JUDGE VALDERRAMA HAS ENGAGED IN A TERRORIST ACT KNOWING THE FBI IS ON NOTICE BEING APPRISED OF ALL CRIMINAL ACTS ASSOCIATED ON THIS MATTER SURPASSING HUMAN IMAGINATION MADE IT CLEAR IN FRONT OF EVERYONE IN HIS COURT KNOWING THAT FEDERAL JUDGE JOHN DARRAH FEDERAL JUDGE HAD JURISDICTION ON SAID MATTER AND THERE WAS A COURT APPEARANCE SEPTEMBER 15, @9:30 IGNORED THE FACT HE HAD NO AUTHORITY OR JURISDICTION TO HEAR OR RULE ON SAID CASE BASICALLY GAVE A MIDDLE FINGER IN HIS ACTIONS AND MADE SURE THE ATTORNEY RECORDED ON THE COURT ORDER "THERE IS NO JUST REASON FOR DELAY"
HE CATEGORICALLY DENIED EVERYTHING THAT WAS PROPERLY PRESENTED BY MYSELF AND GRANTED EVERYTHING THAT WAS UNLAWFULLY PRESENTED BY THE DEFENDANTS.
EVERY ATTORNEY HAD THEIR MOUTHS OPEN IN SHOCK AS THE JUDGE DEMONSTRATED VENOMOUS RAGE AT ME AS IF I DID SOMETHING PERSONAL TO HIM IT IS CLEAR HE IS NOT ACCUSTOMED TO DEALING WITH A "REAL MAN"!
THERE ARE SOME BLACK AND BROWN DEMOCRATIC JUDGES WEARING ROBES THAT WILL DO ANYTHING TO PLEASE THEIR RACIST OPPRESSIVE DEMOCRATIC MASTERS IN POWER CHICAGO LACKS MEN OF COLOR IN POLITICAL OR JUDGES AUTHORITY WITH TESTICLES OR A BACKBONE TO TAKE A STAND ON WHAT IS RIGHT THAT IS WHY THUGS GANG BANGERS COWARDS ARE IN CONTROL REINING HAVOC ON THE NEIGHBORHOODS AND COMMUNITIES AND COURTS.
VOTING DEMOCRATIC IN CHICAGO IS A SURE FIRE WAY OF MAKING SURE THE RACIST IRISH AND EVERY CAUCASIAN ETHNIC THAT EMBRACES THEIR DOCTRINES, SO AS TO MAINTAIN CONTROL OF EVERY LEGAL ENTITY KEEPING PEOPLE OF COLOR OPPRESSED UNEMPLOYED INCARCERATED BY ANY MEANS NECESSARY SO AS TO MAINTAIN JOB SECURITY FOR THEIR WHITE FAMILIES.
LEE OTIS LOVE, JR. HAD A CONDOMINIUM 2 OR THREE CARS HAD A GREAT JOB SOUGHT CUSTODY OF HIS DAUGHTER AND A RACIST MEXICAN JUDGE WENT ALONG WITH RACIST IRISH JUDGES DESTROYED THIS MAN FINANCIALLY HE LOST EVERYTHING SPENT OVER $30,000.00 IN LEGAL FEES HIS FIFTH OR SIXTH ATTORNEY NICK IS NOW GOING TO RESIGN REPRESENTING HIM BEFORE JUDGE LOZA BECAUSE JUDGES ARE THE MODERN DAY TERRORISTS REINING HAVOC ON INNOCENT UNITED STATES CITIZENS OF COLOR.
