#JudicialCorruption in Chicago, Illinois how to fix cases

LEGAL FACTS NO POLITICIAN OR ANY JUDGE WANT THE PUBLIC TO READ OR KNOW IN HOW THEY OWN AND CONTROL THE CITY UNLAWFULLY OPPRESSING PEOPLE OF COLOR.

First all, I would like to thank the Federal Government in believing in my legal documentations and allowing me the latitude in fettering out the needed corroboration in upholding the legal claims asserted in all affidavits.

Secondly, to my Brazilian family of followers and everyone sharing the same concept of spiritual enrichment, Ellegua expresses warm wishes to you all and may your roads be forever opened for your support and dedication eradicating injustice wherever it maybe.

1.) Feb. 6, 2012, Motion for Re pagination of Record, due to Error & Omission, Filed before the U.S. Court of Appeals w/Affidavit.

Appellant's Motion was Denied.

The Motion unequivocally Demonstrated the deliberate obstacles manufactured in the record in an attempt to undermine Appellant's ability in preparing the Brief as many of you can see the Brief has already been posted prior.

Page 2 of said Motion Appellant Challenged 3 of their top judges to a chess match at the same time they Declined.

2.) Jan 23, 2012, Motion for Reconsideration for Appointment Counsel Rule To Show Cause Remanding Judge Darrah Into Custody Instanter For Fraud & Contempt of Court w/ Affidavit.

The Judges (Daniel A. Manion) repeatedly kept referencing Appellant as an inmate Farmer V. Haas, 990 F2d 319, 321 (7th Cir. 1993)

See Page 11 from Affidavit C-D How white men "mighty in power" view the heterosexual Free Black Man as a Homosexual Prisoner.

3.) Feb. 27, 2012 Motion For Reconsideration Vacate Orders Due To Bias or Fraud, Extension of Time to File Brief w/Affidavit

Appellant's Motion was Denied but from Affidavit Page 4, #1-2 demonstrates the number of inconsistencies former Chief Judge William J. Bauer made dismissing the Motion.

4.) Oct. 24, 2011, Appellant filed the following;

MOTION FOR – DISQUALIFICATION OF JUDGE--PERSONAL BIAS OR PREJUDICE{28 USCA 144, 455 (B) (1)} VACATE ORDER OF OCT. 21, 2011, DUE TO FRAUD/ERROR

That Judge Darrah Denied the Motion, the Motion unequivocally demonstrated Judges corroboration in an Organized Chain Conspiracy as he attempted to use his Robe helping out the Racist conspiritors associated with the Political Machine and Racist Fraternal network.

5.) March 8, 2011, Appellant filed MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION/VACATE(Jan. 20, 2011) ORDER Due TO “FRAUD” ON COURT “PERJURY” JUDGES CORROBBORATION IN AN ORGANIZED CHAIN CONSPIRACY “CIVIL RIGHTS VIOLATIONS” & OTHER IRREGULARITIES w/AFFIDAVIT

What is hilarious they used a black attorney who had no knowledge of what he was up against and no legal expertise to out litigate the Appellant.

This particular document every Black, Hispanic and Latino man living in Chicago, Illinois who may have had their license suspended illegally need to gather themselves and File a Class-Action lawsuit against the Secretary of State.

The Affidavit clearly and unequivocally demonstrate how blacks allow themselves to be Prostituted protecting Corrupt white men falsifying anything and everything necessary to uphold their Racist Doctrines in this Corrupt City of Democrats as Terrorists.

IN THE

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT

CHICAGO, ILLINOIS 60604

Joe Louis Lawrence ) Appeal from the United States

Appellant ) District Court for the Northern

No. 11-3481 ) District of Illinois, Eastern Division

V )

) No. 11 CV 6887

Sec. of State, Clerk of Circuit Court, States Atty., )

Atty. Gen., Circuit Court Judges, State Judges, )

ATU 241, CTA Rachael Kaplan, Kent S. Ray )

Appellee )

NOTICE OF MOTON

Please be advised that on February 6, 2012, A Motion for Repagination of Record due to Error & Omission has been filed before the United States Court of Appeals.

Many will see the legal system is Enforcing Jim Crow Laws

: Cook County States Attorney Chief Judge Timothy C. Evans

Anita Alvarez 50 West Washington, Suite 2600

50 West Washington, Suite 500 Chicago, Ill. 60601

Chicago, Ill. 60601

Presiding Judge Mosche Jacobius

Chicago Transit Authority Legal Dept. 50 West Washington, Suite

Kent S. Ray, Rachael Kaplan Chicago, Ill. 60601

567 West Lake Street Chicago, IL. 60603

Chicago, Ill. 60661-1498 Hon. Mary Lane Mikva

50 West Washington, Suite

Chicago, Ill. 60601

Clerk of the Circuit Court

Dorothy Brown Attorney General

50 West Washington, Suite 1001 Lisa Madigan

Chicago, Ill. 60601 100 West Randolph, Suite 1300

Chicago, Ill. 60601

Asst. Atty. Gen.

Tyler Roland Asst. Gen. Counsel, Sec. of State

100 West Randolph, Suite 1300 Terrence McConville

Chicago, Ill. 60601 100 West Randolph, Suite 500

Chicago, Ill. 60601

Amalgamated Transit Union, 241

20 South Clark, Suite 850

Chicago, Ill. 60604

COURTESY COPIES TO THE FOLLOWING:

Commander & Chief President Barack Obama Mr. President this document corroborates the neccessicity and warrants the jurisdiction of your office to Dispatch Military personnel to this City to free African American, Hispanic Men from the Racial Injustice controlled by the Political Machine Thank you Respectfully submitted Joe Louis.

U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder

Dir. Mueller, FBI, Wash. D.C

Robert Grant U.S. Atty. Pat. Fitzgerald

FBI 219 South Dearborn, Suite 500

2111 West Roosevelt Road Chicago, Ill. 60604

Chicago, Ill. 60612

Madam Dorothy Tucker (Anchorwoman)

Channel 2 News

22 West Washington

Chicago, Ill. 60602

I affirm the above as being true.

Seeing that the Seventh Circuit is the second highest court in the United States, Appellant is challenging 3 of the courts top judges to a chess match and will play all 3 at the same time;

A- If Appellant defeats any judge, he is to preside over any case that comes before the Court of Appeals of that judge defeated;

B- If Appellant defeats all 3 male judges, he is write the decision for or against the appealing party;

C- Appellant is playing if you touch a piece you must move it and will bring a clock;

D- Seeing that certain white men personify themselves as superior intellects over persons of color, said judges should not have any problems checkmating the Pro Se Appellant;

Appellant is looking forward to wearing all 3 judges robes.

Respectfully Submitted

Joe Louis Lawrence

Counsel Pro Se

Email: joelouislaw@yahoo.com

(312) 927-4210

P.O. Box 490075

Chicago, Ill. 60649

IN THE

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT

CHICAGO, ILLINOIS 60604

CIRCUIT JUDGE

Joe Louis Lawrence ) Appeal from the United States

Appellant ) District Court for the Northern

No. 11-3481 ) District of Illinois, Eastern Division

V )

) No. 11 CV 6887

Sec. of State, Clerk of Circuit Court, States Atty., )

Atty. Gen., Circuit Court Judges, State Judges, )

ATU 241, CTA Rachael Kaplan, Kent S. Ray )

Appellee )

MOTON FOR REPAGINATION OF RECORD DUE TO ERROR & OMISSION W/Affidavit

Now comes Joe Louis Lawrence, Attorney Pro Se Appellant in this cause files herewith his second affidavit as required by Title 28, attesting the veracity and accuracy of all statements recorded within.

Based thereon, plaintiff-appellant respectfully moves this Honorable Court who is not Bias and understands how to enforce the laws in accordance to the United States Constitution and according to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure not to dismiss said matter presented before this court but grant Special Consideration in this matter, due to the unlawful injustices recorded in said Affidavit compelling this court to act in accordance to the Laws of the United States Constitution Instanter to execute jurisdiction over the parties involved in this proceeding who is not intimidated or fear reprisals from these individuals.

February 6, 2012

Respectfully Submitted

Joe Louis Lawrence

P.O. Box 490075

Chicago, Illinois 60649-0075

IN THE

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT

CHICAGO, ILLINOIS 60604

AFFIDAVIT

In Support of

MOTON FOR REPAGINATION OF RECORD DUE TO ERROR & OMISSION

I Joe Louis Lawrence, being duly sworn on oath states:

1.) That on Friday February 3, 2012, Appellant obtained the CD-Rom with the record allegedly in it’s entirety burned to a copy submitted to Appellant;

2.) Appellant examined the CD learned and realized upon preparing the brief that the clerk with initials (JMP) inadvertently paginated the record incorrectly, in addition, they left out Judge Darrah’s court order allowing Appellant to Appeal on Appeal;

A- That Judge Darrah used his Robe and authority to engage in Racist Terrorist Acts to prevent the United States Marshall’s from effecting service on members of the Political Machine recorded in said complaint;

B- Said Judge DENIED Appellant’s Informa Pauperis Application by committing Perjury and Fraud along with a Racist Hate Crime by DENYING said application

3.) That said document “Internal Use Only”, hereto attached, Exhibit A, acknowledges and records 9/30/2011, Page 3, Received Complaint and 9 copies

A- Clerk erred said record is Paginated as Page 1 of 39;

B- Judge Darrah Lied (Perjury) committed fraud stated, “On October 7, 2011, Joe Louis Lawrence submitted a Complaint seeks a Rule To Show Cause relating to various assertions, including: (1) the corroboration of judges and public officials in an organized chain conspiracy et al., referenced as Exhibit B, which was filed September 30, 2011;

C- That said Exhibit B is recorded by the clerks office as Page 131, but is actually Page 129;

4.) That said Exhibit A, states Demand: $9,999,000 should be $350 million, Cause: Job Discrimination (Employment), should be Unequal Protection of the laws, Wrongful Incarceration etc;

5.) That Appellant is a CTA employee but members of the Political Machine had a City Hall official who controls and owns all judges he appoints, appointed an attorney from the CTA an Associate Judge (Ronald Bartkowicz) who issued a Bogus Warrant against Appellant for an Order of Protection alleging he physically assaulted a woman, Judge was unaware the woman was a Police Officer, Appellant never assaulted any woman;

A- Appellant was before Judge David Delgado on a unrelated matter in his full CTA uniform wearing his badge, where he was handcuffed, badge removed off his body, they told the judge Appellant was not an employee, Judge said if he ever found out he was an employee, he was going to lock everyone up at the CTA and did not care who they were;

B- CTA attorney Kent Stephen Ray along with other CTA employees and certain members in ATU 241, mainly secretary Michael Simmons took part in stealing his back wages while off work injured;

C- That under the Daley Administration CTA officials claimed they did not have the money to return to Appellant and that the money had to come out of someone’s budget anyone reinstating Appellant would be terminated, (allegedly Evelyn Borrero) had intimate connections with a political powerhouse at City Hall keeping them abreast of the matter;

6.) That when judges in the County Courts falsify court orders, they make sure clerks in Dorothy Brown’s office remove them from the court files;

A-Appellant has been Remanded into custody 5 times for “ALLEGEDLY” “owing” child support, No Court Order was signed by any judge because he did not owe any money to anyone; State tried to suspend his license for “ALLEGEDLY OWING” almost $60,000.00 going into a “corrupt white mans pocket” This is how Corrupt White men are getting rich off Racial Injustice.

