Wikipedia Racial Injustice in Chicago Courts

Search results

Tuesday, August 20, 2019


UPDATE JUDGE NORGLE SAID THIS CASE WAS IN FACT FRIVOLOUS

SEE HOW ALLEGED "WHITE NATIONALIST" JUDGES IN THE FEDERAL COURT ENGAGE IN A PLETHORA OF CIVIL RIGHTS VIOLATIONS SURPASSING THE CRIMES OF THE GREYLORD ERA

JUDGE NORGLE IS BASICALLY LETTING EVERYONE THAT READS THE CRIMES THAT IS NOTED IN THIS DOCUMENT THAT THEY ARE UNTOUCHABLE BECAUSE IT IS HIS ALLEGED IMPRESSION MEMBERS IN LAW ENFORCEMENT SHARE THE SAME SENTIMENTS AS HE AND THEY DO, THAT IS WHY THEY ARE ABLE TO ENGAGE IN TYRANNY ACTS AT WILL AND NOT FEAR ANY REPRISALS FROM LAW ENFORCEMENT.

The Seventh Circuit has collectively weighed in on Judge Norgle better than any lawyer ever could. His handling of the trial of former Chicago City Treasurer Miriam Santos caused the Seventh Circuit to coin the phrase "veritable avalanche of errors." United States v. Santos, 201 F.3d 953 (7th Cir. 2000). A Lexis search of "norgle" and "circuit rule 36" (meaning the Seventh Circuit re-assigned the case to another judge on remand) turns up 14 cases, including cases not involving new trials (see, e.g., Holmes v. Vill. of Hoffman Estates, 511 F.3d 673 (7th Cir. 2007)). Other decisions in Judge Norgle's wall of reversed legal rulings include: Williams v. City of Chicago, 733 F.3d 749 (7th Cir. 2013); Redmond v. Redmond, 724 F.3d 779 (7th Cir. 2013); Ty Inc. v. Softbelly's, 353 F.3d 528 (7th Cir. 2003); United States v. Robinson, 724 F.3d 878 (7th Cir. 2013); Schmude v. Sheahan, 420 F.3d 645 (7th Cir. 2005); and Grun v. Pneumo Adex Corp., 163 F.3d 411 (7th Cir. 1999). This is but a small sample of rulings where the appeals court has confirmed Judge Norgle's repeated legal errors. The repeated nature of these rulings indicates what can plainly be noticed in Judge Norgle's courtroom -- that he fails to learn from, or to correct, his mistakes. Even more shocking is that a judge with such an extensive record of legal errors teaches law at John Marshall Law School. Any student who wishes to pass the Illinois bar, or function effectively in a courtroom with even a minimally competent trier of fact, is advised to avoid his class -- or, failing that, to disregard nearly everything that he teaches them.



 IN THE 
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
EASTERN DIVISION
                                                                         )
                                                                         )
 Joe Louis Lawrence                                        )            Hon. Charles R. Norgle, Sr.            
        Plaintiff                                                     )
                                                                         )                 93 CV 01609
          VS                                                          )                                 
                                                                         )                                 
 Chicago Transit Authority                                )               
        Defendant                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   

   Now comes Petitioner, Joe Louis Lawrence, Counsel Pro Se in this cause respectfully represents to this court the reasons and files herewith his Affidavit in support of Motion to Vacate August 8, court order et al;

 Respectfully Submitted,

By:   _________________         
       Joe Louis Lawrence
          Counsel  Pro Se
       P. O. Box 490075
    Chicago, IL. 60649-0075                                                                                                                              
            312 965-6455
     Joelouis565@yahoo.com
    Twitter: @joelouis7







                                                                                       IN THE 
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
                                                                EASTERN DIVISION
  

                                                                                                                                                               
IN SUPPORT OF MOTION  TO VACATE THE AUGUST 8, 2019 COURT ORDER ET AL.

1.     I am Joe Louis Lawrence, Counsel Pro Se, Petitioner in this cause, being first duly sworn on oath deposes and states, as follows;

2.     That on August 8, 2019 Petitioner received an email from the Clerk of the District Court stating that said case was Dismissed August 6, 2019 due to being Frivolous.


3.     That Respondent failed to respond or adhere to the  Northern District Local Rule 56.2. N.D. Ill. Civ. R. 56.2, regarding the Summary Judgment.

4.     SUMMARY JUDGMENT STANDARDS Summary judgment obviates the need for a trial where there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(c). To determine whether any genuine fact exists, the court must pierce the pleadings and assess the proof as presented in depositions, answers to interrogatories, admissions, and affidavits that are part of the record. Fed R. Civ. P. 56(c) Advisory Committee’s notes. The party seeking summary judgment bears the initial burden of proving there is no genuine issue of material fact. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, 477 U.S. 317, 323, 91 L. Ed. 2d 265, 106 S. Ct. 2548 (1986). In response, the nonmoving party cannot rest on bare pleadings alone but must use the evidentiary tools listed above to designate specific material facts showing that there is a genuine issue for trial. Id. at 324; Insolia v. Philip Morris Inc., 216 F.3d 596, 598 (7th Cir. 2000). A material fact must be outcome determinative under the governing law. Insolia, 216 F.3d at 598-99. Although a bare contention that an issue of fact exists is insufficient to create a factual dispute, Bellaver v. Quanex Corp., 200 F.3d 485, 492 (7th Cir. 2000), the court must construe all facts in a light most favorable to the nonmoving party as well as view all reasonable inferences in that party’s favor. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc., 477 3 U.S. 242, 255, 91 L. Ed. 2d 202, 106 S. Ct. 2505 (1986).

