THE REALITY IS THAT OFFICER ELLA FRENCH AND THE BABIES IN CHICAGO DID NOT HAVE TO DIE!
WHAT THE PUBLIC IS UNAWARE OF MANY JUDGES HAVE BEEN POLITICALLY APPOINTED OR ARE WHITE NATIONALISTS AND INSURRECTIONISTS AND ARE USING THEIR POSITIONS TO DESTROY ETHNIC INDIVIDUALS THEY DEEM BENEATH THEM AND BECAUSE OF THIS BEHAVIOR MAKES THEM "PRIVATE CITIZENS"
BLACK LIVES DON'T MATTER TO BLACK JUDGES AND MANY ANGLO SAXONS, THAT IS WHY THE FELONIES COMMITED BY SO MANY COLORED INDIVIDUALS ARE BEING RE RELEASED INTO SOCIETY, SO THAT THESE VERY COLORED RUFFIANS CAN CONTINUE TO UNLEASH MAYHEM ON SOCIETY CAUSING "MASS GENOCIDE" IN THE COLORED COMMUNITIES.
WHAT THE JUDGES FAIL TO REALIZE IS THAT BULLETS DON'T DISCRIMINATE ON IT'S INTENDED TARGETS SO WHILE MANY JUDGES ARE NOW "PRIVATE CITIZENS" VIOLATING THEIR OATHS AND LAWS ON THE BENCH DEEM THEMSELVES UNTOUCHABLE AND IMMUNE IS THE MAIN PROBLEM CHICAGO IN NOT ONLY VIOLENT, BUT CORROBORARTES A VERACITY, THAT MANY JUDGES ARE USING THEIR POSITIONS TO INVOKE HATE BY CLAIMING IN MANY INSTANCES THEY HAVE NO JURISDICTION WHEN CONFRONTED WITH CLAIMS OF EVIDENCE PRESENTED BEFORE THEM IN ANY COURT.
BECAUSE SO MANY IN THE PUBLIC ARE IGNORANT AND DO NOT READ ANYTHING FOR THEMSELVES ASSUME WHATEVER THEY READ OR WHAT A POLITICIAN SAYS IS IN FACT GOSPEL.
POLICE CHIEF DAVID BROWN WAS MAN ENOUGH TO SPEAK UP AND CALL OUT THE COURTS FOR CONTINUOUSLY RE RELEASING VIOLENT OFFENDERS ONCE THEY WERE ARRESTED, BUT WHAT THE CHIEF DIDN'T REALIZE IS THAT BECAUSE OF THE COLOR OF HIS SKIN AND NOT QUALIFICATIONS OF HIS AUTHORITY IT IS NOT FULLY RECOGNIZED IN RACIST CHICAGO WITH ANGLO-SAXONS PULLING THE STRINGS WITH A HANDFUL OF COLOREDS THAT ARE SURBORDINATE TO THEIR AUTHORITY.
WHEN AN ANGLO-SAXON IS WRONG OR IS PERPETRATING INJUSTICE ON COLORED PEOPLE IN ANY CAPACITY NO COLORED PERSON IN CHICAGO IS SUPPOSED TO OPEN THEIR MOUTHS AND ADMONISH THEM, THEY ARE SUPPOSED TO BLAME ANOTHER COLORED PERSON OR HAVE A WHITE PERSON TO BLAME, THAT ANGLO-SAXON.
IT HAS GOTTEN SO BAD NOW ELDERLY SENIOR CITIZEN JEWS ARE NOW BEING TREATED AS COLORED PEOPLE IN RE DEAN SALLAS IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF AMELIA SALLAS CASE NUMBER 07- P-5360 A MARRIED COUPLE OF ABOUT 50 YEARS BUT HIS WIFE IS GUARDIAN OF THE STATE.
CHICAGO IS DEFINITELY NOT A PLACE FOR ANY COLORED PERSON OR JEWISH SENIORS WITH ANY TYPE OF MONEY BECAUSE THE CRIMINAL ENTERPRISE OF COOK COUNTY WILL FIND A WAY TO STEAL YOUR HOME DISGUISED AS A ILLEGAL FORECLOSURE, FRAME INNOCENT MEN TO EXTORT FUNDS FROM THEIR ACCOUNTS DISGUISED AS CHILD SUPPORT ETC.
THE FIRST THING INSURRECTIONISTS JUDGES CLAIM WHO ARE INVOLVED, THEY HAVE NO JURISDICTION OR JUDGES HAVE IMMUNITY WHICH IS NOT TRUE.
THE QUESTION IS HOW MANY MORE POLICE OFFICERS OR BABIES HAVE TO BE KILLED BEFORE JUDGES WHO ARE NOW DEEMED AS "PRIVATE CITIZENS" ARE QUESTIONED AND INVESTIGATED ?
I AM SURE THEIR ARE SOME GREAT JUDGES ON THE BENCHES OF ILLINOIS BIT NONE OF THEM ARE RECORDED IN THESE DOCUMENTS.