CHICAGO NEEDS MILITARY SUPPORT TO ERADICATE THE THUGS WITH GUNS AND TRACK DOWN THE SOURCES WHO ARE SUPPLYING GUNS TO THE REBELS AND THE INSTALLMENT OF SPECIAL FORCES PURSUING JUDGES WHO ARE USING THEIR INFLUENCE AND AUTHORITY AIDING AND ABETTING CRIMINALS ENGAGING IN A VARIETY OF CIVIL RIGHTS TERRORIST ACTS;
IN THE
UNITED STATES
DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF
ILLINOIS
EASTERN DIVISION
Joe Louis Lawrence
Civil Action #16-cv-7434
Hon: John
W. Darrah
Plaintiff
V
420 East Ohio, Chicago Housing Authority
345 East Ohio, K2 Apartments, City of Chicago,
Commission on Human Relations Supreme Court
Of Illinois, Alderman
Edward Burke,
Franklin U.
Valderrama, Mary Lane Mikva
Defendants
MOTION TO SUPPLEMENT MOTION THAT CORROBORATES “FRAUD
& “CORRUPTION” IN COOK COUNTY COURTS w/AFFIDAVIT
Now comes Joe Louis Lawrence, Counsel Pro Se a United States Citizen
born and raised a Freeman by all governing laws of the United States
Constitution, Plaintiff in this cause files herewith his affidavit as required
by Title 28, United States Code, Section 144 to show that because of Honorable
John W. Darrah’s error not recognizing a claim was filed in said Complaint
caused the aforementioned of a Circuit Court judge acting outside of his
judicial provisions ignoring the laws with venomous arrogance said matter was
before the court’s jurisdiction.
Based thereon Plaintiff respectfully moves that the Honorable John W.
Darrah allow said Motion to be supplemented.
1.) That on September
7, 2016, Plaintiff appeared before Associate County judge Valderrama on the
10:00am call;
2.) Attorneys
present Senior Attorney for the City of Chicago, Margaret Diaz, Assistant
General Counsel, Chicago Housing Authority, Thomas B. King, Kyle Petersen,
Seyfarth & Shaw 420 East Ohio, Yuleida
Joy, K2 Apartments, Cary G. Schiff & Associates, Christian Novay for 345 East Ohio, Lewis Brisbois Bisggaard & Smith,
LLC
3.) Plaintiff
informed the Court for the Record, “Your
Honor last time up this matter was before the Illinois Supreme Court on a Writ
of Mandamus Supervisory Order on his Disqualification, since that time, I have
received two court orders denying the Motions absent a signature from the
Illinois Supreme Court in violation of Supreme
Rule 272”
4.) That in
furtherance to said violations, I sought the jurisdiction of the Federal Court
where this matter is presently before Judge Darrah, I have served copies of said
Motion on you and every attorney involved” and because this matter is presently
in the jurisdiction of the Federal Court due to the noted alleged acts, “the judge asked the attorneys for a reply”
A- Thomas B. King
acknowledged receipt of said Motion, Kyle Petersen, Margaret Diaz and Yuleida
Joy, Christian Novay said they didn’t receive the Motion---I informed the
court, I had extra copies to tender to the attorneys to verify said matter is
before the Federal Court;
B- Plaintiff
tendered a copy to Margaret Diaz and Yuleida Joy;
C- Valderrama
stated in open court, you can litigate anywhere you want, I am going forward on
this case tired of this you had months with this matter, I am not delaying this
anymore! Ignoring the fact he had no jurisdiction on said matter further
demonstrating a F#&K the Federal Judge or his jurisdiction attitude;
D- Court order
states “The court finds there is no
just reason for delay”
5.) That Judge
Valderrama vehemently categorically denied everything Plaintiff filed and
granted Motions Defendants unlawfully and where Christian Novay never filed an appearance
but prepared the Court Order and the judge signed it hereto attached, Ex A;
6.) That said
judge is demonstrating to this Honorable Federal Court nobody tells him what to
do, he is a law unto himself and made it clear in said order, he is untouchable
and if the court wants him off the case they will need to arrest him;
7.) Said judge
signed Ex B where said attorney
never filed an appearance and has admitted this fact in open court hereto
attached, Gr Ex B Vol II, Par. 7B Christian Novay stated from
Affidavit and court transcript, “If the
court pleases, in that case then, we are in a different situation and we are in
the situation where we likewise never filled an appearance nor have had any
intention”
A- Said judge
made the order Final pursuant to Supreme Court 304/a;
Properly alleged facts within an affidavit that are not contradicted by counter affidavit are taken as true, despite the existence of contrary averments in the adverse party’s pleadings. Professional Group Travel, Ltd. v. Professional Seminar Consultants Inc., 136 ILL App 3d 1084, 483 N.E. 2d 1291; Buzzard v. Bolger, 117 ILL App 3d 887, 453 N.E. 2d 1129 et al.
