THE POLICE SHOOT DOWN INNOCENT MEN OF COLOR WHILE CITY HALL OFFICIALS & AFRICAN AMERICAN OFFICIALS CLOSE THEIR EYES AND LET JIM CROW DESTROY INNOCENT MEN OF COLOR.
LEE OTIS, JR. IS BEING FORCED TO PAY FOR JUSTICE BY EXPENDING DOLLARS HE BARELY HAS JUST TO HAVE A RELATIONSHIP WITH HIS NATURAL BIOLOGICAL DAUGHTER BUT THE MOTHER OF THE CHILD HAVE LIED SLANDERED HIS NAME COMMITTED PERJURY ALL OF THAT WENT IGNORED.
RACIST WHITE PEOPLE WANT YOU TO THINK BLACK AND BROWN MEN ARE DEADBEAT DADS CRIMINALS ETC BUT NOBODY EVER WANT IT BE KNOWN A MAN LIKE MYSELF EXIST AND IS TRYING TO HAVE MY DAUGHTER IN MY LIFE BECAUSE THAT IS NOT HOW THESE RACIST WHITES WHO CONTROLS THE COURTS AND CHICAGO WANT TO SEE MEN LIKE MYSELF.
#BLACKANDBROWNLIVESDONTMATTER IN CHICAGO #CHIRAQ
Monday April 14th 2014
Honorable Judge Pamela E. Loza
Daley Center
50 W. Washington St., Rm. CL12
Chicago, Illinois 60602
(312) 603-1260
Chicago, Illinois 60602
(312) 603-1260
Petitioner: Lee Oties Love Jr.
8435 South Peoria
Chicago, Il 60620
773-783-5691
Urgent Case Update – Lee Oties Love vs. Natasha Broomfield for sole physical custody and joint legal custody; with restricted visitation from the current custodial parent.
Trail date set for May 6th at 2:00pm- Case #13 D 080423 Calendar 99 CL 12
Dear Judge Loza,
Since our last court date the dangers of my daughters daily welfare, emotionally, physically and physiologically have dramatically increased while being in the custody of the defendant her mother Natasha Broomfield. It is no longer my intent to just seek more visitation, it is imperative at this time that the structures set in place for my child’s growth and stability in all aspects of her childhood be examined by the court so that she is placed permanently into my care the petitioner her father as the full custodial parent.
Knowing that time is of the essence I present to you these pertinent points to review before trial:
- The defendant/custodial parent Natasha Broomfield has violated the current order of protection (#11-04-11/CCDRN1-filed 11/04/13) for our daughter against Natasha and her mother Michiko Ingram set in place to protect our daughter who has severe Level 4 allergies against cats from being taken over to her mother’s house where their cats are in the house and still roam free. The defendant has continued to violate this order with no intent to cease and our daughters allergies have escalated to where she has had to stay home wheezing, tongue swollen and with other symptoms related to inflamed allergies preventing her from being a child.
The defendant has always had options for child care other than endangering our daughters life on a daily basis from myself who’s employer allows more flexibility, than the defendants employer and is concurrent with the hours she needs assistance to my mother Armanetta Carter Love who is a retired school teacher and who has stated to Tasha and in documentation and on many occasions that she is able to watch our daughter at any time and she is only 3 blocks away and a phone call away.
The conclusion as to why the defendant continues to not utilize our options for daycare and continues to place our child’s life in danger is one that our child cannot afford to wait for the answer.
A case has been opened through Illinois Department of Children and Family services, Myra Boyce 708-210-3628 can be contacted for any inquires, updates on her medical conditions and investigation results.
- The defendant has violated the parent medication agreement currently set in place on several occasions at her leisure and not her sound discretion. A few documented instances where no reason was given as to why the violation was justified were; on my birthday weekend I was to have our child from Friday March 21st 2014 until March 24th at 7pm. The defendant did not bring our child to me until March 22nd 2014 and with clear indication that she had been exposed to cats as her allergies were once again inflamed. That Monday morning on March 24th my child was still suffering from her symptoms so I decided to call the school and inform them that Kaylee would not be present, I then contacted the defendant and called off work to care for our child. Within 15 minutes the defendant and Riverdale police were at my door demanding that I wake our child because I was not allowed to have her. Puzzled as to why the defendant would subject our child to being woken out of a sound sleep while she is ill to bathe, dress and take her out into the cold in the presence of police boggles my mind, but once again I complied to keep the peace. The defendant stated she was taking her to see the doctor, but neither evidence nor a conclusion on the welfare of our child was given to me. I was not allowed the courtesy of a phone call to update me on her health or that I would not be allowed to visit or see her for the remainder of the day.
The second incident in a line of many is the week of March 31st - April 7th 2014 our child’s Spring Break (which I wasn’t notified of until 30 minutes before she dropped our child off at my mother’s house 30 minutes away from where I live and without contacting me first the parent) and my scheduled weekend of overnight visitation the defendant out of compliance with state orders for joint legal custody as well as out compliance with IRS orders while her charges are pending for IRS fraud removed our child from Illinois and went to Wisconsin without my knowledge, April 2nd -April 7th. The defendant texted my phone at 5:22pm on April 2nd the day of my scheduled visitation to tell me that she had an emergency and she wasn’t dropping our child off without divulging to me where she was. I then went to Riverdale Police Department who accompanied me to her home.
