BEFORE YOU VOTE DEMOCRATIC READ HOW DEMOCRATS DESTROY MEN OF COLOR AND RECRUIT ONLY THOSE ETHNIC INDIVIDUALS WHO WILL DO WHAT THY ARE TOLD
First of all, the very acts perpetrated in this post are from members of the Democratic Political Machine and because the Democrats control and sponsors all black and brown members in their party not one of them will speak up or speak against anything that is deemed atrocious.
In that, many are only puppets figureheads to disguise how the true policies of "Jim Crow Laws" are still being enforced by using persons of color to enforce their hateful doctrines.
Did you know the Republican Party was founded by freed Black Slaves and Anti-Slavery Whites?
The Democratic Party was the Party of Slavery and Lynching, they destroyed and committed genocide on innocent families of color in 1854 and is doing the same thing now by recruiting and appointing inferior Black & Brown people today to destroy any and all intelligent persons of color who challenges their doctrines in the courts or any capacity that might expose them.
Read how members of the Democratic Party condoned and embraced a Police Officer who raped and sexually abused his minor biological daughters by impregnating them as a plethora of racist white men and inferior or candy ass men went along to protect the sick pedophile by framing me for a crime that, I never committed.
Read how members of the Democratic Party destroyed my children psychologically by forcing me off my job unlawfully stealing my wages while off work injured on duty, garnisheeing my wages for child support to the very woman who was impregnated by her biological father.
Read how members of the Democratic Party in the legal tribunal "Trespassed upon the Laws" and ignored every document that was presented establishing my innocence validating the verity, Chicago, Illinois is still in the "Dark Ages" of injustice where JIM CROW still rules!
Read how members of the Democratic Party collaborated with certain racist Republicans to conspire with them by upholding and ignoring every legal document that, unequivocally demonstrated how, I successfully litigated and defeated every attorney that the Democratic Machine deployed at me, take notice how they went into my credit report deleted all entries that showed how, I had excellent credit of 800+, look at how Black judges Vladerrama and Boyd retaliated on my son and children TO PLEASE THEIR ALLEGED LOVERS IN THE DEMOCRATIC MACHINE!
This is why Lee Oties Love, Jr. @redbilla is not communicating because the Democrats have made sure he remain unemployed, by blackballing him trying to lock him up unlawfully for not making child support payments for speaking up and against racial injustice by the Democratic Machine
What people don't realize is that, the same violent cowardly thug "Niggers" Shooting and Killing innocent children and people on the south and West sides of Chicago are down town in City Hall operating in disguise destroying their own people to please and be accepted by a Party that don't respect them or their ethnic groups.
AFTER READING THE HORRIFIC ACCOUNTS NOTED IN THIS POST IT WOULD BE SURPRISING ANY SELF-RESPECTING PERSON OF ANY COLOR COULD EVER VOTE DEMOCRATIC IN ILLINOIS AGAIN
Watch "Democrats Hate Black People #walkaway YouTube https://youtu.be/ZbP33yl_kT4
Lastly, very important after reviewing the aforementioned video the following video gives an actual account to my post Watch "The Republican Party was founded by freed Black Slaves and Anti-Slavery White Americans"! on YouTube
IN THE
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT
CHICAGO, ILLINOIS 60604
Joe Louis Lawrence } Appeal from the United
} States District Court for
} The Northern District of Plaintiff-Appellant } Illinois, Eastern Division
}
V }
No. }
} No. 16 CV 7434
420 East Ohio, Chicago Housing Authority }
345 East Ohio, K2 Apartments, City of Chicago, }
Commission on Human Relations Supreme Court }
of Illinois, Alderman Edward Burke, }
Franklin U. Valderrama, Mary Lane Mikva } Robert M. Dow, Jr
} Judge
Defendant-Appellees
MOTION TO SUPPLEMENT
July 31st, 2018
PETITION FOR REVIEW
THAT CORROBORATES JUDICIAL EXTORTION, TREASON OFFENSES
TO: Judicial Council of the Seventh Circuit
FROM:
CC: All parties referenced in the Certificate of Service
SUBJECT: Why this Complaint against Robert M. Dow, Jr. should never have been dismissed:
Associate Cook County Judge now “Private Citizen” William S. Boyd, has engaged in a plethora of unlawful acts including “Treason” by “Trespassing upon the laws” “Fixing cases” in the Domestic Relations Division.
1.) That William S. Boyd had evidence in his possession where Respondent Bernadette Kabir had Defaulted, by not responding or answering said Dissolution of Marriage Petition, hereto attached, VOL 1 Group Ex A Computer printout of the aforementioned matter;
A- That as of the filing of said document e mailed to the Plaintiff no where in the printout does it indicate that the attorney filed anything.
2.) That the Plaintiff had presented and e filed a Motion for Default Prove-up July 18, 2018, hereto attached, as Gr Ex B;
3.) That the Plaintiff received an e mail of documents purportedly e filed from attorney Joan Colen, hereto attached, Vol 2 Gr Ex C
A- Respondent’s 2-615 Motion to Strike Petitioner’s Petition for Dissolution of Marriage, purportedly filed July 20, 2018 but not recorded in the Clerk’s database;
B- Counter-Petition for Dissolution of Marriage, purportedly filed July 20, 2018 but not recorded in the Clerk’s database;
C- An Appearance purportedly filed July 20, 2018 but not recorded in the Clerk’s database;
D- A Notice of Motion for Temporary Maintenance purportedly filed July 30, 2018 but not recorded in the Clerk’s database;
4.) That on Wednesday July 25, 2018, Plaintiff provided a Courtesy Copy of the aforementioned documents that was to be presented on the July 30, 2018 Motion call at 9:30am, hereto attached.
