.Courtesy Copy IV Re Notice Recusing the Entire Cook County Judiciary, Re Notice Default of $50 Million Dollars et al., Re Notice Vacating Maritiza Martinez March 27th 2024, Court Order et al.5
Yahoo/Sent
  • Joe Louis 
    From:joelouis565@yahoo.com
    To:Governor JB Pritzker,CCC DomRelCR3006 (Chief Judge's Office),ccc.domrelcr3004@cookcountyil.gov,CCC DomRelCR3008 (Chief Judge's Office),CCC DomRelCRCL12 (Chief Judge's Office)
    Cc:The State of Illinois,sao csed (States Attorney),B. Marshall Hilmes,Maritza Martinez (Judiciary),Alexandrina Shrove
    Bcc:oig.hotline@usdoj.gov,
    Mon, Apr 28 at 8:00 AM

    That Homosexual, Racist or any Judges fraternally connected are in violation of the Ku Klux Klan Act of 1871 they are “Lynching” innocent litigants who challenge their MALFEASANCE with unlawful rulings with Terrorist and Bullying tactics, the judges arbitrarily exercise hate or racial animus against certain litigants, due to  their skin color, or Masculine or Feminine Heterosexual disposition because they are the alleged majority in the Chicago Judiciary and deem themselves untouchable---as the Bogus Paternity case is connected to a Fed Case Joe Louis Lawrence v IBC Wonder Bread et al, 07 C 1191, the FBI needed corroboration of judges participating in a judicial conspiracy showing their involvement with the CTA, they have a bonus because the States Attorneys office along with judges in Cook County Chancery, Cook County Domestic Relations and Clerks in both Federal and State are now complicitly involved.

    Dear Honorable Justices of the Judicial Council Seventh Circuit:
    FBI
    Media
    Professor Ken Dikowsky
    Cook County Judges

    Re Notice Motion Recusing the entire Cook County Judiciary et al. Re Notice Vacating Maritza Martinez March 27th Court Order, Re Notice Default for $50 Million Dollars resulting from Summary Judgment filed Dec. 4, 2023, that has been ADMITTED to by all Parties but is being IGNORED by all Racist or Homosexual judges is why Judge Forti has allegedly been forum-shopped to preside over said case.

    Attention: Chief Judges of the Judicial Council as this case corroborates Page 2, Par 3B of the Formal Complaint Regarding Improper Interference by Clerk of Court in Judicial Misconduct Process, FBI and all Members of Law Enforcement as Democratic Judges and Clerks in Cook County and State Agencies who have ADMITTED to taking part in every aspect that this Respondent has eloquently particularized in all said AFFIDAVITS.

     

    That because of my skin Color along with Senior Citizens unlawfully Evicted, Shemica Taylor who have endured five years for her safety do not want to ever come near any court house in Chicago due to the plethora of Terrorist weaponry of unjust legal applications of the laws designed from the inception to take her child from her in the guise as lawful child custody.

    Because Homosexual, Racist or any Judges fraternally connected are in violation of the Ku Klux Klan Act of 1871 they are “Lynching” innocent litigants who challenge their MALFEASANCE with unlawful rulings with Terrorist and Bullying tactics, the judges arbitrarily exercise hate or racial animus against certain litigants, due to  their skin color, or Masculine or Feminine Heterosexual disposition because they are the alleged majority in the Chicago Judiciary and deem themselves untouchable---as the Bogus Paternity case is connected to a Fed Case Joe Louis Lawrence v IBC Wonder Bread et al, 07 C 1191, the FBI needed corroboration of judges participating in a judicial conspiracy showing their involvement with the CTA, they have a bonus because the States Attorney's office along with judges in Cook County Chancery, Cook County Domestic Relations and Clerks in both Federal and State are now complicitly involved.

    The FBI stated in order for them to invoke jurisdiction, I have to be removed from this matter entirely, because they do not get involved in personal cases, (but made it very clear, they don't want one or two judges, they want all of them involved) I have diligently tried removing myself from this matter but Cook County judges are keeping me as a prisoner intertwined as if they are aware of the FBI's intention and is doing everything unimaginable keeping me in the courts with frivolous prolonged litigations steady trying to EXTORT almost $50,000 for arrearage of child support, that was never owed and never my child who is now a 40 year old woman and knows, I am not her father.  

