MANY OF THE DEMOCRATIC JUDGES INVOLVED IN THE FOLLOWING CASES WITH THE EXCEPTION OF SOME REPUBLICAN JUDGES HAVE DEMONSTRATED THE SAME MINDSET OF EGREGIOUS RACIAL HATRED VICIOUS ANIMOSITY AGAINST BLACK AND BROWN PERSONS SEEKING JUSITICE AS ICE AGENTS HAVE TOWARDS ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS.

IN EVERY CASE THE JUDGES DENIED ME AN ATTORNEY TO REPRESENT ME IN THE COURTS EVEN AS A PAUPER AND WELFARE RECIPIENT, AND IN FACT JUDGE DARRAH ORDERED ME TO PAY THE FILING FEE ON MY CASE BEFORE HIM KNOWING, I HAD NO FUNDS ONLY WELFARE OTHERWISE, WAS GOING TO DISMISS MY CASE.

A- I HAVE PREPARED LEGAL BRIEFS, REPLY BRIEFS, LEGAL MEMORANDUMS, SUMMARY JUDGMENTS, MOTIONS FOR RECONSIDERATION, MOTIONS TO CERTIFY COURT ORDERS, I HAVE NEVER RECEIVED A COURT ORDER THAT STIPULATED IT WAS EVER FROM A JUDGE, JUDICIAL COMPLAINTS OF DISTRICT COURT JUDGES, MOTIONS TO DISQUALIFY JUDGES FROM THE CASE DUE TO BIAS, MOTIONS TO TRANSFER THE CASE OUT OF THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT PURSUANT TO THE BREYERS COMMITTEE REPORT, DUE TO NUMEROUS CONFLICTS OF INTERESTS AND RACIAL HATRED,

B- JUDGES HAVE FOUND WAYS TO UNLAWFULLY DISMISS EVERY CASE PUT BEFORE THEM NEVER CHALLENGED BY ANY LITIGANT AND DESCRIBED MY PLEADINGS AS FRIVOLOUS, FANCIFUL, INCOHERENT ETC.

C- HERE IS A LITTLE-KNOWN FACT MANY PEOPLE DON'T KNOW-- IBC WONDERBREAD FILED BANKRUPTCY WHEN A $350 MILLION LAWSUIT WAS FILED AGAINST THEM FOR RACIAL DISCRIMINATION AT THE PLANT, A LAW FIRM BIOFF, FINUCANE & COFFEY FROM ST LOUIS MISSOURI WAS RECRUITED TO CHALLENGE ME ALONG WITH LAW PROFESSORS FOR THE CTA AND TOP APPELLATE CITY ATTORNEYS.

D- JUDGE WILLIAM J. BAUER IS THE ONLY JUDGE TO ORDER THE ATTORNEYS TO RESPOND IN THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT AND I HANDLED MY BUSINESS VERY WELL NEVER EVER HAVE A FEDERAL JUDGE EVER ORDERED ANYBODY TO RESPOND TO ANYTHING, I EVER FILED IN FEDERAL COURT.

E- I HAVE BEEN MANY TIMES DENIED BUT NEVER TRIED IN ANY COURT ONLY BECAUSE OF MY BROWN COLORED SKIN--A JUDGE WHOM, I WOULD SAY WAS A JUDGE OF AN IMPECCABLE LEGAL APTITUDE WHOM CERTAIN JUDGES WERE INTIMIDATED BY HIM MADE A STATEMENT TO CLERKS AND COLLEAGUES ABOUT ME WAS THAT, I HAD TO HAVE BEEN AN INMATE SOMEWHERE BECAUSE NO FREEMAN CAN PREPARE LEGAL DOCUMENTS LIKE THIS BECAUSE THIS IS NOT WHAT THEY DO ONLY PRISONERS BECAUSE THEY HAVE NOTHING BUT FREETIME, THEY ARE NOT GOING ANYWHERE, (WHAT HE SAID WAS SHARED WITH ME BY CERTAIN INDIVIDUALS IN THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT, A LOT OF PEOPLE RESPECTED ME UP THERE BUT ONE OR TWO JUDGES THEY PLAYED CHESS MADE A COMPLIMENT OF HOW I PREPARED MY PLEADINGS AND REFERENCED THE JUDGES STYLE IT PISSED HIM OFF EMPHATICALLY).

