ILLINOIS CORRUPTION IS IN THE SUPREME COURT CHALLENGING FBI TO COME GET THEM

PURSUANT TO SUPREME COURT RULE 272 "IF AT THE TIME OF ANNOUNCING FINAL JUDGMENT THE JUDGE REQUIRES THE SUBMISSION OF A FORM OF A WRITTEN JUDGMENT TO BE SIGNED BY THE JUDGE ET AL. THE JUDGMENT BECOMES FINAL ONLY WHEN THE SIGNED JUDGMENT IS FILED."

MAY 3, 2016 JUDGE MARY JANE THEIS GRANTED MOTION TO FOR LEAVE TO FILE IN FORMA PAUPERIS AND WAIVE FILING FEES ORDER. MOTION GRANTED IT WAS MAILED FROM CHICAGO SUPREME COURT.

MAY 18, 2016 JUDGE CHARLES FREEMAN GRANTED MOTION TO SUPPLEMENT MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS AND/OR FOR ISSUANCE OF A SUPERVISORY ORDER VACATING ORDERS AND RECUSING JUDGE VALDERRAMA FOR "CAUSE" DUE TO BIAS AND/OR PREJUDICIAL CONDUCT PURSUANT TO S.H.A. 735 ILCS 5/2 -1001 (a) (2,3) (WEST 2006) , AND TO IMPOSE SANCTIONS PURSUANT TO SUPREME COURT RULE 137 INSANTER. MOTION ALLOWED. THIS ORDER WAS MAILED FROM SPRINGFIELD SUPREME COURT.

JUNE 1, 2016 ORDER WAS MAILED FROM SPRINGFIELD.

IT IS APPARENT CORRUPTION IS BEFORE THE SUPREME COURT BUT TO DETERMINE IF JUDGES ARE INVOLVED OR A JANITOR MAILED THE ORDER.

THIS CASE MADE IT BEFORE THE CIRCUIT COURT BECAUSE SOMEONE ON THE CITY LEVEL MAILED TO MY POST OFFICE BOX COURT ORDERS DISMISSING MY DISCRIMINATION CASES AGAINST THE AFOREMENTIONED BUILDINGS ORDERS DISMISSING MY CLAIMS WITHOUT AND SIGNATURES ALL OF THE ATTORNEYS HAVE ADMITTED TO ALL OF THE FACTS IN THE COMPLAINTS, AFFIDAVITS AND BEFORE THE SUPREME COURT.

THIS IS THE METHODOLOGY USED TO MAKE AN ASS OUT OF THE GOVERNMENT IF CHARGES WERE BROUGHT BECAUSE NO JUDGE CAN BE PROSECUTED FOR A CRIME ACTING OUTSIDE OF HIS JUDICIAL DISCRETION OR JUDICIAL IMMUNITY BECAUSE HIS NAME IS NOT ENDORSED/

NOW SOMEONE OR MORE THAN ONE PERSON OPERATING IN THE SUPREME COURT CAPACITY HAS NOW CHALLENGED THE FEDERAL AUTHORITIES TO COME AND REMOVE THEM WITH PROSECUTORIAL AUTHORITY BECAUSE THEY DON'T SEEM TO THINK THEY ARE SMART ENOUGH TO IDENTIFY ANY OF THEM BECAUSE THE GOOD OL BOYS WHO HAVE TERRORIST CONTROL OVER ALL OF THE COURTS ENFORCING JIM CROW LAWS SEEM S TO THINK THEY ARE SMARTER THAN ANYONE PRESIDENT OBAMA HAS APPOINTED.

ANY JUDGE THAT LAWFULLY DENIES THIS MOTION IS ENGAGING IN AN ELABORATE CONSPIRACY DEMONSTRATING NO CHICAGO CITIZEN ESPECIALLY OF COLOR IS CAPABLE OF RECEIVING JUSTICE IN ANY COURTS.

THAT IS WHY SO MANY JUDGES ARE ABLE TO VIOLATE THE CIVIL RIGHTS OF OTIS LOVE, JR OR ANYONE THEY SEE FIT WHO CHALLENGES THEIR TERRORIST CONTROL.

THIS IS WHY SO MANY PEOPLE ARE LOSING THEIR HOMES IN FORECLOSURE BECAUSE OF THE UNLAWFUL CRIMINAL ACTS OF JUDGES NOT SIGNING ORDERS ALLOWING BANK ATTORNEYS TO STEAL HOMES.

THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE NEEDS TO DO AN INVESTIGATION ON THE JUDGES HERE IN ILLINOIS STARTING WITH THE SUPREME COURT.

FOR THE RECORD: EVERY JUDGE IN THE SUPREME COURT IS NOT CORRUPT!  

ಸ್ಪ್ರೇ? *. *26.1818 ぶ

'&#ణా

SUPREME COURT OF ILLINOIS SUPREME COURT BUILDING

200 East Capitol Avenue SPRINGFIELD, ILLINOIS 62701–1721

CAROLYNTAFT GROSBOLL FIRST DISTRICT OFFICE

Clerk of the Court 160 North LaSalle Street, 20" Floor

Chicago, Illinois 60601-3103 

(217) 782-2035 (312) 793-1332 

TDD: (217) 524-8132 TDD: (312) 793-6185

June 1, 2016

Mr. Joe Louis Lawrence

P.O. BOX 490075 

Chicago, IL 60649-0075

In re: Joe Louis Lawrence, petitioner, v. Hon. Mary L. Mikva, Judge of the Circuit Court of Cook County, et al., etc., respondents. Mandamus/Supervisory Order. No. 120724

Today the following order was entered in the captioned case:

Motion by petitioner, prose, for leave to file petition for writ of mandamus and/or for issuance of a supervisory order vacating orders and recusing Judge Valderrama for "cause" due to bias and/or prejudicial conduct pursuant to S.H.A. 735 ILCS 5/21001(a)(2,3)(West 2006), and to impose sanctions pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 137 with affidavit.

Motion Denied.

Order entered by the Court.

cc: All Counsel of Record