Thu, Aug 19 at 10:12 PMGreetings Professor Ken and Brother Lanre Amu:I am going to respond to this email with an emphatic response, First of all Brother Amu because of our skin color we will never receive Equal Protection of the Laws or treated just in Illinois as long as "Private Citizens" are in control because you are a licensed man of color who reported crimes of Anglo-Saxon judges committing acts of wrong doing against your clients got your licensed suspended.What you didn't know Bro Amu because of your skin color and being a member of the Illinois Bar you had to seek permission from an Anglo-Saxon for permission to open your mouth and levy any complaint on any white person in Chicago, Illinois many of the Blacks in power OMG! Especially Black Men EXCEPT CHIEF OF POLICE Hon David Brown, as a MAN of COLOR, he called out the problem dealing with the ongoing violence is the courts, he was absolutely CORRECT, the media and so many ignorant people are trying to blame him and other Policeman for the mayhem and chaotic violence in our streets.Because you men are not from this Plantation styled City many of the sorry Colored people with positions talk loud say BLACK LIVES MATTER, but they hate who they are and are the main persons contributing to the mayhem of what is going on in this city.The judges and attorneys are allegedly receiving the funds from the minuscule bonds that these diabolical criminals perpetrate their hateful acts upon, as long as Colored people are killing each other perpetrating GENOCIDE, acting as the FOOT SOLDIERS, for the judicial Terrorists acting as "Private Citizens" releasing criminals back into the streets after committing heinous crimes is another way of the the KU KLUX KLAN to use the laws unlawfully in allowing criminals to terrorize the City of Chicago in trying to make Hon David Brown, Police Chief and the Police to look incompetent trying to combat violence simply because of the color of his skin being a leader of color and not a PUSSY type of man trying to kiss somebodies Ass to be liked.The reality is that many of the Colored men in supposed authority are mere figureheads, their authority is limited to colored people, the Anglo-Saxons who control the coloreds in power knew you were going to be a problem so they had a colored man Charles Freeman, my late Prince Hall Lodge Brother to make sure that your law license was in fact suspended because YOU WERE TOO DAM SMART! and too outspoken, the Political Machine didn't want you and to be honest their were a lot of NIGGERS, who were hating on you as well because of your intellectual brilliance.What Chicago Political system is trying to tell you is that no matter how smart you may be or you think you are, YOU ARE STILL A NIGGER and is showing you, you will never practice law in Illinois and they have thus far proved their point.I am presenting this document in two parts to simplify this for everyone because many are illiterate, incompetent or simply challenged to ascertain what is being articulated in this email due to their self-denial of the realities of what is going on within the City nobody want to address.Here is a Jurisdictional Memorandum being Supplemented filed (August 9, 2021) this very motion epitomizes State Agencies, State employees, State Judges etc., all are acting outside of the jurisdictions of their oaths making them "Private Citizens" the problem is when a colored person levies a complaint against any politically connected Anglo-Saxon, that complaint is strategically dismissed or ignored and the what is worse many of the COLORED people mostly described as African Americans have sold out to the Political establishment by going along with the racism or egregious injustices perpetrated by Anglo-Saxons; moreover, many of the colored persons who has DEEP ASS self-hate for themselves engage in the same racist acts assisting the very racist Anglo- Saxons who hate them.(I am only giving everyone a taste of the document this is the first 8 pages of the Supplement)PART 2 is below the SupplementThis is theMOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION/REHEARING OF JURISDICTIONAL MEMORANDUM & MOTION TO SUPPLEMENT JURISDICTIONAL MEMORANDUM DUE TO JUDICIAL “ORGANIZED CONSPIRACY” JUDGES NOT HAVING SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION DISPARATE APPLICATION OF THE LAWS DUE TO DEMOCRATIC JUDGES ENGAGING IN RACIAL HATE CRIMES ENTERING ORDERS BEING “VOID” A “NULLITY” CASE BEING “FRAUDULENT” JUDGES “TRESPASSING UPON THE LAWS” ENGAGING IN TREASON OFFENSES ACTING AS “PRIVATE CITIZENS” ALTERNATIVELY DISQUALIFY JUDGES DUE TO BIAS CONFLICT OF INTEREST PURSUANT TO {28 USCA 144, 455 (b) (1)} Canon 3E (1990) TRANSFER CASE PURSUANT TO RULE 26 BREYERS COMMITTEE REPORT239 F.R.D. at 214-15 TO ANOTHER CIRCUIT OUTSIDE THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT
&
REINSTATE MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION (filed JULY 18, 2019, No 19-2040) FOR RECONSIDERATION DUE TO JUDICIAL “ORGANIZED CONSPIRACY” DISPARATE APPLICATION OF THE LAWS DUE TO DEMOCRATIC JUDGES ENGAGING IN RACIAL HATE CRIMES ENTERING ORDERS BEING “VOID” A “NULLITY” CASE BEING “FRAUDULENT” JUDGES “TRESPASSING UPON THE LAWS” ENGAGING IN TREASON OFFENSES ACTING AS “PRIVATE CITIZENS” ALTERNATIVELY DISQUALIFY JUDGES DUE TO BIAS CONFLICT OF INTEREST PURSUANT TO {28 USCA 144, 455 (b) (1)} Canon 3E (1990)
RETIRED 7TH CIRCUIT JUDGE RICHARD A POSNER STATED “MOST JUDGES REGARD PRO SE LITIGANTS AS KIND OF TRASH NOT WORTH THE TIME”I am only presenting 10 pages out of 32 to give each reader a little taste how Anglo-Saxons Alleged White Nationalists are controlling the courts and is the reason why innocent babies, children now Fallen Police Officer Ella French have lost their lives to senseless violence due to many CORRUPT JUDGES ON MANY BENCHES IN ILLINOISMY DEEPEST CONDOLENCES TO THE MOTHERS WHO HAVE LOST THEIR CHILDREN AND LOVED ONES AND ELLA FRENCH (POLICE OFFICER) WHO HAVE LOST THEIR LIVES TO GUN VIOLENCE DUE TO SO MANY JUDGES ACTING AS "PRIVATE CITIZENS" not as judges honoring their oath or laws of the UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT OR UNITED STATES CONSTITUTIONTO EVERY MEDIA PERSON, JOURNALISTS AND ALDERMAN STOP CRITICIZING THE MAYOR OR POLICE CHIEF FOR MISPRONOUNCING FALLEN POLICE OFFICER ELLA FRENCH'S NAME AND FOCUS ON HOW WE CAN MOVE FORWARD SO NO OTHER BABY OR POLICER IS KILLED AND START ADDRESSING REMOVING CORRUPT JUDGES FROM THE BENCHES.I HAVE DEFEATED EVERY ATTORNEY IN THIS STATE AND CITY OF CHICAGO IF I WAS LICENSED BY THE ILLINOIS BAR--HELL MY LAW LICENSED WOULD HAVE BEEN SUSPENDED LIKE BRO LANRE AMUSTOP LOOKING FOR SOMEONE ELSE TO CHANGE SOMETHING YOU ARE THE CHANGEIN THE
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT
CHICAGO, ILLINOIS 60604
Monzella Y. Johnson } Appeal from the United
Plaintiffs –Appellant } States District Court for
} the Northern District of
} Illinois, Eastern Division
V }
No. 21-2264 }
} No. 1:21-cv-02707
U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION }
As TRUSTEE for securitized Trust }
2006-NC3, et al. }
Defendant-Appellees } Judge Gary Feinerman
MOTION TO SUPPLEMENT
JURISDICTIONAL MEMORANDUM
CORROBORATION OF STATE AGENCIES, ARBITRATORS, ILLINOIS INDUSTIAL COMMISSION ACTING AS “PRIVATE CITIZENS” VIOLATING SECTION 1983 OF THE CIVIL RIGHTS ACT
Now comes Defendant Monzella Y. Johnson Pro Se hereby respectfully Moves this court with corroboration and affidavit the noted reasons herewith her Affidavit in support of Motion to Supplement et al;
Respectfully submitted,
Monzella Y. Johnson, Pro Se
5217 S. Ingleside Ave
Chicago, Il 60615
773 835-5849
IN THE
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT
219 South Dearborn
CHICAGO, ILLINOIS 60604
AFFIDAVIT
IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO SUPPLEMENT JURISDICTIONAL MEMORANDUM SAID EXHIBITS BEING TENDERED CORROBORATESS AND DEMONSTRATES IN A PARTICULARIZE MANNER VERACITY STATE OFFICIALS AND ATTORNEYS USING THEIR GOVERNMENT POSITIONS VIOLATING ALL OATHS BY TRESPASSING UPON THE LAWS COMMITTING TREASON MAKING THE STATE’S ORDERS “VOID” A “NULLITY”
IN THAT SAID ARBITRATORS PRESIDING OVER THESE CASES HAVE NO JURISDICTION ACTING AS PRIVATE CITIZENS IN THAT A RULE TO SHOW CAUSE REMANDING THEM INTO CUSTODY FOR THE FOREGOING ACTS & MANDATORY INJUNCTION PROHIBITING ALL ILLINOIS ARBITRATORS FROM PRESIDING OVER ANY CASE NAMED IN ANY COMPLAINT AND REMOVAL OF ANY STATE OFFICIAL HAVING KNOWLEDGE OR NOTICE OF THE FOREGOING CIVIL RIGHTS VIOLATIONS AND DID NOTHING.
