THE ROSEANNE BARR SHOW HAS BEEN CANCELED FOR HER RACIST COMMENTS REGARDING VALERIE JARRETT, STARBUCKS HAS BEEN IN THE NEWS FOR 2 AFRICAN AMERICAN MEN BEING ARRESTED FOR SITTING IN THE PLACE.
NOBODY IS REALLY READING THE HOLOCAUST APARTHEID ACTS OF HATE THAT DEMOCRATIC AND CERTAIN REPUBLICAN JUDGES HAVE AGAINST MEN OF COLOR AS THEY USE THE LAWS AS WEAPONS DENYING THEM JUSTICE IN THE COURTS BECAUSE THE POLITICIANS ARE STILL IN THE ARCHAIC AGES OF JIM CROW.
THIS MOTION DISQUALIFYING JUDGE ROBERT M. DOW, JR. CLEARLY AND UNEQUIVOCALLY DEMONSTRATE THE HATE RACIST AND INFERIOR NIGGER JUDGES HAVE STOOPED TO DENYING INNOCENT MEN OF COLOR JUSTICE SO AS TO KEEP THEM OPPRESSED.
A FEDERAL JUDGE TRYING TO PROTECT MEMBERS OF THE DEMOCRATIC POLITICAL MACHINE AS THEY ENGAGED IN TERRORIST ACTS COMMITTING A PLETHORA OF SORDID CIVIL RIGHTS VIOLATIONS TRYING TO MAKE AN INNOCENT MAN APPEAR GUILTY AND ILLITERATE IN THE APTITUDE OF LAWS.
ACCORDING TO AREA OF THE LAWS THE ATTORNEYS HAVE ADMITTED TO EVERYTHING RECORDED IN THIS DOCUMENT SO THE JUDGE GOT A FEDERAL CLERK TO BACK DATE A LATE COURT ORDER BY PLACING THE COURT ORDER IN THE FEDERAL DATABASE AFTER THE SUMMARY JUDGMENT WAS FILED WHICH IS A FELONY ACT BY THE CLERK HE SHOULD BE IN JAIL!
TO FURTHER AMPLIFY AND CORROBORATE THE JUDGES INVOLVEMENT AIDING AND ABETTING IN THIS CRIMINAL CONSPIRACY HE CLAIMED TO HAVE DENIED THE SUMMARY JUDGMENT APRIL 3, 2018 BUT USED CASE LAW THAT WAS NOT FILED UNTIL APRIL 24, 2018 WHICH PROVES HIS POSITION NOT AS A FEDERAL JUDGE BUT NOW A PRIVATE CITIZEN.
HOW CAN PEOPLE OF COLOR RECEIVE JUSTICE IN A CITY OR STATE WHEN JUDGES DON'T BELIEVE IN THE LAWS OF THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION?
IN THE
UNITED STATES
COURT OF APPEALS
FOR
THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT
CHICAGO, ILLINOIS 60604
Joe Louis Lawrence
Civil Action #16 CV 7434
Hon: Robert M. Dow, Jr.
Plaintiff
V
420 East Ohio,
Chicago Housing Authority
345 East Ohio, K2
Apartments, City of Chicago,
Commission on Human
Relations Supreme Court
of Illinois, Alderman Edward Burke,
Franklin U. Valderrama, Mary Lane
Mikva
Defendants
MOTION FOR DISQUALIFICATION
OF JUDGE--PERSONAL BIAS OR PREJUDICE {28 USCA 144, 455 (B) (1)} VACATE ORDER OF
MAY 3 2018 & MAY 9, DUE TO FEDERAL CLERK COMMITTING FRAUD ENTERING COURT
ORDER IN COMPUTER UNLAWFULLY
To the Honorable Justices
of the Seventh Circuit of the United States Court of Appeals:
Complainant a United States Citizen, Joe
Louis Lawrence, hereby respectfully represents as Counsel Pro Se shows this
court with corroboration/admissions and affidavit the noted reasons why this
matter should be within this Court’s Jurisdiction so as to reassign this matter
to a judge with integrity; {Pursuant to
Fed Rules of Civil Procedure and LR40.1 (b) (d) (e3)} with Affidavit.
