“The Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals held that the Circuit Court of Cook County is a criminal enterprise. U.S. v. Murphy, 768 F.2d 1518, 1531 (7th Cir. 1985)”.
The United States Supreme
Court recently acknowledged the judicial corruption in Cook County, when it
stated that Judge "Maloney was one of many dishonest judges exposed and
convicted through 'Operation Greylord', a labyrinthine federal investigation of
judicial corruption in Chicago". Bracey v. Gramley,
case No. 96-6133 (June 9, 1997).
Since
judges who do not report the criminal activities of other judges become
principals in the criminal activity, 18 U.S.C. Section 2, 3 & 4, and since
no judges have reported the criminal activity of the judges who have been
convicted, the other judges are as guilty as the convicted judges.
Joe LouisFrom:joelouis565@yahoo.comTo:CCC.DomRelCR3008@cookcountyil.gov,sao.csed@cookcountysao.org,Yolanda Simmons (States Attorney)Cc:timothyevans@cookcountyil.gov,B. Marshall Hilmes,Cook County States Attorney,The State of Illinois,Jaime Barcas (Chief Judge's Office)Tue, Oct 29, 2024 at 1:07 PMGreetings Madam Clerk Jo Anne Cepak via Judge Fishman:I just received an Order today explaining their is a Zoom hearing Friday November 1, 2024 at 9:00 am.So that the judge can see for herself and not glean a negative impression of me representing myself by force and necessity seeing that every judge that is selected is coming from the 30th floor typically don't favor men of Color or a Black Man.Said Motion is before her on a Status Call to Disqualify Judge Michael A. Forti Instanter For "Cause" et al.Francoise Hightower Police Officer is being represented by the States Attorney.1.) Would you like a briefing schedule on this matter giving the States Attorney time to respond, I will only need 7 days on any response.2.) I have Motions that have to be Re Noticed Motion to Vacate Judge Maritza's Court Order of March 27, 2024, Re Notice Motion to Recuse the Entire Cook County Judiciary and Appoint a Special Prosecutor et al., Re Notice Motion for Default Judgment resulting from a Summary Judgment filed in Dec. 2023 before Judge Chivira.3.) I am fully aware that my skin Color and Heterosexual disposition is an egregious deterrent to me receiving any justice before certain judges.With this being said and we are clear, how would you like for me to proceed in your court?Respectfully submitted,Joe Louis Lawrence
- Joe LouisFrom:joelouis565@yahoo.comTo:CCC DomRelCR1905 (Chief Judge's Office),DRDivOrders Cal01 (Circuit Court),Jaime Barcas (Chief Judge's Office),sao.csed@cookcountysao.org,GovernorsOfficeCc:ilrb.filing@illinois.gov,Ocj Chief (Chief Judge's Office),The State of Illinois,Cook County States Attorney,ABA Commission On Racial and Ethnic Diversity In the ProfessionWed, May 29, 2024 at 7:52 AMAttention Presiding Judge Regina Scannicchio:As a Heterosexual Man of Color, I have been before Ku Klan Klan acting judges and inferior other judges and now it seems like, I feel as if the Hispanic judges are sexist, racist or both this was explained to Jaime Barcus the other day.I don't care who is sleeping with who, or who is related to who and what judges don't like straight Colored Men or Women or what judges are with the Ku Klux Klan or Nazi fraternal order etc., but if this type of individuals infringes on my Civil Liberties, we are going to have a problem.Bad enough a crazy cop has been stalking me for years trying to extort money from me for child support, I never owed, and this is her father's child how much dirt can one person have on anybody to put a stranglehold on so many people to not do what is right?When Anita Alvarez was the States Attorney and her Assistant John Ouska were the only people who did not go along with anyone falsifying documents like so many others did, the "Good ol Boys" saw to it bad publicity surrounding the Laquan McDonald case put the brakes on her career.I thank God for her and so many others behind the scenes doing what is right trying to make a difference in this racist Apartheid sordid legal system.After my diligent research, first of all congratulations on being named the Presiding Judge as of May 23, 2024, you may or not know of the horrific particulars being experienced it was explained to your Executive Assistant Jaime Barcus via email and in person.Because of the Color of my skin and the fact, I am not in any way INFERIOR or SUBMISSIVE to White Supremacy nobody is speaking up or against the TYRANNY and racist JIM CROW acts demonstrated in this matter which has now compelled Judge Chivira to try and intimidate and bully me by violating all of the Canon Ethics along with Martinez by trying to emulate what the Irish and Polish ethnic judges did.They realize how much Hate we men of Color and our Heterosexuality felt that they could do whatever and nobody would admonish them and continue to support these criminal violations.Please find the following Complaint Corroborating Judge Chivira and Martinez engaging in what could be interpreted as racially motivated because Chivira is quoted as saying Arce is involved who is Hispanic and Martinez has already assumed your position as Presiding Judge.Will you HELP me? or at least direct this complaint to the forces who will make a difference seeing that so many are on an alleged payroll and don't see anything.Thank you
COMPLAINT JUDICIAL CORRUPTION/OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE
Prima Facia Showing of Judge Chivira and Martinez using their Judicial Robes Obstructing Justice acting like Gang Bangers or Thugs and is seemingly trying to recruit all of the racist or sexist Hispanic judges to assist her in this Civil Rights Scandal of trying to cover-up her involvement as an Assistant States Attorney she colluded with her Superior Thomas Kantas and falsified a number of documents mainly it was explained that they backdated Tycee’s age to make it look like she was 10 years younger when she was emancipated and I was Francoise’s ex husband angry because of the divorce and was retaliating against her by not making child support payments to justify getting some of the most racist judges to go along with this EGREGIOUS EXTORTION ATTEMPT but nobody knew I was on Welfare and had to pay my welfare money in Judge Haracz’s court to keep from going to jail because he was just a bill collector and Police Officer Francoise had papers falsified to reflect she was on welfare.
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY
ILLINOIS
DOMESTIC RELATIONS
DIVISIO1N
IN RE
)
)
Francoise Hightower ) Judge Abbey Fishman Romanek
Petitioner
)
) Cal 94
VS
)
) No. 88 D
079012
Joe Louis Lawrence )
Respondent
) Room 3008
RESPONDENT’S MOTION
FOR DISQUALIFICATION OF JUDGE ABBEY ROMANEK INSTANTER OF JUDGE FOR “CAUSE”
“BEING A RACIST” HATE BIAS PREJUDICE PURSUANT to S.H.A. 735 ILCS 5/2 ---1001 (a) JUDGE RECEIVED COURT ORDER FROM
PRESIDING JUDGE & ASSISTANT STATES ATTORNEY AND HER CLERK OF THE STATES
ATTORNEY REPRESENTING POLICE OFFICER FRANCOISE HIGHTOWER IN SAID PATERNITY
MATTER AND SAID “I THINK IT’S A MISTAKE OF FACT AND CAN BE CURED” JUDGE ROMANEK
UNEQUIVOCALLY BECAME A “PRIVATE CITIZEN” ATTACHING A PERSONAL BIAS ENGAGING IN
AN ORGANIZED CRIMINAL CONSPIRACY CIVIL
RIGHTS VIOLATIONS “FRAUD” TRESPASSING UPON THE LAWS ENGAGING IN TREASON
OFFENSES MAKING HER ORDER VOID/NULLITY
DUE TO PRIMA FACIE SHOWING STATES
ATTORNEY ADMITTING/CORROBORATING THEIR
ROLES IN SAID CONSPIRACY AND JUDGE TRIED
TO USE HER UNLAWFUL AUTHORITY IN COVERING-UP CRIMES OF OTHER ASSISTANT STATES
ATTORNEYS UNLAWFUL INVOLVEMENT VACATE NOV 1st COURT ORDER MOST
IMPORTANTLY SUMMARY JUDGMENT FILED DEC 4, 2023, WAS ADMITTED TO BY STATES
ATTORNEY KIM FOXX AND FRANCOISE HIGHTOWER LOCAL RULE Local Rule 56.1 The rule is very clear that
"all material facts set forth in the statement required of the moving
party will be deemed admitted unless controverted by the statement of the
opposing party." Local Rule 56.1(b)(3)(B). DEFAULT WAS
FILED ORIGINALLY FEB 9, 2024, RE NOTICED JUDGE MARITZA MARTINEZ ENTERED AN
ORDER MARCH 27, 2024 RETURNING THE CASE BACK TO JUDGE IRIS Y. CHIVIRA REFUSING
TO VACATE HER OBSTRUCTIVE ORDER BECAUSE PRESIDING JUDGE NEVER AUTHORIZED OR SIGNED
A COURT ORDER ASSIGINING THE CASE TO JUDGE MARTINEZ CORROBORATING
DEMOCRATIC RACIAL HATE AND CORRUPTION CONTROLLING THE JUDICIARY RESPONDENT
FILED AN APPEARANCE FOR THE FIRST TIME SEPT 19, 2024 CORROBORATING NO JUDGE
EVER HAD JURISDICTION ON HIM WITH AFFIDAVIT
Now comes Respondent Joe Louis Lawrence, Counsel
Pro Se in this cause respectfully represents to this court the reasons and
files herewith his Affidavit in support of Respondent’s Motion for Disqualification
Judge Abbey Romanek Instanter et al;
- That
Pursuant to Steinbrecher v. Steinbrecher, 197 Ill. 2d 514, 528
(2001) “Pro Se litigants are presumed to have full
knowledge of applicable court rules and procedures”
- That under 18 U.S.C.