“The Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals held that the Circuit Court of Cook County is a criminal enterprise. U.S. v. Murphy, 768 F.2d 1518, 1531 (7th Cir. 1985)”.
I am Monzella Y. Johnson, Appellant in this cause, being first duly sworn on oath deposes and states, as follows;
1.) That hereto attached, Gr Ex A, (Official Complaint Alleging Corruption and Racism in the Industrial Commission) Feb 12, 2021 email sent to a plethora of State Agencies namely the Chairman of the Illinois Industrial Commission via Annette Roti corroborating “Private Citizens” are using their government positions violating the Civil Rights of Colored persons in a plethora of terrorist egregious manners and no actions were initiated on said complaint.
A- That said Petitioner filed her complaint Feb. 12, 2021 particularizing in chronological detail the role specific racist Anglo-Saxons had in “FIXING” a Workman’s Compensation case where the Federal Government Social Security found the Complainant totally disabled.
B- Petitioner filed her Summary Judgment Sept. 2020 PETITIONERS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT CRIMINAL CONSPIRACY” w/AFFIDAVIT, said Political Machine Terrorist Insurrectionists have demonstrated the necessary HATE CRIMES being exhausted making sure colored people not receive EQUAL TREATMENT of any laws in ILLINOIS.
2.) That because so many alleged members are in Cook County or State of Illinois work for the Terrorist Cell in the Democratic Party criminal enterprise do not follow the laws of the United States Constitution they circumvent the laws by enforcing Jim Crow laws which has been outlawed by the United States Supreme Court and all laws of the United States Constitution, they don’t recognize persons of color equal in any capacity Civil Rights Act of 1866- first section, enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled. That all persons born in the United States and not subject to any foreign power, excluding Indians not taxed, are hereby declared to be citizens of the United States; and such citizens of every race and color, without regard to any previous condition of slavery or involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall have the same right, in every State and Territory in the United States, to make and enforce contracts, to sue, be parties, and give evidence, to inherit, purchase, lease, sell, hold and convey real and personal property, and to full and equal benefit of the laws and proceedings for the security of person and property, as is enjoyed by white citizens, and shall be subject to like punishment, pains, and penalties, and to none other, any law, statute, ordinances, regulation, or custom, to the contrary notwithstanding, Act of April 9, 1866, Ch. 31, 1, 14 Stat. 27, 42 U.S.C.A. 1981.
3.) That a second Complaint was filed against the Industrial Commission hereto attached, Gr Ex B, (Feb 11, 2021) emailed and mailed to Special Agent FBI, Emmerson Buie, US Attorney John R. Lausch, Illinois Attorney General Kwame Raoul, Arbitrator Paul Cellini.
A- That said Complaint was particularized in accordance to Rules and Laws establishing veracity Public Political State Officials were complicit in said “Organized Criminal Conspiracy” or simply closed their eyes to the crimes perpetrated on said individuals, due to their skin color not being Anglo-Saxon.
C- Petitioner filed her Summary Judgment PETITIONERS MOTION OBJECTING & STRIKING RESPONDENT’S MOTION FOR DISMISSAL DUE TO ADMISSIONS BY THE RESPONDENT NOT IMPEACHING OR DENYING OR SUBMITTING A COUNTER-AFFIDAVIT & SUMMARY JUDGMENT w/AFFIDAVIT in Nov. 2020, Arbitrator Cellini stated, that the Industrial Commission don’t accept Summary Judgments.
D-
4.) That said Petitioner emailed her Proposal to Arbitrator Cellini (18 WC 25010) ref as Gr Ex C Aug 4, 2021, attorney representing Adams & Assoc/ Joliet Job Corps replied saying, “I have revisited your demand with my client. Respondent’s offer remains the same as previously outlined”, ref as Ex D which is $30,000.00.
5.) Petitioner provided to Arbitrator Cellini particularizing a plethora of documents of Arbitrators, Attorneys and Commissioners engaging in Terrorist Insurrectionist Acts via United States Postal Priority Mail (Tracking #9505-5110-2089-1084-6922-16), hereto attached, as Gr Ex E detailing the horrifying painful examination or company physician Dr. Gleason inflicting more pain to the injured knee and numerous falsehoods in his report undermining her injury due to her ethnicity as a colored African American woman.
A- That pursuant to Page 2 Par 5 was succinct and unequivocal, “That Pursuant to Page 3, Pars 9-11 CORROBORATE and DEMONSTRATE beyond the PREPONDERANCE OF THE EVIDENCE a PLETHORA OF DEMOCRATIC INSURRECTIONIST ARE ON THE STATE LEVEL in ILLINOIS AGENCIES working FRATERNALLY TO DENY, OPPRESS, DISCRIMINATE and STEAL FROM PERSONS OF COLOR making sure any and all United States Constitutional Laws are not afforded to them, See the attached Post taken from the Blog unlawful1.blogspot.com et al. Section 1983 of U.S.C.S. contemplates the depravation of Civil Rights through the Unconstitutional Application of a Law by conspiracy or otherwise. Mansell v. Saunders (CA 5 F 1A) 372 F 573, especially if the conspiracy was actually carried into effect, where an action is for a conspiracy to interfere with Civil Rights under 42 U.S.C.S. 1985 (3), or for the depravation of such rights under 42 U.S.C.S. 1983, if the conspiracy was actually carried into effect and plaintiff was thereby deprived of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the United States Constitution and Laws, the gist of the action may be treated as one for the depravation of rights under 42 U.S.C.S. 1983, Lewis v. Brautigam (CA 5 F 1a) 227 F 2d 124, 55 Alr 2d 505, John W. Strong, 185, 777-78 (4 th ed. 1992).
Jennings v. Patterson, 488 F. 2d 442, equal access to public facilities. The court found that the plaintiffs had been “denied the right to hold and enjoy their property on the same basis as white citizens.” Jennings suggests the potential usefulness of the equal benefit clause in guaranteeing full and equal enjoyment of public property and public services.” Developments in the Law section 1981, 15 Harv. Civ. Rts. ---- Civ. Lib. L. Rev 29, 133 (1980).
B- That Pursuant to Gr Ex E is a series of emails sent by Joe Louis seeking help from Investigative Reporters or any person in authority Aldermen, Chief Judge, States Attorney, Attorney General over 50 individuals including cases of other Petitioners experiencing the same RACIAL HATRED in State Agencies or Courts.
