BLUEPRINT ON HOW FEDERAL CLERKS HELP FEDERAL JUDGES "FIX" CASES PROTECTING CORRUPT DEMOCRATIC JUDGES ALLEGEDLY FOR A NOMINAL FEE

READ HOW A CORRUPT DEMOCRATIC ALDERMAN ASSIGNED JUDGES TO FRAME AN INNOCENT MAN IN A PATERNITY MATTER WHERE THE PERPETRATOR WAS A CHICAGO POLICE OFFICER IMPREGNATING HIS BIOLOGICAL MINOR DAUGHTERS.

READ HOW A FEDERAL JUDGE ON PRESIDENT TRUMP'S LONG LIST OF SUPREME COURT JUDGES WENT ALONG WITH DEMOCRATIC TERRORISM FALSIFYING COURT ORDERS HELPING DEMOCRATS REMAIN IN POWER USING RACIST CORRUPT TERRORIST CONTROL OVER THE LEGAL VENUES.

READ HOW A GANG OF PROMINENT ATTORNEYS AND LAW FIRMS GANGED UP ON ONE PRO SE ATTORNEY ADMITTED TO ALL CRIMES AND ACTS LODGED AT HIM NEVER OBJECTED OR DENIED ANY OF THE PLEADINGS FILED IN COURT WITH AFFIDAVITS BECAUSE THEY WERE TRUE IN IT'S ENTIRETY.

WHEN ATTORNEYS ARE UNABLE TO WIN CASES AGAINST THEIR LEGAL COUNTERPARTS READ HOW DEMOCRATS UNDERMINE THE INTEGRITY OF THEIR PROFESSION ENGAGING IN DIABOLICAL CRIMINAL ACTS IN AN ATTEMPT TO PROCURE VERDICTS IN THEIR FAVOR.

READ HOW A PROPER SUMMARY JUDGMENT WAS FILED APRIL 24, 2018, FEDERAL JUDGE ROBERT M. DOW, JR.THE JUDGE ENTERED A COURT ORDER AFTER THE AFOREMENTIONED DATE TRYING TO UNDERMINE THE PLAINTIFF ASSUMING HE MAY HAVE BEEN INFERIOR IN THE APPLICATIONS OF THE LAWS.

ROBERT DOW HAD A FEDERAL CLERK TO TAKE HIS COURT ORDER TYPED UP AFTER APRIL 24, 2018 TO ENTER IT IN THE DATA SYSTEM TO REFLECT THE CASE WAS DISMISSED APRIL 3, 2018, THE CLERK WHO DID THIS HAD INITIALS K.S.

JUST TO DEMONSTRATE HOW IGNORANT SO MANY IN THESE COMPETENT POSITIONS ARE THE JUDGE'S LAW CLERK FOLLOWING INSTRUCTIONS FROM HIS BOSS USED A CASE LAW FROM THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT DATED APRIL 24, 2018!!!!!!

SO ASK YOURSELF HOW IN THE HELL CAN A JUDGE SAY CASE WAS DISMISSED APRIL 3, 2018 WITH A CASE USED IN THE DISMISSAL WAS NOT ENTERED INTO THE COMPUTER SYSTEM UNTIL APRIL 24, 2018?

ALL OF THIS WAS DONE IN AN ATTEMPT TO MAKE THE PRO SE PLAINTIFF LOOK IGNORANT ON THE COURT DATE OF MAY 2, 2018. 

                                                            IN THE

                                  UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

                                         FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT

                                            CHICAGO, ILLINOIS 60604

Joe Louis Lawrence                                                    } Appeal from the United

                                                                                      } States District Court for

                                                                                      } The Northern District of Plaintiff-Appellant                                                      } Illinois, Eastern Division

                                                                                      }

    V                                                                               }

No. 18-2305                                                                  }

                                                                                      }   No. 16 CV 7434

420 East Ohio, Chicago Housing Authority             }

345 East Ohio, K2 Apartments, City of Chicago,    }

Commission on Human Relations Supreme Court  }

 of Illinois, Alderman Edward Burke,                       }   

 Franklin U. Valderrama, Mary Lane Mikva           } Robert M. Dow, Jr                       

                                                                                       }      Judge

 Defendant-Appellees

                                  

July 5, 2018 

                                               PETITION FOR REVIEW

TO: Judicial Council of the Seventh Circuit

FROM:

CC:   All parties referenced in the Certificate of Service

SUBJECT:  Why this Complaint against Robert M. Dow, Jr. should never have been dismissed:                                                                           

                                      

Diane P. Wood, has engaged in a plethora of unlawful acts including “Treason” by “Trespassing upon the laws” dismissing said judicial complaint.   

1.)  That Diane P. Wood had evidence in her possession where Federal clerk with initials K.S. received from Robert M. Dow, Jr. after April 24, 2018 his court order dated April 3, 2018 and recorded it into the computer system as April 3, 2018, that said judge violated the oath of his duties recognizing he had jurisdiction as he “Trespassed upon the Laws” by corroborating his role in an “Organized Conspiracy” engaging in “Treason” Under Federal law which is applicable to all states, the U.S. Supreme Court stated that if a court is "without authority, its judgments and orders are regarded as nullities. They are not voidable, but simply void; and form no bar to a recovery sought, even prior to a reversal in opposition to them. They constitute no justification; and all persons concerned in executing such judgments or sentences, are considered, in law, as trespassers." Elliot v. Piersol, 1 Pet. 328, 340, 26 U.S. 328, 340 (1828)

The U.S. Supreme Court, in Scheuer v. Rhodes, 416 U.S. 232, 94 S. Ct. 1683, 1687 (1974) stated that "when a state officer acts under a state law in a manner violative of the Federal Constitution, he "comes into conflict with the superior authority of that Constitution, and he is in that case stripped of his official or representative character and is subjected in his person to the consequences of his individual conduct. The State has no power to impart to him any immunity from responsibility to the supreme authority of the United States." [Emphasis supplied in original]. By law, a judge is a state officer.  The judge then acts not as a judge, but as a private individual (in his person).

2.)  That said May 9, 2018 order is in fact a Nullity, Void “without authority” Judge Dow became a “Private Citizen” by subornation of perjury with a Federal clerk by backdating a court order for the judge for April 3, 2018 when in fact the court order was entered after April 24, 2018.

3.)  That one can infer from said acts, that Robert Dow assumed he was either dealing with a person of a Democratic mentality or someone ignorant simply because of the melanin in their skin.

A-     Judge Dow mentioned in court that he was on the rules committee; furthermore, he has an undergraduate degree (Bachelors) from Yale University, Doctorate in Philosophy from the University of Oxford, and Juris Doctorate from Harvard Law School.

B-    That if the right computer IT specialist was to look at the hard drive of the computer that K.S. entered the judge’s court order, they would see that the April 3, court order was entered after Complainant’s Motion for Summary judgment was in fact filed.

C-    That many judges are using their law school education as weapons against the innocent and Pros Se litigants to keep them oppressed and maintain Terrorist White Supremacy control over the legal system keeping “Jim Crow” applications active and alive in Illinois courts by any and every deceptive means necessary which has been admitted by all Defendants and corroborated to within this aforementioned document.

4.)    Complainant filed a MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE w/AFFIDAVIT, on, April 24, 2018, court date was scheduled for May 2, 2018 at 9:15am.

5.)  Complainant learned in court (May 2, 2018) that Judge Dow stated in a perjured manner that he dismissed or closed the matter on April 3, 2018, but never issued any court order for May 2, 2018.

6.)    That on, May 2, 2018 Complainant filed a Motion for Reconsideration & Vacate Court Order due to it being a Nullity Pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure with Affidavit and will present said legally sufficient instrument before any Judge in  judge Robert M. Dow’s stead May 10 , 2018, at 9:15am in room 1919.

      

7.)    That on May 9^th Complainant appeared on the 9:15am Motion call and was on the Motion call sheet but the judge appeared nervous noticing Complainant in the court, his case was never called it was not until going to the 11:00am call Complainant notified the clerk his case was not called and learned his case was dismissed May 9, 2018.

       A- To authenticate the veracity of this assertion, hereto attached, the actual order properly certified by Susan V. Kelley, U. S. Bankruptcy Judge, April 24, 2018 demonstrating Judge Dow had help from a Federal Clerk engaging in criminal acts well known in the Cook County Clerks’ office of clerks destroying records or helping corrupt attorneys for a nominal fee by recording documents filed late placed in the data system as corroborated in this case.

       B- That because these are Democrats involved Chief Judge Diane P. Woods, Chief Judge of the Seventh Circuit corroborated her role as a “Private Citizen” engaged in Terrorist Acts in an attempt to protect and condone the “Criminal Enterprise” by dismissing a valid complaint articulating the aforementioned facts, which states “Complainant has filed a misconduct complaint against the judge assigned to his case. This is complainant’s third complaint against a judge. The first two were dismissed as frivolous and this one is no different. Complainant alleges the judge is biased based on his adverse ruling. Nothing in this court record establishes judicial misconduct”

       C- That said court order is not signed pursuant to Appendix D Section 352 (b) Review of complaint by Chief Judge states, “Action by a Chief judge following a review----After expeditiously reviewing a complaint under subsection (a), the chief judge by written order stating his or her reasons…..” said judge never signed her name to any document mailed to the Complainant.

       D- How is it a judge appointed to know the laws and rules violate every rule within the laws expect Pro Se litigants to abide by the laws and receive any vindication of the laws in their courts whereby; judges are only on the bench to “Trespass upon any and all laws” so as to protect their membership in the Democratic Machine?

