#TERRORISM IN CHICAGO IGNORED BECAUSE PEOPLE OF COLOR ARE VICTIMS PART 1 OF 3

1.)   JUDGE VALDERRAMA RELEASED THE VIDEO WHERE A WHITE POLICE OFFICER MURDERED AN UNARMED 17 YEAR OLD SHOOTING HIM 16 TIMES DEMONSTRATING HIS RACIAL HATRED NEVER HAVE A RABID DOG OR COYOTE SHOT 16 TIMES.

2.)   IN THIS CASE THE JUDGE USED HIS ROBE AND SACRIFICED HIS CAREER PROTECTING CORRUPT RACIST WHITE MEN ENGAGING IN DIABOLICAL HATE CRIMES DISCRIMINATING AGAINST ME AND MY FAMILY WITH A SECTION 8 VOUCHER, EXHAUSTED CRIMES SURPASSING HUMAN IMAGINATION FOR APPLYING AT BUILDINGS WHERE PEOPLE OF COLOR WERE NOT SUPPOSED TO APPLY AT OR LIVE.

3.)   THEY USED KU KLUX KLAN TACTICS DEPLOYED TOP INTERNATIONAL LAW FIRM SEYFARTH & SHAW 4 ATTORNEYS ANNE D. HARRIS, KYLE PETERSEN, JEFFREY K. ROSS AND MEREDITH OLIVA, CHICAGO HOUSING AUTHORITY, 3 ATTORNEYS (OFFICE OF THE GENERAL COUNSEL) THOMAS B. KING, MARIA SEWELL JOSEPH AND JESSICA MALLON, CITY OF CHICAGO,4 ATTORNEYS THE MAYORS TOP DOGS STEPHEN R. PATTON CORPORATION COUNSEL, MARY E. RUETHER, DEPUTY CORP. COUNSEL, REY A. PHILLIPS SANTOS AND CHIEF ASSISTANT CORP. COUNSEL MYRIAM ZRECZNY KASPER, CARY G. SCHIFF ( Cary G. Schiff & Associates is one of the largest firms in Illinois as measured by volume of Forcible Entry and Detainer Actions filed.) CHRISTOPHER R. JOHNSON, YULEIDA JOY, 

Gordon & Rees Ranked on Law360’s List of Largest U.S. Law Firms

Gordon & Rees LLP has been ranked as No. 71 on the “Law360 400,” Law360’s annual ranking of the 400 largest law firms in the nation. The list features the largest law firms as measured by domestic attorney and partner headcount. FORMER DISTRICT ATTORNEY FROM NEW YORK CHRISTIAN NOVAY, LINDSAY WATSON

 15 + ATTORNEYS PAID TO LYNCH ME USING THE LAWS!

A JUDGE TRIED TO APPOINT LAW FIRMS TO ASSIST ME THEY DECLINED BECAUSE THEY ARE CONSIDERED THE GOOD OL BOYS LAWYERS IN CHICAGO ARE AFRAID OF THESE TERRORISTS.

PART II OF III DESCRIBES HOW THEY ALLEGEDLY MURDERED MY BROTHER TIMOTHY LAWRENCE THE WAY JUDGE VALDERRAMA THREATENED ME IN COURT AND HOW MY BROTHER WAS KILLED, IT WAS AS IF HE KILLED MY BROTHER THINKING HE WAS ME (I CAN'T PROVE THIS BUT IT IS MY OPINION)

THEY WAY THEY KILLED MY BROTHER YOU WOULD THINK A MEMBER OF ISIS KILLED HIM SHOT HIM IN THE HEAD AND BURNED HIS BODY AND BLEW UP THE HOUSE LIKE C4 WAS USED DEMONSTRATING RACIAL HATRED AND WAR;

THE RACIST COWARDS CAME AFTER MY SON ALLEGEDLY INTIMIDATING ANYONE THAT ALLOWED HIM TO PLAY FOOTBALL SOME OF THE RACIST MEN AND WOMEN AT LEO HIGH SCHOOL AND PHILLIPS HIGH SCHOOL DID'NT HAVE TO BE COERCED MAKING SURE HE DIDN'T QUALIFY FOR ANY FOOTBALL SCHOLARSHIP.

PART III OF III DESCRIBES HOW MANY NEGROES AND HISPANICS HAVE CLOSED THEIR EYES TO THE PLETHORA OF TERRORIST ACTS PERPETRATED BY WHITE MEN ORGANIZED IN POWER BY ALLOWING THEMSELVES TO BE WHORED OUT TO ASSIST THEM IN ANY RACIST ACT UPHOLDING JIM CROW LAWS SO AS TO PROTECT THE CORRUPT WHITE MEN IN POWER.

