Wikipedia Racial Injustice in Chicago Courts

Search results

Saturday, March 23, 2019

ALLEGEDLY JUSSIE SMOLLETT CONCOCTED A STORY OF BEING A VICTIM A HATE CRIME HERE IS EVIDENCE OF A HATE CRIME INVOLVING ALDERMAN EDWARD BURKE & A PLETHORA OF HIS RACIST JUDGES HE HAS APPOINTED TO THE BENCH FRAMING ME PROTECTING A PEDOPHILE POLICE OFFICER FROM GOING TO JAIL AND LOSING HIS JOB ON THE POLICE FORCE.

EDWARD BURKE MANAGED TO MAINTAIN EMPLOYMENT IN CITY HALL AS AN ALDERMAN AND TREASURER "FIXING" CASES FOR RACIST PROMINENT ATTORNEYS INSURING VERDICTS FAVORABLE TO THOSE ABLE TO AFFORD THE COSTS.

BLACK AND BROWN JUDGES IN THIS CITY AND STATE DO NOT HAVE ANY AUTHORITY OVER PROMINENT WHITES IN THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY THEY ARE ONLY APPOINTED TO POSITIONS OF AUTHORITY TO YIELD THE IMPRESSION BLACKS HAVE POWER WHEN IN FACT THEY DO NOT.

TAKE THIS CASE AN AFRICAN AMERICAN JUDGE D ADOLPHUS RIVERS HAD THIS CASE BEFORE HIM FOR 2 YEARS BEFORE DISMISSING IT SEPTEMBER 17, 1987, I LOST MY JOB WITH THE COOK COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT BECAUSE TOO MANY DAYS HAD TO BE TAKEN OFF TO GO TO COURT.

JOSEPH V RODDY AN IRISH ATTORNEY ALLEGEDLY CONNECTED TO ALDERMAN BURKE AND RICHARD DALEY AND FORMER STATES ATTORNEY WHO WAS THE GO TO ATTORNEY GETTING POLICEMEN OFF FOR CRIMES THEY MAY HAVE COMMITTED.

HE REFILED THE PATERNITY CASE WITH THE CASE NUMBER 88 D 079012 AND WENT BEFORE JUDGE RIVERS FEBRUARY 8, 1988, THE JUDGE TOLD RODDY "IF YOU HAVE ANY DIFFICULTY SERVING THE DE FENDANT (ME) IN THIS CASE, YOU MAY WANT TO FILE THE APPROPRIATE  MOTION TO VACATE THE NON-SUIT ORDER, THE JUDGE IS REFERENCING THE SEPT. 17, 1987 ORDER.

KEEP IN MIND THE COOK COUNTY SHERIFF NEVER SERVED ME ANY SUMMONS TO APPEAR ON THIS CASE AND THE COURT FILE STATES DEFENDANT WAS NEVER SERVED.

RODDY HIRED A DETECTIVE AGENCY AND HIRED A HISPANIC PERSON TO FALSIFY A DESCRIPTION OF MY GRANDMOTHER AND THE BUILDING TO SAY THAT, I WAS SERVED A SUMMONS MY GRANDMOTHER STAYED 7911 SOUTH CLYDE ON THE 3RD FLOOR AND ACROSS THE HALL WAS MY PLAY UNCLE WHO WAS A POLICE OFFICER, HE INSTRUCTED ME TO GIVE THE POLICE HIS NAME IF I EVER HAD TROUBLE WITH ANY POLICE OFFICER TRYING TO PROTECT FRANCOISE'S FATHER---YOU CAN GO TO THE BUILDING RIGHT NOW IT IS ABANDONED RIGHT OFF THE ALLEY THERE IS NO 3RD FLOOR REAR APARTMENT.

THE HISPANIC PERSON NEVER SAW OR SPOKE TO MY GRANDMOTHER BUT MADE UP A GRANDMOTHER DESCRIPTION SAYING SHE WAS 70-75 YEARS OF AGE WITH WHITE HAIR HE WAS PROBABLY DESCRIBING HIS OWN GRANDMOTHER; MOREOVER, MY GRANDMOTHER WAS 63 YEARS OLD AND TRUE OLD SCHOOL, SHE NEVER ANSWERED HER DOOR FOR NOBODY AND KEPT HER GATE LOCKED WITH A PADLOCKED WHEN SHE DIED IN HER APARTMENT THE PARAMEDICS HAD TO ENTER THE APARTMENT FROM THE 3RD FLOOR BECAUSE THE GATE WAS LOCKED.

