Wikipedia Racial Injustice in Chicago Courts

Search results

Thursday, April 30, 2015

BLUEPRINT ON HOW CASES ARE FIXED IN CHICAGO, ILLINOIS WITH OR WITHOUT AN ATTORNEY:

THE COLOR OF YOUR SKIN MAKES A DIFFERENCE IN CHICAGO, ILLINOIS COURT AND BECAUSE THE JUDGE MAY BE BLACK "NEGROE" HISPANIC DOES NOT GUARANTEE THE PERSON WILL HAVE SYMPATHY OR RULE WITHIN THE CONFINES OF THE LAWS RIGHTEOUSLY

FOR EXAMPLE SINCE 1987, I ONLY HAD THE EXPERIENCE OF GOING BEFORE ONLY 1 JUDGE DEEMED AFRICAN AMERICAN BEEN BEFORE HIM FOR 2 YEARS CASE 85 D 068184, HE DISMISSED THE CASE ON SEPTEMBER 17, 1987.

AFTER ALDERMAN EDWARD BURKE, FINANCE CHAIRMAN, POINTMAN WHO ASSIGNS JUDGES TO THE POSITION AS ASSOCIATE JUDGE UNDER CASE 88 D 079012 THEIR HAS BEEN 21 JUDGES IN THE COUNTY COMPLICIT MOSTLY IRISH AND POLISH BUT THERE WAS AN AFRICAN AMERICAN "NEGROE" ASSOCIATE JUDGE WHO WAS PERMANENTLY APPOINTED R. MORGAN HAMILTON WHO DID WHATEVER SHE WAS SUPPOSED TO DO.

IN 1992 THE CASE WAS BEFORE KAPLAN JORDAN A WELL RESPECTED JUDGE WHO TOLD ME DURING THIS TIME AS LONG AS I APPEARED BEFORE HIS COURT HE WOULD NEVER ISSUE A RULE TO SHOW CAUSE AGAINST ME AND REFERRED TO ME AS COUNSEL AND ADMIRED ME DEFENDING MYSELF BECAUSE SEVERAL OF MY ATTORNEYS HAD BEEN THREATEN OFF MY CASE.

KEEP IN MIND, I HAD NO IDEA WHAT A RULE TO SHOW CAUSE WAS  AT THIS TIME I WAS OFF WORK WITH THE CTA DUE TO A WORK RELATED INJURY, THIS PARTICULAR DAY JUDGE KAPLAN WAS ABSENT, THE HIGHTOWER CASE APPEARED ON HIS CALL, MORGAN HAMILTON WAS THE SUPERVISING JUDGE, I HAD TO APPEAR BEFORE HER SHE WAS SOMEWHAT CURT,  I THOUGHT SHE WAS BRIGHT ARTICULATE WITH AN ATTITUDE MANY WHITE ATTORNEYS HATED GOING BEFORE HER, I THOUGHT THEY WERE RACIST AND RESENTED HER BECAUSE OF HER SKIN COLOR AND SHE WAS A JUDGE. LITTLE DID I KNOW

WHEN I APPEARED BEFORE JUDGE MORGAN I WAS VERY POLITE AND PROFESSIONAL AS I EXPLAINED OR TRIED TO EXPLAIN THE MERITS OF MY CASE, SHE REPLIED "YEAH, I KNOW ALL ABOUT THIS MESS THEY BETTER BE GLAD THIS MESS WAS NOT ON MY CALENDAR" SHE EVEN HAD HER CLERK TO CALL JOSEPH V. RODDY'S LAW OFFICE NOBODY ANSWERED THE CALL SHE BECAME EVEN MORE ANGRY!

I ASKED THE JUDGE IF SHE WOULD DISMISS THIS MATTER BECAUSE I AM LOSING JOBS COMING BACK AND FORTH TO COURT THIS IS NOT MY CHILD? HER REPLY, THIS IS NOT MY CASE BUT I AM GOING TO NOTE IN THE COURT ORDER BUT I AM NOT SIGNING IT THAT "DEFENDANT IS NOT TO RETURN BACK TO COURT UNLESS PROPERLY NOTIFIED" KEEP IN MIND SHE WAS THE SUPERVISOR.

I WAS NEVER SERVED OR NOTIFIED IN AND AROUND SEPTEMBER 1994, ALDERMAN BURKE APPOINTED RONALD BARTKOWICZ TO THE BENCH AS ASSOCIATE JUDGE, HE WAS A FORMER CTA ATTORNEY IN WORKMAN'S COMPENSATION THE SAME AREA, I WAS IN WHERE CTA PERSONNEL REQUESTED, I FALSIFY HOW MY INJURY WAS SUSTAINED AND USE A MEDICAL CARD TO ABSORB THE COSTS OF MY MEDICAL EXPENSES.

