CORRUPTION IN COOK COUNTY COURTS AND NOBODY SEEMS TO SEE IT THERE IS NO JUSTICE FOR HETEROSEXUALS, SENIOR CITIZENS OR PEOPLE OF COLOR
THOSE ETHNIC GROUPS WHO ARE WILLING TO SELL THEIR SOULS OUT FOR THEIR OWN PEOPLE ARE PROMOTED OR APPOINTED WITHIN THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY BUT THEY HAVE TO REMEMBER WHITE SUPREMACY COMES BEFORE GOD AND THEY MUST DO WHAT THEY ARE TOLD AT ALL TIMES AND AGAINST THEIR OWN ETHNIC GROUPS.
SEE HOW THE BLACK OR BROWN RACE IS DESTROYED AS SO MANY COLOREDS HAVE SOLD OUT WANTING TO BE ACCEPTED BY THOSE THEY DEEM AS THEIR SUPERIOR OR MASTERS IN THE POLITICAL MACHINE.
YOU WON'T FIND ONE BLACK OR BROWN PERSON IN CHICAGO'S DEMOCRATIC MACHINE DENOUNCING ANY OF THESE EGREGIOUS RACIST EVENTS RECORDED ON THIS POST DUE TO SO MANY ALLEGEDLY SLEEPING WITH THE OPPRESSOR OR DOING WHAT THEY ARE TOLD TO MAINTAIN THEIR POSITIONS IN THE POLITICAL PARTY JUST LIKE THEY DID AS SLAVES IN THE PLANTATION HOUSE FOR THEIR SLAVE MASTERS.
IF YOU WATCHED JAMIE FOXX AND SAMUEL L JACKSON IN #DJANGOUNCHAINED READ THE REALITY OF WHAT REALLY TAKES PLACE IN #CANDYLAND CHICAGO THE ONLY THING MANY COLORED RUNS ARE THEIR MOUTHS NOTHING ELSE -- A CAUCASIAN IS GOING TO HAVE TO COME AND TELL THEM WHAT TO DO OR HOW TO DO IT THIS IS WHY SO MANY INCOMPETENT COLOREDS ARE IN POSITION BECAUSE SO MANY OF THEM ARE FAR MORE LOYAL AND SUBMISSIVE THAN ANY OTHER RACE.
MANY ARE HOPING THAT THE PUBLIC WON'T READ THIS INFORMATION
THIS DOCUMENT WAS FILED FRIDAY JULY 11, 2025, AROUND 8:45AM BUT NO TIME STAMP IS RECORDED ON ANY OF THE DOCUMENTS AND IT HAS NOT BEEN DOCKETED IN THE DATABASE IF THE CORRUPT AND RACIST DEMOCRATS INVOLVED IN THIS SICK CRIMINAL ENTERPRISE, THEY WOULD TRY AND KEEP IT OUT OF THE DATABASE.
SO, YOU THE VIEWER ARE READING THE ACTUAL DOCUMENT MINUS THE EXHIBITS ATTACHED, SO THIS DOCUMENT GIVES A PRIMA FACIE ILLUSTRATION ON HOW CASES ARE "FIXED" IN CHICAGO ILLINOIS AND HOW EVERYONE IS LAUGHING AT THE FBI OR PRESIDENT TRUMP BECAUSE THE GOVERNMENT IS NOT SMART ENOUGH TO FIGURE OUT HOW AND WHY THE CRIMINAL ENTERPRISE OF COOK COUNTY IS SO ELUSIVE TO THE AUTHORITIES.
IF MORE COMPETENT INTELLECTS AND HETEROSEXUALS WERE INVOLVED MANY LIVES AND HOMES OF SENIOR CITIZENS WOULD HAVE BEEN SAVED TYRANNY, RACISM, HOMOSEXUALITY TARGETING HETEROSEXUALS AND SENIOR CITIZENS ARE THE REAL REASON WHY WE HAVE A PROBLEM WITH OUR JUDICIAL SYSTEM.
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS
COUNTY DEPARTMENT—DOMESTIC
RELATIONS
July 11, 2025
COURTESY
COPY
In the Matter of Francoise Hightower v Joe Louis
Lawrence
88 D
079012
Court Date August 11, at 10:30am 50 West Washington
CL-12
Honorable Patricia Fallon:
- Please find
the Motion for Summary Judgment et al (filed July 11, 2025).
- Please find
the Motion to Recuse Judge Fallon due to conflict of interest et al.
- That a
Drafted Court Order is being tendered to this court.
Defendant has due-diligently tried emailing and trying to
communicate to this court in the hopes this matter did not languish in the
legal system for two months in that Judge Forti immediately recused himself
once Defendant learned of his employment with City Hall helping Kent Stephen
Ray and did not want me appearing on the zoom call so it was wishful thinking
that this court was going to extend the same courtesy.
Hoping this email receives you in great health and spirits.
