EDWARD BURKE MANAGED TO MAINTAIN EMPLOYMENT IN CITY HALL AS AN ALDERMAN AND TREASURER "FIXING" CASES FOR RACIST PROMINENT ATTORNEYS INSURING VERDICTS FAVORABLE TO THOSE ABLE TO AFFORD THE COSTS.
BLACK AND BROWN JUDGES IN THIS CITY AND STATE DO NOT HAVE ANY AUTHORITY OVER PROMINENT WHITES IN THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY THEY ARE ONLY APPOINTED TO POSITIONS OF AUTHORITY TO YIELD THE IMPRESSION BLACKS HAVE POWER WHEN IN FACT THEY DO NOT.
TAKE THIS CASE AN AFRICAN AMERICAN JUDGE D ADOLPHUS RIVERS HAD THIS CASE BEFORE HIM FOR 2 YEARS BEFORE DISMISSING IT SEPTEMBER 17, 1987, I LOST MY JOB WITH THE COOK COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT BECAUSE TOO MANY DAYS HAD TO BE TAKEN OFF TO GO TO COURT.
JOSEPH V RODDY AN IRISH ATTORNEY ALLEGEDLY CONNECTED TO ALDERMAN BURKE AND RICHARD DALEY AND FORMER STATES ATTORNEY WHO WAS THE GO TO ATTORNEY GETTING POLICEMEN OFF FOR CRIMES THEY MAY HAVE COMMITTED.
HE REFILED THE PATERNITY CASE WITH THE CASE NUMBER 88 D 079012 AND WENT BEFORE JUDGE RIVERS FEBRUARY 8, 1988, THE JUDGE TOLD RODDY "IF YOU HAVE ANY DIFFICULTY SERVING THE DE FENDANT (ME) IN THIS CASE, YOU MAY WANT TO FILE THE APPROPRIATE MOTION TO VACATE THE NON-SUIT ORDER, THE JUDGE IS REFERENCING THE SEPT. 17, 1987 ORDER.
KEEP IN MIND THE COOK COUNTY SHERIFF NEVER SERVED ME ANY SUMMONS TO APPEAR ON THIS CASE AND THE COURT FILE STATES DEFENDANT WAS NEVER SERVED.
RODDY HIRED A DETECTIVE AGENCY AND HIRED A HISPANIC PERSON TO FALSIFY A DESCRIPTION OF MY GRANDMOTHER AND THE BUILDING TO SAY THAT, I WAS SERVED A SUMMONS MY GRANDMOTHER STAYED 7911 SOUTH CLYDE ON THE 3RD FLOOR AND ACROSS THE HALL WAS MY PLAY UNCLE WHO WAS A POLICE OFFICER, HE INSTRUCTED ME TO GIVE THE POLICE HIS NAME IF I EVER HAD TROUBLE WITH ANY POLICE OFFICER TRYING TO PROTECT FRANCOISE'S FATHER---YOU CAN GO TO THE BUILDING RIGHT NOW IT IS ABANDONED RIGHT OFF THE ALLEY THERE IS NO 3RD FLOOR REAR APARTMENT.
THE HISPANIC PERSON NEVER SAW OR SPOKE TO MY GRANDMOTHER BUT MADE UP A GRANDMOTHER DESCRIPTION SAYING SHE WAS 70-75 YEARS OF AGE WITH WHITE HAIR HE WAS PROBABLY DESCRIBING HIS OWN GRANDMOTHER; MOREOVER, MY GRANDMOTHER WAS 63 YEARS OLD AND TRUE OLD SCHOOL, SHE NEVER ANSWERED HER DOOR FOR NOBODY AND KEPT HER GATE LOCKED WITH A PADLOCKED WHEN SHE DIED IN HER APARTMENT THE PARAMEDICS HAD TO ENTER THE APARTMENT FROM THE 3RD FLOOR BECAUSE THE GATE WAS LOCKED.
ON MAY 2, 1988 THE STATES ATTORNEY ON BEHALF OF RICHARD J. DALEY HIS NAME WAS GEORGE BERBAS HE APPEARED IN COURT ON BEHALF OF FRANCOISE THE STATES ATTORNEY INFORMED JUDGE RIVERS THAT HE THOUGHT SUBSTITUTED SERVICE WAS HAD ON THE DEFENDANT--- THE JUDGE SAID IF YOU HAD JUST DONE THAT IT WOULD HAVE SHOWN SOME COMPLIANCE WITH THE ORDER, THAT WAS ENTERED ON MARCH 21ST ----KEEP IN MIND I HAVE NO KNOWLEDGE OF ANY OF THIS GOING ON IN 1988.
