Wikipedia Racial Injustice in Chicago Courts

Search results

Saturday, February 14, 2015

RACISM CHICAGO STYLE WHAT POLITICIANS ARE WILLING TO SAY TO GET BLACK AND BROWN PEOPLE TO VOTE FOR THEM WHEN THEY CAN'T STAND THE CITIZENS

PRESIDENT OBAMA IS ENDORSING RAHM EMMANUEL FOR RE ELECTION AS MAYOR OF THE CITY OF CHICAGO

RAHM EMMANUEL HAS AN ADMINISTRATION IN THE CITY OF CHICAGO DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RELATIONS INVOLVED IN RACIAL HATE CRIMES COVERING UP RACIAL DISCRIMINATION IN HOUSING.

THIS CASE DEMONSTRATES HOW CHICAGO IS LIKENED TO A SLAVE PLANTATION IN THAT MANY BLACKS DON'T REALIZE THEY ARE FREE BUT ARE WILLING TO DESTROY THE LIVES OF INNOCENT PEOPLE OF COLOR SO AS TO BE ACCEPTED BY THE WHITE MEN "ORGANIZED" IN NUMBERS DESTROYING AND OPPRESSING INNOCENT PERSONS OF COLOR.

THIS CASE IS LIKENED TO A RACIAL HOLOCAUST ONLY IN GERMANY JEWS WERE BURNED IN CONCENTRATION CAMPS RACIAL HATRED AND GENOCIDE WAS THAT INTENSE, IN CHICAGO GENOCIDE AND THE RACIAL HOLOCAUST IS PERPETRATED DIFFERENTLY JAILS AND INJUSTICE ARE THE MAINSTAY IN HOW CORRUPT WHITE MEN ARE MAKING THEIR MONIES.

IT IS MUCH MORE PROFITABLE TO LYNCH A BLACK AND BROWN MAN THIS WAY ILLUSTRATED IN THIS DOCUMENT THAN TO USE A "ROPE"

 

Honorable Franklin U. Valderrama
2601 Richard J. Daley Center
Chicago, Illinois 60602                                                  Feb.  13, 2015
                                                                                      Case# 15 CH 01670
                                                                                             Room 2305
                                                  
                                          COURTESY COPY
                                   A MUST READ
Honorable Judge Valderrama:
  
Please Find Plaintiff’s
                                                                  
   PETITION FOR RULE TO SHOW CAUSE DUE TO CORROBBORATION of FRAUD PERJURY CIVIL RIGHTS VIOLATIONS RETALIATION ON COMPLAINANT REMAND/BODY ATTACHMENT INSTANTER   
 w/Affidavit with the attachments demonstrating heinous criminal acts likened to war crimes.   
 
Special Note:  Please be advised  the number of attorneys  engaging in criminal acts upholding “fraud”.

Terrorism is here in America in this State of Illinois, City of Chicago and the techniques used to Oppress and commit Genocide on innocent men of color and the methodologies employed in how certain ethnic groups are recruited to advance their agenda to remain employed to destroy an innocent man in the likes of the plaintiff for standing up to Racist Terrorism in this State in the courts for seeking equality conditions where housing was concerned trying to live with a CHA voucher;  

Count the number of lawyers and judges used to attempt “Lynching” on an innocent man simply for standing up to Racism, Racial Segregation and Racial Injustice in Chicago and how many closed their eyes to the crimes because Black and Brown lives don’t matter living in Chicago.


.

Court Call Feb. 27, 2015 @ 9:30 am
  
Let this communication receive you and your family in good health
Respectfully Submitted,


________________________
Joe Louis Lawrence
Petitioner
Counsel Pro Se
(312) 927-4210

  


















CC. Chief Judge Timothy Evans Courtesy Copy U.S. Atty. Zachary T. Fardon, Judge Mary Mikva, Gordon & Rees, Cary & Schiff & Assc., Seyfarth & Shaw, CHA, Maria Sewell Joseph, Gov. Bruce Rauner, Mayor Rahm Emmanuel
       Presiding Judge Moshe Jacobius, Asst. Gen Counsel, Sec. of State Terrence McConville, City of Chg Commission on Human Relations,   States Attorney, Anita Alvarez, Clerk of Circuit Court Dorothy Brown  

    Robert J. Holley, FBI Agent Chicago Courtesy Copy

________________________________________________________________________

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT
OF
COOK COUNTY, ILLNOIS
CHANCERY DIVISION
)
In Re Racial Discrimination                          )                            2015 CH 01670
/Source Income Violations                            )
Housing Matters:                                           )                            Hon. Rodolfo Garcia     
Joe Louis Lawrence                                      )                            Room 2601    
            Petitioner                                            )                            DEMAND          
                                                                       )               $25 MILLION DOLLARS     
            V                                                        )        
420 East Ohio, Chicago Housing Authority)
345 East Ohio, City of Chicago, Commission)
 On Human Relations                                     )                                                      
           Respondents                                        )                                                        
________________________________________________________________________