Respectfully Submitted,
By:
_________________
Joe Louis Lawrence
Counsel Pro Se
CC
All Parties Noticed in the Certificate of Service
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY
ILLINOIS
DOMESTIC RELATIONS
DIVISION
IN RE
)
)
Francoise Hightower ) Judge Patricia Fallon
Petitioner
)
) Cal 54
VS
)
) No. 88 D
079012
Joe Louis Lawrence )
Respondent
) Room CL-12
ORDER
THIS CAUSE coming to be heard on
Respondent’s Motion for
Summary Judgment, Motion to Recuse Judge Fallon et al. and Motion Directing
this matter be Transferred to the 3rd Municipal District Rolling
Meadows Instanter Re Notice Motion to Recuse the Entire Cook County Judiciary
and Appoint a Special Prosecutor, Court having read the Motion
accompanied with Affidavits no parties challenging the merits and Petitioner
being fully advised in the premises:
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED
THAT, DEFENDANT’S MOTION to Recuse Judge Fallon is Granted Instanter, THE COURT
FINDS AS FOLLOWS:
- This Court never had
jurisdiction nor did the Presiding Judge Regina Scannicchio Order the
Judge to preside over the subject matter.
- Defendant’s Motion to
Recuse the Entire Cook County Judiciary and Appoint a Special Prosecutor is
Granted case is being transferred to Rolling Meadows District said County
will determine the merits of the Rule to Show Cause and other issues.
- Defendant’s Motion for Summary
Judgment is continued to Rolling Meadows District et al.
- This Court does not have jurisdiction to
Vacate or Rule on Judge Forti’s case 2020 D 079452 and is Ordering
this matter be directed to the Presiding Judge so that the 18 USC 242
Civil Rights Violations surrounding that matter can be addressed.
- That on allegations of the
Motion of other parties complicit in an alleged Criminal Enterprise
Conspiracy: It is Ordered: Rolling Meadows District will address the
following. That the Attorney
Registration & Disciplinarian Commission to invoke jurisdiction and
Investigate Assistant States Attorney and all other Attorneys in this
matter and the Judicial Inquiry Board to investigate matters involving
Judges in this Paternity matter and any other judges complicit in these
egregious sinister acts.
- That because the Petitioner and allegations of her being a Police
Officer and Respondent having been Remanded into Custody 5 times on
allegations of child support on a case Dismissed Sept 17, 1987 and
reinstated without his knowledge where he was found in Default May 18,
1988 and never ordered to pay any child support how is this matter on the
calendar for 40 years and never addressed.
A- It is Ordered: That Director of the State
Police Brendan F. Kelly investigate and
ascertain how a Chicago Police Officer managed to use her Police authority and
have a State Agency Child Support Enforcement to act as her Private Attorney
involving many State employees in this alleged Criminal Enterprise.
B- It is Ordered: That every Cook County
Employee or Judges who were complicit in the Obstruction and participation in
all Criminal Fraudulent Acts a Rule to Show Cause Remanding them into Custody
with a body attachment warrant of a Million Dollars and be forcibly removed
from their positions Instanter.
- It is Ordered: That
upon the signing date of this order all parties shall have 30 days from
that date to comply and present its finding before the next court date of
the County outside of Cook County handling other parts of this matter.
FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THIS COURT ORDER IS PUNISHABLE
WITH CONTEMPT OF COURT AND CAN/WILL BE REMANDED IN CUSTODY UP TO 30 DAYS AND
FINED
“No one is above the Law”, citing a 1928
decision by Supreme Court Justice Louis Brandeis Olmstead v. United States, 277 U.S. 438 (1928),
“We must subject government officials to the
same rules of conduct that we expect of the citizen. The very existence of the
government is imperiled if it fails to observe the law scrupulously. As
Brandeis puts it, "if the government becomes a lawbreaker, it breeds
contempt for law; it invites every man to become a law unto himself; it invites
anarchy. To declare that in the administration of the criminal law the end
justifies the means—to declare that the government may commit crimes in order
to secure the conviction of a private criminal—would bring terrible
retribution. Against that pernicious doctrine this court should resolutely set
its face."
ORDERED PREPARED BY:
Joe Louis Lawrence
Counsel Pro Se
Post Office Box 490075
Chicago, Ill 60649
312 965-6455
Joelouis565@yahoo.com
ENTERED:
_________________________
Judge
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK
COUNTY ILLINOIS
DOMESTIC RELATIONS DIVISION
IN RE
)
)
Francoise Hightower ) Judge Fallon
Petitioner
)
) Cal 54
VS
)
) No. 88 D 079012
Joe Louis Lawrence )
Respondent
) Room CL-12
Now comes Respondent, Joe
Louis Lawrence, Counsel Pro Se in this cause respectfully represents to this
court the reasons and files herewith his Affidavit in support of Motion for
Summary Judgment et al;
Respectfully
Submitted,
By: _________________
Joe Louis Lawrence
Counsel Pro Se
This is an updated version of Lynching, with
unjust rulings and unjust applications of the laws “Gas Lighting” Inducing
Reliance on any and all parties so as to justify their racial fraternal sexist
hatred on any person challenging Democratic Machine Personnel the unimpeached
aforementioned document validates the verity how the laws are ignored and
circumvented as the actors within the Cook County and judges do not see African American or Hispanic
Men, men or women as Free Citizens, but
as Inferior Beings, this case demonstrates how to destroy and Criminalize the
Black Brown, Hispanic man or woman.
Defendants was job security for all of the
racist, inferior intellectually challenged attorneys that was deployed to take
him or any law firm on litigiously so as to demonstrate “White Supremacy” is
how Chicago is governed and ran in the United States of America, under the
Democratic Machine no man or woman of color was to provide for or love their
family only Welfare, no man of color was to have a job only Welfare, no man of
color was to have an education if it looks as if you have some intellect, the Wrath of
Racism will be deployed against anyone who won’t succumb to their JIM CROW
tactics as demonstrated in this case but in Shemica’s case Judge Forti and the
attorneys made sure her minor child was kidnapped so as to break her will and
spirit for daring to challenge such men of diabolical hatred and racial animas
behavior.
