SEE HOW THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY HERE IN ILLINOIS IS REALLY A COMMUNIST TERRORIST NETWORK USED TO OPPRESS BLACK HISPANIC LATINO PEOPLE WHILE THE IRISH and POLISH persons seize control of the city, courts and all government offices.
1.) Motion for Disqualification of Judge Due to Bias (Civil Rights Violations) and or Prejudice pursuant to Canon 3 (C) (1) and to Vacate Orders where Criminal Conspiracy Civil Rights were Violated (filed April 2, 2010)
Their were some Homosexual and Lesbian Judges along with the understandable Racist Judges hated and resented the Appellant for standing up to that which was wrong in the courts because many of them had no back bone, banded together as "THUGS" "HOODLUMS" "NEIGHBORHOOD GANGBANGERS WITH ROBES" TO PROTECT THEIR IDENTITIES AS THEY TRIED TO PROTECT ALL INVOLVED IN THIS DIABOLICAL TERRORIST CONSPIRACY;
The Affidavit explains in specific detail how the Political Machine works how Judges were selected and the unlawful acts that had to be committed to remain a judge.
To best understand the unnecessary evils that has been endured in this mayhem is likened to watching Wesley Snipes in Blade 1, and 2 or Jet Li in The One.
2.) Motion to Disqualify Justice Robert Cahill for Bias (Civil Rights Violations) and or Prejudice pursuant to Canon 3 (c) (1) and to Vacate any Orders where Civil Rights were Violated (filed Feb. 17, 2010).
The Affidavit clearly unequivocally demonstrate how the Judges used their robes and abused the powers to protect the CTA in the Criminal Racist Conspiracies as they stole wages and tried to destroy his personnel records to reflect he was not an employee.
3.) Motion to Disqualify Judge William O
Maki for Bias (Corroboration Civil
Rights Violations) and or Prejudice pursuant to Canon 3 (c) (1) and to Vacate any
Orders where Criminal Conspiracy Civil Rights were Violated: (filed Oct 18, 2010)
The Affidavit clearly shows how Appellant stood his ground in Illinois as Judges committed "Heinous Criminal Civil Rights Violations"
The Feds are probably sitting back laughing their hearts out because the Judges seems to think this is a joke.
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY ILLINOIS
DOMESTIC RELATIONS DIVISION
IN RE MARRIAGE OF
Joe Louis Lawrence
Case # 08 D 10264
Petitioner
VS Calendar 73
Room 1508
Carolyn Yvette Lawrence Hon. R. Morgan Hamilton
Respondent
Notice of
Motion
for Disqualification of Judge Due to Bias (Civil Rights Violations) and or Prejudice
pursuant to Canon 3(C) (1) and to Vacate Orders where Criminal Conspiracy Civil
Rights were Violated
YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED that Plaintiff
Moves to the Chief Judge/ Presiding Court for an Order on Motion for
Disqualification of Judge Due to Bias (Civil Rights Violations) and or
Prejudice pursuant to Canon 3 (C) (1) and to Vacate Orders where Criminal
Conspiracy Civil Rights were violated.
TO: Rachael Kaplan FBI Robert Grant
(Courtesy Copy)
567 West Lake
Street 2111 West
Roosevelt Road
Chicago, Ill. 60661 Chicago, Ill. 60612
Chief Judge Timothy Evans U.S. ATTY Patrick
Fitzgerald
Daley
Center
219 South Dearborn Suite 500
Suite
2600 Chicago, Ill. 60604
Ruth B. Watson (Child Rep)
1011 Lake #412
Oak Park, Ill. 60301
Brian E. Wright, 5310 North Harlem, Chg. Ill. 60656
PLEASE BE ADVISED that on May 24, 2010
said Notice of Motion was hereby filed with the Motion for Disqualification of
Judge Due to Bias (Civil Rights Violations) and or Prejudice pursuant to Canon
3 (C) (1) and to Vacate Orders where Criminal Conspiracy Civil Rights were
Violated with the attachments and mailed/hand delivered to all parties recorded
in said notice via regular mail.
Respectfully Submitted
Joe Louis Lawrence
P.O. Box
490075
Chicago, Illinois
60649-0075
(312) 927-4210
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY ILLINOIS
DOMESTIC RELATIONS DIVISION
IN RE MARRIAGE OF
Joe Louis Lawrence
Case # 08 D 10264
Petitioner
VS
Calendar 73
Room 1508
Carolyn Yvette Lawrence
Hon. R. Morgan Hamilton
Respondent
Motion
for Disqualification of Judge Due to Bias (Civil Rights Violations) and or Prejudice
pursuant to Canon 3(C) (1) and to Vacate Orders where Civil Rights were
Violated
Now comes Plaintiff, Joe Louis Lawrence, Attorney Pro Se,
in this cause, files herewith his affidavit, factually establishing the Bias (Civil
Rights Violations) Prejudice alleged herein, with exhibits, in accordance to
Supreme Court of Illinois and Canon rules in accordance to the American
Jurisprudence and pleadings (rev.) to show that the Honorable R. Morgan
Hamilton have a personal bias or
prejudice against the Plaintiff and have demonstrated such by engaging in a
criminal conspiracy assisting the attorneys at the Chicago Transit Authority et
al., she had personal knowledge of undisputed evidentiary
facts accompanied by affidavits concerning the Plaintiff; where many Judges
used their robes in an attempt to cover up the unprecedented acts of conspiracy
fraud perpetrated in the courts;
Based
thereon Plaintiff respectfully moves
that the Honorable R. Morgan Hamilton proceed no further herein, and that the
Honorable Timothy Evans, Chief Judge of the Circuit Court of Cook County assign
this matter accordingly.
This
is not the Plaintiff’s first motion to recuse in this cause made by the movant,
Respectfully Submitted,
By:
________________________
Attorney Pro Se
STATE OF ILLINOIS )
)
COUNTY OF COOK )
AFFIDAVIT
In support of Motion to Disqualify Judge
R. Morgan Hamilton for Bias (Civil Rights Violations) and or Prejudice pursuant
to Canon 3 (c) (1) and to Vacate any Orders where Criminal Conspiracy Civil
Rights were Violated:
1.)
I
am Joe Louis Lawrence, Attorney Pro Se, defendant in this cause, being first
duly sworn on oath deposes and states, as follows;
2.)
I am
informed and believe and based on such information and belief, allege that the
Honorable R. Morgan Hamilton , whom this cause has pended before, has a
Personal Bias and or Prejudice and has demonstrated beyond the Preponderance of
the evidence her conspiratory participation in an elaborate conspiracy;
A-
Said
Judges had knowledge and received affidavits, particularly (Motion For Reconsideration/Vacate
Order due to Error, Organized Chain Conspiracy, “Fraud” Racial Fraternal Civil
Rights Violations w/Affidavit filed Nov. 30, 2009 )—detailing “Corruption”
“Fraud” “Perjury” and a host of other Civil Rights Violations;
B-
Said
Judge LIED on the Plaintiff and made Fraudulent remarks in a court order in
1994
C-
That
the Cook County Sheriff was aware of the Judges engaging in Criminal Civil
Rights Corruption Conspiracy, hereto attached, Ex A, Court Order from Judge David Delgado which states “Defendant appeared on different case and
lied to the court on various item’s & left court under a cloud of distrust
held by Sheriff’s office”
D-
Said
Judge was trying to protect and cover up for Judge Ronald Barkowicz who had
falsified court orders for Joseph V. Roddy against the plaintiff;
E-
Said
Judge as supervisor closed her eyes became complicit in an organized chain
conspiracy as powerfully connected white men tried to systematically rape the
Plaintiff with their applications of injustice perpetrated at him for standing
up to racism lodged at him by the CTA, Judges and lawyers in the Paternity
matter;
F-
Said
Judge demonstrated no integrity in the law and her venomous resentment and
biasness at him being a black man for retaliating against said racist
terrorists in a legally applicable manner demonstrating every law and Civil
Rights Violations;
G-
That
on Oct. 22, 2009, under cross examination Defendant Carolyn Lawrence testified
working for the VA Hospital and receiving public Aid, said judge recorded her
testimony in her notes and had her to repeat it, did not question or challenge
said defendant because she was assigned to this case to FIX IT, by
protecting the conspirators as they used his wife in an attempt to defeat him, the same way she went along with others as they
FIXED the paternity case;
That the Judge erred
considerably when she received notice
and knowledge of other Judges complicit in a Criminal Conspiracy failed to
follow Canon Ethics Leslie W. Abramson, 25 Hofstra L. Rev. 751 (1997).
The Judges Ethical Duty to Report Misconduct by Other Judges and Lawyers and
its effect on Judicial Independence.
