MOTION TO DISQUALIFY COOK COUNTY JUDGE MICHAEL A FORTI (FILED SEPT. 25, 2024) UNEQUIVOCALLY SHOWING THAT AS A HETEROSEXUAL FREEMAN THE RACISTS AND ALLEGED HOMOSEXUALS HAVE SEIZED THE ENTIRE JUDICIARY SYSTEM AND IS ONLY ALLEGEDLY GIVING WHO THEY WANT TO HAVE JUSTICE NOT IN ACCORDANCE WITH ANY ILLINOIS RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURES OR THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION
THE MOTION TITLE CAPTIONED SELF EXPLAINS THAT THERE ARE NOT ANY REAL JUDGES IN THE COURTS BUT A BUNCH OF "PRIVATE CITIZENS" DOING WHAT THE FUCK THEY WANT BECAUSE NOBODY IS LEGALLY COMPETENT TO CHALLENGE THEM DUE, TO SO MANY BEING INFERIOR OR ALLEGEDLY IN THE CLOSET AND IS ALLEGEDLY AFRAID THAT SOMEONE MIGHT SNITCH ON WHO IS SLEEPING WITH WHOMEVER, WHO IS MARRIED IN A HETEROSEXUAL UNION BUT LIVING A DOUBLE LIFE IN THE CLOSET.
NOBODY IS AT ALL WHO OR WHAT THEY PRESENT THEMSELVES TO BE
SOMEBODY SHOULD HAVE TOLD THEM WHEN YOU LIVE IN A GLASS HOUSE, YOU SHOULD NOT THROW STONES WHEN EVERYBODY STARTED LYING AND COVERING UP FOR SO MANY CAUGHT UP IN THIS BABYLON SHIT, THAT'S WHEN THEY STARTED THROWING STONES.
IN THE CIRCUIT
COURT OF COOK COUNTY ILLINOIS
DOMESTIC RELATIONS
DIVISIO1N
IN RE
)
)
Francoise Hightower ) Judge Michael A. Forti
Petitioner
)
) Cal 61
VS
)
) No. 88 D
079012
Joe Louis Lawrence )
Respondent
) Room 3004
RESPONDENT’S
MOTION TO DISQUALIFY JUDGE MICHAEL A.
FORTI INSTANTER FOR “CAUSE” PERJURY & VACATE SEPTEMBER 19, 2024 COURT ORDER
DUE TO HATE BIAS PREJUDICE PURSUANT to S.H.A. 735 ILCS 5/2 ---1001 (a) (2,3) TOTAL CORROBORATION OF DEMOCRATIC JUDGES IN COOK COUNTY NOT
FOLLOWING ANY RULES OF ILLINOIS CIVIL PROCEDURES OR IN ACCORDANCE TO ILLINOIS
STATUTES BUT AS “PRIVATE CITIZENS”, HE
IS ENGAGING IN A PRIMAE FACIE SHOWING ENGAGING IN AN ORGANIZED CRIMINAL CONSPIRACY CIVIL RIGHTS VIOLATIONS “FRAUD” TRESPASSING
UPON THE LAWS ENGAGING IN TREASON OFFENSES BY MAKING FALSE STATEMENTS IN HIS
ORDER SAYING FRANCOISE HIGHTOWER IS SELF-REPRESENTING HERSELF WHEN THE RECORD
AND COURT ORDERS SHOW THAT THE STATES ATTORNEY IS REPRESENTING SAID POLICE
OFFICER AND RESPONDENT “DID NOT FILE PROPER MOTIONS BUT RATHER NOTICES” MAKING HIS
ORDER VOID/NULLITY AND IS USING HIS
UNLAWFUL AUTHORITY TRYING TO PROTECT HIS FRIEND AND COLLEAGE MARITZA MARTINEZ
AS JUDGE STATED, HE WAS NOT GOING TO TOUCH THE MOTION TO VACATE HER MARCH 27TH
COURT ORDER BUT FAILED TO RECUSE HIMSELF ON THE GROUNDS OF CONFLICT OF
INTEREST NOW CRIMINAL COVER-UP CONSPIRACY, DUE TO PETITIONER & ASSISTANT
STATES ATTORNEYS ADMITTING/CORROBORATING THEIR ROLES IN SAID CONSPIRACY AND
JUDGE CHAVIRA BEING A FORMER ASSISTANT STATES ATTORNEY USED HER UNLAWFUL
AUTHORITY WITH FORMER ASSISTANT STATES ATTORNEY THOMAS KANTAS IN COVERING-UP
CRIMES OF OTHER ASSISTANT STATES ATTORNEYS UNLAWFUL INVOLVEMENT IN
MANUFACTURING DOCUMENTS CAUSING AN EMANCIPATED ADULT TYCEE HIGHTOWER TO APPEAR
AS A MINOR SO AS TO EXTORT MONEY FROM THE RESPONDENT JUDGE NEVER HAD
JURISDICTION OR AUTHORITY TO PRESIDE OVER CASE TO DISQUALIFY CHAVIRA AND THE
ASSISTANT STATES ATTORNEY IS SHOWING AS A CAUCASIAN SHE CAN VIOLATE ANY LAWS
WHERE RESPONDENT IS CONCERNED AND ADMITTED REPRESENTING CHICAGO POLICE OFFICER
DUE TO BLACK DEMOCRATS HAVING NO AUTHORITY OVER CERTAIN CAUCASIANS & HAVE
THE CLERK OF THE COUNTY, IRIS Y MARTINEZ TRANSFER THIS MATTER AWAY FROM COOK
COUNTY & APPOINT A SPECIAL PROSECUTOR INSTANTER DUE TO DEMOCRATIC JUDGES
KNOWING RESPONDENT HAS BEEN FRAMED BUT BECAUSE OF THE HIM BEING A COLORED
HETEROSEXUAL FREEMAN SAID JUDGES ARE DEMONSTRATING HOW THEY CAN “TRESPASS UPON
THE LAWS AND DO WHATEVER THEY WANT ENGAGING IN JIM CROW APPLICATIONS BASED UPON
RACIST OR ALLEGED HOMOSEXUAL FRATERNAL RELATIONS, RESPONDENT AS A HETEROSEXUAL
FREEMAN NO COOK COUNTY JUDGE WILL RULE IN RESPONDENT’S MANNER AND RULE TO SHOW
CAUSE REMANDING ALL PARTIES INTO CUSTODY INSTANTER W /BODY ATTACHEMENT w/AFFIDAVIT
Now comes Respondent Joe Louis Lawrence,
Counsel Pro Se in this cause respectfully represents to this court the reasons
and files herewith his Affidavit in support of Respondent’s Motion to Disqualify
judge Michael A. Forti Instanter et al;
1.)