5.     In a patent infringement action, an accused infringer seeking summary judgment of noninfringement may meet its initial burden by providing evidence that would preclude a finding of infringement or by showing that the evidence fails to establish a material issue of fact essential to the patentee’s case. Vivid Techs. v. Am. Sci. & Eng’g, Inc., 200 F.3d 795, 807 (Fed. Cir. 1999). A court may grant summary judgment of noninfringement if, after viewing the alleged facts in the light most favorable to the patentee and drawing all reasonable inferences in the patentee’s favor, there is no genuine issue as to whether the patent claims encompass the accused device. Novartis Corp. v. Ben Venue Labs., 271 F.3d 1043, 1046 (Fed. Cir. 2001); Pitney Bowes, Inc. v. Hewlett-Packard Co., 182 F.3d 1298, 1304 (Fed. Cir. 1999).

6.      LOCAL RULE 56.1 Before determining whether a genuine issue of material fact exists with regard to either TelLock’s claims or Jasco’s counterclaims, the court must wade through the parties’ Local Rule 56.1 filings. It is apparent to the court that both parties, Tel-Lock in particular, require instruction as to the straightforward Local Rules of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois. The Local Rules provide detailed instructions as to how litigants should approach their summary judgment motions and responses. Local Rule 56.1(a) provides that a motion for summary must include a "statement of material facts as to which the moving party contends there is no genuine issue and that entitle the moving party to a judgment as a matter of law."

This statement of material facts "shall consist of short numbered paragraphs, including within each paragraph specific references to the affidavits, parts of the record, and other supporting materials relied upon to support the facts set forth in that paragraph." Part (b) of Local Rule 56.1 requires a party opposing summary 4 judgment to file a concise response to the movant's statement of material facts. That statement is required to include a response to each numbered paragraph in the moving party's statement, including in the case of any disagreement, "specific references to the affidavits, parts of the record, and other supporting materials relied upon." The rule is very clear that "all material facts set forth in the statement required of the moving party will be deemed admitted unless controverted by the statement of the opposing party." Local Rule 56.1(b)(3)(B).

7.    That because of Judge Norgle’s corroboration being an alleged participant in a “White Nationalist Organized Criminal Conspiracy” as a “Private Citizen” not a Federal judge for which he took his oath and appointed to ignored the very laws that granted the Petitioner the relief he was seeking; due to Petitioner’s skin color;

8.    That because of Judge Norgle’s corroboration being an alleged participant in a “White Nationalist Organized Criminal Conspiracy” as a “Private Citizen” not a Federal judge for which he took his oath and appointed to closed his eyes to the Local Rules that Respondent Chicago Transit Authority and Local 241 Amalgamated Transit Union attorneys have admitted to all pleadings which validates the verity of why the Petitioner should be awarded the $35 Million Dollars but because judge Norgle used his robe and unlawful authority to further violate section 1983 of U.S.C.S. which contemplates the depravation of Civil Rights through the Unconstitutional Application of a Law by conspiracy or otherwise. Mansell v. Saunders (CA 5 F 1A) 372 F 573, especially if the conspiracy was actually carried into effect, where an action is for a conspiracy to interfere with Civil Rights under 42 U.S.C.S. 1985 (3), or for the depravation of such rights under 42 U.S.C.S. 1983, if the conspiracy was actually carried into effect and plaintiff was thereby deprived of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the United States Constitution and Laws, the gist of the action may be treated as one for the depravation of rights under 42 U.S.C.S. 1983, Lewis v. Brautigan (CA 5 F 1a) 227 F 2d 124, 55 Alr 2d 505, John W. Strong, 185, 777-78 (4th ed. 1992).

9.    That Judge Norgle had alleged knowledge of Petitioner’s case being before Judge Robert M. Dow, Jr, 16 CV 7434 both judges sharing the same floor Joe Louis Lawrence v 420 East Ohio et al., in that Judge Dow seemingly got away with his corroboration being an alleged participant in a “White Nationalist Organized Criminal Conspiracy” as a “Private Citizen” not a Federal judge for which he took his oath and appointed to the bench, he too closed his eyes to the Local Rules as mentioned in the aforementioned Paragraph, hereto attached, Gr Ex A, Notice of Motion for Summary Judgment Pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure w/Affidavit; $30 Million Dollars.

A-   In that all Racist Parties and inferior parties have admitted Page 3, Par 4 from the Affidavit “That said Defendants Defaulted in the same like manner in the Cook County Court and relied on a Negroe judge inferior in nature to “Trespass upon the Laws” and commit all sorts of infamous crimes, trying to save the perpetrators guilty of Housing Discrimination and Voucher Discrimination along with various acts of Civil Rights violations hereto attached, Brief before the Seventh Circuit filed March 14, 2018;  (Lee Oties Love, Jr. v Supreme Court of IL. Et al.)

B-   Said Brief unequivocally demonstrate the magnitude African American Democrats are willing to do to destroy their own ethnic group so as to be accepted by “White Nationalist” controlling the Democratic party “Political Machine” by embracing “Jim Crow Laws” by denying any and all claims put before the courts by persons of color against Caucasian racist Irish and other Democrats”. 

10.     That in furtherance to the verity of Par 9A, of Gr Ex A, Petitioner filed a Motion Moving for Prove-Up Entering Default Judgment & Summary Judgment w/Affidavit, ref as Gr Ex B where all Defendants were served by Certified Mail via Cook County Clerk and Cook County Sheriffs due to said judge being allegedly inferior and a Negroe Democrat satisfied the merits of what he was willing to do as a Democrat destroying anyone within his ethnicity denied said motion when all attorneys admitted to all of Petitioners Pleadings.

