UPDATE February 26, 2019 how covering up an incest case has surpassed human expectation in Judge Elizabeth Rivera's court room.

#AldermanEdwardBurke allegedly has successfully helped a #GayMan who was married stabbed his wife 40 times with the help of his gay lover for $250,000.00 of the insurance money to be with his Gay boyfriend, he allegedly got away with murder.

Alderman Edward Burke seems to have issues with men like myself, I am That, That I am a Heterosexual Man standing in a Square circle of integrity, he has employed a number of other men under his control to aid and assist in the continuous covering-up of #WilliamJenkinsHightower a former Police officer of #FrancoiseLouiseBarbaraHightower, she too is also a former Police officer.

Alderman Edward Burke allegedly fixed a murder case where Police beat a Black man to death for smoking on the L train--so fixing an incest case with Nigger Judges he affectionately calls them or using his racist Irish or Polish homies is a piece of cake so he thought.

#ToniPreckwinkle allegedly received Notice and Knowledge of all salacious details as the Cook County President but because of her affiliation to Burke and the Political Machine kept her mouth SHUT just like #TimothyEvans, #DorothyBrown etc. making these psychotic sociopaths think they can just FUCK over anybody and get away with it.

On Feb. 26, I appeared on Judge Rivera's call number 8 on the call before Associate Judge Daniel A. Travino who informed me that, he or no other judge were able to rule on my motion for reconsideration because judge #Mackoff entered the order, this was kinda confusing, I asked the judge if this was judge Rivera's call? He said yes.

Personally, I feel as if I am among'st  a number of sick as men in love with each other frolicking in orgasms, in FUCKING over me watching me spin myself litigiously defending my name and honor in the courts, trying to vindicate my name as they laugh in unison because of the control they have over the legal system making sure their kind of men DENY me justice on every account.

President Obama signed into law the right for same sex to marry the irony to this is now that so many of them have ascended to POWER, some of them are worse than any two legged creature by participating in these heinous infamous crimes acting as Domestic Terrorists.

No need hiding in the closet married men sleeping with Black and Brown men so many are keeping their mouths shut because many are getting paid to maintain their alleged identities which begs the question, how can a man or woman not certain of their own identity or sexuality in conflict with a Heterosexual person help a person like myself or anyone else Heterosexual?


They got a judge #MyronFMackoff appointed to the bench May 2018 not even a year on the bench rule on a Hispanic judges case who has been on the bench since 1997? 22 years on the bench as a female judge these type of men do not RESPECT or HONOR a female unless she is a sellout to her ethnicity or accept her role as a inferior being and collect her pay check like the rest of the women in the Democratic Political Machine. 

Because of my skin color and sexual orientation, I am not able to receive JUSTICE due to this FACT!     

The Clerks familiar with this case said this case is Fucked up because this case is assigned to calendar 44 which is judge Rivera and judge Mackoff is calendar 41 they didn't see me being able to go directly to Mackoff because it is not his case.

I need a real man or woman with integrity to preside over this case most of the cowards in this legal system are not fit to wear a robe what is sad and weird the black and brown man seems to be the new woman.

Who or what a man is or not is none of my business and I give less than a dam, but it is apparent my sexuality means a lot to the corrupt racist sick men controlled or intimately involved allegedly with Alderman Edward Burke.

I challenge any Journalist or Media representative to grant me the same media exposure that was given to Jussie Smollet in his claims of hate crimes but in my case, these are actual acts of pure hate, no where will you find, I had to embellish  or pay anyone to seek any attention.

My Blog with these Posts are featured in 86 countries and i have been in so many internet newspapers, I have lost count. Now tell me how do I get an interview to articulate my pain behind these episodes of Human Demonicism ?

DOMESTIC TERRORISM HAS A NEW FACE COOK COUNTY ANY WOMAN WHO HAS BEEN SEXUALLY ABUSED RAPED IN ANY CAPACITY VIA INCEST ETC. NEED TO SEE HOW ALDERMAN BURKE APPOINT JUDGES AND HOW CERTAIN MEN  JUDGES UNDER HIS CONTROL GO OUT OF THEIR WAY TO PROTECT THE PERPETRATORS.

THIS CASE WAS ORIGINALLY ASSIGNED TO JUDGE JEAN COCOZZA SHE RECUSED HERSELF FROM THE CASE VOLUNTARILY SHE WAS A SENIOR LAW CLERK TO LODGE BROTHER MEMBER OF JACHIN PRINCE HALL 133 SUPREME COURT JUSTICE CHARLES FREEMAN FOR 15 YEARS.

THE CASE WAS THEN ASSIGNED TO JUDGE ELIZABETH LOREDO RIVERA WHO WAS NOT IN THE LEAST BIT INTIMIDATED BY ANYONE, I THOUGHT SHE WAS GOING TO BE BULLIED OR INTIMIDATED BY THE RACIST BULLY JUDGES.

ON JANUARY 21ST I SAW A MALE JUDGE SITTING ON THE BENCH IN HER STEAD, I KNEW SOME SHIT WAS IN THE GAME HE WAS SENT TO DISMISS MY CASE BECAUSE JUDGE RIVERA WAS NOT GOING ALONG WITH THE POLITICAL BULL SHIT!

WHEN THE FBI RAIDED CITY HALL AND SEIZED CERTAIN DOCUMENTS OF PERTINENCE FROM EDWARD BURKES OFFICE THAT WAS LIKENED TO THE CHESS ANALOGY OF "STORMING THE CASTLED KING" 

READ HOW POWERFUL NAMED POLITICIANS KNEW OF THE SHIT BURKE HAD DONE TO ME KEPT THEIR MOUTHS SHUT BURKE MISTOOK ME FOR THE WOMAN HE TOOK HER BABY FROM CLAIMING SHE WAS A DRUG ADDICT.

THIS VERY DOCUMENT WAS PREPARED AS A GAMBIT PAWN BECAUSE #BURKEOWNSBLACKJUDGES AND THE IRISH AND POLISH JUDGES ALL MAYBE MOST BECAUSE CERTAIN JUDGES, HE OWNS TOLD ME EVERYTHING, I HAVE PREPARED AND SAID IN MY PLEADINGS ARE IN FACT TRUE, THAT IS HOW THINGS ARE DONE UP HERE.

SO WITH THAT BEING SAID, I NEVER EXPECTED A GOOD JUDGE LIKE JUDGE RIVERA TO HAVE MY CASE OR KEEP IT BUT COULDN'T TAKE ANY CHANCES CERTAIN AREAS OF LAWS WERE DELIBERATELY WITHHELD SO THAT ONE OF BURKES CONTROLLED ASSOCIATE JUDGES COULD COME ALONG AND DENY THE MOTION.

READ HOW THE SON OF A PROMINENT JUDGE GOT INVOLVED IN THIS CASE INVOKED HIS AUTHORITY OVER HISPANIC JUDGE RIVERA'S CASE WRONGFULLY TRYING TO SAVE SOME OF THE PARTIES INVOLVED MOSTLY MEN NOW HE NEEDS SOMEONE TO SAVE HIM.

THE FBI HAS EVERY DOCUMENT ONE OF THE FIELD AGENTS STATED THEIR WAS NO WAY I SHOULD HAVE BEEN LOCKED UP FROM THE MAY 15, 1988 COURT ORDER, I WAS 5X'S FOR #ALLEGEDLYOWINGCHILDSUPPORT.

READ HOW #BLACKJUDGESARETHENEWTERRORIST IN THE DEMOCRATIC MACHINE WHAT THE RACIST WHITES CAN NOT DO BLATANTLY TO DESTROY AND VIOLATE THE CIVIL RIGHTS OF PERSONS OF COLOR THEY EMPLOY BLACK JUDGES TO DO THEIR DIRTY WORK--READ HOW WILLIAM STEWART BOYD, FREDRENNA LYLE, FRANKLIN ULYSSES VALDERRAMA ENGAGE IN DIABOLICAL CRIMINAL ACTS ON BEHALF OF THEIR WHITE RACIST BRETHERN IN THE DEMOCRATIC MACHINE.

COOK COUNTY PRESIDENT #PRECKWINKLE NOW HAS COMMERCIALS AIRING HOW SHE AUTHORED THE LAQUAN MC DONALDS AUTOPSY REPORT TO BE RELEASED SHOWING, HOW MANY TIMES HE WAS SHOT IN THE BACK AS #ANITAALVAREZ #RAHMEMMANUEL AND MC CARTHY TRIED COVERING IT UP---GUESS WHAT #VALDERRAMA WAS THE JUDGE THIS ADMISSION PROVES THAT BLACK JUDGES ARE PUPPETS WHO DO WHAT THEY ARE TOLD.