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY ILLINOIS
DOMESTIC RELATIONS DIVISION
IN RE
)
)
Francoise Hightower ) Judge Patricia Fallon
Petitioner
)
) Cal 54
VS
)
) No. 88 D 079012
Joe Louis Lawrence )
Respondent
) Room CL-12
AFFIDAVIT
IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE w/AFFIDAVIT
1.
I am Joe Louis
Lawrence, Counsel Pro Se, Respondent in this cause, being first duly sworn on
oath deposes and states, as follows;
2.
That on June 10,
2025 Defendant Filed a MOTION TO RECUSE HON PATRICIA FALLON DUE TO CONFLICT OF INTEREST
PRIOR ASSOCIATION TO THE STATES ATTORNEY OFFICE WHERE ALLEGED HOMOSEXUAL KENT
STEPHEN RAY FORMER GENERAL COUNSEL OF THE CTA USED HIS UNLAWFUL JURISDICTION
DESTROYING PERSONNEL RECORDS OF RESPONDENT AND ENGINEERED THE FALSIFICATION AND
COLLUSION WITH HIS ALLEGED FORMER EX JUDGE FORTI WHO WAS A CORPORATION ATTORNEY
IN CITY HALL WHO HAS STALKED THE RESPONDENT SINCE 1994 AIDING AND ABETTING IN
RACIAL HATE CONSPIRACIES ON CASE 93 L010772 (JOE LOUIS LAWRENCE VS CTA) AS
CHIEF ASST COUNSEL & USED HIS ROBE VIOLATING THE CIVIL RIGHTS OF RESPONDENT
AND SHEMICA TAYLOR ISSUING THE UNLAWFUL ORDER OF PROTECTION AGAINST HER KEEPING
HER FROM HER NATURAL BIOLOGICAL DAUGHTER AS LAW FIRMS SOUGHT OUTRAGEOUS LEGAL
FEES WHERE JUDGE FORTI IS SEEKING TO REMAND HER INTO CUSTODY ON A RULE TO SHOW
CAUSE NOT PAYING AN ALLEGED HOMOSEXUAL CHILD REP- REQUEST FOR RE NOTICE OF
RECUSING THE ENTIRE COOK COUNTY JUDICIARY
AND APPOINT A SPECIAL PROSECUTOR PURSUANT TO THE CASE OF 2 EX-COOK COUNTY
ASSISTANT STATE’S ATTORNEY’S (NICHOLAS TRUTENKO, ANDREW HORVAT) DUE TO FORMER
ASSISTANT’S STATES ATTORNEY IRIS Y. CHIVIRA ALLEGEDLY TOOK PART IN THE
FALSIFICATION OF BACKDATING RECORDS ET AL.
3.
That as of July 14, 2025, the States Attorney, nor Illinois
Attorney General or the Child Rep of the minor of Shemica Taylor responded by
attempting to Impeach the veracity of all Pleadings factually recorded.
A-
Respondent Shemica
Taylor is the biological mother of the minor child whom was kidnapped via a
plethora of void court orders; she lodged allegations of abuse charges 555 West
Monroe case gets consolidated with judge Forti, States Atty Grants her Child
Support with Judge Myron Mackoff 2 months later he vacates his final Order and
case gets consolidated with Judge Forti and he issued an Order Protection on
her
.
B-
Official Complaint Letter
Gr Ex B to ARDC June 16, 2023, Page 3 Par 1, Mr. Gelderman and
Ms. Platt also failed to investigate the domestic violence of Mr. Williams et al.
Ex C signed agreement 20 OP 07405 Taylor v Williams Judge Cushin
C-
That Judge David
Haracz made sure the Plaintiff never paid any child support to Shemica Taylor
and had more control and influence over the minor than the mother who had the
child.
D-
That the same judge
David Haracz stated to the Respondent Joe Louis Lawrence that biologically the
child was not his he was just a bill collector and had to get money from him
some type of way, as he was on Welfare with a wife and 5 children and was Remanded
into custody and had to pay with his welfare benefits as he worked with Forti,
Francoise Hightower and Kent Stephen Ray.
4.
Hereto attached,
Gr Ex A, An Investigative Reporter Mike Volpe did an article, “Another
one bites the dust in Cook County featuring Judge Rosanna Fernandez”. Certain
judges and law firms associated in these cases are named in an active Federal
Lawsuit.
A-
That Page 7, Pars
1-5 corroborates the malfeasance of judge’s systemic roles violating their
oaths of office.
(1) Marissa filed for a substitution of judge last fall.
Judge Fernandez refused to hear it claiming Marissa was required to appear in
person.
(2) After that, Kent and Marissa filed for a substitution of
judge for cause; this was denied, but after that a bizarre set of events
occurred.
(3) On January 27, 2025, Marissa filed a “MOTION FOR STAY AND
REPAIR OF JURISDICTION.”
(4) That’s a motion title I had not heard before. The motion
accused much of the Cook County judiciary of wantonly and improperly moving the
case from judge to judge outside the rules, and possibly the law.
(5) The motion accuses the presiding judge Cook County’s
family court division Regina Scannicchio of being involved in the malfeasance.
5.