11.     That Judge Norgle had alleged knowledge Judge Dow seemingly got away with his corroboration being an alleged participant in a “White Nationalist Organized Criminal Conspiracy” as a “Private Citizen” not a Federal judge for which he took his oath and appointed to the bench had a Motion for Disqualification of judge Personal Bias or Prejudice {28 USCA 144, 455 (B) (1) } Vacate Order of May 3, 2018 & May 9, due to Federal Clerk Committing Fraud Entering Court Order in Computer Unlawfully as Gr Ex C before the Court of Appeals Seventh Circuit.
A-   That Gr Ex C had directed evidence and corroboration of judge Dow engaging in an active Criminal Terrorist Racist Conspiracy where he signed a court order dated April 3rd, 2018, see Page 4, Pars 3-5, Par 4, “That the Judge used his position and authority in an attempt to undermine the integrity of Plaintiff’s motion by Inducing Reliance on all persons and judges reviewing this matter; in that Page 2 of the manufactured order that corroborates the Judge as a “Private Citizen states Milchtein v Chisholm, 880 F 3d 895, 897 (7th Cir 2018)”  

B-   That Par 5, states “That said order demonstrates said judge colluding in a diabolical conspiracy with the Defendants, Memorandum Decision and Order Granting Motion for Partial Summary Judgment which was filed April 24th,  2018 et al.

C-    
12.     That Judge Norgle is anticipating the same support and corroborating assistance said alleged White Nationalists granted to Judge Dow as they “Corroborated in an “Organized Criminal Conspiracy” as “Private Citizens” in the Seventh Circuit” whereby Gr Ex D, Motion for Reconsideration et al filed May 2, 2018, Page 3 Par 4 states, “That Page 2 of the alleged order purportedly entered in the data system timely, states, “Plaintiff’s motion must be denied, because this Court has no authority to review the decisions of state court judges like Valderrama. Pursuant to the Rooker-Feldman doctrine, only the Supreme Court of the United States has statutory authority to review the decisions of state courts in civil cases” the laws and citations are from the Seventh Circuit; That the United States Supreme Court has already laid out the precedent of the laws that are being ignored in Illinois Under Federal law which is applicable to all states, the U.S. Supreme Court stated that if a court is "without authority, its judgments and orders are regarded as nullities.”
A- That because of Judge Dow’s corroboration being an alleged participant in a “White Nationalist Organized Criminal Conspiracy” as a “Private Citizen” not a Federal judge for which he took his oath and appointed to the bench closed his eyes to the Local Rules and admissions of all attorneys admitting to the plethora of Civil Rights Violations of judges “Trespassing upon the Laws” engaging in “Treason Offenses” became a law unto himself signed a court order May 9 2018 making sure Petitioner did not come to the court to vociferously impeach the judges unlawful acts, court order states, “Plaintiff’s motion for reconsideration {36) is denied for all the reasons stated in the Court’s prior order, as well as Judge Darrah’s orders. Federal courts are courts of limited jurisdiction and this Court lacks jurisdiction to review the Circuit Court orders about which Plaintiff complains. This case remains closed and Plaintiff’s recourse is to file a notice of appeal. Notice of motion date 5/10/2018 is stricken and no appearances are necessary on that date.   
       
B- That Pars 7 and 8 of Page 4 corroborates the entire legal system is under siege by Domestic Terrorists inciting hate from the benches using inferior colored people willing to sacrifice their lives and freedom to be accepted in the Democratic Political Machine That said court order signed by Judge Valderrama, pursuant to Gr Ex C from the Dec 12, Motion, states “IT IS ORDERED THAT: this case is transferred to Calendar 6 Judge Mikva, for the sole purpose of hearing the Petition for Substitution of Judge for Cause. . Upon resolution of the Motion, the case shall be returned to the Presiding Judge for the appropriate assignment. Judge Moche Jacobius signed the Order March 18, 2016.
  
                       That the aforementioned Directive was never adhered to making every order entered    by “Private Citizen” Valderrama a “Nullity” VOID ENTIRELY
C-  Petitioner learned that certain Caucasian judges were not going along with Burke against the Petitioner and were going to make the CHA and buildings pay him for discriminating against him since they understood what he had been going through in the courts, in that allegedly “Private Citizen” Valderrama learned of this so he took it upon himself to rule on the matter which was on Judge Cecilia Gamrath’s calendar.

13.    That Petitioner filed his Notice of Appeal June 11, 2018 ref as Gr Ex E with his Jurisdictional Statement.

14.     That Petitioner purportedly received an Order from an unnamed judge with no signature (June 13, 2018) Par 2 of the order states, “The Notice of Appeal does not identify any order that appellant Lawrence wants this court to review. Additionally, the notice of appeal was filed June 11, 2018, three days late, as to the district court’s most recent order of May 9, 2018.” “The notice of appeal of course, is untimely……”  
A-   That June 9, 2018 was on a Saturday; therefore, the Appeal could not be properly filed until the next working day which was Monday 2 days later June 11, 2018, making the Notice of Appeal timely filed.

15. That Par 3 states IT IS ORDERED that Appellant, on or before June 27, 2018, file a brief memorandum stating why this appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.”

16. That pursuant to Par 9A, of Gr Ex A corroborates the verity that alleged Clerks and attorneys are complicit in the alleged manufacturing of court orders in said Organized Conspiracy U. S. Sup Court Digest 24(1) General Conspiracy, U.S. 2003, Essence of a conspiracy is an agreement to commit an unlawful act.----U.S. v. Jimenez Recio,; 123 S Ct. 819, 537 U.S. 270, 154 L. Ed 2d 744, on remand 371 F. 3d 1093.

17. That Petitioner filed his Jurisdictional Memorandum ref as Gr Ex F, whereby said persons in the Seventh Circuit corroborating their roles as “Private Citizens” engaged in mail-fraud by mailing to the Petitioner court orders not signed or certified by any judge in the Seventh Circuit.

