A look at how racist Caucasians circumvent the United States Constitution, United States Supreme Court and infiltrate the Judicial Circuits or Federal building and enforce hate, racism, tyranny, terrorism and "Lynching" with unjust applications of the laws against Blacks, Colored and Senior Citizens.
In this case Democrats own and seems to control every racist person in the judiciary and in spite of the acronym DEI or any other sexual groups nobody speaks up for Heterosexual Freemen or women Black or of Color, Senior Citizens are treated worse than criminals or immigrants.
For example, the Civil Rights Act of 1866 1.) Civil Rights Act of 1866- first section, enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled. That all persons born in the United States and not subject to any foreign power, excluding Indians not taxed, are hereby declared to be citizens of the United States; and such citizens of every race and color, without regard to any previous condition of slavery or involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall have the same right, in every State and Territory in the United States, to make and enforce contracts, to sue, be parties, and give evidence, to inherit, purchase, lease, sell, hold and convey real and personal property, and to full and equal benefit of the laws and proceedings for the security of person and property, as is enjoyed by white citizens, and shall be subject to like punishment, pains, and penalties, and to none other, any law, statute, ordinances, regulation, or custom, to the contrary notwithstanding, Act of April 9, 1866, Ch. 31, 1, 14 Stat. 27, 42 U.S.C.A. 1981.
The Ku Klux Klan are not wearing white hoods burning crosses "Lynching" with ropes they are allegedly in our courts, State Agencies, Federal Agencies, Police Stations, firehouses, government etc. making sure Blacks, Colored and Senior Citizens are discriminated against along with any other ethnic groups they deem inferior to their race. The following are examples of crimes committed that went ignored and attempts being made to cover-up terrorist acts.
HERE IS A CASE THAT HAS BEEN OVER SINCE JUNE 10, 2010, AND AFFIRMED BY THE APPELLATE COURT DEC 30, 2011, AND COURT ORDER CERTIFIED OCT 29, 2024, BY THE CLERK OF COOK COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT,
A- Black, certain Colored, Gay or Lesbian Democratic Judges or members of any racist fraternal order have worked together to diabolically violate the Civil Rights of any and all Heterosexuals of Color and Senior Citizens by becoming "Private Citizens" using their "Official Positions as Judges, Clerks, Judges, etc. upholding crimes for Domestic Terrorists, Banks, rogue attorneys, States Attorneys, Assistant Attorney Generals and a number of judges, Cook County, State and Federal.
B- In spite of laws affording Equal Protection to Blacks, senior Citizens etc. Blacks are only allowed or appointed into the Democratic Party provided they embrace the genocide and corruption and tyranny of racism and keeping their mouths shut as banks steal the homes of innocent hard working senior citizens or injustices perpetrated on innocent Black or Colored men who may have been wrongfully Remanded to Prison or wrongfully accused in any child support scams.
C- So racist white judges continue their assault of racial hate by making egregious false rulings against any innocent person seeking justice in the Federal venue.
THERE ARE CERTAIN FEDERAL JUDGES WHO HATE BLACK AMERICANS AND PEOPLE OF COLOR; ESPECIALLY, SENIOR CITIZENS TO THE POINT WHERE THEY HAVE CLOSED THEIR EYES TO EVERY CRIMINAL CIVIL RIGHTS ACT ASSOCIATED IN THIS MATTER.
1.) A CLERK DESTROYED THE ENTIRE NOTICE OF APPEAL RECORD THAT WAS FILED DEC 26, 2024.
2.) FED JUDGE APRIL PERRY FALSIFIED DISMISSING THE CASE DEC 13, 2024, ONLY AFTER A SUMMARY JUDGMENT WAS FILED DEC 16, 2024, WITH A COURT DATE OF DEC 19, 2024, AT 10:00AM PER HER CLERKS INSTRUCTIONS, BUT THE MOST VICIOUS PART OF THIS IS THAT SHE NEVER RECEIVED THE CASE VIA HER CLERK DEC 13, 2024, AT 4:30 VIA HER DEPUTY CLERK.
3.) US BANK HAS ADMITTED TO EVERY CRIMINAL CIVIL RIGHTS VIOLATIONS HAVING JUDGES IN THEIR BACK POCKET WHO HAD THE COOK COUNTY SHERIFF'S TO UNLAWFULLY EVICT SENIOR CITIZEN FIRST RESPONDERS FROM THEIR HOME TRYING TO STEAL WHAT NEVER BELONG TO THEM.