H-
That
because of the veracity of all pleadings and facts presented before this
Honorable Court with affidavits, no
attorney objected to or denied any of the factual claims presented;
Pursuant to 735 ILCS 5/2-610 where allegations of complaint are not denied,
there is admission of all facts well-pleaded by adversary, and such admission,
drawn from failure to plead, may be considered as evidence. Hecht v. Hecht,
App. 1 Dist. 1977, 7 Ill. Dec. 169, 49 Ill. App. 3d 334, 364 N.E. 2d 330.
Pursuant to 735 ILCS 5/2-612 Counsel never objected to the sufficiency of
Petitioners pleadings, Objections to sufficiency of pleadings either in form or
substance must be made In trial court, and if not so made, they will be
considered waived and cannot be raised for the first time on appeal. People
ex rel. Deynes v. Harris, App. 1948, 77 N.E. 2d 439, 333 Ill. App. 280.
Counsel
for Respondent waived any defects against Petitioner in any pleadings by
failing to object, any defects in pleadings, either of form or substance, not
objected to in trial are waived on appeal. Geleto v. Giglietti, 1976, 40
Ill.App 3d 226, 352 N.E. 2d 1; In re Leyden Fire Protection Dist., 1972, 4 Ill.
App. 3d 273, 280 N.E. 2d 744; Lyon v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co., 1942, 315
Ill. App. 451, 43 N.E. 2d 187.
Arkansas
Code of Judicial Conduct Commentary to Canon 2 (1988) provides that “{A} judge
must avoid all impropriety.” And appearance of impropriety.” Accordingly, “{A}
judge should disqualify himself in a proceeding in which his impartiality might
reasonably be questioned …..”Arkansas
Code of Judicial Conduct, Canon 3 (C) (1) 1988.
Where a judge exhibits
bias or the appearance of bias, the court will reverse. Patterson v. R.T., 301
Ark. 400, 784 S.W. 2d 777 (1990); Farley v. Jester, 257 Ark. 686, 520 S.W. 2d
200 (1975) “The proper administration of the law requires not only that judges
refrain from actual bias, but also that they avoid all appearances of
unfairness. “Bolden v. State, 262 Ark.
718, 561 S.W. 2d 281 (1978).
3.)
The
facts and reasons for the belief that such Bias and or Prejudice and Civil
Rights Violations exists, are that, the following laws were noticeably maliciously
violated, said Judge having complete knowledge and was aware of all “fraudulent” acts perpetrated by
the Chicago Transit Authority attorneys, and Circuit Court Judges engaged in
the same conspiracy when she was supervising Judge, she ignored all laws;
A- Due to said Judges Biasness she has
exercised anarchy and a Disparate application of the laws of everyone involved
who shared a political make up by ignoring every criminal Civil Rights Act
lodged at the Plaintiff;
B-
Said
Judges violated all Rules of law Canon Ethics, Code of Judicial Conduct Rule
62 Scott, 377
Mass. 364, 386 N.E. 2d 218, 220 (1979) See Lopez-Alexander, Unreported Order
No. 85-279 (Colo. May 3, 1985) (Judge removed for, inter alia, a persistent
pattern of abuse of the contempt power. The Mayor of Denver accepted the
findings of the Denver County Court Judicial Qualification Commission that the
judge’s conduct could not be characterized as mere mistakes or errors of law
and that the conduct constituted willful misconduct in office and conduct
prejudicial to the administration of justice that brings the judicial office
into disrepute). Canon Ethics where there is a pattern of disregard or
indifference, which warrant discipline.
A
judge’s disrespect for the rules of court demonstrates disrespect for the law.
Judges are disciplined under Canon 2A for violating court rules and procedures.
Judge ignored mandated witness order in attempt to accommodate witnesses’
schedules; Citing Canon 2A the court noted, “[a] court’s indifference to
clearly stated rules breeds disrespect for and discontent with our justice
system. Government can not demand respect of the laws by its citizens when its
tribunals ignore those very same laws”)
C- Said Judge had knowledge the Chicago Transit Authority
under the direction of Kent Stephen Ray (Gen. Counsel for CTA)) have properly
agreed to all facts recorded and have now resigned his position from the CTA;
D-
Every
Court Order entered by this court has been FRAUDULENTLY
ENTERED;
E- Defendant’s counsel (Brian E. Wright)
never filed an appearance before the court and the Judge ignored this legal
procedure ;
Ill. App. (1st
Dist. 2000) “A VOID Judgment or ORDER” is one that is entered by a court
lacking jurisdiction over the parties or the subject matter, or lacking the
inherent power to enter the particular order of judgment or where the order was
procured by FRAUD—in re Adoption of E.L., 248 Ill. Dec. 171, 733 N.E. 2d 846,
315 Ill. App. 3d 137-Judgm 7, 16, 375
4.)
Said Judge
have demonstrated the same level of Prejudice and Biasness as her racist colleagues in the courts, when racism is an issue, they simply
recruit the necessary ethnic individuals that would go along with wrong so as
to camouflage and protect the actual leaders perpetrating said racial acts;
A- Said
Racist Judges responsible for organizing racial segregation in the courts have
remarkable control over the black woman and they have complied with whatever
directive necessary to destroy the black man and his children in the legal
system as demonstrated towards the Plaintiff;
B- That
because of the Judge’s Biasness and Personal Prejudice against the Plaintiff’s
his minor children especially the younger son is academically behind this Judge
failed to execute the laws in a legally upright manner punishing and
Sanctioning the parties responsible for enrolling him in a School that was not
State Certified or accredited and collected $5000.00 dollars from his
enrollment;
CANON 1
A Judge should uphold the INTEGRITY and
independence of the JUDICIARY.
The
integrity and independence of judges depend in turn upon their acting without
fear or favor. Although judges should be independent, they should comply with
the law, as well as the provisions of this code. Public confidence in the
impartiality of the judiciary is maintained by the adherence of each judge to
this responsibility. Conversely, violation of this code diminishes public
confidence in the judiciary and thereby does injury to the system of government
under law.
5.)
That the color or ethnic origin of said Judges in
this manner is of no merit because they all share a philosophical doctrine so
as to keep their jobs “Go along with wrong, see wrong, close eyes to wrong in
order to get along with the wrongdoers”
See that is why, the Ku Klux Klan Act of
1871 (was enacted) - Section 1 (42 U.S.C.) 1983.
“Of all the
Civil Rights legislation enacted in the aftermath of the Civil War, none has
had a greater contemporary impact than the Ku Klux Klan Act of 1871. The Act
grew out of a special one-paragraph message sent to the 42d Congress on March
23, 1871, by President Ulysses S. Grant, urgently requesting the enactment of
legislation”.
Section 2 (42 U.S.C.)
In the House of Representatives.
“Congressional
Debate of the second section of the Ku Klux Klan Act was more extensive and
enduring than that of Section 1; As originally presented, Sec. 2 made it a
felony for any “two or more persons” to conspire to commit certain enumerated
crimes “in violation of the rights and privileges, or immunities of any person,
to which he is entitled under the Constitution and laws of the United States.
“Throughout the debates, supporters
of the Act made repeated references to the depredations of the Ku Klux Klan;
Victims of these atrocities included not only blacks but white Republicans as
well. The crimes that were perpetrated, therefore, were not viewed as isolated
occurrences, but as part of an “Organized Conspiracy….Political in its origin
and aims”, “crimes perpetrated by concert and agreement, by men in large
numbers acting with a common purpose for the injury of a certain class of
citizens entertaining certain political principles, id, at 457 (remarks of Rep. Coburn). See also e.g., id.
At 437 (remarks of Rep. Cobb) (“None but Democrats belong or can belong to
these societies”) et al.,
“Where
these gangs of Assassins show themselves the rest of the people look on, if not
with sympathy, at least with forbearance. The boasted courage of the South is
not courage in their presence. Sheriffs, having eyes to see, see not; judges,
having ears to hear, hear not; witnesses conceal the truth or falsify it; grand
or petit juries act as if they might be accomplices. In the presence of these
gangs all the apparatus and machinery of civil government, all the processes of
justice, skulk away as if government and justice were crimes and feared
detection. Among the most dangerous things an injured party can do is to appeal
to justice. Of the uncounted scores and hundreds of atrocious mutilations and
murders it is credibly stated that not one has been punished. Cong. Globe,
supra note 2, app. At 78 (remarks of Rep. Perry). (“While murder is
stalking abroad in disguise, while whippings and lynching’s and banishment have
been visited upon unoffending American citizens, the local administrations have
been found inadequate or unwilling to apply the proper corrective”) et al., ….
And the State made no successful effort to bring the guilty to punishment or
afford protection or redress to the outraged and innocent.”)
The Miseducation of the Negroe Political
Education Neglected
Carter G. Woodson, 1933
The
opponents of freedom and social justice decided to work out a program which would
enslave the negroes’ mind in as much as the freedom of body had to be conceded.