ON MAY 2, 1988 THE STATES ATTORNEY ON BEHALF OF RICHARD J. DALEY HIS NAME WAS GEORGE BERBAS HE APPEARED IN COURT ON BEHALF OF FRANCOISE THE STATES ATTORNEY INFORMED JUDGE RIVERS THAT HE THOUGHT SUBSTITUTED SERVICE WAS HAD ON THE DEFENDANT--- THE JUDGE SAID IF YOU HAD JUST DONE THAT IT WOULD HAVE SHOWN SOME COMPLIANCE WITH THE ORDER, THAT WAS ENTERED ON MARCH 21ST ----KEEP IN MIND I HAVE NO KNOWLEDGE OF ANY OF THIS GOING ON IN 1988.

THE STATES ATTORNEY WAS GANGING UP ON ME IN A RACIST MANNER ALONG WITH JOSEPH V. RODDY FRAMING ME OR TRYING AT THIS POINT TO PROTECT THE REAL MOTHERFUCKER HER FATHER WHO ALLEGEDLY RAPED AND HAD SEX WITH ALL OF HIS DAUGHTERS HELL HE BRAGGED TO ME THAT ALL OF HIS DAUGHTERS HAD GOOD PUSSY IN FRONT OF FRANCOISE AND HER MOTHER.

MAY 18, 1988 FRANCOISE TOLD THE JUDGE SHE WAS IN FACT A POLICE OFFICER MYSTERIOUSLY JUDGE RIVERS USED PATERNITY TESTS FROM A CASE HE DISMISSED ON SEPTEMBER 17, 1987 NO PATERNITY TESTS EVER WAS HAD ON THE 1988 CASE; FURTHERMORE, THE ORDER DID NOT HAVE THE ATTORNEY'S INFORMATION OR JUDGE RIVERS SIGNATURE--- MOST IMPORTANT THE ORDER NEVER ORDERED ME TO PAY ANY CHILD SUPPORT.

BECAUSE JUDGE RIVERS WAS A BLACK JUDGE EVERY WHITE JUDGE THAT WAS APPOINTED IGNORED HIS COURT ORDER AND ENTER ALL SORTS OF FUCKING RACIST ORDERS HELPING EACH RACIST WHITE MAN STEAL ALL OF MY WAGES AS JUDGES ACTED LIKE KU KLUX KLANSMEN REMANDING INTO CUSTODY FOR STANDING UP TO THEM DENOUNCING THE RACIST HATEFUL ACTS PERPETRATED AT ME AT THE AUTHORING OF ALDERMAN EDWARD BURKE.

EVERY WHITE JUDGE CONNECTED TO BURKE TRIED LYNCHING ME USING INJUSTICE AS A METHOD OF TRYING TO BREAK ME---NOT ONE BLACK OR BROWN JUDGE WHO RECEIVED NOTICE AND KNOWLEDGE OF THIS OPENED THEIR MOUTHS!

I WAS TOLD BY WHITE ATTORNEYS IN THE VICINITY OF JUDGES THAT NO IRISH, OR POLISH JUDGE WAS EVER GOING TO RULE IN MY FAVOR AGAINST THEIR PEOPLE AND AS FAR AS YOUR BROS BLACK JUDGES YOU CAN FORGET ABOUT THEM BECAUSE THEY DO WHAT THEY ARE TOLD AND YOU ARE BETTER OFF STAYING AWAY FROM THEM.

TO VALIDATE THE VERITY OF THE AFOREMENTIONED EVERY BLACK JUDGE, I HAVE BEEN IN FRONT OF WAS WORSE THAN ANY WHITE JUDGE, I GUESS JUDGE RIVERS HAD HIS PRICE BECAUSE HE WAS PROMOTED TO SUPERVISING JUDGE AND WAS TRANSFERRED TO THE COURT ON CHICAGO AVE NEAR WOODS STREET, I WENT TO HIM AS HE SIGNED ALL OF MY TRANSCRIPTS CERTIFYING THE EVENTS AS BEING TRUE WHAT TOOK PLACE IN HIS COURTS.

FAST FORWARD TO NOW BECAUSE JUDGE RIVERA IS IN FACT HISPANIC TO FURTHER AMPLIFY BLACK AND BROWN JUDGES HAVE LIMITED TO NO JURISDICTION OVER RACIST WHITES INVOLVED IN RACIAL HATE CRIMES OR INJUSTICES WHERE PEOPLE OF COLOR ARE CONCERNED JUDGE MYRON MACKOFF TOOK OVER HER CALENDAR AND COMMITTED ALL TYPES OF CRIMINAL TERRORIST HATE CRIMES ON HER CALL DENYING MY MOTION PROVING RACIAL HATE CRIMES ARE REAL IN CHICAGO COURTS.

EDWARD BURKE CAN FIX CASES WHERE WHITE POLICEMAN CAN BEAT THE SHIT OUT OF A BLACK MAN KILLING HIM ON A CTA TRAIN AND HAND PICK JUDGES TO FIX THE CASE AND NOTHING FUCKING HAPPENS TO HIM.

