WIDESPREAD MISCONDUCT, JUDICIAL CORRUPTION, ILLEGAL FORECLOSURE EVICTIONS, EXTORTION COVER-UP IN CHILD SUPPORT, JUDGES APPOINTED TO THE BENCH WITH NO KNOWLEDGE OF THE RULES OR CIVIL PROCEDURES, KIDNAPPING CHILDREN FROM MOTHERS AND GIVING THEM TO EX MEN NOT HUSBANDS (MOTHER WAS NEVER A CRIMINAL OR HAD ANY DCFS CHARGES, ALLEGEDLY JUDGES RECEIVED A KICKBACK TO PREVENT FROM PAYING ANY CHILD SUPPORT, STATE AGENCIES FALSIFYING DOCUMENTS TO JUSTIFY EXTORTION IN CHILD SUPPORT MATTER, US BANK HAD ATTORNEYS TO HELP STEAL A HOME OF RETIRED SENIOR CITIZENS OF 65 YEARS WHERE ATTORNEYS EMAILED THE JUDGE AND INSTRUCTED HIM ON HOW TO PREPARE THE COURT ORDER, SO THAT THE COOK COUNTY SHERIFF'S CAN EVICT THEM ILLEGALLY, GENOCIDE ON THE BLACK AND BROWN FAMILIES AS CASES ARE FRIVOLOUSLY PROLONGED IN THE COURTS SO THAT COURT APPOINTED ATTORNEYS FOR THE CHILDREN CAN MAKE MONEY
DEPENDING ON YOUR SKIN COLOR, AGE (DON'T BE A SENIOR CITIZEN) SEXUALITY BELONGING TO THE SODOM & GOMORRAH FRATERNITY (COOK COUNTY COURTS ARE THE UPDATED VERSION TO BABYLON) INCEST, CHILD ABUSE, PEDOPHILIA HAS BEEN COVERED UP BY NUMEROUS JUDGES AND ENCOURAGED BECAUSE THE OFFENDERS SEEM TO RECEIVE THESE JUDGES IN ANY COURT PROCEEDING.
THIS COURT SYSTEM IS BREEDING THE TYPE OF CHAOTIC EVENTS SEEN IN TODAYS YOUTH, ASK YOURSELF HOW MANY OF THOSE CHILDREN HAVE PARENTS WHO HAVE BEEN PRODUCTS OF THE COURT SYSTEM OR DADS LOCKED UP OR ABSENT IN THEIR LIVES.
JUDGES LIKE FORTI AND SO MANY LIKE HIM ARE CREATING PROFITING CIRCUMSTANCES FOR THOSE IN THE CRIMINAL ENTERPRISE OF COOK COUNTY SO THOSE CHILDREN NOT KILLED BY RANDOM VIOLENCE ARE PSYCHOLOGICALLY DESTROYED BY THE COOK COUNTY JUDICIAL SYSTEM.
AS A PROFESSOR STATED ON SOCIAL MEDIA WHY OFFEND OR UPSET THE VERY PEOPLE WHO ARE BEING ALLEGEDLY FINANCED----JUSTICE IS FOR SALE
THIS IS WHY SO MANY COURTS ARE HAD IN ZOOM SO THAT MANY CAN NOT WITNESS JUST HOW CORRUPT OR IGNORANT SO MANY JUDGES ARE PRESENTLY ON THE BENCH, LOOK AT THIS PATERNITY CASE 40 YEARS OLD ALL OF THE BLACK LEADERS ADMITTED EVERYTHING IS TRUE INCLUDING FRANCOISE, BUT FORTI AND HIS ARMY OF RACISTS AND HOMOSEXUALS WHO HATE BLACK AND BROWN PEOPLE ARE TRYING TO DENY ME JUSTICE OR ANY VICTORY SIMPLY BECAUSE OF THE COLOR OF MY SKIN EVEN THOUGH THE LAWS, EVIDENCE AND ALL PARTIES ADMISSIONS.