It was well understood that if by teaching of history the white man could be
further assured of his superiority and the negroe could be made to feel that he
had always been a failure and that the subjection of his will to some other
race is necessary for the freedman, then, would still be a slave. If you can
control a man’s thinking you do not have to worry about his action. When you
determine what a man shall think you do not have to concern yourself about what
he will do. If you make a man feel that he is inferior, you do not have to
compel him to accept an inferior status, for he will seek it himself. If you
make a man think that he is justly an outcast, you do not have to order him to
the back door. He will go without being told; and if there is no back door, his
very nature will demand one.
6.)
Said
Judge is not dispensating the laws in accordance to the laws of the United
States Constitution but in accordance to other Political/fraternal laws outside
of the Constitution and Illinois Supreme Court rules;
Under Section 4 of the Ku Klux Klan Act of 1871:
The President had additional
power in case of rebellion within a state to suspend the writ of habeas corpus
and to declare and enforce marital law. Cong.
Globe, supra note 1, at 317. With respect to a definition of rebellion,
Section 4 provided;
“Whenever in any State or part
of a State……unlawful combinations……..shall be organized and armed, and so
numerous and powerful as to be able, by violence, to either overthrow or set at
defiance the constituted authorities of such State, or when the constituted
authorities are in complicity with or shall connive at the unlawful purposes of
such powerful and armed combinations; and whenever, by reason of either or all
of the causes aforesaid, the conviction of such offenders and the preservation
of the public safety shall become…. Impracticable, in every such case such
combinations shall be deemed a rebellion against the Government of the United
States….”
794 S.W. 2d 692 (Mo.
App. 1990) “No system of justice can function at its best or maintain broad
public confidence if a litigant can be compelled to submit his case in a court
where the litigant sincerely believes the judge is incompetent or prejudicial……
{T}hat is the price to be paid for a judicial system that seeks to free a
litigant from a feeling of oppression”. State ex Rel. McNary v. Jones, 472 S.W.
2d. 637, 639-640 (Mo. App. 1971) Indeed, the
right to disqualify a judge is “one of the keystones of our legal
administration edifice“ State ex Rel. Campbell v. Kohn, 606 S.W. 2d 399-401(Mo. App. 1980). It is
vital to public confidence in the legal system that the decisions of the court
are not only fair, but also appear fair. Thus whether the disqualification of a
judge hinges on a statute or rule in favor of the right to disqualify. A
liberal construction is necessary if we wish to promote and maintain public
confidence in the judicial system. Kohn, 606 S.W. 2d at 401; State ex Rel. Ford
Motor Co. v. Hess S.W. 2d 147, 148 (Mo.
App. 1987).
7.)
Said
Judge have truly demonstrated that because of Plaintiff’s skin color, and he is
prosecuting his claims Pro Se against powerfully connected white men in said
State of Illinois, he will never receive Equal Protection of the Laws as long
as there are Judges like R. Morgan Hamilton and others beholding to the
Political machine, presiding over this
matter as demonstrated, by denying every Motion accompanied by affidavit;
Section 1983 of USCS contemplates the
depravation of Civil Rights through the unconstitutional application of a law
by conspiracy or otherwise. Mansell V. Saunders ( CA 5 FLa) 372 F 2d
573,especially if the conspiracy was actually carried into effect and plaintiff
was thereby deprived of any rights privileges, or immunities secured by the
Constitution and laws, the gist of the action may be treated as one for the
depravation of rights under 42 USCS 1983 Lewis V. Brautigam (CA 5 Fla) 227 F 2d
124, 55 Alr 2d 505.
The
Judges, Attorneys, clerks involved have done a wonderful job amplifying their
criminal conspiratory relationship beyond their own imagination this case
reminds me of Stone Phillips initiating a undercover sting capturing pedophiles
on Channel 5, those sexual predators are
soliciting minors over the internet for sex knowing their ages, but when they
are caught and notified that they are apart of a sting, they have no defense
for their criminal solicitation, this is you and every person in position to exercise accountability)
You and all of the attorneys have complete knowledge of the FBI’s involvement,
demonstrated draconian disrespect for the law, used their robes to incite Hate
Crimes, Like a police officer planting
drugs on an innocent black man to justify an arrest, or killing them; Like a
fireman burning a black mans home or business, he does not like in his
neighborhood; these people are your next door neighbors, look at this case good
it demonstrates how educated Caucasians feel about people of color;
so what Africans Americans have
top positions in Chicago, or the State of Illinois, when there is a Negroe in
charge to effect a possible change for the better he is prohibited because his
education is almost entirely in the hands of those who have enslaved them and
now segregate them. The Negroes placed in charge would be the products of the
same system and would show no more conception of the task at hand than do the
whites who have educated them shaped their minds as they would have them to function.
Carter G. Woodson 1933
WHEREFORE the aforementioned reasons recorded
above, PLAINTIFF respectfully
requests:
1.) That
Judge R. Morgan Hamilton proceed no further and be Disqualified from this
matter;
2.) That
all Orders procured by her as a result to said Biasness/Civil Rights Violations
be Vacated Instanter;
3.) That
this matter be presented before a Judge who Honors the United States
Constitution and Rules of the Illinois Supreme Court and Civil Procedures;
4.) That
this matter be reassigned via computer generation to a judge in another venue
with no political associations or connections to the political machine
5.) Invoke
any and all Sanctions and any remedy necessary not mentioned this court deems
just;
FURTHER AFFIANTH SAYETH NOT
By:____________________ ___
Joe Louis Lawrence
As
penalties as provided by law, pursuant to Section 1-109 of the Code of Civil
Procedures, the undersigned certifies that the statement set forth in this
instrument are true and correct, except as to matters herein stated, the
undersigned certifies as aforesaid that he verily believes the same to be true.
Attorney Pro Se
Joe
Louis Lawrence
Atty.
For Pro Se
P.O.Box 490075
Chicago, Illinois
60649
Atty.
Code: 99500
(312)
927-4210
APPEAL TO THE ILLINOIS
APPELLATE COURT
FIRST DISTRICT
FROM THE CIRCUIT
COURT OF
COOK COUNTY
DOMESTIC
RELATIONS DIVISION
________________________________________________________________________
)
Joe Louis
Lawrence
)
) Trial Court No. 08 D 10264
Plaintiff-Appellant
) General No.
09-3389
) Division No. 6
V. )
)
Carolyn Yvette
Lawrence ) Hon. R. Morgan
Hamilton
)
Defendant- Appellee
)
)
Notice of
Motion
for Disqualification of Judge Due to Bias (Civil Rights Violations) and or Prejudice
pursuant to Canon 3(C) (1) and to Vacate Orders where Civil Rights were
Violated
YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED that
Plaintiff-Appellant Moves to the Illinois Appellate Court, First District for
an Order on Motion for Disqualification of Judge Due to Bias (Civil Rights
Violations) and or Prejudice pursuant to Canon 3 (C) (1) and to Vacate Orders
where Civil Rights were Violated.
TO: Rachael Kaplan FBI Robert Grant (Courtesy Copy)
567 West Lake
Street 2111 West
Roosevelt Road
Chicago, Ill.
60661 Chicago, Ill.
60612
Chief Judge Timothy Evans U.S. ATTY Patrick Fitzgerald
Daley
Center
219 South Dearborn Suite 500
Suite
2600
Chicago, Ill. 60604
Ruth B. Watson (Child Rep)
1011 Lake #412
Oak Park, Ill. 60301
Brian E.
Wright, 5310 North Harlem, Chg. Ill. 60656
PLEASE BE ADVISED that on Feb. 17, 2010 said Notice of Motion was
hereby filed with the Motion for Disqualification of Judge Due to Bias (Civil
Rights Violations) and or Prejudice pursuant to Canon 3 (C) (1) and to Vacate
Orders wherer Civil Rights were Violated with the attachments and mailed/hand
delivered to all parties recorded in said notice via regular mail.
Respectfully Submitted
Joe Louis Lawrence
P.O. Box 490075
Chicago, Illinois 60649-0075
(312) 927-4210
APPEAL TO THE ILLINOIS APPELLATE COURT
FIRST DISTRICT
FROM THE CIRCUIT
COURT OF
COOK COUNTY
DOMESTIC
RELATIONS DIVISION
________________________________________________________________________
)
Joe Louis
Lawrence )
) Trial Court
No. 08 D 10264
Plaintiff-Appellant
) General No.
