UPDATE! UPDATE! PURSUANT TO THE MARCH 4TH POST LETTER SENT TO THE FBI AND US ATTORNEY THIS IS THE MOTION DARRYL SIMKO WHO BECAME A PRIVATE CITIZEN WHEN HE SIGNED A COURT ORDER DISMISSING THIS VERY DOCUMENT WHEN THE COURT DATE WAS SCHEDULED FOR MARCH 25, 2019.

FOR ANY JUDGE BLACK OR WHITE HAVING KNOWLEDGE THAT THE FBI AND US ATTORNEY IS RECEIVING NOTICE AND KNOWLEDGE OF ALL PROCEEDINGS AND STILL VIOLATE A PLETHORA OF LAWS SURPASSING WHAT FORMER ROD BLAGOJEVICH DID TRYING TO SELL A SENATE SEAT, EVERY JUDGE HAS COMMITTED TREASON AND DESERVES TO BE EXECUTED FROM CRIMES AGAINST THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION OR LIFE IN A MAXIMUM FEDERAL PENITENTIARY AND TRIED AS DOMESTIC TERRORIST.

THE SICKEST PSYCHOTIC ACT OF THESE PERPETRATORS IS THAT THE COLORED NIGGERS FIGURED AS LONG AS THEIR ACTS WERE ON PEOPLE OF COLOR NOTHING WAS GOING TO HAPPEN TO THEM, AS THEY CONSPIRED WITH RACIST JUDGES IN THE DEMOCRATIC POLITICAL MACHINE.

SELF HATE IS REAL PEOPLE NEED TO OPEN THEIR EYES AND ACCEPT THE REALITY THAT BLACK AND BROWN PEOPLE IN THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY HAVE PROVEN THEMSELVES UNWORTHY, INCOMPETENT, DANGEROUS AND A THREAT TO NATIONAL SECURITY ANYTIME YOU USE YOUR OWN ETHNICITY TO CAMOUFLAGE RACIST OR SEXIST ACTS OF WHITES PROTECTING AND UPHOLDING A PLETHORA OF CRIMINAL ACTS IN COMBINATION ARE DEEMED TERRORIST ACTS AND SHOULD BE ADDRESSED IMMEDIATELY.     

HOW EDWARD BURKE ALLEGEDLY APPOINTED BLACK JUDGES NAMELY FREDRENNA LYLE AS SHE ENGAGED IN DIABOLICAL CRIMINAL ACTS HELPING WHITE ATTORNEYS TRY AND STEAL THEIR HOME IN THE DISGUISE AS A FORECLOSURE

FREDRENNA LYLE IS ALLEGEDLY EXPECTING ALDERMAN BURKE TO SAVE HER AND FOR JUDGE SIMKO TO IGNORE THIS VERY DOCUMENT THAT ESTABLISHES BEYOND THE PREPONDERANCE OF THE EVIDENCE HER CRIMINAL INVOLVEMENT IN AN ORGANIZED CONSPIRACY.

BLACK AND BROWN JUDGES ARE COGNIZANT THE LEGAL SYSTEM IS RACIST SEEMS TO FEEL AS LONG AS THEIR CRIMES ON PEOPLE OF COLOR THE POLITICAL MACHINE WILL REWARD THEM WITH BEING CONTINUOUSLY REAPPOINTED TO THEIR POSITIONS EVEN IF THE PUBLIC VOTE THEM OFF THE BENCH.

IT IS NOT THE REPUBLICAN PARTY RESPONSIBLE FOR THIS HATE PERPETRATED BY DEMOCRATS STILL ENFORCING JIM CROW LAWS AS BLACK AND BROWN JUDGES ACT LIKE "HOUSE NIGGERS" OR MACHINE PUPPETS, OVERSEERS ON A PLANTATION.