                                                            EMERGENCY                                                   
   PETITION FOR RULE TO SHOW CAUSE DUE TO CORROBBORATION of FRAUD PERJURY CIVIL RIGHTS VIOLATIONS RETALIATION ON COMPLAINANT REMAND/BODY ATTACHMENT INSTANTER   
                               IMPOSE SANCTIONS w/AFFIDAVIT

    Now comes Petitioner, Joe Louis Lawrence, Counsel Pro Se, in this cause respectfully represents to this court the reasons and files herewith his Affidavit in support for said Petition for Rule to Show Cause for Willful Misrepresentations to Court et al… Remand/Body Attachment Instanter Impose Sanctions, pursuant to the Ku Klux Klan Act of 1871, Section 1983 of U.S.C.S., S.H.A. Criminal Ch. 38, 33-3, Civil Rights Act of 1964, 3D (2) Reporting Lawyer Misconduct;


































                                                                                             Respectfully Submitted,    
                                                            Joe Louis Lawrence

                                                                                          Petitioner                                   
                                                              P.O. Box 490075
                                                                Chicago, Illinois 60649-0075
                                                            312 927-4210
                                                                               joelouislaw@yahoo.com
                                                                                              Twitter @joelouis7

















                                         AFFIDAVIT
  
I Joe Louis Lawrence, being duly sworn on oath states:


1.)  That pursuant to 735 ILCS 5/3-101, et seq. 420 East Ohio, ZRS Management, Tracking #7014-0150-0001-5043-5130 was served via certified mail Feb. 6, 2015, 10:57 am,

2.)  That pursuant to 735 ILCS 5/3-101, et seq. 345 East Ohio, Village Green Management same sequence of numbers except for the last four numbers, #5154 was served via certified mail Feb. 6, 2015, 1:18 pm;

3.)  That pursuant to 735 ILCS 5/3-101, et seq. City of Chicago, Commission on Human Relations  same sequence of numbers except for the last four numbers, #5147 was served via certified mail Feb. 5, 2015, 2:12 pm;

4.)  That pursuant to 735 ILCS 5/3-101, et seq. Chicago Housing Authority   same sequence of numbers except for the last four numbers, #5123 was served via certified mail Feb. 6, 2015, 12:35 pm;

5.)  That said attorneys and all participants  have satisfied the legal standard of the preponderance of the evidence taking part in an “Organized Conspiracy” engaging in Terrorist activities likened to the Ku Klux Klan fraternal order;


6.)   That the CHA Terrorist Operatives with vexation for the laws deliberately made perjured testimony to Hearing Officer Frederick Bates for reasons in trying to remove petitioner from voucher program, but was reinstated, Jan 21, 2015;
A-    That because of the “Organized Conspiracy” perpetrated at Petitioner by Respondents at the CHA and Commission on Human Relations, as they colluded mailing out “Fraudulent” court orders absent certification with a seal or signature;   

B-    That because of Petitioners ethnicity non-white many in the City of Chicago Commission on Human Relations, CHA have corroborated their roles in this active chain conspiracy by disseminating false documents to whomever is necessary to Induce Reliance on the agency or judge hearing the matter, as demonstrated in this case;

That Group Ex A, of the Request for Review et al filed (Jan 30, 2015) unequivocally demonstrate the mayhem and Terrorist Acts many racist individuals were willing to exhaust covering up-crimes that should have been reported and addressed but was ignored because Petitioner’s life did not matter; Canon
3D (1) Reporting Judicial Misconduct
A-   Mass. Comm. On Judicial Ethics, Op. 2002-04 (2002)……………………………………

B-   That in addition to the Organized Conspiracy, Respondents continued to violate Petitioners Civil Rights as they colluded with alleged members of the City of Chicago by accessing personal credit information where there was on a “freeze” on said report while said matter was under investigation.  See Par. 15 of Dec. 10, response;

C-    Pursuant to Vigus V. O’Bannon, 1886 N.E 788, 188 Ill 334 Hazelton V. Carolus, 1907 132 Ill. App. 512, hereto attached,  

D-    Petitioner Appealed to the Appellate Court where Honorable Rodolfo Garcia, Thomas Hoffman, John Owen Steele, Patrick J. Quinn former Governor Pat Quinn’s brother, Themesis Karnezis, Mary K. Rochford, Warren D. Wolfson who is related to Loretta Higgins- Wolfson, Mathias W. Delort, Bertina Lampkin, Sebastian Patti, Shelvin Louise Marie Hall, Joy Cunningham, Mary Jane Theis, who had a father convicted in the Greylord sting as a judge, Michael Murphy all were complicit in covering-up criminal Civil Rights violations of a “Bogus” paternity case 88 D 079012, said judges ignored every unchallenged affidavit issued orders outside of their provisions of judicial immunity;
  Cannon v. Commission on Judicial Qualifications,
14 Cal. 3d 678, 537 P. 2d 898, 122 Cal. Rptr. 778 (1975)……………………

