IT'S OFFICIAL THE DEMOCRATC PARTY IS WARRING WITH THE UNITED STATES FEDERAL GOVERNMENT: THE CHIEF JUDGE TIMOTHY CALVIN EVANS, FORMER STATES ATTORNEY KIM FOXX, POLICE OFFICER FRANCOISE LOUISE BARBARA HIGHTOWER-BELMER, STATE ATTORNEY GENERAL KWAME RAOUL ALL HAVE ADMITTED THAT THE PLEADINGS WERE IN FACT TRUE IN THE DFAULT SUMMARY JUDGMENT OF $50 MILLION DOLLARS FILED FEB 9, 2024.
Blacks and certain Hispanics are only allowed in the Democratic Party so as to use and exploit their own ethnic groups satisfying the wishes of those controlling the Political Machine corroborating the fact no Senior Citizen, Heterosexual man or woman will ever receive justice in any court until the Federal Government eradicates all "Private Citizens" acting as judges or weapons of mass destruction BY ISSUING RULINGS CONSISTENT WITH TERRORISM AND A UPDATED VERSION OF LYNCHING IN THE COURTS.
1.) That the present judges in the Seventh Circuit read evidence of Cook
County judges violating the RICO ACT,
the 7th Cir. Held that
the Cook County Courts were a Criminal enterprise. U.S. v. Murphy, 768 F. 2d 1518, 1531 where precedent was enacted by
Judges Frank H. Easterbrook, Richard D. Cudahy and former Chief judge Luther
Merritt Swygert;
2.) That every judge in the Seventh Circuit closed their eyes
to every unlawful terrorist act perpetrated by the Appellee’s said Appellant
has put before them on appeal in affidavits validating the verity of judges
committing Treason Trespassing upon the laws of the United States Constitution
engaging in “WAR” against the United
States Constitution making every order rendered against the Petitioner. If a judge does not fully comply with the
Constitution, then his orders are void, In re Sawyer, 124 U.S. 200 (1888), he
or she is without jurisdiction, and he/she has engaged in an act or acts of
treason at the time of filing this Motion no charges or indictments has been
presented availing or addressing the veracity of the pleadings.
3.) That
Judge Diane Sykes (now Chief Judge), Ann Claire Williams (Retired) Kenneth
Ripple ( Judges
Diane S. Sykes, Ann Claire Williams and Kenneth Ripple became “Trespassers
of the Laws” “Private Citizens”11-3481 falsified their court
order against the Appellant
4.) How can any Appellant
Black, Brown, Senior Citizens receive any type of justice in the Seventh
Circuit if judges go along with the criminals or any person controlling
Democratic or any Political Party ?
1.) The U.S. Supreme Court,
in Scheuer v. Rhodes, 416 U.S. 232, 94 S. Ct. 1683,
1687 (1974) stated that "when a state officer acts under a state law in a
manner violative of the Federal Constitution, he "comes into conflict with
the superior authority of that Constitution, and he is in that case stripped of
his official or representative character and is subjected in his person to
the consequences of his individual conduct. The State has no power to impart to
him any immunity from responsibility to the supreme authority of the United
States." [Emphasis supplied in original].
2.)
Under Federal law, which is applicable to all states, the U.S.
Supreme Court stated that if a court is "without authority, its judgments
and orders are regarded as nullities. They are not voidable but simply void;
and form no bar to a recovery sought, even prior to a reversal in opposition to
them. They constitute no justification; and all persons concerned in executing
such judgments or sentences, are considered, in law, as
trespassers." Elliot v. Piersol, 1 Pet. 328,
340, 26 U.S. 328, 340 (1828)
3.) That every judge who became “Private
Citizens” acting outside of their jurisdiction and oath upholding Tyranny,
Terrorism in the Courts have demonstrated a Rebellion against the Federal
Government, United States Constitution and laws of the United States Supreme
Court succinctly articulates how the State and members of the Federal
Government have used Hate, Racism and their Political Affiliation making sure
no Defendant- Appellant receive Equal Protection of the Laws pursuant to the
Civil Rights Act of 1866.
MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT
|  Mon, Feb 10, 2:49 PM (15 hours ago) | | ||
| ||||
| Mon, Feb 10, 4:54 PM (13 hours ago) | | ||
| ||||
UNITED STATES
COURT OF APPEALS
FOR
THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT
CHICAGO, ILLINOIS 60604
U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, } Appeal from the United
As
TRUSTEE for securitized Trust
} States District Court for
2006-NC3, et al.