That Judge Michael
A. Forti being cognizant that no Black Democrat in authority will address
anything he does unlawfully from the bench figured by lying on said court order
saying Petitioner is self-representing herself because of his Homosexual and
Anglo-Saxon disposition nothing will ever happen to him.
2.)
That Respondent has
not seen Francoise and had a conversation with her since, she lived in Hyde
Park on Everett in 1989 or 1990, when she stated that her attorney Joseph V.
Roddy came to her and asked her, if was
crazy because nothing will work on him, he won’t give up, her reply, “was that
Joe is a fighter if something is not right he is going to fight for what he
believes in and so if you did something to him and he is fighting you, that’s
because something you did is not right and, I’m not in it”
3.)
That because of the vicious lies not errors, Judge Forti has
demonstrated the very burden Respondent
could never get justice in Cook County due to his skin color and Heterosexual
disposition, hereto attached, Respondent’s Motion for Presiding judge Regina A.
Scannicchio to invoke Jurisdiction Disqualifying Judge Maritza Martinez, Aug
12, 2024, Respondent never ever received any type of acknowledgement or court
order from the Presiding judge.
4.)
That alleged Homosexuals, Bisexuals are working with the racists
in the judiciary are the new Domestic Terrorists controlling the Democratic
Party in Cook County and has summoned all members in the closet to obstruct him
from having any success in this Domestic Terrorist Criminal Enterprise.
5.)
That unbeknown to said
“Private Citizens” impersonating Cook County judges, the State of Illinois
Division of Child Support sent the Respondent a Letter June 13, 2024 (HFS) for the first time in over 30 years, ASA Harris acknowledged having a Court Order from a
Judge in 2007 where Tycee Hightower was emancipated in 2002, before judge
Chavira
and the Respondent replied expeditiously July 1, 2024 via email to every
Democratic Person in the legal profession,
A-
That a Child Support representative called the Respondent August
31st 2023 of 312 793-2526 23 minutes 40 seconds, stating she
received a referral from Springfield to ZERO out child support et al. hereto
attached as Gr Ex 2 Respondent asked her a question in Spanish, she did
not answer because it was learned that she was of Polish ethnicity.
B-
That on June 26, 2020, ref as Gr Ex 3,
C-
That the letter on its
face corroborates how racism and corruption played a major role against the
Respondent when Chavira was allegedly the Assistant States Attorney during the
years 2002-2007, the Illinois Dept of Public Aid Div of Child Support had the
Respondent in court illegally him and his family were on Public Aid as well and
he was taking his family to therapy at UIC 3-4 days out of the week and Public
Aid had to provide him additional monies so that he could get his family to
their appointments for the help that was needed coping with depression etc.
D-
That the Political
Machine rewarded every Black or Colored person who participated in the creation
or falsification of any documents or kept their mouths shut or snitched on
those trying to help him against the Respondent for the alleged Ku Klux Klan
judges and attorneys Lester Barclay is the President of the CTA, William
Stewart Boyd became a judge and a monster!, Iris Chavira allegedly received a
judicial position not qualified one bit, etc. but as long as Black and certain
Hispanics destroy their own ethnic groups, they will be rewarded a position in
the Democratic Party.
6.)
That because of the
Color of Respondent’s skin said communication fell on DEAF EARS,
nevertheless, Respondent due-diligently particularized the fraudulent events
and made sure the applicable parties were highlighted so that members of law
enforcement would not have any problems ascertaining the Colored or Racist Klan
involved, hereto attached, Gr Ex 4, and 5, Email sent to Gov Pritzker
& Elizabeth M. Whitehorn, Director and Iris Martinez Clerk of the Circuit
Court of Cook County at 9:33 am and 3:33 pm showing how a racist judge of
Polish ethnicity admitted issuing a Bogus warrant against the Respondent for
her Irish Attorney Joseph V. Roddy where the judge threatened him if he
continued to be reinstated to the CTA, he was going to lock him up again!
Judges
acted as Ku Klux Klansmen for Petitioner as a Police Officer what did she have
to do for them returning the favor with her Police badge?
7.)
That Respondent being
aware of Blacks in the Democratic Party-Political Machine are nothing more than Puppets or Figure heads
upholding racism and Jim Crow Laws in Cook County or the City of Chicago will
never and have never attempted to speak up or try and do what was right by him
in standing up to the Caucasians who were the initial authors of these Ku Klux
Klan Criminal Civil Rights Violations.
8.)
President Biden stated in a Leaked Zoom Call:
via TikTock and X ll_Purpose_Hak 
(@HakHinton)
posted at 1:29 AM on Tue, Sep 17, 2024:
Mass immigration is by design.
Joe Biden and Democrats have let in over 10
million illegal immigrants.
They will get political representation and
amnesty once Democrats get back control.
