Wikipedia Racial Injustice in Chicago Courts

Search results

Thursday, May 3, 2018

REPUBLICAN FEDERAL JUDGE ACTING LIKE A DEMOCRAT FIXING A CASE IN FEDERAL COURT:

FEDERAL JUDGE ROBERT M. DOW, JR. DID THE UNTHINKABLE AND SIGNED HIS NAME TO THE COURT ORDER.

ON APRIL 24TH, I FILED A MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE W/AFFIDAVIT AND SERVED IT ON ALL PARTIES AND NOTICED IT FOR MAY 2ND AT 9:15 AM, THE CLERKS CHECKED THE CASE 16 CV 7434 MAKING SURE THE CASE WAS ACTIVE BEFORE ACCEPTING MY MOTION IT WAS VERY ACTIVE AND ALL COPIES WERE FILE STAMPED.

JUDGE DOW'S CLERK PLACED MY MOTION ON THE 9:15 AM MOTION CALL SHEET.

ON MAY 2ND MY CASE WAS CALLED, I WAS THE ONLY BROWN COMPLEXIONED MAN DRESSED BEFORE THE COURT, JUDGE DOW STATED, HE DIDN'T KNOW WHY I WA ON THE MOTION CALL BECAUSE HE CLOSED MY CASE, I EXPLAINED TO HIM HOW IS THAT THE LAST COURT ORDER, I RECEIVED WAS FROM YOU IN DECEMBER 2017?

NOW THE COURT ROOM WAS FULL OF PEOPLE, MY MOUTH WAS WIDE OPEN BECAUSE I KNEW THEIR WAS SOME SHIT IN THIS MATTER BUT COULD'NT QUITE FIGURE OUT WHAT HAPPENED--THE JUDGE ACTED NERVOUS HAD HIS CLERK TO HAD ME HER COMPUTER PRINTOUT AND HIS COURT ORDER CLOSING THE CASE ALONG WITH A CARD TO GO TO HIBBLER LEGAL CLINIC FOR HELP.

I EXPLAINED TO THIS JUDGE, I NEVER RECEIVED ANY KNOWLEDGE OF MY CASE BEING CLOSED OTHERWISE, I WOULD HAVE PREPARED ANOTHER MOTION MY MOUTH WAS STILL WIDE OPENED--SOME ATTORNEYS WERE GRUMBLING THEY KNEW THIS JUDGE DID SOMETHING CROOKED SOME OF THE ATTORNEYS LOOKED AT ME SHAKING THEIR HEADS.

JUDGE DOW APPEARED STUNNED AND TAKEN BACK AT MY ABILITY TO ARTICULATE THE LAWS TO HIM IN HIS COURT--JUDGE DOW HAD THE LOOK IN HIS EYES, THAT HE FUCKED UP AFTER HEARING ME SPEAK.

LET ME TELL YOU WHY HE WAS SO NERVOUS, THIS JUDGE COLLUDED WITH A FEDERAL CLERK WITH OVER RIDDING AUTHORITY TO INCLUDE HIS COURT ORDER DATED APRIL 3RD WHICH WAS PREPARED AFTER APRIL 24TH.

I WANT ALL OF YOU JOURNALISTS LAW ENFORCEMENT FEDERAL OFFICIALS TO PULL UP THIS CASE   Milchtein v. Chisholm, 880 F. 3d 895, 897-98 (7th Cir. 2018),  THIS CASE WAS FILED APRIL 24TH 2018.

CAN ANYONE EXPLAIN HOW THIS REPUBLICAN JUDGE WITH ALL OF THESE ACADEMIC CREDENTIALS EXPLAIN HOW HE STOOPED TO DEMOCRATIC TACTICS OF TRESPASSING UPON THE LAWS LIKENED TO ELEPHANT MANURE INCLUDE A LAW FROM THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT PUT IT IN A COURT ORDER FOR APRIL 3RD THAT WAS NOT FILED UNTIL APRIL 24TH?