5.) That on July 30, 2018 “Private Citizen” Boyd “Trespassed upon the Laws” in an arrogant venomous manner by DENYING said default, stating “the statutes has changed” furthermore, when the Plaintiff informed him that none of the documents being addressed before the court is in the computer system in that Plaintiff checked the computers this morning, “Private Citizen” Boyd’s response was this, “did you receive an email? Plaintiff’s reply was yes, “Private Citizen" Boyd” stated, “it did not have to be on the computer if it is in your email”
A- That Judge Boyd thought he was talking to a dummy in the Plaintiff and that whatever he said in court was supposed to be accepted as the gospel;
B- How can this judge rule on documents that is not properly before the court but deny everything that is properly filed within the system?
6.) That because Joan Colen has favor with “Private Citizen” Boyd and could violate any laws deemed inappropriate, she presented to the Plaintiff a Financial Affidavit falsified by his ex-wife stating she lived 9049 S. Bishop, Apt 1, which is her brothers apartment, she is still living in the home with the Plaintiff, hereto attached as Vol 3 Gr Ex E.
7.) That that said judge violated the oath of his duties recognizing he had no jurisdiction as he “Trespassed upon the Laws” by corroborating his role in an “Organized Conspiracy” by trying to enforce the Plaintiff to comply with a series of unlawful acts, hereto attached, as Gr Ex D Court Order that Boyd refused to sign stating because Plaintiff was not an attorney he did not receive a sign court order only a stamped order in violation of Sup Ct Rule 272, thereby demonstrating said person engaging in “Treason” Under Federal law which is applicable to all states, the U.S. Supreme Court stated that if a court is "without authority, its judgments and orders are regarded as nullities. They are not voidable, but simply void; and form no bar to a recovery sought, even prior to a reversal in opposition to them. They constitute no justification; and all persons concerned in executing such judgments or sentences, are considered, in law, as trespassers." Elliot v. Piersol, 1 Pet. 328, 340, 26 U.S. 328, 340 (1828)
The U.S. Supreme Court, in Scheuer v. Rhodes, 416 U.S. 232, 94 S. Ct. 1683, 1687 (1974) stated that "when a state officer acts under a state law in a manner violative of the Federal Constitution, he "comes into conflict with the superior authority of that Constitution, and he is in that case stripped of his official or representative character and is subjected in his person to the consequences of his individual conduct. The State has no power to impart to him any immunity from responsibility to the supreme authority of the United States." [Emphasis supplied in original]. By law, a judge is a state officer. The judge then acts not as a judge, but as a private individual (in his person).
8.) That said July 30, 2018 court order is in fact a Nullity, Void “without authority” Judge Boyd became a “Private Citizen” engaging in a plethora of “Treason Offenses”
9.) That “Private Citizen” Boyd committed the same criminal aforementioned acts in Joe Louis Lawrence’s Divorce matter when his ex- wife was in Default Case # 08 D 10264;
10.) That a total of 10 judges somehow was on this case as it was “Fixed”
11.) That on Oct. 27, 2008, Petitioner filed a Petition for Dissolution of Marriage where the case was assigned to former attorney William S. Boyd who represented him in the Hightower v. Lawrence matter;
12.) That said “Private Citizen” allegedly negotiated a judges position out of deceiving the Petitioner and abandoning him in the middle of the litigation;
13.) That on Nov. 17, 2008, Petitioners’ ex-wife being properly served, filed her Appearance Nov. 17, 2008;
14.) That Petitioner filed an Emergency Motion Seeking Custody of said minor children Nov. 24, 2008;
15.) That former attorney now judge Boyd appointed former attorney (Lester Barclay) as the child Rep who returned his $1000.00 retainer from the same bogus paternity case 88 D 079012;
A- Respondent being in Default there was no need for a Child Rep.
16.) That on Jan 26, 2009, Petitioner filed a Motion to Supplement Motion to Modify Emergency Intervention Plan et al., hereto attached, Gr Ex F;
A- That Lester Barclay pursuant to Par 1 of Page 1, states unequivocally, “Lester Barclay court appointed attorney for minor children without investigation or any motions before the court impeaching any inaccuracies on the part of the Intervener or Respondent, informed the court, Jan 12, 2009, “He embraces the Interveners Report”
17.) That Petitioner filed a Motion for Default Judgment Motion to Modify Emergency Interveners Plan et al. March 26, 2009, “Private Citizen” Boyd ignored everything the Petitioner filed, hereto attached as Gr Ex G;
A- “Private Citizen” Boyd became a Law unto himself as he “Trespassed upon the Laws” DENIED every Motion, Petition accompanied with an Affidavit;
B- “Private Citizen” Boyd allowed an ACTIVE POLICE DETECTIVE (Brian E. Wright) to come in and represent said ex-wife as an attorney;
C- In that, said attorney was no stranger to Boyd, during and before the hearing or court Boyd would summon Brian to his chambers, Petitioner would follow because he was the attorney prosecuting his matter, Boyd said he was not an attorney, he could not come into the judge’s chambers, that was a what the fuck moment!
D- That many Deputies and law enforcement officials informed the Petitioner that he was going through so much in the courts because there was too many “Candy Asses” on the bench;
18.) In addition, when judges act when they do not have jurisdiction to act, or they enforce a void order (an order issued by a judge without jurisdiction), they become trespassers of the law, and are engaged in treason.