UPON THE READING OF THIS DOCUMENT, WE ARE IN A STATE OF TYRANNY, CHAOS IT'S NO WONDER IMMIGRANTS ARE BEING ALLOWED BY DEMOCRATIC PUBLIC OFFICIALS TO ALLEGEDLY VIOLATE AND CIRCUMVENT ANY LAWS TO AVOID DEPORTATION BECAUSE OF THE RACISM AND WHITE SUPREMACY CONTROLLING THE JUDICIARY AND MANY BLACK OR COLORD PUBLIC OFFICIALS HAVE SOLD OUT AND GOING ALONG TO GET ALONG WITH THE DOMESTIC TERRORISTS.
CAN I ASK MY #TWITTERFRIENDS A QUESTION, HOW CAN THE COLOR OF YOUR SKIN FORETELL YOUR ACADEMICS OR QUALIFICATIONS WHEN EVERYONE INVOLVED IS NOT OF COLOR?
BLACK/COLORED PEOPLE HISTORICALLY HAVE TO BE 10 TIMES SMARTER, OR STRONGER IN EVERYTHING WE DO JUST TO GET WHAT IS RIGHTFULLY DUE AND STILL THIS IS WHAT PROFESSIONAL WHITES ARE STILL DOING TO UNDERMINE THE INTELLIGENCE OF QUALIFIED SENIOR CITIZENS OR BLACK/COLORED PERSON SEEKING JUSTICE FROM APARTHEID, RACISM AND JUDICIAL TERRORISM.
IN THE
UNITED STATES
COURT OF APPEALS
FOR
THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT
CHICAGO, ILLINOIS 60604
U.S. BANK NATIONAL
ASSOCIATION, } Appeal from the
United
As TRUSTEE for
securitized Trust }
States District Court for
2006-NC3, et al.
} the Northern District of
Plaintiffs
–Appellees
} Illinois, Eastern Division
V
}
No. 24 cv 12195
} No. 25-1118
}
Monzella Y.
Johnson
}
Defendant-Appellant
} Judge April Perry
EMERGENCY MOTION FOR DEFAULT AND ENFORCEMENT OF THE JAN 10, 2025
EMERGENCY MOTION FOR STAY OF EXECUTION ET AL. COMPELLING THE UNITED STATES
MARSHALL’S TO DELIVER THE ORDER IN 48 HOURS TO THE COOK COUNTY SHERIFF’S
DEEMING ALL COURT ORDERS AS A NULLITY/VOID CORROBORATING NO JUDGE HAD
JURISDICTION ON THE APPELLANT BUT BECAUSE OF THEIR SKIN COLOR, BEING SENIOR
CITIZENS PRO SE, CERTAIN JUDGES HATING PEOPLE OF COLOR NOT APPLYING THE LEGAL
CITATIONS CORRECTLY SO AS TO LITIGIOUSLY WEAR DOWN ANY APPELLANT FIGHTING FOR
THEIR RIGHTS IN THE COURTS WHERE THE SUMMARY JUDGMENT INVOLVING ALL PARTIES HAVE
UNEQUIVOCALLY ADMITTED TO, ALL PLEADINGS THAT NO JUDGES IN THE ILLINOIS
TRIBUNAL WILL EVER RULE IN ACCORDANCE TO THE FED RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE OR
CIVIL RIGHTS ACT OF 1868 OR ALTERNATIVELY REASSIGN THIS MATTER TO ANOTHER
CIRCUIT WHO WILL HONOR THE LAWS OF THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION AND SUPREME
COURT PURSUANT TO THE BREYER COMMITTEE REPORT The request for a transfer may be made at any stage of the
proceeding before a reference to the Judicial Conference under Rule 20 (b) (1) (C) or 20 (b) (2) or a
Petition for Review is filed under Rule
22:
Rule 26 implements the Breyer Committee’s
recommended use of transfers. Breyer
Committee Report, 239 F.R.D. at 214-15.
Rule 26 authorizes the transfer of a complaint proceeding
to another judicial council selected by the Chief Justice. Such transfers may
be appropriate, for example, in the case of a serious complaint where there are
multiple disqualifications among the original council, where the issues are
highly visible and a local disposition may weaken public confidence in the
process, where internal tensions arising in the council as a result of the
complaint render disposition by a less involved council appropriate, or where a
complaint calls into question policies or governance of the home court of
appeals et al.
w/AFFIDAVIT
Now comes Defendant-Appellant, Monzella Y.
