Wikipedia Racial Injustice in Chicago Courts

Search results

Thursday, August 29, 2019


JUDICIAL COMPLAINT & MOTION TO DISQUALIFY CHARLES R. NORGLE, SR. ALLEGED WHITE NATIONALIST FROM THE ILLINOIS NORTHERN DISTRICT

JUDGE NORGLE NEVER DENIED HE WAS A RACIST OR "WHITE NATIONALIST"

HE AGREED WITH EVERYTHING RECORDED IN THE MOTION TO SUPPLEMENT MOTION ET AL. THAT IS WHY HE SIGNED THE COURT ORDER AUGUST 19, 2019 BUT REFUSED TO GRANT THE JUDGMENT OF $33 MILLION DOLLARS ONLY BECAUSE OF RACIST HATEFUL DEMEANOR

CHICAGO'S LEGAL SYSTEM AND JUDGES ARE ENFORCING LAWS INDICATIVE TO A 3RD WORLD COUNTRY RACIAL HATRED IS WORSE IN ILLINOIS THAN ANY SOUTHERN STATE.

JUDGES ARE USING THE LAWS AS WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION DESTROYING PEOPLE UNLAWFULLY BECAUSE THEY DON'T MEET THE ETHNICITY OF THOSE PRESIDING ON THE BENCHES.

WHILE COWARDLY MEN GO OUT AND MASS SHOOT UP A COMMUNITY KILLING ETHNIC GROUPS NOT OF THEIR ETHNICITY THE JUDGES HERE IN THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS AND SEVENTH CIRCUIT EMULATE THE SAME VILE RACIST HATE BY MISAPPLYING THE LAWS COMMITTING PERJURY TO ETHNIC GROUPS THEY DEEM INFERIOR TO THEM AS ARTICULATED IN THIS DOCUMENT.

1.      That it is clear no Hispanic or Black person described as a Democrat in Cook County have any real authority where it matters especially as demonstrated in this

cause, “Jim Crow” laws are being enforced by spineless men of color and racist men hiding behind men of color using them as the Enforcers using the laws as weapons to Terrorize, Bully or “Lynch” anyone that challenges said Democrats in these unlawful proceedings as articulated throughout all pleadings and affidavits.  

Not since the Book Lawyers and Judges in Collusion The Fraternity, by John Fitzgerald Molloy said former judge articulated the horrors within the legal arena but the Plaintiff has went even further granting the “Blue Print on Domestic Terrorism” and the extent a judge will go to destroy the lives of innocent men and women of color.

What is most appalling is the extent colored judges so as to be accepted by a party that has been typically historically racist as Democrats are willing to perpetrate injustice on their own ethnicity so as to prove and be accepted by a party that has wielded so much Hate at a man simply because of the color of his skin.   

Plaintiff Prays further that this Honorable Judge recognize the Plaintiff as a Freeman Born & Raised in these United States of America and not inferior or less than any man responsible for the incitement of these heinous Hateful Acts. 

                                                      IN THE
                                          UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                                                 FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT
                                                    CHICAGO, ILLINOIS 60604




 Joe Louis Lawrence                                                    Civil Action #93 CV

                                                                                       Hon:  Charles R. Norgle Sr.
  Plaintiff

    V

 Chicago Transit Authority

 Defendants

                                                                                    JUDICIAL COMPLAINT


                                                     
To the Honorable Justices of the Seventh Circuit of the United States Court of Appeals:


    Complainant a United States Citizen, Born & Raised a Free Man  Joe Louis Lawrence, hereby respectfully represents as Counsel Pro Se shows this court with corroboration/admissions and Court Order the noted reasons why this matter should be within this Court’s Jurisdiction so as to Vacate the court order reassign this matter to a judge with integrity, not affiliated with the Terrorist Democratic and some noted Republican Judges who have assumed the roles as “Private Citizens” “Trespassing upon the Laws” protecting the Alleged “White Nationalists”; {Pursuant to Fed Rules of Civil Procedure and   with Affidavit.


   Now comes Joe Louis Lawrence, Counsel Pro Se Appellant in this cause  files herewith his affidavit as required by Title 28, United States Code, Section 144, to show that the “Private Citizen” Charles R. Norgle, Sr. has a personal bias with compelling evidence  against him where a proper sufficient Motion for Summary Judgment was filed stating a cause how and why this court has jurisdiction to grant said motion never objected to or denied by any of the Defendants; motions corroborating judicial corruption with court transcripts demonstrating “Fraud” “Trespassing upon the Laws” “Perjury” and a plethora of “Terrorist Civil Rights Acts” put before the court that the District Court ignored upholding Racism and Terrorism in the courts.