FOR AN ORDER RECOMMENDING A SPECIAL PROSECUTOR OUTSIDE OF STATES ATTORNEY ANITA ALVAREZ ATTORNEY GENERAL LISA MADIGAN JURISDICTION.

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT

OF

COOK COUNTY, ILLNOIS

CHANCERY DIVISION

In Re Racial Discrimination/Source Income Violations

Housing Matters:                                                                

Joe Louis Lawrence                                                               Case # 2015 CH 01670

            Appellant                                                                  HON. F. U. Valderrama       

                                                                                                   Room 2305       

            V

420 East Ohio, Chicago Housing Authority

345 East Ohio, City of Chicago, Commission on Human Relations, K2 Apartments                                                                                             

           Respondents                                                                                                 

.                                        2ND AMENDED COMPLAINT

REQUEST FOR REVIEW DUE TO “FRAUD” “TERRORIST ACTS VIOLATIONS” “CONTEMPT OF COURT” PERJURY & “CRIMINAL JUDICIAL CONSPIRACY/COVER-UP CONSPIRACY” “CORRUPTION” OTHER IRREGULARITIES & IMPOSE SANCTIONS WITH AFFIDAVIT

    Now comes Plaintiff Joe Louis Lawrence, Counsel Pro Se, in this cause respectfully represents to this court the reasons and files herewith his Affidavit in support for said Request for Review/Appeal/Rule to Show Cause for “Fraud” “Contempt of Court” “Perjury”  “Criminal Conspiracy”/ “Cover-up Conspiracy” “Corruption” other Irregularities & Impose Sanctions with Affidavit, pursuant to the provisions of the Admin. Rev. Law, 735 ILCS 5/3-101 pursuant to the Ku Klux Klan Act of 1871, Section 1983 of U.S.C.S., S.H.A. Criminal Ch. 38, 33-3, Civil Rights Act of 1964, 3D (2) Reporting Lawyer Misconduct, CCHR Reg. Rule 240.349 of the City of Chicago Human Relations Commission;

Be advised the Commission has committed “Fraud” of many sorts engaged in a Heinous Civil Rights Conspiracy enacting “Jim Crow Laws” outlawed by the United Supreme Court by covering up and ignoring the various criminal acts by members of the Democratic Political Machine.

That Pursuant to Sup Ct. Rule 272 “if at the time of announcing final judgment the judge requires the submission of a form of written judgment to be signed by the judge et al” the judgment becomes final only when the signed judgment is filed—there was never any signatures or seals recorded from the mailed documents!  Causing the documents to be VOID in authority!

                                                                                     Respectfully Submitted,    

                                                            Joe Louis Lawrence

                                                            Counsel Pro Se/Appellant                                                                            

                                                              P.O. Box 490075

                                                                Chicago, Illinois 60649-0075

                                                            312 927-4210

                                                                     joelouislaw@yahoo.com

                                                                                 Twitter @joelouis7

                                         AFFIDAVIT

  

I Joe Louis Lawrence, being duly sworn on oath states:

1.)     That pursuant to Judge Valderrama’s series of criminal errors trying to protect white men and uphold racist hate crimes lodged at the Plaintiff, Friday November the 13^th court order is void and defective on all accounts;

2.)     That Par. 1 is not accurate, hereto attached Vol. II #28 Ex I, Vol III #39 demonstrate Racial Discrimination unequivocally along with a plethora of other heinous Civil Rights Violations culminating into Domestic Terrorist Acts;

A-   The judge granted the City’s motion to Dismiss absent a counter-affidavit or legal precedents in the laws that warranted any dismissals and most importantly, the court never mentioned why Plaintiff had to Amend his complaint;

B-   The Judge committed another grave error from , Par. 2, “Plaintiff has yet to file an Amended Complaint” Plaintiff filed an Amended Complaint March 4, 2015; furthermore, the court RECORDED the Petition for Rule to Show Cause as being “REPLETE” which simply means Abundantly filled or gorged with food or drink,  and noted another grammatical usage of a word describing the Plaintiff’s Petition as being “INVECTIVE” insulting, abusive, or highly critical language, (the tool of invective is generally employed in both poetry and prose to reiterate the significance of the deeply felt emotions of the writer);

C-   Judge stated, “as best as the court can discern, allegedly unsigned orders from the city et al.”, FACT, from affidavit (Motion for Reconsideration et al., page 6, Par A-E, #10  Gr Ex H, I lacking jurisdiction of authority causing it to be Void, Judge Valderrama acknowledged receiving orders, Page 12, Lines 10-13, “Thank you. I do have---- I have seen this, this order denying request for review. And I have read it. Thank you; I am not sure how that ties in though. I’ve read that document”

D-   The court on its face demonstrated lacking the legal aptitude to proceed on said matter when he made the aforementioned  statement and was trying to let the attorneys Bully the plaintiff anyway they saw fit as he kept his eyes closed to the mayhem initiated in his court as he took part in the proceedings;

E-   Par 3 the court made an incorrect legal citation, in that the proper laws to have been noted on this order is US Sup Court Digest 24(1) General Conspiracy, Organized Conspiracy, pursuant to Vol II, page 18, Section 1983 of U.S.C.S. contemplates the depravation of Civil Rights through the Unconstitutional Application of a Law by conspiracy or otherwise. Mansell v. Saunders (CA 5 F 1A) 372 F 573, especially if the conspiracy was actually carried into effect, et al.

