Wikipedia Racial Injustice in Chicago Courts

Search results

Thursday, October 16, 2025

 

SANCTUARY CITY VS MAYHEM, TYRANNY TO AMERICAN U.S. COLORED AND SENIOR CITIZENS DEMOCRATS DON'T UPHOLD THE LAWS OF THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION AND HAS ADMITTED THIS FACT VIA SUMMARY JUDGMENT

1.)  “Any judge who does not comply with his oath to the Constitution of the United States wars against that Constitution and engages in acts in violation of the Supreme Law of the Land. The judge is engaged in acts of treason. Having taken at least two, if not three oaths of office to support the Constitution of the United States, and the Constitution of the State of Illinois, any judge who has acted in violation of the Constitution is engaged in an act or acts of treason. If a judge does not fully comply with the Constitution, then his orders are void, In re Sawyer, 124 U.S. 200 (1888) he/she is without jurisdiction, and he/she has engaged in an act or acts of treason.” 

     2.) Democrats as Organized Ku Klux Klansman violating every aspect of the Constitution as Judges, Politicians States Attorneys Obstructing any law abiding innocent American Citizen to receive justice or safety under their control.    

AS A CITIZEN BORN ON AMERICAN SOIL DEMOCRATS HAVE DEMONSTRATED THE SAME ANIMUS HATRED THE KU KLU KLAN HAS DEMONSTRATED ON BLACK AMERICANS IN THE 1800'S CAUSING REPUBLICAN PRESIDENT ULYSSES S. GRANT WAR HERO had to enact the following legislation.

See that is why, the Ku Klux Klan Act of 1871 (was enacted) - Section 1 (42 U.S.C.) 1983.

       “Of all the Civil Rights legislation enacted in the aftermath of the Civil War, none has had a greater contemporary impact than the Ku Klux Klan Act of 1871. The Act grew out of a special one-paragraph message sent to the 42d Congress on March 23, 1871, by President Ulysses S. Grant, urgently requesting the enactment of legislation”.

Section 2 (42 U.S.C.) In the House of Representatives.

        “Congressional Debate of the second section of the Ku Klux Klan Act was more extensive and enduring than that of Section 1; As originally presented, Sec. 2 made it a felony for any “two or more persons” to conspire to commit certain enumerated crimes “in violation of the rights and privileges, or immunities of any person, to which he is entitled under the Constitution and laws of the United States.

           “Throughout the debates, supporters of the Act made repeated references to the depredations of the Ku Klux Klan; Victims of these atrocities included not only blacks but white Republicans as well. The crimes that were perpetrated, therefore, were not viewed as isolated occurrences, but as part of an “Organized Conspiracy….Political in its origin and aims”, “crimes perpetrated by concert and agreement, by men in large numbers acting with a common purpose for the injury of a certain class of citizens entertaining certain political principles, id, at 457 (remarks of Rep. Coburn). See also e.g., id. At 437 (remarks of Rep. Cobb) (“None but Democrats belong or can belong to these societies”) et al.,

           “Where these gangs of Assassins show themselves the rest of the people look on, if not with sympathy, at least with forbearance. The boasted courage of the South is not courage in their presence. Sheriffs, having eyes to see, see not; judges, having ears to hear, hear not; witnesses conceal the truth or falsify it; grand or petit juries act as if they might be accomplices. In the presence of these gangs all the apparatus and machinery of civil government, all the processes of justice, skulk away as if government and justice were crimes and feared detection. Among the most dangerous things an injured party can do is to appeal to justice. Of the uncounted scores and hundreds of atrocious mutilations and murders it is credibly stated that not one has been punished. Cong. Globe, supra note 2,  app. At 78 (remarks of Rep. Perry). (“While murder is stalking abroad in disguise, while whippings and lynching’s and banishment have been visited upon unoffending American citizens, the local administrations have been found inadequate or unwilling to apply the proper corrective”) et al., …. And the State made no successful effort to bring the guilty to punishment or afford protection or redress to the outraged and innocent.”)     