C- That retired attorney Ken Ditkowsky the only Caucasian stated, Page 6, Par 4 “It appears like so many of us this citizen has run into the bureaucracy , Court corruption, administrative corruption and finally frustration, retaliation and worse. Does anyone wonder why violence is so prevalent in places like Chicago? Joe Louis is not a violent man! He is like the rest of us—frustrated with the corruption that is so pervasive in Illinois”
D- The title of the aforementioned email is CORRUPTION AND EXTORTION IN THE ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF CHILD SUPPORT—STEALING MY WAGES, JOBS AND STIMULUS CHECKS NOT ADDRESSED PURSUANT TO THE OEIG REFERRAL.
E- That Page 7 of Gr Ex E establishes with veracity certain colored persons are mere figure heads with the Political Machine and with IMPOTENT AUTHORITY, where racist Anglo Saxons are involved, email sent to States Attorney KIM Foxx/ Kwamie Raoul, never a response, Pages 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 gave a particularized account of the Terrorist Acts perpetrated by “PRIVATE CITIZENS” engaging in HATE CRIMES as TRUE DEMOCRATS using their unlawful positions likened to the KU KLU KLAN “LYNCHING an innocent man as they frolic with joy and not one COLORED OFFICIAL OPENED THEIR MOUTHS, due to their INFERIOR DISPOSITION within the DEMOCRATIC POLITICAL MACHINE.
F- That Page 14 is by far the most EGREGIOUS DOCUMENT ever to be witnessed by anyone a COURT ORDER SIGNED BY A COOK COUNTY JUDGE TIMOTHY P. MURPHY signed 9/08/06 BODY ATTACHMENT ORDER where said Respondent was REMANDED INTO CUSTODY 5 TIMES FOR ALLEGEDLY OWING 49, 670.66--- That every Exhibit within this Motion demonstrates multiple acts of systemic applications of constitutional violations, in that judges and State Agencies acted as decision makers possessing final authority, Brown v. Bryan County, OKL., 67 F. 3d 1174 (1995), Stokes v. Bullins, 844 F. 2d 269, 275 (5th Cir. 1988), Wassum v. City of Bellaire, Texas, 861 F. 2d 453, 456 (5th Cir. 1988), Benavides v. County of Wilson, 955 F. 2d 968, 972 (5th Cir.) cert. denied,__ U.S.__, 113 S.Ct. 79, 121 L. Ed. 2d 43 (1992), “Liability will accrue for the acts of a municipal official when the official possess “final policymaking authority” to establish municipal policy with respect to the conduct that resulted in a violation of constitutional rights. Pembaur v. City of Cincinnati, 475 U.S. 469, 483, 106 S. Ct. 1292, 1300, 89 L.Ed. 2d 452 (1986) (plurality opinion),Smith v. Wade U.S. 30, 35, 103 S. Ct.1625, 1629, 75 L Ed 2d 632 (1983)
6.) That Petitioner emailed her Proposal to Arbitrator Cellini from a prior email from the night before (19 WC 13788), this is her second time presenting it with no reply, ref as Gr Ex F, that said Proposal of August 4, responding to Cellini’s August 3, 8:37 pm particularized a plethora of EGREGIOUS ACTS, that can be gleaned actions of a REPROBATED MIND, in that he as the Anglo Saxon he is never addressed any of the Civil Rights Violations and as of this timing today never initiated a response, due to his complicit involvement in said “Organized Criminal Conspiracy”.
1.) 7.) That Petitioner emailed and mailed to Arbitrator Cellini and other parties, ref as Gr Ex G, Courtesy Copy Exhibit List, Page 1 Par 1 A-B That because of Petitioner’s skin color being non-Anglo Saxon they have refused to pay temporary payments, medical expenses, in that, the following injury was incurred Pursuant to Vigus O’Bannon Page 7, Par 18, the necessary fraternal Organized Conspiracies had to keep people of color from receiving Equal Protection of the Laws in Illinois State Agencies and Illinois Courts.
A- That pursuant to Gr Ex O, Page 6 Par B states, “Judge Murphy violated his Judicial Authority to prevent Plaintiff from cross-examining Thomas Webber, attorney representing IBC Wonder bread, they stole $55,000.00 of his disability monies while off injured on duty with a torn rotator cuff surgery had to be had, and he was on Welfare with wife and 5 children when all of the aforementioned took place”;
B- That said March 13, email 2021, 9:30 PM Corroborates and Demonstrates the necessary evils said Racial Hatred is levying at this Petitioner making it clear to her and everyone reading this that, “BLACK LIVES DON’T MATTER” in any VENUE in ILLINOIS as longs as the Democratic Insurrectionist are in Control of the Courts and State Agencies.
8.) That Page 13, 14 Pars 2-5 validate the veracity of colored people not receiving EQUAL PROTECTION OF THE LAWS in ILLINOIS, the level and manner of what despicable hate a Racist Anglo Saxon is willing to do in DESTROYING people of color in an attempt to flaunt their DELUSION OF BEING SUPERIOR, in these illustrations noted if a snake is crawling on its belly how can it be an elephant walking on four legs?
A- That as a Certified employee of Rockdale School District, Petitioner is the recipient of receiving Welfare because her racist employer and racist attorneys and Illinois legal system do not deem colored people as being EQUAL when it comes to receiving equal protection within the laws of the United States Constitution.
Dated Feb. 24, 2021, A passport has been paid with all expedited fees was DENIED because "the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) certified that you owe child support" WHERE IS THE FUKING COURT ORDER THAT SAYS, I OWE ANYTHING?
2.) Dated Nov. 6, 2020, A letter from the OEIG referring the Child Support to address the Complaint of how a $1200.00 stimulus check was stolen in the guise of saying child support arrearage, WHAT FUKING ARREARAGE?
3.) When you start investigating this mess start with the RACIST POLACA RONALD BARTKOWICZ, WHO ENTERED A BOGUS WARRANT against me for an ORDER OF PROTECTION against Francoise who was a Police officer whom, I had not seen or communicated with it was drafted to help the CTA UNLAWFULLYREMOVE FROM MY BODY MY BADGE AND EMPLOYEE ID CARD proving, I was an employee in 605.
Ronald Bartkowicz was working in the Workman's Compensation Department at the CTA and was aware that his racist brethren had stolen my wages while off injured on duty and didn't have the money in the budget to repay me what they took, so they called on him to help save them---Make the CTA TO RETURN MY BADGE 26115.
4.) I AM LEGALLY HOMELESS AND STILL ON PUBLIC AID BECAUSE RACIST REDNECK INSURRECTIONISTS HAVE FOUND A WAY to LYNCH INNOCENT BLACK AND BROWN MEN infiltrating the legal system by CRIMINILIZING, OPPRESSING MEN OF COLOR in a TERRORIST SADISTIC MANNER as demonstrated in this case without wearing HOODS CARRYING BURNING CROSSES!
