JUDICIAL COMPLAINT & MOTION TO DISQUALIFY CHARLES R. NORGLE, SR. ALLEGED WHITE NATIONALIST FROM THE ILLINOIS NORTHERN DISTRICT
JUDGE NORGLE NEVER DENIED HE WAS A RACIST OR "WHITE NATIONALIST"
HE AGREED WITH EVERYTHING RECORDED IN THE MOTION TO SUPPLEMENT MOTION ET AL. THAT IS WHY HE SIGNED THE COURT ORDER AUGUST 19, 2019 BUT REFUSED TO GRANT THE JUDGMENT OF $33 MILLION DOLLARS ONLY BECAUSE OF RACIST HATEFUL DEMEANOR
CHICAGO'S LEGAL SYSTEM AND JUDGES ARE ENFORCING LAWS INDICATIVE TO A 3RD WORLD COUNTRY RACIAL HATRED IS WORSE IN ILLINOIS THAN ANY SOUTHERN STATE.
JUDGES ARE USING THE LAWS AS WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION DESTROYING PEOPLE UNLAWFULLY BECAUSE THEY DON'T MEET THE ETHNICITY OF THOSE PRESIDING ON THE BENCHES.
WHILE COWARDLY MEN GO OUT AND MASS SHOOT UP A COMMUNITY KILLING ETHNIC GROUPS NOT OF THEIR ETHNICITY THE JUDGES HERE IN THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS AND SEVENTH CIRCUIT EMULATE THE SAME VILE RACIST HATE BY MISAPPLYING THE LAWS COMMITTING PERJURY TO ETHNIC GROUPS THEY DEEM INFERIOR TO THEM AS ARTICULATED IN THIS DOCUMENT.
1.
That it is clear no Hispanic or Black person described as a Democrat
in Cook County have any real authority where it matters especially as
demonstrated in this
cause, “Jim Crow” laws are being enforced by spineless men of
color and racist men hiding behind men of color using them as the Enforcers
using the laws as weapons to Terrorize, Bully or “Lynch” anyone that challenges
said Democrats in these unlawful proceedings as articulated throughout all
pleadings and affidavits.
Not since the Book Lawyers and Judges in Collusion The Fraternity, by
John Fitzgerald Molloy said former judge articulated the horrors within the
legal arena but the Plaintiff has went even further granting the “Blue Print on
Domestic Terrorism” and the extent a judge will go to destroy the lives of
innocent men and women of color.
What is most appalling is the extent colored judges so as to be
accepted by a party that has been typically historically racist as Democrats
are willing to perpetrate injustice on their own ethnicity so as to prove and
be accepted by a party that has wielded so much Hate at a man simply because of
the color of his skin.
Plaintiff Prays further that this Honorable Judge recognize the
Plaintiff as a Freeman Born & Raised in these United States of America and
not inferior or less than any man responsible for the incitement of these
heinous Hateful Acts.
IN THE
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT
CHICAGO, ILLINOIS 60604
Joe Louis Lawrence Civil
Action #93 CV
Hon: Charles
R. Norgle Sr.
Plaintiff
V
Chicago Transit Authority
Defendants
To the Honorable Justices of the Seventh Circuit of
the United States Court of Appeals:
Complainant a United States Citizen,
Born & Raised a Free Man Joe Louis
Lawrence, hereby respectfully represents as Counsel Pro Se shows this court
with corroboration/admissions and Court Order the noted reasons why this matter
should be within this Court’s Jurisdiction so as to Vacate the court order
reassign this matter to a judge with integrity, not affiliated with the
Terrorist Democratic and some noted Republican Judges who have assumed the
roles as “Private Citizens” “Trespassing upon the Laws” protecting the Alleged “White
Nationalists”; {Pursuant to Fed Rules of Civil Procedure and with Affidavit.
Now
comes Joe Louis Lawrence, Counsel Pro Se Appellant in this
cause files herewith his affidavit as required by Title 28,
United States Code, Section 144, to show that the “Private Citizen” Charles
R. Norgle, Sr. has a personal bias with compelling evidence against
him where a proper sufficient Motion for Summary Judgment was filed stating a
cause how and why this court has jurisdiction to grant said motion never
objected to or denied by any of the Defendants; motions corroborating judicial
corruption with court transcripts demonstrating “Fraud” “Trespassing
upon the Laws” “Perjury” and a plethora of “Terrorist Civil
Rights Acts” put before the court that the District Court ignored upholding
Racism and Terrorism in the courts.
