UPDATE JUDGE NORGLE SAID THIS CASE WAS IN FACT FRIVOLOUS
SEE HOW ALLEGED "WHITE NATIONALIST" JUDGES IN THE FEDERAL COURT ENGAGE IN A PLETHORA OF CIVIL RIGHTS VIOLATIONS SURPASSING THE CRIMES OF THE GREYLORD ERA
JUDGE NORGLE IS BASICALLY LETTING EVERYONE THAT READS THE CRIMES THAT IS NOTED IN THIS DOCUMENT THAT THEY ARE UNTOUCHABLE BECAUSE IT IS HIS ALLEGED IMPRESSION MEMBERS IN LAW ENFORCEMENT SHARE THE SAME SENTIMENTS AS HE AND THEY DO, THAT IS WHY THEY ARE ABLE TO ENGAGE IN TYRANNY ACTS AT WILL AND NOT FEAR ANY REPRISALS FROM LAW ENFORCEMENT.
The Seventh Circuit has collectively weighed in on Judge Norgle better than any lawyer ever could. His handling of the trial of former Chicago City Treasurer Miriam Santos caused the Seventh Circuit to coin the phrase "veritable avalanche of errors." United States v. Santos, 201 F.3d 953 (7th Cir. 2000). A Lexis search of "norgle" and "circuit rule 36" (meaning the Seventh Circuit re-assigned the case to another judge on remand) turns up 14 cases, including cases not involving new trials (see, e.g., Holmes v. Vill. of Hoffman Estates, 511 F.3d 673 (7th Cir. 2007)). Other decisions in Judge Norgle's wall of reversed legal rulings include: Williams v. City of Chicago, 733 F.3d 749 (7th Cir. 2013); Redmond v. Redmond, 724 F.3d 779 (7th Cir. 2013); Ty Inc. v. Softbelly's, 353 F.3d 528 (7th Cir. 2003); United States v. Robinson, 724 F.3d 878 (7th Cir. 2013); Schmude v. Sheahan, 420 F.3d 645 (7th Cir. 2005); and Grun v. Pneumo Adex Corp., 163 F.3d 411 (7th Cir. 1999). This is but a small sample of rulings where the appeals court has confirmed Judge Norgle's repeated legal errors. The repeated nature of these rulings indicates what can plainly be noticed in Judge Norgle's courtroom -- that he fails to learn from, or to correct, his mistakes. Even more shocking is that a judge with such an extensive record of legal errors teaches law at John Marshall Law School. Any student who wishes to pass the Illinois bar, or function effectively in a courtroom with even a minimally competent trier of fact, is advised to avoid his class -- or, failing that, to disregard nearly everything that he teaches them.
IN
THE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
EASTERN DIVISION
)
)
Joe Louis Lawrence ) Hon. Charles R. Norgle, Sr.
Plaintiff
)
) 93 CV 01609
VS
)
)
Chicago Transit Authority )
Defendant
Now comes Petitioner, Joe
Louis Lawrence, Counsel Pro Se in this cause respectfully represents to this
court the reasons and files herewith his Affidavit in support of Motion to
Vacate August 8, court order et al;
Respectfully Submitted,
By: _________________
Joe Louis Lawrence
Counsel
Pro Se
P. O. Box 490075
Chicago, IL. 60649-0075
312
965-6455
Joelouis565@yahoo.com
Twitter: @joelouis7
IN THE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
EASTERN DIVISION
IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO
VACATE THE AUGUST 8, 2019 COURT ORDER ET AL.
1.
I am Joe Louis Lawrence, Counsel Pro Se, Petitioner in this cause,
being first duly sworn on oath deposes and states, as follows;
2.
That on August 8, 2019 Petitioner received an email from the
Clerk of the District Court stating that said case was Dismissed August 6, 2019
due to being Frivolous.
3.
That Respondent failed to respond or adhere to the Northern
District Local Rule 56.2. N.D.
Ill. Civ. R. 56.2, regarding the Summary Judgment.
4. SUMMARY JUDGMENT STANDARDS Summary judgment obviates the need
for a trial where there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and the
moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(c).
To determine whether any genuine fact exists, the court must pierce the
pleadings and assess the proof as presented in depositions, answers to interrogatories,
admissions, and affidavits that are part of the record. Fed R. Civ. P. 56(c)
Advisory Committee’s notes. The party seeking summary judgment bears the
initial burden of proving there is no genuine issue of material fact. Celotex
Corp. v. Catrett, 477 U.S. 317, 323, 91 L. Ed. 2d 265, 106 S. Ct. 2548 (1986).
In response, the nonmoving party cannot rest on bare pleadings alone but must
use the evidentiary tools listed above to designate specific material facts
showing that there is a genuine issue for trial. Id. at 324; Insolia v. Philip
Morris Inc., 216 F.3d 596, 598 (7th Cir. 2000). A material fact must be outcome
determinative under the governing law. Insolia, 216 F.3d at 598-99. Although a
bare contention that an issue of fact exists is insufficient to create a
factual dispute, Bellaver v. Quanex Corp., 200 F.3d 485, 492 (7th Cir. 2000),
the court must construe all facts in a light most favorable to the nonmoving
party as well as view all reasonable inferences in that party’s favor. Anderson
v. Liberty Lobby, Inc., 477 3 U.S. 242, 255, 91 L. Ed. 2d 202, 106 S. Ct. 2505
(1986).
5. In a patent infringement action,
an accused infringer seeking summary judgment of noninfringement may meet its
initial burden by providing evidence that would preclude a finding of
infringement or by showing that the evidence fails to establish a material
issue of fact essential to the patentee’s case. Vivid Techs. v. Am. Sci. &
Eng’g, Inc., 200 F.3d 795, 807 (Fed. Cir. 1999). A court may grant summary
judgment of noninfringement if, after viewing the alleged facts in the light
most favorable to the patentee and drawing all reasonable inferences in the
patentee’s favor, there is no genuine issue as to whether the patent claims
encompass the accused device. Novartis Corp. v. Ben Venue Labs., 271 F.3d 1043,
1046 (Fed. Cir. 2001); Pitney Bowes, Inc. v. Hewlett-Packard Co., 182 F.3d
1298, 1304 (Fed. Cir. 1999).