F-    That because of the judges intimate involvement “FIXING” this case he went outside of the judicial provisions of his  immunity by recording false entries in Par 4, Administrative agencies are without Contempt powers as an officer of the court Plaintiff had a duty and legal obligation to  Due-diligently inform the court of corrupt unlawful practices exercised at the Human Rights Commission;

G-   The Judge egregiously stated, Par 5,  “Plaintiff also alleges that Defendants’ attorneys have committed  fraud  on the court  et al.,

H-   That Ex J, K and L demonstrates proper service was had on the defendants, I and J are Summons issued by the Clerk of the Circuit Court pursuant to 735 ILCS 5/3- 101 et seq pursuant to Motion for Disqualification of judge et al., (April 2, 2015) Group Ex A, Page 4, Line 21-24, Plaintiff “The city clerk’s office in fact served them certified mail. The judge “No. The clerk’s office doesn’t serve anybody by certified mail”. The Judge ignored the Affidavit as Gr Ex B by the Clerk of the Circuit Court providing a printout of all parties properly served a summons and Complaint and printouts of the Cook County Sheriff personally serving all parties the Amended Petition for Rule to Show Cause et al.

I-    Hereto attached, not recorded in the court files but Sheriff made it clear Plaintiff have nothing to worry about they have copies get all their Asses! Group Ex F, #01712556 CHA served via corp. 3-11-2015, Alina Dekkal, #01712557 Rahm Emanuel (Mayor) via corp. 3-12-2015, N. Nieminski, #01712558 served personally Christian T. Novay 3-9-2015, #01712560 served personally Christopher Johnson 3-12-2015, #01722070 served Seyfarth & Shaw via corp. Barbara Renias 3-16-2015;

J-    That Page 9 Line 22-24 The Judge “there being no evidence of summons and complaint on the housing authority as well as 345 East Ohio”, Page 10 Line 1-2 “the petition is denied as I have no jurisdiction so I can’t even hear it” 

K-   That the Judge became a law unto himself (Motion for Reconsideration et al filed April 21, 2015) Affidavit Page 2-11 unequivocally demonstrated the plethora of CRIMINAL ERRORS  the judge made in this case no attorney spoke up with integrity denouncing their participation in the draconian Terrorist Acts;

L-    Par 6 and 7 of the judge’s order demonstrates the court is in Contempt of the laws by signing orders against the manifest weight of the evidence because of Plaintiff’s skin color and the legal system upholding Racist terrorist acts upon persons of color, the court has used his robe and unlawful authority to assist the perpetrators of said heinous crimes protecting them to continue their Terrorist acts on the plaintiff for standing up to corruption and the aforementioned acts, due to no one admonishing him because Black and Brown lives really don’t matter in this city and he is demonstrating this fact in all of his actions.

M-  The worst part is that the judge has demonstrated a fearless untouchable arrogance, due to Plaintiff’s skin color knowing he would never be admonished; due, to Plaintiff standing up to Chicago’s Domestic Terrorist, he had a 2 page order already prepared where the City attorney was not present and did not respond but 420 East Ohio and the CHA had enjoined with the city but CHA and 420 East Ohio appeared Friday the 13^th, giving oral testimony without Notice or knowledge to the Plaintiff, DENYING the Petition for Rule to show Cause and ignored the ReNotice Objecting the Dismissal et al. And does not list the attorneys who were present IN SAID COURT ORDER.

N-   That because the CHA and 420 East Ohio had enjoined with the City they are bound by the city attorneys argument before the court but ignored all rules of Civil Procedure allowed T.B. King to argue unlawfully before the court; 

   

3.)     That said identified person operating in disguise as an alleged Commissioner for the Chicago Commission on Human Relations used his position and unlawful authority to uphold “Jim Crow Laws” of said Confederate applications to unlawfully dismiss said Complaint filed by the City of Chicago with no name;

4.)         That Vol II Gr Ex A1, hereto attached Racial War et al. email from CHA Kris Klepper (July 11, 2014) she stated, “Hello Joe. I believe the rent is too high for this development its over $4000 and I don’t know of any unit renting that much……….” “you should consider something less expensive”