THE STATES ATTORNEY WAS GANGING UP ON ME IN A RACIST MANNER ALONG WITH JOSEPH V. RODDY FRAMING ME OR TRYING AT THIS POINT TO PROTECT THE REAL MOTHERFUCKER HER FATHER WHO ALLEGEDLY RAPED AND HAD SEX WITH ALL OF HIS DAUGHTERS HELL HE BRAGGED TO ME THAT ALL OF HIS DAUGHTERS HAD GOOD PUSSY IN FRONT OF FRANCOISE AND HER MOTHER.
MAY 18, 1988 FRANCOISE TOLD THE JUDGE SHE WAS IN FACT A POLICE OFFICER MYSTERIOUSLY JUDGE RIVERS USED PATERNITY TESTS FROM A CASE HE DISMISSED ON SEPTEMBER 17, 1987 NO PATERNITY TESTS EVER WAS HAD ON THE 1988 CASE; FURTHERMORE, THE ORDER DID NOT HAVE THE ATTORNEY'S INFORMATION OR JUDGE RIVERS SIGNATURE--- MOST IMPORTANT THE ORDER NEVER ORDERED ME TO PAY ANY CHILD SUPPORT.
BECAUSE JUDGE RIVERS WAS A BLACK JUDGE EVERY WHITE JUDGE THAT WAS APPOINTED IGNORED HIS COURT ORDER AND ENTER ALL SORTS OF FUCKING RACIST ORDERS HELPING EACH RACIST WHITE MAN STEAL ALL OF MY WAGES AS JUDGES ACTED LIKE KU KLUX KLANSMEN REMANDING INTO CUSTODY FOR STANDING UP TO THEM DENOUNCING THE RACIST HATEFUL ACTS PERPETRATED AT ME AT THE AUTHORING OF ALDERMAN EDWARD BURKE.
EVERY WHITE JUDGE CONNECTED TO BURKE TRIED LYNCHING ME USING INJUSTICE AS A METHOD OF TRYING TO BREAK ME---NOT ONE BLACK OR BROWN JUDGE WHO RECEIVED NOTICE AND KNOWLEDGE OF THIS OPENED THEIR MOUTHS!
I WAS TOLD BY WHITE ATTORNEYS IN THE VICINITY OF JUDGES THAT NO IRISH, OR POLISH JUDGE WAS EVER GOING TO RULE IN MY FAVOR AGAINST THEIR PEOPLE AND AS FAR AS YOUR BROS BLACK JUDGES YOU CAN FORGET ABOUT THEM BECAUSE THEY DO WHAT THEY ARE TOLD AND YOU ARE BETTER OFF STAYING AWAY FROM THEM.
TO VALIDATE THE VERITY OF THE AFOREMENTIONED EVERY BLACK JUDGE, I HAVE BEEN IN FRONT OF WAS WORSE THAN ANY WHITE JUDGE, I GUESS JUDGE RIVERS HAD HIS PRICE BECAUSE HE WAS PROMOTED TO SUPERVISING JUDGE AND WAS TRANSFERRED TO THE COURT ON CHICAGO AVE NEAR WOODS STREET, I WENT TO HIM AS HE SIGNED ALL OF MY TRANSCRIPTS CERTIFYING THE EVENTS AS BEING TRUE WHAT TOOK PLACE IN HIS COURTS.
FAST FORWARD TO NOW BECAUSE JUDGE RIVERA IS IN FACT HISPANIC TO FURTHER AMPLIFY BLACK AND BROWN JUDGES HAVE LIMITED TO NO JURISDICTION OVER RACIST WHITES INVOLVED IN RACIAL HATE CRIMES OR INJUSTICES WHERE PEOPLE OF COLOR ARE CONCERNED JUDGE MYRON MACKOFF TOOK OVER HER CALENDAR AND COMMITTED ALL TYPES OF CRIMINAL TERRORIST HATE CRIMES ON HER CALL DENYING MY MOTION PROVING RACIAL HATE CRIMES ARE REAL IN CHICAGO COURTS.
EDWARD BURKE CAN FIX CASES WHERE WHITE POLICEMAN CAN BEAT THE SHIT OUT OF A BLACK MAN KILLING HIM ON A CTA TRAIN AND HAND PICK JUDGES TO FIX THE CASE AND NOTHING FUCKING HAPPENS TO HIM.
OR HE CAN FIX A FUCKING CASE WHERE A BLACK MAN CAN STAB HIS WIFE IN THE MOUTH 40 FUCKING TIMES WITH THE ASSISTANCE OF HIS GAY LOVER FOR THE INSURANCE MONEY AND NOTHING FUCKING HAPPENS TO HIM.