  

       E- That because Plaintiff-Appellant has defeated every attorney representing the Appellees said “Private Citizens” perpetrating as judges have to violate their oaths to deny any and every valid document Plaintiff-Appellant have put before them so as to demonstrate to everyone following this case this is how Democrats operate within the jurisprudence of the laws who happens to lack the legal aptitude in defeating their opponents litigiously or whom may be politically connected who is unqualified to be judges but because of their political contributions they are judges.

       F- The aforementioned demonstrates how valid cases are dismissed unlawfully, thereby forcing Pro Se litigants to frivolously exhaust laws filing briefs so as to wear them down financially and psychologically likened to “war crimes”.  

The District court and Chief judge closed their eyes to the Mayhem of Democratic judges as “Private Citizens” perpetrating acts of “Treason” entering “VOID ORDERS” entered against the Plaintiff-Appellant for standing up to racial terrorism validating the verity of the aforementioned order as an order described as a nullity on all accounts.

8.)     In addition, when judges act when they do not have jurisdiction to act, or they enforce a void order (an order issued by a judge without jurisdiction), they become trespassers of the law, and are engaged in treason.

A-     Pursuant to {28 USCA 144, 455 (B) (1)} Sufficient for Removal, conduct which does not constitute a criminal offense may be sufficiently violative of the Judicial Canons to warrant removal for cause. Napolitano v Ward, 457 F 2d 279 (7^th Cir.), cert denied, 409 U.S. 1037, 93 S. Ct. 512, 34 L. Ed. 2d 486 (1972), that said District Court judge methodically violated his oath by stating  

Pursuant to Sup Ct. Rule 272 “if at the time of announcing final judgment  the judge requires the submission of a form of written judgment to be signed by the judge et al” the judgment becomes final only when the signed judgment is filed— Judges are bound by this rule before their court orders are valid;

B.     Citing Canon 2A the court noted, “[a] court’s indifference to clearly stated rules breeds disrespect for and discontent with our justice system. Government cannot demand respect of the laws by its citizens when its tribunals ignore those very same laws”)

C.     The District Court and certain Democratic judges in the Seventh Circuit demonstrating many acts of Improprieties in an attempt to aid and assist said Defendant’-Appellee  named in Suit, In Re Judge No. 93-154, 440 S.E.2d 169 (Ga. 1994), And Deception by falsifying reasons for preventing a legally sufficient Complaint and Motion from being served on Appellee’s, In re Ferrara, 582 N.W. 2d 817 (Mich. 1998),In re Renfer, 493 S.E. 2d 434 (N.C. 1997), In re Kroger, 702 A. 2d 64 (Vt. 1997), Gonzalez v. Commission on Judicial Performance, 33 Cal. 3d 359, 657 P. 2d 372, 377, 188 Cal. Rptr. 880 (1983).

D.    Section 1983 of U.S.C.S. contemplates the depravation of Civil Rights through the Unconstitutional Application of a Law by conspiracy or otherwise. Mansell v. Saunders (CA 5 F 1A) 372 F 573, especially if the conspiracy was actually carried into effect, where an action is for a conspiracy to interfere with Civil Rights under 42 U.S.C.S. 1985 (3), or for the depravation of such rights under 42 U.S.C.S. 1983, if the conspiracy was actually carried into effect and plaintiff was thereby deprived of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the United States Constitution and Laws, the gist of the action may be treated as one for the depravation of rights under 42 U.S.C.S. 1983, Lewis v. Brautigam (CA 5 F 1a) 227 F 2d 124, 55 Alr 2d 505, John W. Strong, 185, 777-78 (4 th ed. 1992)

E.     That the Judge erred considerably when it received notice and knowledge of other Judges complicit in a Criminal Conspiracy failed to follow Canon Ethics Leslie W. Abramson, 25 Hofstra L. Rev. 751 (1997). The Judges Ethical Duty to Report Misconduct by Other Judges and Lawyers and its effect on Judicial Independence.

F.      That because many white nationalist have infiltrated the Democratic party and has methodically overturned the legal tribunal recruiting the necessary persons who will keep their mouths shut and continue the terrorist mayhem on innocent citizens fighting injustice in the courts;

The Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals held that the Circuit Court   of Cook County is a criminal enterprise. U.S. v. Murphy, 768 F.2d 1518,     1531 (7th Cir. 1985).

The United States Supreme Court recently acknowledged the judicial corruption in Cook County, when it stated that Judge "Maloney was one of many dishonest judges exposed and convicted through 'Operation Greylord', a labyrinthine federal investigation of judicial corruption in Chicago". Bracey v. Gramley, case No. 96-6133 (June 9, 1997).

Since judges who do not report the criminal activities of other judges become principals in the criminal activity, 18 U.S.C. Section 2, 3 & 4, and since no judges have reported the criminal activity of the judges who have been convicted, the other judges are as guilty as the convicted judges.

The criminal activities that the Federal Courts found in the Circuit Court of Cook County still exist, and are today under the care, custody and control of Judge Timothy C. Evans (Chief Judge). The Circuit Court of Cook County remains a criminal enterprise.

1.)  That on September 27, 2016, (07-16-90074) Chief Judge Diane P. Wood allegedly Denied said Complaint without certifying the order with her signature and the basis of her alleged denial was frivolous, lacking sufficient evidence to raise an inference that misconduct has occurred, or containing allegations which are incapable of being established through investigation; or;

2.)  That said Motion to Disqualify judge Darrah went ignored pursuant to the Civil Rights Act of 1866 referencing, Par. 8, Page 12;

3.)  That judges within the Democratic Political Machine has systematically denied every document, motion, affidavit court transcript put before the courts demonstrating members within the Political Machine has used their robes influence and authority to continuously enforce Jim Crow laws outlawed by the United States Supreme Court;

4.)   Petitioner has filed the appropriate Complaint detailing how cases are “Fixed” in all courts as judges are selected and appointed along racist political criteria’s as African American judges are politically appointed to deny and oppress their own race making sure they secure their positions of employment doing what they are told to do. 

5.)  That because of Petitioners skin color Caucasians have demonstrated he has no legal right of Equal Protection of the laws afforded by the United States Constitution and has used their positions on all accounts to undermine the United States Constitution demonstrating Racist Terrorist Supremacy Pursuant to the Ku Klux Klan act of 1866, referencing Par. 22, Page 12 of the Motion for Reconsideration Vacate Order of August 8^th Due to Deliberate Error Bias/and or Prejudice; 

6.)  That allegedly, Chief Judge Diane P. Wood ignored Par. 4B, C, Page 3 of Motion for Reconsideration et al. 4B “Plaintiff is up against 6 law firms with personnel surpassing 20+ attorneys the same methodology the Democrats of the Ku Klux Klan exercised in the past “Lynching’…et al. 4C “That Par 5B “Ed Burke approached Judge Cieslik and told him to withdraw from the case. When the judge refused to withdraw from the case, he told the judge. Whats the big deal? “It’s only a Fucking Nigger” Anne Burke, also requested that the judge withdraw from the case saying “My husband was the one who put you on the bench”

 The Racist men “Organized in said Conspiracies” were so use to dealing with inferior males of color did not see or respect them as men tried to exhaust the same intimidating tactics as demonstrated in this case on the Petitioner:

When people ask how and why, Did all the judges enter orders against you and you were never served? They did the same thing YOU did ignored Appellant and assumed he was a Typical NIGGA, Passive NIGGA, Ignorant NIGGA, while the laws clearly demonstrate my innocence they say NIGGA you GUILTY, I say I am a CTA employee they say NIGGA you ain’t, I say I work for IBC/Wonder bread they say NIGGA you DISCHARGED, I say I have a wife and 5 children they say NIGGA you don’t have any dependent’s, I say I AM that That I AM somebody they say NIGGA you don’t get it, you don’t exist, I say I am Educated I have spent 12-14 hours a day in the Law Library studying the law and it’s applications, they laugh at me and say NIGGA it ain’t what you know, it is who you know, I say I have applied the laws better than some your best involved in this conspiracy, they say NIGGA you right, because everyone involved is related to someone who is related to someone no one is listening, I say I have proof they say NIGGA there is no such thing as proof I say what do you mean? They say NIGGA we Lie we Destroy we Cheat we Intimidate/Threaten we Undermine anyone necessary to advance our Doctrines, I say my faith is in GOD, they Laugh NIGGA where was your GOD all those years when we Economically Murdered you, NIGGA where was your GOD all those years when we Assassinated your Character, NIGGA where was your GOD all those years when we Buried your ASS left you for DEAD, NIGGA you should be on CRACK/HEROIN, NIGGA you ain’t committed SUICIDE, NIGGA you should’a ROBBED somebody, NIGGA you look GOOD how come you ain’t PIMPIN? NIGGA with your MIND you can be the best DRUG DEALER, wait a minute NIGGA who are you? How come nothing seems to have WORKED? First of All I am no NIGGA the GOD I serve moves me by way of the SPIRIT, When I seek JUSTICE you reward me INJUSTICE, when I seek HELP, you LAUGH at me, when my family and I suffer you CELERBRATE.

7.)  That Chief Judge Diane P. Wood ignored the very laws and precedents established from the very court she works in - That due to the judges Bias and or Prejudice conduct pursuant to Sup Ct Rule 71, Sufficient for Removal, conduct which does not constitute a criminal offense may be sufficiently violative of the Judicial Canons to warrant removal for cause. Napolitano v Ward, 457 F 2d 279 (7^th Cir.), cert denied, 409 U.S. 1037, 93 S. Ct. 512, 34 L. Ed. 2d 486 (1972).

