A FEDERAL JUDGE USED HIS BIASNESS, RACIAL HATRED AND UNLAWFUL JUDICIAL AUTHORITY TO DISMISS A VALID FEDERAL COMPLAINT IN THE NORTHERN DISTRICT COURT.
WE ARE LIVING IN A DIFFERENT ERA NOW TECHNOLOGY HAS EVOLVED CAMERAS TO CAPTURE REAL TIME POLICE ABUSE, SOCIAL MEDIA TO DISPLAY INCONSISTENCIES, FALSEHOODS, X WHERE THE ACTUAL COURT DOCUMENTS CAN BE DISPLAYED TO UNEQUIVOCALLY SHOW THE WORLD, RACISM, CORRUPTION ETC.
THE WORLD NEEDS TO SEE THE EXTENT CERTAIN HATEFUL WHITE PEOPLE ARE WILLING TO DO AS DEMOCRATS MAKING SURE NO BLACK, BROWN OR COLORED PERSON RECEIVE ANY JUSTICE OR EQUAL PROTECTION IN THEIR COURTS.
EVERY IRISH, POLISH ETHNIC PERSONS ALONG WITH MANY IN THE LGBT WENT ALONG WITH THE WRONG DOERS SO AS TO BE ACCEPTED HAVE SYSTEMATICALLY DENIED EVERY MOTION, COMPLAINT OR WAS ALLEGEDLY RESPONSIBLE FOR HAVING DOCUMENTS DELETED FROM DATABASES TO FRAME OR CRIMINALIZE INNOCENT BLACK OR BROWN MEN TO JUSTIFY THEIR NARRATIVE OF THAT ETHNIC GROUP.
.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
EASTERN DIVISION
|
Joe Louis Lawrence
VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS, LLC
EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES, L.L.C. Successor in interest to EQUIFAX
CREDIT INFORMATION SERVICES, INC., EXPERIAN
INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC.,
.
EXPERIAN INFORMATION SERVICES,
INC., .
TRANS UNION L. L. C.,
Defendants. |
) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) |
______________________ Hon Robert Blakey Magistrate
Judge Hon Albert Berry, III Civil Action No. 25 cv- 12239 |
NOTICE OF APPEAL
REQUESTING RULE TO SHOW CAUSE AGAINST
ALL PARTIES COMPLICIT IN DOMESTIC TERRORISM IN THE COURTS NO DEMOCRATIC JUDGE OR
HOMOSEXUAL IN ILLINOIS WILL EVER RULE IN FAVOR OF THE PLAINTIFF AND ADMITTED
THIS VIA SUMMARY JUDGMENT (July 14, 2025 Cook County Domestic Relations) Posner: ABA Journal (September 11, 2017)
Most judges regard pro se litigants as
'kind of trash not worth the time' ( 7th Cir)
To: See the Certificate of Service of Parties
Said case
demonstrates within the parameter of the laws how the Illinois legal system is
under siege, as stated in earlier affidavits, the Ku Klux Klan, pursuant to the
act of 1871 Section 1 (42 U.S.C.) Remarks of Rep. Cobb) (“None but Democrats
belong or can belong to these societies”)
PLEASE BE ADVISED that on June 30, 2026, A Notice of Appeal and
Jurisdictional Statement has been filed before the Northern District of
Illinois .
Defendant
is Appealing the June 24, 2026 court
ruling against the manifest weight of the evidence unopposed by the Defendants.
Respectfully Submitted
Joe Louis Lawrence, Pro Se
PO Box 4353
Chicago, Illinois 60680
Dated
June 30, 2026
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
EASTERN DIVISION
|
Joe Louis Lawrence
VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS, LLC
EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES, L.L.C. Successor in interest to EQUIFAX
CREDIT INFORMATION SERVICES, INC., EXPERIAN
INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC.,
.
EXPERIAN INFORMATION SERVICES,
INC., .
