BRAZEN CORRUPTION RACISM EGREGIOUS CONSPIRACY IN THE DOMESTIC RELATIONS OF COOK COUNTY COURTS---
THE IRISH, POLISH AND CERTAIN HISPANIC JUDGES AND ALL NEGRO JUDGES GO ALONG WITH THE VIOLATIONS OF THE CIVIL RIGHTS OF ALL BLACK, BROWN AND COLORED LITIGANTS SO AS TO MAINTAIN THEIR POSITIONS OR STATUS WITHIN THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY.
JUDGE ROSA SILVA AND PATRICK POWERS ARE THE SUBJECTS TO A MOTION TO DISQUALIFY THEM, JUDGE POWERS HAS BEEN USING JUDGE SILVAS SIGNATURE STAMP TO KEEP THE DEFENDANT FROM APPEARING BEFORE HER COURT WHEN THIS WAS LEARNED THE MOTION WAS IMMEDIATELY FILED.
BECAUSE THE PRESIDING JUDGE ALLEGEDLY DID NOT TO TAKE PART IN ANY OF THESE RACIAL HATE CRIMES VIOLATING THE DEFENDANT'S CIVIL RIGHTS, JUDGE ABBEY ROMANEK WAS RECRUITED AND FORUM SHOPPED TO ACT AS THE ACTING PRESIDING JUDGE AND RECRUIT JUDGE LIONEL BAPTISTE TO COME AND DENY THE MOTION TO DISQUALIFY SILVA AND POWERS WHAT THEY DIDN'KNOW WAS THAT A MOTION TO DISQUALIFY ABBEY ROMANEK HAD BEEB SITTING ON THE DOCKET AND RE NOTICED BECAUSE JUDGE FORTI RECUSED HIMSELF FROM THIS CASE WITH JUDGE SCANNICCHIO PROPERLY SIGNING HIM OFF THE CASE.
BECAUSE JUDGE POWERS ALLEGEDLY CONTROLS HOW SILVA RULES MAKING SURE THE CIVIL RIGHTS OF BLACK OR BROWN PEOPLE ARE AFFECTED AS DEMONSTRATED IN THIS CASE UNDER CAL 52 THE CASE IS BEING UNLAWFULLY TRANSFERED TO JUDGE LIONEL BAPTISTE CAL 42 WHICH IS NOT LAWFUL BECAUSE ONLY THE PRESIDING JUDGE CAN REASSIGN CASES TO ANOTHER JUDGE.
THE DATABASE ACCURATELY REFLECTS THAT THE PRESIDING JUDGE NEVER AUTHORIZED THE LEGAL TRANSFER OF ANY JUDGE IS WHY IT IS STILL IN HER JURISDICTION BUT CERTAIN COOK COUNTY JUDGES ARE ABOVE THE LAWS AND ACTING AS KLANS MEN WITHIN THE JUDICIARY SHOWING THEY CAN DO WHAT THE FUCK THEY WANT AS DEMOCRATS AND NOBODY IS GOING TO STOP THEM BECAUSE THIS IS THEIR MODIS OPERANDI DEALING WITH BLACK OR COLORED PEOPLE.
THEY MADE SURE THE STATES ATTORNEY DID NOT RECEIVE THIS COURT ORDER BECAUSE ASA NORA MATRANGA AS AN OFFICER OF THE COURT HAVE TO NOTIFY PROPER AUTHORITIES THAT FRAUD WAS TAKING PLACE IN THE COURTS.
a. “A Void Judgment from its inception is and forever continues to be
absolutely null, without legal efficacy, ineffectual to bind parties or support
a right, of no legal force and effect whatever, and incapable of confirmation,
ratification, or enforcement in any manner or to any degree. “A void judgment,
order or decree may be attacked at any time or in any court, either directly or
collaterally” Oak Park Nat Bank v. Peoples Gas Light & Coke Col, 46 Ill.