    Respectfully submitted,

    Joe Louis Lawrence, Counsel Pro Se




    Download all attachments as a zip file
  •  
    From:kenditkowsky@yahoo.com
    To:Governor JB Pritzker,CCC DomRelCR3006 (Chief Judge's Office),ccc.domrelcr3004@cookcountyil.gov,CCC DomRelCR3008 (Chief Judge's Office),CCC DomRelCRCL12 (Chief Judge's Office)
    Cc:The State of Illinois,sao csed (States Attorney),B. Marshall Hilmes,Maritza Martinez (Judiciary),Alexandrina Shrove
    Mon, Apr 28 at 11:06 AM
    In an e-mail I wrote today the following.    It is applicable to your e-mail, to wit:

    "Unfortunately, the averment of corruption in the Justice system is no longer academic.    It is real.   In fact it is a pandemic!     The shock of OPERATION GREYLORD has not only worn off - John Kass, but a columnist for the Chicago Tribune also wrote a column in which he disclosed how one become a Judge in Cook County, Illinois.    Not only is Kass no longer writing for the Tribune, but, a search for his article is futile.    Janet Phelan who has disclosed who judges accept gratuities on a regular basis has to live in fear.   JoAnne Denison and Lanre Amu ******.   

    "What is unreal is the desire of those in power to NOT address the corruption problem.    A judge, an administrator, and/or an executive who received a gratuity for doing the job (or not doing the job) is required to pay taxes on the remuneration.    Mr. Trump was the victim of Lawfare.    Did I not hear that he wants to make "Tips" tax free!    Does this include the gratuity to the trier of fact for his/her service in violation of 720 ILCS 5/17 - 56 or for ignoring the procrustean rules applied to a fiduciary and codified in part in 755 ILCS 5/11a - 3.    

    "What has happened is any professional who calls attention to this extra circular source of income is subject to disciplinary action."

    Why is this quote relevant?

    It is relevant because when the facts are actually examined (in my opinion) Mr. Louis (not his real name) has a reason for being aggrieved as in spite of Article 1 Section 12 of the Illinois Constitution and the 14th Amendment he might get a more judicial decision from three members of the KKK sitting as Judges in Stalin's Soviet Russia.


    Ken Ditkowsky




  • Joe Louis 
    From:joelouis565@yahoo.com
    To:mecataylor28@gmail.com
    Mon, Apr 28 at 8:03 AM
  • kenneth ditkowsky
    In an e-mail I wrote today the following. It is applicable to your e-mail, to wit: "Unfortunately, the averment of corruption in the Justice system is no longer academic. It is real. In fact it is a pandemic! The shock of OPERATION GREYLORD has not only worn off - John Kass, but a columnist for the Chicago Tribune also wrote a column in which he disclosed how one become a Judge in Cook County, Illinois. Not only is Kass no longer writing for the Tribune, but, a search for his article is futile. Janet Phelan who has disclosed who judges accept gratuities on a regular basis has to live in fear. JoAnne Denison and Lanre Amu ******. "What is unreal is the desire of those in power to NOT address the corruption problem. A judge, an administrator, and/or an executive who received a gratuity for doing the job (or not doing the job) is required to pay taxes on the remuneration. Mr. Trump was the victim of Lawfare. Did I not hear that he wants to make "Tips" tax free! Does this include the gratuity to the trier of fact for his/her service in violation of 720 ILCS 5/17 - 56 or for ignoring the procrustean rules applied to a fiduciary and codified in part in 755 ILCS 5/11a - 3. "What has happened is any professional who calls attention to this extra circular source of income is subject to disciplinary action." Why is this quote relevant? It is relevant because when the facts are actually examined (in my opinion) Mr. Louis (not his real name) has a reason for being aggrieved as in spite of Article 1 Section 12 of the Illinois Constitution and the 14th Amendment he might get a more judicial decision from three members of the KKK sitting as Judges in Stalin's Soviet Russia. Ken Ditkowsky
    Mon, Apr 28 at 11:06 AM
  • Joe Louis 
    From:joelouis565@yahoo.com
    To:info@repcassidy.com,Elk@housegop.org,Ugaste@ilhousegop.org
    Mon, Apr 28 at 11:32 AM
  • Joe Louis 
    From:joelouis565@yahoo.com
    To:Governor JB Pritzker,CCC DomRelCR3006 (Chief Judge's Office),ccc.domrelcr3004@cookcountyil.gov,CCC DomRelCR3008 (Chief Judge's Office),CCC DomRelCRCL12 (Chief Judge's Office)
    Cc:The State of Illinois,sao csed (States Attorney),B. Marshall Hilmes,Maritza Martinez (Judiciary),Alexandrina Shrove
    Tue, Apr 29 at 2:04 PM
    I have been advised to resubmit the Summary Judgment, Default Judgment and Motion to Vacate Court Order of Maritza Martinez et al.