Now
comes Joe Louis Lawrence, Counsel Pro Se Appellant in this cause files herewith his affidavit as required by Title 28, United States Code, Section 144,
to show that the Honorable Robert M. Dow, Jr, has a personal bias with compelling
evidence against him where a proper sufficient
Motion for Summary Judgment was filed stating a cause how and why this court
has jurisdiction to grant said motion never objected to or denied by any of the
Defendants; motions corroborating judicial corruption with court transcripts
demonstrating “fraud” “Trespassing upon the Laws” “perjury” and a plethora of
“Terrorist Civil Rights Acts” put before the court that the District Court
ignored upholding Racism and Terrorism in the courts.
That said judge has corroborated and
demonstrated his role unequivocally as a “Trespasser of the Laws” when he
received the proper Motion for Reconsideration et al. and DENIED said Motion.
Based thereon, Plaintiff-Appellant respectfully moves that the Honorable
Robert M. Dow, Jr. proceed no further herein and that this Honorable Seventh
Circuit invoke jurisdiction; due to members of the Democratic Political Machine
seizing control over all courts and certain judges politically appointed
because of their racist hatred of ethnic groups they deem inferior to them so
as to enforce the laws pursuant to the
United States Constitution who is not Bias and understands how to enforce the
laws in accordance to the United States Constitution and according to Federal
Rules of Civil Procedure to hear this proceeding who is not intimidated or fear
reprisals from these individuals.
Now
comes Joe Louis Lawrence, Attorney Pro Se Appellant in this cause files
herewith his affidavit as required by Title
28, attesting the veracity and accuracy of all statements recorded within.
Respectfully Submitted,
By:
_________________
Joe Louis Lawrence
Counsel
Pro Se
P.
O. Box 490075
312 965-6455
Joelouis565@yahoo.com
@joelouis7
IN THE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT
COURT
FOR THE
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF
ILLINOIS
EASTERN DIVISION
AFFIDAVIT
IN
SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR DISQUALIFICATION OF JUDGE--PERSONAL BIAS OR PREJUDICE {28 USCA 144, 455
(B) (1)} VACATE ORDER OF MAY 3 2018 & MAY 9, DUE TO FEDERAL CLERK
COMMITTING FRAUD ENTERING COURT ORDER IN COMPUTER UNLAWFULLY
{Pursuant to the Rules of Federal
Civil Procedure & U.S. Constitution}
Section 1983 of U.S.C.S., S.H.A. Criminal Ch.
38, 33-3, Civil Rights Act of 1964, Canon 3D (1) Reporting Judicial Misconduct,
3D (2) Reporting Lawyer Misconduct;
I
am Joe Louis Lawrence, Counsel Pro Se Heterosexual Man Born and Raised a Free MAN Counsel Pro Se, HAVE BEEN MANY
TIMES DENIED IN ALL COURTS BUT NEVER TRIED being duly sworn on oath
states:
1.
That on May 2, 2018, Plaintiff appeared on Judge Dow’s
Motion Call for a Summary judgment;
A- Plaintiff
learned in court that Judge Dow purportedly dismissed or closed the matter he
said on April 3, 2018, nobody provided any notice of this act nor did any of
the Defendants’ communicate this fact when Notice of Summary Judgment was
served on all of them.
B- Judge
Dow in no way appeared racist or lack an intelligent aptitude of the laws maybe
extraordinarily passive trying to save certain persons caught up in this matter.
C- Judge
Dow mentioned in court that he was on the rules committee; furthermore, he has
an undergraduate degree (Bachelors) from Yale University, Doctorate in
Philosophy from the University of Oxford, and Juris Doctorate from Harvard Law
School.