App. 2d 385, 197 N.E. 3d 73, 77, (1st Dist. 1964)
1.) The United States Supreme Court recently acknowledged the judicial corruption in Cook County, when it stated that Judge "Maloney was one of many dishonest judges exposed and convicted through 'Operation Greylord', a labyrinthine federal investigation of judicial corruption in Chicago". Bracey v. Gramley, case No. 96-6133 (June 9, 1997).
Since judges who do not report the criminal activities of
other judges become principals in the criminal activity, 18 U.S.C. Section 2, 3
& 4, and since no judges have reported the criminal activity of the judges
who have been convicted, the other judges are as guilty as the convicted
judges.
Under Federal law which is
applicable to all states, the U.S. Supreme Court stated that if a court is
"without authority, its judgments and orders are regarded as nullities.
They are not voidable, but simply void; and form no bar to a recovery sought,
even prior to a reversal in opposition to them. They constitute no
justification; and all persons concerned in executing such judgments or
sentences, are considered, in law, as trespassers." Elliot
v. Piersol, 1 Pet. 328, 340, 26 U.S. 328, 340 (1828)
The Illinois Supreme Court held
that if a court "could not hear the matter upon the jurisdictional paper
presented, its finding that it had the power can add nothing to its authority,
- it, had no authority to make that finding." The People v.
Brewer, 128 Ill. 472, 483 (1928). The judges listed below had no
legal authority (jurisdiction) to hear or rule on certain matters before them.
They acted without any jurisdiction.
When judges act when they do not have jurisdiction to act, or they
enforce a void order (an order issued by a judge without jurisdiction), they
become trespassers of the law, and are engaged in treason.
| Case Number | Calendar | Date Filed | Division | ||||
| 1988D079012 | DRCAL01 | 01/01/1988 | District 1 | ||||
| Plaintiff(s) | Case Type | Defendant(s) | Attorney | ||||
| FRANCOIS HIGHTOWER FRANCOISE LOUISE BARBER HIGHTOWER FRANCOISE LOUISE BARBER HIGHTOWER | Petition to Establish Parentage (Non IV-D) | JOSEPH LAWRENCE JOE L LAWRENCE JOE L LAWRENCE | MANILOW AND GOLDMAN LTD JOSEPH V RODDY | ||||
| Ad Damnum | |||||||
| 0 | |||||||
Future Court Activity:
Case Activities:
| Activity Date: | 07/22/2026 | Event Desc: | Assign To Judge Within Division | Comments: |
| Activity Date: | 07/13/2026 | Event Desc: | Motion Filed | Comments: |
| Activity Date: | 07/13/2026 | Event Desc: | Notice Of Motion Filed | Comments: |
| Activity Date: | 07/08/2026 | Event Desc: | Motion Filed | Comments: |
| Activity Date: | 07/08/2026 | Event Desc: | Notice Of Motion Filed | Comments: |
| Activity Date: | 07/06/2026 | Event Desc: | Assign To Judge Within Division | Comments: |
| Activity Date: | 07/06/2026 | Event Desc: | Motion To - Denied - | Comments: |
| Activity Date: | 07/02/2026 | Event Desc: | Case Assigned to Zoom Hearing - Allowed | Comments: |
| Activity Date: | 07/02/2026 | Event Desc: | Cause Continued For Hearing (Res) - Allowed - | Comments: |
| Activity Date: | 06/23/2026 | Event Desc: | Notice Of Motion Filed | Comments: |
| Activity Date: | 06/23/2026 | Event Desc: | Exhibits Filed | Comments: |
| Activity Date: | 06/23/2026 | Event Desc: | Motion Filed | Comments: |
| Activity Date: | 04/01/2026 | Event Desc: | Substitution Of Judge For Cause - Allowed | Comments: |
| Activity Date: | 04/01/2026 | Event Desc: | Assign To Judge Within Division |