BECAUSE I REFUSED TO COMPLY WITH CTA'S DIRECTIVE RONALD BARTKOWICZ ISSUE A BOGUS WARRANT AGAINST ME FOR ASSAULTING FRANCOISE HIGHTOWER A POLICE OFFICER, THE CRAZY PART I HAD NOT SEEN OR SPOKE TO FRANCOISE DURING THIS TIME

WHILE HANDCUFFED ILLEGALLY CTA HAD A INVESTIGATOR TO COME REMOVE MY BADGE FROM MY BODY TO CONCEAL THE FACT, I WAS AN EMPLOYEE AND TO PROTECT THE IRISH JUDGE RESPONSIBLE FOR AUTHORIZING MY WAGES TO GARNISHEED TO THE LAW FIRM OF JOSEPH V. RODDY IN C/O FRANCOISE HIGHTOWER

MORGAN HAMILTON WENT ALONG WITH BARTKOWICZ BUT THE COOK COUNTY SHERIFF COMPLAINED OF THE ILLEGAL ACTS MADE HAMILTON MAD SHE RECORDED ON A COURT ORDER , I LEFT A CLOUD OF DISTRUST TELLING THE SHERIFF I WAS A CTA EMPLOYEE.

THE MORAL OF THIS JUST BECAUSE A JUDGE IS BLACK AFRICAN AMERICAN NEGROE WHATEVER THEY CALL THEMSELVES SOME THEM IN POWER ARE WORSE THAN WHITES AND WILL DO ANYTHING NECESSARY TO OPPRESS ANY MINORITY SEEKING JUSTICE OR RELIEF WHERE RACISM IS APPARENT.

THESE ARE THE TYPE OF BLACKS YOU READ ABOUT THAT IS DESTROYING PEOPLE THAT LOOK LIKE THEM ON THE SOUTH SIDE OR ANY SIDE WHERE HOMICIDES ARE HIGH IN THAT COMMUNITY DUE TO THEIR OWN SELF-HATRED.

SO IN POLITICS OR THE COURT SYSTEM POLICE ETC BLACKS WHO HATE THEMSELVES ARE THE ONES WHO WILL NOT STAND FOR NOTHING SELL OUT THEIR RACE SO AS TO BE ACCEPTED BY THEIR OPPRESSORS AS DEMONSTRATED IN THIS CASE.

SO THAT THE RECORD IS CLEAR CHICAGO DO NOT NECESSARILY NEED MORE BLACK JUDGES BUT MORE JUDGES OF COLOR WITH SOME INTEGRITY.      




________________________________________________________________________

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT
OF
COOK COUNTY, ILLNOIS
CHANCERY DIVISION
                                                                )
In Re Racial Discrimination                          )                      Trial #2015 CH 01670
/Source Income Violations                            )                    
Housing Matters:                                           )                       Gen. #      
Joe Louis Lawrence                                      )                                 
            Petitioner                                            )                       Div. #               
                                                                       )                     
            V                                                        )        
420 East Ohio, Chicago Housing Authority  )             Hon. F. U. Valderrama     
345 East Ohio, City of Chicago, Commission)
 on Human Relations                                     )                                                      
           Respondents                                        )                                                        
________________________________________________________________________

                                                                     NOTICE OF APPEAL
                                                                                                                       
    YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED that Plaintiff-Appellant Appeals to the Illinois Appellate Court, First District, from the Orders entered April 28, 2015, for not applying Equal Protection of the Laws, Lack of Jurisdiction, Fraud, Conspiracy, Canon Violations, Conflict of Interest other Civil Rights Violations etc.; 

    Plaintiff-Appellant will seek a reversal, or in the alternative, reversal and remand with instructions for further proceedings, in that his family has been Retaliated upon for Complaining of Housing Fraud re Section 8 and Housing Discrimination Circuit Court judge closed his eyes and became bias and complicit in said conspiracy at the plethora of unchallenged affidavits presented before him demonstrating all acts.