242 and 42 U.S.C. 1985 (3) (b). A judge does not have the discretion
on whether or not to follow Supreme Ct. Rules, but a duty to follow.
People v. Gersh, 135 Ill. 2d 384 (1990).
It appears no judge seems to
understand they can’t invoke jurisdiction until Judge Martinez Vacates her
unlawful court order of March 27 and Feb 2024.
3. That this is the actual
Communication from the Motion Call of Nov 1, 2024 9:05 call, Francoise
Hightower was a NO SHOW, but Assistant States Attorney Madison Mathis was
present but had no court file and Judge Romanek did not pass the case like
judges normally do.
4.
Judge Abbey Romanek: Are there any attorneys on the Hightower
case? I thought they were.
5. Judges
Clerk April: I don’t. think so, I
was told that the state was involved in this case. So I don’t other than that,
I don’t think they are.
6. Assistant
States Attorney Madison Mathis: I am
trying to double check our involvement on this matter.
7. Judge
Abbey Romanek: OK in any event, Sir, Mr. Lawrence, can you unmute and raise your right
hand, please? Do you solemnly swear to tell the truth, The whole truth. So help
you God.
8. Joe
Louis Lawrence: Yes Ma’am
9. Judge
Abbey Romanek: OK, all right, Sir. You’re looking to move your case from
Judge Forti for cause. What is the reason?
10. Joe
Louis Lawrence: I’ve cited the reasons in my motion. Your honor he
indicated that Francois was representing herself when in fact the state’s
attorney have been representing Francois since the inception of this case. I
have never been served in this matter and the default was entered and never
vacated. So all of the events that have taken place in this matter has been
articulated within the motion and submitted with an affidavit.
11. Judge
Abbey Romanek: Ok, So are you willing to move
forward based on just your affidavit and your information and the information
in your motion?
12. Joe
Louis Lawrence: Yeah, that is correct your honor.
13. Judge
Abbey Romanek: Ok, I have a question for you
though. When did, did you do a motion to vacate the default?
14. Joe
Louis Lawrence: The motion to vacate the default was done in August of
1988. But the wrong date was in fact vacated which kept the May 18 1988 default
order legally in place.
15. Judge
Abbey Romanek: O. K. You don’t talk about that at all in your motion.
16. Joe
Louis Lawrence No, no. The motion to disqualify the judge is different from
the events I did a petition for re for rehearing. I sent an email to you.
Particularizing the events so that we would know how to move forward on this
case. The fact that Judge Forti was not reviewing any of the information that
was presented to him. I came to court basically to see exactly how your honor
wanted to move forward on this matter. Now as far as you wanting the specific
information about what I did I could have had that itemized and presented to
you today.
17. Judge Abbey Romanek: Oh O. K. Well, I just
asked you what I, I didn’t see anything about your default so maybe that’s not
part of this OK. Thank you, sir. I
understand that you are moving forward to move Mr. or sorry judge Forti from this
case based on the fact that you, there’s
a conspiracy and what looks like judges acting as Ku Klux Klansmen.
18. Joe
Louis Lawrence: Can I interject respectfully your honor?
19. Judge
Abbey Romanek OK, well, he’s you’re calling. You’re saying he’s a racist
Sir?
20. Joe
Louis Lawrence: Your Honor, Judge. Forti indicated that Francois was self-
representing herself when the documents in the motion and in all my court
orders showed that the state’s attorney has in fact been representing
Francois Hightower as a police officer.
That within itself, Your Honor show’s bias and complicity. What else must I do
to show that there’s bias?
21. Judge
Abbey Romanek: O. K. All right. Well, I don’t find that to be biased and
complicity. I find that to be a mistake of fact, which can be easily fixed. The
States Attorney is here and they don’t and aren’t aware of this case at all. So
I’m not even sure that they are involved in this case.
22. Joe
Louis Lawrence: But I submitted the court orders showing that the state’s
attorney did,
23. Judge
Romanek: Well ok in fact, well, then that’s just a mistake of fact. And if
that’s the case, then that can be cured. It doesn’t show bias. So your motion
to
24. Assistant
States Attorney Madison Mathis: Your honor, I actually found this case in
one of our databases. It looks like it looks like it had been taken off call
for non-states attorney matter back on
Let’s see here March 27th of 2024.
25. Judge
Romanek: But I see something here from May 20.
26. Assistant
States Attorney Madison Mathis: Oh, OK. But it looks like the state has
worked on this case before.
27. Judge
Romanek: But they’re not currently
involved? But I don’t. I don’t have the file on hand. I think that’s just the
issue likely if respondent filed an emergency motion that would be why I don’t
have the file on hand.
28. Judge
Romanek: OK, Alright. So I. think it’s a mistake of fact and can be cured
and does not prove bias on that on behalf of Judge Forti. So Sir your motion is
respectfully denied and we will send this case back to Judge Forti. Thank you.
I have my 9:30 calls. We have his information.
Section
1983 of U.S.C.S. contemplates the depravation of Civil Rights through the
Unconstitutional Application of a Law by conspiracy or otherwise. Mansell
v. Saunders (CA 5 F 1A) 372 F 573, especially if the conspiracy was
actually carried into effect, where an action is for a conspiracy to interfere
with Civil Rights under 42 U.S.C.S. 1985 (3), or for the depravation of such
rights under 42 U.S.C.S. 1983, if the conspiracy was actually carried into
effect and plaintiff was thereby deprived of any rights, privileges, or
immunities secured by the United States Constitution and Laws, the gist of the
action maybe treated as one for the depravation of rights under 42 U.S.C.S.
1983, Lewis v. Brautigam (CA 5 F 1a) 227 F 2d 124,
55 Alr 2d 505, John W. Strong, 185, 777-78 (4th ed. 1992).
A- That
Pursuant to Par 21, Judge Romanek stated, “I don’t find that to be
biased and complicity. I find that to be a mistake of fact et al. The States
Attorney is here and they don’t and aren’t aware et al. and in Par 25
acknowledges, “I see something here from May 20,”
B- Judge
Romanek in her own admission acknowledged seeing a court order but acted as if
she thought ASA Madison Mathis was going to violate
RPC 3.3, but she told the truth and demonstrated integrity which is rare in
Cook County Courts. Ethics
All Illinois lawyers must be familiar with the Illinois Rules of Professional Conduct, and trail lawyers must be
particularly familiar with the rules that apply specially to them.
RPC
3.3, entitled “Conduct Before a Tribunal,” sets forth the
standards to be followed by the trial lawyer during “battle.” Section (a) of
that rule states:
(a) In appearing in a professional capacity before a tribunal, a
lawyer shall not:
(1) make a statement of
material fact or law to a tribunal which the lawyer knows or reasonably should
know is false;
B- That on July
9, 2024 on Judge Arce’s Call Cal D, Francoise Hightower was Present with
the Assistant States Attorney where she checked off In Re Parentage of, In
Re Allocation of Parental Responsibilities and signed by the Judge.