7.) That Exhibit C, hereto attached, demonstrates Judge Darrah as a Liar, Terrorist and a Racist Judge, in that all of the reasons, he dismissed said complaint is predicated on the fact, he said Appellant filed a Rule to Show Cause as a Complaint, in that Exhibit A, corroborates said Judge as a Liar;

8.) That Exhibit A , clerk erred by not indicating that Appellant left 9 copies with the Rule to Show Cause Motion;

Anybody involved in this Conspiracy thought Everybody told Somebody what to cover-up and destroy, to keep nobody of learning of Everybody’s involvement, the problem was that, Everybody thought nobody knew and told, Somebody not to worry because Nobody would never know how they lied, falsified, conspired, and destroyed all documents to save Everybody, but Somebody knew of what Everybody did and Nobody paid attention because to them it was a “joke” Anybody became very nervous because now they realize Somebody lied and now Everybody is in trouble with the LAW and will go to jail because Everybody thought Somebody was telling the “TRUTH”!

9.) That Judge Darrah was counting on his Racist Colleagues in the Seventh Circuit to do what they have done to blacks for years—Said Judges have replaced the ropes with Racial Injustice, this is an updated version of Lynching, they do not see African American or Hispanic Men, as men, but as NIGGAS, this case demonstrates how to destroy the Black, Hispanic man.

When people ask how and why, Did all the judges enter orders against you and you were never served? They did the same thing YOU did ignored Appellant and assumed he was a Typical NIGGA, Passive NIGGA, Ignorant NIGGA, while the laws clearly demonstrate my innocence they say NIGGA you GUILTY, I say I am a CTA employee they say NIGGA you ain’t, I say I work for IBC/Wonder bread they say NIGGA you DISCHARGED, I say I have a wife and 5 children they say NIGGA you don’t have any dependent’s, I say I AM that That I AM somebody they say NIGGA you don’t get it, you don’t exist, I say I am Educated I have spent 12-14 hours a day in the Law Library studying the law and it’s applications, they laugh at me and say NIGGA it ain’t what you know, it is who you know, I say I have applied the laws better than some your best involved in this conspiracy, they say NIGGA you right, because everyone involved is related to someone who is related to someone no one is listening, I say I have proof they say NIGGA there is no such thing as proof I say what do you mean? They say NIGGA we Lie we Destroy we Cheat we Intimidate/Threaten we Undermine anyone necessary to advance our Doctrines, I say my faith is in GOD, they Laugh NIGGA where was your GOD all those years when we Economically Murdered you, NIGGA where was your GOD all those years when we Assassinated your Character, NIGGA where was your GOD all those years when we Buried your ASS left you for DEAD, NIGGA you should be on CRACK/HEROIN, NIGGA you ain’t committed SUICIDE, NIGGA you should’a ROBBED somebody, NIGGA you look GOOD how come you ain’t PIMPIN? NIGGA with your MIND you can be the best DRUG DEALER, wait a minute NIGGA who are you? How come nothing seems to have WORKED? First of All I am no NIGGA the GOD I serve moves me by way of the SPIRIT, When I seek JUSTICE you reward me INJUSTICE, when I seek HELP, you LAUGH at me, when my family and I suffer you CELERBRATE.

Psalm 121 Verse 1, 2, I will lift up mine eyes unto the hills, from whence cometh my help. My help cometh from the Lord, which made Heaven and earth.

10.)That because certain Judges in the Seventh Circuit especially Frank H. Easterbrook do not view a black man as an intellect or anything positive for that matter, in that, he and his band of Terrorists have ignored every unchallenged affidavit, every legal pleading, Appellant has presented to them demonstrating Racial Injustice;

11.) That because nothing Appellant says or presents substantiates veracity, due to his ethnicity is all the reasons why this Motion is before the court, Corrupt white Racist men can do whatever they desire on individuals outside their ethnicity and has demonstrated no respect for President Obama or the FBI;

A- That no male Judge of Irish, German Jewish Polish ethnicity will admonish any of the Judges involved in these Terrorists Civil Rights Acts perpetrated against the Appellant;

B- That said complaint Judge Darrah claimed was not filed identifies every participant involved in said Conspiracy and the necessary criminal acts, that went ignored, and the roles each person played as they soared in their careers; look at the jails and the type of black judges appointed to do the “corrupt white man’s Racist Dirty Deeds on their own people.

12.)That said Judges are asking Appellant to perfect a brief with a plethora of errors, the basis of appealing a case is to present court errors, as an officer of the court it is his duty to present these errors to this governing body;

A- Let’s give the Honorable Judges the benefit of the doubt, say they were not aware how cases were fixed and did not want to know;

B- In the County Circuit courts records are removed from the court files at will at the advantage of the Political Machine, there is not a Black or Hispanic person who will acknowledge or admit that fact because in many instances, they are used to protect these corrupt white men by doing whatever they are told to do, they are treated as children;

13.)That said Judges are Exercising Racial Hate Crimes from the bench, using their robes to aid and abet in Criminal Terrorist activities, Dispensating unjust unlawful laws denying Equal Protection to Appellant and anyone else seeking relief in their courts;

A- For Example Appellant is in a pivotal position to change the history of the laws in the State of Illinois, City of Chicago, Federal Courts but there are Judges in the Seventh Circuit still in a time capsule of yesteryear, a black man is still viewed as someone inferior to them, some type of sexual toy, uneducated, a yes man;

B- Appellant is nothing like no other man, the men in the Seventh Circuit has ever come in contact with, Appellant has out briefed, under Daley the Cities top litigators, CTA’s top litigators, IBC wonder bread recruited a law firm from Kansas City all of them lied and committed fraud made Asses out of the Judges in the Seventh Circuit when they submitted briefs in 2008;

C- Appellant has presented a Brief with at least 80 legal citations, which was his first Brief ever presented to any court, Appellants goal is to present this brief with at least 100 legal citations;

FURTHER AFFIANT SAYETH NAUGHT

Wherefore the aforementioned reasons Appellant respectfully requests that an Order be entered Repaginating the record.

Respectfully submitted,

Joe Louis Lawrence

Counsel Pro Se

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I Joe Louis Lawrence, plaintiff, certify that I have on this day deposited said Notice of Motion and Motion to all parties recorded in said Notice of Motion via regular mail, hand delivery, via fax transmission.

Dated February 6, 2012

_____________________

Joe Louis Lawrence

Counsel Pro Se

CERTIFICATE OF ATTORNEY PRO SE

I hereby certify that I am the Attorney Pro Se plaintiff-appellant in the above entitled cause, and as such prepared the above affidavit and is cognizant of the proceedings there is and that such affidavit and application are made in good faith and not for the purpose of hindrance or delay.

Respectfully Submitted

Joe Louis Lawrence

Counsel Pro Se

P.O. Box 490075

Chicago, Illinois 60649-0075

Monday February 6, 2012

IN THE

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT

CHICAGO, ILLINOIS 60604

Joe Louis Lawrence ) Appeal from the United States

Appellant ) District Court for the Northern

No. 11-3481 ) District of Illinois, Eastern Division

V )

) No. 11 CV 6887

Sec. of State, Clerk of Circuit Court, States Atty.,)

Atty. Gen., Circuit Court Judges, State Judges, )

ATU 241, CTA Rachael Kaplan, Kent S. Ray )

Appellee )

NOTICE OF MOTON

Please be advised that on January 23, 2012, A Motion for Reconsideration for Appointment of Counsel et al has been filed before the United States Court of Appeals.

: Cook County States Attorney Chief Judge Timothy C. Evans

Anita Alvarez 50 West Washington, Suite 2600

50 West Washington, Suite 500 Chicago, Ill. 60601

Chicago, Ill. 60601

Presiding Judge Mosche Jacobius

Chicago Transit Authority Legal Dept. 50 West Washington, Suite

Kent S. Ray, Rachael Kaplan Chicago, Ill. 60601

567 West Lake Street Chicago, IL. 60603

Chicago, Ill. 60661-1498 Hon. Mary Lane Mikva

50 West Washington, Suite

Chicago, Ill. 60601

Clerk of the Circuit Court

Dorothy Brown Attorney General

50 West Washington, Suite 1001 Lisa Madigan

Chicago, Ill. 60601 100 West Randolph, Suite 1300

Chicago, Ill. 60601

Asst. Atty. Gen.

Tyler Roland Asst. Gen. Counsel, Sec. of State

100 West Randolph, Suite 1300 Terrence McConville

Chicago, Ill. 60601 100 West Randolph, Suite 500

Chicago, Ill. 60601

Amalgamated Transit Union, 241

20 South Clark, Suite 850

Chicago, Ill. 60604

COURTESY COPIES TO THE FOLLOWING:

Commander & Chief President Barack Obama Mr. President this document demonstrates the legal system here in Illinois/Federal Courts is under siege by terrorists impersonating Judges, you signed the Martial Law bill NDAA, Jan. 1, 2012, and said “I have signed this bill despite having serious reservations with certain provisions that regulate the detention, interrogation, and prosecution of suspected terrorists”

Mr. President this document warrants the jurisdiction of the enactment of that law Instanter, Thank you.

U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder

Dir. Mueller, FBI, Wash. D.C

Robert Grant U.S. Atty. Pat. Fitzgerald

FBI 219 South Dearborn, Suite 500

2111 West Roosevelt Road Chicago, Ill. 60604

Chicago, Ill. 60612

Madam Dorothy Tucker (Anchorwoman)

Channel 2 News

22 West Washington

Chicago, Ill. 60602

I affirm the above as being true.

Respectfully Submitted

Joe Louis Lawrence

Counsel Pro Se

Email: joelouislaw@yahoo.com

(312) 927-4210

P.O. Box 490075

Chicago, Ill. 60649

IN THE

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT

CHICAGO, ILLINOIS 60604

CIRCUIT JUDGE

Daniel A. Manion

Joe Louis Lawrence ) Appeal from the United States

Appellant ) District Court for the Northern

No. 11-3481 ) District of Illinois, Eastern Division

V )

) No. 11 CV 6887

Sec. of State, Clerk of Circuit Court, States Atty.,)

Atty. Gen., Circuit Court Judges, State Judges, )

ATU 241, CTA Rachael Kaplan, Kent S. Ray )

Appellee )

MOTON FOR RECONSIDERATION FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL

RULE TO SHOW CAUSE REMANDING JUDGE DARRAH INTO CUSTODY INSTANTER FOR FRAUD & CONTEMPT OF COURT

W/Affidavit

January 23, 2012

Respectfully Submitted

Joe Louis Lawrence

P.O. Box 490075

Chicago, Illinois 60649-0075

IN THE

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT

CHICAGO, ILLINOIS 60604

1^st AFFIDAVIT

In Support of

MOTON FOR RECONSIDERATION FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL

RULE TO SHOW CAUSE REMANDING JUDGE DARRAH INTO CUSTODY INSTANTER FOR FRAUD & CONTEMPT OF COURT

W/Affidavit

I Joe Louis Lawrence, being duly sworn on oath states:

1.) In Farmer V. Haas, 990 F.2d 319,321 (7^th Cir. 1993) the precedent given by this court relates to a prisoner seeking representation of an attorney in a Civil Trial for being Raped by another man as a inmate;

A- Appellant is not a prisoner and is a free and accepted African American Man Born & Raised, a United States Citizen.

