MAJOR CORRUPTION SCANDAL IN THE STATES ATTORNEYS' OFFICE UNDER KIM FOXX ON NOVEMBER 14, 2023, ON THE 9:30AM CALL, I APPEARED BEFORE THE HONORABLE JUDGE CHIVIRA, A CAUCASIAN ASSISTANT STATES ATTORNEY TOLD THE JUDGE THAT THEY WERE NOT SERVED NOR WAS SHE THE ASSIGNED TO THIS CASE AND HAVE TO READ THROUGH THE FILE TO DETERMINE, THE STATES ATTORNEYS' INVOLVEMENT.
I BRIEFLY INTERJECTED AND SUGGESTED, THAT YOUR HONOR SET UP A BRIEFING SCHEDULE, THE WOMAN STATES ATTORNEY IMMEDIATELY OBJECTED! WHICH WAS KIND OF HILARIOUS TO ME BECAUSE SHE JUST TOLD THE JUDGE, THAT SHE NOTHING ABOUT THE CASE BUT OBJECTED, SHE STATED THAT SHE WAS NOT THE PERSON ASSIGNED TO THE CASE SO WHAT DIFFERENCE DID IT MAKE IF THE JUDGE GRANTED MY REQUEST?
IT IS MY OPINION THAT THE ASSISTANT STATES ATTORNEY WAS TRYING TO PROTECT ALL OF THE RACIST PARTIES COMPLICIT IN EVERY EGREGIOUS ACT CAPTURED ON PAPER---THE WOMAN WAS LUCKY BECAUSE I WAS OUT OF MY ELEMENT IN A PARKING LOT TOOK MY MOM TO THE DOCTOR AND NEVER DID ZOOM BEFORE HAD TO CALL MY SON TO THE PARKING LOT TO HELP ME HEAR WHAT WAS GOING ON.
THE JUDGE WAS AN EXCELLENT PROFESSIONAL WHO QUESTIONED MY OBJECTIVE AND RREQUESTED THAT, I RENOTICE THE PETITION AND PROVIDE THE STATES ATTORNEY A COPY OF THE SAME MOTION ONLY TO ANOTHER EMAIL NUMBER EVEN THOUGH, I EXPLAINED TO HER THAT IT WAS EMAILED TO THE STATES ATTORNEY, SO THE WHITE ASSISTANT SAID SHE CHATTED IT TO ME WHICH PISSED ME THE FUCK OFF BECAUSE, I AM ON THE INTERNET ZOOM LOOKING AT HER, I DIDN'T UNDERSTAND HER TRYING TO CHAT BUT LEARNED IT WAS A FEATURE FROM ZOOM, THAT WAS ON MY PHONE.
FRANCOISE NEVER APPEARED ON ZOOM, I WONDER WHY NOT? SHE RECRUITED EVERY RACIST KU KLUX KLAN ACTING PARTIES AND INFERIOR SLAVE MINDED NEGROS TO HELP HER TRY AND EXTORT MY MONIES FROM EVERY EMPLOYER IN THIS CITY, SHE REALLY FUCKED UP MESSING WITH THE GREEKS AT ALPHA BAKING, THEY TOLD ME, BACK THEN I WAS UP AGAINST SOME SHIT AND THEY WAS NOT GIVING THE STATES ATTORNEY SHIT ABOUT ME, I DIDN'T REALLY UNDERSTAND WHAT THEY WERE TALKING ABOUT BECAUSE, I WAS DEALING WITH SOME SERIOUS RACIAL SHIT WORKING AT THE BREAD COMPANIES.
WHILE OFF WORK AT WONDER BREAD WITH A WORK-RELATED INJURY WHERE, I TORE MY ROTATOR CUFF FALLING OFF THE TRUCK, I NEVER EVER RECEIVED A WORKMAN'S COMPENSATION CHECK SOMEBODY ELSE COLLECTED MY MONEY BUT PUBLIC AID AND THE TEAMSTERS UNION PAID MY MEDICAL AND I RECEIVED FOOD STAMPS AND CASH EVERY MONTH----NEVER A WORKMANS COMPENSATION CHECK-- IT IS A FACT BLACK PEOPLE DO NOT RECEIVE WORKMAN'S COMPENSATION IN A EQUAL MANNER AS WHITE PEOPLE MANY ARE FORCED ON PUBLIC AID OR SOCIAL SECURITY DEPENDING ON THEIR AGE OR DISABILITY
I HAVE BEEN LOCKED UP 5 TIMES FOR ALLEGEDLY OWING CHILD SUPPORT, I HAVE HAD MANY TO TELL ME THAT, I WAS NEVER LOCKED UP AND WAS SENT TO A PSYCHIATRY FROM A REFERRAL FROM ERICA EUGENE OF PUBLIC AID BECAUSE THEY HAD NO KNOWLEDGE OF ANY CHILD SUPPORT ORDERS IN THEIR DATA SYSTEM BUT FELT THAT, I WAS EXPERIENCING SOME TYPE OF MENTAL ILLNESS.
