Wikipedia Racial Injustice in Chicago Courts

Search results

Friday, May 31, 2019


HOW ALDERMAN EDWARD BURKE AND HIS COLORED WATER BOYS AND GIRLS RAN A SUCCESSFUL CRIMINAL ENTERPRISE NOT FEARING THE FBI STEALING HOMES IN THE GUISE OF FORECLOSURE

THEIR HAS NOT BEEN A BLACK NEGROE OR WHATEVER THEY WANT TO CALL THEMSELVES OR A HISPANIC MALE OR MAN WITH ANY TESTICLES TO STAND FOR WHAT WAS RIGHT WHERE PEOPLE OF COLOR WAS VICTIMIZED BY THE "CRIMINAL ENTERPRISE" CONTROLLED BY THE DEMOCRATS UNDER ALDERMAN EDWARD BURKE.

FINALLY, THE MEDIA AND THE FBI SEE THE HOW COOK COUNTY AND CERTAIN FEDERAL JUDGES ARE A PART OF A CRIMINAL ENTERPRISE UNDER THE AUTHORITY OF ALDERMAN EDWARD BURKE AS CORRUPT ANGLO SAXON JUDGES TRIED TO DO EVERYTHING UPHOLDING THE CRIMINAL ACTS MENTIONED IN THIS DOCUMENT.


              IN THE 
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
EASTERN DIVISION
           
             
             

 U.S. BANK N.A. AS TRUSTEE FOR SECURITIZED TRUST MASTR ASSET BACKED SECURITIES TRUST 2006-NC3; UBS REAL ESTATE SECURITIES INC.; MORTGAGE ASSET SECURITIZATION TRANSACTIONS, INC.; WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.; MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEM, AKA “MERS”
                                         Plaintiffs,
                   
MONZELLA JOHNSON

                                        Defendant.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
  ______________________
Hon. Gary Feinerman
 Magistrate Judge Maria Valdez


Civil Action No.
16-cv- 08628





                                NOTICE OF APPEAL

 To: Cook County States Attorney                Chief Judge Timothy C. Evans
         Kim Foxx                                             50 West Washington, Suite 2600
         50 West Washington, Suite 500                Chicago, Ill. 60601
         Chicago, Ill. 60601                           

Clerk of the Circuit Court                                    Attorney General                  
Dorothy Brown                                                    Kwame Raoul
50 West Washington, Suite 1001                        100 West Randolph, Suite 1300
Chicago, Ill. 60601                                              Chicago, Ill. 60601
                                                                
                                              


 .US Attorney                                          FBI  Dir. Chris Wray
John R. Lausch, Jr.                                2111 West Roosevelt Road
219 S. Dearborn, 5th floor                         Chicago, Ill. 60612
                                                                          

 Postestivo & Assoc.                          Hinshaw & Culbertson, LLP
 223 West Jackson Blvd. Suite 610     151 N. Franklin Street, #2500
Chicago, Illinois 60606                         Chicago, Illinois 60606

                                                                     
COURTESY COPIES TO THE FOLLOWING:

      Hon Mayor Lori Lightfoot
        City Hall 7th floor
       Chicago, IL. 60601



Said case demonstrates within the parameter of the laws how the Illinois legal system is under siege, as stated in earlier affidavits, the Ku Klux Klan, pursuant to the act of 1871 Section 1 (42 U.S.C.) Remarks of Rep. Cobb) (“None but Democrats belong or can belong to these societies”)



                PLEASE BE ADVISED that on May 30, 2019, A Notice of  Appeal has been filed before the Northern District of Illinois .  

                                                                            Respectfully Submitted

                                                                             ______________________                                                                                                                                                                                             
                                                                                  Monzella Y. Johnson
                                                                                 5217 S. Ingleside Ave.
                                                                                   Chicago, IL. 60615
                                                                                                    
    
               
                                                                           

Dated May 30, 2019
                                                                                   
                                                                                        


           
             
             

 U.S. BANK N.A. AS TRUSTEE FOR SECURITIZED TRUST MASTR ASSET BACKED SECURITIES TRUST 2006-NC3; UBS REAL ESTATE SECURITIES INC.; MORTGAGE ASSET SECURITIZATION TRANSACTIONS, INC.; WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.; MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEM, AKA “MERS”
                                         Plaintiffs,
                   
MONZELLA JOHNSON

                                        Defendant.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
  ______________________
H. Gary Feinerman
 Magistrate Judge Maria Valdez


Civil Action No.
16-cv- 08628







                                                  Jurisdictional Statement


Order entered: May 1, 2019
Notice of Appeal filed: May 30, 2019

Statutes: Democratic Judges violating United States Supreme Court Rulings Enforcing “Jim Crow Laws” “Trespassing upon the Laws” “No Jurisdiction on the Appellant” Committing Fraud, Engaging in Treason Like Offenses, Judges Committing Perjury, Judges aiding and abetting in a Criminal Conspiracy, Judge committing Unequal Protection of the Laws Violations, Judge acting outside of the Immunity provisions of his Oath, as “Private Citizens” outlawed by the United States Supreme Court  as they used their robes and jurisdiction to aid and assist Terrorist Democratic Judges and Public Officials in covering-up Criminal Civil Rights Violations, Disparate Unequal Protection of the Laws, Racial Hate Crimes, Slander and Defamation of Character, Civil Rights Violations, Racial Terrorism Conspiracy, Public, Political, Fraternal Corruption Conspiracies by Democrats, and other Un-Constitutional Lawless Violations.