FILED MAY 23, 2025
COURT DATE IS JUNE 9, AT 10:00AM VIA ZOOM
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY
ILLINOIS
DOMESTIC RELATIONS DIVISION
IN RE )
)
Francoise
Hightower ) Judge Michael A. Forti
Petitioner )
) Cal 61
VS )
) No. 88 D 079012
Joe Louis
Lawrence
)
Respondent ) Room 3004
MOTION
TO VACATE IMPROPER DISMISSAL (MAY 12, 2025) (POST
RECUSAL TESTIMONY) VOID ORDER AND REQUEST FOR RE
NOTICE OF RECUSING THE ENTIRE COOK COUNTY JUDICIARY JUDICIARY AND APPOINT A SPECIAL PROSECUTOR PURSUANT TO
THE CASE OF 2 EX-COOK COUNTY ASSISTANT STATE’S ATTORNEY’S (NICHOLAS TRUTENKO,
ANDREW HORVAT) DUE TO FORMER ASSISTANT’S STATES ATTORNEY IRIS Y. CHIVIRA
ALLEGEDLY TOOK PART IN THE FALSIFICATION OF BACKDATING RECORDS ET AL. JUDGE FORTI HAVING A
HEARING MAY 9, 2025 ON THE 11:00AM CALL, STATED “you know what, Sir
I’m going to recuse myself like others but I’m going to apprise Judge Scannicchio” (STATE OF ILLINOIS
AFFIDAVIT PROPERLY NOTARIZED ATTESTING TO THIS VERACITY) AS ASA YOLANDA SIMMONS
VIOLATED THE ETHICS OF RPC 3.3 CORROBORATOING HER INVOLVEMENT COLLUDING WITH
JUDGE FORTI IN SYSTEMIC CIVIL RIGHTS VIOLATIONS VERIFYING SAID JUDGES ARE
“PRIVATE CITIZENS” “TRESPASSING UPON THE LAWS” LOPER BRIGHT ENTERPRISES V
RAIMONDO, 603 U,S. 369 (2024) TO
SECTION 42 USC 1983 OF THE CIVIL RIGHTS STATUTE, The Illinois Supreme Court held that if a court "could not hear the
matter upon the jurisdictional paper presented, its finding that it had the
power can add nothing to its authority, - it, had no authority to make that
finding." The People v. Brewer, 128 Ill. 472, 483
(1928). The judges assigned had no legal authority (jurisdiction) to hear or
rule on certain matters before them. They acted without any jurisdiction.
When judges act
when they do not have jurisdiction to act, or they enforce a void order (an
order issued by a judge without jurisdiction), they become trespassers of the
law, and are engaged in treason.
1.)
President Trump issued a Memorandum April
9, 2025
2.)
That On
Dec 4, 2023, 2023, Respondent filed a Motion for Summary Judgment and Default
Judgment of $50 million dollars, February 9, 2024 properly served on all
parties pursuant to Illinois Supreme Court Rule 11 and local rules
3.)
That Petitioner being represented by the States
Attorney nor herself failed to file a response or objection. Under Illinois
Supreme Court Rule 191 and Rule 56, the factual allegations and statements in
support of summary judgment were deemed admitted.
4.)
That Judge Michael Forti, presiding over this matter,
subsequently recused himself on May
9, 2025 via Hearing where an affidavit was filed May 12, 2025 in the Clerk of
Cook County verified said admissions.
5.)
That despite
having recused himself, Judge Forti entered
an order back dating to May 9, 2025 but entered May 12, 2025 and
emailed to Respondent May 13, 2025 at 5:05am dismissing the Petitioner’s
Motion, referring to it incorrectly as a “Petition,” and stating that the case
is “off call.”
6.)
That it is well-settled law in Illinois that a judge
who has recused themselves may no longer
take judicial action in a matter. Any such action is beyond their
authority and is void ab initio.
See In re Marriage of Petersen, 319
Ill. App. 3d 325, 327 (1st Dist. 2001) (“A void order may be attacked at
any time.”).
7.)
The judge’s action deprived said Respondent of due process and constitutes a violation of
judicial ethics under Canon
2, Rule 2.11 of the Illinois Code of Judicial Conduct.
8.)
That Page 5, Par 13 of the Summary Judgment is an
admission demonstrating Blacks, Negros, Colored etc. have no authority over
Anglo Saxon judges within the judiciary, most importantly to further amplify
said veracity the Chief Judge Timothy Calvin Evans whom Judge Forti is subordinate
to and laws of the Appellate Court and Supreme Court rules have vexatiously with “Damnosis” Contempt issued
rulings of Bias, Hatred and in a Terrorist manner which is systematic to all
Civil Rights Violations, by unlawfully Dismissing a legal Default trying to “FIX”
said case in an attempt to save his kind of people caught up in this matter.
9.)
INDUCING RELIANCE
To prevail in a
cause of action for fraud, plaintiff must prove that defendant made statement
of material nature which was relied on by victim and was made for purposes of
inducing reliance, and that victim’s reliance led to his injury. Parsons
V. Winter, 1986, 1 Dist., 491 N.E. 2d 1236, 96 ILL Dec. 776, 142 ILL App 3d
354, Appeal Denied.
In Carter V. Mueller
457 N.E. 2d 1335 ILL. App. 1 Dist. 1983 The Supreme Court
has held that: “The elements of a cause of action for fraudulent
misrepresentation (sometimes referred to as “fraud and deceit” or deceit) are:
(1) False statement of material fact; (2) known or believed to be false by the
party making it; (3) intent to induce the other party to act; (4) action by the
other party in reliance on the truth of the statement; and (5) damage to the
other party resulting from such reliance.
That
Pursuant to Vigus V. O’Bannon, 1886
8 N.E 788, 118 ILL 334. Hazelton V. Carolus, 1907 132 ILL. App. 512. here are
other cases of Fraud
10.)