WORSE HE FIXED CASES INVOLVING CHILD MOLESTATION'S AND NO CHARGES WERE EVER LEVIED AGAINST HIM PROVING THAT STATES ATTORNEY KIM FOXX IS ONLY ALLOWED TO COME AFTER BLACK AND BROWN MEN LIKE JUSSIE SMOLLETT OR R KELLY.
THIS VERY DOCUMENT PROVES WHAT, I HAVE BEEN ASSERTING FOR THE LAST 30 YEARS BLACK AND BROWN DEMOCRATS HAVE ACCEPTED THEIR ROLES AS INFERIOR MEN OR WOMEN, MODERN DAY SLAVES OR PUPPETS TO RACIST WHITE MEN CONTROLLING THE DEMOCRATIC MACHINE PARTY AND THE SICKEST PART THAT EVERY JUDGE LIVING IN THE CLOSET FEARING THAT I MAY LEARN IS THAT AND HAVE BEEN INFORMED, THAT SO MANY BLACK AND BROWN JUDGES MEN ARE ALLEGEDLY SLEEPING WITH WHITE JUDGES GOING ALONG WITH THIS DEMONIC SICKNESS SO THAT THEY CAN EMULATE THEIR POWER AND DESTROY PEOPLE'S LIVES BECAUSE AS COWARDS OR PUSSIES THEY DID NOT HAVE THE BACKBONE OR COURAGE STAND UP LIKE A MAN AND FIGHT OR SPEAK UP.
THIS IS A DOCUMENT DEPICTING RACIAL HATE BY WHITE MEN IN COOK COUNTY SURPASSING HUMAN IMAGINATION BEING NATIVE AMERICAN CHEROKEE AND AFRICAN AMERICAN IT IS THESE TYPE OF MEN THAT STOOPED TO DEMONIC LOWS TRYING TO PLACE ME IN THE IMAGE OF WHAT EXISTED IN THEIR HEARTS.
AN INDIVIDUAL IS IN HIS HEART WHAT HE THINKS HIMSELF TO BE AND OUT OF HIS HEART FLOWS THE ISSUES OF LIFE.
RACIST WHITE MEN AND SICK ASS NEGROES HAVE ELEVATED TO POSITIONS OF AUTHORITY THAT NONE OF THEM TRULY ARE QUALIFIED FOR SIMPLY AT THE EXPENSE OF DESTROYING AN INNOCENT PERSONS LIFE.
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY ILLINOIS
DOMESTIC RELATIONS DIVISION
IN RE )
)
Francoise Hightower )
Judge Elizabeth Loredo-Rivera
Petitioner
)
) Cal 41
VS )
) No. 88 D 079012
Joe Louis Lawrence )
Respondent
) Room 1908
RESPONDENT’S
MOTION FOR DISQUALIFICATION OF JUDGE
FOR “CAUSE” RACIAL HATE BIAS PREJUDICE PURSUANT to S.H.A.
735 ILCS 5/2 ---1001 (a) (2,3) ENGAGING IN AN ORGANIZED
CRIMINAL CONSPIRACY CIVIL RIGHTS
VIOLATIONS “FRAUD” TRESPASSING UPON THE LAWS ENGAGING IN TREASON OFFENSES
MAKING ALL ORDERS A NULLITY w/AFFIDAVIT
Now comes Respondent
Joe Louis Lawrence, Counsel Pro Se in this cause respectfully represents to
this court the reasons and files herewith her Affidavit in support of
Respondent’s Motion for Disqualification et al;
1.
That the States Attorney having admitted to all facts recorded in
said Motion to Vacate Jan 22, 2019 Order &For Reconsideration to Reinstate
case 88 D 079012 & Vacate all judgments due to Orders being Void a Nullity
case being “Fraudulent” et al; Exhibits 1-15 establishes veracity surpassing
human imagination.
A-
That said Motion validated the verity no Court or judge ever had jurisdiction on the Respondent ignored
Defendants valid Affidavits and Exhibits demonstrating Prejudice and Bias
behavior pursuant to S.H.A. 735 ILCS 5/2-----1001 (a) (3); Sup. Ct. Rule 63 (C) (1),
due to Racial Hate Bias.
2. That
because of the Respondent’s skin color and alleged sexual orientation
Respondent has been held at a legal standard higher than every white
unqualified attorney or States Attorney
he has been before in the courts in that, every white judge demonstrated their
demonic hate by closing their eyes to the draconian criminal Terrorists Acts
perpetrated and authored by Alderman Edward Burke.