C- That it
is definitely apparent certain corrupt renegade Assistant States Attorneys
acting as “Private Citizens” are methodically trying to make sure that only the
racist Bias judges handle this case and is probably why the judges on the 30th
Floor only receive any Motions file to Disqualify any judge because that floor
alone harbors most of the racist hateful judges in Cook County and the 28th
floor is the floor where homes are illegally foreclosed on and stolen from hard
working Colored or Black citizens.
D- A RACIST
JUDGE WILL NEVER SEE WHAT ANOTHER PERSON OF THEIR KIND IS EVER DOING WRONG
BECAUSE IT IS NORMAL BEHAVIOR.
29. Respondent was advised by a competent reliable
source not to inundate Judge Romanek with so many filings ( my interpretation
don’t be the warrior), hereto attached Email sent Tuesday Oct. 29, at 1:07 pm
A- See many don’t realize is
that Judges/Clerks of Polish and Irish ethnicity already informed me that their
people were REDNECKS, or GOOD OL BOYS and have Ku Klux Klan backgrounds and
made it clear that Blacks were worse and no better and would never help me
because they have to do what they are told, in that a True Racist will never
back down their hateful disposition towards any person of Color.
B- Said Email Par 1, Would you
like a Briefing schedule et al?
30. That Judge Romanek had a
personal agenda, she wanted to let her colleagues know from her actions, she
could upstage the Respondent with her interrogations, she reminds me of the
late Morgan Hamilton who was a permanent Associate Judge, when the Sheriffs and
Clerks asked me my choice of judges who were going to replace my former
attorney and judge on my divorce case (William S. Boyd), I knew Jeane Bernstein
didn’t like Hispanics and Morgan Hamilton didn’t like Brothers, before I could open
my mouth Hamilton she said screaming from her chambers, “YALL STILL HAVING
PROBLEMS WITH THAT NIGGER? GIVE HIM TO ME, I’LL TAKE CARE OF HIM” everybody
in the court were Caucasian Deputies and Attorneys as I digress,
31. That Par 11, Judge
Romanek stated “ Ok, So are you willing to move
forward based on just your affidavit and your information and the information
in your motion?
A- The State’s Attorney has not
objected nor is Francoise present but now the judge is initiating a Personal
interest; thereby, corroborating now how she has become complicit in this
Criminal Conspiracy never at anytime did she ask if Francoise Hightower
received notice or knowledge as if she was already aware of her not going to be
in court.
32. Respondent
already knew the type of judges he was going to be met with never expected to
be before a competent judge with integrity and to this day not one judge
disappointed him in that said SUMMARY JUDGMENT was filed Dec
4, 2023, accompanied by Affidavit, Served on the States Attorney and
Francoise Hightower.
33. That the States
Attorney Kim Foxx and Police Officer Francoise L. B. Hightower have ADMITTED to
all PLEADINGS Pursuant to Local Rule 56.1.
34. That said judge became the De facto attorney for Francoise by
asking questions, Par 13, I have a question for you though. When
did, did you do a motion to vacate the default?
B- It was apparent Judge
Romanek was stunned by Respondent’s articulate diction in his responses to
every question she presented which yielded an unintelligent reply by saying it
was a Mistake of Fact that can be cured, that’s like saying it is daylight and
dark outside at the same time and it only looks like it is dark outside because
you are wearing sunglasses.
35. That on two specific
occasions, I was present in court and a judge was having a Hearing and a
Caucasian Attorney had presented a Motion with an Affidavit and opposing
Counsel tried to argue his way without any response, the attorney went to
respond and the judge stopped him telling him why mess up you stated you were
standing on your Motion, the judge ruled in favor of the Attorney with the
supporting affidavit to his Motion.
36.
37. On the other occasion a
well-represented articulate Caucasian female attorney representing an African
American where opposing Counsel didn’t respond to the Motion for the Hearing
and tried to finesse the judge and they tried baiting the professional
Caucasian woman attorney into an argument, the judge asked her if she had a
reply to their argument, she told the judge she was standing on her Motion and
the judge ruled in her favor.
38.
39. Respondent stood on his
Motion unopposed and the judge still denied his Motion to Disqualify Judge
Forti it is judges like her and so many others is why the jails are filled with
men of Color because her kind don’t recognize their innocence or their academic
ability to present a formidable defense even when the evidence proves within
the Preponderance of the Evidence Standard required in the Illinois Rules of
Civil Procedures.
40.
41. That the ILLINOIS STATE BAR ASSOCIATION
STANDING COMMITTEE ON JUDICIAL EVALUATIONS-COOK COUNTY 2022 GENERAL ELECTION
CANDIDATES SEEKING TO FILL JUDICIAL VACANCIES IRIS Y. CHAVIRA ---NOT
RECOMMENDED
Alliance
Evaluation Results
The Alliance of Bar Associations
includes 12 bar associations that work collaboratively to evaluate judicial
candidates, but publish independent recommendations.
· Bar Association Approval Key:
· High (>7 Bars Approve)
· Low (<5 Bars Approve)
· Results Pending
ALL BARS FOUND HER NOT RECOMMENDED
Iris Y. Chivira
declined to participate in the judicial evaluation process. Pursuant to ISBA
guidelines, Ms. Iris Y. Chavira is found to be NOT RECOMMENDED for election to
the Circuit Court of Cook County.
42. That the 14th SUBCIRCUIT
BROWN VACANCY CHAVIRA IS RUNNING UNOPPOSED IN THE PRIMARY. DISCRIMINATING
AGAINST QUALIFIED ATTORNEYS WHO SHOULD HAVE BEEN ON THE BALLOT RUNNING AGAINST
HER, VISIT injusticewatch.org/judges.
A-
That
Iris Y. Chivira finagled herself “FRAUDULENTLY” by getting on the
Cook County Ballot UNOPPOSED, with the assistance of other Corrupt Clerks in
Cook County bypassing the integrity process by DISCRIMINATING against QUALIFIED
or OVERLYQUALIFID CANDIDATES from being Cook County judges. INDUCING
RELIANCE
To prevail in a cause of action for
fraud, plaintiff must prove that defendant made statement of material nature
which was relied on by victim and was made for purposes of inducing reliance,
and that victim’s reliance led to his injury. Parsons V. Winter,
1986, 1 Dist., 491 N.E. 2d 1236, 96 ILL Dec. 776, 142 ILL App 3d 354, Appeal
Denied.
In Carter V. Mueller 457 N.E. 2d 1335 ILL. App. 1 Dist.
1983 The Supreme Court has held that: “The
elements of a cause of action for fraudulent misrepresentation (sometimes
referred to as “fraud and deceit” or deceit) are: (1) False statement of
material fact; (2) known or believed to be false by the party making it; (3)
intent to induce the other party to act; (4) action by the other party in
reliance on the truth of the statement; and (5) damage to the other party
resulting from such reliance.
43. That
because of her allegiance to whoever placed her on the Cook County ballot
unopposed, she acted as a “Private Citizen” by unlawfully signing a
Court Order Nov. 29, 2023 as Ex A, the States Attorney having admitted
to all facts recorded in said Motion to Zero Out Child Support et al. 88 D 079012 .
44. That on Nov 14, 2023,
Judge Chavira informed the Caucasian Assistant States Attorney that, she
thought this was her case via Zoom, the ASA informed the judge, that she didn’t
think, they were involved and complained the Motion was over 13 pages (which
made no sense)
A-
Judge Chivira asked if Francoise had been sent a copy,
said reply was yes, and informed the judge that electronic service was emailed
to statesattorney@cookcountyil.gov,
the judge said that is not the correct email and the Caucasian ASA provided sao.csed@cookcountyil.gov.
B-
That most importantly Judge Chivira requested to see
Respondent’s face and directed him on how to navigate his phone so she can see
him, Respondent was in a Parking lot at Advocate on 26th King Drive,
he took his Mom to her Medical Appointment and this was his first time being on
Zoom.
C-
Respondent requested that the judge set a Briefing
schedule so as to ascertain the merits of the Motion because no Clerk in the
Child Support Division could provide him any information and that he had to go
before a judge to obtain any information about the case, she was accurate and
had professional integrity.