E-   That Respondents are anticipating any judge recorded within the aforementioned, who is corrupt and willing to step outside of their immunity provisions and commit the following “Terrorist Crimes” by dismissing said “Request for Review et al” simply because ethnic groups Black and Brown don’t matter; Judges erred in abusing the adversarial process, a fundamental aspect of the adversarial system is that proceedings are to be conducted in open court. Judges have been disciplined for disposing of cases without an adversarial proceeding, In re Fitzgerald, Unreported Determination (Ky. Comm’n 1986); Holder, 74 N.J. 581, 379 A. 2d 220 (1977……………………….

 Scott, 377 Mass. 364, 386 N.E. 2d 218, 220 (1979) See Lopez-Alexander, Unreported Order No. 85-279 (Colo. May 3, 1985) (Judge removed for, inter alia, a persistent pattern of abuse of the contempt power. The Mayor of Denver accepted the findings of the Denver County Court Judicial Qualification Commission that the judge’s conduct could not be characterized as mere mistakes or errors of law and that the conduct constituted willful misconduct in office and conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice that brings the judicial office into disrepute). Canon Ethics where there is a pattern of disregard or indifference, which warrant discipline.

Vaughn 462 S.E. 2d 728 (Ga. 1995), The Supreme Court of Georgia removed a judge from office for disregarding defendant’s constitutional rights

 Section 1983 of USCS contemplates the depravation of Civil Rights through the unconstitutional application of a law by conspiracy or otherwise. Mansell V. Saunders (CA 5 Fla) 372 F 2d 573, especially if the conspiracy was actually carried into effect and plaintiff was thereby deprived of any rights privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws, the gist of the action may be treated as one for the depravation of rights under 42 USCS 1983 Lewis V. Brautigam (CA 5 Fla) 227 F 2d 124, 55 Alr 2d 505.  


7.)  That many blacks along with obvious whites working for Edward Burke see him as a Messiah an untouchable God in that, they have forsaken the integrity of their careers by participating in said Terrorists Acts, so as to maintain their positions of authority and titles oppressing individuals like the Petitioner and said Blacks, Latinos are only figureheads and will not enforce the laws on the perpetrators who’s ethnicity is white and is a part of the “Organized Conspiracy”; 
A-   That Judge Moche Jacobius before being appointed judge of the circuit court had assisted Petitioner on another case as Assistant Attorney General was aware of the corruption and mayhem he had experienced in the courts is the only attorney to appoint him legal representation when locked up 5 times for allegedly owing child support on a “Bogus” paternity case that had no judges signatures which is the modis operandi of the perpetrators involved engaging in this “Terrorist Organized Conspiracy”;
B-   That Judge Timothy P. Murphy said “today is your lucky day” and was upset he could not remand Petitioner back into custody because his attorney Gerald Nordgren informed him he was on Public Aid;

That Under Section 4 of the Ku Klux Klan Act of 1871: the law is clear, “Whenever in any State or part of a State………unlawful combinations…….shall be organized and armed, and so numerous and powerful et al…………and whenever, by reason of either or all of the causes aforesaid, the conviction of such offenders and the preservation of the public safety shall become…..Impracticable, in every such case such combinations shall be deemed a rebellion against the Government of the United States…..”
 
8.)   Said Respondent Terrorists impersonating attorneys and private citizens thought they were in fact denying the Petitioner in their plethora of unlawful acts were really demonstrating their might against the Federal Government;

A-    That because the conspirators have demonstrated their rebellion against the federal government, it is necessary to ascertain how many are willing to spend the rest of their lives in a Maximum Federal Penitentiary or face execution working for the King of Terrorism;

B-    That because this matter is now before a judge with “Contempt Power” it is necessary to establish a precedent in the laws imposing applicable laws that would discourage and prohibit this area of Racial Genocide, Racial Apartheid ethnic cleansing of persons of color from Equal access to the laws and Public Housing, unlawful incarcerations by a racial majority seizing a City and legal system is why Remands are necessary with Body attachments;

C-    Petitioner served Rahm Emmanuel via Police Personnel, he ignored the issues simply because Black and Brown people lives simply don’t matter where racial Discrimination or Segregation is concerned,  Chicago Reader, Feb. 5, 2015, Steve Bogira and Mike Dumke, The Chicago agency charged with investigating complaints of housing discrimination is the Commission on Human Relations. In recent years, it has seldom punished landlords for discriminating racially. The commission's modest $1.9 million budget has grown yet more modest since Rahm Emanuel became mayor: he's cut it to $1.1 million. It's one of the things we would have liked to have discussed with him, but he declined to talk with us about segregation.