3. That
said judge was allegedly forum-shopped to undermine the authority of Elizabeth Loredo- Rivera by circumventing her authority
and directives that was clearly articulated to the Respondent by providing the
court order to the States Attorney with proof of delivery when Respondent
adhered to said directive, Mackoff was forum-shopped to use his robe and
violate the oath of his duties and become complicit in an “Organized
Conspiracy” by becoming a “Private Citizen” in
denying Respondents motions in an attempt to protect the judges involved and
the States Attorneys.
4. That because of Mackoff’s corroborating role as a “Private
Citizen” against the Respondent he has caused the case to be delayed with vexation
causing the Respondent greater aggravation and emotional stress and judge
Rivera to waste the courts time in preparing a transfer order, hereto attached
court order March 19, 2019;
5. That because of Mackoff’s corroborating role as a “Private
Citizen” Respondent had to appear before judge Arce a Team Leader who is
responsible for reassigning the case the Mackoff, hereto attached court order March
19, 2019;
6. That
because of Mackoff’s racist condescending behavior Respondent explained the
issues of why and how no judge ever had jurisdiction after sitting in his court
for almost an hour, he had no body in his court where Respondent had to wait
for an unqualified States Attorney;
7. That
under no circumstances did judge Rivera ever sign any court order where the
States Attorney was present and signed court orders which states Illinois Department
of Healthcare and Family Services ex rel. on behalf
of Francoise.
8. That
because of Mackoff’s Bias and Racist demeanor at the Respondent in his attempt to
undermine him in his understanding of the laws and all legal procedures said he
did not see anything wrong and told the States Attorney to prepare the order
because he may or may not have jurisdiction but this had to go upstairs to be
appealed;
9. The
States Attorney was so incompetent he did not know how to prepare a transfer
order so the judge prepared the order for him.
10. That Mackoff
and the States Attorney colluding together in this “Organized Conspiracy” said States Attorney prepared the court
order that says, “Illinois Department of Healthcare and Family Services ex rel” scratched
off at the bottom that he was in the court or the States Attorney was involved
initialed FOC which means Friend of
the Court, in his oral argument which was objected to, he asked that the court
strike Respondent’s Motion because he can not argue child support orders now it
is past 30 days.
11. That Mackoff
acting as a “Private Citizen” corroborated everything properly asserted
in Judge Rivera’s court when she had her clerk to go in the computer and verify
who the last attorney was and it was in fact the States Attorney and now that
Mackoff has established with veracity his admission being complicit in
Terrorist Acts against the Respondent.
12. That
Mackoff prepared the Transfer Order and it says O/C which means Order of the
Court, he further stated that the May 18, 1988 court order in the Respondent’s
exhibits was a copy a signature is on the original, Respondent countered
assuming arguendo a signature is on the order, the order is void a Nullity
because the court never had jurisdiction on me and still to this day you don’t
have jurisdiction, that court order never authorized me to pay any child
support and when Benjamin Mackoff was the Presiding judge he provided and
certified a computer printout of actual court dates registered in the computer there
were court orders and continuances that was never recorded in the database. My
attorney appeared in court and vacated the wrong date when service was
allegedly had on me is why this order is still legally standing, Judge Mackoff
looked at the Respondent did not say anything. He denied the Motion hereto
attached, March 19, 2019 Transfer Order.
13. That Mackoff
have corroborated in his actions and admissions Racial Hate and Terrorism is
common place in Cook Courts or where ever white men filled with hate resides
and the arguments and evidence presented are not considered as crimes but a
norm.
14. That
unbeknown to judge Daniel Trevino can’t honestly depict him any way as a racist
because of court demeanor and sensitivity and patience to helping out an
elderly couple in a divorce proceeding during his tenure on the bench in judge
Rivera’s absence see the Memo sent to the Chief Judge March 13, 2019 court
order attached, acknowledges Assistant States Attorney in court along with the
Respondent but she marks out the fact the States attorney is involved by
recording FOC.
A- Said
States Attorney used her position and authority and became complicit in an
Organized Criminal Conspiracy engaging in racist Terrorist Acts.
15. That Blacks
in Chicago in the Democratic Party closes their eyes to the unlawful mayhem
many innocent or elderly men or women disenfranchised by whatever means
experienced in the legal system because they are now the new colored Ku Klux
Klan or puppets in the Democratic Machine.
A-
To
show fraud upon the court, the complaining party must establish that the alleged
misconduct affected the integrity of the judicial process, either because the
court itself was defrauded or because the misconduct was perpetrated by
officers of the court. Alexander v. Robertson, 882, F. 2d 421,424 (9th
Cir. 1989);
B-
A void judgment does not create any binding obligation.