That said judge has corroborated and
demonstrated his role unequivocally as a “Trespasser of the Laws” when
he HEARD testimony with affidavits DENIED said Motion, to Vacate August 8, 2019
Court Order due to Fraud et al. after the Defendants admitted to every PLEADING
recorded.
Based
thereon, Plaintiff-Complainant respectfully moves that the judge Robert R. Norgle,
Sr. proceed no further herein and that this Honorable Seventh Circuit invoke
jurisdiction; and transfer this matter outside of the Northern District Of
Illinois and away from the Seventh Circuit due to members of the Democratic
Political Machine seizing control over all courts and certain judges
politically appointed because of their racist hatred of ethnic groups they deem
inferior to them so as to enforce the laws pursuant to the United
States Constitution who is not Bias and understands how to enforce the laws in
accordance to the United States Constitution and according to Federal Rules of
Civil Procedure to hear this proceeding who is not intimidated or fear
reprisals from these individuals.
Pursuant to Rule 26 it implements the Breyer
Committee’s recommended use of transfers. Breyer
Committee Report, 239 F.R.D. at 214-15.
Rule 26 authorizes the transfer of a complaint
proceeding to another judicial council selected by the Chief Justice. Such
transfers may be appropriate, for example, in the case of a serious complaint
where there are multiple disqualifications among the original council, where
the issues are highly visible and a local disposition may weaken public
confidence in the process, where internal tensions arising in the council as a
result of the complaint render disposition by a less involved council
appropriate, or where a complaint calls into question policies or governance of
the home court of appeals et al.
Now
comes Joe Louis Lawrence, Attorney Pro Se Appellant in this cause files
herewith his affidavit as required by Title 28, attesting the
veracity and accuracy of all statements recorded
within.
Respectfully Submitted,
By: _________________
Joe Louis Lawrence
Counsel
Pro Se
P.
O. Box 490075
312
965-6455
Joelouis565@yahoo.com
@joelouis
IN THE
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT
CHICAGO, ILLINOIS
60604
AFFIDAVIT
IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR MOTION FOR DISQUALIFICATION OF JUDGE/VACATE AUGUST 19, 2019
COURT ORDER—(DUE TO PRIMA FACIE ADMISSIONS OF COURT ORDER AUGUST 20, 2019
GRANTING MOTION TO SUPPLEMENT ET AL.) PERSONAL BIAS AND JUDGE NORGLE AS AN
ALLEGED WHITE NATIONALIST ENGAGING IN HATE CRIMES OF AN ACTIVE “ORGANIZED
CONSPIRACY” W/AFFIDAVIT {28 USCA 144,
455 (B) (1)} VACATE ORDER OF AUGUST 19 2019 DUE TO ORDER BEING A “NULLITY” “VOID”
FRAUDULENTLY ENTERED
{Pursuant to the Rules of Federal Civil Procedure & U.S.
Constitution}
“No one is above the Law”, citing a 1928 decision by Supreme Court Justice Louis Brandeis Olmstead v. United States, 277 U.S. 438 (1928),
“We must subject government officials to the same rules of conduct that we expect of the citizen. The very existence of the government is imperiled if it fails to observe the law scrupulously. As Brandeis puts it, "if the government becomes a lawbreaker, it breeds contempt for law; it invites every man to become a law unto himself; it invites anarchy. To declare that in the administration of the criminal law the end justifies the means—to declare that the government may commit crimes in order to secure the conviction of a private criminal—would bring terrible retribution. Against that pernicious doctrine this court should resolutely set its face."
Section
1983 of U.S.C.S., S.H.A. Criminal Ch. 38, 33-3, Civil Rights Act of 1964, Canon
3D (1) Reporting Judicial Misconduct, 3D (2) Reporting Lawyer Misconduct;
I am Joe Louis Lawrence, Native/African American “Free Man” born a
United States Citizen not a deportee, not a slave or illegal immigrant, not
inferior to another man’s color of his or her skin, Heterosexual Man Born
and Raised a Free MAN Counsel Pro Se, HAVE BEEN MANY TIMES
DENIED IN ALL COURTS BUT NEVER TRIED being duly sworn on oath
states:
1.) That on July 26, 2019, Plaintiff appeared Judge Norgle
pursuant to his Motion Call for a Summary judgment;
A-
Plaintiff received a
phone call Thursday (July 25, 2019 in the afternoon) from the Judges Clerk that
the judge want’s us in court tomorrow all attorneys.
