SANCTUARY CITY VS MAYHEM, TYRANNY TO AMERICAN U.S. COLORED AND SENIOR CITIZENS DEMOCRATS DON'T UPHOLD THE LAWS OF THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION AND HAS ADMITTED THIS FACT VIA SUMMARY JUDGMENT
2.) Democrats as Organized Ku Klux Klansman violating every aspect of the Constitution as Judges, Politicians States Attorneys Obstructing any law abiding innocent American Citizen to receive justice or safety under their control.
AS A CITIZEN BORN ON AMERICAN SOIL DEMOCRATS HAVE DEMONSTRATED THE SAME ANIMUS HATRED THE KU KLU KLAN HAS DEMONSTRATED ON BLACK AMERICANS IN THE 1800'S CAUSING REPUBLICAN PRESIDENT ULYSSES S. GRANT WAR HERO had to enact the following legislation.
See that is why, the Ku
Klux Klan Act of 1871 (was enacted) - Section
1 (42 U.S.C.) 1983.
“Of all the Civil Rights legislation enacted in the aftermath of the Civil War, none has had a greater contemporary impact than the Ku Klux Klan Act of 1871. The Act grew out of a special one-paragraph message sent to the 42d Congress on March 23, 1871, by President Ulysses S. Grant, urgently requesting the enactment of legislation”.
Section 2 (42 U.S.C.)
In the House of Representatives.
“Congressional
Debate of the second section of the Ku Klux Klan Act was more extensive and
enduring than that of Section 1; As originally presented, Sec. 2 made it a
felony for any “two or more persons” to conspire to commit certain enumerated
crimes “in violation of the rights and privileges, or immunities of any person,
to which he is entitled under the Constitution and laws of the United States.
“Throughout
the debates, supporters of the Act made repeated references to the depredations
of the Ku Klux Klan; Victims of these atrocities included not only blacks but
white Republicans as well. The crimes that were perpetrated, therefore, were
not viewed as isolated occurrences, but as part of an “Organized
Conspiracy….Political in its origin and aims”, “crimes perpetrated by concert
and agreement, by men in large numbers acting with a common purpose for the
injury of a certain class of citizens entertaining certain political
principles, id, at 457 (remarks of Rep.
Coburn). See also e.g., id. At 437 (remarks of Rep. Cobb) (“None but Democrats
belong or can belong to these societies”) et al.,
“Where these gangs of Assassins show themselves the rest of the people look on, if not with sympathy, at least with forbearance. The boasted courage of the South is not courage in their presence. Sheriffs, having eyes to see, see not; judges, having ears to hear, hear not; witnesses conceal the truth or falsify it; grand or petit juries act as if they might be accomplices. In the presence of these gangs all the apparatus and machinery of civil government, all the processes of justice, skulk away as if government and justice were crimes and feared detection. Among the most dangerous things an injured party can do is to appeal to justice. Of the uncounted scores and hundreds of atrocious mutilations and murders it is credibly stated that not one has been punished. Cong. Globe, supra note 2, app. At 78 (remarks of Rep. Perry). (“While murder is stalking abroad in disguise, while whippings and lynching’s and banishment have been visited upon unoffending American citizens, the local administrations have been found inadequate or unwilling to apply the proper corrective”) et al., …. And the State made no successful effort to bring the guilty to punishment or afford protection or redress to the outraged and innocent.”)
A- This Summary Judgment was from the following:
1.
That on June 10,
2025 Defendant Filed a MOTION TO RECUSE HON PATRICIA FALLON DUE TO CONFLICT OF INTEREST
PRIOR ASSOCIATION TO THE STATES ATTORNEY OFFICE WHERE ALLEGED HOMOSEXUAL KENT
STEPHEN RAY FORMER GENERAL COUNSEL OF THE CTA USED HIS UNLAWFUL JURISDICTION
DESTROYING PERSONNEL RECORDS OF RESPONDENT AND ENGINEERED THE FALSIFICATION AND
COLLUSION WITH HIS ALLEGED FORMER EX JUDGE FORTI WHO WAS A CORPORATION ATTORNEY
IN CITY HALL WHO HAS STALKED THE RESPONDENT SINCE 1994 AIDING AND ABETTING IN
RACIAL HATE CONSPIRACIES ON CASE 93 L010772 (JOE LOUIS LAWRENCE VS CTA) AS
CHIEF ASST COUNSEL & USED HIS ROBE VIOLATING THE CIVIL RIGHTS OF RESPONDENT
AND SHEMICA TAYLOR ISSUING THE UNLAWFUL ORDER OF PROTECTION AGAINST HER KEEPING
HER FROM HER NATURAL BIOLOGICAL DAUGHTER AS LAW FIRMS SOUGHT OUTRAGEOUS LEGAL
FEES WHERE JUDGE FORTI IS SEEKING TO REMAND HER INTO CUSTODY ON A RULE TO SHOW
CAUSE NOT PAYING AN ALLEGED HOMOSEXUAL CHILD REP- REQUEST FOR RE NOTICE OF
RECUSING THE ENTIRE COOK COUNTY JUDICIARY
AND APPOINT A SPECIAL PROSECUTOR PURSUANT TO THE CASE OF 2 EX-COOK COUNTY
ASSISTANT STATE’S ATTORNEY’S (NICHOLAS TRUTENKO, ANDREW HORVAT) DUE TO FORMER
ASSISTANT’S STATES ATTORNEY IRIS Y. CHIVIRA ALLEGEDLY TOOK PART IN THE
FALSIFICATION OF BACKDATING RECORDS ET AL.