By 2040 this country is Doomed not just because of African Americans but it
will be minority white European and you guys are going to have to start working
more with the Hispanics.
https://t.co/DCIk7Jzepc
(https://x.com/HakHinton/status/1835929025354580422?s=03)
The President of the United States has implied that it is better
to work with unqualified immigrants regardless to their backgrounds than to
deal with African Americans; unfortunately, if you look at Chicago alone with
the number of Negroes in authority how many of them have any power over corrupt
racist Caucasians?
9.)
That on June 21, 2024, Respondent filed the aforementioned:
MOTION TO
RECUSE THE ENTIRE COOK COUNTY JUDICIARY AND APPOINT A SPECIAL PROSECUTOR
PURSUANT TO THE CASE OF 2 EX-COOK COUNTY ASSISTANT STATE’S ATTORNEY’S (NICHOLAS
TRUTENKO, ANDREW HORVAT) DUE TO FORMER ASSISTANT’S STATES ATTORNEY IRIS Y.
CHIVIRA ALLEGEDLY TOOK PART IN THE FALSIFICATION OF BACKDATING RECORDS MAKING
HER A MINOR FOR POLICE OFFICER FRANCOISER HIGHTOWER FOR HER EMANCIPATED
DAUGHTER TYCEE LAQITA HIGHTOWER CAUSING RESPONDENT TO BE REMANDED INTO CUSTODY
FOR ALLEGEDLY OWING CHILD SUPPORT 5 TIMES THAT WAS NEVER OWED AND NOT HIS CHILD
AND THEY HAVE ADMITTED TO THE VERACITY OF THIS VIA SUMMARY JUDGMENT/DEFAULT BUT
COOK COUNTY JUDGES ARE TRYING TO CONTINUOUSLY COVER-UP THE MAYHEM &
EGREGIOUS INJUSTICES BECAUSE OF HIS SKIN COLOR COVERING UP A PLETHORA OF CRIMES
ASSOCIATED IN THIS MATTER WHERE THE MAY 29TH EMAIL WAS SENT TO
PRESIDING JUDGE REGINA SCANNICCHIO TO VACATE COURT ORDER BEING VOID/A NULLITY
(MARCH 27, 2024) DUE TO JUDGE MARITZA MARTINEZ NOT HAVING JURISDICTION AND
INVOKING THE JURISDICTION OF THE STATE POLICE/JUDICIAL COMMISSION TO FORCIBLY
REMOVE JUDGE (S) INSTANTER FROM THEIR POSITIONS DUE TO ADMISSIONS OF SUMMARY
JUDGMENT (FILED DEC 4, 2023) Local Rule 56.1 The rule is very clear that
"all material facts set forth in the statement required of the moving
party will be deemed admitted unless controverted by the statement of the
opposing party." Local Rule 56.1(b)(3)(B).
10.)
Said Clerk provided him a Court date of July 9, 2024 before
Preliminary Judge Edward Arce for the 10:30 am Call.
11.)
That on July 9, 2024, Respondent was #3 on the Judges Call Sheet
The actual
Communication from the Motion Call
Judge
Arce: Then we have Francois Hightower, and Joseph Lawrence?
Joe
Lawrence Present your Honor
Judge
Arce: Good morning, Sir, are you representing yourself Sir?
Joe
Lawrence: Yes, Sir.
Judge
Arce: Are you on the phone ma’am?
Francoise:
Good morning. Your honor Yes, I am.
Judge
Arce: Good morning and this is, I
believe, is Mr. Lawrence’s motion?
Joe
Lawrence: That is correct, Yes, Sir.
Judge
Arce: Go ahead with your motion.
Joe
Lawrence: This is the motion to recuse
the entire Cook County Judiciary and appoint a special prosecutor pursuant to
the case of 2 ex Cook County Assistant States Attorneys. But before we even
finish with this particular motion, Your Honor, this matter was supposed to be
before Judge Maritza Martinez for the recusal of Judge Chavira, So I don’t
understand how is it this case was assigned to you as the preliminary judge?
Judge
Arce: I’m gonna. It was assigned to me
because it’s got to come through me and then I assign it and send it back to
the presiding judge who transfers it back to Judge Martinez. So that’s what I’m
gonna do O. K.
Joe
Lawrence: O. K.
Judge
Arce: Yes, then. So I’ll prepare that order transferring the case to Judge Scannuchio
The presiding judge for transfer to Judge Martinez, who’s the judge that you
have are seeking to vacate an order. If I remember correctly,
Joe
Lawrence: that is correct.
Judge
Arce: All right.
Joe
Lawrence: Will I receive an order from you?
Judge
Arce: I’ll prepare that order later
today. It’ll be sent into the clerk’s office.
Joe
Lawrence: Thank you.
Judge
Arce: All right, you’re all set. Thank you. All right, we’ve called all of the
cases on our 10:30 call.
12.)
That at no time was the judge racist unprofessional or anything
related to the sort it is clear from his ruling, he received a verbal
disposition on how to move on said case but, he decided correctly to enter an
Order sending this matter to the Presiding judge for an Order sending it to
Judge Martinez which is kind of difficult because she never had any
jurisdiction in the first place because Presiding Judge Scannicchio never
signed a Court Order removing Judge Chavira.
A-
That
Maritza Martinez finagled herself “FRAUDULENTLY” into this case by
assuming jurisdiction on a matter she never had any authority; she went beyond
her authority and became a “Private Citizen”. INDUCING RELIANCE
To prevail in a cause of action for
fraud, plaintiff must prove that defendant made statement of material nature
which was relied on by victim and was made for purposes of inducing reliance,
and that victim’s reliance led to his injury. Parsons V. Winter,
1986, 1 Dist., 491 N.E. 2d 1236, 96 ILL Dec. 776, 142 ILL App 3d 354, Appeal
Denied.
In Carter V. Mueller 457 N.E. 2d 1335 ILL. App. 1 Dist.
