PART 1, SEE HOW RACIST JUDGES IN THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY AND SOME REPUBLICANS DON'T RESPECT OR HONOR ANY BLACK PERSON'S AUTHORITY AND ONLY RECRUIT AND APPOINT INFERIOR BLAC OR BROWN JUDGES WHO WILL GO ALONG WITH ANY CRIMES PERPETRATED ON THEIR OWN ETHNIC GROUPS AND CLOSING THEIR EYES TO ALL AREAS OF RACISM AND INJUSTICE SO AS NOT TO OFFEND OR UPSET THEIR POLITICAL MASSAS IN THE PARTY.
FORMER STATES ATTORNEY KIM FOXX, CHIEF JUDGE TIMOTHY CALVIN EVANS, GOVERNOR JB PRITZKER, JUDGE IRIS Y. CHIVIRA, COOK COUNTY SHERIFF TOM DART, STATE POLICE VIA EMAIL AND PRIORITY MAIL TO FRANCOISE, THE SUMMARY JUDGMENT (FILED DEC 4, 2023).
THE SUMMARY JUDGMENT PARTICULARIZED HOW JUDGES IN THE ILLINOIS APPELLATE COURT ILRB NOS L-CB-23-004, TRIED TO FIX AND COVER-UP CIVIL RIGHTS VIOLATIONS OF THE STATE NOT RECEIVING ANY RECORDS FROM THE CTA IMPEACHING THE VERACITY OF MY COMPLAINT FILED AGAINST THE LABOR BOARD. JUDGE TERRANCE LAVINE IGNORED THE FOLLOWING LEGAL PRECEDENT AND DISMISSED MY COMPLAINT UNLWFULLY.
1.) 2022
IL App (4th) 200519, We will reverse the Board’s findings of fact only if they
are against the manifest weight of the evidence. Champaign-Urbana Public Health
District v. Illinois Labor Relations Board, State Panel, 354 Ill. App. 3d 482,
487 (2004). we will reverse the Board’s determination only if it is clearly
erroneous. SPEED District 802 v. Warning, 242 Ill. 2d 92, 112 (2011). To so
reverse, we must be convinced the Board committed a mistake.
The record on appeal is entirely
devoid of anything evidencing a Board investigation. The Board submits more
than once in its brief that the record contains the documents required by the
Illinois Supreme Court rules, implying that is the end of the inquiry. However,
it is not.
¶ 17 The Board must follow its own
rules, as those rules have force of law. Department of Central
Management Services/Illinois Commerce Comm'n v. Illinois Labor Relations Board,
State Panel, 406 Ill.App.3d 766, 771, 348 Ill. Dec. 226, 943
N.E.2d 1136 (2010). Further, the City rightfully insists the
Board comply with its
[202 N.E.3d 919]
own rules. Id. The problem facing us is
that, based on the record, we cannot determine if the Board conducted an
investigation such that we can review the Board's action.
¶ 18 For this reason, the Board, like any other administrative agency, is
obligated to create and provide a record sufficient to permit judicial review
of its decisions. Miles v. Housing Authority, 2015 IL App
(1st) 141292, ¶ 23, 395 Ill. Dec. 689, 39 N.E.3d 156.
We can hold the absence of a complete record against such an agency, even when
the agency is not the party appealing. Id. An administrative
body must not only provide the reviewing court with the entire record of
proceedings but also a record of the evidence the agency considered. Id. The
body must do so in order for the court to undertake judicial review. Id. As
in Miles, because of the state of the record, "our
ability to conduct a meaningful judicial review has been thwarted." Id. ¶
29. Given the Board's decision is subject to judicial review, it is appropriate
the Board provide an adequate record so that we can undertake our review. Id. ¶
24.