   Plaintiff is appealing to the  Court of Appeals, for a Reversal Sanctions and Remand with instructions notifying Federal authorities based on the foregoing stated above:


   Appellant has Due-Diligently been fighting to keep their home from unlawfully being stolen from them in the disguise as foreclosure before the Supreme Court of Illinois, District Court and  Court of Appeals for over 11 years racist political judges appointed by Alderman Edward Burke have systematically “Trespassed upon the Laws” entering Orders that are “VOID” a “NULLITY” pursuant to the laws of the United States Supreme Court as judges used their robes and unlawful authority to maintain a Democratic “Lynching” of the laws on the Appellants as senior citizens in that every Black and Brown person in the Democratic Party kept their mouths shut because they are powerless over Anglo Saxon men in the Democratic Party and they are only figureheads.


   Appellant is appealing to the  Court of Appeals, because Anglo Saxon judges in the Democratic party have systematically ignored that they were the victims of an “Organized Conspiracy” perpetrated by Democratic judges acting as “Private Citizens” controlling the Criminal Enterprise in all of the courts controlled by Democrats, in that Judge Feinerman closed his eyes to all Terrorist Treason offenses accompanied by an affidavit unimpeached by every attorney.

“Grounds warranting a motion to reconsider include (1) an intervening change in the controlling law, (2) new evidence previously unavailable, and (3) the need to correct clear error or prevent manifest injustice.” Id. (citing Brumark Case 1:07-cv-00644-WDM-KLM Document 158 Filed 08/25/2009 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 6 1 Although the Tenth Circuit does not allow citation to unpublished opinions for precedential value, unpublished opinions may be cited for persuasive value. 10th Cir. R. 32.1. 3 Corp. v. Samson Resources Corp., 57 F.3d 941, 948 (10th Cir. 1995)).


           1.) That pursuant to Defendant’s Motion for Reconsideration filed November 4, 2016 judge Yeghiayan became complicit in an “Organized Conspiracy” by “Trespassing upon the Laws” using his robe and judicial authority to cover-up the “Treason Offenses” engaged upon by other Democratic judges and operatives in the Terrorist Criminal Enterprise in Cook County.

         2.) That judge Yeghiayan had his law clerk to call the Defendant’s on Oct. 24, 2016 at 9:00am telling them to be in court Nov. 3, 2016 at 9:00am.

         3.) That Defendant’s appeared in court pursuant to the judge’s directive and learned he had dismissed the case Nov. 2, 2016 remanding the matter back to the Criminal Enterprise of Cook County.

                 TO FURTHER AMPLIFY DEMOCRATIC JUDGE YEGHIAYAN’S participation in what is now described as a Hate Crime corroborating his role in an “Organized Criminal Conspiracy” aiding and assisting the Plaintiff’s in trying to steal their home

          4.)  That Defendant’s filed the proper Motion Objecting Plaintiff’ Motion for Remand due to Fraud & Misrepresentations to the Court, in that Pars 1-6 articulates well pleaded-facts that corroborates Democratic Operatives engaging in an “Organized Criminal Conspiracy” trying to steal the Defendant’s home it is now in its eleventh year and every Democratic judge has closed their eyes to judges Trespassing upon the laws in this matter.


          5.)  Pursuant to Par 7 of the aforementioned Motion, hereto attached, Gr Ex A, B, C and D, Corroborate the veracity that Democratic judges has taken seize of the courts in a Terrorist manner and is systematically engaging in “Treason Offenses” enforcing Jim Crow Laws in the courts;   
              A- Pursuant to Gr Ex A Defendant’s Original Petition Notice of Removal from State Jurisdiction, filed April 19, 2019 Judge Robert W. Gettleman, 19 CV 02668, that every Racist Anglo Saxon judge in the Democratic Party unlawfully “Trespassed upon the Laws” ignored every Affidavit Motions Defendant properly plead before the courts and Denied every document that corroborated his innocence, that no court had jurisdiction on him for 31 years. Said woman was allegedly impregnated by her biological father framed the Plaintiff to keep her father from going back to jail and losing his Police Officers position.

              B- In furtherance to the above, Page 9 of the document Par 10 A, B Page 8 Line 1 Joseph V. Roddy asked Plaintiff, Did you also file answer interrogatories’ which were sworn to under oath by you, on April 1986?” Line 2 Francoise’s reply “Yes I did.”
      Lines 4-6 And that indicated, exactly, the time you lived with Mr. Hightower and had intercourse with defendant, is that correct, Line 7 “Yes, it did”.