1983 The Supreme Court has held that: “The
elements of a cause of action for fraudulent misrepresentation (sometimes
referred to as “fraud and deceit” or deceit) are: (1) False statement of
material fact; (2) known or believed to be false by the party making it; (3)
intent to induce the other party to act; (4) action by the other party in
reliance on the truth of the statement; and (5) damage to the other party
resulting from such reliance.
A- . CONSPIRACY
Fraud maybe inferred from nature of acts complained of, individual and
collective interest of alleged conspirators, situation, intimacy, and relation
of parties at time of commission of acts, and generally all circumstances
preceding and attending culmination of claimed conspiracy Illinois Rockford
Corp. V. Kulp, 1968, 242 N.E. 2d 228, 41
ILL. 2d 215.
Conspirators to be guilty of offense need
not have entered into conspiracy at
same time or have taken part in all its actions. People V. Hardison, 1985, 911
Dec. 162, 108. Requisite mens rea elements of conspiracy are satisfied
upon showings of agreement of offense with intent that offense be committed;
Actus reas element is satisfied of act in furtherance of agreement People
V. Mordick, 1981, 50 ILL, Dec. 63
A-
#JudicialCorruption in Chicago, Illinois how to fix cases: HOW JUDGES IN CHICAGO
COURTS MAKE ASSES OUT OF THE... https://unlawful1.blogspot.com/2018/06/how-judges-in-chicago-courts-make-asses.html?spref=tw
B-
Anytime a racist Irish have the audacity to say to an
innocent man “today is your lucky day, I can’t LOCK YOU UP anymore” judge
Timothy P. Murphy or a Polaca David E. Haracz tells you, “I know that
you are not the BIOLOGICAL FATHER, I’m just the BILL COLLECTOR” or the
other Polaca Ronald Bartkowicz issues a BOGUS WARRANT as a former CTA attorney
trying to help keep his racist Brethren from being discovered at the CTA (admit
to everything as being accurate in the Motion to Disqualify him and compliments
the Motion and asks the Respondent “How did you know, that I use to work for
the CTA?”) who stole said wages while off work injured on duty and to
cover-up all of the illegal wage garnishees sent to her racist Irish attorney
representing Police Officer Francoise Louise Barbara Hightower-Belmer, there is
a huge problem in the judiciary, A HETEROSEXUAL FREEMAN OR WOMAN cannot receive
Equal Justice or Equal Protection within the laws OF THIS CITY OR STATE, when
these racist hateful individuals have found a way to circumvent the United
States Constitution and still enforce Jim Crow laws which has been outlawed by
the U.S. Supreme Court as demonstrated though out this case. #JudicialCorruption in Chicago, Illinois how to fix cases... https://unlawful1.blogspot.com/2012/08/chronology-of-unlawful-contempt-charges.html? A Certified Affidavit Notarized ignored by racist States
Attorney Dick Devine.
a.
To
show fraud upon the court, the complaining party must establish that the
alleged misconduct affected the integrity of the judicial process, either
because the court itself was defrauded or because the misconduct was
perpetrated by officers of the court. Alexander v. Robertson, 882, F. 2d
421,424 (9th Cir. 1989);
b.
A void judgment does not create any binding obligation.
Kalb v. Feuerstein (1940) 308 US 433, 60 S Ct 343, 84 L, Ed 370.
Properly alleged facts within an affidavit that are
not contradicted by counter affidavit are taken as true, despite the existence
of contrary averments in the adverse party’s pleadings. Professional
Group Travel, Ltd. v. Professional Seminar Consultants Inc., 136 ILL App 3d
1084, 483 N.E. 2d 1291; Buzzard v. Bolger, 117 ILL App 3d 887, 453 N.E. 2d 1129
et al
2.
A-
Motions for Reconsideration are designed to
bring to the court’s attention newly discovered evidence that was unavailable
at time of original hearing, changes in existing law, or errors in court’s
application of law. Continental Cas.
Co. v. Security Ins. Co. of Hartford, App. 1 Dist. 1996, 216 Ill. Dec. 314, 279
Ill. App. 3d 815, 665 N.E. 2d 374, appeal dismissed, et al.;
B-
The purpose of a Motion to Vacate is to alert
the trial court to errors it has made and to afford an opportunity for their
correction. In re Marriage of King, App.
1 Dist. 2002, 270 Ill. Dec. 540, 336 Ill. App. 3d 83, 783 N.E. 2d 115,
rehearing denied pending appeal; et al.
C-
Pursuant to 735
ILCS 5/2-612 Counsel never Objected to the sufficiency of Petitioners
pleadings, Objections to sufficiency of pleadings either in form or substance
must be made In trial court, and if not so made, they will be considered waived
and cannot be raised for the first time on appeal. People ex rel. Deynes
v. Harris, App. 1948, 77 N.E. 2d 439, 333 Ill. App. 280.
3.
That because of the above; Fraud admissibility
great latitude is permitted in proving fraud C.J.S. Fraud 104 ET Seg. Fraud
51-57. where a question of fraud and deceit is the issue involved in a case,
great latitude is ordinarily permitted in the introduction of evidence,
and courts allow the greatest liberality in the method of examination and in
the scope of inquiry Vigus V. O’Bannon, 1886 8 N.E 788, 118 ILL 334.
Hazelton V. Carolus, 1907 132 ILL. App. 512. https://unlawful1.blogspot.com/2014/12/blacklivesdontmatter-judgemikva-never.html?spref=tw
A- That
said case had to recruit a judge from the juvenile division because no judge in
the Daley Center aka (Babylon, Hell, etc.) wanted to have any dealings with the
Respondent, Judge Mikva told the Respondent “he had a Gift, he can tell a
story using the laws and she understood everything he was saying, in that his
pleadings were unique not the way law school teaches students how to plead.”