FRANCOISE LOUISE BARBARA HIGHTOWER-BELMER AS A POLICE OFFICER USED HER BADGE AND POLITICAL INFLUENCE TO RUIN MY LIFE AND THE LIVES OF SO MANY ONLY GOD KNOWS THE LIVES OF SO MANY PEOPLE SHE HAS DESTROYED AND IS BEST DESCRIBED AS A MONSTER.
I THANK THAT CAUCASIAN ASSISTANT STATES ATTORNEY ALLEGEDLY LYING TO THE JUDGE SAYING THAT SHE DIDN'T KNOW ABOUT THE HIGHTOWER V LAWRENCE CASE BECAUSE, I WAS ABLE TO LOCATE DOCUMENTS SHOWING THAT THE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC AID REPRESENTING FRANCOISE THE POLICE OFFICER WITH HER 21 YEAR OLD DAUGHTER AND THOMAS KANTAS WAS A TOP DOG STATES ATTORNEY WHO ILLEGALLY HAD A NUMBER OF ASSISTANT STATES ATTORNEYS FALSIFYING A LOT OF DOCUMENTS; WHEREBY, HAVING ME LOCKED UP UNLAWFULLY WHERE JUDGE HARACZ HAD ME USING MY PUBLIC AID MONEY TO PAY CHILD SUPPORT, HE TOLD ME THAT, BIOLOGICALLY, I WAS NOT THE CHILDS FATHER, HE WAS JUST A BILL COLLECTTOR AND HAD TO GET MONEY FROM ME SOME TYPE OF WAY. WHAT THE FUCK!!!
I HAD THE PLEASURE OF TALKING TO A FULL-TIME JOURNALIST BUT HE HAD 6 CASES IN FRONT OF ME AND WANTED TO DO MY STORY BUT IS KINDA TIED UP.
I NEED A SCHOOL OR INNOCENCE PROJECT WITH ATTORNEYS WHO DON'T MIND WORKING PRO BONO TO HELP ME TO HELP MYSELF AS WE HELP OTHERS
I HAD WHITE JUDGES TO TELL ME WHAT, I WAS ASSERTING IN MY DOCUMENTS WERE IN FACT TRUE, BUT I WAS SUPPOSED TO HAVE A SPONSOR SAYING THESE THINGS IT WAS MY UNDERSTANDING ONLY A WHITE MAN WAS ALLOWED TO CRITICIZE OR ADMONISH ANOTHER CAUCASIAN BUT THEY TOLD ME THAT, I WOULD BE THE ONE WHO COULD POSSIBLY CHANGE THAT, THEY EXPLAINED THAT IS HOW IT IS UP HERE.
SO ON CASE Case # 10 CH 23588 JOE LOUIS LAWRENCE V SECRETARY OF STATE, JESSE WHITE ET AL. THE STATE WAS TRYIN TO SUSPEND MY DRIVERS LICENSE ON THIS BOGUS PATERNITTY CASE AND TYLER ROLAND WAS THE ASSISTANT ATTORNEY GENERAL, JUDGE MIKVA REFERRED ME TO A JEWISH LAW GROUP OF ATTORNEYS AND A SMOOTH VERY INTELLIGENT JEWISH PERSON SAT ME DOWN REVIEWED MY CASE AND ASKED ME WHAT IS IT WE ARE SUPPOSED TO DO FOR YOU THAT YOU HAVE ALREADY LAID OUT SO ELOQUENTLY IN YOUR PLEADINGS? THEY ASKED IF I WAS AN ATTORNEY OR IN LAW SCHOOL BECAUSE WHAT YOU ARE SAYING HERE FROM WHAT, I CAN SEE IS CLEAR AND WELL PLEAD.