    I have never ever as a Plaintiff or Defendant ever had a racist or any judge to ever tell me to be quiet or shut up in any court as Michael Forti did in his court disrespecting me because, I was not stupid or went along with the chicanery taking place with him and ASA Yolanda Simmons but many of the judges told me, I was correct in my pleadings just the wrong person making allegations against white men, I am to have a sponsor, or another person implied a white man or union attorneys because up here in Cook County we do things differently) I am still fighting the same "FIXED INCEST PATERNITY CASE" because every attorney retained or tried helping me have been intimidated allegedly bought off, for example William Stewart Boyd was my attorney and Divorce judge and refused to get off my case in a Divorce matter took my baby son from me, I filed a Motion to Disqualify him and judge Edward Jordan issued an Order returning my son back into my custody. judge Boyd knew my ex wife was dealing with major depression and I was the main parent facilitating the needs for the entire household began siding with the Ruffians working against me unlawfully.

    When judge Boyd became a judge, he was aware of everything, so he allegedly negotiated a judges position he never informed me or withdrew from my case, so I had to due-diligently articulate this matter by defending myself.

    It is clear many off the judges in Cook County do not recognize or honor cases that are Vacated, Disposed or Dismissed, they allow attorneys to profit off of this level of egregious injustices in the event the County system database crashes or documents are mysteriously deleted like so many other documents; hereto attached, said PDF"s are submitted for the Court's perusal.

    Court Date May 9, 2025 at 9:00am

    Zoom Link for Michael A. Forti
    Meeting ID: 828 4953 7745
    Password: 286646
    Dial In Number: 312-626-6799




    1.       Judge Abbey Romanek: O. K. All right. Well, I don’t find that to be biased and complicity. I find that to be a mistake of fact, which can be easily fixed. The States Attorney is here and they don’t and aren’t aware of this case at all. So I’m not even sure that they are involved in this case.

    2.      Joe Louis Lawrence: But I submitted the court orders showing that the state’s attorney did,

    3.      Judge Romanek: Well ok in fact, well, then that’s just a mistake of fact. And if that’s the case, then that can be cured. It doesn’t show bias. So your motion to

    4.      Assistant States Attorney Madison Mathis: Your honor, I actually found this case in one of our databases. It looks like it looks like it had been taken off call for non-states attorney  matter back on Let’s see here March 27th of 2024.

    5.      Judge Romanek: But I see something here from May 20.

    She committed Perjury on the bench saying the Assistant States Attorney is not on the case, Once President Trump is inaugurated he needs to send in the military because we have a different breed of Domestic Terrorists running Chicago’s courts.

    Clerk:  Mr. Lawrence, the Judge told you to come back at 11, you are a little early.

    Joe Louis Lawrence: OK, Alright.

    ASA: What I would do I will ask you to unmute yourself and I’ll call you all individually  to discuss your child support matter. But I do see I have someone in the county lockup Mr. Lee. Can you please unmute yourself? Good morning, Sir how are you? I’m OK,

    ASA: Well, Mr. Lee, you were here ‘cause you have not submitted to genetic testing. Have you been submitted to genetic testing there in the detention center phone?

    OK, so is there possible to get him to genetic testing today?

    Deputy: I have no idea. OK, so what I’ll do, what are you in for? Sir? I didn’t know any other case. No. OK, so what I’ll do, sir,

    ASA: I’ll go ahead and release you on this case only, and I’ll need you to go submit for the genetic testing. OK, and if you do not test, I’m gonna issue another warrant. OK, so let me give you your next court date, and I will write this on the order. I’m gonna send order over to you. OK, so now I’m gonna give you an extra day. Your next court date will be January 3rd at 11:00 AM. And you’ll be on zoom. Okay. Now go ahead with your question So you’re gonna send me all that information. OK, we have to go, have to come. No, she knows. So you’ll get the email, tell you when it comes back to the zoom, as well as you get an order for your genetic testing, and you do that as soon as possible. But you do it before the 3rd of next month. So you’re gonna send me somewhere in particular, and you go down, you go to the Daley center in the basement. That’s where you take it at. OK, just go along. I don’t have to pay for it? No, I remember last time they told me I was gonna have to pay. What do they call it? What they. Pay for this test. OK, the State pays for this test, but you need to take it.

