EXTRA EXTRA READ ALL ABOUT IT!
JUDGE NORGLE DID NOT DENY ANY PART OF THIS MOTION BUT GRANTED THE MOTION.
THE ORDER STATES PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO SUPPLEMENT IS GRANTED. NO APPEARANCE IS REQUIRED. IT IS SO ORDERED.
CAN SOMEONE EXPLAIN WHY JUDGES ARE ABLE TO VIOLATE THE LAWS OF THE CONSTITUTION AND REMAIN ON THE BENCH?
DEMOCRATIC JUDGES ON THE TYRANNY AND RACIAL HATE ON THE COURT BENCHES BUT REPUBLICANS SOME ARE JOINING THE RANKS OF RACIAL HATRED AND NOT ONE PERSON IS TALKING ABOUT THIS.
EXCEPT JUDGE RICHARD POSNER WHO RETIRED FROM THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT BECAUSE OF THE HATE JUDGES HAD TOWARDS PERSONS OF COLOR.
IN THE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT
COURT
FOR THE
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF
ILLINOIS
EASTERN DIVISION
)
)
Joseph L.
Lawrence ) Hon Charles R. Norgle, Sr.
Plaintiff )
) 93 CV 01609
VS
)
)
Chicago Transit
Authority )
Defendant )
MOTION TO SUPPLEMENT MOTION WITH COURT
TRANSCRIPT OF JULY 26, 2019 THAT CORROBORATES JUDGE NORGLE AS AN ALLEGED WHITE
NATIONALIST ENGAGING IN HATE CRIMES OF AN ACTIVE “ORGANIZED CONSPIRACY” w/AFFIDAVIT WHEREBY WARRANTING THE
JURISDICTION OF THE FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION/UNITED STATES ATTORNEY
INSTANTER
Now
comes Joe Louis Lawrence, Counsel Pro Se a United States Citizen Born and Raised
a Freeman depose and states, by all governing laws of the United States
Constitution, Plaintiff in this cause files herewith his affidavit as required
by Title 28, United States Code, to show that said Transcript unequivocally
corroborate without a scintilla of falsity that Judge Norgle’s ruling against
the Plaintiff is predicated on Racism, Racial Hatred because of Plaintiff’s
skin color.
1.
That Judge
Norgle waited 26 years in which to have the Plaintiff to appear before him to
explain his Summary Judgment numerous
judges in Cook County courts were “Trespassing upon the Laws” acting as
“Private Citizens” no citizen of Color in Illinois were able to receive Equal
Protection of the Laws as long as the present administration of law breakers were
on the bench engaging in “Treason Offenses”, ref as Gr Ex A Motion to
Reinstate Case Due to Democratic Judges/Attorneys Trespassing Upon the Laws
Committing Treason Acting as Private Citizens Making the District Court Order
“Void a Nullity” .
2.
That Page
8 Par I was in Judge Norgle’s possession states, “Hereto attached, Letter
from Michael Cook Manager Personnel,
Dates of Employment from 11-10-1989, “THE ABOVE INFORMATION IS FURNISHED IN
REPLY TO YOUR REQUEST FOR VERIFICATION OF EMPLOYMENT FROM THE CTA. HE 
WAS NEVER DISCHARGED” along with a printout from CTA’s database Oct.
20, 1994, time 13:57 Date in Job 05-17-90 but last day worked 3-8-90 no
DISCHARGE is recorded on the database.
WAS NEVER DISCHARGED” along with a printout from CTA’s database Oct.
20, 1994, time 13:57 Date in Job 05-17-90 but last day worked 3-8-90 no
DISCHARGE is recorded on the database.
“THIS PRINTOUT WAS MISFILED IN ANOTHER JACKET AND IS THE ONLY COPY THAT
MAKES SENSE”
3.
That Page
8 Par J was in Judge Norgle’s possession states, Hereto attached, Ex L3
CTA’s answer to State of Illinois, Department of Human Rights, Dennis Powell
Investigator African American “CTA admits Complainant was hired in March 1987”
CTA also admits that Complainant was discharged from the CTA in April
1992”.
4.
That
Plaintiff filed said Motion to Supplement Oct 11, 2018, MOTION TO SUPPLEMENT MOTION THAT CORROBORATES DEMOCRATIC JUDGES
ENGAGING IN AN ACTIVE “ORGANIZED CONSPIRACY” “FRAUD & “CORRUPTION” IN COOK
COUNTY COURTS w/AFFIDAVIT
A-
That
Edward A. Arce and William Stewart Boyd were complicit in their corroboration
shaking down an innocent Plaintiff Cazembe O. Kabir as they used their robes
extorted money from him covering up the crimes by denying every motion, he
presented challenging the “Fraudulent” Civil Rights violations.
