Wikipedia Racial Injustice in Chicago Courts

Search results

Friday, February 26, 2021

IN ILLINOIS COURTS MOST JUDGES DON'T HONOR THE OATH BUT MAKE RULINGS IN ACCORDANCE TO THEIR POLITICAL RACIAL FRATERNAL GUIDELINES.

IN OHIO A FORMER JUDGE TRACIE HUNTER HAD A JURY OF HER OWN PEERS WHERE SHE WAS FOUND GUILTY FOR JUDICIAL VIOLATIONS WHILE IN HER ROBE.

HERE IN ILLINOIS JUDGE LYLE AND SO MANY OTHER JUDGES LIKE HER, HAVE RACIST MEMBERS IN STATE AGENCIES USING THEIR POSITIONS TO PROTECT AND UPHOLD EGREGIOUS CORRUPTION, HATE AND RACISM IN THE COURTS.

BLACK ON BLACK CRIMES SEEMS TO BE INDIRECTLY ENCOURAGED AND INCITED, IN THAT, THIS IS WHAT MAKES THE NEWS AND SALE NEWSPAPERS IF YOU PICK UP THE NEWSPAPER THE FIRST PAGE TELLS YOU HOW MANY BLACKS WERE KILLED ON THE SOUTH OR WEST SIDE.

WELL THAT SAME MENTALITY IS ENCOURAGED IN THE COURTS BLACK AND BROWN JUDGES OF THE SAME MENTAL THUGGERY  COMMIT THE SAME TYPE OF CRIMES, ON THE BENCH AID AND ASSISTING RACIST WHITEMEN IN THE POLITICAL MACHINE, BLACK AND BROWN JUDGES ARE LIKE POLITICAL ENFORCERS.

BLACK AND BROWN POLITICIANS GET ON TV AND TALK BLACK LIVES MATTER EQUALITY FOR EVERYBODY ESPECIALLY FOR THE GAY AND LESBIAN COMMUNITIES, BUT IN REALITY THEY ARE INDIRECTLY DISCRIMINATING HETEROSEXUALS AND OTHERS AFFECTED BY THE DISPARATE CONDITIONS WITHIN THE LAWS.

NOT ONE BLACK OR BROWN PERSON ESPECIALLY MAYOR LIGHTFOOT WHO IS A OUTSPOKEN GAY PERSON HAS OPENED THEIR MOUTHS TO DENOUNCE THE HATEFUL RACIST ACTS PERPETRATED IN THIS CASE WHERE RACISM AND NIGGERCISM IS PREVALENT.

BECAUSE ALLEGED RACIST AND ALLEGED MEN AND WOMEN WHO HAPPENS TO BE GAY OR LESBIAN ARE INTERTWINED IN THESE HEINOUS DEMONIC ACTS OF OVERT DISCRIMINATORY ACTS, THE PARTIES INVOLVED HAVE DONE EVERYTHING IN THEIR POWERS BY CLOSING THEIR EYES KEEPING THEIR MOUTHS SHUT, IN AN ATTEMPT TO PROTECT ALL FRATERNAL PARTIES CONNECTED AS INSURRECTIONIST.

AMERICA SAW THE WHITE SUPREMECISTS AS INSURRECTIONISTS AS THEY SEIZED THE WHITEHOUSE, HERE IN CHICAGO WE HAVE A DIFFERENT BREED OF INSURRECTIONISTS ACTING IN CONCERT AGAINST BLACK AND BROWN PEOPLE, AND THE ELDERLY. 

WHICH FURTHER CORROBORATES WHY CHICAGO IS SO CORRUPT, AND DEMONSTRATES THE 14TH AMENDEMENT IS NOT APPLIED TO UNITED STATES CITIZENS BORN AND RAISED IN CHICAGO, ILLINOIS, AND THE NECESSARY STEPS, BLACK AND BROWN PEOPLE ARE WILLING TO DO, AND ARE DOING SUPPRESSING THE EQUAL PROTECTION OF THE LAWS TO HETEROSEXUALS OR ANYBODY WHO WON'T SUCCUMB TO POLITICAL OPPRESSION, OR WHO SPEAKS UP AGAINST RACISM IN THE COURTS OR ANYPLACE EG. CTA, POST OFFICE, CITY HALL, ETC.

#BLACKLIVESDONTMATTER     

Former Judge Tracie Hunter dragged out of the courtroom, ordered to serv... https://youtu.be/Pg0XXhkt0gw via @YouTube  


Marcia Johnson frogishtwo65@gmail.com

Thu, Feb 25, 7:26 AM (1 day ago)
to ccc.mfmlcalendar56courtclerkccc.mfmlcalendar12timothy.evansdartesia.pittsChicagoCMS.Webmasterpresspamela.cummingsrkuesterrperdewstatesattorneyStephen.Rotello

         Along with Courtesy Copies sent to the Chief Judge, Supervising Judge, Special Agent of the FBI and a host of others.

Judge Lyle has used her robe to Bully us long enough it's time for everyone to see how Black politicians or judges use their positions to destroy and Bully Black and Brown people condoning racism and vicious hate; whereby; when complaints are levied against whites so many are installed in State Agencies to suppress our voices or complaints treating us as Dred Scott and seems to only employ Black judges like Lyle or Public Officials who don't value or love who they are.

There is no way Lyle who in every way has been a thug in a robe trying to Bully and intimidate us because of the fact we are seniors, would do this to any white person!

She is no different from the carjackers stealing  people's cars at gunpoint/ as everyone can see she is of the same mental frame and disposition only she has chosen to use her robe to facilitate her crimes it's amazing
nobody Black in authority see the wrongs because our lives as BLACK WOMEN don't matter.   

The Chief of Staff from the Executive Ethics Commission referred our Complaint to the ARDC and Judicial Inquiry Board but the very racist individuals controlling racism and Black judges and Politicians closed their 
eyes ignored the Complaint or said they never received any referral, but in the meantime, we are still going through this bullshit!! 