US Bank et al vs Monzella
Johnson et al. 2008 CH 33616 case vacated HOW A CERTIFIED COURT ORDER (OCT. 29, 2024) OF JUDGE PAMELA
GILLESPIE VACATING FORECLOSURE JUNE 10, 2010, AND AFFIRMED BY THE APPELLATE
COURT 5TH DIVISION DEC. 30, 2011, whereby, attorneys emailed
Judge Derico with instructions on how to construct a court order so as to
unlawfully evict senior citizens from their home of 64 years before
Thanksgiving 2024, Black or certain Latino judges are only appointed to the
bench or state agencies to fulfill the doctrines of hate and racial oppression
on their own ethnic groups no other group.
11.)
In Re M. G.W Case #2020 D 79452 a case very similar to the 88 D 079012 is
fraught with fraud and corruption where former judge David Haracz signed an
Allocation Order refusing a trial and signed the court order (November 4, 2021)
without any of the parties or their attorneys and Judge Forti is using that
fraudulent document to remove the child from the mother unlawfully, furthermore
demonstrating his untouchable status as a homosexual terrorizing a Black woman
because nobody Black or of competent authority can admonish him, said orders
are a Nullity/Void and needs to be vacated instanter.
A-
Fraudulent Allocation
Court Order hereto attached, Ex A, How an Allocation should be presented Page
13 AGREED ALLOCATION OF PARENTAL RESPONSIBILITIES AND PARENTING PLAN Ex B
B-
Allocation Order
violated Illinois: 750 ILCS 5/602.10 (Parenting Plan),
Illinois Supreme Court Rule 924
C- Drafting the Allocation
Judgment
Typically,
one attorney (often the petitioner’s) drafts the proposed judgment.
D-
Review and Agreement
Signature and Filing
E-
Once
finalized:
a.
Both parties sign the judgment (or
their attorneys if permitted).
b.
Attorneys sign to indicate approval
as to form and substance.
F-
The final
version is filed with the clerk of the court.
12.)
Respondent has
exhausted nearly $50,000 for legal representation, not one motion was ever
adjudicated hereto attached Partial Responses to Complaint to the ARDC #2023 IN02076
A- The Attorney for the A.R.D.C. Michael Rusch
in his Oct 2, 2023 reply Page 2 Par 1, Lines 2-4 Based on
conversations with you, Beerman Law requested a full trial before the judge.
The court denied that request et al.
B- That Par 2, Line 3-5 “Regarding Beermann Law, you stated that
Beermann Law failed to challenge the judge, demand a fair trial, or appeal the
judge’s decision et al. further demonstrating the following:
A-
Public
Corruption
B-
Abuse
of Authority under color of law (18 U. S. C. 242)
C-
Bribery
or honest services fraud (18 U.S.C. 1341, 1346, 666)
D-
Civil
Rights violations
13.)
That because of the Unlawful Court Order Void in its entirety in
reference to Par 11 A, Judge Forti has Induced Reliance on an INNOCENT
RESPONDENT, predicated from a plethora of fraudulent court orders causing harm
to her by illegally signing a COURT ORDER MAY 8, 2025 FOR AN INTERIM ORDER OF
PROTECTION ET AL. THE COURT HEREBY FINDS A. SHEMICA HAS ABSCONDED, CONCEALED
AND KIDNAPPED THE MINOR CHILD et al. “RIDICULOUS
SLANDER OF A JUDGE”
14.)
That a Rule to Show Cause for SHEMICA’S failure to pay CHILD
REPRESENTATIVE FEES ET AL.
15.)
That #5 of the order states, “This matter is set for return on
the Order of Protection for November 12, 2025 et al”. “LITIGIOUSLY
PROLONGED SO MANY CAN PROFIT”
16.)
That Judge Forti further violated 18 U.S.C. 242 by authorizing
the COOK COUNTY SHERIFFS TO SERVE THESE UNLAWFUL DOCUMENTS DUE TO HIS WRECKLESS
DISREGARD FOR ANY LAWS.
17.)
JUDGE FORTI SIGNED A COURT ORDER MAY 9, 2025, ON A RULE TO SHOW
CAUSE: COURT FINDS A PRIMA FACIE CASE OF INDIRECT CIVIL CONTEMPT….FOR FAILURE
TO PAY THE CHILD REPRESENTATIVE’S RETAINER, CONTINUED TO AUG 25, 2025.
18.)
That on Monday May 19, 2025, Respondent’s daughter was removed
from her custody in the State of Indiana where she fled for her safety and
has NEVER BEEN UNDER THE JURISDICTION OF COOK COUNTY ONCE JUDGE DAVID E. HARACZ
SIGNED THE VOID COURT ORDER OF NOV. 21, 2021.
19.)
That an email reply (May 19, 2025) from a
retired attorney further articulating the corruption in Cook County Courts
ignored, hereto attached, Ex 3 Page 2, Par 2 How does an ordinary citizen in Illinois
obtain Justice? ---The answer is simple, he/she just does not.