FACT:  July 11,   2025  MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO ILLINOIS (735 ILCS 5/2-1005) & FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE CORROBORRATING THE VERACITY COOK COUNTY JUDGES DO NOT HONOR DUE PROCESS OR CIVIL RIGHTS EQUAL PROTECTION TO IT’S CITIZENS PRO SE OR WITH ATTORNEYS IN ANY OF THE COURT’S w/AFFIDAVIT

                      A- This Summary Judgment was from the following: 

1.        That on June 10, 2025 Defendant Filed a MOTION TO RECUSE HON PATRICIA FALLON DUE TO CONFLICT OF INTEREST PRIOR ASSOCIATION TO THE STATES ATTORNEY OFFICE WHERE ALLEGED HOMOSEXUAL KENT STEPHEN RAY FORMER GENERAL COUNSEL OF THE CTA USED HIS UNLAWFUL JURISDICTION DESTROYING PERSONNEL RECORDS OF RESPONDENT AND ENGINEERED THE FALSIFICATION AND COLLUSION WITH HIS ALLEGED FORMER EX JUDGE FORTI WHO WAS A CORPORATION ATTORNEY IN CITY HALL WHO HAS STALKED THE RESPONDENT SINCE 1994 AIDING AND ABETTING IN RACIAL HATE CONSPIRACIES ON CASE 93 L010772 (JOE LOUIS LAWRENCE VS CTA) AS CHIEF ASST COUNSEL & USED HIS ROBE VIOLATING THE CIVIL RIGHTS OF RESPONDENT AND SHEMICA TAYLOR ISSUING THE UNLAWFUL ORDER OF PROTECTION AGAINST HER KEEPING HER FROM HER NATURAL BIOLOGICAL DAUGHTER AS LAW FIRMS SOUGHT OUTRAGEOUS LEGAL FEES WHERE JUDGE FORTI IS SEEKING TO REMAND HER INTO CUSTODY ON A RULE TO SHOW CAUSE NOT PAYING AN ALLEGED HOMOSEXUAL CHILD REP- REQUEST FOR RE NOTICE OF RECUSING THE ENTIRE COOK COUNTY JUDICIARY AND APPOINT A SPECIAL PROSECUTOR PURSUANT TO THE CASE OF 2 EX-COOK COUNTY ASSISTANT STATE’S ATTORNEY’S (NICHOLAS TRUTENKO, ANDREW HORVAT) DUE TO FORMER ASSISTANT’S STATES ATTORNEY IRIS Y. CHIVIRA ALLEGEDLY TOOK PART IN THE FALSIFICATION OF BACKDATING RECORDS ET AL. 

a

1.)    The Illinois Supreme Court has held that "if the magistrate has not such jurisdiction, then he and those who advise and act with him, or execute his process, are trespassers." Von Kettler et.al. v. Johnson, 57 Ill. 109 (1870)

Under Federal law which is applicable to all states, the U.S. Supreme Court stated that if a court is "without authority, its judgments and orders are regarded as nullities. They are not voidable, but simply void; and form no bar to a recovery sought, even prior to a reversal in opposition to them. They constitute no justification; and all persons concerned in executing such judgments or sentences, are considered, in law, as trespassers." Elliot v. Piersol, 1 Pet. 328, 340, 26 U.S. 328, 340 (1828)

The Illinois Supreme Court held that if a court "could not hear the matter upon the jurisdictional paper presented, its finding that it had the power can add nothing to its authority, - it, had no authority to make that finding." The People v. Brewer, 128 Ill. 472, 483 (1928). The judges listed below had no legal authority (jurisdiction) to hear or rule on certain matters before them. They acted without any jurisdiction.

When judges act when they do not have jurisdiction to act, or they enforce a void order (an order issued by a judge without jurisdiction), they become trespassers of the law, and are engaged in treason.

That under 18 U.S.C. 242 and 42 U.S.C. 1985 (3) (b). A judge does not have the discretion on whether or not to follow Supreme Ct. Rules, but a duty to follow. People v. Gersh, 135 Ill. 2d 384 (1990).

 

The Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals held that the Circuit Court   of Cook County is a criminal enterprise. U.S. v. Murphy, 768 F.2d 1518,     1531 (7th Cir. 1985)”.

 


NOTHING BUT DEMOCRATS ARE INVOLVED COVERING UP ALL SICK EGREGIOUS ACTS NOW WARRING AGAINST THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION JUST LOOK AT THE ABOVE COURT ORDER IT SAYS CALENDAR E WHICH IS JUDGE PATRICK POWERS BUT IS USING THE SIGNATURE STAMP OF HISPANIC JUDGE ROSA MARIE SILVA WHICH IS ABSURD AND DEFINITELY ACTIONS OF THE KU KLUX KLAN APPARATUS.