B- That Judge Easterbrook was aware of the “Systemic” Racial application of Unjust Laws Dispensated against Appellant, where affidavits had been unchallenged and filed before the courts demonstrating he was up against the Ku Klux Klan, attorneys and Judges with racial affiliations, Political Machine operatives with Racial Affiliations with the City etc,. said Judge ignored every unlawful criminal act, used his robe and authority protecting everyone involved;

C- That because he was the architect of the precedence case Farmer V. Haas, demonstrated Racial Hostile Animus Venomous Retaliation Bias against appellant, by unlawfully denying him counsel so as to prevent others of learning of the type of Injustice exercised in the courts, said Judge usurped his powers and authority ignored the United States Supreme Court and other compelling citations that warranted the Appointment of an Attorney;

D- So that the named Judges are not surprised Appellant has created a Petition (website http://sign.org/sign/remand-federal-judge) 106 people signed the petition, Remove or Remand any and all Judges related to this case who have used their positions unlawfully et al,;

E- That a News Advisory was sent to all of the Newspapers in the United States but most importantly, Attorney General Eric Holder, Dir. Of FBI Robert Mueller, Special Agent (Chicago) Robert Grant, Senator Mark Kirk.

F- How can a man shackled behind bars compare to a free U.S. citizen of color?

The United States Supreme Court has held that 28 USCA 1915 (e) (1) does not authorize a Federal Court to require an unwilling attorney to represent an indigent litigant in a Civil case; Mallard V. U.S. Dist. Court for Southern Dist. Of Iowa, 490 US 296, 109 S. Ct. 1814, 104 L. Ed. 2d 318 (1989) et al;

2.) The Informa Pauperis Statute requires that the litigant be unable to obtain counsel 28 USCA 1915 (e) (1) before appointment may be considered, so a plaintiff must present evidence that reasonably diligent effort to obtain counsel has been made before the court will favorably consider their application; Nelson V. Redfield Lithograph Printing, 728 F 2d 1003 (8^th Cir 1984) rejected on other grounds by U.S. et al;.

It has been held that a court may deny a plaintiff’s motion for counsel if it concludes that the chances of success are highly dubious, and to reach this conclusion, it may rely in part on an evaluation by a member of the bar that the claim has no merit; Pena V. Choo, 826 F 168 (2d Cir. 1987).

3.) There are a number of factors which a court may consider in making a determination regarding the propriety of Appointing Counsel including (1) whether the litigants cause of action appears to be meritorious; (2) whether the litigant is financially unable to employ Counsel; (3) whether the litigant, after diligent effort, has been unable to secure counsel, such inability including inability because of financial status, reluctance of local lawyers to take the case , or other reasons; Applications of Miller, 427 F. Supp. 896 (W. D. Tex 1977). Other factors include:

A- the plaintiff’s ability to investigate, gather, and present crucial facts;

B- the type and complexity of the case;

C- the complexity of legal issues;

D- whether the case’s factual issues turn on credibility, and the need for the trained presentation of evidence and cross- examination;

E- The plaintiff’s apparent ability to present the case; Hodge V. Police Officers, 802 F 2d 58 (2d Cir 1986).

The timeliness of the request is also a factor; finally the court may also determine that the nature of the litigation is such that the court as well as the plaintiff would benefit from the Assistance of Counsel; Nelson V. Redfield Lithograph Printing, 728 F 2d.1003 (8^th Cir. 1984) rejected on other grounds by U.S. V. 30. 64 Acres of Land, more or less, Situated in Klickitat County, State of Wash., 795 F 2d 796, 5 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 415 (9^th Cir1986).

4.) Appellant has presented numerous unchallenged affidavits before Chief Judge Frank H. Easterbrook, Judges Richard A. Posner, Richard D. Cudahy, Terrance T. Evans, John Daniel Tinder, Diane S. Sykes, Ilana Diamond Rovner now Daniel A. Manion .

5.) That because the above mentioned Judges unanimously share the same Racist Doctrines of Racial Apartheid, Racial Genocide on ethnic individuals outside their ethnicity, Racial Segregation, Applying Jim Crow laws outlawed by the United States Supreme Court, Exercising Racial Hate Crimes from the bench, using their robes to aid and abet in Criminal Terrorist activities, Dispensating unjust unlawful laws denying Equal Protection to Appellant and anyone else reporting or seeing relief in their courts, violated their oath as Federal Judges engaging in Treason like offenses;

Commentary to Canon 2 offers a test for the appearance of impropriety: “whether the conduct would create in reasonable minds a perception that the judge’s ability to carry out judicial responsibilities with integrity, impartiality and competence is impaired.” ABA Model Code of Judicial Conduct, Commentary to Canon 2A, paragraph 2 (1990). A reference to the Commentary under 2C alerts one to the fact that the appearance of impropriety can also be created by a judge’s membership in or knowing approval of organizations that engage in invidious discrimination.

Bozarth, 604 A. 2d 100 (N.J. 1992) See also Public Admonishment of Drew (Cal. Comm’n on Judicial Performance, July 1996) (judge admonished for numerous violations including denying a defendant his right to appointed counsel on the grounds of the ability of others to pay for legal representation and the possibility of future employment

Dash, 564 S.E. 2d 672 (S.C. 2002). The Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals Judges failed to follow and apply said laws in an applicable legal manner.

A- History Records how African Americans earned their freedom from President Lincoln when they fought in the Civil War defeating the South;

B- History Records how African Americans fought in World War II as Fighter Pilots as the Tuskegee Airmen when Jim Crowism was strong in the south, George Lucas is producing the movie Red Tails depicting these fighter pilots who saved America from Hitler where white pilots requested they escort them into Germany ;

C- History is taking place now a Pro Se Appellant without his official law license with the support of the Federal Government and allied law enforcement support is backing his Prosecutorial/ Defense against some of the most Treacherous Terrorist Judges ever recorded in history trapping them in the law with law demonstrating their criminal involvement in a Racially Hostile Criminal Terrorist Conspiracy associated with the Political Machine;

6.) Said judges have failed to follow the laws under Canon 2A and the failure to apply the laws to matters that come before them, a judge’s disrespect for the rules of court demonstrates disrespect for the law. Judges are disciplined under Canon 2 A for violating court rules and procedures. Judged ignored mandated witness order in attempt to accommodate witnesses’ schedules; Citing Canon 2A the court noted, “[a] court’s indifference to clearly stated rules breeds disrespect for and discontent with our justice system. Government can not demand respect of the laws by its citizens when its tribunals ignore those very same laws”)

Crawford v. State, 770 N.E. 2d 775 (Ind.)

Dash, 564 S.E. 2d 672 (S.C. 2002).

7.) Judge Manion, having complete cognizance Appellant’s Civil Rights were being violated had an ethical duty to report misconduct by other judges Leslie W. Abramson, 25 Hofstra L. Rev. 751 (1997). The Judges Ethical Duty to Report Misconduct by Other Judges and Lawyers and its effect on Judicial Independence. But instead elected, to demonstrate Blatant Racism and Overt Conspiracy in dismissing said Petitions and Motions put before the court, their statement was clear “As Judges they are Above the Law, Federal Officials (FBI) have to Invoke their Authority because they are not Honoring any Laws of the United States Constitution where Appellant is concerned and have demonstrated that fact;” Because they are the true Terrorists in this matter, what Adolph Hitler could not accomplish in the War with the United States have been replaced with some of the offspring from that era inciting “WAR LIKE Crimes on people of color, using the laws to achieve their racist goals;

A- Said judges have DENIED every legally sufficient document Appellant put before the court protecting and upholding corruption and Terrorism in this State, City of Chicago Turner 24 F. Cas. 337 (No. 14247) C.C.D. Md. 1867) The “equal benefit” clause is cited in what would appear to be the earliest reported case enforcing the section. The plaintiff was an emancipated slave who was indentured as an apprentice to her former master. Although both whites and blacks could be indentured as an apprentice, under the law of Maryland, indentured blacks were not accorded the same educational benefits as whites and, unlike whites, were subject to being transferred to any other person in the same county. Circuit Judge Chase granted a writ of habeas corpus upon finding that the purported apprenticeship was in fact involuntary servitude and a denial under the Civil Rights Act of 1866 of the “full and equal benefit of all laws. And most important, Civil Rights Act of 1866- first section, enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled. That all persons born in the United States and not subject to any foreign power, excluding Indians not taxed, are hereby declared to be citizens of the United States; and such citizens of every race and color, without regard to any previous condition of slavery or involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall have the same right, in every State and Territory in the United States, to make and enforce contracts, to sue, be parties, and give evidence, to inherit, purchase, lease, sell, hold and convey real and personal property, and to full and equal benefit of the laws and proceedings for the security of person and property, as is enjoyed by white citizens, and shall be subject to like punishment, pains, and penalties, and to none other, any law, statute, ordinances, regulation, or custom, to the contrary notwithstanding, Act of April 9, 1866, ch. 31, 1, 14 Stat. 27, 42 U.S.C.A. 1981 (a)

B- In that no attorney in any court were able to litigiously impeach any facts Appellant presented before the courts, their was not one attorney, law Professors, States Attorneys, Attorney Generals etc., who was able to litigiously out brief the Appellant in any of the courts, in that, their was not one attorney in this State of Illinois, City of Chicago, who challenged any affidavit he presented in any court because everything asserted in all legal documents were true;

C- In that legally everyone (Judges, lawyers etc) have legally admitted and corroborated their involvement in this “Diabolical Chain Conspiracy Terrorist Racist Civil Rights acts, engaging unequivocally in Jim Crow laws;

8.) Said judges are cognizant and is deliberately Violating Appellant’s Civil Rights because he stood up to Racial Injustice, the judges having cognizance of the FBI’s involvement and has received notice of said facts Jennings v. Patterson, 488 F. 2d 442, equal access to public facilities. The court found that the plaintiffs had been “denied the right to hold and enjoy their property on the same basis as white citizens.” Jennings suggests the potential usefulness of the equal benefit clause in guaranteeing full and equal enjoyment of public property and public services.” Developments in the Law section 1981, 15 Harv. Civ. Rts. ---- Civ. Lib. L. Rev 29, 133 (1980). Said judges have demonstrated no regard for the FBI or The Laws of the United States Constitution in Appellant’s attempt to obtain Equal Access to the Courts Scott, 377 Mass. 364, 386 N.E. 2d 218, 220 (1979) See Lopez-Alexander, Unreported Order No. 85-279 (Colo. May 3, 1985) (Judge removed for, inter alia, a persistent pattern of abuse of the contempt power. The Mayor of Denver accepted the findings of the Denver County Court Judicial Qualification Commission that the judge’s conduct could not be characterized as mere mistakes or errors of law and that the conduct constituted willful misconduct in office and conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice that brings the judicial office into disrepute). Canon Ethics where there is a pattern of disregard or indifference, which warrant discipline.

