BECAUSE CORRUPT RACIST JUDGES CONTROLS HOW CLERKS MAIL OUT BOGUS COURT ORDERS WITHOUT SIGNATURES.
THIS MOTION FORCES THE "WHITE NATIONALIST" RACIST JUDGES IN THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT TO SIGN THEIR NAMES IDENTIFYING THE AUTHORS OF THIS "ORGANIZED CONSPIRACY" WARRING AGAINST THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION.
IN THE
UNITED STATES
COURT OF APPEALS
FOR
THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT
CHICAGO, ILLINOIS 60604
U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, } Appeal from the United
As TRUSTEE for
securitized Trust } States District Court for
2006-NC3, et al. } the Northern District of
Plaintiffs –Appellees } Illinois, Eastern Division
V
}
No. 19-2040 } No. 1:16-cv-08628
}
Monzella Y. Johnson
}
Defendant-Appellee } Judge Gary Feinerman
MOTION TO VACATE COURT ORDERS WITHOUT
SIGNATURES AND TO CERTIFY COURT ORDERS WITH SIGNATURES PURSUANT TO FEDERAL
RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE AND INVOKE THE JURISDICTION OF THE FEDERAL BUREAU OF
INVESTIGATIONS/UNITED STATES ATTORNEY INSTANTER
Now comes Appellant Monzella Y.
Johnson, Pro Se in this cause respectfully files her affidavit in support of the
aforementioned motion to vacate court orders without signatures et al.
Respectfully Submitted
5217
S. Ingleside Ave.
Chicago, IL. 60615
1.) That pursuant to Federal
Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 60 Relief from a Judgment or Order:
(a) Corrections: Based on
Clerical Mistakes: Oversights and Omissions. The court may correct a clerical mistake arising from oversight
or omission whenever one is found in a judgment, order, or other part of the
record. The court may do so on motion or on its on, with or without notice. But
after an appeal has been docketed in the appellate court and while it is
pending, such a mistake maybe corrected only with the appellate courts leave.
(b) Grounds for Relief from a
Final Judgment, Order, or Proceeding. On
motion and just terms, the court may relieve a party or its legal
representative from a final judgment, order or proceeding for the following
reasons:
(1) Mistake, inadvertence,
surprise, or excusable neglect;
(2) Newly discovered evidence
that, with reasonable diligence, could have been discovered in time to move for
a new trial under Rule 59 (b);
(3) Fraud (whether previously
called intrinsic or extrinsic ), misrepresentation, or misconduct by an opposing
party;
(4) The judgment is void.
2.) That on July 30, 2019,
Appellant purportedly received an order from this court On consideration of the
motion for reconsideration filed by defendant-appellant on July 18, 2019, and
construed as a petition for rehearing, all members of the original panel have
voted to deny the petition.
Accordingly, the petition for rehearing is hereby DENIED.
3.) That said judges ignored
the fact the Appellees admitted every assertion/pleading recorded by the
Appellant in their Jurisdictional Statement.
A-
Pursuant to Federal Rule 56; but because said judges are racist and don’t view African
Americans or persons of color with a scintilla of intelligence even though said
Appellant’s is a retired School teacher and retired Police officer; moreover,
said judges not only became active “Trespassers of the Laws” but “Private
Citizens” falsifying the application of the laws as a unlawful means of
Remanding the case back to State Court trying to protect every Anglo Saxon
person complicit in this “Organized Conspiracy”
4.) That Hereto attached as Gr Ex A, MOTION TO VACATE AUGUST 8, 2019 COURT ORDER
DUE TO FRAUD JUDGE NORGLE’S COMPLICIT CORROBORATION ENGAGING IN WHITE
SUPREMECIST HATE CRIMES CORROBORATING IN AN “ORGANIZED CONSPIRACY” WITH OTHER
FEDERAL JUDGES “TRESPASSING UPON THE LAWS” AS A “PRIVATE CITIZEN” MAKING THE
COURT ORDER A “NULLITY” “VOID” w/AFFIDAVIT THEREBY DISQUALIFYING HIM FROM
THIS CASE DUE TO A PRIMA FACIE SHOWING OF BIAS/PREJUDICE AT PLAINTIFF DUE TO
HIS SKIN COLOR PURSUANT TO {28 USCA 144, 455 (b) (1) AND WARRANTS THE JURISDICTION
OF THE FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION/ UNITED STATES ATTORNEY INSTANTER.
5.)
That Hereto attached, as Gr Ex B, MOTION TO SUPPLEMENT MOTION WITH COURT TRANSCRIPT OF JULY 26, 2019 THAT
CORROBORATES JUDGE NORGLE AS AN ALLEGED WHITE NATIONALIST ENGAGING IN HATE
CRIMES OF AN ACTIVE “ORGANIZED CONSPIRACY” w/AFFIDAVIT WHEREBY WARRANTING THE
JURISDICTION OF THE FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION/UNITED STATES ATTORNEY
INSTANTER.
6.) That without court signatures it is
difficult to ascertain the names of the judges complicit in this “Organized
Conspiracy” pursuant to the factual assertions recorded within the aforementioned
pleadings.
“We must subject government officials to the same rules of conduct that we expect of the citizen. The very existence of the government is imperiled if it fails to observe the law scrupulously. As Brandeis puts it, "if the government becomes a lawbreaker, it breeds contempt for law; it invites every man to become a law unto himself; it invites anarchy. To declare that in the administration of the criminal law the end justifies the means—to declare that the government may commit crimes in order to secure the conviction of a private criminal—would bring terrible retribution. Against that pernicious doctrine this court should resolutely set its face."