a
1.)
The
Illinois Supreme Court has held that "if the magistrate has not such
jurisdiction, then he and those who advise and act with him, or execute his
process, are trespassers." Von Kettler et.al. v. Johnson,
57 Ill. 109 (1870)
Under Federal law which is
applicable to all states, the U.S. Supreme Court stated that if a court is
"without authority, its judgments and orders are regarded as nullities.
They are not voidable, but simply void; and form no bar to a recovery sought,
even prior to a reversal in opposition to them. They constitute no
justification; and all persons concerned in executing such judgments or
sentences, are considered, in law, as trespassers." Elliot
v. Piersol, 1 Pet. 328, 340, 26 U.S. 328, 340 (1828)
The Illinois Supreme Court held
that if a court "could not hear the matter upon the jurisdictional paper
presented, its finding that it had the power can add nothing to its authority,
- it, had no authority to make that finding." The People v.
Brewer, 128 Ill. 472, 483 (1928). The judges listed below had no
legal authority (jurisdiction) to hear or rule on certain matters before them.
They acted without any jurisdiction.
When judges act when they do not have jurisdiction to act, or they
enforce a void order (an order issued by a judge without jurisdiction), they
become trespassers of the law, and are engaged in treason.
That under 18
U.S.C. 242 and 42 U.S.C. 1985 (3) (b). A judge does not have the discretion
on whether or not to follow Supreme Ct. Rules, but a duty to follow. People v.
Gersh, 135 Ill. 2d 384 (1990).
“The Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals held that the Circuit
Court of Cook County is a criminal
enterprise. U.S. v. Murphy,
768 F.2d 1518, 1531 (7th Cir. 1985)”.
NOTHING BUT DEMOCRATS ARE INVOLVED COVERING UP ALL SICK EGREGIOUS ACTS NOW WARRING AGAINST THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION JUST LOOK AT THE ABOVE COURT ORDER IT SAYS CALENDAR E WHICH IS JUDGE PATRICK POWERS BUT IS USING THE SIGNATURE STAMP OF HISPANIC JUDGE ROSA MARIE SILVA WHICH IS ABSURD AND DEFINITELY ACTIONS OF THE KU KLUX KLAN APPARATUS.
1.)
Respondent is not before Judge Patrick Powers
and therefore said order reflects Joe Lawrence as the Petitioner and uses the
judges signature stamp ROSA MARIA SILVA.
2.)
Judge Powers has violated the same violations
of JUDGE FRANCIS A.
GEMBALA
FOR VIOLATION OF THE CODE OF JUDICIAL CONDUCT
as Judge Forti and other Judges have violated every Code of Judicial Conduct as
Judge Frances A. Gembala violated in the same aforementioned Complaint filed in
1997 that has been tendered to the Judicial Inquiry Board this year.
See the Motion to Expedite
Defendant’s Affected from Judicial Malfeasance & Violations of the Illinois
Code of Judicial Conduct et. al. (filed Aug 12, 2025) particularizes in its
entirety systemic tyranny in the courts judges not following any Canon or U.S.
Constitutional laws only that of a racist fraternity seen in Sun Down
communities.
As of the 2020 Census, there are 472 sundown towns in Illinois. This number reflects the state's history of racial segregation and exclusion, which has been documented through various studies and historical records. Additional
Sundown Towns in Illinois
Think
that’s it? Unfortunately, you’d be wrong.
Illinois
has a deeply rooted history of sundown towns. Here are some suspected and
confirmed sundown towns in Illinois that were not included in this article.