5.)        Said records unequivocally demonstrate CHA colluding with Defendants making sure he did not move into certain areas due to his skin color and the Commission having knowledge of this falsified documents upholding racism racial discrimination and a plethora of Civil Rights Violations in Housing and other acts of “FRAUD”, hereto attached, Gr Ex A, B, C, D and E Orders from the Commission violating Supreme Court Rule 272 where a signature is required and mail fraud Inducing Reliance on all parties;

A-   That Gr. Ex A Order Denying Request for Review, in favor of Respondent 420 East Ohio with no signature or seal; (Jan. 6, 2015)

B-   That Gr. Ex B Order Denying Request for Review, in favor of Respondent CHA and The Streeter 355 East Ohio with no signature or seal;(Jan. 6, 2015)

C-   That the Respondent City of Chicago ignored Gr Ex F Motion for Reconsideration et al w/Affidavit;(Dec. 8, 2014)

D-   That Gr. Ex C Order Finding No Substantial Evidence, in favor of Respondent 420 East Ohio with no signature or seal; (Dec. 2015)

E-   That Gr. Ex D Investigative Order against Appellant seeking documents with no signature or seal;(Dec 29, 2014)

F-    That Gr. Ex E Order to Respond and Notice of Potential Default with no signature or seal; (Jan. 5, 2015)

6.)     That Plaintiff filed Gr. Ex’s G, H, I and M

A-   That Gr. Ex G Motion Objecting Extension of Time w/Affidavit before the Respondent City of Chicago went ignored by all parties due to the veracity stated within;

B-   That Gr. Ex H Motion Moving for a Default w/Affidavit (Jan. 22, 2015) this said document went ignored by all parties, due to the veracity stated within;

C-   That Plaintiff complying with the clerks directive, Gr Ex I  recorded the names and certified numbers for all defendant’s for proper service via United States Postal delivery;

D-   That Gr. Ex M Plaintiff filed a Motion to Cure Defects in Investigative Order Due to Error or Fraud w/Affidavit, nobody denied or objected to the Motion;

E-   That Defendant’s attorneys from the CHA and 345 East Ohio with contemptuous vexation for the laws committed PERJURY told the judge “they were never served”! Allegedly a city attorney stood in the background observing took a picture of the court order with their cell phone;

F-     That Gr. Ex J, Frank Fiorentino signed for 345 East Ohio;

G-   That Gr. Ex K, Jeffrey Wilson, signed for Chicago Commission on Human Relations;

H-   That Gr. Ex L, C. Armstrong signed for the CHA;

Terrorism is here in America in this State of Illinois, City of Chicago and the techniques used to Oppress and commit Genocide on innocent men of color and the methodologies employed in how certain ethnic groups are recruited to advance their agenda to remain employed to destroy an innocent man and his children in the likes of the plaintiff for standing up to Racist Terrorism in this State in the courts for seeking equality conditions where housing was concerned trying to live with a CHA voucher; 

Count the number of lawyers and judges used to attempt “Lynching” on an innocent man simply for standing up to Racism, Racial Segregation and Racial Injustice in Chicago and how many closed their eyes to the crimes because Black and Brown lives don’t matter living in Chicago.

7.)     That Judge Franklin Ulysses Valderrama had jurisdiction over the parties when they were properly before the court but used his robe and authority to assist in Terrorist Acts:

A-   That Plaintiff honestly in error failed to attach the court orders from the Commission on Human Relations, but deliberately made sure they were in the Petition for Rule to show Cause where service was effected on all parties involved so as to demonstrate to this court, the racist animosity of the mindset of the parties involved, in that whether they are in court before this Honorable Court or Plaintiff is presenting perfected legal documents the hue of our skin tone still to this day (year 2015) yields the diabolical heinous acts of what white men are willing to do to undermine the integrity of an innocent man prohibiting him and family equal access to housing or the laws and in the judge’s case no respect because you are in a robe!

 

8.)     That Anne D. Harris referenced the Plaintiff’s documents as “Gibberish” but admitted she was in fact served certified mail by the Clerk of the Circuit Court;

9.)     That Defendants CHA maliciously with vexatious contempt for the laws incited racist policies made perjured admissions to the Commission on Human Relations and court.    