    Mr. Lee OK, I’m gonna take it Monday then.

    ASA: I’m gonna check if you don’t take it. I’m gonna issue another warrant for your arrest. Alright. Mr. Davidson, I’ll send this order over, probably within the next 45 minutes. And thank you That’s the one I’m done. I’ll send the order to you. Thank you. Thank you, ma’am. Have a good day. Thank you. You too Alright, ma’am, I’m ready for you parties now.

    States Attorney Yolanda Simmons:  I’m gonna call your name, and I’ll be asking yourselves to give me a number. Where I can reach you at, I have Mr. Lawrence. Please unmute yourself.

    ASA: OH yeah. Good morning. Yes, you have a state child support case. Yes, ma’am. I have noticed. OK, give me a phone number.

    ASA: I can reach you at 312 965-6455. OK, go ahead and mute yourself. I’ll give you a call.

    Joe Louis Lawrence: Excuse me, I spoke to Miss Simmons. She said, I have to speak to judge Forti.

    Clerk: This is about what’s supposed to go before the Judge, right?

    Joe Louis Lawrence: Yes.

    Clerk: OK, yeah. See, it has to go back before that judge to ask

    Joe Louis Lawrence: Yes, ma’am, OK Yeah,

    Joe Louis Lawrence: Madam Clerk. Could you put me back before Judge Forti please?

    Clerk: Well, that has to be done before the Coordinator, So you would just have to hold on a moment.

    Joe Louis Lawrence: OK,

    Clerk: thank you.

    Clerk: Alright.

    Clerk: so you have to go back before that judge to ask for a change of venue or SOJ.

    Joe Louis Lawrence: That is correct,

    Clerk: So You have to go back to that judge. Which judge was it?

    Joe Louis Lawrence: It was Judge Romanek

    Clerk You have to go back before that judge. You have to file your motion.

    Joe Louis Lawrence But I did, I did all of that. The clerks indicated that Romanek said send the case to Forti

    Clerk No it can’t come to judge Forti just like that

    Joe Louis  Lawrence but that’s why I…

    Clerk:   So now listen to me Sir, Listen to me. You have to go before that judge with your motion. You say you went before Judge Romanek to ask, what did you ask for? Was it an SOJ substitution of judge?

    Joe Louis Lawrence: Yes, ma’am. Yes, ma’am.

    Clerk: OK, so now listen to me. Listen to me. So Judge Romanek is supposed to send that substitution of  judge to our presiding judge, which is Judge Scannicchio. It has to go to the presiding judge and then they enter it into a lottery system to sort it out to go to another judge. You just can’t say go to judge Forti. It was never on Judge Forti’s call.

    Joe Louis Lawrence: with all due the respect. Who am I speaking to please?

    Clerk Kimberly Wilson: My name is Kimberly Wilson. I am the coordinator.

    Joe Louis Lawrence: OK, OK everything you’re saying I’m familiar. With but I can’t do nothing different if this is where they’re sending me. I sent him a courtesy copy explaining what was said. So if I'm not supposed to be in front of Judge Forti which I understand and know this, I just need an order from Forti sending this matter to Scannicchio. I can’t make nobody put me where I’m supposed to go, now I am going through Romper Room.

    Clerk Kimberly Wilson: I see and I hear you, Judge Forti can’t do an order Because it was never on his call. Judge Romanek is supposed to do the order to send it to Judge Scannicchio. She knows this. She’s supposed to do the order sending it to Judge Scannicchio. Pretty much judge Forti has nothing to do with it. is what I am trying to tell you.

    Joe Louis Lawrence: But I understand. But you see where…

    Clerk Kimberly Wilson:  He can’t do an order because it’s not on his call and it was not before him. It’s what I’m trying to say. So you have to go back before Judge Romanek for her to do an order to transfer to substitute the judge. You want to change? You want to substitute a judge? Is what you want.