F- I HAVE BEEN HONORED AND GRATEFUL TO HAVE RECEIVED FAVOR FROM GOD IN MEETING PEOPLE NOT OF MY ETHNICITY WHO EXTENDED AN OLIVE BRANCH OF COURTESY AND SUPPORT KNOWING EXACTLY WHAT, I WAS UP AGAINST.

G- THE REALITY IS THAT APARTHEID, RACISM, EGREGIOUS HATE WITHIN THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY IS STILL IN ILLINOIS COURTS LONG BEFORE PRESIDENT TRUMP ASSUMED HIS POSITION IN THE WHITEHOUSE- ASK YOURSELF WHY ARE DEMOCRATIC JUDGES SO QUICK TO COMPLAIN ABOUT ICE AND THEIR VIOLENT ACTS ON ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS NOT ONE BLACK OR BROWN DEMOCRAT UTTERED A WORD ABOUT THE KU KLUX KLAN ACTS OF INJUSTICES AND MAYHEM FROM THE BENCH OF JUDGES DOING WHATEVER THEY PLEASED BECAUSE THEY LITERALLY HATE COLORED PEOPLE AND IS ONLY WEARING THAT ROBE TO INCITE HATRED AND GENOCIDE ON THOSE ETHNIC GROUPS THEY DEEM INFERIOR TO THEM EVEN THE BLACK AND CERTAIN BROWN JUDGES WHO WILL NEVER SPEAK UP BUT DO WHAT THEY ARE TOLD.

WHY WOULD THE CASE INVOLVING THE CHICAGO TRANSIT AUTHORITY BE MISSING FROM THE FEDERAL PACER TRACKING SYSTEM 93 CV 01609?

THE CTA NOR ATU LOCAL 241 UNION APEARED BEFORE JUDGE CHARLES R. NORGLE, SR. WHEN HE ORDERED THEM TO APPEAR BEFORE HIM ON JULY 26, 2019, AT 9:30 AM.

I HAVE DEFEATED EVERY POWERHOUSE ATTORNEY DEPLOYED AGAINST ME IN EVERY CASE BUT BECAUSE OF MY BROWN SKIN TONE JUDGES WHO SHARE THE SAME MINDSET OF ICE AGENTS HAVE USED THEIR ROBES AND UNLAWFUL AUTHORITY TO ACT AS DEFACTO ATTORNEYS FOR ALL OF THE PARTIES WHOM, I WAS COMPLAINING ABOUT OR LITIGATING AGAINST.

AT LEAST CHARLES NORGLE, SR. ADMITTED HE WAS RACIST AND SAID I WAS FRIVOLOUS EVEN AFTER DEFEATING THE CHICAGO TRANSIT AUTHORITY AND ATU 241 ATTORNEYS, I FILED A SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND HE ORDERED THEM TO APPEAR BEFORE HIM AND WHEN THEY DIDN'T SHOW UP TO COURT, HE ORDERED ME TO PROCEED WITH MY ARGUMENT, HE WAS SHOCKED AS FUCK ON MY PRESENTSATION AND MY ABILITY TO ARTICULATE THE LAWS DISTINCTIVELY TO HIM.

I HAVE NEVER BEEN TERMINATED FROM THE CTA OR EVER IMPREGNATED A FORMER POLICE OFFICER FRANCOISE HIGHTOWER WHO WAS IMPREGNATED BY HER NATURAL BIOLOGICAL FATHER WHO WAS A POLICE OFFICER WHEN HE WAS HAVING SEX WITH HIS BIOLOGICAL MINOR DAUGHTERS.

DUE TO EGREGIOUS HATE AND RACISM EVERY JUDGE WENT ALONG WITH ALL CIVIL RIGHTS VIOLATIONS, NOW I AM BATTLING POWER HOUSE ATTORNEYS REPRESENTING THE MAJOR CREDIT BUREAS WHO PUT FALSE INFORMATION ON MY CREDIT REPORT.

BUT VERIZON HAS BEEN RUNNING A BUSINESS HERE IN ILLINOIS FOR 25 YEARS NEVER REGISTERING WITH THE STATE OF ILLINOIS BUT EVERY OTHER BUSINESSPERSON HAVE TO REGISTER IF YOU WANT TO HAVE A BUSINESS HERE IN ILLINOIS.

Thursday, August 22, 2019

EXTRA EXTRA READ ALL ABOUT IT!

JUDGE NORGLE DID NOT DENY ANY PART OF THIS MOTION BUT GRANTED THE MOTION.

THE ORDER STATES PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO SUPPLEMENT IS GRANTED. NO APPEARANCE IS REQUIRED. IT IS SO ORDERED.

