be made at any stage of the proceeding before a reference to
the Judicial Conference under Rule 20
(b) (1) (C) or 20 (b) (2) or a Petition for Review is filed under Rule 22:
Rule 26, it implements the Breyer Committee’s
recommended use of transfers. Breyer
Committee Report, 239 F.R.D. at 214-15.
Rule 26 authorizes the transfer of a
complaint proceeding to another judicial council selected by the Chief Justice.
Such transfers may be appropriate, for example, in the case of a serious
complaint where there are multiple disqualifications among the original
council, where the issues are highly visible and a local disposition may weaken
public confidence in the process, where internal tensions arising in the
council as a result of the complaint render disposition by a less involved
council appropriate, or where a complaint calls into question policies or
governance of the home court of appeals et al.
Now
comes April Redeaux., Pro Se Appellant in this cause files herewith his affidavit as required by Title 28, United States Code, Section 144,
to show that the Honorable Virginia M. Kendall, has a personal bias with
compelling evidence demonstrating said judges “Trespassing upon the Laws” against
him because of his skin color and where legally sufficient Complaint stating a
cause how and why this court has jurisdiction; motions corroborating judicial
corruption “fraud” “perjury” and a plethora of “Terrorist Civil Rights Acts”
put before the court that the District Court and Court of Appeals judges
ignored the criminal acts of the Democratic judges and described them as moot
upholding Racism, Terrorism and “Treason as judges Trespassed upon the Laws” in
the criminal enterprise known as Cook County courts.
That said judges are demonstrating
unequivocally this is how traditional Democrats and racist Republicans of the
Political Machine in this era and beyond feels towards persons of color and the
necessary steps they and their brethren are willing to sacrifice and enforce
keeping persons of color like the Plaintiff oppressed and treated as a criminal
non United States Citizen; and is attempting to cover up the systemic legal
applications of racism judicial terrorism that Appellant has diligently put
before the courts, where judges and lawyers have participated in said
conspiracies and have admitted it pursuant to all laws recorded.
Based thereon, Plaintiff-Appellant
respectfully moves that the Private Citizen Virginia M. Kendall proceed no
further herein and that this Honorable Seventh Circuit invoke jurisdiction
assign this matter to the Judicial Council so as to exhaust proper protocol in
transferring this ,matter to another judicial circuit to judges that will honor
the laws of the United States Constitution and it’s rules; due to members of
the Democratic Political Machine seizing control over all courts and certain
judges politically appointed because of their racist hatred of ethnic groups
they deem inferior to them so as to enforce
the laws pursuant to the United States Constitution who is not Bias and
understands how to enforce the laws in accordance to the United States
Constitution and according to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure to hear this
proceeding who is not intimidated or fear reprisals from these individuals.
Now comes April Redeaux Pro Se Appellant in
this cause files herewith her affidavit as required by Title 28, attesting the veracity and accuracy of all statements
recorded within.
IN THE
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR
THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
U.S. Attorney
John R. Lausch, Jr.
219 South Dearborn Suite
500
Chicago, Ill 60605
Cook County State’s
Attorney Chief
Judge Timothy C. Evans
Kim
Foxx 50 West Washington, Suite 2600
50 West Washington, Suite 500 Chicago, Ill. 60601
Chicago, Ill. 60601
Karen Bowes 50 West Washington, Chicago, IL
60601 Room ;
Gordon Nelson 100 N. LaSalle, Suite 800,
Chicago, IL 60602,
Steve Wasko 1440 Renaissance Dr. Suite 230, Park
Ridge, IL. 60068;
Clarence Parker, 205 Atwood, Dr.
HollySprings NC, 27540
Grace Dickler 50 West Washington,
Chicago, IL 60601 Room;
Gregory E. Ahern, Jr. 50 West
Washington, Chicago IL 60601 Room
PLEASE BE ADVISED that on January 3, 2018, a Motion to Disqualify judge been filed before the
United States Court of Appeals/Judicial Council.