I EXPLAINED TO HIM THAT, BECAUSE OF MY SKIN COLOR THEY WANT A WHITE MAN TO SAY THESE ISSUES AND NOT ME, HE SAID THAT IS SOME BULLSHIT AND PEOPLE ARE GOING TO HAVE TO WAKE UP WE ARE NOT LIVING IN THOSE TIMES ANYMORE, HE SAID THE PROBLEM HERE IN YOUR CASE YOU ARE DEALING WITH "WHITE TRASH" AND THEY ARE ALL IN-CITY HALL, MY REPLY WHO IS THAT HILLBILLYS? HE SAID NO IF YOU WERE IN FRONT THEM YOU WOULD HAVE A BETTER CHANCE SPEAKING THAN THESE OTHER FOLKS, HE SAID THERE ARE WHITE PEOPLE WHO DON'T WANT TO DEAL WITH THOSE TYPE OF WHITE PEOPLE AND NOT ALL WHITE PEOPLE ARE THE SAME AS YOU CAN SEE AND I SAID NOT ALL BLACKS WILL HELP AS WELL AND HE AGREED.
HE TOLD ME TO GO BACK AND TELL THE JUDGE THAT THE LAW FIRM CAN NOT BE OF ANY ASSISTANCE AND SHE IS GOING TO HAVE TO LISTEN TO YOU BECAUSE YOU ARE VERY INTELLIGENT AND HAS PRESENTED YOUR CASE BETTER THAN MANY LICENSED ATTORNEYS HE HAS SEEN.
I REPORTED BACK BEFORE JUDGE MIKVA AND THE ASSISTANT ATTORNEY GENERAL NEVER PRODUCED A COURT ORDER EVER SHOWING, I OWED CHILD SUPPORT AND RULED IN MY FAVOR AND TOLD ME THAT, I HAD A GIFT WITH THE LAW, IN THAT, I TELL A STORY USING THE LAWS.
SHE WAS SHOCKED AT HOW, I REPEATED EVERYTHING THE ATTORNEY SAID NEVER IDENTIFYING THEM AND TO THIS DAY MY CDL LICENSE WAS NEVER EVER SUSPENDED.
I AM CAPABLE OF DEFENDING MYSELF DEALING WITH WHITE OR BLACK TRASH.
SEE HOW A POLICE OFFICER WILLIAM J. HIGHTOWER (DECEASED) IMPREGNATED HIS DAUGHTERS COVERED IT UP UNDER THE ERA OFF JOHN BURGE WHO TORTURED AND SENT A LOT OF INNOCENT BLACK MEN TO JAIL
IN THIS CASE THE STATES ATTORNEY HAD ASSISTANT STATES ATTORNEYS WHO FACILITATED THEIR UNLAWFUL AUTHORIITY IN CONSPIRING WITH A COOK COUNTY JUDGE WHO WAS BLACK AND AN IRISH POLITICALLY CONNECTED ATTORNEY AS MANY OF THEM ENGAGED IN KU KLUX KLAN ACTS MALISCIOUSLY FRAMED AN INNOCENT MAN IN AN INCESTUOUS SCANDAL OF IMPREGNATING HIS SECOND BIOLOGICAL DAUGHTER.
FRANCOISE LOUISE BARBARA HIGHTOWER-BELMER AS AN ACTIVE POLICE OFFICER BECAME COMPLICIT USED HER BADGE AND FATHERS INFLUENCE TO RECRUIT ALL OF THE RACIST JUDGES BECAUSE HER MOTHER WAS A CAUCASIAN WOMAN SO THIS WAS THE JUDGES OPPORTUNITY TO EXERCISE THEIR TRUE KLAN HATRED WEARING THEIR ROBES MAKING THIS AN UPDATED LYNCHING VERSION OF AN EMMITT TILL.
EVERY BLACK DEMOCRAT IN PRESENT AUTHORITY WHO RECEIVED THIS INFORMATION IGNORED IT AS IF I WAS A NOBODY EVEN MAYOR BRANDON WHO DID THE SAME THING LORI LIGHTFOOT DID, IT WAS MY OPINION, I FELT BECAUSE OF MY HETEROSEXUAL DISPOSITION NONE OF THEM WOMEN SEEMS TO SPEAK UP ON MEN LIKE MY SELF AS FOR MAYOR JOHNSON, I THOUGHT HIM BEING A BLACK MAN, HE WOULD UNDERSTAND THE PLIGHT AND INJUSTICES OF WHAT BLACK MEN HAVE TO ENDURE UNJUSTLY AND RACIALLY BECAUSE OF OUR SKIN COLOR.