Everybody is making money off of our misery and corruption but don't nobody see anything wrong!

Strangely, nobody from the Judicial Inquiry Board has ever responded and never denied receiving the Complaint.

Nobody can say they didn't know what was going on in the courts and never received a Courtesy Copy

Marcie Johnson 

To:OIG. Referrals
Cc:dmtucker@cbs.com,Jerry Butler Cook County Commissioner,Cook County States Attorney,dartesia.pitts@illinois.gov,gov.foia@illinois.gov,Kiran Mehta,neil.olson@illinois.gov,Carol Marin,Cook County Bar Association,John Fountain Sun Times,Pamela Cummings Cook County Preckwinkle,Kenneth Ditkowsky,iteam@abc.com,Tim Novak Sun Times,Attorney General,Clerk of Circuit Court Brown,2nd Vice President Muhhamad ATU,Keith Hill President,Marcellus Barnes,Lanre Amu Railroaded by ARDC,ATU 1st Vice-President Woodrow,Report Corruption,Office of the President,Toi W. Bowers Fin Secretary,askocr@ojp.usdoj.gov,newstips@kirotv.com,Fox News,Department of Justice,La Shawn K. Ford,ashmar.mandou@lawndalenews.com,Frank Main,Chicago FBI,msommers@atu.org,daniel.nardini@lawndalenews.com,cmeister@il-fa.com,onlineeditors@dailyherald.com,Emily Hoener Injustice watch,darryldennard@iheartmedia.com,editor@reachmediainc.com,Trinitychicago Info,Better Government Association,Chicago Bar Association,kkirk@atu.org,Chicago Sun Times,ethics@atg.state.il.us,Quartz News,Marcia Johnson
Thu, Jul 30, 2020 at 7:00 PM
                                   OFFICIAL COMPLAINT AGAINST LICENSE STATE ATTORNEYS AS JUDGES WHO USES THEIR SKIN COLOR TO OPPRESS AND DESTROY THEIR OWN ETHNIC GROUPS SO AS TO BE ACCEPTED BY THE DEMOCRATIC POLITICAL MACHINE

   1.)  Black or Brown judges are mere puppets pursuant to Page 3 Par 3 all attorneys representing the banks in this matter has admitted "That Pursuant to Par B Page 14, 15 That the Associate Judge abused her discretion violated all Canon ethics and Illinois Rules of Civil Procedure and Defendants Civil Rights by denying the aforementioned Motions proving beyond the Preponderance of the Evidence that Associate Judges cannot and will not apply the laws in a just and fair manner, due to how they are appointed. In that Black and Brown judges are mere puppets and has demonstrated their willingness to go to jail risk losing everything to protect Alderman Burke or any Anglo-Saxon person in the Democratic Political Machine”;

From said Respondent's Motion for Summary Judgment et al  filed Nov. 12, 2019.

Freddrenna Lyle has corroborated and demonstrated within the confines of the laws not having any jurisdiction over Caucasian attorneys and has acted as a Domestic Terrorist in aiding and abetting in Treason Offenses in using her robe trying to protect all attorneys trying to steal said Defendant's home.

2.)  Please find a letter sent to the FBI and Governor Pritzker detailing emphatically an active criminal chain conspiracy at work it seems to have fell on deaf ears because as senior citizens and being women of color stealing, killing or robbing anybody black or elderly women not white is not a priority so nobody responded to them. 

3.)  Please find a court order from Lyle ordering all cases be continued to August 25, at 10:30 pursuant to said computer printout from the Clerk of the Circuit Court database.

4.)  Please find from that same database printout emails and postcards sent to all attorneys informing them of said fact of August 25th continuance.  

5.)  Potestivo lawyers and Lord & Locke lawyers ignored said court order and filed motions to appear before her so as to give her alleged instructions on what they want her to do.

6.)  Most importantly Defendant submitted an email to Lyle's court to ascertain what court date are they to attend it went ignored, so Defendant forwarded the same email to Judge Jacobius's court nobody from his court replied.

  The chief Judge, States Attorney and Attorney General received NOTICE and KNOWLEDGE of all criminal acts but because of the color of their skin and limited authority over Anglo Saxon individuals they kept their mouths SHUT .

 "HE WHO PASSIVELY ACCEPTS EVIL IS AS MUCH INVOLVED IN IT AS HE WHO HELPS TO PERPETRATE IT. HE WHO ACCEPTS EVIL WITHOUT PROTESTING AGAINST IT IS REALLY COOPERATING WITH IT". Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.

            9. That a licensed attorney Sawyer had the audacity to stand before the court and say Page 13 Lines 15-20 “For example, their citation of rule—Local Rule 56.1, I believe they’re referencing the Local Rules of the Northern District of Illinois and not the Local Rules of Cook County. So, they have not met their burden on summary judgments and that needs to be denied.”
           10. That another licensed attorney seems to have a mockery out of the court on their limited understanding of any laws in justifying their criminal episodes in the courts stated, Page 14 Lines 12-18 Whiteman “I would just add that the issues of material facts in this case are whether or not the defendants paid their mortgage. All the irrelevant facts they bring up, a motion for sanctions, cross motions for summary judgment, they’re completely irrelevant to the matter at hand. I ask their motions be denied.

    Wherefore Defendants Marcia Johnson, Monzella Y. Johnson Prays that the Inspector General or whatever ethics Commission ENFORCE  and ERADICATE  all persons of color the same way the laws are exercised against racist whites in removing all parties using their skin colors upholding Terrorist Acts in the courts.  

   Because Black Democrats in this city have limited authority over all persons dispatch those persons Born & Raised Free Men or Women and not none who has demonstrated being inferior or puppets in the Democratic Political Machine.