Respectfully Submitted
_______________________
April
Redeaux
1414 W. Welland Court
Roselle,
IL 60172
773 783-5691
IN THE
UNITED STATES
COURT OF APPEALS
FOR
THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT
AFFIDAVIT
In support of Motion to Disqualify et al.
In
support of Motion
To Disqualify Virginia M.
Kendall Diane Sykes and various judges subject to an active Complaint Case
# 07-16-90074 Judge of the Northern District of Illinois for
Personal Bias or Prejudice “FRAUD” “Trespassing upon the Laws” pursuant to 28
USCA 144, 455 (b) (1)
{Pursuant to the Rules of Federal
Civil Procedure & U.S. Constitution}
Section
1983 of U.S.C.S., S.H.A. Criminal Ch. 38, 33-3, Civil Rights Act of 1964, Canon
3D (1) Reporting Judicial Misconduct, 3D (2) Reporting Lawyer Misconduct;
I am April
Redeaux being duly sworn on oath states:
1.)
That on Nov. 7, 2017, Plaintiff filed her Complaint stating all
claims why the Federal Court had jurisdiction on said matter and it was
assigned to Judge Virginia M. Kendall;
2.)
That said judge entered a Minute Order on Nov. 13, 2017
recognizing said Complaint having merit satisfied all legal criteria’s
necessary demonstrating not being Frivolous, hereto attached Ex A, Notification of Docket Entry;
A-
Judge Kendall’s Order states, “Initial status hearing set for 1/11/2018 at 9:00 am. Joint Status Report
due by 1/8/2018. The parties are directed to Judge Kendall’s web page et al.”
B- Plaintiff
received 7 additional pages, “Notice of
Mandatory Initial Discovery, Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot Project”
C-
Said Judge Ordered, “Lead Counsel is directed to appear at this status hearing”.
3.)
That Appellant filed a Petition for Rule to Show Cause Remanding Circuit Debra
B. Walker et al. & Attorneys
“Trespassing upon the Laws”
Corroboration in an Organized Chain Conspiracy “Treason” (Filed Nov. 27, 2017) “Fraud of all sorts” Contempt of
Court other Irregularities, Remand/Body Attachment Instanter Mandatory
Injunction prohibiting State County courts from entering any judgments
Instanter and Vacate all orders Void in nature against the Plaintiff.
4.)
That Appellant received a phone call telling her not to
report to court, in that, said judge demonstrated an episode by altering her
legal disposition and DENIED her Motion and Complaint, hereto attached, Gr Ex B, November 29, 2017 Order of 5
pages ;
A- Judge
Kendal became a "Private Citizen”
when she became a “Trespasser upon the Laws”
B- That
because of her being a “Private Citizen”
in her rulings Nullified her orders as being Void;
5.) Pursuant
to the Court’s Order it
is filled with vexatious damnosus
overtones;
C- That Page 2 Par. 3 she stated, “From what the court can discern from
Plaintiff’s 112 page complaint, Plaintiff generally complains of
racial discrimination by the “Illinois Legal system” et al.
D- That a court
views a complaint’s allegations in a light most favorable to the plaintiff,
draws all reasonable inferences in favor of the plaintiff, and takes as true
all well- pleaded facts and allegations in the complaint. Reger Dev., LLC v.
Nat’l City Bank, 592 F. 3d 759, 764 (7th
Cir. 2010). Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 8 (a) (2) requires “a short and
plain statement of the claim showing that the pleader is entitled to relief” in
order to provide the defendant with fair notice of the plaintiff’s claims and
the grounds upon which they rest. Bell Atl. V. Twombly, 550, U.S. 544, 555
(2007). To survive a motion to dismiss, the plaintiff’s claim must be
plausible, and the factual allegations of the complaint must be “enough to
raise a right to relief above the speculative level.” Brooks v. Ross, 578 F. 3d
574, 581 (7th Cir. 2009) (quoting Twombly, 550 U.S. at 555)
E-
She
further stated, “Plaintiff alleges that the Cook County Circuit Court “never
had jurisdiction” over the matter.