Johnson Pro Se in this cause respectfully represents to this court the reasons
and files herewith her Affidavit in support of Emergency Motion for Default &
Enforcement et al;
1.) That the present judges in the Seventh Circuit read evidence of Cook
County judges violating the RICO ACT,
the 7th Cir. Held that
the Cook County Courts were a Criminal enterprise. U.S. v. Murphy, 768 F. 2d 1518, 1531 where precedent was enacted by
Judges Frank H. Easterbrook, Richard D. Cudahy and former Chief judge Luther
Merritt Swygert;
2.) That every judge in the Seventh Circuit closed their eyes
to every unlawful terrorist act perpetrated by the Appellee’s said Appellant
has put before them on appeal in affidavits validating the verity of judges
committing Treason Trespassing upon the laws of the United States Constitution
engaging in “WAR” against the United
States Constitution making every order rendered against the Petitioner. If a judge does not fully comply with the
Constitution, then his orders are void, In re Sawyer, 124 U.S. 200 (1888), he
or she is without jurisdiction, and he/she has engaged in an act or acts of
treason at the time of filing this Motion no charges or indictments has been
presented availing or addressing the veracity of the pleadings.
3.) That
Judge Diane Sykes (now Chief Judge), Ann Claire Williams (Retired) Kenneth
Ripple ( Judges
Diane S. Sykes, Ann Claire Williams and Kenneth Ripple became “Trespassers
of the Laws” “Private Citizens”11-3481 falsified their court
order against the Appellant
4.) How can any Appellant
Black, Brown, Senior Citizens receive any type of justice in the Seventh
Circuit if judges go along with the criminals or any person controlling
Democratic or any Political Party ?
“In 1987 the State of
Illinois ordered Joe Lawrence to pay child support. He did not comply, and consequently the state revoked his
driver's license. He appealed the revocation to the Secretary of
State, but his appeal was denied. Lawrence also unsuccessfully sued his former employers, International Brands Corporation
and the Chicago Transit Authority, in state and federal court for embezzlement
and theft.”
FACT Appellant never ever had
his Commercial Driver’s license suspended, and was never terminated from the
Chicago Transit Authority and IBC Wonder bread he was off work with a
work-related injury case #93 CV 01609 Lawrence v CTA where
judge Hogan or Maddux stated, “Plaintiff was a very bright kid in that
everything, he has said in his complaint is in fact true but up here we do
things differently, he was not supposed to be bringing these issues up here on
his own, he needed his union or a sponsor” See Page 6 Par
5C, as for IBC Wonder bread he was off work with a torn rotator
cuff falling from a truck where surgery was required and was never notified of
any termination.
A- That the Chicago Transit
Authority Defaulted in Cook County Court but because of the Appellant’s skin
color he never received a judgment in his favor corroborating how Democrats
control and dispensate laws in Illinois because he did not have Anglo Saxon men
speaking on his behalf.
5.) That on September 17, 1987 States
Attorney, Richard J. Daley Dismissed a Paternity Suit against him (case 85 D 068184)
via Assistant States Attorney, Nigerian
American Obrietta Scott this case is the only case where Paternity Tests
were taken and Excluded the Appellant Cook County Relative Chance of Paternity
was 17.91% but was altered to reflect a 99.99% of Paternity him being the
father.
A-
That
American Red Cross had a Relative Chance of Paternity of 7219.9520 Relative
Chance of Paternity but was altered to reflect a 99.98% Relative Chance of
Paternity.
B-
That
in spite of manipulating the numbers on each Paternity Tests trying to protect
the Policeman Biological father (deceased now) of the Police woman active on
the Police force today, Appellant was still excluded from Paternity through the
Mendelian Laws of Inheritance.
6.) That because of the unintelligence of so
many involved who tried to protect a Pedophile Police Officer none of them were
aware he was directly excluded from Paternity, there are two types of exclusion
in Paternity Testing: direct exclusion and indirect exclusion. In a direct
exclusion, the child has a marker in their blood not found in either parent.
7.) In both Paternity Tests antigens
(markers from the ABO blood group) were missing on both tests not present in
either the mother or alleged father.