10.)     In the 20th century, the Supreme Court began to overturn Jim Crow laws on constitutional grounds. In Buchanan v. Warley 245 US 60 (1917), the court held that a Kentucky law could not require residential segregation. The Supreme Court in 1946, in Irene Morgan v. Virginia ruled segregation in interstate transportation to be unconstitutional, in an application of the commerce clause of the Constitution. It was not until 1954 in Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka 347 US 483 that the court held that separate facilities were inherently unequal in the area of public schools, effectively overturning Plessy v. Ferguson, and outlawing Jim Crow in other areas of society as well. This landmark case consisted of complaints filed in the states of Delaware (Gebhart v. Belton); South Carolina (Briggs v. Elliott); Virginia (Davis v. County School Board of Prince Edward County); and Washington, D.C. (Spottswode Bolling v. C. Melvin Sharpe). These decisions, along with other cases such as McLaurin v. Oklahoma State Board of Regents 339 US 637 (1950), NAACP v. Alabama 357 US 449 (1958), and Boynton v. Virginia 364 US 454 (1960), slowly dismantled the state-sponsored segregation imposed by Jim Crow laws so the Democrats in Chicago, Illinois have been able to circumvent this area of the law by appointing black and brown faces in  various positions undermining the very laws used to abolish racial discrimination as they closed their eyes to criminal civil rights violations;

A-   Plaintiff filed a Motion for Reconsideration Vacate Order Due To “Fraud” Terrorist Conspiracy Acts Civil Rights Violations Impose Sanctions w/Affidavit (Dec. 8, 2014);

B-   That a City employee in the Commission on Human Relations falsified a document purported as an Order from the authority of the Commissioner absent a signature or seal titled “Request for Review” denying said Motion Jan. 6, 2015;

C-   Plaintiff filed a “Request for Review” Impose Sanctions w/Affidavit March 28, 2014, that a City employee in the Commission on Human Relations falsified a document purported as an Order from the authority of the Commissioner absent a signature or seal titled “Request for Review” denying said document Jan. 6, 2015;

11.)     That Plaintiff legally with astute integrity filed an “Emergency Amended Petition for Rule to Show Cause et al., w/Affidavit (March 14, 2014), totaling 157 pages served on all parties as well as Hon. Rahm Emmanuel (Mayor) via personal service, said Complaint was expeditiously dismissed unlawfully (March 18, 2014) ignoring all of the corroborating facts of all parties involved, hereto attached, Gr Ex F, Motion for Reconsideration et al; Because of Appellant’s ethnicity Rahm Emmanuel closed his eyes to the Racist Heinous Acts perpetrated by the Political Machine.

           

A-     "The mayor of Chicago is the mayor of Chicago land," Myron Orfield says. Orfield, who used to live here, has been a leading force for desegregation in the Twin Cities—he's the executive director of the Institute on Race & Poverty at the University of Minnesota. He says a Chicago mayor carries much clout with suburban mayors, and could use it to help ease

 Segregation in the city and the near suburbs.

B-     Pursuant to 735 ILCS 5/2-610 where allegations of complaint are not denied, there is admission of all facts well-pleaded by adversary, and such admission, drawn from failure to plead, may be considered as evidence. Hecht v. Hecht, App. 1 Dist. 1977, 7 Ill. Dec. 169, 49 Ill. App. 3d 334, 364 N.E. 2d 330.

C-    Pursuant to 735 ILCS 5/2-612 Counsel never Objected to the sufficiency of Petitioners pleadings, Objections to sufficiency of pleadings either in form or substance must be made In trial court, and if not so made, they will be considered waived and cannot be raised for the first time on appeal. People ex rel. Deynes v. Harris, App. 1948, 77 N.E. 2d 439, 333 Ill. App. 280.

That because of the above; Fraud admissibility great latitude is permitted in proving fraud C.J.S. Fraud 104 ET Seg. Fraud 51-57. where a question of fraud and deceit is the issue involved in a case,  great latitude is ordinarily permitted in the introduction of evidence, and courts allow the greatest liberality in the method of examination and in the scope of inquiry Vigus V. O’Bannon, 1886 8 N.E 788, 118 ILL 334. Hazelton V. Carolus, 1907 132 ILL. App. 512.

12.)   That because the Democratic Political Machine is likened to the Ku Klux Klan or ISIS Terrorist group Page 3, 4 of Gr Ex F demonstrate the racial hatred “Powerful Whites” under the Catholic doctrine faith and some of the Jewish faith in authority have against persons of color and the degree of “Hate Crimes” they are willing to exhaust making sure a person of color remain oppressed;

A-           A- That there has not been a single person to stand up against the Racist Atrocities lodged at the Complainant in every layer of this conspiracy ILL. App. (1^st Dist. 2000). A “VOID JUDGEMENT OR ORDER” is one that is entered by a court lacking jurisdiction over the parties or the subject matter, or lacking the inherent power to enter the particular order of judgment, or where the order was procured by FRAUD- in re Adoption of E.L., 248 ILL. Dec. 171, 733 N.E. 2d 846, 315 ILL. App. 3d 137- Judgm 7, 16, 375.  

B-     U.S 2003. Essence of a conspiracy is an agreement to commit an unlawful act.-U.S. v. Jimenez Recio; 123 SCt. 819, 537 U.S. 270, 154, L. Ed.2d 744, on remand 371 F.3d 1093;

   Agreement to commit an unlawful act, which constitutes the essence of a conspiracy, is a distinct evil that exist and be punished whether or not the substantive crime ensues,-id.