Joe Louis 
From:joelouis565@yahoo.com
To:sao csed (States Attorney),Cook County States Attorney,sao csed (States Attorney),Yolanda Simmons (States Attorney),B. Marshall Hilmes
Cc:Kenneth Ditkowsky,GovernorsOffice,ccso.opr@ccsheriff.org,mayadukmasova@injusticewatch.org,independent.inspectorgeneral@cookcountyil.gov
Bcc:brady_chambers@innd.uscourts.gov,deana_brinkley@ilsd.uscourts.gov,pepperpo@wied.uscourts.gov,pratt_crd@insd.uscourts.gov,wiwd_ecfhelp@wiwd.uscourts.gov
Wed, Oct 15 at 5:46 PM
The only reason why Defendant was not before Judge Rosa Silva was because of the court order allegedly drafted by Judge Patrick Powers in an attempt to find him in Contempt of Court unlawfully after all, his kind had him REMANDED 5 times into custody for allegedly owing child support on a child not only not his but was DISMISSED September 17, 1987.

AND DISCRIMINATION BECAUSE OF MY SKIN COLOR AND HETEROSEXUAL DISPOSITION ASSISTANT STATES ATTORNEY RHONDA HAWKINS-LYKE ALLEGEDLY FOLLOWED THE DIRECTIVES OF CALENDAR E JUDGE PATRICK POWERS Induced Judge Rosa Silva to sign a Court Order September 17, 2025 Stating the Illinois Dept of Healthcare & Family Services was representing Joe Louis Lawrence as the Petitioner and Francoise Hightower as the Respondent which is “Fraudulent”So that Patrick Powers is clear only States Attorneys were notified of the Emergency Court Hearing before Judge Silva in a timely manner no judges so as to fetter out who or what judge was disseminating information it wouldn't be complicated for the feds to ascertain phone records of certain actors involved in this "Organized Chain Criminal Conspiracy, for example they have all of the email threads of Judge Derico receiving instructions from a law firm on how to sign specific court orders giving the Cook County Sheriffs unlawful authority evicting senior citizens First Responders from their home of 65 years in an ILLEGAL FORECLOSURE.

This is the Blueprint on how innocent Black and Brown Americans as well as senior citizens are discriminated against by members of the Democratic Judiciary who hate Colored People and only hire and appoint them to DESTROY and commit GENOCIDE on their own ethnic groups no IRISH, POLISH AND DEFINITELY NO BLACK JUDGE WILL EVER RULE IN FAVOR OF ANY AMERICANS VICTIMIZED BY THESE RACIST ATROCITIES BUT WILL UPHOLD THE RIGHTS OF VIOLENT ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS.

Respectfully submitted

Joe Louis    

1.)   Respondent is not before Judge Patrick Powers and therefore said order reflects Joe Lawrence as the Petitioner and uses the judges signature stamp ROSA MARIA SILVA.

2.)   Judge Powers has violated the same violations of JUDGE FRANCIS A. GEMBALA
FOR VIOLATION OF THE CODE OF JUDICIAL CONDUCT as Judge Forti and other Judges have violated every Code of Judicial Conduct as Judge Frances A. Gembala violated in the same aforementioned Complaint filed in 1997 that has been tendered to the Judicial Inquiry Board this year.

See the Motion to Expedite Defendant’s Affected from Judicial Malfeasance & Violations of the Illinois Code of Judicial Conduct et. al. (filed Aug 12, 2025) particularizes in its entirety systemic tyranny in the courts judges not following any Canon or U.S. Constitutional laws only that of a racist fraternity seen in Sun Down communities.     

As of the 2020 Census, there are 472 sundown towns in Illinois. This number reflects the state's history of racial segregation and exclusion, which has been documented through various studies and historical records.  Additional Sundown Towns in Illinois

Think that’s it? Unfortunately, you’d be wrong.

Illinois has a deeply rooted history of sundown towns. Here are some suspected and confirmed sundown towns in Illinois that were not included in this article. Just so you know, it is A LOT:

Addison, Albers, Albion, Altamont, Alto Pass, Anna, Arcola, Arenzville, Arlington Heights, Arthur, Ashland, Ashley, Assumption, Athens, Atwood, Auburn, Ava, Aviston, Balcom, Barrington, Bartelso, Bartlett, Bartonville, Beardstown, Beaucoup, Beckemeyer, Beecher, Belknap, Bellwood, Bensenville, Benton, Berryville, Berwyn, Bethany, Bloomingdale, Blue Mound, Bluford, Bolingbrook, Bradley, Braidwood, Breese, Bridgeport, Brookfield, Brooklyn, Brown County, Brownstown, Buckley, Buckner, Buffalo, Bunker Hill, Bureau, Burr Ridge, Cairo, Calhoun, Calhoun County, Campbell Hill, Cantrall, Carlinville, Carlyle, Carmi, Carterville, Carthage, Cary, Casey, Catlin, Cave-in-Rock, Cherry, Chester, Chicago

3.)   That Hon Rosa Silva asserted in her directives, that the State had to be present on October 15, 2025 at 9:00  am.