TRANS UNION L. L. C.,
Defendants. |
) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) |
______________________ Hon Robert Blakey Magistrate
Judge Hon Albert Berry, III Civil Action No. 25 cv- 12239 |
Jurisdictional
Statement
Order entered: June 24, 2026,
Notice of Appeal filed: June 24, 2026
The
District Court Dismissed Plaintiffs case because he did not comply with the courts
unlawful directive of participating in the unlawful Status Conferences after
the January 6, 2026 order entered ex parte, and (2) the Court’s subsequent
denial of disqualification and vacatur, January 27, 2026 citing “PLAINTIFF
FAILED TO NOTICE THEM FOR PRESENTMENT AND BECAUSE THEY LACK MERIT”
That
on December 2, 2025, This Honorable Court issued an Order, “Extends the
deadline for the parties joint status report to 12/29/2025” and Ordered the Plaintiff, “The Court
previously Ordered Plaintiff to file a status report concerning service on
Verizon by 12/ 3/ 25, and hereby extends that deadline to 12/19/25. “If
Plaintiff declines to participate in the preparation and filing of a joint
status report, the Court will dismiss the case for failure to comply with a
court order and failure to prosecute”.
Plaintiff
never received any Court Order prior to December 2, 2025 and no Clerk in the
Northern District of Illinois were able to locate such an order.
Plaintiff
filed his Status Report on Service of Verizon Communications, Inc. Dec
10, 2025 and his Initial Joint Status Report Dec 12, 2025 in response to
the Courts Directive without any hesitation demonstrating respect and a moral
compass to the rules of FRCP and this court.
Defendant’s
failed to comply with the District Judges order of Dec 29, 2025, Plaintiff
filed his Summary Judgment (Jan. 5, 2026) unabated by three competent Power
House Fortune 500 Law firms.
District
Judge Entered an Order Jan. 9, 2026, Denied Plaintiff’s Default, filed Jan 7,
2026, Plaintiff never received the following “Minute entry before the
Honorable John Robert Blakey: The Court denies Plaintiff’s motion for default
judgment57 and request for default59 and strikes the 1/7/26 notice of motion
date ( which in any event fails to comply with this Court’s standing orders).
Defendants have responded to the complaint, and Plaintiff’s requests lack
merit. The parties’ 1/28/26 status report deadline stands”.
The
District Judge resents the Plaintiff and
it is egregiously reflected in his rulings
The judge favors the defendants and is holding
the Plaintiff at a higher standard within the laws than licensed attorneys.
The judge abandoned neutrality.
The judicial process is unfair to the Plaintiff.
Email Transmission sent Tuesday Jan 20, 2026
at 9:48am to all attorneys and Cook County Democratic Judges still trying to
“FIX” a Paternity Case Former States Attorney Richard J. Daley Dismissed
September 17, 1987.
- Statutes: Democratic Judges
violating United States Supreme Court Rulings Enforcing “Jim Crow Laws”,
Violations of the Ku Klux Klan Act of 1871, “Trespassing upon the Laws”
“No Jurisdiction on case, Order being Void a “Nullity” Obstruction of
Justice ” Committing Fraud, Engaging in Treason Like Offenses, Judges
Committing Perjury, Judges aiding and abetting in a Criminal Conspiracy,
Judge committing Unequal Protection of the Laws Violations, Judge acting
outside of the Immunity provisions of his Oath, as “Private Citizens”
outlawed by the United States Supreme Court as they used their robes and jurisdiction
to aid and assist Terrorist Democratic Judges and Public Officials in
covering-up Criminal Civil Rights Violations, Disparate Unequal Protection
of the Laws, Racial Hate Crimes, Slander and Defamation of Character,
Civil Rights Violations, Civil Rights Act of 1983, Racial Terrorism
Conspiracy, Public, Political, Fraternal Corruption Conspiracies by
Democrats, and other Un-Constitutional Lawless Violations, Violation of
Canon Ethics : A
judge shall uphold the integrity and independence of the judiciary. Canon
2: A judge shall avoid impropriety and the appearance of
impropriety in all of the judge's activities. Canon
3: A judge shall
perform the duties of judicial office impartially and diligently,
Ex Parte Grant of Substantive
Relief, Improper Relief Granted to a Party in Default, No showing of excusable neglect
under Rule 6(b)(1)(B) was made Granting
relief to a defaulted party without vacating default and without a Rule
6(b) showing constitutes reversible procedural error. Black, 22
F.3d at 1407; Pretzel, 28 F.3d at 45. Granting time extensions to a defaulted party without
vacating default constitutes procedural advocacy, not neutral
adjudication. Black v. Lane, 22 F.3d 1395, 1407 (7th Cir. 1994)
Defaulted parties are not entitled to merits-based relief absent proper procedure. Pretzel & Stouffer v. Imperial Adjusters, 28 F.3d 42, 45 (7th Cir. 1994)
Extensions after deadline require excusable neglect
- Fed. R.
