DEMOCRATS IN CHICAGO HAVE MANAGED TO CIRCUMVENT THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION AND VIOLATE EVERY LAW UNIMAGINABLE "FIXING" ANY CASE IN CHICAGO, ILLINOIS COMMITTING TREASON:
EVERY BLACK DEMOCRATIC JUDGE SEE THE RACIST ACTS OF OTHER JUDGES ENGAGING IN TREASON AND OTHER TERRORIST ACTS HAVE CLOSED THEIR EYES TO THE PLETHORA OF MANY ENGAGING DIABOLICAL TREASON OFFENSES TRYING TO STEAL THE JOHNSON SISTER'S HOME.
NO PERSON OF COLOR OR INDEPENDENT WHITES ESPECIALLY REPUBLICANS CAN OR EVER RECEIVE ANY JUSTICE IN ILLINOIS DUE TO THE COURTS BEING "RIGGED" WITH WITH POLITICAL APPOINTEES OPERATING AS TERRORISTS DOING WHAT THEY ARE TOLD, THIS IS WHY OTIS LEE LOVE, JR, DR. LINDA SHELTON DR. BANSA AND WIFE BISHOP CONNIE BANSA AND A HOST OF OTHERS ARE EXPERIENCING THE LEVEL OF INJUSTICE IN THE COURTS BECAUSE JUDGES HAVE BEEN UNTOUCHABLE NOT FEARING ANY FEDERAL AUTHORITIES BASICALLY GIVING THE FBI THE MIDDLE FINGER.
MANY BLACK AND BROWN JUDGES ARE GOING ALONG WITH WRONG SO AS TO BE ACCEPTED BY THE WRONG DOERS WHICH IS A SICKNESS WITHIN ITSELF.
RULE 26 IS NEW WAIT UNTIL YOU READ THE DEC 9, 2016 POST FROM JOE LOUIS LAWRENCE
IN THE
UNITED STATES
COURT OF APPEALS
FOR
THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT
USCA-7th Circuit
RECEIVED
DEC 14, 2016 NR
Monzella Johnson,
Petitioner
07-16-90079
v
Diane P.
Wood, Samuel Der-Yeghiayan, Pamela Myerson Timothy C. Evans
Anne M.
Burke, Robert R. Thomas, Charles Freeman, Thomas L. Kilbride,
Lloyd A.
Karmeier, Rita Garman, Mary Jane Theis et al.
Respondents
PETITION FOR REVIEW & PETITION TO TRANSFER
THIS CASE TO ANOTHER JUDICIAL COUNCIL
To the Honorable Justices
of the Seventh Circuit of the United States Court of Appeals:
Complainant
a United States Citizen, Monzella Y. Johnson, hereby respectfully represents as
Pro Se shows this court with corroboration/admissions and affidavit the noted
reasons why this matter should be reviewed and Transferred to another Judicial
Council.
Now
comes Monzella Y. Johnson, Pro Se Appellant in this cause files herewith her affidavit as required by Title 28, United States Code, Section 144,
to show that Judge Honorable Samuel Der-Yeghiayan, and a plethora of other
judges has Trespassed upon the Laws in an arrogant “Contemptuous manner” this
Seventh Circuit has ignored all sufficient motions with affidavits, stating a
cause how and why this court has jurisdiction; motions corroborating judicial
corruption “fraud” “perjury” and a plethora of “Terrorist Civil Rights Acts”
put before the courts that the District Court ignored and holding Racism
Corruption in the courts.
STATUTES: Trespassers of the Laws, Treason, hereto attached, Group Ex. A, Judicial Complaint,
(filed Dec. 6, 2016) detailing just how said judges engaging in acts of Treason
likened to “Weapons of Mass Destruction” destroying innocent lives like
the Appellant;
Rule
26 authorizes the transfer of a complaint proceeding to another
judicial council selected by the Chief Justice. Such transfers may be appropriate,
for example, in the case of a serious complaint where there are multiple
disqualifications among the original council, where the issues are highly
visible and a local disposition may weaken public confidence in the process,
where internal tensions arising in the council as a result of the complaint
render disposition by a less involved council appropriate, or where a complaint
calls into question policies or governance of the home court of appeals et al.