#HONEDWARDJORDAN WHO TOOK OVER MY DIVORCE CASE FROM BOYD TOLD HE READ MY COURTESY COPIES AND WAS IMPRESSED, HE SAID "REMEMBER THERE ARE MORE WITH ME THAN AGAINST ME"

                   IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY ILLINOIS

DOMESTIC RELATIONS DIVISION

IN RE                                                             )

                                                                         )

 Francoise Hightower                                      )       Judge Myron F. Mackoff                         

        Petitioner                                                 )

                                                                         )        Cal 44

          VS                                                          )                                  

                                                                         )        No. 88 D 079012                         

 Joe Louis Lawrence                                        )        

        Respondent                                              )        Room CL-02

                 MOTION TO VACATE Jan 22, 2019 ORDER & FOR RECONSIDERATION TO REINSTATE CASE 88 D 079012 & VACATE ALL JUDGMENTS DUE TO ORDERS BEING VOID A NULLITY CASE BEING “FRAUDULENT” JUDGES #“TRESPASSINGUPONTHE #LAWS” ENGAGING IN #TREASONOFFENSES ACTING AS #“PRIVATECITIZENS” MAKING MISREPRESENTATIONS TO THE COURT & ISSUANCE OF A RULE TO SHOW CAUSE FOR SANCTIONS AND REMAND PURSUANT TO SUPREME COURT RULE 137

Now comes the Joe Louis Lawrence, Counsel Pro Se, Heterosexual MAN BORN & RAISED a FREEMAN Promise and Swear to this Honorable Court as follows:  

That on Feb. 26, 2019 was #8 on the call but next to the last person called Respondent appeared before Associate Judge Daniel A. Travino and requested a Hearing or continuous before Judge Rivera because Judge Rivera was absent and learned no judge can rule on this matter because Judge Mackoff entered an order denying a valid Motion.

That Judge Travino was clear he had no jurisdiction to reconsider or vacate another judge’s order Respondent was greatly perturbed at the Romper Room Bullsh$t taking place but said judge demonstrated great integrity so Respondent requested, that he indicate this in his order that this is to go before Judge Mackoff because of his court order, he ordered the States Attorney to do that.

The #StatesAttorney insists they were not involved and have not filed anything impeaching Respondent’s pleadings but is expecting every white judge to systematically “Trespass upon the Laws” and continuously engage in HATE CRIMES of “TREASON” ignoring the Respondents pleadings.

With this being said can this Honorable court explain how can any of the judges politically connected or appointed rule on this very case and have the Respondent Remanded into custody 5x’s unlawfully when the May 18, 1988 court order Ref as #3 on the Exhibit List  nowhere on the order does it reflect any child support payments or signatures?

Respondent received support from #BenjaminMackoff #AureliaPuckinsi and #MorganFinley said clerks provided him documents of Francoise’s father William Jenkins Hightower being arrested in 1976 or 77 for impregnating his minor biological daughter the attorney general was prosecuting the matter. (Judge Kelly issued an order with leave to reinstate)

Hon Benjamin Mackoff signed an affidavit demonstrating legal court dates had in the computer because petitioner had appeared in court on several occasions without any Notice to the Respondent or his attorney----read #5 of the Ex 3 it says case was continued for child support no where in the data system is that date recorded.

The States Attorney has re indicted R. Kelly on allegations of sex related charges where he had a bond of $ million dollars but the same state is closing their eyes to a series of white judges covering up and racially ignoring the Respondent not charging or investigating no one for their roles in these Civil Rights Violations, this is a perfect case for recognizing this as a HATE CRIME in that white defendants who have killed received probation or few years for killing.

The Chicago police successfully investigated Jussie Smollett’s claims of being attacked resulting from a Hate crime and learned it was allegedly staged.

Nobody questioned or exhausted any resources where the Respondent is concerned due to his ethnicity and corrupt racist white judges involved and appointed by Edward Burke are involved.

Most importantly Francoise Louise Barbara Hightower former Police officer like her alleged colleague former #PoliceSergeantRonaldWatts as he framed multiple defendants whom were later freed from jail and exonerated by the States Attorney and judge.

Francoise began her career as a corrupt police officer and liar she swore to paternity tests  never had on the 1988 paternity matter.

That because of Judge Mackoff’s  noted interference in Judge Rivera’s case (whom demonstrated a listening ear and willingness to let the law work specifically stated for the Respondent to make sure he has proof the States Attorney was served before her jurisdiction was had) it’s apparent she is not going to ever touch this case because of judge Mackoff’s involvement making this his case trying to “FIX” the case helping the “Trespassers”.

                                                     

                                                                             2

Pursuant to Ex 8 from exhibit List Par 1, Page 3 In his book, Mr. Cooley stated Ed Burke and Anne Burke along with Attorney Pat Tuite fixed a murder case before Judge Maloney.  Herbert Cammon’s case was a murder case in which it was alleged that Herbert Cammon, a gay black man, murdered his wife with the help of his gay lover by stabbing her over 40 times and leaving the knife sticking out of her mouth.  It was alleged that he murdered his wife to obtain the proceeds of a $250,000 life insurance policy. The case was originally assigned to Judge Arthur Ceilsik. After a mistrial because of a hung jury, Ed Burke approached Judge Cieslik and told him to withdraw from the case. When the judge refused to withdraw from the case, he told the judge, “What’s the big deal.  It’s only a fucking nigger.”  Ed Burke’s wife, Anne, had filed an appearance in the case as co-counsel with Pat Tuite.  Anne Burke also requested that the judge withdraw from the case saying, “My husband was the one who put you on the bench.”  [Judge Cieslek lived in the 14^th ward.]  When the judge finally withdrew from the case due to media pressure initiated by the attorneys, the case was assigned to Judge Tom Maloney.  Judge Maloney dismissed the case in a bench trial.

  That every white man that has presided over this case and Denied the Respondents claims were allegedly under the control or authority of Alderman Edward Burke any judge that tried to help the Respondent by doing what is right were removed from the case, in that this is the first time ever a judge ruling on another judge’s calendar call where the Respondent was ever involved.

That judge Mackoff has rules in his own court, “Motions shall be filed with the Clerk's office prior to the date for presentation of the motion to the Court and set for presentation on an available Friday at 9:30. On the day of presentation, you will get a briefing schedule and a hearing date from the Court. You will never get a hearing date from the Circuit Clerk. The moving party is responsible for delivering courtesy copies of the motion and any responses and replies to the Court at least seven (7) calendar days before the hearing date”. 

    

1.    1.  )   That Respondent appeared before Judge Myron F. Mackoff in leiu of Judge Rivera who was absent pursuant to Judge Rivera’s directive Respondent provided the court order apprising him said matter was in fact continued until Jan. 22, 2019, his order prevented Respondent from receiving any justice in judge Rivera’s court;

2 2.)    That the State refused to get involved stating they were not involved and this was not a state matter, the clerk respectively interjected and informed the judge Respondent was in fact following the judges’ directive in notifying the States Attorney because they were the last attorneys of record;

33 .)    Judge Mackoff appeared to want to follow the clerk’s disposition on what Judge Rivera stated, until the States attorney told the judge to read the Respondents other motion, motion to impose sanctions et al. He began perusing the documents and stated, “said motion made no sense and that, I agree (he was agreeing to something the States Attorney never said), he stated, Respondent did not cite any laws that was germane to what he was seeking”.

44 .)    Respondent interjected and stated it is kinda ironic you mentioning arrears because the clerks office have me owing almost $80,000.00 getting ready to go to collections there were no paternity tests or DNA of any sort, the original case was dismissed September 17, 1987 with paternity tests, there was no motion to consolidate the prior case with this 1988 case; whereby this 88 D case never ordered me to pay any child support but found me in default court records

                                                                              3

      would prove, I was never served and this is an incest case where a Police officer had impregnated his biological daughters and had surprising political connections where, I was framed protecting him numerous affidavits attesting to this in my motions but nothing was done.

55.)    Furthermore, Judge Mackoff stated, Respondent could be accurate and telling the truth but the court had no jurisdiction on child support judgments or Post Trial judgments because the case is old in the 80’s but if this was an arrears matter this would be different.”

66.)    Finally, Judge Mackoff appeared totally “discombobulated” at the Respondent’s ability to articulate the laws in a concise coherent manner never providing much eye contact but kept his eyes fixated thumbing through the exhibits looking at both court orders and perusing the pages in a noticeable shocking manner.

77.)    To validate the verity of the aforementioned Par 6, Judge Mackoff had requested the judges’ clerk to provide him a blank court order as he wrote, “The matter comes before the court on various motions by Respondent regarding paternity, child support and other unrelated matters. It is hereby ordered (6) This court has no authority to abate arrears and give Respondent the relief he is apparently requesting (7) The motion is therefore denied without prejudice.   

                    A-     Judge Mackoff after writing the order had the audacity to ask the Respondent had he ever tried to do anything about this case and what did the other judges do? Respondent’s reply, “they did the same thing you did denied everything”

                    B-    The judge seemed to be regretting or having second thoughts for what he did tried to express to the Respondent, he stated, “it is not over for him, he have to stick with one court order that is the subject to an issue and how this court has jurisdiction and cite case laws that is germane to his pleadings”  

                      C-    What Myron F. Mackoff didn’t know is that Hon Benjamin Mackoff signed a computer printout attesting to court dates and records not in the court files where someone was repeatedly deleting documents trying to cover up numerous crimes of someone appearing in court without the Respondent’s knowledge.

                      D-    That Hon Benjamin Mackoff knew the injustices Respondent was experiencing did what the Respondent requested of his jurisdiction when Aurelia Pucinski was the Clerk of Cook County something no Black person has done.