Kalb v. Feuerstein (1940) 308 US 433, 60 S Ct 343, 84 L, Ed 370.
Properly alleged
facts within an affidavit that are not contradicted by counter affidavit are
taken as true, despite the existence of contrary averments in the adverse
party’s pleadings. Professional Group Travel, Ltd. v. Professional
Seminar Consultants Inc., 136 ILL App 3d 1084, 483 N.E. 2d 1291; Buzzard v.
Bolger, 117 ILL App 3d 887, 453 N.E. 2d 1129 et al
16.
That Exhibits 1-16 demonstrate how Racist
white men circumvent the laws and undermine people in color authority as they trivialize
their authority and falsify any and every document necessary upholding Jim Crow
Laws and enforce Terrorist Hate at the Defendant and at any persons like him in
the courts by criminalizing us (them) so as to satisfy their doctrines of keeping
people of color oppressed demeaned incarcerated by every means possible as
articulated in every exhibit.
17.
Respondent’s
Grandmother never had white hair and was 63 years old and did not look her age;
furthermore, there was no 3rd floor rear apartment and she kept her
gate locked, never answered her door for anyone not even family you had to call
her first; otherwise, you would be sitting downstairs in the cold or rain.
A-
Motions for Reconsideration are designed to
bring to the court’s attention newly discovered evidence that was unavailable
at time of original hearing, changes in existing law, or errors in court’s
application of law. Continental Cas.
Co. v. Security Ins. Co. of Hartford, App. 1 Dist. 1996, 216 Ill. Dec. 314, 279
Ill. App. 3d 815, 665 N.E. 2d 374, appeal dismissed, et al.;
B-
The purpose of a Motion to Vacate is to alert
the trial court to errors it has made and to afford an opportunity for their
correction. In re Marriage of King, App.
1 Dist. 2002, 270 Ill. Dec. 540, 336 Ill. App. 3d 83, 783 N.E. 2d 115,
rehearing denied pending appeal; et al.
C-
Pursuant to 735
ILCS 5/2-612 Counsel never Objected to the sufficiency of Petitioners
pleadings, Objections to sufficiency of pleadings either in form or substance
must be made In trial court, and if not so made, they will be considered waived
and cannot be raised for the first time on appeal. People ex rel. Deynes
v. Harris, App. 1948, 77 N.E. 2d 439, 333 Ill. App. 280.
18. That because of the above; Fraud admissibility
great latitude is permitted in proving fraud C.J.S. Fraud 104 ET Seg. Fraud
51-57. where a question of fraud and deceit is the issue involved in a case,
great latitude is ordinarily permitted in the introduction of evidence,
and courts allow the greatest liberality in the method of examination and in
the scope of inquiry Vigus V. O’Bannon, 1886 8 N.E 788, 118 ILL 334.
Hazelton V. Carolus, 1907 132 ILL. App. 512.
“In addition, when judges act when they do not have jurisdiction to
act, or they enforce a void order (an order issued by a judge without
jurisdiction), they become trespassers of the law, and are engaged in treason.”
Ethics
All Illinois lawyers must be familiar with the Illinois Rules of Professional Conduct, and trail lawyers must be
particularly familiar with the rules that apply specially to them.
RPC
3.3, entitled “Conduct Before a Tribunal,” sets forth the
standards to be followed by the trial lawyer during “battle.” Section (a) of
that rule states:
(a) In appearing in a professional capacity before a tribunal, a
lawyer shall not:
(1) make a statement of
material fact or law to a tribunal which the lawyer knows or reasonably should
know is false;
(2) fail to disclose to a
tribunal a material fact known to the lawyer when disclosure is necessary to
avoid assisting a criminal or fraudulent act by the client;
(3) fail to disclose to the
tribunal legal authority in the controlling jurisdiction known to the lawyer to
be directly adverse to the position of the client and not disclosed by opposing
counsel;
(4) Offer evidence that the
lawyer knows to be false. If a lawyer has offered material evidence and comes
to know of its falsity, the lawyer shall take reasonable remedial measures;
(5) participate in the creation
or preservation of evidence when the lawyer knows or reasonably should know the
evidence is false ;
(6) counsel or assist the
client in conduct the lawyer knows to be illegal of fraudulent;
(7) engage in other illegal
conduct or conduct in violation of these Rules;
(8) fail to disclose the
identities of the clients represented and of the persons who employed the
lawyer unless such information is privileged or irrelevant;
(9) intentionally degrade a
witness or other person by stating or alluding to personal facts concerning
that person which are not relevant to the case;
(10) in trial, allude to any matter that the lawyer does not
reasonably believe is relevant or that will not be supported by admissible
evidence, assert personal knowledge of facts in issue except when testifying as
a witness, or state a personal opinion as to the justness of a cause, the
credibility of a witness, the culpability of a civil litigant or the guilt or
innocence of and accused, but a lawyer may argue, on analysis of evidence, for
any position or conclusion with respect to the matter stated herein;
Acts constituting direct, criminal
contempt
A wide variety of acts may constitute a direct, criminal
contempt. And act may be criminal contempt even though it is also an indictable
crime. Beattie v. People, 33 Ill. Ill. Ill.