    All Black and Brown are not inferior or second class sellouts only the ones involved in this case.

   Respectfully,

    Joe Louis 

            IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY, 

ILLINOIS COUNTY DEPARTMENT--CHANCERY DIVISION

 

U.S. Bank National Association, As Trustee Under)

Pooling and Servicing Agreement Dated as of        )

December 1, 2006 Mastr Asset–Backed Securities )

Trust 2006-NC3 Mortgage Pass-Through                )           Case # 2008 CH 33616

Certificates, Series 2006-NC3                                 )                                                           Petitioner        )

                                                                                          )          

V.                                                                                      )                Judge Freddrenna Lyles

                                                                                         )                                                                                        ) Room 2808    

                                                                                )

Monzella Y. Johnson, A/K/A Monzella                    )                                   

Johnson; Marcia E. Johnson A/K/A Marcia                           ) 

Johnson: Mortgage Electronic Registration            )

Systems, Inc. As Nominee for New Century          )

Mortgage Corporation; Monzella Y. Johnson         )                                         

( C ) Cestui Que Trust; Discover Bank;                  )

Unknown Owners and Non-Record Claimants,     )

                                                                               )

                                                           Respondents            )

                                                                                                                                                                                                        

       RESPONDENT’S MOTION FOR DISQUALIFICATION OF JUDGE “PRIVATE CITIZEN” FOR “CAUSE” USING HER ROBE ENGAGING IN A CRIMINAL CONSPIRACY  & VACATE (February9th 2021) ORDER DUE TO 14th AMENDMENT CIVIL RIGHTS VIOLATIONS “FRAUD” TRESPASSING UPON THE LAWS MAKING THE ORDER A NULLITY w/AFFIDAVIT

   Now comes Petitioner, Monzella Y. Johnson et al. being represented Pro Se in this cause respectfully represents to this court the reasons and files herewith her Affidavit in support of Respondent’s Motion for Disqualification et al;

 

1.      That Judge Lyle is demonstrating Untouchable Arrogance, in that, she has received an email, hereto attached, properly demonstrating Motions had been Re Noticed for the court date of Feb. 8th, at 10:30 am, she ignored every document and accepted the Fraudulent Motion of Plaintiff’s Motion as a Summary Judgment;

 

2.      That Plaintiff’s never filed a Summary Judgment but because of Respondent’s skin color Lyle is using her own skin color to aid and assist racist Bank attorneys to steal said home and figures as long as her actions are perpetrated on women or men of color her crimes will be excused;

 

3.      That Ex A email of Feb 3, 2021 detailing all documents sent to Judge Lyle and so many other parties because of the color of our skin nobody responded or addressed the HATE and CORRUPT JUDICIAL ACTS PERPETRATED BY LYLE AND THE ATTORNEYS.

 

4.      That Ex B email of Feb 3, 2021 detailing all documents sent to Judge Lyle and so many others, but an Email was finally sent from Chief Judge via Stephen M. Brandt;

 

5.      That Ex C email of July 30, 2020, OFFICIAL COMPLAINT AGAINST LICENSE ATTORNEYS STATE ATTORNEYS AS JUDGES WHO USES THEIR SKIN COLOR TO OPPRESS AND DESTROY THEIR OWN ETHNIC GROUPS SO AS TO BE ACCEPTED BY THE DEMOCRATIC POLITICAL MACHINE and a letter sent to Governor Pritzker and the FBI Special Agent Emmerson Buie.

 

6.      That That Ex D email of Feb 22, 2021 seeking to ascertain the status of the Executive Ethics Committee’s referral to the ARDC and Judicial Inquiry Board, Althea k. Welsh claims they never received any referral despite providing an email demonstrating otherwise.

 

7.      That Ex E email from a retired attorney advocate for African Immigrant Attorney (Lanre Amu) who’s law license by the IARDC, had been SUSPENDED, where he   had Kangaroo Hearings, but Althea K. Welsh the same person who saw nothing the racist Anglo-Saxon attorneys did in the 88 D 079012 Paternity case, when Joe Louis Lawrence filed Complaints against Joseph V. Roddy and Robert Anthony Egan where he was never served to appear in any court and never owed any child support, where their was never any paternity tests, DISMISSED his CCOMPLAINT saying she did not see any wrong doing on the part of the attorneys.

 

8.        That it is clear and convincing Chicago, Illinois has their own breed of Insurrectionists in the courts and State Agencies and Judge Lyle seems to be relying on all racist hateful Anglo-Saxon’s to come and save her.

   

9.      That Plaintiffs having admitted to all facts recorded in said Respondent’s Response Motion Striking & Objecting Plaintiff’s Motion filed July 7, 2017 et al. via affidavit;

A-    Court having no jurisdiction ignored Defendants valid Summary Judgment demonstrating Prejudice and Bias behavior pursuant to S.H.A. 735 ILCS 5/2-----1001 (a) (3); Sup. Ct. Rule 63 (C) (1).

 

10.  That Judge Lyle realizing she would not be admonished or ridiculed for violating her oath against women of color continuously demonstrated her role as that of a “Thug” in a robe allowed a politically connected racist law firm Potestivo & Assoc. to unlawfully corroborate with certain attorneys with U.S. Bank and others to try and steal Defendant’s home disguised as an unlawful foreclosure.

 

11.  That the Appellate Court Fifth Division, judges Nathaniel Howse, Jr. now an Illinois Sup. Ct. justice, Joseph Gordon and Epstein  affirmed a decision (Nov 30, 2011) judge Gillespie entered vacating the foreclosure That on June 7, 2010, Judge Gillespie entered an Order “The court on its own motion vacates the judgment of foreclosure for lack of a proper affidavit in support et al.