8.)  That the FBI believed the Petitioners assertions of the Ku Klux Klan running the legal system needed corroboration made it clear to him they wanted all of the judges involved, so a technique was designed to trap every judge acting as “Weapons of Mass Destruction” under Alderman Edward Burkes authority and control;

A-   Petitioner is grateful to God and many with government acronyms who did not look at his skin color but provided him the latitude to demonstrate how the government can invoke it’s authority without getting involved in his matter personally;

B-     That Under Section 4 of the Ku Klux Klan Act of 1871: the law is clear, “Whenever in any State or part of a State………unlawful combinations…….shall be organized and armed, and so numerous and powerful et al…………and whenever, by reason of either or all of the causes aforesaid, the conviction of such offenders and the preservation of the public safety shall become…..Impracticable, in every such case such combinations shall be deemed a rebellion against the Government of the United States…..”

C-   How can a judge within the laws deny a man or woman seeking justice of the laws if he or she doesn’t know the laws themselves?

Petitioner has been many times denied by the very judges appointed or elected who have tried him or the merits of his claims simply because he stands on the square of integrity, and is a Heterosexual God fearing man, Psalm 121, Verse 1,    I will lift up mine eyes unto the hills, from whence cometh my help.

² My help cometh from the Lord, which made heaven and earth.

 

9.)  That every person who happens to be “masters of darkness” endorsing self-hatred at persons of color or racial hatred they would systematically term the Petitioner as “Frivolous” and simply deny any and every document he filed, is what made this entire operation a success because  it was those judges who were either Bias, Racist, Inferior and or Corrupt;

10.)   That said judges complicit in said Terrorist Acts had no real need to have a comprehensive understanding of the laws because if the case was “Fixed” there was no read to listen or read whatever the Petitioner wrote or presented before the courts because there were many in the legal system ruled with pure hate in their hearts against persons of color as in the Petitioners case;

11.)     That no Afro American judge or Politician male will step up and admonish whites complicit in said acts, they go along with wrong so as to get along with the wrong doers which is why Chicago is in the apathetic state it is in today can’t blame the white man for everything too blacks have sold out participating in the genocide and mass incarceration of their own race;

The Mis education of the Negroe, Carter G. Woodson 1933

History shows that it does not matter who is in power... those who have not learned to do for themselves and have to depend solely on others never obtain any more rights or privileges in the end than they did in the beginning.

Here is a quote from the book:

"When you control a man's thinking you do not have to worry about his actions. You do not have to tell him not to stand here or go yonder. He will find his 'proper place' and will stay in it. You do not need to send him to the back door. He will go without being told. In fact, if there is no back door, he will cut one for his special benefit. His education makes it necessary.

12.)   That the November 23, 2016 Petition for Review with Affidavit named all judges further corroborating their roles “Trespassing upon the Laws” (Daniel A. Manion, Diane Sykes, Richard A. Posner, Richard D. Cudahy, Daniel Tinder, Ilana Diamond Rovner) in the Court of Appeals demonstrated their racial hatred at the Petitioner for standing up to corruption and racial hatred collectively denied every motion accompanied with an affidavit;   

A-   Petitioner informed the court how CHA colluded with Craig Fulton case 13 cv 02852 Edmond E. Chang was the judge, City officials and CHA embezzled money from the section 8 program where abandoned buildings were used placing innocent families like the Petitioner in buildings that was “Nigger Rigged” which is the term city officials described when buildings are put together bypassing all city certifications and inspections to place qualified applicants in substandard housing as they collect tax free money from the Federal Government section 8 program;

B-   That many administrators within the Section 8 program where aware of this allegedly received kickbacks keeping their mouths and was relying on every corrupt judge where this matter presided before to Dismiss the claims as John Darrah and his fraternal brethren did in the 7^th Cir;

C-   That said net had to be widened so as to include and trap every person involved stealing from the Federal Housing program not excluding anyone;

13.)   That said Motion to Disqualify judge Darrah went ignored pursuant to the Civil Rights Act of 1866 referencing, Par. 8, Page 12;

14.)   That judges within the Democratic Political Machine has systematically denied every document, motion, affidavit court transcript put before the courts demonstrating members within the Political Machine have used their robes influence and authority to continuously enforce Jim Crow Laws outlawed by the United States Supreme Court;

A-   On the Bogus Paternity case 88 D 079012 where Secret Service Agents contacted Petitioner on another unrelated matter and mentioned the paternity case as Bogus Plaintiff identified them as FBI agents they laughed and said they are not any of those “Wussies”

B-   That the FBI did not have to create a Bogus case snaring corrupt judges, they snared themselves, in that it took at least 21 Cook County judges to continuously “FIX” falsify court orders under Edward Burkes authority in spite of certain alleged Irishmen and others pleading with him to leave the Plaintiff alone;

C-   In that the worst part is that said judges David E. Haracz, Timothy P. Murphy & Ronald Bartkowicz a former CTA attorney working in workman’s compensation department was appointed as judge to issue an order of protection order against Petitioner on behalf of Chicago Police Officer Francoise Louise Barbara Hightower, he was not aware she was a Police officer but was using Public Aid and attorney Joseph V. Roddy trying to extort money from him using the child support scheme unlawfully, Roddy was successful in that Petitioners wages were garnisheed to the Law office of Joseph c/o Francoise Hightower the secretary at Reliable School Bus company displayed the cancelled checks to the Petitioner, she said she has processed 100’s of child support payments and never seen anything like this the President of the company questioned the unsigned court order, Petitioner had to receive welfare and food stamps they garnisheed so much money from the Petitioner, he was not able to provide for his family;

D-   Petitioner was Remanded in custody while in his CTA uniform as the judge used his unlawfully authority helping the CTA take his badge off his body, but the Cook County Sheriff made the attorney sign on their stationery what they were removing from his body while handcuffed, Sheriff Beradi told them you know this is not right!

E-   Judge Bartkowicz used his robe unlawfully to help the CTA from paying him his lost wages that the CTA stole while he was off work injured on duty and ordered him to go drive a school bus and threatened him if he was to try and return back to CTA he was going to have him remanded into custody because CTA said “You are not an employee”;

F-   Cook County Sheriff informed the Petitioner that the judge was a former CTA employee and should not be on your case, “Fuck what he said, we run the courts” you are not going to jail, they escorted him home and picked him up for court;

G-   Petitioner filed a Motion Disqualifying Ronald Bartkowicz from the case for Bias and conflict of interest, said judge asked the Petitioner, it is true, and how did you know? He recused himself and the case went to Morgan Hamilton who hated men of color, she and (Franklin Valderrama acted like they came from the same womb);

H-   Morgan Hamilton was the supervising Associate judge never elected helped judge Bartkowicz by falsifying a court order saying “Petitioner left a cloud of mistrust saying he was a CTA employee” the Cook County Sheriff were very vociferous in speaking up in Petitioners behalf about the corruption in the paternity case, so she reassigned the case to David Delgado he read the warrant, he became adamant and said if he ever found out Petitioner was a CTA employee, he was going to lock up everybody at the CTA;

I-     Judge Delgado noticed the warrant was missing a lot of pertinent information, he told Francoise’s attorney, I cannot send him to jail on this it has no return date, no court information, it was basically blank, he said if he was to send Petitioner to jail, he would never come out and be lost in the system an attempt was to made on his life Judge Bartkowicz was heard saying he wanted no part of this and the day Petitioner was supposed to be in jail another person was locked up and hung in the jail cell;

J-    The case was reassigned to Judge Lester Bonoguru, see unlawful1.blogspot.com Post Thursday August 30, 2012, Certified Affidavit demonstrating the Chronology of unlawful Contempt Charges issued by Racist Hateful white men operating on behalf of their Boss Edward Burke;    

K-   Judge Lester Bonoguru stated, Page 3, Par 10, Post August 30, 2012, unlawful1.blogspot.com, “He was aware who, I was and what was going on he said the problem here is that a lot of men paid a lot of money getting their law school education and you are embarrassing them” et al. 

L-    That of the 21 judges one of them was a FBI agent appointed to the Circuit Court who somehow mysteriously had Plaintiff in Contempt of Court and Plaintiff never appeared before him and so many of the judges involved with falsifying court documents;

M-  That not less than 15 State Appellate judges signed their names denying every Motion and Affidavit demonstrating, corroborating racist white men within the Democratic Party “Organized” with “Terror and Mayhem” in mind perpetrated heinous “Hate Crimes” at the Petitioner ignored everything he filed demonstrating his innocence;

N-   That allegedly Supreme Court judge Anne Burke had 2-4 attorneys to go along with her in denying every Motion accompanied with affidavits denying his Writ of Mandamus and Supervisory;

    

15.)    Petitioner has filed the appropriate Complaints Motions, Exhibits corroborated with affidavits detailing how cases are “Fixed” in all courts, hereto attached, Ex A, Court Order signed and certified by George F. Sculley, Jr. Vacating Order of Possession September 11, 2012;   

A-   That Craig Fulton allegedly had intimate relations with said judge when he was an attorney and thought he could commit any crime and get out of jail free, in that, Judge Sculley admitted to Petitioner he prepared the papers for Craig Fulton when he was the attorney, see Gr Ex C, Page 8, Par18 A-E;

B-   That Craig would brag how he knew people didn’t have to pay city water bills, he had no credit and that CHA was depositing money in his girlfriend’s account in Las Vegas and was connected and stated, “he had no idea who the Petitioner knew his people told him to leave the Petitioner along because he was generating too much heat”

C-   Petitioner submitted to the Deputy clerks everything that was deleted from the Database in the Daley Center regarding said case sources within the Sheriff stated, Judge Leonard Murray signed an Order illegally allowing the Cook County Sheriff to break into Petitioners home stealing all of his original court documents and 25 years of personal effects making the Petitioner HOMELESS TO THIS VERY DAY and on Welfare;

D-   That said Ex A was never vacated and Craig Fulton never challenged or objected to anything Petitioner filed in the courts;

16.)   That because of Ex A every Federal and State judge that had Notice and knowledge of the foregoing stated above became complicit and established their roles intimately in an “Organized Conspiracy”, hereto attached, Gr Ex B, Page 8, Par 9, FACT: “The Democratic Political Machine judges in the 7^th Circuit Court of Appeals is by far why Chicago is the most racist segregated City and State to live in et al….”