09-3389
) Division No. 6
V. )
)
Carolyn Yvette
Lawrence ) Hon. R. Morgan
Hamilton
)
Defendant- Appellee
)
)
Motion
for Disqualification of Judge Due to Bias (Civil Rights Violations) and or Prejudice
pursuant to Canon 3(C) (1) and to Vacate Orders where Civil Rights were
Violated
Now comes defendant, Joe Louis
Lawrence, Attorney Pro Se, in this cause, files herewith his affidavit,
factually establishing the Bias (Civil Rights Violations) Prejudice alleged
herein, with exhibits, in accordance to Supreme Court of Illinois and Canon
rules in accordance to the American Jurisprudence and pleadings (rev.) to show
that the Honorable Justice Robert Cahill, has a personal bias or prejudice
against the Plaintiff-Appellant and has demonstrated such in violating his
civil rights and favors the attorneys for the Chicago Transit Authority, he has
personal knowledge of undisputed evidentiary facts accompanied by affidavits
concerning the proceeding; he is using his robe in an attempt to cover up the
unprecedented acts of conspiracy fraud perpetrated on the courts;
Based
thereon defendant respectfully moves that the Honorable Justice Robert Cahill
proceed no further herein, and that the Honorable Timothy Evans, Chief Judge of
the Circuit Court of Cook County assign this matter accordingly.
This
is not Appellant’s first motion to recuse, but the first motion in the
Appellate Court in this cause made by the movant,
Respectfully Submitted,
By:
________________________
Attorney Pro Se
Joe Louis Lawrence
STATE OF ILLINOIS )
)
COUNTY
OF COOK )
AFFIDAVIT
In support of Motion to Disqualify
Justice Robert Cahill for Bias (Civil Rights Violations) and or Prejudice
pursuant to Canon 3 (c) (1) and to Vacate any Orders where Civil Rights were
Violated:
1.)
I
am Joe Louis Lawrence, Attorney Pro Se, defendant in this cause, being first
duly sworn on oath deposes and states, as follows;
2.)
I am
informed and believe and based on such information and belief, allege that the
Honorable Justice Robert Cahill, whom this cause has pended before, has a
Personal Bias and or Prejudice and has demonstrated beyond the Preponderance of
the evidence his conspiratory participation in an elaborate conspiracy;
A-
Said
Judge along with Justice Joseph Gordon, Justice Margaret Stanton
McBride had knowledge and received affidavits (Motion For Mandatory
Injunction & Rule To Show Cause For Fraud and To Impose
Sanctions)—detailing “Corruption” “Fraud” “Perjury” and a host of other Civil
Rights Violations;
That the Justices erred considerably
when it received notice and knowledge of other Judges complicit in a Criminal
Conspiracy failed to follow Canon Ethics Leslie W. Abramson, 25 Hofstra
L. Rev. 751 (1997). The Judges Ethical Duty to Report Misconduct by Other
Judges and Lawyers and its effect on Judicial Independence.
B-
That
because of the veracity of all pleadings and facts presented before this
Honorable Appellate Court with affidavits, no attorney objected to or denied
any of the factual claims presented;
C-
That
said Judge was so busy scratching out other Judges names, he forgot to sign the
order thereby voiding any certification;
Pursuant to 735 ILCS 5/2-610 where allegations of complaint are not denied,
there is admission of all facts well-pleaded by adversary, and such admission,
drawn from failure to plead, may be considered as evidence. Hecht v. Hecht,
App. 1 Dist. 1977, 7 Ill. Dec. 169, 49 Ill. App. 3d 334, 364 N.E. 2d 330.
Pursuant to 735 ILCS 5/2-612 Counsel never Objected to the sufficiency of
Petitioners pleadings, Objections to sufficiency of pleadings either in form or
substance must be made In trial court, and if not so made, they will be
considered waived and cannot be raised for the first time on appeal. People
ex rel. Deynes v. Harris, App. 1948, 77 N.E. 2d 439, 333 Ill. App. 280.
Counsel
for Respondent waived any defects against Petitioner in any pleadings by
failing to object, any defects in pleadings, either of form or substance, not
objected to in trial are waived on appeal. Geleto v. Giglietti, 1976, 40
Ill.App 3d 226, 352 N.E. 2d 1; In re Leyden Fire Protection Dist., 1972, 4 Ill.
App. 3d 273, 280 N.E. 2d 744; Lyon v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co., 1942, 315
Ill. App. 451, 43 N.E. 2d 187.
Arkansas
Code of Judicial Conduct Commentary to Canon 2 (1988) provides that “{A} judge
must avoid all impropriety.” And appearance of impropriety.” Accordingly, “{A}
judge should disqualify himself in a proceeding in which his impartiality might
reasonably be questioned …..”Arkansas
Code of Judicial Conduct, Canon 3 (C) (1) 1988.
Where a judge exhibits
bias or the appearance of bias, the court will reverse. Patterson v. R.T., 301
Ark. 400, 784 S.W. 2d 777 (1990); Farley v. Jester, 257 Ark. 686, 520 S.W. 2d
200 (1975) “The proper administration of the law requires not only that judges
refrain from actual bias, but also that they avoid all appearances of
unfairness. “Bolden v. State, 262 Ark.
718, 561 S.W. 2d 281 (1978).
3.)
The
facts and reasons for the belief that such Bias and or Prejudice and Civil
Rights Violations exists, are that, the following laws were noticeably maliciously
violated, Justice Cahill having complete knowledge and was aware of all
“fraudulent” acts perpetrated by the Chicago Transit Authority attorneys, and
Circuit Court Judges ignored the law and (Motion for Extension of Time to
Submit Record and Record Excused for being late);
A- Due to said Judges Biasness and ethnic
make-up, he exercised anarchy and a Disparate application of the laws of
everyone involved who shared his racial make up by ignoring every criminal
Civil Rights Act lodged at Appellant;
B-
Said
Judge violated all Rules of law Canon Ethics, Code of Judicial Conduct Rule
62 Scott, 377
Mass. 364, 386 N.E. 2d 218, 220 (1979) See Lopez-Alexander, Unreported Order
No. 85-279 (Colo. May 3, 1985) (Judge removed for, inter alia, a persistent
pattern of abuse of the contempt power. The Mayor of Denver accepted the
findings of the Denver County Court Judicial Qualification Commission that the
judge’s conduct could not be characterized as mere mistakes or errors of law
and that the conduct constituted willful misconduct in office and conduct
prejudicial to the administration of justice that brings the judicial office
into disrepute). Canon Ethics where there is a pattern of disregard or indifference,
which warrant discipline.
A
judge’s disrespect for the rules of court demonstrates disrespect for the law.
Judges are disciplined under Canon 2A for violating court rules and procedures.
Judged ignored mandated witness order in attempt to accommodate witnesses’
schedules; Citing Canon 2A the court noted, “[a] court’s indifference to
clearly stated rules breeds disrespect for and discontent with our justice
system. Government can not demand respect of the laws by its citizens when its
tribunals ignore those very same laws”)
C- Judge Cahill had knowledge the Chicago Transit Authority
under the direction of Kent Stephen Ray (Gen. Counsel for CTA)) had a former
atty./Judge Bartkowicz to manufacture a bogus warrant against the Appellant for
an Order of Protection;
D- Judge Cahill had knowledge the Chicago Transit
Authority stole his wages while off work with a work-related injury, while
handcuffed on said Bogus warrant, his CTA badge was removed from his body, in
an attempt to cover up his employment at the CTA and monies stolen from him;
E- Judge Cahill had knowledge because of the above, no
judge in the Cook County Circuit Court had legal jurisdiction over the Appellant to enforce or enter any orders/ judgments
against the Appellant ;
Ill.
App. (1st Dist. 2000) “A VOID Judgment or ORDER” is one that is
entered by a court lacking jurisdiction over the parties or the subject matter,
or lacking the inherent power to enter the particular order of judgment or
where the order was procured by FRAUD—in re Adoption of E.L., 248 Ill. Dec.
171, 733 N.E. 2d 846, 315 Ill. App. 3d 137-Judgm 7, 16, 375
4.)
Judge Cahill
demonstrated the same level of Prejudice and Biasness as Chief Judge Frank H.
Easterbrook, hereto attached, Group Ex.
A, (Motion for Disqualification of Judge—Personal Bias or Prejudice et al.,
Page 4, #2- 2C demonstrates said Judges similar profiles of same Biasness;
A- That Page 4, #2 “that Chief Judge
Frank H. Easterbrook without any legal precedence authority ruled on the motion
filed against him et al., hereto attached, Group Ex B (“A Response to Rule To Show Cause—Pro Se Appellant”)
B- That Page 5, #6-6E, demonstrates the veracity and consistency of all
facts presented before this tribunal;
CANON 1
A Judge should uphold the INTEGRITY and
independence of the JUDICIARY.
The
integrity and independence of judges depend in turn upon their acting without
fear or favor. Although judges should be independent, they should comply with
the law, as well as the provisions of this code. Public confidence in the
impartiality of the judiciary is maintained by the adherence of each judge to
this responsibility. Conversely, violation of this code diminishes public
confidence in the judiciary and thereby does injury to the system of government
under law.
5.)
That Justice Cahill unfortunately is
attempting what the Chief Judge of the 7th Circuit could not
accomplish, he was met with opposition by his colleagues, hereto attached, Group
Ex. C;
A- That Page 6, #16, #17, demonstrates the FBI’s involvement not a single
Judge or Justice has been able to allude the trap, they have trapped themselves
in said conspiracy;
See that is why, the Ku Klux Klan Act of
1871 (was enacted) - Section 1 (42 U.S.C.) 1983.