Civ. P. 5(a)
- Fed. R.
Civ. P. 7(b)
- Canon
3(A)(4), Code of Conduct for U.S. Judges
Judge Blakey received Notice
and Knowledge of Democratic Cook County Judges engaging in a Criminal
Enterprise in Cook County Dec 10, 2025, Status Report on Service of Verizon
Communications, Inc Ref as Ex A .Motion for Entry of Default for Failure to Appear,
Failure to Plead, and for Setting of Prove-Up Hearing et al. ($50 Million
Dollars), 2.) Re Notice Motion to Recuse the Entire Cook County Judiciary and
Appoint a Special Prosecutor et al., 3) Re Notice Motion to Expedite Defendants
Affected from Judicial Malfeasance & Violations of the Illinois Code of
Judicial Conduct et al.
That on Jan 2, 2026
Plaintiff Re Noticed Motion to Disqualify Judge Rosa Marie Silva & Patrick
Powers for “Cause” Particularizing in specific details how certain Democratic
Judges egregiously desecrate the laws, hereto attached as the Irish Judge Patrick
Powers allegedly used Hispanic Judge Rosa Silva signature stamp to deny and
keep the Plaintiff from appearing before her.
A-
Cook County Courts still a Criminal Enterprise
had Cook County Clerks to obstruct justice making sure the Motion never entered
the database and receive a judge or court date leaving the entire case in limbo
violating all Civil Rights Statutes.
Plaintiff is appealing to the Court
of Appeals, for
a Reversal Sanctions and Remand with instructions notifying Federal authorities
based on the foregoing stated above:
Defendant is appealing
to the Court of Appeals, because Irish,
Polish or Homosexual or DEI judges in the Democratic party have systematically
ignored, the fact Plaintiff are
victims of an “Organized Criminal Conspiracy” perpetrated by racist or
hateful judges acting as “Private Citizens” controlling the Criminal Enterprise
in all of the courts controlled by Democrats, in that Judge Blakey of Irish
ethnicity entered a number of “FRAUDULENT” court orders against the Plaintiff
to protect his kind of people involved and continue his fraternal racial
hatred, obstruct and corroborate his role as an alleged “White Supremacist”
Judge Blakey closed his eyes to all of the criminal acts of
Democratic Judges violating Section 1983 of the Civil Rights Act against the Plaintiff
as he became the “Defacto” attorney for Verizon Communications, Inc condoning
all Terrorist Treason offenses accompanied by an affidavit unimpeached by every
attorney supporting the Plaintiff by continuously violating his Civil Rights
when the case was legally over when Verizon unlawfully with venomous Contempt
for the laws of the court e filed a motion to the Court Jan 2, 2026 knowing the
building was closed for the holidays and other Defendant’s never responded to
the Dec. 29, 2025 Court Order; whereby, Plaintiff filed his Summary Judgment
Jan 5, 2026 and the Court ignored all of his valid filings prolonging this matter
frivolously as all attorneys are being compensated off of egregious injustices
of this court.
“Grounds warranting a motion to
reconsider include (1) an intervening change in the controlling law, (2) new
evidence previously unavailable, and (3) the need to correct clear error or
prevent manifest injustice.” Id. (citing Brumark Case 1:07-cv-00644-WDM-KLM
Document 158 Filed 08/25/2009 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 6 1 Although the Tenth
Circuit does not allow citation to unpublished opinions for precedential value,
unpublished opinions may be cited for persuasive value. 10th Cir. R. 32.1. 3
Corp. v. Samson Resources Corp., 57 F.3d 941, 948 (10th Cir. 1995)).
A-
That
Plaintiff and other innocent Litigants of color cases have appeared before JUDGES ALLEGEDLY
DESCRIBED AS MEMBERS OF THE KU KLUX KLAN, NAZI FRATERNAL ORDER OR WHITE
NATIONALIST MEMBERS OR DEI HOMOSEXUALS who have systematically denied all of
their claims as outlined in the aforementioned history of cases.