4.)   Judge Patrick Powers Court Order violated Respondent’s Civil Rights, condoned racial tyranny in violation of the Ku Klux Klan Act of 1871, vexatiously violated the integrity of a Hispanic Judge by undermining her authority by creating a VOID COURT ORDER fraught with “Fraud” and corruption as he became a “Private Citizen” “Trespassing upon the Laws” trying to protect all parties associated in said Organized Criminal Conspiracy.

5.)   Judge Patrick Powers allegedly unlawfully used his robe to obstruct the Respondent from appearing before Judge Silva to prevent ASA Rhonda Hawkins from possibly revealing how she received information about Francoise which has been impeached in the Motion to Vacate accompanied with Affidavit and possibly prevent judge Silva from placing her in Contempt of Court on the Rule to Show Cause et al.

6.)   That because of said Oct 14, 2025 Court Order, the Nov 5th date is a sham and an attempt to continuously violate the Civil Rights of the Respondent and any persons sharing his ethnicity or sexuality because the County has already admitted via Summary Judgment filed July 11, 2025  MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO ILLINOIS (735 ILCS 5/2-1005) & FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE CORROBORRATING THE VERACITY COOK COUNTY JUDGES DO NOT HONOR DUE PROCESS OR CIVIL RIGHTS EQUAL PROTECTION TO IT’S CITIZENS PRO SE OR WITH ATTORNEYS IN ANY OF THE COURT’S w/AFFIDAVIT

 In re Attorney Josie Norton

Judge Silva: It looks like today was for the hearing on the rule to show cause and. Get time to respond. I don’t think there’s a filing on.

 

Attorney Josie Norton: No judge, so I did not get a response. However, he did send a payment to and I can screen share this if the court wants, but a payment was received by my client on September 29. June child care payment for Isabella Avila and Sophia Avila ‘s. This is my form of communication or response as stated in the court order. Obviously it’s not a response but because he sent that I wanted to acknowledge it.

 

Judge Silva: OK. So Sir the response is that you have to. She filed a petition for rule to show cause, so she has it in paragraphs. You have to go through each paragraph and admit, deny or give your explanation. So I don’t know, I don’t have it memorized here, but let’s say the 1st one was two children were born to this couple, you’re either gonna admit or deny it, and then you’re gonna go through each paragraph and admit, deny or respond. So I guess you thought that you were doing that, but that’s not actually how it’s gone. But it’s actually set for hearing today. So give me one second. Let me just see.

 

Judge Silva: Mr. Lawrence, what case are you here on today?

 

Defendant Joe Louis Lawrence: Motion to vacate to September 17th.

 

Judge Silva: You’re muted. Can you unmute yourself and give me your case number ‘cause I don’t have you on the call here.  And then I’ll get you guys in a second.

 

Defendant: Sorry. I’m sorry. Good morning, your Honor I’m here. I’m here on the 1988 DO 79012, Mr. Patel,

 

Judge Silva: 07 what ?

 

Defendant: 07912, sorry. 079, 012, 012

 

Judge Silva: Give me one second. I actually think your case might be up tomorrow. Wasn’t it child support related?

 

Defendant: Yes, ma’am. But the court order was incorrect and I was in. I came to court Friday and Mr Patel informed me  that, I was to come to court this morning At 9:00

 

Judge Silva: OK, give me one second. I don’t know why I would have done it. I think. I think I meant to put October 15th, ‘cause it was a state. Your case involves the States Attorney, right?

 

Defendant: Yes, ma’am.

 

Judge Silva: Yeah, it should have been October 15th. I’m sorry. Let me look to see why I probably possibly. OK. Oh, Mr. Patel is telling me right now that your case is actually up tomorrow. Let me look it up.

 

Defendant: I thought, he said come after Columbus Day.

 

Judge Silva: I guess, but maybe why is it there’s no order? Oh sorry, this is the wrong case. Number 07.  What’s the case number ‘cause?

 

Defendant: 1988? D 079012.

 

Judge Silva: That belong is that Francoise, if I tell me.

 

Defendant: Yes, ma’am. Yes, ma’am.

 

Judge Silva: Oh, sorry. Eleven 5, right? I is. I think it’s tomorrow though, Sir Oh some reason. But what’s 11 5?