B-
That presented
his, Gr Ex A Motion for Summary Judgment, no attorney from the
CTA filed an Appearance or appeared before the court to defend any of the
assertions properly plead; thereby validating the verity of all pleadings being
factual, In the case of Raymond, 442 F. 3d at 606.(7th Cir. 2013) The Court, nevertheless, is concerned and
considers the prejudice to Plaintiff for Plaintiff’s counsel’s failure,
particularly because cases should be decided on their merits. Certainly, the
failure to file a response to a summary judgment motion can be fatal. See, e.g.,
id at 611.
C-
That upon completion of Plaintiff’s successful
argument as the judge made a series of redundant interrogatories at him, that
which was answered coherently as possible, hereto attached, Gr Ex B, Court Transcript of July 26, 2019,
with the Motion to Supplement et al attached, whereby; said judge
entered an order “Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment is taken under
advisement” , Ref as Ex C Court Order of July 26, 2019, but
most importantly Judge Norgle asked Page 15 Line 23 “You’re
seeking $33 Million”? Line 24 Plaintiff’s reply, “Well, it’s
the Court’s discretion”-- Line 25
Judge Norgle “What is your demand, damages”? Plaintiff Lines
1-6 “I’ve been off work, I’ve been harassed, I’ve been forced to live as
a criminal for reasons that I did not deserve this, my family has been
affected, and that is the reason why I put $33 Million on there. Of course, the
Court has discretion to determine a ruling that they feel is favorable based on
what I’ve been through.” Judge Norgle Lines 7-8 “Who do
you want to pay”? “Are you saying the CTA should pay you $33 Million”?
Plaintiff Lines 9-11 “Unless the Court decides otherwise, the
Chicago Transit Authority was, in fact, the principal parties that took place
in falsifying all these documents”. Judge Norgle Lines 12-13 “Who
else would pay you any part of the $33 Million”? Plaintiff Lines
14-15 “Well, Your Honor, that’s up to the Court’s discretion”. Judge
Norgle Line 16 “Well who are you saying”? Plaintiff “Well,
there was judges involved that acted as private citizens, because the judge
that issued the bogus warrant was a CTA employee. He had no reasons to issue a
warrant and that’s how my badge was taken off me. I wouldn't even be in this
matter if it wasn't for what that judge did”. Judge Norgle Line
22 “Which Judge? Plaintiff Line 23 “Ronald
Bartkowicz, Cook County judge.” Judge Norgle Line 24, “Are
you suing him”? Plaintiff Line 25 Page 17 Line 1
“No Sir Your Honor. You asked me a question, I’m responding to you.” Judge
Norgle Page 17 Lines 2-3 judge Norgle, “Yeah. Well,
I’m trying to find out who you’re suing. So it all gets down to the CTA”? Plaintiff
Lines 4-5 “All of this here took place within the CTA, yes, Your
Honor”. Judge Norgle Line 6 “So the single defendant here
is the CTA”? Plaintiff Line
7 “that is correct, Your Honor”, Judge Norgle Line 8 “Okay,
And you want $33 Million”? Plaintiff Line 9 “Yes”. Judge
Norgle Lines 10-11 “Okay, The matter is under advisement. Thank
you”.
2.)
That Judge Norgle perpetrated the crimes of
mail fraud and other criminal actions by Inducing certain federal personnel
that Plaintiff had not provided on his email hereto attached, Ref as Ex D,
“states ORDER: Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment [31] is denied as
frivolous. The docket reflects that Plaintiff has not provided a valid mailing
address to the clerk; thus, the Clerk is directed to deliver a copy of this
order to Plaintiff by any means practicable, including electronic delivery to
the email address listed in the instant motion et al.”
3.)
That Judge Norgle engaged in acts of subornation
of perjury, in that Plaintiff reported to the Federal Building August 19, 2019
and learned from a new clerk that court orders had been mailed to 5950 North
Kenmore and that the mail had been returned back to clerk of the Federal Court
and Plaintiff had received a copy of the
order with a plethora of “Fraudulent” entries said lies were likened to "dandelions in the spring grass” "The entire defense was a
lie," the judge said. Charles Norgle’s
exact quote when he sentenced, Angela Jackson former law
student was sentenced to nearly 5 1/2 years in prison Tuesday for writing
racial slurs on several packages delivered to her home in a scheme to extort
more than $500,000 from United Parcel Service. (Chicago Tribune May 12,
1999, Matt O’Connor Tribune Staff Reporter).