Official
misconduct is a criminal offense; and a public officer or employee commits
misconduct, punishable by fine, imprisonment, or both, when, in his official
capacity, he intentionally or recklessly fails to perform any mandatory duty as
required by law; or knowingly performs an act which he knows he is forbidden by
law to perform; or with intent to obtain a personal advantage for himself or
another, he performs an act in excess of his lawful authority ….S.H.A. Ch 38
33-3.
A- “The Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals held
that the Circuit Court of Cook County
is a criminal enterprise. U.S.
v. Murphy, 768 F.2d 1518,
1531 (7th Cir. 1985)”.
The United States Supreme
Court recently acknowledged the judicial corruption in Cook County, when it
stated that Judge "Maloney was one of many dishonest judges exposed and
convicted through 'Operation Greylord', a labyrinthine federal investigation of
judicial corruption in Chicago". Bracey v. Gramley,
case No. 96-6133 (June 9, 1997).
Since
judges who do not report the criminal activities of other judges become
principals in the criminal activity, 18 U.S.C. Section 2, 3 & 4, and since
no judges have reported the criminal activity of the judges who have been
convicted, the other judges are as guilty as the convicted judges.
- That Mackoff
demonstrated Bias and racist collusion by signing his name on court orders
that was clearly fraudulent
A- He
used his robe and unlawful authority in the same identical manner as the other Judges
named in the Motion accompanied with Affidavits proving Black and Brown lives
don’t matter due to Terrorist Control Racist Democrats have over the legal
tribunals 735 ILCS
5/2—1001(a)(3) (West 2006). Although the statute does not define “cause”, Illinois courts
have held that in such circumstances, actual prejudice has been required to
FORCE REMOVAL of a judge from a case, that is, either prejudicial trial conduct
or personal bias. Rosewood Corp. n Transamerica Insurance Co., 57 Ill 2d
247, 311 N.E. 2d 673 (1974; In re Marriage of Kozloff, 101 Ill 2d 526, 532, 79
Ill. Dec 165 463 N.E. 2d 719 (1984); see also People v. Vance, 76 Ill. 2d 171,
181, 28 Ill. Dec. 508, 390 N.E. 2d 867 (1979).
20. In that
African American judges ignorant of the laws are just as worse as racist
judges, in that, many of them closes their eyes and commit the same acts as
racist judges, due to them selling out their ethnicity for whatever alleged fee
or favor they can receive;
- The Illinois Supreme Court
has held that "if the magistrate has not such jurisdiction, then he
and those who advise and act with him, or execute his process, are
trespassers." Von Kettler et.al. v. Johnson,
57 Ill. 109 (1870)
Under Federal law which is applicable
to all states, the U.S. Supreme Court stated that if a court is "without
authority, its judgments and orders are regarded as nullities. They are not
voidable, but simply void; and form no bar to a recovery sought, even prior to
a reversal in opposition to them. They constitute no justification; and all
persons concerned in executing such judgments or sentences, are considered, in
law, as trespassers." Elliot v. Piersol, 1 Pet.
328, 340, 26 U.S. 328, 340 (1828)
The Illinois Supreme Court held
that if a court "could not hear the matter upon the jurisdictional paper
presented, its finding that it had the power can add nothing to its authority,
- it, had no authority to make that finding." The People v.
Brewer, 128 Ill. 472, 483 (1928). The judges listed below had no
legal authority (jurisdiction) to hear or rule on certain matters before them.
They acted without any jurisdiction.
When judges act when they do not have jurisdiction to act, or they
enforce a void order (an order issued by a judge without jurisdiction), they
become trespassers of the law, and are engaged in treason.
A-
That Judge Mackoff with Brazen disregard for the
laws openly articulated he read everything recorded in the Motion couldn’t see
how the court had any jurisdiction, in that he may be wrong this is a matter
for an appeal, that
due to the judges Bias and or Prejudice conduct
pursuant to Sup Ct Rule 71, Sufficient for Removal, conduct which does
not constitute a criminal offense may be sufficiently violative of the Judicial
Canons to warrant removal for cause. Napolitano v Ward, 457 F 2d 279 (7th Cir.), cert denied, 409
U.S. 1037, 93 S. Ct. 512, 34 L. Ed. 2d 486 (1972).