Pursuant to Sup Ct. Rule 272 “if at the time of announcing final judgment the judge requires the submission of a form of written judgment to be signed by the judge et al” the judgment becomes final only when the signed judgment is filed— Judges are bound by this rule before their court orders are valid;
B. Citing Canon 2A the court noted, “[a] court’s indifference to clearly stated rules breeds disrespect for and discontent with our justice system. Government cannot demand respect of the laws by its citizens when its tribunals ignore those very same laws”)
C. Section 1983 of U.S.C.S. contemplates the depravation of Civil Rights through the Unconstitutional Application of a Law by conspiracy or otherwise. Mansell v. Saunders (CA 5 F 1A) 372 F 573, especially if the conspiracy was actually carried into effect, where an action is for a conspiracy to interfere with Civil Rights under 42 U.S.C.S. 1985 (3), or for the depravation of such rights under 42 U.S.C.S. 1983, if the conspiracy was actually carried into effect and plaintiff was thereby deprived of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the United States Constitution and Laws, the gist of the action may be treated as one for the depravation of rights under 42 U.S.C.S. 1983, Lewis v. Brautigam (CA 5 F 1a) 227 F 2d 124, 55 Alr 2d 505, John W. Strong, 185, 777-78 (4 th ed. 1992)
D. That the Judge erred considerably when it received notice and knowledge of other Judges complicit in a Criminal Conspiracy failed to follow Canon Ethics Leslie W. Abramson, 25 Hofstra L. Rev. 751 (1997). The Judges Ethical Duty to Report Misconduct by Other Judges and Lawyers and its effect on Judicial Independence.
E. That because many white nationalist have infiltrated the Democratic party and has methodically overturned the legal tribunal recruiting the necessary persons who will keep their mouths shut and continue the terrorist mayhem on innocent citizens fighting injustice in the courts;
The Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals held that the Circuit Court of Cook County is a criminal enterprise. U.S. v. Murphy, 768 F.2d 1518, 1531 (7th Cir. 1985).
The United States Supreme Court recently acknowledged the judicial corruption in Cook County, when it stated that Judge "Maloney was one of many dishonest judges exposed and convicted through 'Operation Greylord', a labyrinthine federal investigation of judicial corruption in Chicago". Bracey v. Gramley, case No. 96-6133 (June 9, 1997).
Since judges who do not report the criminal activities of other judges become principals in the criminal activity, 18 U.S.C. Section 2, 3 & 4, and since no judges have reported the criminal activity of the judges who have been convicted, the other judges are as guilty as the convicted judges.
The criminal activities that the Federal Courts found in the Circuit Court of Cook County still exist, and are today under the care, custody and control of Judge Timothy C. Evans (Chief Judge). The Circuit Court of Cook County.
21.) That judges within the Democratic Political Machine has systematically denied every document, motion, affidavit court transcript put before the courts demonstrating members within the Political Machine has used their robes influence and authority to continuously enforce Jim Crow laws outlawed by the United States Supreme Court;
22.) “Ed Burke approached Judge Cieslik and told him to withdraw from the case. When the judge refused to withdraw from the case, he told the judge. Whats the big deal? “It’s only a Fucking Nigger” Anne Burke, also requested that the judge withdraw from the case saying “My husband was the one who put you on the bench”
The Racist men “Organized in said Conspiracies” were so use to dealing with inferior males of color did not see or respect them as men tried to exhaust the same intimidating tactics as demonstrated in this case on the Petitioner:
23.) That every person who happens to be “masters of darkness” endorsing self-hatred at persons of color or racial hatred they would systematically term the Petitioner as “Frivolous” and simply deny any and every document he filed, is what made this entire operation a success because it was those judges who were either Bias, Racist, Inferior and or Corrupt;
24.) That said judges complicit in said Terrorist Acts had no real need to have a comprehensive understanding of the laws because if the case was “Fixed” there was no read to listen or read whatever the Petitioner wrote or presented before the courts because there were many in the legal system ruled with pure hate in their hearts against persons of color as in the Petitioners case;
25.) That no Afro American judge or Politician male will step up and admonish whites complicit in said acts, they go along with wrong so as to get along with the wrong doers which is why Chicago is in the apathetic state it is in today can’t blame the white man for everything too blacks have sold out participating in the genocide and mass incarceration of their own race;
THAT WILLIAM S. BOYD AS PETITIONERS ATTORNEY WAS COGNIZANT OF THE AFOREMENTIONED
26.) That judges within the Democratic Political Machine has systematically denied every document, motion, affidavit court transcript put before the courts demonstrating members within the Political Machine have used their robes influence and authority to continuously enforce Jim Crow Laws outlawed by the United States Supreme Court;
A- On the Bogus Paternity case 88 D 079012 where Secret Service Agents contacted Petitioner on another unrelated matter and mentioned the paternity case as Bogus Plaintiff identified them as FBI agents they laughed and said they are not any of those “Wussies”
B- That the FBI did not have to create a Bogus case snaring corrupt judges, they snared themselves, in that it took at least 21 Cook County judges to continuously “FIX” falsify court orders under Edward Burkes authority in spite of certain alleged Irishmen and others pleading with him to leave the Plaintiff alone;
C- In that the worst part is that said judges David E. Haracz, Timothy P. Murphy & Ronald Bartkowicz a former CTA attorney working in workman’s compensation department was appointed as judge to issue an order of protection order against Petitioner on behalf of Chicago Police Officer Francoise Louise Barbara Hightower, he was not aware she was a Police officer but was using Public Aid and attorney Joseph V. Roddy trying to extort money from him using the child support scheme unlawfully, Roddy was successful in that Petitioners wages were garnisheed to the Law office of Joseph c/o Francoise Hightower the secretary at Reliable School Bus company displayed the cancelled checks to the Petitioner, she said she has processed 100’s of child support payments and never seen anything like this the President of the company questioned the unsigned court order, Petitioner had to receive welfare and food stamps they garnisheed so much money from the Petitioner, he was not able to provide for his family;
D- Petitioner was Remanded in custody while in his CTA uniform as the judge used his unlawfully authority helping the CTA take his badge off his body, but the Cook County Sheriff made the attorney sign on their stationery what they were removing from his body while handcuffed, Sheriff Beradi told them you know this is not right!