A-
That first of all, please
find lies in series, “Plaintiff has not cited a specific Federal Rule of Civil
Procedure as the basis for bringing this motion.”
B-
THE QUESTION BEGS TO
KNOW HOW MANY YEARS WILL HE GET FOR THE NUMBER OF ORCHESTRATED LIES HE HAS
PREPARED IN HIS COURT ORDER?
C-
That pursuant to the
aforementioned, Page 1, ref as Gr Ex E of the Motion to Reinstate
Case due to Democratic judges/attorneys Trespassing upon the laws committing
Treason acting as Private Citizens making the District Court Order “Void” a “Nullity”
Par 1 is a Federal Precedent by
the United Supreme Court, states “Under Federal law which is applicable to all
states, the U.S. Supreme Court stated that if a court is “without authority,
its judgments and orders are regarded as nullities. They are not voidable, but
simply void; and form no bar to a recovery sought, even prior to a reversal in
opposition to them. They constitute no justification; and all persons concerned
in executing such judgments or sentences, are considered, in law, as
trespassers. “Elliot v. Piersol, 1 Pet. 328, 340, 26 U.S. 328, 340 (1828).
D-
That judge Norgle
allegedly conspired with a Federal Clerk who purportedly mailed the September
27, 2018 and December 21, 2018 court orders to his Post Office Box 490075
Chicago, Il. 60649, but was unlawfully mailing additional court orders to 5950
North Kenmore, Chicago, Il. 60660 where they were returned and is noted in the
Federal database.
E-
That Plaintiff lived
in that Condominium when he was an injured employee with the Chicago Transit
Authority and lost his unit (around 1995 or 1996) due to the CTA not paying him
any workman’s compensation and racially discriminated against him for not
falsifying the merits in how his work-related injury was sustained so as to use
a Public Aid medical card to ascertain all medical expenses from the injury.
F-
That Plaintiff have
never ever did an address change but the Seventh Circuit and other District
Court Judges had Plaintiff’s Post Office Box number due to him not having a
legal address being legally homeless, in that judge Franklin Ulysses Valderamma
and Robert M. Dow, Jr. systematically corroborated their roles in said “Organized
Conspiracy” denied every motion Summary Judgment, Court Transcripts and Affidavits
so as to protect all alleged “White Nationalists Democrats and Racist
Republicans caught up in said Conspiracy making sure he remained homeless not
being able to use his Section 8 voucher to live in what was described as
Mobility areas because of his skin color and he didn’t pay the alleged
$1000-$2000 for his voucher to City Hall Officials, but 420 East Ohio took
approximately $700 from him and never returned it and K2 took $500 from him and
never returned his money but 345 East Ohio returned his checks telling him if
he made $140,000.00 a year he qualified to live in hteir units with his
voucher, (and put it in writing) so the alleged “White Nationalists Democrats
in the Political Machine” and Alleged Puppet Inferior Niggers” did everything
from a Psychotic Demonic perspective corroborating Terrorists have taken seize
of the legal venues warranting Military support for the effective eradication
of all insurgents working against the government.
G-
That said court
order of August 19, 2019 is “FRAUDULENT”
from the beginning to the end, ref as Ex D.
4.) That Judge Norgle became a law
unto himself corroborating his role as a “White Nationalist” engaging in
Racist Hate Crimes became a law unto himself ignored the United States Supreme
Court and Local Rules of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of
Illinois. The Local Rules provide detailed instructions as to how litigants
should approach their summary judgment motions and responses. Local Rule 56.1(a)
provides that a motion for summary must include a "statement of material facts
as to which the moving party contends there is no genuine issue and that
entitle the moving party to a judgment as a matter of law."
This statement of
material facts "shall consist of short numbered paragraphs, including
within each paragraph specific references to the affidavits, parts of the
record, and other supporting materials relied upon to support the facts set
forth in that paragraph." Part (b) of Local Rule 56.1 requires a party
opposing summary 4 judgment to file a concise response to the movant's
statement of material facts. That statement is required to include a response
to each numbered paragraph in the moving party's statement, including in the case
of any disagreement, "specific references to the affidavits, parts of the
record, and other supporting materials relied upon." The rule is very
clear that "all material facts set forth in the statement required of the
moving party will be deemed admitted unless controverted by the statement of
the opposing party." Local Rule 56.1(b)(3)(B).
5.)