D- That
said judge made deliberate errors in the laws so as to pass the buck, this is
known as “Trespassing upon the Laws”
which is an act of “Treason” only if
he refuses to correct his errors.
E- That
said judge colluded with a Federal Clerk in that said clerk with initials K.S.
improperly recorded the April 3, 2018 court order into the database when in
fact said order was in fact tendered after Plaintiff filed his Motion for
Summary Judgment April 24, 2018.
F- Very
few men have the credentials held by said judge it would be a disgrace for a
man with such qualifications throw his career away trying to save “Private Citizens” perpetrating their roles
as judges whom never should have been in the legal profession in the first
place.
G- That
Federal Officials should investigate the clerks and data system because at the
time of Motion being filed for Summary Judgment Plaintiff nor the clerks saw
the Order; otherwise, Plaintiffs motion never would have been filed or made it
on the Judges Motion call.
2.
That on December 18, 2017 Judge Robert M. Dow, Jr.
entered a “Minute Order” hereto attached, “Plaintiff’s motion to reinstate the case is taken under advisement.
The court will issue a ruling by mail after it has taken an opportunity to
review the motion and the prior history of the case, …..et al. Notice of motion
date of 12/21/2017 is stricken and no appearances are necessary on that date.” Is
the only court order Plaintiff ever received from the court.
3.
That “Private Citizen” Robert M. Dow, Jr.
violated his oath operated outside of his jurisdiction became a “Trespasser of
the Laws” engaging in “Treason” signed an order of April 3, 2018 but never
properly Docketed as indicated on the computer printout hereto attached.
- That
the Judge used his position and authority in an attempt to undermine the
integrity of Plaintiff’s motion by Inducing Reliance on all persons and
judges reviewing this matter; in that Page 2 of the manufactured order that corroborates the Judge as a
“Private Citizen” states Milchtein
v Chisholm, 880 F 3d 895, 897 (7th Cir 2018)
- That
said order demonstrates said judge colluding in a diabolical conspiracy
with the Defendants, “Memorandum
Decision and Order Granting Motion for Partial Summary Judgment which
was filed April 24th, 2018, validating the verity that a
Federal Clerk has used their position and authority to commit a criminal
act engaging in now a conspiracy pursuant to Mansell v. Saunders
(CA 5 F 1A) 372 F 573, especially if the conspiracy was actually carried
into effect, where an action is for a conspiracy to interfere with Civil
Rights under 42 U.S.C.S. 1985 (3), or for the depravation of such rights
under 42 U.S.C.S. 1983, if the conspiracy was actually carried into effect
and plaintiff was thereby deprived of any rights, privileges, or
immunities secured by the United States Constitution and Laws, the gist of
the action maybe treated as one for the depravation of rights under 42
U.S.C.S. 1983,
6.
That Page 2
of the unlawful order purportedly entered in the data system after Plaintiff’s,
states, “Plaintiff’s motion must be
denied, because this Court has no authority to review the decisions of state
court judges like Valderrama. Pursuant to the Rooker-Feldman doctrine, only the
Supreme Court of the United States has statutory authority to review the
decisions of state courts in civil cases” the laws and citations are from
the Seventh Circuit; That the United States Supreme Court has already laid out
the precedent of the laws that are being ignored in Illinois Under Federal law which is
applicable to all states, the U.S. Supreme Court stated that if a court is
"without authority, its judgments and orders are regarded as nullities. They
are not voidable, but simply void; and form no bar to a recovery sought, even
prior to a reversal in opposition to them. They constitute no justification;
and all persons concerned in executing such judgments or sentences, are
considered, in law, as trespassers." Elliot v. Piersol,
1 Pet. 328, 340, 26 U.S. 328, 340 (1828)
When judges act when they do not
have jurisdiction to act, or they enforce a void order (an order issued by a
judge without jurisdiction), they become trespassers of the law, and are engaged
in treason (see below).