D-
The Caucasian ASA immediately Objected to any Briefing
schedule and the judge said she agreed (which is now a Prima Facie showing of Judge
acting as a de facto ASA) and ordered the Respondent to Re file the Motion to
Zero out Child Support and email it to the email just provided from the ASA,
Respondent was confused and asked the Judge, “if the Motion is being
spindled to the next available date?” The judge became hesitant and said
that she was Striking the Motion and (the ASA never objected or requested a
Strike etc.) that the State was going to provide the next court date, hereto
attached, Ex B, Nov 29, Email sent verifying that Respondent never
received a Court Order from the Judge acknowledging he was before the court.
E-
That the ASA Harris made a statement that validated her
role as a Terrorist Conspirator as a “Private Citizen” mentioned that
they had a signed Court Order of 2007, (Tycee was 23 years old) Respondent
Objected to any Court Order of 2007 that Corroborates everything properly
asserted because it not only proves that a judge was complicit in this
conspiracy but the Plaintiff was in fact was an adult and the May 18, 1988
Court Order never Ordered the Respondent to pay anything.
F-
That Respondent was Induced into believing that Judge
Chivira was impartial never acknowledged Respondent was before her or that she
instructed him to Re Notice the Motion as stated in Ex A
corroborates factually why no Bar or the Illinois State Bar Association
never RECOMMENDED her to seek any JUDICIAL VACANCY.
G- That
Ex C, Per Court Order (Filed Nov. 15, 2023) is compliance and veracity
of Judge Chivira/and ASA Harris name recorded on the order of said women
engaging in an ACTIVE CHAIN CONSPIRACY. CONSPIRACY
Fraud maybe inferred from nature of acts complained of, individual and
collective interest of alleged conspirators, situation, intimacy, and relation
of parties at time of commission of acts, and generally all circumstances
preceding and attending culmination of claimed conspiracy Illinois Rockford
Corp. V. Kulp, 1968, 242 N.E. 2d 228, 41
ILL. 2d 215.
Conspirators to be guilty of offense need
not have entered into conspiracy at
same time or have taken part in all its actions. People V. Hardison, 1985, 911
Dec. 162, 108. Requisite mens rea elements of conspiracy are satisfied
upon showings of agreement of offense with intent that offense be committed;
Actus reas element is satisfied of act in furtherance of agreement People
V. Mordick, 1981, 50 ILL, Dec. 63
H-
That the judge nor her Clerk or any member of the
States Attorney’s Office ever mailed to the Respondent a copy of Ex A or
sent it via email and Judge Chivira requested his email Nov. 14, 2023.
I-
That said Motion validated the verity no Court or judge ever had jurisdiction on the Respondent ignored
Defendants valid Affidavits and Exhibits demonstrating Prejudice and Bias
behavior pursuant to S.H.A. 735 ILCS 5/2-----1001 (a) (3); Sup. Ct. Rule 63 (C) (1),
due to Racial Hate Bias.
45. That
because of the Respondent’s skin color and alleged sexual orientation
Respondent has been held at a legal standard higher than every white, Colored
unqualified attorney or States Attorney,
he has been before in all of the courts in that, every white judge demonstrated
their demonic hate by closing their eyes to the draconian criminal Terrorists
Acts and whoever has assumed the position of Alderman Edward Burke assigning
attorneys to the Cook County Ballot putting who they want as judges or is still
appointing racist Brethren judges, assuming his position and it is still
business as usual, they are still continuing this mayhem selecting unqualified
thugs with law licenses as if nobody is reading or watching.
46. So
that everyone is clear that this matter is being observed after emailing
(Motion for Summary Judgment et al.) Judge Chivira and the ASA from the law
library in Cook County ScanEz station Dec. 4, at 1:30pm and sending it to two
private emails someone in a pay upgrade surpassing everyone involved removed
them from his emails, unlawful1.blogspot.com has a detailed narrative of
how cases are “Fixed” in Cook County and State Courts.
47. That
said judge along with a plethora of hateful Black Women allegedly figured if
their acts are on Black or Brown Men the powerfully connected racist White Men
controlling the Democratic Political Machine would reward and save them from
any prosecutions and Francoise has been rewarded tremendously exercising the
racist side from her mother’s heritage embracing diabolical hatred going with
Ku Klux Klan tyranny trying to receive money Respondent never owed her but she
had her father’s child and he had an Irish Drunk judge to issue an Order
Respondent was not to see the child Judge James J. Meehan in 1989.
48. That
what every attorney, Judge or Assistant States Attorneys or Assistant Attorney
Generals didn’t realize is that Respondent was prepared for the Ku Klux Klan or
any of their inferior sellouts on any bench, while it was not the intention to
trap Hispanic Judge Iris Y. Chivira she had an out by not signing any
court orders but the objective was to reel in some of the most racist hateful
men on the bench, trapping Colored people was a given because many of them
don’t read and believe the racist Political Machine Operatives will or can save
them.
49. That
a Polaco aka “Good Ol Boy” (Law Division Judge Ronald Bartkowicz)
admitted fucking over the Respondent and it seemed to have perturbed another “Good
ol Boy” Appellate Court judge “Private Citizen Terrance J. Lavine”
in a horrific manner, he has done everything unimaginable to keep said
admission from being a part of the Appellate Record, that certain State
employees in the Labor Board deleted trying to save the CTA/ATU Local 241 in
that Gr Ex D, Motion for
Disqualification of judge et al. a Anglo-Saxon Man admitting he has WRONGED
a FREE BLACK MAN, See the Court Order Oct. 14, 1994, “APPEARING ON
THE RESPONDENT’S CALL TO RECUSE BECAUSE OF MY PRIOR ASSOCIATION WITH CHICAGO
TRANSIT AUTHORITY” See Motion his initials RB.
Respondent was informed that allegedly someone was paid $50,000.00 to
DESTROY said Personnel or Paternity records and was coming after him for the
money in the guise of child in support and whoever paid need to get their money
back because Judge Edward Jordan put the fear of God in Rachel Kaplan who
succeeded Kent Stephan Ray of the CTA and turned over his employment file via
subpoena In RE Joe Louis Lawrence v Carolyn Lawrence 08 D
10264 (Divorce connected to Hightower v Lawernce) Judge Boyd was his
former attorney and judge on the matter and allegedly negotiated an Associates
Judges position from Burke and was his ENFORCER, became the Judge for the
divorce never withdrew from the case as his attorney pretended like he didn’t
know the Respondent and didn’t allow his Default after his Ex admitted to all
Pleadings of the Complaint, he became personally obstructive and allowed an
active Police Detective to represent said Ex which was not a problem but the
judge and Detective spent more time in his chambers than he did in front of the
Respondent, he would come out of his chambers zipping up his pants with a KOOL
AID smile (Boyd is Mean Looking and Ugly) but his demeanor always changed
when he came out of the chambers with the Detective. Respondent looked at his
male Clerk who may have been bisexual he put his head down and never looked
back up at the Respondent and then the Detective would come out after him and
anything, he filed Boyd Granted it but when he took his son from him telling
Lester Barclay who was the GAL representing his children telling him to tell me
in front of my face, “that he is the judge and what he says goes” (He
took his baby son from his custody Ex wife was so depressed dealing with
Bipolar disorder not able to get out of bed and was about to collect social
security for her depression until they gave her a job at the VA hospital and
Public Aid with no experience and illegally split welfare part was in his name
and her name but Respondent was the Head of Household) it was FUCKING WAR!
Respondent didn’t care who was giving who BLOW JOBS, Lester
Barclay was afraid of Boyd, Boyd was a like a Black version of Raul Vega who
was very very nasty to women attorneys, Boyd Bullied Black men and sent them to
jail, my Lodge Brother had a stroke became blind in one eye and was living in a
Nursing Home from what he experienced from Boyd being sent to jail for not
having any money
CASE # 2018 D 003208
( he was like Stephen on Django featuring Jamie Foxx.
That Brian needed Lester Barclay to go along with him
in saying that Respondent was abusive to his children in a violent manner,
Lester withdrew from being the Gal so Ruth B. Watson became the new Gal and it
was pitched to her Judge Morgan Hamilton was in agreement but Ruth was going to
withdraw and was against them using children trying to DENIGRATE Respondent’s
character she was very irate but professional which is rarely seen in a Black
Woman in the Courts.