That Respondent
Filed a Summary Judgment Dec. 4, 2023 before Judge Iris Y. Chivira she and her
alleged racist Lesbian Judges fraternity members and Judge Forti, Maritza
Martinez who mistook Respondent for one of the Inferior Spineless black or
Brown men who would let anyone walk on them or violate their Civil Rights
because many had no self-respect for themselves and wanted to be accepted.
6.
That on Feb 9, 2024
Respondent Filed a Default for $50 Million Dollars Maritza Martinez
“Fraudulent” assumed jurisdiction on the matter to Disqualify Judge Chivira as
he was provided a Court Order absent the Presiding Judges signature, she never
vacated any of her court orders but African American Supervisor Clerk Connie on
the 8th floor made the Respondent pay to Vacate said order knowing
he was a Pauperis, but Judge Martinez never vacated any of her court orders and
Judge Forti took over and tried using his position to try and Bully and
intimidate Respondent or anyone who stood up against his tyranny and racist
injustices in his court.
A-
Respondent has
appeared before Maritza Martinez who never had jurisdiction to appear on the
case no more than any Assistant States Attorneys but understates Attorney Kim
Foxx, and alleged Police Officer Francoise Hightower, Chief Judge Timothy
Calvin Evans and Illinois Attorney General Kwame Raoul, Gov Pritzker who
received Notice and knowledge of the Summary Judgment and Default never DENIED
or OBJECTED to any of the FACTUAL pleadings.
B-
Kent Stephen Ray
former CTA Gen Counsel transferred to the position as an Assistant States
Attorney used his alleged unlawful authority colluding with Francoise Hightower
as her adult daughters age was backdated to make her a minor as Foti used City
Hall and all of his influences “Gas Lighting” everyone to violate the Civil Rights
of the Respondent or any person like Shemica Taylor who challenges his authority.
7.
That Judge Forti and
Judge Romanek has used various deceptive unlawful judicial acts frivolously
prolonging this matter of 40 years in an attempt to keep the FBI from invoking
jurisdiction on what they have described a personal private civil matter something
the FBI do not get involve in.
8.
That on Oct. 26, 2023 Respondent Filed a Motion to Zero Out Child
Support and served the last Attorney of Record States Attorney and Chicago
Police Officer Francoise L. B. Hightower on the same day, hereto attached, Ex
A Proof of Delivery .
9.
That on Nov 28, 2023
Francoise L.B. Hightower, her daughter and Assistant States Attorney acting as
a “Private Citizen” made Perjured Admissions to the court of a
Court Order of 2007 being entered Ordering the Respondent to pay CHILD SUPPORT.
10.
That in 2007
Tycee Laqita Hightower was 23 years old and was EMANCIPATED in 2002
and at no time did she, Francoise her mother or the States Attorney Object,
Respond or Deny to any of the Pleadings properly asserted in said Motion
to Zero Out Child Support et al. accompanied with an AFFIDAVIT, even Judge
Chivira as a former States Attorney heard all of the PRIMA FACIE LIES never
questioned any female but stated she was DENYING the Defendant’s Motion, and
noting his objection to what the CCSA presented, hereto attached, Ex H,
Email sent but never answered.
11.
The most
egregious part is when the Negro CCSA asked Francoise if she wanted to waive
the illegal child support or receive it? Her reply was a psychotic sociopath
response was “YES, I want to receive it”!
12. Former
CCSA Thomas Kantas was the point person in the hierarchy of the States
Attorney’s office who had Carolyn
Kennedy, Amy Bernard and Brian Volkman representing Police Officer Francoise
Hightower when her daughter was 21 years old receiving numerous unlawful court
orders, whereby; Defendant had been REMANDED into CUSTODY 5 times for ALLEGEDLY
OWING CHILD SUPPORT, see the Notice of Petition filed Nov 1, 2005 and
all related documents demonstrating the States Attorneys representing Police
Officer Francoise Louise Barbara Hightower-Belmer (totaling 17 pages).
A- That
Yolanda Banks of Div of Child Support committed MAIL FRAUD & PERJURY
mailed to Alpha Baking, Interstate Brands Corp. Fraudulent documents seeking
Defendant’s wages in 2005 while Tycee was 21 years old.
13. That
former Jewish Judge Moche Jacobius whom Respondent met and knew when he was an
Assistant Attorney General told him that he heard about him attorneys were
speaking up on how he was defending himself in the early 1990’s appointed him a
Jewish attorney Gerald Nordgreen where he was held in Contempt of Court for
Allegedly Owing Child Support, Court Order that FALSELY STATES In Re the
Former Marriage of Francoise Hightower v Joseph Lawrence
14. September 21, 2023, the Supreme
Court of Illinois entered an order striking Thomas Alexander Kantas’s name from
the roll of attorneys licensed to practice law in Illinois amid allegations of
fraud and deception. Posted by AlabNews Staff
Writer | Oct 24, 2023 | News, Illinois, State Level
15. Motions for summary
judgment in Illinois are governed by the Illinois Code of Civil Procedure, 735
ILCS 5/2-10051. A defendant may move
for summary judgment at any time1.A party is entitled
to summary judgment if2: The pleadings, depositions and admissions on file, together with
the supporting affidavits (if any) show that there is no genuine issue as to
any material fact.
16.
The
moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.
17.