A- To
further amplify the veracity of the aforementioned claim Judge Forti and other
racist judges have used racial hate, Terrorism “Lynching tactics covering up
sordid Civil Rights Violations (40 years) on a Paternity case knowing Respondent
was framed and not only wasn’t his child but forcing him to pay for an incest
matter of a biological Police officer impregnating his daughters, but because
of his skin color and being a Heterosexual, they want the FBI and everyone to
know that they can Criminalize any innocent person to achieve their
satisfaction.
B- That as
if the aforementioned isn’t enough to make the average person puke trying to
ascertain these demonic acts, Respondent Shemica Taylor a mother with no
criminal record, no DCFS record of any sort and due to the alleged Homosexual/Bisexual
and racial hatred of her being a loving Heterosexual mother has been
criminalized and defamed entirely claiming she kidnapped her own biological
child. “sic” “CASE PROLONGED NOW 5 YEARS”
20.)
The message
is clear to all RESPECTABLE MEN OR WOMEN regardless to your skin color, YOUR
MOTHER, AUNT OR DAUGHTERS, GRANDMOTHERS ETC CAN BE RAPED ABUSED, EVICTED
UNLAWFULLY OR GUARDIANS OF COOK COUNTY and be robbed and get a judge like
Forti, Romanek, Derico etc. and the crimes of all perpetrators will be egregiously
covered-up demonstrating no justice can ever be had in any COOK COUNTY COURTS.
MEMORANDUM
FOR THE HEADS OF EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENTS AND AGENCIES #14219
SUBJECT:
DIRECTING THE REPEAL OF UNLAWFUL REGULATIONS
Promoting economic growth and American
innovation are top priorities of this Administration. Unlawful,
unnecessary, and onerous regulations impede these objectives and impose massive
costs on American consumers and American businesses. In recent years, the
Supreme Court has issued a series of decisions that recognize appropriate
constitutional boundaries on the power of unelected bureaucrats and that
restore checks on unlawful agency actions. Yet, despite these critical
course corrections, unlawful regulations — often promulgated in reliance on
now-superseded Supreme Court decisions — remain on the books.
Consistent with these priorities and with
my commitment to restore fidelity to the Constitution, on February 19, 2025,
I issued Executive Order 14219 (Ensuring Lawful Governance and
Implementing the President’s “Department of Government Efficiency” Deregulatory
Initiative). It directed the heads of all
executive departments and agencies to identify certain categories of unlawful
and potentially unlawful regulations within 60 days and begin plans to repeal
them. This review-and-repeal effort shall prioritize evaluating each
existing regulation’s lawfulness under the following United States Supreme
Court decisions:
A-
State Agencies and Judges have demonstrated
anarchy and chaos in the courts needing Federal intervention because this is a
40 year (“Fixed Incest Paternity case) old case and judges and state agencies
have demonstrated how they are able to violate and circumvent the laws of the
US Constitution and still enforce Jim Crow Laws outlawed by the US Supreme
Court.
21.)
THAT COOK COUNTY JUDGES DO NOT HONOR OR ABIDE BY ANY LAWS OF THE
UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION
A- Steinbrecher v. Steinbrecher, 197 Ill. 2d 514, 528 (2001) “Pro Se litigants are presumed to have full knowledge of
applicable court rules and procedures”
B-
The Seventh Circuit
Court of Appeals held that the Circuit Court
of Cook County is a criminal enterprise. U.S. v. Murphy, 768 F.2d 1518, 1531 (7th Cir. 1985)”.
22.)
That because Judge Forti did not enter a court order into the
record from the May 9, 2025, 9:00am Hearing, said State of Illinois
Affidavit is being filed, Particularizing all events that transpired in
that court corroborating “Fraud” and “Corruption”
23.)
That years ago a Judge of Jewish ethnicity and of impeccable
integrity advised me to always obtain a court order from a judge anytime you
appear before him and an Irish Judge Patrick McGann told me to never appear in
any court on Hearsay information.
A-
Case 88 D 079012 Aug 3, 1988 vacating wrong date of defective
service of Feb 24, not Feb 24, 1988 caused the May 18, 1988 DEFAULT to stand
never ordering child support, causing all court orders afterwards to be deemed
Void/a Nullity.
B-
Respondent served Courtesy Copy IV via email April 28, 2025,
to Judge Forti and members of the Judiciary as well as the Judicial Council of
the Seventh Circuit, particularizing the racist hateful terrorist criminal acts
of him and all of his kind has participated in and are guilty of.
C-
Because of Respondents skin color and not being intimidated or
bullied by him or the state he has recused himself from the matter when he
never was supposed to be on the case in the first place.
1.)
The Summary Judgment was filed Dec 4, 2023
and was ignored and thereby admitted too in its entirety Local Rule 56.1(a) provides that a motion for summary
must include a "statement of material facts as to which the moving party
contends there is no genuine issue and that entitle the moving party to a
judgment as a matter of law."