OR HE CAN FIX A FUCKING CASE WHERE A BLACK MAN CAN STAB HIS WIFE IN THE MOUTH 40 FUCKING TIMES WITH THE ASSISTANCE OF HIS GAY LOVER FOR THE INSURANCE MONEY AND NOTHING FUCKING HAPPENS TO HIM.

WORSE HE FIXED CASES INVOLVING CHILD MOLESTATION'S AND NO CHARGES WERE EVER LEVIED AGAINST HIM PROVING THAT STATES ATTORNEY KIM FOXX IS ONLY ALLOWED TO COME AFTER BLACK AND BROWN MEN LIKE JUSSIE SMOLLETT OR R KELLY.

THIS VERY DOCUMENT PROVES WHAT, I HAVE BEEN ASSERTING FOR THE LAST 30 YEARS BLACK AND BROWN DEMOCRATS HAVE ACCEPTED THEIR ROLES AS INFERIOR MEN OR WOMEN, MODERN DAY SLAVES OR PUPPETS TO RACIST WHITE MEN CONTROLLING THE DEMOCRATIC MACHINE PARTY AND THE SICKEST PART THAT EVERY JUDGE LIVING IN THE CLOSET FEARING THAT I MAY LEARN IS THAT AND HAVE BEEN INFORMED, THAT SO MANY BLACK AND BROWN JUDGES MEN ARE ALLEGEDLY SLEEPING WITH WHITE JUDGES GOING ALONG WITH THIS DEMONIC SICKNESS SO THAT THEY CAN EMULATE THEIR POWER AND DESTROY PEOPLE'S LIVES BECAUSE AS COWARDS OR PUSSIES THEY DID NOT HAVE THE BACKBONE OR COURAGE STAND UP LIKE A MAN AND FIGHT OR SPEAK UP.

THIS IS A DOCUMENT DEPICTING RACIAL HATE BY WHITE MEN IN COOK COUNTY SURPASSING HUMAN IMAGINATION BEING NATIVE AMERICAN CHEROKEE AND AFRICAN AMERICAN IT IS THESE TYPE OF MEN THAT STOOPED TO DEMONIC LOWS TRYING TO PLACE ME IN THE IMAGE OF WHAT EXISTED IN THEIR HEARTS.

AN INDIVIDUAL IS IN HIS HEART WHAT HE THINKS HIMSELF TO BE AND OUT OF HIS HEART FLOWS THE ISSUES OF LIFE.

RACIST WHITE MEN AND SICK ASS NEGROES HAVE ELEVATED TO POSITIONS OF AUTHORITY THAT NONE OF THEM TRULY ARE QUALIFIED FOR SIMPLY AT THE EXPENSE OF DESTROYING AN INNOCENT PERSONS LIFE.         


IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY ILLINOIS
DOMESTIC RELATIONS DIVISION


IN RE                                                              )
                                                                         )
 Francoise Hightower                                      )        Judge Elizabeth Loredo-Rivera                     
        Petitioner                                                 )
                                                                         )        Cal 41 
          VS                                                          )                                  
                                                                         )        No. 88 D 079012                         
 Joe Louis Lawrence                                        )         
        Respondent                                              )        Room 1908

  

                                                                                                                                                                                                        
       RESPONDENT’S MOTION FOR DISQUALIFICATION OF JUDGE FOR “CAUSE” RACIAL HATE BIAS PREJUDICE PURSUANT to S.H.A. 735 ILCS 5/2 ---1001 (a) (2,3)    ENGAGING IN AN ORGANIZED CRIMINAL CONSPIRACY  CIVIL RIGHTS VIOLATIONS “FRAUD” TRESPASSING UPON THE LAWS ENGAGING IN TREASON OFFENSES MAKING ALL ORDERS A NULLITY w/AFFIDAVIT
   Now comes Respondent Joe Louis Lawrence, Counsel Pro Se in this cause respectfully represents to this court the reasons and files herewith her Affidavit in support of Respondent’s Motion for Disqualification et al;

1.      That the States Attorney having admitted to all facts recorded in said Motion to Vacate Jan 22, 2019 Order &For Reconsideration to Reinstate case 88 D 079012  & Vacate all judgments due to Orders being Void a Nullity case being “Fraudulent” et al;  Exhibits 1-15 establishes veracity surpassing human imagination.
A-    That said Motion validated the verity no Court or judge ever had  jurisdiction on the Respondent ignored Defendants valid Affidavits and Exhibits demonstrating Prejudice and Bias behavior pursuant to S.H.A. 735 ILCS 5/2-----1001 (a) (3); Sup. Ct. Rule 63 (C) (1), due to Racial Hate Bias.