THIS SENIOR CITIZEN COUPLES OF SISTERS HAVE SPENT NOW 11 YEARS AFTER RETIRING EXPENDING MONIES THEY HAVE EARNED AND SAVED TO ENJOY THEIR LIVES INTO FEEDING IN TO THE CESSPOOL OF CORRUPTION AS RACIST ATTORNEYS MAKE MONEY OFF INJUSTICE AND CORRUPTION DESTROYING PEOPLE OF COLOR FINANCIALLY.

COOK COUNTY IS DEFINITELY NOT A PLACE FOR A COLORED PERSON OR FAMILY RACIST WHITE MEN LIKE ALDERMAN BURKE AND HIS KIND ON THE JUDICIAL SYSTEM AS DEMOCRATS HAVE SPENT A LIFETIME CONTROLLING THE LEGAL SYSTEM AND COURTS MAKING SURE PEOPLE OF COLOR NOT RECEIVE JUSTICE SEEMS LIKE ONLY WHEN THE MEDIA GETS INVOLVED AND START AIRING THE INJUSTICES; OTHERWISE, IT IS BUSINESS AS USUAL. 

            IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS

COUNTY DEPARTMENT--CHANCERY DIVISION

U.S. Bank National Association, As Trustee Under)

Pooling and Servicing Agreement Dated as of        )

December 1, 2006 Mastr Asset–Backed Securities )

Trust 2006-NC3 Mortgage Pass-Through               ) Case # 2008 CH 33616

Certificates, Series 2006-NC3                                 )                                                           Petitioner        )

                                                                                 )          

V.                                                                              ) Judge Darryl B. Simko

                                                                                 )                                            ) Room 2806    

                                                                                 )

Monzella Y. Johnson, A/K/A Monzella                  )                                   

Johnson; Marcia E. Johnson A/K/A Marcia            )

Johnson: Mortgage Electronic Registration            )

Systems, Inc. As Nominee for New Century          )

Mortgage Corporation; Monzella Y. Johnson         )                                         

( C ) Cestui Que Trust; Discover Bank;                  )

Unknown Owners and Non-Record Claimants,      )

                                                                                 )

                                                           Respondents  )

                                                                                                                                                                                                        

       RESPONDENT’S MOTION STRIKING PETITIONER’S RESPONSE MOTION FOR DISQUALIFICATION OF JUDGE AS FRIVOLOUS FOR “CAUSE” DUE TO “PERJURY” “FRAUD” & IMPOSE SANCTIONS PURSUANT TO SUPREME COURT RULE 137  MAKING THE RESPONSE A NULLITY w/AFFIDAVIT

   Now comes Respondent, Monzella Y. Johnson et al. being represented Pro Se in this cause respectfully represents to this court the reasons and files herewith her Affidavit in support of Respondent’s Response Motion Striking Petitioner’s Response Motion et al;

1.      Pursuant to the Rules of Illinois Civil Procedures and Respondent’s Affidavits Petitioner never filed a counter-affidavit to any of the pleadings presented to the court.

Pursuant to Illinois Civil Procedure Rules, failure to file an answer, where an answer is required, results in the admission of the allegations of the complaint, Ill. S. Ct. R. 286 (a) Pinnacle Corp. v. Village of Lake in the Hills, 258 Ill. App 3d 205, 196 Ill. Dec 567, 630 N.E. 2d 502 (2d Dist. 1994)

                That because Petitioner properly plead to all facts correctly in said complaint negates any extension of time for the Defendant to respond, due to there not being “Good Cause Shown” Bright v. Dicke, 166 Ill. 2d 204, 209 Ill. Dec. 735 652 N.E. 2d 275 (1995)

                   Justice Harrison delivered the opinion of the court:

The issue in this case is whether a circuit court may permit a party to respond to a request for the admission of facts or the genuineness of documents once the 28-day time limit specified by Rule 216 (c) (134 Ill. 2d R. 216 (c) has expired. For the reasons that follow, we hold that the court may allow an untimely response where the delinquent party has shown good cause for the delay in accordance with Rule 183 (134 Ill. 2d R. 183) Because No Good Cause was shown here, permission to make a late response was properly denied. The circuit court’s order denying such permission and the judgment of the appellate court affirming the circuit court’s order are therefore affirmed

2.      That Plaintiffs having admitted to all facts recorded in said Respondent’s Response Motion Striking & Objecting Plaintiff’s Motion filed July 7, 2017 et al. via affidavit, Hereto attached as Gr Ex A;

A-    Court having no jurisdiction ignored Defendants valid Summary Judgment demonstrating Prejudice and Bias behavior pursuant to S.H.A. 735 ILCS 5/2-----1001 (a) (3); Sup. Ct. Rule 63 (C) (1).