This statement of
material facts "shall consist of short numbered paragraphs, including within each paragraph specific
references to the affidavits, parts of the record, and other supporting
materials relied upon to support the facts set forth in that paragraph." Part (b) of Local Rule 56.1 requires a party opposing
summary for judgment to file a concise response to the movant's statement of
material facts. That statement is required to include a response to each
numbered paragraph in the moving party's statement, including in the case of
any disagreement, "specific references to the affidavits, parts of the
record, and other supporting materials relied upon." The rule is very
clear that "all material facts set forth in the statement required of the
moving party will be deemed admitted unless controverted by the statement of
the opposing party." Local Rule 56.1(b)(3)(B).
2.)
That
the Default was filed Feb. 9, 2024 and methodically particularized all
documents filed with affidavits and never denied or objected to but the judges
mistook him as being a pushover simply because of their alleged skin color or
alleged homosexual fraternal liaisons.
In the matter of Raymond, 442 F. 3d at 606. (7th Cir. 2013) ) The Court,
nevertheless, is concerned and considers the prejudice to Plaintiff for
Plaintiff’s counsel’s failure, particularly because cases should be decided on
their merits. Certainly, the failure to file a response to a summary judgment
motion can be fatal. See, e.g., id at 611.
24.) The following events are transcribed from the Dec 13, 2024 where
ASA Yolanda never provided a court order
25.)
Joe Louis Lawrence: So I am. I’m respectfully objecting to the state
being involved because judged when Eileen Burke was a judge, she was involved
in this matter and denied..
26.)
Judge Forti: And at the moment, Sir, Sir, this is falling. I’m
telling you that you have filed a motion against a variety of parties,
including the assistant state’s attorney. You got him. You filed a motion for
default. Isn’t that, right?
27.)
Joe Louis Lawrence: That is correct. And I also filed a motion to go to a
different venue
28.)
Judge Forti: I am letting him Miss Simmons know that you filed this motion
for default. And I want to know what Miss Simmons’s position is now.
29.)
ASA: At this time, I have received some emails on this
case. From Scannicchio Clerk as well as from our own internal policies on how
we handle with these cases. Your honor. I’m going to have to set this for brief
continuance and get more clarification from my supervised attorney about how we
handle these types of cases given the nature of what Mr. Lawrence has filed. So
what date?
30.)
Judge Forti: So what day?
31.)
ASA: I want to say this for January 30th. I’m sorry.
January 3rd.
32.)
Judge Forti: is that work, Mr. Lawrence?
33.)
Joe Louis Lawrence: It’s fine.
34.)
ASA: Can you come back here at noon?
35.)
Joe Louis Lawrence: Back to zoom?
36.)
ASA: Yes.
37.)
Joe Yes
38.)
Judge Forti: And the issue is where it where you’re get your getting Miss
Simmons is seeking the continuance with respect to the fact that you re noticed
your motion for default
39.)
Joe Louis Lawrence: And for the Cook County Judiciary to
be recused as well.
40.)
Judge Forti: That I cannot do.
41.)
Joe Louis Lawrence: And we still have Maritza Martinez motion that have not been
addressed that I paid to $75 for
42.)
Judge Forti: You need to go back to Miss Judge Martinez I can only
handle because I have not recused myself and your effort to get me recused by
virtue of the SOJ was denied. So I am. Keeping this case until at least we see
what Miss Simmons says on the motion for default anything relating to Judge
Romanek or Judge Martinez you have to raise in those courtrooms all right. So
Miss Simmons, what do you have Mr. Lawrence’s contact information?
43.) That ASA Yolanda Simmons never presented any documents
impeaching the veracity of any Respondents pleadings but made irrelevant
statements in the court and violated the sections of the Illinois Rules of
Professional Conduct, RPC 3.3…
. Enforcement of a Void Judgment
The
May 8, 1996, court order, which has been used to enforce child support
obligations against me and, is void ab initio due to the existence of an
unvacated prior order dated May 18, 1988. The enforcement of a void judgment
violates due process rights, that the original order (1988) superseded everything
else.
- “A void judgment is one which,
from its inception, is a complete nullity and without legal effect.”
— People v. Wade, 116 Ill. 2d 1, 506 N.E.2d 954 (1987)
- “A judgment is void if it
violated due process.”
— Johnson v. Zerbst, 304 U.S. 458 (1938)
2. Falsification of Court Records
There
is evidence suggesting that Assistant State’s Attorneys and others, along with
CTA General Attorney, participated in altering official records to misrepresent
Tycee’s age, thereby falsely establishing minor status to justify child support
enforcement, The
State’s Attorney and others are accused of backdating or altering a birthdate
to make someone a minor again, likely to continue child support obligations
past their lawful limit are egregious within the laws itself and demonstrates
serious criminal allegations being covered up.
- “Fraud upon the court… vitiates
the entire proceeding.”
— People v. Sterling, 357 Ill. 354, 192 N.E. 229 (1934)
- “Fraud upon the court is fraud
which is directed to the judicial machinery itself.”