   That said judge has corroborated and demonstrated his role unequivocally as a “Trespasser of the Laws” when he HEARD testimony with affidavits DENIED said Motion, to Vacate August 8, 2019 Court Order due to Fraud et al. after the Defendants admitted to every PLEADING recorded.     

   Based thereon, Plaintiff-Complainant respectfully moves that the judge Robert R. Norgle, Sr. proceed no further herein and that this Honorable Seventh Circuit invoke jurisdiction; and transfer this matter outside of the Northern District Of Illinois and away from the Seventh Circuit due to members of the Democratic Political Machine seizing control over all courts and certain judges politically appointed because of their racist hatred of ethnic groups they deem inferior to them so as to  enforce the laws pursuant to the United States Constitution who is not Bias and understands how to enforce the laws in accordance to the United States Constitution and according to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure to hear this proceeding who is not intimidated or fear reprisals from these individuals.
  
Pursuant  to Rule 26  it implements the Breyer Committee’s recommended use of transfers. Breyer Committee Report, 239 F.R.D. at 214-15.
Rule 26 authorizes the transfer of a complaint proceeding to another judicial council selected by the Chief Justice. Such transfers may be appropriate, for example, in the case of a serious complaint where there are multiple disqualifications among the original council, where the issues are highly visible and a local disposition may weaken public confidence in the process, where internal tensions arising in the council as a result of the complaint render disposition by a less involved council appropriate, or where a complaint calls into question policies or governance of the home court of appeals et al.        

   Now comes Joe Louis Lawrence, Attorney Pro Se Appellant in this cause files herewith his affidavit as required by Title 28, attesting the veracity and accuracy of all statements recorded within.      

                                                                                                                                                                                               

   



                                                                 Respectfully Submitted,

                                                        By:   _________________          

                                                                                             Joe Louis Lawrence
                                                                                                 Counsel Pro Se
                                                                                               P. O. Box 490075
                                                                                                   312 965-6455
                                                                          Joelouis565@yahoo.com
                                                                              @joelouis


                                                           IN THE
                             UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                                                 FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT
                                                    CHICAGO, ILLINOIS 60604
                                                  

                                                           AFFIDAVIT
                                                                                                                                                               
IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR  MOTION FOR DISQUALIFICATION OF JUDGE/VACATE AUGUST 19, 2019 COURT ORDER—(DUE TO PRIMA FACIE ADMISSIONS OF COURT ORDER AUGUST 20, 2019 GRANTING MOTION TO SUPPLEMENT ET AL.) PERSONAL BIAS AND JUDGE NORGLE AS AN ALLEGED WHITE NATIONALIST ENGAGING IN HATE CRIMES OF AN ACTIVE “ORGANIZED CONSPIRACY” W/AFFIDAVIT  {28 USCA 144, 455 (B) (1)} VACATE ORDER OF AUGUST 19 2019 DUE TO ORDER BEING A “NULLITY” “VOID” FRAUDULENTLY ENTERED


{Pursuant to the Rules of Federal Civil Procedure & U.S. Constitution}

   In 1986 the United States Supreme Court issued three decisions clarifying Rule 56. Though there was a dissent in every decision, there was also substantial agreement among all the opinions. Justices Powell, Marshall and O'Connor joined every majority. Only Justice Brennan dissented in every case, and even then, he agreed in large part with the majority's analysis of Rule 56, but judges in the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals do not honor or abide by the laws of the United States Supreme Court; due, to their Terrorist Control over the entire legal tribunals of the State, City and Cook County and certain Federal Republican judges, in that, only those in majority of the Corrupt Democratic Political Machine and it’s noted conspirators are the benefactors in these tyranny offenses while the innocent and the just people of color are suffering at the helm of Terrorist controlling the legal tribunals.
“No one is above the Law”,  citing a 1928 decision by Supreme Court Justice Louis Brandeis Olmstead v. United States, 277 U.S. 438 (1928),
“We must subject government officials to the same rules of conduct that we expect of the citizen. The very existence of the government is imperiled if it fails to observe the law scrupulously. As Brandeis puts it, "if the government becomes a lawbreaker, it breeds contempt for law; it invites every man to become a law unto himself; it invites anarchy. To declare that in the administration of the criminal law the end justifies the means—to declare that the government may commit crimes in order to secure the conviction of a private criminal—would bring terrible retribution. Against that pernicious doctrine this court should resolutely set its face."         