88.)    Respondent articulated the number of “fraudulent” irregularities mainly the May 18, 1988 court absent signatures of a judge or attorney, his reply “a signature was not necessary”

Rule 272. When Judgment is Entered If at the time of announcing final judgment the judge requires the submission of a form of written judgment to be signed by the judge or if a circuit court rule requires the prevailing party to submit a draft order, the clerk shall make a notation to that effect and the judgment becomes final only when the signed judgment is filed. If no such signed written judgment is to be filed, the judge or clerk shall forthwith make a notation of 

                                                                          4

judgment and enter the judgment of record promptly, and the judgment is entered at the time it is entered of record.

Orders and judgments may be prepared, presented, and signed electronically, if permitted by the Supreme Court. Amended October 25, 1990, effective November 1, 1990; amended Dec. 29, 2017, eff. Jan. 1, 2018.

The Committee’s Comments’ The purpose of this rule is to remove any doubt as to the date a judgment is entered. It applies to both law and equity, and the distinction stated in Freeport Motor Casualty Co. v. Tharp, 406 111. 295, 94 N.E.2d 139 (1950), as to the effective dates of a judgment at law and a decree in equity is abolished.

In 1990 the rule was amended to provide that in those cases in which, by circuit court rule, the prevailing party is required to submit a draft order, a judgment becomes final only after the signed judgment is filed. The 1990 amendment was intended to negate the ruling in Davis v. Carbondale Elementary School District No. 95 (1988), 170 111. App. 3d 687, 525 N.E. 2d l35.

     Fraud admissibility great latitude is permitted in proving fraud C.J.S. Fraud 104 ET Seg. Fraud 51-57. where a question of fraud and deceit is the issue involved in a case, great latitude is ordinarily permitted in the introduction of evidence, and courts allow the greatest liberality in the method of examination and in the scope of inquiry Vigus V. O’Bannon, 1886 8 N.E 788, 118 ILL 334. Hazelton V. Carolus, 1907 132 ILL. App. 512. Respondent provided cases attached to the exhibits 18 D 3208 and Emergency Motion filed before Federal Judge Charles R. Norgle, Sr. regarding William Stewart Boyd, case 2015 CH 01670 Re Franklin Ulysses Valderrama, case 12-M-711552 Leonard Murray, case 2008 CH 33616 US Bank et al. v Monzella Y. Johnson et al. Exhibits 1-11 validate the verity in how these unrelated cases are related to the aforementioned case.

99.)    The aforementioned cases describe the Black men or women are the worse judges any educated man  or woman of color can go before in Cook County unlike so many racist judges, in case 18 D 3208 Boyd realizing he is untouchable because his actions are against persons of color and due to his alleged associations to Alderman Edward Burke remanded Mr. Kabir into custody unlawfully for $6800.00 said Plaintiff was a former personal Assistant to the Minister Louis Farrakhan in the N.O.I F.O.I, an impeccable Brother in the Masonic Lodge overseeing many responsible Brethren and outstanding Administrator at the Chicago Post office missed days at work being in Cook County jail as Boyd is using his robe allowing the attorney Joan S. Colen to commit perjury as soon to be ex-wife became complicit in an “Organized Conspiracy” as fraudulent documents are presented as Reliance is Induced in his court violating every aspect of Plaintiff’s Civil Rights criminalizing him unlawfully to justify his actions.

110.)        Boyd has unlawfully DENIED every motion Plaintiff filed in his court most importantly the DEFAULT where the Defendant failed to answer or respond to Plaintiff’s Petition for Dissolution of marriage due to infidelity and violence in the time allotted by the Illinois Code of Civil procedure rules nor did she or her attorney request additional time to plead Boyd became a law unto himself became complicit in an “Organized Conspiracy” engaging in a Criminal Enterprise.

                                                                                    5

111.)        Boyd is working with Joan S. Colen in an attempt trying to Remand Mr. Cazembe Kabir back into custody (Feb. 8, 2019) unlawfully said judge and attorney are now acting as Domestic Terrorists seeking to destroy the Plaintiff in that case for not succumbing to their criminal acts of intimidation trying to extort money from him affidavits presented showing he did not have the money demanded or in his account; moreover, Boyd unlawfully ordered the Exclusive Possession of Property inherited from Cazembe’s father to the Defendant his soon to be ex wife.

11   12.)        Boyd committed the same crime in Respondent’s divorce in the matter of 2008 D 010264 Lawrence v Lawrence Boyd pretended like he didn’t know the Respondent DENIED his Default Motion knew of the mental illness of his former wife and the effect the paternity case had on his family; also him being displaced from the CTA, he prepared the Motion that stated “Petitioner was forced to take a low paying job” because Judge Ronald Bartkowicz a former CTA attorney from the workman’s compensation division, stated “if Petitioner continued trying to be reinstated to the CTA he was going to lock him up”

113.)        Respondent confided in to Boyd on so many levels, he noticed his ring and asked him of his Masonic affiliation Respondent informed him he was from Prince Hall Jachin 133 lodge when he was representing him on the paternity case.

             A-    Boyd never filed an Appearance and never withdrew from the 88 D 079012 case;

             B-    Boyd acted like a double agent of some sort pretending to be of concern joining a Masonic lodge on the south side (seeking the support and protection of the Brethren) but at the same time deceiving and misrepresenting the Respondent and other Masonic men legally upright standing perpendicular in all of their endeavors and at the same time helping Racist white Democrats as they violate men of color Civil Rights Criminalizing us (them) any way they see fit.

             C-    To amplify the veracity to the aforementioned on case 2008 D 010264 Boyd ordered the removal of his minor son from his custody, he acted as if he was Schizophrenic or Bipolar because Respondent was the major care taker for all of his children and had documentation from medical and other professionals within the Department of Human Services and couldn’t fathom the judges’ reasons Respondent asked him, “why are you doing this to me and my family”?  (in a shocking manner)  

              D-     Boyd Stated, “I am the judge, I don’t have to explain myself to anybody do I Mr. Barclay”?

              E-     That Honorable Edward Jordan on Respondents motion returned his minor son back to him Boyd was in so much rage and hostility at that time he had refused to sign the court order releasing him from the case.

114.)        Respondent articulated there were no paternity tests nor motions to consolidate the prior case that was dismissed September 17, 1987 or was ever entered in the 1988 case.

                                                                            6

115.)        Judge Mackoff stated, “for the Respondent to identify a specific order that Respondent deemed a Nullity and show legal citations that supported his argument for the relief he was seeking because he didn’t see any legal references in his motion.”

116.)        Respondent was confused because judge Mackoff kept speaking in the first person pronoun so, “he confusingly asked the judge are you the judge going to be taking over this case? His reply, “was no this is judge Rivera’s case”

117.)        Judge Mackoff  surprisingly undermined the integrity of his colleague Honorable Elizabeth Loredo- Rivera by circumventing her authority and directives that was clearly articulated to the Respondent by providing the court order to the States Attorney with proof of delivery when Respondent adhered to said directive, Mackoff was forum-shopped to use his robe and violate the oath of his duties and become complicit in an “Organized Conspiracy” by becoming a “Private Citizen” in denying Respondents motions in an attempt to protect the judges involved and the States Attorneys.

118.)        That pursuant to a letter Par 9 from the Exhibit List hereto attached, Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, Oct. 30, 2014 states, “As we understand it, the Consumer Response team recognized that two separate cases were filed in Illinois Cook County Circuit Court (case number 85 D 068184 and case number 88 D 079012). The Consumer Response Team further recognized that while case 85 D068184 had been dismissed by the Cook County Circuit Court in Illinois, they found no records of dismissal for the separate case number 88 D 079012 that may address your credit report issue’’.

119.)        That Respondent is the victim of a Domestic Terrorist Network of judges in the Democratic Party exercising their robes as “Private Citizens” in a sophisticated manner to EXTORT money from the Respondent in the guise of child support on a Paternity matter that was never his child or ordered to pay child support.   

220.)        That Respondent received a letter from Il Dept of Healthcare and Family Services Division of Child Support, pursuant to Par 10 from the Exhibit List, Sept. 28, 2018 states, “Our records show that as of 08/31/2018, you owe past due support in the amount of $79, 802.30”

221.)        Motion of Respondent’s (Monzella Y. Johnson) Re Notice Motion for Disqualification of judge et al., pursuant to Par 11 from the Exhibit List, Page 2 Par 2 states, “that Judge Lyle realizing she would not be admonished or ridiculed for violating her oath against women of color continuously demonstrated her role as that of a “Thug” in a robe allowed an alleged politically connected racist law firm Potestivo & Assoc. to unlawfully corroborate with certain attorneys with the US Bank and others to try and steal Defendant’s home disguised as an unlawful foreclosure”.    

          A-   Motions for Reconsideration are designed to bring to the court’s attention newly discovered evidence that was unavailable at time of original hearing, changes in existing law, or errors in court’s application of law. Continental Cas. Co. v. Security Ins. Co. of Hartford, App. 1 Dist. 1996, 216 Ill. Dec. 314, 279 Ill. App. 3d 815, 665 N.E. 2d 374, appeal dismissed, et al.;

                                                                           7

          B-     The purpose of a Motion to Vacate is to alert the trial court to errors it has made and to afford an opportunity for their correction. In re Marriage of King, App. 1 Dist. 2002, 270 Ill. Dec. 540, 336 Ill. App. 3d 83, 783 N.E. 2d 115, rehearing denied pending appeal; et al.