E- Judge Bartkowicz used his robe unlawfully to help the CTA from paying him his lost wages that the CTA stole while he was off work injured on duty and ordered him to go drive a school bus and threatened him if he was to try and return back to CTA he was going to have him remanded into custody because CTA said “You are not an employee”;
F- Cook County Sheriff informed the Petitioner that the judge was a former CTA employee and should not be on your case, “Fuck what he said, we run the courts” you are not going to jail, they escorted him home and picked him up for court;
G- Petitioner filed a Motion Disqualifying Ronald Bartkowicz from the case for Bias and conflict of interest, said judge asked the Petitioner, it is true, and how did you know? He recused himself and the case went to Morgan Hamilton who hated men of color, she and (Franklin Valderrama acted like they came from the same womb);
H- Morgan Hamilton was the supervising Associate judge never elected helped judge Bartkowicz by falsifying a court order saying “Petitioner left a cloud of mistrust saying he was a CTA employee” the Cook County Sheriff were very vociferous in speaking up in Petitioners behalf about the corruption in the paternity case, so she reassigned the case to David Delgado he read the warrant, he became adamant and said if he ever found out Petitioner was a CTA employee, he was going to lock up everybody at the CTA;
I- Judge Delgado noticed the warrant was missing a lot of pertinent information, he told Francoise’s attorney, I cannot send him to jail on this it has no return date, no court information, it was basically blank, he said if he was to send Petitioner to jail, he would never come out and be lost in the system an attempt was to made on his life Judge Bartkowicz was heard saying he wanted no part of this and the day Petitioner was supposed to be in jail another person was locked up and hung in the jail cell;
J- The case was reassigned to Judge Lester Bonoguru, see unlawful1.blogspot.com Post Thursday August 30, 2012, Certified Affidavit demonstrating the Chronology of unlawful Contempt Charges issued by Racist Hateful white men operating on behalf of their Boss Edward Burke;
K- Judge Lester Bonoguru stated, Page 3, Par 10, Post August 30, 2012, unlawful1.blogspot.com, “He was aware who, I was and what was going on he said the problem here is that a lot of men paid a lot of money getting their law school education and you are embarrassing them” et al.
27.) That no African American, Latino or otherwise in authority have any real authority over Caucasians in the Democratic party this has already been admitted to throughout said pleadings prepared by the Complainant;
28.) This case amplifies and demonstrates the real hatred corroborated Democrats and certain Republicans truly have towards persons of color and their families the Demonic Terrorist Psychotic Acts they are willing to exhaust making sure Petitioner or anyone like him not receive any justice controlled by the Democratic Party.
29.) A- Hereto attached, Gr Ex I Parenting Plan regarding Petitioners minor child, and how “Private Citizen” Boyd who was aware of of his family’s mental illnesses and issues that the Petitioner was battling thought, they had an inside track in trying to destroy him by trying to obstruct him from continuously defending himself against racial injustice in the courts.
A- That Lester Barclay withdrew from the case when he and Brian Wright were not successful in trying to impeach the Petitioners character when he cross-examined his ex-wife for almost 2 hours they objected to his line of questioning at least 10 times, Morgan Hamilton who had an obvious hate for the Petitioner over-ruled them on 9 objections and asked him to rephrase only one question;
B- Said Ex-wife admitted to working at the VA Hospital and receiving Public Aid, Morgan Hamilton wrote down every answer in a judges book.
C- That Brian Wright was trying to encourage his minor children to say he was violent and abusive to their mother in an attempt to discredit him from having custody of the minors, said attorney (Ruth B. Watson) threatened to withdraw from the case, she snapped and said, she was not going to be a part of children being coached to lie on their dad when it was obvious Petitioner was not abusive in any manner.
D- Morgan Hamilton did not want said attorney to withdraw so no child was called to testify against him case was delayed.
30.) In that, not one Gay judge, Bisexual or closet individual opened their mouths denouncing the terrorists acts of heinous injustices levied at the Complainant because of their allegiance to “Private Citizens” where many of the judges are only on the bench due to political influences, enormous contributions to allegedly Michael Madigan or Edward Burkes political campaigns or certain black male judges who maybe in intimate relationships with powerful white judges with wives and children.
A- That pursuant to Gr Ex H, Emergency Motion for Reconsideration/Vacate Order due to Error, “Fraud” “Lack of Jurisdiction” et al. Page 2, Par A-F, “Judge Boyd prepared said Motion to reflect Petitioner was forced to take a low paying job because Judge Ronald Bartkowicz a former CTA attorney, stated "if Petitioner continued trying to be reinstated to the CTA, he was going to lock him up”
B- That Page 3 Par 5 unequivocally corroborate “Private Citizen” Boyd’s involvement “fixing” divorce case in favor of “Machine Democrats” controlling his employment status, it states “That Judge Boyd stated to petitioner August 25, 2009, when he removed said minor from his custody to him, “sir you look like you are confused or don’t understand something “ Petitioner’s reply, "with all due respect sir, I don’t see how, you can ignore all of the documents and admissions of respondent’s involvement of abuse to children and admissions of criminal acts,” Judge Boyd’s reply , “I don’t have to explain nothing! I gave you an ORDER! “Do I Mr. Barclay? “No sir, your honor, you do not “ Judge Boyd, “now you are going to release your son to your wife”
To show fraud upon the court, the complaining party must establish that the alleged misconduct affected the integrity of the judicial process, either because the court itself was defrauded or because the misconduct was perpetrated by officers of the court. Alexander v. Robertson, 882, F. 2d 421,424 (9th Cir. 1989);
A void judgment does not create any binding obligation. Kalb v. Feuerstein (1940) 308 US 433, 60 S Ct 343, 84 L, Ed 370.