} the Northern District of
Plaintiffs –Appellees }
Illinois, Eastern Division
V
}
No. 24 cv 12195
} No. 25-1118
}
Monzella Y. Johnson
}
Defendant-Appellant
} Judge April Perry
MOTION FOR DEFAULT OF THE SUMMARY JUDGMENT (FILED JAN 27, 2025)
PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE w/AFFIDAVIT WARRANTING THE
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE TO INVOKE JURISDICTION BECAUSE RACISM JUDICIAL CORRUPTION
HAVE BEEN ADMITTED TO BY ALL APPELLEES AND EVERYONE INVOLVED WHERE ONLY A NON-RACIST
HETEROSEXUAL CAUCASIAN DOJ CAN PUT THE APPELLANTS BACK IN THEIR HOME DUE TO RACISM
& EGREGIOUS HATE FOR SENIOR CITIZENS OR HETEROSEXUAL BLACK OR BROWN MEN AS
PRO SE LITIGANTS WHO ARE HELD AT DISPARATE LEGAL STANDARDS THAN ANY LICENSED
BOARD ATTORNEY
Now comes Defendant-Appellant, Monzella Y.
Johnson Pro Se in this cause respectfully represents to this court the reasons
and files herewith her Affidavit in support of Motion for Summary Judgment et
al;
1.) That pursuant to the Emergency Motion for
Stay of Execution Prohibiting Altisource, Cook County Sherrif’s or any Person from
Removing said Possessions of 61 Years et al. served via electronically delivery
Jan. 10, 2025, Appellees have admitted to the veracity of all Pleadings
demonstrating Terrorism and violations of the Appellants Civil Rights (Sections
42 USC 1983) having them unlawfully evicted because they litigiously
articulated and particularized said case was Vacated and Affirmed in the
Circuit Court and State Appellate Court (Dec 30, 2011) 14 years ago.
A-
That
Racism, Corruption & Sexism where alleged certain homosexual and Lesbian
judges are untouchable with inferior Blacks or Colored People keeping their
mouths shut in authority; whereby, the Sheriff’s Police directed an
Appellant to file a Complaint against the judges with the Judicial Inquiry
Board, hereto attached, Dec 18, 2024 letter from Michael Deno, Executive
Dir & Gen Counsel he DENIED a prior Complaint but because said individuals
were Caucasian and of Law Enforcement, he was not sure if he had jurisdiction, hereto
attached Ex A.
B-
That
the Justice Department is suing Illinois and Cook County over sanctuary status
corroborating the fact Chicago Democrats unequivocally favors illegal violent
immigrants and certain criminals than the Civil Rights of its lawful born
citizens in America.
2.) That every judge who became “Private
Citizens” acting outside of their jurisdiction and oath upholding Tyranny,
Terrorism in the Courts have demonstrated a Rebellion against the Federal
Government, United States Constitution and laws of the United States Supreme
Court succinctly articulates how the State and members of the Federal
Government have used Hate, Racism and their Political Affiliation making sure
no Defendant- Appellant receive Equal Protection of the Laws pursuant to the
Civil Rights Act of 1866.
3.) That Page 16 Par 21 another
Appellant (Brief 11-3481) (Brief 07-2287, Motion to Disqualify Judge
Easterbrook was filed and he denied it and an Appointment of Counsel Standish
Willis citing Farmer v. Haas a Homosexual inmate that had nothing to do
with the Freeman Appellant and denied every Motion, he presented to the Court )
Appellant filed a Summary Judgment (Dec 4, 2023) in the Cir Ct of Cook County,
see the Notice of Emergency Defendant’s Original Petition et al. the Chief
Judge, States Attorney and Illinois Attorney General et al all admitted to
egregiously violating his Civil Rights pursuant to the Civil Rights Act of 1866
as it relates to the Appellant’s present case corroborating the fact no
Democrat has or ever dispensed Equal Protection of the Laws in Chicago,
Illinois and certain Federal Judges of the Republican nature followed suit and
vented their same hate in unlawful rulings to wear down the litigator and
protect the parties initiating racial, criminal or terrorist acts in the
courts.
A-
Defendant
filed Notice of Filing Service on the Registered Agent & all related
Parties et al Dec. 3, 2024.
B-
Plaintiff-Appellees
have never responded to any Summary Judgments, Pleadings or Briefing Schedules
but has admitted to all Pleadings accompanied via Affidavits.
C-
Defendant-Appellant
has asthma medicine at her home and is still homeless due to the continuous racist hateful Civil Rights Violations.