6. LOCAL RULE 56.1 Before
determining whether a genuine issue of material fact exists with regard to
either TelLock’s claims or Jasco’s counterclaims, the court must wade through
the parties’ Local Rule 56.1 filings. It is apparent to the court that both
parties, Tel-Lock in particular, require instruction as to the straightforward
Local Rules of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois.
The Local Rules provide detailed instructions as to how litigants should
approach their summary judgment motions and responses. Local Rule 56.1(a)
provides that a motion for summary must include a "statement of material facts
as to which the moving party contends there is no genuine issue and that
entitle the moving party to a judgment as a matter of law."
This statement of
material facts "shall consist of short numbered paragraphs, including
within each paragraph specific references to the affidavits, parts of the
record, and other supporting materials relied upon to support the facts set
forth in that paragraph." Part (b) of Local Rule 56.1 requires a party
opposing summary 4 judgment to file a concise response to the movant's
statement of material facts. That statement is required to include a response
to each numbered paragraph in the moving party's statement, including in the
case of any disagreement, "specific references to the affidavits, parts of
the record, and other supporting materials relied upon." The rule is
very clear that "all material facts set forth in the statement required of
the moving party will be deemed admitted unless controverted by the statement
of the opposing party." Local Rule 56.1(b)(3)(B).
7.
That because of Judge Norgle’s corroboration being an alleged
participant in a “White Nationalist Organized Criminal Conspiracy” as a “Private
Citizen” not a Federal judge for which he took his oath and appointed to
ignored the very laws that granted the Petitioner the relief he was seeking;
due to Petitioner’s skin color;
8. That because of Judge
Norgle’s corroboration being an alleged participant in a “White Nationalist
Organized Criminal Conspiracy” as a “Private Citizen” not a Federal judge for
which he took his oath and appointed to closed his eyes to the Local Rules that Respondent Chicago
Transit Authority and Local 241 Amalgamated Transit Union attorneys have
admitted to all pleadings which validates the verity of why the Petitioner
should be awarded the $35 Million Dollars but because judge Norgle used his
robe and unlawful authority to further violate section
1983 of U.S.C.S. which contemplates the depravation of Civil Rights through the
Unconstitutional Application of a Law by conspiracy or otherwise. Mansell
v. Saunders (CA 5 F 1A) 372 F 573, especially if the conspiracy was
actually carried into effect, where an action is for a conspiracy to interfere
with Civil Rights under 42 U.S.C.S. 1985 (3), or for the depravation of such
rights under 42 U.S.C.S. 1983, if the conspiracy was actually carried into
effect and plaintiff was thereby deprived of any rights, privileges, or
immunities secured by the United States Constitution and Laws, the gist of the
action may be treated as one for the depravation of rights under 42 U.S.C.S.
1983, Lewis v. Brautigan (CA 5 F 1a) 227 F 2d 124,
55 Alr 2d 505, John W. Strong, 185, 777-78 (4th ed. 1992).
9.
That Judge Norgle had alleged knowledge of Petitioner’s case
being before Judge Robert M. Dow, Jr, 16 CV 7434 both judges sharing the same
floor Joe Louis Lawrence v 420 East Ohio et al., in that Judge
Dow seemingly got away with his corroboration being an alleged participant in a
“White Nationalist Organized Criminal Conspiracy” as a “Private Citizen” not a
Federal judge for which he took his oath and appointed to the bench, he too
closed his eyes to the Local Rules as mentioned in the aforementioned
Paragraph, hereto attached, Gr Ex A, Notice of Motion for Summary
Judgment Pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure w/Affidavit; $30 Million
Dollars.
A-
In that all Racist Parties and inferior parties have admitted Page
3, Par 4 from the Affidavit “That said Defendants Defaulted in the same
like manner in the Cook County Court and relied on a Negroe judge inferior in
nature to “Trespass upon the Laws” and commit all sorts of
infamous crimes, trying to save the perpetrators guilty of Housing
Discrimination and Voucher Discrimination along with various acts of Civil
Rights violations hereto attached, Brief before the Seventh Circuit
filed March 14, 2018; (Lee Oties Love, Jr. v Supreme Court of
IL. Et al.)
B-
Said Brief unequivocally demonstrate the magnitude African
American Democrats are willing to do to destroy their own ethnic group so as to
be accepted by “White Nationalist” controlling the Democratic
party “Political Machine” by embracing “Jim Crow Laws” by
denying any and all claims put before the courts by persons of color against
Caucasian racist Irish and other Democrats”.
10. That
in furtherance to the verity of Par 9A, of Gr Ex A,
Petitioner filed a Motion Moving for Prove-Up Entering Default Judgment &
Summary Judgment w/Affidavit, ref as Gr Ex B where all Defendants were
served by Certified Mail via Cook County Clerk and Cook County Sheriffs due to
said judge being allegedly inferior and a Negroe Democrat satisfied the merits
of what he was willing to do as a Democrat destroying anyone within his
ethnicity denied said motion when all attorneys admitted to all of Petitioners
Pleadings.
11. That Judge Norgle had alleged knowledge Judge
Dow seemingly got away with his corroboration being an alleged participant in a
“White Nationalist Organized Criminal Conspiracy” as a “Private Citizen” not a
Federal judge for which he took his oath and appointed to the bench had a
Motion for Disqualification of judge Personal Bias or Prejudice {28 USCA 144,
455 (B) (1) } Vacate Order of May 3, 2018 & May 9, due to Federal Clerk
Committing Fraud Entering Court Order in Computer Unlawfully as Gr Ex C
before the Court of Appeals Seventh Circuit.