B- That
the transcript attached to the database in Cook County is incredible reading
material, the FBI or State Police will love reading this document it
corroborates how a State Agency similar to how Edward Burke was convicted was
being used to try and suspend said driver’s license.
“In addition,
when judges act when they do not have jurisdiction to act, or they enforce a
void order (an order issued by a judge without jurisdiction), they become
trespassers of the law, and are engaged in treason.”
C- That said link particularizes some of the cases linked to the
Hightower v Lawrence “fraudulently”
https://unlawful1.blogspot.com/2020/07/the-real-reason-why-chicago-is-so.html?spref=tw
Ethics
All Illinois lawyers must be familiar with the Illinois Rules of Professional Conduct, and trail lawyers must be
particularly familiar with the rules that apply specially to them.
RPC
3.3, entitled “Conduct Before a Tribunal,” sets forth the
standards to be followed by the trial lawyer during “battle.” Section (a) of
that rule states:
(a) In appearing in a professional capacity before a tribunal, a
lawyer shall not:
(1) make a statement of
material fact or law to a tribunal which the lawyer knows or reasonably should
know is false;
(2) fail to disclose to a
tribunal a material fact known to the lawyer when disclosure is necessary to
avoid assisting a criminal or fraudulent act by the client;
(3) fail to disclose to the
tribunal legal authority in the controlling jurisdiction known to the lawyer to
be directly adverse to the position of the client and not disclosed by opposing
counsel;
(4) Offer evidence that the
lawyer knows to be false. If a lawyer has offered material evidence and comes
to know of its falsity, the lawyer shall take reasonable remedial measures;
(5) participate in the creation
or preservation of evidence when the lawyer knows or reasonably should know the
evidence is false ;
(6) counsel or assist the
client in conduct the lawyer knows to be illegal of fraudulent;
(7) engage in other illegal
conduct or conduct in violation of these Rules;
(8) fail to disclose the
identities of the clients represented and of the persons who employed the
lawyer unless such information is privileged or irrelevant;
(9) intentionally degrade a
witness or other person by stating or alluding to personal facts concerning
that person which are not relevant to the case;
(10) in trial, allude to any matter that the lawyer does not
reasonably believe is relevant or that will not be supported by admissible
evidence, assert personal knowledge of facts in issue except when testifying as
a witness, or state a personal opinion as to the justness of a cause, the
credibility of a witness, the culpability of a civil litigant or the guilt or
innocence of and accused, but a lawyer may argue, on analysis of evidence, for
any position or conclusion with respect to the matter stated herein;
Acts constituting direct, criminal
contempt
A wide variety of acts may constitute a direct, criminal
contempt. And act may be criminal contempt even though it is also an indictable
crime. Beattie v. People, 33
Official
misconduct is a criminal offense; and a public officer or employee commits
misconduct, punishable by fine, imprisonment, or both, when, in his official
capacity, he intentionally or recklessly fails to perform any mandatory duty as
required by law; or knowingly performs an act which he knows he is forbidden by
law to perform; or with intent to obtain a personal advantage for himself or
another, he performs an act in excess of his lawful authority ….S.H.A. Ch 38
33-3.
- “The Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals
held that the Circuit Court of
Cook County is a criminal enterprise. U.S. v. Murphy, 768 F.2d 1518, 1531 (7th Cir. 1985)”.
The United States Supreme
Court recently acknowledged the judicial corruption in Cook County, when it
stated that Judge "Maloney was one of many dishonest judges exposed and
convicted through 'Operation Greylord', a labyrinthine federal investigation of
judicial corruption in Chicago". Bracey v. Gramley,
case No. 96-6133 (June 9, 1997).
Since
judges who do not report the criminal activities of other judges become
principals in the criminal activity, 18 U.S.C. Section 2, 3 & 4, and since
no judges have reported the criminal activity of the judges who have been
convicted, the other judges are as guilty as the convicted judges.
- That Judge Maritza
Martinez demonstrated Bias and collusion by signing her name on court
order that was clearly fraudulent (Feb 26 2024, March 27. 2024)
a. She
used her robe and unlawful authority in the same identical manner as the other Democratic
Judges not realizing she became a “Private Citizen” and no longer operating
under an obligation and oath she swore to because she was never recommended to
be a judge in the first place so she never really understood her function on
the bench but as long as she denied Respondents Motions accompanied with
Affidavits she showed her allegiance to whomever sponsored her on the Cook
County ballot proving Black and Brown lives don’t matter due to Terrorist Control
Racist Democrats have over the legal tribunals 735 ILCS 5/2—1001(a)(3) (West 2006). Although the statute does
not define “cause”, Illinois courts have held that in such circumstances,
actual prejudice has been required to FORCE REMOVAL of a judge from a case,
that is, either prejudicial trial conduct or personal bias. Rosewood Corp. n
Transamerica Insurance Co., 57 Ill 2d 247, 311 N.E. 2d 673 (1974; In re
Marriage of Kozloff, 101 Ill 2d 526, 532, 79 Ill. Dec 165 463 N.E. 2d 719
(1984); see also People v. Vance, 76 Ill. 2d 171, 181, 28 Ill. Dec. 508, 390
N.E. 2d 867 (1979).
5.
In that African American judges ignorant of the laws
are just as worse as racist judges, in that, many of them closes their eyes and
commit the same acts as racist judges, due to them selling out their ethnicity
for whatever alleged fee or favor they can receive, but in this case an
investigation needs to be had to ascertain how this Hispanic Attorney (Iris
Chavira) made it to the Cook County Ballot UNOPPOSED overlooking and
DISCRIMINATING AGAINST QUALIFIED ATTORNEYS WHO WORKED HARD AND HAVE THE REAL
ACADEMICS BEHIND THEM and INDUCED the SUPREME COURT OF ILLINIOIS to have sworn
her in as a JUDGE.