7.) That it is apparent someone is using the
Seventh Circuit as a Terrorist Cell in which to prohibit cases of merit from
having justice had due to them being women of color.
Section 1983 of USCS contemplates the depravation
of Civil Rights through the unconstitutional application of a law by conspiracy
or otherwise. Mansell V. Saunders (CA 5 FLa) 372 F 2d 573, especially if the
conspiracy was actually carried into effect and plaintiff was thereby deprived
of any rights privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws,
the gist of the action may be treated as one for the depravation of rights under
42 USCS 1983 Lewis V. Brautigam (CA 5 Fla) 227 F 2d 124, 55 Alr 2d 505
U. S Sup Court Digest 24(1) General Conspiracy
U.S. 2003. Essence of a conspiracy is an agreement to commit an unlawful
act.—U.S. v. Jimenez Recio, 123 S. Ct. 819, 537 U.S. 270, 154 L.Ed.2d 744, on
remand 371F.3d 1093
Agreement to commit an
unlawful act, which constitutes the essence of a conspiracy, is a distinct evil
that exist and be punished whether or not the substantive crime ensues.-Id.
Conspiracy poses a threat to
the public over and above the threat of the commission of the relevant
substantive crime, both because the combination in crime makes more likely the
commission of other crimes and because it decreases the part from their path of
criminality.-Id.
CONSPIRACY
Fraud maybe inferred from nature of acts complained of,
individual and collective interest of alleged conspirators, situation,
intimacy, and relation of parties at time of commission of acts, and generally
all circumstances preceding and attending culmination of claimed conspiracy Illinois Rockford
Corp. V. Kulp, 1968, 242 N.E. 2d 228, 41 ILL. 2d 215.
Conspirators
to be guilty of offense need not have entered into conspiracy at same time or
have taken part in all its actions. People V. Hardison, 1985, 911
Dec. 162, 108. Requisite mens rea elements of conspiracy are satisfied upon showings of agreement
of offense with intent that offense be committed;
Actus reas element is satisfied of act in
furtherance of agreement People V. Mordick, 1981, 50 ILL, Dec. 63
Vaughn 462 S. E. 2d 728
(Ga.1995), The Supreme Court of
Georgia removed a Judge from office for disregarding defendant’s Constitutional
rights; Hammel, 668 N. E. 2d 390 (N.Y. 1996) (Judge removed for
improperly jailing defendants for their alleged failure to pay fines and make
restitution which the judge had imposed, disregarding the defendants basic
constitutional rights;
WHEREFORE DEFENDANT PRAYS that this Court Vacate
said Orders absent any signatures tendered to the Appellant in its entirety and
Certify all Orders pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedures
1.) Order the United States Attorney/Federal
Bureau of Investigations to Invoke Jurisdiction on all parties complicit in
this “Organized Conspiracy” so as to deploy the necessary military
personnel to forcibly eradicate any and all persons associated in these “Treason
Offenses” against the government.
I affirm the
above as being true.
Respectfully Submitted
_____________________
Monzella
Y. Johnson
Chicago, IL. 60615
Defendant-Appellant
IN THE
UNITED STATES
COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE
SEVENTH CIRCUIT
Certificate of Service
I
Monzella Y. Johnson, Defendant-Appellant,
certify that I have on this day deposited said Notice and Motion to all parties
recorded in said Notice via regular mail/hand delivery.
To: US
Attorney
FBI
Dir. Chris Wray
John
R. Lausch, Jr. 2111
West Roosevelt Road
219 S. Dearborn,
5th floor
Chicago,
Ill. 60612
Hon Mayor Lori
Lightfoot
City Hall 7th floor
Chicago, IL. 60601
Circuit Court of Cook County, Dorothy Brown
50 West Washington,
Chicago, IL 60601 Suite 1001
Cook County
States Attorney Chief
Judge Timothy C. Evans
Kim
Foxx 50 West Washington, Suite 2600
50 West Washington, Suite 500 Chicago, Ill. 60601
Chicago, Ill. 60601
Postestivo & Assoc. Hinshaw
& Culbertson, LLP
223 West Jackson Blvd. Suite 610 151 N. Franklin Street, #2500
Chicago, Illinois 60606 Chicago, Illinois
60606
PLEASE BE ADVISED that on August 20, 2019, A Motion to Vacate and Certify et al. have been filed before
the United States Court of Appeals.
Respectfully Submitted
_______________________
Monzella
Y. Johnson
5217 S. Ingleside Ave.
Chicago, IL. 60615
UNITED STATES
COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE
SEVENTH CIRCUIT
CHICAGO, ILLINOIS 60604
AFFIDAVIT
I Monzella Y. Johnson, files herewith her
affidavit as required by Title 28, United States Code:
I Monzella Y. Johnson Pro
Se being duly sworn on oath states that, I have caused the aforementioned
Notice and Motion to Vacate and Certify et al., to the noted Appellees via hand
delivery or U.S Postal service. August 20, 2019, the undersigned certifies that
the statements set forth in this instrument are true and correct, except
as to matters therein stated to be on information and belief and as to such
matters, the undersigned certifies as aforesaid that he verily believes the
same to be true.
Respectfully
Submitted
Notary
____________________
5217 S. Ingleside
Chicago, Il 60615
No comments:
Post a Comment