 

12.  That Fredrenna Lyles became a law unto herself a “Private Citizen” corroborated and demonstrated her role as an active Terrorist aiding and abetting in the stealing of a Retired Police Officer’s and Retired Chicago Board of Education, Educator’s home by accommodating and ruling in favor of every unlawful document they have filed, in that she signed an Oct. 29, 2018 Court Order Vacating a Judgment  Dec. 6, 2018.

 

13.  That Blacks in Chicago in the Democratic Party closes their eyes to the unlawful mayhem many innocent or elderly men or women disenfranchised by whatever means experienced in the legal system because they are now the new colored Ku Klux Klan or puppets in the Democratic Machine. 

 

14.  That the Defendants filed the proper Motion Objecting Respondent’s Motion et al. Lyle did not have a Hearing and even when there was a Hearing, she ruled any way she felt not in accordance to any laws in the books or rules.  

 

15.  That the Defendants have spent the last 13 years as elderly women depleting their savings fighting corruption Niggercism, racism trying to keep their home that they respectfully earned laboring in the work place by putting her life on the line protecting citizens of Chicago and educating children preparing them for the future and this is what many can expect and look forward to living in Democratic Corrupt City.      

 

A-    To show fraud upon the court, the complaining party must establish that the alleged misconduct affected the integrity of the judicial process, either because the court itself was defrauded or because the misconduct was perpetrated by officers of the court. Alexander v. Robertson, 882, F. 2d 421,424 (9th Cir. 1989);

 

B-    A void judgment does not create any binding obligation. Kalb v. Feuerstein (1940) 308 US 433, 60 S Ct 343, 84 L, Ed 370.

 

  Properly alleged facts within an affidavit that are not contradicted by counter affidavit are taken as true, despite the existence of contrary averments in the adverse party’s pleadings. Professional Group Travel, Ltd. v. Professional Seminar Consultants Inc., 136 ILL App 3d 1084, 483 N.E. 2d 1291; Buzzard v. Bolger, 117 ILL App 3d 887, 453 N.E. 2d 1129 et al

 

16.  Chronology of Facts:  That on July 28, 2017 Defendant’s appeared before Judge Fredrenna Lyles where Postestivo & Assoc. were represented by Shawn Beshant a female attorney;

A-    Pursuant to Group Ex A, (July 18, 2017 Notarized Transcript) Page 3, Lines 12-13, Judge Lyles stated, “Counsel, I have a response filed by the defendants. And do you need time to reply?”

 

B-    Pursuant to Page 3, Line 14 Counsel asked, “Yes can we have 21 days?”

 

C-    Pursuant to Lines 15-21 Judge Lyles stated, “They filed a motion and you filed a response, and because they were the ones who filed the motion, they get a chance to reply to the things that you raised in your response. And so that’s what we are doing this morning. August 8th would be the date that the reply would be due.”  

 

D-    Pursuant to Page 4, Lines 3-4 Judge Lyles stated, “This will be the last pleading….et al.”

 

E-     Pursuant to Page 4, Lines 16-17 Defendant Marcia Johnson stated, “For the record we object to their motion for the record”

 

F-     Pursuant to Page 4, Lines 18-20, Judge Lyles stated, “I certainly anticipated that, because I did have a chance to briefly look at your response.”

 

G-     Pursuant to Page 4, Line 22-23, Judge Lyles stated, “But they need to file a written reply”

 

H-    That judge Lyles gave specific reasons for said written reply, Page 5, Lines 1-6, she stated, “For 2 reasons. One is because we want to make sure we have a good record in case it goes up; and secondly, because I have over 3,000 cases in total, and I can’t possibly be expected to remember everything. So, I have to read it. Let’s have it in writing. Okay?”  

 

17.  That the Plaintiffs failed to comply to the Judges court order never requested leave to answer or respond later; thereby DEFAULTING and Summary Judgment was properly filed and served upon the Plaintiffs in a proper timely manner;

 

18.  That the Defendant’s properly filed said Notice of Motion for Summary Judgment due to “Fraud” on the Court pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 137 on August 23, 2017 and served upon Bryan at 12:50pm on Aug. 23, 2017 at the Law firm of Postestivo & Assoc., by Joe Louis Lawrence;

   

19.  That Page 2, of Respondent’s Motion for Summary Judgment et al. is clear within the Preponderance of evidence legal standard demonstrating how attorneys are trying to steal the Defendants homes in the guise of “Foreclosure” hereto attached;

 

20.  That Page 3, Par 6 of Respondent’s Response Motion Striking & Objecting Plaintiff’s Motion for Entry of Default judgment et al. states, That the Plaintiffs are expecting this court to ignore the Defendant’s legal affidavits and meritorious defenses and deny anything they submit due to their skin color being African American and the fact they are Pro Se and continue to abuse discretion of the court and enter orders void in nature;

 

A-   Motions for Reconsideration are designed to bring to the court’s attention newly discovered evidence that was unavailable at time of original hearing, changes in existing law, or errors in court’s application of law. Continental Cas. Co. v. Security Ins. Co. of Hartford, App. 1 Dist. 1996, 216 Ill. Dec. 314, 279 Ill. App. 3d 815, 665 N.E. 2d 374, appeal dismissed, et al.;

 

B-     The purpose of a Motion to Vacate is to alert the trial court to errors it has made and to afford an opportunity for their correction. In re Marriage of King, App. 1 Dist. 2002, 270 Ill. Dec. 540, 336 Ill. App. 3d 83, 783 N.E. 2d 115, rehearing denied pending appeal; et al.

 

C-    Pursuant to 735 ILCS 5/2-612 Counsel never Objected to the sufficiency of Petitioners pleadings, Objections to sufficiency of pleadings either in form or substance must be made in trial court, and if not so made, they will be considered waived and cannot be raised for the first time on appeal. People ex rel. Deynes v. Harris, App. 1948, 77 N.E. 2d 439, 333 Ill. App. 280.