NOW THAT THIS JUDGE HAVE PISSED HIS CAREER AWAY COMMITTING PERJURY AND MULTIPLE FELONY ACTS, HE HAS MADE IT CLEAR THAT PEOPLE OF COLOR CAN NOT RECEIVE EQUAL PROTECTION OF THE LAWS BECAUSE JUDGES ARE EITHER BOUGHT AND PAID FOR, OR SLEEPING WITH EACH OTHER, OR FRATERNALLY POLITICALLY CONNECTED IN  HATRED.

NOW THE QUESTION IS HOW MUCH DID THEY PAY THE FEDERAL CLERK TO ABUSE HIS POSITION AND AUTHORITY TO AID AND ABET IN A CRIMINAL CONSPIRACY TAMPERING WITH THE GOVERNMENT'S COMPUTER TO ASSIST THE JUDGE IN THIS MATTER?     



IN THE 
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
EASTERN DIVISION

 Joe Louis Lawrence                                                      Civil Action #16 CV 7434

                                                                                       Hon:  Robert M. Dow, Jr. 
  Plaintiff

    V

420 East Ohio, Chicago Housing Authority  
345 East Ohio, K2 Apartments, City of Chicago,
Commission on Human Relations Supreme Court
 of Illinois, Alderman Edward Burke,                           
 Franklin U. Valderrama, Mary Lane Mikva                                    

 Defendants
                                                                                                                                                                                               
MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION & VACATE COURT ORDER DUE TO IT BEING A NULLITY PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE w/AFFIDAVIT
   Now comes Petitioner, Joe Louis Lawrence, Counsel Pro Se in this cause respectfully represents to this court the reasons and files herewith his Affidavit in support of Motion for Reconsideration et al;



                                                                 Respectfully Submitted,

By:   _________________         


                                                                            Joe Louis Lawrence
                                                                                                        Counsel Pro Se
                                                                                                       P. O. Box 490075
                                                                                                        312 965-6455
                                                                                               Joelouis565@yahoo.com
                                                                                                    @joelouis7



                                                               IN THE 
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
                                               EASTERN DIVISION

                                                         AFFIDAVIT
                                                                                                                                                               
IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION VACATE ORDER PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE w/AFFIDAVIT


1.    I am Joe Louis Lawrence, Counsel Pro Se, Petitioner in this cause, being first duly sworn on oath deposes and states, as follows;

2.      That on May 2, 2018, Plaintiff appeared on Judge Dow’s Motion Call for a Summary judgment;
A-    Plaintiff learned in court that Judge Dow purportedly dismissed or closed the matter he said on April 3, 2018, nobody provided any notice of this act nor did any of the Defendants’ communicate this fact when Notice of Summary Judgment was served on all of them.

B-    Judge Dow in no way appeared racist or lack an intelligent aptitude of the laws maybe extraordinarily passive trying to save certain persons caught up in this matter.

C-    Judge Dow mentioned in court that he was on the rules committee; furthermore, he has an undergraduate degree (Bachelors) from Yale University, Doctorate in Philosophy from the University of Oxford, and Juris Doctorate from Harvard Law School.

D-    That said judge made deliberate errors in the laws so as to pass the buck, this is known as “Trespassing upon the Laws” which is an act of “Treason” only if he refuses to correct his errors.

E-     Very few men have the credentials held by said judge it would be a disgrace for a man with such qualifications throw his career away trying to save “Private Citizens” perpetrating their roles as judges whom never should have been in the legal profession in the first place.

F-     That Federal Officials should investigate the clerks and data system because at the time of Motion being filed for Summary Judgment Plaintiff nor the clerks saw the Order; otherwise, Plaintiffs motion never would have been filed or made it on the Judges Motion call.

3.      That on December 18, 2017 Judge Robert M. Dow, Jr. entered a “Minute Order” hereto attached, “Plaintiff’s motion to reinstate the case is taken under advisement. The court will issue a ruling by mail after it has taken an opportunity to review the motion and the prior history of the case, …..et al. Notice of motion date of 12/21/2017 is stricken and no appearances are necessary on that date.”