B-    To show fraud upon the court, the complaining party must establish that the alleged misconduct affected the integrity of the judicial process, either because the court itself was defrauded or because the misconduct was perpetrated by officers of the court. Alexander v. Robertson, 882, F. 2d 421,424 (9^th Cir. 1989);

C-    A void judgment does not create any binding obligation. Kalb v. Feuerstein (1940) 308 US 433, 60 S Ct 343, 84 L, Ed 370.

  Properly alleged facts within an affidavit that are not contradicted by counter affidavit are taken as true, despite the existence of contrary averments in the adverse party’s pleadings. Professional Group Travel, Ltd. v. Professional Seminar Consultants Inc., 136 ILL App 3d 1084, 483 N.E. 2d 1291; Buzzard v. Bolger, 117 ILL App 3d 887, 453 N.E. 2d 1129 et al

3.      That pursuant to the legal precedent already noted Page 5 and 6 articulates other Chancery cases of judges engaging in “Fraudulent Acts”, Petitioner never addressed or attempted to impeach any of Respondents pleadings,  Fraud admissibility great latitude is permitted in proving fraud C.J.S. Fraud 104 ET Seg. Fraud 51-57. where a question of fraud and deceit is the issue involved in a case,  great latitude is ordinarily permitted in the introduction of evidence, and courts allow the greatest liberality in the method of examination and in the scope of inquiry Vigus V. O’Bannon, 1886 8 N.E 788, 118 ILL 334. Hazelton V. Carolus, 1907 132 ILL. App. 512.

4.      That Pars 8-12 Page 2, 3 are in fact Pleadings that establishes veracity demonstrating within the Preponderance of the Laws said judge is not only Bias but is acting as a “Private Citizen”  .

5.      That pursuant to Page 6 Par 15-16 Judge Lyle further demonstrated her Bias Prejudicial disposition at the Respondents acknowledged affirmatively, “Yes ma’am. I know” to the fact Respondent properly objected in a timely manner and in accordance to the Illinois Sup Court Rules, and Rules in accordance to the Rules of Illinois Civil Procedure.

A-      Respondent Monzella Johnson stated, “I object, He is saying our response, but they were the ones that were supposed to respond, according to the ruling pursuant to the Court’s order entered”

6.      That the attorneys for the Respondent violated all of the Rules of Professional Conduct (RPC 3.3) Pursuant to Page 7 of the Motion.

7.      That the Plaintiffs failed to comply to the Judges court order never requested leave to answer or respond later; thereby DEFAULTING and Summary Judgment was properly filed and served upon the Plaintiffs in a proper timely manner, Hereto attached Gr Ex B;

8.      That the Defendant’s properly filed said Notice of Motion for Summary Judgment due to “Fraud” on the Court pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 137 on August 23, 2017 and served upon Bryan at 12:50pm on Aug. 23, 2017 at the Law firm of Postestivo & Assoc., by Joe Louis Lawrence;

   

9.      That Page 2, of Respondent’s Motion for Summary Judgment et al.. is clear within the Preponderance of evidence legal standard demonstrating how attorneys are trying to steal the Defendants homes in the guise of “Foreclosure” hereto attached;

10.          That Pursuant to Par 3 , Page 8 states “The Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals held that the Circuit Court   of Cook County is a criminal enterprise. U.S. v. Murphy, 768 F.2d 1518,     1531 (7th Cir. 1985)”.