          C-    Properly alleged facts within an affidavit that are not contradicted by counter affidavit are taken as true, despite the existence of contrary averments in theadverse party’s pleadings. Professional Group Travel, Ltd. v. Professional Seminar Consultants Inc., 136 ILL App 3d 1084, 483 N.E. 2d 1291; Buzzard v. Bolger, 117 ILL App 3d 887, 453 N.E. 2d 1129 et al.

222.)        That Respondent deliberately left Par 9 and 10 from the original Motion to Reinstate Case et al. so as to trap the author orchestrating this Mayhem knowing said Motion was going to be DENIED so that he could have the opportunity to come back with the proper motion for reconsideration.

          A-    That all judges acted as a “Private Citizens” ( May 18, 1988) court order entered “Fraudulently” in that Cook County judges never had jurisdiction on the Respondent to compel him to submit to any laws from any court compelling him to pay child support  or enter any orders finding him in Contempt of Court, the Illinois Supreme Court has held that "if the magistrate has not such jurisdiction, then he and those who advise and act with him, or execute his process, are trespassers." Von Kettler et.al. v. Johnson, 57 Ill. 109 (1870)

          B-    Under Federal law which is applicable to all states, the U.S. Supreme Court stated that if a court is "without authority, its judgments and orders are regarded as nullities. They are not voidable, but simply void; and form no bar to a recovery sought, even prior to a reversal in opposition to them. They constitute no justification; and all persons concerned in executing such judgments or sentences, are considered, in law, as trespassers." Elliot v. Piersol, 1 Pet. 328, 340, 26 U.S. 328, 340 (1828)

         C-    That under 18 U.S.C. 242 and 42 U.S.C. 1985 (3) (b). A judge does not have the discretion on whether or not to follow Supreme Ct. Rules, but a duty to follow. People v. Gersh, 135 Ill. 2d 384 (1990).

A judge’s disrespect for the rules of court demonstrates disrespect for the law. Judges are disciplined under Canon 2A for violating court rules and procedures. Judge ignored mandated witness order in attempt to accommodate witnesses’ schedules; Citing Canon 2A the court noted, “[a] court’s indifference to clearly stated rules breeds disrespect for and discontent with our justice system. Government cannot demand respect of the laws by its citizens when its tribunals ignore those very same laws”)

          D-    Fraud upon the court is a basis for equitable relief. Luttrell v. United States, 644 F. 2d 1274, 1276 (9^th Cir. 1980); see Abatti v. C.I.R., 859 F 2d 115, 118 (9^th Cir. 1988) “it is beyond question that a court may investigate a question as to whether there was fraud in the procurement of a judgment” Universal Oil Products Co. v. Root Refining Co., 328 U.S. 575, 66 S. Ct. 1176, 90 L. Ed. 1447. The power of the court to unearth such a fraud is the power to unearth it effectively. See Hazel-Atlas Glass Co. v. Hartford-Empire Co., 322 U.S. 238, 64 S. Ct. 997, 88 

                                                                                   8  

          L. Ed. 1250; Sprague v. Ticonic National Bank, 1184 and United States v. Throckmorton, 98 U.S. (8 Otto) 61, 25 L. Ed. 93.

          E-     “A judge is an officer of the court, as are all members of the Bar. A judge is a judicial officer, paid by the Government to act impartially and lawfully”. People v. Zajic, 88 Ill. App 3d 477, 410 N.E. 2d 626. “A void judgment is regarded as a nullity, and the situation is the same as it would be if there were no judgment. It has no legal or binding force or efficacy for any purpose or at any place….It is not entitled to enforcement. 30A Am Judgments 43, 44, 45. Henderson v Henderson 59 S.E. 2d  227-232 

          F-     “A Void Judgment from its inception is and forever continues to be absolutely null, without legal efficacy, ineffectual to bind parties or support a right, of no legal force and effect whatever, and incapable of confirmation, ratification, or enforcement in any manner or to any degree. “A void judgment, order or decree may be attacked at any time or in any court, either directly or collaterally” Oak Park Nat Bank v. Peoples Gas Light & Coke Col, 46 Ill. App. 2d 385, 197 N.E. 3d 73, 77, (1^st Dist. 1964)   

          G-    To show fraud upon the court, the complaining party must establish that the alleged misconduct affected the integrity of the judicial process, either because the court itself was defrauded or because the misconduct was perpetrated by officers of the court. Alexander v. Robertson, 882, F. 2d 421,424 (9^th Cir. 1989);

          H-    A void judgment does not create any binding obligation. Kalb v. Feuerstein (1940) 308 US 433, 60 S Ct 343, 84 L, Ed 370.

The U.S. Supreme Court, in Scheuer v. Rhodes, 416 U.S. 232, 94 S. Ct. 1683, 1687 (1974) stated that "when a state officer acts under a state law in a manner violative of the Federal Constitution, he "comes into conflict with the superior authority of that Constitution, and he is in that case stripped of his official or representative character and is subjected in his person to the consequences of his individual conduct. The State has no power to impart to him any immunity from responsibility to the supreme authority of the United States." [Emphasis supplied in original].

By law, a judge is a state officer as in this case.

The judge then acts not as a judge, but as a private individual (in his person).

The Illinois Supreme Court held that if a court "could not hear the matter upon the jurisdictional paper presented, its finding that it had the power can add nothing to its authority, - it, had no authority to make that finding." The People v. Brewer, 128 Ill. 472, 483 (1928). The judges listed below had no legal authority (jurisdiction) to hear or rule on certain matters before them. They acted without any jurisdiction.

When judges act when they do not have jurisdiction to act, or they enforce a void order (an order issued by a judge without jurisdiction), they become trespassers of the law, and are engaged in treason (see below).

                                                                       9

The Court in Yates v. Village of Hoffman Estates, Illinois, 209 F. Supp. 757 (N.D. Ill. 1962) held that "not every action by a judge is in exercise of his judicial function. ... It is not a judicial function for a judge to commit an intentional tort even though the tort occurs in the courthouse."

When a judge acts as a trespasser of the law, when a judge does not follow the law, the judge loses subject-matter jurisdiction and the judge’s orders are void, of no legal force or effect.

Pursuant to Judge Myron T. Mackoff’s directive on Honorable Elizabeth Loredo Rivera’s case the following Pleadings demonstrates how Democratic judges and a plethora of political figures took part in “Treason Offenses” “Trespassing upon the Laws”  

The U.S. Supreme Court has stated that "No state legislator or executive or judicial officer can war against the Constitution without violating his undertaking to support it.” Cooper v. Aaron, 358 U.S. 1, 78 S.Ct. 1401 (1958).

Any judge who does not comply with his oath to the Constitution of the United States wars against that Constitution and engages in acts in violation of the Supreme Law of the Land. The judge is engaged in acts of treason.

Having taken at least two, if not three, oaths of office to support the Constitution of the United States, and the Constitution of the State of Illinois, any judge who has acted in violation of the Constitution is engaged in an act or acts of treason (see below).

If a judge does not fully comply with the Constitution, then his orders are void, In re Sawyer, 124 U.S. 200 (1888), he/she is without jurisdiction, and he/she has engaged in an act or acts of treason. 

Whenever a judge acts where he/she does not have jurisdiction to act, the judge is engaged in an act or acts of treason. U.S. v. Will, 449 U.S. 200, 216, 101 S.Ct. 471, 66 L.Ed.2d 392, 406 (1980); Cohens v. Virginia, 19 U.S. (6 Wheat) 264, 404, 5 L.Ed 257 (1821)

1.        1.)    That case 88 D 079012 is a “FIXED CASE” absent the jurisdiction of every judge under the alleged authority of Alderman Edward Burke.

2.       2.)     Said case was originally DISMISSED under case 85 D 068184 September 17, 1987 before judge D. Adolphus Rivers where Richard J. Daley was the States Attorney.

3.         3.)  That because Richard J. Daley allegedly wanted no part to unlawfully “FIXING” said Paternity case against the Respondent where there were allegations of William Jenkins Hightower a Chicago Police Officer impregnating his second biological daughter Francoise Louise Barbara Hightower, the first daughter being Danielle Hightower as a minor.

4.        4.)   That because of Francoise’s fathers’ political connection to Joseph V. Roddy who was allegedly a great colleague to Edward Burke orchestrated the “Fixing” of said case assigning certain judges of Irish descent to do what was necessary framing the Respondent for a child that was never his.

                                                                                10

5.        5.)   That under case 85 D 068184 Respondent DEMANDED a JURY TRIAL and was properly served had two independent paternity tests that excluded him from paternity but was altered to state he was the father from Cook County Hospital and American Red Cross Hospital.

6.         6.)  That under case 88 D 079012 Respondent was never served!!! There were never any paternity tests nor were there a Motion filed to consolidate the 85 D 068184 pursuant to the Feb 1988 court order if the Respondent was never served.

7.        7.)   That because of the confidence in Edward Burke’s assignment of judges being appointed to this case and because D. Adolphus Rivers being at the time an African American his court directive was ignored.

8.        8.)   That on May 18, 1988, hereto attached, a blank court order absent a judges’ signature or attorney information finding the Respondent in Default on a plethora of “Fraudulent misrepresentations” made to the court about serving him which was never true.