2.      That because of the Respondent’s skin color and alleged sexual orientation Respondent has been held at a legal standard higher than every white unqualified attorney  or States Attorney he has been before in the courts in that, every white judge demonstrated their demonic hate by closing their eyes to the draconian criminal Terrorists Acts perpetrated and authored by Alderman Edward Burke.

3.      That said judge was allegedly forum-shopped to undermine the authority of Elizabeth Loredo- Rivera by circumventing her authority and directives that was clearly articulated to the Respondent by providing the court order to the States Attorney with proof of delivery when Respondent adhered to said directive, Mackoff was forum-shopped to use his robe and violate the oath of his duties and become complicit in an “Organized Conspiracy” by becoming a “Private Citizen” in denying Respondents motions in an attempt to protect the judges involved and the States Attorneys.

4.      That because of Mackoff’s corroborating role as a “Private Citizen” against the Respondent he has caused the case to be delayed with vexation causing the Respondent greater aggravation and emotional stress and judge Rivera to waste the courts time in preparing a transfer order, hereto attached court order March 19, 2019;

5.      That because of Mackoff’s corroborating role as a “Private Citizen” Respondent had to appear before judge Arce a Team Leader who is responsible for reassigning the case the Mackoff, hereto attached court order March 19, 2019;

6.      That because of Mackoff’s racist condescending behavior Respondent explained the issues of why and how no judge ever had jurisdiction after sitting in his court for almost an hour, he had no body in his court where Respondent had to wait for an unqualified States Attorney;

7.      That under no circumstances did judge Rivera ever sign any court order where the States Attorney was present and signed court orders which states Illinois Department of Healthcare and Family Services ex rel. on behalf of Francoise.

8.      That because of Mackoff’s Bias and Racist demeanor at the Respondent in his attempt to undermine him in his understanding of the laws and all legal procedures said he did not see anything wrong and told the States Attorney to prepare the order because he may or may not have jurisdiction but this had to go upstairs to be appealed;

9.      The States Attorney was so incompetent he did not know how to prepare a transfer order so the judge prepared the order for him.

10.  That Mackoff and the States Attorney colluding together in this “Organized Conspiracy” said States Attorney prepared the court order that says, “Illinois Department  of Healthcare and Family Services ex rel” scratched off at the bottom that he was in the court or the States Attorney was involved initialed FOC which means Friend of the Court, in his oral argument which was objected to, he asked that the court strike Respondent’s Motion because he can not argue child support orders now it is past 30 days.

11.  That Mackoff acting as a “Private Citizen” corroborated everything properly asserted in Judge Rivera’s court when she had her clerk to go in the computer and verify who the last attorney was and it was in fact the States Attorney and now that Mackoff has established with veracity his admission being complicit in Terrorist Acts against the Respondent.

12.  That Mackoff prepared the Transfer Order and it says O/C which means Order of the Court, he further stated that the May 18, 1988 court order in the Respondent’s exhibits was a copy a signature is on the original, Respondent countered assuming arguendo a signature is on the order, the order is void a Nullity because the court never had jurisdiction on me and still to this day you don’t have jurisdiction, that court order never authorized me to pay any child support and when Benjamin Mackoff was the Presiding judge he provided and certified a computer printout of actual court dates registered in the computer there were court orders and continuances that was never recorded in the database. My attorney appeared in court and vacated the wrong date when service was allegedly had on me is why this order is still legally standing, Judge Mackoff looked at the Respondent did not say anything. He denied the Motion hereto attached, March 19, 2019 Transfer Order.

13.  That Mackoff have corroborated in his actions and admissions Racial Hate and Terrorism is common place in Cook Courts or where ever white men filled with hate resides and the arguments and evidence presented are not considered as crimes but a norm.

14.  That unbeknown to judge Daniel Trevino can’t honestly depict him any way as a racist because of court demeanor and sensitivity and patience to helping out an elderly couple in a divorce proceeding during his tenure on the bench in judge Rivera’s absence see the Memo sent to the Chief Judge March 13, 2019 court order attached, acknowledges Assistant States Attorney in court along with the Respondent but she marks out the fact the States attorney is involved by recording FOC.
A-    Said States Attorney used her position and authority and became complicit in an Organized Criminal Conspiracy engaging in racist Terrorist Acts.

15.  That Blacks in Chicago in the Democratic Party closes their eyes to the unlawful mayhem many innocent or elderly men or women disenfranchised by whatever means experienced in the legal system because they are now the new colored Ku Klux Klan or puppets in the Democratic Machine. 

A-    To show fraud upon the court, the complaining party must establish that the alleged misconduct affected the integrity of the judicial process, either because the court itself was defrauded or because the misconduct was perpetrated by officers of the court. Alexander v. Robertson, 882, F. 2d 421,424 (9th Cir. 1989);

B-    A void judgment does not create any binding obligation. Kalb v. Feuerstein (1940) 308 US 433, 60 S Ct 343, 84 L, Ed 370.