The United States Supreme Court recently acknowledged the judicial corruption in Cook County, when it stated that Judge "Maloney was one of many dishonest judges exposed and convicted through 'Operation Greylord', a labyrinthine federal investigation of judicial corruption in Chicago". Bracey v. Gramley, case No. 96-6133 (June 9, 1997).

Since judges who do not report the criminal activities of other judges become principals in the criminal activity, 18 U.S.C. Section 2, 3 & 4, and since no judges have reported the criminal activity of the judges who have been convicted, the other judges are as guilty as the convicted judges.

11. FACT Pursuant to Par 17, 18 Page 8, 9 That said Judge demonstrated a Bias Prejudicial disposition at the Respondents within the Preponderance of the Laws  used her judicial authority to aid and abet in an “Organized Conspiracy” trying to steal the Respondent’s home in the guise as a Foreclosure.

12. FACT Pursuant to the July 18, 2017 court order by Judge Lyles ordering the Respondent to reply by August 8, 2017 lost jurisdiction on this case when she became a “Trespasser” conspiring with the Petitioners bending and violating the laws to accommodate unlawful answers when the time properly expired.      

13. FACT Pursuant to Par 18, Page 9 That said judge demonstrated Bias Prejudicial disposition at the Respondents within the Preponderance of the Laws used her judicial authority to aid and abet in an “Organized Conspiracy” in a attempt to justify criminally colluding with the Petitioners, stated, Lines 2-6, Page 4 “Now, what he said was he didn’t get a copy of your response to which he going to reply. So he needs additional time so that they can file a reply. That’s what he was basically saying.”

BRUBAKKEN v. Morrison, No. 1-9-1670, 1992 Ill App. LEXIS 2144 (1^st Dist. Dec. 30, 1992). Additionally, the fact that a false statement or omission is the result of an honest mistake is no defense to entry of a sanction. ID. To the extent that an individual lawyer has engaged in sanction able conduct, that lawyer’s firm can also be jointly and severally liable with the lawyer.

A-   Judge Lyles used her robe and unlawful authority in the same identical manner as Judge Valderrama in ignoring said Summary Judgment due to Plaintiffs Defaulting 735 ILCS 5/2—1001(a)(3) (West 2006). Although the statute does not define “cause”, Illinois courts have held that in such circumstances, actual prejudice has been required to FORCE REMOVAL of a judge from a case, that is, either prejudicial trial conduct or personal bias. Rosewood Corp. n Transamerica Insurance Co., 57 Ill 2d 247, 311 N.E. 2d 673 (1974; In re Marriage of Kozloff, 101 Ill 2d 526, 532, 79 Ill. Dec 165 463 N.E. 2d 719 (1984); see also People v. Vance, 76 Ill. 2d 171, 181, 28 Ill. Dec. 508, 390 N.E. 2d 867 (1979).

B-     FACT Pursuant to Page 9 Par E, Respondent did not Object or Deny or attempt to impeach any of the pleadings due to its veracity because nothing happened to Judge Valderama as he too ruled on a case not in his jurisdiction that was on Cal 6 when his call was Cal 3, That Judge Lyles is expecting the same body of racist judges and politicians that embraced Valderrama for his Treason Offenses against a Pro Se litigant who shared his ethnicity to save her in the same like manner, in that judges like the aforementioned are willing to do whatever it takes to destroy their own so as to be accepted by those who hate persons of color and is controlling the Democratic Party;

C-    In that African American judges ignorant of the laws are just as worse as racist judges, in that, many of them closes their eyes and commit the same acts as racist judges, due to them selling out their ethnicity for whatever alleged fee they can receive;

  

The Illinois Supreme Court has held that "if the magistrate has not such jurisdiction, then he and those who advise and act with him, or execute his process, are trespassers." Von Kettler et.al. v. Johnson, 57 Ill. 109 (1870)

Under Federal law which is applicable to all states, the U.S. Supreme Court stated that if a court is "without authority, its judgments and orders are regarded as nullities. They are not voidable, but simply void; and form no bar to a recovery sought, even prior to a reversal in opposition to them. They constitute no justification; and all persons concerned in executing such judgments or sentences, are considered, in law, as trespassers." Elliot v. Piersol, 1 Pet. 328, 340, 26 U.S. 328, 340 (1828)

The Illinois Supreme Court held that if a court "could not hear the matter upon the jurisdictional paper presented, its finding that it had the power can add nothing to its authority, - it, had no authority to make that finding." The People v. Brewer, 128 Ill. 472, 483 (1928). The judges listed below had no legal authority (jurisdiction) to hear or rule on certain matters before them. They acted without any jurisdiction.