Every Inferior Negro
who had titles in the Democratic Party looked at Burke as if he was their White
Jesus and would commit any crime unimaginable so that their racist Political Machine
Gods would love and accept them but the Irish and Polish ethnic judges were
described as “the Good ol boys” or “White Trash” never feared Black authority
and laughed at it and was aware that
numerous judges engaged in “Racist Terrorist Conspiracies where Respondent
was concerned falsified an entire case 88 D 079012 under the authority and
leadership of former Police Officer Alderman Edward Burke assigned all judges
to enter corrupt unlawful orders on a Paternity Case that was DISMISSED
September 17, 1987,” but because these were RACIST WHITE MEN IN THE
DEMOCRATIC MACHINE, this was a norm violating the Civil Rights of men or women
of color;
18. Anybody involved in this Conspiracy
thought Everybody told Somebody what to cover-up and destroy, to keep nobody of
learning of Everybody’s involvement, the problem was that, Everybody thought
nobody knew and told, Somebody not to worry because Nobody would never know how
they lied, falsified, conspired, and destroyed all documents to save Everybody,
but Somebody knew of what Everybody did and Nobody paid attention because to
them it was a “joke” Anybody became very nervous because now they realize Somebody
lied and now Everybody is in trouble with the LAW and will go to jail because
Everybody thought Somebody was telling the “TRUTH”!
19. That
pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure RULE 8 (1) In
General. In responding to a pleading, a party must:
(A)
State in short and
plain terms its defenses to each claim asserted against it; and
(B) Admit or Deny the allegations
asserted against it by an opposing party.
(2) Denials—Responding to the
Substance. A denial must fairly respond to the substance of the allegation.
(3) General and Specific Denials.
A party that intends in good faith to deny all the allegations of a
pleading—including the jurisdictional grounds—may do so by a general denial. A
party that does not intend to deny all the allegations must either specifically
deny designated allegations or generally deny all except those specifically
admitted.
(4) Denying Part of an Allegation.
A party that intends in good faith to deny only part of an allegation must
admit the part that is true and deny the rest.
(5) Lacking Knowledge or Information.
A party that lacks knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief about
the truth of an allegation must so state, and the statement, has the effect of
a denial.
(6) Effect of Failing to Deny. An
allegation –other than one relating to the amount of damages –is admitted if a
responsive pleading is required and the allegation is not denied. If a
responsive pleading is not required an allegation is considered denied or
avoided.
20. Fraud admissibility great
latitude is permitted in proving fraud C.J.S. Fraud 104 ET Seg. Fraud 51-57.
where a question of fraud and deceit is the issue involved in a case, great
latitude is ordinarily permitted in the introduction of evidence, and courts
allow the greatest liberality in the method of examination and in
the scope of
inquiry Vigus
V. O’Bannon, 1886 8 N.E 788, 118 ILL 334. Hazelton V. Carolus, 1907 132 ILL.
App. 512, Gr Ex B Ref on Page 4
INDUCING RELIANCE
To prevail in a cause of action
for fraud, plaintiff must prove that defendant made statement of material
nature which was relied on by victim and was made for purposes of inducing
reliance, and that victim’s reliance led to his injury. Parsons V. Winter,
1986, 1 Dist., 491 N.E. 2d 1236, 96 ILL Dec. 776, 142 ILL App 3d 354, Appeal
Denied.
In Carter V. Mueller 457
N.E. 2d 1335 ILL. App. 1 Dist. 1983 The Supreme Court has held that: “The elements of a
cause of action for fraudulent misrepresentation (sometimes referred to as
“fraud and deceit” or deceit) are: (1) False statement of material fact; (2)
known or believed to be false by the party making it; (3) intent to induce the
other party to act; (4) action by the other party in reliance on the truth of
the statement; and (5) damage to the other party resulting from such reliance.
U. S Sup Court Digest 24(1)
General Conspiracy
U.S. 2003. Essence of a conspiracy is
an agreement to commit an unlawful act.—U.S. v. Jimenez Recio, 123 S. Ct. 819,
537 U.S. 270, 154 L.Ed.2d 744, on remand 371F.3d 1093
Agreement to commit an
unlawful act, which constitutes the essence of a conspiracy, is a distinct evil
that exist and be punished whether or not the substantive crime ensues.-Id.
Conspiracy poses a threat to
the public over and above the threat of the commission of the relevant
substantive crime, both because the combination in crime makes more likely the
commission of other crimes and because it decreases the part from their path of
criminality.-Id.
CONSPIRACY
Fraud maybe
inferred from nature of acts complained of, individual and collective interest
of alleged conspirators, situation, intimacy, and relation of parties at time
of commission of acts, and generally all circumstances preceding and attending
culmination of claimed conspiracy Illinois Rockford
Corp. V. Kulp, 1968, 242 N.E. 2d 228, 41 ILL. 2d 215.
Conspirators
to be guilty of offense need not have entered into conspiracy at same time or
have taken part in all its actions. People V. Hardison, 1985, 911
Dec. 162, 108. Requisite mens rea elements of conspiracy are satisfied upon showings of
agreement of offense with intent that offense be committed; Actus reas element
is satisfied of act in furtherance of agreement People V. Mordick, 1981,
50 ILL, Dec. 63
1.
The Local Rules provide detailed
instructions as to how litigants should approach their summary judgment motions
and responses. Local Rule 56.1(a) provides that a motion for summary must
include a "statement of material facts as to which the moving party
contends there is no genuine issue and that entitle the moving party to a
judgment as a matter of law."
2.