B-
In that no
States Attorney nor the Attorney General or the judges themselves DENIED the
unlawful “Trespassing upon the Laws” “Treason Offenses” pursuant to Federal
Rule 56, one can infer from the above said judges were of the impression as long as they are
perpetrating crimes on persons of color the alleged “White Nationalists”
controlling them and the Democratic Political Machine were going to save them
and protect them from any admonishment.
Based
thereon Plaintiff respectfully moves that the Honorable Charles R. Norgle, Sr.
be removed Instanter and allow said (Transcript) Motion to be
supplemented.
Under Federal law which is applicable to all states, the U.S.
Supreme Court stated that if a court is "without authority, its judgments
and orders are regarded as nullities. They are not voidable, but simply void;
and form no bar to a recovery sought, even prior to a reversal in opposition to
them. They constitute no justification; and all persons concerned in executing
such judgments or sentences, are considered, in law, as
trespassers." Elliot v. Piersol, 1 Pet. 328,
340, 26 U.S. 328, 340 (1828.)
When judges act when they do not
have jurisdiction to act, or they enforce a void order (an order issued by a
judge without jurisdiction), they become trespassers of the law, and are
engaged in treason.
The U.S. Supreme Court, in Scheuer
v. Rhodes, 416 U.S. 232, 94 S. Ct. 1683, 1687 (1974) stated that
"when a state officer acts under a state law in a manner violative of the
Federal Constitution, he "comes into conflict with the superior authority
of that Constitution, and he is in that case stripped of his official or representative
character and is subjected in his person to the consequences
of his individual conduct. The State has no power to impart to him any immunity
from responsibility to the supreme authority of the United States."
[Emphasis supplied in original].
By law, a judge is a state
officer as in this case Federal officers.
The judge then acts not as a
judge, but as a private individual (in his person).
Under
Federal law which is applicable to all states, the U.S. Supreme
Court stated that if a court
is "without authority, its judgments and
orders are regarded as
nullities. They are not voidable, but simply
void; and form no bar to a
recovery sought, even prior to a reversal in
opposition to them. They
constitute no justification; and all persons concerned in executing such
judgments or sentences, are considered, in law, as trespassers." Elliot v.
Piersol, 1 Pet. 328, 340, 26 U.S. 328, 340 (1828)
“The Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals held
that the Circuit Court of Cook County
is a criminal enterprise. U.S.
v. Murphy, 768 F.2d 1518,
1531 (7th Cir. 1985)”.
5.
That Par
2 of Petitioner’s Motion for Reconsideration Vacate (August 27th 2018) Order due
to Error “Fraud” Trespassing Upon the Laws Making the Order A “Nullity” “Void”
w/AFFIDAVIT, states “That Judge Edward Arce became complicit in
an “Organized Conspiracy” by ignoring all legal citations and precedents
demonstrating Judge Boyd acted as a “Private Citizen”
6.
That it is clear no Hispanic or Black person described as a Democrat
in Cook County have any real authority where it matters especially as
demonstrated in this
cause, “Jim Crow” laws are being enforced by spineless men of
color and racist men hiding behind men of color using them as the Enforcers
using the laws as weapons to Terrorize, Bully or “Lynch” anyone that challenges
said Democrats in these unlawful proceedings as articulated throughout all
pleadings and affidavits.
The
U.S. Supreme Court has stated that "No state legislator or executive or
judicial officer can war against the Constitution without violating his
undertaking to support it.” Cooper v. Aaron, 358 U.S.
1, 78 S. Ct. 1401 (1958).
Any
judge who does not comply with his oath to the Constitution of the United
States wars against that Constitution and engages in acts in violation of the
Supreme Law of the Land. The judge is engaged in acts of treason.
Having
taken at least two, if not three, oaths of office to support the Constitution
of the United States, and the Constitution of the State of Illinois, any judge
who has acted in violation of the Constitution is engaged in an act or acts of
treason (see below).
If a
judge does not fully comply with the Constitution, then his orders are
void, In re Sawyer, 124 U.S. 200 (1888), he/she is
without jurisdiction, and he/she has engaged in an act or acts of treason.
Judges
have given themselves judicial immunity for their judicial functions. Judges
have no judicial immunity for criminal acts, aiding, assisting, or conniving
with others who perform a criminal act, or for their administrative/
ministerial duties. When a judge has a duty to act, he does not have discretion - he is then not performing a judicial act, he is performing a ministerial act.
ministerial duties. When a judge has a duty to act, he does not have discretion - he is then not performing a judicial act, he is performing a ministerial act.