¶ 19 In matters such as this one, it is appropriate for a reviewing court to reverse and remand to the administrative agency to detail its findings supporting its conclusions. Soto v. Board of Fire & Police Commissioners, 2013 IL App (2d) 120677, ¶ 32, 371 Ill. Dec. 181, 989 N.E.2d 1109. Our responsibility is to ensure the board acted in compliance with the appropriate "legal parameters," which we cannot do because there are no findings. Id. Among other inquiries, we need to determine whether the Board relied on improper factors when granting the petition. Id. ¶ 27.
2.) The record on it’s face does not have any
response from the CTA proving beyond the Preponderance of the Evidence
Plaintiff’s Pleadings are in fact of veracity and the CTA is relying on every
racist corrupt person involved to save them in the Cook County Criminal
Enterprise.
THE SUMMARY JUDGMENT PARTICULARIZED JUDICIAL CORRUPTION IN THE CHANCERY DIVISION INVOLVING JUDGE FREDRENNA LYLE TRYING TO FIX A FORECLOSURE CASE AREADY VACATED IN 2010 CASE 2008 CH 33616.
BECAUSE FREDRENNA LYLE DID A GREAT JOB HELPING RACIST BANK ATTORNEYS STEAL THE HOMES IN ILLEGAL FORECLOSURES, SHE WAS PROMOTED TO THE APPELLATE COURT WHERE SHE CAN CONTINUE BEING A SELLOUT AND SERVANT TO HER MASSAS CONTROLLING HER IN THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY.
HER REPLACEMENT WAS ANOTHER INFERIOR BLACK MALE WORSE THAN HER WHO EXEMPLIFIED A HATE FOR BLACK WOMEN ESPECIALLY SENIOR CITIZENS AND IS HUGE IN TRINITY CHURCH WHERE REV MOSS IS THE PASTOR.
BANK ATTORNEYS NEVER FILED ANY APPEARANCES KNOWING THAT MANY OF THE BLACK JUDGES AIN'T SHIT AND WILL DO WHATEVER THEY ARE TOLD TO DO EMAILED THE JUDGE EXPARTE INSTRUCTED HIM ON HOW TO WRITE UP THE COURT ORDER SO THAT THE COOK COUNTY SHERIFF CAN COME AND LOCK THEM OUT OF THEIR ORDER, HE RESPONDED BACK TO THE BANK ATTORNEY THROUGH HIS LAW CLERK COMPLYING WITH THEIR EVERY DEMAND, WHAT HE DOESN'T REALIZE IS THAT THE FBI HAS ALL OF THE EMAIL THREADS OF THAT COMMUNICATION.
ASSUMING ARGUENDO, THE FORECLOSURE WAS LEGIT (BUT IT WAS NOT) THE JUDGE WOULD DIRECT THE TENANTS OR HOMEOWNERS WOULD BE DIRECTED TO THE LAW CENTER FOR BETTER HOUSING, 100 N LA SALLE, ST #2500 CHICAGO, IL 60602, OR THE DIRECTOR TERESA HERRERA TO ASCERTAIN RENT RECEIPTS, IF THE RESPONDENT RECEIVED ANY 5 DAY NOTICE OR SERVED PERSONALLY SO AS TO PRESENT A PROPOSAL FOR MONIES FOR THEM FOR MOVING OUT OR CLEAN UP FEES ALLEGEDLY $10,500 PER PERSON IN THE RESIDENCE.
NEVER AT ANY TIME WAS THE CASE SENT TO EVICTIONS COURT BUT RELIED ON JUDGE JAMES T. DERICO TO VIOLATE THE CIVIL RIGHTS OF THE SENIOR CITIZENS BY USING HIS SKIN COLOR TO ORDER THE COOK COUNTY SHERIFF TO HAVE THEM TO ILLEGALLY EVICT THE SENIOR CITIZENS AND IT WAS DONE AS THEIR HOME WAS VICIOUSLY TRASHED AND RANSACKED AS THEIR PERSONAL EFFECTS OF 64 YEARS WAS STOLEN.