9.        9.)   That Respondent had retained an Attorney Robert Anthony Egan who for years at that time aggressively represented and defended him and was the attorney of record but was never notified of any attorney going back before the clerks’ office refiling the matter.

10.    10.)    That Respondent was a CTA Bus Operator at 69^th Ashland where Francoise appeared at the garage in her Police Officers uniform and left a copy of the May 1988 court order, clerks and bus operators described her perfectly’

11.     11.)  That Respondent immediately notified Robert Egan of the court order, he purportedly went to vacate the date of Feb. 23, 1988 service of alleged service but vacated Feb. 24, 1988.

12.     12.)  That because of the “Fraudulent admissions” the May 18, 1988 court order demonstrating Respondent was never ORDERED to pay any child support still legally standing to this very day.

13.     13.)  That alderman Edward Burke appointed an alcoholic Associate Irish judge who was always drunk James T. Meehan to preside over the case where he “Trespassed upon the Laws” ordered the Respondent to pay Francoise’s attorney Joseph V. Roddy legal fees despite of testimony from Francoise having had gonorrhea and received medicine from her physician prescribing medicine for her and her partner, Respondent never had any disease from her but she had testified Respondent was the only person she had sex with and the child was allegedly born with an infection.

          A-    Respondent had a diary of the women he slept with and the date he had sex with Francoise was the second week of March but was pregnant in the second week of February.

          B-     Judge Meehan heard testimony of John Patterson III Francoise’s physician alter medical records to reflect the child was born premature.

          C-     Judge Meehan ordered the Respondent never to see the child because he knew the child was not his but ordered him to pay child support.

                                                                              11

14.     14.)  That Alderman Burke appointed Ronald Bartkowicz a former CTA attorney to preside over the Hightower case where he “Trespassed upon the Laws” engaged in “Treason” signed a Bogus Warrant against the Respondent for an Order of Protection in favor of Francoise. Respondent had not seen or communicated with Francoise.

          A-    That Ronald Bartkowicz threatened the Respondent in open court, stated if “he ever tried to be reinstated back to the CTA he was going to have him locked up because CTA said you are not an employee they fired you.”

          B-     That the Cook County Sheriff Deputy informed the Respondent Fuck him and what he said he is working with the CTA, he was an attorney and should not be on this case, Respondent was shocked and scared because he had no idea what was going on and why a warrant was ever issued.

          C-     That the Respondent filed a Motion to Disqualify Ronald Bartkowicz due to the conflict, said judge was shocked asked him how did he know? 

15.    15.)   That Alderman Burke appointed David E. Haracz a former Legal Aid attorney who “Trespassed upon the Laws” engaged in “Treason” was a Supervisor at the time Respondent was seeking their support they had turned him down for any representation stating because there were too many judges on the case.

          A-    That Judge Haracz stated, “He realize this may not be his child he is just the bill collector, he has to get money from him some kind of way”

          B-     That the Respondent presented documents establishing the fact he was a certified CTA employee, Haracz stated, “you know, you are an employee you were telling the truth all along, you know, you are really smart, I mean really really smart” In a startling dumbfounded manner.

          C-     That Haracz placed the Respondent in Contempt for Allegedly owing child support, Respondent had to pay monies from his welfare payments and was sent to jail.

16.     16.)  That every judge Burke appointed became “Private Citizens” as diabolical Racist White men had placed him in Contempt of Court for Allegedly owing Child Support when the record demonstrated he owed nothing.

17.    17.)   That Alderman Burke appointed the ultimate racist Timothy P. Murphy, he demonstrated a personal hate because the Respondent was well versed in the laws when it was the Respondent’s opportunity to cross-examine Russ Hinkle from Wonder Bread human resource department, to prove he was an employee off work with a torn rotator cuff resulting from being injured on the truck not receiving any money (workman’s compensation), he ordered the Deputies to Remand the Respondent into Custody for Contempt of Court, the Deputies were shocked they expressed this is some deep bullshit, they said this is not about child support, Respondent explained to them about the father being a Police Officer impregnated his daughter who was a Police officer, they said, that they heard about the Respondent and this case and was very supportive to him. Respondent never got the opportunity to prove he was an active employee at Wonder Bread;

                                                                                                                   

                                                                                 12

          A-    That allegedly Moche Jacobius whom Respondent had met prior as an Assistant Attorney General who learned of the Respondent fighting a Bogus Paternity case long before he became a judge, told him that he heard about that matter wished him success provided an attorney Gerald Norgren to defend him in the Contempt matter before Murphy.

          B-     That during this time never did Haracz or Murphy ever have a court file on the Respondent it was the States Attorney always providing documents, Respondent repeatedly refuted the allegations with numerous motions but was ignored and Denied because of his ethnicity.

          C-     Respondent was in Court because the Illinois Department of Public Aid was representing Francoise an active Police Officer when her daughter was a grown woman and the Respondent was on Public Aid with his family.

          D-    That Murphy had the audacity to say in front of the Respondent and Norgren “Today is your lucky day, I can’t lock you up anymore”

         E-     Respondent was on welfare with is wife and children and the judges were forcing him to pay his welfare money to pay child support.

          F-      That while everyone was falsifying and “Trespassing upon the Laws” trying to help Francoise in this “Heinous Diabolical Nefarious Acts” she notified school officials at Bogan High School in Chicago 79^th Pulaski that “she did not know who the father was of her daughter “

18.     18.)  That Alderman Burke had appointed Associate judge Morgan Hamilton as a permanent judge during this time who had a self-hate for her own skin color and would do anything to protect a corrupt white judge wrote on a court order “that Respondent left a cloud of mistrust by the Cook County Sheriff claiming he was a CTA employee” as she was trying to protect Ronald Bartkowicz.

19.     19.)  That Alderman Edward Burke appointed Leida J. Santiago- Gonzalez she was on the bench cussing, I don’t know who the fuck he think he is referring to the Respondent he will be going to jail, Respondent felt like he was about to have a bile movement but nothing was coming out he fell to the floor, he couldn’t see but was able to hear somebody shouted he is having an anxiety attack call the paramedics, the judge said his ass better be having something, someone provided something to smell and gave him some water, the Deputies comforted him said he didn’t need to go to the hospital try to breathe and get yourself together.

          A-    Respondent never got the opportunity to stand before the judge.

20.   20.)    That because Alderman Edward Burke is the Author of Racist hate in acquiring judges who will abide by his rules of “Trespassing upon the Laws” and engage in “Treason Offenses” is why no Democratic judge of merit or any person with integrity would assist the Respondent because the Democratic Party is the original party of racial hatred.

                                                                     

                                                                                     13

          A-    Democratic Mayor Rahm Emmanuel, Former Police Superintendent McCarthy, Former States Attorney, Attorney General Lisa Madigan received Notice and knowledge of Corruption on Police Officer et al. via email hereto attached.

          B-     Democratic States Attorney Kim Foxx received Notice and Knowledge via email and Memo of States Attorneys using their positions to assist a Police Officer (retired).

          C-     That Respondent was informed by certain Caucasians that no Person Democratic of Irish or Polish ethnicity will ever rule in his favor against the perpetrators involved and especially none of his Bros referencing Black men fraternal or otherwise, in that they said they are the worse persons he was to ever go before for help because they do what they are told but there are some good white judges who will help him.

          D-    To validate the verity of Par C Respondent was living in an abandoned building that was “Nigger Rigged” the terminology city officials used to describe a said building CHA approved the respondent to move in case 12-M-711552 where judge George Scully had vacated order of possession in Respondent’s favor, allegedly Edward Burke had Leonard Murray a Black judge to issue an order for the Cook County Sheriff to break into his home 10058 S Vernon using a Battering Ram because the owner was connected to certain City officials where he did not have to pay water bills and was collecting section 8 monies by “Fixing” up abandon buildings not cleared by the city inspectors by bypassing city permits.

          E-     That Respondent lost 25-30 years of his possessions in the 4-bedroom home and was informed if he attempted to enter the building because a green NO TRESPASSING Notice was Posted on the front door.

          F-      That Alderman Edward Burke allegedly orchestrated the entire conspiracy seeking to ascertain what documents respondent in his possession Respondent had transcripts of the entire 88 D 079012 case and the entire original court file of 85 D 068184 and credit reports showing student loans paid off excellent credit and scores of 800+ in that after Respondent’s home was broken into his identity was tampered with someone went into his credit and deleted every item that was paid off in good status and placed a number of false entries on credit report by bringing his credit score to 500 and 600 in an attempt to blemish his credit score so as to keep him from qualifying from moving into certain buildings with his section 8 voucher with poor credit.

21.    21.)   That every person who received Notice and Knowledge of the aforementioned acts and did nothing have become complicit as active “Trespassers of the Laws” engaging in “Treason Offenses”

22.    22.)   That a certain person or persons of white ethnicity allegedly connected to Edward Burke tried reaching out to him to leave the Respondent alone let him go back to work with the CTA and give him his money, Burkes alleged reply, “Fuck that Nigger as long as he is the Alderman Respondent will never go back to the CTA and he ain’t getting shit!” 