5.) NOTICE THE COURT ORDER SIGNED ALLEGEDLY IN ARREARS $49,670.66 SIGNED BY TIMOTHY P. MURPHY WHO TOOK ORGASMIC SINISTER PLEASURE LOCKING UP BLACK AND BROWN MEN, HE HAD THE FUKING AUDACITY TO TELL ME IN FRONT OF GERALD NORDGREN, "TODAY IS MY LUCKY DAY, HE CAN NOT LOCK ME UP ANYMORE" Nordgren found a statute in the law, that explained because, I was on
public aid, they couldn't lock me up for child support.
That said Arbitrators, Political State Officials certain judges etc., are likened to Weapons of Mass Destruction in that said individuals have deluded themselves into believing there is not a Federal judge with any Academic skills or knowledge of the laws to ascertain how they have been able to make an Ass out of the legal system where there are competent judges by Inducing Reliance upon any and all individuals within the legal arena by “Trespassing upon the Laws” as “Private Citizens” by enforcing Tyranny of any magnitude upon ethnic individuals whom they are inferior to their ethnicity.
The request for a transfer may be made at any stage of the proceeding before a reference to the Judicial Conference under Rule 20 (b) (1) (C) or 20 (b) (2) or a Petition for Review is filed under Rule 22:
Rule 26, it implements the Breyer Committee’s recommended use of transfers. Breyer Committee Report, 239 F.R.D. at 214-14.
I affirm the aforementioned as being true.
Respectfully submitted,
Monzella Y. Johnson, Pro Se
5217 S. Ingleside Ave
Chicago, Il 60615
773 835-5849
WHEREFORE the aforementioned reasons Appellant respectfully Prays for the Relief
1. For an Order Supplementing the Motion;
2. Due to the Noted Deliberate arrogant Criminal Acts of State Officials “FIXING” workman’s compensation cases involving politically connected law firms and a plethora of other conspirators Appellant Prays that this court invoke Jurisdiction because Tyranny, Terrorism Political Corruption is controlling the courts.
3. For an Order on the Issuance of a Rule to Show Cause Instanter on any and all attorneys complicit in aiding and abetting in a criminal conspiracy against warring against the United States Constitution and Government.
4. For an Order Transferring this matter to another Circuit not affiliated to the Terrorist cell of the Seventh Circuit pursuant to Rule 26
5. For an Order appointing a Special Prosecutor who understands the jurisdiction of their profession to investigate and ascertain all other parties complicit in these Terrorist Treason Offenses of all cases noted within;
6. For an Order upon conviction of all parties that military personnel be deployed to eradicate all personnel Trespassing upon the Laws be treated as Hostile Terrorists and eliminated accordingly;
7. For an Order staying any and all legal enforcements of all parties noted within due to the plethora of Felonies enacted by “Private Citizens” perpetrating roles as State Officials, Attorneys etc. Trespassing upon the Laws”
8. For an Order appointing Federal judges to replace all incompetent judges, State Officials, Arbitrators and officials who have closed their eyes violated their oaths in allowing Terrorist to take seize of the legal system.
9. For an Order on bond be not less than one million dollars for any and all parties charged in these crimes in warring against the United States Constitution.
10. For an Order to deploy Special Military Personnel to forcibly remove and eradicate every “Private Citizen” perpetrating as judges Trespassing upon the Laws and warring against the United States Constitution.
11. For an Order removing any and all parties and of all Circuits who as Public Servants failed to investigate remove or report any of the aforementioned persons in accordance to their oath and Public Duty.
12. For an Order setting a Hearing Date for all attorneys who sat by in an idle manner and did not exercise his or her duties pursuant to the Ethics of R.P.C 3.3 and speak up or report the terrorist acts perpetrated by “Private Citizens” violating their oaths as Public Servants.
13. For the entry of an Order awarding to your Petitioner for such other relief and any other relief necessary as equity may require of which this court may deem overwhelmingly just;IN THE
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT
CHICAGO, ILLINOIS 60604
U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, } Appeal from the United
As TRUSTEE for securitized Trust } States District Court for
2006-NC3, et al. } the Northern District of
Plaintiffs –Appellees, } Illinois, Eastern Division
V }
No. 19-2040 } No. 1:16-cv-08628
}
Monzella Y. Johnson }
Defendant-Appellant. } Judge Gary Feinerman
FRANK H. EASTERBROOK
MICHAEL S. KANNE
MICHAEL Y. SCUDDER
MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION/REHEARING OF JURISDICTIONAL MEMORANDUM & MOTION TO SUPPLEMENT JURISDICTIONAL MEMORANDUM DUE TO JUDICIAL “ORGANIZED CONSPIRACY” JUDGES NOT HAVING SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION DISPARATE APPLICATION OF THE LAWS DUE TO DEMOCRATIC JUDGES ENGAGING IN RACIAL HATE CRIMES ENTERING ORDERS BEING “VOID” A “NULLITY” CASE BEING “FRAUDULENT” JUDGES “TRESPASSING UPON THE LAWS” ENGAGING IN TREASON OFFENSES ACTING AS “PRIVATE CITIZENS” ALTERNATIVELY DISQUALIFY JUDGES DUE TO BIAS CONFLICT OF INTEREST PURSUANT TO {28 USCA 144, 455 (b) (1)} Canon 3E (1990) TRANSFER CASE PURSUANT TO RULE 26 BREYERS COMMITTEE REPORT239 F.R.D. at 214-15 TO ANOTHER CIRCUIT OUTSIDE THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT
&
REINSTATE MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION (filed JULY 18, 2019, No 19-2040) FOR RECONSIDERATION DUE TO JUDICIAL “ORGANIZED CONSPIRACY” DISPARATE APPLICATION OF THE LAWS DUE TO DEMOCRATIC JUDGES ENGAGING IN RACIAL HATE CRIMES ENTERING ORDERS BEING “VOID” A “NULLITY” CASE BEING “FRAUDULENT” JUDGES “TRESPASSING UPON THE LAWS” ENGAGING IN TREASON OFFENSES ACTING AS “PRIVATE CITIZENS” ALTERNATIVELY DISQUALIFY JUDGES DUE TO BIAS CONFLICT OF INTEREST PURSUANT TO {28 USCA 144, 455 (b) (1)} Canon 3E (1990)
RETIRED 7TH CIRCUIT JUDGE RICHARD A POSNER STATED “MOST JUDGES REGARD PRO SE LITIGANTS AS KIND OF TRASH NOT WORTH THE TIME”
“No one is above the Law”, citing a 1928 decision by Supreme Court Justice Louis Brandeis Olmstead v. United States, 277 U.S. 438 (1928),
“We must subject government officials to the same rules of conduct that we expect of the citizen. The very existence of the government is imperiled if it fails to observe the law scrupulously. As Brandeis puts it, "if the government becomes a lawbreaker, it breeds contempt for law; it invites every man to become a law unto himself; it invites anarchy. To declare that in the administration of the criminal law the end justifies the means—to declare that the government may commit crimes in order to secure the conviction of a private criminal—would bring terrible retribution. Against that pernicious doctrine this court should resolutely set its face."