   Conspiracy poses a threat to the public over and above the threat of the commission of the relevant substantive crime, both because the combination in crime makes more likely the commission of other crimes and because it decreases the part from their path of criminality-id;

13.)     That because Brown, Black and some foreigners lives don’t matter this is the consensus of Democrats in the Political Machine to maintain job security keeping their ethnicity employed as demonstrated in this matter how top attorneys are earning income at the demise and Racial Torture of an innocent man standing up to them in a “Homeless State” is how The Chicago Commission on Human Relations erred in ignoring all of Plaintiffs affidavits never challenged or objected to, (1995), Stokes v. Bullins, 844 F. 2d 269, 275 (5^th Cir. 1988), Wassum v. City of Bellaire, Texas, 861 F. 2d 453, 456 (5^th Cir. 1988), Benavides v. County of Wilson, 955 F. 2d 968, 972 (5^th Cir.) cert. denied,__ U.S.__, 113 S.Ct. 79, 121 L. Ed. 2d 43 (1992), “Liability will accrue for the acts of a municipal official when the official possess “final policymaking authority” to establish municipal policy with respect to the conduct that resulted in a violation of constitutional rights. Pembaur v. City of Cincinnati, 475 U.S. 469, 483, 106 S. Ct. 1292, 1300, 89 L.Ed. 2d 452 (1986) (plurality opinion), Smith v. Wade U.S. 30, 35, 103 S. Ct.1625, 1629, 75 L Ed 2d 632 (1983)

Pursuant to the following statement from a legal brief “The promise of equality has been the cornerstone of the American government, from the Declaration of Independence’s pronouncement that “all men are created equal”, to President Abraham Lincoln’s restatement of the promise in his Gettysburg Address, to the ultimate incorporation of the right to equal protection of the laws in the United States and Illinois Constitutions.

President Barack Obama recently invoked this promise of equality when he stated, “Every single American –gay, straight, lesbian, bisexual, transgender—every single American deserves to be treated equally in the eyes of the law and the eyes of our society”. It’s a simple proposition. “Barack Obama, Remarks by the President of the United States at the Human Rights campaign’s Annual National Dinner (Oct. 1, 2011)   http://www.whitehouse.gov/thepress-office/2011/10/01/remarks-president-human-rights-campaigns-annual-national-dinner.

14.)     That the Defendant’s in Chicago don’t honor or respect the President of the United States due to their racist hatred for people of color, the events recorded within the aforementioned validate the veracity of this assertion;

Beatie v. People, 33 Ill. App 651, 189 WL 2373 (1st Dist.1989). As is making false representations to the court. People v. Katelhut, 332 Ill. App. 693, 54 N.E. 2d 590, (1st Dist. 1944). Misconduct of an officer of the court is punishable as contempt. People ex rel. Rusch v. Levin, 305 Ill. App. 142, 26 N. E. 2d 895 (1st Dist. 1939). 

 Section 1983 of U.S.C.S. contemplates the depravation of Civil Rights through the Unconstitutional Application of a Law by conspiracy or otherwise. Mansell v. Saunders (CA 5 F 1A) 372 F 573, especially if the conspiracy was actually carried into effect, where an action is for a conspiracy to interfere with Civil Rights under 42 U.S.C.S. 1985 (3), or for the depravation of such rights under 42 U.S.C.S. 1983, if the conspiracy was actually carried into effect and plaintiff was thereby deprived of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the United States Constitution and Laws, the gist of the action may be treated as one for the depravation of rights under 42 U.S.C.S. 1983, Lewis v. Brautigam (CA 5 F 1a) 227 F 2d 124, 55 Alr 2d 505, John W. Strong, 185, 777-78 (4 the ed. 1992).

       14.)  How can any person whether they are Irish or of Polish ethnicity be the majority in control, see wrong, ignore wrong, close their ears and eyes to wrong when a person of their ethnic group commits fraudulent acts?

         15.)   How can any Judge whether they be Asian, Mexican or African American etc.,   who are a minority on the bench or in a Commission go up against a majority in control especially if that lawyer or law firm is of the majority’s ethnic make-up or part of the Terrorist Order and rule against that lawyer and not expect some type of repercussion from those in control?

16.)   That said document that was mailed by the unnamed Commissioner had as much value to it as yesterday’s toilet paper where said paper is heavily needed from those suffering from Crohn’s Disease involved in these matters;

        Section 2 (42 U.S.C.) In the House of Representatives.

        “Congressional Debate of the second section of the Ku Klux Klan Act was more extensive and enduring than that of Section 1; As originally presented, Sec. 2 made it a felony for any “two or more persons” to conspire to commit certain enumerated crimes “in violation of the rights and privileges, or immunities of any person, to which he is entitled under the Constitution and laws of the United States.