CAN SOMEONE EXPLAIN WHY JUDGES ARE ABLE TO VIOLATE THE LAWS OF THE CONSTITUTION AND REMAIN ON THE BENCH?

DEMOCRATIC JUDGES ON THE TYRANNY AND RACIAL HATE ON THE COURT BENCHES BUT REPUBLICANS SOME ARE JOINING THE RANKS OF RACIAL HATRED AND NOT ONE PERSON IS TALKING ABOUT THIS.

EXCEPT JUDGE RICHARD POSNER WHO RETIRED FROM THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT BECAUSE OF THE HATE JUDGES HAD TOWARDS PERSONS OF COLOR.

IN THE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION

)

Joseph L. Lawrence ) Hon Charles R. Norgle, Sr.

Plaintiff )

) 93 CV 01609

VS )

)

Chicago Transit Authority )

Defendant )

MOTION TO SUPPLEMENT MOTION WITH COURT TRANSCRIPT OF JULY 26, 2019 THAT CORROBORATES JUDGE NORGLE AS AN ALLEGED WHITE NATIONALIST ENGAGING IN HATE CRIMES OF AN ACTIVE “ORGANIZED CONSPIRACY” w/AFFIDAVIT WHEREBY WARRANTING THE JURISDICTION OF THE FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION/UNITED STATES ATTORNEY INSTANTER

Now comes Joe Louis Lawrence, Counsel Pro Se a United States Citizen Born and Raised a Freeman depose and states, by all governing laws of the United States Constitution, Plaintiff in this cause files herewith his affidavit as required by Title 28, United States Code, to show that said Transcript unequivocally corroborate without a scintilla of falsity that Judge Norgle’s ruling against the Plaintiff is predicated on Racism, Racial Hatred because of Plaintiff’s skin color.

1. That Judge Norgle waited 26 years in which to have the Plaintiff to appear before him to explain his Summary Judgment numerous judges in Cook County courts were “Trespassing upon the Laws” acting as “Private Citizens” no citizen of Color in Illinois were able to receive Equal Protection of the Laws as long as the present administration of law breakers were on the bench engaging in “Treason Offenses”, ref as Gr Ex A Motion to Reinstate Case Due to Democratic Judges/Attorneys Trespassing Upon the Laws Committing Treason Acting as Private Citizens Making the District Court Order “Void a Nullity” .

2. That Page 8 Par I was in Judge Norgle’s possession states, “Hereto attached, Letter from Michael Cook Manager Personnel, Dates of Employment from 11-10-1989, “THE ABOVE INFORMATION IS FURNISHED IN REPLY TO YOUR REQUEST FOR VERIFICATION OF EMPLOYMENT FROM THE CTA. HE

WAS NEVER DISCHARGED” along with a printout from CTA’s database Oct. 20, 1994, time 13:57 Date in Job 05-17-90 but last day worked 3-8-90 no DISCHARGE is recorded on the database.

“THIS PRINTOUT WAS MISFILED IN ANOTHER JACKET AND IS THE ONLY COPY THAT MAKES SENSE”

3. That Page 8 Par J was in Judge Norgle’s possession states, Hereto attached, Ex L3 CTA’s answer to State of Illinois, Department of Human Rights, Dennis Powell Investigator African American “CTA admits Complainant was hired in March 1987” CTA also admits that Complainant was discharged from the CTA in April 1992”.

4. That Plaintiff filed said Motion to Supplement Oct 11, 2018, MOTION TO SUPPLEMENT MOTION THAT CORROBORATES DEMOCRATIC JUDGES ENGAGING IN AN ACTIVE “ORGANIZED CONSPIRACY” “FRAUD & “CORRUPTION” IN COOK COUNTY COURTS w/AFFIDAVIT

Tuesday, August 20, 2019

UPDATE JUDGE NORGLE SAID THIS CASE WAS IN FACT FRIVOLOUS

SEE HOW ALLEGED "WHITE NATIONALIST" JUDGES IN THE FEDERAL COURT ENGAGE IN A PLETHORA OF CIVIL RIGHTS VIOLATIONS SURPASSING THE CRIMES OF THE GREYLORD ERA

JUDGE NORGLE IS BASICALLY LETTING EVERYONE THAT READS THE CRIMES THAT IS NOTED IN THIS DOCUMENT THAT THEY ARE UNTOUCHABLE BECAUSE IT IS HIS ALLEGED IMPRESSION MEMBERS IN LAW ENFORCEMENT SHARE THE SAME SENTIMENTS AS HE AND THEY DO, THAT IS WHY THEY ARE ABLE TO ENGAGE IN TYRANNY ACTS AT WILL AND NOT FEAR ANY REPRISALS FROM LAW ENFORCEMENT.