         Section 1983 of U.S.C.S., S.H.A. Criminal Ch. 38, 33-3, Civil Rights Act of 1964, Canon 3D (1) Reporting Judicial Misconduct, 3D (2) Reporting Lawyer Misconduct;


I am Joe Louis Lawrence, Native/African American “Free Man” born a United States Citizen not a deportee, not a slave or illegal immigrant, not inferior to another man’s color of his or her skin, Heterosexual Man Born and Raised a Free MAN Counsel Pro Se, HAVE BEEN MANY TIMES DENIED IN ALL COURTS BUT NEVER TRIED being duly sworn on oath states:  


1.)        That on  July 26, 2019, Plaintiff appeared Judge Norgle pursuant to his Motion Call for a Summary judgment;

A-   Plaintiff received a phone call Thursday (July 25, 2019 in the afternoon) from the Judges Clerk that the judge want’s us in court tomorrow all attorneys.

B-   That presented his, Gr Ex A Motion for Summary Judgment, no attorney from the CTA filed an Appearance or appeared before the court to defend any of the assertions properly plead; thereby validating the verity of all pleadings being factual, In the case of Raymond, 442 F. 3d at 606.(7th Cir. 2013)  The Court, nevertheless, is concerned and considers the prejudice to Plaintiff for Plaintiff’s counsel’s failure, particularly because cases should be decided on their merits. Certainly, the failure to file a response to a summary judgment motion can be fatal. See, e.g., id at 611.  

C-    That upon completion of Plaintiff’s successful argument as the judge made a series of redundant interrogatories at him, that which was answered coherently as possible, hereto attached, Gr Ex B, Court Transcript of July 26, 2019, with the Motion to Supplement et al attached, whereby; said judge entered an order “Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment is taken under advisement” , Ref as Ex C Court Order of July 26, 2019, but most importantly Judge Norgle asked Page 15 Line 23 “You’re seeking $33 Million”? Line 24 Plaintiff’s reply, “Well, it’s the Court’s discretion”--  Line 25 Judge Norgle “What is your demand, damages”? Plaintiff Lines 1-6 “I’ve been off work, I’ve been harassed, I’ve been forced to live as a criminal for reasons that I did not deserve this, my family has been affected, and that is the reason why I put $33 Million on there. Of course, the Court has discretion to determine a ruling that they feel is favorable based on what I’ve been through.” Judge Norgle Lines 7-8 “Who do you want to pay”? “Are you saying the CTA should pay you $33 Million”? Plaintiff Lines 9-11 “Unless the Court decides otherwise, the Chicago Transit Authority was, in fact, the principal parties that took place in falsifying all these documents”. Judge Norgle Lines 12-13 “Who else would pay you any part of the $33 Million”? Plaintiff Lines 14-15 “Well, Your Honor, that’s up to the Court’s discretion”. Judge Norgle Line 16 “Well who are you saying”? Plaintiff “Well, there was judges involved that acted as private citizens, because the judge that issued the bogus warrant was a CTA employee. He had no reasons to issue a warrant and that’s how my badge was taken off me. I wouldn't even be in this matter if it wasn't for what that judge did”. Judge Norgle Line 22 “Which Judge? Plaintiff Line 23 “Ronald Bartkowicz, Cook County judge.” Judge Norgle Line 24, “Are you suing him”? Plaintiff Line 25 Page 17 Line 1 “No Sir Your Honor. You asked me a question, I’m responding to you.” Judge Norgle Page 17 Lines 2-3 judge Norgle, “Yeah. Well, I’m trying to find out who you’re suing. So it all gets down to the CTA”? Plaintiff Lines 4-5 “All of this here took place within the CTA, yes, Your Honor”. Judge Norgle Line 6 “So the single defendant here is the CTA”? Plaintiff  Line 7 “that is correct, Your Honor”, Judge Norgle Line 8 “Okay, And you want $33 Million”? Plaintiff Line 9 “Yes”. Judge Norgle Lines 10-11Okay, The matter is under advisement. Thank you”.  

2.)      That Judge Norgle perpetrated the crimes of mail fraud and other criminal actions by Inducing certain federal personnel that Plaintiff had not provided on his email hereto attached, Ref as Ex D, “states ORDER: Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment [31] is denied as frivolous. The docket reflects that Plaintiff has not provided a valid mailing address to the clerk; thus, the Clerk is directed to deliver a copy of this order to Plaintiff by any means practicable, including electronic delivery to the email address listed in the instant motion et al.”