17.)   In furtherance to the above, when cases are “Fixed” Corrupt judges have found a way to circumvent a good judges integrity by undermining his authority by engaging in diabolical acts overturning his authority unlawfully as demonstrated in this document;  

A-   That Gr Ex D, Motion for Disqualification of judge et al. (Former Chief Judge Frank H. Easterbrook) Page 4 Par. B, “That judge Easterbrook is aware of the “Systemic” Racial application of Unjust Laws Dispensated against Appellant et al……….said judge ignored every unlawful criminal act”;

B-   That Group Ex D, E, F, G, H categorically demonstrate the unwarranted racial hatred Easterbrook and other judges had towards the Petitioner simply for standing up to Racial Injustice, said judge had the audacity to cite a law for reasons denying him legal representation Farmer v Haas, 990 F 2d 319, 321 (7^th Cir 1993) Page 6, Par 7 B-C a prisoner who was a homosexual raped by another inmate viciously where correctional officers placed the man in the cell against the homosexual request, he had fear for his life which was warranted because what he feared actually took place, he was brutally raped.

C-   In that said judge have never met a man like the Plaintiff and judging how he has habitually tried denigrating Petitioner in denying him an appointment of attorney and justice his Ivy League education didn’t seem to help him from not getting trapped in this conspiracy like the rest of his colleagues;

18.)   That Judge Edmond E. Chang closed his eyes to the injustices on case 13 CV 02852 because this is the Democratic way in Illinois persons of color are not equal in accordance to the laws where Democrats rule but they are required to vote every year or whenever there is an election keeping the oppressors in power so they can continue to deny any document that demonstrates Disparate treatment in the laws or Discrimination and more importantly Unequal Protection of the Laws, in that, said order is in violation of Rule 60 (b) (3) (4), Ex A hereto attached, validates the verity of judges engaging in diabolical criminal acts;

 

19.)   That Judge Darrah was expecting the very judges in the Court of Appeals to help him once again in upholding the assassination of Petitioner’s character as demonstrated in the aforementioned cases, in that said judges are a law unto themselves, anarchy runs the courts demonstrating within the Preponderance of the Evidence legal standards that, Illinois courts and Federal Courts are presently under siege by Terrorists who have infiltrated the Democratic party and is inciting laws against the United States Constitution;   

A-   That many have complained on what the President  Donald Trump’s administration will bring to America is already here in Chicago courts it’s just been kept a secret for so many years, now the world can see justice is not afforded to everyone.

20.)    That Gr Ex H, Motion for Reconsideration for Appointment of Counsel et al. Judge Daniel Manion filed 1-23-2012, that Page 5, Pars 2, 3 unequivocally validate the verity said judge exercising anarchy from the bench operating outside of his judicial discretion but from a racist fraternal disposition;

D-   That Gr Ex I, Motion for Reconsideration Vacate Orders due to Bias or Fraud et al. Judge William J. Bauer, Filed Feb. 27, 2013, said motion clearly identifies the heinous acts of Holocaust Oppression that is indicative to the laws afforded within the United States Constitution but because said judge don’t embrace and follow the doctrines of the United States Constitution, Page 9, Par 7, “Because they are true Terrorists in this matter, what Adolph Hitler could not accomplish in the War with the United States have been replaced with some of the offspring inciting “WARLIKE Crimes on people of color, using the laws unlawfully to achieve their racist goals”;

E-   That Gr Ex J, Joe Louis Lawrence v IBC/Wonder bread, Chicago Transit Authority, Chicago Police, Complaint of Civil Rights Violations, Equal Protection of the Laws Violations, Employment Discrimination/Retaliatory Harassment, Disparate Treatment, $350 Million, Judge Kennelly case 07-1191 stated, “the gist of Mr. Lawrence complaint is somewhat difficult to make out” see unlawful1.blogspot.com Post April 14, 2012,  Brief prepared by the Petitioner his very first Dec. 7, 2007, Page 11 Statement of the Issues demonstrates a comprehensible picture of the racist events taking place in the courts as corrupt white men “Organized in said Conspiracy” not fearing the laws of any judge because said judges worked for the Democratic Political Machine”

F-   That Gr Ex F of Part 1, Petition for Review clearly and unequivocally validate the verity of judges engaging in a diabolical conspiracy committing “Fraud” and “Perjury”, thereby, violating Rule 60 (b) (3) Fraud (whether previously called intrinsic or extrinsic), misrepresentation, or misconduct by an opposing party; (4) the judgment is void; Fed Rules of Civil Procedure.

G-   That Gr Ex F of Part 1, Petition for Review impeaches Judge Darrah’s credibility and demonstrates a violation of Rule 60 (b) (3) (4) and Gr Ex A hereto attached, further amplifies the verity within the Preponderance of the Evidence of said judge and his racist brethren along with many inferior persons of color as Trespassers of the Laws;

H-   That Gr Ex K Motion for Appointment of Counsel, Rule to Show Cause Remanding Judge Darrah et al. filed Nov. 7, 2011, said judges denied Petitioner legal representation thinking they would be able to bully him and apply any order against him and it would go unnoticed, in that said judges further amplified this fact by prohibiting him from filing any documents knowing all of his funds had been stolen and extorted and that he was on welfare, Diane Sykes and David Hamilton issued an order to the clerks letting them know they were not to accept any documents from the Petitioner unless he paid $505.00; 

I-     That the crimes perpetrated by judge Darrah and all of his brethren surpasses the crimes of former Governor Rod Blagoivich who tried selling President Obama’s Senate seat and has been sentenced to 14 years in Federal prison, in that every judge and attorney in said matter should receive nothing less than LIFE for their actions in the aforementioned documents;

21.)   That said judges have violated the oath of their offices in that no Circuit Court judge ever had  jurisdiction but the Federal judges ignored the Treason Like offenses and continuously violated their oath on the bench;

22.)   That the Petitioner filed the aforementioned PETITION TO TRANSFER TO ANOTHER JUDICIAL COUNCIL AND RULE TO SHOW CAUSE  Dec. 7, 2017 said Chief Democratic Judge ignored the laws, rules and United States Constitution making sure Petitioner remain oppressed according to racial discriminatory criterias.                             

                         

 I Joe Louis Lawrence, Petitioner Pro se Counsel, Heterosexual Native/African American “Free Man” Born & Raised hereby petitions the Honorable Judicial Council of the aforementioned statutes of violations ignored by Judge John W. Darrah and all of his colleagues complicit in said foregoing acts to transfer said matter Pursuant to Rule 26.

Statute: Unequal Protection of the Laws Violations, Disparate Unequal Protection of the Laws, Civil Rights Violations, Housing Discrimination,  Judicial Bias, Judges Acting outside of their immunity provisions, Jim Crow Violations, Violations of the provisions of the Ku Klux Klan Act of 1871, Judicial Abuse of  Discretion, Racial Terrorism Conspiracy, Perjury, Admission of all facts by all Defendants, No Objections by any Defendants, Public, Political, Fraternal Corruption Conspiracies, Fraud on the Courts and other Un-Constitutional Lawless Violations.

The request for a transfer may be made at any stage of the proceeding before a reference to the Judicial Conference under Rule 20 (b) (1) (C) or 20 (b) (2) or a Petition for Review is filed under Rule 22:

Rule 26 is new, it implements the Breyer Committee’s recommended use of transfers. Breyer Committee Report, 239 F.R.D. at 214-15.

Rule 26 authorizes the transfer of a complaint proceeding to another judicial council selected by the Chief Justice. Such transfers may be appropriate, for example, in the case of a serious complaint where there are multiple disqualifications among the original council, where the issues are highly visible and a local disposition may weaken public confidence in the process, where internal tensions arising in the council as a result of the complaint render disposition by a less involved council appropriate, or where a complaint calls into question policies or governance of the home court of appeals et al.       

23.)   That the present judges in the Seventh Circuit read evidence of Cook County judges violating the RICO ACT, the 7^th Cir. Held that the Cook County Courts were a Criminal enterprise. U.S. v. Murphy, 768 F. 2d 1518, 1531 where precedent was enacted by Judges Frank H. Easterbrook, Richard D. Cudahy and former Chief judge Luther Merritt Swygert;

24.)   That every judge in the Seventh Circuit closed their eyes to every complaint said Petitioner put before them on appeal in affidavits validating the verity of judges committing Treason Trespassing upon the laws of the United States Constitution engaging in “WAR” against the United States Constitution making every order rendered against the Petitioner. If a judge does not fully comply with the Constitution, then his orders are void, In re Sawyer, 124 U.S. 200 (1888), he or she is without jurisdiction, and he/she has engaged in an act or acts of treason;

25.)   That every judge in the Seventh Circuit closed their eyes to the fact Petitioner was locked up unlawfully 5 times for allegedly owing child support on a case Alderman Edward Burke and his Democratic Terrorist in the Political Machine orchestrated (88 D 079012) to unlawfully extort money, hereto attached, Gr Ex A, falsified document Monthly Billing Statement of Child Support Account from the Il Dept. of Healthcare and Family Services, against Petitioner in the name of child support where the case was dismissed September 17, 1987 85 D 068185;

26.)  That every judge in the Seventh Circuit were aware Judge Kenneth Ripple, African American Ann Claire Williams, and Diane Sykes Trespassed upon the laws and committed Treason lied on court documents saying, “In 1987 the State of Illinois ordered Joe Lawrence to pay child support. He did not comply, and consequently the state revoked his driver's license. He appealed the revocation to the Secretary of State, but his appeal was denied. Lawrence also unsuccessfully sued his former employers, International Brands Corporation and the Chicago Transit Authority, in state and federal court for embezzlement and theft”.

