Wikipedia Racial Injustice in Chicago Courts

Search results

Sunday, August 5, 2018



PROOF DEMOCRATS HATE PEOPLE OF COLOR ENFORCING JIM CROW LAWS OUTLAWED BY THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT

THE DUMB ASS CLERK WHO DRAFTED THIS DOCUMENT TRYING TO PASS IT AS A JUDGES ORDER HAS CORROBORATED EVERYTHING THAT IS BEFORE THE COURT.

TO FURTHER AMPLIFY HIS IGNORANCE AND ALLEGIANCE TO DEMOCRATIC TERRORIST CONTROLLING THE COURTS, THIS BIG DUMMY ENGAGED IN A CRIMINAL OFFENSE BY COMMITTING MAIL FRAUD AND OTHER SORTS OF CIVIL RIGHTS VIOLATIONS

HIS VERY OFFENSE NOTED ON THE AFOREMENTIONED ORDER IS WHY THE PETITION FOR REVIEW WAS FILED LAW PROFESSOR FOR THE UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO AND CHIEF JUDGE OF THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT TRIED TO PASS OFF COURT ORDERS DISMISSING ALL COMPLAINTS FILED AGAINST RACIST CORRUPT DEMOCRATIC JUDGES WITHOUT HER SIGNATURES.

That because these are Democrats involved Chief Judge Diane P. Woods, Chief Judge of the Seventh Circuit corroborated her role as a “Private Citizen” engaged in Terrorist Acts in an attempt to protect and condone the “Criminal Enterprise” by dismissing a valid complaint articulating the aforementioned facts, which states “Complainant has filed a misconduct complaint against the judge assigned to his case. This is complainant’s third complaint against a judge. The first two were dismissed as frivolous and this one is no different. Complainant alleges the judge is biased based on his adverse ruling. Nothing in this court record establishes judicial misconduct”


       C- That said court order is not signed pursuant to Appendix D Section 352 (b) Review of complaint by Chief Judge states, “Action by a Chief judge following a review----After expeditiously reviewing a complaint under subsection (a), the chief judge by written order stating his or her reasons…..” said judge never signed her name to any document mailed to the Complainant.

THAT BECAUSE DIANE PAMELA WOODS COULD'NT DISMISS THE PETITION FOR REVIEW BECAUSE OF IT'S VERACITY AND SERIES OF CRIMINAL ACTS TRYING TO SAVE UNQUALIFIED RACIST DEMOCRATIC JUDGES----SHE DID NOT DISMISS THE PETITION FOR REVIEW AFTER IT WAS BROUGHT TO HER ATTENTION IT WAS NOT SIGNED PURSUANT TO THE RULES OF THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE JUDICIAL CONDUCT AND DISABILITY ACT OF 1980 APPENDIX D.

TAKE A LOOK AT THIS COURT ORDER NOT ONLY IT IS NOT SIGNED IT IS BOGUS FOR ALL OF THE REASONS THE PETITION FOR REVIEW IS FILED.

DEMOCRATS DO NOT ADMONISH DEMOCRATS ENGAGING IN HORRIFIC CRIMES AGAINST PERSONS OF COLOR AS DEMONSTRATED IN THE AFOREMENTIONED SUPPLEMENT. 

HOW IN THE HELL CAN A MOTION BE FILED ON THE 31ST OF JULY AND BE DISMISSED AUGUST 1ST, 2018?

A FEDERAL CLERK HAD TO COMMIT MAIL FRAUD TRYING TO SAVE JUDGES AND ATTORNEYS THAT NO CROOKED CORRUPT JUDGE CAN SAVE.

HAD HE KNOWN THE FBI HAD TOOK A COMPLAINT ON THIS VERY CASE, HE WOULD HAVE LEFT THIS DOCUMENT ALONE. 







United States Court of Appeals
For the Seventh Circuit Chicago, Illinois 60604
August 1, 2018
Before
DIANE P. WOOD, Chief Judge
In Re:
JOE LOUIS LAWRENCE
No.
07-18-90039
Upon consideration of the motion to supplement the petition for review, filed by complainant Joe Louis Lawrence on July 31, 2018,

IT IS ORDERED that the motion to supplement is DENIED.






No comments:

Post a Comment