— Bulloch v. United States, 763 F.2d 1115, 1121 (10th Cir. 1985)
Such
actions, not only undermine the judicial process but may also constitute
criminal offenses under:
- 720 ILCS 5/17-3 – Forgery
- 720 ILCS 5/33-3 – Official
Misconduct
3.
Unlawful Arrest and Retaliation
In
1994, a former CTA attorney in the workman’s compensation division Judge issued
a warrant leading to my arrest and the removal of my CTA badge while I was
handcuffed. This action appears to have been retaliatory, stemming from my
prior complaints against systemic racism and injustice at the CTA for not
paying any workman’s compensation while off work injured on duty ( a drunk
police officer totaled his van on my rear bumper while standing still on a CTA
bus)
Police
Officer levied a false allegation complaint where an Order of Protection was
never served on me and had no knowledge of but was arrested and Remanded into
custody.
- “A person has a constitutional
right to be free from arrest unless probable cause exists.”
— Beck v. Ohio, 379 U.S. 89 (1964)
- “Retaliation for the exercise
of constitutional rights is actionable under § 1983.”
— Mt. Healthy City Sch. Dist. Bd. of Educ. v. Doyle, 429 U.S.
274 (1977)
If
the arrest was indeed retaliatory, it constitutes a violation of my First and
Fourth Amendment rights.
4.
Denial of Due Process
The
persistent handling of my case by certain judges, despite evident conflicts of
interest and potential biases, raises concerns about forum shopping and denial
of a fair trial. The
case is kept in front of certain judges to ensure a predetermined outcome due
to racial bias or corruption
- “A fair trial in a fair
tribunal is a basic requirement of due process.”
— In re Murchison, 349 U.S. 133 (1955)
- “Due process of law requires
that a party be accorded procedural fairness, i.e., given notice and an
opportunity to be heard.”
— Fiallo v. Lee, No. 1-04-0440 (Ill. App. Ct. 2005)
5.
Improper Enforcement and Financial Extortion
The
enforcement of the 1996 order, despite its void status, has led to unauthorized
wage garnishments and financial penalties, effectively amounting to extortion
under the guise of legal authority.
- “The knowing use of a void
judgment as a basis for legal enforcement can constitute fraud.”
— People ex rel. Brzica v. Village of Lake Barrington, 268 Ill.
App. 3d 420 (1994)
Such
actions may also violate federal statutes, including:
- 18 U.S.C. § 1341 – Frauds and
Swindles
- 18 U.S.C. § 242 – Deprivation
of Rights Under Color of Law
6.
Federal Implications and Need for Oversight
Given
the involvement of public officials and potential systemic misconduct, this
matter may fall under the purview of federal oversight agencies, including the
FBI and the U.S. Department of Justice.
Based
on the aforementioned, my Prayer for Relief respectfully requests:
- Immediate suspension of all
enforcement actions related to the May 8, 1996, order.
- Transfer My Summary Judgment,
Default Judgment & Motion to Recuse the Entire Cook County Judiciary
and Appoint a Special Prosecutor et al. to another venue free of Bias.
- Comprehensive investigation
into the alleged misconduct by the Illinois Judicial Inquiry Board and
other appropriate bodies who have ignored all my complaints
- Referral of this matter to
federal authorities for potential civil rights violations.
- Vacate all Court Orders that
Judge Forti unlawfully signed having Respondent Shemica Taylor’s kidnapped
daughter RETURNED BACK INTO HER CUSTODY INSTANTER.
Given
the involvement of public officials and potential systemic misconduct, this
matter may fall under the purview of federal oversight agencies, including the
FBI and the U.S. Department of Justice.
In addition to the above, My Prayer for Relief
respectfully requests:
- Immediate suspension of all
enforcement actions related to the May 8, 1996, order.
- Comprehensive investigation
into the alleged misconduct by the Illinois Judicial Inquiry Board and
other appropriate bodies.
- Referral of this matter to
federal authorities for potential civil rights violations.
- Rule to Show Cause against all
parties complicit in the Criminal Enterprise of Cook County with a Body
Attachment Instanter.
The
actions described herein represent not only personal grievances but also
potential systemic failures within our judicial system. Upholding the rule of
law and ensuring justice requires that such allegations be thoroughly
investigated and addressed.
1.) The United States Supreme Court recently acknowledged
the judicial corruption in Cook County, when it stated that Judge "Maloney
was one of many dishonest judges exposed and convicted through 'Operation
Greylord', a labyrinthine federal investigation of judicial corruption in
Chicago". Bracey v. Gramley, case No. 96-6133
(June 9, 1997).
Since judges who do not report the criminal activities of
other judges become principals in the criminal activity, 18 U.S.C. Section 2, 3
& 4, and since no judges have reported the criminal activity of the judges
who have been convicted, the other judges are as guilty as the convicted
judges.
Under Federal law which is
applicable to all states, the U.S. Supreme Court stated that if a court is
"without authority, its judgments and orders are regarded as nullities.