9.) Said judges have demonstrated they are “Above the Law” and has employed tactics validating the veracity they are “Untouchable” Vaughn 462 S.E. 2d 728 (Ga. 1995), The Supreme Court of Georgia removed a judge from office for disregarding defendant’s constitutional rights.

Arkansas Code of Judicial Conduct Commentary to Canon 2 (1988) provides that “(A)” judge must avoid all impropriety” And appearance of impropriety.” Accordingly, (A) judge should disqualify himself in a proceeding in which his impartiality might be questioned. . . . . . “Arkansas Code of Judicial Conduct, Canon 3 (c) (1) 1988.

Where a judge exhibits bias or the appearance of bias, the court will reverse. Patterson V. RT., 301 Ark. 400, 784 S. W. 2d 777 (1990); Farley V. Jester, 257 Ark. 686, 520 S. W. 2d 200 (1975) “The proper Administration of the law requires not only that judges refrain from actual bias, but also that they avoid all appearances of unfairness. “Bolden V. State, 262 Ark 718, 561 S.W. 2d 281 (1978).

10.) To further amplify the heinous depraved double standard of the laws Civil Rights violations, hereto attached, Ex A Court Order signed by Judge Sheila Finnegan appointing an attorney to case #11-cv-5517, a Caucasian woman, with an application to proceed informa pauperis, hereto attached, as Group Ex. B House worth $235,000.00, income of $750.00, and money in the bank;

A-Appellant has been forced on welfare, due to the Powerful White men and women in power receiving food stamps living on section 8 beneath poverty, said Terrorists Judges have exercised laws outside of their Judicial immunity making sure Appellant lives an oppressive lifestyle while they are in control;

B- If the above is not depraved and psychotic enough to demonstrate Federal Judges in an Organized Racist Civil Rights Terrorists Acts, a widower, a great-grandmother, a mother, a grand-mother (Plaintiff) case #12-cv-11, filed an affidavit with her informa pauperis application with her Complaint, Judge Milton I. Shadur Senior Judge ORDERED her to pay $350 filing fee on or before January 25, 2012 before her case could go forward;

C- That said Judge has been dispensating Corrupt laws in his court for so long, that, it is a practicing norm for them, he said “This court has waded through the welter of documents provided by knight, who has quite understandably not expended(or, more accurately, wasted) the $350 filing fee needed to gain entry to the federal courthouse door.”

This case is like a colon full of toxic bile (corrupt courts) with years of constipation, Appellant has presented legal documentation, that is so erect and firm with virility; whereby, it has been properly inserted in the orifice of injustices domain penetrating the colon releasing 60-75 years of bile causing a Diarrhea effect, the stench and aura is so overwhelming the corrupt of the corrupted will abide by the laws of the United States Constitution, due to sickness on any level reading the atrocities of all illegalities, unlawful Civil Rights Violations perpetrated against Appellant for every corrupt attorney that appears in any court, that is how much bile that has to be cleaned (incarcerate) up and for every corrupt judge there is, that is, that much more bile that has to be cleaned and shoveled (removed from position), no righteous judge can dispensate any justice under the filth of conditions;

Cleanliness is next to Godliness, the best soap or detergent to free yourself in this matter is telling the TRUTH, the truth shall set you free from this aura and by abiding by the Laws of GOD and the United States Constitution;

U.S. Supreme Court Digest 24 (1) GENERAL CONSPIRACY

U. S. 2003. Essence of a conspiracy is an agreement to commit an unlawful act,-U.S. V. Jimenez Recio; 123 S Ct. 819, 537 U.S. 270, 154 L. Ed. 2d 744, on remand 371 F 3d 1093.

Agreement to commit an unlawful act, which constitutes the essence of a conspiracy, is a distinct evil that exist and be punished whether or not the substantive crime ensues.-Id.

Conspiracy poses a threat to the public over and above the threat of the commission of the relevant substantive crime, both because the combination in crime makes more likely the commission of other crimes and because it decreases the part from their path of criminality.-Id.

Wednesday April 26, 2006 Page 1, Illinois Political Machines help breed Corruption, Associated press writer Deanna Bellandi states” Illinois is apparently a Petri Dish for corruption. It is a real Breeding ground”

CANON 1

A judge should uphold the integrity and independence of the judiciary.

The integrity and independence of judges depend in turn upon their acting without fear or favor. Although judges should be independent, they should comply with the law, as well as provisions of this code. Public confidence in the impartiality of the judiciary is maintained by the adherence of each judge to this responsibility. Conversely, violation of this code diminishes public confidence in the judiciary and thereby does injury to the system of government under law.

The Miseducation of the Negroe Political Education Neglected

Carter G. Woodson, 1933

The opponents of freedom and social injustice decided to work out a program which would enslave the negroes’ mind in as much as the freedom of body had to be conceded. It was well understood that if by teaching of history the white man could be further assured of his superiority and the negroe could be made to feel that he always been a failure and that the subjection of his will to some other race is necessary for the freedman, then, would still be a slave. If you can control a man’s thinking you do not have to worry about his action. When you determine what a man shall think you do not have to concern yourself about what he will do. If you make a man feel that he is inferior, you do not have to compel him to accept an inferior status, for he will seek it himself. If you make a man think that he is justly an outcast, you do not have to order him to the back door. He will go without being told, and if there is no back door, his very nature will demand one.

This applies to every black and brown judge who has allowed them to be prostituted into dispensating corrupt laws from the bench in an attempt to be accepted by Powerful Corrupt White Terrorist described as Judges, by oppressing their own people committing Genocide on their own race.

In Hitler’s era he placed Jews in incinerators burned them in masses because of their ethnicity, In this era, Judges have personified the doctrines of his technique by incarcerating the Black and Hispanic men in record numbers creating jobs and maintaining jobs for the corrupt “Powerful White Man”.

A- Judge Manion as a Corrupt White man in Power has demonstrated he along with other Terrorists Judges do what they want on the bench and is challenging the Federal Government to come and remove them. Section 1983 of USCS contemplates the depravation of Civil Rights through the unconstitutional application of a law by conspiracy or otherwise. Mansell V. Saunders (CA 5 Fla) 372 F 2d 573, especially if the conspiracy was actually carried into effect and plaintiff was thereby deprived of any rights privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws, the gist of the action may be treated as one for the depravation of rights under 42 USCS 1983 Lewis V. Brautigam (CA 5 Fla) 227 F 2d 124, 55 Alr 2d 505.

B- Judge Manion and his army of Judicial Terrorists have satisfied and met the full criteria of Racial Discrimination Terrorism at appellant in that, Farmer V. Haas is a universal stereotypical analogy how powerful Caucasians view African Americans especially the men (we) are criminals first before we are termed as a man, it is clear he and those that embraces his philosophy oppresses people of color;

C- For the record, Appellant is no Homosexual, and is not a prisoner, Born and Raised a Freeman, a United States Citizen, said judges seems to have an obsession with male prisoners and rape, said corrupt racist judges keep referencing Farmer v. Haas when denying him equal access to the courts;

D- One can only infer from the above, any judge that references a Heterosexual man not imprisoned to a case that describes a prisoner being viciously raped pleading for help, not to be caged with a man who suspects the worst will happen to him, and denies him legal relief because he is an inmate, makes the judges a rapists, just as vicious as the rapists committing the act itself, they are living out their own sick fantasies on the vicious oppressions and sexual rapes perpetrated on African American and Hispanic men;

794 S.W. 2d 692 (Mo. App. 1990) “No system of justice can function at its best or maintain broad public confidence if a litigant can be compelled to submit his case in a court where the litigant sincerely believes the judge is incompetent or prejudicial …………{T}hat is the price to be paid for a judicial system that seeks to free a litigant from a feeling of oppression”. State ex Rel. McNary V. Jones, 472 S. W. 2d 637, 639-640 (Mo. App. 1971) Indeed, the right to disqualify a judge is “one of the keystones of our legal administration edifice” State ex Rel. Campbell V. Cohn, 606 S.W. 2d 399-401 (Mo. App. 1980). It is vital to public confidence in the legal system that the decisions of the court are not only fair, but also appear fair. Thus whether the disqualification of a judge hinges on a statute or rule in favor of the right to disqualify. A liberal construction is necessary if we wish to promote and maintain public confidence in the judicial system. Kohn, 606 S.W. at 401; State ex Rel. Ford Motor Co. V. Hess S.W. 2d 147, 148 (Mo. App1987).

FURTHER AFFIANT SAYETH NAUGHT

Wherefore the aforementioned reasons Appellant respectfully requests that Judge Manion Recuse himself Instanter assign this matter to a Judge with no Irish or German racial fraternal associations to the Political Machine;

2.) Reconsideration for appointment of an attorney is enforced instanter.

3.) Issue aRULE TO SHOW CAUSE REMANDING JUDGE DARRAH INTO CUSTODY INSTANTER FOR FRAUD & CONTEMPT OF COURT;

4.) That because 8 judges and still counting are in complicity engaging in Terrorist activities using their robes in a Criminal Conspiracy transfer this matter to the United States Supreme Court Justices for Directives;

Respectfully submitted,

Joe Louis Lawrence

Counsel Pro Se

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

Dated January 23, 2012

_____________________

Joe Louis Lawrence

Counsel Pro Se

CERTIFICATE OF ATTORNEY PRO SE

Respectfully Submitted

Joe Louis Lawrence

Counsel Pro Se

P.O. Box 490075

Chicago, Illinois 60649-0075

Monday January 23, 2012

IN THE

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT

CHICAGO, ILLINOIS 60604

Joe Louis Lawrence ) Appeal from the United States

Appellant ) District Court for the Northern

No. 11-3481 ) District of Illinois, Eastern Division

V )

) No. 11 CV 6887

Sec. of State, Clerk of Circuit Court, States Atty., )

Atty. Gen., Circuit Court Judges, State Judges, )

ATU 241, CTA Rachael Kaplan, Kent S. Ray )

Appellee )

NOTICE OF MOTON

Please be advised that on February 2, 2012, A Motion for Reconsideration Vacate Orders Extension of Time Due to Bias Civil Rights Violations has been filed before the Court of Appeals.

Cook County States Attorney Chief Judge Timothy C. Evans

Anita Alvarez 50 West Washington, Suite 2600

50 West Washington, Suite 500 Chicago, Ill. 60601

Chicago, Ill. 60601

Presiding Judge Mosche Jacobius

Chicago Transit Authority Legal Dept. 50 West Washington, Suite

Kent S. Ray, Rachael Kaplan Chicago, Ill. 60601

567 West Lake Street Chicago, IL. 60603

Chicago, Ill. 60661-1498 Hon. Mary Lane Mikva

50 West Washington, Suite

Chicago, Ill. 60601

Clerk of the Circuit Court

Dorothy Brown Attorney General

50 West Washington, Suite 1001 Lisa Madigan

Chicago, Ill. 60601 100 West Randolph, Suite 1300

Chicago, Ill. 60601

Asst. Atty. Gen.