That because Federal Judge Norgle has
corroborated and admitted his role in this “Organized Conspiracy” by signing
the Court Order (August 20, 2019) ref as Gr Ex B Motion to Supplement
Motion with Court Transcript of July 26, 2019 that Corroborates judge Norgle as
an Alleged White Nationalist Engaging in Hate Crimes of an Active “Organized
Conspiracy” w Affidavit whereby warranting the Jurisdiction of the Federal
Bureau of Investigations/United States Attorney negates any of his alleged Brethren to preside
over this case in the Seventh Circuit due to Page 1 states “That judge
Norgle’s ruling against the Plaintiff is predicated on Racism, Racial Hatred
because of Plaintiff’s skin color”.
6.)
That because Federal Judge Norgle has
corroborated and admitted his role in this “Organized Conspiracy” in
fact “Nullifies” the August 19, 2019 court order making it “Void”.
7.)
That Judge Norgle realizes that he is
caught in this Diabolical Heinous Hate Crime making it clear to his Brethren if
he is going down everybody is going down with him said inferior Negroes and
Colored people along with the alleged “White Nationalist” in the Democratic
Political Machine are no longer conspiring with the Plaintiff now their crimes
are against the government pursuant to the Ku Klux Klan Act of 1871.
Section 4 the law
is clear, “Whenever in any State or part of a State………unlawful
combinations…….shall be organized and armed, and so numerous and powerful et
al…………and whenever, by reason of either or all of the causes aforesaid, the
conviction of such offenders and the preservation of the public safety shall
become…..Impracticable, in every such case such combinations shall be deemed a
rebellion against the Government of the United States…
A-
Posner: ABA Journal (September 11, 2017)
Most judges regard pro se litigants as
'kind of trash not worth the time' Posner, 78, told the Chicago Daily Law Bulletin last week that he decided to retire
because of conflicts with his colleagues over the treatment of pro se
litigants, who represent themselves. In a new interview with the New York Times, Posner elaborated on his concerns about the
treatment of such litigants.
8.)
“The basic thing is
that most judges regard these people as kind of trash not worth the time of a
federal judge,” Posner said.
In
the 7th Circuit, staff lawyers review appeals from pro se litigants, and their
recommendations are generally rubber-stamped by judges, he noted.
Posner
wanted to give the pro se litigants a better shake by reviewing all of the
staff attorney memos before they went to the panel of judges. Posner had
approval from the director of the staff attorney program. “But the judges, my
colleagues, all 11 of them, turned it down and refused to give me any
significant role. I was very frustrated by that,” Posner said.
Posner
has written about the pro se issue in an upcoming book, and its publication
“would be particularly awkward” if he remained on the court because it
“implicitly or explicitly” criticizes the other judges, he said.
That Pursuant to Judge Posner’s admissions about said Federal
judges and the corroboration recorded in this document demonstrates Prejudice, Bias, Racial Hate Crimes, demonstrates Unequal Treatment of the Laws,
demonstrates Disparate
Dispensation of the Laws at the Petitioner due to his skin color, demonstrates how effective how alleged “White Nationalist judges” are in Inducing Reliance Mississippi
Comm’n on Judicial Performance v. Fletcher, 686 So.
2d 1075 (Miss. 1996) and Carter v. Mueller, 457
N.E. 2d 1335 Ill. App. (1st Dist. 1983) on several Judges in the Court of Appeals and others in legal
authority conspiring against Petitioner, in that, said individuals of this
Secret Fraternal Order Invoked Racial Apartheid, Invoked Genocidal Applications
of the laws in accordance to their by-laws of the Fraternity, and total
disregard to any laws of the United States Constitution Commentary Canon 2, 2A 2C, Crawford v. State, 770 N.E. 2d 775 (Ind. Dash, 564 S.E.
2d 672 (S.C. 2002), Ferra, 582 N.W. 2d 817 (Mich 1998)
9.)
That very few judges especially Norgle seems
to have the aptitude being in the legal profession the question is how many
other judges like him are presiding on the bench?
10.)
That Pursuant to Page 4 Par 11, Motion to Vacate August 8, 2019 et
al. That
Judge Norgle had alleged knowledge Judge Dow seemingly got away with his
corroboration being an alleged participant in a “White Nationalist Organized
Criminal Conspiracy” as a “Private Citizen” not a Federal judge for which he
took his oath and appointed to the bench had a Motion for Disqualification of
judge Personal Bias or Prejudice {28 USCA 144, 455 (B) (1) } Vacate Order of
May 3, 2018 & May 9, due to Federal Clerk Committing Fraud Entering Court
Order in Computer Unlawfully as Gr Ex C before the Court of Appeals
Seventh Circuit.