27.)   That certain judges in the Seventh Circuit were aware Petitioner was homeless and the Nazi style acts perpetrated at him with a Section 8 voucher was denied access to live within the city using said voucher, due to ethnicity and complaining blowing the whistle on many of the powerfully connected judges engaging in criminal terrorist acts;

28.)   That certain judges in the Seventh Circuit were aware African American Associate Political Appointed judge Franklin Ulylesses Vallderrama acting as a Puppet for his white masters, “Fixed” the case Trespassed upon the Laws and committed Treason threatened the Petitioner in open court in front of many white attorneys who openly stated, “Hell naw, I don’t want no part of this shit! This judge is crazy”

A-   That Judge Valderrama ignored the fact the 6 or 7 law firms admitted to Petitioner’s claims of Housing and Racial Discrimination regarding Source Income violations DEFAULTED on $25 Million Dollars, said judge stated, “he does not accept certified mail or an affidavit printout from the clerk’s office (Dorothy Brown) showing the parties were served and never replied timely; 

B-   Judges Mary Lane Mikva and Neil Cohen have asked said attorneys to respond or rebut the Petitioners argument all have declined and never have any attorney ever objected or denied any of the facts Petitioner has put before any courts, so said judges have to step outside their jurisdiction and commit Treason to keep the Petitioner from having Equal Protection of the Laws from any courts where they have control. 

29.)    That it is apparent no judge in the Seventh Circuit were aware they had become Trespassers of the laws and committed Treason pursuant to the aforementioned acts and are the new “Weapons of Mass Destruction” and a dangerous Threat to National Security due to their abuse of Power;

30.)   That no African American, Latino or otherwise in authority have any real authority over Caucasians in the Democratic party this has already been admitted to throughout said pleadings prepared by the Complainant;

31.)   This case amplifies and demonstrates the real hatred corroborated Democrats and certain Republicans truly have towards persons of color and the Demonic Terrorist Psychotic Acts they are willing to exhaust making sure Complainant or anyone like not receive any justice controlled by the Democratic Party.

32.)   In that not one Gay judge, Bisexual or closet individual opened their mouths denouncing the terrorists acts of heinous injustices levied at the Complainant because of their allegiance to “Private Citizens” where many of the judges are only on the bench due to political influences, enormous contributions to allegedly Michael Madigan or Edward Burkes political campaigns or certain black male judges who maybe in intimate relationships with powerful white judges with wives and children.

33.)   It has been alleged that because so many have had illicit affairs with prominent political figures, they had to keep their mouths shut out of fear their affairs maybe revealed!

34.)   “Private Citizen” Diane Wood was in receipt of the aforementioned recorded within with a law degree corroborated her racial hatred, ineptitude in ascertaining the Constitutional violations recorded but deemed the Complainant “frivolous” because he articulated the merits of the laws better than she and her colleagues ever could comprehend not being formerly educated at any recognized law schools.   

  Turner 24 F. Cas. 337 (No. 14247) C.C.D. Md. 1867) The “equal benefit” clause is cited in what would appear to be the earliest reported case enforcing the section. The plaintiff was an emancipated slave who was indentured as an apprentice to her former master. Although both whites and blacks could be indentured as an apprentice, under the law of Maryland, indentured blacks were not accorded the same educational benefits as whites and, unlike whites, were subject to being transferred to any other person in the same county. Circuit Judge Chase granted a writ of habeas corpus upon finding that the purported apprenticeship was in fact involuntary servitude and a denial under the Civil Rights Act of 1866 of the “full and equal benefit of all laws.

 Despite the United States Constitution and Civil Rights Act Plaintiff has not been treated as a citizen of the United States in that whites under this Political System has been able to circumvent the laws and commit Terrorist Acts of Treason Trespassing upon the laws at will because they are the majority in control of Chicago, Ill. Political system; 

35.)   Democrats within the Political Machine do not want an educated man of color or Heterosexual to be gainfully employed, provide for his family or live freely where they desire, in that they are criminalized in the aforementioned manner so as to destroy men of color by any means necessary.

DEMOCRATIC PARTY HAS ROOTS IN VIOLENCE, RACISM AND BIGOTRY

DECEMBER 18, 2013| BY ROBERT GEHL

History can be an annoying, pernicious thing. Especially for those who try to hide it.

When I read this morning that a high school in the South was going to drop its racist, confederate name, I immediately thought of Democrats Strom Thurmond or Robert Byrd, who were Klan members and staunch segregationists.

But no … the school is Nathan B. Forrest High School in Jacksonville, Fla. Forrest was a Confederate General and a leader of the Ku Klux Klan.

I decided to research a little bit into General Forrest and it turns out he was honored at the 1868 Democratic National Convention. In fact, the KKK was founded by Democrats to terrorize blacks and white Republicans.

The history of the Democratic Party is rooted in racism, violence, lynchings and bigotry. The National Review published an article detailing the racist history of the Democratic Party:

May 22, 1856: Two years after the Grand Old party’s birth, U.S. Senator Charles Sumner (R., Mass.) rose to decry pro-slavery Democrats. Congressman Preston Brooks (D., S.C.) responded by grabbing a stick and beating Sumner unconscious in the Senate chamber. Disabled, Sumner could not resume his duties for three years.

July 30, 1866: New Orleans’s Democratic government ordered police to raid an integrated GOP meeting, killing 40 people and injuring 150.

September 28, 1868: Democrats in Opelousas, Louisiana killed nearly 300 blacks who tried to foil an assault on a Republican newspaper editor.

October 7, 1868: Republicans criticized Democrats’ national slogan: “This is a white man’s country: Let white men rule.”

April 20, 1871: The GOP Congress adopted the Ku Klux Klan Act, banning the pro-Democrat domestic terrorist group.

October 18, 1871: GOP President Ulysses S. Grant dispatched federal troops to quell Klan violence in South Carolina.

September 14, 1874: Racist white Democrats stormed Louisiana’s statehouse to oust GOP Governor William Kellogg’s racially integrated administration; 27 are killed.

August 17, 1937: Republicans opposed Democratic President Franklin Delano Roosevelt’s Supreme Court nominee, U.S. Senator Hugo Black (D., Al.), a former Klansman who defended Klansmen against race-murder charges.

February 2005: The Democrats’ Klan-coddling today is embodied by KKK alumnus Robert Byrd, West Virginia’s logorrhea U.S. senator and, having served since January 3, 1959, that body’s dean. Thirteen years earlier, Byrd wrote this to the KKK’s Imperial Wizard: “The Klan is needed today as never before and I am anxious to see its rebirth here in West Virginia.” Byrd led Senate Democrats as late as December 1988. On March 4, 2001, Byrd told Fox News’s Tony Snow:

 “There are white niggers. I’ve seen a lot of white niggers in my time; I’m going to use that word.” National Democrats never have arranged a primary challenge against or otherwise pressed this one-time cross-burner to get lost.

Contrast the KKKozy Democrats with the GOP. When former Klansman David Duke ran for Louisiana governor in 1991 as a Republican, national GOP officials scorned him. Local Republicans endorsed incumbent Democrat Edwin Edwards, despite his ethical baggage. As one Republican-created bumper sticker pleaded: “Vote for the crook: It’s important!”

Republicans also have supported legislation favorable to blacks, often against intense Democratic headwinds:

In 1865, Congressional Republicans unanimously backed the 13th Amendment, which made slavery unconstitutional. Among Democrats, 63 percent of senators and 78 percent of House members voted: “No.”

In 1866, 94 percent of GOP senators and 96 percent of GOP House members approved the 14th Amendment, guaranteeing all Americans equal protection of the law. Every congressional Democrat voted: “No.”

February 28, 1871: The GOP Congress passed the Enforcement Act, giving black voters federal protection.

February 8, 1894: Democratic President Grover Cleveland and a Democratic Congress repealed the GOP’s Enforcement Act, denying black voters federal protection.

January 26, 1922: The U.S. House adopted Rep. Leonidas Dyer’s (R., Mo.) bill making lynching a federal crime. Filibustering Senate Democrats killed the measure.

May 17, 1954: As chief justice, former three-term governor Earl Warren (R., Calif.) led the U.S. Supreme Court’s desegregation of government schools via the landmark Brown v. Board of Education decision. GOP President Dwight Eisenhower’s Justice Department argued for Topeka, Kansas’s black school children. Democrat John W. Davis, who lost a presidential bid to incumbent Republican Calvin Coolidge in 1924, defended “separate but equal” classrooms.

September 24, 1957: Eisenhower deployed the 82nd Airborne Division to desegregate Little Rock’s government schools over the strenuous resistance of Governor Orval Faubus (D., Ark.).

May 6, 1960: Eisenhower signs the GOP’s 1960 Civil Rights Act after it survived a five-day, five-hour filibuster by 18 Senate Democrats.