Respectfully Submitted
_____________________
Monzella Y. Johnson
5217 S. Ingleside Ave.
Chicago,
IL. 60615
IN THE
UNITED STATES
COURT OF APPEALS
FOR
THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT
CHICAGO, ILLINOIS 60604
1.) That said
Chief judge had evidence from Page 5,
Par. 4, Motion to Disqualify
Judge Samuel Der-Yeghiayan et al. filed (Nov. 14, 2016) further
validating the verity within the “Preponderance
of the Evidence” that said judge and attorneys were acting in concert
in said “Organize Conspiracy”
engaging in TREASON and WAR on the United States Constitution
A-
The court ignored the valid certified court order
demonstrating Cook County Circuit Court judge vacated the Foreclosure judgment
June 2, 2010;
B- In
that said, Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals held that the Circuit Court of Cook
County is a criminal enterprise. U. S. v. Murphy, 768 F. 2d 1518, 1531
(7th Cir. 1985).
“Since judges who do not report the criminal activities of other
judges become principals in the criminal activity, 18 U.S.C. Section 1, and
since no judges have reported the criminal activity of the judges who have been
convicted, the other judges are as guilty as the convicted judges”
Section 1983 of USCS contemplates the
depravation of Civil Rights through the unconstitutional application of a law
by conspiracy or otherwise. Mansell V. Saunders (CA 5 FLa) 372 F 2d 573,
especially if the conspiracy was actually carried into effect and plaintiff was
thereby deprived of any rights privileges, or immunities secured by the
Constitution and laws, the gist of the action may be treated as one for the
depravation of rights under 42 USCS 1983 Lewis V. Brautigam (CA 5 Fla) 227 F 2d
124, 55 Alr 2d 505
2.) That Page 4, Par. 5 (A) further validate the
verity within the “Preponderance of
the Evidence” that said judge and attorneys were acting in concert in
said “Organize Conspiracy”;
C-
The court ignored the valid certified court order
demonstrating Cook County Circuit Court judge vacated the Foreclosure judgment
June 2, 2010;
U. S Sup Court Digest 24(1) General Conspiracy
U.S. 2003. Essence of a conspiracy is an agreement to commit an unlawful
act.—U.S. v. Jimenez Recio, 123 S. Ct. 819, 537 U.S. 270, 154 L.Ed.2d 744, on
remand 371F.3d 1093
Agreement to commit an
unlawful act, which constitutes the essence of a conspiracy, is a distinct evil
that exist and be punished whether or not the substantive crime ensues.-Id.
Conspiracy poses a threat
to the public over and above the threat of the commission of the relevant
substantive crime, both because the combination in crime makes more likely the
commission of other crimes and because it decreases the part from their path of
criminality.-Id.
CONSPIRACY
Fraud maybe inferred from nature of acts complained of,
individual and collective interest of alleged conspirators, situation,
intimacy, and relation of parties at time of commission of acts, and generally
all circumstances preceding and attending culmination of claimed conspiracy Illinois Rockford
Corp. V. Kulp, 1968, 242 N.E. 2d 228, 41 ILL. 2d 215.
Conspirators
to be guilty of offense need not have entered into conspiracy at same time or
have taken part in all its actions. People V. Hardison, 1985, 911
Dec. 162, 108. Requisite mens rea elements of conspiracy are satisfied upon showings of
agreement of offense with intent that offense be committed; Actus reas element
is satisfied of act in furtherance of agreement People V. Mordick, 1981,
50 ILL, Dec. 63
Vaughn 462 S. E. 2d 728
(Ga.1995), The Supreme Court of
Georgia removed a Judge from office for disregarding defendant’s Constitutional
rights; Hammel, 668 N. E. 2d 390 (N.Y. 1996) (Judge removed for
improperly jailing defendants for their alleged failure to pay fines and make
restitution which the judge had imposed, disregarding the defendants basic
constitutional rights;
3.) That the court
ignored the Defendant’s Motions accompanied with affidavits and clear
attachments described as exhibits demonstrating a plethora of Criminal Civil
Rights violations with “Fraudulent Acts surpassing human imagination signed and
entered an order stating, “This court granted Plaintiff’s motion to remand “
A-
It further
stated, “Having remanded the instant
action to state court with a certified copy of the order, this court lacks
jurisdiction over the instant matter”
B- That because of the
judges intimate ability in colluding with said attorneys clearly and
convincingly violated all Canon Ethics and his jurisdiction by expeditiously
having a certified order to be mailed remanding said matter back to state court
claiming he had no jurisdiction;
Civil
Rights Act of 1866- first section, enacted by the Senate and House of
Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled. That
all persons born in the United States and not subject to any foreign power,
excluding Indians not taxed, are hereby declared to be citizens of the United
States; and such citizens of every race and color, without regard to any
previous condition of slavery or involuntary servitude, except as a punishment
for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall have the same
right, in every State and Territory in the United States, to make and enforce
contracts, to sue, be parties, and give evidence, to inherit, purchase, lease,
sell, hold and convey real and personal property, and to full and equal benefit
of the laws and proceedings for the security of person and property, as is
enjoyed by white citizens, and shall be subject to like punishment, pains, and
penalties, and to none other, any law, statute, ordinances, regulation, or
custom, to the contrary notwithstanding, Act of April 9, 1866, Ch. 31, 1, 14
Stat. 27, 42 U.S.C.A. 1981 (a).