F-
That
said judge being of Irish descent will never rule in favor of any African
Americans against her ethnic group this is the systemic pattern of how “Jim Crow” is still be prosecuted
unlawfully in the courts.
6.) Pursuant
to the Complaint In Re The
Parentage of Clarence Parker v. April Redeaux, 12 D 8436, (Judge Karen
Bowes) Motion for Disqualification of Judge for Cause due to “Fraud” (Civil
Rights Violations) and or Prejudice pursuant to S.H.A. 735 ILCS 5/2—1001 (a)
(2,3) and to Vacate all Orders due to “Trespassing upon the Laws” Court
never had Jurisdiction Orders are “Void” Judge Gregory Emmitt Ahern, Jr.
ignored the Defendants unchallenged Affidavits stated, “Judge Bowes did not do
anything wrong” and that the laws indicated were generalizations”. Denied the
Motion.
7.) Pursuant
to the Notice of Service of the Complaint, are the court orders of Oct.
17, 2017 Associate Judge Karen J. Bowes did not sign the court order
transferring the matter to the presiding judge in violation of Sup Ct Rule 272, Directed Evidence of
Trespassing upon the Laws;
8.) Pursuant
to the Presiding Judge transferring the matter to judge Ahern it was not signed
in violation to Sup Ct. Rule 272,
Directed Evidence of Trespassing upon the Laws;
9.) That
Associate Judge Gregory Emmett Ahern, Jr. became complicit in an “Organized Conspiracy” Denied the
Motion with his certified signature corroborating his role “Trespassing upon the Laws” enforcing a void order deemed a
nullity;
10.)
She
noted as a footnote 1,
The Court’s own research shows that Defendant Cook County Circuit Court Judge
Grace Dickler is the presiding judge et al.
A- If said judge acting as a “Private Citizen” was as thorough in
her research, she would have been able to ascertain that the information noted
about other Pro se individuals were in fact Directed Evidence of veracity hereto attached Gr Ex C, said Gr F
(Petition to Transfer to Another Judicial Council), demonstrates the number of
judges as “Private Citizens”
B-
That
Gr Ex D, PETITION FOR REVIEW
W/AFFIDAVIT PART II filed Dec. 2016 has never been
adjudicated or finalized very few judges in Illinois seems to have a
comprehensible fundamental interpretation of “Trespassing upon the Laws” in that the Executive Committee
has reassigned Gr Ex C to a judge of
impeccable academic qualifications Judge Robert M. Dow, Jr., received his Bachelors
from Yale, Doctorate from Oxford and Juris Doctorate from Harvard
Under
Federal law which is applicable to all states, the U.S. Supreme Court stated
that if a court is "without authority, its judgments and orders are
regarded as nullities. They are not voidable, but simply void; and form no bar
to a recovery sought, even prior to a reversal in opposition to them. They
constitute no justification; and all persons concerned in executing such
judgments or sentences, are considered, in law, as trespassers." Elliot v.
Piersol, 1 Pet. 328, 340, 26 U.S. 328, 340 (1828)
11.)
That no Appellant is able to receive justice in
Illinois as long as Judicial Terrorism is at the helms covering-up for one
another “Trespassing upon the Laws” engaging
in “Treason”
12.)
Every judge
guilty of Trespassing keeps referencing laws from the Seventh Circuit ignoring
the laws of the United States Supreme Court validating the verity of the “Private Citizens” warring against the
United States constitution;
13.)
That Judge Ann Claire Williams who took part in an “Organized Conspiracy” “Trespassed upon the Laws” has retired
last month when Gr Ex C was filed
for Reinstatement.
14.)
That the Nov. 29, 2017, order of the aforementioned
matter demonstrates how this “Private Citizen” corroborated her role
in an “Organized Conspiracy”
Dismissed the case with Prejudice for being frivolous, which is interesting
because said order is a Nullity Void in its entirety.
The U.S. Supreme Court has stated
that "No state legislator or executive or judicial officer can war against
the Constitution without violating his undertaking to support it.” Cooper
v. Aaron, 358 U.S. 1, 78 S. Ct. 1401 (1958).