18. That the enumerated Pleading #8 further corroborate and demonstrate the magnitude said alleged “White Nationalist” in the Seventh Circuit engaging in egregious acts of “Treason” “Trespassing upon the laws” willfully by laughing at the Federal Government F.B.I and United States Attorney making it clear to them that they are the Democratic Untouchables with a few Republicans under their control.
A-   June 1, 2018 letter was sent to the Petitioner from the Judicial Council of the Seventh Circuit, No. 07-18-90039, In Re Complaint against a judge, Memorandum, states “Complainant has filed a misconduct complaint against the judge assigned to his case. This is complainant’s third complaint against a judge. The first two were dismissed as Frivolous and this one is no different. Complainant alleges the judge is biased based on his adverse ruling. Nothing in this court record establishes judicial misconduct.”  
   
19.   That said Chief judge Diane P. Wood never signed the aforementioned documents within Gr Ex F.

A-   That said Federal judges corroborated their roles in said “Organized Conspiracy” systematically made sure no person of color was afforded “Equal Access and Equal Treatment of the laws in Illinois, due to that fact. The court did not afford Petitioner or any person of color any Equal Protection of the Laws in spite of the Laws of the United States Constitution.

B-   Civil Rights Act of 1866- first section, enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled. That all persons born in the United States and not subject to any foreign power, excluding Indians not taxed, are hereby declared to be citizens of the United States; and such citizens of every race and color, without regard to any previous condition of slavery or involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall have the same right, in every State and Territory in the United States, to make and enforce contracts, to sue, be parties, and give evidence, to inherit, purchase, lease, sell, hold and convey real and personal property, and to full and equal benefit of the laws and proceedings for the security of person and property, as is enjoyed by white citizens, and shall be subject to like punishment, pains, and penalties, and to none other, any law, statute, ordinances, regulation, or custom, to the contrary notwithstanding, Act of April 9, 1866, Ch. 31, 1, 14 Stat. 27, 42 U.S.C.A. 1981 (a)     

             
C-   Turner 24 F. Cas. 337 (No. 14247) C.C.D. Md. 1867) The “equal benefit” clause is cited in what would appear to be the earliest reported case enforcing the section. The plaintiff was an emancipated slave who was indentured as an apprentice to her former master. Although both whites and blacks could be indentured as an apprentice, under the law of Maryland, indentured blacks were not accorded the same educational benefits as whites and, unlike whites, were subject to being transferred to any other person in the same county. Circuit Judge Chase granted a writ of habeas corpus upon finding that the purported apprenticeship was in fact involuntary servitude and a denial under the Civil Rights Act of 1866 of the “full and equal benefit of all laws.
D-    
20.   That Gr Ex G ( Jurisdictional Memorandum filed June 10, 2019) is Part 1 of 2 the Blue Print that amplifies the verity of alleged “White Nationalist” taking seize of the United States Court of Appeals as Domestic Terrorist, Page 1 Par 1, states why this appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction: Cook County Judges have been indicted and Convicted for Corruption and “Fixing” cases in Greylord but Federal Democratic Judges are ignoring the crimes due to Defendant being female African Americans complaining not Anglo-Saxon person, hereto attached, Gr Ex A Jurisdictional Brief Memorandum (filed June 5, 2019) detailing how Democrats under Alderman Burke “Fixed” cases where Supreme court Judge Anne burke coercing a judge as an attorney, Anne Burke also requested that the judge withdraw from the case saying, “My husband was the one who put you on the bench.”  
A-   That on June 11, 2019, Appellants received an unsigned court order not certified, stated “On consideration of the Jurisdictional Memorandum filed by Appellant on June 10, 2019, IT IS ORDERED that the appellee shall file, on or before June 18, 2019, a response to appellant’s filing, addressing the jurisdictional issue raised in the court’s order of June 3, 2019.

B-    That said Appellees failed to ask the court for an extension of time to respond, failed to respond to the Jurisdictional Memorandum; thereby, admitting to all pleadings pursuant to Federal Rule 56.1 (b)(3)(B).  

21.     That filed the appropriate Motion ref as Gr Ex H, Motion for Summary Judgment Pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure w/Affidavit, June 24, 2019 seeking $11 Million Dollars.

22.     That on July 2, 2019, alleged “White Nationalist” judges names recorded on said order without their signatures certifying the verity that they entered the order stated. On consideration of the papers filed in this appeal and review of the short record, IT IS ORDERED that this appeal is DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction.

A-    To show fraud upon the court, the complaining party must establish that the alleged misconduct affected the integrity of the judicial process, either because the court itself was defrauded or because the misconduct was perpetrated by officers of the court. Alexander v. Robertson, 882, F. 2d 421,424 (9th Cir. 1989);

B-    A void judgment does not create any binding obligation. Kalb v. Feuerstein (1940) 308 US 433, 60 S Ct 343, 84 L, Ed 370.

That under 18 U.S.C. 242 and 42 U.S.C. 1985 (3) (b). A judge does not have the discretion on whether or not to follow Supreme Ct. Rules, but a duty to follow. People v. Gersh, 135 Ill. 2d 384 (1990).

“Grounds warranting a motion to reconsider include (1) an intervening change in the controlling law, (2) new evidence previously unavailable, and (3) the need to correct clear error or prevent manifest injustice.” Id. (citing Brumark Case 1:07-cv-00644-WDM-KLM Document 158 Filed 08/25/2009 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 6 1 Although the Tenth Circuit does not allow citation to unpublished opinions for precedential value, unpublished opinions may be cited for persuasive value. 10th Cir. R. 32.1. 3 Corp. v. Samson Resources Corp., 57 F.3d 941, 948 (10th Cir. 1995).