 

Defendant: But the 11/5 is correct. That’s what you have it set for. But the order I’m here on the emergency because the order is not articulated correctly. It has me down as the petitioner and the state is representing me. When in fact the state is representing Francois. That's why this this is why I have this emergency hearing.

 

Judge Silva: OK. I didn’t see that. Where? When did you file an emergency hearing?

 

Defendant: When I filed this here, I had to get an emergency date from your clerk.

 

Judge Silva: He doesn’t give out dates, so just one second ‘cause it’s not a, it is not up today even for an emergency I don’t see any emergency hearing set for today. There’s a notice of motion.

 

Defendant: Yes ma’am,

 

Judge Silva: that something was filed To vacate something

 

Defendant: September 17 court order yes, ma’am.

 

Judge Silva: It’s just a notice of motion. It’s not even set for presentment. It’s just that you giving everyone notice that you filed it. So come back November 5th. Court order,

 

Defendant: Your Honor, is not correctly stated. It says that, that state is represented me.

 

Judge Silva: OK we will address it when the state is here I cannot address your case without the state being present so we’ll come back tomorrow to 15. Think it’s up? Actually November 5th says here. November 5th, 2025 at 9:00 AM.

 

Defendant: But I was trying to do an Emergency. They told me I had to speak with your clerk.

 

Judge Silva: You didn’t file an emergency motion to be presented. You filed a notice of filing. You didn’t give the state notice. It’s not up today, so you have to refile it. That’s what you want to do. But there is nothing on file for an emergency motion.

 

Defendant: Can I get in tomorrow with all due respect?

 

Judge Silva: I can’t give you legal advice..

 

Defendant: I can do the Re notice, I know.

 

Judge Silva: You gave notice of filing. No one’s ever gonna appear on a notice of filing. This is just you’re giving notice that you filing something. So. Nov 5, thank you.

 

Defendant: OK.

 

 

The Illinois Code of Judicial Conduct Rule 62(A) states: A judge should respect and comply with the law and should conduct himself or herself at all times in a manner that promotes public confidence in the integrity and impartiality of the judiciary.

The Illinois Code of Judicial Conduct Rule 63(A) states:

(A) Adjudicative Responsibilities

(1) A judge should be faithful to the law and maintain professional competence in it.

INHERENT POWER OF THE COURT

Judge Gembala knew, or should have known, that every court of lawful jurisdiction has the inherent power to determine subject-matter jurisdiction. Inherent power of a court is not dependent on whether a court has jurisdiction, otherwise it could never have the lawful authority to determine if it had jurisdiction in any matter before it. This inherent power to determine jurisdiction applies not only to determine its own jurisdiction, but the jurisdiction of any other court. People v. Childs, 278 Ill.App.3d 65, 663 N.E.2d 161 (4th Dist. 1996) ("The duty to vacate a void judgment is based on the inherent power of a court to expunge from its records void acts of which it has knowledge."); Evans v. Corporate Services, 207 Ill.App.3d 297, 565 N.E.2d 724 (2nd Dist. 1990) ("A court has inherent authority to expunge void acts from its records.").

  • “A void judgment is one which, from its inception, is a complete nullity and without legal effect.”

— People v. Wade, 116 Ill. 2d 1, 506 N.E.2d 954 (1987)

  • “A judgment is void if it violated due process.”

— Johnson v. Zerbst, 304 U.S. 458 (1938)

 

                                           AFFIDAVIT

I Joe Louis Lawrence, Counsel Pro Se being duly sworn on oath states the aforementioned pleadings enumerated within said Affidavit pursuant to 735 1265 5/1-109, the undersigned certifies that the statements set forth in this instrument are true and correct, except as to matters therein stated to be on information and belief and as to such matters, the undersigned certifies as aforesaid that he verily believes the same to be true.

 

 

 

 

 

Respectfully Submitted  

                                                                                                    Notary

                                                                       

____________________

 

Joe Louis Lawrence

Counsel Pro Se


 

 

 

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY ILLINOIS

DOMESTIC RELATIONS DIVISION

IN RE                                                               )

                                                                         )

 Francoise Hightower                                      )        Judge Rosa Silva                  

        Petitioner                                                 )

                                                                         )        Cal 52

          VS                                                          )                                 

                                                                         )        No. 88 D 079012                         

 Joe Louis Lawrence                                        )        

        Respondent                                             )        Room 1903

 

                               STATE OF ILLINOIS AFFIDAVIT       

                                              NOTICE OF FILING             

I  Joe Louis Lawrence, Counsel Pro Se Defendant, certify that I have on this day deposited said Illinois Affidavit  PARTICULARIZED EVENTS CAPSULIZING JUDICIAL RACIAL HATE/CORRUPTION COVER-UP et al. to all parties recorded in said Notice via regular/electronic delivery.