C- That Boyd was very nasty and demeaning to Lester Barclay, he had personalities like an octopus had legs surpassing any Bipolar symptoms, he never had Lester to come to his chambers alone when Petitioner was in court but was a happier man when he exited his chambers with Brian.
D- That Gr Ex J are CTA records received under a Subpoena where Judge Edward Jordan asked Chief Attorney, Rachael L. Kaplan “if she ever appeared before him”, her reply, was “no”, he stated, “if the CTA records were not produced pursuant to the Subpoena, she was going to wish she never appeared before him, he asked her if he made himself clear”? Her reply, “Yes your Honor very”
E- That Hon Jordan ordered the Petitioner to have custody of his minor son.
F- That said records reflect just how racist and corrupt Democratic Judges are towards the Brown man in the Petitioners case and the extent said men or women in said party are willing to exhaust undermining the laws of the United States Constitution in covering up the vicious Civil Rights Violations making fabricated admissions of him being terminated;
G-
31.) It has been alleged that because so many have had illicit affairs with prominent political figures, they had to keep their mouths shut out of fear their affairs maybe revealed!
Turner 24 F. Cas. 337 (No. 14247) C.C.D. Md. 1867) The “equal benefit” clause is cited in what would appear to be the earliest reported case enforcing the section. The plaintiff was an emancipated slave who was indentured as an apprentice to her former master. Although both whites and blacks could be indentured as an apprentice, under the law of Maryland, indentured blacks were not accorded the same educational benefits as whites and, unlike whites, were subject to being transferred to any other person in the same county. Circuit Judge Chase granted a writ of habeas corpus upon finding that the purported apprenticeship was in fact involuntary servitude and a denial under the Civil Rights Act of 1866 of the “full and equal benefit of all laws.
Despite the United States Constitution and Civil Rights Act Plaintiff has not been treated as a citizen of the United States in that whites under this Political System has been able to circumvent the laws and commit Terrorist Acts of Treason Trespassing upon the laws at will because they are the majority in control of Chicago, Ill. Political system and control any and all Candy Ass judges;
32.) That said Democrats within the Political Machine do not want an educated man of color or Heterosexual to be gainfully employed, provide for his family or live freely where they desire, in that they are criminalized in the aforementioned manner so as to destroy men of color by any means necessary.
A- Hereto attached Gr Ex K, Letter faxed to the Illinois Child Support Enforcement, that was faxed (Jan. 14, 2014), Page 2 Par 5, “According to CTA personnel a judge signed a garnishee order for Joseph V. Roddy it had no seal of the clerk which many knew something fishy was going on asked if creditor was screwing the Mayors’ daughter because somebody in City Hall have a hard on for him, that is why CTA had to destroy his personnel records to keep him from returning to work to protect the judge involved”
B- That Par 4, and 5 on Page 1, states “Jenkins left the Police in 1988 and joined the Dade City Police Department in that same year. Cook County personnel and court officials stated, “it was imperative that Joseph Lawrence be named the father by whatever means necessary otherwise the transfer would not go through and Jenkins Hightower would lose his pension and go to penitentiary”
C- That William Jenkins Hightower stated to the Petitioner in the Presence of Francoise and her mother “that all of his daughter’s had good pussy in an arrogant braggadocio manner”, Francoise insisted she loved the Petitioner but her father was in love with her, she expressed loving her father but not in the way he felt towards her.
D- Petitioner walked away from the relationship couldn’t date a woman sleeping with her father so his life gets turned upside down for what her father did to her!
33.) The Democratic Party is just as racist and hateful today as they ever were, as it is recorded within because so many want to be accepted by said political party many have forsaken their own love for themselves and have sold out to this party by violating every person of color Civil Rights or Liberty as articulated within.
Civil Rights Act of 1866- first section, enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled. That all persons born in the United States and not subject to any foreign power, excluding Indians not taxed, are hereby declared to be citizens of the United States; and such citizens of every race and color, without regard to any previous condition of slavery or involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall have the same right, in every State and Territory in the United States, to make and enforce contracts, to sue, be parties, and give evidence, to inherit, purchase, lease, sell, hold and convey real and personal property, and to full and equal benefit of the laws and proceedings for the security of person and property, as is enjoyed by white citizens, and shall be subject to like punishment, pains, and penalties, and to none other, any law, statute, ordinances, regulation, or custom, to the contrary notwithstanding, Act of April 9, 1866, Ch. 31, 1, 14 Stat. 27, 42 U.S.C.A. 1981 (a).
In the 20th century, the Supreme Court began to overturn Jim Crow laws on constitutional grounds. In Buchanan v. Warley 245 US 60 (1917), the court held that a Kentucky law could not require residential segregation. The Supreme Court in 1946, in Irene Morgan v. Virginia ruled segregation in interstate transportation to be unconstitutional, in an application of the commerce clause of the Constitution. It was not until 1954 in Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka 347 US 483 that the court held that separate facilities were inherently unequal in the area of public schools, effectively overturning Plessy v. Ferguson, and outlawing Jim Crow in other areas of society as well. This landmark case consisted of complaints filed in the states of Delaware (Gebhart v. Belton); South Carolina (Briggs v. Elliott); Virginia (Davis v. County School Board of Prince Edward County); and Washington, D.C. (Spottswode Bolling v. C. Melvin Sharpe). These decisions, along with other cases such as McLaurin v. Oklahoma State Board of Regents 339 US 637 (1950), NAACP v. Alabama 357 US 449 (1958), and Boynton v. Virginia 364 US 454 (1960), slowly dismantled the state-sponsored segregation imposed by Jim Crow laws.