A- That Gr Ex C had
directed evidence and corroboration of judge Dow engaging in an active Criminal
Terrorist Racist Conspiracy where he signed a court order dated April 3rd,
2018, see Page 4, Pars 3-5, Par 4, “That the Judge used his position
and authority in an attempt to undermine the integrity of Plaintiff’s motion by
Inducing Reliance on all persons and judges reviewing this matter; in that Page
2 of the manufactured order that corroborates the Judge as a “Private Citizen
states Milchtein v Chisholm, 880 F 3d 895, 897 (7th Cir 2018)”
B- That Par 5, states “That
said order demonstrates said judge colluding in a diabolical conspiracy with
the Defendants, Memorandum Decision and Order Granting Motion for Partial
Summary Judgment which was filed April 24th, 2018 et al.
C-
12. That
Judge Norgle is anticipating the same support and corroborating assistance said
alleged White Nationalists granted to Judge Dow as they “Corroborated in an “Organized
Criminal Conspiracy” as “Private Citizens” in the Seventh Circuit” whereby Gr
Ex D, Motion for Reconsideration et al filed May 2, 2018, Page 3 Par 4
states, “That Page 2 of the alleged order purportedly entered
in the data system timely, states, “Plaintiff’s motion must be denied,
because this Court has no authority to review the decisions of state court
judges like Valderrama. Pursuant to the Rooker-Feldman doctrine, only the
Supreme Court of the United States has statutory authority to review the
decisions of state courts in civil cases” the laws and citations are
from the Seventh Circuit; That the United States Supreme Court has already laid
out the precedent of the laws that are being ignored in Illinois Under Federal law which is applicable
to all states, the U.S. Supreme Court stated that if a court is "without
authority, its judgments and orders are regarded as nullities.”
A-
That because of Judge Dow’s corroboration being an alleged
participant in a “White Nationalist Organized Criminal Conspiracy” as a “Private
Citizen” not a Federal judge for which he took his oath and appointed to the
bench closed his eyes to the Local Rules and admissions of all attorneys
admitting to the plethora of Civil Rights Violations of judges “Trespassing
upon the Laws” engaging in “Treason Offenses” became a law unto himself signed
a court order May 9 2018 making sure Petitioner did not come to the court to vociferously
impeach the judges unlawful acts, court order states, “Plaintiff’s motion for
reconsideration {36) is denied for all the reasons stated in the Court’s prior
order, as well as Judge Darrah’s orders. Federal courts are courts of limited
jurisdiction and this Court lacks jurisdiction to review the Circuit Court
orders about which Plaintiff complains. This case remains closed and Plaintiff’s
recourse is to file a notice of appeal. Notice of motion date 5/10/2018 is
stricken and no appearances are necessary on that date.
B-
That Pars 7 and 8 of Page 4 corroborates
the entire legal system is under siege by Domestic Terrorists inciting hate
from the benches using inferior colored people willing to sacrifice their lives
and freedom to be accepted in the Democratic Political Machine That said court
order signed by Judge Valderrama, pursuant to Gr Ex C from the Dec 12,
Motion, states “IT IS ORDERED THAT: this case is transferred to Calendar 6
Judge Mikva, for the sole purpose of hearing the Petition for Substitution of
Judge for Cause. . Upon resolution of the Motion, the case shall be returned to
the Presiding Judge for the appropriate assignment. Judge Moche Jacobius signed
the Order March 18, 2016.
That the aforementioned Directive was never adhered to making
every order entered by “Private
Citizen” Valderrama a “Nullity” VOID ENTIRELY
C-
Petitioner learned that
certain Caucasian judges were not going along with Burke against the Petitioner
and were going to make the CHA and buildings pay him for discriminating against
him since they understood what he had been going through in the courts, in that
allegedly “Private Citizen” Valderrama learned of this so he took it upon
himself to rule on the matter which was on Judge Cecilia Gamrath’s calendar.
13. That Petitioner filed his Notice of Appeal June
11, 2018 ref as Gr Ex E with his Jurisdictional Statement.
14. That Petitioner purportedly received an
Order from an unnamed judge with no signature (June 13, 2018) Par 2 of the
order states, “The Notice of Appeal does not identify any order that appellant Lawrence
wants this court to review. Additionally, the notice of appeal was filed June
11, 2018, three days late, as to the district court’s most recent order of May
9, 2018.” “The notice of appeal of course, is untimely……”
A- That June 9, 2018 was on a
Saturday; therefore, the Appeal could not be properly filed until the next
working day which was Monday 2 days later June 11, 2018, making the Notice of
Appeal timely filed.
15. That Par 3 states IT
IS ORDERED that Appellant, on or before June 27, 2018, file a brief memorandum
stating why this appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.”
16. That pursuant to Par
9A, of Gr Ex A corroborates the verity that alleged Clerks and attorneys
are complicit in the alleged manufacturing of court orders in said Organized Conspiracy
U. S. Sup Court Digest 24(1) General Conspiracy, U.S. 2003, Essence of
a conspiracy is an agreement to commit an unlawful act.----U.S. v. Jimenez
Recio,; 123 S Ct. 819, 537 U.S. 270, 154 L. Ed 2d 744, on remand 371 F. 3d 1093.
17. That Petitioner filed his
Jurisdictional Memorandum ref as Gr Ex F, whereby said persons in the Seventh
Circuit corroborating their roles as “Private Citizens” engaged in
mail-fraud by mailing to the Petitioner court orders not signed or certified by
any judge in the Seventh Circuit.
18. That the enumerated
Pleading #8 further corroborate and demonstrate the magnitude said alleged “White
Nationalist” in the Seventh Circuit engaging in egregious acts of “Treason” “Trespassing
upon the laws” willfully by laughing at the Federal Government F.B.I and United
States Attorney making it clear to them that they are the Democratic
Untouchables with a few Republicans under their control.