Just so you know, it is A LOT:
Addison,
Albers, Albion, Altamont, Alto Pass, Anna, Arcola, Arenzville, Arlington
Heights, Arthur, Ashland, Ashley, Assumption, Athens, Atwood, Auburn, Ava,
Aviston, Balcom, Barrington, Bartelso, Bartlett, Bartonville, Beardstown,
Beaucoup, Beckemeyer, Beecher, Belknap, Bellwood, Bensenville, Benton,
Berryville, Berwyn, Bethany, Bloomingdale, Blue Mound, Bluford, Bolingbrook,
Bradley, Braidwood, Breese, Bridgeport, Brookfield, Brooklyn, Brown County,
Brownstown, Buckley, Buckner, Buffalo, Bunker Hill, Bureau, Burr Ridge, Cairo,
Calhoun, Calhoun County, Campbell Hill, Cantrall, Carlinville, Carlyle, Carmi,
Carterville, Carthage, Cary, Casey, Catlin, Cave-in-Rock, Cherry, Chester,
Chicago
3.)
That Hon Rosa Silva asserted in her
directives, that the State had to be present on October 15, 2025 at 9:00 am.
4.)
Judge Patrick Powers Court Order violated
Respondent’s Civil Rights, condoned racial tyranny in violation of the Ku Klux
Klan Act of 1871, vexatiously violated the integrity of a Hispanic Judge by
undermining her authority by creating a VOID COURT ORDER fraught with “Fraud”
and corruption as he became a “Private Citizen” “Trespassing upon the Laws”
trying to protect all parties associated in said Organized Criminal Conspiracy.
5.)
Judge Patrick Powers allegedly unlawfully
used his robe to obstruct the Respondent from appearing before Judge Silva to
prevent ASA Rhonda Hawkins from possibly revealing how she received information
about Francoise which has been impeached in the Motion to Vacate accompanied
with Affidavit and possibly prevent judge Silva from placing her in Contempt of
Court on the Rule to Show Cause et al.
6.)
That because of said Oct 14, 2025 Court
Order, the Nov 5th date is a sham and an attempt to continuously
violate the Civil Rights of the Respondent and any persons sharing his
ethnicity or sexuality because the County has already admitted via Summary
Judgment filed July 11, 2025 MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
PURSUANT TO ILLINOIS (735 ILCS 5/2-1005) & FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE
CORROBORRATING THE VERACITY COOK COUNTY JUDGES DO NOT HONOR DUE PROCESS OR
CIVIL RIGHTS EQUAL PROTECTION TO IT’S CITIZENS PRO SE OR WITH ATTORNEYS IN ANY
OF THE COURT’S w/AFFIDAVIT
In re Attorney Josie Norton
Judge
Silva: It looks like today was for the hearing on the rule to show cause and.
Get time to respond. I don’t think there’s a filing on.
Attorney
Josie Norton: No judge, so I did not get a response. However, he did send a
payment to and I can screen share this if the court wants, but a payment was
received by my client on September 29. June child care payment for Isabella
Avila and Sophia Avila ‘s. This is my form of communication or response as
stated in the court order. Obviously it’s not a response but because he sent
that I wanted to acknowledge it.
Judge
Silva: OK. So Sir the response is that you have to. She filed a petition for rule
to show cause, so she has it in paragraphs. You have to go through each
paragraph and admit, deny or give your explanation. So I don’t know, I don’t
have it memorized here, but let’s say the 1st one was two children
were born to this couple, you’re either gonna admit or deny it, and then you’re
gonna go through each paragraph and admit, deny or respond. So I guess you
thought that you were doing that, but that’s not actually how it’s gone. But
it’s actually set for hearing today. So give me one second. Let me just see.
Judge
Silva: Mr. Lawrence, what case are you here on today?
Defendant
Joe Louis Lawrence: Motion to vacate to September 17th.
Judge
Silva: You’re muted. Can you unmute yourself and give me your case number
‘cause I don’t have you on the call here.
And then I’ll get you guys in a second.
Defendant:
Sorry. I’m sorry. Good morning, your Honor I’m here. I’m here on the 1988 DO
79012, Mr. Patel,
Judge
Silva: 07 what ?
Defendant:
07912, sorry. 079, 012, 012
Judge
Silva: Give me one second. I actually think your case might be up tomorrow.
Wasn’t it child support related?
Defendant:
Yes, ma’am. But the court order was incorrect and I was in. I came to court
Friday and Mr Patel informed me that, I
was to come to court this morning At 9:00
Judge
Silva: OK, give me one second. I don’t know why I would have done it. I think.
I think I meant to put October 15th, ‘cause it was a state. Your
case involves the States Attorney, right?