That Police Officer Hightower today has
legally stalked and recruited every racist/hateful person in this conspiracy
and certain lesbians and gays to engage in a diabolical heinous Civil Rights
Conspiracy in seeking money from him for a child not his but an extortion
attempt as the adult’s age was backdated to reflect she was a minor on a case
88 D 079012 that was created by the Democratic Party no service, no Paternity
Tests, as the Cook County Criminal Enterprise orchestrated the draconian hate
at him because of his Heterosexual Freeman disposition as they have admitted to
having him Remanded into custody five times for allegedly owing child support Section 1983 of U.S.C.S. contemplates the depravation of
Civil Rights through the Unconstitutional Application of a Law by conspiracy or
otherwise. Mansell v. Saunders (CA 5 F 1A) 372 F 573, especially if
the conspiracy was actually carried into effect, where an action is for a
conspiracy to interfere with Civil Rights under 42 U.S.C.S. 1985 (3), or for
the depravation of such rights under 42 U.S.C.S. 1983, if the conspiracy was
actually carried into effect and plaintiff was thereby deprived of any rights,
privileges, or immunities secured by the United States Constitution and Laws,
the gist of the action may be treated as one for the depravation of rights
under 42 U.S.C.S. 1983, Lewis v. Brautigan (CA 5 F
1a) 227 F 2d 124, 55 Alr 2d 505, John W. Strong, 185, 777-78 (4 the
ed. 1992).
8.) Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 8: (D) A motion under this Rule 8(a)(2) must be filed with the circuit
clerk and normally will be considered by a panel of the court. But in an
exceptional case in which time requirements make that procedure impracticable,
the motion may be made to and considered by a single judge.
9.) Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 18: (D) The motion must be filed with the circuit clerk and normally will be
considered by a panel of the court. But in an exceptional case in which time
requirements make that procedure impracticable, the motion may be made to and
considered by a single judge.
10.)
Seventh Circuit Overturns $44.7 Million Jury Verdict
Against City in Shooting Incident
Chief Judge Diane Sykes, Michael Kanne authored this ruling
Wednesday,
February 24, 2021 Julie
Tappendorf
The Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals
recently overturned a jury verdict against the City of Chicago awarding $44.7
million in damages relating to a shooting involving an off-duty police
officer. First Midwest Bank as Guardian v. City of Chicago.
According to the court opinion, the
plaintiff claimed that a Chicago police officer shot his friend during an
argument when the two had been drinking. The friend suffered traumatic brain
and other injuries. The friend sued the City of Chicago seeking damages for the
shooting, arguing that the City was responsible for the officer's conduct.
Specifically, the plaintiff claimed that the City's failure to have an
"early warning system" to identify officers who might engage in
misconduct, failure to adequately investigate and discipline officers who
engage in misconduct, and the "code of silence" among police officers
contributed to the shooting incident. The City argued that the officer was off
duty and not acting under "color of state law" at the time of the
shooting, so the City was not liable under Section 1983 of the Civil Rights
Act. The case made its way to a jury which found the City of Chicago liable and
awarded $44.7 million in damages to the plaintiff. The jury found that two of the
City's policies - its failure to maintain an adequate early warning system and
failure to adequately investigate and discipline officers - caused the officer
to shoot his friend.
The City appealed to the Seventh Circuit
Court of Appeals, which reversed the jury verdict and award. The appeals court
found that although the injuries suffered by plaintiff from the shooting
incident were grievous, the City was not responsible for the officer's actions,
where the officer was acting as a private citizen and not as a City police
officer. The Seventh Circuit noted that Section 1983
imposes liability only when a municipality has violated a
federal right. Since none of the plaintiff's federal rights were violated,
the court of appeals overturned the jury verdict against the City of Chicago.
11.)
The U.S. Supreme Court, in Scheuer v. Rhodes,
416 U.S. 232, 94 S. Ct. 1683, 1687 (1974) stated that "when a state
officer acts under a state law in a manner violative of the Federal
Constitution, he "comes into conflict with the superior authority of that
Constitution, and he is in that case stripped of his official or representative
character and is subjected in his person to the consequences
of his individual conduct. The State has no power to impart to him any immunity
from responsibility to the supreme authority of the United States."
[Emphasis supplied in original].
12.)
Under Federal law which is applicable to all states, the U.S.
Supreme Court stated that if a court is "without authority, its judgments
and orders are regarded as nullities. They are not voidable, but simply void;
and form no bar to a recovery sought, even prior to a reversal in opposition to
them. They constitute no justification; and all persons concerned in executing
such judgments or sentences, are considered, in law, as
trespassers." Elliot v. Piersol, 1 Pet. 328,
340, 26 U.S. 328, 340 (1828)
13.)
That
every judge who became “Private Citizens” acting outside of their jurisdiction
and oath upholding Tyranny, Terrorism in the Courts have demonstrated a
Rebellion against the Federal Government, United States Constitution and laws
of the United States Supreme Court succinctly articulates how the State and
members of the Federal Government have used Hate, Racism and their Political
Affiliation making sure no Defendant- Appellant receive Equal Protection of the
Laws pursuant to the Civil Rights Act of 1866.