MOTION TO
VACATE COURT ORDER BEING VOID/A NULLITY (MARCH 27, 2024) DUE TO JUDGE MARITZA
MARTINEZ NOT HAVING JURISDICTION AND INVOKING THE JURISDICTION OF THE STATE
POLICE/JUDICIAL COMMISSION TO FORCIBLY REMOVE JUDGE (S) INSTANTER FROM THEIR
POSITIONS DUE TO ADMISSIONS OF SUMMARY JUDGMENT (FILED DEC 4, 2023) Local Rule 56.1 The rule is very clear that
"all material facts set forth in the statement required of the moving
party will be deemed admitted unless controverted by the statement of the
opposing party." Local Rule 56.1(b)(3)(B).
Fri, Mar 28 at 10:41 AMAttention Madam Coordinator Mary A. Marchese:As per our conversation Thursday afternoon, you asserted that according to your database, the only information recorded was the year 2019 and December 2023 which was in total disbelief, this dialogue was shared only after it was explained that an appearance was had before Forti Dec. 9, 2024, and continued to Dec. 13, 2024 where Assistant States Attorney, Yolanda Simmons continued the matter to Jan 3, 2025 at noon but never provided a court order.You stated emphatically but in a professional manner that there were many motions denied but the States Attorney office was not involved after explaining to you that a Summary Judgment was filed in dec. 2023 and the default judgment had been filed and was continued to Jan. 3, 2025, at noon but Yolanda Simmons never ever provided the court order.You were shocked and asked when the last time, you were in court? and it was explained Dec 9 and Dec 13, 2024, it was stated, that Yolanda was going to be emailed or called, and she was going to contact me because you have no record of the State being involved.For the record, NO ASSISTANT STATES ATTORNEY EVER EMAILED ME A COURT ORDER AFTER ANY COURT PROCEEDINGS.1.) Because of your skin color is why Yolanda contacted me in that many of the Black females involved in this mess are worse than the racist judges involved and will go along with anything egregious as hell involving assisting judges and will assist the judges and keep their mouths shut.2.) Forti blatantly Lied and signed a Court Order (Sept. 19, 2024) saying Francoise and I were self-represented, and "RESPONDENT IS GRANTED LEAVE TO FILE MOTIONS THAT COMPLY WITH THE ILLINOIS CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE AND THE RULES OF THE COURT OF COOK COUNTY.3.) His Court Order on all legal accounts is deemed Void/a Nullity, very few Democratic judges understand the Rules of Law or its procedures and not any attorneys e.g. Attorney Generals, Assistant States Attorneys, Corporation Counsels, General Counsels, Law Professors etc. has ever accused me of lacking knowledge in the rule of law.4.) Judge Abbey Romanek made her racist disposition towards me clear and was shocked at my impromptu answers to her every query people like her assumed my skin color seems to dictate my intellect, on (Nov. 1, 2024), Francoise was a No Show on Zoom and ASA Madison Mathis had no court file of the case and she did not pass the case so that she could ascertain the file.5.) Judge Romanek became a law unto herself by ignoring her Clerk, ASA evidence as well as my unrebutted testimony articulating that the States Attorney were representing the Police Officer Francoise Louise Barbara Hightower-Belmer, her reply was that it was "a mistake of fact."A- Judge Romanek electronically signed a Court Order for Calendar 1, "Respondent failed to meet his burden to establish the Judge Michael Forti demonstrated actual prejudice"B- Judge Romanek electronically signed a Court Order for Calendar 1, Transferring the matter back to Judge Forti.6.) (July 9, 2024), Hon Edward Arce, Francoise appeared via the ASA signed a Court Order where the ASA acknowledged representing her and it was for "In Re Parentage of", "In Re Allocation of Parental Responsibilities" no racist or sexist judge exemplifies his court decorum or professionalism.7.) That on (Oct 28, 2024) Presiding Judge Regina Scannicchio signed a Court Order acknowledging ASA Yolanda Simmons as the Police Officer's representative.8.) Per ASA Madison Mathis testimony in Judge Abbeys Court on (March 27, 2024) the ASA was on the case as Maritza Martinez assumed jurisdiction where a Hearing Court Order was provided to me blank typed up without the Presiding Judges signature, (Feb, 20, 2024) and sent to the States Attorney via email where Martinez went on a tirade when asking her how did