           “Throughout the debates, supporters of the Act made repeated references to the depredations of the Ku Klux Klan; Victims of these atrocities included not only blacks but white Republicans as well. The crimes that were perpetrated, therefore, were not viewed as isolated occurrences, but as part of an “Organized Conspiracy….Political in its origin and aims”, “crimes perpetrated by concert and agreement, by men in large numbers acting with a common purpose for the injury of a certain class of citizens entertaining certain political principles, id, at 457 (remarks of Rep. Coburn). See also e.g., id. At 437 (remarks of Rep. Cobb) (“None but Democrats belong or can belong to these societies”) et al.,

           “Where these gangs of Assassins show themselves the rest of the people look on, if not with sympathy, at least with forbearance. The boasted courage of the South is not courage in their presence. Sheriffs, having eyes to see, see not; judges, having ears to hear, hear not; witnesses conceal the truth or falsify it; grand or petit juries act as if they might be accomplices. In the presence of these gangs all the apparatus and machinery of civil government, all the processes of justice, skulk away as if government and justice were crimes and feared detection. Among the most dangerous things an injured party can do is to appeal to justice. Of the uncounted scores and hundreds of atrocious mutilations and murders it is credibly stated that not one has been punished. Cong. Globe, supra note 2, app. At 78 (remarks of Rep. Perry). (“While murder is stalking abroad in disguise, while whippings and lynching’s and banishment have been visited upon unoffending American citizens, the local administrations have been found inadequate or unwilling to apply the proper corrective”) et al., …. And the State made no successful effort to bring the guilty to punishment or afford protection or redress to the outraged and innocent.”)  

The President had additional power in case of rebellion within a state to suspend the writ of habeas corpus and to declare and enforce marital law. Cong. Globe, supra note 1, at 317. With respect to a definition of rebellion, Section 4 provided;

17.)   FACT: CHA had agreed to pay rent for the Appellant via the Mobility program at 420 East Ohio but the Respondent did not want him and family in the building and used falsified credit scores of Appellant and children credit scores only after his identity was compromised and stolen where CHA officials were involved to deny him access to renting the unit;

     A- That said documents tendered with the filing of the March 14, Amended Emergency Petition for Rule to Show Cause et al clearly and unequivocally demonstrate Complainant’s credit score at 670, down from 716 despite credit report hacked and falsified;

Civil Rights Act of 1866- first section, enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled. That all persons born in the United States and not subject to any foreign power, excluding Indians not taxed, are hereby declared to be citizens of the United States; and such citizens of every race and color, without regard to any previous condition of slavery or involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall have the same right, in every State and Territory in the United States, to make and enforce contracts, to sue, be parties, and give evidence, to inherit, purchase, lease, sell, hold and convey real and personal property, and to full and equal benefit of the laws and proceedings for the security of person and property, as is enjoyed by white citizens, and shall be subject to like punishment, pains, and penalties, and to none other, any law, statute, ordinances, regulation, or custom, to the contrary notwithstanding, Act of April 9, 1866, Ch. 31, 1, 14 Stat. 27, 42 U.S.C.A. 1981                 

 Turner 24 F. Cas. 337 (No. 14247) C.C.D. Md. 1867) The “equal benefit” clause is cited in what would appear to be the earliest reported case enforcing the section. The plaintiff was an emancipated slave who was indentured as an apprentice to her former master. Although both whites and blacks could be indentured as an apprentice, under the law of Maryland, indentured blacks were not accorded the same educational benefits as whites and, unlike whites, were subject to being transferred to any other person in the same county. Circuit Judge Chase granted a writ of habeas corpus upon finding that the purported apprenticeship was in fact involuntary servitude and a denial under the Civil Rights Act of 1866 of the “full and equal benefit of all laws.

That because of the number of years Appellant have been harmed by said Civil Rights Violations and no one objected to said assertions put before this tribunal, Complainant is seeking  $25 Million from the inception of this matter, until this matter is finally adjudicated and for the heinous Racial Hate acts associated in these matters causing some of his children to be hospitalized for various psychological traumas where therapy was necessary but said medical information was used unlawfully in an attempt to destroy Plaintiff;

    Smith v. Wade, 461 U.S. 30, 35, 103 S. Ct. 1625, 1629, 75 L Ed 2d 632 (1983)  Justice Brennen “The threshold standard for allowing punitive damages for reckless or callous indifference applies even in a case, such as here, where the underlying standard of liability for compensatory damages because is also one of recklessness. There is no merit to petitioner’s contention that actual malicious intent should be the standard for punitive damages because the deterrent purposes of such damages would be served only if the threshold for those damages is higher in every case than the underlying standard for liability in the first instance. The common-law rule is otherwise, and there is no reason to depart from the common-law rule in the context of {1983}”          