A- That Gr Ex C had
directed evidence and corroboration of judge Dow engaging in an active Criminal
Terrorist Racist Conspiracy where he signed a court order dated April 3rd,
2018, see Page 4, Pars 3-5, Par 4, “That the Judge used his position
and authority in an attempt to undermine the integrity of Plaintiff’s motion by
Inducing Reliance on all persons and judges reviewing this matter; in that Page
2 of the manufactured order that corroborates the Judge as a “Private Citizen
states Milchtein v Chisholm, 880 F 3d 895, 897 (7th Cir 2018)”
B- That Par 5, states “That
said order demonstrates said judge colluding in a diabolical conspiracy with
the Defendants, Memorandum Decision and Order Granting Motion for Partial
Summary Judgment which was filed April 24th, 2018 et al.
C-
That from the May 2, 2018 Court Transcript ref as Gr
Ex F Page 2 Lines 9-10 Judge Dow engaged in Perjury, stated “did
you get the order that I sent out about a month ago on April 3rd?
There was an order…”
11.)
That
because there are judges in the Seventh Circuit as alleged “White Nationalist”
makes it totally impossible for any judge to preside over this matter, due to
the following ref as Gr Ex G Judicial Complaint naming a
plethora of Democratic Judges complicit in Terrorist Acts “Trespassing
upon the Laws” where Seventh Circuit judges closed their eyes as alleged “White
Nationalists” also ref as Gr Ex H Petition to Transfer to
Another Judicial Council went ignored while former President Obama was in
office as racist alleged “White Nationalist” ran the gamut on Judicial
Corruption staying ahead of any government investigation due to the
aforementioned;
12.)
That if Federal Officials had a forensic IT specialist
to investigate the data system of April 3, 2018 they would see that judge Dow
never DENIED his Summary Judgment because at the time of Motion being filed for
Summary Judgment Plaintiff nor the clerks saw the Order in the system;
otherwise, Plaintiffs motion never would have been filed or made it on the
Judges Motion call what is so ironic a clerk with impeccable integrity was
training a new clerk and specifically articulated to them “you have to check
and make sure the case is not closed before you enter motions in the system”.
13.)
That on December
18, 2017 Judge Robert M. Dow, Jr. entered a “Minute Order” hereto
attached, “Plaintiff’s motion to reinstate the case is taken under advisement. The court
will issue a ruling by mail after it has taken an opportunity to review the
motion and the prior history of the case, .et al. Notice of motion date of
12/21/2017 is stricken and no appearances are necessary on that date.” Is the only court order
Plaintiff ever received from the court.
14.)
That “Private Citizen” Robert M. Dow, Jr.
violated his oath operated outside of his jurisdiction became a “Trespasser of
the Laws” engaging in “Treason” signed an order of April 3, 2018 but relied on
alleged “White Nationalist to “War against the United States Constitution” by “Trespassing
upon the Laws” engaging in “Treason Offenses” now Norgle is hoping other judges
would help him or sink with him in this Mayhem.
15.) That the Judge used his position and
authority in an attempt to undermine the integrity of Plaintiff’s motion by
Inducing Reliance on all persons and judges reviewing this matter; in that Page
2 of the manufactured order that corroborates the Judge as a “Private Citizen”
states Milchtein v Chisholm, 880 F 3d 895, 897 (7th Cir
2018)
16.) That said order demonstrates said judge colluding in a
diabolical conspiracy with the Defendants, “Memorandum Decision and
Order Granting Motion for Partial Summary Judgment which was filed
April 24th, 2018, validating the verity that a Federal Clerk has used
their position and authority to commit a criminal act engaging in now a
conspiracy pursuant to Mansell v. Saunders (CA 5 F 1A) 372 F
573, especially if the conspiracy was actually carried into effect, where an
action is for a conspiracy to interfere with Civil Rights under 42 U.S.C.S.
1985 (3), or for the depravation of such rights under 42 U.S.C.S. 1983, if the
conspiracy was actually carried into effect and plaintiff was thereby deprived
of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the United States
Constitution and Laws, the gist of the action may be treated as one for the
depravation of rights under 42 U.S.C.S. 1983,
A-
To show fraud upon the
court, the complaining party must establish that the alleged misconduct
affected the integrity of the judicial process, either because the court itself
was defrauded or because the misconduct was perpetrated by officers of the
court. Alexander v. Robertson, 882, F. 2d 421,424 (9th Cir.