 

 

21.               That said Defendants as Pro Se litigants retired Police Officer and retired educator from the Board of education followed all rules of Illinois Civil Procedure, Supreme Court Rules  with greater integrity and adherence to the laws;

 

22.  That because of the above; Fraud admissibility great latitude is permitted in proving fraud C.J.S. Fraud 104 ET Seg. Fraud 51-57. where a question of fraud and deceit is the issue involved in a case,  great latitude is ordinarily permitted in the introduction of evidence, and courts allow the greatest liberality in the method of examination and in the scope of inquiry Vigus V. O’Bannon, 1886 8 N.E 788, 118 ILL 334. Hazelton V. Carolus, 1907 132 ILL. App. 512.

 

A-    Pursuant to this precedent, hereto attached Gr Ex B Brief 17-cv-05482 Memorandum before the Seventh Circuit where a Federal judge tried to assist Defendant Judges who had “Trespassed upon the Laws” criminalizing him because as an African American man Pro Se litigant who fought back seeking custody of his daughter;

 

B-    Pursuant to Respondent’s Response Motion Striking & Objecting Plaintiff’s Motion et al. that Plaintiff’s failed to reply to on Page 4 Gr Ex B in the matter of Elena Fedorova v. Chicago Community Management et al. a veteran being wrongfully “Foreclosed”   

 

C-    That Page 3, Par 6 and 7of Gr Ex B is germane and applicable in this matter and demonstrates said judge acted as a private individual;

 

D-    That Par. 19, Page 4 from the aforementioned Motion Objecting Respondent’s Motion, Motion to Supplement Motion that Corroborates Democratic Judges engaging in an Active “Organized Conspiracy” “Fraud” & “Corruption” in Cook County Courts w/ Affidavit, before Fed Judge Charles Norgle unequivocally demonstrate how a Black judge William S. Boyd deceived and misrepresented his client Joe Louis in the Hightower v. Lawrence matter and earned an Associate judge’s position.

 

E-     That Page 4, Par 9 states, “In addition, when judges act when they do not have jurisdiction to act, or they enforce a void order (an order issued by a judge without jurisdiction), they become trespassers of the law, and are engaged in treason.”   

 

F-     That hereto attached, Gr Ex C, Motion Moving for Default & Summary 2015 CH 01670 Judgment w/Affidavit,  (Filed March 23, 2015) seeking $25 Million Dollars Pro Se litigant presented a valid complaint and was homeless due to the aforementioned, Judge Valderrama Trespassed upon the laws denied every document Plaintiff filed before him documents demonstrating he was discriminated from moving into units with a Section 8 voucher (#9727767) with great credit scores management took his money when they learned of his skin color refused to let him move into their units;

 

G-    That not one attorney guilty and cognizant of the aforementioned acts feared any reprisals from the judge because all of them knew the type of judge he was and what to expect. 

 

H-    That the aforementioned judge stated referencing unlawful1.blogspot.com April 21, 2015 Post, Page 2, Par 2 Judge Valderrama stated, “No the clerk’s office doesn’t serve anybody by certified mail. Let me back up. “When I say service, I don’t mean mailing anything. When I say service, I mean providing a copy of the complaint and summons on the entity that you have names in your complaint”

 

I-       That because of the prominent attorneys chagrin in being out maneuvered by a Pro Se litigant Judge Valderrama acted as a private person acted outside of his oath colluded with the Defendants Trespassing upon the laws engaging in Treason Offenses, in that judge Lyles has mirrored his every act as she committed the same criminal acts, in that African American or certain Hispanic Democratic judges due to self-hatred do not rule in favor of their ethnic groups or laws in accordance to the United States Constitution they embrace and condone racism.

 

J-      That Page 2 Par 5 further validate the verity of said judge acting outside of his jurisdiction as a Trespasser the law states, “Pursuant to 735 ILCS 5/3-105 “service of summons, summons issued in any action to review the final administrative decision of any administrative agency shall be served by registered or certified mail on the administrative agency and on each of the other defendants….et al” 

 

K-    That said Pro Se litigant defended himself against City attorneys, CHA attorneys, at least 12 of them named in the record not one person denied or objected to any of the assertions recorded in his complaint noted in unlawful1.blogspot.com Dec. 1, 2015 Posted in 3 parts.

 

                         

  1. Chronology of Facts validating Judge Fredrenna Lyles Trespassing upon the Laws engaging in “Fraudulent Acts”

A-     Pursuant to Gr Ex D, (Notarized Court transcript of September 1, 2017) Lines 7-17 Page 3 Mitchell Shanks Counsel for US Bank stated, “Mitchell Shanks on behalf of US Bank. This matter was set today for a hearing on our motion for summary judgment”

 

B-      “In the original order, there was an indication that a response was already filed. So then would leave that we only needed time to reply, but we didn’t receive—a response not filed. We didn’t receive their response until August 23rd. So essentially, we are just asking for time to reply to the response and then reset for hearing”;

 

  1. That Defendant Monzella Johnson stated, Lines 19-22 Page 3, “I object. He is saying our response, but they were the ones that were supposed to respond, according to the ruling pursuant to the Court’s order entered”

A-    Judge Lyles stated Line 23, “Yes ma’am. I know”

 

Ethics

            All Illinois lawyers must be familiar with the Illinois Rules of Professional Conduct, and trail lawyers must be particularly familiar with the rules that apply specially to them.