22. That judge Mackoff has
demonstrated an unknown interest in this matter which has blinded his
objectivity in adjudicating the merits of this matter, due to the
aforementioned; Sup Ct. Rule 63 (c) (1) (d) mandates disqualification
where the judge has an interest in the proceeding. (eff. April 16, 2007).
A judge’s disrespect for the rules of court demonstrates
disrespect for the law. Judges are disciplined under Canon 2A for violating
court rules and procedures. Judge ignored mandated witness order in attempt to
accommodate witnesses’ schedules; Citing Canon 2A the court noted, “[a] court’s
indifference to clearly stated rules breeds disrespect for and discontent with
our justice system. Government cannot demand respect of the laws by its
citizens when its tribunals ignore those very same laws”)
A-
Fraud upon the court is a basis for equitable relief. Luttrell v.
United States, 644 F. 2d 1274, 1276 (9th Cir. 1980); see Abatti v.
C.I.R. , 859 F 2d 115, 118 (9th Cir. 1988) “it is beyond question
that a court may investigate a question as to whether there was fraud in the
procurement of a judgment” Universal Oil Products Co. v. Root Refining Co., 328
U.S. 575, 66 S. Ct. 1176, 90 L. Ed. 1447. The power of the court to unearth
such a fraud is the power to unearth it effectively. See Hazel-Atlas Glass Co.
v. Hartford-Empire Co., 322 U.S. 238, 64 S. Ct. 997, 88 L. Ed. 1250; Sprague v.
Ticonic National Bank, 1184 and United States v. Throckmorton, 98 U.S. (8 Otto)
61, 25 L. Ed. 93.
B-
“A judge is an officer of the court, as are all members of the Bar. A
judge is a judicial officer, paid by the Government to act impartially and
lawfully”. People v. Zajic, 88 Ill. App 3d 477, 410 N.E. 2d 626. “A void judgment is regarded as a
nullity, and the situation is the same as it would be if there were no
judgment. It has no legal or binding force or efficacy for any purpose or at
any place….It is not entitled to enforcement. 30A Am Judgments 43, 44,
45. Henderson v Henderson 59 S.E. 2d
227-232
C-
“A Void Judgment from
its inception is and forever continues to be absolutely null, without legal
efficacy, ineffectual to bind parties or support a right, of no legal force and
effect whatever, and incapable of confirmation, ratification, or enforcement in
any manner or to any degree. “A void judgment, order or decree may be attacked
at any time or in any court, either directly or collaterally” Oak Park Nat Bank v.
Peoples Gas Light & Coke Col, 46 Ill. App. 2d 385, 197 N.E. 3d 73, 77, (1st
Dist. 1964)
That under 18
U.S.C. 242 and 42 U.S.C. 1985 (3) (b). A judge does not have the discretion
on whether or not to follow Supreme Ct. Rules, but a duty to follow. People v.
Gersh, 135 Ill. 2d 384 (1990).
Under
penalties as provided by law pursuant to 735 1265 5\1-109, the undersigned
certifies that the statements set forth in this instrument are true and
correct, except as to matters therein stated to be on information and belief
and as to such matters, the undersigned certifies as aforesaid that he verily
believes the same to be true.
Respectfully submitted,
___________________________
Joe Louis Lawrence
PO Box 490075
Chicago, IL. 60649
312
965-6455
WHEREFORE the aforementioned
reasons Defendant respectfully Prays for the Relief
1.
For an Order Vacating and Disqualifying Judge Mackoff Instanter
for the Criminal Acts of Trespassing upon the Laws on Judge Rivera’s Calendar
call in her absence Jan. 22, 2019;
2.
For an Order transferring
certain parts of this matter to a Judge in the Federal venue due to Corruption and Fraud;
3.
For an Order reimbursing all fees and
costs to the Defendant for the enforcement of this matter;
4.
For an Order of Sanctions Remands and
Disbarments of all attorneys involved in this matter;
5.
For the entry of an Order awarding to your Petitioner for
such other relief and any other relief necessary as equity may require of which
this court may deem overwhelmingly just;
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY ILLINOIS
DOMESTIC
RELATIONS DIVISION
EXHIBIT LIST
1.) March 19, 2019 Court Order
from Judge Rivera transferring case to Judge Arce who has been described as a Team
Lead to transfer the matter to judge Mackoff not P.J. Dickler.
2.) March 19, 2019 Court Order
from Judge Arce transferring said case to Judge Mackoff not P.J. Dickler.