Any judge who does not comply
with his oath to the Constitution of the United States wars against that
Constitution and engages in acts in violation of the Supreme Law of the Land.
The judge is engaged in acts of treason.
Having taken at least two, if not
three, oaths of office to support the Constitution of the United States, and
the Constitution of the State of Illinois, any judge who has acted in violation
of the Constitution is engaged in an act or acts of treason (see below).
15.)
If a judge does not fully comply with the
Constitution, then his orders are void, In re Sawyer,
124 U.S. 200 (1888), he/she is without jurisdiction, and he/she has engaged in
an act or acts of treason.
B. That
said judges are playing games with the Plaintiff-Appellant using the laws
against her as a Weapon of Mass Destruction keeping her oppressed by any and
all means, Section 1983 of U.S.C.S. contemplates the depravation of
Civil Rights through the Unconstitutional Application of a Law by conspiracy or
otherwise. Mansell v. Saunders (CA 5 F 1A) 372 F 573,
especially if the conspiracy was actually carried into effect, where an action
is for a conspiracy to interfere with Civil Rights under 42 U.S.C.S. 1985 (3),
or for the depravation of such rights under 42 U.S.C.S. 1983, if the conspiracy
was actually carried into effect and plaintiff was thereby deprived of any
rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the United States Constitution and
Laws, the gist of the action may be treated as one for the depravation of
rights under 42 U.S.C.S. 1983, Lewis v. Brautigam (CA
5 F 1a) 227 F 2d 124, 55 Alr 2d 505, John W. Strong, 185, 777-78 (4 th
ed. 1992).
16.)
That pursuant to request Investigate Alderman
Edward and Supreme Court Judge Ann Burke, Page
3 Par 2, “In his book, Mr. Cooley
stated Ed Burke and Anne Burke along with Attorney Pat Tuite fixed a murder
case before judge Maloney. Herbert Cammon’s case was a murder case in which it
was alleged that Herbert Cammon, a gay black man, murdered his wife with the
help of his gay lover by stabbing her over 40 times and leaving the knife
sticking out of her mouth” et al
A- “When the judge refused to withdraw from the
case, he told the judge, “What’s the big deal. It’s only a fucking nigger”
B- “Anne Burke also requested that the judge
withdraw from the case saying”
“My
husband was the one who put you on the bench”
17.) That
Pursuant to Motion to Reinstate Case Due To Judge Valderrama Trespassing
Upon The Laws Committing Treason Making The Order “Void” A “Nullity” Said
Judge Presided Over A Case He had No Jurisdiction Acting As A Private Citizen
Rule To Show Cause Remanding Him Into Custody w/Affidavit;
A- Page 2 Par. 2, 3 of the aforementioned Affidavit
corroborates and demonstrates Seventh Circuit Court judges as active
participants in an “Organized Conspiracy upholding judges engaging in the
Criminal Enterprise Trespassing upon the Laws”
U. S Sup Court Digest 24(1) General Conspiracy
U.S. 2003. Essence of a conspiracy is an agreement to commit an unlawful
act.—U.S. v. Jimenez Recio, 123 S. Ct. 819, 537 U.S. 270, 154 L.Ed.2d 744, on
remand 371F.3d 1093
Agreement to commit an
unlawful act, which constitutes the essence of a conspiracy, is a distinct evil
that exist and be punished whether or not the substantive crime ensues.-Id.
Conspiracy poses a threat
to the public over and above the threat of the commission of the relevant
substantive crime, both because the combination in crime makes more likely the
commission of other crimes and because it decreases the part from their path of
criminality.-Id.
CONSPIRACY
Fraud maybe inferred from nature of acts complained of,
individual and collective interest of alleged conspirators, situation,
intimacy, and relation of parties at time of commission of acts, and generally
all circumstances preceding and attending culmination of claimed conspiracy Illinois Rockford
Corp. V. Kulp, 1968, 242 N.E. 2d 228, 41 ILL. 2d 215.