              C- Pursuant to Gr Ex B Motion to Reinstate case due to Democratic Judges/Attorneys Trespassing upon the Laws Committing Treason Acting as Private Citizens Making the District Court Order “Void a Nullity” filed September 19, 2018, Judge Charles R. Norgle, Sr. case 93 CV 01609, Page 6 Par 5C “Plaintiff filed a Motion to Disqualify Judge Patrick McGann and appeared before Judge Michael j. Hogan, or William Maddux (March 10, 1994) who stated, “Plaintiff was a very bright kid in that everything he has said in his Complaint is in fact true but up here we do things differently, he was not supposed to be bringing these issues up here on his own, he needed his union or a sponsor.”  
      
               D- Said judges admitted “Treason and Trespassing upon the Laws” were in fact a normal practice in Cook County and implied his skin color was the prohibiting factor granting him any relief, in that Par E validates the verity of this assertion.
      6.)    Pursuant to Gr Ex C Motion to Supplement Motion that Corroborates Democratic Judges Engaging in an Active “Organized Conspiracy” “Fraud” “Corruption” In Cook County Courts w/Affidavits, Page 3 Par 5 states unequivocally, “That it is clear no Hispanic or Black person described as a Democrat in Cook County have any real authority where it matters especially as demonstrated in this cause, “Jim Crow” laws are being enforced by spineless men of color and racist men hiding behind men of color using them as the Enforcers using the laws as weapons to Terrorize, Bully or “Lynch” anyone that challenges said Democrats in these unlawful proceedings as articulated throughout all pleadings and affidavits”

That under 18 U.S.C. 242 and 42 U.S.C. 1985 (3) (b). A judge does not have the discretion on whether or not to follow Supreme Ct. Rules, but a duty to follow. People v. Gersh, 135 Ill. 2d 384 (1990).

          
A-    That  the court  became  a law unto  themselves  denied  said  motion  and became “Private Citizens” not having any jurisdiction over the Defendant making all Orders a “Nullity”.

             B-  To show fraud upon the court, the complaining party must establish that the alleged misconduct affected the integrity of the judicial process, either because the court itself was defrauded or because the misconduct was perpetrated by officers of the court. Alexander v. Robertson, 882, F. 2d 421,424 (9th Cir. 1989);

C-    A void judgment does not create any binding obligation. Kalb v. Feuerstein (1940) 308 US 433, 60 S Ct 343, 84 L, Ed 370.

   
   Appellant is appealing to the  Court of Appeals, because Anglo Saxon judges in the Democratic party have systematically ignored the legal issues that has been unimpeached by any and all States Attorneys, Attorney Generals or Corporation Council Attorneys, General Counsels or Private Attorneys of multi-million-dollar revenues in every venue where this case was in litigation before.

In furtherance to the above, Anglo Saxon Democrats obstructed the aforementioned Petition for Review to further corroborate their involvement in an “Organized Criminal Conspiracy” protecting said Democrats but from the same Motion for Reconsideration.

      11. “That said judge is living up to the doctrines of the Democratic Parties creed in that it was more important for the Plaintiff’s to try and steal their home, but said senior citizen women of color had to explain how their Removal was timely; sic  He ignored the following properly plead assertions 10-20 taken from the Motion Objecting Remand et al.  corroborating Democratic judges and other Terrorist Operatives engaging in an active “Organized Criminal Conspiracy” trying to steal Defendant’s home”.

      12.  “That it is unfathomable to see where a Black man murdered his wife stabbing her 40 times in the mouth solicit the services of Edward Burke and he assigns the case to the right Democratic Irish judge and Herbert Cammon gets’ away with murder with the assistance of his gay lover for the life insurance of $250,000.00 corroborating the fact Democrats have Terrorist control over the legal tribunals in Chicago, Illinois”.  

The request for a transfer may be made at any stage of the proceeding before a reference to the Judicial Conference under Rule 20 (b) (1) (C) or 20 (b) (2) or a Petition for Review is filed under Rule 22:

Rule 26 is new; it implements the Breyer Committee’s recommended use of transfers. Breyer Committee Report, 239 F.R.D. at 214-15.

Rule 26 authorizes the transfer of a complaint proceeding to another judicial council selected by the Chief Justice. Such transfers may be appropriate, for example, in the case of a serious complaint where there are multiple disqualifications among the original council, where the issues are highly visible and a local disposition may weaken public confidence in the process, where internal tensions arising in the council as a result of the complaint render disposition by a less involved council appropriate, or where a complaint calls into question policies or governance of the home court of appeals et al.       

That the present judges in the Seventh Circuit read evidence of Cook County judges violating the RICO ACT, the 7th Cir. Held that the Cook County Courts were a Criminal enterprise. U.S. v. Murphy, 768 F. 2d 1518, 1531 where precedent was enacted by Judges Frank H. Easterbrook, Richard D. Cudahy and former Chief judge Luther Merritt Swygert;


 JUDICIAL CONFERENCE COMMITTEE ON JUDICIAL AND DISABILITY
                 ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES
                                 ONE COLUMBUS CIRCLE, NE
                                   WASHINGTON D. C. 20544

   
Monzella Johnson,
     Petitioner                                                                        07-16-90079

v

Diane P. Wood, Samuel Der-Yeghiayan, Pamela Myerson Timothy C. Evans
Anne M. Burke, Robert R. Thomas, Charles Freeman, Thomas L. Kilbride,
Lloyd A. Karmeier, Rita Garman, Mary Jane Theis et al.