The Seventh Circuit has collectively weighed in on Judge Norgle better than any lawyer ever could. His handling of the trial of former Chicago City Treasurer Miriam Santos caused the Seventh Circuit to coin the phrase "veritable avalanche of errors." United States v. Santos, 201 F.3d 953 (7th Cir. 2000). A Lexis search of "norgle" and "circuit rule 36" (meaning the Seventh Circuit re-assigned the case to another judge on remand) turns up 14 cases, including cases not involving new trials (see, e.g., Holmes v. Vill. of Hoffman Estates, 511 F.3d 673 (7th Cir. 2007)). Other decisions in Judge Norgle's wall of reversed legal rulings include: Williams v. City of Chicago, 733 F.3d 749 (7th Cir. 2013); Redmond v. Redmond, 724 F.3d 779 (7th Cir. 2013); Ty Inc. v. Softbelly's, 353 F.3d 528 (7th Cir. 2003); United States v. Robinson, 724 F.3d 878 (7th Cir. 2013); Schmude v. Sheahan, 420 F.3d 645 (7th Cir. 2005); and Grun v. Pneumo Adex Corp., 163 F.3d 411 (7th Cir. 1999). This is but a small sample of rulings where the appeals court has confirmed Judge Norgle's repeated legal errors. The repeated nature of these rulings indicates what can plainly be noticed in Judge Norgle's courtroom -- that he fails to learn from, or to correct, his mistakes. Even more shocking is that a judge with such an extensive record of legal errors teaches law at John Marshall Law School. Any student who wishes to pass the Illinois bar, or function effectively in a courtroom with even a minimally competent trier of fact, is advised to avoid his class -- or, failing that, to disregard nearly everything that he teaches them.

IN THE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION

)

Joe Louis Lawrence ) Hon. Charles R. Norgle, Sr.

Plaintiff )

) 93 CV 01609

VS )

)

Chicago Transit Authority )

Defendant

MOTION TO VACATE AUGUST 8, 2019 COURT ORDER DUE TO FRAUD JUDGE NORGLE’S COMPLICIT CORROBORATION ENGAGING IN WHITE SUPREMECIST HATE CRIMES CORROBORATING IN AN “ORGANIZED CONSPIRACY” WITH OTHER FEDERAL JUDGES “TRESPASSING UPON THE LAWS” AS A “PRIVATE CITIZEN” MAKING THE COURT ORDER A “NULLITY” “VOID” w/AFFIDAVIT THEREBY DISQUALIFYING HIM FROM THIS CASE DUE TO A PRIMA FACIE SHOWING OF BIAS/PREJUDICE AT PLAINTIFF DUE TO HIS SKIN COLOR PURSUANT TO {28 USCA 144, 455 (b) (1) AND WARRANTS THE JURISDICTION OF THE FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION/UNITED STATES ATTORNEY INSTANTER

Thursday, August 29, 2019

JUDICIAL COMPLAINT & MOTION TO DISQUALIFY CHARLES R. NORGLE, SR. ALLEGED WHITE NATIONALIST FROM THE ILLINOIS NORTHERN DISTRICT

JUDGE NORGLE NEVER DENIED HE WAS A RACIST OR "WHITE NATIONALIST"

HE AGREED WITH EVERYTHING RECORDED IN THE MOTION TO SUPPLEMENT MOTION ET AL. THAT IS WHY HE SIGNED THE COURT ORDER AUGUST 19, 2019 BUT REFUSED TO GRANT THE JUDGMENT OF $33 MILLION DOLLARS ONLY BECAUSE OF RACIST HATEFUL DEMEANOR

CHICAGO'S LEGAL SYSTEM AND JUDGES ARE ENFORCING LAWS INDICATIVE TO A 3RD WORLD COUNTRY RACIAL HATRED IS WORSE IN ILLINOIS THAN ANY SOUTHERN STATE.

JUDGES ARE USING THE LAWS AS WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION DESTROYING PEOPLE UNLAWFULLY BECAUSE THEY DON'T MEET THE ETHNICITY OF THOSE PRESIDING ON THE BENCHES.