A-
That upon the court’s reading of this
Emergency Motion an outspoken racist homosexual judge in the Circuit Court of
Cook County, Domestic Relations Division Judge Michael A. Forti et al. has
become a “Private Citizen” following suit of the other racist judges who hate
Black and Brown men by presiding on a case he has no jurisdiction when a
Summary Judgment and Default judgment was filed and served on all parties nobody
denied the factual pleadings.
14.)
History shows that it does not matter who is in power... those who
have not learned to do for themselves and have to depend solely on others never
obtain any more rights or privileges in the end than they did in the beginning.
"When you control a man's thinking you do not have to worry
about his actions. You do not have to tell him not to stand here or go yonder.
He will find his 'proper place' and will stay in it. You do not need to send
him to the back door. He will go without being told. In fact, if there is no
back door, he will cut one for his special benefit. His education makes it
necessary." Carter G. Woodson, 1933
a.
To
show fraud upon the court, the complaining party must establish that the
alleged misconduct affected the integrity of the judicial process, either
because the court itself was defrauded or because the misconduct was
perpetrated by officers of the court. Alexander v. Robertson, 882, F. 2d
421,424 (9th Cir. 1989);
b.
A void judgment does not create any binding obligation.
Kalb v. Feuerstein (1940) 308 US 433, 60 S Ct 343, 84 L, Ed 370.
15.)
“No one is above the Law”, citing a 1928
decision by Supreme Court Justice Louis Brandeis Olmstead
v. United States, 277 U.S. 438 (1928),
“We must subject government officials to
the same rules of conduct that we expect of the citizen. The very existence of
the government is imperiled if it fails to observe the law scrupulously. As
Brandeis puts it, "if the government becomes a lawbreaker, it breeds
contempt for law; it invites every man to become a law unto himself; it invites
anarchy. To declare that in the administration of the criminal law the end
justifies the means—to declare that the government may commit crimes in order
to secure the conviction of a private criminal—would bring terrible
retribution. Against that pernicious doctrine this court should resolutely set
its face."
16.)
That pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure RULE 8 (1) In
General. In responding to a pleading, a party must:
(A) State in short and plain terms its
defenses to each claim asserted against it; and
(B) Admit or Deny the allegations asserted against it by an
opposing party.
(2) Denials—Responding
to the Substance. A denial must fairly respond to the substance of the
allegation.
(3) General and
Specific Denials. A party that intends in good faith to deny all the
allegations of a pleading—including the jurisdictional grounds—may do so by a
general denial. A party that does not intend to deny all the allegations must
either specifically deny designated allegations or generally deny all except
those specifically admitted.
(4) Denying Part
of an Allegation. A party that intends in good faith to deny only part of
an allegation must admit the part that is true and deny the rest.
(5) Lacking
Knowledge or Information. A party that lacks knowledge or information
sufficient to form a belief about the truth of an allegation must so state, and
the statement, has the effect of a denial.
(6) Effect of
Failing to Deny. An allegation –other than one relating to the amount of
damages –is admitted if a responsive pleading is required and the allegation is
not denied. If a responsive pleading is not required an allegation is
considered denied or avoided.
17.)
For an Order Directing the Appellees to Pay to the Appellant $3000.00
-$5000.00 a day for the time they have been unlawfully evicted from their home
not having any effect on the $40 Million Dollar Demand Pursuant to Smith v. Wade, 461 U.S. 30, 35 103 S. Ct.
1625, 1629, 75 L Ed 2d 632 (1983) Justice Brennen “The threshold standard for
allowing punitive damages for reckless or callous indifference applies even in
a case, such as here, where the underlying standard of liability for
compensatory damages because is also one of recklessness. There is no merit to
petitioner’s contention that actual malicious intent should be the standard for
punitive damages because the deterrent purposes of such damages would be served
only if the threshold for those damages is higher in every case than the
underlying standard for liability in the first instance. The common-law rule is
otherwise, and there is no reason to depart from the common-law rule in the
context of {1983} of $40 Million Dollars;
18.)
For an Order Reassigning this
matter to another Circuit Rule 26 authorizes the transfer of a complaint
proceeding to another judicial council selected by the Chief Justice. Such
transfers may be appropriate, for example, in the case of a serious complaint
where there are multiple disqualifications among the original council, where
the issues are highly visible and a local disposition may weaken public
confidence in the process, where internal tensions arising in the council as a
result of the complaint render disposition by a less involved council
appropriate, or where a complaint calls into question policies or governance of
the home court of appeals et al.