A Motion to
Disqualify him was filed he was PISSED and Judge Jordan returned his son and
said don’t worry about Judge Boyd and said that “there are more people with
you than against you remember that” and reminded him that he read all of
his Courtesy Copies he tendered to him.
It was learned that everybody was after said back
wages of the CTA rumor had it the CTA was planning on paying the Respondent but
too many people got intertwined and no CTA Official was going to authorize
paying the Respondent many were upset, he filed for a Divorce because they
needed the ex-wife to help bring him down it never worked.
A-
Respondent was asked if he could trap judges in the
same manner, he prepares pleadings against any attorneys, he has been up
against? This is the technique being demonstrated judges must violate the laws
and act outside of their jurisdiction making them “Trespassers of the Laws”
“Private Citizens” in order that the trap be effective the Good ol
Boys never learned this area of law and many Inferior Beings of Color do
what they are told don’t know this area of law either.
B-
That judge Chivira only signed a court order
likened to using yesterday’s toilet paper having loose bowels allegedly after
Respondent filed his Motion for Summary Judgment et al. Dec. 4, 2023 and
requests the strictest proof thereof validating other parties in the Cook
County Clerk Offices or judges Law Clerks complicit in said “Criminal
Enterprise Child Support Extortion Operation” the following Par C
articulates how judges circumvent the laws and act as “Private Citizens”
violating their oaths keeping Apartheid and Jim Crow Laws effective in
Illinois.
C-
#JudicialCorruption in Chicago, Illinois how to fix cases: HOW JUDGES IN CHICAGO
COURTS MAKE ASSES OUT OF THE... https://unlawful1.blogspot.com/2018/06/how-judges-in-chicago-courts-make-asses.html?spref=tw
D-
Anytime a racist Irish have the audacity to say to an
innocent man “today is your lucky day, I can’t LOCK YOU UP anymore” or a
Polaca tells you, “I know that you are not the BIOLOGICAL FATHER, I’m just
the BILL COLLECTOR” or the other Polaca issues a BOGUS WARRANT as a former
CTA attorney trying to help keep his racist Brethren from being discovered at
the CTA (admit to everything as being accurate in the Motion to Disqualify him
and compliments the Motion and asks the Respondent “How did you know, that I
use to work for the CTA?”) who stole said wages while off work injured on
duty and to cover-up all of the illegal wage garnishees sent to her racist
Irish attorney representing Police Officer Francoise Louise Barbara
Hightower-Belmer. #JudicialCorruption in Chicago,
Illinois how to fix cases... https://unlawful1.blogspot.com/2012/08/chronology-of-unlawful-contempt-charges.html? A Certified Affidavit Notarized ignored by racist States
Attorney Dick Devine.
E-
That Kent Stephen Ray of 93 L 10772 was a
flaming white version of RuPaul stood before Judge Patrick McGann and said that
“Respondent had no proof of him being Discharged and thinks that there is a
“Grannnnd Conspiracy against him” literally flaunting his hands like a
woman in a theatrical manner” McGann became very angry at the Respondent called
him Garbage asked him who the hell he thought he was filing this mess and got
up from the bench trying to approach the Respondent but a Big Brother Deputy
stood in front of him preventing the judge from leaving the bench, Respondent
Objected to the judges biasness and admitted what the CTA said and the judge
went on a tangent again about coming to court on HEARSAY, said judge was
reassigned to Traffic Court which was 321 N. LaSalle.
50. That
under no circumstances did judge Chivari want anyone to know that Respondent was
before her on Nov 14, 2023, that is why Harris ASA referenced Oct 26,
2023 on Ex A and never Ref Ex C the Caucasian ASA was smart
she never put her name on any court order where the States Attorney was present
and which states Illinois Department of Healthcare and Family Services ex rel. on behalf of
Francoise as a Police Officer only ignorant people of Color or Racists will
put their names on such documents.
51. That
because of Bias and legal aptitude not fitting to be on RECOMMENED as
judge in the first place and being placed on the ballot against the EXPERTS
ANALYSIS corroborates and demonstrates unequivocally how putting a judge
with no integrity or legal experience is an egregious detriment and cancer to
any court where justice is supposed to prevail.
a. Said
States Attorney used her position and authority and became complicit in an
Organized Criminal Conspiracy engaging in racist Terrorist Acts.
52. That
Blacks in Chicago in the Democratic Party closes their eyes to the unlawful
mayhem many innocent or elderly men or women disenfranchised by whatever means
experienced in the legal system because they are now the new colored Ku Klux
Klan or puppets in the Democratic Machine.
a.
To
show fraud upon the court, the complaining party must establish that the
alleged misconduct affected the integrity of the judicial process, either
because the court itself was defrauded or because the misconduct was
perpetrated by officers of the court. Alexander v. Robertson, 882, F. 2d
421,424 (9th Cir. 1989);
b.
A void judgment does not create any binding obligation.
Kalb v. Feuerstein (1940) 308 US 433, 60 S Ct 343, 84 L, Ed 370.
Properly alleged facts within an affidavit that are
not contradicted by counter affidavit are taken as true, despite the existence
of contrary averments in the adverse party’s pleadings. Professional
Group Travel, Ltd. v. Professional Seminar Consultants Inc., 136 ILL App 3d
1084, 483 N.E. 2d 1291; Buzzard v. Bolger, 117 ILL App 3d 887, 453 N.E. 2d 1129
et al
53.
A-
Motions for Reconsideration are designed to
bring to the court’s attention newly discovered evidence that was unavailable
at time of original hearing, changes in existing law, or errors in court’s
application of law. Continental Cas.
Co. v. Security Ins. Co. of Hartford, App. 1 Dist. 1996, 216 Ill. Dec. 314, 279
Ill. App. 3d 815, 665 N.E. 2d 374, appeal dismissed, et al.;
B-
The purpose of a Motion to Vacate is to alert
the trial court to errors it has made and to afford an opportunity for their
correction. In re Marriage of King, App.
1 Dist. 2002, 270 Ill. Dec. 540, 336 Ill. App. 3d 83, 783 N.E. 2d 115,
rehearing denied pending appeal; et al.
C-
Pursuant to 735
ILCS 5/2-612 Counsel never Objected to the sufficiency of Petitioners
pleadings, Objections to sufficiency of pleadings either in form or substance
must be made In trial court, and if not so made, they will be considered waived
and cannot be raised for the first time on appeal. People ex rel. Deynes
v. Harris, App. 1948, 77 N.E. 2d 439, 333 Ill. App. 280.
54. That because of the above; Fraud admissibility
great latitude is permitted in proving fraud C.J.S. Fraud 104 ET Seg. Fraud
51-57. where a question of fraud and deceit is the issue involved in a case,
great latitude is ordinarily permitted in the introduction of evidence,
and courts allow the greatest liberality in the method of examination and in
the scope of inquiry Vigus V. O’Bannon, 1886 8 N.E 788, 118 ILL 334.
Hazelton V. Carolus, 1907 132 ILL. App. 512. https://unlawful1.blogspot.com/2014/12/blacklivesdontmatter-judgemikva-never.html?spref=tw
A- That
said case had to recruit a judge from the juvenile division because no judge in
the Daley Center aka (Babylon, Hell, etc.) wanted to have any dealings with the
Respondent, Judge Mikva told the Respondent “he had a Gift, he can tell a
story using the laws and she understood everything he was saying, in that his
pleadings were unique not the way law school teaches students how to plead.”
B- That
the transcript attached to the database in Cook County is incredible reading
material, the FBI or State Police will love reading this document it
corroborates how a State Agency similar to how Edward Burke was convicted was
being used to try and suspend said driver’s license.
“In addition,
when judges act when they do not have jurisdiction to act, or they enforce a
void order (an order issued by a judge without jurisdiction), they become
trespassers of the law, and are engaged in treason.”
C- That said link particularizes some of the cases linked to the
Hightower v Lawrence “fraudulently”
https://unlawful1.blogspot.com/2020/07/the-real-reason-why-chicago-is-so.html?spref=tw
Ethics
All Illinois lawyers must be familiar with the Illinois Rules of Professional Conduct, and trail lawyers must be
particularly familiar with the rules that apply specially to them.