They are not voidable, but simply void; and form no bar to a recovery sought,
even prior to a reversal in opposition to them. They constitute no
justification; and all persons concerned in executing such judgments or
sentences, are considered, in law, as trespassers." Elliot
v. Piersol, 1 Pet. 328, 340, 26 U.S. 328, 340 (1828)
The Illinois Supreme Court held
that if a court "could not hear the matter upon the jurisdictional paper
presented, its finding that it had the power can add nothing to its authority,
- it, had no authority to make that finding." The People v.
Brewer, 128 Ill. 472, 483 (1928). The judges listed below had no
legal authority (jurisdiction) to hear or rule on certain matters before them.
They acted without any jurisdiction.
When judges act when they do not have jurisdiction to act, or they
enforce a void order (an order issued by a judge without jurisdiction), they
become trespassers of the law, and are engaged in treason.
44.) Pembaur
v. City of Cincinnati, 475 U.S. 469 (1986), is a United States Supreme Court case
that clarified a previous case, Monell v. Department of Social Services (1978),
and established that municipalities can be held liable even for a single
decision that is improperly made, State Agency colluded with a plethora of
other agencies violating the Ku Klux Klan Act of 1871 and Civil rights Act of
1866 and Mansell v Saunders (CA 5 F 1A)
372 F 2d.
Clerk
Coordinator Ebony:
8:55am: I need everyone good morning. Come on good morning, good morning, Emily
and good morning. Good morning, OK. I have a few announcements to make. The
first announcement is, if you are here for a state case or child support case,
where they told you to come on the call at 9:O5 your court call really starts
at 11:00 AM. So you can come back when the states attorneys are here at 11:00
AM to have your case heard. OK, so if you’re here on child support, any child
support expense related issue, or if the state’s attorney told you to come at
9O5 to check in, come. Back at 11:00 AM when the state’s attorney arrives to
have your case heard. But you guys are free to log off. Same information same
everything, Meeting ID password, just at 11:00 AM. Thank you all so much. Thank
you. No problem. Thank you. No problem. See you at 11. Thank you
ASA
Yolanda Simmons: Good
afternoon. This is assistant state attorney Yolanda Simmons. This is the child
support call for calendar 61. Judge Forti. I will call your name as I see it
listed on the screen. I will ask for a phone number to contact you at and I
will call you to have a conference with your case. Okay, alright. Umm, Mr.
Lawrence, please unmute yourself, Give me a number. I can reach you at.
31296565 31296564554 5
Respondent
Joe Louis Lawrence:
Yep.
ASA
Yolanda Simmons: Alright.
Thank you.
Judge
Forti: Ebony are you
there?
Clerk
Coordinator Eboni:
Yes judge, I am here are you ready to go to the last breakout room?
Judge
Forti: Yes. And let
me just while I peer momentarily, folks, are you all here on Carrera?
Fernandez,
Judge
Forti: I’m finishing
up a prove up, and then I’ll be able to deal with you all. I see Mr. Wasco is
here. Are the other parties here on Fernandez?
Attorney
Bridget Obyrne: Good
morning, your honor. I’m here on behalf of Efrain. I’m waiting for a partner in
my firm. And then I think we are waiting for Peter Olson on behalf of the other
party.
Judge
Forti All right,
ebony, when everyone is here for the 12:00 o’clock if you could put them in
another breakout room, because I think Yolanda will still have the main room.
Ebony: OK, awesome. No problem.
Judge
forti: So you’re
putting me into number three? Well, as the court reporter, and I believe Miss
Lillian is free to go. Isn’t she? Don’t we need to? We don’t need her for
number three.
Ebony: No, I already explained to them.
No, I already explained to room 4 what they needed to do. So they’re good to
go.
Judge Forti: what’s next Yolanda?
ASA
Yolanda Simmons:
Alright, Thank you. OK, you have, we have Mr. Lawrence, your honor. This is
Lawrence versus Hightower. Now, this is a old case
Judge
Forti: Now we had
this case for many, many times.
ASA
Yolanda Simmons:
Yes. Now your honor, Mr. Lawrence’s initial pleading was on the state provided
case. He was trying to zero out the arrears. And that motion was ultimately
denied. And that resulted in Mr. Lawrence filing motions trying to have
yourself and other judges removed for prejudice and other issues. Your honor.
And that’s why I’m here today. So technically his motions are here before the
court currently before the court on non-State
issues, but they originated from a state case.
Respondent
Joe Louis Lawrence: But
I think the….
Judge
Forti: Mr. Lawrence
you’ve got dates separate in a part from this. Your SOJ’s have not been looked
upon favorably. So I’m not sure what’s up to day. Miss Simmons, I don’t want to
hear anything other than a state matter today.
Respondent
Joe Louis Lawrence: The
default, your honor, this is what this matter is about, your honor. A re notice
for the default and a re notice to recuse the entire Cook County Judiciary.
Judge
Forti and that , you
know what, Sir I’m going to recuse myself like others but I’m going to apprise
Judge Scannicchio of this, because you cannot recuse the entire. Domestic
relations division.
Respondent
Joe Louis Lawrence:
Your honor This is a 40-year-old case…..