                        WHITEHOUSE 1600 PENNSYLVANIA AVENUE, N.W.

                                        WASHINGTON D. C. 20500 US

                                             President Donald J. Trump

Cc Attorney General Pam Bondi  U.S. Dept. of Justice 950 Pennsylvania Ave N.W.   Washington D.C. 20530-0001

     FBI Director Kash Patel 935 Pennsylvania Ave. N.W. Washington, D.C.20535

     US Attorney Andrew S. Boutros Eastern Division, 219 S. Dearborn St. 5th Floor, Chicago, Illinois

 

 

                    Hon Judicial Council of the Seventh Circuit

                Governor JB Pritzker gov.casework@illinois.gov    

To:   Hon Rosa Silva CCC.DomRelCR1903@cookcountyil.gov

        dmpatel@cookcountycourt.com

        Hon James Shapiro CCC.DomRELCR2103A@cookcountyil.gov

        Hon Patrick Powers CCC.DomRelCR1603@cookcountyil.gov

         Hon Judge Patricia Fallon CCC.DomRelCRCL12@cookcountyil.gov

         Hon Michael A. Forti CCC.DomRelCR3004@cookcountyil.gov

         Hon.  Iris Y. Chavira CCC.DomRelCRCL12@cookcountyil.gov

         Hon. Andrea Webber CCC.DomRelCRCL06@cookcountyil.gov

        Hon Maritza Martinez CCC.DomRelCR3006@cookcountyil.gov

        Hon Abbey Romanek  CCC.DomRelCR3008@cookcountyil.gov

   sao.csed@cookcountyil.gov         Yolanda.simmons@cookcountysao.org

Cook County State’s Attorney                               Chief Judge Timothy C. Evans

       Eilene O’Neil Burke                                     timothy.evans@cookcountyil.gov      

      statesattorney@cookcountyil.gov

The Crusader Newspaper Group

Managing Editor Sharon Fountain

sfountain@chicagocrusader.com

 

ccso.opr@ccsheriff.org

independent.inspectorgeneral@cookcountyil.gov

Injustice Watch

mayadukmasova@injusticewatch.org

 

                                                        State Police isp.contact@illinois.gov 

                                                                                Illinois State Police                                           

Chicago Police Superintendent, 3510 S. Michigan Ave, Chicago Ill. 60653

Email CLEARPATH@chicagopolice.org

Dir.  FBI,                                                                      Hon Mayor Brandon                         

Special Agent in Charge (FBI)                                City Hall 7th floor                                  

                                                                                       Chicago, IL. 60601                          

 2111 West Roosevelt Road

Chicago, Il 60608                                 

Illinois Judicial Inquiry Board
100 W. Randolph Street, Suite 14-500
Chicago, IL 60601
judicial.inquiry@illinois.gov

 

Illinois Courts Commission

555 West Monroe, 15th floor

Chicago Ill. 60661

info@IllinoisCourtsCommission.gov

 

Illinois Court Commission Members

Justice P. Scott Neville, Jr. Chairman

Justice Thomas M. Harris

Justice Margaret Stanton McBride

Judge Lewis Nixon

Judge Sheldon Sobol

Judge Aurora Abella-Austriaco

Madam Paula Wolf                             

press@cookcountyil.gov

ilrb.filing@illinois.gov,
alexandrina.shrove@ilag.gov,
oig.referrals@illinois.gov
                  
rwillis@laboradvocates.com,
jodi.mar@illinois.gov,
helen.j.kim@illinois.gov,
lashonda.channel@illinois.gov,
brianna.klein@illinois.gov,
kimberly.stevens@illinois.gov,
anna.hamburg-gal@illinois.gov,
khill@atu241chicago.org,
frogishtwo65@gmail.com,
                                                                          

 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

 

The undersigned hereby certifies that the above notice and all attachments were caused to be emailed to the above parties at the addresses provided before 5:00 pm on  Oct. 15, 2025 .

 

 

 

 

 

                                                                ________________________

                                                                                   Respectfully Submitted, 

                                                                                        Counsel Pro Se

                                                                                      Joe Louis Lawrenc

 




 

 


No comments:

Post a Comment