1989);
B-
A void judgment does not
create any binding obligation. Kalb v. Feuerstein (1940) 308 US 433, 60
S Ct 343, 84 L, Ed 370.
17.)
That said court order
signed by Judge Valderrama, pursuant to Gr Ex C from the Dec
12, Motion, states “IT IS ORDERED THAT: this case is
transferred to Calendar 6 Judge Mikva, for the sole purpose of
hearing the Petition for Substitution of Judge for Cause. . Upon resolution of
the Motion, the case shall be returned to the Presiding Judge for the
appropriate assignment. Judge Moche Jacobius signed the Order March 18, 2016.
18.)
That the aforementioned
Directive was never adhered to making every order entered by “Private
Citizen” Valderrama a “Nullity” VOID ENTIRELY,
thereby wanting every Federal Official
to know as an inferior male he is willing give his life or freedom to protect
the alleged “White Nationalist” controlling the Democratic Political Machine”
as demonstrated in this matter.
A- “A Void Judgment from
its inception is and forever continues to be absolutely null, without legal
efficacy, ineffectual to bind parties or support a right, of no legal force and
effect whatever, and incapable of confirmation, ratification, or enforcement in
any manner or to any degree. “A void judgment, order or decree may be attacked
at any time or in any court, either directly or collaterally” Oak Park Nat
Bank v. Peoples Gas Light & Coke Col, 46 Ill. App. 2d 385, 197 N.E. 3d 73,
77, (1st Dist. 1964)
B- “The Seventh
Circuit Court of Appeals held that the Circuit Court of Cook
County is a criminal enterprise. U.S. v. Murphy, 768 F.2d
1518, 1531 (7th Cir. 1985)”.
FURTHER AFFIANT SAYETH NOT
Joe
Louis Lawrence
__________________
Counsel
Pro Se
P.
O. Box 490075
312 965-6455
Joelouis565@yahoo.com
@joelouis7
WHEREFORE the
aforementioned reasons Plaintiff respectfully Prays for the Relief
1. For
an Order Vacating the Orders signed by judges Norgle and Dow due to “Trespassing upon the
Laws” and acts of “Treason”.
2. For an
Order reassigning this matter to another Circuit or District not influenced by
corruption or politicians in Chicago.
3. For
an Order Granting both Summary Judgments Instanter.
4. For
an Order issuing a Rule to Show Cause Remanding Charles R. Norgle, Sr.
Robert M. Dow, Jr. Franklin U. Valderrama into Custody Instanter.
5. For an
Order appointing a Special Prosecutor who understands the jurisdiction of their
profession to investigate and ascertain all other parties complicit in these
Terrorist Treason Offenses of all cases noted within;
6. For an
Order staying any and all legal enforcements of all parties noted within due to
the plethora of Felonies enacted by “Private Citizens” perpetrating roles as
judges Trespassing upon the Laws”
7. For an
Order on bond be not less than one million dollars for any and all parties
charged in these crimes in warring against the United States Constitution.
8. For an
Order removing the Chief Judge of Cook County and Presiding judges of all
Circuits who as Public Servants failed to investigate remove or report any
judge in accordance to their oath and Public Duty.
9. For an
Order setting a Hearing Date for all attorneys who sat by in an idle manner and
did not exercise his or her duties pursuant to the Ethics of R.P.C 3.3 and
speak up or report the terrorist acts perpetrated by “Private Citizens”
violating their oaths as judges.
10.
For an Order forwarding to Congress or the United States Supreme
Court to authorize the Execution or Imposing Mandatory Life sentences upon
every person that conspire, that engages in any acts of Treason, Trespassing upon
the Laws against the United States government.
For the entry of an Order awarding
to your Petitioner for such other relief and any other relief necessary as
equity may require of which this court may deem overwhelmingly just;
IN THE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
EASTERN DIVISION
EXHIBIT LIST
1.) Gr Ex A Motion for Summary
Judgment Page
1.
2.) Gr Ex B, Court Transcript of July 26, 2019, Motion
to Supplement Motion et al.( filed August 19, 2019.) (Judge Norgle
sounding illiterate and unqualified to be any judge).
3.) Gr Ex C Court Order of
July 26, 2019.
4.) Gr Ex D Court Order of August 19,
2019.
5.) Gr Ex E Motion to Reinstate Case et al. (filed Sept. 19, 2018.)