This statement of material facts
"shall consist of short numbered paragraphs, including within each paragraph specific
references to the affidavits, parts of the record, and other supporting
materials relied upon to support the facts set forth in that paragraph." Part (b) of Local Rule 56.1 requires a party opposing
summary for judgment to file a concise response to the movant's statement of
material facts. That statement is required to include a response to each
numbered paragraph in the moving party's statement, including in the case of any
disagreement, "specific references to the affidavits, parts of the record,
and other supporting materials relied upon." The rule is very clear
that "all material facts set forth in the statement required of the moving
party will be deemed admitted unless controverted by the statement of the
opposing party." Local Rule 56.1(b)(3)(B).
In the matter
of Raymond, 442 F. 3d at 606. (7th Cir. 2013) ) The Court, nevertheless, is concerned and
considers the prejudice to Plaintiff for Plaintiff’s counsel’s failure,
particularly because cases should be decided on their merits. Certainly, the
failure to file a response to a summary judgment motion can be fatal. See,
e.g., id at 611.
3. That the Defendant has met and exceeded the burden required in Fed Rule Civ P. 8 and 9 require
plaintiffs to particularize their allegations of "fraud on the court" in as
short, plain, and direct a way as is reasonable. To comply with these rules,
the Court instructed plaintiffs to set out each judicial proceeding complained
of, allege specific facts that make those proceedings "fraudulent" or
otherwise improper, and name the judges and other individuals involved and the
extent of their involvement in each claim of "fraudulent" or
otherwise improper conduct.
3. That
because of the color of said Defendant’s and Plaintiff’s skin State Employees
nor Democratic judges deem them United States Citizens entitled to Equal
Protection of the Laws and is violating every area of the laws egregiously as
if they are Ku Klux Klan members.
4. . “Any judge who
does not comply with his oath to the Constitution of the United States wars
against that Constitution and engages in acts in violation of the Supreme Law
of the Land. The judge is engaged in acts of treason. Having taken at least
two, if not three oaths of office to support the Constitution of the United
States, and the Constitution of the State of Illinois, any judge who has acted
in violation of the Constitution is engaged in an act or acts of treason. If a
judge does not fully comply with the Constitution, then his orders are void, In re Sawyer, 124 U.S. 200 (1888)
he/she is without jurisdiction , and he/she has engaged in an act or acts of
treason.”
5. That
the recent ruling from Judge Sykes and Michael S. Kanne where former appointed
Trump Amy Barrett stated: ( ALL REPUBLICANS)
Seventh Circuit Overturns $44.7 Million
Jury Verdict Against City in Shooting Incident
Wednesday,
February 24, 2021 Julie
Tappendorf
The Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals recently overturned a
jury verdict against the City of Chicago awarding $44.7 million in damages
relating to a shooting involving an off-duty police officer. First Midwest Bank as Guardian v. City of Chicago.
According to the court opinion, the plaintiff claimed that
a Chicago police officer shot his friend during an argument when the two had
been drinking. The friend suffered traumatic brain and other injuries. The
friend sued the City of Chicago seeking damages for the shooting, arguing that
the City was responsible for the officer's conduct. Specifically, the plaintiff
claimed that the City's failure to have an "early warning system" to
identify officers who might engage in misconduct, failure to adequately investigate
and discipline officers who engage in misconduct, and the "code of
silence" among police officers contributed to the shooting incident. The
City argued that the officer was off duty and not acting under "color of
state law" at the time of the shooting, so the City was not liable under
Section 1983 of the Civil Rights Act. The case made its way to a jury which
found the City of Chicago liable and awarded $44.7 million in damages to the
plaintiff. The jury found that two of the City's policies - its failure to
maintain an adequate early warning system and failure to adequately investigate
and discipline officers - caused the officer to shoot his friend.
The City appealed to the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals,
which reversed the jury verdict and award. The appeals court found that
although the injuries suffered by plaintiff from the shooting incident were
grievous, the City was not responsible for the officer's actions, where the
officer was acting as a private citizen and not as a City police officer. The
Seventh Circuit noted that Section 1983 imposes liability only when
a municipality has violated a federal right. Since none of the plaintiff's
federal rights were violated, the court of appeals overturned the jury verdict
against the City of Chicago.
A-
That said Motion establishes with complete
veracity, within the Preponderance of the laws, that said Democrats within the
Democratic Political Machine along with some Republicans have corroborated
violating Section 1983 along with a plethora of other Terrorists Acts as
Judges, Mayors, States Attorneys, Attorney Generals and numerous officers of
the courts, kept their eyes closed and mouths shut of the noted crimes recorded
within said Motion; thereby, warranting this matter to be transferred out of
the TERRORIST CRIMINAL ENTERPRISE of the DEMOCRATIC CONTROLLED POLITICAL
MACHINE to another Tribunal away from CHICAGO.
1.) That pursuant to Federal
Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 60 Relief from a Judgment or Order:
(a) Corrections: Based on
Clerical Mistakes: Oversights and Omissions. The court may correct a clerical mistake
arising from oversight or omission whenever one is found in a judgment, order,
or other part of the record. The court may do so on motion or on its own, with
or without notice. But after an appeal has been docketed in the appellate court
and while it is pending, such a mistake maybe corrected only with the appellate
courts leave.