The U.S. Supreme Court, in Scheuer
v. Rhodes, 416 U.S. 232, 94 S. Ct. 1683, 1687 (1974) stated that
"when a state officer acts under a state law in a manner violative of the
Federal Constitution, he "comes into conflict with the superior authority
of that Constitution, and he is in that case stripped of his official or
representative character and is subjected in his person to the
consequences of his individual conduct. The State has no power to impart to him
any immunity from responsibility to the supreme authority of the United
States." [Emphasis supplied in original].
By law, a judge is a state
officer as in this case Federal officers.
The judge then acts not as a
judge, but as a private individual (in his person).
7.
That it is clear in Judge Dow did not want Plaintiff to
articulate the merits of his Motion on May 10, 2018 on the 9:15 motion call out
of fear his colleagues would question his integrity, so he dismissed
Plaintiff’s motion on Wednesday but said motion remained on the Motion call;
whereby, Plaintiff sat in court for more than 2 hours and walked up to the
clerk to ascertain why his case was not called, clerk stated he dismissed the
case yesterday.
8.
That Defendants having admitted to all facts recorded in said Complaint
et al. via affidavit and Court Transcripts;
A-
Court having no jurisdiction to Dismiss valid Prove up Default
& Summary Judgment March 30, 2015, due to Judge Valderrama corroborating
his role engaging in “Treason” “Trespassing upon the Laws” hereto attached
, March 30, 2015 Court Order.
B-
To show fraud upon the court, the complaining party must establish
that the alleged misconduct affected the integrity of the judicial process,
either because the court itself was defrauded or because the misconduct was perpetrated
by officers of the court. Alexander v. Robertson, 882, F. 2d 421,424 (9th
Cir. 1989);
C-
A void judgment does not create any binding obligation.
Kalb v. Feuerstein (1940) 308 US 433, 60 S Ct 343, 84 L, Ed 370.
9.
That said court order signed by Judge Valderrama,
pursuant to Gr Ex C from the Dec 12,
Motion, states “IT IS ORDERED THAT:
this case is transferred to Calendar 6 Judge Mikva, for the sole purpose
of hearing the Petition for Substitution of Judge for Cause. . Upon resolution
of the Motion, the case shall be returned to the Presiding Judge for the
appropriate assignment. Judge Moche Jacobius signed the Order March 18, 2016.
10.
That the aforementioned Directive was never adhered
to making every order entered by “Private
Citizen” Valderrama a “Nullity” VOID ENTIRELY
A-
“A Void Judgment from
its inception is and forever continues to be absolutely null, without legal
efficacy, ineffectual to bind parties or support a right, of no legal force and
effect whatever, and incapable of confirmation, ratification, or enforcement in
any manner or to any degree. “A void judgment, order or decree may be attacked
at any time or in any court, either directly or collaterally” Oak Park Nat Bank v.
Peoples Gas Light & Coke Col, 46 Ill. App. 2d 385, 197 N.E. 3d 73, 77, (1st
Dist. 1964)
B-
“The Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals
held that the Circuit Court of Cook
County is a criminal enterprise. U.S. v. Murphy, 768 F.2d 1518, 1531 (7th Cir. 1985)”.
11. That
pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure RULE 8 (1) In General.
In responding to a pleading, a party must:
(A) State in short
and plain terms its defenses to each claim asserted against it; and
(B) Admit or
Deny the allegations asserted against it by an opposing party.
(2) Denials—Responding to the Substance. A denial must fairly respond
to the substance of the allegation.
(3) General and Specific Denials. A party that intends in good faith to
deny all the allegations of a pleading—including the jurisdictional grounds—may
do so by a general denial. A party that does not intend to deny all the
allegations must either specifically deny designated allegations or generally
deny all except those specifically admitted.
(4) Denying Part of an Allegation. A party that intends in good faith
to deny only part of an allegation must admit the part that is true and deny
the rest.
(5) Lacking Knowledge or Information. A party that lacks knowledge or
information sufficient to form a belief about the truth of an allegation must
so state, and the statement, has the effect of a denial.