4.      That Page 2 of the alleged order purportedly entered in the data system timely, states, “Plaintiff’s motion must be denied, because this Court has no authority to review the decisions of state court judges like Valderrama. Pursuant to the Rooker-Feldman doctrine, only the Supreme Court of the United States has statutory authority to review the decisions of state courts in civil cases” the laws and citations are from the Seventh Circuit; That the United States Supreme Court has already laid out the precedent of the laws that are being ignored in Illinois Under Federal law which is applicable to all states, the U.S. Supreme Court stated that if a court is "without authority, its judgments and orders are regarded as nullities. They are not voidable, but simply void; and form no bar to a recovery sought, even prior to a reversal in opposition to them. They constitute no justification; and all persons concerned in executing such judgments or sentences, are considered, in law, as trespassers." Elliot v. Piersol, 1 Pet. 328, 340, 26 U.S. 328, 340 (1828)
When judges act when they do not have jurisdiction to act, or they enforce a void order (an order issued by a judge without jurisdiction), they become trespassers of the law, and are engaged in treason (see below).
The U.S. Supreme Court, in Scheuer v. Rhodes, 416 U.S. 232, 94 S. Ct. 1683, 1687 (1974) stated that "when a state officer acts under a state law in a manner violative of the Federal Constitution, he "comes into conflict with the superior authority of that Constitution, and he is in that case stripped of his official or representative character and is subjected in his person to the consequences of his individual conduct. The State has no power to impart to him any immunity from responsibility to the supreme authority of the United States." [Emphasis supplied in original].
By law, a judge is a state officer as in this case Federal officers.
The judge then acts not as a judge, but as a private individual (in his person).

5.       That it is clear in Judge Dow’s legal disposition he wants no part of this mess which demonstrates a conflict of his sworn oath to do as judge over this matter.

6.      That Defendants having admitted to all facts recorded in said Complaint et al. via affidavit and Court Transcripts;
A-    Court having no jurisdiction to Dismiss valid Prove up Default & Summary Judgment March 30, 2015, due to Judge Valderrama corroborating his role engaging in “Treason” “Trespassing upon the Laws” hereto attached , March 30, 2015 Court Order.

B-    To show fraud upon the court, the complaining party must establish that the alleged misconduct affected the integrity of the judicial process, either because the court itself was defrauded or because the misconduct was perpetrated by officers of the court. Alexander v. Robertson, 882, F. 2d 421,424 (9th Cir. 1989);

C-    A void judgment does not create any binding obligation. Kalb v. Feuerstein (1940) 308 US 433, 60 S Ct 343, 84 L, Ed 370.

7.      That said court order signed by Judge Valderrama, pursuant to Gr Ex C from the Dec 12, Motion, states “IT IS ORDERED THAT: this case is transferred to Calendar 6 Judge Mikva, for the sole purpose of hearing the Petition for Substitution of Judge for Cause. . Upon resolution of the Motion, the case shall be returned to the Presiding Judge for the appropriate assignment. Judge Moche Jacobius signed the Order March 18, 2016.
  
8.      That the aforementioned Directive was never adhered to making every order entered by “Private Citizen” Valderrama a “Nullity” VOID ENTIRELY

A-    “A Void Judgment from its inception is and forever continues to be absolutely null, without legal efficacy, ineffectual to bind parties or support a right, of no legal force and effect whatever, and incapable of confirmation, ratification, or enforcement in any manner or to any degree. “A void judgment, order or decree may be attacked at any time or in any court, either directly or collaterally” Oak Park Nat Bank v. Peoples Gas Light & Coke Col, 46 Ill. App. 2d 385, 197 N.E. 3d 73, 77, (1st Dist. 1964)

B-    The Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals held that the Circuit Court   of Cook County is a criminal enterprise. U.S. v. Murphy, 768 F.2d 1518,     1531 (7th Cir. 1985)”.
      
9.      That pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure RULE 8 (1) In General. In responding to a pleading, a party must:
(A) State in short and plain terms its defenses to each claim asserted against it; and
(B)  Admit or Deny the allegations asserted against it by an opposing party.

(2) Denials—Responding to the Substance. A denial must fairly respond to the substance of the allegation.
(3) General and Specific Denials. A party that intends in good faith to deny all the allegations of a pleading—including the jurisdictional grounds—may do so by a general denial. A party that does not intend to deny all the allegations must either specifically deny designated allegations or generally deny all except those specifically admitted.
(4) Denying Part of an Allegation. A party that intends in good faith to deny only part of an allegation must admit the part that is true and deny the rest.
(5) Lacking Knowledge or Information. A party that lacks knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief about the truth of an allegation must so state, and the statement, has the effect of a denial.
(6) Effect of Failing to Deny. An allegation –other than one relating to the amount of damages –is admitted if a responsive pleading is required and the allegation is not denied. If a responsive pleading is not required an allegation is considered denied or avoided.
      