Tyler Roland Asst. Gen. Counsel, Sec. of State

100 West Randolph, Suite 1300 Terrence McConville

Chicago, Ill. 60601 100 West Randolph, Suite 500

Chicago, Ill. 60601

Amalgamated Transit Union, 241

20 South Clark, Suite 850

Chicago, Ill. 60604

COURTESY COPIES TO THE FOLLOWING:

Commander & Chief President Barack Obama Mr. President this document demonstrates the legal system here in Illinois/Federal Courts is under siege by terrorists impersonating judges you signed the Martial Law Bill NDAA, Jan 1, 2012, and said, “I have signed this bill despite having serious reservations with certain provisions that regulate the detention, interrogation, and prosecution of suspected terrorists”

Mr. President this document warrants the jurisdiction of the enactment of that law Instanter,

Before American Troops are sent to other Countries sacrificing their lives for the freedom of other ethnic groups, let’s send American Troops Navy Seals to eradicate the Terrorists from power, oppressing the Hispanics and Blacks in this Corrupt City Chicago.

Thank you respectfully submitted Joe Louis.

U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder

Dir. Mueller, FBI, Wash. D.C

Robert Grant U.S. Atty. Pat. Fitzgerald

FBI 219 South Dearborn, Suite 500

2111 West Roosevelt Road Chicago, Ill. 60604

Chicago, Ill. 60612

Madam Dorothy Tucker (Anchorwoman)

Channel 2 News

22 West Washington

Chicago, Ill. 60602

Twitter Followers

Media

I affirm the above as being true.

Respectfully Submitted

Joe Louis Lawrence

Counsel Pro Se

Email: joelouislaw@yahoo.com

Twitter: joelouis7

(312) 927-4210

P.O. Box 490075

Chicago, Ill. 60649

IN THE

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT

CHICAGO, ILLINOIS 60604

CIRCUIT JUDGE

William J. Bauer

Joe Louis Lawrence ) Appeal from the United States

Appellant ) District Court for the Northern

No. 11-3481 ) District of Illinois, Eastern Division

V )

) No. 11 CV 6887

Sec. of State, Clerk of Circuit Court, States Atty., )

Atty. Gen., Circuit Court Judges, State Judges, )

ATU 241, CTA Rachael Kaplan, Kent S. Ray )

Appellee )

MOTON FOR RECONSIDERATION VACATE ORDERS DUE TO BIAS OR FRAUD, EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE BRIEF W/Affidavit

Now comes Joe Louis Lawrence, Attorney Pro Se Appellant in this cause files herewith his third affidavit as required by Title 28, attesting the veracity and accuracy of all statements recorded within.

Based thereon, plaintiff-appellant respectfully moves this Honorable Court where certain judges has demonstrated Bias but is in need of a judge who understands how to enforce the laws in accordance to the United States Constitution and according to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure not to dismiss said matter presented before this court but grant Special Consideration in this matter, due to the unlawful injustices recorded in said Affidavit compelling this court to act in accordance to the Laws of the United States Constitution Instanter to execute jurisdiction over the parties involved in this proceeding who is not intimidated or fear reprisals from these individuals.

February 27, 2012

Respectfully Submitted

Joe Louis Lawrence

P.O. Box 490075

Chicago, Illinois 60649-0075

IN THE

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT

CHICAGO, ILLINOIS 60604

3^rd AFFIDAVIT

In Support of

MOTON FOR RECONSIDERATION VACATE ORDERS DUE TO BIAS OR FRAUD, EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE BRIEF

I Joe Louis Lawrence, being duly sworn on oath states:

1.) That William J. Bauer either knowingly with malicious intentions committed Fraud or erred in said February 16, 2012 court order;

A- Motions for Reconsideration are designed to bring to the court’s attention newly discovered evidence that was unavailable at time of original hearing, changes in existing law, or errors in court’s application of law. Continental Cas. Co. v. Security Ins. Co. of Hartford, App. 1 Dist. 1996, 216 Ill. Dec. 314, 279 Ill. App. 3d 815, 665 N.E. 2d 374, appeal dismissed, et al.;

B- The purpose of a Motion to Vacate is to alert the trial court to errors it has made and to afford an opportunity for their correction. In re Marriage of King, App. 1 Dist. 2002, 270 Ill. Dec. 540, 336 Ill. App. 3d 83, 783 N.E. 2d 115, rehearing denied pending appeal; et al.

C- Properly alleged facts within an affidavit that are not contradicted by counter affidavit are taken as true, despite the existence of contrary averments in the adverse party’s pleadings. Professional Group Travel, Ltd. v. Professional Seminar Consultants Inc., 136 ILL App 3d 1084, 483 N.E. 2d 1291; Buzzard v. Bolger, 117 ILL App 3d 887, 453 N.E. 2d 1129 et al.

D- The above is Basic State Law-- no Judge in the Federal Circuit seems to have a comprehensible understanding of legal procedures in a simple manner; thereby, engaging in a plethora of corrupt legal practices so as to compensate and cover-up where they are intellectually challenged in the law!

2.) That William J. Bauer recorded in said court order of Feb. 16, 2012 , “The record contains the correct page numbers; page number one corresponds to the first page of the first document et al”

A- Judge Bauer has been dispensating Racial Injustice wrongfully for so long he does not recognize the accurate dispensation of the laws; whereby, “wrong is right and right is wrong” that’s his mentality now;

B- Judge Bauer and his colleagues have been enforcing laws oppressing African Americans and Hispanics for so long as corrupt racist white man, they have demonstrated no respect for their positions as a Federal Judge, no regard for the Federal oath, or any regard for the United States Constitution;

C- That no Judge especially Judge Bauer did not in any way impeach the veracity of any facts put before the court under affidavit in any of said motions;

Appellant have been waiting on said Judge was wondering what was taking him so long in putting his name on said court order; seeing that the Seventh Circuit is the Taliban of Racist Terrorist Corruption;

A – That there are two more judges’ male and a female who hate African Americans, if they played chess Appellant would remove a rook off the board for each judge neither would defeat him.

B- That Appellant is born and raised under the American flag and no other flag is it subordinate to and is demonstrating his (Red Tail movie) approach fighting the Terrorists Judges in this Racial War and will fetter out expose any and every corrupt Terrorist Judge wearing a judicial robe in this Corrupt City Chicago, State of Illinois;

3.) That Chicago is the most Corrupt City in America, Huffington Post, Internet Newspaper, February 23, 2012;

4.) University of Illinois Professor Dick Simpson, “The two worst crime zones in Illinois are the governor’s mansion…..and the City Council Chambers in Chicago.” Simpson a former Chicago Alderman, told the AP “no other State can match us.”

5.) In that no judge in the Seventh Circuit can defend against the Pro Se attack in chess it’s best described as the Sicilian Attack Dragon style, which is designed for powerful corrupt racist nefarious white terrorists;

A- The LORD said unto my Lord, sit thou on my right hand, till I make thine enemies thy footstool? King James Bible (Cambridge Ed.)

B- Appellant thanks said Judge for Denying the prior motion it only amplified what he had been asserting on Twitter Judges in Illinois lack the aptitude in Constitutional law and many attorneys are intellectually challenged in the proper applications of the law;

6.) In that Appellant has a special surprise for all of the judges in the Seventh Circuit this battle said judges have invited him to is all over the world (smile) Appellant is on Twitter joelouis7, the whole world is aware of this matter;

7.) In Farmer V. Haas, 990 F.2d 319,321 (7^th Cir. 1993) the precedent given by this court relates to a prisoner seeking representation of an attorney in a Civil Trial for being Raped by another man as a inmate;

A- Appellant is not a prisoner and is a free and accepted African American Man Born & Raised, a United States Citizen.

F- How can a man shackled behind bars compare to a free U.S. citizen of color?

8.) The Informa Pauperis Statute requires that the litigant be unable to obtain counsel 28 USCA 1915 (e) (1) before appointment may be considered, so a plaintiff must present evidence that reasonably diligent effort to obtain counsel has been made before the court will favorably consider their application; Nelson V. Redfield Lithograph Printing, 728 F 2d 1003 (8^th Cir 1984) rejected on other grounds by U.S. et al;.

9.) There are a number of factors which a court may consider in making a determination regarding the propriety of Appointing Counsel including (1) whether the litigants cause of action appears to be meritorious; (2) whether the litigant is financially unable to employ Counsel; (3) whether the litigant, after diligent effort, has been unable to secure counsel, such inability including inability because of financial status, reluctance of local lawyers to take the case , or other reasons; Applications of Miller, 427 F. Supp. 896 (W. D. Tex 1977). Other factors include:

A- the plaintiff’s ability to investigate, gather, and present crucial facts;

B- the type and complexity of the case;

C- the complexity of legal issues;

D- whether the case’s factual issues turn on credibility, and the need for the trained presentation of evidence and cross- examination;

E- The plaintiff’s apparent ability to present the case; Hodge V. Police Officers, 802 F 2d 58 (2d Cir 1986).

10.) Appellant has presented numerous unchallenged affidavits before Chief Judge Frank H. Easterbrook, Judges Richard A. Posner, Richard D. Cudahy, (deceased Terrance T. Evans), John Daniel Tinder, Diane S. Sykes, Ilana Diamond Rovner, Daniel A. Manion, now William J. Bauer .

11.) That because the above mentioned Judges unanimously share the same Racist Doctrines of Racial Apartheid, Racial Genocide on ethnic individuals outside their ethnicity, Racial Segregation, Applying Jim Crow laws outlawed by the United States Supreme Court, Exercising Racial Hate Crimes from the bench, using their robes to aid and abet in Criminal Terrorist activities, Dispensating unjust unlawful laws denying Equal Protection to Appellant and anyone else reporting or seeing relief in their courts, violated their oath as Federal Judges engaging in Treason offenses;

Dash, 564 S.E. 2d 672 (S.C. 2002). The Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals Judges failed to follow and apply said laws in an applicable legal manner.

A- History Records how African Americans earned their freedom from President Lincoln when they fought in the Civil War defeating the South;

Crawford v. State, 770 N.E. 2d 775 (Ind.)

Dash, 564 S.E. 2d 672 (S.C. 2002).