July 2, 1964: Democratic President Johnson signed the 1964 Civil Rights Act after former Klansman Robert Byrd’s 14-hour filibuster and the votes of 22 other Senate Democrats (including Tennessee’s Al Gore, Sr.) failed to scuttle the measure. Illinois Republican Everett Dirksen rallied 26 GOP senators and 44 Democrats to invoke cloture and allow the bill’s passage. According to John Fonte in the January 9, 2003, National Review, 82 percent of Republicans so voted, versus only 66 percent of Democrats.

True, Senator Barry Goldwater (R., Ariz.) opposed this bill the very year he became the GOP’s presidential standard-bearer. However, Goldwater supported the 1957 and 1960 Civil Rights Acts and called for integrating Arizona’s National Guard two years before Truman desegregated the military. Goldwater feared the 1964 Act would limit freedom of association in the private sector, a controversial but principled libertarian objection rooted in the First Amendment rather than racial hatred.

June 29, 1982: President Ronald Reagan signed a 25-year extension of the Voting Rights Act of 1965.

The Republican Party also is the home of numerous “firsts.” Among them:

Until 1935, every black federal legislator was Republican. America’s first black U.S. Representative, South Carolina’s Joseph Rainey, and our first black senator, Mississippi’s Hiram Revels, both reached Capitol Hill in 1870. On December 9, 1872, Louisiana Republican Pinckney Benton Stewart “P.B.S.” Pinchback became America’s first black governor.

August 8, 1878: GOP supply-siders may hate to admit it, but America’s first black Collector of Internal Revenue was former U.S. Rep. James Rapier (R., Ala.).

October 16, 1901: GOP President Theodore Roosevelt invited to the White House as its first black dinner guest Republican educator Booker T. Washington. The pro-Democrat Richmond Times newspaper warned that consequently, “White women may receive attentions from Negro men.” As Toni Marshall wrote in the November 9, 1995, Washington Times, when Roosevelt sought reelection in 1904, Democrats produced a button that showed their presidential nominee, Alton Parker, beside a white couple while Roosevelt posed with a white bride and black groom. The button read: “The Choice Is Yours.”

GOP presidents Gerald Ford in 1975 and Ronald Reagan in 1982 promoted Daniel James and Roscoe Robinson to become, respectively, the Air Force’s and Army’s first black four-star generals.

November 2, 1983: President Reagan established Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.’s birthday as a national holiday, the first such honor for a black American.

President Reagan named Colin Powell America’s first black national-security adviser while GOP President George W. Bush appointed him our first black secretary of state.

President G.W. Bush named Condoleezza Rice America’s first black female NSC chief, then our second (consecutive) black secretary of State. Just last month, one-time Klansman Robert Byrd and other Senate Democrats stalled Rice’s confirmation for a week. Amid unanimous GOP support, 12 Democrats and Vermont Independent James Jeffords opposed Rice — the most “No” votes for a State designee since 14 senators frowned on Henry Clay in 1825.

By the way, if we’re going to strip schools of the names of racists, Strom Thurmond High School in South Carolina and Robert C Byrd high school in West Virginia should be at the top of the list.

36.)     That said Democrats are still living up to their Terrorist Acts of Racial hatred, in that hereto attached, case number 85 D 068184 signed and certified court order pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 272 dismissing said paternity matter September 17, 1987 by Judge D. Adolphus Rivers.

A-    That the aforementioned case Complainant requested a Jury Trial and Paternity test from Cook County excluded him from paternity the likelihood of paternity was 17,905% but someone allegedly intimidated the Doctor into recording that paternity was 99.99 %.

B-   That Complainant took another paternity test under the same case from the American Red Cross, which excluded him it stated, the likelihood of paternity was 7,220%  this Doctor was allegedly intimidated into saying the paternity was 99.99%. The Red Cross’s test further excluded the Complainant from paternity by what is called Medellan Laws of Inheritance   (Which is no blood tests can ever determine paternity, exclusion is a

                biological certainty.

There is exclusion when the child has two types of exclusion direct and indirect exclusion. Which are markers noted in the blood paternity testing: In a direct exclusion, the marker not found in either parent. According to this rule, I am excluded from paternity because both tests indicated, the mother and the alleged father to be compatible with the same genetic marker. The other test indicated that the hospital was unable to find a genetic marker in the child.

According to the Mendellan Laws of Inheritance of the ABO blood

group: antigens (any of a class of substances, produced by the body that stimulated production of antibodies) cannot occur in a child if they are not present in the parents, therefore, antigens cannot be absent in a child if they are present in both parents; therefore, the antigen should be transmitted to the child.

C-    Now for the case 88 D 079012 the Complainant was never served to appear in court and there were no paternity tests ever taken and the court orders were never signed, hereto attached, but the Complainant was “LOCKED UP” 5x’s for allegedly owing child support to a woman who was impregnated by her natural biological father who was a Police officer; whereby, he was arrested for impregnating his other minor daughter and was reinstated back onto the Police force.

D-    That at least 50+ Democratic judges racist, ignorant and unqualified by all legal means, inferior with no integrity etc. went along with framing the innocent Complainant to keep a corrupt pedophile police officer from going to penitentiary for committing the same incestuous offense on his biological daughters.

E-    That every judge in the Seventh Circuit were aware Judge Kenneth Ripple, African American Ann Claire Williams, and Diane Sykes Trespassed upon the laws and committed Treason lied on court documents saying, “In 1987 the State of Illinois ordered Joe Lawrence to pay child support. He did not comply, and consequently the state revoked his driver's license. He appealed the revocation to the Secretary of State, but his appeal was denied. Lawrence also unsuccessfully sued his former employers, International Brands Corporation and the Chicago Transit Authority, in state and federal court for embezzlement and theft”.

F-     That every person involved in this conspiracy is likened to them trying to clean their anuses full of defecation resulting from diarrhea with yesterday’s toilet paper which has created a cesspool of their waste by trying to justify and condone what is an impossibility to a possibility by criminalizing an innocent man for the “shit” they have caused and created.

The problem here is that so many Democrats rely on everyone within the party to go along with them Anybody involved in this Conspiracy thought Everybody told Somebody what to cover-up and destroy, to keep nobody of learning of Everybody’s involvement, the problem was that, Everybody thought nobody knew and told, Somebody not to worry because Nobody would never know how they lied, falsified, conspired, and destroyed all documents to save Everybody, but Somebody knew of what Everybody did and Nobody paid attention because to them it was a “joke” Anybody became very nervous because now they realize Somebody lied and now Everybody is in trouble with the LAW and will go to jail because Everybody thought Somebody was telling the “TRUTH”!

37.)     The Democratic Party is just as racist and hateful today as they ever were, as it is recorded within because so many want to be accepted by said political party many have forsaken their own love for themselves and have sold out to this party by violating every person of color Civil Rights or Liberty as articulated within.

Civil Rights Act of 1866- first section, enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled. That all persons born in the United States and not subject to any foreign power, excluding Indians not taxed, are hereby declared to be citizens of the United States; and such citizens of every race and color, without regard to any previous condition of slavery or involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall have the same right, in every State and Territory in the United States, to make and enforce contracts, to sue, be parties, and give evidence, to inherit, purchase, lease, sell, hold and convey real and personal property, and to full and equal benefit of the laws and proceedings for the security of person and property, as is enjoyed by white citizens, and shall be subject to like punishment, pains, and penalties, and to none other, any law, statute, ordinances, regulation, or custom, to the contrary notwithstanding, Act of April 9, 1866, Ch. 31, 1, 14 Stat. 27, 42 U.S.C.A. 1981 (a).

In the 20th century, the Supreme Court began to overturn Jim Crow laws on constitutional grounds. In Buchanan v. Warley 245 US 60 (1917), the court held that a Kentucky law could not require residential segregation. The Supreme Court in 1946, in Irene Morgan v. Virginia ruled segregation in interstate transportation to be unconstitutional, in an application of the commerce clause of the Constitution. It was not until 1954 in Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka 347 US 483 that the court held that separate facilities were inherently unequal in the area of public schools, effectively overturning Plessy v. Ferguson, and outlawing Jim Crow in other areas of society as well. This landmark case consisted of complaints filed in the states of Delaware (Gebhart v. Belton); South Carolina (Briggs v. Elliott); Virginia (Davis v. County School Board of Prince Edward County); and Washington, D.C. (Spottswode Bolling v. C. Melvin Sharpe). These decisions, along with other cases such as McLaurin v. Oklahoma State Board of Regents 339 US 637 (1950), NAACP v. Alabama 357 US 449 (1958), and Boynton v. Virginia 364 US 454 (1960), slowly dismantled the state-sponsored segregation imposed by Jim Crow laws.

38.)     That because Negroes in Chicago Democratic Party are mere figureheads most of them neither one has the authority to admonish any Caucasian unless they receive permission; hereto attached, an unlawful document manufactured by “Organized Terrorist” within the Democratic Party from the Illinois Dept of Healthcare and Family Services et al. Notice of Intent to Pursue Collection Remedies, states “Our records show that as of 8-31-2017, you owe past due support in the amount of $77,388.98 et al.

 The Miseducation of the Negroe Political Education Neglected

     Carter G. Woodson, 1933

The opponents of freedom and social justice decided to work out a program which would enslave the negroes’ mind in as much as the freedom of body had to be conceded. It was well understood that if by teaching of history the white man could be further assured of his superiority and the negroe could be made to feel that he had always been a failure and that the subjection of his will to some other race is necessary for the freedman, then, would still be a slave. If you can control a man’s thinking you do not have to worry about his action. When you determine what a man shall think you do not have to concern yourself about what he will do. If you make a man feel that he is inferior, you do not have to compel him to accept an inferior status, for he will seek it himself. If you make a man think that he is justly an outcast, you do not have to order him to the back door. He will go without being told; and if there is no back door, his very nature will demand one.