4.) That pursuant to Federal
Rules of Civil Procedure RULE 8 (1) In General. In
responding to a pleading, a party must:
(A) State in short and plain terms its
defenses to each claim asserted against it; and
(B) Admit or Deny the allegations asserted against it by an
opposing party.
(2) Denials—Responding
to the Substance. A denial must fairly respond to the substance of the
allegation.
(3) General and
Specific Denials. A party that intends in good faith to deny all the
allegations of a pleading—including the jurisdictional grounds—may do so by a
general denial. A party that does not intend to deny all the allegations must
either specifically deny designated allegations or generally deny all except
those specifically admitted.
(4) Denying Part
of an Allegation. A party that intends in good faith to deny only part of
an allegation must admit the part that is true and deny the rest.
(5) Lacking
Knowledge or Information. A party that lacks knowledge or information
sufficient to form a belief about the truth of an allegation must so state, and
the statement, has the effect of a denial.
(6) Effect of
Failing to Deny. An allegation –other than one relating to the amount of
damages –is admitted if a responsive pleading is required and the allegation is
not denied. If a responsive pleading is not required an allegation is
considered denied or avoided.
5.) For an Order Pursuant to Smith v. Wade, 461 U.S. 30, 35 103 S. Ct.
1625, 1629, 75 L Ed 2d 632 (1983) Justice Brennen “The threshold standard for
allowing punitive damages for reckless or callous indifference applies even in
a case, such as here, where the underlying standard of liability for
compensatory damages because is also one of recklessness. There is no merit to
petitioner’s contention that actual malicious intent should be the standard for
punitive damages because the deterrent purposes of such damages would be served
only if the threshold for those damages is higher in every case than the
underlying standard for liability in the first instance. The common-law rule is
otherwise, and there is no reason to depart from the common-law rule in the
context of {1983} of $40 Million Dollars;
6.) Plaintiff-Appellees have not raised any
affirmative defenses.
Summary judgment is
appropriate when the pleadings, depositions, admissions and affidavits, viewed
in a light most favorable to the movant or non-movant fail to establish a
genuine issue of material fact, thereby
1. Entitling the moving party
to judgment as a matter of law.
The purpose of summary
judgment is not to try a question of fact, but simply to determine whether
one exists.
When the party moving for
summary judgment supplies evidentiary facts which, if not contradicted, would
entitle her to judgment, the opposing party cannot rely upon his
non-compliance to Federal Rules of Civil Procedures or a court order or a
complaint or answer if submitted alone to raise issues of material fact. A
counter Affidavit is necessary to refute evidentiary facts properly asserted by
affidavit Supporting the motion or else the facts are deemed admitted.
Here, Defendant-Appellant
has supplied affidavits, Court Orders, Certified Court transcripts and other
evidentiary material that establishes all of the elements necessary to entitle
it to recovery, including the amount of damages. Plaintiff-Appellees have
failed to submit any evidence in opposition to any Motions with Affidavits to any
Court to raise any genuine issues of material fact.
7.) That
pursuant to the textbook historical precedents
relating to Section 42 USC 1983
Turner 24 F. Cas. 337 (No. 14247)
C.C.D. Md. 1867) The “equal benefit” clause is cited in what would appear to be
the earliest reported case enforcing the section. The plaintiff was an
emancipated slave who was indentured as an apprentice to her former master. Although
both whites and blacks could be indentured as an apprentice, under the law of
Maryland, indentured blacks were not accorded the same educational benefits as
whites and, unlike whites, were subject to being transferred to any other
person in the same county. Circuit Judge Chase granted a writ of habeas corpus
upon finding that the purported apprenticeship was in fact involuntary
servitude and a denial under the Civil Rights Act of 1866 of the “full and
equal benefit of all laws.
Professional Group Travel, Ltd. v. Professional Seminar
Consultants INC., 136 Ill App. 3d 1084 et al. State Law:
Properly alleged facts within an affidavit that are not contradicted by
counter-affidavit are taken as true, despite the existence of contrary
averments in the adverse parties’ pleadings, Section 1983 of U.S.C.S.
contemplates the depravation of Civil Rights through the Unconstitutional
Application of a Law by conspiracy or otherwise. Mansell v. Saunders (CA
5 F 1A) 372 F 573, especially if the conspiracy was actually carried into
effect, where an action is for a conspiracy to interfere with Civil Rights
under 42 U.S.C.S. 1985 or for the
depravation of such rights under 42 U.S.C.S. 1983, if the conspiracy was
actually carried into effect and plaintiff was thereby deprived of any rights,
privileges, or immunities secured by the United States Constitution and Laws,
the gist of the action may be treated as one for the depravation of rights
under 42 U.S.C.S. 1983, Lewis v. Brautigam (CA 5 F
1a) 227 F 2d 124, 55 Alr 2d 505, John W. Strong, 185, 777-78 (4th ed. 1992).