Conspirators
to be guilty of offense need not have entered into conspiracy at same time or
have taken part in all its actions. People V. Hardison, 1985, 911
Dec. 162, 108. Requisite mens rea elements of conspiracy are satisfied upon showings of
agreement of offense with intent that offense be committed; Actus reas element
is satisfied of act in furtherance of agreement People V. Mordick, 1981,
50 ILL, Dec. 63
Vaughn 462 S. E. 2d 728
(Ga.1995), The Supreme Court of
Georgia removed a Judge from office for disregarding defendant’s Constitutional
rights; Hammel, 668 N. E. 2d 390 (N.Y. 1996) (Judge removed for
improperly jailing defendants for their alleged failure to pay fines and make restitution
which the judge had imposed, disregarding the defendants basic constitutional
rights;
B- That Ex
C demonstrates the need for the Justices of another Court of Appeals outside the Seventh Circuit
to invoke jurisdiction in this matter because the present legal system is in
the hands of Domestic Terrorists along with some racist Irish Republicans who
have infiltrated the Democratic Political Machine and is enforcing Jim Crow laws with their
appointed brethren also known as “Good
ol Boys” using Afro American Negroes who have allowed themselves to be
whored out as prostitutes upholding the criminal acts of said Terrorists while
everyone in responsible authority turn their heads and close their eyes to the
crimes perpetrated on innocent persons of color and independent whites as demonstrated in this case and it is alleged
many have secret intimate relations with said individuals and will never open
their mouths about whatever injustices being perpetrated on innocent persons of
color;
The request
for a transfer may be made at any stage of the proceeding before a reference to
the Judicial Conference under Rule 20
(b) (1) (C) or 20 (b) (2) or a Petition for Review is filed under Rule 22:
Rule 26, it implements the Breyer Committee’s
recommended use of transfers. Breyer
Committee Report, 239 F.R.D. at 214-15.
Rule 26 authorizes the transfer of a
complaint proceeding to another judicial council selected by the Chief Justice.
Such transfers may be appropriate, for example, in the case of a serious
complaint where there are multiple disqualifications among the original
council, where the issues are highly visible and a local disposition may weaken
public confidence in the process, where internal tensions arising in the
council as a result of the complaint render disposition by a less involved
council appropriate, or where a complaint calls into question policies or
governance of the home court of appeals et al.
That
said judges in the Seventh Circuit
closed their eyes to the legal issues put before them on appeal in
affidavits validating the verity of judges committing Treason Trespassing upon
the laws of the United States Constitution engaging in “WAR” against the United States Constitution making every order
rendered against the Petitioner. If a
judge does not fully comply with the Constitution, then his orders are void, In
re Sawyer, 124 U.S. 200 (1888), he or she is without jurisdiction, and he/she
has engaged in an act or acts of treason;
Civil
Rights Act of 1866- first section, enacted by the Senate and House of
Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled. That
all persons born in the United States and not subject to any foreign power,
excluding Indians not taxed, are hereby declared to be citizens of the United
States; and such citizens of every race and color, without regard to any
previous condition of slavery or involuntary servitude, except as a punishment
for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall have the same
right, in every State and Territory in the United States, to make and enforce
contracts, to sue, be parties, and give evidence, to inherit, purchase, lease,
sell, hold and convey real and personal property, and to full and equal benefit
of the laws and proceedings for the security of person and property, as is
enjoyed by white citizens, and shall be subject to like punishment, pains, and
penalties, and to none other, any law, statute, ordinances, regulation, or
custom, to the contrary notwithstanding, Act of April 9, 1866, Ch. 31, 1, 14
Stat. 27, 42 U.S.C.A. 1981 (a).