That former illustrious President Barack Obama did try to help the Complainant when he was in Congress and Rod Blagovich was the Governor papers were sent for him to fill out for a pardon from the prison board. Complainant wrote back explaining he was not in prison and never received any reply.

That the Complainant voted for former President Barack Obama twice because of his impressive speeches and seemed like a family man who could relate to the plights of the issues correlating to that of the Complainant but they fell on deaf ears.

39.)   Before coming to Washington as our 16^th president, Abraham Lincoln practiced law in Illinois for 17 years, reaching the pinnacle of the profession as one of the most sought-after trial attorneys in the state. So, where’d he go to law school? University of Chicago? Northwestern? It’s actually a trick question: he didn’t go to law school, and not just because these prestigious schools hadn’t yet been founded. You didn’t need a law degree to practice law in the early 19^thcentury. The former rail splitter borrowed legal treatises from a colleague in the Illinois legislature, took an oral exam, and was admitted to practice law in 1836. 

Today, of course, there’s almost no way around earning a law degree if you want to be a lawyer. The legal profession revolves around the notion that attending an accredited law school is the only way to learn ideas and skills that are essential to being a good lawyer.

40.)     Can anyone explain how is it so many involved with law degrees from some impressive law schools wear robes as Jurist but lack the necessary credentials of that of a certified judge but have demonstrated and corroborated their roles as “Private Citizens” engaging in an “Organized Conspiracy”?

41.)     Can anyone explain how is it Petitioner has presented the laws in a legally sufficient manner against Democrats engaging in an “Organized Conspiracy” in the same like manner as former President Abraham Lincoln would have prepared pleadings in a similar manner, who did not attend any law school but was denied and found “Frivolous” if not for no other reason but to demonstrate “Jim Crow Laws” are still being enforced in Illinois courts? 

42.)     It is a “FACT” Democrats involved in this “Organized Conspiracy” are anti-American, anti-Constitution they have created job security by engaging in genocidal applications of the laws making sure qualified persons of color have an unequal chance at any endeavor by undermining any and everything we aspire to accomplish as articulated within the aforementioned, in that Complainant is legally homeless, forced off his jobs Cook County Sheriff, Chicago Transit Authority, Chicago Board of Education, Chicago Post Office, Reliable School Bus Co. and forced to exist on welfare treated as a prisoner, runaway slave or an unlawful citizen of the United States making sure the Complainant not be a man or provider for himself or his children.

43.)     It is a “FACT” the Democrats in this “Organized Conspiracy” especially the attorneys have generated pay checks taking care of their families traveling sending their children to the best of schools money can buy off the “cesspool of shit” they have created finding the Complainant “frivolous” for attempting to rise above the mayhem likened to “war crimes” perpetrated by the Democratic party and approved by Federal judge who happens to be the Chief judge Diane Wood.

Under Section 4 of the Ku Klux Klan Act of 1871:

The President had additional power in case of rebellion within a state to suspend the writ of habeas corpus and to declare and enforce marital law. Cong. Globe, supra note 1, at 317. With respect to a definition of rebellion, Section 4 provided;

“Whenever in any State or part of a State……unlawful combinations……..shall be organized and armed, and so numerous and powerful as to be able, by violence, to either overthrow or set at defiance the constituted authorities of such State, or when the constituted authorities are in complicity with or shall connive at the unlawful purposes of such powerful and armed combinations; and whenever, by reason of either or all of the causes aforesaid, the conviction of such offenders and the preservation of the public safety shall become…. Impracticable, in every such case such combinations shall be deemed a rebellion against the Government of the United States….”  

44.)     That every Democrat involved in this “Organized Conspiracy” insist on trying to make the Complainant into a slave, a lesser man in the image of their image but not a “FREEMAN BORN & RAISED in the United States of America;

…For the present, it is enough to affirm the equal manhood of the Negro race. Is it not as astonishing that, while we are plowing, planting, and reaping, using all kinds of mechanical tools, erecting houses, constructing bridges, building ships, working in metals of brass, iron, copper, and secretaries, having among us lawyers doctors, ministers, poets, authors, editors, orators, and teachers; and that, while we are engaged in all manner of enterprises common to other men, digging gold in California, capturing the whale in the Pacific, feeding sheep and cattle on the hillside, living, moving acting, thinking planning, living in families as husbands, wives, and children, and above all, confessing and worshipping the Christian ‘s God, and looking hopefully for life and immortality beyond the grave, we are called upon to prove that we are men!  

“What, to the American slave, is your 4th of July?" he asked. "I answer; a day that reveals to him, more than all other days in the year, the gross injustice and cruelty to which he is the constant victim. To him, your celebration is a sham; your boasted liberty, an unholy license; your national greatness, swelling vanity; your sounds of rejoicing are empty and heartless; your denunciation of tyrants, brass fronted impudence; your shouts of liberty and equality, hollow mockery; your prayers and hymns, your sermons and thanksgivings, with all your religious parade and solemnity, are, to Him, mere bombast, fraud, deception, impiety, and hypocrisy — a thin veil to cover up crimes which would disgrace a nation of savages."

"There is not a nation on the earth guilty of practices more shocking and bloody than are the people of the United States, at this very hour,” he added..

Go where you may, search where you will, roam through all the monarchies and despotisms of the Old World, travel through South America, search out every abuse, and when you have found the last, lay your facts by the side of the everyday practices of this nation, and you will say with me that, for revolting barbarity and shameless hypocrisy, America reigns without a rival.

Excerpts from Frederick Douglass’ Independence Day Speech at Rochester, 1841.

JUDICIAL IMMUNITY

Judges have given themselves judicial immunity for their judicial functions. Judges have no judicial immunity for criminal acts, aiding, assisting, or conniving with others who perform a criminal act, or for their administrative/ 
ministerial duties. When a judge has a duty to act, he does not have discretion - he is then not performing a judicial act, he is performing a ministerial act.

Judicial immunity does not exist for judges who engage in criminal activity, for judges who connive with, aid and abet the criminal activity of another judge, or to a judge for damages sustained by a person who has been harmed by the judge's connivance with, aiding and abetting, another judge's criminal activity.

TRESPASSERS OF THE LAW

The Illinois Supreme Court has held that "if the magistrate has not such jurisdiction, then he and those who advise and act with him, or execute his process, are trespassers." Von Kettler et.al. v. Johnson, 57 Ill. 109 (1870)

Under Federal law which is applicable to all states, the U.S. Supreme Court stated that if a court is "without authority, its judgments and orders are regarded as nullities. They are not voidable, but simply void; and form no bar to a recovery sought, even prior to a reversal in opposition to them. They constitute no justification; and all persons concerned in executing such judgments or sentences, are considered, in law, as trespassers." Elliot v. Piersol, 1 Pet. 328, 340, 26 U.S. 328, 340 (1828)

The Illinois Supreme Court held that if a court "could not hear the matter upon the jurisdictional paper presented, its finding that it had the power can add nothing to its authority, - it, had no authority to make that finding." The People v. Brewer, 128 Ill. 472, 483 (1928). The judges listed below had no legal authority (jurisdiction) to hear or rule on certain matters before them. They acted without any jurisdiction.

When judges act when they do not have jurisdiction to act, or they enforce a void order (an order issued by a judge without jurisdiction), they become trespassers of the law, and are engaged in treason (see below).

The Court in Yates v. Village of Hoffman Estates, Illinois, 209 F.Supp. 757 (N.D. Ill. 1962) held that "not every action by a judge is in exercise of his judicial function. ... It is not a judicial function for a judge to commit an intentional tort even though the tort occurs in the courthouse."

When a judge acts as a trespasser of the law, when a judge does not follow the law, the judge loses subject-matter jurisdiction and the judge’s orders are void, of no legal force or effect.

The U.S. Supreme Court, in Scheuer v. Rhodes, 416 U.S. 232, 94 S.Ct. 1683, 1687 (1974) stated that "when a state officer acts under a state law in a manner violative of the Federal Constitution, he "comes into conflict with the superior authority of that Constitution, and he is in that case stripped of his official or representative character and is subjected in his person to the consequences of his individual conduct. The State has no power to impart to him any immunity from responsibility to the supreme authority of the United States." [Emphasis supplied in original].

By law, a judge is a state officer or Federal officer.

The judge then acts not as a judge, but as a private individual (in his person).

VIOLATION OF OATH OF OFFICE

In Illinois, 705 ILCS 205/4 states "Every person admitted to practice as an attorney and counselor at law shall, before his name is entered upon the roll to be kept as hereinafter provided, take and subscribe an oath, substantially in the following form:

'I do solemnly swear (or affirm, as the case may be), that I will support the constitution of the United States and the constitution of the state of Illinois, and that I will faithfully discharge the duties of the office of attorney and counselor at law to the best of my ability.'"

In Illinois, a judge must take a second oath of office. Under 705 ILCS 35/2 states, in part, that "The several judges of the circuit courts of this State, before entering upon the duties of their office, shall take and subscribe the following oath or affirmation, which shall be filed in the office of the Secretary of State:

'I do solemnly swear (or affirm, as the case may be) that I will support the constitution of the United States, and the constitution of the State of Illinois, and that I will faithfully discharge the duties of judge of ______ court, according to the best of my ability.'"

Further, if the judge had enlisted in the U.S. military, then he has taken a third oath. Under Title 10 U.S.C. Section 502 the judge had subscribed to a lifetime oath, in pertinent part, as follows: "I, __________, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign or domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; ...".