 

            RPC 3.3, entitled “Conduct Before a Tribunal,” sets forth the standards to be followed by the trial lawyer during “battle.” Section (a) of that rule states:

(a)  In appearing in a professional capacity before a tribunal, a lawyer shall not:

(1)  make a statement of material fact or law to a tribunal which the lawyer knows or reasonably should know is false;

 

(2)  fail to disclose to a tribunal a material fact known to the lawyer when disclosure is necessary to avoid assisting a criminal or fraudulent act by the client;

 

(3)  fail to disclose to the tribunal legal authority in the controlling jurisdiction known to the lawyer to be directly adverse to the position of the client and not disclosed by opposing counsel;

 

(4)  Offer evidence that the lawyer knows to be false. If a lawyer has offered material evidence and comes to know of its falsity, the lawyer shall take reasonable remedial measures;

 

(5)  participate in the creation or preservation of evidence when the lawyer knows or reasonably should know the evidence is false ;

 

(6)  counsel or assist the client in conduct the lawyer knows to be illegal of fraudulent;

 

(7)  engage in other illegal conduct or conduct in violation of these Rules;

 

(8)  fail to disclose the identities of the clients represented and of the persons who employed the lawyer unless such information is privileged or irrelevant;

 

(9)  intentionally degrade a witness or other person by stating or alluding to personal facts concerning that person which are not relevant to the case;

 

(10) in trial, allude to any matter that the lawyer does not reasonably believe is relevant or that will not be supported by admissible evidence, assert personal knowledge of facts in issue except when testifying as a witness, or state a personal opinion as to the justness of a cause, the credibility of a witness, the culpability of a civil litigant or the guilt or innocence of and accused, but a lawyer may argue, on analysis of evidence, for any position or conclusion with respect to the matter stated herein;

 

 

Acts constituting direct, criminal contempt

          A wide variety of acts may constitute a direct, criminal contempt. And act may be criminal contempt even though it is also an indictable crime. Beattie v. People, 33 Ill. App 651, 1889 WL 2373 (1st Dist. 1889). As is making false representations to the court. People v. Katelhut, 322 Ill. App. 693, 54 N.E.2d 590 (1st Dist. 1944). Misconduct of an officer of the court is punishable as contempt. People ex rel. Rusch v. Levin, 305 Ill. App. 142, 26 N.E. 2d 895 (1st Dist. 1939).

 

Official misconduct is a criminal offense; and a public officer or employee commits misconduct, punishable by fine, imprisonment, or both, when, in his official capacity, he intentionally or recklessly fails to perform any mandatory duty as required by law; or knowingly performs an act which he knows he is forbidden by law to perform; or with intent to obtain a personal advantage for himself or another, he performs an act in excess of his lawful authority ….S.H.A. Ch 38 33-3.

 

B-     That Pursuant to Gr Ex B, Page 6 states The Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals held that the Circuit Court   of Cook County is a criminal enterprise. U.S. v. Murphy, 768 F.2d 1518,     1531 (7th Cir. 1985)”.

The United States Supreme Court recently acknowledged the judicial corruption in Cook County, when it stated that Judge "Maloney was one of many dishonest judges exposed and convicted through 'Operation Greylord', a labyrinthine federal investigation of judicial corruption in Chicago". Bracey v. Gramley, case No. 96-6133 (June 9, 1997).

Since judges who do not report the criminal activities of other judges become principals in the criminal activity, 18 U.S.C. Section 2, 3 & 4, and since no judges have reported the criminal activity of the judges who have been convicted, the other judges are as guilty as the convicted judges.

 

  1.  That said Judge demonstrated cognizance of her premeditated acts of Treason condoning said attorney to commit perjury never admonishing him for inconsistent perjured remarks made in court   

 

  1. That said judge demonstrated Bias and collusion stated, Lines 2-6, Page 4 “Now, what he said was he didn’t get a copy of your response to which he going to reply. So, he needs additional time so that they can file a reply. That’s what he was basically saying.”

D-    Judge Lyles used her robe and unlawful authority in the same identical manner as Judge Valderrama in ignoring said Summary Judgment due to Plaintiffs Defaulting 735 ILCS 5/2—1001(a)(3) (West 2006). Although the statute does not define “cause”, Illinois courts have held that in such circumstances, actual prejudice has been required to FORCE REMOVAL of a judge from a case, that is, either prejudicial trial conduct or personal bias. Rosewood Corp. n Transamerica Insurance Co., 57 Ill 2d 247, 311 N.E. 2d 673 (1974; In re Marriage of Kozloff, 101 Ill 2d 526, 532, 79 Ill. Dec 165 463 N.E. 2d 719 (1984); see also People v. Vance, 76 Ill. 2d 171, 181, 28 Ill. Dec. 508, 390 N.E. 2d 867 (1979).

 

E-       That Judge Lyles is expecting the same body of racist judges and politicians that embraced Valderrama for his Treason Offenses against a Pro Se litigant who shared his ethnicity to save her in the same like manner, in that judges like the aforementioned are willing to do whatever it takes to destroy their own so as to be accepted by those who hate persons of color and is controlling the Democratic Party;

 

F-        In that African American judges ignorant of the laws are just as worse as racist judges, in that, many of them closes their eyes and commit the same acts as racist judges, due to them selling out their ethnicity for whatever alleged fee they can receive;

  

  1. The Illinois Supreme Court has held that "if the magistrate has not such jurisdiction, then he and those who advise and act with him, or execute his process, are trespassers." Von Kettler et.al. v. Johnson, 57 Ill. 109 (1870)

Under Federal law which is applicable to all states, the U.S. Supreme Court stated that if a court is "without authority, its judgments and orders are regarded as nullities. They are not voidable, but simply void; and form no bar to a recovery sought, even prior to a reversal in opposition to them. They constitute no justification; and all persons concerned in executing such judgments or sentences, are considered, in law, as trespassers." Elliot v. Piersol, 1 Pet. 328, 340, 26 U.S. 328, 340 (1828)

The Illinois Supreme Court held that if a court "could not hear the matter upon the jurisdictional paper presented, its finding that it had the power can add nothing to its authority, - it, had no authority to make that finding." The People v. Brewer, 128 Ill. 472, 483 (1928). The judges listed below had no legal authority (jurisdiction) to hear or rule on certain matters before them. They acted without any jurisdiction.