In the
20th century, the Supreme Court began to overturn Jim Crow laws on
constitutional grounds. In Buchanan v. Warley 245 US 60 (1917), the
court held that a Kentucky law could not require residential segregation. The Supreme Court
in 1946, in Irene Morgan v. Virginia ruled segregation in
interstate transportation to be unconstitutional, in an application of the commerce
clause of the Constitution. It was not until 1954 in Brown v. Board of
Education of Topeka 347 US 483 that the court held that separate facilities
were inherently unequal in the area of public schools, effectively overturning Plessy
v. Ferguson, and outlawing Jim Crow in other areas of society as well. This
landmark case consisted of complaints filed in the states of Delaware (Gebhart
v. Belton); South Carolina (Briggs
v. Elliott); Virginia (Davis v. County
School Board of Prince Edward County); and Washington,
D.C. (Spottswode Bolling v. C. Melvin Sharpe).
These decisions, along with other cases such as McLaurin v. Oklahoma State
Board of Regents 339 US 637 (1950), NAACP
v. Alabama 357 US 449 (1958), and Boynton v. Virginia 364 US 454 (1960),
slowly dismantled the state-sponsored segregation imposed by Jim Crow laws.
As the color
line itself solidified at the turn of the nineteenth century, Jim Crow imposed
on black people clear tactical disadvantages: restricted economic
possibilities, narrow educational opportunities, inadequate housing options,
high rates of death and disablement, persistent unemployment, and unrelenting
poverty. Inasmuch as Jim Crow represented the race problem described by Gunnar
Myrdal (1898–1987) in
his 1944 treatise The American Dilemma, it was Jim Crow that
created the race quandary; whites constructed the obstacles African Americans
confronted, while also blaming them for their conditions, denying them access
to the resources of problem solving, and daring them—under threat of violence—to complain, protest, or advance.
Finally,
protests or challenges to Jim Crow often proved futile, given law enforcement’s complicity in the structure. From
emancipation to the turn of the century, the Ku Klux Klan operated as a
paramilitary arm of the Democratic Party in the South. The Klan, nightriders,
red shirts, and other white terrorists intimidated African Americans with
personal attacks, school burnings, and lynchings. African Americans rarely
served as policemen, sheriffs, or deputies before the late 1940s. During the
1950s and 1960s, the connections between municipal and state governments, law
enforcement, and racial violence were well known by officials and citizens
alike. White officers were known to harass black people, disrupt black
neighborhoods, and assault black women. Arrested for inflated charges, denied
satisfactory counsel, and serving harsh sentences, African Americans were
further disadvantaged in the courtroom. Rarely did they receive good counsel,
nor could they serve on juries. When black lawyers could appear in the
courtroom to argue cases, white judges and juries rarely listened. All-white
juries decided against black defendants, even in the most obvious cases of
innocence, but rarely convicted white defendants, despite evidence of guilt.
African Americans—including
the innocent—suffered
the harsher punishments of extended jail time, forced farm labor, and peonage.
Even women could be placed on the chain gangs working the roads and tracks
across the South.
The
Chicago Daily Law Bulletin, Wednesday April 26, 2006, Page 1, Illinois
Political Machines help breed corruption, Associated Press writer Deanna
Bellandi states, “Illinois is apparently a Petri dish for corruption. It
is a real breeding ground”.
That Chicago
is the most Corrupt City in America, Huffington Post, Internet
Newspaper, February 23, 2012; University of Illinois Professor Dick Simpson, “The
two worst crime zones in Illinois are the governor’s mansion…..and the City
Council Chambers in Chicago.” Simpson a former Chicago Alderman told the AP “no
other State can match us.”
Turner 24 F.
Cas. 337 (No. 14247) C.C.D. Md. 1867) The “equal benefit” clause is cited in
what would appear to be the earliest reported case enforcing the section. The
plaintiff was an emancipated slave who was indentured as an apprentice to her
former master. Although both whites and blacks could be indentured as an
apprentice, under the law of Maryland, indentured blacks were not accorded the
same educational benefits as whites and, unlike whites, were subject to being
transferred to any other person in the same county. Circuit Judge Chase granted
a writ of habeas corpus upon finding that the purported apprenticeship was in
fact involuntary servitude and a denial under the Civil Rights Act of 1866 of
the “full and equal benefit of all laws”.