23.     That Gr Ex I, Part 2 of 2 final Blueprint MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION DUE TO JUDICIAL “ORGANIZED CONSPIRACY” DISPARATE APPLICATION OF THE LAWS  DUE TO DEMOCRATIC JUDGES ENGAGING IN RACIAL HATE CRIMES ENTERING ORDERS BEING “VOID” A “NULLITY” CASE BEING “FRAUDULENT” JUDGES “TRESPASSING UPON THE LAWS” ENGAGING IN TREASON OFFENSES ACTING AS “PRIVATE CITIZENS”   ALTERNATIVELY DISQUALIFY JUDGES DUE TO BIAS CONFLICT OF INTEREST PURSUANT TO {28 USCA 144, 455 (b) (1)} Canon 3E (1990) 
RETIRED 7TH CIRCUIT JUDGE RICHARD A POSNER STATED “MOST JUDGES REGARD PRO SE LITIGANTS AS KIND OF TRASH NOT WORTH THE TIME”

24.     That said alleged “White Nationalists” demonstrating their racist hatred towards persons of color and anyone who tries to challenge their authority or fraternal members of said Domestic Terrorist Cells are systematically DENIED challenging the Federal Officials and its Special Forces to effectively eradicate them from their positions in that said Seventh Circuit corroborated their roles in an “Organized Conspiracy” mailed to the Appellant an unsigned Court absent any signatures or certifications July 30, 2019. On consideration of the motion for reconsideration filed by defendant -appellant on July 18, 2019, and construed as a petition for rehearing, all members of the original panel have voted to deny the petition.

Accordingly, the petition for rehearing is hereby DENIED.

A-   That Pursuant to Page 10 Par F of Gr Ex I The Judicial Conduct and Disability Act Study Committee Section 352 directs the chief judge to dismiss the complaint or conclude the proceeding by “written order, stating his or her reasons” and provide the order to the complainant and subject judge in that nowhere in Gr Ex L is the Chief judges signature recorded validating the verity of said Complaint against District Judge Robert M. Dow, Jr. being lawfully dismissed making the “Order Void a Nullity”

B-    That Pursuant to Page 11 Par 1,  FACT     Posner: ABA Journal (September 11, 2017) ref as Gr Ex P Most judges regard pro se litigants as 'kind of trash not worth the time' Posner, 78, told the Chicago Daily Law Bulletin last week that he decided to retire because of conflicts with his colleagues over the treatment of pro se litigants, who represent themselves. In a new interview with the New York Times, Posner elaborated on his concerns about the treatment of such litigants.
“The basic thing is that most judges regard these people as kind of trash not worth the time of a federal judge,” Posner said.
In the 7th Circuit, staff lawyers review appeals from pro se litigants, and their recommendations are generally rubber-stamped by judges, he noted.
Posner wanted to give the pro se litigants a better shake by reviewing all of the staff attorney memos before they went to the panel of judges. Posner had approval from the director of the staff attorney program. “But the judges, my colleagues, all 11 of them, turned it down and refused to give me any significant role. I was very frustrated by that,” Posner said.
Posner has written about the pro se issue in an upcoming book, and its publication “would be particularly awkward” if he remained on the court because it “implicitly or explicitly” criticizes the other judges, he said.
That Pursuant to Judge Posner’s admissions about said Federal judges and the corroboration recorded in this document demonstrates Prejudice, Bias, Racial Hate Crimes, demonstrates Unequal Treatment of the Laws, demonstrates Disparate Dispensation of the Laws at the Petitioner due to his skin color, demonstrates how effective how alleged “White Nationalist judges” are in Inducing Reliance Mississippi Comm’n on Judicial Performance v. Fletcher, 686 So. 2d 1075 (Miss. 1996)  and  Carter v. Mueller, 457 N.E. 2d 1335 Ill. App. (1st Dist. 1983) on several Judges in the Court of Appeals and others in legal authority conspiring against Petitioner, in that, said individuals of this Secret Fraternal Order Invoked Racial Apartheid, Invoked Genocidal Applications of the laws in accordance to their by-laws of the Fraternity, and total disregard to any laws of the United States Constitution Commentary Canon 2, 2A 2C,  Crawford v. State, 770 N.E. 2d 775 (Ind. Dash, 564 S.E. 2d 672 (S.C. 2002), Ferra, 582 N.W. 2d 817 (Mich 1998)

  

C-   Leslie W. Abramson, 25 Hofstra L. Rev. 751 (1997). The Judges Ethical Duty to Report Misconduct by Other Judges and Lawyers and its effect on Judicial Independence.

D-   A judge’s disrespect for the rules of court demonstrates disrespect for the law. Judges are disciplined under Canon 2 A for violating court rules and procedures. Judged ignored mandated witness order in attempt to accommodate witnesses’ schedules; Citing Canon 2A the court noted, “[a] court’s indifference to clearly stated rules breeds disrespect for and discontent with our justice system. Government cannot demand respect of the laws by its citizens when its tribunals ignore those very same laws”)

E-   That Judge Norgle unlawfully DENIED said Summary Judge calling it Frivolous validates the verity, he was complicit in an “Organized Conspiracy” and constitutes a failure to follow the Canon laws, Matter of Markey, 696 N.E. 2d 523 (Mass.1998), Mississippi Comm’n on Judicial Performance v. Byers, 757 So. 2d 961 (Miss. 2000).