     Respondents

 PETITION FOR REVIEW & PETITION TO TRANSFER THIS CASE TO ANOTHER JUDICIAL COUNCIL
                                                     
To the Honorable Judicial Conference Committee et al. of the United States:

    Complainant a United States Citizen, Monzella Y. Johnson, hereby respectfully represents as Pro Se shows this Judicial Conference Committee with corroboration/admissions and affidavit the noted reasons why this matter should be reviewed and Transferred to another Judicial Council within the United States.

   Now comes Monzella Y. Johnson, Pro Se Appellant in this cause  files herewith her affidavit as required by Title 28, United States Code, Section 144, to show that Judge Honorable Samuel Der-Yeghiayan, and a plethora of other judges has Trespassed upon the Laws in an arrogant “Contemptuous manner” the Seventh Circuit, Judicial Council has ignored all sufficient motions with affidavits, stating a cause how and why this court has jurisdiction; motions corroborating judicial corruption “fraud” “perjury” and a plethora of “Terrorist Civil Rights Acts” put before the courts that the District Court ignored and holding Racism Corruption in the courts.

STATUTES: Trespassers of the Laws, Treason, hereto attached, Group Ex. A, Judicial Complaint, (filed Dec. 6, 2016) detailing just how said judges engaging in acts of Treason likened to “Weapons of Mass Destruction” destroying innocent lives like the Appellant;

Rule 26 authorizes the transfer of a complaint proceeding to another judicial council selected by the Chief Justice. Such transfers may be appropriate, for example, in the case of a serious complaint where there are multiple disqualifications among the original council, where the issues are highly visible and a local disposition may weaken public confidence in the process, where internal tensions arising in the council as a result of the complaint render disposition by a less involved council appropriate, or where a complaint calls into question policies or governance of the home court of appeals et al.



  




                                                             






                                                                               Respectfully Submitted

                                                                               Monzella Y. Johnson
                                                                              5217 S. Ingleside Ave.
                                                                               Chicago, IL. 60615
                                                                                                    





























         JUDICIAL CONFERENCE COMMITTEE ON JUDICIAL AND DISABILITY
                 ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES
                                 ONE COLUMBUS CIRCLE, NE
                                   WASHINGTON D. C. 20544
                               
                                                              

1.)    That because the Seventh Circuit is comprised of Democratic judges filled with hatred surpassing all laws of the United States constitution have methodically and actively committing “Treason” and is “Trespassing upon the laws” relying on any Democrat or Republican to continuously overthrow the government enforcing laws outlawed by the United States constitution; hereto attached, January 24, 2017 document not signed;
A-    Said order was mailed so as to undermine and demonstrate said Democrats within the Seventh Circuit were in fact untouchable and is expecting President Elect Trump to close his eyes to the injustices and Mayhem in Chicago courts and Federal courts as others have done before his administration;

B-    That the aforementioned order further demonstrates no Democrat in the judicial capacity have the legal integrity or knowledge to dispensate the laws equitably in accordance to the United States Constitution, in that all of them have closed their eyes to the pattern of corruption and “Treason” by members of their party in that many of them have become professional law breaking criminals; 

2.)    That said Chief judge had evidence from Page 5, Par. 4, Motion to Disqualify Judge Samuel Der-Yeghiayan et al. filed (Nov. 14, 2016) further validating the verity within the “Preponderance of the Evidence” that said judge and attorneys were acting in concert in said “Organize Conspiracy” engaging in TREASON and WAR on the United States Constitution.
A-    The court ignored the valid certified court order demonstrating Cook County Circuit Court judge vacated the Foreclosure judgment June 2, 2010;

B-     In that said, Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals held that the Circuit Court of Cook County is a criminal enterprise. U. S. v. Murphy, 768 F. 2d 1518, 1531 (7th Cir. 1985). 

“Since judges who do not report the criminal activities of other judges become principals in the criminal activity, 18 U.S.C. Section 1, and since no judges have reported the criminal activity of the judges who have been convicted, the other judges are as guilty as the convicted judges”   
  

Section 1983 of USCS contemplates the depravation of Civil Rights through the unconstitutional application of a law by conspiracy or otherwise. Mansell V. Saunders (CA 5 FLa) 372 F 2d 573, especially if the conspiracy was actually carried into effect and plaintiff was thereby deprived of any rights privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws, the gist of the action may be treated as one for the depravation of rights under 42 USCS 1983 Lewis V. Brautigam (CA 5 Fla) 227 F 2d 124, 55 Alr 2d 505

3.)      That Page 4, Par. 5 (A) further validate the verity within the “Preponderance of the Evidence” that said judge and attorneys were acting in concert in said “Organize Conspiracy”;
C-    The court ignored the valid certified court order demonstrating Cook County Circuit Court judge vacated the Foreclosure judgment June 2, 2010;

U. S Sup Court Digest 24(1) General Conspiracy

U.S. 2003. Essence of a conspiracy is an agreement to commit an unlawful act.—U.S. v. Jimenez Recio, 123 S. Ct. 819, 537 U.S. 270, 154 L.Ed.2d 744, on remand 371F.3d 1093

  Agreement to commit an unlawful act, which constitutes the essence of a conspiracy, is a distinct evil that exist and be punished whether or not the substantive crime ensues.-Id.
  Conspiracy poses a threat to the public over and above the threat of the commission of the relevant substantive crime, both because the combination in crime makes more likely the commission of other crimes and because it decreases the part from their path of criminality.-Id.