“Of all the Civil Rights legislation
enacted in the aftermath of the Civil War, none has had a greater contemporary
impact than the Ku Klux Klan Act of 1871. The Act grew out of a special
one-paragraph message sent to the 42d Congress on March 23, 1871, by President
Ulysses S. Grant, urgently requesting the enactment of legislation”.
Section 2 (42 U.S.C.)
In the House of Representatives.
“Congressional
Debate of the second section of the Ku Klux Klan Act was more extensive and
enduring than that of Section 1; As originally presented, Sec. 2 made it a
felony for any “two or more persons” to conspire to commit certain enumerated
crimes “in violation of the rights and privileges, or immunities of any person,
to which he is entitled under the Constitution and laws of the United States.
“Throughout the debates, supporters
of the Act made repeated references to the depredations of the Ku Klux Klan;
Victims of these atrocities included not only blacks but white Republicans as
well. The crimes that were perpetrated, therefore, were not viewed as isolated
occurrences, but as part of an “Organized Conspiracy….Political in its origin
and aims”, “crimes perpetrated by concert and agreement, by men in large
numbers acting with a common purpose for the injury of a certain class of
citizens entertaining certain political principles, id, at 457 (remarks of Rep. Coburn). See also e.g., id.
At 437 (remarks of Rep. Cobb) (“None but Democrats belong or can belong to
these societies”) et al.,
“Where
these gangs of Assassins show themselves the rest of the people look on, if not
with sympathy, at least with forbearance. The boasted courage of the South is
not courage in their presence. Sheriffs, having eyes to see, see not; judges,
having ears to hear, hear not; witnesses conceal the truth or falsify it; grand
or petit juries act as if they might be accomplices. In the presence of these
gangs all the apparatus and machinery of civil government, all the processes of
justice, skulk away as if government and justice were crimes and feared
detection. Among the most dangerous things an injured party can do is to appeal
to justice. Of the uncounted scores and hundreds of atrocious mutilations and
murders it is credibly stated that not one has been punished. Cong. Globe,
supra note 2, app. At 78 (remarks of Rep. Perry). (“While murder is
stalking abroad in disguise, while whippings and lynching’s and banishment have
been visited upon unoffending American citizens, the local administrations have
been found inadequate or unwilling to apply the proper corrective”) et al., ….
And the State made no successful effort to bring the guilty to punishment or
afford protection or redress to the outraged and innocent.”)
6.)
The
Appellant has complied with all directives demonstrating how the paternity
matter had relationship to a $350 million dollar Federal class-action lawsuit
against IBC alleging Ku Klux Klan, Nazi affiliations, and how the CTA and their
attorneys had relationship to the paternity matter;
The FBI has made it
clear the allegations between the CTA and paternity case needed corroboration
something the defendant did not have at the time, “if another company comes
along and commit the same acts as the CTA we will get everyone involved”
The Miseducation of the Negroe Political
Education Neglected
Carter G. Woodson, 1933
The
opponents of freedom and social justice decided to work out a program which
would enslave the negroes’ mind in as much as the freedom of body had to be conceded.
It was well understood that if by teaching of history the white man could be
further assured of his superiority and the negroe could be made to feel that he
had always been a failure and that the subjection of his will to some other
race is necessary for the freedman, then, would still be a slave. If you can
control a man’s thinking you do not have to worry about his action. When you
determine what a man shall think you do not have to concern yourself about what
he will do. If you make a man feel that he is inferior, you do not have to
compel him to accept an inferior status, for he will seek it himself. If you
make a man think that he is justly an outcast, you do not have to order him to
the back door. He will go without being told; and if there is no back door, his
very nature will demand one.
7.)
Judge
Cahill along with other Judges of various ethnicities demonstrated the same
level of Racial Oppression/Apartheid as the Nazi’s did to the Jews in Germany,
Sadaam Huessin exercised in Iraq, they used their robes to support and condone
Racism against the Appellant and has demonstrated no remorse to their
actions—and is making it clear to the Federal Government “You must come and
get all of (us) Judges they are a one
for all and all for one Fraternity” they
are a law unto themselves true anarchy rein in the courts when it comes to a
Black or Hispanic man receiving Justice in Illinois Courts;
Under Section 4 of the Ku Klux Klan Act of 1871:
The President had additional
power in case of rebellion within a state to suspend the writ of habeas corpus
and to declare and enforce marital law. Cong.
Globe, supra note 1, at 317. With respect to a definition of rebellion,
Section 4 provided;
“Whenever in any State or part
of a State……unlawful combinations……..shall be organized and armed, and so
numerous and powerful as to be able, by violence, to either overthrow or set at
defiance the constituted authorities of such State, or when the constituted
authorities are in complicity with or shall connive at the unlawful purposes of
such powerful and armed combinations; and whenever, by reason of either or all
of the causes aforesaid, the conviction of such offenders and the preservation
of the public safety shall become…. Impracticable, in every such case such
combinations shall be deemed a rebellion against the Government of the United
States….”
794 S.W. 2d 692 (Mo.
App. 1990) “No system of justice can function at its best or maintain broad
public confidence if a litigant can be compelled to submit his case in a court
where the litigant sincerely believes the judge is incompetent or prejudicial……
{T}hat is the price to be paid for a judicial system that seeks to free a
litigant from a feeling of oppression”. State ex Rel. McNary v. Jones, 472 S.W.
2d. 637, 639-640 (Mo. App. 1971) Indeed, the
right to disqualify a judge is “one of the keystones of our legal
administration edifice“ State ex Rel. Campbell v. Kohn, 606 S.W. 2d 399-401(Mo. App. 1980). It is
vital to public confidence in the legal system that the decisions of the court
are not only fair, but also appear fair. Thus whether the disqualification of a
judge hinges on a statute or rule in favor of the right to disqualify. A
liberal construction is necessary if we wish to promote and maintain public
confidence in the judicial system. Kohn, 606 S.W. 2d at 401; State ex Rel. Ford
Motor Co. v. Hess S.W. 2d 147, 148 (Mo.
App. 1987).
8.)
Judge
Cahill and his colleagues has truly
demonstrated that because of Appellant’s skin color he will never receive Equal
Protection of the Laws as long as they are Justices presiding over this matter
as demonstrated by denying every Motion accompanied by affidavit;
Section 1983 of USCS contemplates the
depravation of Civil Rights through the unconstitutional application of a law
by conspiracy or otherwise. Mansell V. Saunders ( CA 5 FLa) 372 F 2d
573,especially if the conspiracy was actually carried into effect and plaintiff
was thereby deprived of any rights privileges, or immunities secured by the
Constitution and laws, the gist of the action may be treated as one for the
depravation of rights under 42 USCS 1983 Lewis V. Brautigam (CA 5 Fla) 227 F 2d
124, 55 Alr 2d 505.
The Judges, Attorneys, clerks involved
have done a wonderful job amplifying their criminal conspiratory relationship
beyond their own imagination this case reminds me of Stone Phillips
initiating a undercover sting capturing pedophiles on Channel 5, those sexual predators are soliciting minors
over the internet for sex knowing their ages, but when they are caught and
notified that they are apart of a sting, they have no defense for their criminal
solicitation, this is you and every
person in position to exercise accountability) You and all of the attorneys
have complete knowledge of the FBI’s involvement, demonstrated draconian
disrespect for the law, used their robes to incite Hate Crimes, Like a police officer planting drugs on an innocent
black man to justify an arrest, or killing them; Like a fireman burning a black
mans home or business, he does not like in his neighborhood; these people are
your next door neighbors, look at this case good it demonstrates how educated Caucasians
feel about people of color;
so what Africans Americans have
top positions in Chicago, or the State of Illinois, when there is a Negroe in
charge to effect a possible change for the better he is prohibited because his
education is almost entirely in the hands of those who have enslaved them and
now segregate them. The Negroes placed in charge would be the products of the
same system and would show no more conception of the task at hand than do the
whites who have educated them shaped their minds as they would have them to
function. Carter G. Woodson 1933
FURTHER AFFIANTH SAYETH NOT
By:____________________ ___
Joe Louis Lawrence
As
penalties as provided by law, pursuant to Section 1-109 of the Code of Civil
Procedures, the undersigned certifies that the statement set forth in this
instrument are true and correct, except as to matters herein stated, the
undersigned certifies as aforesaid that he verily believes the same to be true.
Joe Louis Lawrence
Attorney Pro Se
Joe
Louis Lawrence
Atty.
For Pro Se
P.O.Box 490075
Chicago, Illinois
60649
Atty.