D-   That the Mayor’s true color on how he feels about people of color is indicative to how policies are enforced under his jurisdiction but President Obama is endorsing him for re-election unaware Rahm Emmanuel do not share the same sentiment, Racism and Racial Hatred is how Chicago is presently governed;
  
The Mis education of the Negroe, Carter G. Woodson 1933

“History shows that it does not matter who is in power or what revolutionary forces take over the government, those who have not learned to do for themselves and have to depend solely on others never obtain any more rights or privileges in the end than they had in the beginning.” 

“When you control a man's thinking you do not have to worry about his actions. You do not have to tell him not to stand here or go yonder. He will find his 'proper place' and will stay in it. You do not need to send him to the back door. He will go without being told. In fact, if there is no back door, he will cut one for his special benefit. His education makes it necessary.” 

9.)         That many Respondents white and Hispanic not racist and not a part of the political machine tried to help Petitioner, stated “he needed a court order from a judge not connected because there are too many judges Burke owns and is involved and nobody wants to lose their job doing what is right to help you”

               A-) That because Ed Burke is the Finance Chairman and responsible who receives payment from the City, allegedly stated “As long as he is Chairman the Nigger referencing Petitioner will never be reinstated to CTA and receive his back wages” To this date no one has ever objected to the veracity of said assertions recorded in said affidavits.

          B-)   That Petitioner under the FBI’s directorship ascertained the necessary corroboration from every legal tribunal and State Agencies demonstrating and recording in all affidavits how cases are fixed and judges are used as weapons of “Mass Destruction” against citizens of color as demonstrated in this matter;

         C-)  That all parties were properly noticed that the FBI was in fact receiving courtesy copies basically presented a middle finger to the Feds and every respected legal representative of the laws challenging them to exercise their authority and necessary force removing them from office;  

Section 2 (42 U.S.C.) In the House of Representatives.
        “Congressional Debate of the second section of the Ku Klux Klan Act was more extensive and enduring than that of Section 1; As originally presented, Sec. 2 made it a felony for any “two or more persons” to conspire to commit certain enumerated crimes “in violation of the rights and privileges, or immunities of any person, to which he is entitled under the Constitution and laws of the United States.
           “Throughout the debates, supporters of the Act made repeated references to the depredations of the Ku Klux Klan; Victims of these atrocities included not only blacks but white Republicans as well. The crimes that were perpetrated, therefore, were not viewed as isolated occurrences, but as part of an “Organized Conspiracy….Political in its origin and aims”, “crimes perpetrated by concert and agreement, by men in large numbers acting with a common purpose for the injury of a certain class of citizens entertaining certain political principles, id, at 457 (remarks of Rep. Coburn). See also e.g., id. At 437 (remarks of Rep. Cobb) (“None but Democrats belong or can belong to these societies”) et al.,
           “Where these gangs of Assassins show themselves the rest of the people look on, if not with sympathy, at least with forbearance. The boasted courage of the South is not courage in their presence. Sheriffs, having eyes to see, see not; judges, having ears to hear, hear not; witnesses conceal the truth or falsify it; grand or petit juries act as if they might be accomplices. In the presence of these gangs all the apparatus and machinery of civil government, all the processes of justice, skulk away as if government and justice were crimes and feared detection. Among the most dangerous things an injured party can do is to appeal to justice. Of the uncounted scores and hundreds of atrocious mutilations and murders it is credibly stated that not one has been punished. Cong. Globe, supra note 2,  app. At 78 (remarks of Rep. Perry). (“While murder is stalking abroad in disguise, while whippings and lynching’s and banishment have been visited upon unoffending American citizens, the local administrations have been found inadequate or unwilling to apply the proper corrective”) et al., …. And the State made no successful effort to bring the guilty to punishment or afford protection or redress to the outraged and innocent.”)    

     Fraud admissibility great latitude is permitted in proving fraud C.J.S. Fraud 104 ET Seg. Fraud 51-57. where a question of fraud and deceit is the issue involved in a case, great latitude is ordinarily permitted in the introduction of evidence, and courts allow the greatest liberality in the method of examination and in the scope of inquiry Vigus V. O’Bannon, 1886 8 N.E 788, 118 ILL 334. Hazelton V. Carolus, 1907 132 ILL. App. 512.
  
                INDUCING RELIANCE
To prevail in a cause of action for fraud, plaintiff must prove that defendant made statement of material nature which was relied on by victim and was made for purposes of inducing reliance, and that victim’s reliance led to his injury. Parsons V. Winter, 1986, 1 Dist., 491 N.E. 2d 1236, 96 ILL Dec. 776, 142 ILL App 3d 354, Appeal Denied.