CONSPIRACY
Fraud maybe inferred from nature of acts complained of, individual and collective interest of alleged conspirators, situation, intimacy, and relation of parties at time of commission of acts, and generally all circumstances preceding and attending culmination of claimed conspiracy Illinois Rockford Corp. V. Kulp, 1968, 242 N.E. 2d 228, 41 ILL. 2d 215.

     Conspirators to be guilty of offense need not have entered into conspiracy at same time or have taken part in all its actions. People V. Hardison, 1985, 911 Dec. 162, 108. Requisite mens rea elements of conspiracy are satisfied upon showings of agreement of offense with intent that offense be committed; Actus reas element is satisfied of act in furtherance of agreement People V. Mordick, 1981, 50 ILL, Dec. 63

Vaughn 462 S. E. 2d 728 (Ga.1995), The Supreme Court of Georgia removed a Judge from office for disregarding defendant’s Constitutional rights; Hammel, 668 N. E. 2d 390 (N.Y. 1996) (Judge removed for improperly jailing defendants for their alleged failure to pay fines and make restitution which the judge had imposed, disregarding the defendants basic constitutional rights;

The United States Supreme Court recently acknowledged the judicial corruption in Cook County, when it stated that Judge "Maloney was one of many dishonest judges exposed and convicted through 'Operation Greylord', a labyrinthine federal investigation of judicial corruption in Chicago". Bracey v. Gramley, case No. 96-6133 (June 9, 1997).

Since judges who do not report the criminal activities of other judges become principals in the criminal activity, 18 U.S.C. Section 1, and since no judges have reported the criminal activity of the judges who have been convicted, the other judges are as guilty as the convicted judges.


TRESPASSERS OF THE LAW
The Illinois Supreme Court has held that "if the magistrate has not such jurisdiction, then he and those who advise and act with him, or execute his process, are trespassers." Von Kettler et.al. v. Johnson, 57 Ill. 109 (1870)
Under Federal law which is applicable to all states, the U.S. Supreme Court stated that if a court is "without authority, its judgments and orders are regarded as nullities. They are not voidable, but simply void; and form no bar to a recovery sought, even prior to a reversal in opposition to them. They constitute no justification; and all persons concerned in executing such judgments or sentences, are considered, in law, as trespassers." Elliot v. Piersol, 1 Pet. 328, 340, 26 U.S. 328, 340 (1828)

The Illinois Supreme Court held that if a court "could not hear the matter upon the jurisdictional paper presented, its finding that it had the power can add nothing to its authority, - it had no authority to make that finding." The People v. Brewer, 128 Ill. 472, 483 (1928).

When judges act when they do not have jurisdiction to act, or they enforce a void order (an order issued by a judge without jurisdiction), they become trespassers of the law, and are engaged in treason (see below).

The Court in Yates v. Village of Hoffman Estates, Illinois, 209 F. Supp. 757 (N.D. Ill. 1962) held that "not every action by a judge is in exercise of his judicial function. ... It is not a judicial function for a judge to commit an intentional tort even though the tort occurs in the courthouse." When a judge acts as a trespasser of the law, when a judge does not follow the law, the judge loses subject-matter jurisdiction and the judge’s orders are void, of no legal force or effect.

The U.S. Supreme Court, in Scheuer v. Rhodes, 416 U.S. 232, 94 S. Ct. 1683, 1687 (1974) stated that "when a state officer acts under a state law in a manner violative of the Federal Constitution, he "comes into conflict with the superior authority of that Constitution, and he is in that case stripped of his official or representative character and is subjected in his person to the consequences of his individual conduct. The State has no power to impart to him any immunity from responsibility to the supreme authority of the United States." [Emphasis supplied in original]. By law, a judge is a state officer.  The judge then acts not as a judge, but as a private individual (in his person).
 

        That said judges have violated the oath of their offices in that no Circuit Court judge ever had  jurisdiction but the Federal judges ignored the Treason Like offenses and continuously violated their oath on the bench;
  The U.S. Supreme Court has stated that "No state legislator or executive or judicial officer can war against the Constitution without violating his undertaking to support it.". Cooper v. Aaron, 358 U.S. 1, 78 S. Ct. 1401 (1958).