RPC
3.3, entitled “Conduct Before a Tribunal,” sets forth the
standards to be followed by the trial lawyer during “battle.” Section (a) of
that rule states:
(b) In appearing in a professional capacity before a tribunal, a
lawyer shall not:
(1) make a statement of
material fact or law to a tribunal which the lawyer knows or reasonably should
know is false;
(2) fail to disclose to a
tribunal a material fact known to the lawyer when disclosure is necessary to
avoid assisting a criminal or fraudulent act by the client;
(3) fail to disclose to the
tribunal legal authority in the controlling jurisdiction known to the lawyer to
be directly adverse to the position of the client and not disclosed by opposing
counsel;
(4) Offer evidence that the
lawyer knows to be false. If a lawyer has offered material evidence and comes
to know of its falsity, the lawyer shall take reasonable remedial measures;
(5) participate in the creation
or preservation of evidence when the lawyer knows or reasonably should know the
evidence is false ;
(6) counsel or assist the
client in conduct the lawyer knows to be illegal of fraudulent;
(7) engage in other illegal
conduct or conduct in violation of these Rules;
(8) fail to disclose the
identities of the clients represented and of the persons who employed the
lawyer unless such information is privileged or irrelevant;
(9) intentionally degrade a
witness or other person by stating or alluding to personal facts concerning
that person which are not relevant to the case;
(10) in trial, allude to any matter that the lawyer does not
reasonably believe is relevant or that will not be supported by admissible
evidence, assert personal knowledge of facts in issue except when testifying as
a witness, or state a personal opinion as to the justness of a cause, the
credibility of a witness, the culpability of a civil litigant or the guilt or
innocence of and accused, but a lawyer may argue, on analysis of evidence, for
any position or conclusion with respect to the matter stated herein;
Acts constituting direct, criminal
contempt
A wide variety of acts may constitute a direct, criminal
contempt. And act may be criminal contempt even though it is also an indictable
crime. Beattie v. People, 33
Official
misconduct is a criminal offense; and a public officer or employee commits
misconduct, punishable by fine, imprisonment, or both, when, in his official
capacity, he intentionally or recklessly fails to perform any mandatory duty as
required by law; or knowingly performs an act which he knows he is forbidden by
law to perform; or with intent to obtain a personal advantage for himself or
another, he performs an act in excess of his lawful authority ….S.H.A. Ch 38
33-3.
- “The
Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals held that the Circuit Court of Cook County is a criminal
enterprise. U.S. v.
Murphy, 768 F.2d 1518,
1531 (7th Cir. 1985)”.
The United States
Supreme Court recently acknowledged the judicial corruption in Cook County,
when it stated that Judge "Maloney was one of many dishonest judges
exposed and convicted through 'Operation Greylord', a labyrinthine federal
investigation of judicial corruption in Chicago". Bracey v.
Gramley, case No. 96-6133 (June 9, 1997).
Since judges who do not report the criminal activities of other
judges become principals in the criminal activity, 18 U.S.C. Section 2, 3 &
4, and since no judges have reported the criminal activity of the judges who
have been convicted, the other judges are as guilty as the convicted judges.
- That Judge Chivra
demonstrated Bias and collusion by signing her name on court order that
was clearly fraudulent (Nov 28 or 29 2023).
a. She
used her robe and unlawful authority in the same identical manner as the other Democratic
Judges not realizing she became a “Private Citizen” and no longer operating
under an obligation and oath she swore to because she was never recommended to
be a judge in the first place so she never really understood her function on
the bench but as long as she denied Respondents Motions accompanied with
Affidavits she showed her allegiance to whomever sponsored her on the Cook
County ballot proving Black and Brown lives don’t matter due to Terrorist Control
Racist Democrats have over the legal tribunals 735 ILCS 5/2—1001(a)(3) (West 2006). Although the statute does
not define “cause”, Illinois courts have held that in such circumstances,
actual prejudice has been required to FORCE REMOVAL of a judge from a case,
that is, either prejudicial trial conduct or personal bias. Rosewood Corp. n
Transamerica Insurance Co., 57 Ill 2d 247, 311 N.E. 2d 673 (1974; In re
Marriage of Kozloff, 101 Ill 2d 526, 532, 79 Ill. Dec 165 463 N.E. 2d 719
(1984); see also People v. Vance, 76 Ill. 2d 171, 181, 28 Ill. Dec. 508, 390
N.E. 2d 867 (1979).
56. In
that African American judges ignorant of the laws are just as worse as racist
judges, in that, many of them closes their eyes and commit the same acts as
racist judges, due to them selling out their ethnicity for whatever alleged fee
or favor they can receive, but in this case an investigation has to be had to
ascertain how this Hispanic Attorney made it to the Cook County Ballot
UNOPPOSED overlooking and DISCRIMINATING AGAINST QUALIFIED ATTORNEYS WHO WORKED
HARD AND HAVE THE REAL ACADEMICS BEHIND THEM and INDUCED the SUPREME COURT OF
ILLINIOIS to have sworn her in as a JUDGE.
- The Illinois Supreme Court has held that
"if the magistrate has not such jurisdiction, then he and those who
advise and act with him, or execute his process, are
trespassers." Von Kettler et.al. v. Johnson,
57 Ill. 109 (1870)
Under Federal law which is
applicable to all states, the U.S. Supreme Court stated that if a court is
"without authority, its judgments and orders are regarded as nullities.
They are not voidable, but simply void; and form no bar to a recovery sought,
even prior to a reversal in opposition to them. They constitute no
justification; and all persons concerned in executing such judgments or
sentences, are considered, in law, as trespassers." Elliot
v. Piersol, 1 Pet. 328, 340, 26 U.S. 328, 340 (1828)
The Illinois Supreme Court held
that if a court "could not hear the matter upon the jurisdictional paper
presented, its finding that it had the power can add nothing to its authority,
- it, had no authority to make that finding." The People v.
Brewer, 128 Ill. 472, 483 (1928). The judges listed below had no
legal authority (jurisdiction) to hear or rule on certain matters before them.
They acted without any jurisdiction.
When judges act when they do not have jurisdiction to act, or they
enforce a void order (an order issued by a judge without jurisdiction), they
become trespassers of the law, and are engaged in treason.
A- That
Judge Chivari, Martinez and Romanek with Brazen disregard for the laws Chivira was
a former Assistant States Attorney openly tried “fixing” said case
demonstrating a Prima Facie showing of Bias and or Prejudice conduct
pursuant to Sup Ct Rule 71, Sufficient for Removal, conduct which does
not constitute a criminal offense may be sufficiently violative of the Judicial
Canons to warrant removal for cause. Napolitano v Ward, 457 F 2d 279 (7th Cir.), cert denied, 409
U.S. 1037, 93 S. Ct. 512, 34 L. Ed. 2d 486 (1972).
58. That judge Chivari,
Martinez, Romanek has demonstrated an unknown interest in this matter which has
blinded her objectivity in adjudicating the merits of this matter, due to the
aforementioned; Sup Ct. Rule 63 (c) (1) (d) mandates disqualification
where the judge has an interest in the proceeding. (eff. April 16, 2007).
A
judge’s disrespect for the rules of court demonstrates disrespect for the law.
Judges are disciplined under Canon 2A for violating court rules and procedures.
Judge ignored mandated witness order in attempt to accommodate witnesses’
schedules; Citing Canon 2A the court noted, “[a] court’s indifference to
clearly stated rules breeds disrespect for and discontent with our justice
system. Government cannot demand respect of the laws by its citizens when its
tribunals ignore those very same laws”)
a. Fraud upon the court is
a basis for equitable relief. Luttrell v. United States, 644 F. 2d 1274, 1276
(9th Cir. 1980); see Abatti v. C.I.R. , 859 F 2d 115, 118 (9th
Cir. 1988) “it is beyond question that a court may investigate a question as to
whether there was fraud in the procurement of a judgment” Universal Oil
Products Co. v. Root Refining Co., 328 U.S. 575, 66 S. Ct. 1176, 90 L. Ed.
1447. The power of the court to unearth such a fraud is the power to unearth it
effectively. See Hazel-Atlas Glass Co. v. Hartford-Empire Co., 322 U.S. 238, 64
S. Ct. 997, 88 L. Ed. 1250; Sprague v. Ticonic National Bank, 1184 and United
States v. Throckmorton, 98 U.S. (8 Otto) 61, 25 L. Ed. 93.
b. “A judge is an officer of
the court, as are all members of the Bar. A judge is a judicial officer, paid
by the Government to act impartially and lawfully”. People v. Zajic, 88
Ill. App 3d 477, 410 N.E. 2d 626. “A
void judgment is regarded as a nullity, and the situation is the same as it
would be if there were no judgment. It has no legal or binding force or
efficacy for any purpose or at any place….It is not entitled to enforcement.