10.  That said Defendants Defaulted in the same like manner in the Cook County Court and relied on a Negroe judge inferior in nature to “Trespass upon the Laws” and commit all sorts of infamous crimes, trying to save the perpetrators guilty of Housing Discrimination and Voucher Discrimination along with various acts of Civil Rights violations hereto attached, Brief before the Seventh Circuit filed March 14, 2018;  (Lee Oties Love, Jr. v Supreme Court of IL. Et al.)
A-    Said Brief unequivocally demonstrate the magnitude African American Democrats are willing to do to destroy their own ethnic group so as to be accepted by “White Nationalist” controlling the Democratic party “Political Machine” by embracing “Jim Crow Laws” by denying any and all claims put before the courts by persons of color against Caucasian racist Irish and other Democrats. 

B-    That no Defendant denied or responded to the merits of the Brief at the time of this Motion being filed validating the verity of all acts by members of the Democratic Political Machine in it’s entirety.

11.  That under the authority of Alderman Edward Burke he has recruited Ronald Bartkowicz former CTA workman’s compensation attorney to “Trespass upon the Laws” in that said judge issued a Bogus warrant against the Petitioner on a Bogus paternity case where he was unlawfully arrested his CTA Badge was removed from his body so as to protect the racist individuals responsible for stealing his wages while off work injured on duty where a drunk police officer totaled his van on Petitioners bus while he was standing still;
A-    Hereto attached, per subpoena Cook County judge not connected to the Democratic Machine of Racist and inferior Terrorists ordered the production of said CTA records, demonstrating Petitioner still being a CTA employee;

B-    That because ATU 241 Secretary Michael Simmons was having and alleged intimate relationship with former Chief attorney Kent Stephan Ray and other men in the closet of the union obstructed his reinstatement, in that no heterosexual man of any competent or erect authority demonstrated any integrity only total impotency at the Petitioner for taking a stand at so many of them in their cowardly fraternal order;  
 
12.  That under the authority of Alderman Edward Burke he recruited the other aforementioned judges David Haracz, Timothy P. Murphy, see unlawful1.blogspot.com Chronology of Unlawful Contempt Charges by the Democratic Political Machine, August 30, 2012, demonstrating how racist Democrats “Trespass upon the Laws” engaging in “Treason.”

13.  That because so many black men Negroe or African American are the new black women for these Cacausion men with wives and children none of them opened their mouths; moreover, there is a person in prominent authority been married to his wife for 10, 20 or 30 years had a man in his life almost the same time of his marriage so it is these type of individuals who are not at all what they appear to be but is using their political, racist and sexual cowardice at the Petitioner for being what he was born to be a man, a man’s man.

14.  Allegedly, Edward Burke had Judge John T. Carr to aid and assist his ex-wife by having the court reporter to allegedly leave the court as he aided her by allowing her to manufacture allegations of domestic abuse on his children DCFS got involved asserting he was a black belt in martial arts using it to discipline his children, by her going along with these sick acts she was promised welfare in her name. (none of it was true) they tried getting the Police involved “Desk Sargent   told DCFS not to bring that shit back up in here!”
A-    To further amplify the horrors of hate Edward Burke and his regime of judges using their robes to “Trespass upon the Laws” Petitioner was taking his family to family psychiatrist at least 2 and 3 times a week behind the episodes of what he was going through in the courts.

15.  Allegedly, Edward Burke and other Democrats incur profits off of judges “Trespassing upon the laws” where injustice is present, in that, hereto attached, Monthly Billing Statement of Child Support Account, manufactured by the Illinois Dept. of Healthcare and Family Services asserting Petitioner owes $228.00 on a case Democratic Judges have used their robes as “Private Citizens” aiding and abetting in “Treason” and a plethora of diabolical criminal conspiracies seeking money in an unlawful manner.
A-    “Private Citizen” Valderrama having cognizance of the plethora of criminal acts of what other judges engaged in against the Petitioner demonstrated untouchable arrogance because nothing happened to the other judges, thought he could profit off the Petitioner but what he was too ignorant to realize none of the judges signed any court orders on the 88 D 079012 case, he has signed every court order and has agreed to everything by not denying anything.
      