A- June 1, 2018 letter was
sent to the Petitioner from the Judicial Council of the Seventh Circuit, No.
07-18-90039, In Re Complaint against a judge, Memorandum, states “Complainant
has filed a misconduct complaint against the judge assigned to his case. This
is complainant’s third complaint against a judge. The first two were dismissed
as Frivolous and this one is no different. Complainant alleges the judge is
biased based on his adverse ruling. Nothing in this court record establishes
judicial misconduct.”
19. That
said Chief judge Diane P. Wood never signed the aforementioned documents within
Gr Ex F.
A-
That said Federal judges corroborated their
roles in said “Organized Conspiracy” systematically made sure no person of
color was afforded “Equal Access and Equal Treatment of the laws in Illinois,
due to that fact. The court did not afford Petitioner or any person of color
any Equal Protection of the Laws in spite of the Laws of the United States
Constitution.
B-
Civil Rights Act of 1866- first section, enacted by the Senate
and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress
assembled. That all persons born in the United States and not subject to any
foreign power, excluding Indians not taxed, are hereby declared to be citizens
of the United States; and such citizens of every race and color, without regard
to any previous condition of slavery or involuntary servitude, except as a
punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall
have the same right, in every State and Territory in the United States, to make
and enforce contracts, to sue, be parties, and give evidence, to inherit,
purchase, lease, sell, hold and convey real and personal property, and to full
and equal benefit of the laws and proceedings for the security of person and
property, as is enjoyed by white citizens, and shall be subject to like
punishment, pains, and penalties, and to none other, any law, statute,
ordinances, regulation, or custom, to the contrary notwithstanding, Act of
April 9, 1866, Ch. 31, 1, 14 Stat. 27, 42 U.S.C.A. 1981
(a)
C-
Turner 24 F. Cas. 337 (No. 14247) C.C.D. Md. 1867) The “equal benefit”
clause is cited in what would appear to be the earliest reported case enforcing
the section. The plaintiff was an emancipated slave who was indentured as an
apprentice to her former master. Although both whites and blacks could be indentured
as an apprentice, under the law of Maryland, indentured blacks were not
accorded the same educational benefits as whites and, unlike whites, were
subject to being transferred to any other person in the same county. Circuit
Judge Chase granted a writ of habeas corpus upon finding that the purported
apprenticeship was in fact involuntary servitude and a denial under the Civil
Rights Act of 1866 of the “full and equal benefit of all laws.
D-
20. That Gr
Ex G ( Jurisdictional Memorandum filed June 10, 2019) is Part 1 of 2
the Blue Print that amplifies the verity of alleged “White Nationalist” taking
seize of the United States Court of Appeals as Domestic Terrorist, Page 1
Par 1, states why this appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction:
Cook County Judges have been indicted and Convicted for Corruption and “Fixing” cases
in Greylord but Federal Democratic Judges are ignoring the crimes due to
Defendant being female African Americans complaining not Anglo-Saxon person,
hereto attached, Gr Ex A Jurisdictional Brief Memorandum (filed
June 5, 2019) detailing how Democrats under Alderman Burke “Fixed” cases where
Supreme court Judge Anne burke coercing a judge as an attorney, Anne Burke also
requested that the judge withdraw from the case saying, “My husband was the one
who put you on the bench.”
A- That on June 11, 2019, Appellants
received an unsigned court order not certified, stated “On consideration of the
Jurisdictional Memorandum filed by Appellant on June 10, 2019, IT IS ORDERED
that the appellee shall file, on or before June 18, 2019, a response to
appellant’s filing, addressing the jurisdictional issue raised in the court’s
order of June 3, 2019.
B- That said Appellees failed to ask the court
for an extension of time to respond, failed to respond to the Jurisdictional
Memorandum; thereby, admitting to all pleadings pursuant to Federal Rule 56.1 (b)(3)(B).
21. That
filed the appropriate Motion ref as Gr Ex H, Motion for Summary Judgment
Pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure w/Affidavit, June 24, 2019 seeking
$11 Million Dollars.
22. That on July 2, 2019, alleged “White
Nationalist” judges names recorded on said order without their signatures
certifying the verity that they entered the order stated. On consideration of the
papers filed in this appeal and review of the short record, IT IS ORDERED that
this appeal is DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction.
A-
To show fraud upon the court, the complaining party must establish
that the alleged misconduct affected the integrity of the judicial process,
either because the court itself was defrauded or because the misconduct was
perpetrated by officers of the court. Alexander v. Robertson, 882, F. 2d
421,424 (9th Cir. 1989);
B-
A void judgment does not create any binding
obligation. Kalb v. Feuerstein (1940) 308 US 433, 60 S Ct 343, 84 L, Ed 370.
That under 18 U.S.C. 242 and 42
U.S.C. 1985 (3) (b). A judge does not have the discretion on whether or not
to follow Supreme Ct. Rules, but a duty to follow. People v. Gersh, 135 Ill. 2d
384 (1990).
“Grounds warranting a motion to
reconsider include (1) an intervening change in the controlling law, (2) new
evidence previously unavailable, and (3) the need to correct clear error or
prevent manifest injustice.” Id. (citing Brumark Case 1:07-cv-00644-WDM-KLM
Document 158 Filed 08/25/2009 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 6 1 Although the Tenth
Circuit does not allow citation to unpublished opinions for precedential value,
unpublished opinions may be cited for persuasive value. 10th Cir. R. 32.1. 3
Corp. v. Samson Resources Corp., 57 F.3d 941, 948 (10th Cir. 1995).