Any judge who does not comply with his oath to the Constitution of the United States wars against that Constitution and engages in acts in violation of the Supreme Law of the Land. The judge is engaged in acts of treason.   Having taken at least two, if not three, oaths of office to support the Constitution of the United States, and the Constitution of the State of Illinois, any judge who has acted in violation of the Constitution is engaged in an act or acts of treason (see below).   If a judge does not fully comply with the Constitution, then his orders are void, In re Sawyer, 124 U.S. 200 (1888), he/she is without jurisdiction, and he/she has engaged in an act or acts of treason.
TREASON
Whenever a judge acts where he/she does not have jurisdiction to act, the judge is engaged in an act or acts of treason. U.S. v. Will, 449 U.S. 200, 216, 101 S.Ct. 471, 66 L.Ed.2d 392, 406 (1980); Cohens v. Virginia, 19 U.S. (6 Wheat) 264, 404, 5 L.Ed 257 (1821)
Any judge or attorney who does not report the above judges for treason as required by law may themselves be guilty of misprision of treason, 18 U.S.C. Section 2382.


4.)       That the Judge  ignored the Defendant’s Motions accompanied with affidavits and clear attachments described as exhibits demonstrating a plethora of Criminal Civil Rights violations with “Fraudulent Acts surpassing human imagination became a “Trespasser of the Laws” signed and entered an order stating, “This court granted Plaintiff’s motion to remand “

A-    It further stated, “Having remanded the instant action to state court with a certified copy of the order, this court lacks jurisdiction over the instant matter”

B-     That because of the judges intimate ability in colluding with said attorneys clearly and convincingly violated all Canon Ethics and his jurisdiction by expeditiously having a certified order to be mailed remanding said matter back to state court claiming he had no jurisdiction;

Civil Rights Act of 1866- first section, enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled. That all persons born in the United States and not subject to any foreign power, excluding Indians not taxed, are hereby declared to be citizens of the United States; and such citizens of every race and color, without regard to any previous condition of slavery or involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall have the same right, in every State and Territory in the United States, to make and enforce contracts, to sue, be parties, and give evidence, to inherit, purchase, lease, sell, hold and convey real and personal property, and to full and equal benefit of the laws and proceedings for the security of person and property, as is enjoyed by white citizens, and shall be subject to like punishment, pains, and penalties, and to none other, any law, statute, ordinances, regulation, or custom, to the contrary notwithstanding, Act of April 9, 1866, Ch. 31, 1, 14 Stat. 27, 42 U.S.C.A. 1981 (a).
 In the 20th century, the Supreme Court began to overturn Jim Crow laws on constitutional grounds. In Buchanan v. Warley 245 US 60 (1917), the court held that a Kentucky law could not require residential segregation. The Supreme Court in 1946, in Irene Morgan v. Virginia ruled segregation in interstate transportation to be unconstitutional, in an application of the commerce clause of the Constitution. It was not until 1954 in Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka 347 US 483 that the court held that separate facilities were inherently unequal in the area of public schools, effectively overturning Plessy v. Ferguson, and outlawing Jim Crow in other areas of society as well. This landmark case consisted of complaints filed in the states of Delaware (Gebhart v. Belton); South Carolina (Briggs v. Elliott); Virginia (Davis v. County School Board of Prince Edward County); and Washington, D.C. (Spottswode Bolling v. C. Melvin Sharpe). These decisions, along with other cases such as McLaurin v. Oklahoma State Board of Regents 339 US 637 (1950), NAACP v. Alabama 357 US 449 (1958), and Boynton v. Virginia 364 US 454 (1960), slowly dismantled the state-sponsored segregation imposed by Jim Crow laws.
   As the color line itself solidified at the turn of the nineteenth century, Jim Crow imposed on black people clear tactical disadvantages: restricted economic possibilities, narrow educational opportunities, inadequate housing options, high rates of death and disablement, persistent unemployment, and unrelenting poverty. Inasmuch as Jim Crow represented the race problem described by Gunnar Myrdal (18981987) in his 1944 treatise The American Dilemma, it was Jim Crow that created the race quandary; whites constructed the obstacles African Americans confronted, while also blaming them for their conditions, denying them access to the resources of problem solving, and daring themunder threat of violenceto complain, protest, or advance.

   Finally, protests or challenges to Jim Crow often proved futile, given law enforcements complicity in the structure. From emancipation to the turn of the century, the Ku Klux Klan operated as a paramilitary arm of the Democratic Party in the South. The Klan, nightriders, red shirts, and other white terrorists intimidated African Americans with personal attacks, school burnings, and lynchings. African Americans rarely served as policemen, sheriffs, or deputies before the late 1940s. During the 1950s and 1960s, the connections between municipal and state governments, law enforcement, and racial violence were well known by officials and citizens alike. White officers were known to harass black people, disrupt black neighborhoods, and assault black women. Arrested for inflated charges, denied satisfactory counsel, and serving harsh sentences, African Americans were further disadvantaged in the courtroom. Rarely did they receive good counsel, nor could they serve on juries. When black lawyers could appear in the courtroom to argue cases, white judges and juries rarely listened. All-white juries decided against black defendants, even in the most obvious cases of innocence, but rarely convicted white defendants, despite evidence of guilt. African Americansincluding the innocentsuffered the harsher punishments of extended jail time, forced farm labor, and peonage. Even women could be placed on the chain gangs working the roads and tracks across the South.