7.) Judge Bauer, having complete cognizance Appellant’s Civil Rights were being violated had an ethical duty to report misconduct by other judges Leslie W. Abramson, 25 Hofstra L. Rev. 751 (1997). The Judges Ethical Duty to Report Misconduct by Other Judges and Lawyers and its effect on Judicial Independence. But instead elected, to demonstrate Blatant Racism and Overt Conspiracy in dismissing said Petitions and Motions put before the court, their statement was clear “As Judges they are Above the Law, Federal Officials (FBI) have to Invoke their Authority because they are not Honoring any Laws of the United States Constitution where Appellant is concerned and have demonstrated that fact;” Because they are the true Terrorists in this matter, what Adolph Hitler could not accomplish in the War with the United States have been replaced with some of the offspring from that era inciting “WAR LIKE Crimes on people of color, using the laws to achieve their racist goals;

A- Said judges have DENIED every legally sufficient document Appellant has put before the court protecting and upholding corruption and Terrorism in this State, City of Chicago Turner 24 F. Cas. 337 (No. 14247) C.C.D. Md. 1867) The “equal benefit” clause is cited in what would appear to be the earliest reported case enforcing the section. The plaintiff was an emancipated slave who was indentured as an apprentice to her former master. Although both whites and blacks could be indentured as an apprentice, under the law of Maryland, indentured blacks were not accorded the same educational benefits as whites and, unlike whites, were subject to being transferred to any other person in the same county. Circuit Judge Chase granted a writ of habeas corpus upon finding that the purported apprenticeship was in fact involuntary servitude and a denial under the Civil Rights Act of 1866 of the “full and equal benefit of all laws. And most important, Civil Rights Act of 1866- first section, enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled. That all persons born in the United States and not subject to any foreign power, excluding Indians not taxed, are hereby declared to be citizens of the United States; and such citizens of every race and color, without regard to any previous condition of slavery or involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall have the same right, in every State and Territory in the United States, to make and enforce contracts, to sue, be parties, and give evidence, to inherit, purchase, lease, sell, hold and convey real and personal property, and to full and equal benefit of the laws and proceedings for the security of person and property, as is enjoyed by white citizens, and shall be subject to like punishment, pains, and penalties, and to none other, any law, statute, ordinances, regulation, or custom, to the contrary notwithstanding, Act of April 9, 1866, ch. 31, 1, 14 Stat. 27, 42 U.S.C.A. 1981 (a)

B- In that no attorney in any court will be able to litigiously impeach any facts Appellant has presented before the courts, their was not one attorney, law Professors, States Attorneys, Attorney Generals etc., who was able to litigiously out brief the Appellant in any of the courts, in that, their was not one attorney in this State of Illinois, City of Chicago, who has challenged any affidavit presented in any court because everything asserted in all legal documents were true;

C- In that legally everyone especially Judge Bauer (Judges, lawyers etc) have legally admitted and corroborated their involvement in this “Diabolical Chain Conspiracy Terrorist Racist Civil Rights acts, engaging unequivocally in Jim Crow laws, and Treason against the government;

8.) Said judges are cognizant and is deliberately Violating Appellant’s Civil Rights because he stood up to Racial Injustice, the judges having cognizance of the FBI’s involvement and have received notice of said facts Jennings v. Patterson, 488 F. 2d 442, equal access to public facilities. The court found that the plaintiffs had been “denied the right to hold and enjoy their property on the same basis as white citizens.” Jennings suggests the potential usefulness of the equal benefit clause in guaranteeing full and equal enjoyment of public property and public services.” Developments in the Law section 1981, 15 Harv. Civ. Rts. ---- Civ. Lib. L. Rev 29, 133 (1980). Said judges have demonstrated no regard for the FBI or The Laws of the United States Constitution in Appellant’s attempt to obtain Equal Access to the Courts Scott, 377 Mass. 364, 386 N.E. 2d 218, 220 (1979) See Lopez-Alexander, Unreported Order No. 85-279 (Colo. May 3, 1985) (Judge removed for, inter alia, a persistent pattern of abuse of the contempt power. The Mayor of Denver accepted the findings of the Denver County Court Judicial Qualification Commission that the judge’s conduct could not be characterized as mere mistakes or errors of law and that the conduct constituted willful misconduct in office and conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice that brings the judicial office into disrepute). Canon Ethics where there is a pattern of disregard or indifference, which warrant discipline.

U.S. Supreme Court Digest 24 (1) GENERAL CONSPIRACY

U. S. 2003. Essence of a conspiracy is an agreement to commit an unlawful act,-U.S. V. Jimenez Recio; 123 S Ct. 819, 537 U.S. 270, 154 L. Ed. 2d 744, on remand 371 F 3d 1093.

Agreement to commit an unlawful act, which constitutes the essence of a conspiracy, is a distinct evil that exist and be punished whether or not the substantive crime ensues.-Id.

CANON 1

A judge should uphold the integrity and independence of the judiciary.

The Miseducation of the Negroe Political Education Neglected

Carter G. Woodson, 1933

This applies to every black and brown judge who has allowed themselves to be prostituted into dispensating corrupt laws from the bench in an attempt to be accepted by Powerful Corrupt White Terrorist described as Judges, by oppressing their own people committing Genocide on their own race.

A- Judge Bauer as a Corrupt White man in Power has demonstrated he along with other Terrorists Judges do what they want on the bench and is challenging the Federal Government to come and remove them. Section 1983 of USCS contemplates the depravation of Civil Rights through the unconstitutional application of a law by conspiracy or otherwise. Mansell V. Saunders (CA 5 Fla) 372 F 2d 573, especially if the conspiracy was actually carried into effect and plaintiff was thereby deprived of any rights privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws, the gist of the action may be treated as one for the depravation of rights under 42 USCS 1983 Lewis V. Brautigam (CA 5 Fla) 227 F 2d 124, 55 Alr 2d 505.

B- Judge Bauer and his army of Judicial Terrorists have satisfied and met the full criteria of Racial Discrimination Terrorism at appellant in that, Farmer V. Haas is a universal stereotypical analogy how powerful Caucasians view African Americans especially the men (we) are criminals first before we are termed as a man, it is clear he and those that embraces his philosophy oppresses people of color;

FURTHER AFFIANT SAYETH NAUGHT

Wherefore the aforementioned reasons Appellant respectfully requests that Judge Bauer Recuse himself Instanter assign this matter to a Judge with no Irish or German racial fraternal associations to the Political Machine;

2.) Reconsideration for appointment of an attorney is enforced instanter.

3.) Issue aRULE TO SHOW CAUSE REMANDING JUDGE DARRAH INTO CUSTODY INSTANTER FOR FRAUD & CONTEMPT OF COURT;

5) That the Commander & Chief President Barack Obama issue a directive abolishing these Terrorist acts perpetrated against the Appellant;

Respectfully submitted,

Joe Louis Lawrence

Counsel Pro Se

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

Dated February 27, 2012

_____________________

Joe Louis Lawrence

Counsel Pro Se

CERTIFICATE OF ATTORNEY PRO SE

Respectfully Submitted

Joe Louis Lawrence

Counsel Pro Se

P.O. Box 490075

Chicago, Illinois 60649-0075

Monday February 27, 2012

IN THE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION

Joe Louis Lawrence

Plaintiff CIVIL ACTION NO 11 CV 6887

Honorable Judge John W. Darrah

V Room 1203

Secretary of State, Clerk of Circuit Court,

States Attorney, Attorney General, Circuit Court Judges

Amalgamated Trans. Union 241, State Judges Illinois

Kent S. Ray, Rachael L.Kaplan

Defendants

MOTION FOR – DISQUALIFICATION OF JUDGE--PERSONAL BIAS OR PREJUDICE{28 USCA 144, 455 (B) (1)} VACATE ORDER OF OCT. 21, 2011, DUE TO FRAUD/ERROR

Now comes Joe Louis Lawrence, Counsel Pro Se a United States Citizen born and raised a freeman by all governing laws of the United States Constitution, Appellant in this cause files herewith his affidavit as required by Title 28, United States Code, Section 144 to show that the Honorable John W. Darrah has a personal bias against the Appellant and have committed egregious “fraud” with compelling evidence in an attempt to prevent him “equal access” to the Federal Court’s jurisdiction;

Said Judge John W. Darrah made gross fabrications about the Appellant’s documents filed before the court which are unfounded, he says “it is impossible to discern from Plaintiff’s rambling” et al;

Based thereon Appellant respectfully moves that the Honorable John W. Darrah proceed no further herein vacate all orders against the Appellant and have this matter reassigned via computer generation to another judge who is not bias and understands how to dispensate the laws in accordance to the United States Constitution and in accordance to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure to preside over this matter;

October 24, 2011.

Respectfully Submitted

Joe Louis Lawrence

PO Box 490075

Chicago, Ill. 60649-0075

Email: joelouislaw@yahoo.com

Phone: 312 927-4210

IN THE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION

AFFIDAVIT

In support of Motion

To Disqualify John W. Darrah, Judge of the Northern District of Illinois for Personal Bias or Prejudice “FRAUD” pursuant to 28 USCA 144, 455 (b) (1)

I Joe Louis Lawrence, Counsel Pro Se being duly sworn on oath states:

1.) That on the Court Order Judge Darrah records, “On October 7, 2011, Joe Louis Lawrence submitted a Complaint with an application to proceed without paying the customary $350 filing fee…. Et al. hereto attached, Ex A, September 30, 2011, Complaint;

A- Said Judge was cognizant and aware his actions in this matter were in fact unlawful, but because he shared the same animus racial hatred towards the appellant as complained of in all documents, he manufactured a date of Oct. 7, 2011, in that, all other Judges in the State and Circuit Courts lied and committed “fraud” on the courts and nothing happened to them;

B- Said judge demonstrated hostile biasness by ignoring the very complaint that provided various claims as to why the Federal Court have jurisdiction in this matter, he literately turned his back on the complaint, closed his eyes to the plethora of Racists Civil Rights violations perpetrated at the plaintiff; The judge erred by demonstrating an act of Improprieties in an attempt to aid and assist said Appellee’s named in Suit, In Re Judge No. 93-154, 440 S.E.2d 169 (Ga. 1994), And Deception by falsifying reasons for preventing a legally sufficient Complaint and Petition for Rule to show Cause et al., from being served on Appellee’s, In re Ferrara, 582 N.W. 2d 817 (Mich. 1998),In re Renfer, 493 S.E. 2d 434 (N.C. 1997), In re Kroger, 702 A. 2d 64 (Vt. 1997), Gonzalez v. Commission on Judicial Performance, 33 Cal. 3d 359, 657 P. 2d 372, 377, 188 Cal. Rptr. 880 (1983);

C- Said Judges forgot to do what his racist colleagues did on the State level at least when Court Orders were entered in a fabricating manner, the members of the Political Machine had the records removed from the court files and the entire Paternity matter is allegedly under the authority of a powerful City Hall official, Case #85 D 068185 and 88 D 079012;

D- Said Judge has demonstrated a norm in how things are done when it involves Racial Injustice on non-white citizens because Plaintiff is a welfare recipient his expectation is nobody would take the word of a poor Nigger over his authority and not even question his authority simply because he is a white man;

E- Judge Darrah was misinformed in that, Plaintiff is not a NIGGER and is not inferior to any man and the laws should have been dispensated equally in accordance to the laws of the United States Constitution and within Federal Rules of Civil Procedures;

F- That Dorothy Tucker news anchorwoman aired a young man on the news (September 15, 2011) who was experiencing the exact same plight as the Appellant on he contemplated suicide, for 21 years he had fighting a paternity matter for which he was not the father;

G- An unidentified case worker said “his biggest mistake was not knowing what petition to ask for”

Black and Hispanic minority men are misrepresented in the courts and under represented a black or Hispanic man can spend 20-30 years in prison on Death Row or incarcerated for crimes they did not commit before DNA reveals oops they did not do it, but a man’s life is descimated behind these racist atrocities’

On the other hand, take men like the Appellant and the person Dorothy Tucker aired in the news, these racist men have found another way to oppress and psychologically destroy the minority man using the Child support system—Corrupt white men have found a lucrative way to create job security for themselves at the expense of innocent black and brown men;

2.) That the aforementioned entry is fabricated entirely said Judge committed “Fraud” on the Court;

A- Said Judge’s legal entries for dismissing said complaint have been Unconstitutionally recorded and frivolously applied and questions the judges future tenure as a Federal Judge for his criminal actions in this matter; the judge erred in abusing the adversarial process, a fundamental aspect of the adversarial system is that proceedings are to be conducted in open court. Judges have been disciplined for disposing of cases without an adversarial proceeding, In re Fitzgerald, Unreported Determination (Ky. Comm’n 1986); Holder, 74 N.J. 581, 379 A. 2d 220 (1977);

B- Plaintiff was scheduled to appear before Judge Darrah Tuesday October 25, 2011, at 9:00am, hereto attached, Ex B, October 11, 2011, Petition for Rule to Show Cause et al.