23. That Gr Ex I, Part 2 of 2
final Blueprint MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION DUE TO JUDICIAL
“ORGANIZED CONSPIRACY” DISPARATE APPLICATION OF THE LAWS DUE TO DEMOCRATIC JUDGES ENGAGING IN RACIAL HATE CRIMES ENTERING ORDERS
BEING “VOID” A “NULLITY” CASE BEING “FRAUDULENT” JUDGES “TRESPASSING UPON THE
LAWS” ENGAGING IN TREASON OFFENSES ACTING AS “PRIVATE CITIZENS” ALTERNATIVELY
DISQUALIFY JUDGES DUE TO BIAS CONFLICT OF INTEREST PURSUANT TO {28 USCA 144, 455 (b) (1)} Canon 3E (1990)
RETIRED 7TH CIRCUIT JUDGE
RICHARD A POSNER STATED “MOST JUDGES REGARD PRO SE LITIGANTS AS KIND OF
TRASH NOT WORTH THE TIME”
24. That said alleged “White Nationalists”
demonstrating their racist hatred towards persons of color and anyone who tries
to challenge their authority or fraternal members of said Domestic Terrorist
Cells are systematically DENIED challenging the Federal Officials and its Special
Forces to effectively eradicate them from their positions in that said Seventh
Circuit corroborated their roles in an “Organized Conspiracy” mailed to the
Appellant an unsigned Court absent any signatures or certifications July 30,
2019. On consideration of the motion for reconsideration filed by defendant
-appellant on July 18, 2019, and construed as a petition for rehearing, all
members of the original panel have voted to deny the petition.
Accordingly,
the petition for rehearing is hereby DENIED.
A- That Pursuant to Page
10 Par F of Gr Ex I The Judicial Conduct and Disability Act
Study Committee Section
352 directs the chief judge to dismiss the complaint or conclude the proceeding
by “written order, stating his or her reasons” and provide the order to the
complainant and subject judge in that nowhere in Gr Ex L is the Chief judges
signature recorded validating the verity of said Complaint against District
Judge Robert M. Dow, Jr. being lawfully dismissed making the “Order Void a
Nullity”
B-
That Pursuant to Page 11 Par 1, FACT Posner: ABA Journal (September 11, 2017) ref
as Gr Ex P Most judges regard pro se litigants as 'kind of trash not worth the
time' Posner, 78, told the Chicago Daily Law Bulletin last week that he decided to retire
because of conflicts with his colleagues over the treatment of pro se
litigants, who represent themselves. In a new interview with the New York Times, Posner elaborated on his concerns about the
treatment of such litigants.
“The
basic thing is that most judges regard these people as kind of trash not worth
the time of a federal judge,” Posner said.
In
the 7th Circuit, staff lawyers review appeals from pro se litigants, and their
recommendations are generally rubber-stamped by judges, he noted.
Posner
wanted to give the pro se litigants a better shake by reviewing all of the
staff attorney memos before they went to the panel of judges. Posner had
approval from the director of the staff attorney program. “But the judges, my
colleagues, all 11 of them, turned it down and refused to give me any
significant role. I was very frustrated by that,” Posner said.
Posner
has written about the pro se issue in an upcoming book, and its publication
“would be particularly awkward” if he remained on the court because it
“implicitly or explicitly” criticizes the other judges, he said.
That Pursuant to Judge Posner’s admissions about said Federal
judges and the corroboration recorded in this document demonstrates Prejudice, Bias, Racial Hate Crimes, demonstrates Unequal Treatment of the Laws,
demonstrates Disparate
Dispensation of the Laws at the Petitioner due to his skin color, demonstrates how effective how alleged “White Nationalist judges” are in Inducing Reliance Mississippi
Comm’n on Judicial Performance v. Fletcher, 686 So.
2d 1075 (Miss. 1996) and Carter v. Mueller, 457
N.E. 2d 1335 Ill. App. (1st Dist. 1983) on several Judges in the Court of Appeals and others in legal
authority conspiring against Petitioner, in that, said individuals of this
Secret Fraternal Order Invoked Racial Apartheid, Invoked Genocidal Applications
of the laws in accordance to their by-laws of the Fraternity, and total
disregard to any laws of the United States Constitution Commentary Canon 2, 2A 2C, Crawford v. State, 770 N.E. 2d 775 (Ind. Dash, 564 S.E.
2d 672 (S.C. 2002), Ferra, 582 N.W. 2d 817 (Mich 1998)
C- Leslie W.
Abramson, 25 Hofstra L. Rev. 751 (1997). The Judges Ethical Duty
to Report Misconduct by Other Judges and Lawyers and its effect on Judicial
Independence.
D- A judge’s
disrespect for the rules of court demonstrates disrespect for the law. Judges
are disciplined under Canon 2 A for violating court rules and procedures.
Judged ignored mandated witness order in attempt to accommodate witnesses’
schedules; Citing Canon 2A the court noted, “[a] court’s indifference to
clearly stated rules breeds disrespect for and discontent with our justice
system. Government cannot demand respect of the laws by its citizens when its
tribunals ignore those very same laws”)
E- That
Judge Norgle unlawfully DENIED said Summary Judge calling it Frivolous validates
the verity, he was complicit in an “Organized Conspiracy” and constitutes a
failure to follow the Canon laws, Matter of Markey, 696 N.E. 2d 523
(Mass.1998), Mississippi Comm’n on Judicial Performance v. Byers, 757 So. 2d
961 (Miss. 2000).
F- That Judge
Norgle and Robert M. Dow, Jr. demonstrated multiple acts of Improprieties in an
attempt to aid and assist said Appellee’s named in Suit, In Re Judge
No. 93-154, 440 S.E.2d 169 (Ga. 1994), And Deception by falsifying reasons for
preventing a legally sufficient Summary Judgment from being honored against the
Defendant’s, In re Ferrara, 582 N.W. 2d 817 (Mich. 1998),In re Renfer, 493 S.E.