- The Illinois Supreme Court has held that
"if the magistrate has not such jurisdiction, then he and those who
advise and act with him, or execute his process, are
trespassers." Von Kettler et.al. v. Johnson,
57 Ill. 109 (1870)
Under Federal law which is
applicable to all states, the U.S. Supreme Court stated that if a court is
"without authority, its judgments and orders are regarded as nullities.
They are not voidable, but simply void; and form no bar to a recovery sought,
even prior to a reversal in opposition to them. They constitute no
justification; and all persons concerned in executing such judgments or
sentences, are considered, in law, as trespassers." Elliot
v. Piersol, 1 Pet. 328, 340, 26 U.S. 328, 340 (1828)
The Illinois Supreme Court held
that if a court "could not hear the matter upon the jurisdictional paper
presented, its finding that it had the power can add nothing to its authority,
- it, had no authority to make that finding." The People v.
Brewer, 128 Ill. 472, 483 (1928). The judges listed below had no
legal authority (jurisdiction) to hear or rule on certain matters before them.
They acted without any jurisdiction.
When judges act when they do not have jurisdiction to act, or they
enforce a void order (an order issued by a judge without jurisdiction), they
become trespassers of the law, and are engaged in treason.
A- That
Judge Michael A. Forti with Brazen disregard for the laws openly tried “fixing”
said case demonstrating a Prima Facie showing of Bias and or Prejudice conduct
pursuant to Sup Ct Rule 71, Sufficient for Removal, conduct which does
not constitute a criminal offense may be sufficiently violative of the Judicial
Canons to warrant removal for cause. Napolitano v Ward, 457 F 2d 279 (7th Cir.), cert denied, 409
U.S. 1037, 93 S. Ct. 512, 34 L. Ed. 2d 486 (1972).
7.
That
judge Forti has demonstrated an unknown interest in this matter which has
blinded his objectivity in adjudicating the merits of this matter, due to the
aforementioned; Sup Ct. Rule 63 (c) (1) (d) mandates disqualification
where the judge has an interest in the proceeding. (eff. April 16, 2007).
A
judge’s disrespect for the rules of court demonstrates disrespect for the law.
Judges are disciplined under Canon 2A for violating court rules and procedures.
Judge ignored mandated witness order in attempt to accommodate witnesses’
schedules; Citing Canon 2A the court noted, “[a] court’s indifference to
clearly stated rules breed disrespect for and discontent with our justice
system. Government cannot demand respect of the laws by its citizens when its
tribunals ignore those very same laws”)
a. Fraud upon the court is
a basis for equitable relief. Luttrell v. United States, 644 F. 2d 1274, 1276
(9th Cir. 1980); see Abatti v. C.I.R. , 859 F 2d 115, 118 (9th
Cir. 1988) “it is beyond question that a court may investigate a question as to
whether there was fraud in the procurement of a judgment” Universal Oil
Products Co. v. Root Refining Co., 328 U.S. 575, 66 S. Ct. 1176, 90 L. Ed.
1447. The power of the court to unearth such a fraud is the power to unearth it
effectively. See Hazel-Atlas Glass Co. v. Hartford-Empire Co., 322 U.S. 238, 64
S. Ct. 997, 88 L. Ed. 1250; Sprague v. Ticonic National Bank, 1184 and United
States v. Throckmorton, 98 U.S. (8 Otto) 61, 25 L. Ed. 93.
b. “A judge is an officer of
the court, as are all members of the Bar. A judge is a judicial officer, paid
by the Government to act impartially and lawfully”. People v. Zajic, 88
Ill. App 3d 477, 410 N.E. 2d 626. “A
void judgment is regarded as a nullity, and the situation is the same as it
would be if there were no judgment. It has no legal or binding force or
efficacy for any purpose or at any place….It is not entitled to enforcement.
30A Am Judgments 43, 44, 45. Henderson v Henderson 59 S.E. 2d 227-232
c. “A Void Judgment from its inception is and forever continues to be
absolutely null, without legal efficacy, ineffectual to bind parties or support
a right, of no legal force and effect whatever, and incapable of confirmation,
ratification, or enforcement in any manner or to any degree. “A void judgment,
order or decree may be attacked at any time or in any court, either directly or
collaterally” Oak Park Nat Bank v. Peoples Gas Light & Coke Col, 46 Ill.
App. 2d 385, 197 N.E. 3d 73, 77, (1st Dist. 1964)
That under 18
U.S.C. 242 and 42 U.S.C. 1985 (3) (b). A judge does not have the discretion
on whether or not to follow Supreme Ct. Rules, but a duty to follow. People v.
Gersh, 135 Ill. 2d 384 (1990).
Under penalties as provided by
law pursuant to 735 1265 5\1-109, the undersigned certifies that the statements
set forth in this instrument are true and correct, except as to matters therein
stated to be on information and belief and as to such matters, the undersigned
certifies as aforesaid that he verily believes the same to be true.
Respectfully submitted,
___________________________
Joe Louis Lawrence
PO Box 490075
Chicago, IL. 60649
312 965-6455
WHEREFORE the aforementioned reasons Defendant respectfully Prays
for the Relief
1. For an Order Vacating the
September 19, 2024 Court Order and Disqualifying Judge Michael A. Forti
Instanter for the Criminal Acts of Trespassing upon the Laws and Perjury, and For
an Order transferring this matter to a
Judge in the Federal venue due to Corruption
and Fraud;
2. For
an Order reimbursing all fees and costs to the Defendant for the enforcement of
this matter;
3. For an Order issuing a
Mandatory Injunction of HFS/Child Support Enforcement to Prohibit said unit
from prosecuting any more cases until an investigation is had ascertaining all
parties involved in said Criminal Enterprise.