Defendants have not raised any affirmative defenses.

Summary judgment is appropriate when the pleadings, depositions, admissions and affidavits, viewed in a light most favorable to the movant or non-movant fail to establish a genuine issue of material fact, thereby    
1.      Entitling the moving party to judgment as a matter of law.

The purpose of summary judgment is not to try a question of fact, but simply to                 
Determine whether one exists.

When the party moving for summary judgment supplies evidentiary facts which,
 If not contradicted, would entitle him to judgment, the opposing party cannot
 Rely upon his complaint or answer alone to raise issues of material fact. A counter
 Affidavit is necessary to refute evidentiary facts properly asserted by affidavit
 Supporting the motion or else the facts are deemed admitted.

Here, Plaintiff has supplied affidavits, Certified Court transcripts and other evidentiary material that establishes all of the elements necessary to entitle it to recovery under the parties’ agreements, including the amount of damages. Defendants have failed to submit any evidence in opposition to the Motion or Order to raise any genuine issues of material fact. Thus summary judgment is proper.


             FURTHER AFFIANT SAYETH NOT

                                                                            Joe Louis Lawrence

                                                                           __________________
                                                                                                        Counsel Pro Se
                                                                                                       P. O. Box 490075
                                                                                         312 965-6455
                                                                                               joelouislaw@yahoo.com
                                                                                          @joelouis7
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      
WHEREFORE the aforementioned reasons Plaintiff respectfully Prays for the Relief


1.    For an Order Vacating the Order due to Error.

2.    For an Order Granting Summary Judgment Instanter.

3.    For an Order issuing a Rule to Show Cause Remanding Franklin U. Valderrama into Custody Instanter.

4.    For an Order appointing a Special Prosecutor who understands the jurisdiction of their profession to investigate and ascertain all other parties complicit in these Terrorist Treason Offenses of all cases noted within;

5.    For an Order staying any and all legal enforcements of all parties noted within due to the plethora of Felonies enacted by “Private Citizens” perpetrating roles as judges Trespassing upon the Laws”

6.    For an Order on bond be not less than one million dollars for any and all parties charged in these crimes in warring against the United States Constitution.

7.    For an Order removing the Chief Judge of Cook County and Presiding judges of all Circuits who as Public Servants failed to investigate remove or report any judge in accordance to their oath and Public Duty.

8.    For an Order setting a Hearing Date for all attorneys who sat by in an idle manner and did not exercise his or her duties pursuant to the Ethics of R.P.C 3.3 and speak up or report the terrorist acts perpetrated by “Private Citizens” violating their oaths as judges.

9.    For the entry of an Order awarding to your Petitioner for such other relief and any other relief necessary as equity may require of which this court may deem overwhelmingly just;







IN THE 
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
EASTERN DIVISION

 Joe Louis Lawrence                                                      Civil Action #16 CV 7434

                                                                                       Hon:   Robert M. Dow, Jr.    
  Plaintiff

    V

420 East Ohio, Chicago Housing Authority  
345 East Ohio, K2 Apartments, City of Chicago,
Commission on Human Relations Supreme Court
 of Illinois, Alderman Edward Burke,                          
 Franklin U. Valderrama, Mary Lane Mikva                                    

 Defendants
                                                                                                                                                                                                    NOTICE OF      
 MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION & VACATE COURT ORDER DUE TO IT BEING A NULLITY PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE w/AFFIDAVIT

Please be advised that on, May 2, 2018 Plaintiff has filed before this District Court, Motion for Summary Judgment et al; and will present said legally sufficient instrument before any Judge in  judge Robert M. Dow’s stead May 10 , 2018, at 9:15am in room 1919.       