2d 434 (N.C. 1997), In re Kroger, 702 A. 2d 64 (Vt. 1997), Gonzalez v. Commission
on Judicial Performance, 33 Cal. 3d 359, 657 P. 2d 372, 377, 188 Cal. Rprt. 880
(1983)
25. In 1986 the United States Supreme Court issued three decisions
clarifying Rule 56. Though there was a dissent in every decision, there was
also substantial agreement among all the opinions. Justices Powell, Marshall
and O'Connor joined every majority. Only Justice Brennan dissented in every
case, and even then, he agreed in large part with the majority's analysis of Rule
56, but judges in the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals do not honor or
abide by the laws of the United States Supreme Court; due, to their Terrorist
Control over the entire legal tribunals of the State, City and Cook County and certain
Federal Republican judges, in that, only those in majority of the Corrupt
Democratic Political Machine and it’s noted conspirators are the benefactors in
these tyranny offenses while the innocent and the just people of color are
suffering at the helm of Terrorist controlling the legal tribunals.
“No one
is above the Law”, citing a 1928 decision by Supreme Court Justice Louis
Brandeis Olmstead v. United States, 277 U.S. 438 (1928),“We must subject government officials to the same rules of conduct that we expect of the citizen. The very existence of the government is imperiled if it fails to observe the law scrupulously. As Brandeis puts it, "if the government becomes a lawbreaker, it breeds contempt for law; it invites every man to become a law unto himself; it invites anarchy. To declare that in the administration of the criminal law the end justifies the means—to declare that the government may commit crimes in order to secure the conviction of a private criminal—would bring terrible retribution. Against that pernicious doctrine this court should resolutely set its face."
26. Judge Norgle as a “Private Citizen” is expecting
his alleged racist Brethren in the alleged “White Nationalist Terrorist Network”
to continue to desecrate the laws against the government and uphold the “Treason
Offenses” he has perpetrated against the Petitioner because of the color of his
skin.
A-
That to further amplify alleged “White Nationalist Racist
Terrorist” seizing control of the legal tribunals in Illinois, hereto attached,
Gr Ex J, Motion for an Order on Transferring this case to the Federal
Court due to no State Judges having Jurisdiction on the Appellant making all
orders Void a Nullity, (filed in the Appellate Court of Illinois, August 2,
2019)
B-
That alleged “White Nationalist” “Private Citizen” Margaret
McBride became a law unto herself by pledging her allegiance to said Domestic
Terrorist by “Trespassing upon the Laws that which she or no other State or
Cook County Judge has jurisdiction, DENIED said Motion and certified the court
order with her signature, ref as Ex K, This matter coming to be heard on
Plaintiff-Appellant’s motion to transfer this case to federal court, and the
court being fully advised in the premises; IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that
Plaintiff-Appellant’s motion to transfer is denied.
C-
That said judge should never have presided over this matter not
only have she corroborated her role as a co-conspirator in this matter and egregious
racist hatred at the Petitioner, she is an Alumni of Depaul Law School where
Edward Burke attended; thereby making her court order “Void” a “Nullity” Thomas
Durkin tried the same “shit” somehow taking the case from Judge Gettleman and
ruling against the Petitioner trying to save Edward Burke.
D-
That said judge demonstrated so much animosity at the Petitioner
she failed to recognize Par 9 Ex F, G, of Gr Ex K United States
Mail returned to Petitioner stating Francoise was DECEASED, mail returned to
sender, she never ordered the suspension of this matter pending an investigation
seeing that she was a former States Attorney.
E-
That Judge Norgle on July 26, 2019, during the Hearing made an
inquiry to the Petitioner about said Paternity matter and asked for the case
number which was 19-0845, further corroborates trying to receive any merited
justice in this state is likened to trying to use yesterdays toilet paper on
today’s anus having diarrhea.
F-
That no Democratic judge
or racist Federal judge in this state will honor the laws of the United States
Constitution or the aforementioned precedent by the Seventh Circuit will admonish
other Anglo Saxon men in the Democratic Party who have violated the Civil
Rights of every person of color, in that said Judges are using their robes as
“Private Citizens” to incite hate and Disparate
rulings in this “Organized Conspiracy”.
G- That said Democratic
judges have demonstrated and corroborated themselves as a threat to National
Security and a Menace to Society, in that Black and Brown judges are
benefitting and profiting off the racial injustices perpetrated by those
controlling the “Criminal Enterprise” in the Democratic Political
Machine are named and noted throughout this document and affidavits are not
admonished because the crimes are perpetrated on their own ethnic groups.
H-
That in Illinois under the Democratic Tyranny Terrorist Regime
of racist alleged “White Nationalist and Inferior judges protecting the authors
of Jim Crow enforcement it is acceptable for a colored man to marry or sleep
with these hateful individuals, and close their eyes to the heinous atrocities
lodged at him so as to keep their secrets of what they do to one another in the
closet, but has elected to go along with sinister Demonic Psychotic Acts in an
attempt to cover-up what started out as incest and sexual abuse which
culminated into a “shitstorm of corruption” nobody is who they appear to be or
what they are supposed to be.
I-
But those very individuals are seeking to destroy the life of a
Heterosexual innocent God-Fearing man with no qualms against any persons in how
they live their lives or who they sleep with can’t receive “Fucking Justice”
simply because he is a Freeman Born and Raised with skin of color !
Anybody involved in this Conspiracy thought
Everybody told Somebody what to cover-up and destroy, to keep nobody of
learning of Everybody’s involvement, the problem was that, Everybody thought
nobody knew and told, Somebody not to worry because Nobody would never know how
they lied, falsified, conspired, and destroyed all documents to save Everybody,
but Somebody knew of what Everybody did and Nobody paid attention because to
them it was a “joke” Anybody became very nervous because now they realize Somebody
lied and now Everybody is in trouble with the LAW and will go to jail because
Everybody thought Somebody was telling the “TRUTH”!
Jennings v. Patterson, 488 F.
2d 442, equal access to public facilities. The court found that the plaintiffs
had been “denied the right to hold and enjoy their property on the same basis
as white citizens.” Jennings suggests the potential usefulness of the equal
benefit clause in guaranteeing full and equal enjoyment of public property and
public services.” Developments in the Law section 1981, 15 Harv. Civ. Rts. ----
Civ. Lib. L. Rev 29, 133 (1980).