                                                                         _________________________________
                                                                                Joe Louis Lawrence, Counsel Pro Se


Name               Joe Louis Lawrence
Attorney for    Pro Se
Address           P.O. Box 490075
City, State       Chicago, Illinois 60649-0075
Phone              (312) 927-4210
Email               joelouislaw@yahoo.com
________________________________________________________________________

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT
OF
COOK COUNTY, ILLNOIS
CHANCERY DIVISION
)
In Re Racial Discrimination                          )                      Trial #2015 CH 01670
/Source Income Violations                            )                    
Housing Matters:                                           )                       Gen. #      
Joe Louis Lawrence                                      )                                  
            Petitioner                                            )                       Div. #              
                                                                       )                    
            V                                                        )        
420 East Ohio, Chicago Housing Authority)             Hon. F. U. Valderrama     
345 East Ohio, City of Chicago, Commission)
 On Human Relations                                     )                                                       
           Respondents                                        )                                                        
________________________________________________________________________


                                                  Jurisdictional Statement

Order entered:  April 28, 2015
Notice of Appeal filed: April 30, 2015

Statutes: Circuit Court Judge Committing Fraud, Circuit Court Judge aiding and abetting in a Criminal Conspiracy, Circuit Court Judge committing Unequal Protection of the Laws Violations, Circuit Court Judge engaging in “Treason Like Offenses”, Circuit Court Judge acting outside of the Immunity provisions of his Oath, Circuit Court Judge engaging in “Jim Crowis’m” Laws outlawed by the United States Supreme Court  as he used his robe and jurisdiction to aid and assist attorneys engaging in Terrorists Acts of Racial Oppression and housing discrimination where Public Officials tried to cover-up Criminal Civil Rights Violations, Disparate Unequal Protection of the Laws, Retaliatory Racial Harassment, Civil Rights Violations, Racial Terrorism Conspiracy, Public, Political, Fraternal Corruption Conspiracies, and other Un-Constitutional Lawless Violations.


 Plaintiff is appealing to the Appellate Court , for a reversal and remand with instructions based on the foregoing stated above:

 The Appellate Court has the Jurisdiction, to correct any error, Sanction or admonish any person (s) who engages in an organized Chain Conspiracy and establish any precedent in the law where deemed necessary, without fear of reprisals from any political organization, terrorist fraternal orders, elected or otherwise, for the mandate of their decision;

 The Appellate Court has the Jurisdiction and Wisdom to recognize when an individual has not been afforded sapiency in accordance to the United States Constitution;

   Plaintiff is before the Appellate Court  because as a”Pro Se” litigant Judge Valderrama has maliciously with deliberate depraved indifference for the laws stated in court order Judge Valderamma stated “No. The clerk’s office doesn’t serve anybody by certified mail. Let me back up.” “When I say service, I don’t mean mailing anything. When I say service I mean providing a copy of the complaint and summons on the entity that you have named in your complaint, 420 East Ohio, the housing authority, 345 East Ohio, and it looks like the City of Chicago and Commission on Human Relations”.

   Plaintiff having filed a Motion for Disqualification of judge due to Bias (Civil Rights Violations) et al.  Prior, it was denied.

  Plaintiff having filed the proper Motion for Reconsideration Vacate March 30, 2015 Default Order along with the Summary Judgment --
1.)          Pursuant to 735 ILCS 5/3-105 quote “service of summons, summons issued in any action to review the final administrative decision of any administrative agency shall be served by registered or certified mail on the administrative agency and on each of the other defendants except in the case of a review of a final administrative decision of the regional board of school trustees, regional superintendent of schools, or state superintendent of education et al”.

Service on the administrative agency shall be made by the clerk of the court by sending a copy of the summons addressed to the agency at its main office in the state. The clerk of the court shall also mail a copy of the summons to each of the other defendants, addressed to the last known place of residence or principal place of business of each defendant.

   Judge Valderrama ignored the rules and legal precedents entered in Plaintiff’s affidavit no attorney challenged or filed any objections to said Motion or answered the complaints served upon them, Plaintiff informed the court if he Denied this Motion he was going to file an Appeal to the Appellate Court, his response “do what you want to want to do” in an arrogant untouchable demeanor and Denied said Motion.

                                Fraud admissibility great latitude is permitted in proving fraud C.J.S. Fraud 104 ET Seg. Fraud 51-57. where a question of fraud and deceit is the issue involved in a case, great latitude is ordinarily permitted in the introduction of evidence, and courts allow the greatest liberality in the method of examination and in the scope of inquiry Vigus V. O’Bannon, 1886 8 N.E 788, 118 ILL 334. Hazelton V. Carolus, 1907 132 ILL. App. 512.