3.) March 19, 2019 Court Order
from Judge Mackoff where the Assistant States Attorney acknowledges
representing Francoise on behalf of Ill. Dept of Healthcare et al.
4.) March 19, 2019 Court Order prepared
by Judge Mackoff transferring the case back to Judge Arce.
5.) March 13, 2019 Memo to Chief Judge
Timothy Evans with 2 court orders attached.
6.) February 8, 1988 Court Transcript
Certified by Anita Todd Washington Court Reporter.
7.) February 21 1988 2 pages
Affidavit falsified by Rock Detective Agency.
8.) May 2, 1988 Court Transcript
Certified by Phyllis J. Epps Court Reporter where the Assistant States Attorney
Richard Senar was in Court on behalf of Francoise.
9.) May 18, 1988 Court Transcript
Certified by Oona Campbell-Smith.
10.)
Certified May 18, 1988 Court Order (March 21, 2019) no attorney info or Judges
information.
11.)
Certified August 3, 1988 Court Order (March 21, 2019) no Judges signature and
it is not recorded on the database.
12.) June 12, 1991
Subpoena sent to Northern Trust Bank seeking financial information from
Respondent’s grandmother subpoena states In Re the Marriage of Francoise
Hightower 2 pages respondent was never married to her.
13.) July 6, 1990
Affidavit for Wage Deduction Order sent to CTA Falsified by Joseph v. Roddy
& Assoc.
14.) March 1, 1977
Certified Statement of Disposition where William Jenkins Hightower was arrested
for allegedly impregnating his minor daughter.
15.) January 3,
2007 Notarized Affidavit Chronology of Unlawful Contempt Charges w/Affidavit
never challenged or addressed.
16.) March 21, 2019
Cook County Receipt Certification fee of $18.00.
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY ILLINOIS
DOMESTIC RELATIONS DIVISION
IN RE )
)
Francoise Hightower )
Judge Elizabeth Loredo-Rivera
Petitioner
)
) Cal 41
VS )
) No. 88 D 079012
Joe Louis Lawrence )
Respondent
) Room 1908
NOTICE OF
RESPONDENT’S
MOTION FOR DISQUALIFICATION OF JUDGE
FOR “CAUSE” RACIAL HATE BIAS PREJUDICE PURSUANT to S.H.A.
735 ILCS 5/2 ---1001 (a) (2,3) ENGAGING IN AN “ORGANIZED”
CRIMINAL CONSPIRACY CIVIL RIGHTS
VIOLATIONS “FRAUD” TRESPASSING UPON THE LAWS ENGAGING IN TREASON OFFENSES
MAKING ALL ORDERS A NULLITY w/AFFIDAVIT
Please be
advised that on April 16 , 2019, Defendant has filed before this Circuit Court,
Motion for Disqualification et al; and will present said legally sufficient
instrument before Judge Rivera or any Judge in her stead April 16, at 9:30
am in room 1908.
U.S.
Attorney
John R. Laush, Jr.
219 South Dearborn Suite
500
Chicago, Ill 60605
FBI Dir. Jeffrey S. Sallet
2111 West Roosevelt Road
Chicago, IL. 60612
Judge Grace Dickler Room 1901 Daley Center, Chg. Il 60601
Cook County State’s Attorney
Chief Judge Timothy C. Evans
Kim
Foxx
50 West Washington, Suite 2600
50 West Washington, Suite 500 Chicago, Ill. 60601
Chicago, Ill. 60601
CERTIFICATE
OF SERVICE
The
undersigned hereby certifies that the above notice and all attachments were
caused to be personally delivered, to the above parties at the addresses
provided before 5:00 pm on March 22,
2019.
________________________
Respectfully Submitted, Counsel Pro Se
Joe Louis Lawrence
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY ILLINOIS
DOMESTIC RELATIONS DIVISION
IN RE )
)
Francoise Hightower )
Judge Elizabeth Loredo-Rivera
Petitioner
)
) Cal 41
VS )
) No. 88 D 079012
Joe Louis Lawrence )
Respondent
) Room 1908
AFFIDAVIT
STATE OF ILLINOIS )
)
COUNTY OF COOK )
I Joe Louis Lawrence Counsel Pro Se being
duly sworn on oath states the aforementioned pleadings enumerated within said
motion pursuant to 735 1265 5/1-109, the undersigned certifies that the
statements set forth in this instrument are true and correct, except as to matters therein stated
to be on information and belief and as to such matters, the undersigned
certifies as aforesaid that he verily believes the same to be true.
Respectfully Submitted
Notary
____________________
PO Box 490075
Chicago, IL.
60649
312 965-6455
No comments:
Post a Comment