Jennings v. Patterson, 488 F. 2d 442,
equal access to public facilities. The court found that the plaintiffs had been
“denied the right to hold and enjoy their property on the same basis as white
citizens.” Jennings suggests the potential usefulness of the equal benefit clause
in guaranteeing full and equal enjoyment of public property and public
services.” Developments in the Law section 1981, 15 Harv. Civ. Rts. ---- Civ.
Lib. L. Rev 29, 133 (1980).
Scott, 377 Mass. 364, 386 N.E. 2d 218, 220 (1979) See
Lopez-Alexander, Unreported Order No. 85-279 (Colo. May 3, 1985) (Judge removed
for, inter alia, a persistent pattern of abuse of the contempt power. The Mayor
of Denver accepted the findings of the Denver County Court Judicial
Qualification Commission that the judge’s conduct could not be characterized as
mere mistakes or errors of law and that the conduct constituted willful
misconduct in office and conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice that
brings the judicial office into disrepute). Canon Ethics where there is a
pattern of disregard or indifference, which warrant discipline. Cannon v.
Commission on Judicial Qualifications, 14 Cal. 3d 678, 537 P. 2d 898,
122 Cal. Rprt. 778 (1975).
In the wake of extensive investigations
by Federal Law enforcement authorities revealing widespread corruption in the
Illinois court system (“Operation Greylord”) and elsewhere, indicating not only
that significant professional misconduct was occurring but also that the
requirement to report misconduct was frequently ignored, particularly in the
cases of judges with regard to the conduct of other judges. Lisa L. Milord, The Development of the ABA,
Judicial Code 24-25 (1992), Vaughn 462 S.E. 2d 728
(Ga. 1995), The Supreme Court of Georgia removed a judge from office for
disregarding defendant’s constitutional rights. Illinois Rockford Corp. V.
Kulp, 1968, 242 N.E. 2d 228, 41 Ill 2d 215. U. S. Sup Court
Digest 24(1) General Conspiracy, U.S. 2003, Essence of a conspiracy is
an agreement to commit an unlawful act.----U.S. v. Jimenez Recio,; 123 S Ct.
819, 537 U.S. 270, 154 L. Ed 2d 744, on remand 371 F. 3d 1093. People
v. Hardison, 1985, 911 Dec. 162, 108; People v. Mordick, 1981,
50 Ill, Dec 63. S.H.A. Ch 38 33-3, Official misconduct is a
criminal offense; and a public officer or employee commits misconduct,
punishable by fine, imprisonment, or both, when in his capacity, he
intentionally or recklessly fails to perform any mandatory duty as required by
law; or knowingly performs an act which he knows he is forbidden by law to
perform; or with intent to obtain a personal advantage for himself or another,
he performs an act in excess of his lawful
authority…….
Thus, Summary Judgment is proper.
FURTHER
AFFIANT SAYETH NOT
IN THE
UNITED STATES
COURT OF APPEALS
FOR
THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT
CHICAGO, ILLINOIS 60604
AFFIDAVIT
I Monzella Y. Johnson Pro Se being duly sworn on oath
states the aforementioned pleadings enumerated within said motion pursuant to
Federal Rules of Civil Procedures, the undersigned certifies that the
statements set forth in this instrument are true and correct, except as to
matters therein stated to be on information and belief and as to such matters,
the undersigned certifies as aforesaid that she verily believes the same to be
true.
Respectfully Submitted
Notary
____________________
Monzella Y. Johnson
Frogishtwo65@gmail.com
773 835-5849
IN THE
UNITED STATES
COURT OF APPEALS
FOR
THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT
CHICAGO, ILLINOIS 60604
U.S. BANK NATIONAL
ASSOCIATION, } Appeal from the
United
As TRUSTEE for
securitized Trust }
States District Court for
2006-NC3, et al.
} the Northern District of
Plaintiffs
–Appellees
} Illinois, Eastern Division
V
}
No. 24 cv 12195
} No. 25-1118
}
Monzella Y.