3.)      That Judge Norgle engaged in acts of subornation of perjury, in that Plaintiff reported to the Federal Building August 19, 2019 and learned from a new clerk that court orders had been mailed to 5950 North Kenmore and that the mail had been returned back to clerk of the Federal Court and Plaintiff had received a copy of  the order with a plethora of “Fraudulent” entries said lies were likened to "dandelions in the spring grass” "The entire defense was a lie," the judge said. Charles Norgle’s exact quote when he sentenced, Angela Jackson former law student was sentenced to nearly 5 1/2 years in prison Tuesday for writing racial slurs on several packages delivered to her home in a scheme to extort more than $500,000 from United Parcel Service. (Chicago Tribune May 12, 1999, Matt O’Connor Tribune Staff Reporter).
A-    That first of all, please find lies in series, “Plaintiff has not cited a specific Federal Rule of Civil Procedure as the basis for bringing this motion.”

B-    THE QUESTION BEGS TO KNOW HOW MANY YEARS WILL HE GET FOR THE NUMBER OF ORCHESTRATED LIES HE HAS PREPARED IN HIS COURT ORDER?
  
C-    That pursuant to the aforementioned, Page 1, ref as Gr Ex E of the Motion to Reinstate Case due to Democratic judges/attorneys Trespassing upon the laws committing Treason acting as Private Citizens making the District Court Order “Void” a “Nullity”  Par 1 is a Federal Precedent by the United Supreme Court, states “Under Federal law which is applicable to all states, the U.S. Supreme Court stated that if a court is “without authority, its judgments and orders are regarded as nullities. They are not voidable, but simply void; and form no bar to a recovery sought, even prior to a reversal in opposition to them. They constitute no justification; and all persons concerned in executing such judgments or sentences, are considered, in law, as trespassers. “Elliot v. Piersol, 1 Pet. 328, 340, 26 U.S. 328, 340 (1828).

D-    That judge Norgle allegedly conspired with a Federal Clerk who purportedly mailed the September 27, 2018 and December 21, 2018 court orders to his Post Office Box 490075 Chicago, Il. 60649, but was unlawfully mailing additional court orders to 5950 North Kenmore, Chicago, Il. 60660 where they were returned and is noted in the Federal database.

E-     That Plaintiff lived in that Condominium when he was an injured employee with the Chicago Transit Authority and lost his unit (around 1995 or 1996) due to the CTA not paying him any workman’s compensation and racially discriminated against him for not falsifying the merits in how his work-related injury was sustained so as to use a Public Aid medical card to ascertain all medical expenses from the injury.

F-     That Plaintiff have never ever did an address change but the Seventh Circuit and other District Court Judges had Plaintiff’s Post Office Box number due to him not having a legal address being legally homeless, in that judge Franklin Ulysses Valderamma and Robert M. Dow, Jr. systematically corroborated their roles in said “Organized Conspiracy” denied every motion Summary Judgment, Court Transcripts and Affidavits so as to protect all alleged “White Nationalists Democrats and Racist Republicans caught up in said Conspiracy making sure he remained homeless not being able to use his Section 8 voucher to live in what was described as Mobility areas because of his skin color and he didn’t pay the alleged $1000-$2000 for his voucher to City Hall Officials, but 420 East Ohio took approximately $700 from him and never returned it and K2 took $500 from him and never returned his money but 345 East Ohio returned his checks telling him if he made $140,000.00 a year he qualified to live in hteir units with his voucher, (and put it in writing) so the alleged “White Nationalists Democrats in the Political Machine” and Alleged Puppet Inferior Niggers” did everything from a Psychotic Demonic perspective corroborating Terrorists have taken seize of the legal venues warranting Military support for the effective eradication of all insurgents working against the government.

G-    That said court order of August 19, 2019 is  “FRAUDULENT” from the beginning to the end, ref as Ex D.

4.)   That Judge Norgle became a law unto himself corroborating his role as a “White Nationalist” engaging in Racist Hate Crimes became a law unto himself ignored the United States Supreme Court and Local Rules of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois. The Local Rules provide detailed instructions as to how litigants should approach their summary judgment motions and responses. Local Rule 56.1(a) provides that a motion for summary must include a "statement of material facts as to which the moving party contends there is no genuine issue and that entitle the moving party to a judgment as a matter of law."

This statement of material facts "shall consist of short numbered paragraphs, including within each paragraph specific references to the affidavits, parts of the record, and other supporting materials relied upon to support the facts set forth in that paragraph." Part (b) of Local Rule 56.1 requires a party opposing summary 4 judgment to file a concise response to the movant's statement of material facts. That statement is required to include a response to each numbered paragraph in the moving party's statement, including in the case of any disagreement, "specific references to the affidavits, parts of the record, and other supporting materials relied upon." The rule is very clear that "all material facts set forth in the statement required of the moving party will be deemed admitted unless controverted by the statement of the opposing party." Local Rule 56.1(b)(3)(B).