  Properly alleged facts within an affidavit that are not contradicted by counter affidavit are taken as true, despite the existence of contrary averments in the adverse party’s pleadings. Professional Group Travel, Ltd. v. Professional Seminar Consultants Inc., 136 ILL App 3d 1084, 483 N.E. 2d 1291; Buzzard v. Bolger, 117 ILL App 3d 887, 453 N.E. 2d 1129 et al

16.   That Exhibits 1-16 demonstrate how Racist white men circumvent the laws and undermine people in color authority as they trivialize their authority and falsify any and every document necessary upholding Jim Crow Laws and enforce Terrorist Hate at the Defendant and at any persons like him in the courts by criminalizing us (them) so as to satisfy their doctrines of keeping people of color oppressed demeaned incarcerated by every means possible as articulated in every exhibit.

17.  Respondent’s Grandmother never had white hair and was 63 years old and did not look her age; furthermore, there was no 3rd floor rear apartment and she kept her gate locked, never answered her door for anyone not even family you had to call her first; otherwise, you would be sitting downstairs in the cold or rain.  

A-   Motions for Reconsideration are designed to bring to the court’s attention newly discovered evidence that was unavailable at time of original hearing, changes in existing law, or errors in court’s application of law. Continental Cas. Co. v. Security Ins. Co. of Hartford, App. 1 Dist. 1996, 216 Ill. Dec. 314, 279 Ill. App. 3d 815, 665 N.E. 2d 374, appeal dismissed, et al.;

B-     The purpose of a Motion to Vacate is to alert the trial court to errors it has made and to afford an opportunity for their correction. In re Marriage of King, App. 1 Dist. 2002, 270 Ill. Dec. 540, 336 Ill. App. 3d 83, 783 N.E. 2d 115, rehearing denied pending appeal; et al.

C-    Pursuant to 735 ILCS 5/2-612 Counsel never Objected to the sufficiency of Petitioners pleadings, Objections to sufficiency of pleadings either in form or substance must be made In trial court, and if not so made, they will be considered waived and cannot be raised for the first time on appeal. People ex rel. Deynes v. Harris, App. 1948, 77 N.E. 2d 439, 333 Ill. App. 280.

18.  That because of the above; Fraud admissibility great latitude is permitted in proving fraud C.J.S. Fraud 104 ET Seg. Fraud 51-57. where a question of fraud and deceit is the issue involved in a case,  great latitude is ordinarily permitted in the introduction of evidence, and courts allow the greatest liberality in the method of examination and in the scope of inquiry Vigus V. O’Bannon, 1886 8 N.E 788, 118 ILL 334. Hazelton V. Carolus, 1907 132 ILL. App. 512.

“In addition, when judges act when they do not have jurisdiction to act, or they enforce a void order (an order issued by a judge without jurisdiction), they become trespassers of the law, and are engaged in treason.”   

Ethics
            All Illinois lawyers must be familiar with the Illinois Rules of Professional Conduct, and trail lawyers must be particularly familiar with the rules that apply specially to them.

            RPC 3.3, entitled “Conduct Before a Tribunal,” sets forth the standards to be followed by the trial lawyer during “battle.” Section (a) of that rule states:
(a)  In appearing in a professional capacity before a tribunal, a lawyer shall not:
(1)  make a statement of material fact or law to a tribunal which the lawyer knows or reasonably should know is false;

(2)  fail to disclose to a tribunal a material fact known to the lawyer when disclosure is necessary to avoid assisting a criminal or fraudulent act by the client;

(3)  fail to disclose to the tribunal legal authority in the controlling jurisdiction known to the lawyer to be directly adverse to the position of the client and not disclosed by opposing counsel;

(4)  Offer evidence that the lawyer knows to be false. If a lawyer has offered material evidence and comes to know of its falsity, the lawyer shall take reasonable remedial measures;

(5)  participate in the creation or preservation of evidence when the lawyer knows or reasonably should know the evidence is false ;

(6)  counsel or assist the client in conduct the lawyer knows to be illegal of fraudulent;

(7)  engage in other illegal conduct or conduct in violation of these Rules;

(8)  fail to disclose the identities of the clients represented and of the persons who employed the lawyer unless such information is privileged or irrelevant;

(9)  intentionally degrade a witness or other person by stating or alluding to personal facts concerning that person which are not relevant to the case;

(10) in trial, allude to any matter that the lawyer does not reasonably believe is relevant or that will not be supported by admissible evidence, assert personal knowledge of facts in issue except when testifying as a witness, or state a personal opinion as to the justness of a cause, the credibility of a witness, the culpability of a civil litigant or the guilt or innocence of and accused, but a lawyer may argue, on analysis of evidence, for any position or conclusion with respect to the matter stated herein;


Acts constituting direct, criminal contempt
          A wide variety of acts may constitute a direct, criminal contempt. And act may be criminal contempt even though it is also an indictable crime. Beattie v. People, 33 Ill. App 651, 1889 WL 2373 (1st Dist. 1889). As is making false representations to the court. People v. Katelhut, 322 Ill. App. 693, 54 N.E.2d 590 (1st Dist. 1944). Misconduct of an officer of the court is punishable as contempt. People ex rel. Rusch v. Levin, 305 Ill. App. 142, 26 N.E. 2d 895 (1st Dist. 1939).