The Chicago Daily Law Bulletin, Wednesday April 26, 2006, Page 1, Illinois Political Machines help breed corruption, Associated Press writer Deanna Bellandi states, “Illinois is apparently a Petri dish for corruption. It is a real breeding ground”.         

That Chicago is the most Corrupt City in America, Huffington Post, Internet Newspaper, February 23, 2012; University of Illinois Professor Dick Simpson, “The two worst crime zones in Illinois are the governor’s mansion…..and the City Council Chambers in Chicago.” Simpson a former Chicago Alderman told the AP “no other State can match us.”   

Turner 24 F. Cas. 337 (No. 14247) C.C.D. Md. 1867) the “equal benefit” clause is cited in what would appear to be the earliest reported case enforcing the section. The plaintiff was an emancipated slave who was indentured as an apprentice to her former master. Although both whites and blacks could be indentured as an apprentice, under the law of Maryland, indentured blacks were not accorded the same educational benefits as whites and, unlike whites, were subject to being transferred to any other person in the same county. Circuit Judge Chase granted a writ of habeas corpus upon finding that the purported apprenticeship was in fact involuntary servitude and a denial under the Civil Rights Act of 1866 of the “full and equal benefit of all laws.

5.)         That The judge’s orders of Nov 22, 2016 citing 28 U.S.C. 352 (b)(1)(A)(ii) and   spews the racial hatred and disdain said judges have against the Appellant as they willfully engaged in Treason, Trespassing upon the Laws ; See Gr Ex B, Petition to Transfer to Another Judicial Council, (filed Dec 9, 2016)

6.)       “Any judge who does not comply with his oath to the Constitution of the United States wars against that Constitution and engages in acts in violation of the Supreme Law of the Land. The judge is engaged in acts of treason. Having taken at least two, if not three oaths of office to support the Constitution of the United States, and the Constitution of the State of Illinois, any judge who has acted in violation of the Constitution is engaged in an act or acts of treason. If a judge does not fully comply with the Constitution, then his orders are void, In re Sawyer, 124 U.S. 200 (1888) he/she is without jurisdiction , and he/she has engaged in an act or acts of treason.”          
 
7.)   A judge’s disrespect for the rules of court demonstrates disrespect for the law. Judges are disciplined under Canon 2A for violating court rules and procedures. Judge ignored mandated witness order in attempt to accommodate witnesses’ schedules; Citing Canon 2A the court noted, “[a] court’s indifference to clearly stated rules breeds disrespect for and discontent with our justice system. Government can not demand respect of the laws by its citizens when its tribunals ignore those very same laws”)

8.)   Finally, “An Evaluation of the United States District Court Judges in Chicago, by the Chicago Council of Lawyers was had against Judge Samuel Der-Yeghiayan, states Page 10, Par.2, While a minority of lawyers commented positively on Judge Der-Yeghiayan, the vast majority of lawyers interviewed gave him poor marks on virtually all areas relevant to the Council’s evaluation, and these poor marks are consistent with the ratings given to Judge Der-Yeghiayan by respondents to the Council’s written survey”
A-    That said report truly find him unqualified and stated, “he lacks an adequate understanding of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and suggested that the judge’s background had not prepared him to assume such an important post.” 6

                                                                        
  
Wherefore the Foregoing Reasons, Appellant Prays for the following relief:

1.)   Appellant requests that another Honorable Court of Appeals, Judicial Circuit accept Jurisdiction of this matter and Invoke authority Instanter and reassign this matter accordingly and or due to the unprecedented Terrorist Civil Rights said attorneys and judges are complicit in, Order a Rule to Show Cause for Remands and Indictments on all parties associated in said Treason Offenses;

2.)    Impose Sanctions/Remands against and all parties for Contempt of the United States Constitution for their crimes against the Defendant/Government 

3.)   Issue an Injunction on U S Bank and all judges presiding in the matter trying to steal Defendants home in the unlawful application of Foreclosure and relied on judges acting outside their jurisdiction committing treason offenses; 

4.)   Issue an Order Nullifying Voiding all orders and Chief Judge in the Court of Appeals absent a signature, due to “Fraud” “Treason” Trespassing upon the Laws” and other Civil Rights Violations;

5.)   An order issuing a Moratorium on all Foreclosures in Cook County Circuit courts, Appellate Court or Supreme Court of Illinois where Wells Fargo and U. S. Bank are a party to foreclosures where “Fraud” and treason is apparent and not being properly registered in the State of Illinois; 
        
Finally, this Affidavit is best closed by a jurist who has stated”; Citing Canon 2A the court noted, “[a] court’s indifference to clearly stated rules breeds disrespect for and discontent with our justice system. Government can not demand respect of the laws by its citizens when its tribunals ignore those very same laws”)

Federal Court FEDERAL JUDGE GETTLEMAN: stated, Tuesday March 10, 2009, where he found Superintendent of police Jody Weiss in Contempt of Court and Ordered the City to Pay $100,000.00, “No one is above the Law”, he cited a 1928 decision by Supreme Court Justice Louis Brandeis, that said, “If the Government becomes the law breaker, it breeds Contempt for the Law, It invites everyman to become a law unto himself. It invites Anarchy.”           