5.)       That because Federal Judge Norgle has corroborated and admitted his role in this “Organized Conspiracy” by signing the Court Order (August 20, 2019) ref as Gr Ex B Motion to Supplement Motion with Court Transcript of July 26, 2019 that Corroborates judge Norgle as an Alleged White Nationalist Engaging in Hate Crimes of an Active “Organized Conspiracy” w Affidavit whereby warranting the Jurisdiction of the Federal Bureau of Investigations/United States Attorney  negates any of his alleged Brethren to preside over this case in the Seventh Circuit due to Page 1 states “That judge Norgle’s ruling against the Plaintiff is predicated on Racism, Racial Hatred because of Plaintiff’s skin color”.

6.)        That because Federal Judge Norgle has corroborated and admitted his role in this “Organized Conspiracy” in fact “Nullifies” the August 19, 2019 court order making it “Void”.

7.)        That Judge Norgle realizes that he is caught in this Diabolical Heinous Hate Crime making it clear to his Brethren if he is going down everybody is going down with him said inferior Negroes and Colored people along with the alleged “White Nationalist” in the Democratic Political Machine are no longer conspiring with the Plaintiff now their crimes are against the government pursuant to the Ku Klux Klan Act of 1871.

Section 4 the law is clear, “Whenever in any State or part of a State………unlawful combinations…….shall be organized and armed, and so numerous and powerful et al…………and whenever, by reason of either or all of the causes aforesaid, the conviction of such offenders and the preservation of the public safety shall become…..Impracticable, in every such case such combinations shall be deemed a rebellion against the Government of the United States…

A-    Posner: ABA Journal (September 11, 2017)  Most judges regard pro se litigants as 'kind of trash not worth the time' Posner, 78, told the Chicago Daily Law Bulletin last week that he decided to retire because of conflicts with his colleagues over the treatment of pro se litigants, who represent themselves. In a new interview with the New York Times, Posner elaborated on his concerns about the treatment of such litigants.
8.)    “The basic thing is that most judges regard these people as kind of trash not worth the time of a federal judge,” Posner said.
In the 7th Circuit, staff lawyers review appeals from pro se litigants, and their recommendations are generally rubber-stamped by judges, he noted.
Posner wanted to give the pro se litigants a better shake by reviewing all of the staff attorney memos before they went to the panel of judges. Posner had approval from the director of the staff attorney program. “But the judges, my colleagues, all 11 of them, turned it down and refused to give me any significant role. I was very frustrated by that,” Posner said.
Posner has written about the pro se issue in an upcoming book, and its publication “would be particularly awkward” if he remained on the court because it “implicitly or explicitly” criticizes the other judges, he said.
That Pursuant to Judge Posner’s admissions about said Federal judges and the corroboration recorded in this document demonstrates Prejudice, Bias, Racial Hate Crimes, demonstrates Unequal Treatment of the Laws, demonstrates Disparate Dispensation of the Laws at the Petitioner due to his skin color, demonstrates how effective how alleged “White Nationalist judges” are in Inducing Reliance Mississippi Comm’n on Judicial Performance v. Fletcher, 686 So. 2d 1075 (Miss. 1996)  and  Carter v. Mueller, 457 N.E. 2d 1335 Ill. App. (1st Dist. 1983) on several Judges in the Court of Appeals and others in legal authority conspiring against Petitioner, in that, said individuals of this Secret Fraternal Order Invoked Racial Apartheid, Invoked Genocidal Applications of the laws in accordance to their by-laws of the Fraternity, and total disregard to any laws of the United States Constitution Commentary Canon 2, 2A 2C,  Crawford v. State, 770 N.E. 2d 775 (Ind. Dash, 564 S.E. 2d 672 (S.C. 2002), Ferra, 582 N.W. 2d 817 (Mich 1998)
9.)      That very few judges especially Norgle seems to have the aptitude being in the legal profession the question is how many other judges like him are presiding on the bench?