27. That Petitioner has ordered the transcripts
from Judge Robert M. Dow, Jr 5 Pages (May 2, 2018) and Charles Norgle, Sr. 26
Pages (July 26, 2019), see while so many of you were laughing on the golf
courses making a mockery of the Petitioner as he traveled through every legal
venue in Illinois seeking “Light” justice in the courts as a
Freeman Born and Raised in the United States of America, but was met with “Darkness”
corruption, mayhem, tyranny and injustices in the
courts not one racist judge or inferior colored person realized, they were warring
against the government not the Petitioner in violation to Section 4 of the Ku
Klux Klan Act.
A-
That said racist judges are likened to cowardly mass murderers
only they are destroying lives committing genocide with their pens acting as
false Gods destroying the innocent and just.
B-
If anyone was to read the transcript of Petitioner before “Private
Citizen” Charles Norgle, Sr. if he was the Grand Imperial Wizard or Grand Dragon
of the Ku Klux Klan after he heard the Petitioner’s opening argument and
articulate responses to every cross examination the judge delivered to the him
as Petitioner maintained eye contact throughout his delivery, the only thing
the judge said at the end he was going to take this matter under advisement.
C-
28. That said judges in the Democratic Political
Machine and alleged “White Nationalists Terrorists” along with Inferior colored
persons have managed to circumvent the laws of the United States Constitution
and United States Supreme Court and still enforce Jim Crow Laws outlawed by the
United States Supreme Court and is daring and begging Federal Officials to come
and try to remove them.
29. See that is why, the Ku Klux Klan Act of 1871 (was
enacted) - Section 1 (42 U.S.C.) 1983.
“Of
all the Civil Rights legislation enacted in the aftermath of the Civil War,
none has had a greater contemporary impact than the Ku Klux Klan Act of 1871.
The Act grew out of a special one-paragraph message sent to the 42d Congress on
March 23, 1871, by President Ulysses S. Grant, urgently requesting the
enactment of legislation”.
Section 2 (42 U.S.C.) In
the House of Representatives.
“Congressional
Debate of the second section of the Ku Klux Klan Act was more extensive and
enduring than that of Section 1; As originally presented, Sec. 2 made it a
felony for any “two or more persons” to conspire to commit certain enumerated
crimes “in violation of the rights and privileges, or immunities of any person,
to which he is entitled under the Constitution and laws of the United States.
“Throughout
the debates, supporters of the Act made repeated references to the depredations
of the Ku Klux Klan; Victims of these atrocities included not only blacks but
white Republicans as well. The crimes that were perpetrated, therefore, were
not viewed as isolated occurrences, but as part of an “Organized
Conspiracy….Political in its origin and aims”, “crimes perpetrated by concert
and agreement, by men in large numbers acting with a common purpose for the
injury of a certain class of citizens entertaining certain political
principles, id, at 457 (remarks of Rep. Coburn). See also e.g., id. At
437 (remarks of Rep. Cobb) (“None but Democrats belong or can belong to these
societies”) et al.,
30. “Where
these gangs of Assassins show themselves the rest of the people look on, if not
with sympathy, at least with forbearance. The boasted courage of the South is
not courage in their presence. Sheriffs, having eyes to see, see not; judges,
having ears to hear, hear not; witnesses conceal the truth or falsify it; grand
or petit juries act as if they might be accomplices. In the presence of these
gangs all the apparatus and machinery of civil government, all the processes of
justice, skulk away as if government and justice were crimes and feared
detection. Among the most dangerous things an injured party can do is to appeal
to justice. Of the uncounted scores and hundreds of atrocious mutilations and
murders it is credibly stated that not one has been punished. Cong. Globe,
supra note 2, app. At 78 (remarks of Rep. Perry). (“While
murder is stalking abroad in disguise, while whippings and lynching’s and
banishment have been visited upon unoffending American citizens, the local
administrations have been found inadequate or unwilling to apply the proper
corrective”) et al., …. And the State made no successful effort to bring the
guilty to punishment or afford protection or redress to the outraged and
innocent.”)
31. Under
Section 4 of the Ku Klux Klan Act of 1871: the law is clear, “Whenever in any
State or part of a State………unlawful combinations…….shall be organized and
armed, and so numerous and powerful et al…………and whenever, by reason of either
or all of the causes aforesaid, the conviction of such offenders and the
preservation of the public safety shall become…..Impracticable, in every such
case such combinations shall be deemed a rebellion against the Government of
the United States…
FURTHER AFFIANT SAYETH NOT
WHEREFORE the aforementioned reasons Petitioner respectfully Prays
for the Relief
1.) For an Order Transferring
this matter to the Executive-Committee for Reassignment.
2.) For an Order Vacating the
August 8, 2019 court order due to it being “Void” a “Nullity”
3.) For an Order requesting the
United States Attorney/Federal Bureau of Investigations to investigate the
allegations of judges involvement in “White Nationalist Supremist Groups and Complicit
in Government Corruption “Fixing” cases.
4.) For the entry of an Order awarding to your
Petitioner for such other relief and any other relief necessary as equity may
require of which this court may deem overwhelmingly just;
5.)
IN THE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
EASTERN DIVISION
EXHIBIT
LIST
6.) Gr Ex A Notice of Motion for Summary
Judgment Pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure w/Affidavit (Filed April
24, 2018) 16 CV 7434.
7.) Gr Ex B Motion Moving for Prove-Up
Entering Default Judgment w/Affidavit (Filed Jan. 19, 2015) 2015 CH 01670 In
the Circuit Court of Cook County Chancery Division.