  

                                                                                       14

A-    That because Alderman Edward Burke controls all the Niggers at the CTA and Local ATU 241 and those under his control Respondent has never been properly reinstated to the CTA because of the intimate nature Burke seems to have against men he seems to affectionately hates and disparages in conversations referencing them as Niggers!

B-     That because Alderman Edward Burke allegedly controls 98% of the Black men on the Cook County Bench allegedly authorized Franklin Ulysses Valderrama to “FIX” case 2015 CH 01670  a Discrimination Suit Respondent filed against various units who refused to allow him to rent into their buildings (credit score 716) with his voucher because of his skin color they took his fucking money didn’t return it, they DEFAULTED and Valderrama had no jurisdiction on the case because Moche Jacobius signed a court order removing him from the case. Valderrama became a God and law unto himself ruled on the case keeping Cecilia Gamrath from presiding over the case, he stated he didn’t accept certified mail nor did he except the Cook County Sheriff serving the parties.

23.      23.)  There is not a Black man in Chicago politics with any testicles to stand up to Burke to tell him he is wrong but will remain in the closet hoping nobody will ever discover who they are.

                   A- INDUCING RELIANCE

To prevail in a cause of action for fraud, plaintiff must prove that defendant made statement of material nature which was relied on by victim and was made for purposes of inducing reliance, and that victim’s reliance led to his injury.Parsons V. Winter, 1986, 1 Dist., 491 N.E. 2d 1236, 96 ILL Dec. 776, 142 ILL App 3d 354, Appeal Denied.

     In Carter V. Mueller 457 N.E. 2d 1335 ILL. App. 1 Dist. 1983 The Supreme Court has held that: “The elements of a cause of action for fraudulent misrepresentation (sometimes referred to as “fraud and deceit” or deceit) are: (1) False statement of material fact; (2) known or believed to be false by the party making it; (3) intent to induce the other party to act; (4) action by the other party in reliance on the truth of the statement; and (5) damage to the other party resulting from such reliance.

24.     24.)  That Respondent was referred to William S. Boyd by a remarkable attorney James Montgomery who had him to sit and explain his issue for at least 30 minutes and was impressed with Respondents presentation, a member of Trinity church Boyd is in no way anything like Mr. Montgomery blacks like Boyd in the Cook County courts as Democrats are sell outs destroying their own ethnic groups so as to be accepted by the likes of Edward Burke whom has no love for persons of color and has demonstrated in the aforementioned how he destroys men of color and the Demonic Hate exercised as he selects and appoints judges to uphold his doctrines circumventing the laws of the United States constitution enforcing Jim Crow Laws.

25.    25.)  That in furtherance to the above, Respondent asserts with authority and based on such information and belief, demonstrate beyond the Preponderance of the evidence standard that all judges acted as a “Private Citizens” and has “Trespassed upon the laws” whom this cause has pended before, has demonstrated taking part in an “Organized Conspiracy” with said Alderman 

                                                                                   15

         Burke by making sure Joe Louis Lawrence remain oppressed for being a Heterosexual “FREEMAN” standing up to the unlawful acts perpetrated at him by racist white men engaging in Terrorist Acts in the Democratic Party. .

     Conspirators to be guilty of offense need not have entered conspiracy at same time or have taken part in all its actions. People V. Hardison, 1985, 911 Dec. 162, 108. Requisite mens rea elements of conspiracy are satisfied upon showings of agreement of offense with intent that offense be committed; Actus reas element is satisfied of act in furtherance of agreement People V. Mordick, 1981, 50 ILL, Dec. 63

Vaughn 462 S. E. 2d 728 (Ga.1995), The Supreme Court of Georgia removed a Judge from office for disregarding defendant’s Constitutional rights; Hammel, 668 N. E. 2d 390 (N.Y. 1996) (Judge removed for improperly jailing defendants for their alleged failure to pay fines and make restitution which the judge had imposed, disregarding the defendants’ basic constitutional rights;

26.   26.)  That Respondent has demonstrated beyond the Preponderance of Evidence that said acts demonstrates how Section 1983 of U.S.C.S. contemplates the depravation of Civil Rights through the Unconstitutional Application of a Law by conspiracy or otherwise.Mansell v. Saunders (CA 5 F 1A) 372 F 573, especially if the conspiracy was actually carried into effect, where an action is for a conspiracy to interfere with Civil Rights under 42 U.S.C.S. 1985 (3), or for the depravation of such rights under 42 U.S.C.S. 1983, if the conspiracy was actually carried into effect and plaintiff was thereby deprived of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the United States Constitution and Laws, the gist of the action may be treated as one for the depravation of rights under 42 U.S.C.S. 1983, Lewis v. Brautigan (CA 5 F 1a) 227 F 2d 124, 55 Alr 2d 505, John W. Strong, 185, 777-78 (4 the ed. 1992).        

          A-    “The Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals held that the Circuit Court   of Cook County is a criminal enterprise. U.S. v. Murphy, 768 F.2d 1518,    1531 (7th Cir. 1985)”.

27.    27.)    That Respondent’s (former attorney William S. Boyd) has demonstrated being unfit and should be disbarred from the practice of law for his criminal involvement violating every aspect of Illinois Ethics by misrepresenting the Respondent to allegedly receive an Associate Judges position.

Ethics

All Illinois lawyers must be familiar with the Illinois Rules of ProfessionalConduct, and trial lawyers must be particularly familiar with the rulesthat apply specially to them.

RPC 3.3, entitled “Conduct Before a Tribunal," sets forth the standards to be followed by the trial lawyer during “battle." Section (a) of that rule states:

(a) In appearing in a professional capacity before a tribunal, a lawyer shall not:

                                                                   16

(1) Make a statement of material fact or law to a tribunal which the lawyer knows or reasonably should know is false;

(2) Fail to disclose to a tribunal a material fact known to the lawyer when disclosure is necessary to avoid assisting a criminal or fraudulent act by the client;

(3) Fail to disclose to the tribunal legal authority in the controlling jurisdiction known to the lawyer to be directly adverse to the position of the client and not disclosed by opposing counsel;

(4) Offer evidence that the lawyer knows to be false. If a lawyer has offered material evidence and comes to know of its falsity, the lawyer shall take reasonable remedial measures;

Supreme Court Rule [137] provides in pertinent part:

            If a pleading, motion, or other paper is signed in violation of this Rule, the court, upon motion or upon its own initiative, may impose upon the person who signed it , a represented party, or both, an appropriate sanction, which may include an order to pay to the other party or parties the amount of reasonable expenses incurred because of the filling of the pleading, motion, or other paper, including a reasonable attorney fee. Not only will the courts consider an award of sanctions for active false statements: failures to disclose material facts to the court can also justify an award of sanctions. BRUBAKKEN v. Morrison, No. 1-9-1670, 1992 Ill App. LEXIS 2144 (1^st Dist. Dec. 30, 1992). Additionally, the fact that a false statement or omission is the result of an honest mistake is no defense to entry of a sanction. ID. To the extent that an individual lawyer has engaged in sanction able conduct, that lawyer’s firm can also be jointly and severally liable with the lawyer.

Despite the United States Constitution and Civil Rights Act Plaintiff has not been treated as a citizen of the United States in that whites under this Political System has been able to circumvent the laws and commit treason like offenses because they are the majority in control in Chicago, Ill. Political system; Pursuant to Vigus v. O’ Bannon is an example of the “Fraudulent” Racist Acts perpetrated against persons like the Plaintiff standing up to Racial Injustice and Terrorism!

Plaintiff’s license was never suspended because there was never a signed court order stating he owed any child support but was locked up 5 times for allegedly owing child support;

    A.  Plaintiff Lost his job with Sheriff Department in the Administrative capacity because of the Bogus Paternity case;

          B.  Despite scoring in the top 5-10% on the Police Exam a Commander with the Police Department could not bring him on the Police department because of some integrity issues that had to be resolved with the Bogus Paternity case;

          C.    Plaintiff lost his job driving a School bus (Reliable who later went out of business) because someone was forcing them to accept bogus court orders for wage garnishees where Plaintiff was forced to get on Welfare because of all of the money extorted from his salary;

                                                                                 17

          D.    Plaintiff was rear ended by drunk Police Officer standing still driving a CTA bus Officer totaled his van, Plaintiff sustained a back injury while off work injured on duty allegedly City hall officials and CTA personnel stole his wages and tried to destroy said personnel records saying Plaintiff was never a CTA employee.

          E.     Despite filing a grievance the Union never acted on the matter even up to this date, but the union Javier Perez called the Plaintiff last year telling them they never received a letter from his physician stating he was fit to return to return to work, if he had that letter we could do something about getting you reinstated, what he did not realize Plaintiff had the information faxed it to him never heard from him again;

          F.     Plaintiff got accepted to Northwestern Law School scored very high on LSAT could not attend school because of the plethora of Racist Diabolical Obstructions no white man have to endure living in Chicago, Illinois.  

