Wikipedia Racial Injustice in Chicago Courts

Search results

Wednesday, November 7, 2012

PURSUANT TO THE CLERK OF THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT DIRECTIVE

PER SUPERVISOR MR. ATKINS DIRECTIVE SAID CORRECTIONS HAVE BEEN MADE AND ALL PARTIES ARE TO RECEIVE A COPY OF THE LETTER AND CORRECTIONS MADE IN ACCORDANCE TO (GAIL JOHNSON)  SPECIFICATION OF RULE  44;

REPEATED PHONE CALLS WERE IN FACT MADE TO GAIL JOHNSON (NOVEMBER 6th, 2012) WITH  VOICE MESSAGES AS OF THIS POSTING, SHE HAS NEVER RETURNED ANY PHONE CALLS.

PERHAPS GAIL JOHNSON WAS AWARE RETURNING 20LBS OF LEGAL DOCUMENTS BACK TO ME WHICH WAS RECEIVED FROM THE POST OFFICE NOVEMBER 6TH WAS A GROSS ERROR BECAUSE RULE 44 WAS IN FACT MENTIONED IN THE ORIGINAL PETITION FOR REHEARING OF POST 10-25-12






















No comments:

Post a Comment