she have jurisdiction on a case that was not properly assigned to her?A- That she at least acknowledges that "they" told her to preside over this matter but never identifying the conclave of who they were, but whoever "they" were don't like Black Men especially of any Heterosexual nature.B- That Martinez signed a court order (Feb. 26, 2024) where the ASA was present continuing the matter to March 27, 2024.9.) That on (Nov. 14, 2023) Caucasian ASA refused to accept a Briefing schedule and Chivira agreed, (Nov 28, 2023) ASA Harris before former ASA/Judge Iris Y. Chivira representing Francoise Hightower where she was present in court as ASA Harris admitted in open court having a court order signed by Timothy Murphy (2007) where Tycee was (23 years old) emancipated and an adult which was objected to.A- When Gov Pritzker had someone from Springfield not sure if they were from the OEIG, he informed me that there was never a court order entered against me for child support only an arrearage order which don't make any sense and that they had judges on the case, I am unaware of and that the media needed to be contacted an investigative reporter like Pam Zekman and for me to get in touch with one of them.B- If I am not mistaken the Man from Springfield had the Court Order of August 3, 1988 where the alleged defective service was Feb. 23, 1988 but Judge Rivers signed the court order for Feb 24, 1988, which is why there was never a child support order ever entered because Rivers knew I was not the father, he went along with this shit because he got to be a Supervising Judge and William Stewart Boyd who came highly recommended was nothing like James Montgomery is probably the worse Black Man then Derico backstabbed me and got a judges position out of the deal.C- No Democratic Judge this case has been before in any court understands Default or Dispose etc.That because of the above it has been alleged that Judge Forti et al. are moving on disposed cases helping corrupt fathers bully the mothers removing the minor children from their custody investigate how Black or Brown women are losing custody and see for yourself how racism and sexism are weaponized against certain women; 2008 CH 33616 Derico had exparte communications with bank attorneys he instructed Cook County Sheriffs to unlawfully EVICT SENIOR CITIZENS of 64 years from their home (Nov 24, 2024) when the case was DISMISSED June 3, 2010, and AFFIRMED by the APPELLATE COURT Dec 30, 2011 Fraud admissibility great latitude is permitted in proving fraud C.J.S. Fraud 104 ET Seg. Fraud 51-57. where a question of fraud and deceit is the issue involved in a case, great latitude is ordinarily permitted in the introduction of evidence, and courts allow the greatest liberality in the method of examination and in the scope of inquiry Vigus V. O’Bannon, 1886 8 N.E 788, 118 ILL 334. Hazelton V. Carolus, 1907 132 ILL. App. 512Now if you don't have any of these cases in your database ask yourself after reading the veracity of a Prima Facie showing of Judicial Corruption someone was stupid enough to believe that by deleting the data, they were saving everyone caught up in this scandal.Now, I am tendering to your attention the Summary Judgment, Default Judgment of $50 Million Dollars along with the Motion to Disqualify Judge Abbey Romanek because many of the court orders corroborate how the State has been involved since the inception.Madam Mary, a Clerk of impeccable moral turpitude corroborated your findings of only being able to see certain court files only up to 2019 at the Daley Center, which was consistent with your statement, but in reviewing the computer at the front counter it is evidenced that a number of court entries over six thousand pages.A racist judge or homosexual/Bisexual will not honor any laws of integrity or follow any rules of Civil Procedure and definitely don't honor any parts of the United States Constitution as you can see but the FBI is following this case, and others they complimented how well, I diligently fought to keep the Johnson sisters in their home, ( which took me by surprise) they want me out of this case so they can invoke jurisdiction and I am diligently exhausting every avenue trying to get a court date for the Default Hearing anyone doubting law enforcement position do something stupid and see how far you make itRespectfully submitted,Joe Louis Lawrence
No comments:
Post a Comment