Judicial immunity does not exist
for judges who engage in criminal activity, for judges who connive with, aid
and abet the criminal activity of another judge, or to a judge for damages
sustained by a person who has been harmed by the judge's connivance with,
aiding and abetting, another judge's criminal activity.
WHEREFORE
the aforementioned reasons Plaintiff respectfully Prays for the Relief
1.
For an Order Supplementing the Court Transcript of July 26,
2019 Motion.
2.
For an Order issuing a Rule
to Show Cause Remanding William S. Boyd and all other men and women complicit
in this “Organized Conspiracy” into Custody Instanter.
3.
For an Order Removing Edward A. Arce from his
position due to acts as a “Private Citizen” engaging in knowing acts of
“Treason”
Smith
v. Wade, 461 U.S. 30, 35, 103 S. Ct.
1625, 1629, 75 L Ed 2d 632 (1983) Justice Brennen “The threshold standard for
allowing punitive damages for reckless or callous indifference applies even in
a case, such as here, where the underlying standard of liability for
compensatory damages because is also one of recklessness. There is no merit to
petitioner’s contention that actual malicious intent should be the standard for
punitive damages because the deterrent purposes of such damages would be served
only if the threshold for those damages is higher in every case than the
underlying standard for liability in the first instance. The common-law rule is
otherwise, and there is no reason to depart from the common-law rule in the
context of {1983}”
“No one
is above the Law”, citing a 1928 decision by Supreme Court Justice Louis
Brandeis Olmstead v. United States, 277 U.S. 438 (1928),“We must subject government officials to the same rules of conduct that we expect of the citizen. The very existence of the government is imperiled if it fails to observe the law scrupulously. As Brandeis puts it, "if the government becomes a lawbreaker, it breeds contempt for law; it invites every man to become a law unto himself; it invites anarchy. To declare that in the administration of the criminal law the end justifies the means—to declare that the government may commit crimes in order to secure the conviction of a private criminal—would bring terrible retribution. Against that pernicious doctrine this court should resolutely set its face."
Not since the Book Lawyers and Judges in Collusion The Fraternity, by
John Fitzgerald Molloy said former judge articulated the horrors within the
legal arena but the Plaintiff has went even further granting the “Blue Print on
Domestic Terrorism” and the extent a judge will go to destroy the lives of
innocent men and women of color.
What is most appalling is the extent colored judges so as to be
accepted by a party that has been typically historically racist as Democrats
are willing to perpetrate injustice on their own ethnicity so as to prove and
be accepted by a party that has wielded so much Hate at a man simply because of
the color of his skin.
Plaintiff Prays further that this Honorable Judge recognize the
Plaintiff as a Freeman Born & Raised in these United States of America and
not inferior or less than any man responsible for the incitement of these
heinous Hateful Acts.
Civil Rights Act of 1866-
first section, enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United
States of America in Congress assembled. That all persons born in the United
States and not subject to any foreign power, excluding Indians not taxed, are
hereby declared to be citizens of the United States; and such citizens of every
race and color, without regard to any previous condition of slavery or
involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall
have been duly convicted, shall have the same right, in every State and
Territory in the United States, to make and enforce contracts, to sue, be parties,
and give evidence, to inherit, purchase, lease, sell, hold and convey real and
personal property, and to full and equal benefit of the laws and proceedings
for the security of person and property, as is enjoyed by white citizens, and
shall be subject to like punishment, pains, and penalties, and to none other,
any law, statute, ordinances, regulation, or custom, to the contrary
notwithstanding, Act of April 9, 1866, ch. 31, 1, 14 Stat. 27, 42 U.S.C.A. 1981
(a)
Turner 24 F. Cas. 337 (No. 14247)
C.C.D. Md. Maryland
That
no Afro American, Negroe, Black judge or
Politician male will step up and admonish whites complicit in said acts, they
go along with wrong so as to get along with the wrong doers which is why
Chicago is in the apathetic state it is in today can’t blame the white man for
everything too many blacks have sold out participating in the genocide and mass
incarceration of their own race so as to continuously fulfill the doctrines of
the Democratic Party;
Plaintiff
is a living testimony and example of the aforementioned as is Homeless living
on Welfare because the Democratic Party do not accept or recognize intelligent
independent men of color who don’t accept racial oppression as a way of
living.