NOW COMES the Appellant, Monzella Y. Johnson (Plaintiff), hereby respectfully Moves this court with corroboration, affidavits, unimpeached Summary Judgments from all law firms associated in this matter where court transcripts have been provided with prior Motion for Reconsideration due to “Fraud” & Misrepresentations to the court with all attachments {Pursuant to Fed Rules of Civil Procedures}:
1.) That said judges ignored the fact the Appellees admitted every assertion/pleading recorded by the Appellant in their Jurisdictional Statement.
A- Pursuant to Federal Rule 56;
B- That the aforementioned Honorable Judges Order of August 4, 2021 DISIMISSING said APPEAL pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1291 is a respectable error, The U.S. Supreme Court, in Scheuer v. Rhodes, 416 U.S. 232, 94 S. Ct. 1683, 1687 (1974) stated that "when a state officer acts under a state law in a manner violative of the Federal Constitution, he "comes into conflict with the superior authority of that Constitution, and he is in that case stripped of his official or representative character and is subjected in his person to the consequences of his individual conduct. The State has no power to impart to him any immunity from responsibility to the supreme authority of the United States." [Emphasis supplied in original].
C- When a judge acts as a trespasser of the law, when a judge does not follow the law, the judge loses subject-matter jurisdiction and the judge’s orders are void, of no legal force or effect.
D- That in said Motion to Reinstate Motion for Reconsideration filed July 18, 2019, Plaintiff was in fact a Defendant-Appellant in that cause and said Motion particularized the plethora of “Fraudulent Acts” of Judges acting as “Private Citizens”
1.) That pursuant to the Appeals court tosses $44.7 million verdict in shooting by off-duty Chicago cop, says city can’t be held liable
By JASON MEISNER and STACY ST. CLAIR
CHICAGO TRIBUNE |
FEB 23, 2021 AT 11:49 AM
A federal appeals court on Tuesday threw out a historic $44.7 million judgment against the city stemming from a shooting by an off-duty Chicago cop, saying that while the incident that left the cop’s friend paralyzed was “tragic,” the city cannot be held liable.
The ruling by the 7th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, which was widely expected, wipes out the decision by a jury nearly four years ago that found the city had repeatedly failed to identify Officer Patrick Kelly as a problem before he shot his friend in the head after a night of heavy drinking.
Chicago police officer should be fired for shooting friend nearly a deca...
Stacy St. Clair, Jeff Coen
Michael LaPorta was shot and severely injured with a Chicago police officer's gun in 2010. A new ruling says the...
The 24-page opinion, written by Chief Judge Diane Sykes and joined by Judge Michael Kanne, said that while the victim, Michael LaPorta, indeed suffered grievous, life-altering injuries, the “legal theory for holding the city liable is deeply flawed.”
“LaPorta’s case is tragic. His injuries are among the gravest imaginable. His life will never be the same,” Sykes wrote. “But ... because none of LaPorta’s federal rights were violated, the verdict against the City of Chicago cannot stand.”
Judge Amy Coney Barrett participated in the oral arguments in December 2019 but has since been elevated to the U.S. Supreme Court and was not a part of the ruling.
A spokesperson for the city’s Law Department was not immediately available for comment.
But it was clear during the appellate arguments that the 7th Circuit was skeptical of the city’s liability, regardless of Kelly’s troubled past.
“The harm was inflicted by the off-duty officer,” Sykes said at the time. “The city did not violate anybody’s bodily integrity, the off-duty officer did.”
Sykes wrote in the opinion released Tuesday that the state is not obligated to protect individuals against “private violence.”
“When Kelly shot LaPorta, he was not acting as a Chicago police officer but as a private citizen,” the opinion stated.
“Grounds warranting a motion to reconsider include (1) an intervening change in the controlling law, (2) new evidence previously unavailable, and (3) the need to correct clear error or prevent manifest injustice.” Id. (citing Brumark Case 1:07-cv-00644-WDM-KLM Document 158 Filed 08/25/2009 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 6 1 Although the Tenth Circuit does not allow citation to unpublished opinions for precedential value, unpublished opinions may be cited for persuasive value. 10th Cir. R. 32.1. 3 Corp. v. Samson Resources Corp., 57 F.3d 941, 948 (10th Cir. 1995)).
2.) The U.S. Supreme Court, in Scheuer v. Rhodes, 416 U.S. 232, 94 S. Ct. 1683, 1687 (1974) stated that "when a state officer acts under a state law in a manner violative of the Federal Constitution, he "comes into conflict with the superior authority of that Constitution, and he is in that case stripped of his official or representative character and is subjected in his person to the consequences of his individual conduct. The State has no power to impart to him any immunity from responsibility to the supreme authority of the United States." [Emphasis supplied in original].
By law, a judge is a State Officer or Federal Officer.
The judge then acts not as a judge, but as a private individual (in his person).
3.) The United States Supreme Court recently acknowledged the judicial corruption in Cook County, when it stated that Judge "Maloney was one of many dishonest judges exposed and convicted through 'Operation Greylord', a labyrinthine federal investigation of judicial corruption in Chicago". Bracey v. Gramley, case No. 96-6133 (June 9, 1997).
“The Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals held that the Circuit Court of Cook County is a criminal enterprise. U.S. v. Murphy, 768 F.2d 1518, 1531 (7th Cir. 1985)”.
A- Hon. Frank H. Easterbrook took part in this precedent.
Since judges who do not report the criminal activities of other judges become principals in the criminal activity, 18 U.S.C. Section 2, 3 & 4, and since no judges have reported the criminal activity of the judges who have been convicted, the other judges are as guilty as the convicted judges.
4.) That To show fraud upon the court, the complaining party must establish that the alleged misconduct affected the integrity of the judicial process, either because the court itself was defrauded or because the misconduct was perpetrated by officers of the court. Alexander v. Robertson, 882, F. 2d 421,424 (9th Cir. 1989);
a. A void judgment does not create any binding obligation. Kalb v. Feuerstein (1940) 308 US 433, 60 S Ct 343, 84 L, Ed 370.
That under 18 U.S.C. 242 and 42 U.S.C. 1985 (3) (b). A judge does not have the discretion on whether or not to follow Supreme Ct. Rules, but a duty to follow. People v. Gersh, 135 Ill. 2d 384 (1990).
5.) That Rule 26 it implements the Breyer Committee’s recommended use of transfers. Breyer Committee Report, 239 F.R.D. at 214-15. In That Chief Judge Diane P. Wood obstructed justice used her position and authority covering-up every egregious diabolical Terrorist Acts perpetrated by her colleagues’ judges as “Private Citizens”.