F-   That Judge Norgle and Robert M. Dow, Jr. demonstrated multiple acts of Improprieties in an attempt to aid and assist said Appellee’s  named in Suit, In Re Judge No. 93-154, 440 S.E.2d 169 (Ga. 1994), And Deception by falsifying reasons for preventing a legally sufficient Summary Judgment from being honored against the Defendant’s, In re Ferrara, 582 N.W. 2d 817 (Mich. 1998),In re Renfer, 493 S.E. 2d 434 (N.C. 1997), In re Kroger, 702 A. 2d 64 (Vt. 1997), Gonzalez v. Commission on Judicial Performance, 33 Cal. 3d 359, 657 P. 2d 372, 377, 188 Cal. Rprt. 880 (1983)
25.    In 1986 the United States Supreme Court issued three decisions clarifying Rule 56. Though there was a dissent in every decision, there was also substantial agreement among all the opinions. Justices Powell, Marshall and O'Connor joined every majority. Only Justice Brennan dissented in every case, and even then, he agreed in large part with the majority's analysis of Rule 56, but judges in the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals do not honor or abide by the laws of the United States Supreme Court; due, to their Terrorist Control over the entire legal tribunals of the State, City and Cook County and certain Federal Republican judges, in that, only those in majority of the Corrupt Democratic Political Machine and it’s noted conspirators are the benefactors in these tyranny offenses while the innocent and the just people of color are suffering at the helm of Terrorist controlling the legal tribunals.
“No one is above the Law”,  citing a 1928 decision by Supreme Court Justice Louis Brandeis Olmstead v. United States, 277 U.S. 438 (1928),
“We must subject government officials to the same rules of conduct that we expect of the citizen. The very existence of the government is imperiled if it fails to observe the law scrupulously. As Brandeis puts it, "if the government becomes a lawbreaker, it breeds contempt for law; it invites every man to become a law unto himself; it invites anarchy. To declare that in the administration of the criminal law the end justifies the means—to declare that the government may commit crimes in order to secure the conviction of a private criminal—would bring terrible retribution. Against that pernicious doctrine this court should resolutely set its face."         
26.     Judge Norgle as a “Private Citizen” is expecting his alleged racist Brethren in the alleged “White Nationalist Terrorist Network” to continue to desecrate the laws against the government and uphold the “Treason Offenses” he has perpetrated against the Petitioner because of the color of his skin.
A-   That to further amplify alleged “White Nationalist Racist Terrorist” seizing control of the legal tribunals in Illinois, hereto attached, Gr Ex J, Motion for an Order on Transferring this case to the Federal Court due to no State Judges having Jurisdiction on the Appellant making all orders Void a Nullity, (filed in the Appellate Court of Illinois, August 2, 2019)

B-   That alleged “White Nationalist” “Private Citizen” Margaret McBride became a law unto herself by pledging her allegiance to said Domestic Terrorist by “Trespassing upon the Laws that which she or no other State or Cook County Judge has jurisdiction, DENIED said Motion and certified the court order with her signature, ref as Ex K, This matter coming to be heard on Plaintiff-Appellant’s motion to transfer this case to federal court, and the court being fully advised in the premises; IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff-Appellant’s motion to transfer is denied.  

C-   That said judge should never have presided over this matter not only have she corroborated her role as a co-conspirator in this matter and egregious racist hatred at the Petitioner, she is an Alumni of Depaul Law School where Edward Burke attended; thereby making her court order “Void” a “Nullity” Thomas Durkin tried the same “shit” somehow taking the case from Judge Gettleman and ruling against the Petitioner trying to save Edward Burke.

D-   That said judge demonstrated so much animosity at the Petitioner she failed to recognize Par 9 Ex F, G, of Gr Ex K United States Mail returned to Petitioner stating Francoise was DECEASED, mail returned to sender, she never ordered the suspension of this matter pending an investigation seeing that she was a former States Attorney.

E-   That Judge Norgle on July 26, 2019, during the Hearing made an inquiry to the Petitioner about said Paternity matter and asked for the case number which was 19-0845, further corroborates trying to receive any merited justice in this state is likened to trying to use yesterdays toilet paper on today’s anus having diarrhea.  

F-    That no Democratic judge or racist Federal judge in this state will honor the laws of the United States Constitution or the aforementioned precedent by the Seventh Circuit will admonish other Anglo Saxon men in the Democratic Party who have violated the Civil Rights of every person of color, in that said Judges are using their robes as “Private Citizens” to incite hate and Disparate  rulings in this “Organized Conspiracy”.

G-  That said Democratic judges have demonstrated and corroborated themselves as a threat to National Security and a Menace to Society, in that Black and Brown judges are benefitting and profiting off the racial injustices perpetrated by those controlling the “Criminal Enterprise” in the Democratic Political Machine are named and noted throughout this document and affidavits are not admonished because the crimes are perpetrated on their own ethnic groups.  

H-   That in Illinois under the Democratic Tyranny Terrorist Regime of racist alleged “White Nationalist and Inferior judges protecting the authors of Jim Crow enforcement it is acceptable for a colored man to marry or sleep with these hateful individuals, and close their eyes to the heinous atrocities lodged at him so as to keep their secrets of what they do to one another in the closet, but has elected to go along with sinister Demonic Psychotic Acts in an attempt to cover-up what started out as incest and sexual abuse which culminated into a “shitstorm of corruption” nobody is who they appear to be or what they are supposed to be.

I-     But those very individuals are seeking to destroy the life of a Heterosexual innocent God-Fearing man with no qualms against any persons in how they live their lives or who they sleep with can’t receive “Fucking Justice” simply because he is a Freeman Born and Raised with skin of color !


 Anybody involved in this Conspiracy thought Everybody told Somebody what to cover-up and destroy, to keep nobody of learning of Everybody’s involvement, the problem was that, Everybody thought nobody knew and told, Somebody not to worry because Nobody would never know how they lied, falsified, conspired, and destroyed all documents to save Everybody, but Somebody knew of what Everybody did and Nobody paid attention because to them it was a “joke” Anybody became very nervous because now they realize Somebody lied and now Everybody is in trouble with the LAW and will go to jail because Everybody thought Somebody was telling the “TRUTH”!

 Jennings v. Patterson, 488 F. 2d 442, equal access to public facilities. The court found that the plaintiffs had been “denied the right to hold and enjoy their property on the same basis as white citizens.” Jennings suggests the potential usefulness of the equal benefit clause in guaranteeing full and equal enjoyment of public property and public services.” Developments in the Law section 1981, 15 Harv. Civ. Rts. ---- Civ. Lib. L. Rev 29, 133 (1980).