The U.S. Supreme Court has stated that "No state legislator or executive or judicial officer can war against the Constitution without violating his undertaking to support it.” Cooper v. Aaron, 358 U.S. 1, 78 S.Ct. 1401 (1958).

Any judge who does not comply with his oath to the Constitution of the United States wars against that Constitution and engages in acts in violation of the Supreme Law of the Land. The judge is engaged in acts of treason.

Having taken at least two, if not three, oaths of office to support the Constitution of the United States, and the Constitution of the State of Illinois, any judge who has acted in violation of the Constitution is engaged in an act or acts of treason (see below).

If a judge does not fully comply with the Constitution, then his orders are void, In re Sawyer, 124 U.S. 200 (1888), he/she is without jurisdiction, and he/she has engaged in an act or acts of treason. 

TREASON

Whenever a judge acts where he/she does not have jurisdiction to act, the judge is engaged in an act or acts of treason. U.S. v. Will, 449 U.S. 200, 216, 101 S.Ct. 471, 66 L.Ed.2d 392, 406 (1980); Cohens v. Virginia, 19 U.S. (6 Wheat) 264, 404, 5 L.Ed 257 (1821)

What is the penalty for treason?

18 U.S. Code § 2381 – Treason

Whoever, owing allegiance to the United States, levies war against them or adheres to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort within the United States or elsewhere, is guilty of treason and shall suffer death, or shall be imprisoned not less than five years and fined under this title but not less than $10,000; and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States.

(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 807; Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXIII, § 330016(2) (J), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2148.)

Attorney General Sessions: Actions “from racial bigotry and hatred….cannot be tolerated an innocent 32 year old Caucasian woman was killed as white nationalist banded together seeking white supremacy in Charlottesville Virginia. In Chicago any nonwhite person who closes their eyes and jurisdiction to a person of color seeking jurisdiction and protection to the very mayhem of racial hatred is a colored version of the very hate groups that is being denounced in that city is all the reasons why “Jim Crow laws” are still being enforced in the courts of Chicago, Illinois Negroe blacks and certain Hispanic judges as Democrats keep their mouths shut and go along with racial injustice due to their inferior disposition.

  FEDERAL JUDGE GETTLEMAN: stated, Tuesday March 10, 2009, where he found Superintendent of police Jody Weiss in Contempt of Court and Ordered the City to Pay $100,000.00, “No one is above the Law”, he cited a 1928 decision by Supreme Court Justice Louis Brandeis, that said, “If the Government becomes the law breaker, it breeds Contempt for the Law, It invites everyman to become a law unto himself. It invites Anarchy.”            

The Chicago Daily Law Bulletin, Wednesday April 26, 2006, Page 1, Illinois Political Machines help breed corruption, Associated Press writer Deanna Bellandi states, “Illinois is apparently a Petri dish for corruption. It is a real breeding ground”.         

That Chicago is the most Corrupt City in America, Huffington Post, Internet Newspaper, February 23, 2012; University of Illinois Professor Dick Simpson, “The two worst crime zones in Illinois are the governor’s mansion…..and the City Council Chambers in Chicago.” Simpson a former Chicago Alderman told the AP “no other State can match us.”   

Petitioner is before the Honorable Judicial Council because of the color of his skin all defendants have admitted to all criminal acts and civil rights violations but the judges have ignored all admissions affidavits, the Laws and laws the United States Constitution and Plaintiffs Civil Liberties, validating the veracity Plaintiff is a nobody merely because of his skin color, every ruling has been dispensated according to racial political guidelines;

Petitioner Prays’ that this Honorable Judicial Council Invoke Jurisdiction and Order the Removal of Robert M. Dow, Jr and any and all judges complicit in the Coup enforcing Jim Crow Laws, and are Trespassers of the Laws in the State of Illinois recorded within;

Petitioner Prays that this Honorable Judicial Council recruit Judges from other Circuits with integrity and knowledge of the laws and render every order entered against the Petitioner as Null and Void/Invoke a Moratorium prohibiting any of the aforementioned judges from prosecuting anymore authority from the bench Instanter;

Petitioner Prays that this Honorable Judicial Council Order the Defendants post bond on the Summary Judgment of $25 Million Dollars that no Defendant has denied or objected to but relied on a Federal judge to save them pursuant to  Smith v. Wade, 461 U.S. 30, 35, 103 S. Ct. 1625, 1629, 75 L Ed 2d 632 (1983)  Justice Brennen “The threshold standard for allowing punitive damages for reckless or callous indifference applies even in a case, such as here, where the underlying standard of liability for compensatory damages because is also one of recklessness. There is no merit to petitioner’s contention that actual malicious intent should be the standard for punitive damages because the deterrent purposes of such damages would be served only if the threshold for those damages is higher in every case than the underlying standard for liability in the first instance. The common-law rule is otherwise, and there is no reason to depart from the common-law rule in the context of {1983}”          

 

  

I affirm the above as being true.

                                                                                            Respectfully Submitted

                                                                                              Joe Louis Lawrence

                                                                                          Plaintiff-Counsel Pro Se

                                                          IN THE

                                  UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

                                         FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT

                                            CHICAGO, ILLINOIS 60604

                                                    Certificate of Service

   

I  Joe Louis Lawrence, certify that I have on this day filed said Notice of Petition for Review before the Seventh Circuit United States Court of Appeals and noted parties.

Please be advised that on July 5, 2018 Plaintiff has filed before this Seventh Circuit, Petition for Review before the Judicial Council.

Chicago Housing Authority             Wilson Elser Moskowitz Edelman & Dicker LLP

Office of the General Counsel                     Christian T. Novay

Asst Gen Counsels                                  55 West Monroe, Street, Suite 3800  

Maria Sewell Joseph   T.B. King                 Chicago, Il 60603

60 East Van Buren

Chicago, Ill 60605                                                                          

                                                                       Seyfarth & Shaw

                                                   Jeffrey K. Ross, Kyle A. Petersen & Anne Harris        

                                                                  Willis/Sears Tower

                                                                  Chicago, Ill. 60603

Stephan R. Patton, Mary E. Reuther, Rey A. Phillip Santos, S. Atty. Martha Diaz

Corp Counsel, Deputy Corp. Counsel, Asst Corp Counsel

30 N. LaSalle Street, Suite 800

Chicago, Ill 60602

Cary G. Schiff & Associates                    Gordon & Rees LLP

Christopher R. Johnson                           Goli Rahimi

Yuleida Joy                                               1 North Franklin, Suite 800

134 N. LaSalle Street, Suite 1720             Chicago, Illinois 60606

Chicago, Ill. 60602                                    

Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith, LLP

Christian Novay

550 West Adams Street, Suite 300

Chicago, IL. 60661

      Chief Judge Timothy C. Evans, Daley Center, Chg., Ill. 60601

      Presiding Judge Moche Jacobius, Room 2403, Daley Center, Chg. Ill. 60601

      Assc. Judge Franklin U. Valderrama, Room 2402, Daley Center, Chg. Ill. 60601  

    Clerk of Circuit Court Dorothy Brown, Suite 1001, Chg Ill. 60601                                           

       

      States Attorney, Kim Foxx, Room 500 Daley Center, Chg. Ill. 60601

      Atty Gen Lisa Madigan, 100 West Randolph, Suite 1300 Chg. Ill. 60601

           

CHA Mobility                                             CHA Mobility, HCP Counselors

Chris Klepper, Executive Dir                     Tracey Robinson/Joann Harris

28 East Jackson Blvd.                                    4859 S. Wabash, Suite 2^nd Floor  

Chicago, Ill 60604                                          Chicago, Ill. 60615     

                                                                   

CHA Mobility, Real Estate Specialist               

Jessie McDaniel                                                        

4859 S. Wabash                                                    

Chicago, Ill. 60615                                                

Courtesy Copies:

US Attorney                                                FBI  Dir. Chris Wray  

John R. Lausch, Jr.                               2111 West Roosevelt Road

219 S. Dearborn, 5^th floor                              Chicago, Ill. 60612

Chicago, Ill. 60604

Governor                                                Hon Mark Kirk

Bruce Rauner                                         607 East Adams, Suite 1520

100 West Randolph, Suite                       Springfield, Ill. 62701

Chicago, Ill. 60601

Mayor                                            Deputy Regional Adm., Field Office Dir.

Rahm Emanuel                                       Beverly E. Bishop

City Hall                                              77 West Jackson Boulevard

Chicago, Ill. 60601                              Chicago, Ill. 60604

Hon Dick Durbin                                             Judge

525 South 8^th St.                                             Frederick Bates

Springfield, Ill. 62703                               50 West Washington Room

                                                                     Chicago, Ill. 60601

Judge                                                           

Celia C. Gamrath                                            Judge

50 West Washington Room 2508             Neil Cohen

                                                                50 West Washington Room 2308

                                        Alderman David Moore

                                        Alderman Ed Burke  

                                      Alderwoman Carrie Austin

                                       Alderwoman Emma Mitts

Cook County President                               Cook County Sheriff

Toni Preckwinkle                                            Thomas J. Dart

118 N. Clark, Room 517                         Richard J. Daley Center, Room 701

Chicago, Ill. 60602                                        Chicago, Ill. 60602

                                           

               PLEASE BE ADVISED that on July 5, 2018, A Petition for Review has been filed with the Court of Appeals Seventh Circuit and said copies being served on said applicable parties via hand delivery or regular mail;

                                                                                 Respectfully, Submitted,

                                                                                   Joe Louis Lawrence

                                                                                   Counsel Pro Se

                                                                                  Chicago, Ill 60649

                                                                                   312 965-6455

                                                                                   joelouis565@yahoo.com

                                                                                     @joelouis