30A Am Judgments 43, 44, 45. Henderson v Henderson 59 S.E. 2d 227-232
c. “A Void Judgment from its inception is and forever continues to be
absolutely null, without legal efficacy, ineffectual to bind parties or support
a right, of no legal force and effect whatever, and incapable of confirmation,
ratification, or enforcement in any manner or to any degree. “A void judgment,
order or decree may be attacked at any time or in any court, either directly or
collaterally” Oak Park Nat Bank v. Peoples Gas Light & Coke Col, 46 Ill.
App. 2d 385, 197 N.E. 3d 73, 77, (1st Dist. 1964)
Under penalties as provided by
law pursuant to 735 1265 5\1-109, the undersigned certifies that the statements
set forth in this instrument are true and correct, except as to matters therein
stated to be on information and belief and as to such matters, the undersigned
certifies as aforesaid that he verily believes the same to be true.
Respectfully submitted,
___________________________
Joe Louis Lawrence
PO Box 490075
Chicago, IL. 60649
312 965-6455
WHEREFORE the aforementioned reasons Defendant respectfully Prays
for the Relief
1. For an Order Vacating and
Disqualifying Judge Romanek Instanter for the Criminal Acts of Trespassing upon
the Laws on For an Order transferring
certain parts of this matter to a Judge in the Federal venue due to Corruption and Fraud;
2. For
an Order reimbursing all fees and costs to the Defendant for the enforcement of
this matter;
3. For an Order issuing a
Mandatory Injunction of HFS/Child Support Enforcement to Prohibit said unit
from prosecuting any more cases until an investigation is had ascertaining all
parties involved in said Criminal Enterprise.
A-
That said ASA Harris and the Caucasian
ASA on the Nov 14, 2023 and any other ASAs be referred for Law License be REVOKED
INSTANTER for violations of Ethics RPC 3.3 and
every other ASA involved.
4. For an Order investigating
the Clerks who was responsible for ascertaining the names of other Attorneys
not Recommended to be judges who bypassed the proper legal requirements and
finagled their way to the Cook County Ballot.
5. For
an Order on Rule to Show Cause of Sanctions Remands and Disbarments of all Assistant
States Attorneys, Clerks and State employees involved in this matter;
6. For an Order assigning this
matter away from the LGBTQ/Irish/Polish/American African Americans because many
judges and CTA employees and Clerks of that union has displayed Terrorist Hate
at the Respondent due to his Heterosexual Outspoken Whistle Blower disposition,
he doesn’t care about them but they have demonstrated diabolical resentment and
hate at him.
A- It is apparent alleged Blow
Jobs or physical copulation, or Females Licking another Female or whatever they
do to achieve satisfaction in Chambers or whatever govt offices to be performed
on the subjects whom they are subordinate to demonstrates a CONFLICT OF
INTERESTS, TYRANNY, APARTHEID in a sexual and racial terrorist manner.
7. For the entry of an Order
awarding to your Petitioner for such other relief and any other relief
necessary as equity may require of which this court may deem overwhelmingly
just;
Narrative of Popular Black Movie as it relates to Black Women in
authority here.
“It is a work that subtly is an indictment
overtly is an indictment on the Black Man” Minister Louis Farrakahan
This case depicts how the Black Woman is used to satisfy the wishes of
the racist white man’s stereotypical illustration of the Black Man in how certain
movies are glorified as the Black Man is
depicted as being emasculated or the worse man a Black woman can be with who
have been abused by one in any fashion demonstrated in the movie, the worse
part of this is that a Black Man can have sexual relations with another white
man but his hate is still so deep for the Black Man even after getting on his
knees or bending over to fulfill his sexual desires, the white man would seek
to have innocent children to lie on an innocent Black man in an attempt to
demean and denigrate that Man in futile attempts to destroy the Black family in
an attempt to further exacerbate any hostility in the divorce by creating a
scenario using and teaching children how to hate their Black fathers; thereby,
causing and creating the psychological damage of self-hate and violence within
the Black communities the racist white man is so effective manipulating the
Black woman (Tycee Laqita Hightower don’t know the Respondent never had a
discussion nor have she met his mother and she will be 40 years old Nov 21, 2024).
In the minds of this woman or any woman her Dad is a good for nothing
DEADBEAT Dad when in actuality her grandfather is her Dad and her mother feels
that it is appropriate to continually lie and deceive everyone about her sexual
relationship with her biological father and conceiving his child it’s as if
there is some type of badge of honor for an abused woman to hurt and punish a
great Black Man of Color who did nothing to her, by vilifying him negatively to
satisfy her own alleged psychological illness what other reason would a woman
sexually abused by a family member or stranger go along with this? or keep
their mouths shut at the injustices he has experienced?
Respondent has never abused any woman or child but because of his Male
Masculine Heterosexual disposition in the legal venues controlled by racist
White Democrats who have Buck Broken those men not strong enough to either
fight back or simply accepted the abuse as a the norm and the very women
sexually abused by their fathers, brothers or strangers have ascended to
positions of power and has used said positions to Destroy and Criminalize the
Black Man necessary to achieve any endeavor the racist white man is seeking and
protect him at any costs by covering up committing perjury etc.
This case demonstrates the necessary steps exhausted needed to destroy
and Criminalize the Black Man using the Black woman or any Colored Person
inferior enough to get involved as Judge Chivira which begs the question what
powerful woman did she have to sleep with or allow them to have their way with
her by placing her on the ballot?
Now that Edward Burke has been rightfully Convicted many of the sick ass
judges he has put on the benches as judges are still present and act as if he
is still their God and Savior not fearing the FBI are still “FIXING” cases as
this is Burke’s baby, he appointed every racist corrupt judge assigned to this
case and the only judges he did not assign are the ones not caught up or
involved in any way.
Allegedly Cook County President, Toni Preckwinkle is the author of this
mess,
“OH WHAT A WEB WE WEAVE WHEN WE
DECEIVE”
That every woman intertwined in this case have one thing in common all
of them have been sexually abused and has lied, slandered, or defamed an
INNOCENT MAN and never healed from their abuse; and never confronting their
abuser or learned how to let go and never accepting the fact it was not their
fault being raped, but elected to remain as victims by coming after an innocent
man who did nothing to any of them so as to satisfy and justify the Hated White
Man’s stereotypical image on what a Black Man is to them.
It
is women like this intertwined in this case why our Black and Brown communities
are endowed with so much violence, disrespect and hatred for one another
because so many have lost respect for themselves and have allowed the real
culprit White Man to use you in keeping the Black and Brown Man displaced from
society as they profit off your misery and displaced rage as they manufacture
any document in your behalf acting as your SLAVE MASTER GIVING YOU WHAT YOU
SEEK.
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY ILLINOIS
DOMESTIC
RELATIONS DIVISION
EXHIBIT LIST
1.) Ex A- November 28, 2023 Court Order
from Judge Chivira never sent electronically or mailed.
2.) Ex B- November 29, 2023, Email to
Judge Chivira Clerk articulating he never received any Court Order from Nov 14,
2023 and Par 4A, 4B ASA Harris acknowledged having a Court Order
from a Judge in 2007 where Tycee Hightower was emancipated in 2002.
3.) Ex C- Re Noticed filed
November 15, 2023, states per Court Order which was really her directive
because she never formally acknowledged Respondent being court.
4.) Gr Ex D- Cook County Judge Ronald Bartkowicz whom Alderman
Edward Burke appointed to the bench ADMITTED ISSUING A BOGUS WARRANT
(Oct 14, 1994) against the Respondent for Irish Brethren representing Police
Officer Francoise L. B. Hightower. He initialed R B see Motion which was filed
Oct 13, 1994 with an Affidavit nobody DENIED or OBJECTED to due to its
veracity.
5.) Ex E – Email to Judge Fishman via her Clerk Jo
Anne Cepak Oct 29, 2024, 1:07pm
6.) Ex F- Court Order from Presiding Judge Regina
Scannicchio In Re Allocation of authorizing Judge Romanek to preside on
said matter of Disqualifying Judge Forti et al.