6.) That Appellant has filed a complaint before the Judicial Conference Committee on Judicial and Disability et al. and Petition for Review & Petition to Transfer This case to Another Judicial Council (07-16-90079) pursuant to RULE 26 “authorizes the transfer of a complaint proceeding to another judicial council selected by the Chief Justice. Such transfers may be appropriate, for example, in the case of a serious complaint where there are multiple disqualifications among the original council et al.”
7.) That said REINSTATE MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION (filed JULY 18, 2019, No 19-2040), unequivocally particularized a historic account of judges acting as “Private Citizens”, that corroborates State Officials, Public Agencies within the Municipalities of Chicago, Illinois seizing Terrorist control over all State Public Agencies and Colored, African Americans kept their mouths shut while Civil Rights violations were taking place.
8.) That said Motion to Supplement Motion to Supplement Jurisdictional Memorandum et al. (filed August 9, 2021) relates to the aforementioned Par 7 as Judge Feinerman corroborated his role as a “Private Citizen” and lost subject -matter jurisdiction; thereby making his court order a “Nullity” “Void” The Seventh Circuit noted that Section 1983 imposes liability only when a municipality has violated a federal right.
A- Judges Diane S. Sykes, Michael Kanne and Supreme Court Justice Amy Barret who was the judge before being nominated to the United States Supreme Court overturned the $44.7 million dollar jury verdict, see Page 3 Par C of the Jurisdictional Memorandum;
B- “Plaintiff does not set forth legitimate grounds for Disqualifying District Judge Feinerman” (Denied June 10, 2021).
C- That Judge Feinerman did everything in his unlawful authority as a “Private Citizen” “Trespassed upon the Laws” The U.S. Supreme Court, in Scheuer v. Rhodes, 416 U.S. 232, 94 S. Ct. 1683, 1687 (1974) stated that "when a state officer acts under a state law in a manner violative of the Federal Constitution, he "comes into conflict with the superior authority of that Constitution, and he is in that case stripped of his official or representative character and is subjected in his person to the consequences of his individual conduct. The State has no power to impart to him any immunity from responsibility to the supreme authority of the United States."
The judge then acts not as a judge, but as a private individual (in his person).
9.) FACT- That Judge Feinerman violated the aforementioned Model of Judicial Conduct Canon 3E (1990) “Motions containing allegations of an appearance of partiality should be decided by another judge. Avoiding the appearance of impropriety is "as important to developing public confidence in the judiciary as avoiding impropriety itself. United States v. Hollister, 746 F.2d 420, 425-26 (8th Cir. 1984)”.
A- That said pleadings taken from the Motion for Reconsideration filed in the District Court, (June 28, 2021) that is subject to the Appeal
11.) That because US Bank realized they have been DEFEATED with the unimpeachable Complaint filed in Federal Court did not attempt or try to finagle themselves out of the TRUTHFUL PLEADINGS, thereby admitting pursuant to Fed. Rule 56.1.
12.) That said Judge set up a status hearing date on May 21, 2021 for June 19, 2021 at 9:15 am, he indicated in his order. Initial Status Report shall be filed by 7/12/2021.
13.) Plaintiff is the only litigator, that complied with said Order and filed said Motion for Summary Judgment et al. June 16, 2021.
14.) That allegedly said Judge in a fit of rage acting in his own volition as a “Private Citizen” one can easily infer from the foregoing document, DENIED said Summary Judgment. On June 22, 2021, Motion for Summary Judgment is denied for failure to comply with Local Rule 56.1, The motion Hearing set for 7/19/2021 is stricken.
A- That said Judge Denied Appellant’s valid Summary Judgment when the Appellee has admitted to every assertion via Summary Judgments in the Circuit Courts, Court of Appeals and District Courts and because of the color of the Appellants skin, Judges become “Private Citizens” making sure Corruption, Violence and all acts of Terror and Fraud gets passed in their courts.
B-
10.) That every judge in the Seventh Circuit closed their eyes to every valid complaint, motions and affidavits Summary Judgments said Petitioner put before them on appeal in affidavits validating the verity of judges committing Treason Trespassing upon the laws of the United States Constitution engaging in “WAR” against the United States Constitution making every order rendered against the Petitioner. If a judge does not fully comply with the Constitution, then his orders are void, In re Sawyer, 124 U.S. 200 (1888), he or she is without jurisdiction, and he/she has engaged in an act or acts of treason;
11.) FACT: Retired Judge Richard A. Posner on Record “The Basic Thing is that Most Judges Regard These People As Kind Of Trash Not Worth The Time” In the 7th Circuit, staff lawyers review appeals from pro se litigants, and their recommendations are generally rubber-stamped by judges, he noted.
Posner wanted to give the pro se litigants a better shake by reviewing all of the staff attorney memos before they went to the panel of judges. Posner had approval from the director of the staff attorney program. “But the judges, my colleagues, all 11 of them, turned it down and refused to give me any significant role. I was very frustrated by that,” Posner said.
Posner has written about the pro se issue in an upcoming book, and its publication “would be particularly awkward” if he remained on the court because it “implicitly or explicitly” criticizes the other judges, he said.
12.) That Hon. Posner at least opened his mouth and became the “WHISTLEBOWER” admonishing his Republican colleague’s history already records the vicious hate Democrats had against people of color, the Ku Klux Klan Act of 1871 speaks on this people need to see and understand RACISM, HATE, HOMOSEXUALITY, VIOLENCE is not in one party, it is in every party (Democratic, Republican) and every ethnic group.
13.) Pursuant to Section 4 of the Ku Klux Klan Act of 1871: the law is clear, “Whenever in any State or part of a State………unlawful combinations…….shall be organized and armed, and so numerous and powerful et al…………and whenever, by reason of either or all of the causes aforesaid, the conviction of such offenders and the preservation of the public safety shall become…..Impracticable, in every such case such combinations shall be deemed a rebellion against the Government of the United States…..”
A- That every judicial act denial towards the Appellant corroborates the veracity said judges has met the burden of warring against the Government of the United States and is grandiose enough to FLAUNT their acts to the United States Supreme Court and members of Congress.