WHILE COWARDLY MEN GO OUT AND MASS SHOOT UP A COMMUNITY KILLING ETHNIC GROUPS NOT OF THEIR ETHNICITY THE JUDGES HERE IN THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS AND SEVENTH CIRCUIT EMULATE THE SAME VILE RACIST HATE BY MISAPPLYING THE LAWS COMMITTING PERJURY TO ETHNIC GROUPS THEY DEEM INFERIOR TO THEM AS ARTICULATED IN THIS DOCUMENT.

1. That it is clear no Hispanic or Black person described as a Democrat in Cook County have any real authority where it matters especially as demonstrated in this

cause, “Jim Crow” laws are being enforced by spineless men of color and racist men hiding behind men of color using them as the Enforcers using the laws as weapons to Terrorize, Bully or “Lynch” anyone that challenges said Democrats in these unlawful proceedings as articulated throughout all pleadings and affidavits.

Not since the Book Lawyers and Judges in Collusion The Fraternity, by John Fitzgerald Molloy said former judge articulated the horrors within the legal arena but the Plaintiff has went even further granting the “Blue Print on Domestic Terrorism” and the extent a judge will go to destroy the lives of innocent men and women of color.

What is most appalling is the extent colored judges so as to be accepted by a party that has been typically historically racist as Democrats are willing to perpetrate injustice on their own ethnicity so as to prove and be accepted by a party that has wielded so much Hate at a man simply because of the color of his skin.

Plaintiff Prays further that this Honorable Judge recognize the Plaintiff as a Freeman Born & Raised in these United States of America and not inferior or less than any man responsible for the incitement of these heinous Hateful Acts.

IN THE

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT

CHICAGO, ILLINOIS 60604

Joe Louis Lawrence Civil Action #93 CV

Hon: Charles R. Norgle Sr.

Plaintiff

Chicago Transit Authority

Defendants

JUDICIAL COMPLAINT

MOTION FOR DISQUALIFICATION OF JUDGE/VACATE AUGUST 19, 2019 COURT ORDER—(DUE TO PRIMA FACIE ADMISSIONS OF COURT ORDER AUGUST 20, 2019 GRANTING MOTION TO SUPPLEMENT ET AL.) PERSONAL BIAS AND JUDGE NORGLE AS AN ALLEGED WHITE NATIONALIST ENGAGING IN HATE CRIMES OF AN ACTIVE “ORGANIZED CONSPIRACY” W/AFFIDAVIT {28 USCA 144, 455 (B) (1)} VACATE ORDER OF AUGUST 19 2019 DUE TO ORDER BEING A “NULLITY” “VOID” FRAUDULENTLY ENTERED

To the Honorable Justices of the Seventh Circuit of the United States Court of Appeals:

Complainant a United States Citizen, Born & Raised a Free Man Joe Louis Lawrence, hereby respectfully represents as Counsel Pro Se shows this court with corroboration/admissions and Court Order the noted reasons why this matter should be within this Court’s Jurisdiction so as to Vacate the court order reassign this matter to a judge with integrity, not affiliated with the Terrorist Democratic and some noted Republican Judges who have assumed the roles as “Private Citizens” “Trespassing upon the Laws” protecting the Alleged “White Nationalists”; {Pursuant to Fed Rules of Civil Procedure and with Affidavit.

Now comes Joe Louis Lawrence, Counsel Pro Se Appellant in this cause files herewith his affidavit as required by Title 28, United States Code, Section 144, to show that the “Private Citizen” Charles R. Norgle, Sr. has a personal bias with compelling evidence against him where a proper sufficient Motion for Summary Judgment was filed stating a cause how and why this court has jurisdiction to grant said motion never objected to or denied by any of the Defendants; motions corroborating judicial corruption with court transcripts demonstrating “Fraud” “Trespassing upon the Laws” “Perjury” and a plethora of “Terrorist Civil Rights Acts” put before the court that the District Court ignored upholding Racism and Terrorism in the courts.

That said judge has corroborated and demonstrated his role unequivocally as a “Trespasser of the Laws” when he HEARD testimony with affidavits DENIED said Motion, to Vacate August 8, 2019 Court Order due to Fraud et al. after the Defendants admitted to every PLEADING recorded.

Based thereon, Plaintiff-Complainant respectfully moves that the judge Robert R. Norgle, Sr. proceed no further herein and that this Honorable Seventh Circuit invoke jurisdiction; and transfer this matter outside of the Northern District Of Illinois and away from the Seventh Circuit due to members of the Democratic Political Machine seizing control over all courts and certain judges politically appointed because of their racist hatred of ethnic groups they deem inferior to them so as to enforce the laws pursuant to the United States Constitution who is not Bias and understands how to enforce the laws in accordance to the United States Constitution and according to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure to hear this proceeding who is not intimidated or fear reprisals from these individuals.