10.)         That Pursuant to Page 4 Par  11, Motion to Vacate August 8, 2019 et al. That Judge Norgle had alleged knowledge Judge Dow seemingly got away with his corroboration being an alleged participant in a “White Nationalist Organized Criminal Conspiracy” as a “Private Citizen” not a Federal judge for which he took his oath and appointed to the bench had a Motion for Disqualification of judge Personal Bias or Prejudice {28 USCA 144, 455 (B) (1) } Vacate Order of May 3, 2018 & May 9, due to Federal Clerk Committing Fraud Entering Court Order in Computer Unlawfully as Gr Ex C before the Court of Appeals Seventh Circuit.
A-   That Gr Ex C had directed evidence and corroboration of judge Dow engaging in an active Criminal Terrorist Racist Conspiracy where he signed a court order dated April 3rd, 2018, see Page 4, Pars 3-5, Par 4, “That the Judge used his position and authority in an attempt to undermine the integrity of Plaintiff’s motion by Inducing Reliance on all persons and judges reviewing this matter; in that Page 2 of the manufactured order that corroborates the Judge as a “Private Citizen states Milchtein v Chisholm, 880 F 3d 895, 897 (7th Cir 2018)”  

B-   That Par 5, states “That said order demonstrates said judge colluding in a diabolical conspiracy with the Defendants, Memorandum Decision and Order Granting Motion for Partial Summary Judgment which was filed April 24th,  2018 et al.

C-   That from the May 2, 2018 Court Transcript ref as Gr Ex F Page 2 Lines 9-10 Judge Dow engaged in Perjury, stated “did you get the order that I sent out about a month ago on April 3rd? There was an order…”

11.)              That because there are judges in the Seventh Circuit as alleged “White Nationalist” makes it totally impossible for any judge to preside over this matter, due to the following ref as Gr Ex G Judicial Complaint naming a plethora of Democratic Judges complicit in Terrorist Acts “Trespassing upon the Laws” where Seventh Circuit judges closed their eyes as alleged “White Nationalists” also ref as Gr Ex H Petition to Transfer to Another Judicial Council went ignored while former President Obama was in office as racist alleged “White Nationalist” ran the gamut on Judicial Corruption staying ahead of any government investigation due to the aforementioned;

12.)             That if  Federal Officials had a forensic IT specialist to investigate the data system of April 3, 2018 they would see that judge Dow never DENIED his Summary Judgment because at the time of Motion being filed for Summary Judgment Plaintiff nor the clerks saw the Order in the system; otherwise, Plaintiffs motion never would have been filed or made it on the Judges Motion call what is so ironic a clerk with impeccable integrity was training a new clerk and specifically articulated to them “you have to check and make sure the case is not closed before you enter motions in the system”.

13.)           That on December 18, 2017 Judge Robert M. Dow, Jr. entered a “Minute Order” hereto attached, “Plaintiff’s motion to reinstate the case is taken under advisement. The court will issue a ruling by mail after it has taken an opportunity to review the motion and the prior history of the case, .et al. Notice of motion date of 12/21/2017 is stricken and no appearances are necessary on that date.” Is the only court order Plaintiff ever received from the court.

14.)           That “Private Citizen” Robert M. Dow, Jr. violated his oath operated outside of his jurisdiction became a “Trespasser of the Laws” engaging in “Treason” signed an order of April 3, 2018 but relied on alleged “White Nationalist to “War against the United States Constitution” by “Trespassing upon the Laws” engaging in “Treason Offenses” now Norgle is hoping other judges would help him or sink with him in this Mayhem.

15.)          That the Judge used his position and authority in an attempt to undermine the integrity of Plaintiff’s motion by Inducing Reliance on all persons and judges reviewing this matter; in that Page 2 of the manufactured order that corroborates the Judge as a “Private Citizen” states Milchtein v Chisholm, 880 F 3d 895, 897 (7th Cir 2018)  

16.)          That said order demonstrates said judge colluding in a diabolical conspiracy with the Defendants, “Memorandum Decision and Order Granting Motion for Partial Summary Judgment which was filed April 24th, 2018, validating the verity that a Federal Clerk has used their position and authority to commit a criminal act engaging in now a conspiracy pursuant to Mansell v. Saunders (CA 5 F 1A) 372 F 573, especially if the conspiracy was actually carried into effect, where an action is for a conspiracy to interfere with Civil Rights under 42 U.S.C.S. 1985 (3), or for the depravation of such rights under 42 U.S.C.S. 1983, if the conspiracy was actually carried into effect and plaintiff was thereby deprived of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the United States Constitution and Laws, the gist of the action may be treated as one for the depravation of rights under 42 U.S.C.S. 1983,



A-    To show fraud upon the court, the complaining party must establish that the alleged misconduct affected the integrity of the judicial process, either because the court itself was defrauded or because the misconduct was perpetrated by officers of the court. Alexander v. Robertson, 882, F. 2d 421,424 (9th Cir. 1989);

B-      A void judgment does not create any binding obligation. Kalb v. Feuerstein (1940) 308 US 433, 60 S Ct 343, 84 L, Ed 370.