B-
That
former States Attorney Kim Foxx, That
Plaintiff Filed a Summary Judgment Dec. 4, 2023 before Judge Iris Y. Chivira
she and her alleged racist Lesbian Judges fraternity members and Judge Forti,
Maritza Martinez who mistook Respondent for one of the Inferior Spineless black
or Brown men who would let anyone walk on them or violate their Civil Rights
because many had no self-respect for themselves and wanted to be accepted.
C-
That on Feb 9, 2024
Respondent Filed a Default for $50 Million Dollars Maritza Martinez
“Fraudulent” assumed jurisdiction on the matter to Disqualify Judge Chivira as
he was provided a Court Order absent the Presiding Judges signature, she never
vacated any of her court orders but African American Supervisor Clerk Connie on
the 8th floor made the Respondent pay to Vacate said order knowing
he was a Pauperis, but Judge Martinez never vacated any of her court orders and
Judge Forti took over and tried using his position to try and Bully and
intimidate Respondent or anyone who stood up against his tyranny and racist
injustices in his court.
D- That Plaintiff filed a Motion
for Summary Judgment Pursuant to Illinois (735 ILCS 5/2-1005) & Federal Rules
of Civil Procedure Corroborating the Veracity Cook County Judges do Not Honor Due
Process or Civil Rights Equal Protection to its Citizens Pro Se or with Attorneys
in any of the Court’s w/Affidavit on July 14, 2025.
E-
Respondent has appeared
before Maritza Martinez who never had jurisdiction to appear on the case no
more than any Assistant States Attorneys but understates Attorney Kim Foxx, and
alleged Police Officer Francoise Hightower, Chief Judge Timothy Calvin Evans
and Illinois Attorney General Kwame Raoul, Gov Pritzker who received Notice and
knowledge of the Summary Judgment and Default never DENIED or OBJECTED to any
of the FACTUAL pleadings.
F-
“the fact Negroes in the Democratic Party have
no authority over Racist Anglo- Saxons” Pages 7-8 of the Affidavit, Summary
Judgment have been admitted to via Local Rule 56.1
G-
“Any judge who does not comply
with his oath to the Constitution of the United States wars against that
Constitution and engages in acts in violation of the Supreme Law of the Land.
The judge is engaged in acts of treason. Having taken at least two, if not
three oaths of office to support the Constitution of the United States, and the
Constitution of the State of Illinois, any judge who has acted in violation of
the Constitution is engaged in an act or acts of treason. If a judge does not
fully comply with the Constitution, then his orders are void, In re Sawyer, 124 U.S. 200 (1888)
he/she is without jurisdiction , and he/she has engaged in an act or acts of
treason.”
H-
That Fed Rule Civ P. 8 and 9 require
plaintiffs to particularize their allegations of "fraud
on the court" in as short, plain, and direct a way as is
reasonable. Plaintiff complied with said rule but the court was a law unto
himself.
I-
Posner: ABA Journal (September 11, 2017)
Most judges regard pro se litigants as
'kind of trash not worth the time' Posner, 78, told
the Chicago Daily Law Bulletin last week that he decided
to retire because of conflicts with his colleagues over the treatment of pro se
litigants, who represent themselves. In a new interview with
the New York Times, Posner elaborated on his concerns about
the treatment of such litigants.
A-
“The basic thing
is that most judges regard these people as kind of trash not worth the time of
a federal judge,” Posner said.
In the 7th Circuit, staff lawyers review appeals from pro
se litigants, and their recommendations are generally rubber-stamped by judges,
he noted.
Posner wanted to give the pro se litigants a better shake
by reviewing all of the staff attorney memos before they went to the panel of
judges. Posner had approval from the director of the staff attorney program.
“But the judges, my colleagues, all 11 of them, turned it down and refused to
give me any significant role. I was very frustrated by that,” Posner said. Posner
has written about the pro se issue in an upcoming book, and its publication
“would be particularly awkward” if he remained on the court because it
“implicitly or explicitly” criticizes the other judges, he said.
News about Mayor Lightfoot Calling Racism A
Public Health Crisis June 17, 2021
bing.com/news
1.)
PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO DISQUALIFY AND RECUSE THE DISTRICT JUDGE PURSUANT TO 28
U.S.C. § 455(a) AND (b)(1) DUE TO A PRIMA FACIE SHOWING OF BIAS &
PREDJUDICE AGAINST THE PLAINTIFF
2.) PLAINTIFF’S
MOTION TO VACATE THE JANUARY 6, 2026, VOID ORDER/AND ANY OTHER ORDER ENTERED IN
VIOLATION OF DUE PROCESS
3.) PLAINTIFF’S
NOTICE OF DUE PROCESS VIOLATIONS
TAKE
A LOOK AT EX A OF THE MOTION TO DISQUALIFY ET AL. #58 NOTICE OF MOTION BY JOE
LOUIS LAWRENCE FOR PRESENTMENT OF MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT57 BEFORE
HONORABLE JOHN ROBERT BLAKEY ON 1/7/2026 AT 11:00AM is egregiously wrong! Clerk
with the initials BI
The
Default was filed Jan. 7, 2026, and properly Noticed for Jan 14, at 11:00am, a
copy of that filed document is attached with the Motion to Vacate et al.
Plaintiff
never received any other court orders after Jan 6, 2026, the same day Defendant
Matthew D. Kelley filed their defective documents.
Plaintiff
is dealing with the same type of systemic racism in Cook County Courts as
certain judges acting as Defacto attorneys, Assistant States Attorneys racist
and corrupt framing me on an incest paternity case involving a police officer
case been dismissed since September 17, 1987, by Richard J. Daley and reopened
without my knowledge 88 D 079012 found me in default May 18, 1988 never
ordering child support, but the Irish and Polish ethnic judges and all
homosexuals went along with all wrongs and injustices seeking arrearages on a
case not only not my child but never ordered to pay anything and certain
licensed attorneys in Federal Court are in violation of RPC 3.3 engaging in
diabolical racial acts as everyone involved, who see these wrongs and are
remaining quiet turning a blind eye to these terrorists acts, are now complicit
in all acts of tyranny and racism due to racial hatred of any and all Colored
Persons speaking up and fighting against Racial Apartheid in the Courts,
likened to the Ku Klux Klan or Nazi fraternal order controlling the judiciary
using the courts to unlawfully extort money from the Plaintiff on a closed
case.
"Lynchings
are not used with ropes in Chicago it is done judicially with gross
misapplications of the laws, gaslighting or blatant injustices"
Every
attorney appearing in any court where the Plaintiff is concerned is making good
money off their clients, but he is living in indigency below poverty for
standing up to tyranny and racial terrorism in the courts because his skin
color or sexuality as a Heterosexual Man who does not fit the narrative of their
fraternal order.
Ethics
All
Illinois lawyers must be familiar with the Illinois Rules of
Professional Conduct, and trail lawyers must be particularly
familiar with the rules that apply specially to them.
RPC 3.3,
entitled “Conduct Before a Tribunal,” sets forth the standards to
be followed by the trial lawyer during “battle.” Section (a) of that rule
states:
(a) In
appearing in a professional capacity before a tribunal, a lawyer shall not
That under 18 U.S.C. 242 and
42 U.S.C. 1985 (3) (b). A judge does not have the discretion on whether or
not to follow Supreme Ct. Rules, but a duty to follow. People v. Gersh, 135
Ill. 2d 384 (1990).
A-
That the court
became
a law unto
themselves
denied
said
motion
and
became “Private Citizens” not having any jurisdiction over the Defendant making
all Orders a “Nullity”.
B-
To show fraud upon the court, the complaining
party must establish that the alleged misconduct affected the integrity of the
judicial process, either because the court itself was defrauded or because the
misconduct was perpetrated by officers of the court. Alexander v. Robertson,
882, F. 2d 421,424 (9th Cir. 1989);
C-
A void judgment does not create any binding obligation.
Kalb v. Feuerstein (1940) 308 US 433, 60 S Ct 343, 84 L, Ed 370.
That certain judges in the Federal Circuit read evidence of Cook County
judges violating the RICO ACT, the 7th Cir. Held that the Cook
County Courts were a Criminal enterprise. U.S.
v. Murphy, 768 F. 2d 1518, 1531 where precedent was enacted by Judges Frank H.