(6) Effect of Failing to Deny. An allegation –other than one relating
to the amount of damages –is admitted if a responsive pleading is required and
the allegation is not denied. If a responsive pleading is not required an
allegation is considered denied or avoided.
12. That
said Defendants Defaulted in the same like manner in the Cook County Court and
relied on a Negroe judge inferior in nature to “Trespass upon the Laws”
and commit all sorts of infamous crimes, trying to save the perpetrators guilty
of Housing Discrimination and Voucher Discrimination along with various acts of
Civil Rights violations hereto attached, Brief before the Seventh Circuit
filed March 14, 2018; (Lee Oties
Love, Jr. v Supreme Court of IL. Et al.)
A- Said
Brief unequivocally demonstrate the magnitude African American Democrats are
willing to do to destroy their own ethnic group so as to be accepted by “White
Nationalist” controlling the Democratic party “Political Machine” by
embracing “Jim Crow Laws” by denying
any and all claims put before the courts by persons of color against Caucasian
racist Irish and other Democrats.
B- That
no Defendant denied or responded to the merits of the Brief at the time of this
Motion being filed validating the verity of all acts by members of the
Democratic Political Machine in it’s entirety.
13. That under
the authority of Alderman Edward Burke he has recruited Ronald Bartkowicz
former CTA workman’s compensation attorney to “Trespass upon the Laws”
in that said judge issued a Bogus warrant against the Petitioner on a Bogus
paternity case where he was unlawfully arrested his CTA Badge was removed from
his body so as to protect the racist individuals responsible for stealing his
wages while off work injured on duty where a drunk police officer totaled his
van on Petitioners bus while he was standing still;
A-
Hereto attached, per subpoena Cook County judge not
connected to the Democratic Machine of Racist and inferior Terrorists ordered
the production of said CTA records, demonstrating Petitioner still being a CTA
employee;
B-
That because ATU 241 Secretary Michael Simmons was
having and alleged intimate relationship with former Chief attorney Kent
Stephan Ray and other men in the closet of the union obstructed his
reinstatement, in that no heterosexual man of any competent or erect authority demonstrated
any integrity only total impotency at the Petitioner for taking a stand at so
many of them in their cowardly fraternal order;
14. That
under the authority of Alderman Edward Burke he recruited the other aforementioned
judges David Haracz, Timothy P. Murphy, see
unlawful1.blogspot.com Chronology of Unlawful Contempt Charges by the
Democratic Political Machine, August 30, 2012, demonstrating how racist
Democrats “Trespass upon the Laws” engaging in “Treason.”
15. That
because so many black men Negroe or African American are the new black women
for these Cacausion men with wives and children none of them opened their
mouths; moreover, there is a person in prominent authority been married to his
wife for 10, 20 or 30 years had a man in his life almost the same time of his
marriage so it is these type of individuals who are not at all what they appear
to be but is using their political, racist and sexual cowardice at the
Petitioner for being what he was born to be a man, a man’s man.
16. Allegedly,
Edward Burke had Judge John T. Carr
to aid and assist his ex-wife by having the court reporter to allegedly leave
the court as he aided her by allowing her to manufacture allegations of
domestic abuse on his children DCFS got involved asserting he was a black belt
in martial arts using it to discipline his children, by her going along with
these sick acts she was promised welfare in her name. (none of it was true)
they tried getting the Police involved “Desk
Sargent told DCFS not to bring that
shit back up in here!”
A- To
further amplify the horrors of hate Edward Burke and his regime of judges using
their robes to “Trespass upon the Laws” Petitioner was taking his family
to family psychiatrist at least 2 and 3 times a week behind the episodes of
what he was going through in the courts.
17. Allegedly,
Edward Burke and other Democrats incur profits off of judges “Trespassing
upon the laws” where injustice is present, in that, hereto attached,
Monthly Billing Statement of Child Support Account, manufactured by the
Illinois Dept. of Healthcare and Family Services asserting Petitioner owes
$228.00 on a case Democratic Judges have used their robes as “Private
Citizens” aiding and abetting in “Treason” and a plethora of diabolical
criminal conspiracies seeking money in an unlawful manner.