BUT HE SEEMS SO PREOCCUPIED WITH MIGRANTS WHAT I'M EXPERIENCING OR ANY OTHER CITIZEN IN THIS CITY IS DEFINITELY OF NO CONCERN.
IT IS A FACT!!! BLACK DEMOCRATS ONCE THEY ARE ELECTED OR APPOINTED, THEY FORGET HOW THEY GOT THEIR POSITIONS AND MANY SEEMS TO FORGET THEIR SKIN COLOR.
APARTHEID CONDITIONS WITHIN THE LEGAL SYSTEM IS EXASCERBATED BECAUSE OF SO MANY INFERIOR HATEFUL BLACKS AND STILL THE ANTIQUATED ANGLO-SAXONS WHO STILL DO NOT SEE PEOPLE OF COLOR AS VIABLE CITIZENS ONLY MIGRANTS WHO CAN'T VOTE OR PUT ANY POLITICIAN IN ANY OFFICE BUT, THESE SAME DEMOCRATS WHO DON'T RESPECT US AS CITIZENS EXPECT PEOPLE TO COME OUT AND VOTE FOR THEM WHEN THEY DON'T GIVE A SHIT ABOUT OUR CIVIL RIGHTS.
I WANT SOMEBODY ANYBODY TO POINT OUT ONE REPUBLICAN WHO HAVE FUCKED OVER ME AND MY CIVIL RIGHTS ALL OF THESE YEARS AND WHEN YOU GET THROUGH LOOKING, I WANT YOU TO COUNT EVERY PERSON INVOLVED AND ASK YOURSELF WHY DID YOU VOTE ?
MANY ARE GOING TO SEE BLACK DEMOCRATS ARE ONLY FIGUREHEADS IN THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY MANY ARE AN EXTENSION TO THE RACIST HATEFUL MEN OR WOMEN THEY HAVE REPLACED AND THE SAD REALITY NONE OF THEM HAVE THE INDEPENDENT MENTAL AUTHORITY TO ADDRESS THESE DRACONIAN CIVIL RIGHTS VIOLATIONS OUT OF FEAR, THEY MAY OFFEND THEIR SPONSORS OR POLITICAL MASTERS.
THE REAL QUESTION IS THIS HOW MANY INNOCENT MEN OR WOMEN HAVE BEEN WRONGFULLY ARRESTED OR SENT TO PRISON BECAUSE OF FRANCOISE'S CORRUPT DIRTY INVOLVEMENT WITH ROGUE ASSISTANT STATES ATTORNEYS?
SHE STOLE MY STIMULUS CHECK IN THIS RACIST EXTORTION SCHEME AND EVERYBODY IN THE CHILD SUPPORT DIVISION KNOWS, I NEVER OWED ANY CHILD SUPPORT BUT BECAUSE OF MY SKIN COLOR AND SO MANY SELF-HATED BLACKS WHO HAVE NO REAL AUTHORITY KEPT THEIR HEADS DOWN AND MOUTHS SHUT.
WHO IS GOING TO HELP ME? O LORD MY GOD IS THERE ANY HELP FOR THIS W'S SON?
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK
COUNTY ILLINOIS
DOMESTIC RELATIONS DIVISION
IN RE
)
)
Francoise Hightower ) Judge Iris Y. Chivira
Petitioner
)
) Cal 41
VS
)
) No. 88 D 079012
Joe Louis Lawrence )
Respondent
) Room CL 12
Per Court Order RE NOTICE OF
PETITION TO ZERO
OUT CHILD SUPPORT DUE TO ASSISTANT STATES ATTORNEYS PROSECUTORIAL MISCONDUCT AS
HE ILLEGALLY ACTED AS AN ENFORCEMENT OFFICIAL FOR PUBLIC AID ON BEHALF OF
POLICE OFFICER FRANCOISE L. B. HIGHTOWER-BELMER, INDUCED RELIANCE ON JUDGES
FRAUDULENTLY TO REMAND RESPONDENT INTO CUSTODY 5 TIMES FOR ALLEGEDLY OWING
CHILD SUPPORT ON A CASE DISMISSED SEPT 17, 1987 AND JUDGE ENTERED A FINAL JUDGMENT
DEFAULT MAY 18, 1988 ON DEFECTIVE SERVICE NEVER VACATED AND NEVER ORDERED
RESPONDENT TO PAY CHILD SUPPORT MAKING ANY AND ALL ORDERS AFTER THE ABOVE DATE
VOID.