Easterbrook, Richard D. Cudahy and former Chief judge Luther Merritt Swygert;
Respectfully Submitted
Civil
Rights Act of 1866- first section, enacted by the Senate and House of
Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled. That
all persons born in the United States and not subject to any foreign power,
excluding Indians not taxed, are hereby declared to be citizens of the United
States; and such citizens of every race and color, without regard to any
previous condition of slavery or involuntary servitude, except as a punishment
for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall have the same
right, in every State and Territory in the United States, to make and enforce
contracts, to sue, be parties, and give evidence, to inherit, purchase, lease,
sell, hold and convey real and personal property, and to full and equal benefit
of the laws and proceedings for the security of person and property, as is
enjoyed by white citizens, and shall be subject to like punishment, pains, and
penalties, and to none other, any law, statute, ordinances, regulation, or
custom, to the contrary notwithstanding, Act of April 9, 1866, Ch. 31, 1, 14
Stat. 27, 42 U.S.C.A. 1981 (a).
In the
20th century, the Supreme Court began to overturn Jim Crow laws on
constitutional grounds. In Buchanan v. Warley 245 US 60 (1917), the
court held that a Kentucky law could not require residential segregation. The Supreme Court
in 1946, in Irene Morgan v. Virginia ruled segregation in
interstate transportation to be unconstitutional, in an application of the commerce
clause of the Constitution. It was not until 1954 in Brown v. Board of
Education of Topeka 347 US 483 that the court held that separate facilities
were inherently unequal in the area of public schools, effectively overturning Plessy
v. Ferguson, and outlawing Jim Crow in other areas of society as well. This
landmark case consisted of complaints filed in the states of Delaware (Gebhart
v. Belton); South Carolina (Briggs
v. Elliott); Virginia (Davis v. County
School Board of Prince Edward County); and Washington,
D.C. (Spottswode Bolling v. C. Melvin Sharpe).
These decisions, along with other cases such as McLaurin v. Oklahoma State
Board of Regents 339 US 637 (1950), NAACP
v. Alabama 357 US 449 (1958), and Boynton v. Virginia 364 US 454 (1960),
slowly dismantled the state-sponsored segregation imposed by Jim Crow laws.
As the color line itself solidified at the
turn of the nineteenth century, Jim Crow imposed on black people clear tactical
disadvantages: restricted economic possibilities, narrow educational
opportunities, inadequate housing options, high rates of death and disablement,
persistent unemployment, and unrelenting poverty. Inasmuch as Jim Crow
represented the race problem described by Gunnar Myrdal (1898–1987) in his 1944 treatise The
American Dilemma, it was Jim Crow that created the race quandary; whites constructed
the obstacles African Americans confronted, while also blaming them for their
conditions, denying them access to the resources of problem solving, and daring
them—under threat of
violence—to
complain, protest, or advance.
Finally, protests or challenges to Jim Crow
often proved futile, given law enforcement’s complicity in the structure. From emancipation to the turn of the
century, the Ku Klux Klan operated as a paramilitary arm of the Democratic
Party in the South. The Klan, nightriders, red shirts, and other white
terrorists intimidated African Americans with personal attacks, school
burnings, and lynchings. African Americans rarely served as policemen,
sheriffs, or deputies before the late 1940s. During the 1950s and 1960s, the
connections between municipal and state governments, law enforcement, and
racial violence were well known by officials and citizens alike. White officers
were known to harass black people, disrupt black neighborhoods, and assault
black women. Arrested for inflated charges, denied satisfactory counsel, and
serving harsh sentences, African Americans were further disadvantaged in the
courtroom. Rarely did they receive good counsel, nor could they serve on
juries. When black lawyers could appear in the courtroom to argue cases, white
judges and juries rarely listened. All-white juries decided against black
defendants, even in the most obvious cases of innocence, but rarely convicted
white defendants, despite evidence of guilt. African Americans—including the innocent—suffered the harsher punishments of
extended jail time, forced farm labor, and peonage. Even women could be placed
on the chain gangs working the roads and tracks across the South.