B- That because said judges Pro Se litigants as Trash and will never honor or uphold any laws of equality where a colored person is concerned and unequivocally demonstrate and warrant the Transfer of this matter to another District that recognizes Pro se and other litigants as Human Citizens of the United States
Thu, Aug 19 at 10:12 PM
Fri, Aug 20 at 11:00 AMJoe -The current narrative is quite simple - if you do not echo certain words and phrases you are a racist.You (and I) have a common problem. Our contemporaries (even though I'm ancient and you are aspiring become so) have diagnosed our malady - they call it 'foot in mouth disease!' Certain words turn all the 'true believers' off!the long and short - or the bottom line - is that you and I are united in believing that the 1st paragraph of the 14th Amendment is the CORE VALUE of the civilization that we would like to exist and the one we are promised by the Constitution. When we see an open and notorious W R O N G such as has been done to our mutual friend Lanre Amu it wounds us. It is a gaping sore that festers uncontrollably.When the wound is administered routinely in a 'cline' and particular people are targeted not only by the 'ruling classes' but by the lackeys of the system and we observe rank hyprocriy (sp?) as the norm and the standard of conduct SOMETIMES IT IS JUST TOO MUCH!The concept you and I advocate is quite simple. treat me, my brother, my sister, my neighbor, and the stranger fairly, honestly, and substantially the same whether you favor me, disfavor me, or otherwise regard me. A plus B plus C always and forever equals D. In addressing my problem - you do not have to be RIGHT, nor do you have to be superhuman - all you have to do is demonstrate integrity and honor.Integrity and honor are not one shot affairs. The Lanre Amu case is an example. It is possible to present an obvious up and down fact situation in such an inept form that A plus A does not appear to equal 2 A but something extranious. Indeed, I've met lawyers who could muddle a fact situation presentation to the point of total confusion, and others who could so distract from the issue at hand that the trier of fact was lucky to find his way home at the end of the day.BUT AT THE END OF THE DAY - when a mistake and/or a wrong occurs, our system of Law claims to provide a mechanism that allows for substantive justice. In Amu's case, independently CRAINS CHICAGO BUSINESS made the same accusations that Amu did as to one of the judges. This fact and the ready verification of the facts reported should have informed the SUPREME COURT OF ILLINOIS and the IARDC that a terrible mistake occurred.Then looking into the case the SUPREME COURT OF ILLINOIS ought to have detected something terriby wrong at the IARDC and in accordance with the sworn OATH that ever justice takes Article 1 Section 12 of the Illinois Constitution should have appeared in the visor of each Justice! Amu's license should have been summarily restored and a full and complete honest investigation should have followed.Instead, Amu was trampled upon and subjected to Klu Klux Klan style Justice by our Illinois Supreme Court. ( yes - I know in today's politically correct society it is w r o n g to think such thought much less utter it! The fact the same is true is irrelevant!)Is it a coincidence that people who are powerless are faced with this problem more often than the rich and powerful? Mr. Golbert - the Cook County Pubic Guardian - does not fear the loss of his law license for taking dominion and control over Dean Sallas' property even though his action was totally violate of Section 16-1 of the Criminal Code. Ditto for the Byline Bank and 755 ILCS 5/11a - 22, mail fraud, wire fraud, money laundering statutes! Indeed, when Dean Sallas obtained the ability to give voice to his greviances an ILLINOIS ATTORNEY assigned to the Illinois attorney registration and disciplinary commission of the Supreme Court of Illinois was dispatched to have a talk with Attorney JoAnne Denison and convince her to cease helping Sallas obtain access to the Court hearings that were facilitating the wrongful criminal confiscation of his and his wife's life savings! This attorney also sent me an e-mail. When I responded she blocked my e-mails!The public is starting to recognize that the foregoing is occurring right here in the United STates of America. For our 'best and brightest' (self proclaimed) this situation cannot be tolerated - how can it be Louis & Ditkowsky = claim the same rights as Charles P. Golbert *****!INTOLERABLE!NEXT LANRE AMU might demand EQUAL PROTECTION OF THE LAW!!!!!! He might even think that he is a honored a person as the Honorable S. Boliker and/or the honorable Charles P. Golbert, Elizabeth Casanovia, ******.Intolerable! DEAD WRONG! OUTRAGEOUS & A VIOLATION OF RULE 8.4.!Ken Ditkowsky
Fri, Aug 20 at 11:51 AMPerhaps AZ, at least some parts of AZ, are far different than more eastern cities, maybe. But for many "white folk" that I know, most are good people, living their lives the best they can and rarely racist.I see a black doctor, have had black friends, see an East Indian specialist, my primary care physician is Syrian, the nurse practitioner I just spoke with is Hispanic, and the other NP is from Malasia. My brother in law is Hispanic and so are my niece and nephew, I have had close friends who are Jewish and I am in love with a lady who is half Lebanese and half Irish.I am English/Welsh.I could care less what color anyone is and continue to believe that America is still the land of opportunity for most if not all who want to work hard, care for others and reach their highest potential. Look at some of the wealthiest American's -- many are now black and others as well.Just my opinion.- Fri, Aug 20 at 12:54 PMmaybe you are blind to the 'real world!'looking at my world in a parochial sense I also have friends of every race, color, ethnic group etc and we get along famously. However, getting along with me is not the issue. THE ISSUE IS - DOES OUR SOCIETY TREAT ALL CITIZENS (yes this is limited group) with equal respect. I can say from your e-mails that the political/judicial elite ignored the 14th Amendment when you requested their assistance.Did this blindless to the discrimination that you were receiving have a racial basis? This is a suble question. We have groups within groups. Give Joe Louis a telephone call - in 15 minutes he'll curl your hair! He lives with intra- racial discrimination 24/7 as well as extra- racial discrimination. Some of the discrimination cannot be helped - it is part of the DNA. Such is not a gustification - it is breed. (Need an example - why are there so many un-natural blonds out there? Should not a lady be proud to have dark hair - rather that just dark roots?) Other is taught.When racism becomes part of Government or government activity it becomes obnoxious and wrong. When it is whim and caprice - so what -- you do not have to like me! You can choose as your rationale - even though you do not need a rationale - the fact that if you put soap in my hair it would rival a brillo pad in cleaning power!Government is subtle in its racism. It is also venal and historical. It is not harmless - especially if it is aimed at you, however, if you cannot stand the heat of the kitchen it is just tooooo bad! I notice in successive e-mails you ve disclosed your ethnicity. I am not blind to the fact that my children are interested in their ancestry as are so many of their generation. I am also not blind to the fact that for years every Monday I went to services at the Chinese Christian Church and stood out like a 'sore thumb!' (I was their attorney and Board meetings followed weekly services) Today, I met a church member who apparently remembered me. He saw me an started to laugh.I do not usually provoke laughter - he explained that a story popped into his head when he saw me. He remembered that I was friends with "MR MOY" and I got him (Mr. Moy) in a world of trouble with his duaghter in law. It seems that Sam (Mr. Moy) had promised his daughter a car when she got a driver's license. Of course, she remembered it!A grandchild is a very special person - most grandfathers would rather ***** than go back on even a promise to a grandchild. Ergo, Sam went to his daughter in law and asked if he could purchase a car for his grandaughter. Esther - the daughter in law - said NO!I was consulted. I asked the question: "is there any reason why you cannot purchase a new car for yourself!" Sam did - and he and wound up in deep deep excreta! The grand-daughter wound up with the extra car!It seems the gentleman who laughed at me - had a 12 year old car in his garage that he intended to sell - HIs grandchild - came to him and asked if she could have that old vehicle - by reflex he said 'yes!' As he fled his home trying to think up an excuse - who should he run into at the Mall!It is a small world! (I have a 16 year old grand=daughter who just asked me if I'd help her get a car! - I told her to ask her parents - thereupon my wife told me I was not to purchase one for her and I was not to give her my vehicle)
No comments:
Post a Comment