Code: 99500
(312)
927-4210
APPEAL TO THE ILLINOIS APPELLATE COURT
FIRST DISTRICT
FROM THE CIRCUIT
COURT OF
COOK COUNTY
DOMESTIC
RELATIONS DIVISION
________________________________________________________________________
)
)
Joe Louis
Lawrence
)
) Trial Court
No. 08 D 10264
Plaintiff-Appellant ) General No. 09-3389
) Division No.
6
V. )
)
Carolyn Yvette
Lawrence ) Hon. R. Morgan
Hamilton
)
Defendant- Appellee )
)
DRAFT ORDER
This matter having
come on to be heard on Motion for Disqualification of Judge Due To Bias (Civil
Rights Violations) and or Prejudice pursuant to Canon 3 (C) (1) and to Vacate
Orders where Civil Rights were Violated due notice having been given, the court
having jurisdiction over the parties and the subject matter, and being fully
advised in the premises;
It is HEREBY ORDERED that Justice Robert
Cahill is Recused Pursuant To Canon 3
(C) (1) and Orders DENIED with Affidavits are VACATED INSTANTER;
ENTERED:
_________________________________
Justice Denise O’Malley
_________________________________
Justice Robert Cahill
_________________________________
Justice Joseph Gordon
Joe Louis Lawrence
Attorney Pro Se ________________________________
P.O. Box 490075 Justice
Margaret Stanton McBride
Chicago,
Illinois 60649-0075
(312) 927-4210
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY ILLINOIS
CHANCERY DIVISION
Joe Louis Lawrence
Case # 10 CH 23588
Petitioner
VS
Calendar
Room 2302
Jesse White, Secretary of State
Et al. Hon.
William O Maki
Respondents
Notice of
Motion
for Disqualification of Judge Due to Bias( Corroboration of Civil Rights Violations)
and or Prejudice pursuant to Canon 3(C) (1) and to Vacate Orders where Criminal
Conspiracy Civil Rights were Violated
YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED that Plaintiff
Moves to the Chief Judge/ Presiding Court for an Order on Motion for
Disqualification of Judge Due to Bias (Corroboration of Civil Rights
Violations) and or Prejudice pursuant to Canon 3 (C) (1) and to Vacate Orders
where Criminal Conspiracy Civil Rights were violated.
TO: Tyler Roland FBI Robert Grant (Courtesy Copy)
100 W. Randolph St. 13th Floor 2111 West Roosevelt Road
Chicago, Ill.
60661 Chicago, Ill. 60612
Chief Judge Timothy Evans U.S. ATTY Patrick
Fitzgerald
Daley Center 219 South Dearborn Suites 500
Suite
2600
Chicago, Ill. 60604
Clerk of Circuit
Court Dorothy Brown Presiding Judge Moshe Jacobius
Daley Center Daley
Center
Suite 1001 Suite 1901
Hearing Officer, Angelina L. Young, 17 North State, Suite
1200, Chgo. Ill. 60601
Secretary of State Atty. Edmund Michalowski, 17 North State,
Suite 1200 Chg. Ill. 60601
PLEASE BE ADVISED that on Oct. 8, 2010
said Notice of Motion was hereby filed with the Motion for Disqualification of
Judge Due to Bias (Civil Rights Violations) and or Prejudice pursuant to Canon
3 (C) (1) and to Vacate Orders where Criminal Conspiracy Civil Rights were
Violated with the attachments and mailed/hand delivered to all parties recorded
in said notice via regular mail.
Plaintiff will present said Motion before Judge William O Maki Oct.
18, 2010 @9:30
Respectfully
Submitted
Joe Louis Lawrence
P.O. Box
490075
Chicago,
Illinois 60649-0075
(312) 927-4210
________________________________________________________________
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY ILLINOIS
CHANCERY DIVISION
Joe Louis Lawrence
Case # 10 CH 23588
Petitioner
VS
Calendar
Room 2302
Jesse White, Secretary of State
Et al Hon. William O Maki
Respondents
Motion
for Disqualification of Judge Due to Bias (Civil Rights Violations) and or Prejudice
pursuant to Canon 3(C) (1) and to Vacate Orders where Civil Rights were
Violated
Now comes Plaintiff, Joe Louis Lawrence, Attorney Pro
Se, in this cause, files herewith his affidavit, factually establishing the Bias
(Civil Rights Violations) Prejudice alleged herein, with exhibits, in
accordance to Supreme Court of Illinois and Canon rules in accordance to the
American Jurisprudence and pleadings (rev.) to show that the Honorable William O Maki have a personal bias or prejudice against the Plaintiff
and have corroborated beyond the preponderance of the evidence standards by
engaging in a criminal conspiracy assisting the attorneys and a host of
Terrorist Conspirators connected to the Political Machine, Racist Fraternal
network and in the closet et al., he had personal knowledge of undisputed evidentiary
facts accompanied by affidavits concerning the Plaintiff; where many Judges
used their robes in an attempt to cover up the unprecedented acts of conspiracy
fraud perpetrated in the courts where no Judge ever had jurisdiction;
Based
thereon Plaintiff respectfully moves
that the Honorable William O Maki proceed no further herein, and that the
Honorable Timothy Evans, Chief Judge of the Circuit Court of Cook County assign
this matter accordingly.
This
is not the Plaintiff’s first motion to recuse in this cause made by the movant,
Respectfully Submitted,
By:
________________________
Attorney Pro Se
STATE OF ILLINOIS )
)
COUNTY OF COOK )
AFFIDAVIT
In support of Motion to Disqualify Judge
William O Maki for Bias (Corroboration Civil
Rights Violations) and or Prejudice pursuant to Canon 3 (c) (1) and to Vacate any
Orders where Criminal Conspiracy Civil Rights were Violated:
1.)
I
am Joe Louis Lawrence, Attorney Pro Se, Plaintiff in this cause, being first
duly sworn on oath deposes and states, as follows;
2.)
I am
informed and believe and based on such information and belief, demonstrate
beyond the Preponderance of evidence standard that the Honorable William O Maki is a RACIST, whom this cause has
pended before, has demonstrated Personal Bias, Prejudice and being in Cahoots
with said Terrorists conspirators connected the Political Machine Racist
Fraternal closet order engaging in an elaborate criminal conspiracy;
A-
Said
Judge had knowledge and received affidavits, particularly (Judicial Review
et al w/ Affidavit filed June 3, 2010)—detailing “Corruption” “Fraud”
“Perjury” and a host of other Civil Rights Violations;
B-
Said
Judge had knowledge and received
affidavits, particularly (Motion for Default Judgment Remand/Body Attachment
with Affidavit Petition for Rule To Show Cause For Fraud on the Court filed
Aug. 26, 2010);
C-
Said Judge had knowledge and received
affidavits particularly (Motion To Supplement Petition For Rule To Show
Cause Due To Corroboration Of Perjury/Criminal Mail Fraud et al Impose
Sanctions filed Sept. 23, 2010);
D-
Said Judge had knowledge and was aware Clerk
of the Circuit Court Dorothy Brown never filed an appearance after being served
and was under the jurisdiction of the courts legally admitted to all facts
presented in Plaintiffs affidavits;
That the Judge erred
considerably when he received notice and knowledge of other Judges complicit in
a Criminal Conspiracy failed to follow Canon Ethics Leslie W. Abramson,
25 Hofstra L. Rev. 751 (1997). The Judges Ethical Duty to Report Misconduct by
Other Judges and Lawyers and its effect on Judicial Independence.