(b) Grounds for Relief from a
Final Judgment, Order, or Proceeding. On motion and just terms, the court may relieve a party or its
legal representative from a final judgment, order or proceeding for the
following reasons:
(1) Mistake, inadvertence,
surprise, or excusable neglect;
(2) Newly discovered evidence
that, with reasonable diligence, could have been discovered in time to move for
a new trial under Rule 59 (b);
(3) Fraud (whether previously
called intrinsic or extrinsic ), misrepresentation, or misconduct by an
opposing party;
(4) The judgment is void.
Plaintiffs have not raised any affirmative defenses.
Summary judgment is appropriate when the
pleadings, depositions, admissions and affidavits, viewed in a light most
favorable to the movant or non-movant fail to establish a genuine issue of material
fact, thereby
1. Entitling
the moving party to judgment as a matter of law.
The purpose of summary judgment is not to try
a question of fact, but simply
to
Determine whether one exists.
When the party moving for summary judgment
supplies evidentiary facts which,
If not contradicted, would entitle him
to judgment, the opposing party cannot
Rely upon his complaint or answer alone
to raise issues of material fact. A counter
Affidavit is necessary to refute
evidentiary facts properly asserted by affidavit
Supporting the motion or else the facts
are deemed admitted.
Here, Defendant has supplied affidavits,
Certified Court transcripts and other evidentiary material that establishes all
of the elements necessary to entitle it to recovery under the parties’
agreements, including the amount of damages. Plaintiffs have failed to submit
any evidence in opposition to the Motion or Order to raise any genuine issues
of material fact. Thus, summary judgment is proper.
That
because of the heinous acts Plaintiff Shemica Taylor and Defendant Joe Louis
Lawrence have been harmed by said Civil Rights Violations and no one objected
to said assertions put before any tribunal, Plaintiff is seeking is seeking the
return of her child Instanter and an Independent Prosecutor to investigate the
allegations particularized and ignored in said Motions and Affidavits,
Pleadings with punitive damages; Smith v. Wade, 461 U.S. 30, 35, 103
S. Ct. 1625, 1629, 75 L Ed 2d 632 (1983)
Justice Brennen “The threshold standard for allowing punitive damages
for reckless or callous indifference applies even in a case, such as here,
where the underlying standard of liability for compensatory damages because is
also one of recklessness. There is no merit to petitioner’s contention that
actual malicious intent should be the standard for punitive damages because the
deterrent purposes of such damages would be served only if the threshold for
those damages is higher in every case than the underlying standard for
liability in the first instance. The common-law rule is otherwise, and there is
no reason to depart from the common-law rule in the context of {1983}”
Finally,
this Affidavit is best closed by a jurist who has stated”; Citing Canon 2A the
court noted, “[a] court’s indifference to clearly stated rules breed disrespect
for and discontent with our justice system. Government cannot demand respect of
the laws by its citizens when its tribunals ignore those very same laws”)
Federal
Court FEDERAL JUDGE GETTLEMAN:
stated, Tuesday March 10, 2009, where he found Superintendent of police Jody
Weiss in Contempt of Court and Ordered the City to Pay $100,000.00, “No
one is above the Law”, he cited a 1928 decision by Supreme Court
Justice Louis Brandeis, that said, “If the Government becomes the law breaker,
it breeds Contempt for the Law, it invites everyman to become a law unto
himself. It invites Anarchy.”
Under Federal law which is applicable to all
states, the U.S. Supreme Court stated that if a court is "without
authority, its judgments and orders are regarded as nullities. They are not
voidable, but simply void; and form no bar to a recovery sought, even prior to
a reversal in opposition to them. They constitute no justification; and all
persons concerned in executing such judgments or sentences, are considered, in
law, as trespassers." Elliot v. Piersol, 1 Pet.
328, 340, 26 U.S. 328, 340 (1828)
When judges act when they do not have
jurisdiction to act, or they enforce a void order (an order issued by a judge
without jurisdiction), they become trespassers of the law, and are engaged in
treason (see below).
The U.S. Supreme Court, in Scheuer
v. Rhodes, 416 U.S. 232, 94 S. Ct. 1683, 1687 (1974) stated that
"when a state officer acts under a state law in a manner violative of the
Federal Constitution, he "comes into conflict with the superior authority
of that Constitution, and he is in that case stripped of his official or
representative character and is subjected in his person to the
consequences of his individual conduct. The State has no power to impart to him
any immunity from responsibility to the supreme authority of the United
States." [Emphasis supplied in original].
By law, a judge is a state officer as in this
case Federal officers.
The judge then acts not as a judge, but as a
private individual (in his person).
FURTHER AFFIANT SAYETH NOT
Joe Louis Lawrence
__________________ NOTARY
WHEREFORE the
aforementioned reasons Respondent respectfully Prays for the Relief
1. For
an Order Granting Summary Judgment Instanter for a JUDGMENT
of Recusing Cook County Judges and Transferring this matter to Rolling Meadows
Court & Vacate the Void Court Orders of Nov. 4, 2021 that Nullifies every
Court Order Judge Forti has unlawfully signed against Shemica Taylor return her
child Instanter via Cook County Sheriffs do to Police & Judges violating 18
USC 242 et al.
2. For
an Order issuing a Rule to Show Cause Remanding all parties complicit
in this “Organized Conspiracy” into Custody Instanter.