Johnson
}
Defendant-Appellant
} Judge April Perry
Certificate of Service
I Monzella Y. Johnson, Defendant-Appellant,
certify that I have on this day Electronically Emailed said Default of the Summary
Judgment et al. to all parties recorded in said Notice via Email except
Cook County Judges via Courtesy Copies per Sheriff Police Directives to email
them any and all correspondence.
Dept
of Justice, US Atty
Gen Pam Bondi 950 Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Washington, DC 20530
Attorney General
Kwame Raoul alexandrina.shrove@ilag.gov
555 West Monroe Suite 1300
Chicago, Ill. 60601
Cook County State’s Attorney Chief Judge Timothy C. Evans
Eileen
O’Neil Burke timothy.evans@cookcountyil.gov
statesattorney@cookcountyil.gov
Cook County Sheriff’s
Tom Dart
50 West
Washington, Suite 702 email CCSO@ccsheriff.org
Chg. IL 60601
President/CEO Rick Aneshansel
US Bank Natl. Assoc. rick.aneshansel@usbank.com
Registered
Agent: Grace A. Gorka US Bank Natl.
Assoc.
190 S. LaSalle,
grace.gorka@usbank.com
ggorka@usbank.com
Chg. IL 60603
JSC_General@atgf.com Pamela Murphy-Boylan President CEO of the
(TJSC)
RPerdew@lockelord.com Lord & Locke Law Firm
simon.feng@lockelord.com Lord & Locke Law Firm
pmal@potestivolaw.com Potestivo Law Firm
chicagodocket@lockelord.com Lord & Locke Law Firm
Cook County Eviction Superintendent Colin.Luce@ccsheriff.org
CCSO Evictions CCSO.evictions@ccsheriff.org
ccc.chancerycalendar12@cookcountyil.gov Presiding Judge S. H. Hall
Sheriff’s Police Molly Adams
molly.adams@ccsheriff.org
Potestivo & Ass., PC
Bryan G. Thompson, Poulami Mal
bthompson@potestivolaw.com
223 West Jackson, Blvd, Suite
610
Chicago, IL. 60606
Cook County Clerk, Iris Y. Martinez
CCCWebsite@cookcountycourt.com
PLEASE BE ADVISED that on Feb. 10, 2025 A Notice of Default of the Summary
Judgment et al. has been filed in the United States Court of Appeals,
Seventh Circuit before the Honorable Justices.
Dated
Feb 10th, 2025
Respectfully submitted,
_________________________
Monzella Y. Johnson
Frogishtwo65@gmail.com.
THE IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY ILLINOIS
DOMESTIC RELATIONS DIVISION
IN RE
)
)
Francoise Hightower ) Judge Iris Y. Chivira
Petitioner
)
) Cal 41
VS
)
) No. 88 D 079012
Joe Louis Lawrence )
Respondent
) Room CL-12
MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT OF FRAUD
OF $50 MILLION
DOLLARS
Now comes Joe
Louis Lawrence, Counsel Pro Se. in this cause respectfully represents to this
court the reasons and files herewith his Affidavit in support of Motion for
Default Judgment due to “Fraud” of $50 Million Dollars.
1.
That pursuant to Motions accompanied by Affidavits said Plaintiff
and the States Attorney failed to respond to said Respondent’s Petition to Zero
out Child Support due to Assistant States Attorneys Prosecutorial Misconduct et
al. (filed Oct 26, 2023) served on the Petitioners via electronically and
mailed via Priority Tracking #9505-5156-4056-3301-7893- 63 delivered Oct. 28,
2023 at 2:52 pm in the mailbox.
3.
That pursuant to Judge Chivira a former Assistant States Attorney
tried to pretend she was not an attorney for the States Attorney used her
unlawful authority and acted as a “Private Citizen” by violating the Civil
Rights of the Respondent Denied said valid aforementioned Motion that was
properly agreed upon by the ASA via not objecting or denying any of the
Pleadings.
5.
That pursuant to a Motion for Disqualification Instanter of Judge
for Cause et al. accompanied by
Affidavits said Plaintiff and the States Attorney failed to respond to
said Motion (filed Dec 26, 2023) served on the
Petitioners via electronically and mailed via Priority Tracking
#9505-5116-1093-3360-0084- 14 delivered Dec. 28, 2023 at 12:40 pm in the
mailbox.
6.
That Colored judges are promoted and Appointed on their abilities
as Democrats Oppressing ethnic groups of Color hereto attached, Gr Ex A, Respondent’s
Motion for Reconsideration Vacate (Feb 5. 2024 Order) Eviction & Rule to
Show Cause et al.