A-
That said ASA Harris and the Caucasian
ASA on the Nov 14, 2023 and July 9, 2024 be referred for Law License be REVOKED
INSTANTER for violations of Ethics RPC 3.3 and
every other ASA involved.
4. For
an Order on Rule to Show Cause of Sanctions Remands and Disbarments of all Assistant
States Attorneys, Clerks and State employees involved in this matter;
5. For an Order assigning this
matter away from the LGBTQ/Irish/Polish/American African Americans because many
judges and CTA employees and Clerks of that union has displayed Terrorist Hate
at the Respondent due to his Heterosexual Outspoken Whistle Blower disposition,
he doesn’t care about them but they have demonstrated diabolical resentment and
hate at him.
A- It is apparent alleged Blow
Jobs or physical copulation, or Females Licking another Female or whatever they
do to achieve satisfaction in Chambers or whatever govt offices to be performed
on the subjects whom they are subordinate to demonstrates a CONFLICT OF
INTERESTS, TYRANNY, APARTHEID in a sexual and racial terrorist manner.
B- Cook County Courts are
likened to being Babylon or Hell justice lies within the judge of the beholder
and not in accordance to any rules of law or laws of the United States
Constitution.
6. For the entry of an Order
awarding to your Petitioner for such other relief and any other relief
necessary as equity may require of which this court may deem overwhelmingly
just;
That every woman intertwined in this case have one thing in common all
of them have been sexually abused and has lied, slandered, or defamed an
INNOCENT MAN and never healed from their abuse; and never confronting their
abuser or learned how to let go and never accepting the fact it was not their
fault being raped, but elected to remain as victims by coming after an innocent
man, who did nothing to any of them so as to satisfy and justify the Hatred
White Man’s stereotypical image on what a Black or Colored Man is to them.
It
is women like this intertwined in this case why our Black and Brown communities
are endowed with so much violence, disrespect, and hatred for one another
because so many have lost respect for themselves and have allowed the real
culprit hateful White Men or Spineless Cowardly Men of Color to use you in
keeping the Black and Brown Man displaced from society as they profit off your
misery and displaced rage as they manufacture any document in your behalf
acting as your SLAVE MASTER GIVING YOU WHAT YOU SEEK.
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY ILLINOIS
DOMESTIC
RELATIONS DIVISION
EXHIBIT LIST
1.) Ex - Court Order from Preliminary Judge Edward Arce
signed showing alleged racist ASA acknowledging representing CPD Francoise.
(July 9, 2024)
2.) Ex - 1 Nov 28, 2023, ASA Harris acknowledging representing Francoise where Tycee Hightower was emancipated in
2002.
3.) Ex - 2 Printout from database May 28, 2024 States
Attorney Motion/Continuances
4.) Ex -3
August 12, 2024 filing on Calendar
One and B never addressed.
5.) Gr Ex 4, 5
Emails sent to Governor
Pritzker, Elizabeth M. Whitehorn, Dir, Iris Martinez Clerk of the Circuit Court
of Cook County, Official Response to the June 13, 2024 Letter from HFS.
IN
THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY ILLINOIS
DOMESTIC RELATIONS DIVISIO1N
IN RE
)
)
Francoise
Hightower
) Judge Michael A. Forti
Petitioner
)
) Cal 61
VS
)
) No. 88 D 079012
Joe Louis
Lawrence
)
Respondent
) Room 3004
RESPONDENT’S
MOTION TO DISQUALIFY JUDGE MICHAEL A.
FORTI INSTANTER FOR “CAUSE” PERJURY & VACATE SEPTEMBER 19, 2024 COURT ORDER
DUE TO HATE BIAS PREJUDICE PURSUANT to S.H.A. 735 ILCS 5/2
---1001 (a) (2,3) TOTAL CORROBORATION OF DEMOCRATIC JUDGES IN COOK COUNTY NOT
FOLLOWING ANY RULES OF ILLINOIS CIVIL PROCEDURES OR IN ACCORDANCE TO ILLINOIS
STATUTES BUT AS “PRIVATE CITIZENS”, HE
IS ENGAGING IN A PRIMAE FACIE SHOWING ENGAGING IN AN ORGANIZED CRIMINAL CONSPIRACY CIVIL RIGHTS VIOLATIONS “FRAUD” TRESPASSING
UPON THE LAWS ENGAGING IN TREASON OFFENSES BY MAKING FALSE STATEMENTS IN HIS
ORDER SAYING FRANCOISE HIGHTOWER IS SELF-REPRESENTING HERSELF WHEN THE RECORD
AND COURT ORDERS SHOW THAT THE STATES ATTORNEY IS REPRESENTING SAID POLICE
OFFICER AND RESPONDENT “DID NOT FILE PROPER MOTIONS BUT RATHER NOTICES” MAKING
HIS ORDER VOID/NULLITY AND IS USING HIS
UNLAWFUL AUTHORITY TRYING TO PROTECT HIS FRIEND AND COLLEAGE MARITZA MARTINEZ
AS JUDGE STATED, HE WAS NOT GOING TO TOUCH THE MOTION TO VACATE HER MARCH 27TH
COURT ORDER BUT FAILED TO RECUSE HIMSELF ON THE GROUNDS OF CONFLICT OF
INTEREST NOW CRIMINAL COVER-UP CONSPIRACY, DUE TO PETITIONER & ASSISTANT