     In Carter V. Mueller 457 N.E. 2d 1335 ILL. App. 1 Dist. 1983 The Supreme Court has held that: “The elements of a cause of action for fraudulent misrepresentation (sometimes referred to as “fraud and deceit” or deceit) are: (1) False statement of material fact; (2) known or believed to be false by the party making it; (3) intent to induce the other party to act; (4) action by the other party in reliance on the truth of the statement; and (5) damage to the other party resulting from such reliance.

Properly alleged facts within an affidavit that are not contradicted by counter affidavit are taken as true, despite the existence of contrary averments in the adverse party’s pleadings. Professional Group Travel, Ltd. v. Professional Seminar Consultants Inc., 136 ILL App 3d 1084, 483 N.E. 2d 1291; Buzzard v. Bolger, 117 ILL App 3d 887, 453 N.E. 2d 1129 et al.

            
 U. S Sup Court Digest 24(1) General Conspiracy

U.S. 2003. Essence of a conspiracy is an agreement to commit an unlawful act.—U.S. v. Jimenez Recio, 123 SCt. 819, 537 U.S. 270, 154 L.Ed.2d 744, on remands 371F.3d 1093

         Agreement to commit an unlawful act, which constitutes the essence of a conspiracy, is a distinct evil that exist and be punished whether or not the substantive crime ensues.-Id.
         Conspiracy poses a threat to the public over and above the threat of the commission of the relevant substantive crime, both because the combination in crime makes more likely the commission of other crimes and because it decreases the part from their path of criminality.-Id.
 
CONSPIRACY
Fraud maybe inferred from nature of acts complained of, individual and collective interest of alleged conspirators, situation, intimacy, and relation of parties at time of commission of acts, and generally all circumstances preceding and attending culmination of claimed conspiracy Illinois Rockford Corp. V. Kulp, 1968, 242 N.E. 2d 228, 41 ILL. 2d 215.
 
      Conspirators to be guilty of offense need not have entered into conspiracy at same time or have taken part in all its actions. People V. Hardison, 1985, 911 Dec. 162, 108. Requisite mens rea elements of conspiracy are satisfied upon showings of agreement of offense with intent that offense be committed; Actus reas element is satisfied of act in furtherance of agreement People V. Mordick, 1981, 50 ILL, Dec. 63

       Supreme Court Rule [137] provides in pertinent part:

            If a pleading, motion, or other paper is signed in violation of this Rule, the court, upon motion or upon its own initiative, may impose upon the person who signed it, a represented party, or both, an appropriate sanction, which may include an order to pay to the other party or parties the amount of reasonable expenses incurred because of the filling of the pleading, motion, or other paper, including a reasonable attorney fee. Not only will the courts consider an award of sanctions for active false statements: failures to disclose material facts to the court can also justify an award of sanctions.

BRUBAKKEN v. Morrison, No. 1-9-1670, 1992 Ill App. LEXIS 2144 (1st Dist. Dec. 30, 1992). Additionally, the fact that a false statement or omission is the result of an honest mistake is no defense to entry of a sanction. ID. To the extent that an individual lawyer has engaged in sanctionable conduct, that lawyer’s firm can also be jointly and severally liable with the lawyer.
   
10.)               That because of the Directed Evidence and admissions in the aforementioned recorded within Complainant is seeking all parties be REMANDED into CUSTODY Instanter regardless to their Racial Political Fraternal Affiliations for their respective roles in said Criminal Housing Conspiracies;
A-   That all parties have demonstrated in their respective roles that they are not capable of DISCHARGING their duties in accordance to the Laws of Professional Ethics, Rules of Illinois Supreme Court or United States Constitution with any integrity; therefore, a COURT’S ORDER is needed to MANDATE THE PARTIES TO act within their obligations;

   The Chicago Daily Law Bulletin, Wednesday April 26, 2006, Page 1, Illinois Political Machines help breed corruption, Associated Press writer Deanna Bellandi states, “Illinois is apparently a Petri dish for corruption. It is a real breeding ground”.        

That Chicago is the most Corrupt City in America, Huffington Post, Internet Newspaper, February 23, 2012; University of Illinois Professor Dick Simpson, “The two worst crime zones in Illinois are the governor’s mansion…..and the City Council Chambers in Chicago.” Simpson a former Chicago Alderman told the AP “no other State can match us.”   


                                       FURTHER AFFIANTH SAYETH NAUGHT

Under penalties as provided by law pursuant to 735 1265 5\1-109, the undersigned certifies that the statements set forth in this instrument are true and correct, except as to matters therein stated to be on information and belief and as to such matters, the undersigned certifies as aforesaid that he verily believes the same to be true.