When judges act when they do not have jurisdiction to act, or they enforce a void order (an order issued by a judge without jurisdiction), they become trespassers of the law, and are engaged in treason.

The U.S. Supreme Court, in Scheuer v. Rhodes, 416 U.S. 232, 94 S. Ct. 1683, 1687 (1974) stated that "when a state officer acts under a state law in a manner violative of the Federal Constitution, he "comes into conflict with the superior authority of that Constitution, and he is in that case stripped of his official or representative character and is subjected in his person to the consequences of his individual conduct. The State has no power to impart to him any immunity from responsibility to the supreme authority of the United States." [Emphasis supplied in original].

14. FACT Pursuant to Page 10 Par 2 judge Lyle demonstrated Bias Prejudicial disposition at the Respondents within the Preponderance of the Laws  used her judicial authority to aid and abet in an “Organized Conspiracy” by justifying her unlawful acts to further amplify the veracity of the above, Pursuant to Page 5, Lines 15-24, Page 6, Lines 1-2  Judge Lyles stated, “I know it may seem rather unusual, but it happens all the time in courts, things are—people are in offices and maybe they get misplaced. So it’s not unusual for me to give persons standing on your side additional time. In fact, much to the banks chagrin, I give them a lot of additional time so that they can protect their cases”

“And so when the plaintiff asks for additional time, it’s only fair and equitable that. I give them additional time. So that’s what I’m doing”

15. FACT Pursuant to Page 10 Par 3, Respondent respectfully interjected further validating the veracity of Judge Lyle demonstrating Biasness against the Respondent’s  Marcia Johnson stated, Page 6, Lines 3-4 “I just want to get the record straight”

16.  FACT Pursuant to Page 10 Par 4 that said judge in her own admission against the Respondent in an arrogant untouchable manner , Judge Lyle stated unequivocally, Page 6, Lines 5-8 “Okay. That’s what I’m doing today. And regarding the record, you have a young lady over here who’s taking down verbatim what we say” Further validate the veracity that she is Bias and Prejudice and as long as her actions were perpetrated against people of color she had nothing to worry about.

17. That Chagrin is defined as disquietude or distress of mind caused by humiliation, or having failed  

A-    Having been beaten in a court battle by African American women fighting to save their home, POTESTIVO & Associates retreated to chagrin or allegedly committed careercide resorted to all levels of “Fraud”.

18. FACT Pursuant to Page 10 Par 6 judge Lyle admitted on the record being Bias and Prejudice granting more time to the banks unlawfully in an attempt to wear down said women for standing up to injustice in her court and bulliness by the Law firm; Judge Lyles violated her oath assumed jurisdiction on a matter she did not have any and became complicit in an “Organized Conspiracy” signing her name to a court order described as  a Nullity Void in its entirety granting the attorneys the opportunity to earn wages off the injustices perpetrated at the Respondent’s as they suffer financially behind these “Organized Conspiracies”;

A-    That Judge Lyles with Brazen disregard for the laws openly articulated her unlawful reasons granting the Plaintiff’s more time in an attempt for them to try and defeat said retired Defendants That due to the judges Bias and or Prejudice conduct pursuant to Sup Ct Rule 71, Sufficient for Removal, conduct which does not constitute a criminal offense may be sufficiently violative of the Judicial Canons to warrant removal for cause. Napolitano v Ward, 457 F 2d 279 (7^th Cir.), cert denied, 409 U.S. 1037, 93 S. Ct. 512, 34 L. Ed. 2d 486 (1972).