In the
20th century, the Supreme Court began to overturn Jim Crow laws on
constitutional grounds. In Buchanan v. Warley 245 US 60 (1917), the
court held that a Kentucky law could not require residential segregation. The Supreme Court
in 1946, in Irene Morgan v. Virginia ruled segregation in
interstate transportation to be unconstitutional, in an application of the commerce
clause of the Constitution. It was not until 1954 in Brown v. Board of
Education of Topeka 347 US 483 that the court held that separate facilities
were inherently unequal in the area of public schools, effectively overturning Plessy
v. Ferguson, and outlawing Jim Crow in other areas of society as well. This
landmark case consisted of complaints filed in the states of Delaware (Gebhart
v. Belton); South Carolina (Briggs
v. Elliott); Virginia (Davis v. County
School Board of Prince Edward County); and Washington,
D.C. (Spottswode Bolling v. C. Melvin Sharpe).
These decisions, along with other cases such as McLaurin v. Oklahoma State
Board of Regents 339 US 637 (1950), NAACP
v. Alabama 357 US 449 (1958), and Boynton v. Virginia 364 US 454 (1960),
slowly dismantled the state-sponsored segregation imposed by Jim Crow laws.
As the color
line itself solidified at the turn of the nineteenth century, Jim Crow imposed
on black people clear tactical disadvantages: restricted economic
possibilities, narrow educational opportunities, inadequate housing options,
high rates of death and disablement, persistent unemployment, and unrelenting
poverty. Inasmuch as Jim Crow represented the race problem described by Gunnar
Myrdal (1898–1987) in
his 1944 treatise The American Dilemma, it was Jim Crow that
created the race quandary; whites constructed the obstacles African Americans
confronted, while also blaming them for their conditions, denying them access
to the resources of problem solving, and daring them—under threat of violence—to complain, protest, or advance.
Finally,
protests or challenges to Jim Crow often proved futile, given law enforcement’s complicity in the structure. From
emancipation to the turn of the century, the Ku Klux Klan operated as a
paramilitary arm of the Democratic Party in the South. The Klan, nightriders,
red shirts, and other white terrorists intimidated African Americans with
personal attacks, school burnings, and lynchings. African Americans rarely
served as policemen, sheriffs, or deputies before the late 1940s. During the
1950s and 1960s, the connections between municipal and state governments, law
enforcement, and racial violence were well known by officials and citizens
alike. White officers were known to harass black people, disrupt black
neighborhoods, and assault black women. Arrested for inflated charges, denied
satisfactory counsel, and serving harsh sentences, African Americans were
further disadvantaged in the courtroom. Rarely did they receive good counsel,
nor could they serve on juries. When black lawyers could appear in the
courtroom to argue cases, white judges and juries rarely listened. All-white
juries decided against black defendants, even in the most obvious cases of
innocence, but rarely convicted white defendants, despite evidence of guilt.
African Americans—including
the innocent—suffered
the harsher punishments of extended jail time, forced farm labor, and peonage.
Even women could be placed on the chain gangs working the roads and tracks
across the South.