  1. When judges act when they do not have jurisdiction to act, or they enforce a void order (an order issued by a judge without jurisdiction), they become trespassers of the law, and are engaged in treason.

 

  1. That to further amplify the veracity of the above, Pursuant to Page 5, Lines 15-24, Page 6, Lines 1-2  Judge Lyles stated, “I know it may seem rather unusual, but it happens all the time in courts, things are—people are in offices and maybe they get misplaced. So, it’s not unusual for me to give persons standing on your side additional time. In fact, much to the banks chagrin, I give them a lot of additional time so that they can protect their cases”

“And so, when the plaintiff asks for additional time, it’s only fair and equitable that. I give them additional time. So that’s what I’m doing”

 

  1. That Defendant Marcia Johnson stated, Page 6, Lines 3-4 “I just want to get the record straight”

 

  1.  Judge Lyle stated unequivocally, Page 6, Lines 5-8 “Okay. That’s what I’m doing today. And regarding the record, you have a young lady over here who’s taking down verbatim what we say”

 

  1. That Chagrin is defined as disquietude or distress of mind caused by humiliation, disappointment or failure

 

  1. That because of the bank being allegedly embarrassed at being defeated litigiously by the Defendants Judge Lyles violated her oath assumed jurisdiction on a matter she did not have and became complicit in an “Organized Conspiracy” signing her name to a court order described as  a Nullity Void entirely;

 

A-    That Judge Lyles with Brazen disregard for the laws openly articulated her unlawful reasons granting the Plaintiff’s more time in an attempt for them to try and defeat said retired Defendants That due to the judges Bias and or Prejudice conduct pursuant to Sup Ct Rule 71, Sufficient for Removal, conduct which does not constitute a criminal offense may be sufficiently violative of the Judicial Canons to warrant removal for cause. Napolitano v Ward, 457 F 2d 279 (7th Cir.), cert denied, 409 U.S. 1037, 93 S. Ct. 512, 34 L. Ed. 2d 486 (1972).

 

7.    That judge Lyles has demonstrated an unknown interest in this matter which has blinded her objectivity in adjudicating the merits of this matter, due to the aforementioned; Sup Ct. Rule 63 (c) (1) (d) mandates disqualification where the judge has an interest in the proceeding. (eff. April 16, 2007).

 

A judge’s disrespect for the rules of court demonstrates disrespect for the law. Judges are disciplined under Canon 2A for violating court rules and procedures. Judge ignored mandated witness order in attempt to accommodate witnesses’ schedules; Citing Canon 2A the court noted, “[a] court’s indifference to clearly stated rules breed disrespect for and discontent with our justice system. Government cannot demand respect of the laws by its citizens when its tribunals ignore those very same laws”)

 

A-    Fraud upon the court is a basis for equitable relief. Luttrell v. United States, 644 F. 2d 1274, 1276 (9th Cir. 1980); see Abatti v. C.I.R. , 859 F 2d 115, 118 (9th Cir. 1988) “it is beyond question that a court may investigate a question as to whether there was fraud in the procurement of a judgment” Universal Oil Products Co. v. Root Refining Co., 328 U.S. 575, 66 S. Ct. 1176, 90 L. Ed. 1447. The power of the court to unearth such a fraud is the power to unearth it effectively. See Hazel-Atlas Glass Co. v. Hartford-Empire Co., 322 U.S. 238, 64 S. Ct. 997, 88 L. Ed. 1250; Sprague v. Ticonic National Bank, 1184 and United States v. Throckmorton, 98 U.S. (8 Otto) 61, 25 L. Ed. 93.

 

B-    A judge is an officer of the court, as are all members of the Bar. A judge is a judicial officer, paid by the Government to act impartially and lawfully”. People v. Zajic, 88 Ill. App 3d 477, 410 N.E. 2d 626. “A void judgment is regarded as a nullity, and the situation is the same as it would be if there were no judgment. It has no legal or binding force or efficacy for any purpose or at any place….It is not entitled to enforcement. 30A Am Judgments 43, 44, 45. Henderson v Henderson 59 S.E. 2d  227-232  

 

C-    “A Void Judgment from its inception is and forever continues to be absolutely null, without legal efficacy, ineffectual to bind parties or support a right, of no legal force and effect whatever, and incapable of confirmation, ratification, or enforcement in any manner or to any degree. “A void judgment, order or decree may be attacked at any time or in any court, either directly or collaterally” Oak Park Nat Bank v. Peoples Gas Light & Coke Col, 46 Ill. App. 2d 385, 197 N.E. 3d 73, 77, (1st Dist. 1964)           

 

  1.  That under 18 U.S.C. 242 and 42 U.S.C. 1985 (3) (b). A judge does not have the discretion on whether or not to follow Supreme Ct. Rules, but a duty to follow. People v. Gersh, 135 Ill. 2d 384 (1990).

 

Under penalties as provided by law pursuant to 735 1265 5\1-109, the undersigned certifies that the statements set forth in this instrument are true and correct, except as to matters therein stated to be on information and belief and as to such matters, the undersigned certifies as aforesaid that he verily believes the same to be true.

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   

                                                                                 Respectfully submitted,

 

 

                                                                                  Monzella Y. Johnson, Pro Se

                                                                                         5217 S. Ingleside Ave

                                                                                        Chicago, Il 60615

                                                                                           773 835-5849

 

 

                                                                                                                                      

WHEREFORE the aforementioned reasons Defendant respectfully Prays for the Relief

 

 

  

1.    For an Order Vacating  the February 9th, 2021 Void Court Order

 

2.    For an Order Disqualifying and Transferring this matter to a Judge from another venue due to Corruption and Fraud;

 

3.    For an Order issuing an Injunction prohibiting this judge or any judge named from foreclosing on any homes pending a thorough investigation.