A-
“Private Citizen” Valderrama having cognizance
of the plethora of criminal acts of what other judges engaged in against the
Petitioner demonstrated untouchable arrogance because nothing happened to the other
judges, thought he could profit off the Petitioner but what he was too ignorant
to realize none of the judges signed any court orders on the 88 D 079012 case,
he has signed every court order and has agreed to everything by not denying
anything.
Defendants have not raised any
affirmative defenses.
Summary judgment is appropriate when the pleadings, depositions,
admissions and affidavits, viewed in a light most favorable to the movant or non-movant
fail to establish a genuine issue of material fact, thereby
1.
Entitling the moving party to judgment as a matter of
law.
The purpose of summary judgment is not to try a question of
fact, but simply to
Determine whether one exists.
When the party moving for summary judgment supplies evidentiary
facts which,
If not contradicted,
would entitle him to judgment, the opposing party cannot
Rely upon his
complaint or answer alone to raise issues of material fact. A counter
Affidavit is
necessary to refute evidentiary facts properly asserted by affidavit
Supporting the motion
or else the facts are deemed admitted.
Here, Plaintiff has supplied
affidavits, Certified Court transcripts and other evidentiary material that
establishes all of the elements necessary to entitle it to recovery under the
parties’ agreements, including the amount of damages. Defendants have failed to
submit any evidence in opposition to the Motion or Order to raise any genuine
issues of material fact. Thus summary judgment is proper.
FURTHER AFFIANT SAYETH NOT
Joe
Louis Lawrence
__________________
Counsel
Pro Se
P.
O. Box 490075
312
965-6455
joelouislaw@yahoo.com
@joelouis7
WHEREFORE the aforementioned
reasons Plaintiff respectfully Prays for the Relief
1.
For an Order Vacating the
Orders signed by judge Dow due to “Trespassing upon the Laws” and acts of
“Treason”.
2.
For an Order reassigning this matter to another venue not
influenced by corruption or politicians in Chicago.
3.
For an Order Granting Summary Judgment Instanter.
4.
For an Order issuing a Rule
to Show Cause Remanding Franklin U. Valderrama into Custody Instanter.
5.
For an Order appointing a
Special Prosecutor who understands the jurisdiction of their profession to
investigate and ascertain all other parties complicit in these Terrorist
Treason Offenses of all cases noted within;
6.
For an Order staying any and all legal enforcements of all parties
noted within due to the plethora of Felonies enacted by “Private Citizens”
perpetrating roles as judges Trespassing upon the Laws”
7.
For an Order on bond be
not less than one million dollars for any and all parties charged in these
crimes in warring against the United States Constitution.
8.
For an Order removing the
Chief Judge of Cook County and Presiding judges of all Circuits who as Public
Servants failed to investigate remove or report any judge in accordance to
their oath and Public Duty.
9.
For an Order setting a
Hearing Date for all attorneys who sat by in an idle manner and did not
exercise his or her duties pursuant to the Ethics of R.P.C 3.3 and speak up or
report the terrorist acts perpetrated by “Private Citizens” violating their
oaths as judges.
10. For the entry of an Order
awarding to your Petitioner for such other relief and any other relief
necessary as equity may require of which this court may deem overwhelmingly
just;
IN THE
UNITED STATES
COURT OF APPEALS
FOR
THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT
CHICAGO,
ILLINOIS 60604
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I Joe Louis Lawrence, certify that I have on
this day filed said Notice of Motion for Disqualification of judge et al.
Before the Seventh Circuit United States Court of Appeals and noted parties.
Please be
advised that on, May 10, 2018
Plaintiff has filed before this Seventh Circuit, Motion for Disqualification of
judge et al.