The
Chicago Daily Law Bulletin, Wednesday April 26, 2006, Page 1, Illinois
Political Machines help breed corruption, Associated Press writer Deanna
Bellandi states, “Illinois is apparently a Petri dish for corruption. It
is a real breeding ground”.
That Chicago
is the most Corrupt City in America, Huffington Post, Internet
Newspaper, February 23, 2012; University of Illinois Professor Dick Simpson, “The
two worst crime zones in Illinois are the governor’s mansion…..and the City
Council Chambers in Chicago.” Simpson a former Chicago Alderman told the AP “no
other State can match us.”
Turner
24 F.
Cas. 337 (No. 14247) C.C.D. Md. 1867) the “equal benefit” clause is cited in
what would appear to be the earliest reported case enforcing the section. The
plaintiff was an emancipated slave who was indentured as an apprentice to her
former master. Although both whites and blacks could be indentured as an
apprentice, under the law of Maryland, indentured blacks were not accorded the
same educational benefits as whites and, unlike whites, were subject to being
transferred to any other person in the same county. Circuit Judge Chase granted
a writ of habeas corpus upon finding that the purported apprenticeship was in
fact involuntary servitude and a denial under the Civil Rights Act of 1866 of
the “full and equal benefit of all laws.
4.) That The judge’s orders of Nov 22, 2016
citing 28 U.S.C. 352 (b)(1)(A)(ii)
and spews the racial hatred and disdain
said judges have against the Appellant as they willfully engaged in Treason, Trespassing upon the Laws
; See Gr Ex B, Petition to Transfer to Another Judicial Council, (filed
Dec 9, 2016)
5.) “Any judge who does not comply with his oath to the
Constitution of the United States wars against that Constitution and engages in
acts in violation of the Supreme Law of the Land. The judge is engaged in acts
of treason. Having taken at least two, if not three oaths of office to support
the Constitution of the United States, and the Constitution of the State of
Illinois, any judge who has acted in violation of the Constitution is engaged
in an act or acts of treason. If a judge does not fully comply with the
Constitution, then his orders are void, In
re Sawyer, 124 U.S. 200 (1888) he/she is without jurisdiction , and
he/she has engaged in an act or acts of treason.”
6.) A judge’s disrespect
for the rules of court demonstrates disrespect for the law. Judges are
disciplined under Canon 2A for violating court rules and procedures. Judge
ignored mandated witness order in attempt to accommodate witnesses’ schedules;
Citing Canon 2A the court noted, “[a] court’s indifference to clearly stated
rules breeds disrespect for and discontent with our justice system. Government
can not demand respect of the laws by its citizens when its tribunals ignore
those very same laws”)
7.) Finally, “An Evaluation
of the United States District Court Judges in Chicago, by the Chicago Council
of Lawyers was had against Judge Samuel Der-Yeghiayan, states Page 10, Par.2, While a minority of
lawyers commented positively on Judge Der-Yeghiayan, the vast majority of
lawyers interviewed gave him poor marks on virtually all areas relevant to the
Council’s evaluation, and these poor marks are consistent with the ratings
given to Judge Der-Yeghiayan by respondents to the Council’s written survey”
A- That said
report truly find him unqualified and stated, “he
lacks an adequate understanding of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and
suggested that the judge’s background had not prepared him to assume such an
important post.” 6
Wherefore the Foregoing
Reasons,
Appellant Prays for the
following relief:
1.) Appellant requests that
another Honorable Court of Appeals, Judicial Circuit accept Jurisdiction of this
matter and Invoke authority Instanter and reassign this matter accordingly and
or due to the unprecedented Terrorist Civil Rights said attorneys and judges
are complicit in, Order a Rule to Show
Cause for Remands and Indictments on all parties associated in said Treason
Offenses;
2.) Impose Sanctions/Remands against and all
parties for Contempt of the United States Constitution for their crimes against
the Defendant/Government
3.) Issue an Injunction on U
S Bank and all judges presiding in the matter trying to steal Defendants home
in the unlawful application of Foreclosure and relied on judges acting outside
their jurisdiction committing treason offenses;
4.) Issue an Order Nullifying
Voiding Judge Samuel Der-Yeghiayan’s orders and Chief Judge in the Court of
Appeals absent a signature, due to “Fraud” and other Civil Rights Violations;
5.) An order issuing a Moratorium on all Foreclosures in Cook
County Circuit courts, Appellate Court or Supreme Court of Illinois
where Wells Fargo and U. S. Bank are a party to foreclosures where “Fraud” and
treason is apparent and not being properly registered in the State of
Illinois;
Finally,
this Affidavit is best closed by a jurist who has stated”;
Citing Canon 2A the court noted, “[a] court’s indifference to clearly stated
rules breeds disrespect for and discontent with our justice system. Government
can not demand respect of the laws by its citizens when its tribunals ignore
those very same laws”)
Federal
Court FEDERAL JUDGE GETTLEMAN:
stated, Tuesday March 10, 2009, where he found Superintendent of police Jody
Weiss in Contempt of Court and Ordered the City to Pay $100,000.00, “No
one is above the Law”, he cited a 1928 decision by Supreme Court
Justice Louis Brandeis, that said, “If the Government becomes the law breaker,
it breeds Contempt for the Law, It invites everyman to become a law unto
himself. It invites Anarchy.”