Chicago Housing Authority             Wilson Elser Moskowitz Edelman & Dicker LLP
Office of the General Counsel                     Christian T. Novay
Asst Gen Counsels                                  55 West Monroe, Street, Suite 3800  
Maria Sewell Joseph   T.B. King                 Chicago, Il 60603
60 East Van Buren
Chicago, Ill 60605                                                                          
                                                                       Seyfarth & Shaw
                                                   Jeffrey K. Ross, Kyle A. Petersen & Anne Harris        
                                                                  Willis/Sears Tower
                                                                  Chicago, Ill. 60603

Stephan R. Patton, Mary E. Reuther, Rey A. Phillip Santos, S. Atty. Martha Diaz
Corp Counsel, Deputy Corp. Counsel, Asst Corp Counsel
30 N. LaSalle Street, Suite 800
Chicago, Ill 60602

Cary G. Schiff & Associates                    Gordon & Rees LLP
Christopher R. Johnson                           Goli Rahimi
Yuleida Joy                                               1 North Franklin, Suite 800
134 N. LaSalle Street, Suite 1720             Chicago, Illinois 60606
Chicago, Ill. 60602                                    

Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith, LLP
Christian Novay
550 West Adams Street, Suite 300
Chicago, IL. 60661


      Chief Judge Timothy C. Evans, Daley Center, Chg., Ill. 60601
      Presiding Judge Moche Jacobius, Room 2403, Daley Center, Chg. Ill. 60601
      Assc. Judge Franklin U. Valderrama, Room 2402, Daley Center, Chg. Ill. 60601  
    Clerk of Circuit Court Dorothy Brown, Suite 1001, Chg Ill. 60601                                           
       
      States Attorney, Kim Foxx, Room 500 Daley Center, Chg. Ill. 60601
      Atty Gen Lisa Madigan, 100 West Randolph, Suite 1300 Chg. Ill. 60601
           
CHA Mobility                                             CHA Mobility, HCP Counselors
Chris Klepper, Executive Dir                     Tracey Robinson/Joann Harris
28 East Jackson Blvd.                                    4859 S. Wabash, Suite 2nd Floor  
Chicago, Ill 60604                                          Chicago, Ill. 60615     
                                                                   
CHA Mobility, Real Estate Specialist               
Jessie McDaniel                                                        
4859 S. Wabash                                                    
Chicago, Ill. 60615                                                

Courtesy Copies:
US Attorney                                                FBI  Dir. Chris Wray   
John R. Lausch, Jr.                               2111 West Roosevelt Road
219 S. Dearborn, 5th floor                              Chicago, Ill. 60612
Chicago, Ill. 60604

Governor                                                Hon Mark Kirk
Bruce Rauner                                         607 East Adams, Suite 1520
100 West Randolph, Suite                       Springfield, Ill. 62701
Chicago, Ill. 60601

Mayor                                            Deputy Regional Adm., Field Office Dir.
Rahm Emanuel                                       Beverly E. Bishop
City Hall                                              77 West Jackson Boulevard
Chicago, Ill. 60601                              Chicago, Ill. 60604

Hon Dick Durbin                                             Judge
525 South 8th St.                                             Frederick Bates
Springfield, Ill. 62703                               50 West Washington Room
                                                                     Chicago, Ill. 60601
Judge                                                           
Celia C. Gamrath                                            Judge
50 West Washington Room 2508             Neil Cohen
                                                                50 West Washington Room 2308

                                        Alderman David Moore
                                        Alderman Ed Burke  
                                      Alderwoman Carrie Austin
                                       Alderwoman Emma Mitts

Cook County President                               Cook County Sheriff
Toni Preckwinkle                                            Thomas J. Dart
118 N. Clark, Room 517                         Richard J. Daley Center, Room 701
Chicago, Ill. 60602                                        Chicago, Ill. 60602

                                           
               PLEASE BE ADVISED that on May 10, 2018, A Motion for Reconsideration Vacate Order et al. has been filed with the Northern District of Illinois and said copies being served on said applicable parties via hand delivery or regular mail;


                                                                                 Respectfully, Submitted,

                                                                                   Joe Louis Lawrence
                                                                                   Counsel Pro Se
                                                                                  Chicago, Ill 60649
                                                                                   312 965-6455
                                                                                   joelouis565@yahoo.com
                                                                                     @joelouis


No comments:

Post a Comment