19. That Pursuant to Par 6A Page 10 That judge Lyles has demonstrated an unknown interest in this matter which has blinded her objectivity in adjudicating the merits of this matter, due to the aforementioned; Sup Ct. Rule 63 (c) (1) (d) mandates disqualification where the judge has an interest in the proceeding. (eff. April 16, 2007).

A judge’s disrespect for the rules of court demonstrates disrespect for the law. Judges are disciplined under Canon 2A for violating court rules and procedures. Judge ignored mandated witness order in attempt to accommodate witnesses’ schedules; Citing Canon 2A the court noted, “[a] court’s indifference to clearly stated rules breeds disrespect for and discontent with our justice system. Government cannot demand respect of the laws by its citizens when its tribunals ignore those very same laws”)

A-    Fraud upon the court is a basis for equitable relief. Luttrell v. United States, 644 F. 2d 1274, 1276 (9^th Cir. 1980); see Abatti v. C.I.R. , 859 F 2d 115, 118 (9^th Cir. 1988) “it is beyond question that a court may investigate a question as to whether there was fraud in the procurement of a judgment” Universal Oil Products Co. v. Root Refining Co., 328 U.S. 575, 66 S. Ct. 1176, 90 L. Ed. 1447. The power of the court to unearth such a fraud is the power to unearth it effectively. See Hazel-Atlas Glass Co. v. Hartford-Empire Co., 322 U.S. 238, 64 S. Ct. 997, 88 L. Ed. 1250; Sprague v. Ticonic National Bank, 1184 and United States v. Throckmorton, 98 U.S. (8 Otto) 61, 25 L. Ed. 93.

B-    “A judge is an officer of the court, as are all members of the Bar. A judge is a judicial officer, paid by the Government to act impartially and lawfully”. People v. Zajic, 88 Ill. App 3d 477, 410 N.E. 2d 626. “A void judgment is regarded as a nullity, and the situation is the same as it would be if there were no judgment. It has no legal or binding force or efficacy for any purpose or at any place….It is not entitled to enforcement. 30A Am Judgments 43, 44, 45. Henderson v Henderson 59 S.E. 2d  227-232  

C-    “A Void Judgment from its inception is and forever continues to be absolutely null, without legal efficacy, ineffectual to bind parties or support a right, of no legal force and effect whatever, and incapable of confirmation, ratification, or enforcement in any manner or to any degree. “A void judgment, order or decree may be attacked at any time or in any court, either directly or collaterally” Oak Park Nat Bank v. Peoples Gas Light & Coke Col, 46 Ill. App. 2d 385, 197 N.E. 3d 73, 77, (1^st Dist. 1964)           

20.  That under 18 U.S.C. 242 and 42 U.S.C. 1985 (3) (b). A judge does not have the discretion on whether or not to follow Supreme Ct. Rules, but a duty to follow. People v. Gersh, 135 Ill. 2d 384 (1990).

Under penalties as provided by law pursuant to 735 1265 5\1-109, the undersigned certifies that the statements set forth in this instrument are true and correct, except as to matters therein stated to be on information and belief and as to such matters, the undersigned certifies as aforesaid that he verily believes the same to be true.

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   

                                                                                 Respectfully submitted,

                                                                                  Monzella Y. Johnson, Pro Se

                                                                                         5217 S. Ingleside Ave

                                                                                        Chicago, Il 60615

                                                                                           773 835-5849

     

                                                           

                                                                                

WHEREFORE the aforementioned reasons Respondent respectfully Prays for the Relief

  

1.    For an Order Imposing Sanctions on all attorneys and law Firm for their “Fraudulent Acts” in this matter. 

2.    For an Order Substituting said Judge due to Prejudice & Bias and “Trespassing upon the Laws”;

3.    For the entry of an Order awarding to your Petitioner for such other relief and any other relief necessary as equity may require of which this court may deem overwhelmingly just;

        IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS

COUNTY DEPARTMENT--CHANCERY DIVISION

U.S. Bank National Association, As Trustee Under)

Pooling and Servicing Agreement Dated as of        )