17.)            That said court order signed by Judge Valderrama, pursuant to Gr Ex C from the Dec 12, Motion, states “IT IS ORDERED THAT: this case is transferred to Calendar 6 Judge Mikva, for the sole purpose of hearing the Petition for Substitution of Judge for Cause. . Upon resolution of the Motion, the case shall be returned to the Presiding Judge for the appropriate assignment. Judge Moche Jacobius signed the Order March 18, 2016.
  
18.)        That the aforementioned Directive was never adhered to making every order entered by “Private Citizen” Valderrama a “Nullity” VOID ENTIRELY,  thereby wanting every Federal Official to know as an inferior male he is willing give his life or freedom to protect the alleged “White Nationalist” controlling the Democratic Political Machine” as demonstrated in this matter.

A-    “A Void Judgment from its inception is and forever continues to be absolutely null, without legal efficacy, ineffectual to bind parties or support a right, of no legal force and effect whatever, and incapable of confirmation, ratification, or enforcement in any manner or to any degree. “A void judgment, order or decree may be attacked at any time or in any court, either directly or collaterally” Oak Park Nat Bank v. Peoples Gas Light & Coke Col, 46 Ill. App. 2d 385, 197 N.E. 3d 73, 77, (1st Dist. 1964)

B-    The Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals held that the Circuit Court   of Cook County is a criminal enterprise. U.S. v. Murphy, 768 F.2d 1518,     1531 (7th Cir. 1985)”.
      

     

                        FURTHER AFFIANT SAYETH NOT

                                                                            Joe Louis Lawrence

                                                                          __________________
                                                                                            Counsel Pro Se
                                                                                           P. O. Box 490075
                                                                                              312 965-6455
                                                                       Joelouis565@yahoo.com
                                                                            @joelouis7
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      
WHEREFORE the aforementioned reasons Plaintiff respectfully Prays for the Relief


1.    For an Order Vacating the Orders signed by judges Norgle and  Dow due to “Trespassing upon the Laws” and acts of “Treason”.

2.    For an Order reassigning this matter to another Circuit or District not influenced by corruption or politicians in Chicago.

3.    For an Order Granting both Summary Judgments Instanter.

4.    For an Order issuing a Rule to Show Cause Remanding Charles R. Norgle, Sr. Robert M. Dow, Jr. Franklin U. Valderrama into Custody Instanter.

5.    For an Order appointing a Special Prosecutor who understands the jurisdiction of their profession to investigate and ascertain all other parties complicit in these Terrorist Treason Offenses of all cases noted within;

6.    For an Order staying any and all legal enforcements of all parties noted within due to the plethora of Felonies enacted by “Private Citizens” perpetrating roles as judges Trespassing upon the Laws”

7.    For an Order on bond be not less than one million dollars for any and all parties charged in these crimes in warring against the United States Constitution.

8.    For an Order removing the Chief Judge of Cook County and Presiding judges of all Circuits who as Public Servants failed to investigate remove or report any judge in accordance to their oath and Public Duty.

9.    For an Order setting a Hearing Date for all attorneys who sat by in an idle manner and did not exercise his or her duties pursuant to the Ethics of R.P.C 3.3 and speak up or report the terrorist acts perpetrated by “Private Citizens” violating their oaths as judges.

10.  For an Order forwarding to Congress or the United States Supreme Court to authorize the Execution or Imposing Mandatory Life sentences upon every person that conspire, that engages in any acts of Treason, Trespassing upon the Laws against the United States government.
  
For the entry of an Order awarding to your Petitioner for such other relief and any other relief necessary as equity may require of which this court may deem overwhelmingly just;

























IN THE 
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
EASTERN DIVISION


                                    EXHIBIT LIST


1.)  Gr Ex A Motion for Summary Judgment Page 1.

2.)   Gr Ex B, Court Transcript of July 26, 2019, Motion to Supplement Motion et al.( filed August 19, 2019.) (Judge Norgle sounding illiterate and unqualified to be any judge).

3.)  Gr Ex C  Court Order of July 26, 2019.

4.)  Gr Ex D Court Order of August 19, 2019.

5.)  Gr Ex E  Motion to Reinstate Case et al. (filed Sept. 19, 2018.)

6.)  Gr Ex F Court Transcript of May 2, 2018 (Judge Dow committing Perjury).