    Joe Louis Lawrence: When I did this, I originally filed  a motion to disqualify Judge Forti. The case was sent to Romanek. Romanek did not follow the procedures. She said that everything I was saying, I was wrong and I filed the proper motion to recuse her November the 4th when the Clerks went to put me on her calendar, she informed them that she did not want me on her calendar and said to send this case to Judge Forti is the reason why I'm here.

    Clerk Kimberly Wilson: Madam Clerk, Can you look this case up for us and tell me what’s going on? For some reason I can’t get into the into the odyssey to look this up.

    Joe Louis Lawrence: I mean they are playing games with me now. I wouldn’t be in front of him if I’m trying to recuse him. Yes,

    Madam Clerk: Mr. Lawrence. Do you know your case number? I don’t have your case number 88 DO79O12. Wait wait one moment, You said 1988 D.

    Joe Louis Lawrence Yes ma’am.

    Madam Clerk: OK go ahead D  079012 If I could get in, cause our system is acting up.

    Clerk Kimberly Wilson:  I’m having a problem with the system. It won’t even let me sign on to the system.

    Madam Clerk:  I know it’s a mess today. Is it Hightower and Joseph Lawrence?  

    Joe Louis Lawrence: Yes Ma’am,  OK,  this is not even my child.

    Madam Clerk: Ok what are you trying to find out?

    Clerk Kimberly Wilson: Basically He’s saying that, He’s trying to do a substitution of judge before the proper judge. Romanek. And for some reason, they told him he had to come to judge Forti. As far as we know, he's not even saying it. It is on. It is assigned to his calendar, if that’s, if that means anything.

    Joe Louis Lawrence: Yes, It does

    Madam Clerk: it is calendar 61. OK,

    Clerk Kimberly Wilson:  OK, so, Mr. Lawrence, you were right. It is on calendar 61.

    Clerk Kimberly Wilson: So Mr. Lawrence

    Judge Forti:  So, Mr. Lawrence,  you’re clogging the system with all due respect here. Here’s the issue. Miss Simmons and I are going to address your motion that you filed for default. That piece of the case is on calendar 61. But the piece of the matter that deals with Judge Romanek is not on my calendar. I just sent an email to Judge Scannicchio’s assistant to confirm that, So only with respect to your motion for default, are we going to deal with this today? And Miss Simmons, when you’re ready, I’d like to handle the Lawrence matter.

    Joe Louis Lawrence: Your Honor, I filed a motion to disqualify you, so you shouldn’t be handling anything.

    ASA Yolanda Simmons: Your Honor, I am ready

    Judge Forti: Well, who heard that? as, I understand it. And that’s why I’m asking if there was a motion to disqualify me. There should be an order indicating whether or not that motion to disqualify was granted or not. I’m not aware of it being granted.

    Joe Louis Lawrence: That is the motion put before Judge Romanek. That’s the issue right now.

    Judge Forti: Well If she denied it, then it’s done. And you’re back in front of me.

    Joe Louis Lawrence: Judge Scannicchio Never sent the case to you.

    Judge Forti: No, that’s not true. Miss Simmons, all right. Did you get a copy of Mr. Lawrence’s motion for default?

    ASA Yolanda Simmons: Yes, I did. Now, this is just to refresh myself, Mr. Lawrence. You’re trying to terminate arrearage because you’re alleging the petitioner is deceased. Is that correct?

    Joe Louis Lawrence: Excuse me!

    ASA Yolanda Simmons:  Are you trying to terminate arrearage? Because you are alleging the petitioner is deceased?

    Joe Louis Lawrence: No, no. I filed the default from a Summary Judgment.

    ASA Yolanda Simmons:  OK, so I got something from Judge Scannicchio, because your case was with   Judge Scannicchio, correct?

    Joe Louis Lawrence:  Not that I know of.

    Judge Forti: It was on calendar one at interim basis. Mr. Lawrence is saying that Judge Roman Act denied his motion and now. After the Fact he wants to disqualify Judge Romanek that’s not the way it works,

    ASA: Yolanda Simmons Right.

    Judge Forti:  But you’re involved in Simmons because Mister Lawrence filed a complaint against the assistant state’s attorney and a slew of other people, He claims that,  You have got notice of this and that is why I want you to be on this because he has filed a motion for default

    Joe Louis Lawrence: Your Honor, First of all,  You’re confusing the issues with all due respect!