                                                                                                                                               
                                                                                          Joe Louis Lawrence

                                                                     Complainant/Counsel Pro Se
















________________________________________________________________________
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT
OF
COOK COUNTY, ILLNOIS
CHANCERY DIVISION
)
In Re Racial Discrimination                          )                            2015 CH 01670
/Source Income Violations                            )
Housing Matters:                                           )                            Hon. Rodolfo Garcia     
Joe Louis Lawrence                                      )                            Room 2601    
            Petitioner                                            )                            DEMAND          
                                                                       )               $25 MILLION DOLLARS     
            V
420 East Ohio, Chicago Housing Authority
345 East Ohio, City of Chicago, Commission on Human Relations                                                                                              
           Respondents                                                                                                
 ________________________________________________________________________

In Accordance to all of The Cook County Circuit Court Rules

MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN SUPPORT OF THE RELIEF REQUESTED

            The canons of ethic in the Rules of Professional Conduct constitute a safe guide for professional conduct, and attorneys may be disciplined for not observing them. In re Himmel, 125 Ill.2d 531, 533 N.E.2d 790, 127 Ill. Dec 708 (1988). Although they represent the best thoughts of the organized bar, it has been held that these canons are non-enforceable other than through the disciplinary proceedings. Ettinger v. Rolewick, 140 Ill.App.3d 295, 488 N.E.2d 598, 94 Ill.Dec.599 (1st Dist. 1986). Disciplinary proceedings and sanctions are strictly within the province of the Supreme Court. Reed Yates Farms, Inc. v. Yates, 172 Ill.App.3d 519, 526 N.E2d 1115, 122 Ill.Dec 576 (4th Dist.), appeal denied, the Illinois Supreme Court, through its disciplinary arm, the Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission, is the only forum for exacting such punishment. Beale v. Edgemark Financial Corp., 297 Ill. App. 3d 999, 697 N.E.2d 820, 232 Ill. Dec. 78 (1st Dist. 1998). The ultimate authority to regulate and define the practice of law rests with the Supreme Court. Perto v. Board of Review, Illinois Department of Employment Security, 274 Ill. App.3d 485, 654 N.E.2d 232, 210 Ill. Dec. 933 (2d Dist.), appeal denied, 164 Ill. 2d 581 (1995).




Ethics
            All Illinois lawyers must be familiar with the Illinois Rules of Professional Conduct, and trail lawyers must be particularly familiar with the rules that apply specially to them.

            RPC 3.3, entitled “Conduct Before a Tribunal,” sets forth the standards to be followed by the trial lawyer during “battle.” Section (a) of that rule states:
(a)   In appearing in a professional capacity before a tribunal, a lawyer shall not:
(1)   make a statement of material fact or law to a tribunal which the lawyer knows or reasonably should know is false;

(2)   fail to disclose to a tribunal a material fact known to the lawyer when disclosure is necessary to avoid assisting a criminal or fraudulent act by the client;

(3)   fail to disclose to the tribunal legal authority in the controlling jurisdiction known to the lawyer to be directly adverse to the position of the client and not disclosed by opposing counsel;

(4)   Offer evidence that the lawyer knows to be false. If a lawyer has offered material evidence and comes to know of its falsity, the lawyer shall take reasonable remedial measures;

(5)   participate in the creation or preservation of evidence when the lawyer knows or reasonably should know the evidence is false ;

(6)   counsel or assist the client in conduct the lawyer knows to be illegal of fraudulent;

(7)   engage in other illegal conduct or conduct in violation of these Rules;

(8)   fail to disclose the identities of the clients represented and of the persons who employed the lawyer unless such information is privileged or irrelevant;

(9)   intentionally degrade a witness or other person by stating or alluding to personal facts concerning that person which are not relevant to the case;

(10) in trial, allude to any matter that the lawyer does not reasonably believe is relevant or that will not be supported by admissible evidence, assert personal knowledge of facts in issue except when testifying as a witness, or state a personal opinion as to the justness of a cause, the credibility of a witness, the culpability of a civil litigant or the guilt or innocence of and accused, but a lawyer may argue, on analysis of evidence, for any position or conclusion with respect to the matter stated herein;


Acts constituting direct, criminal contempt
          A wide variety of acts may constitute a direct, criminal contempt. And act may be criminal contempt even though it is also an indictable crime. Beattie v. People, 33 Ill. App 651, 1889 WL 2373 (1st Dist. 1889). As is making false representations to the court. People v. Katelhut, 322 Ill. App. 693, 54 N.E.2d 590 (1st Dist. 1944). Misconduct of an officer of the court is punishable as contempt. People ex rel. Rusch v. Levin, 305 Ill. App. 142, 26 N.E. 2d 895 (1st Dist. 1939).

Official misconduct is a criminal offense; and a public officer or employee commits misconduct, punishable by fine, imprisonment, or both, when, in his official capacity, he intentionally or recklessly fails to perform any mandatory duty as required by law; or knowingly performs an act which he knows he is forbidden by law to perform; or with intent to obtain a personal advantage for himself or another, he performs an act in excess of his lawful authority ….S.H.A. Ch 38 33-3.