7.)  Gr Ex G Judicial Complaint naming 50 judges Democrats Obstructing justice because of the control they had in all courts. (filed Dec 6, 2016).

8.)  Gr Ex H  Petition to Transfer to Another Judicial Council, Democrats made sure nobody in Washington D.C. investigated any of the assertions (filed Dec 19, 2016).






















UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
EASTERN DIVISION


                                   AFFIDAVIT

I Joe Louis Lawrence, Counsel Pro Se being duly sworn on oath states the aforementioned pleadings enumerated within said motion pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedures, the undersigned certifies that the statements set forth in this instrument are true and correct, except as to matters therein stated to be on information and belief and as to such matters, the undersigned certifies as aforesaid that she verily believes the same to be true.

Respectfully Submitted                                                         
                                                                        



Joe Louis Lawrence                                        Notary

__________________
    



























UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE
 SEVENTH CIRCUIT CHICAGO ILLINOIS 60604


                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       NOTICE OF      
  MOTION FOR DISQUALIFICATION OF JUDGE/VACATE AUGUST 19, 2019 COURT ORDER—(DUE TO PRIMA FACIE ADMISSIONS OF COURT ORDER AUGUST 20, 2019 GRANTING MOTION TO SUPPLEMENT ET AL.) PERSONAL BIAS AND JUDGE NORGLE AS AN ALLEGED WHITE NATIONALIST ENGAGING IN HATE CRIMES OF AN ACTIVE “ORGANIZED CONSPIRACY” W/AFFIDAVIT  {28 USCA 144, 455 (B) (1)} VACATE ORDER OF AUGUST 19 2019 DUE TO ORDER BEING A “NULLITY” “VOID” FRAUDULENTLY ENTERED

 Please be advised that on, August 29, 2019 Plaintiff has filed before this  Court of Appeals  Motion to Disqualify et al. August  29, 2019  et al;  
General Counsel: Karen G. Seimetz         Local Union 241 Amalgamated Transit Union  
                                                                       President Keith Hill/ 1st Vice President
Chicago Transit Authority                                        1613 S. Michigan
Law Department 567                                               Chicago, IL 60613
567 West Lake Street                        
Chicago, IL 60661
   

                                  Hon Mayor Lori Lightfoot
                                           City Hall 7th floor
                                           Chicago, IL. 60601                                                                               
Circuit Court of Cook County, Dorothy Brown
50 West Washington,
Chicago, IL 60601 Suite 1001

Courtesy Copies:
Cook County State’s Attorney                 Cook County Sheriff
Kim Foxx                                                     Thomas J. Dart
50 West Washington, Room 500            Richard J. Daley Center, Room 701
Chicago, Ill. 60602                                        Chicago, Ill. 60602
                                                                                                                              
US Attorney                                                FBI Dir. Chris Wray  
John R. Lausch, Jr.                               2111 West Roosevelt Road
219 S. Dearborn, 5th floor                              Chicago, Ill. 60612
Chicago, Ill. 60604
        Judge                                                   Judge                       
Celia C. Gamrath                                      Neil Cohen                                
50 West Washington Room 2508    50 West Washington Room 2308        
     Judge                                                       Judge
Franklin U. Valderrama                            Moche Jacobius, Presiding Judge
50 West Washington Room 2402            50 West Washington Room 2403       

Judge                                                      Attorney General
Fredrick H. Bates                                   Kwame Raoul
Markham, IL. Room 102                         State of Illinois Building 13th Floor

Cook County President                        Chief Judge
Toni Preckwinkle                                Timothy C. Evans                                         
118 N. Clark, Room 517                    50 West Washington, Room 2600          
Chicago, Ill. 60602                                        
                                   
Secretary of State
Asst Gen Counsel Terry Mc Conville 5th Floor
State of Illinois Building


               PLEASE BE ADVISED that on August 29, 2019, A Motion to Vacate August 19, 2019 Court Order et al. has been filed with the  Court of Appeals and said copies being served on said applicable parties via hand delivery or regular mail;








                                                                                                     Respectfully, Submitted,  

                                                                          ______________________
                                                                                        Joe Louis Lawrence
                                                                                          Counsel Pro Se
                                                                                          Chicago, Ill 60649
                                                                                              312 965-6455
                                                                                        joelouis565@yahoo.com
                                                                                               @joelouis7













                                           
               PLEASE BE ADVISED that on August 29, 2019, A Motion for Disqualification of judge/Vacate Court Order et al. has been filed with the Court of Appeals Seventh Circuit and said copies being served on said applicable parties via hand delivery or regular mail;