Pursuant to 735 ILCS
5/2-612 Counsel never Objected to the sufficiency of Petitioners pleadings,
Objections to sufficiency of pleadings either in form or substance must be made
In trial court, and if not so made, they will be considered waived and cannot
be raised for the first time on appeal. People ex rel. Deynes v. Harris,
App. 1948, 77 N.E. 2d 439, 333 Ill. App. 280.
8.) Pursuant to Sup Ct.
Rule 71, Sufficient for Removal, conduct which does not constitute a
criminal offense may be sufficiently violative of the judicial canons to
warrant removal for cause. Napolitano v. Ward, 457 F 2d 279 (7th Cir.), cert denied, 409
U.S. 1037, 93 S. Ct. 512, 34 L. Ed. 2d 486 (1972).
That the Chief Judge (Timothy
C. Evans) erred considerably when he received notice and knowledge of other
Judges complicit in a Criminal Conspiracy failed to follow Canon Ethics Leslie
W. Abramson, 25 Hofstra L. Rev. 751 (1997). The Judges Ethical Duty to
Report Misconduct by Other Judges and Lawyers and its effect on Judicial
Independence.
9.) That Judge Valderrama
has acted outside of his judicial provisions of the immunity clause when he
exercised the duties of his authority outside the laws of the United States
Constitution when he sided with the conspirators DISMISSING Plaintiff’s legal Complaint
unlawfully, ignoring all sorts of “Fraud”
and “Criminal Civil Rights Violations of all parties noted in said Affidavits
and Complaint Ref as Ex B and Par G, Page 7 et al Section 1983 of USCS
contemplates the depravation of Civil Rights through the unconstitutional
application of a law by conspiracy or otherwise. Mansell V. Saunders (CA 5 Fla)
372 F 2d 573, especially if the conspiracy was actually carried into effect and
plaintiff was thereby deprived of any rights privileges, or immunities secured
by the Constitution and laws, the gist of the action may be treated as one for
the depravation of rights under 42 USCS 1983 Lewis V. Brautigam (CA 5 Fla) 227
F 2d 124, 55 Alr 2d 505;
a. Said Judge violated all Rules of law Canon Ethics, Code of
Judicial Conduct Rule 62 Scott,
377 Mass. 364, 386 N.E. 2d 218, 220 (1979) See Lopez-Alexander, Unreported
Order No. 85-279 (Colo. May 3, 1985) (Judge removed for, inter
alia, a persistent pattern of abuse of the contempt power. The Mayor of Denver
accepted the findings of the Denver County Court Judicial Qualification
Commission that the judge’s conduct could not be characterized as mere mistakes
or errors of law and that the conduct constituted willful misconduct in office
and conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice that brings the
judicial office into disrepute). Canon Ethics where there is a pattern of
disregard or indifference, which warrant discipline.
A
judge’s disrespect for the rules of court demonstrates disrespect for the law.
Judges are disciplined under Canon 2A for violating court rules and procedures.
Judge ignored mandated witness order in attempt to accommodate witnesses’
schedules; Citing Canon 2A the court noted, “[a] court’s indifference to
clearly stated rules breeds disrespect for and discontent with our justice
system. Government can not demand respect of the laws by its citizens when its
tribunals ignore those very same laws”)
10.)