       G.    They have retaliated on Plaintiff’s children along with a plethora of other “Fraudulent Acts”.

                                                                                  18

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY ILLINOIS

DOMESTIC RELATIONS DIVISION

 IN RE                                                             )

                                                                         )

 Francoise Hightower                                      )       Judge Myron F. Mackoff                         

        Petitioner                                                 )

                                                                         )        Cal 44

          VS                                                          )                                  

                                                                         )        No. 88 D 079012                         

 Joe Louis Lawrence                                        )        

        Respondent                                              )        Room CL-02

                 MOTION TO VACATE Jan 22, 2019 ORDER FOR RECONSIDERATION TO REINSTATE CASE 88 D 079012 & VACATE ALL JUDGMENTS DUE TO ORDERS BEING VOID A NULLITY CASE BEING “FRAUDULENT” JUDGES “TRESPASSING UPON THE LAWS” ENGAGING IN TREASON OFFENSES ACTING AS “PRIVATE CITIZENS” MAKING MISREPRESENTATIONS TO THE COURT & ISSUANCE OF A RULE TO SHOW CAUSE FOR SANCTIONS AND REMAND PURSUANT TO SUPREME COURT RULE 137

      In Accordance to all of  The Cook County Circuit Court Rules

MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN SUPPORT OF THE RELIEF REQUESTED

            The canons of ethic in the Rules of Professional Conduct constitute a safe guide for professional conduct, and attorneys may be disciplined for not observing them. In re Himmel, 125 Ill.2d 531, 533 N.E.2d 790, 127 Ill. Dec 708 (1988). Although they represent the best thoughts of the organized bar, it has been held that these canons are non-enforceable other than through the disciplinary proceedings. Ettinger v. Rolewick, 140 Ill.App.3d 295, 488 N.E.2d 598, 94 Ill.Dec.599 (1^st Dist. 1986). Disciplinary proceedings and sanctions are strictly within the province of the Supreme Court. Reed Yates Farms, Inc. v. Yates, 172 Ill.App.3d 519, 526 N. E2d 1115, 122 Ill. Dec 576 (4^th Dist.), appeal denied, the Illinois Supreme Court, through its disciplinary arm, the Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission, is the only forum for exacting such punishment. Beale v. Edgemark Financial Corp., 297 Ill. App. 3d 999, 697 N.E.2d 820, 232 Ill. Dec. 78 (1^st Dist. 1998). The ultimate authority to regulate and define the practice of law rests with the Supreme Court. Perto v. Board of Review, Illinois Department of Employment 

                                                                    19

Security, 274 Ill. App.3d 485, 654 N.E.2d 232, 210 Ill. Dec. 933 (2d Dist.), appeal denied, 164 Ill. 2d 581 (1995).

Acts constituting direct, criminal contempt

          A wide variety of acts may constitute a direct, criminal contempt. And act may be criminal contempt even though it is also an indictable crime. Beattie v. People, 33 Ill. App 651, 1889 WL 2373 (1^st Dist. 1889). As is making false representations to the court. People v. Katelhut, 322 Ill. App. 693, 54 N.E.2d 590 (1^st Dist. 1944). Misconduct of an officer of the court is punishable as contempt. People ex rel. Rusch v. Levin, 305 Ill. App. 142, 26 N.E. 2d 895 (1^st Dist. 1939).

Official misconduct is a criminal offense; and a public officer or employee commits misconduct, punishable by fine, imprisonment, or both, when, in his official capacity, he intentionally or recklessly fails to perform any mandatory duty as required by law; or knowingly performs an act which he knows he is forbidden by law to perform; or with intent to obtain a personal advantage for himself or another, he performs an act in excess of his lawful authority ….S.H.A. Ch 38 33-3.

False statements

            Censure was recommended sanction for attorney who engaged in conduct involving dishonesty, made statement of material fact or law to tribunal which she knew or reasonably should have known to be false, and failed to disclose to tribunal a material fact known to her when disclosure was necessary to avoid assisting criminal or fraudulent at by client, given that attorney’s misconduct was not result of dishonest or corrupt motive, but of misguided attempt to accommodate clients.   99 Ill.Atty.Reg. & Disc.Comm. SH11.

            Three-year suspension was recommended sanction for attorney who engaged in conduct involving dishonesty and fraud, made statement of material fact to tribunal which he knew or reasonably should have known was false, and offered evidence that he knew to be false and failed to take reasonable remedial measures. 96 Ill.Atty.Reg. & Disc.Comm. SH 358.

            Disbarment was recommended sanction for attorney who engaged in conduct involving dishonesty, made false statements of material fact or law to tribunal which she knew were false and engaged in conduct which tended to defeat administration of justice.  95 Ill Atty. Reg. & Disc. Comm. CH 877.

            Censure was recommended sanction for attorney who made statements of material fact or law known was false, and engaged in conduct which was prejudicial to the administration of justice. 95 Ill Atty.Reg. & Disc.Comm. CH 504.

          One-year suspension was recommended sanction for attorney who made statement of material fact which he knew was false in appearing in professional capacity before tribunal, made a statement of material fact which he knew to be false in course of representing client, and engaged in conduct involving dishonesty.  95 Ill Atty.Reg. & Disc.Comm. CH 191.

                                                                             20

            Disbarment was recommended sanction for attorney who engaged in serious misconduct by making misrepresentation during his divorce proceedings and who was a recidivist.   94 Ill.Atty.Reg. & Disc.Comm. SH469

Fraud on court

            Two-year suspension, retroactive to beginning of interim suspension, was recommended sanction for attorney who made statement of material fact or law to tribunal which lawyer knew or reasonably should have known to be false, instituted criminal charges as prosecutor when he knew or reasonably should have known that charges were not supported by probable cause, committed criminal act that reflected adversely upon lawyer ‘s honesty, trustworthiness, or fitness as lawyer, engaged in conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit, or misrepresentation, engaged in conduct prejudicial to administration of justice, and engaged in conduct which tended to bring courts or legal profession into disrepute.  96 Ill. Atty. Reg. & Disc. Comm. CH 118. 

WHEREFORE the aforementioned reasons Respondent Respectfully prays:

                                                                                1.       That the (Jan 22, 2019 be vacated and deemed a Nullity) due to May 18, 1988 court order being a NULLITY based upon the reasons cited in this document and noted in the Affidavits and appropriate Sanctions be imposed pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 137:

2.)   That the                         2.) That the Chief Judge or Presiding Judge summons Federal authorities to ascertain the criminal allegations noted to determine what prosecutorial remedies are afforded in this matter;

3.)    That Pursuant to Section 2 (42 U.S.C.) In the House of Representatives  “Congressional Debate of the second section of the Ku Klux Klan Act was more extensive and enduring than that of Section 1; As originally presented, Sec. 2 made it a felony for any “two or more persons” to conspire to commit certain enumerated crimes “in violation of the rights and privileges, or immunities of any person, to which he is entitled under the Constitution and laws of the United States.

          “Throughout the debates, supporters of the Act made repeated references to the depredations of the Ku Klux Klan; Victims of these atrocities included not only blacks but white Republicans as well. The crimes that were perpetrated, therefore, were not viewed as isolated occurrences, but as part of an “Organized Conspiracy….Political in its origin and aims”, “crimes perpetrated by concert and agreement, by men in large numbers acting with a common purpose for the injury of a certain class of citizens entertaining certain political principles, id, at 457 (remarks of Rep. Coburn). See also e.g., id. At 437 (remarks of Rep. Cobb) (“None but Democrats belong or can belong to these societies”) et al.  “Where these gangs of Assassins show themselves the rest of the people look on, if not with sympathy, at least with forbearance. The boasted courage of the South is not courage in their presence. Sheriffs, having eyes to see, see not; judges, having ears to hear, hear not; witnesses conceal the truth or falsify it; grand or petit juries act as if they might be accomplices. In the presence of these gangs all the apparatus and machinery of civil government, all the processes of justice, skulk away as if government and justice were crimes and feared detection. Among the most dangerous things an injured party can

                                                                       21

 do is to appeal to justice. Of the uncounted scores and hundreds of atrocious mutilations and murders it is credibly stated that not one has been punished. Cong. Globe, supra note 2, app. At 78 (remarks of Rep. Perry). (“While murder is stalking abroad in disguise, while whippings and lynching’s and banishment have been visited upon unoffending American citizens, the local administrations have been found inadequate or unwilling to apply the proper corrective”) et al., …. And the State made no successful effort to bring the guilty to punishment or afford protection or redress to the outraged and innocent.”)     

4.)   That Under Section 4 of the Ku Klux Klan Act of 1871: the law is clear, “Whenever in any State or part of a State………unlawful combinations…….shall be organized and armed, and so numerous and powerful et al…………and whenever, by reason of either or all of the causes aforesaid, the conviction of such offenders and the preservation of the public safety shall become…..Impracticable, in every such case such combinations shall be deemed a rebellion against the Government of the United States…..”

5.)    That this court collaborate and transfer certain parts of these issues where they may not have jurisdiction on parties complicit in said conspiracies be charged with terrorist acts to the Federal tribunal;   

6.)    That Cook County Sheriffs along with Federal Officials be present until this matter is properly adjudicated.

7.)     That Alderman Edward Burke be Ordered not to proceed any further selecting any more judges Instanter;

8.)     That all Judges name and implicated be Ordered to Recuse themselves pending an investigation for their roles recorded in this document;

9.)     That the Issuance of a Rule to Show Cause for Remand for Perjury and “Fraud” for all parties complicit in these matters.