7.
That said judge of Color is following the exact Terrorist
Apartheid ways of Negros Judge Freddrenna Lyle as she came behind highly
qualified judges who Vacated a Foreclosure/ and Sale of said home in 2009 and affirmed by the
Appellate Court 2010 she allowed racist bank attorneys of the worse kind to
still come after said home illegally making it 14 years + as judge Freddrenna
Lyle allegedly was paid very well by Bank Officials and was PROMOTED to the
Appellate Court for her egregious crimes on senior citizens of Color not
fearing any admonishments because her crimes were on ethnic groups of her hue
and not of Irish or Polish ethnicity.
8.
That hereto attached Gr Ex B, 4 Re Noticed Motions filed Feb. 7, 2024
demonstrating the due-diligence said Retired Senior Citizens who is having to
deplete their pensions and savings fighting to keep their home as heartless
judges and racism working intimately in said Diabolical Mortgage Foreclosure
Criminal Conspiracy.
A-
Pursuant to 735 ILCS 5/2-610 where
allegations of complaint are not denied, there is admission of all facts
well-pleaded by adversary, and such admission, drawn from failure to plead, may
be considered as evidence. Hecht v. Hecht, App. 1 Dist. 1977, 7 Ill. Dec.
169, 49 Ill. App. 3d 334, 364 N.E. 2d 330.
B-
Pursuant to 735 ILCS 5/2-612 Counsel never
Objected to the sufficiency of Petitioners pleadings, Objections to sufficiency
of pleadings either in form or substance must be made In trial court, and if
not so made, they will be considered waived and cannot be raised for the first
time on appeal. People ex rel. Deynes v. Harris, App. 1948, 77 N.E. 2d
439, 333 Ill. App. 280.
9. That Defendant has due-diligently called
and emailed Jaime Barcus on numerous occasions and as recently Feb 8, 2024 at
312 603-5988 (5 mins 32 sec) she stated that she had been trying to email the
Defendant but he explained he only received 1 email on Jan 31, 2024 and the
only email, she stated that she was trying to get a judge for Friday Feb 16,
2024 at 11:00 am Defendant agreed to that time.
10. The United States Supreme Court recently
acknowledged the judicial corruption in Cook County, when it stated that Judge
"Maloney was one of many dishonest judges exposed and convicted through
'Operation Greylord', a labyrinthine federal investigation of judicial
corruption in Chicago". Bracey v. Gramley, case
No. 96-6133 (June 9, 1997).
Since
judges who do not report the criminal activities of other judges become
principals in the criminal activity, 18 U.S.C. Section 2, 3 & 4, and since
no judges have reported the criminal activity of the judges who have been
convicted, the other judges are as guilty as the convicted judges.
In the 20th century, the Supreme Court began to
overturn Jim Crow laws on constitutional grounds. In Buchanan v. Warley 245 US 60 (1917), the
court held that a Kentucky law could not require residential segregation. The Supreme Court
in 1946, in Irene Morgan v. Virginia ruled segregation in
interstate transportation to be unconstitutional, in an application of the commerce
clause of the Constitution. It was not until 1954 in Brown v. Board of
Education of Topeka 347 US 483 that the court held that separate facilities
were inherently unequal in the area of public schools, effectively overturning Plessy
v. Ferguson, and outlawing Jim Crow in other areas of society as well. This
landmark case consisted of complaints filed in the states of Delaware (Gebhart
v. Belton); South Carolina (Briggs
v. Elliott); Virginia (Davis v. County
School Board of Prince Edward County); and Washington,
D.C. (Spottswode Bolling v. C. Melvin Sharpe).
These decisions, along with other cases such as McLaurin v. Oklahoma State
Board of Regents 339 US 637 (1950), NAACP
v. Alabama 357 US 449 (1958), and Boynton v. Virginia 364 US 454 (1960),
slowly dismantled the state-sponsored segregation imposed by Jim Crow laws.
This
document is like Drano of a special kind eradicating years of human defecation
(corruption) clogging up the Illinois court system for at least 50 years or
more;
ILL. App. (1st Dist. 2000).
A “VOID JUDGEMENT OR ORDER” is one that is entered by a court lacking
jurisdiction over the parties or the subject matter, or lacking the inherent
power to enter the particular order of judgment, or where the order was
procured by FRAUD- in re Adoption of E.L., 248 ILL. Dec. 171, 733 N.E. 2d 846,
315 ILL. App. 3d 137- Judgm 7, 16, 375.
U.