STATES ATTORNEYS ADMITTING/CORROBORATING THEIR ROLES IN SAID CONSPIRACY AND
JUDGE CHAVIRA BEING A FORMER ASSISTANT STATES ATTORNEY USED HER UNLAWFUL
AUTHORITY WITH FORMER ASSISTANT STATES ATTORNEY THOMAS KANTAS IN COVERING-UP
CRIMES OF OTHER ASSISTANT STATES ATTORNEYS UNLAWFUL INVOLVEMENT IN
MANUFACTURING DOCUMENTS CAUSING AN EMANCIPATED ADULT TYCEE HIGHTOWER TO APPEAR
AS A MINOR SO AS TO EXTORT MONEY FROM THE RESPONDENT JUDGE NEVER HAD
JURISDICTION OR AUTHORITY TO PRESIDE OVER CASE TO DISQUALIFY CHAVIRA AND THE
ASSISTANT STATES ATTORNEY IS SHOWING AS A CAUCASIAN SHE CAN VIOLATE ANY LAWS
WHERE RESPONDENT IS CONCERNED AND ADMITTED REPRESENTING CHICAGO POLICE OFFICER
DUE TO BLACK DEMOCRATS HAVING NO AUTHORITY OVER CERTAIN CAUCASIANS & HAVE
THE CLERK OF THE COUNTY, IRIS Y MARTINEZ TRANSFER THIS MATTER AWAY FROM COOK
COUNTY & APPOINT A SPECIAL PROSECUTOR INSTANTER DUE TO DEMOCRATIC JUDGES
KNOWING RESPONDENT HAS BEEN FRAMED BUT BECAUSE OF THE HIM BEING A COLORED
HETEROSEXUAL FREEMAN SAID JUDGES ARE DEMONSTRATING HOW THEY CAN “TRESPASS UPON
THE LAWS AND DO WHATEVER THEY WANT ENGAGING IN JIM CROW APPLICATIONS BASED UPON
RACIST OR ALLEGED HOMOSEXUAL FRATERNAL RELATIONS, RESPONDENT AS A HETEROSEXUAL
FREEMAN NO COOK COUNTY JUDGE WILL RULE IN RESPONDENT’S MANNER AND RULE TO SHOW
CAUSE REMANDING ALL PARTIES INTO CUSTODY INSTANTER W /BODY ATTACHEMENT w/AFFIDAVIT
Please be advised that on September 25, 2024 Respondent has filed
before this Domestic Relations Division
Motion Disqualifying Judge Michael A. Forti Instanter et al; and will present
said legally sufficient instrument before Judge Forti Oct. 7, 2024 in his stead at 10:00 am
in room via Zoom
Zoom Link for Michael A.
Forti
Meeting ID: 828 4953 7745
Password: 286646
Dial In Number: 312-626-6799
I Joe Louis Lawrence, Counsel Pro Se Defendant,
certify that I have on this day deposited said Re Notice of Motion for Default
to all parties recorded in said Notice via regular/electronic delivery.
Governor JB Pritzker gov.casework@illinois.gov
To: Hon Michael A. Forti
CCC.DomRelCR3004@cookcountyil.gov
Hon. Iris Y. Chivira CCC.DomRelCRCL12@cookcountyil.gov
Hon. Andrea Webber CCC.DomRelCRCL06@cookcountyil.gov
Hon Maritza Martinez CCC.DomRelCR3006@cookcountyil.gov
Francoise
L.B. Hightower-Belmer 1152 West 102nd Street Chg. Il. 60643-2353
Cook County State’s Attorney Chief Judge Timothy C. Evans
Kim
Foxx
timothy.evans@cookcountyil.gov
statesattorney@cookcountyil.gov
Cook County Sheriff’s
Tom Dart
email CCSO@ccsheriff.org
The Crusader Newspaper Group
Managing Editor Sharon Fountain
State Police isp.contact@illinois.gov
Illinois State Police
Chicago Police Superintendent, 3510 S. Michigan Ave,
Chicago Ill. 60653
Email CLEARPATH@chicagopolice.org
Dir. FBI,
Hon Mayor Brandon
Special Agent in
Charge (FBI) City
Hall 7th floor
Chicago,
IL. 60601
2111 West Roosevelt Road
Chicago, Il 60608
Illinois
Courts Commission
555 West
Monroe, 15th floor
Chicago Ill.
60661
info@IllinoisCourtsCommission.gov
Illinois Court
Commission Members
Justice P.
Scott Neville, Jr. Chairman
Justice Thomas
M. Harris
Justice
Margaret Stanton McBride
Judge Lewis
Nixon
Judge Sheldon
Sobol
Judge Aurora
Abella-Austriaco
Madam Paula
Wolf
Potestivo & Ass., PC
Bryan G. Thompson, Poulami Mal pmal@potestivolaw.com
press@cookcountyil.gov bthompson@potestivolaw.com
ilrb.filing@illinois.gov,
alexandrina.shrove@ilag.gov,
oig.referrals@illinois.gov
rwillis@laboradvocates.com,
jodi.mar@illinois.gov,
helen.j.kim@illinois.gov,
lashonda.channel@illinois.gov,
brianna.klein@illinois.gov,
kimberly.stevens@illinois.gov,
anna.hamburg-gal@illinois.gov,
khill@atu241chicago.org,
frogishtwo65@gmail.com,
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
The undersigned hereby
certifies that the above notice and all attachments were caused to be
personally delivered, to the above parties at the addresses provided before
5:00 pm on September 25, 2024 .
________________________
Respectfully Submitted,
Counsel Pro Se
Joe Louis Lawrenc
AFFIDAVIT
STATE OF ILLINOIS )
)
COUNTY OF COOK )
I Joe Louis Lawrence Counsel Pro Se being duly sworn on
oath states the aforementioned pleadings enumerated within said motion pursuant
to 735 1265 5/1-109, the undersigned certifies that the statements set forth in
this instrument are true
and correct, except as to matters therein stated to be on information and
belief and as to such matters, the undersigned certifies as aforesaid that he
verily believes the same to be true.
Respectfully Submitted
Notary
____________________
PO Box 490075
Chicago, IL.
60649
No comments:
Post a Comment