Chicago
Housing Authority
Wilson
Elser Moskowitz Edelman & Dicker LLP
Office of
the General Counsel Christian
T. Novay
Asst
Gen Counsels
55
West Monroe, Street, Suite 3800
Maria
Sewell Joseph T.B. King
Chicago,
Il 60603
60 East
Van Buren
Chicago,
Ill 60605
Seyfarth & Shaw
Jeffrey K. Ross, Kyle A. Petersen & Anne Harris
Willis/Sears
Tower
Chicago,
Ill. 60603
Stephan R.
Patton, Mary E. Reuther, Rey A. Phillip Santos, S. Atty. Martha Diaz
Corp Counsel, Deputy Corp. Counsel, Asst Corp Counsel
30 N. LaSalle Street, Suite 800
Chicago, Ill 60602
Cary
G. Schiff & Associates Gordon
& Rees LLP
Christopher
R. Johnson
Goli
Rahimi
Yuleida
Joy 1
North Franklin, Suite 800
134 N.
LaSalle Street, Suite 1720
Chicago,
Illinois 60606
Chicago,
Ill. 60602
Lewis
Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith, LLP
Christian
Novay
550 West Adams Street, Suite 300
Chicago, IL. 60661
Chief Judge
Timothy C. Evans, Daley Center, Chg., Ill. 60601
Presiding
Judge Moche Jacobius, Room 2403, Daley Center, Chg. Ill. 60601
Assc.
Judge Franklin U. Valderrama, Room 2402, Daley Center, Chg. Ill. 60601
Clerk
of Circuit Court Dorothy Brown, Suite 1001, Chg Ill. 60601
States
Attorney, Kim Foxx, Room 500 Daley Center,
Chg. Ill. 60601
Atty
Gen Lisa Madigan, 100 West Randolph, Suite 1300 Chg. Ill. 60601
CHA
Mobility
CHA
Mobility, HCP Counselors
Chris
Klepper, Executive Dir
Tracey
Robinson/Joann Harris
28 East
Jackson Blvd.
4859
S. Wabash, Suite 2nd Floor
Chicago,
Ill 60604
Chicago,
Ill. 60615
CHA
Mobility, Real Estate Specialist
Jessie
McDaniel
4859 S.
Wabash
Chicago,
Ill. 60615
Courtesy
Copies:
US
Attorney
FBI Dir. Chris Wray
John
R. Lausch, Jr. 2111
West Roosevelt Road
219 S.
Dearborn, 5th floor
Chicago, Ill. 60612
Chicago,
Ill. 60604
Governor
Hon
Mark Kirk
Bruce
Rauner
607 East Adams, Suite 1520
100 West
Randolph, Suite
Springfield,
Ill. 62701
Chicago,
Ill. 60601
Mayor
Deputy
Regional Adm., Field Office Dir.
Rahm
Emanuel
Beverly
E. Bishop
City Hall
77
West Jackson Boulevard
Chicago,
Ill. 60601
Chicago,
Ill. 60604
Hon
Dick Durbin
Judge
525 South
8th St.
Frederick
Bates
Springfield,
Ill. 62703
50 West Washington Room
Chicago, Ill. 60601
Judge
Celia C. Gamrath Judge
50 West
Washington Room 2508 Neil Cohen
50
West Washington Room 2308
Alderman
David Moore
Alderman Ed Burke
Alderwoman Carrie Austin
Alderwoman Emma Mitts
Cook
County President
Cook
County Sheriff
Toni
Preckwinkle
Thomas
J. Dart
118 N.
Clark, Room 517
Richard
J. Daley Center, Room 701
Chicago,
Ill. 60602
Chicago,
Ill. 60602
PLEASE
BE ADVISED that on May 10, 2018, A Motion for Disqualification of judge et al. has been
filed with the Court of Appeals Seventh Circuit and said copies being served on
said applicable parties via hand delivery or regular mail;
Respectfully, Submitted,
Joe Louis Lawrence
Counsel Pro Se
Chicago,
Ill 60649
312 965-6455
@joelouis
No comments:
Post a Comment