Agreement to commit an unlawful act, which
constitutes the essence of a conspiracy, is a distinct evil that exist and be
punished whether or not the substantive crime ensues.-Id.
Conspiracy poses a threat to the public
over and above the threat of the commission of the relevant substantive crime,
both because the combination in crime makes more likely the commission of other
crimes and because it decreases the part from their path of criminality.-Id.
CONSPIRACY
Fraud maybe inferred from nature of acts complained of, individual and
collective interest of alleged conspirators, situation, intimacy, and relation
of parties at time of commission of acts, and generally all circumstances
preceding and attending culmination of claimed conspiracy Illinois Rockford Corp. V. Kulp,
1968, 242 N.E. 2d 228, 41 ILL. 2d 215.
Conspirators to be guilty of offense
need not have entered into conspiracy at same time or have taken part in all
its actions. People V. Hardison, 1985, 911 Dec. 162, 108.
Requisite mens rea elements of conspiracy are satisfied upon showings of
agreement of offense with intent that offense be committed; Actus reas element is satisfied of act in furtherance of agreement People
V. Mordick, 1981, 50
Supreme Court Rule [137]
provides in pertinent part:
If a pleading, motion, or other
paper is signed in violation of this Rule, the court, upon motion or upon its
own initiative, may impose upon the person who signed it , a represented party,
or both, an appropriate sanction, which may include an order to pay to the
other party or parties the amount of reasonable expenses incurred because of
the filling of the pleading, motion, or other paper, including a reasonable
attorney fee. Not only will the courts consider an award of sanctions for
active false statements: failures to disclose material facts to the court can
also justify an award of sanctions.
BRUBAKKEN v.
Morrison, No. 1-9-1670, 1992 Ill App. LEXIS 2144 (1st Dist. Dec. 30,
1992). Additionally, the fact that a false statement or omission is the result
of an honest mistake is no defense to entry of a sanction. ID. To the extent
that an individual lawyer has engaged in sanctionable conduct, that lawyer’s
firm can also be jointly and severally liable with the lawyer.
End of de jure segregation
In January 1964, President Lyndon
Johnson met with civil rights leaders. On January 8, during his first State of the Union address, Johnson asked
Congress to "let this session of Congress be known as the session which
did more for civil rights than the last hundred sessions combined." On
June 21, civil rights workers Michael
Schwerner, Andrew Goodman, and James
Chaney, disappeared in Neshoba County, Mississippi. The three
were volunteers aiding in the registration of African-American voters as part
of the Mississippi Summer Project. Forty-four
days later, the Federal Bureau of Investigation
recovered their bodies, which had been buried in an earthen dam. The Neshoba
County deputy sheriff, Cecil Price and 16 others, all Ku Klux
Klan members, were indicted for the crimes; seven were convicted.
A judge’s disrespect for the
rules of court demonstrates disrespect for the law. Judges are disciplined
under Canon 2A for violating court rules and procedures. Judged ignored
mandated witness order in attempt to accommodate witnesses’ schedules; Citing
Canon 2A the court noted, “[a] court’s indifference to clearly stated rules
breeds disrespect for and discontent with our justice system. Government can
not demand respect of the laws by its citizens when its tribunals ignore those
very same laws”)
Commentary to Canon 2 offers a test for
the appearance of impropriety: “whether the conduct would create in reasonable
minds a perception that the judge’s ability to carry out judicial
responsibilities with integrity, impartiality and competence is impaired.” ABA
Model Code of Judicial Conduct, Commentary to Canon 2A, paragraph 2 (1990). A
reference to the Commentary under 2C alerts one to the fact that the appearance
of impropriety can also be created by a judge’s membership in or knowing
approval of organizations that engage in invidious discrimination.
That
because of the number of years Defendant have been harmed by said Civil Rights
Violations and no one objected to said assertions put before this tribunal, Defendant
is seeking $50 million dollars Smith v. Wade, 461 U.S. 30, 35, 103 S. Ct. 1625,
1629, 75 L Ed 2d 632 (1983) Justice Brennen “The threshold standard for
allowing punitive damages for reckless or callous indifference applies even in
a case, such as here, where the underlying standard of liability for
compensatory damages because is also one of recklessness. There is no merit to
petitioner’s contention that actual malicious intent should be the standard for
punitive damages because the deterrent purposes of such damages would be served
only if the threshold for those damages is higher in every case than the
underlying standard for liability in the first instance. The common-law rule is
otherwise, and there is no reason to depart from the common-law rule in the
context of {1983}”
FURTHER
AFFIANTH SAYETH NAUGHT
Under penalties as provided by
law pursuant to 735 1265 5\1-109, the undersigned certifies that the statements
set forth in this instrument are true and correct, except as to matters therein
stated to be on information and belief and as to such matters, the undersigned
certifies as aforesaid that he verily believes the same to be true.