6.) Gr Ex F Court Transcript of May 2,
2018 (Judge
Dow committing Perjury).
7.) Gr Ex G Judicial Complaint naming
50 judges Democrats Obstructing justice because of the control they had in all
courts. (filed Dec 6, 2016).
8.) Gr Ex H Petition to Transfer to Another Judicial Council, Democrats made
sure nobody in Washington D.C. investigated any of the assertions (filed Dec
19, 2016).
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
EASTERN DIVISION
AFFIDAVIT
I Joe Louis Lawrence, Counsel Pro Se being
duly sworn on oath states the aforementioned pleadings enumerated within said
motion pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedures, the undersigned certifies
that the statements set forth in this instrument are true and correct, except
as to matters therein stated to be on information and belief and as to such
matters, the undersigned certifies as aforesaid that she verily believes the
same to be true.
Respectfully Submitted
Joe Louis Lawrence Notary
__________________
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE
SEVENTH CIRCUIT CHICAGO
ILLINOIS 60604
NOTICE OF
MOTION
FOR DISQUALIFICATION OF JUDGE/VACATE AUGUST 19, 2019 COURT ORDER—(DUE TO PRIMA
FACIE ADMISSIONS OF COURT ORDER AUGUST 20, 2019 GRANTING MOTION TO SUPPLEMENT
ET AL.) PERSONAL BIAS AND JUDGE NORGLE AS AN ALLEGED WHITE NATIONALIST ENGAGING
IN HATE CRIMES OF AN ACTIVE “ORGANIZED CONSPIRACY” W/AFFIDAVIT {28 USCA 144, 455 (B) (1)} VACATE ORDER OF AUGUST
19 2019 DUE TO ORDER BEING A “NULLITY” “VOID” FRAUDULENTLY ENTERED
Please be
advised that on, August 29, 2019
Plaintiff has filed before this Court of
Appeals Motion to Disqualify et al.
August 29, 2019 et al;
General Counsel: Karen G. Seimetz Local Union 241 Amalgamated Transit
Union
President Keith Hill/ 1st Vice President
Chicago Transit Authority 1613 S. Michigan
Law Department 567 Chicago, IL 60613
567 West Lake Street
Chicago, IL 60661
Law Department 567 Chicago, IL 60613
567 West Lake Street
Chicago, IL 60661
Hon Mayor Lori Lightfoot
City Hall 7th floor
Chicago, IL. 60601
Circuit
Court of Cook County, Dorothy
Brown
50
West Washington,
Chicago,
IL 60601 Suite 1001
Courtesy
Copies:
Cook
County State’s Attorney
Cook
County Sheriff
Kim
Foxx
Thomas
J. Dart
50 West
Washington, Room 500
Richard J.
Daley Center, Room 701
Chicago,
Ill. 60602
Chicago,
Ill. 60602
US
Attorney
FBI Dir. Chris Wray
John
R. Lausch, Jr. 2111
West Roosevelt Road
219 S.
Dearborn, 5th floor
Chicago, Ill. 60612
Chicago,
Ill. 60604
Judge Judge
Celia C. Gamrath Neil Cohen
50 West Washington Room 2508 50 West Washington Room 2308
Judge Judge
Franklin U. Valderrama
Moche Jacobius,
Presiding Judge
50 West Washington Room 2402 50 West Washington Room 2403
Judge
Attorney General
Fredrick H. Bates
Kwame
Raoul
Markham, IL. Room 102 State of Illinois
Building 13th Floor
Cook County President
Chief Judge
Toni Preckwinkle
Timothy
C. Evans
118 N. Clark, Room 517
50 West Washington, Room 2600
Chicago, Ill. 60602
Secretary of State
Asst Gen Counsel Terry
Mc Conville 5th Floor
State of Illinois
Building
PLEASE
BE ADVISED that on August 29, 2019, A Motion to Vacate
August 19, 2019 Court Order et al. has been filed with the Court of Appeals and said copies being served
on said applicable parties via hand delivery or regular mail;
Respectfully, Submitted,
______________________
Joe Louis Lawrence
Counsel Pro Se
Chicago, Ill 60649
312 965-6455
@joelouis7
PLEASE
BE ADVISED that on August 29, 2019, A Motion
for Disqualification of judge/Vacate Court Order et al. has been filed
with the Court of Appeals Seventh Circuit and said copies being served on said
applicable parties via hand delivery or regular mail;
No comments:
Post a Comment