That the Judge erred considerably when it received notice and knowledge of other Judges complicit in a Criminal Conspiracy failed to follow Canon Ethics Leslie W. Abramson, 25 Hofstra L. Rev. 751 (1997). The Judges Ethical Duty to Report Misconduct by Other Judges and Lawyers and its effect on Judicial Independence.

3.) Said Judge records, Lawrence’s Complaint seeks a Rule to Show Cause relating to various assertions, including: (1) the corroboration of judges and public officials in an organized chain conspiracy… et al; The judge erred by engaging in a conspiracy citing a case in the law that is of no merit in this matter and constitutes a failure to follow the Canon laws, Matter of Markey, 696 N.E. 2d 523 (Mass.1998), Mississippi Comm’n on Judicial Performance v. Byers, 757 So. 2d 961 (Miss. 2000)

REPORTING JUDICIAL MISCONDUCT

CANON 3D (1)

Under Section 3D (1), a judge who receives information that indicates “a substantial likelihood that another judge “ has violated the Code of Judicial “should take appropriate action”. The Canon does not require the judge to hold a hearing and make a definitive decision that a violation has occurred before the reporting requirement is triggered and at least one state’s judicial ethics committee has advised that the reporting requirement is triggered when the judge has “sufficient information” to conclude that a “substantial issue” has been raised that a violation has occurred, Mass. Comm. On Judicial Ethics, Op. 2002-04 (2002)

“Appropriate action” may include direct communication with the judge who has committed the violation and reporting the violation to the appropriate or other agency or body. See Commentary to Canon 3D (1). “Appropriate authority” is the authority with responsibility for initiation of disciplinary proceedings with respect to the violation reported. Some jurisdictions’ rules specify to whom a judge must report misconduct. For instance, Massachusetts Rule 3D (1) provides that if a judge becomes aware of another judge’s unprofessional conduct he must report his knowledge to the Chief Justice of the Massachusetts Supreme Court and the court of which the judge in question is a member.

Note that the term “knowledge”, as defined in the Terminology Section, denotes actual knowledge of the fact in question and as such, a person’s knowledge may be inferred from circumstances. In drafting Section 3D (1), the Committee rejected the suggestion that the criteria of raising substantial question as to honesty or trustworthiness be applied in the context of reporting judicial misconduct as well, on the grounds that those criteria are implicit in the present criterion of raising a substantial question as to a judge’s fitness for office.

4.) Plaintiff-Appellant filed a Complaint September 30, 2011, against the Secretary of State, Clerk of the Circuit Court, States Attorney, Attorney General, Circuit Court Judges, Amalgamated Transit Union, 241, State Judges, Illinois, Kent S. Ray, Rachael L. Kaplan as the Defendants;

A- Said Complaint was captioned Complaint of Civil Rights Violations, Unequal Protection of the Laws Violations, Wrongful Incarceration/Remand, Disparate Treatment; Civil Rights Act of 1866- first section, enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled. That all persons born in the United States and not subject to any foreign power, excluding Indians not taxed, are hereby declared to be citizens of the United States; and such citizens of every race and color, without regard to any previous condition of slavery or involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall have the same right, in every State and Territory in the United States, to make and enforce contracts, to sue, be parties, and give evidence, to inherit, purchase, lease, sell, hold and convey real and personal property, and to full and equal benefit of the laws and proceedings for the security of person and property, as is enjoyed by white citizens, and shall be subject to like punishment, pains, and penalties, and to none other, any law, statute, ordinances, regulation, or custom, to the contrary notwithstanding, Act of April 9, 1866, ch. 31, 1, 14 Stat. 27, 42 U.S.C.A. 1981 (a)

5.) Plaintiff-Appellant filed a Petition for Rule to Show Cause Judges Corroboration in an Organized Chain Conspiracy Perjury/Contempt of Court & Contempt of the United States Constitution other Irregularities Remand/Body Attachment Instanter; Turner 24 F. Cas. 337 (No. 14247) C.C.D. Md. 1867) The “equal benefit” clause is cited in what would appear to be the earliest reported case enforcing the section. The plaintiff was an emancipated slave who was indentured as an apprentice to her former master. Although both whites and blacks could be indentured as an apprentice, under the law of Maryland, indentured blacks were not accorded the same educational benefits as whites and, unlike whites, were subject to being transferred to any other person in the same county. Circuit Judge Chase granted a writ of habeas corpus upon finding that the purported apprenticeship was in fact involuntary servitude and a denial under the Civil Rights Act of 1866 of the “full and equal benefit of all laws

A- Appellant is being DENIED Equal access to the Laws of this court due to his SKIN COLOR, the courts have agreed with this disposition and all attorneys are in concert with the above as well, said courts have demonstrated systematically, Appellant is not a free man with Civil Rights he is a Prisoner, a Criminal, despite his intelligence, he has no intelligence, nor is he able to articulate legal issues of the Laws simply because he is a “NIGGER” he is less than any Caucasian with no education, less than the human he thinks himself to be, and as long as Appellant keeps rising up against the Injustices, telling on “WHITE FOLKS” reminding the courts of the wrongs inflicted upon him, as long as there is a RACIST JUDGE in authority, we the RACIST JUDGES in authority will do everything in our POWERS TO DESTROY, DENY JUSTICE, INCITE RACISM, EMBRACE RACISM, COMMIT GENOCIDAL INJUSTICE TO any NIGGER like the Pro Se Appellant because white men can do whatever they please to NIGGERS;

B- Even though Plaintiff-Appellant is in no way, nor does he espouse any connotations of a “NIGGER” said Judges and everyone involved have done anything and everything required of them to be accepted by these Racist Terrorists;

Appellant’s Legal Chronology establishes that FACTin the Complaint as Ex. A!

A- Said laws have been used to protect Racism and everyone who has perpetrated a role in said conspiracy

B- Appellant has been Whipped, Beaten, many times Denied, Psychologically Traumatized, Economically Murdered, The Laws have been used as Water Hoses to keep him down on his ASS never to look up, the Ropes have been replaced with the DISPENSATION of Unconstitutional Application of Unjust Laws as many have tried to lynch and torture said Appellant on paper;

C- No black brown Hispanic, African American man is free in this State of Illinois, in that Judge Darrah has demonstrated what men of his era are willing to do to destroy innocent men of color;

Arkansas Code of Judicial Conduct Commentary to Canon 2 (1988) provides that “{A} judge must avoid all impropriety.” And appearance of impropriety.” Accordingly, “{A} judge should disqualify himself in a proceeding in which his impartiality might reasonably be questioned …..”Arkansas Code of Judicial Conduct, Canon 3 (C) (1) 1988.

Where a judge exhibits bias or the appearance of bias, the court will reverse. Patterson v. R.T., 301 Ark. 400, 784 S.W. 2d 777 (1990); Farley v. Jester, 257 Ark. 686, 520 S.W. 2d 200 (1975) “The proper administration of the law requires not only that judges refrain from actual bias, but also that they avoid all appearances of unfairness. “Bolden v. State, 262 Ark. 718, 561 S.W. 2d 281 (1978).

6.) That Judge Darrah has acted outside of the provisions of the immunity clause when he exercised the duties of his authority outside the laws of the United States Constitution when he sided with the conspirators DISMISSING Appellant’s legal documents unlawfully, committing all sorts of “fraud” and having those “frauds” deposited in a Federal Mailbox which is another criminal act;

a. Said Judge violated all Rules of law Canon Ethics, Code of Judicial Conduct Rule 62 Scott, 377 Mass. 364, 386 N.E. 2d 218, 220 (1979) See Lopez-Alexander, Unreported Order No. 85-279 (Colo. May 3, 1985) (Judge removed for, inter alia, a persistent pattern of abuse of the contempt power. The Mayor of Denver accepted the findings of the Denver County Court Judicial Qualification Commission that the judge’s conduct could not be characterized as mere mistakes or errors of law and that the conduct constituted willful misconduct in office and conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice that brings the judicial office into disrepute). Canon Ethics where there is a pattern of disregard or indifference, which warrant discipline.

b. Said Judge committed the same criminal acts every Circuit Court, Appellate Judges committed in signing court orders unlawfully for each other when no Judge on the State Level ever had any jurisdiction on him that warranted any judicial actions against him;

A judge’s disrespect for the rules of court demonstrates disrespect for the law. Judges are disciplined under Canon 2A for violating court rules and procedures. Judge ignored mandated witness order in attempt to accommodate witnesses’ schedules; Citing Canon 2A the court noted, “[a] court’s indifference to clearly stated rules breeds disrespect for and discontent with our justice system. Government can not demand respect of the laws by its citizens when its tribunals ignore those very same laws”)

7.) That Judge Darrah attempted to save a group of Racist Terrorists by violating the oath of his office doing whatever necessary to further undermine, oppress, psychologically torture the Counsel Pro Se Appellant as far as his robe would allow him by dismissing any and all claims he put before the courts; Bozarth, 604 A. 2d 100 (N.J. 1992) See also Public Admonishment of Drew (Cal. Comm’n on Judicial Performance, July 1996) (judge admonished for numerous violations including denying a defendant his right to appointed counsel on the grounds of the ability of others to pay for legal representation and the possibility of future employment

Dash, 564 S.E. 2d 672 (S.C. 2002). The District Court failed to follow and apply said laws in an applicable legal manner

CANON 1

A Judge should uphold the INTEGRITY and independence of the JUDICIARY.

The integrity and independence of judges depend in turn upon their acting without fear or favor. Although judges should be independent, they should comply with the law, as well as the provisions of this code. Public confidence in the impartiality of the judiciary is maintained by the adherence of each judge to this responsibility. Conversely, violation of this code diminishes public confidence in the judiciary and thereby does injury to the system of government under law.

8.) That because of the horrendous unprecedented acts of “draconian” criminal acts of conspiracies someone on the Federal level allegedly had someone in the Chicago Housing Authority to unlawfully obtain Appellant’s credit report unlawfully, hereto attached, Group Ex C, Oct. 17, 2011, letter sent to Deputy Director Janice Stewart, acknowledged and received by Sequoya Hudson who hand delivered it to Sam Balkin her Assistant;

A- Said letter demonstrates gross negligence and harassment to further wear down the Appellant psychologically by withholding basic services as a Federal Chicago Housing Voucher recipient;

B- Said Deputy Director called the Appellant from 312 786-3678, Appellant returned the call but no communication of any sort establishing who and why his credit report was obtained unlawfully;

C- The events Plaintiff has experienced in this matter are that of “War Like” criminal acts the Terrorists behind these psychological ills have taken racial hatred to another level;

794 S.W. 2d 692 (Mo. App. 1990) “No system of justice can function at its best or maintain broad public confidence if a litigant can be compelled to submit his case in a court where the litigant sincerely believes the judge is incompetent or prejudicial…… {T}hat is the price to be paid for a judicial system that seeks to free a litigant from a feeling of oppression”. State ex Rel. McNary v. Jones, 472 S.W. 2d. 637, 639-640 (Mo. App. 1971) Indeed, the right to disqualify a judge is “one of the keystones of our legal administration edifice“ State ex Rel. Campbell v. Kohn, 606 S.W. 2d 399-401(Mo. App. 1980). It is vital to public confidence in the legal system that the decisions of the court are not only fair, but also appear fair. Thus whether the disqualification of a judge hinges on a statute or rule in favor of the right to disqualify. A liberal construction is necessary if we wish to promote and maintain public confidence in the judicial system. Kohn, 606 S.W. 2d at 401; State ex Rel. Ford Motor Co. v. Hess S.W. 2d 147, 148 (Mo. App. 1987).