34.) Can anyone explain how is it Petitioner has presented the laws in a legally sufficient manner against Democrats engaging in an “Organized Conspiracy” in the same like manner as former President Abraham Lincoln would have prepared pleadings in a similar manner, who did not attend any law school but was denied and found “Frivolous” if not for no other reason but to demonstrate “Jim Crow Laws” are still being enforced in Illinois courts?
35.) It is clear in order to be accepted into the Democratic Party one must be a “Candy Ass” man, violent and or abusive to his or her children, by sleeping and impregnating them, you must be inferior and submissive to all demands directed by White Democrats, you are not to be independent in thought or in any capacity that demonstrates independence, evidence further demonstrate a man can kill his wife while sleeping with a man and solicit the right alderman to “fix” the case so that the insurance money can be collected.
36.) It is a “FACT” Democrats involved in this “Organized Conspiracy” are anti-American, anti-Constitution they have created job security by engaging in genocidal applications of the laws making sure qualified persons of color have an unequal chance at any endeavor by undermining any and everything we aspire to accomplish as articulated within the aforementioned, in that Petitioner is legally homeless, forced off his jobs Cook County Sheriff, Chicago Transit Authority, Chicago Board of Education, Chicago Post Office, Reliable School Bus Co. and forced to exist on welfare treated as a prisoner, runaway slave or an unlawful citizen of the United States making sure the Petitioner not be a man or provider for himself or his children.
37.) It is a “FACT” the Democrats in this “Organized Conspiracy” especially the attorneys have generated pay checks taking care of their families traveling sending their children to the best of schools money can buy off the “cesspool of shit” they have created finding the Petitioner “frivolous” for attempting to rise above the mayhem likened to “war crimes” perpetrated by the Democratic party and approved by Federal judge who happens to be the Chief judge Diane Wood while Nigger Judges or Candy Ass Judges maintain their careers upholding “Jim Crows Laws” undermining the United States Constitution.
Under Section 4 of the Ku Klux Klan Act of 1871:
The President had additional power in case of rebellion within a state to suspend the writ of habeas corpus and to declare and enforce marital law. Cong. Globe, supra note 1, at 317. With respect to a definition of rebellion, Section 4 provided;
“Whenever in any State or part of a State……unlawful combinations……..shall be organized and armed, and so numerous and powerful as to be able, by violence, to either overthrow or set at defiance the constituted authorities of such State, or when the constituted authorities are in complicity with or shall connive at the unlawful purposes of such powerful and armed combinations; and whenever, by reason of either or all of the causes aforesaid, the conviction of such offenders and the preservation of the public safety shall become…. Impracticable, in every such case such combinations shall be deemed a rebellion against the Government of the United States….”
38.) That every Democrat involved in this “Organized Conspiracy” insist on trying to make the Complainant into a slave, a lesser man in the image of their image but not a “FREEMAN BORN & RAISED in the United States of America;
JUDICIAL IMMUNITY
Judges have given themselves judicial immunity for their judicial functions. Judges have no judicial immunity for criminal acts, aiding, assisting, or conniving with others who perform a criminal act, or for their administrative/
ministerial duties. When a judge has a duty to act, he does not have discretion - he is then not performing a judicial act, he is performing a ministerial act.
Judicial immunity does not exist for judges who engage in criminal activity, for judges who connive with, aid and abet the criminal activity of another judge, or to a judge for damages sustained by a person who has been harmed by the judge's connivance with, aiding and abetting, another judge's criminal activity.
TRESPASSERS OF THE LAW
The Illinois Supreme Court has held that "if the magistrate has not such jurisdiction, then he and those who advise and act with him, or execute his process, are trespassers." Von Kettler et.al. v. Johnson, 57 Ill. 109 (1870).
Under Federal law which is applicable to all states, the U.S. Supreme Court stated that if a court is "without authority, its judgments and orders are regarded as nullities. They are not voidable, but simply void; and form no bar to a recovery sought, even prior to a reversal in opposition to them.
They constitute no justification; and all persons concerned in executing such judgments or sentences, are considered, in law, as trespassers." Elliot v. Piersol, 1 Pet. 328, 340, 26 U.S. 328, 340 (1828)
The Illinois Supreme Court held that if a court "could not hear the matter upon the jurisdictional paper presented, its finding that it had the power can add nothing to its authority, - it, had no authority to make that finding." The People v. Brewer, 128 Ill. 472, 483 (1928). The judges listed below had no legal authority (jurisdiction) to hear or rule on certain matters before them. They acted without any jurisdiction.
When judges act when they do not have jurisdiction to act, or they enforce a void order (an order issued by a judge without jurisdiction), they become trespassers of the law, and are engaged in treason (see below).
The Court in Yates v. Village of Hoffman Estates, Illinois, 209 F.Supp. 757 (N.D. Ill. 1962) held that "not every action by a judge is in exercise of his judicial function. ... It is not a judicial function for a judge to commit an intentional tort even though the tort occurs in the courthouse."
When a judge acts as a trespasser of the law, when a judge does not follow the law, the judge loses subject-matter jurisdiction and the judge’s orders are void, of no legal force or effect.