December 1, 2006 Mastr Asset–Backed Securities )

Trust 2006-NC3 Mortgage Pass-Through               ) Case # 2008 CH 33616

Certificates, Series 2006-NC3                                 )                                                           Petitioner        )

                                                                                 )          

V.                                                                              ) Judge Darryl B. Simko

                                                                                 )                                                                                   )     

                                                                                 ) Room 2806   

Monzella Y. Johnson, A/K/A Monzella                  )                                   

Johnson; Marcia E. Johnson A/K/A Marcia            )                                                 Johnson: Mortgage Electronic Registration            )

Systems, Inc. As Nominee for New Century          )

Mortgage Corporation; Monzella Y. Johnson         )                                         

( C ) Cestui Que Trust; Discover Bank;                  )

Unknown Owners and Non-Record Claimants,      )

                                                                                 )

                                                           Respondents  )

                                                                                                                  

NOTICE OF 

         RESPONDENT’S MOTION STRIKING PETITIONER’S RESPONSE MOTION FOR DISQUALIFICATION OF JUDGE FOR “CAUSE” AS FRIVOLOUS DUE TO “PERJURY” “FRAUD” & IMPOSE SANCTIONS PURSUANT TO SUPREME COURT RULE 137  MAKING THE RESPONSE A NULLITY w/AFFIDAVIT

Please be advised that on  March 8, 2018, Defendant has filed before this Circuit Court, Motion for Reconsideration et al; and will present said legally sufficient instrument before Judge Simko or any Judge in his stead March 25, at 10 am in room 2806.       

                                             U.S. Attorney

                                                    Joel R. Levin

                                          219 South Dearborn Suite 500

                                                   Chicago, Ill 60605

        Cook County State’s Attorney            Chief Judge Timothy C. Evans

         Kim Foxx                                              50 West Washington, Suite 2600

         50 West Washington, Suite 500                Chicago, Ill. 60601

         Chicago, Ill. 60601                           

                                                         

Potestivo & Ass., PC                         

223 West Jackson, Blvd, Suite 610  
Chicago, IL. 60606                           

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned hereby certifies that the above notice and all attachments were caused to be personally delivered, to the above parties at the addresses provided before 5:00 pm on September 22, 2017.

                                                                ________________________

                                                                  Respectfully Submitted, Monzella Y. Johnson

            IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS

COUNTY DEPARTMENT--CHANCERY DIVISION

U.S. Bank National Association, As Trustee Under)

Pooling and Servicing Agreement Dated as of        )

December 1, 2006 Mastr Asset–Backed Securities )

Trust 2006-NC3 Mortgage Pass-Through               )  Case # 2008 CH 33616

Certificates, Series 2006-NC3                                 )                                                           Petitioner        )

                                                                                 )          

V.                                                                              )  Judge Darryl B. Simko

                                                                                 )                                                                                   )     

                                                                                 )   Room 2806    

Monzella Y. Johnson, A/K/A Monzella                  )                                   

Johnson; Marcia E. Johnson A/K/A Marcia            )                                                 Johnson: Mortgage Electronic Registration            )

Systems, Inc. As Nominee for New Century          )

Mortgage Corporation; Monzella Y. Johnson         )                                         

( C ) Cestui Que Trust; Discover Bank;                  )

Unknown Owners and Non-Record Claimants,      )

                                                                                 )

                                                           Respondents  )

                                                                                                                   

                                                 AFFIDAVIT

STATE OF ILLINOIS )

                                        )

COUNTY OF COOK   )

I Monzella Y. Johnson Pro Se being duly sworn on oath states the aforementioned pleadings enumerated within said motion pursuant to 735 1265 5/1-109, the undersigned certifies that the statements set forth in this instrument are true and correct, except as to matters therein stated to be on information and belief and as to such matters, the undersigned certifies as aforesaid that he verily believes the same to be true.

Respectfully Submitted                                                         Notary

                                                                        

____________________

Monzella Y. Johnson

5217 S. Ingleside. Ave

Chicago, Il 60615