The Chicago Daily Law Bulletin,
Wednesday April 26, 2006, Page 1, Illinois Political Machines help breed
corruption, Associated Press writer Deanna Bellandi states, “Illinois is
apparently a Petri dish for corruption. It is a real breeding ground”.
That Chicago is the most
Corrupt City in America, Huffington Post, Internet Newspaper,
February 23, 2012; University of Illinois Professor Dick Simpson, “The
two worst crime zones in Illinois are the governor’s mansion….and the City
Council Chambers in Chicago.” Simpson a former Chicago Alderman told the AP “no
other State can match us.”
Turner
24 F.
Cas. 337 (No. 14247) C.C.D. Md. 1867) the “equal benefit” clause is cited in
what would appear to be the earliest reported case enforcing the section. The
plaintiff was an emancipated slave who was indentured as an apprentice to her
former master. Although both whites and blacks could be indentured as an
apprentice, under the law of Maryland, indentured blacks were not accorded the
same educational benefits as whites and, unlike whites, were subject to being
transferred to any other person in the same county. Circuit Judge Chase granted
a writ of habeas corpus upon finding that the purported apprenticeship was in
fact involuntary servitude and a denial under the Civil Rights Act of 1866 of
the “full and equal benefit of all laws.
2.) A judge’s disrespect for
the rules of court demonstrates disrespect for the law. Judges are disciplined
under Canon 2A for violating court rules and procedures. Judge ignored mandated
witness order in attempt to accommodate witnesses’ schedules; Citing Canon 2A
the court noted, “[a] court’s indifference to clearly stated rules breeds
disrespect for and discontent with our justice system. Government cannot demand
respect of the laws by its citizens when its tribunals ignore those very same
laws”)
The U.S. Supreme Court, in Scheuer v. Rhodes,
416 U.S. 232, 94 S. Ct. 1683, 1687 (1974) stated that "when a state
officer acts under a state law in a manner violative of the Federal
Constitution, he "comes into conflict with the superior authority of that
Constitution, and he is in that case stripped of his official or representative
character and is subjected in his person to the consequences
of his individual conduct. The State has no power to impart to him any immunity
from responsibility to the supreme authority of the United States."
[Emphasis supplied in original].
Under
Federal law which is applicable to all states, the U.S. Supreme Court stated
that if a court is "without authority, its judgments and orders are
regarded as nullities. They are not voidable, but simply void; and form no bar
to a recovery sought, even prior to a reversal in opposition to them. They
constitute no justification; and all persons concerned in executing such
judgments or sentences, are considered, in law, as trespassers." Elliot
v. Piersol, 1 Pet. 328, 340, 26 U.S. 328, 340 (1828)
I affirm the
above as being true.
Respectfully Submitted
Joe Louis Lawrence, Pro Se
312 965-6455
PO Box 4353
Chicago, Ill. 60680
Wherefore the Foregoing
Reasons,
Appellant Prays for the
following relief:
1.) Appellant requests that
another Honorable Court of Appeals, Judicial Circuit accept Jurisdiction of
this matter and Invoke authority Instanter and reassign this matter accordingly
and or due to the unprecedented Terrorist Civil Rights said attorneys and judges
are complicit in, Order a Rule to Show
Cause for Remands and Indictments on all parties associated in said Treason
Offenses;
2.) Impose Sanctions/Remands against and all
parties for Contempt of the United States Constitution for their crimes against
the Plaintiff/Government
Finally,
this Affidavit is best closed by a jurist who has stated”; Citing
Canon 2A the court noted, “[a] court’s indifference to clearly stated rules
breeds disrespect for and discontent with our justice system. Government cannot
demand respect of the laws by its citizens when its tribunals ignore those very
same laws”)
Federal
Court FEDERAL JUDGE GETTLEMAN:
stated, March 10, 2009, where he found Superintendent of police Jody Weiss in
Contempt of Court and Ordered the City to Pay $100,000.00, “No one is above the Law”,
he cited a 1928 decision by Supreme Court Justice Louis Brandeis, that said,
“If the Government becomes the law breaker, it breeds Contempt for the Law, It
invites everyman to become a law unto himself. It invites Anarchy.”