 

4.    For an Order Pursuant to Smith v. Wade, 461 U.S. 30, 35 103 S. Ct. 1625, 1629, 75 L Ed 2d 632 (1983) Justice Brennen “The threshold standard for allowing punitive damages for reckless or callous indifference applies even in a case, such as here, where the underlying standard of liability for compensatory damages because is also one of recklessness. There is no merit to petitioner’s contention that actual malicious intent should be the standard for punitive damages because the deterrent purposes of such damages would be served only if the threshold for those damages is higher in every case than the underlying standard for liability in the first instance. The common-law rule is otherwise, and there is no reason to depart from the common-law rule in the context of {1983} of $14 Million Dollars covering the number of years Defendants being in court unlawfully representing job security for the attorneys;

 

5.    For an Order reimbursing all fees and costs to the Defendant for the enforcement of this matter;

 

6.    For Sanctions Remands and Disbarments of all attorneys involved in this matter;   

 

7.    For an Order amending the Summary Judgment to additional Punitive  Million Dollars for the active Chain Conspiracy of so many Public Officials closing their eyes to the enumerated crimes.

 

8.    For the entry of an Order awarding to your Respondent for such other relief and any other relief necessary as equity may require of which this court may deem overwhelmingly just;

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

        IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS

COUNTY DEPARTMENT--CHANCERY DIVISION

 

U.S. Bank National Association, As Trustee Under)

Pooling and Servicing Agreement Dated as of        )

December 1, 2006 Mastr Asset–Backed Securities )

Trust 2006-NC3 Mortgage Pass-Through               )           Case # 2008 CH 33616

Certificates, Series 2006-NC3                                 )                                                           Petitioner        )

                                                                                         )          

V.                                                                                     )                Judge Freddrenna Lyles

                                                                                         )                                                                                   )     

                                                                                )             Room 2808    

Monzella Y. Johnson, A/K/A Monzella                    )                                   

Johnson; Marcia E. Johnson A/K/A Marcia                          )

 Johnson: Mortgage Electronic Registration           )

Systems, Inc. As Nominee for New Century          )

Mortgage Corporation; Monzella Y. Johnson         )                                         

( C ) Cestui Que Trust; Discover Bank;                  )

Unknown Owners and Non-Record Claimants,      )

                                                                                )

                                                           Respondents             )

                                                                                                  NOTICE OF 

   RESPONDENT’S MOTION FOR DISQUALIFICATION OF JUDGE “PRIVATE CITIZEN” FOR “CAUSE” USING HER ROBE ENGAGING IN A CRIMINAL CONSPIRACY  & VACATE (February 9th 2021) ORDER DUE TO 14th AMENDMENT CIVIL RIGHTS VIOLATIONS “FRAUD” TRESPASSING UPON THE LAWS MAKING THE ORDER A NULLITY w/AFFIDAVIT

 

 

Please be advised that on February 24, 2021, Defendant has filed before this Circuit Court, Motion for Reconsideration et al; and will present said legally sufficient instrument before Judge Lyles or any Judge in her stead March 11 , at 10:30 am in room 2808.       

                                             U.S. Attorney

                                                  John R. Laush, Jr.

                                          219 South Dearborn Suite 500

                                                   Chicago, Ill 60605

 

                                           Special Agent Robert J. Bell 

                                            2111 West Roosevelt Road

                                               Chicago, IL. 60608

            

 

 

        Cook County State’s Attorney            Chief Judge Timothy C. Evans

         Kim Foxx                                              50 West Washington, Suite 2600

         50 West Washington, Suite 500                Chicago, Ill. 60601

         Chicago, Ill. 60601                          

 

 

                                                         

        Potestivo & Ass., PC  

      ilpleadings@potestivolaw.com

      rkuester@postestivolaw.com                       

        223 West Jackson, Blvd, Suite 610  
        Chicago, IL. 60606      

                     

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

 

The undersigned hereby certifies that the above notice and all attachments were caused to be emailed, to the above parties at the addresses provided before 5:00 pm on Feb. 24, 2021.

                                                                ________________________

                                                                  Respectfully Submitted, Monzella Y. Johnson

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

            IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS

COUNTY DEPARTMENT--CHANCERY DIVISION

 

U.S. Bank National Association, As Trustee Under)

Pooling and Servicing Agreement Dated as of        )

December 1, 2006 Mastr Asset–Backed Securities )

Trust 2006-NC3 Mortgage Pass-Through               )  Case # 2008 CH 33616

Certificates, Series 2006-NC3                                 )                                                           Petitioner        )

                                                                                         )           

V.                                                                                     )  Judge Freddrenna Lyles

                                                                                         )                                                                                   )     

                                                                                )   Room 2808    

Monzella Y. Johnson, A/K/A Monzella                    )                                   

Johnson; Marcia E. Johnson A/K/A Marcia                           )     

Johnson: Mortgage Electronic Registration            )

Systems, Inc. As Nominee for New Century           )

Mortgage Corporation; Monzella Y. Johnson          )                                         

( C ) Cestui Que Trust; Discover Bank;                  )

Unknown Owners and Non-Record Claimants,      )

                                                                                )

                                                           Respondents  )

                                                                                                                   

                                                 AFFIDAVIT

 

STATE OF ILLINOIS )

                                        )

COUNTY OF COOK   )

 

 

I Monzella Y. Johnson Pro Se being duly sworn on oath states the aforementioned pleadings enumerated within said motion pursuant to 735 1265 5/1-109, the undersigned certifies that the statements set forth in this instrument are true and correct, except as to matters therein stated to be on information and belief and as to such matters, the undersigned certifies as aforesaid that he verily believes the same to be true.

 

Respectfully Submitted                                                         Notary

                                                                       

____________________

Monzella Y. Johnson

5217 S. Ingleside. Ave

Chicago, Il 60615

773 835-5849 



No comments:

Post a Comment