1.)  Hereto attached, Group Ex A, Order from City of Chicago, Commission on Human Relations in violation of Supreme Court Rule 272 no signature and corroborates CHA and 345 East Ohio engaging in an organized Terrorist Conspiracy denying Plaintiff from residing in what is described as an opportunity area using his Section 8 voucher;

2.)  Hereto attached, Gr Ex B, Crain’s business article, (July 28, 2014) “Poor families use supervouchers to rent in city’s priciest buildings which validates the veracity of the aforementioned recorded in Gr Ex A in that whites are only allowed to make $146,000.00 a year and live in the buildings with a voucher but people of color qualified and indigent cannot;

3.)  Hereto attached, Gr Ex C, WBEZ91.5 (April 1, 2014) New Report reveals pervasive discrimination in housing voucher program, which validates the veracity of why Plaintiff is before this Appellate Court;.

4.)  Hereto attached, Gr Ex D, Schock calls for Investigation into Chicago Housing Authority Supervoucher program, (July 28, 2014), which validates the veracity of all complaints and pleadings ignored by the court and parties involved;

5.)  Hereto attached, Gr Ex E, checks tendered to Streeter Place in accordance to said policies but never allowed to rent due to the aforementioned within;

6.)  Hereto attached, Gr Ex F, Request for Tenancy Approval Packet, from the CHA,, #4 Determining Rent CHA will call the owner with a rent offer based on other comparable unassisted units leased within 1 year et al. This document demonstrates a “prima facie” showing that Gr Ex A further amplifies City Officials in the City of Chicago, Human Relations and CHA engaging Terrorist Acts making sure persons of color remain in segregated communities;

7.)  Hereto attached, Gr G, Motion for Reconsideration et al. with affidavit presented before Gr Ex A, Page 3 naming 21 judges some unbeknown to Plaintiff responsible for “Fixing” a paternity case framing Plaintiff protecting a Police officer who had impregnated his minor daughter and was arrested in 1977 or 1976 but was allowed back to the police department and impregnated Francoise Hightower as an adult a Chicago Police officer today.

8.)  Hereto attached, Gr Ex H, Affidavit from the Second Amended Petition for Rule to Show Cause et al. presented before Judge Valderrama, Page 3 naming 13 Appellate judges who had notice and knowledge of the plethora of Racist Terrorist Acts lodged at the Plaintiff ignored Canon 3D (1);

9.)  Hereto attached, Gr Ex I-L Affidavits forwarded to US Attorney Zachary T Fardon in accordance to the Department of Justice directive and has acquired the necessary corroboration from all parties and entities pursuant to the FBI’s directive demonstrating how they can invoke jurisdiction because they don’t get involved in personal matters.

Said Judge has allowed defendants to commit the aforementioned heinous criminal acts, ignoring affidavits, the Laws of the United States Constitution and Plaintiffs Civil Liberties, validating the veracity Plaintiff is a nobody merely because of his skin color, said Judge have corroborated and demonstrated his role in this Organized Chain Conspiracy; 

Under Section 4 of the Ku Klux Klan Act of 1871: the law is clear, “Whenever in any State or part of a State………unlawful combinations…….shall be organized and armed, and so numerous and powerful et al…………and whenever, by reason of either or all of the causes aforesaid, the conviction of such offenders and the preservation of the public safety shall become…..Impracticable, in every such case such combinations shall be deemed a rebellion against the Government of the United States…..” 

 Plaintiff is before the Appellate Court because when Justice was sought certain, Judges claimed they had no Jurisdiction on cases where corruption and racism was apparent in that said individuals share a particular “racial hatred” towards ethnic individuals like the Plaintiff and will stoop to any level necessary to achieve the goals sought as demonstrated in this case which is why Plaintiff is before the  Appellate Court.


I affirm the above as being true.

                                                                                            Respectfully Submitted

                                                                                             Joe Louis Lawrence
                                                                                                Counsel Pro Se



CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

Commander & Chief                            Attorney General of United States
President Barack Obama                                 Loretta Lynch
The White House                           U.S. Department of Justice
1600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW            950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20500                         Washington, DC 20530-0001

Chief Judge Timothy Evans                              Judge Moshe Jacobius
50 West Washington, Suite 2600                           50 West Washington, Suite 2403
Chicago, Illinois 60601                                          Chicago, Ill. 60601

 Judge Mary Lane Mikva                                   Clerk of Circuit Court, Dorothy Brown
50 West Washington, Suite                                    50 West Washington, Suite 1000
Chicago, Ill 60601                                                 Chicago, Ill. 60601