Pursuant to Rule 26 it implements the Breyer Committee’s recommended use of transfers. Breyer Committee Report, 239 F.R.D. at 214-15.

Rule 26 authorizes the transfer of a complaint proceeding to another judicial council selected by the Chief Justice. Such transfers may be appropriate, for example, in the case of a serious complaint where there are multiple disqualifications among the original council, where the issues are highly visible and a local disposition may weaken public confidence in the process, where internal tensions arising in the council as a result of the complaint render disposition by a less involved council appropriate, or where a complaint calls into question policies or governance of the home court of appeals et al.

Now comes Joe Louis Lawrence, Attorney Pro Se Appellant in this cause files herewith his affidavit as required by Title 28, attesting the veracity and accuracy of all statements recorded within.

Respectfully Submitted,

By: _________________

Joe Louis Lawrence

Counsel Pro Se

P. O. Box 490075

312 965-6455

Joelouis565@yahoo.com

@joelouis7

IN THE

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT

CHICAGO, ILLINOIS 60604

AFFIDAVIT

IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR MOTION FOR DISQUALIFICATION OF JUDGE/VACATE AUGUST 19, 2019 COURT ORDER—(DUE TO PRIMA FACIE ADMISSIONS OF COURT ORDER AUGUST 20, 2019 GRANTING MOTION TO SUPPLEMENT ET AL.) PERSONAL BIAS AND JUDGE NORGLE AS AN ALLEGED WHITE NATIONALIST ENGAGING IN HATE CRIMES OF AN ACTIVE “ORGANIZED CONSPIRACY” W/AFFIDAVIT {28 USCA 144, 455 (B) (1)} VACATE ORDER OF AUGUST 19 2019 DUE TO ORDER BEING A “NULLITY” “VOID” FRAUDULENTLY ENTERED

sort by: relevance | newest | oldest

Lawrence v. IBC/Wonderbread et al (1:07-cv-01191)

Courts > Illinois Northern District Court

Filed: May 21, 2007

Nature of Suit: Civil Rights - Other Civil Rights

Parties Matched: Lawrence v. IBC/Wonderbread et al

Lawrence v. Secretary of State (1:11-cv-05142)

Courts > Illinois Northern District Court

Filed: Jul 28, 2011

Judge: George W Lindberg

Nature of Suit: Civil Rights - Other Civil Rights

Parties Matched: Joe Louis Lawrence

Lawrence v. 420 East Ohio et al (1:16-cv-07434)

Courts > Illinois Northern District Court

Filed: Jul 21, 2016

Judge: John W Darrah

Nature of Suit: Civil Rights - Other Civil Rights

Parties Matched: Lawrence v. 420 East Ohio et al

Joe Lawrence v. 420 E. Ohio, et al

Original Case: 1:16-cv-07434

Seventh Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals
Case #:	0:18-cv-02305
Type	civil / private
Nature of Suit	440 Civil Rights - Other Civil Rights

Case Filed:	Jun 12, 2018
Terminated:	Jul 30, 2018

Docket last updated: 07/31/2018 3:32 AM CDT

Tuesday, June 12, 2018
1		Private civil case docketed. IFP on appeal denied on 12/12/2016. Fee due. Docketing statement filed. Transcript information sheet due by 06/26/2018. Fee or IFP forms due on 06/26/2018 for Appellant Joe Louis Lawrence [1] [6931147] 18-2305 (AP)
		Att: 1 18 pgs Civil Case
		Att: 2 1 pgs Fee Notice
		Att: 3 2 pgs Attorney / Party Notice of Docketing
		Att: 4 1 pgs Notice to District Court
2		THIS CAUSE CONSISTS OF MORE THAN 5 PARTIES FOR EITHER SIDE. The following are those parties to this cause as reflected on the District Court docket, yet are not reflected on the Appellate docket/caption for administrative purposes: APPELLEES: Commission on Human Relations Supreme Court of Illinos, Alderman Edward Burke, Franklin U. Valderrrama and Mary Lane Mikva. [2] [6931159] 18-2305 (AP)
3		1 pgs This is notification that no appellee(s) or counsel for the appellee(s) were served in the District Court. [3] [6931160] (Note: The Office of the IL Attorney General has been notified of the filing of the appeal.) 18-2305 (AP)