8.) Gr Ex C Motion for Disqualification
of Judge—Personal Bias or Prejudice {28 USCA 144, 455 (B) (1) Vacate Order of
May 3, 2018 & May 9, due to Federal Clerk Committing Fraud Entering Court
Order in Computer Unlawfully (Filed May 11, 2018). In the United States Court
of Appeals.
9.) Gr Ex D Motion for Reconsideration
& Vacate Court Order due to it being a Nullity Pursuant to federal Rules of
Civil Procedure w/Affidavit (Filed May 2, 2018) In the District Court.
10.)
Gr Ex E Notice of Appeal w/Jurisdictional Statement (Filed June 11, 2018)
In the District Court.
11.)
Gr Ex F Jurisdictional Memorandum (Filed June 18,
2018) In the United States Court of Appeals 18-2305.
12.)
Gr Ex G Jurisdictional Memorandum (Filed June 10, 2018) In the United
States Court of Appeals 19-2040.
13.)
Gr Ex H Motion for Summary Judgment Pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil
Procedure w/Affidavit (Filed June 24, 2019). In the United States Court of
Appeals, 19-2040.
14.)
Gr Ex I Notice of Motion for Reconsideration due to Judicial “Organized
Conspiracy” Disparate Application of the Laws due to Democratic Judges Engaging
in Racial Hate Crimes Entering Orders Being “Void” a “Nullity” case being “Fraudulent”
Judges “Trespassing Upon the Laws” Engaging in Treason Offenses Acting as “Private
Citizens” Alternatively Disqualify Judges due to Bias Conflict of Interest
Pursuant to {USCA 144,, 455 (b) (1) Canon 3E (1990) Retired 7th
Circuit judge Richard A. Posner stated “Most judges regard Pro Se litigants as
kind of trash not worth the time” (Filed July 18, 2019) In the United States
Court of Appeals, 19-2040.
15.)
Gr Ex J Notice of Motion for an Order on Transferring this case to the
Federal Court due to no State Judges having Jurisdiction on the Appellant making
all Orders “Void” a “Nullity” (Filed August 2, 2019) In the Appellate Court of
Illinois 4th Division, 19-0845.
16.)
Gr Ex K Signed Certified Court Order by Margaret Stanton McBride from the
4th Div. Appellate Court.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
EASTERN DIVISION
AFFIDAVIT
I Joe Louis Lawrence, Counsel Pro Se being
duly sworn on oath states the aforementioned pleadings enumerated within said
motion pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedures, the undersigned certifies
that the statements set forth in this instrument are true and correct, except
as to matters therein stated to be on information and belief and as to such
matters, the undersigned certifies as aforesaid that she verily believes the
same to be true.
Respectfully Submitted
Joe Louis Lawrence Notary
__________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
EASTERN DIVISION
NOTICE
OF
MOTION TO VACATE AUGUST 8,
2019 COURT ORDER DUE TO FRAUD JUDGE NORGLE’S COMPLICIT CORROBORATION ENGAGING
IN WHITE SUPREMECIST HATE CRIMES CORROBORATING IN AN “ORGANIZED CONSPIRACY” WITH
OTHER FEDERAL JUDGES “TRESPASSING UPON THE LAWS” AS A “PRIVATE CITIZEN” MAKING
THE COURT ORDER A “NULLITY” “VOID” w/AFFIDAVIT THEREBY DISQUALIFYING HIM FROM
THIS CASE DUE TO A PRIMA FACIE SHOWING OF BIAS/PREJUDICE AT PLAINTIFF DUE TO
HIS SKIN COLOR PURSUANT TO {28 USCA 144, 455 (b) (1) AND WARRANTS THE JURISDICTION
OF THE FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION/ UNITED STATES ATTORNEY INSTANTER
Please be
advised that on, August 15, 2019
Plaintiff has filed before this District Court Motion to Vacate August 5, 2019 et al; and will present said legally
sufficient instrument before any Judge
in Judge Norgle’s stead August 23, ,
2019, at 9:30 am in room 2341
General Counsel: Karen G. Seimetz Local Union 241 Amalgamated Transit
Union
President Keith Hill/ 1st Vice President
Chicago Transit Authority 1613 S. Michigan
Law Department 567 Chicago, IL 60613
567 West Lake Street
Chicago, IL 60661
Law Department 567 Chicago, IL 60613
567 West Lake Street
Chicago, IL 60661
Hon Mayor Lori Lightfoot
City Hall 7th floor
Chicago, IL. 60601
Circuit
Court of Cook County, Dorothy
Brown
50
West Washington,
Chicago,
IL 60601 Suite 1001
Courtesy
Copies:
Cook
County State’s Attorney
Cook
County Sheriff
Kim
Foxx
Thomas
J. Dart
50 West
Washington, Room 500
Richard J.
Daley Center, Room 701
Chicago,
Ill. 60602
Chicago,
Ill. 60602
US
Attorney
FBI Dir. Chris Wray
John
R. Lausch, Jr. 2111
West Roosevelt Road
219 S.
Dearborn, 5th floor
Chicago, Ill. 60612
Chicago,
Ill. 60604
Judge Judge
Celia C. Gamrath Neil Cohen
50 West Washington Room 2508 50 West Washington Room 2308
Judge Judge
Franklin U. Valderrama
Moche Jacobius,
Presiding Judge
50 West Washington Room 2402 50 West Washington Room 2403
Judge
Fredrick H. Bates
Markham, IL. Room 102
Cook County President
Chief Judge
Toni Preckwinkle
Timothy
C. Evans
118 N. Clark, Room 517
50 West Washington, Room 2600
Chicago, Ill. 60602
PLEASE
BE ADVISED that on August 15, 2019, A Motion to Vacate
August 5, 2019 Court Order et al. has been filed with the Northern District of
Illinois and said copies being served on said applicable parties via hand
delivery or Priority regular mail;
Respectfully, Submitted,
______________________
Joe Louis Lawrence
Counsel Pro Se
Chicago, Ill 60649
312 965-6455
@joelou
No comments:
Post a Comment