    Judge Forti:  No I’m not Mr. Lawrence. Please be quiet. Please be quiet. I want Miss Simmons to look into this.

    ASA Yolanda Simmons: So you’re under what I have. The last order on the most relevant order I have is from judge Romanek  returning the case to calendar 61. So that’s what I have.

    Judge Forti:  All right. And she returned it back to me because the motion to disqualify against me was denied. So you understand that Mr. Lawrence, you tried to get me disqualified and Judge Romanek said no.

    Joe Louis Lawrence: But she was  biased and she didn’t send the case to Judge Scannicchio, She sent the case directly to you. And I did that. But that’s O. K. Because it went through calendar one.

    Joe Louis Lawrence: No, it didn’t.

    Judge Forti: Yes, it did. You understand?

    Joe Louis Lawrence:  Where’s the court order at? There’s no court order. There’s no court order from Judge Scannicchio  sending the case back to you.

    Judge Forti: And the reason is the only. Thing that matters is that judge Scannicchio that Judge Romanek  denied the motion to qualify. I mean, yes, to disqualify it. Stayed on calendar. What? So that portion of the case is finished. Do you see an order? Miss Simmons of Judge Romanek denying the motion that?

    ASA: Yolanda Simmons: I see that I have that order right here your Honor.

    Judge Forti:  Fine. Judgment. And your honor. All right, you accept that Mr. Lawrence?

    Joe Louis Lawrence: No, I don’t.

    Judge Forti: All right, why not?

    Joe Louis Lawrence: It’s because Judge Scannicchio was the one that’s supposed to send the case back to you. Not Romanek sending the case to you directly.

    Judge Forti: It went through calendar one. It was the only place. The only place, Sir, once Judge Romanak denied the motion for cause. It had to come back here. Plain and simple. So I. have the case. And Miss Simmons back to what I said, he has filed a motion for default against the state.

    ASA: Yolanda Simmons: OK, now.

    Joe Louis Lawrence:  So I am. I’m respectfully objecting to the state being involved because judged when Eileen Burke was a judge, she was involved in this matter and denied..

    Judge Forti:  And at the moment, Sir, Sir, this is falling. I’m telling you that you have filed a motion against a variety of parties, including the assistant state’s attorney. You got him. You filed a motion for default. Isn’t that, right?

    Joe Louis Lawrence: That is correct. And I also filed a motion to go to a different venue

    Judge Forti: I am letting him Miss Simmons know that you filed this motion for default. And I want to know what Miss Simmons’s position is now.

    ASA:  At this time, I have received some emails on this case. From Scannicchio Clerk as well as from our own internal policies on how we handle with these cases. Your honor. I’m going to have to set this for brief continuance and get more clarification from my supervised attorney about how we handle these types of cases given the nature of what Mr. Lawrence has filed. So what date?

    Judge Forti:  So what day?

    ASA: I want to say this for January 30th. I’m I’m sorry. January 3rd.

    Judge Forti: is that work, Mr. Lawrence?

    Joe Louis Lawrence: It’s fine.

    ASA: Can you come back here at noon?

    Joe Louis Lawrence:  Back to zoom?

    ASA: Yes.

    Joe Yes

    Judge Forti: And the issue is where it where you’re get your getting Miss Simmons is seeking the continuance with respect to the fact that you re noticed your motion for default

    Joe Louis Lawrence: And for the Cook County Judiciary to be recused as well.

    Judge Forti: That I cannot do.

    Joe Louis Lawrence: And we still have Maritza Martinez motion that have not been addressed that I paid to $75 for

    Judge Forti: You need to go back to Miss Judge Martinez I can only handle because I have not recused myself and your effort to get me recused by virtue of the SOJ was denied. So I am. Keeping this case until at least we see what Miss Simmons says on the motion for default anything relating to Judge Romanek or Judge Martinez you have to raise in those courtrooms all right. So Miss Simmons, what do you have Mr. Lawrence’s contact information?

    ASA: I did get a phone number from Mr. Lawrence  Let me see if I still have your number at 312-965-6455.

    Joe Louis Lawrence: That is correct.

    ASA: All right, Mr. Lawrence, I have you.

    Judge Forti: All right. Thank you, Mr. Lawrence. All right, Miss Simmons, what other matters do we have?

     

     

                                                                    Respectfully Submitted

     

                                                                       Joe Louis Lawrence



    Download all attachments as a zip file