E-
That
because of the veracity of all pleadings and facts presented before this
Honorable Court with affidavits, AAG
Tyler Roland never objected to or denied any of the factual claims presented;
F-
Fact AAG Tyler Roland is best described in
this manner as a fall guy, a pansy, used in an attempt to protect the racist
cronies responsible for perpetrating said heinous diabolical criminal treason
like offenses;
G-
Fact Not every person who is black or
looks black, or acts black, who personifies themselves as a African American
will acknowledge said acts perpetrated at the Plaintiff as Racist acts, so as
to seek acceptance and approval from their fraternal order;
H-
Fact Not every Judge in the Circuit Court
of Cook County, State of Illinois is a Racist or in the Closet and is
Heterosexual enough to dispensate the laws in accordance to the United States
Constitution;
I-
Fact This case identifies the type of
personnel recruited to enforce Racial Apartheid Policies in order to secure and
remain accepted in the legal tribunals;
J-
One
can easily infer from the above, Judge Maki and the fraternal order of racist
terrorist were of the impression installing a black man ( AAG Tyler Roland) as
the lead attorney representing the Chief Judge would yield a different outcome
in the courts, again Tyler Roland is
likened to O Leary s cow injustice is likened to fire, where bellows of smoke
(truth) hovering the State just like the Chicago Fire; See page 4 of #7A How Tyler became the
Omega in this matter;
K-
Fact There has not been one single Judge
able to out maneuver, the laws presented by the Counsel Pro Se by preventing
the truth (legal issues) before the courts;
L-
Fact Judges like O Maki are of the same
fabric as Commander burge who was successfully indicted and convicted in Federal for Torturing
innocent young black men where they were incarcerated/confessions coerced for
crimes they did not commit;
M- Fact That history records how innocent
black men were HUNG by terrorist known as the Ku Klux Klan as cowards,
they hid their faces behind white sheets, so the public could not determine
their identities, in Illinois Judges are Brazen! They identify themselves
boldly in how they desecrate the laws protecting and upholding criminal acts of
every member associated in their fraternal order;
N-
Fact Judge O Maki was cognizant no Judge
in the State of Illinois ever had legal jurisdiction on the Plaintiff in
accordance to 735 ILCS 5/2-201, 202, 203, 203.1, 206, 207, 208, 209;
O-
Fact That every person Judges, States
Attys., Attorney Generals and a plethora of other City and State Officials have
demonstrated successfully how case are fixed here in the State of Illinois……a
black or Hispanic man receiving justice before an Irish or Polish Judge is
likened to the Jews being spared entry into furnaces as Hitler sought out
exterminating them in concentration camps etc;
P-
Fact That Judge O Maki has demonstrated
dispensating laws in accordance to Jim Crowism as noted on page 3 of Motion for Default judgment et al #4;
Pursuant to 735 ILCS 5/2-610 where allegations of complaint are not denied,
there is admission of all facts well-pleaded by adversary, and such admission,
drawn from failure to plead, may be considered as evidence. Hecht v. Hecht,
App. 1 Dist. 1977, 7 Ill. Dec. 169, 49 Ill. App. 3d 334, 364 N.E. 2d 330.
Pursuant to 735 ILCS 5/2-612 Counsel never objected to the sufficiency of
Petitioners pleadings, Objections to sufficiency of pleadings either in form or
substance must be made In trial court, and if not so made, they will be
considered waived and cannot be raised for the first time on appeal. People
ex rel. Deynes v. Harris, App. 1948, 77 N.E. 2d 439, 333 Ill. App. 280.
Counsel
for Respondent waived any defects against Petitioner in any pleadings by
failing to object, any defects in pleadings, either of form or substance, not
objected to in trial are waived on appeal. Geleto v. Giglietti, 1976, 40
Ill.App 3d 226, 352 N.E. 2d 1; In re Leyden Fire Protection Dist., 1972, 4 Ill.
App. 3d 273, 280 N.E. 2d 744; Lyon v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co., 1942, 315
Ill. App. 451, 43 N.E. 2d 187.
3.)
For the Record: So that it is clear to Judge O Maki
and every Judge reading this legally sufficient document, what has happened in
this matter was by strategical design---- Plaintiff could have easily filed the
proper legal documents recusing O Maki in August for Bias for his corrupt overt
participation in a DCFS case on Appeal, but was advised against it-----a long
shot, Plaintiff was to try and obtain his signature on a court order;
Reason: Court orders with clerks initials
have no validity, for example, hereto attached, Ex A, Court Order prepared by Tyler Roland did not reflect,
Plaintiff presented any legal documents nor was their a Judges signature
certifying a valid court order;
A-
Hereto
attached, Ex B, Court Order
certified with the Judges signature, Plaintiff notified his clerk per Cook
County Sheriff directive, that Tyler Roland failed to note in the Court Order
Judge O Maki Denying both legally sufficient documents presented that day,
Motion for Default et al and Motion to Supplement Petition for Rule et al;
B-
That
Tyler Roland failed to present a copy of the order to Plaintiff for perusal
before presenting it to the Judge, he was very nervous;
C-
That
Judge O Maki Fixed or did his best trying to Fix a DCFS case 09-2287,
upholding criminal acts surpassing human imagination lawyers impersonating
Judges signing subpoenas, Plaintiffs daughters medical records were removed
from a hospital etc;
D-
That Judge O Maki court order was needed for the
appeal, it never made it to the clerks office, so the record had to be prepared
with the clerks initials;
Arkansas
Code of Judicial Conduct Commentary to Canon 2 (1988) provides that “{A} judge
must avoid all impropriety.” And appearance of impropriety.” Accordingly, “{A}
judge should disqualify himself in a proceeding in which his impartiality might
reasonably be questioned …..”Arkansas
Code of Judicial Conduct, Canon 3 (C) (1) 1988.
Where a judge exhibits
bias or the appearance of bias, the court will reverse. Patterson v. R.T., 301
Ark. 400, 784 S.W. 2d 777 (1990); Farley v. Jester, 257 Ark. 686, 520 S.W. 2d
200 (1975) “The proper administration of the law requires not only that judges
refrain from actual bias, but also that they avoid all appearances of
unfairness. “Bolden v. State, 262 Ark.
718, 561 S.W. 2d 281 (1978).
4.)
The
facts and reasons for the belief that such Racist Bias and or Prejudice with
incredible corroboration and Civil Rights Violations exists, are that, the
following laws were noticeably maliciously violated, said Judge having complete
knowledge and was aware of all “fraudulent”
acts perpetrated by many engaged in the same conspiracy when he was Judge, ignored all laws, namely
5.)
CANON 3D (1) Under Section 3D (1) a Judge who receives information that indicates a
substantial likelihood that another Judge has violated the code of Judicial
should take appropriate action, et al ;
A- Due to said Judges Biasness he has
exercised anarchy and a Disparate application of the laws of everyone involved
who shared a political make up by ignoring every criminal Civil Rights Act
lodged at the Plaintiff;
B-
Said
Judges violated all Rules of law Canon Ethics, Code of Judicial Conduct Rule
62 Scott, 377
Mass. 364, 386 N.E. 2d 218, 220 (1979) See Lopez-Alexander, Unreported Order
No. 85-279 (Colo. May 3, 1985) (Judge removed for, inter alia, a persistent
pattern of abuse of the contempt power. The Mayor of Denver accepted the
findings of the Denver County Court Judicial Qualification Commission that the
judge’s conduct could not be characterized as mere mistakes or errors of law
and that the conduct constituted willful misconduct in office and conduct
prejudicial to the administration of justice that brings the judicial office
into disrepute). Canon Ethics where there is a pattern of disregard or
indifference, which warrant discipline.
A
judge’s disrespect for the rules of court demonstrates disrespect for the law.
Judges are disciplined under Canon 2A for violating court rules and procedures.
Judge ignored mandated witness order in attempt to accommodate witnesses’
schedules; Citing Canon 2A the court noted, “[a] court’s indifference to
clearly stated rules breeds disrespect for and discontent with our justice
system. Government can not demand respect of the laws by its citizens when its
tribunals ignore those very same laws”)
C- Said Judge Maki had knowledge the Attorney
Generals involvement against the Plaintiff, in that, they have properly agreed
to all facts recorded in said affidavits;
D-
Every
Court Order entered by this court has been FRAUDULENTLY
ENTERED;
E- Defendant’s counsel (Tyler Roland)
committed a plethora of fraudulent criminal acts before the court filing
documents and the Judge ignored every legal procedure involved in an attempt to
protect the conspirators involved;
Ill. App. (1st
Dist. 2000) “A VOID Judgment or ORDER” is one that is entered by a court
lacking jurisdiction over the parties or the subject matter, or lacking the
inherent power to enter the particular order of judgment or where the order was
procured by FRAUD—in re Adoption of E.L., 248 Ill. Dec. 171, 733 N.E. 2d 846,
315 Ill. App. 3d 137-Judgm 7, 16, 375
6.)
Said Judge
have demonstrated the same level of Corroboration Prejudice and Biasness as his
racist colleagues in the courts, when
racism is an issue, they simply recruit the necessary ethnic individuals that
would go along with wrong so as to camouflage and protect the actual leaders
perpetrating said racial acts, as demonstrated by selecting Tyler Roland
prosecuting this matter;
A- Said
Racist Judges responsible for organizing racial segregation in the courts have
remarkable control over certain blacks with positions, they are like puppets,
they have demonstrated and complied with whatever directive necessary to
destroy the black man and his children in this legal system as demonstrated
towards the Plaintiff;
B-
CANON 1
A Judge should uphold the INTEGRITY and
independence of the JUDICIARY.
The
integrity and independence of judges depend in turn upon their acting without
fear or favor. Although judges should be independent, they should comply with
the law, as well as the provisions of this code. Public confidence in the
impartiality of the judiciary is maintained by the adherence of each judge to
this responsibility. Conversely, violation of this code diminishes public
confidence in the judiciary and thereby does injury to the system of government
under law.
7.)
That the color or ethnic origin of said Judges in
this manner is of no merit because they all share a philosophical doctrine so
as to keep their jobs “Go along with wrong, see wrong, close eyes to wrong in
order to get along with the wrongdoers”
See that is why, the Ku Klux Klan Act of
1871 (was enacted) - Section 1 (42 U.S.C.) 1983.