Please be advised that on Nov. 15,
2023 Defendant has filed before this Circuit Court, Re Notice Petition to Zero
Out Child Support et al; and will present said legally sufficient instrument
before Judge Chivira Nov. , at 9:30 am via Zoom.
Hon. Iris Y.
Chivira CCC.DomRelCRCL12@cookcountyil.gov
Francoise
L.B. Hightower-Belmer received Priority mail 9505-5156-4056-3301-7893-63 2:52pm
Oct. 28, 2023 via 1152 West 102nd Street Chg. Il. 60643-2353
Per Court Order: sao.csed@cookcountyil.gov
instead of States Attorney statesattorney@cookcountyil.gov who
received it electronically 11/2/23 at 11:30am
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
The undersigned hereby
certifies that the above notice and all attachments were caused to be
personally delivered, to the above parties at the addresses provided before
5:00 pm .
Zoom Link Court date November 28, 2023 at 9:30 am
Meeting ID: 84376080114
Password: 086627
Dial In Number: 312-626-6799
________________________
Respectfully Submitted, Counsel Pro Se
Joe Louis Lawrence
PLEASE BE ADVISED that on Nov. 15, 2023 said RE Notice of Motion
was hereby filed with the Petition to Zero Out Child Support et al. with the
attachments and emailed to all parties recorded in said notice via electronic
service along with the requested documents per court directive showing that the
States Attorney was in fact the last attorney of record
Former CCSA Thomas Kantas was the point person in the
hierarchy of the States Attorney’s office who had Carolyn Kennedy, Amy Bernard
and Brian Volkman representing Police Officer Francoise Hightower when her
daughter was 21 years old receiving numerous unlawful court orders, whereby;
Defendant had been REMANDED into CUSTODY 5 times for ALLEGEDLY OWING CHILD
SUPPORT, see the Notice of Petition filed Nov 1, 2005 and all related
documents demonstrating the States Attorneys representing Police Officer
Francoise Louise Barbara Hightower-Belmer (totaling 17 pages).
September 21, 2023, the
Supreme Court of Illinois entered an order striking Thomas Alexander Kantas’s
name from the roll of attorneys licensed to practice law in Illinois amid
allegations of fraud and deception. Posted by AlabNews Staff
Writer | Oct 24, 2023 | News, Illinois, State Level
_________________________________
Joe Louis Lawrence, Counsel Pro Se
Name Joe
Louis Lawrence
Attorney for Pro Se
Address
City, State
Phone
(312) 965-6455
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY ILLINOIS
DOMESTIC RELATIONS DIVISION
IN RE )
)
Francoise Hightower )
Judge Iris Y. Chivira
Petitioner
)
) Cal 41
VS )
) No. 88 D 079012
Joe Louis Lawrence )
Respondent
) Room CL 12
PETITION TO ZERO OUT CHILD SUPPORT
DUE TO ASSISTANT STATES ATTORNEYS PROSECUTORIAL MISCONDUCT AS HE ILLEGALLY
ACTED AS AN ENFORCEMENT OFFICIAL FOR PUBLIC AID ON BEHALF OF POLICE OFFICER
FRANCOISE L. B. HIGHTOWER-BELMER, INDUCED RELIANCE ON JUDGES FRAUDULENTLY TO
REMAND RESPONDENT INTO CUSTODY 5 TIMES FOR ALLEGEDLY OWING CHILD SUPPORT ON A
CASE DISMISSED SEPT 17, 1987 AND JUDGE ENTERED A FINAL JUDGMENT DEFAULT MAY 18,
1988 ON DEFECTIVE SERVICE NEVER VACATED AND NEVER ORDERED RESPONDENT TO PAY
CHILD SUPPORT MAKING ANY AND ALL ORDERS AFTER THE ABOVE DATE VOID.
Petitions seeking relief from judgment on voidness grounds need
not be brought within two years, and the allegation that the judgment or order
is void substitutes for and negates the need to allege a meritorious defense
and due diligence. S.H.A. 735 ILCS 5/2–1401, 5/2–1401(c, f), Sarkissian v.
Chicago Bd. of Educ., 201 Ill.2d 95 (2002)776 N.E.2d 195, 267 Ill. Dec. 58,
170 Ed. Law Rep. 327.
A- because the court itself was
defrauded or because the misconduct was perpetrated by officers of the court. Alexander
v. Robertson, 882, F. 2d 421,424 (9th Cir. 1989);
B- A
void judgment does not create any binding obligation. Kalb v. Feuerstein
(1940) 308 US 433, 60 S Ct 343, 84 L, Ed 370.