Atty. Gen, Lisa Madigan                            Asst. Atty. Gen Tyler Roland
100 West Randolph, Suite 1200                 100 West Randolph, Suite 1200
Chicago, Ill. 60601                                     Chicago, Ill. 60601
States Attorney, Anita Alvarez, Daley Center, Chg. Ill. 60601

Sec of State                                                  Asst Deputy Dir Candace Cheffin
Asst Gen Counsel Terrence McConville     60 East Van Buren, 8th floor
100 West Randolph, Suite 500                       Chicago, Ill. 60601
Chicago, Ill. 60601      

CHA Mobility                                             CHA Mobility, HCP Counselors
Chris Klepper, Executive Dir                     Tracey Robinson/Joann Harris
28 East Jackson Blvd.                                    4859 S. Wabash, Suite 2nd Floor 
Chicago, Ill 60604                                          Chicago, Ill. 60615    
                                                                    
CHA Mobility, Real Estate Specialist               Recorder of Deeds
Jessie McDaniel                                                    Karen Yarbrough
4859 S. Wabash                                                     118 N. Clark, Room 120
Chicago, Ill. 60615                                                  Chicago, Ill. 60602

City of Chicago, Department of Buildings       Sabre Investments
Christopher Lynch                                               120 West Madison Street
121 North LaSalle, Room 900                                Chicago, Ill 60601
Chicago, Ill. 60601

Cary G. Schiff & Associates                   Gordon & Rees LLP
Christopher R. Johnson, Yuleida Joy        Lindsay Watson, Christian T. Novay
134 N. LaSalle Street, Suite 1720             1 North Franklin, Suite 800
Chicago, Ill. 60602                                    Chicago, Illinois 60606


Stephan R. Patton, Mary E. Ruether, Rey A. Phillip Santos
Corp Counsel, Deputy Corp. Counsel, Asst Corp Counsel
30 N. LaSalle Street, Suite 800
Chicago, Ill 60602

Wilson Elser Moskowitz Edelman & Dicker LLP
Christian Novay
55 West Monroe, Street, Suite 3800
Chicago, Ill. 60603

Jessica Mallon, Gen Counsel CHA                    Roy Martinez Manager 420 East Ohio
60 East Van Buren                                                  420 East Ohio
Chicago, Ill 60601                                                   Chicago, Ill. 60611

Eve Aywaz, Sales Consultant                                   Sarah Aredia, Leasing Consultant
345 East Ohio                                                         420 East Ohio
Chicago, Ill. 60611                                                   Chicago, Ill. 60611  

John-Paul Loseto, Executive Manager
345 East Ohio
Chicago, Ill. 60611
                                                                                                                                                                                                   
Courtesy Copies:

 US Attorney                                            FBI  Robert J. Holley
 Zachary T. Fardon                                    2111 West Roosevelt Road
219 S. Dearborn, 5th floor                         Chicago, Ill. 60612
Chicago, Ill 60604

Hon Judge Neil Cohen
50 West Washington, Suite 2308
Chicago, Ill 60601

Mayor                                            Deputy Regional Adm., Field Office Dir.
Rahm Emanuel                                       Beverly E. Bishop
City Hall                                              77 West Jackson Boulevard
Chicago, Ill. 60601                              Chicago, Ill. 60604

Governor                                                 Hon  Mark Kirk                                
525 South 8th St.                                       607 East Adams, Suite 1520
Springfield, Ill. 62703                               Springfield, Ill. 62701
                                                                    
Bruce Rauner
100 West Randolph
Chicago, Ill. 60601

Cook County President                               Cook County Sheriff
Toni Preckwinkle                                            Thomas J. Dart
118 N. Clark, Room 517                         Richard J. Daley Center, Room 701
Chicago, Ill. 60602                                        Chicago, Ill. 60602

Hon Dick Durbin                                 Hearing Officer CHA
525 South 8th St.                                       Frederick Bates
Springfield, Ill. 62703                           60 East Van Buren, Suite 900
                                                                Chicago, Ill. 60605

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned hereby certifies that the above notice and all attachments were caused to be personally delivered, emailed or via facsimile or deposited in the U.S. mail to the above parties at the addresses provided before 5:00 pm on April 30, 2015.






      
        

                                                                      Respectfully Submitted,

                                                                       Joe Louis Lawrence
                                                             Counse Pro Se
                                                                           PO Box 490075
                                                                      Chicago, Ill. 60649-0075
                                                                          312 927-4210
                                                                      joelouislaw@yahoo.com
                                                           @joelouis7

No comments:

Post a Comment