The U.S. Supreme Court, in Scheuer v. Rhodes, 416 U.S. 232, 94 S.Ct. 1683, 1687 (1974) stated that "when a state officer acts under a state law in a manner violative of the Federal Constitution, he "comes into conflict with the superior authority of that Constitution, and he is in that case stripped of his official or representative character and is subjected in his person to the consequences of his individual conduct. The State has no power to impart to him any immunity from responsibility to the supreme authority of the United States." [Emphasis supplied in original].
By law, a judge is a state officer or Federal officer.
The judge then acts not as a judge, but as a private individual (in his person).
VIOLATION OF OATH OF OFFICE
In Illinois, 705 ILCS 205/4 states "Every person admitted to practice as an attorney and counselor at law shall, before his name is entered upon the roll to be kept as hereinafter provided, take and subscribe an oath, substantially in the following form:
'I do solemnly swear (or affirm, as the case may be), that I will support the constitution of the United States and the constitution of the state of Illinois, and that I will faithfully discharge the duties of the office of attorney and counselor at law to the best of my ability.'"
In Illinois, a judge must take a second oath of office. Under 705 ILCS 35/2 states, in part, that "The several judges of the circuit courts of this State, before entering upon the duties of their office, shall take and subscribe the following oath or affirmation, which shall be filed in the office of the Secretary of State:
'I do solemnly swear (or affirm, as the case may be) that I will support the constitution of the United States, and the constitution of the State of Illinois, and that I will faithfully discharge the duties of judge of ______ court, according to the best of my ability.'"
Further, if the judge had enlisted in the U.S. military, then he has taken a third oath. Under Title 10 U.S.C. Section 502 the judge had subscribed to a lifetime oath, in pertinent part, as follows: "I, __________, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign or domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; ...".
The U.S. Supreme Court has stated that "No state legislator or executive or judicial officer can war against the Constitution without violating his undertaking to support it.” Cooper v. Aaron, 358 U.S. 1, 78 S.Ct. 1401 (1958).
Any judge who does not comply with his oath to the Constitution of the United States wars against that Constitution and engages in acts in violation of the Supreme Law of the Land. The judge is engaged in acts of treason.
Having taken at least two, if not three, oaths of office to support the Constitution of the United States, and the Constitution of the State of Illinois, any judge who has acted in violation of the Constitution is engaged in an act or acts of treason (see below).
If a judge does not fully comply with the Constitution, then his orders are void, In re Sawyer, 124 U.S. 200 (1888), he/she is without jurisdiction, and he/she has engaged in an act or acts of treason.
TREASON
Whenever a judge acts where he/she does not have jurisdiction to act, the judge is engaged in an act or acts of treason. U.S. v. Will, 449 U.S. 200, 216, 101 S.Ct. 471, 66 L.Ed.2d 392, 406 (1980); Cohens v. Virginia, 19 U.S. (6 Wheat) 264, 404, 5 L.Ed 257 (1821)
What is the penalty for treason?
18 U.S. Code § 2381 – Treason
Whoever, owing allegiance to the United States, levies war against them or adheres to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort within the United States or elsewhere, is guilty of treason and shall suffer death, or shall be imprisoned not less than five years and fined under this title but not less than $10,000; and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States.
(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 807; Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXIII, § 330016(2) (J), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2148.)
Attorney General Sessions: Actions “from racial bigotry and hatred….cannot be tolerated an innocent 32 year old Caucasian woman was killed as white nationalist banded together seeking white supremacy in Charlottesville Virginia. In Chicago any nonwhite person who closes their eyes and jurisdiction to a person of color seeking jurisdiction and protection to the very mayhem of racial hatred is a colored version of the very hate groups that is being denounced in that city is all the reasons why “Jim Crow laws” are still being enforced in the courts of Chicago, Illinois Negroe blacks and certain Hispanic judges as Democrats keep their mouths shut and go along with racial injustice due to their inferior disposition.
FEDERAL JUDGE GETTLEMAN: stated, Tuesday March 10, 2009, where he found Superintendent of police Jody Weiss in Contempt of Court and Ordered the City to Pay $100,000.00, “No one is above the Law”, he cited a 1928 decision by Supreme Court Justice Louis Brandeis, that said, “If the Government becomes the law breaker, it breeds Contempt for the Law, It invites everyman to become a law unto himself. It invites Anarchy.”
The Chicago Daily Law Bulletin, Wednesday April 26, 2006, Page 1, Illinois Political Machines help breed corruption, Associated Press writer Deanna Bellandi states, “Illinois is apparently a Petri dish for corruption. It is a real breeding ground”.
That Chicago is the most Corrupt City in America, Huffington Post, Internet Newspaper, February 23, 2012; University of Illinois Professor Dick Simpson, “The two worst crime zones in Illinois are the governor’s mansion…..and the City Council Chambers in Chicago.” Simpson a former Chicago Alderman told the AP “no other State can match us.”
Petitioner is before the Honorable Judicial Council because of the color of his skin all defendants have admitted to all criminal acts and civil rights violations but the judges have ignored all admissions affidavits, the Laws and laws the United States Constitution and Plaintiffs Civil Liberties, validating the veracity Plaintiff is a nobody merely because of his skin color, every ruling has been dispensated according to racial political guidelines;
Petitioner Prays that this Honorable Judicial Council recruit Judges from other Circuits with integrity and knowledge of the laws and render every order entered against the Petitioner as Null and Void/Invoke a Moratorium prohibiting any of the aforementioned judges from prosecuting anymore authority from the bench Instanter;
Petitioner Prays that this Honorable Judicial Council Order an Injunction investigating all parties involved in the 2018 D 003208 Petition of Dissolution matter where proper indictments can be served on the aforementioned persons.