False statements
            Censure was recommended sanction for attorney who engaged in conduct involving dishonesty, made statement of material fact or law to tribunal which she knew or reasonably should have known to be false, and failed to disclose to tribunal a material fact known to her when disclosure was necessary to avoid assisting criminal or fraudulent at by client, given that attorney’s misconduct was not result of dishonest or corrupt motive, but of misguided attempt to accommodate clients.   99 Ill.Atty.Reg. & Disc.Comm. SH11
            Three-year suspension was recommended sanction for attorney who engaged in conduct involving dishonesty and fraud, made statement of material fact to tribunal which he knew or reasonably should have known was false, and offered evidence that he knew to be false and failed to take reasonable remedial measures. 96 Ill.Atty.Reg. & Disc.Comm. SH 358.
            Disbarment was recommended sanction for attorney who engaged in conduct involving dishonesty, made false statements of material fact or law to tribunal which she knew were false and engaged in conduct which tended to defeat administration of justice.  95 Ill Atty.Reg. & Disc.Comm. CH 877.
            Censure was recommended sanction for attorney who made statements of material fact or law known was false, and engaged in conduct which was prejudicial to the administration of justice. 95 Ill Atty.Reg. & Disc.Comm. CH 504
          One-year suspension was recommended sanction for attorney who made statement of material fact which he knew was false in appearing in professional capacity before tribunal, made a statement of material fact which he knew to be false in course of representing client, and engaged in conduct involving dishonesty.  95 Ill Atty.Reg. & Disc.Comm. CH 191.
            Disbarment was recommended sanction for attorney who engaged in serious misconduct by making misrepresentation during his divorce proceedings and who was a recidivist.   94 Ill.Atty.Reg. & Disc.Comm. SH469


Fraud on court
            Two-year suspension, retroactive to beginning of interim suspension, was recommended sanction for attorney who made statement of material fact or law to tribunal which lawyer knew or reasonably should have known to be false, instituted criminal charges as prosecutor when he knew or reasonably should have known that charges were not supported by probable cause, committed criminal act that reflected adversely upon lawyer ‘s honesty, trustworthiness, or fitness as lawyer, engaged in conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit, or misrepresentation, engaged in conduct prejudicial to administration of justice, and engaged in conduct which tended to bring courts or legal profession into disrepute.  96 Ill. Atty. Reg. & Disc. Comm. CH 118. 
   
WHEREFORE the aforementioned reasons Respondent respectfully Prays for the Relief

1.)  For an Order Remanding all attorneys related Respondents found in Contempt who did not report any improprieties to proper authorities demonstrating their non- involvement in Civil Rights Violations, Terrorist Acts et al.

2.)  Pursuant to Smith V. Wade, 461 U.S. 30, 35. 103 S. Ct. 1625, 1629 75 L Ed 2d 632 (1983) that because of the noted depraved acts of all parties For an Order to pay PUNITIVE damages of $25 Million Dollars to the Petitioner and bond be set for all parties from the above demand;
  
3.)  For an Order Recommending a Special Prosecutor outside of States Attorney Anita Alvarez, Attorney General Lisa Madigan jurisdiction (more importantly attorney Kent Stephan Ray who committed numerous Civil Rights violations as General attorney of the CTA is now a States Attorney; Attorney General Lisa Madigan, when confronted with numerous documents alleging “FRAUD on numerous Judges and States Attorneys her reply, “The Civil Rights Bureau of the Attorney General is in receipt of the correspondence you delivered to our offices on 10/26/06. Unfortunately, your file was closed because we do not have jurisdiction over child support related matters”);

4.)  For an Order Compelling Respondents to provide documentation of all persons living in the named units that excluded the Petitioner a 3 bedroom voucher;  
5.)  For an Order issuing an Injunction against the City of Chicago, Commission on Human Relations to ascertain the number of cases “Fixed” that were disposed of without signatures or dismissed;    

6.)  For an Order seeking Federal Jurisdiction in the applicable statutes prohibiting the Respondent CHA from removing any families from the Voucher program and reinstate all families who were removed during the last years Petitioner complained of Racial Discrimination that went ignored;

7.)  For an Order Imposing Sanctions against all attorneys and law firms to absorb any and all attorney fees and costs for the prosecution and enforcement of these matters;

8.)  Prohibit any Attorney from delaying prosecution of this matter with frivolous continuances due to Petitioner and family suffering behind said acts;

9.)  For an Order auditing all tenants for ZRS Management, Riverstone Management and K2 Management and the Streeter to determine the ethnicity of all tenants with vouchers and income criteria with said vouchers;

10.)     For an Order Remanding every Party complicit in said Criminal Conspiratory acts ignoring and covering-up said unlawful acts of all parties and participants at the City of Chicago, Commission on Human Relations responsible for mailing fraudulent documents to Petitioner ;

11.)     For an Order Compelling  all Parties to appear before a Court with jurisdiction to determine who should be REMANDED into Custody for their part in said Terrorist Conspiracies;

12.)     For the entry of an Order awarding to your Respondent for such other relief and any other relief necessary as equity may require of which this court may deem overwhelmingly just;

Under penalties as provided by law pursuant to 735 1265 5\1-109, the undersigned certifies that the statements set forth in this instrument are true and correct, except as to matters therein stated to be on information and belief and as to such matters, the undersigned certifies as aforesaid that he verily believes the same to be true.