3. For an
Order appointing a Special Prosecutor who understands the jurisdiction of their
profession to investigate and ascertain all other parties complicit in these
Terrorist Treason Offenses of all cases noted within;
4. For an
Order staying any and all legal enforcements of all parties noted within due to
the plethora of Felonies enacted by “Private Citizens” perpetrating roles as
judges, States Attorneys, State Agencies etc. Trespassing upon the Laws”
5. For an
Order on bond be not less than one million dollars for any and all parties
charged in these crimes in warring against the United States Constitution.
6. For an
Order removing the Chief Judge of Cook County and Presiding judges of all
Circuits who as Public Servants failed to investigate remove or report any
judge in accordance to their oath and Public Duty.
7. For an
Order setting a Hearing Date for all attorneys who sat by in an idle manner and
did not exercise his or her duties pursuant to the Ethics of R.P.C 3.3 and
speak up or report the terrorist acts perpetrated by “Private Citizens”
violating their oaths as judges, State Employees, Cook County Clerks and
Attorneys.
8. For the
entry of an Order awarding to your Petitioner for such other
relief and any other relief necessary as equity may require of which this court
may deem overwhelmingly just;
Joe Louis Lawrence
Counsel Pro Se
_____________________
.
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY
ILLINOIS
DOMESTIC RELATIONS DIVISION
IN RE
)
)
Francoise
Hightower )
Judge Patricia Fallon
Petitioner )
) Cal 54
VS
)
) No. 88 D 079012
Joe Louis
Lawrence
)
Respondent ) Room CL 12
NOTICE OF
MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO ILLINOIS
(735 ILCS 5/2-1005) & FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE CORROBORRATING THE
VERACITY COOK COUNTY JUDGES DO NOT HONOR DUE PROCESS OR CIVIL RIGHTS EQUAL
PROTECTION TO IT’S CITIZENS PRO SE OR WITH ATTORNEYS IN ANY OF THE COURT’S w/AFFIDAVIT
Please be advised that on July 14, 2025 Respondent has filed
before this Domestic Relations Division
Motion for Summary Judgment et al; and will present said legally sufficient
instrument before Judge Fallon Aug 11, 2024 in her stead at 9:30 am
in room CL-12
I Joe Louis Lawrence, Counsel Pro Se Defendant,
certify that I have on this day deposited said Notice of Motion to Recuse Judge
Fallon et al. to all parties recorded in said Notice via regular/electronic
delivery.
Hon Judicial Council of the Seventh
Circuit
Governor JB Pritzker gov.casework@illinois.gov
To: Hon Judge Patricia Fallon CCC.DomRelCRCL12@cookcountyil.gov
Hon Michael A. Forti
CCC.DomRelCR3004@cookcountyil.gov
Hon. Iris Y. Chavira CCC.DomRelCRCL08cookcountyil.gov
Hon. Andrea Webber CCC.DomRelCRCL06@cookcountyil.gov
Hon Maritza Martinez CCC.DomRelCR3006@cookcountyil.gov
Hon Abbey
Romanek CCC.DomRelCR3008@cookcountyil.gov
sao.csed@cookcountyil.gov Yolanda.simmons@cookcountysao.org
Cook County State’s Attorney Chief Judge Timothy C. Evans
Eilene
O’Neil Burke timothy.evans@cookcountyil.gov
statesattorney@cookcountyil.gov
Susan Mendoza Amanda.prentice@illinoiscomptroller.gov
Child Rep Marcellus H. Moore, Jr. 203 N.
LaSalle Street, Suite 2100 marcellus@childadvocatelawgroup.com
Cook County Sheriff’s
Tom Dart
email CCSO@ccsheriff.org
The Crusader Newspaper Group
Managing Editor Sharon Fountain
State Police isp.contact@illinois.gov
Illinois State Police
Chicago
Police Superintendent, 3510 S. Michigan Ave, Chicago Ill. 60653
Email
CLEARPATH@chicagopolice.org, CaseManagement@chicagopolice.org
Dir. FBI,
Hon
Mayor Brandon
Special Agent in
Charge (FBI) City Hall 7th floor
Chicago, IL. 60601
2111 West Roosevelt Road
Chicago, Il 60608
Illinois
Courts Commission
555 West
Monroe, 15th floor
Chicago Ill.
60661
info@IllinoisCourtsCommission.gov
Illinois Court
Commission Members
Justice P.
Scott Neville, Jr. Chairman
Justice Thomas
M. Harris
Justice
Margaret Stanton McBride
Judge Lewis
Nixon
Judge Sheldon
Sobol
Judge Aurora
Abella-Austriaco
Madam Paula
Wolf
Potestivo & Ass., PC
Bryan G. Thompson, Poulami Mal pmal@potestivolaw.com
press@cookcountyil.gov bthompson@potestivolaw.com
ilrb.filing@illinois.gov,
alexandrina.shrove@ilag.gov,
oig.referrals@illinois.gov
rwillis@laboradvocates.com,
jodi.mar@illinois.gov,
helen.j.kim@illinois.gov,
lashonda.channel@illinois.gov,
brianna.klein@illinois.gov,
kimberly.stevens@illinois.gov,
anna.hamburg-gal@illinois.gov,
khill@atu241chicago.org,
frogishtwo65@gmail.com,
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
The undersigned hereby
certifies that the above notice and all attachments were caused to be emailed
to the above parties at the addresses provided before 5:00 pm on June 10, 2025 .
Respectfully, Submitted,
__________________________
Joe
Louis Lawrence
Counsel
Pro Se
Post Office Box 490075
Chicago,
Ill 60649
No comments:
Post a Comment