That
under 18 U.S.C. 242 and 42 U.S.C. 1985 (3) (b). A judge does not have
the discretion on whether or not to follow Supreme Ct. Rules, but a duty to
follow. People v. Gersh, 135 Ill. 2d 384 (1990).
1. That Respondent has been unlawfully Remanded 5 times
into custody for allegedly owing child support on a case that was Dismissed and
certain Cook County Clerks DELETED the CERTIFIED COPY of August 3, 1988,
COURT ORDER, hereto attached.
2. That on August 31, 2023, Child Support Specialist
called the Respondent, hereto attached Ex 1 email attachment and letter
of communication authenticating said communication where she stated that they
received a referral from Springfield to zero the Respondent out of child
support,
A-
Respondent never ever owed Child Support but because
former Assistant States Attorney used the jurisdiction of the States Attorney
to aid and assist Francoise L. B. Hightower a Police Officer presently
allegedly at Olive Harvey College to EXTORT monies from the Respondent in the
guise of child support, that because of the unlawful enforcement of said
Assistant States Attorney caused a conclave of Inducement of Fraud harming the
Respondent in an assortment of ways violating his Civil Rights, INDUCING RELIANCE on all judges
causing Respondent to be Remanded 5 times for allegedly owing child support to
a Police Officer who knowingly conceived her biological fathers child.
3.
Pursuant
to Page 9, Par 18, Page 8 Line1-2, Judge Rivers seemed to
have been in receipt of documents only he and Francoise were cognizant of he
asked her, “Did you also file answer interrogatories, which were sworn to
under oath by you, on April 4, 1986”?
Francoise Line 3, “Yes,
I did”.
Judge Rivers Lines 4-6,
“And that indicated, exactly, the time you lived with Mr. Hightower and had
intercourse with him, is that correct”?
Francoise Line 7, “Yes,
it did”.
A-
B-
To
prevail in a cause of action for fraud, plaintiff must prove that defendant
made statement of material nature which was relied on by victim and was made
for purposes of inducing reliance, and that victim’s reliance led to his
injury. Parsons
V. Winter, 1986, 1 Dist., 491 N.E. 2d 1236, 96 ILL Dec. 776, 142 ILL App 3d
354, Appeal Denied. In Carter V. Mueller 457 N.E. 2d 1335 ILL. App. 1 Dist. 1983 The Supreme Court has held that:
“The elements of a cause of action for fraudulent misrepresentation (sometimes
referred to as “fraud and deceit” or deceit) are: (1) False statement of
material fact; (2) known or believed to be false by the party making it; (3)
intent to induce the other party to act; (4) action by the other party in
reliance on the truth of the statement; and (5) damage to the other party
resulting from such reliance.
C-
The State never ever provided the Respondent any
documentation verifying he owed child support and Child Support Specialists
have all concurred that they can only communicate or provide any documents via
a Judge’s authority.
D-
Respondent have never been served and never been under
the jurisdiction of the court on the filing of this matter nor have there been
any paternity tests but was methodically framed to protect the real pedophile
of the Chicago Police Department as he was allowed to leave the Chicago Police
Department in 1988 and transferred to Dade City Police force in Florida where
he succumbed to a heart attack while on duty, but had 29 years of service in
Chicago.
E-
That allegedly Francoise’s Police connections or
Political cronies are trying to Bully or influence certain parties to continue
to falsify or delete whatever documents necessary to continue this diabolical
fraudulent extortion scheme.
4. Respondent reported to 36 South Wabash and provided
the following Feb. 8, 1988, May 2, 1988, May 18, 1988, court transcripts;
Affidavit of false service of Feb 23, 1988, May 18, 1988 Court Order Certified
along with the Aug. 3, 1988 Court Order DELETED from the database.
That on Oct. 19, 2023, called from 312 793-2526 (CHICGOZN01 IL) 7 mins 1 sec and stated, she was in receipt of all of the aforementioned documents but was unable to correct anything, she stated that she could not provide him any documents on what he owed but verbally stated he owed almost $50,000.00 and that a judge had to straighten this mess out and that he needed legal aid or a private attorney to handle this case because they were not allowed to correct anything which is the same similar conversation referenced in Par 2. The general rules pertaining to petitions for relief from judgment, that they must be filed within two years of the order or judgment, that the petitioner must allege a meritorious defense to the original action, and that the petitioner must show that the petition was brought with due diligence, do not apply when the petition for
No comments:
Post a Comment