When she finally picked up the police asked her where she was and she admitted she was stuck in Wisconsin because her car broke down. The police then cited her for violation (#R14-03938-Officer Badge/ Hubbard#140) that Friday April 4th the same thing occurred and when Riverdale Police went to her home (R14-03938 Officer Badge/Rodriguez #9635) the defendant would not relinquish our child for my weekend visit stating she had already made plans and had things to do. The next evening of Saturday April 5th 2014 at 10:00 pm the defendant texted me asking if still wanted to see Kaylee. I agreed and she brought my daughter over that evening once again with allergies inflamed and once again ill prepared without her breathing treatment and no eppy-pen to relieve her symptoms. Documented texts are available between the defendant and I to prove the ongoing neglect my daughter incurs.
This occurrence is not rare but frequent where my daughters tongue is swollen, she cannot breathe and she is ill from being exposed to the many allergies she is subjected to while in care of the defendant.
- On April 7th I dropped our daughter off to school and spoke with her teacher. In speaking with her current teacher several questions/concerns were raised; her report card, her progress, her regression in basic skills, her nervousness, and her notice of allergies to the school and to the cafeteria. The apparent neglect from the current custodial parent Natasha Broomfield is evidently clear as I present that my letters to the school, my follow ups and allergy appointments along with consents for medical care if she becomes ill for the school nurse, my letters to the food administrators on what not to feed her are all documented in my name, not her mothers the custodial parent.
Our daughters’ needs are not being considered to the extent of which they need to be. I pay child support and tuition to Calvin Christian School and with the teachers support I have been made aware of these ongoing issues. I need to insure that parent teacher meetings are being attended, progress is being made, and school activities are being participated in and that she is adequately cared for on school breaks and vacation which I am not currently privy to. As a parent I need to be able to stay on top of our child’s education and fundamental growth & development and it is clear that the defendant has and is not doing so.
- The preceding are just 3 major areas of interest in a list of several that raise and answer the question of the defendant being a fit parent to raise and nurture our child. Currently Natasha Broomfield is fighting a fraud case with IRS and owes $130,000 .00 in compound interest. In 2012 the mother of the defendant Michiko Ingram faced embezzlement & money laundering charges within the Bank of America Case Reference # L101212-403. The defendant and her mother have been summoned for charges from the IRS Invoice #3023520000400003413/ Case# 1001004965. Internal revenue Service Commissioner Michael Frazin (312)-566-3994 can be contacted for more information as the case is open with a security clearance.
The defendant carries no bills in her name as well as her home and vehicles are not in her name. The Internal Revenue Service has put a safe lock on our child’s name and social security number due to the defendant trying to open credit in her name. The defendant was terminated from Chicago Transit Authority for embezzlement and due to her history with IRS her degrees seek to be null and void when searching for comparable employment. This family has a history of illegal activity and can only weigh on the mental and emotionally psyche of an individual. Behavior is learned and it is fact that the defendant grew up without a father & without a stable family structure and support. In 15 plus years of knowing the defendant & her mother’s illegal activity proves how one generation can teach the other. The defendants’ residence and extended support has and continues to prove to be an unstable and dangerous environment for our child’s growth and development mentally, emotionally and physically.
As the child’s father I present my family and extended family support. We have never had charges of illegal activity, my parents and extended family have been married and stayed together and have proven to continuously be involved in their children’s lives, whether education, life events and just basic emotional support which cannot be contested by the defendant. The men in my family live by the ‘Carter family Oath’ set forth by my grandfather Arthur Robert Carter Sr. , on men’s duties to care for their families, wives and children and it is passed down and is one of the main reasons I filed motion after motion and will continue to do so.
I have sought out legal representation and have consulted with top Family Law Attorneys 1st Corri Fetman (312) 341-0900, 2nd William McSurley (773) 633-3072, 3rd Ruth Ramirez (708) 596-4400 and 4th Ross Weisman (312) 782-3750 all of whom commended my efforts and research thus far stated I was doing everything correctly and would be representing me if money wasn’t a factor. I have also been approached by the Honorable Judges Judith Sheindlin and Greg Mathis to present my case. The defendant declined but my documents in full were submitted for review by their respectable courts. Let my efforts and those who have helped me thus far prove I am not a random bitter, angry father. My daily footwork, research, ongoing thorough documentation since the day my daughter was born as well as your courts’ home study of which you read aloud during court also proves opposite. I am a concerned hardworking, educated citizen/parent that relishes in the chance to raise my offspring and give her the best start at life.
I plead with you to allow me to teach those family morals, structures and skills I have been taught to my 4 year old child who clearly is regressing and in need of more nurture and guidance from a stable custodial parent. Allow me to be able to go to her school freely and check in on her progress, allow me to have her sleep in an environment where she is not nervous and feels comfortable and confident to be a child. Allow me to adequately care for my daughter scars/symptoms accruing from the neglect of care for her allergies medically documented so that she does not grow up disfigured. Allow me to give my child a chance to know a stable structured family environment. Allow me full physical custody and I invite you into a life that has no secrets, a home that has nothing to hide and father who accepts the courts continuous support. Please contact me if you have any questions, comments, concerns or require more documentation that has been submitted with this letter today.
Thank you for your time. Next court date February 25,2014 @10am .I the petitioner and loving father continue to fight by filing motions and petitiong the court to show cause.A fathers love is just as in important as a mothers love. I just want to love and support my daughter. I grew up with my father and my daughter will as well. I have been the petitioner for since October 21,2013.
Lee Oties Love Jr.
773-783-5691
No comments:
Post a Comment