   The Chicago Daily Law Bulletin, Wednesday April 26, 2006, Page 1, Illinois Political Machines help breed corruption, Associated Press writer Deanna Bellandi states, “Illinois is apparently a Petri dish for corruption. It is a real breeding ground”.         

   That Chicago is the most Corrupt City in America, Huffington Post, Internet Newspaper, February 23, 2012; University of Illinois Professor Dick Simpson, “The two worst crime zones in Illinois are the governor’s mansion…..and the City Council Chambers in Chicago.” Simpson a former Chicago Alderman told the AP “no other State can match us.”   
                                                                                                                                                                             
                                                                                    Respectfully Submitted
                                                                               _____________________                                                                                 
                                                                               Monzella Y. Johnson
                                                                              5217 S. Ingleside Ave.
                                                                               Chicago, IL. 60615
                                                                                                    





























   JUDICIAL CONFERENCE COMMITTEE ON JUDICIAL AND DISABILITY
                 ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES
                                 ONE COLUMBUS CIRCLE, NE
                                   WASHINGTON D. C. 20544


Monzella Johnson,
     Petitioner                                                                        07-16-90079

v

Diane P. Wood, Samuel Der-Yeghiayan, Pamela Myerson Timothy C. Evans
Anne M. Burke, Robert R. Thomas, Charles Freeman, Thomas L. Kilbride,
Lloyd A. Karmeier, Rita Garman, Mary Jane Theis et al.

     Respondents


 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I  Monzella Y. Johnson, certify that I have on this day filed said Notice of Motion for Disqualification of judge et al. Before the Seventh Circuit United States Court of Appeals and noted parties.

To: Dir. James Comey, FBI 601 4th Street Washington D.C. 20535
          FBI Michael J. Anderson 2111 West Roosevelt Road, Chicago, Ill. 60612
          US Attorney, Zachary T. Fardon 219 S. Dearborn, Suite 500

Judicial Conference Committee on Judicial and Disability
Attn: Office of General Counsel
Administrative Office of the United States Courts
One Columbus Circle, NE
Washington, D.C. 20544

                PLEASE BE ADVISED that on February 9, 2017, A Petition for Review et al has been filed before the Judicial Conference et al. Washington D.C. 

                                                                          Respectfully Submitted,
                                                                                    
                                                                               _____________________                                                                                  
                                                                              5217 S. Ingleside Ave.
                                                                               Chicago, IL. 60615


        JUDICIAL CONFERENCE COMMITTEE ON JUDICIAL AND DISABILITY
                 ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES
                                 ONE COLUMBUS CIRCLE, NE
                                   WASHINGTON D. C. 20544
                                  
               

 Monzella Johnson,
     Petitioner                                                                        07-16-90079

v

Diane P. Wood, Samuel Der-Yeghiayan, Pamela Myerson Timothy C. Evans
Anne M. Burke, Robert R. Thomas, Charles Freeman, Thomas L. Kilbride,
Lloyd A. Karmeier, Rita Garman, Mary Jane Theis et al.

     Respondents

                                                                                                                  
                                                  AFFIDAVIT

I Monzella Y. Johnson, files herewith her affidavit as required by Title 28, United States Code:

I Monzella Y. Johnson Pro Se being duly sworn on oath states the aforementioned pleadings enumerated within said Petition for Review et al, the undersigned certifies that the statements set forth in this instrument are true and correct, except as to matters therein stated to be on information and belief and as to such matters, the undersigned certifies as aforesaid that he verily believes the same to be true.

Respectfully Submitted                                                         Notary
                                                                        
____________________
Monzella Y. Johnson
5217 S. Ingleside. Ave
Chicago, Il 60615
773 835-5849



 That it is apparent no judge in the Seventh Circuit were aware they had become Trespassers of the laws and committed Treason pursuant to the aforementioned acts and are the new “Weapons of Mass Destruction” and a dangerous Threat to National Security due to their abuse of Power;


The U.S. Supreme Court, in Scheuer v. Rhodes, 416 U.S. 232, 94 S. Ct. 1683, 1687 (1974) stated that "when a state officer acts under a state law in a manner violative of the Federal Constitution, he "comes into conflict with the superior authority of that Constitution, and he is in that case stripped of his official or representative character and is subjected in his person to the consequences of his individual conduct. The State has no power to impart to him any immunity from responsibility to the supreme authority of the United States." [Emphasis supplied in original].

Under Federal law which is applicable to all states, the U.S. Supreme Court stated that if a court is "without authority, its judgments and orders are regarded as nullities. They are not voidable, but simply void; and form no bar to a recovery sought, even prior to a reversal in opposition to them. They constitute no justification; and all persons concerned in executing such judgments or sentences, are considered, in law, as trespassers." Elliot v. Piersol, 1 Pet. 328, 340, 26 U.S. 328, 340 (1828)


I affirm the above as being true.

                                                                                 Respectfully Submitted

                                                                               _________________________
                                                                                 Monzella Y. Johnson                                                                                                                    
                                                                                 5217 S. Ingleside Ave.
                                                                                  Chicago, IL. 60615