What
benefit is to have a person of color in authority as a judge if he or she
thinks or acts like a racist redneck white Nationalist? Never ever have a Black
Judge or Black Politician Democrat opened their mouths and said stop this is
wrong as a matter of fact, Morgan Hamilton a short haired female judge many
Caucasians flat out told me that Bitch ain’t shit!
I
thought the attorneys were upset because she appeared to be intelligent but she
had a very cold temperament until, I filed a Motion Disqualifying William
Stewart Boyd off my case as my former attorney, he is everything what the
definition of a Nigger, my motion was being decided between Jeanne Bernstein
who allegedly did not like Hispanics and Morgan Hamilton, I was informed those
were the choices, Morgan Hamilton was loud and Nasty in front of all the
Caucasians said “yall still having problems with that Nigga, give that Nigga
to me”
“An Individual is in his heart what he or she thinks
himself to be and out of his or her heart flows the issues of life” R.R.
The Mis
education of the Negroe, Carter G. Woodson 1933
History shows that it does not matter who is in power... those
who have not learned to do for themselves and have to depend solely on others
never obtain any more rights or privileges in the end than they did in the
beginning.
Here is a quote from the book:
"When you control a man's thinking you do not have to worry
about his actions. You do not have to tell him not to stand here or go yonder.
He will find his 'proper place' and will stay in it. You do not need to send
him to the back door. He will go without being told. In fact, if there is no
back door, he will cut one for his special benefit. His education makes it
necessary.
FURTHER AFFIANTH SAYETH NOT
IN THE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT
COURT
FOR THE
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF
ILLINOIS
EASTERN DIVISION
)
)
Joe Louis
Lawrence
) Hon. Charles R. Norgle, Sr.
Plaintiff
)
) 93 CV 01609
VS )
)
Chicago Transit
Authority )
Defendant )
NOTICE OF
MOTION TO
SUPPLEMENT MOTION WITH COURT TRANSCRIPT OF JULY 26, 2019 THAT CORROBORATES
JUDGE NORGLE AS AN ALLEGED WHITE NATIONALIST ENGAGING IN HATE CRIMES OF AN
ACTIVE “ORGANIZED CONSPIRACY”
w/AFFIDAVIT WHEREBY WARRANTING THE JURISDICTION OF THE FEDERAL BUREAU OF
INVESTIGATION/UNITED STATES ATTORNEY INSTANTER
Please be advised that on, August 19, 2019 Plaintiff has filed before this District Court Motion to
Supplement et al; and will present said legally sufficient instrument
before any Judge in Judge Norgle’s stead August 23, 2019, at 9:30 am in room 2341
General Counsel: Karen G. Seimetz Local
Union 241 Amalgamated Transit Union A.F.L.-C.I.O.-C.L.C.
President Keith Hill
Chicago Transit Authority 1613 S.
Michigan
Law Department Chicago, IL 60613
567 West Lake Street
Chicago, IL 60661
Law Department Chicago, IL 60613
567 West Lake Street
Chicago, IL 60661
Hon Mayor Lori Lightfoot
City
Hall 7th floor
Chicago, IL.
60601
Circuit Court of Cook County, Dorothy Brown
50 West Washington,
Chicago, IL 60601 Suite 1001
Courtesy
Copies:
Cook
County State’s Attorney
Cook
County Sheriff
Kim
Foxx
Thomas
J. Dart
50 West
Washington, Room 500
Richard J.
Daley Center, Room 701
Chicago,
Ill. 60602
Chicago,
Ill. 60602
US
Attorney
FBI Dir. Chris Wray
John
R. Lausch, Jr. 2111
West Roosevelt Road
219 S.
Dearborn, 5th floor
Chicago, Ill. 60612
Chicago,
Ill. 60604
Judge Judge
Celia C. Gamrath Neil Cohen
50 West Washington
Room 2508 50
West Washington Room 2308
Judge Judge
Franklin U. Valderrama
Moche Jacobius, Presiding
Judge
50 West Washington Room 2402 50 West Washington Room 2403
Judge
Fredrick H. Bates
Markham, IL. Room 102
Cook County
President
Chief Judge
Toni Preckwinkle
Timothy C.
Evans
118 N. Clark, Room 517
50 West Washington, Room 2600
Chicago, Ill. 60602
PLEASE
BE ADVISED that on August 19, 2019,
A Motion to Supplement et al. has been filed with the Northern
District of Illinois and said copies being served on said applicable parties
via hand delivery or regular mail;
Respectfully, Submitted,
Joe Louis Lawrence
Counsel Pro Se
Post Office Box 490075
Chicago, Ill 60649
312 965-6455
@joelouis
No comments:
Post a Comment