18.) That said case demonstrates multiple acts of
systemic applications of constitutional violations, in that judges and State
Agencies acted as decision makers possessing final authority, Brown v. Bryan
County, OKL., 67 F. 3d 1174 (1995), Stokes v. Bullins, 844 F. 2d 269, 275 (5th
Cir. 1988), Wassum v. City of Bellaire, Texas, 861 F. 2d 453, 456 (5th
Cir. 1988), Benavides v. County of Wilson, 955 F. 2d 968, 972 (5th
Cir.) cert. denied,__ U.S.__, 113 S.Ct. 79, 121 L. Ed. 2d 43 (1992), “Liability
will accrue for the acts of a municipal official when the official possess
“final policymaking authority” to establish municipal policy with respect to
the conduct that resulted in a violation of constitutional rights. Pembaur v.
City of Cincinnati, 475 U.S. 469, 483, 106 S. Ct. 1292, 1300, 89 L.Ed. 2d 452
A-
That not one African American, Negroe or anyone in
competent authority opened their mouths to admonish anyone associated in these
deliberate heinous acts perpetrated by members of the Democratic Political
Machine, due to them only being figureheads.
19.)
That all Defendant-Appellees have properly admitted to
all facts and pleadings recorded in said complaint and motions via affidavits.
20.)
A
judge’s disrespect for the rules of court demonstrates disrespect for the law.
Judges are disciplined under Canon 2A for violating court rules and procedures.
Judge ignored mandated witness order in attempt to accommodate witnesses’
schedules; Citing Canon 2A the court noted, “[a] court’s indifference to
clearly stated rules breeds disrespect for and discontent with our justice
system. Government can not demand respect of the laws by its citizens when its
tribunals ignore those very same laws”)
CANON 1
A judge should uphold the integrity and
independence of the judiciary.
The
integrity and independence of judges depend in turn upon their acting without
fear or favor. Although judges should be independent, they should comply with
the law, as well as provisions of this code. Public confidence in the
impartiality of the judiciary is maintained by the adherence of each judge to
this responsibility. Conversely, violation of this code diminishes public
confidence in the judiciary and thereby does injury to the system of government
under law.
Wherefore the Foregoing
Reasons,
Plaintiff Prays for the following
relief:
1.) Plaintiff requests that
this Honorable Court of Appeals accept Jurisdiction and Transfer this matter to
another Court of Appeals Circuit where they can Invoke authority Instanter and assign
this matter accordingly and or due to the unprecedented Terrorist Civil Rights Acts
recorded within.
Finally,
this Affidavit is best closed by a jurist who has stated”;
Citing Canon 2A the court noted, “[a] court’s indifference to clearly stated
rules breeds disrespect for and discontent with our justice system. Government
can not demand respect of the laws by its citizens when its tribunals ignore
those very same laws”)
Federal
Court FEDERAL JUDGE GETTLEMAN:
stated, Tuesday March 10, 2009, where he found Superintendent of police Jody
Weiss in Contempt of Court and Ordered the City to Pay $100,000.00, “No
one is above the Law”, he cited a 1928 decision by Supreme Court
Justice Louis Brandeis, that said, “If the Government becomes the law breaker,
it breeds Contempt for the Law, It invites everyman to become a law unto
himself. It invites Anarchy.”
The Chicago Daily Law Bulletin, Wednesday April 26, 2006, Page
1, Illinois Political Machines help breed corruption, Associated Press
writer Deanna Bellandi states, “Illinois is apparently a Petri dish for
corruption. It is a real breeding ground”.
That Chicago is the most Corrupt City in America,
Huffington Post, Internet Newspaper, February 23, 2012; University of Illinois
Professor Dick Simpson, “The two worst crime zones in Illinois are the
governor’s mansion…..and the City Council Chambers in Chicago.” Simpson a
former Chicago Alderman told the AP “no other State can match us.”
FURTHER
AFFIANTH SAYETH NOT
Respectfully
Submitted
______________________
April Redeaux
1414 W. Welland Court
Roselle,
IL 60172
773 783-5691
No comments:
Post a Comment