The Chicago Daily Law Bulletin, Wednesday April 26, 2006, Page
1, Illinois Political Machines help breed corruption, Associated Press
writer Deanna Bellandi states, “Illinois is apparently a Petri dish for
corruption. It is a real breeding ground”.
That Chicago is the most Corrupt City in America,
Huffington Post, Internet Newspaper, February 23, 2012; University of Illinois
Professor Dick Simpson, “The two worst crime zones in Illinois are the
governor’s mansion…..and the City Council Chambers in Chicago.” Simpson a
former Chicago Alderman told the AP “no other State can match us.”
Respectfully Submitted
_____________________
Monzella Y. Johnson
5217 S. Ingleside Ave.
Chicago,
IL. 60615
IN THE
UNITED STATES
COURT OF APPEALS
FOR
THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT
Monzella Johnson,
Petitioner
07-16-90079
v
Diane P.
Wood, Samuel Der-Yeghiayan, Pamela Myerson Timothy C. Evans
Anne M.
Burke, Robert R. Thomas, Charles Freeman, Thomas L. Kilbride,
Lloyd A.
Karmeier, Rita Garman, Mary Jane Theis et al.
Respondents
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I
Monzella Y. Johnson, certify that I have
on this day filed said Notice of Motion for Disqualification of judge et al. Before
the Seventh Circuit United States Court of Appeals and noted parties.
To:
Dir. James Comey, FBI 601 4th Street Washington D.C. 20535
FBI Michael J. Anderson 2111 West
Roosevelt Road, Chicago, Ill. 60612
US Attorney, Zachary T. Fardon 219 S. Dearborn, Suite 500
Judicial Conference Committee on Judicial and Disability
Attn: Office of
General Counsel
Administrative Office of the United States Courts
One Columbus Circle, NE
Washington, D.C. 20544
PLEASE BE ADVISED that on December 13, 2016, A Petition for Review et al has been filed before the
United States Court of Appeals.
Respectfully Submitted,
_____________________
Monzella Y. Johnson
5217 S. Ingleside Ave.
Chicago,
IL. 60615
IN THE
UNITED STATES
COURT OF APPEALS
FOR
THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT
Monzella Johnson,
Petitioner
07-16-90079
v
Diane P.
Wood, Samuel Der-Yeghiayan, Pamela Myerson Timothy C. Evans
Anne M.
Burke, Robert R. Thomas, Charles Freeman, Thomas L. Kilbride,
Lloyd A.
Karmeier, Rita Garman, Mary Jane Theis et al.
Respondents
AFFIDAVIT
I Monzella Y. Johnson, files herewith her
affidavit as required by Title 28, United States Code:
I Monzella Y. Johnson Pro Se being duly sworn
on oath states the aforementioned pleadings enumerated within said Petition for
Review et al, the undersigned certifies that the statements set forth in this
instrument are true
and correct, except as to matters therein stated to be on information and
belief and as to such matters, the undersigned certifies as aforesaid that he
verily believes the same to be true.
Respectfully Submitted
Notary
____________________
Monzella Y. Johnson
5217 S. Ingleside. Ave
Chicago, Il 60615
773 835-5849
No comments:
Post a Comment