The Chicago Daily
Law Bulletin, Wednesday April 26, 2006, Page 1, Illinois Political
Machines help breed corruption, Associated Press writer Deanna Bellandi states,
“Illinois is apparently a Petri dish for corruption. It is a real
breeding ground”.
That Chicago
is the most Corrupt City in America, Huffington Post, Internet
Newspaper, February 23, 2012; University of Illinois Professor Dick Simpson, “The
two worst crime zones in Illinois are the governor’s mansion….and the City
Council Chambers in Chicago.” Simpson a former Chicago Alderman told the AP “no
other State can match us.”
IN
THE
UNITED
STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE
NORTHERN
DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
EASTERN
DIVISION
|
Joe Louis Lawrence
VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS,
LLC
EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES, L.L.C.
Successor in interest to EQUIFAX CREDIT
INFORMATION SERVICES, INC., EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC., . EXPERIAN INFORMATION SERVICES, INC., . TRANS UNION L. L. C.,
Defendants. |
) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) |
______________________ Hon
Robert Blakey Magistrate Judge Hon Albert Berry, III Civil
Action No. 25
cv- 12239 |
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I Joe Louis Lawrence
certify that on June.30, 2026 I have caused proper service to be had on the
Plaintiff and noted parties in the Certificate of Service via electronic/email delivery.
To
Camille R.
Nicodemus, Esq. (IL #2452849)
Quilling, Selander, Lownds, Winslett &
Moser, P.C.
10333 North
Meridian Street, Suite 200
Indianapolis,
IN 46290
Telephone: (317) 497-5600, Ext.
601
Fax: (317) 899-9348
E-Mail:
cnicodemus@qslwm.com
Hope Blankenberger
Counsel for Defendant Trans Union LLC
POLSINELLI PC
By: /s/ Rodney L. Lewis
Rodney L. Lewis
Kevin M. Hogan
Matthew Carlins
Polsinelli PC
150 North Riverside Plaza, Suite 3000
Chicago, Illinois 60606
Tel. (312) 819-1900
Fax (312) 819-1910
rodneylewis@polsinelli.com
kmhogan@polsinelli.com
mcarlins@polsinelli.com
Attorneys for Defendant Equifax
Information Services, LLC
Nicole E.
Stoelton
Venable LLP
227 W. Monroe
St., Suite 1900
Chicago, Il.
60606
Phone (312)
820-3437
Fax (312) 820-2401
NEStoelton@venable.com
Attorneys for
Defendant Experian Information Solutions, Inc, and Experian Information
Services, Inc.
Segal
McCambridge Singer & Mahoney, LTD
233 S Wacker Dr. Suite 5500 Chicago, Illinois
60606
Matthew D. Kelly mkelly@smsm.com
Attorneys for Verizon Communications, Inc.
Chief Judge Charles Beach U.S. Attorney Andrew S.
Boutras
ocj.chief@cookcountyil.gov 219 S. Dearborn, Street 5th
floor
Dir. FBI,
Hon Mayor Brandon
Special Agent in
Charge (FBI) City
Hall 7th floor
Chicago,
IL. 60601
2111 West Roosevelt Road
Chicago, Il 60608
Cook County Clerk, Mariyana Spyropoulos
CCCWebsite@cookcountycourt.com
Attorney General Cook County
States Attorney
Kwame Raoul alexandrina.shrove@ilag.gov Eilene O’Neil Burke
555 West Monroe Suite 1300 statesattorney@cookcountyil.gov
Chicago, Ill. 60601
PLEASE BE ADVISED that on June 30, 2026 A Notice of Appeal and
Jurisdictional Statement has been filed in the Northern District of Illinois
Federal Court.
Respectfully submitted,
Joe Louis Lawrence
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
EASTERN DIVISION
AFFIDAVIT
I Joe Louis Lawrence, files herewith his
affidavit as required by Title 28, United States Code:
I Joe Louis Lawrence, Pro Se being duly sworn on oath states
that, I have caused the aforementioned Notice of Appeal and Jurisdictional
Statement, to the noted Defendants via Electronic/email delivery, the
undersigned certifies that the statements set forth in this instrument are
true and correct, except as to matters therein stated to be on information and
belief and as to such matters, the undersigned certifies as aforesaid that he
verily believes the same to be true.
Respectfully
Submitted
Joe Louis Lawrence