Official misconduct is a criminal offense; and a public officer or employee commits misconduct, punishable by fine, imprisonment, or both, when, in his official capacity, he intentionally or recklessly fails to perform any mandatory duty as required by law; or knowingly performs an act which he knows he is forbidden by law to perform; or with intent to obtain a personal advantage for himself or another, he performs an act in excess of his lawful authority ….S.H.A. Ch 38 33-3.

A-     The Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals held that the Circuit Court   of Cook County is a criminal enterprise. U.S. v. Murphy, 768 F.2d 1518,     1531 (7th Cir. 1985)”.
The United States Supreme Court recently acknowledged the judicial corruption in Cook County, when it stated that Judge "Maloney was one of many dishonest judges exposed and convicted through 'Operation Greylord', a labyrinthine federal investigation of judicial corruption in Chicago". Bracey v. Gramley, case No. 96-6133 (June 9, 1997).
Since judges who do not report the criminal activities of other judges become principals in the criminal activity, 18 U.S.C. Section 2, 3 & 4, and since no judges have reported the criminal activity of the judges who have been convicted, the other judges are as guilty as the convicted judges.   

  1. That Mackoff demonstrated Bias and racist collusion by signing his name on court orders that was clearly fraudulent
A-    He used his robe and unlawful authority in the same identical manner as the other Judges named in the Motion accompanied with Affidavits proving Black and Brown lives don’t matter due to Terrorist Control Racist Democrats have over the legal tribunals 735 ILCS 5/2—1001(a)(3) (West 2006). Although the statute does not define “cause”, Illinois courts have held that in such circumstances, actual prejudice has been required to FORCE REMOVAL of a judge from a case, that is, either prejudicial trial conduct or personal bias. Rosewood Corp. n Transamerica Insurance Co., 57 Ill 2d 247, 311 N.E. 2d 673 (1974; In re Marriage of Kozloff, 101 Ill 2d 526, 532, 79 Ill. Dec 165 463 N.E. 2d 719 (1984); see also People v. Vance, 76 Ill. 2d 171, 181, 28 Ill. Dec. 508, 390 N.E. 2d 867 (1979).


20.  In that African American judges ignorant of the laws are just as worse as racist judges, in that, many of them closes their eyes and commit the same acts as racist judges, due to them selling out their ethnicity for whatever alleged fee or favor they can receive;
  
  1. The Illinois Supreme Court has held that "if the magistrate has not such jurisdiction, then he and those who advise and act with him, or execute his process, are trespassers." Von Kettler et.al. v. Johnson, 57 Ill. 109 (1870)
Under Federal law which is applicable to all states, the U.S. Supreme Court stated that if a court is "without authority, its judgments and orders are regarded as nullities. They are not voidable, but simply void; and form no bar to a recovery sought, even prior to a reversal in opposition to them. They constitute no justification; and all persons concerned in executing such judgments or sentences, are considered, in law, as trespassers." Elliot v. Piersol, 1 Pet. 328, 340, 26 U.S. 328, 340 (1828)
The Illinois Supreme Court held that if a court "could not hear the matter upon the jurisdictional paper presented, its finding that it had the power can add nothing to its authority, - it, had no authority to make that finding." The People v. Brewer, 128 Ill. 472, 483 (1928). The judges listed below had no legal authority (jurisdiction) to hear or rule on certain matters before them. They acted without any jurisdiction.
When judges act when they do not have jurisdiction to act, or they enforce a void order (an order issued by a judge without jurisdiction), they become trespassers of the law, and are engaged in treason.

A-    That Judge Mackoff with Brazen disregard for the laws openly articulated he read everything recorded in the Motion couldn’t see how the court had any jurisdiction, in that he may be wrong this is a matter for an appeal, that due to the judges Bias and or Prejudice conduct pursuant to Sup Ct Rule 71, Sufficient for Removal, conduct which does not constitute a criminal offense may be sufficiently violative of the Judicial Canons to warrant removal for cause. Napolitano v Ward, 457 F 2d 279 (7th Cir.), cert denied, 409 U.S. 1037, 93 S. Ct. 512, 34 L. Ed. 2d 486 (1972).