                                                                                                                                   Respectfully Submitted

                                                                              Joe Louis Lawrence
                                                                                                            Complainant                                                         
                                                                                        Counsel Pro se



CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

Commander & Chief                            Attorney General of United States
President Barack Obama                                 Eric Holder
The White House                           U.S. Department of Justice
1600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW            950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20500                         Washington, DC 20530-0001

Chicago Housing Authority             Wilson Elser Moskowitz Edelman & Dicker LLP
Office of the General Counsel                  Christian T. Novay
Asst Gen Counsel                                  55 West Monroe, Street, Suite 3800 
Maria Sewell Joseph                                 Chicago, Il 60603
60 East Van Buren
Chicago, Ill 60605                                  Seyfarth & Shaw
                                                                 Jeffrey K. Ross, Kyle A. Petersen & Anne Harris       
                                                                   131 S. Dearborn Street, Suite 2400
                                                                   Chicago, Ill. 60603

TO AAG Tyler Roland          Chief Judge Timothy Evans, Daley Center, Chg., Ill. 60601
         General Law Bureau       Presiding Judge Jacobius, Daley Center, Chg. Ill. 60601
        100 West Randolph Street Suite 1300
        Chicago, Ill. 60601    Clerk of Circuit Court Dorothy Brown, Suite 1001, Chg. Ill.                                           
        Judge Mikva Daley Center, Chg. Il 60601
       States Attorney, Anita Alvarez, Daley Center, Chg. Ill. 60601
       Atty Gen Lisa Madigan, 100 West Randolph, Suite 1300 Chg. Ill. 60601
           
Sec of State                                                  Asst Deputy Dir Candace Cheffin
Asst Gen Counsel Terrence McConville     60 East Van Buren, 8th floor
100 West Randolph, Suite 500                       Chicago, Ill. 60601
Chicago, Ill. 60601     

CHA Mobility                                             CHA Mobility, HCP Counselors
Chris Klepper, Executive Dir                     Tracey Robinson/Joann Harris
28 East Jackson Blvd.                                    4859 S. Wabash, Suite 2nd Floor 
Chicago, Ill 60604                                          Chicago, Ill. 60615    
                                                                   
CHA Mobility, Real Estate Specialist              
Jessie McDaniel                                                        
4859 S. Wabash                                                    
Chicago, Ill. 60615                                                

City of Chicago, Department of Buildings      
Christopher Lynch                                               
121 North LaSalle, Room 900                               

Chicago, Ill. 60601


Cary G. Schiff & Associates                   Gordon & Rees LLP
Christopher R. Johnson, Yuleda Joy         Lindsay Watson, Christian T. Novay
134 N. LaSalle Street, Suite 1720             1 North Franklin, Suite 800
Chicago, Ill. 60602                                    Chicago, Illinois 60606

Courtesy Copies:
 US Attorney                                            FBI  Robert J. Holley
 Zachary T. Fardon                                    2111 West Roosevelt Road
219 S. Dearborn, 5th floor                         Chicago, Ill. 60612
Chicago, Ill. 60604


Mayor                                            Deputy Regional Adm., Field Office Dir.
Rahm Emanuel                                       Beverly E. Bishop
City Hall                                              77 West Jackson Boulevard
Chicago, Ill. 60601                              Chicago, Ill. 60604



Cook County President                               Cook County Sheriff
Toni Preckwinkle                                            Thomas J. Dart
118 N. Clark, Room 517                         Richard J. Daley Center, Room 701
Chicago, Ill. 60602                                        Chicago, Ill. 60602
                                                                                                                                                                                                                             
                PLEASE BE ADVISED that on   February 9, 2015, An Emergency Petition for Rule to Show Cause et al., has been filed with the Chancery Circuit Court of Cook County and said copy have been delivered or emailed to the applicable parties;






                                                             Respectfully Submitted


                                                                 Joe Louis Lawrence Counsel Pro Se
                                                                           PO Box 490075
                                                                      Chicago, Ill. 60649-0075
                                                                          312 927-4210
                                                                      joelouislaw@yahoo.com
                                                           @joelouis7

                      

No comments:

Post a Comment