That Judge Valderrama’s arrogance and Contempt for the
Laws surpasses grandiose behavior in that, he is using his robe to bully and to
intimidate those unlawfully he feels he can get away with because certain
politicians may allegedly fear him and his ability to retaliate against them
and reveal other terrorists acts many are a part of overthrowing the legal
system in Illinois;
A- That Judge Valderrama and other judges like
him in Cook County is no different from the cowards and thugs in the streets
shooting and killing innocent people of color only he/they is/are destroying
people of color wearing a robe like he is a character portraying Scarface, a notorious
“King Pin” in a robe—Rod Blagoveich
tried selling President Obama’s Senate seat and is doing Federal time,
Valderrama “Fixed” a Circuit
Court case preventing Plaintiff from being awarded $25 Million Dollars and not
one attorney ever denied or objected to any of the pleadings regarding the
judges criminal involvement “Fixing”
said case.
B- That the Cook
County Courts are nothing but a Criminal enterprise the innocent or righteous
United States citizens or Freemen of color as in the Plaintiff’s case cannot
and will not receive justice as long as judges are politically and racially
assigned to do what they are told;
11.)
U. S Sup Court Digest
24(1) General Conspiracy
U.S. 2003. Essence of a conspiracy
is an agreement to commit an unlawful act.—U.S. v. Jimenez Recio, 123 S. Ct.
819, 537 U.S. 270, 154 L.Ed.2d 744, on remand 371F.3d 1093
Agreement to commit an unlawful act, which
constitutes the essence of a conspiracy, is a distinct evil that exist and be
punished whether or not the substantive crime ensues.-Id.
Conspiracy poses a threat to the public
over and above the threat of the commission of the relevant substantive crime,
both because the combination in crime makes more likely the commission of other
crimes and because it decreases the part from their path of criminality.-Id.
CONSPIRACY
Fraud maybe inferred from nature of acts complained of, individual and
collective interest of alleged conspirators, situation, intimacy, and relation
of parties at time of commission of acts, and generally all circumstances
preceding and attending culmination of claimed conspiracy Illinois Rockford Corp. V. Kulp,
1968, 242 N.E. 2d 228, 41 ILL. 2d 215.
CANON 1
A Judge should uphold the INTEGRITY and
independence of the JUDICIARY.
The
integrity and independence of judges depend in turn upon their acting without
fear or favor. Although judges should be independent, they should comply with
the law, as well as the provisions of this code. Public confidence in the
impartiality of the judiciary is maintained by the adherence of each judge to
this responsibility. Conversely, violation of this code diminishes public confidence
in the judiciary and thereby does injury to the system of government under law.
12.)
That because of the horrendous unprecedented acts of
“draconian” criminal acts of conspiracies, the members of the Terrorist cell
Democratic Political Machine have met the legal burden within the Preponderance
of the Evidence Pursuant the
Ku Klux Klan Act of 1871 (was enacted) - Section 1 (42 U.S.C.) 1983.
“Of all the
Civil Rights legislation enacted in the aftermath of the Civil War, none has
had a greater contemporary impact than the Ku Klux Klan Act of 1871. The Act
grew out of a special one-paragraph message sent to the 42d Congress on March
23, 1871, by President Ulysses S. Grant, urgently requesting the enactment of
legislation”.
Section 2 (42 U.S.C.)
In the House of Representatives.
“Congressional
Debate of the second section of the Ku Klux Klan Act was more extensive and
enduring than that of Section 1; As originally presented, Sec. 2 made it a
felony for any “two or more persons” to conspire to commit certain enumerated
crimes “in violation of the rights and privileges, or immunities of any person,
to which he is entitled under the Constitution and laws of the United States.