For the entry of an Order awarding to your Petitioner for such other relief and any other relief necessary as equity may require of which this court may deem overwhelmingly just;

Under penalties as provided by law pursuant to 735 1265 5\1-109, the undersigned certifies that the statements set forth in this instrument are true and correct, except as to matters therein stated to be on information and belief and as to such matters, the undersigned certifies as aforesaid that he verily believes the same to be true.                                                                                          

                                                                    Respectfully Submitted,        

                                                              ____________________

                                                               Joe Louis Lawrence

22

                                                                                                                                     

                         IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY ILLINOIS

DOMESTIC RELATIONS DIVISION

 IN RE                                                             )

 Francoise Hightower                                      )     Judge Myron F. Mackoff                               

        Petitioner                                                 )

                                                                         )        Cal 44 

          VS                                                          )                                  

                                                                         )        No. 88 D 079012                         

 Joe Louis Lawrence                                        )        

        Respondent                                              )        Room CL-02

    NOTICE OF MOTION TO VACATE Jan. 22, 2019 ORDER &  MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION TO REINSTATE CASE 88 D 079012 & VACATE ALL JUDGMENTS DUE TO ORDERS BEING VOID A NULLITY CASE BEING “FRAUDULENT” JUDGES “TRESPASSING UPON THE LAWS” ENGAGING IN TREASON OFFENSES ACTING AS “PRIVATE CITIZENS” MAKING MISREPRESENTATIONS TO THE COURT & ISSUANCE OF A RULE TO SHOW CAUSE FOR SANCTIONS AND REMAND PURSUANT TO SUPREME COURT RULE 13                                                     

                                                                AFFIDAVIT

I Joe Louis Lawrence, Counsel Pro Se being duly sworn on oath states the aforementioned pleadings enumerated within said motion pursuant to 735 1265 5/1-109, the undersigned certifies that the statements set forth in this instrument are true and correct, except as to matters therein stated to be on information and belief and as to such matters, the undersigned certifies as aforesaid that he verily believes the same to be true.

Respectfully Submitted                                                         Notary                                                

____________________

Joe Louis Lawrence

Counsel Pro Se

                                                                       23

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY ILLINOIS

                                         DOMESTIC RELATIONS DIVISION

                                                         EXHIBIT LIST

1.1.)    Memo to States Attorney Kim Foxx received file stamp Nov 30, 2018.

2.2.)    Email to Mayor Rahm Emmanuel, Supt of Police McCarthy, States Atty Anita Alvarez, Atty Gen Lisa Madigan, Preckwinkle via Pamela Cummings.

33.)    May 18, 1988 court order 2 pages no attorney information or judges signature.

44.)    September 17, 1987 court order States Attorney Non-Suited the matter Plaintiff has failed to cooperate in the prosecution of this cause in that she failed to appear on today’s date and also one or more scheduled court appearances 8-20-87, 1-30-87, 3-5-87, 6-9-87 signed by Judge D. Adolphus Rivers.

55.)    Fax to Ill Dept of Child Support Services (Sept 6, 2018) 11 pages.

66.)    Courtesy Copy to William S. Boyd Dec 13, 2018 re case 2018 D 003208.

77.)    Courtesy Copy from Joan S. Colen attorney for Defendant 2018 D 003208.

88.)    A letter from Karyn Mehringer, MA Forensic Psychology, Request for Investigation of Justice Anne Burke, and Alderman Ed Burke, Jan 22, 2008.

99.)    A letter from Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, Oct. 30, 2014, signed by Wendy Kamenshine,, Ombudsman.

110.)                        Letter from the Illinois Dept of Healthcare and Family Services, Division of Child Support, Notice of Intent to Pursue Collections, Sept 28, 2018 seeking $79,802.00.

111.)                        Re Notice of Respondent’s Motion for Disqualification of Judge et al. against Freddrenna Lyle with court order.

                                                                        26

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY ILLINOIS

DOMESTIC RELATIONS DIVISION

 IN RE                                                             )

                                                                         ) 

 Francoise Hightower                                      )        Judge Myron F. Mackoff                       

        Petitioner                                                 )

                                                                         )        Cal 44 

          VS                                                          )                                  

                                                                         )        No. 88 D 079012                         

 Joe Louis Lawrence                                        )        

        Respondent                                              )        Room CL-02                      

                                                               NOTICE OF

                 MOTION TO VACATE Jan 22, 2019 ORDER AND FOR RECONSIDERATION TO REINSTATE CASE 88 D 079012 & VACATE ALL JUDGMENTS DUE TO ORDERS BEING VOID A NULLITY CASE BEING “FRAUDULENT” JUDGES “TRESPASSING UPON THE LAWS” ENGAGING IN TREASON OFFENSES ACTING AS “PRIVATE CITIZENS” MAKING MISREPRESENTATIONS TO THE COURT & ISSUANCE OF A RULE TO SHOW CAUSE FOR SANCTIONS AND REMAND PURSUANT TO SUPREME COURT RULE 137

Please be advised that on February 27, 2019, Respondent has filed before this Circuit Court, Motion for Reconsideration to Reinstate Case 88 D 079012 et al.; and will present said legally sufficient instrument before Judge Myron F. Mackoff or any Judge in his stead March. 19th, 2019, at 9:30 am in room CL-02.    

   

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

Chicago Housing Authority             

Office of the General Counsel                  

Asst Gen Counsel      

                                                                    25

                               

Maria Sewell Joseph                                 

60 East Van Buren

Chicago, Ill 60605                                  Seyfarth & Shaw

                                                                Jeffrey K. Ross, Kyle A. Petersen & Anne Harris

                                                                  , Suite 2400

                                                                  Chicago, Ill. 60603

TO AAG Tyler Roland          Chief Judge Timothy Evans, Daley Center, Chg., Ill. 60601

        General Law Bureau       Presiding Judge Jacobius, Daley Center, Chg. Ill. 60601

       100 West Randolph Street Suite 1300

       Chicago, Ill. 60601    Clerk of Circuit Court Dorothy Brown, Suite 1001, Chg. Ill.                                           

     Judge Grace Dickler Room 1901 Daley Center, Chg. Il 60601

      States Attorney, Kim Foxx, 28 N. Clark 3^rd Floor, Chg. Ill. 60601   

           

Sec of State                                                  Asst Deputy Dir Candace Cheffin

Asst Gen Counsel Terrence McConville     60 East Van Buren, 8^th floor

100 West Randolph, Suite 500                       Chicago, Ill. 60601

Chicago, Ill. 60601   

   

CHA Mobility                                             CHA Mobility, HCP Counselors

Chris Klepper, Executive Dir                     Tracey Robinson/Joann Harris

28 East Jackson Blvd.                                    4859 S. Wabash, Suite 2^nd Floor  

Chicago, Ill 60604                                          Chicago, Ill. 60615     

                                                            26                                                

CHA Mobility, Real Estate Specialist               

Jessie McDaniel                                                        

4859 S. Wabash                                                    

Chicago, Ill. 60615   

                                             

City of Chicago, Department of Buildings       

Christopher Lynch                                               

121 North LaSalle, Room 900                                

Chicago, Ill. 60601

Cary G. Schiff & Associates                    Gordon & Rees LLP

Christopher R. Johnson                           Lindsay Watson, Christian T. Novay

Yuleida Joy                                               1 North Franklin, Suite 800

134 N. LaSalle Street, Suite 1720             Chicago, Illinois 60606

Chicago, Ill. 60602 

                                   

Courtesy Copies:

Charles R. Norgle, Sr. Case 93 CV01609

219 S. Dearborn, Room 2341

Chicago, Ill. 60604

US Attorney                                            FBI  Dir. Chris Wray

John R. Lausch, Jr.                                2111 West Roosevelt Road

219 S. Dearborn, 5^th floor                         Chicago, Ill. 60612

Chicago, Ill. 60604

                                                       27

Mayor                                            Deputy Regional Adm., Field Office Dir.

Rahm Emanuel                                       

City Hall                                              77 West Jackson Boulevard

Chicago, Ill. 60601                              Chicago, Ill. 60604

Hon Dick Durbin                                      Judge

525 South 8^th St.                                       Frederick Bates

Springfield, Ill. 62703                           50 West Washington

                                                               Chicago, Ill. 60601

Judge                                                            

Celia C. Gamrath                                        Judge

50 West Washington Room 2508             Neil Cohen

                                                                50 West Washington Room 2308

                                        Alderman David Moore

                                        Alderman Ed Burke  

                                      Alderwoman Carrie Austin

                                       Alderwoman Emma Mitts

Cook County President                               Cook County Sheriff

Toni Preckwinkle                                            Thomas J. Dart

118 N. Clark, Room 517                         Richard J. Daley Center, Room 701

Chicago, Ill. 60602                                        Chicago, Ill. 60602

                                                                     28

                                                                                                                                                                                                                            

               PLEASE BE ADVISED that on Feb. 27, 2019 A Motion to Vacate and for Reconsideration to Reinstate Paternity case Due to “Fraud” 88 D 079012 et al, has been filed with the Circuit Court of Cook County and said copies being served on said applicable parties via hand delivery or regular mail;

                                                                                Respectfully, Submitted,

                                                                               __________________________

                                                                                   Joe Louis Lawrence

                                                                                   Counsel Pro Se

                                                                                  Chicago, Ill 60649

                                                                                   312 965-6455

                                                                     29