Petitioner Prays that this Honorable Judicial Council Order the record be Supplemented Instanter that no person be exempt to their heinous acts of Trespassing and Treason involving the Chicago Transit Authority and Amalgamated Transit Authority pursuant to Smith v. Wade, 461 U.S. 30, 35, 103 S. Ct. 1625, 1629, 75 L Ed 2d 632 (1983) Justice Brennen “The threshold standard for allowing punitive damages for reckless or callous indifference applies even in a case, such as here, where the underlying standard of liability for compensatory damages because is also one of recklessness. There is no merit to petitioner’s contention that actual malicious intent should be the standard for punitive damages because the deterrent purposes of such damages would be served only if the threshold for those damages is higher in every case than the underlying standard for liability in the first instance. The common-law rule is otherwise, and there is no reason to depart from the common-law rule in the context of {1983}”
Petitioner was advised and Directed from the United States Attorney Division to communicate via chain of command clerk on the 20th Floor of the “Fraudulent Court Order signed by Judge Robert M. Dow, Jr. of April 3, 2018 and speak with the clerk of Chief Judge of the United States District Court if matter was not resolved he was to file a Complaint with the FBI.
Petitioner articulated the events to the Federal Agent and was able to glean from his conversation and draft the Complaint from the documents that presented Judicial Corruption
I affirm the above as being true.
Respectfully Submitted
Joe Louis Lawrence
Plaintiff-Counsel Pro Se
IN THE
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT
CHICAGO, ILLINOIS 60604
Certificate of Service
I Joe Louis Lawrence, certify that I have on this day filed said Notice of Motion to Supplement Petition for Review et al. before the Seventh Circuit United States Court of Appeals and noted parties.
Please be advised that on July 31st, 2018 Plaintiff has filed before this Seventh Circuit, Motion to Supplement Petition for Review et al before the Judicial Council.
Chicago Housing Authority Wilson Elser Moskowitz Edelman & Dicker LLP
Office of the General Counsel Christian T. Novay
Asst Gen Counsels 55 West Monroe, Street, Suite 3800
Maria Sewell Joseph T.B. King Chicago, Il 60603
60 East Van Buren
Chicago, Ill 60605
Seyfarth & Shaw
Jeffrey K. Ross, Kyle A. Petersen & Anne Harris
Willis/Sears Tower
Chicago, Ill. 60603
Stephan R. Patton, Mary E. Reuther, Rey A. Phillip Santos, S. Atty. Martha Diaz
Corp Counsel, Deputy Corp. Counsel, Asst Corp Counsel
30 N. LaSalle Street, Suite 800
Chicago, Ill 60602
Cary G. Schiff & Associates Gordon & Rees LLP
Christopher R. Johnson Goli Rahimi
Yuleida Joy 1 North Franklin, Suite 800
134 N. LaSalle Street, Suite 1720 Chicago, Illinois 60606
Chicago, Ill. 60602
Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith, LLP
Christian Novay
550 West Adams Street, Suite 300
Chicago, IL. 60661
Chief Judge Timothy C. Evans, Daley Center, Chg., Ill. 60601
Presiding Judge Moche Jacobius, Room 2403, Daley Center, Chg. Ill. 60601
Assc. Judge Franklin U. Valderrama, Room 2402, Daley Center, Chg. Ill. 60601
Clerk of Circuit Court Dorothy Brown, Suite 1001, Chg Ill. 60601
States Attorney, Kim Foxx, Room 500 Daley Center, Chg. Ill. 60601
Atty Gen Lisa Madigan, 100 West Randolph, Suite 1300 Chg. Ill. 60601
CHA Mobility CHA Mobility, HCP Counselors
Chris Klepper, Executive Dir Tracey Robinson/Joann Harris
28 East Jackson Blvd. 4859 S. Wabash, Suite 2nd Floor
Chicago, Ill 60604 Chicago, Ill. 60615
CHA Mobility, Real Estate Specialist
Jessie McDaniel
4859 S. Wabash
Chicago, Ill. 60615
Courtesy Copies:
US Attorney FBI Dir. Chris Wray
John R. Lausch, Jr. 2111 West Roosevelt Road
219 S. Dearborn, 5th floor Chicago, Ill. 60612
Chicago, Ill. 60604
Governor Hon Mark Kirk
Bruce Rauner 607 East Adams, Suite 1520
100 West Randolph, Suite Springfield, Ill. 62701
Chicago, Ill. 60601
Mayor Deputy Regional Adm., Field Office Dir.
Rahm Emanuel Beverly E. Bishop
City Hall 77 West Jackson Boulevard
Chicago, Ill. 60601 Chicago, Ill. 60604
Hon Dick Durbin Judge
525 South 8th St. Frederick Bates
Springfield, Ill. 62703 50 West Washington Room
Chicago, Ill. 60601
Judge
Celia C. Gamrath Judge
50 West Washington Room 2508 Neil Cohen
50 West Washington Room 2308
Alderman David Moore
Alderman Ed Burke
Alderwoman Carrie Austin
Alderwoman Emma Mitts
Cook County President Cook County Sheriff
Toni Preckwinkle Thomas J. Dart
118 N. Clark, Room 517 Richard J. Daley Center, Room 701
Chicago, Ill. 60602 Chicago, Ill. 60602
PLEASE BE ADVISED that on July 31st, 2018, A Petition for Review has been filed with the Court of Appeals Seventh Circuit and said copies being served on said applicable parties via hand delivery or regular mail;
Respectfully, Submitted,
Joe Louis Lawrence
Counsel Pro Se
Chicago, Ill 60649
312 965-6455
joelouis565@yahoo.com
@joelouis
No comments:
Post a Comment