Judge
Forti: That’s all
I’m saying at this point. Because I’m going to recuse myself and I don’t have
the time today to go into this. So this may be something, Mr. Lawrence that
ultimately, as I said, I’m going to bring it up with Judge Scannicchio, so Ms.
Simmons, this is off my call right now.
ASA
Yolanda Simmons: All
right will do your honor.
Judge
Forti Sorry, Mr.
Lawrence. What else is up?
Finished at
12:36pm
Certain
Judges in Cook County are preferring Zoom and Break out rooms to conceal their
corrupt activities “FIXING” cases in Cook County.
Pursuant to 735 ILCS 5/2-612 Counsel never
Objected to the sufficiency of Petitioners pleadings, Objections to sufficiency
of pleadings either in form or substance must be made In trial court, and if
not so made, they will be considered waived and cannot be raised for the first
time on appeal. People ex rel. Deynes v. Harris, App. 1948, 77 N.E.
2d 439, 333 Ill. App. 280.
This case is
originally over Sept. 17, 1987 by former States Attorney Richard J. Daley, the
only Irish person who followed the laws and respected the Respondent and his
Attorney Robert A. Egan but was illegally bought back without Respondents
knowledge and was Defaulted May 18, 1988 and never vacated, but this has been
admitted to via Summary Judgment and is being ignored as so many are trying to
continuously cover this matter up even after Defaulting.
AFFIDAVIT
I Joe Louis Lawrence, Counsel Pro Se being duly sworn on oath
states the aforementioned pleadings enumerated within said motion pursuant to
735 1265 5/1-109, the undersigned certifies that the statements set forth in
this instrument are true and correct, except as to matters therein stated
to be on information and belief and as to such matters, the undersigned
certifies as aforesaid that he verily believes the same to be true.
Respectfully
Submitted
Notary
____________________
Joe Louis Lawrence
Counsel Pro Se
NOTICE OF
I Joe Louis Lawrence, Counsel Pro Se Defendant,
certify that I have on this day deposited said Notice of Motion to Vacate et
al. to all parties recorded in said Notice via regular/electronic delivery.
Hon Judicial Council of the Seventh
Circuit
Governor JB Pritzker gov.casework@illinois.gov
To: Hon Michael A. Forti
CCC.DomRelCR3004@cookcountyil.gov
Hon. Iris Y. Chavira CCC.DomRelCRCL12@cookcountyil.gov
Hon. Andrea Webber CCC.DomRelCRCL06@cookcountyil.gov
Hon Maritza Martinez CCC.DomRelCR3006@cookcountyil.gov
Hon Abbey
Romanek CCC.DomRelCR3008@cookcountyil.gov
sao.csed@cookcountyil.gov Yolanda.simmons@cookcountysao.org
Cook County State’s Attorney Chief Judge Timothy C. Evans
Eilene
O’Neil Burke timothy.evans@cookcountyil.gov
statesattorney@cookcountyil.gov
Susan Mendoza Amanda.prentice@illinoiscomptroller.gov
Cook County Sheriff’s
Tom Dart
email CCSO@ccsheriff.org
The Crusader Newspaper Group
Managing Editor Sharon Fountain
State Police isp.contact@illinois.gov
Illinois State Police
Chicago Police Superintendent, 3510 S. Michigan Ave,
Chicago Ill. 60653
Email CLEARPATH@chicagopolice.org
Dir. FBI,
Hon
Mayor Brandon
Special Agent in
Charge (FBI) City Hall 7th floor
Chicago, IL. 60601
2111 West Roosevelt Road
Chicago, Il 60608
Illinois
Courts Commission
555 West
Monroe, 15th floor
Chicago Ill.
60661
info@IllinoisCourtsCommission.gov
Illinois Court
Commission Members
Justice P.
Scott Neville, Jr. Chairman
Justice Thomas
M. Harris
Justice
Margaret Stanton McBride
Judge Lewis
Nixon
Judge Sheldon
Sobol
Judge Aurora
Abella-Austriaco
Madam Paula
Wolf
Potestivo & Ass., PC
Bryan G. Thompson, Poulami Mal pmal@potestivolaw.com
press@cookcountyil.gov bthompson@potestivolaw.com
ilrb.filing@illinois.gov,
alexandrina.shrove@ilag.gov,
oig.referrals@illinois.gov
rwillis@laboradvocates.com,
jodi.mar@illinois.gov,
helen.j.kim@illinois.gov,
lashonda.channel@illinois.gov,
brianna.klein@illinois.gov,
kimberly.stevens@illinois.gov,
anna.hamburg-gal@illinois.gov,
khill@atu241chicago.org,
frogishtwo65@gmail.com,
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
The undersigned hereby
certifies that the above notice and all attachments were caused to be emailed
to the above parties at the addresses provided before 5:00 pm on May 23, 2025 .
________________________
Respectfully Submitted,
Counsel Pro Se
Joe Louis Lawrenc
No comments:
Post a Comment