22. That judge Mackoff has demonstrated an unknown interest in this matter which has blinded his objectivity in adjudicating the merits of this matter, due to the aforementioned; Sup Ct. Rule 63 (c) (1) (d) mandates disqualification where the judge has an interest in the proceeding. (eff. April 16, 2007).

A judge’s disrespect for the rules of court demonstrates disrespect for the law. Judges are disciplined under Canon 2A for violating court rules and procedures. Judge ignored mandated witness order in attempt to accommodate witnesses’ schedules; Citing Canon 2A the court noted, “[a] court’s indifference to clearly stated rules breeds disrespect for and discontent with our justice system. Government cannot demand respect of the laws by its citizens when its tribunals ignore those very same laws”)

A-    Fraud upon the court is a basis for equitable relief. Luttrell v. United States, 644 F. 2d 1274, 1276 (9th Cir. 1980); see Abatti v. C.I.R. , 859 F 2d 115, 118 (9th Cir. 1988) “it is beyond question that a court may investigate a question as to whether there was fraud in the procurement of a judgment” Universal Oil Products Co. v. Root Refining Co., 328 U.S. 575, 66 S. Ct. 1176, 90 L. Ed. 1447. The power of the court to unearth such a fraud is the power to unearth it effectively. See Hazel-Atlas Glass Co. v. Hartford-Empire Co., 322 U.S. 238, 64 S. Ct. 997, 88 L. Ed. 1250; Sprague v. Ticonic National Bank, 1184 and United States v. Throckmorton, 98 U.S. (8 Otto) 61, 25 L. Ed. 93.

B-    A judge is an officer of the court, as are all members of the Bar. A judge is a judicial officer, paid by the Government to act impartially and lawfully”. People v. Zajic, 88 Ill. App 3d 477, 410 N.E. 2d 626. “A void judgment is regarded as a nullity, and the situation is the same as it would be if there were no judgment. It has no legal or binding force or efficacy for any purpose or at any place….It is not entitled to enforcement. 30A Am Judgments 43, 44, 45. Henderson v Henderson 59 S.E. 2d  227-232  

C-    “A Void Judgment from its inception is and forever continues to be absolutely null, without legal efficacy, ineffectual to bind parties or support a right, of no legal force and effect whatever, and incapable of confirmation, ratification, or enforcement in any manner or to any degree. “A void judgment, order or decree may be attacked at any time or in any court, either directly or collaterally” Oak Park Nat Bank v. Peoples Gas Light & Coke Col, 46 Ill. App. 2d 385, 197 N.E. 3d 73, 77, (1st Dist. 1964)           

 That under 18 U.S.C. 242 and 42 U.S.C. 1985 (3) (b). A judge does not have the discretion on whether or not to follow Supreme Ct. Rules, but a duty to follow. People v. Gersh, 135 Ill. 2d 384 (1990).

Under penalties as provided by law pursuant to 735 1265 5\1-109, the undersigned certifies that the statements set forth in this instrument are true and correct, except as to matters therein stated to be on information and belief and as to such matters, the undersigned certifies as aforesaid that he verily believes the same to be true.
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   
                                                                                 Respectfully submitted,

                                                                               ___________________________
                                                                                   Joe Louis Lawrence
                                                                                   PO Box 490075
                                                                                  Chicago, IL. 60649
                                                                                      312 965-6455
           
     









                                                                                                                                       

WHEREFORE the aforementioned reasons Defendant respectfully Prays for the Relief


  
1.    For an Order Vacating and Disqualifying Judge Mackoff Instanter for the Criminal Acts of Trespassing upon the Laws on Judge Rivera’s Calendar call in her absence Jan. 22, 2019;   

2.    For an Order transferring certain parts of this matter to a Judge in the Federal  venue due to Corruption and Fraud;

3.    For an Order reimbursing all fees and costs to the Defendant for the enforcement of this matter;

4.    For an Order of Sanctions Remands and Disbarments of all attorneys involved in this matter;    

5.    For the entry of an Order awarding to your Petitioner for such other relief and any other relief necessary as equity may require of which this court may deem overwhelmingly just;
























IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY ILLINOIS
                                         DOMESTIC RELATIONS DIVISION
                                                      EXHIBIT LIST
1.)    March 19, 2019 Court Order from Judge Rivera transferring case to Judge Arce who has been described as a Team Lead to transfer the matter to judge Mackoff not P.J. Dickler.

2.)    March 19, 2019 Court Order from Judge Arce transferring said case to Judge Mackoff not P.J. Dickler.

3.)    March 19, 2019 Court Order from Judge Mackoff where the Assistant States Attorney acknowledges representing Francoise on behalf of Ill. Dept of Healthcare et al.

4.)   March 19, 2019 Court Order prepared by Judge Mackoff transferring the case back to Judge Arce. 