27.     That Petitioner has ordered the transcripts from Judge Robert M. Dow, Jr 5 Pages (May 2, 2018) and Charles Norgle, Sr. 26 Pages (July 26, 2019), see while so many of you were laughing on the golf courses making a mockery of the Petitioner as he traveled through every legal venue in Illinois seeking “Light” justice in the courts as a Freeman Born and Raised in the United States of America, but was met with “Darkness” corruption, mayhem, tyranny and injustices in the courts not one racist judge or inferior colored person realized, they were warring against the government not the Petitioner in violation to Section 4 of the Ku Klux Klan Act.
A-   That said racist judges are likened to cowardly mass murderers only they are destroying lives committing genocide with their pens acting as false Gods destroying the innocent and just.

B-   If anyone was to read the transcript of Petitioner before “Private Citizen” Charles Norgle, Sr. if he was the Grand Imperial Wizard or Grand Dragon of the Ku Klux Klan after he heard the Petitioner’s opening argument and articulate responses to every cross examination the judge delivered to the him as Petitioner maintained eye contact throughout his delivery, the only thing the judge said at the end he was going to take this matter under advisement.
C-      
28.    That said judges in the Democratic Political Machine and alleged “White Nationalists Terrorists” along with Inferior colored persons have managed to circumvent the laws of the United States Constitution and United States Supreme Court and still enforce Jim Crow Laws outlawed by the United States Supreme Court and is daring and begging Federal Officials to come and try to remove them.

29.        See that is why, the Ku Klux Klan Act of 1871 (was enacted) - Section 1 (42 U.S.C.) 1983.
       “Of all the Civil Rights legislation enacted in the aftermath of the Civil War, none has had a greater contemporary impact than the Ku Klux Klan Act of 1871. The Act grew out of a special one-paragraph message sent to the 42d Congress on March 23, 1871, by President Ulysses S. Grant, urgently requesting the enactment of legislation”.

Section 2 (42 U.S.C.) In the House of Representatives.
        “Congressional Debate of the second section of the Ku Klux Klan Act was more extensive and enduring than that of Section 1; As originally presented, Sec. 2 made it a felony for any “two or more persons” to conspire to commit certain enumerated crimes “in violation of the rights and privileges, or immunities of any person, to which he is entitled under the Constitution and laws of the United States.
           “Throughout the debates, supporters of the Act made repeated references to the depredations of the Ku Klux Klan; Victims of these atrocities included not only blacks but white Republicans as well. The crimes that were perpetrated, therefore, were not viewed as isolated occurrences, but as part of an “Organized Conspiracy….Political in its origin and aims”, “crimes perpetrated by concert and agreement, by men in large numbers acting with a common purpose for the injury of a certain class of citizens entertaining certain political principles, id, at 457 (remarks of Rep. Coburn). See also e.g., id. At 437 (remarks of Rep. Cobb) (“None but Democrats belong or can belong to these societies”) et al.,

30.             “Where these gangs of Assassins show themselves the rest of the people look on, if not with sympathy, at least with forbearance. The boasted courage of the South is not courage in their presence. Sheriffs, having eyes to see, see not; judges, having ears to hear, hear not; witnesses conceal the truth or falsify it; grand or petit juries act as if they might be accomplices. In the presence of these gangs all the apparatus and machinery of civil government, all the processes of justice, skulk away as if government and justice were crimes and feared detection. Among the most dangerous things an injured party can do is to appeal to justice. Of the uncounted scores and hundreds of atrocious mutilations and murders it is credibly stated that not one has been punished. Cong. Globe, supra note 2,  app. At 78 (remarks of Rep. Perry). (“While murder is stalking abroad in disguise, while whippings and lynching’s and banishment have been visited upon unoffending American citizens, the local administrations have been found inadequate or unwilling to apply the proper corrective”) et al., …. And the State made no successful effort to bring the guilty to punishment or afford protection or redress to the outraged and innocent.”)    

31. Under Section 4 of the Ku Klux Klan Act of 1871: the law is clear, “Whenever in any State or part of a State………unlawful combinations…….shall be organized and armed, and so numerous and powerful et al…………and whenever, by reason of either or all of the causes aforesaid, the conviction of such offenders and the preservation of the public safety shall become…..Impracticable, in every such case such combinations shall be deemed a rebellion against the Government of the United States…

                       FURTHER AFFIANT SAYETH NOT


WHEREFORE the aforementioned reasons Petitioner respectfully Prays for the Relief

1.)  For an Order Transferring this matter to the Executive-Committee for Reassignment.

2.)  For an Order Vacating the August 8, 2019 court order due to it being “Void” a “Nullity”

3.)  For an Order requesting the United States Attorney/Federal Bureau of Investigations to investigate the allegations of judges involvement in “White Nationalist Supremist Groups and Complicit in Government Corruption “Fixing” cases.  

4.)   For the entry of an Order awarding to your Petitioner for such other relief and any other relief necessary as equity may require of which this court may deem overwhelmingly just;
5.)   


            





IN THE 
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
EASTERN DIVISION



                                      EXHIBIT LIST

6.)  Gr Ex A Notice of Motion for Summary Judgment Pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure w/Affidavit (Filed April 24, 2018) 16 CV 7434.

7.)  Gr Ex B Motion Moving for Prove-Up Entering Default Judgment w/Affidavit (Filed Jan. 19, 2015) 2015 CH 01670 In the Circuit Court of Cook County Chancery Division.

8.)  Gr Ex C Motion for Disqualification of Judge—Personal Bias or Prejudice {28 USCA 144, 455 (B) (1) Vacate Order of May 3, 2018 & May 9, due to Federal Clerk Committing Fraud Entering Court Order in Computer Unlawfully (Filed May 11, 2018). In the United States Court of Appeals.