Defendant:
Yes, ma’am.
Judge
Silva: Yeah, it should have been October 15th. I’m sorry. Let me
look to see why I probably possibly. OK. Oh, Mr. Patel is telling me right now
that your case is actually up tomorrow. Let me look it up.
Defendant:
I thought, he said come after Columbus Day.
Judge
Silva: I guess, but maybe why is it there’s no order? Oh sorry, this is the
wrong case. Number 07. What’s the case
number ‘cause?
Defendant:
1988? D 079012.
Judge
Silva: That belong is that Francoise, if I tell me.
Defendant:
Yes, ma’am. Yes, ma’am.
Judge
Silva: Oh, sorry. Eleven 5, right? I is. I think it’s tomorrow though, Sir Oh
some reason. But what’s 11 5?
Defendant:
But the 11/5 is correct. That’s what you have it set for. But the order I’m
here on the emergency because the order is not articulated correctly. It has me
down as the petitioner and the state is representing me. When in fact the state
is representing Francois. That's why this this is why I have this emergency
hearing.
Judge
Silva: OK. I didn’t see that. Where? When did you file an emergency hearing?
Defendant:
When I filed this here, I had to get an emergency date from your clerk.
Judge
Silva: He doesn’t give out dates, so just one second ‘cause it’s not a, it is
not up today even for an emergency I don’t see any emergency hearing set for
today. There’s a notice of motion.
Defendant:
Yes ma’am,
Judge
Silva: that something was filed To vacate something
Defendant:
September 17 court order yes, ma’am.
Judge
Silva: It’s just a notice of motion. It’s not even set for presentment. It’s
just that you giving everyone notice that you filed it. So come back November 5th.
Court order,
Defendant:
Your Honor, is not correctly stated. It says that, that state is represented
me.
Judge
Silva: OK we will address it when the state is here I cannot address your case
without the state being present so we’ll come back tomorrow to 15. Think it’s
up? Actually November 5th says here. November 5th, 2025
at 9:00 AM.
Defendant:
But I was trying to do an Emergency. They told me I had to speak with your
clerk.
Judge
Silva: You didn’t file an emergency motion to be presented. You filed a notice
of filing. You didn’t give the state notice. It’s not up today, so you have to
refile it. That’s what you want to do. But there is nothing on file for an
emergency motion.
Defendant:
Can I get in tomorrow with all due respect?
Judge
Silva: I can’t give you legal advice..
Defendant:
I can do the Re notice, I know.
Judge
Silva: You gave notice of filing. No one’s ever gonna appear on a notice of
filing. This is just you’re giving notice that you filing something. So. Nov 5,
thank you.
Defendant:
OK.
The
Illinois Code of Judicial Conduct Rule 62(A) states: A judge should respect and
comply with the law and should conduct himself or herself at all times in a
manner that promotes public confidence in the integrity and impartiality of the
judiciary.
The
Illinois Code of Judicial Conduct Rule 63(A) states:
(A)
Adjudicative Responsibilities
(1)
A judge should be faithful to the law and maintain professional competence in
it.
INHERENT POWER OF THE
COURT
Judge
Gembala knew, or should have known, that every court of lawful jurisdiction has
the inherent power to determine subject-matter jurisdiction. Inherent power of
a court is not dependent on whether a court has jurisdiction, otherwise it
could never have the lawful authority to determine if it had jurisdiction in
any matter before it. This inherent power to determine jurisdiction applies not
only to determine its own jurisdiction, but the jurisdiction of any other
court. People v. Childs, 278 Ill.App.3d 65, 663 N.E.2d 161 (4th Dist. 1996)
("The duty to vacate a void judgment is based on the inherent power of a
court to expunge from its records void acts of which it has knowledge.");
Evans v. Corporate Services, 207 Ill.App.3d 297, 565 N.E.2d 724 (2nd Dist.
1990) ("A court has inherent authority to expunge void acts from its
records.").
- “A
void judgment is one which, from its inception, is a complete nullity and
without legal effect.”
— People v. Wade, 116 Ill. 2d 1, 506
N.E.2d 954 (1987)
- “A
judgment is void if it violated due process.”
— Johnson v. Zerbst, 304 U.S. 458
(1938)
AFFIDAVIT
I Joe Louis Lawrence, Counsel Pro Se being duly sworn on
oath states the aforementioned pleadings enumerated within said Affidavit pursuant
to 735 1265 5/1-109, the undersigned certifies that the statements set forth in
this instrument are true and correct, except as to matters therein stated
to be on information and belief and as to such matters, the undersigned
certifies as aforesaid that he verily believes the same to be true.