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY ILLINOIS
DOMESTIC RELATIONS DIVISIO1N
IN RE
)
)
Francoise
Hightower
) Judge Abbey Fishman
Romanek
Petitioner
)
) Cal 94
VS
)
) No. 88 D 079012
Joe Louis
Lawrence
)
Respondent
) Room 3008
RE NOTICE
OF
RESPONDENT’S MOTION FOR DISQUALIFICATION OF JUDGE ABBEY ROMANEK INSTANTER OF JUDGE FOR
“CAUSE” “BEING A RACIST” HATE BIAS PREJUDICE PURSUANT to S.H.A. 735 ILCS 5/2 ---1001
(a) JUDGE RECEIVED COURT ORDER FROM PRESIDING JUDGE & ASSISTANT STATES
ATTORNEY AND HER CLERK OF THE STATES ATTORNEY REPRESENTING POLICE OFFICER
FRANCOISE HIGHTOWER IN SAID PATERNITY MATTER AND SAID “I THINK IT’S A MISTAKE
OF FACT AND CAN BE CURED” JUDGE ROMANEK UNEQUIVOCALLY BECAME A “PRIVATE
CITIZEN” ATTACHING A PERSONAL BIAS ENGAGING IN AN ORGANIZED CRIMINAL
CONSPIRACY CIVIL RIGHTS VIOLATIONS
“FRAUD” TRESPASSING UPON THE LAWS ENGAGING IN TREASON OFFENSES MAKING HER
ORDER VOID/NULLITY DUE TO PRIMA FACIE
SHOWING STATES ATTORNEY ADMITTING/CORROBORATING THEIR ROLES IN SAID
CONSPIRACY AND JUDGE TRIED TO USE HER
UNLAWFUL AUTHORITY IN COVERING-UP CRIMES OF OTHER ASSISTANT STATES ATTORNEYS
UNLAWFUL INVOLVEMENT VACATE NOV 1st COURT ORDER MOST IMPORTANTLY
SUMMARY JUDGMENT FILED DEC 4, 2023, WAS ADMITTED TO BY STATES ATTORNEY KIM FOXX
AND FRANCOISE HIGHTOWER LOCAL RULE Local Rule 56.1 The rule is very clear that
"all material facts set forth in the statement required of the moving
party will be deemed admitted unless controverted by the statement of the
opposing party." Local Rule 56.1(b)(3)(B). DEFAULT WAS FILED ORIGINALLY FEB
9, 2024, RE NOTICED JUDGE MARITZA MARTINEZ ENTERED AN ORDER MARCH 27, 2024
RETURNING THE CASE BACK TO JUDGE IRIS Y. CHIVIRA REFUSING TO VACATE HER
OBSTRUCTIVE ORDER BECAUSE PRESIDING JUDGE NEVER AUTHORIZED OR SIGNED A COURT
ORDER ASSIGINING THE CASE TO JUDGE MARTINEZ CORROBORATING DEMOCRATIC RACIAL
HATE AND CORRUPTION CONTROLLING THE JUDICIARY RESPONDENT FILED AN APPEARANCE
FOR THE FIRST TIME SEPT 19, 2024 WITH AFFIDAVIT
Please be advised that on July 13, 2026 Respondent has filed
before this Domestic Relations Division
his Re Noticed Motion for Disqualification of Judge Romanek Instanter et al;
and will present said legally sufficient instrument before Judge Rosa
Silva July 22, 2026 in her stead at 9:30 am in room via
Zoom
Zoom Link
Meeting ID: 925 1023 5145
Password: 767670
Dial In Number: 312-626-6799
I Joe Louis Lawrence, Counsel Pro Se Defendant,
certify that I have on this day deposited said Notice and Motion to all parties
recorded in said Notice via regular mail/electronic delivery.
Joe Louis Lawrence
Counsel
Pro Se
Post Office Box 490075
Chicago,
Ill 60649
Joelouis565@yahoo.com
Courtesy
Copies Provided
Hon Judicial Council of the Seventh
Circuit
Governor JB Pritzker gov.casework@illinois.gov
Secretary of State Alexi Giannoulias hfs.dcssdlu@illinois.gov
To: Chief
Judge Charles Beach U.S.
Attorney Andrew S. Boutras
ocj.chief@cookcountyil.gov 219 S. Dearborn, Street 5th
floor
Hon Lionel Baptiste ccc.domrelcr2807@cookcountyil.gov
Hon Rosa Marie Silva dmpatel@cookcountycourt.com
Hon James Shapiro james.shapiro@cookcountyil.gov
Hon Patrick Powers estefania.dominguez@cookcountyil.gov
Hon Judge Patricia Fallon CCC.DomRelCRCL12@cookcountyil.gov
Hon Judge Patricial Fallon edkouenou@cookcountycourt.com
Hon Michael A. Forti CCC.DomRelCR3004@cookcountyil.gov
Hon Edward Arce Edward.arce@cookcountyil.gov
Hon. Iris Y. Chavira CCC.DomRelCRCL08cookcountyil.gov
Hon. Andrea Webber CCC.DomRelCRCL06@cookcountyil.gov
Hon Maritza Martinez CCC.DomRelCR3006@cookcountyil.gov
Hon Abbey
Romanek CCC.DomRelCR3008@cookcountyil.gov
sao.csed@cookcountyil.gov Yolanda.simmons@cookcountysao.org
Cook County State’s Attorney Chief Judge Timothy C. Evans
Eilene
O’Neil Burke timothy.evans@cookcountyil.gov
statesattorney@cookcountyil.gov
Susan Mendoza Amanda.prentice@illinoiscomptroller.gov
Child Rep Marcellus H. Moore, Jr. 203 N.
LaSalle Street, Suite 2100 marcellus@childadvocatelawgroup.com
Cook County Sheriff’s
Tom Dart
email CCSO@ccsheriff.org
The Crusader Newspaper Group
Managing Editor Sharon Fountain
State Police isp.contact@illinois.gov
Illinois State Police
Chicago Police Superintendent, 3510 S. Michigan Ave,
Chicago Ill. 60653
Email CLEARPATH@chicagopolice.org, CaseManagement@chicagopolice.org
Dir. FBI,
Hon Mayor Brandon
Special Agent in
Charge (FBI)
City Hall 7th floor
Chicago,
IL. 60601
2111 West Roosevelt Road
Chicago, Il 60608
Illinois
Courts Commission
555 West
Monroe, 15th floor
Chicago Ill.
60661
info@IllinoisCourtsCommission.gov
Illinois Court
Commission Members
Justice P.
Scott Neville, Jr. Chairman
Justice Thomas
M. Harris
Justice
Margaret Stanton McBride
Judge Lewis
Nixon
Judge Sheldon
Sobol
Judge Aurora
Abella-Austriaco
Madam Paula
Wolf
ilrb.filing@illinois.gov,
alexandrina.shrove@ilag.gov,
oig.referrals@illinois.gov
rwillis@laboradvocates.com,
jodi.mar@illinois.gov,
helen.j.kim@illinois.gov,
lashonda.channel@illinois.gov,
brianna.klein@illinois.gov,
kimberly.stevens@illinois.gov,
anna.hamburg-gal@illinois.gov,
khill@atu241chicago.org,
frogishtwo65@gmail.com,
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
The undersigned hereby certifies
that the above notice and all attachments were caused to be emailed to the
above parties at the addresses provided before 5:00 pm on July 13, 2026.
Joe Louis Lawrence
Post Office Box 490075
Chicago,
Ill 60649
Joelouis565@yahoo.com
AFFIDAVIT
STATE OF ILLINOIS )
)
COUNTY OF COOK )
I Joe Louis Lawrence Counsel Pro Se being duly sworn on
oath states the aforementioned pleadings enumerated within said motion pursuant
to 735 1265 5/1-109, the undersigned certifies that the statements set forth in
this instrument are true
and correct, except as to matters therein stated to be on information and
belief and as to such matters, the undersigned certifies as aforesaid that he
verily believes the same to be true.
Respectfully Submitted
Notary
____________________
PO Box 490075
Chicago, IL.
60649
No comments:
Post a Comment