“Of all the Civil Rights legislation
enacted in the aftermath of the Civil War, none has had a greater contemporary
impact than the Ku Klux Klan Act of 1871. The Act grew out of a special
one-paragraph message sent to the 42d Congress on March 23, 1871, by President
Ulysses S. Grant, urgently requesting the enactment of legislation”.
Section 2 (42 U.S.C.)
In the House of Representatives.
“Congressional
Debate of the second section of the Ku Klux Klan Act was more extensive and
enduring than that of Section 1; As originally presented, Sec. 2 made it a
felony for any “two or more persons” to conspire to commit certain enumerated
crimes “in violation of the rights and privileges, or immunities of any person,
to which he is entitled under the Constitution and laws of the United States.
“Throughout the debates, supporters
of the Act made repeated references to the depredations of the Ku Klux Klan;
Victims of these atrocities included not only blacks but white Republicans as
well. The crimes that were perpetrated, therefore, were not viewed as isolated
occurrences, but as part of an “Organized Conspiracy….Political in its origin
and aims”, “crimes perpetrated by concert and agreement, by men in large
numbers acting with a common purpose for the injury of a certain class of
citizens entertaining certain political principles, id, at 457 (remarks of Rep. Coburn). See also e.g., id.
At 437 (remarks of Rep. Cobb) (“None but Democrats belong or can belong to
these societies”) et al.,
“Where
these gangs of Assassins show themselves the rest of the people look on, if not
with sympathy, at least with forbearance. The boasted courage of the South is
not courage in their presence. Sheriffs, having eyes to see, see not; judges,
having ears to hear, hear not; witnesses conceal the truth or falsify it; grand
or petit juries act as if they might be accomplices. In the presence of these
gangs all the apparatus and machinery of civil government, all the processes of
justice, skulk away as if government and justice were crimes and feared
detection. Among the most dangerous things an injured party can do is to appeal
to justice. Of the uncounted scores and hundreds of atrocious mutilations and
murders it is credibly stated that not one has been punished. Cong. Globe,
supra note 2, app. At 78 (remarks of Rep. Perry). (“While murder is
stalking abroad in disguise, while whippings and lynching’s and banishment have
been visited upon unoffending American citizens, the local administrations have
been found inadequate or unwilling to apply the proper corrective”) et al., ….
And the State made no successful effort to bring the guilty to punishment or
afford protection or redress to the outraged and innocent.”)
The Miseducation of the Negroe Political
Education Neglected
Carter G. Woodson, 1933
The
opponents of freedom and social justice decided to work out a program which
would enslave the Negroes’ mind in as much as the freedom of body had to be
conceded. It was well understood that if by teaching of history the white man
could be further assured of his superiority and the negroe could be made to
feel that he had always been a failure and that the subjection of his will to
some other race is necessary for the freedman, then, would still be a slave. If
you can control a man’s thinking you do not have to worry about his action.
When you determine what a man shall think you do not have to concern yourself
about what he will do. If you make a man feel that he is inferior, you do not
have to compel him to accept an inferior status, for he will seek it himself.
If you make a man think that he is justly an outcast, you do not have to order
him to the back door. He will go without being told; and if there is no back
door, his very nature will demand one.
8.)
Said
Judge is not dispensating the laws in accordance to the laws of the United
States Constitution but in accordance to other Political/fraternal laws outside
of the Constitution and Illinois Supreme Court rules;
Under Section 4 of the Ku Klux Klan Act of 1871:
The President had additional
power in case of rebellion within a state to suspend the writ of habeas corpus
and to declare and enforce marital law. Cong.
Globe, supra note 1, at 317. With respect to a definition of rebellion,
Section 4 provided;
“Whenever in any State or part
of a State……unlawful combinations……..shall be organized and armed, and so
numerous and powerful as to be able, by violence, to either overthrow or set at
defiance the constituted authorities of such State, or when the constituted
authorities are in complicity with or shall connive at the unlawful purposes of
such powerful and armed combinations; and whenever, by reason of either or all
of the causes aforesaid, the conviction of such offenders and the preservation
of the public safety shall become…. Impracticable, in every such case such
combinations shall be deemed a rebellion against the Government of the United
States….”
794 S.W. 2d 692 (Mo.
App. 1990) “No system of justice can function at its best or maintain broad
public confidence if a litigant can be compelled to submit his case in a court
where the litigant sincerely believes the judge is incompetent or prejudicial……
{T}hat is the price to be paid for a judicial system that seeks to free a
litigant from a feeling of oppression”. State ex Rel. McNary v. Jones, 472 S.W.
2d. 637, 639-640 (Mo. App. 1971) Indeed, the
right to disqualify a judge is “one of the keystones of our legal
administration edifice“ State ex Rel. Campbell v. Kohn, 606 S.W. 2d 399-401(Mo. App. 1980). It is
vital to public confidence in the legal system that the decisions of the court
are not only fair, but also appear fair. Thus whether the disqualification of a
judge hinges on a statute or rule in favor of the right to disqualify. A
liberal construction is necessary if we wish to promote and maintain public
confidence in the judicial system. Kohn, 606 S.W. 2d at 401; State ex Rel. Ford
Motor Co. v. Hess S.W. 2d 147, 148 (Mo.
App. 1987).
9.)
Said
Judge have truly demonstrated that because of Plaintiff’s skin color, and he is
prosecuting his claims Pro Se against powerfully connected white men in said
State of Illinois, he will never receive Equal Protection of the Laws as long
as there are Judges like himself in control and others beholding to the
Political machine, presiding over this
matter as demonstrated, by denying every Motion accompanied by affidavit;
A- Said Judge is unaware Jim Crowism is
outlawed here in the United States because it is habitually exercised in Illinois
and dispensated throughout the courts;
B- A black man is not suppose to stand up
to Racial inequality, Racial Apartheid, Racial Injustice perpetrated by corrupt
Racist Judges and the consequences involved when a black man challenges the
Political machine of Fraternal Racist closet individuals;
Section 1983 of USCS contemplates the
depravation of Civil Rights through the unconstitutional application of a law
by conspiracy or otherwise. Mansell V. Saunders ( CA 5 FLa) 372 F 2d
573,especially if the conspiracy was actually carried into effect and plaintiff
was thereby deprived of any rights privileges, or immunities secured by the
Constitution and laws, the gist of the action may be treated as one for the
depravation of rights under 42 USCS 1983 Lewis V. Brautigam (CA 5 Fla) 227 F 2d
124, 55 Alr 2d 505.
The Judges, Attorneys, clerks involved
have done a wonderful job amplifying their criminal conspiratory relationship
beyond their own imagination this case reminds me of Stone Phillips
initiating a undercover sting capturing pedophiles on Channel 5, those sexual predators are soliciting minors
over the internet for sex knowing their ages, but when they are caught and
notified that they are apart of a sting, they have no defense for their criminal
solicitation, this is you and every
person in position to exercise accountability) You and all of the attorneys
have complete knowledge of the FBI’s involvement, demonstrated draconian
disrespect for the law, used their robes to incite Hate Crimes, Like a police officer planting drugs on an innocent
black man to justify an arrest, or killing them; Like a fireman burning a black
mans home or business, he does not like in his neighborhood; these people are
your next door neighbors, look at this case good it demonstrates how educated Caucasians
feel about people of color;
so what Africans Americans have
top positions in Chicago, or the State of Illinois, when there is a Negroe in
charge to effect a possible change for the better he is prohibited because his
education is almost entirely in the hands of those who have enslaved them and
now segregate them. The Negroes placed in charge would be the products of the
same system and would show no more conception of the task at hand than do the
whites who have educated them shaped their minds as they would have them to
function. Carter G. Woodson 1933
WHEREFORE the aforementioned reasons recorded
above, PLAINTIFF respectfully
requests:
1.) That
Judge William O Maki proceed no further and be Disqualified from this matter;
2.) That
all Orders procured by him as a result to said corroboration Biasness/Civil Rights Violations be Vacated
Instanter;
3.) That
this matter be presented before a Judge who Honors the United States
Constitution and Rules of the Illinois Supreme Court and Civil Procedures;
4.) That
this matter be reassigned via computer generation to a judge in another venue
with no political associations or connections to the political machine;
5.) Invoke
any and all Sanctions and any remedy necessary not mentioned this court deems
just;
FURTHER AFFIANTH SAYETH NOT
By:____________________ ___
Joe Louis Lawrence
As
penalties as provided by law, pursuant to Section 1-109 of the Code of Civil
Procedures, the undersigned certifies that the statement set forth in this
instrument are true and correct, except as to matters herein stated, the
undersigned certifies as aforesaid that he verily believes the same to be true.
Attorney Pro Se
Joe
Louis Lawrence
Atty.
for Pro Se
P.O.Box 490075
Chicago, Illinois
60649
Atty.
Code: 99500
(312)
927-4210
No comments:
Post a Comment