Respectfully Submitted
Notary
____________________
Joe Louis Lawrence
Counsel Pro Se
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY ILLINOIS
DOMESTIC RELATIONS DIVISION
IN RE
)
)
Francoise
Hightower )
Judge Rosa Silva
Petitioner )
) Cal 52
VS
)
) No. 88 D 079012
Joe Louis
Lawrence
)
Respondent )
Room 1903
STATE OF ILLINOIS AFFIDAVIT
NOTICE OF FILING
I Joe Louis Lawrence, Counsel Pro Se Defendant,
certify that I have on this day deposited said Illinois Affidavit PARTICULARIZED
EVENTS CAPSULIZING JUDICIAL RACIAL HATE/CORRUPTION COVER-UP et al. to all parties recorded in said Notice via regular/electronic
delivery.
WHITEHOUSE 1600
PENNSYLVANIA AVENUE, N.W.
WASHINGTON D. C. 20500 US
President
Donald J. Trump
Cc Attorney General Pam Bondi U.S. Dept. of Justice 950 Pennsylvania Ave
N.W. Washington D.C. 20530-0001
FBI Director Kash Patel 935 Pennsylvania Ave. N.W. Washington,
D.C.20535
US Attorney Andrew S. Boutros Eastern Division, 219 S. Dearborn
St. 5th Floor, Chicago, Illinois
Hon Judicial Council of the Seventh
Circuit
Governor JB Pritzker gov.casework@illinois.gov
To: Hon Rosa Silva CCC.DomRelCR1903@cookcountyil.gov
dmpatel@cookcountycourt.com
Hon James Shapiro CCC.DomRELCR2103A@cookcountyil.gov
Hon Patrick Powers
CCC.DomRelCR1603@cookcountyil.gov
Hon Judge Patricia Fallon
CCC.DomRelCRCL12@cookcountyil.gov
Hon Michael A. Forti
CCC.DomRelCR3004@cookcountyil.gov
Hon. Iris Y. Chavira CCC.DomRelCRCL12@cookcountyil.gov
Hon. Andrea Webber CCC.DomRelCRCL06@cookcountyil.gov
Hon Maritza Martinez CCC.DomRelCR3006@cookcountyil.gov
Hon Abbey
Romanek CCC.DomRelCR3008@cookcountyil.gov
sao.csed@cookcountyil.gov Yolanda.simmons@cookcountysao.org
Cook County State’s Attorney Chief Judge Timothy C. Evans
Eilene
O’Neil Burke timothy.evans@cookcountyil.gov
statesattorney@cookcountyil.gov
The Crusader Newspaper Group
Managing Editor Sharon Fountain
independent.inspectorgeneral@cookcountyil.gov
Injustice Watch
mayadukmasova@injusticewatch.org
State Police isp.contact@illinois.gov
Illinois State Police
Chicago
Police Superintendent, 3510 S. Michigan Ave, Chicago Ill. 60653
Email
CLEARPATH@chicagopolice.org
Dir. FBI,
Hon
Mayor Brandon
Special Agent in
Charge (FBI) City Hall 7th floor
Chicago, IL. 60601
2111 West Roosevelt Road
Chicago, Il 60608
Illinois Judicial Inquiry Board
100 W. Randolph Street, Suite 14-500
Chicago, IL 60601
judicial.inquiry@illinois.gov
Illinois
Courts Commission
555 West
Monroe, 15th floor
Chicago Ill.
60661
info@IllinoisCourtsCommission.gov
Illinois Court
Commission Members
Justice P.
Scott Neville, Jr. Chairman
Justice Thomas
M. Harris
Justice
Margaret Stanton McBride
Judge Lewis
Nixon
Judge Sheldon
Sobol
Judge Aurora
Abella-Austriaco
Madam Paula
Wolf
press@cookcountyil.gov
ilrb.filing@illinois.gov,
alexandrina.shrove@ilag.gov,
oig.referrals@illinois.gov
rwillis@laboradvocates.com,
jodi.mar@illinois.gov,
helen.j.kim@illinois.gov,
lashonda.channel@illinois.gov,
brianna.klein@illinois.gov,
kimberly.stevens@illinois.gov,
anna.hamburg-gal@illinois.gov,
khill@atu241chicago.org,
frogishtwo65@gmail.com,
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
The undersigned hereby
certifies that the above notice and all attachments were caused to be emailed
to the above parties at the addresses provided before 5:00 pm on Oct. 15, 2025 .
________________________
Respectfully Submitted,
Counsel Pro Se
Joe Louis Lawrenc