5.)    March 13, 2019 Memo to Chief Judge Timothy Evans with 2 court orders attached.

6.)    February 8, 1988 Court Transcript Certified by Anita Todd Washington Court Reporter.

7.)    February 21 1988 2 pages Affidavit falsified by Rock Detective Agency.

8.)    May 2, 1988 Court Transcript Certified by Phyllis J. Epps Court Reporter where the Assistant States Attorney Richard Senar was in Court on behalf of Francoise.

9.)     May 18, 1988 Court Transcript Certified by Oona Campbell-Smith.

10.)                         Certified May 18, 1988 Court Order (March 21, 2019) no attorney info or Judges information.

11.)                         Certified August 3, 1988 Court Order (March 21, 2019) no Judges signature and it is not recorded on the database.

12.)  June 12, 1991 Subpoena sent to Northern Trust Bank seeking financial information from Respondent’s grandmother subpoena states In Re the Marriage of Francoise Hightower 2 pages respondent was never married to her.

13.)  July 6, 1990 Affidavit for Wage Deduction Order sent to CTA Falsified by Joseph v. Roddy & Assoc.

14.)  March 1, 1977 Certified Statement of Disposition where William Jenkins Hightower was arrested for allegedly impregnating his minor daughter.

15.)  January 3, 2007 Notarized Affidavit Chronology of Unlawful Contempt Charges w/Affidavit never challenged or addressed.

16.)  March 21, 2019 Cook County Receipt Certification fee of $18.00.
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY ILLINOIS
DOMESTIC RELATIONS DIVISION


IN RE                                                              )
                                                                         )
 Francoise Hightower                                      )        Judge Elizabeth Loredo-Rivera                     
        Petitioner                                                 )
                                                                         )        Cal 41 
          VS                                                          )                                  
                                                                         )        No. 88 D 079012                         
 Joe Louis Lawrence                                        )         
        Respondent                                              )        Room 1908

  


 NOTICE OF 
   
       RESPONDENT’S MOTION FOR DISQUALIFICATION OF JUDGE FOR “CAUSE” RACIAL HATE BIAS PREJUDICE PURSUANT to S.H.A. 735 ILCS 5/2 ---1001 (a) (2,3)    ENGAGING IN AN “ORGANIZED” CRIMINAL CONSPIRACY  CIVIL RIGHTS VIOLATIONS “FRAUD” TRESPASSING UPON THE LAWS ENGAGING IN TREASON OFFENSES MAKING ALL ORDERS A NULLITY w/AFFIDAVIT

Please be advised that on April 16 , 2019, Defendant has filed before this Circuit Court, Motion for Disqualification et al; and will present said legally sufficient instrument before Judge Rivera or any Judge in her stead April 16, at 9:30 am in room 1908.       
                                             U.S. Attorney
                                                  John R. Laush, Jr.
                                          219 South Dearborn Suite 500
                                                   Chicago, Ill 60605

                                             FBI  Dir.  Jeffrey S. Sallet
                                            2111 West Roosevelt Road
                                               Chicago, IL. 60612

            Judge Grace Dickler Room 1901 Daley Center, Chg. Il 60601


        Cook County State’s Attorney            Chief Judge Timothy C. Evans
         Kim Foxx                                              50 West Washington, Suite 2600
         50 West Washington, Suite 500                Chicago, Ill. 60601
         Chicago, Ill. 60601                          
                                                                         
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned hereby certifies that the above notice and all attachments were caused to be personally delivered, to the above parties at the addresses provided before 5:00 pm on  March 22, 2019.
                                                                ________________________
                                                                  Respectfully Submitted,  Counsel Pro Se
                                                                              Joe Louis Lawrence


























             









IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY ILLINOIS
DOMESTIC RELATIONS DIVISION


IN RE                                                              )
                                                                         )
 Francoise Hightower                                      )        Judge Elizabeth Loredo-Rivera                     
        Petitioner                                                 )
                                                                         )        Cal 41 
          VS                                                          )                                  
                                                                         )        No. 88 D 079012                         
 Joe Louis Lawrence                                        )         
        Respondent                                              )        Room 1908

  





                                                                                                                   
                                                 AFFIDAVIT

STATE OF ILLINOIS )
                                        )
COUNTY OF COOK   )


I Joe Louis Lawrence Counsel Pro Se being duly sworn on oath states the aforementioned pleadings enumerated within said motion pursuant to 735 1265 5/1-109, the undersigned certifies that the statements set forth in this instrument are true and correct, except as to matters therein stated to be on information and belief and as to such matters, the undersigned certifies as aforesaid that he verily believes the same to be true.

Respectfully Submitted                                                         Notary
                                                                       
____________________
PO Box 490075
Chicago, IL. 60649
312 965-6455

No comments:

Post a Comment