Respectfully submitted,
Joe Louis Lawrence
_________________________
WHEREFORE
the
aforementioned reasons Defendant
respectfully Prays:
1.)
For the Relief of
Default Judgment $50 Million Dollars
2.)
Order Remand on every
party complicit in said conspiracy
Instanter;
3.)
Impose Sanctions on
any other Parties and any other members complicit in said conspiracies;
4.)
Invoke any Sanctions
and all remedies not mentioned this court deems just;
5.)
Order the Chicago
Transit Authority to REINSTATE his Position back as whole due to the egregious
conspiracies culminating into CHILD SUPPORT SCAM & COVER-UP as Judge Ronald
Bartkowicz admitted in a Court Order of unlawfully Remanding Defendant on a Bogus
Warrant as he a former CTA attorney was covering up his “Good ol Boys” Brethren
who stole said wages while off work injured on duty.
6.)
Order Francoise to
return his stimulus check of $2000 and every dime she collected from him
illegally Instanter
Under penalties as provided by law pursuant to
735 1265 5\1-109, the undersigned certifies that the statements set forth in
this instrument are true and correct, except as to matters therein stated to be
on information and belief and as to such matters, the undersigned certifies as
afore said that he verily believes the same to be true.
Respectfully Submitted,
Joe Louis Lawrence,
Counsel Pro Se
______________________
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY ILLINOIS
DOMESTIC RELATIONS
DIVISION
IN RE
)
)
Francoise Hightower ) Judge Iris Y. Chivira
Petitioner
)
) Cal 41
VS
)
) No. 88
D 079012
Joe Louis Lawrence )
Respondent
) Room CL-12
NOTICE
OF FILING
MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT OF FRAUD
OF $50
Million Dollars
Please be advised that on Feb.
9, 2024 Defendant has filed before this Circuit Court, Motion for Default
Judgment of $50 Million Dollars; and will present said legally sufficient
instrument before the proper Judge who is presiding on this matter Feb at 10:30 via Zoom.
Zoom Link
Meeting ID: 84376080114
Password: 086627
Dial In Number: 312-626-6799
I Joe Louis Lawrence, Counsel Pro Se Defendant,
certify that I have on this day deposited said Notice and Motion to all parties
recorded in said Notice via regular mail/electronic delivery.
Governor JB Pritzker gov.casework@illinois.gov
To: Hon. Iris Y. Chivira CCC.DomRelCRCL12@cookcountyil.gov
Francoise
L.B. Hightower-Belmer 1152 West 102nd Street Chg. Il. 60643-2353
Cook County State’s Attorney Chief Judge Timothy C. Evans
Kim
Foxx
timothy.evans@cookcountyil.gov
statesattorney@cookcountyil.gov
Cook County Sheriff’s
Tom Dart
email CCSO@ccsheriff.org
The Crusader Newspaper Group
Managing Editor Sharon Fountain
State Police isp.contact@illinois.gov
Illinois State Police
Respectfully, Submitted,
__________________________
Joe
Louis Lawrence
Counsel
Pro Se
Post Office Box 490075
Chicago,
Ill 60649
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
The undersigned hereby
certifies that the above notice and all attachments were caused to be emailed
electronically and mailed, to the above parties at the addresses provided
before 5:00 pm on February 9, 2024.
________________________
Respectfully Submitted,
Joe
Louis Lawrence, Counsel Pro Se
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY ILLINOIS
DOMESTIC RELATIONS DIVISION
IN RE
)
)
Francoise
Hightower
) Judge Iris Y.
Chivira
Petitioner
)
) Cal 41
VS
)
) No. 88 D 079012
Joe Louis
Lawrence
)
Respondent
) Room CL-12
AFFIDAVIT
STATE OF ILLINOIS )
)
COUNTY OF COOK )
I Joe Louis Lawrence, Counsel Pro Se being duly sworn on
oath states the aforementioned pleadings enumerated within said motion pursuant
to 735 1265 5/1-109, the undersigned certifies that the statements set forth in
this instrument are true
and correct, except as to matters therein stated to be on information and
belief and as to such matters, the undersigned certifies as aforesaid that he
verily believes the same to be true.
No comments:
Post a Comment