Finally, this document is best closed by a jurist who has stated”; Citing Canon 2A the court noted, “[a] court’s indifference to clearly stated rules breeds disrespect for and discontent with our justice system. Government cannot demand respect of the laws by its citizens when its tribunals ignore those very same laws”)

Most recently stated in Federal Court FEDERAL JUDGE GETTLEMAN: stated, Tuesday March 10, 2009, where he found Superintendent of police Jody Weiss in Contempt of Court and Ordered the City to Pay $100,000.00, “No one is above the Law”, he cited a 1928 decision by Supreme Court Justice Louis Brandeis, that said, “If the Government becomes the law breaker, it breeds Contempt for the Law, It invites everyman to become a law unto himself. It invites Anarchy.”    

   The Chicago Daily Law Bulletin, Wednesday April 26, 2006, Page 1, Illinois Political Machines help breed corruption, Associated Press writer Deanna Bellandi states, “Illinois is apparently a Petri dish for corruption. It is a real breeding ground”.        

That Chicago is the most Corrupt City in America, Huffington Post, Internet Newspaper, February 23, 2012; University of Illinois Professor Dick Simpson, “The two worst crime zones in Illinois are the governor’s mansion…..and the City Council Chambers in Chicago.” Simpson a former Chicago Alderman told the AP “no other State can match us.”   

         Continuous Terrorist Discrimination ignored by all persons in the Democratic Machine lodged at Plaintiff and family:                                                                                                                       

                                                              VOLUME II

18.)FACT: Properly alleged facts within an affidavit that are not contradicted by counter affidavit are taken as true, despite the existence of contrary averments in the adverse party’s pleadings. Professional Group Travel, Ltd. v. Professional Seminar Consultants Inc., 136 ILL App 3d 1084, 483 N.E. 2d 1291; Buzzard v. Bolger, 117 ILL App 3d 887, 453 N.E. 2d 1129 et al.

10.)FACT: Defendants 420 East Ohio, 345 East Ohio, K2 Apartments, City of Chicago, Commission on Human Relations, Chicago Housing Authority were properly served by the Clerk of the Circuit court Dorothy Brown, DEFAULTED DID NOT RESPOND, FILE ANY APPEARANCES OR OBJECT TO ANY OF THE ISSUES STATED IN THE AFFIDAVITS;

11.)Hereto attached, Motion Moving for Default & Summary judgment w/Affidavit;

12.)The City of Chicago’s Motion is not only legally defective but is untimely and corroborates the fact many attorneys are in engaging in Terrorists Acts in concert which validates the veracity of all assertions properly plead in said affidavits;

13.)  That because of the Defendant’s Terrorist control over certain judges, hereto attached, Gr Ex A, Motion for Reconsideration Vacate May 22, 2015 Order Due to “Error” “Fraud” Corroboration of Public Corruption Violations of the Rico Act w/ Affidavit, (June 9, 2015)

A-    That because of the veracity of the aforementioned no attorneys objected or denied Plaintiff’s Motion;

B-     Pursuant to 735 ILCS 5/2-610 where allegations of complaint are not denied, there is admission of all facts well-pleaded by adversary, and such admission, drawn from failure to plead, may be considered as evidence. Hecht v. Hecht, App. 1 Dist. 1977, 7 Ill. Dec. 169, 49 Ill. App. 3d 334, 364 N.E. 2d 330.

C-        C-   Pursuant to 735 ILCS 5/2-612 Counsel never Objected to the sufficiency of Petitioners pleadings, Objections to sufficiency of pleadings either in form or substance must be made In trial court, and if not so made, they will be considered waived and cannot be raised for the first time on appeal. People ex rel. Deynes v. Harris, App. 1948, 77 N.E. 2d 439, 333 Ill. App. 280.

14.) That because of the racist disposition various Democrats who are fraternally connected to the political machine via Homosexuals, lesbians or Bisexuals who share a combined interest in oppressing citizens of Chicago by any means necessary have circumvented every area of racial equality and equal protection to all citizens as demonstrated in this case by closing their eyes to the plethora of Civil Rights and Terrorist Acts perpetrated in these matters upholding Jim Crow laws to maintain their positions;

        That Judge Valderrama demonstrated his inferior status or otherwise disposition by stating, Par. 2 from Affidavit Motion for Reconsideration Vacate March 30, 2015 Default Order et al. Pursuant to court transcript presented at hearing before Honorable Neil H. Cohen Friday April 17, 2015 referenced as Group Exhibit A, Page 4 line 23-24, Page 5 1-6 Judge Valderamma stated “No. The clerk’s office doesn’t serve anybody by certified mail. Let me back up.” “When I say service, I don’t mean mailing anything. When I say service I mean providing a