9.)  Gr Ex D Motion for Reconsideration & Vacate Court Order due to it being a Nullity Pursuant to federal Rules of Civil Procedure w/Affidavit (Filed May 2, 2018) In the District Court.

10.)               Gr Ex E Notice of Appeal w/Jurisdictional Statement (Filed June 11, 2018) In the District Court.


12.)               Gr Ex G Jurisdictional Memorandum (Filed June 10, 2018) In the United States Court of Appeals 19-2040.

13.)               Gr Ex H Motion for Summary Judgment Pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure w/Affidavit (Filed June 24, 2019). In the United States Court of Appeals, 19-2040.

14.)               Gr Ex I Notice of Motion for Reconsideration due to Judicial “Organized Conspiracy” Disparate Application of the Laws due to Democratic Judges Engaging in Racial Hate Crimes Entering Orders Being “Void” a “Nullity” case being “Fraudulent” Judges “Trespassing Upon the Laws” Engaging in Treason Offenses Acting as “Private Citizens” Alternatively Disqualify Judges due to Bias Conflict of Interest Pursuant to {USCA 144,, 455 (b) (1) Canon 3E (1990) Retired 7th Circuit judge Richard A. Posner stated “Most judges regard Pro Se litigants as kind of trash not worth the time” (Filed July 18, 2019) In the United States Court of Appeals, 19-2040.

15.)               Gr Ex J Notice of Motion for an Order on Transferring this case to the Federal Court due to no State Judges having Jurisdiction on the Appellant making all Orders “Void” a “Nullity” (Filed August 2, 2019) In the Appellate Court of Illinois 4th Division, 19-0845.

16.)               Gr Ex K Signed Certified Court Order by Margaret Stanton McBride from the 4th Div. Appellate Court.




















































UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
EASTERN DIVISION

                                   AFFIDAVIT

I Joe Louis Lawrence, Counsel Pro Se being duly sworn on oath states the aforementioned pleadings enumerated within said motion pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedures, the undersigned certifies that the statements set forth in this instrument are true and correct, except as to matters therein stated to be on information and belief and as to such matters, the undersigned certifies as aforesaid that she verily believes the same to be true.

Respectfully Submitted                                                         
                                                                        



Joe Louis Lawrence                                        Notary

__________________
    


                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            
                                                                                                                                      


























UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
EASTERN DIVISION

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         NOTICE OF      
 MOTION TO VACATE AUGUST 8, 2019 COURT ORDER DUE TO FRAUD JUDGE NORGLE’S COMPLICIT CORROBORATION ENGAGING IN WHITE SUPREMECIST HATE CRIMES CORROBORATING IN AN “ORGANIZED CONSPIRACY” WITH OTHER FEDERAL JUDGES “TRESPASSING UPON THE LAWS” AS A “PRIVATE CITIZEN” MAKING THE COURT ORDER A “NULLITY”  “VOID”    w/AFFIDAVIT THEREBY DISQUALIFYING HIM FROM THIS CASE DUE TO A PRIMA FACIE SHOWING OF BIAS/PREJUDICE AT PLAINTIFF DUE TO HIS SKIN COLOR PURSUANT TO {28 USCA 144, 455 (b) (1) AND WARRANTS THE JURISDICTION OF THE FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION/ UNITED STATES ATTORNEY INSTANTER

 Please be advised that on, August 15, 2019 Plaintiff has filed before this District Court Motion to Vacate August 5, 2019  et al; and will present said legally sufficient instrument before  any Judge in  Judge Norgle’s stead  August  23, , 2019, at 9:30 am in room 2341
General Counsel: Karen G. Seimetz         Local Union 241 Amalgamated Transit Union  
                                                                       President Keith Hill/ 1st Vice President
Chicago Transit Authority                                        1613 S. Michigan
Law Department 567                                               Chicago, IL 60613
567 West Lake Street                        
Chicago, IL 60661
   

                                  Hon Mayor Lori Lightfoot
                                           City Hall 7th floor
                                           Chicago, IL. 60601                                                                               
Circuit Court of Cook County, Dorothy Brown
50 West Washington,
Chicago, IL 60601 Suite 1001

Courtesy Copies:
Cook County State’s Attorney                 Cook County Sheriff
Kim Foxx                                                     Thomas J. Dart
50 West Washington, Room 500            Richard J. Daley Center, Room 701
Chicago, Ill. 60602                                        Chicago, Ill. 60602
                                                                                                                              
US Attorney                                                FBI Dir. Chris Wray  
John R. Lausch, Jr.                               2111 West Roosevelt Road
219 S. Dearborn, 5th floor                              Chicago, Ill. 60612
Chicago, Ill. 60604
        Judge                                                   Judge                       
Celia C. Gamrath                                      Neil Cohen                                
50 West Washington Room 2508    50 West Washington Room 2308        
     Judge                                                       Judge
Franklin U. Valderrama                            Moche Jacobius, Presiding Judge
50 West Washington Room 2402            50 West Washington Room 2403       

Judge
Fredrick H. Bates  
Markham, IL. Room 102                                     

Cook County President                        Chief Judge
Toni Preckwinkle                                Timothy C. Evans                                         
118 N. Clark, Room 517                    50 West Washington, Room 2600          
Chicago, Ill. 60602                                        
                                   


               PLEASE BE ADVISED that on August 15, 2019, A Motion to Vacate August 5, 2019 Court Order et al. has been filed with the Northern District of Illinois and said copies being served on said applicable parties via hand delivery or Priority regular mail;








                                                                                                     Respectfully, Submitted,  

                                                                          ______________________
                                                                                        Joe Louis Lawrence
                                                                                          Counsel Pro Se
                                                                                          Chicago, Ill 60649
                                                                                              312 965-6455
                                                                                        joelouis565@yahoo.com
                                                                                               @joelou

No comments:

Post a Comment