19.)
For An Order Directing the FBI and US
Attorney to coordinate and investigation and bring the appropriate charges
to all persons responsible for the diabolical criminal conspiracies associated
in the Pleadings not excluding any persons in the 1988 D 079012 case and 2008 Ch
33616 terminated foreclosure case.
20.)
That pursuant to the textbook precedent Pembaur v. City of Cincinnati, 475 U.S. 469 (1986)
relating to Section 42 USC 1983
For an Order Directing the United States Marshall’s
to effect Service on the Cook County Sheriff’s Ordering them to Remove/Evict any
and all Persons from the address of 5217 S Ingleside and Remand into Custody
all persons who have committed Fraud on the Court who caused the Appellant’s to
be unlawfully evicted.
FURTHER
AFFIANT SAYETH NOT
IN
THE
UNITED STATES
COURT OF APPEALS
FOR
THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT
CHICAGO, ILLINOIS 60604
AFFIDAVIT
I Monzella Y. Johnson Pro Se being duly sworn on oath
states the aforementioned pleadings enumerated within said motion pursuant to
Federal Rules of Civil Procedures, the undersigned certifies that the
statements set forth in this instrument are true and correct, except as to
matters therein stated to be on information and belief and as to such matters,
the undersigned certifies as aforesaid that she verily believes the same to be
true.
Respectfully Submitted
Notary
____________________
Monzella Y. Johnson
Frogishtwo65@gmail.com
773 835-5849
IN
THE
UNITED STATES
COURT OF APPEALS
FOR
THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT
CHICAGO, ILLINOIS 60604
U.S. BANK NATIONAL
ASSOCIATION, } Appeal from the
United
As TRUSTEE for
securitized Trust }
States District Court for
2006-NC3, et al.
} the Northern District of
Plaintiffs
–Appellees
} Illinois, Eastern Division
V
}
No. 24 cv 12195
} No. 25-1118
}
Monzella Y.
Johnson
}
Defendant-Appellant
} Judge April Perry
Certificate of Service
I Monzella Y. Johnson, Defendant-Appellant,
certify that I have on this day Electronically Emailed said Emergency Motion et
al. to all parties recorded in said Notice via Email except Cook County Judges
via Courtesy Copies per Sheriff Police Directives to email them any and all
correspondence.
Attorney General
Kwame Raoul alexandrina.shrove@ilag.gov
555 West Monroe Suite 1300
Chicago, Ill. 60601
Cook County State’s Attorney Chief Judge Timothy C. Evans
Eileen
O’Neil Burke timothy.evans@cookcountyil.gov
statesattorney@cookcountyil.gov
Cook County Sheriff’s
Tom Dart
50 West
Washington, Suite 702 email CCSO@ccsheriff.org
Chg. IL 60601
President/CEO Rick Aneshansel
US Bank Natl. Assoc. rick.aneshansel@usbank.com
Registered
Agent: Grace A. Gorka US Bank Natl.
Assoc.
190 S. LaSalle,
grace.gorka@usbank.com
ggorka@usbank.com
Chg. IL 60603
JSC_General@atgf.com Pamela Murphy-Boylan President CEO of the
(TJSC)
RPerdew@lockelord.com Lord & Locke Law Firm
simon.feng@lockelord.com Lord & Locke Law Firm
pmal@potestivolaw.com Potestivo Law Firm
chicagodocket@lockelord.com Lord & Locke Law Firm
Cook County Eviction Superintendent Colin.Luce@ccsheriff.org
CCSO Evictions CCSO.evictions@ccsheriff.org
ccc.chancerycalendar12@cookcountyil.gov Presiding Judge S. H. Hall
Sheriff’s Police Molly Adams
molly.adams@ccsheriff.org
Potestivo & Ass., PC
Bryan G. Thompson, Poulami Mal
bthompson@potestivolaw.com
223 West Jackson, Blvd, Suite
610
Chicago, IL. 60606
Cook County Clerk, Iris Y. Martinez
CCCWebsite@cookcountycourt.com
PLEASE BE ADVISED that on Feb..3, 2025 A Notice of Emergency Motion et al. has been filed in
the United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit before the Honorable Justices.
Dated
Feb 3rd, 2025
_________________________
Monzella Y. Johnson
Frogishtwo65@gmail.com.
No comments:
Post a Comment