“Throughout the debates, supporters
of the Act made repeated references to the depredations of the Ku Klux Klan;
Victims of these atrocities included not only blacks but white Republicans as
well. The crimes that were perpetrated, therefore, were not viewed as isolated
occurrences, but as part of an “Organized Conspiracy….Political in its origin
and aims”, “crimes perpetrated by concert and agreement, by men in large
numbers acting with a common purpose for the injury of a certain class of
citizens entertaining certain political principles, id, at 457 (remarks of Rep. Coburn). See also e.g., id.
At 437 (remarks of Rep. Cobb) (“None but Democrats belong or can belong to
these societies”) et al.,
“Where these gangs of
Assassins show themselves the rest of the people look on, if not with sympathy,
at least with forbearance. The boasted courage of the South is not courage in
their presence. Sheriffs, having eyes to see, see not; judges, having ears to
hear, hear not; witnesses conceal the truth or falsify it; grand or petit
juries act as if they might be accomplices. In the presence of these gangs all
the apparatus and machinery of civil government, all the processes of justice,
skulk away as if government and justice were crimes and feared detection. Among
the most dangerous things an injured party can do is to appeal to justice. Of
the uncounted scores and hundreds of atrocious mutilations and murders it is
credibly stated that not one has been punished. Cong. Globe, supra note 2, app.
At 78 (remarks of Rep. Perry). (“While
murder is stalking abroad in disguise, while whippings and lynching’s and
banishment have been visited upon unoffending American citizens, the local
administrations have been found inadequate or unwilling to apply the proper
corrective”) et al., …. And the State made no successful effort to bring the
guilty to punishment or afford protection or redress to the outraged and
innocent.”)
794 S.W. 2d 692 (Mo.
App. 1990) “No system of justice can function at its best or maintain broad
public confidence if a litigant can be compelled to submit his case in a court
where the litigant sincerely believes the judge is incompetent or prejudicial……
{T}hat is the price to be paid for a judicial system that seeks to free a
litigant from a feeling of oppression”. State ex Rel. McNary v. Jones, 472 S.W.
2d. 637, 639-640 (Mo. App. 1971) Indeed, the
right to disqualify a judge is “one of the keystones of our legal
administration edifice “State ex Rel. Campbell v. Kohn, 606 S.W. 2d 399-401(Mo. Mo.
FEDERAL
JUDGE GETTLEMAN: stated, Tuesday March 10, 2009, where he found
Superintendent of police Jody Weiss in Contempt of Court and Ordered the City
to Pay $100,000.00, “No one is above the Law”, he cited a 1928 decision by
Supreme Court Justice Louis Brandeis, that said, “If the Government becomes the
law breaker, it breeds Contempt for the Law, It invites everyman to become a
law unto himself. It invites Anarchy.”
WHEREFORE
the aforementioned reasons Plaintiff respectfully Prays for the Relief
1.
For an Order Supplementing the Motion;
2.
Due to the Noted Deliberate arrogant Criminal Acts of a County
Judge “FIXING” a Discrimination/Housing matter involving CHA officials and a
plethora of other conspirators Remand/Removal Instanter in accordance to this
court’s jurisdiction;
3.
For an Order on the Issuance of a Rule to Show Cause Instanter on any and all
attorneys complicit in aiding and abetting in a criminal conspiracy against the
Plaintiff;
4.
For the entry of an Order awarding to your Petitioner for
such other relief and any other relief necessary as equity may require of which
this court may deem overwhelmingly just;
Respectfully
Submitted
Joe Louis Lawrence
PO Box 490075
Chicago,
Ill. 60649-0075
Email: joelouislaw@yahoo.com
Phone: 312 927-4210
IN THE
UNITED STATES
DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF
ILLINOIS
EASTERN DIVISION
Joe Louis Lawrence Civil Action #16-cv-7434
Hon: John W. Darrah
Plaintiff
V
420 East Ohio, Chicago Housing Authority
345 East Ohio, K2 Apartments, City of Chicago,
Commission on Human Relations Supreme Court
Of Illinois, Alderman
Edward Burke,
Franklin U.
Valderrama, Mary Lane Mikva
Defendants
NOTICE OF
MOTION TO SUPPLEMENT MOTION THAT CORROBORATES
“FRAUD & “CORRUPTION” IN COOK COUNTY COURTS w/AFFIDAVIT
To the Honorable Judge of the United States District Court
for the Northern District:
Moving Party, Joe Louis Lawrence, hereby respectfully
represents as Counsel Pro Se shows this court with an affidavit the noted
reasons why Motion should be Supplemented Pursuant to Fed. Rules of Civil
Procedure; {Pursuant to the provisions of the United States Constitution}
Please be advised that on
September 8, 2016, Plaintiff has filed before this Honorable District
Court, Motion to Supplement et al;
and will present said legally sufficient instrument before Judge Darrah
September 15, at 9:30 am in room 1203
Commander
& Chief
Attorney
General of United States
President
Barack Obama
Loretta
Lynch
The White House
U.S. Department of Justice
1600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW 950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20500 Washington, DC 20530-0001
1600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW 950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20500 Washington, DC 20530-0001
Chief Judge Timothy Evans
Judge
Moshe Jacobius
50 West Washington, Suite 2600 50
West Washington, Suite 2403
Chicago, Illinois 60601
Chicago,
Ill. 60601
Judge Mary Lane Mikva
Clerk
of Circuit Court, Dorothy Brown
50 West Washington, Suite
50
West Washington, Suite 1000
Chicago, Ill 60601
Chicago,
Ill. 60601
Atty. Gen, Lisa Madigan
Asst.
Atty. Gen Tyler Roland
100 West Randolph, Suite 1200
100
West Randolph, Suite 1200
Chicago, Ill. 60601
Chicago,
Ill. 60601
States
Attorney, Anita Alvarez, Daley Center,
Chg. Ill. 60601
Sec of State
Asst
Deputy Dir. Candace Cheffin
Asst Gen Counsel Terrence McConville 60
East Van Buren, 8th floor
100 West Randolph, Suite 500
Chicago,
Ill. 60601
Chicago, Ill. 60601
CHA Mobility
CHA
Mobility, HCP Counselors
Chris Klepper, Executive Dir.
Tracey
Robinson/Joann Harris
28 East Jackson Blvd.
4859
S. Wabash, Suite 2nd Floor
Chicago, Ill 60604
Chicago,
Ill. 60615
CHA Mobility, Real Estate Specialist
Recorder
of Deeds
Jessie McDaniel
Karen
Yarbrough
4859 S. Wabash
118
N. Clark, Room 120
Chicago, Ill. 60615
Chicago,
Ill. 60602
City of Chicago, Department of Buildings
Sabre Investments
Christopher Lynch
120
West Madison Street
121 North LaSalle, Room 900
Chicago,
Ill 60601
Chicago, Ill. 60601
Seyfarth & Shaw
Anne D. Harris, Jeffrey K. Ross, Kyle A. Petersen, Sara Eber Fowler
Suite 2400
131 South Dearborn
Chicago, IL. 60603
Chicago Housing Authority
Office of the General Counsel, Maria Sewell Joseph, Thomas B. King
60 East Van Buren
Chicago, IL. 60605
Cary
G. Schiff & Associates Gordon
& Rees LLP
Christopher
R. Johnson, Yuleida Joy Lindsay
Watson, Christian T. Novay
134 N.
LaSalle Street, Suite 1720
1 North
Franklin, Suite 800
Chicago,
Ill. 60602
Chicago,
Illinois 60606
Stephan R. Patton, Mary E. Reuther, Rey A. Phillip Santos,
Margaret Diaz
Corp Counsel, Deputy Corp. Counsel, Asst Corp Counsel
30 N. LaSalle Street, Suite 800
Chicago, Ill 60602
Wilson Elser Moskowitz Edelman & Dicker LLP
Christian Novay
Lewis
Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith, LLP
55 West Monroe, Street, Suite 3800
Christian
Novay
Chicago, Ill. 60603
550
West Adams Street, Suite 300
Chicago,
IL. 60661
Jessica Mallon, Gen Counsel CHA Roy
Martinez Manager 420 East Ohio
60 East Van Buren
420
East Ohio
Chicago, Ill 60601
Chicago,
Ill. 60611
Eve Aywaz, Sales Consultant
Sarah
Aredia, Leasing Consultant
345 East Ohio
420
East Ohio
Chicago, Ill. 60611
Chicago,
Ill. 60611
John-Paul Loseto, Executive Manager
345 East Ohio
Father
Michael Pfleger
Chicago, Ill. 60611
St.
Sabina
1210
West 78th Pl.
Courtesy Copies:
Chg.
Il 60620
US
Attorney
FBI
Dir. Michael J. Anderson
Zachary
T. Fardon
2111
West Roosevelt Road
219 S.
Dearborn, 5th floor
Chicago,
Ill. 60612
Chicago, Ill 60604
Leo
High School Principal Philip Messina
Hon Judge Neil Cohen
7901
S. Sangamon
50 West Washington, Suite 2308
Chicago,
Il 60620
Chicago, Ill 60601
Mayor
Deputy
Regional Adm., Field Office Dir.
Rahm Emanuel Beverly
E. Bishop
City Hall
77
West Jackson Boulevard
Chicago, Ill. 60601
Chicago,
Ill. 60604
Governor
Hon
Mark Kirk
525 South
8th St.
607
East Adams, Suite 1520
Springfield,
Ill. 62703
Springfield,
Ill. 62701
Bruce
Rauner
Alderman
David Moore
100 West
Randolph
Alderman
Ed Burke
Chicago,
Ill. 60601
Cook County President
Cook
County Sheriff
Toni Preckwinkle
Thomas
J. Dart
118 N. Clark, Room 517
Richard
J. Daley Center, Room 701
Chicago, Ill. 60602
Chicago,
Ill. 60602
Hon
Dick Durbin
Hon
Judge
525 South
8th St.
Frederick
Bates
Springfield,
Ill. 62703
50
West Washington
Chicago,
Ill. 60601
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I Joe Louis Lawrence
Plaintiff-Counsel Pro Se, certify that I have on this day filed said Motion to
Supplement et al. With the Clerk of the United States District Court with all
attachments;
Dated
September 8, 2016
Respectfully
Submitted
Joe Louis
Lawrence
Counsel Pro Se
Chicago,
Illinois 60649-0075
Email: joelouislaw@yahoo.com
Phone: 312 927-4210
Twitter:
@joelouis7
IN THE
UNITED STATES
DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF
ILLINOIS
EASTERN DIVISION
Joe Louis Lawrence
Civil Action #16-cv-7434
Hon: John W. Darrah
Plaintiff
V
420 East Ohio, Chicago Housing Authority
345 East Ohio, K2 Apartments, City of Chicago,
Commission on Human Relations Supreme Court
Of Illinois, Alderman
Edward Burke,
Franklin U.
Valderrama, Mary Lane Mikva
Defendants
AFFIDAVIT
Now
comes Joe Louis Lawrence, Attorney Pro Se Plaintiff in this cause files
herewith his affidavit as required by Title 28, United States Code:
I Joe Louis Lawrence, Counsel Pro Se being
duly sworn on oath states the aforementioned pleadings enumerated within said
motion the undersigned certifies that the statements set forth in this
instrument are true
and correct, except as to matters therein stated to be on information and
belief and as to such matters, the undersigned certifies as aforesaid that he
verily believes the same to be true.
Joe Louis Lawrence
NOTARY
P.O. Box 490075-0075
Chicago, Illinois 60649-0075
@joelouis7
312 927-4210
No comments:
Post a Comment