Section 1983 of USCS contemplates the depravation of Civil Rights through the unconstitutional application of a law by conspiracy or otherwise. Mansell V. Saunders ( CA 5 FLa) 372 F 2d 573,especially if the conspiracy was actually carried into effect and plaintiff was thereby deprived of any rights privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws, the gist of the action may be treated as one for the depravation of rights under 42 USCS 1983 Lewis V. Brautigam (CA 5 Fla) 227 F 2d 124, 55 Alr 2d 505.

FEDERAL JUDGE GETTLEMAN: stated, Tuesday March 10, 2009, where he found Superintendent of police Jody Weiss in Contempt of Court and Ordered the City to Pay $100,000.00, “No one is above the Law”, he cited a 1928 decision by Supreme Court Justice Louis Brandeis, that said, “If the Government becomes the law breaker, it breeds Contempt for the Law, It invites everyman to become a law unto himself. It invites Anarchy.”

Wherefore the aforementioned reasons recorded within Appellant moves this Court to grant the Motion in it’s entirety Disqualifying Judge Darrah from this matter;

FURTHER AFFIANT SAYETH NAUGHT

Respectfully Submitted

Joe Louis Lawrence

PO Box 490075

Chicago, Ill. 60649-0075

Email: joelouislaw@yahoo.com

Phone: 312 927-4210

IN THE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION

Joe Louis Lawrence

Plaintiff CIVIL ACTION NO 11 CV 6887

Honorable John W. Darrah

V Room 1203

Secretary of State, Clerk of Circuit Court,

States Attorney, Attorney General, Circuit Court Judges

Amalgamated Trans. Union 241, State Judges Illinois

Kent S. Ray, Rachael L. Kaplan

Defendants

NOTICE OF

MOTION FOR – DISQUALIFICATION OF JUDGE--PERSONAL BIAS OR PREJUDICE{28 USCA 144, 455 (B) (1)} VACATE ORDER OF OCT. 21, 2011, DUE TO FRAUD/ERROR

To the Honorable Judge of the United States District Court for the Northern District:

Moving Party, Joe Louis Lawrence, hereby respectfully represents as counsel Pro Se shows this court with an affidavit the noted reasons why said judge should be Disqualified from this matter; {Pursuant to the provisions of the United States Constitution}

To: Dir. Mueller FBI Washington D.C.

Robert Grant/Agent Chatto FBI 2111 West Roosevelt Road, Chicago, Ill. 60612

U.S. Attorney Patrick Fitzgerald, 219 S. Dearborn, Suite 500

TO: AAG Tyler Roland Chief Judge Timothy Evans, Daley Center, Chg, Ill. 60601

General Law Bureau Presiding Judge Jacobius, Daley Center, Chg. Ill. 60601

100 West Randolph Street Suite 1300

Chicago, Ill. 60601 Clerk of Circuit Court Dorothy Brown, Suite 1001, Chg. Ill.

Asst. Gen. Counsel, Sec of State Terrence McConville, 100 West Randolph Chg. Ill.

States Attorney, Anita Alvarez, Daley Center, Suite 500 Chg. Ill. 60601

Hon. Mary Lane Mikva Amalgamated Transit Union, President Darrell Jefferson,

Daley Center, Room 2508 Secretary Michael Simmons, 20 S. Clark Suites 850

Chg. Ill. 60603

Dorothy Tucker CHA

Channel 2 News Janice Stewart, Deputy Dir.

22 West Washington 60 East Van Buren

Chicago, Ill. 60602 Chicago, Ill. 60605

PLEASE BE ADVISED that on October 28, 2011, Appellant shall appear before Judge Darrah for the Disqualification from said matter at 9:00am in room 1203;

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I Joe Louis Lawrence Plaintiff-Counsel Pro Se, certify that I have on this day filed said Motion to Disqualify Judge John W. Darrah, due to Bias and or Prejudice pursuant to {USCA 144, 455 (B) (1)} Vacate Order of Oct. 21, 2011, with the Clerk of the United States District Court with all attachments;

Dated October 24, 2011

Respectfully Submitted

Joe Louis Lawrence

Counsel Pro Se

P. O. Box 490075

Chicago, Illinois 60649-0075

Email: joelouislaw@yahoo.com

Phone: 312 927-4210

U. S Sup Court Digest 24(1) General Conspiracy

U.S. 2003. Essence of a conspiracy is an agreement to commit an unlawful act.—U.S. v. Jimenez Recio, 123 SCt. 819, 537 U.S. 270, 154 L.Ed.2d 744, on remand 371F.3d 1093

Agreement to commit an unlawful act, which constitutes the essence of a conspiracy, is a distinct evil that exist and be punished whether or not the substantive crime ensues.-Id.

CONSPIRACY

Fraud maybe inferred from nature of acts complained of, individual and collective interest of alleged conspirators, situation, intimacy, and relation of parties at time of commission of acts, and generally all circumstances preceding and attending culmination of claimed conspiracy Illinois Rockford Corp. V. Kulp, 1968, 242 N.E. 2d 228, 41 ILL. 2d 215.

Conspirators to be guilty of offense need not have entered into conspiracy at same time or have taken part in all its actions. People V. Hardison, 1985, 911 Dec. 162, 108. Requisite mens rea elements of conspiracy are satisfied upon showings of agreement of offense with intent that offense be committed; Actus reas element is satisfied of act in furtherance of agreement People V. Mordick, 1981, 50 ILL, Dec. 63

Civil Rights Act of 1866- first section, enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled. That all persons born in the United States and not subject to any foreign power, excluding Indians not taxed, are hereby declared to be citizens of the United States; and such citizens of every race and color, without regard to any previous condition of slavery or involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall have the same right, in every State and Territory in the United States, to make and enforce contracts, to sue, be parties, and give evidence, to inherit, purchase, lease, sell, hold and convey real and personal property, and to full and equal benefit of the laws and proceedings for the security of person and property, as is enjoyed by white citizens, and shall be subject to like punishment, pains, and penalties, and to none other, any law, statute, ordinances, regulation, or custom, to the contrary notwithstanding, Act of April 9, 1866, ch. 31, 1, 14 Stat. 27, 42 U.S.C.A. 1981 (a).

FURTHER AFFIANTH SAYETH NAUGHT

Under penalties as provided by law pursuant to 735 1265 5\1-109, the undersigned certifies that the statements set forth in this instrument are true and correct, except as to matters therein stated to be on information and belief and as to such matters, the undersigned certifies as aforesaid that he verily believes the same to be true.

Respectfully Submitted

Joe Louis Lawrence

Counsel Pro Se

Joe Louis Lawrence

P.O. Box 490075-0075

Chicago, Illinois 60649-0075

joelouislaw@yahoo.com

312 927-4210

IN THE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION

Joe Louis Lawrence

Plaintiff CIVIL ACTION NO 11 CV 6887

Honorable John W. Darrah

V Room 1203

Secretary of State, Clerk of Circuit Court,

States Attorney, Attorney General, Circuit Court Judges

Amalgamated Trans. Union 241, State Judges Illinois

Kent S. Ray, Rachael L.Kaplan

Defendants

To the Clerk of the above named Court:

Michael W. Dobbins

219 South Dearborn, 20^th Floor

Chicago, Ill. 60604

Application is hereby made for reasons set forth in the attached affidavit and certification, Motion to Disqualify Judge due to Bias and or Prejudice that appropriate proceedings be taken under 28 USCA 144 to assign another Judge to hear the proceeding;

Respectfully submitted,

Joe Louis Lawrence

Counsel Pro Se

P.O. Box 490075-0075

Chicago, Illinois 60649-0075

joelouislaw@yahoo.com

312 927-4210

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY ILLINOIS

CHANCERY DIVISION

Joe Louis Lawrence Case # 10 CH 23588

Plaintiff

Hon. Mary L. Mikva

Jesse White, Illinois Secretary of State Room 2508

Et al

Defendants

MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION/VACATE(Jan. 20, 2011) ORDER Due TO “FRAUD” ON COURT “PERJURY” JUDGES CORROBBORATION IN AN ORGANIZED CHAIN CONSPIRACY “CIVIL RIGHTS VIOLATIONS” & OTHER IRREGULARITIES w/AFFIDAVIT

Now comes Petitioner, Joe Louis Lawrence, Counsel Pro Se, in this cause respectfully represents to this court the reasons and files herewith his Affidavit in support for said Motion Objecting Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss due to “Fraud” On Court “Perjury” Criminal Chain Conspiracy “Corruption” other Civil Rights Violations, pursuant to the provisions of the Admin. Rev. Law, 735 ILCS 5/3-101, Section 1983 of U.S.C.S., S.H.A. Criminal Ch. 38, 33-3, Civil Rights Act of 1964, Canon 3D (1) Reporting Judicial Misconduct, 3D (2) Reporting Lawyer Misconduct;

Respectfully Submitted,

Joe Louis Lawrence

Counsel Pro Se

P.O. Box 490075

Chicago, Illinois 60649-0075

(312) 927-4210

STATE OF ILLINOIS )

)

COUNTY OF COOK )

AFFIDAVIT

Joe Louis Lawrence being first duly sworn on oath deposes and state as follows:

1.) I am Joe Louis Lawrence, Counsel Pro Se.

2.) That on Feb. 28, 2011, Hon. Mary L. Mikva Ordered AAG Tyler Roland to produce the records of case# 10 CH 23588;

A- Tyler Roland tried to finagle his way with the Judge telling her she DISMISSED Plaintiff’s complaint;

B- Plaintiff objected and informed the court, “he filed the proper motion objecting Defendant’s motion to dismiss and you did not dismiss the complaint”;

C- That Judge Mikva motioned the Plaintiff in a courteous manner as he gestured to respond, she stated to Tyler in a professional authoritative manner, “I did not dismiss his complaint only certain portions naming defendants and parts that do not relate to the record”;

PRIOR EVENTS THAT LED TO THE AFOREMENTIONED:

1A.) That on Jan. 20, 2011, Plaintiff meritoriously argued the facts of the case in a legally comprehensible manner;

2B.) FACT AAG Tyler Roland’s defense was that Plaintiff’s complaint was not properly plead, Judges response, “oh it was properly plead, I understood what he was saying. Just because you were taught and trained to prepare pleadings a certain way does not mean the way he pleads differently from the way you were taught does not mean that his pleadings is not properly plead correctly, his are construed differently, this is about the suspension of his license;

3C.) Judge Mikva stated, “this is a very old case and her jurisdiction is limited to what is in the record, before the Adm. Hearings body” –Plaintiff, interjected respectfully, stated, “Your Honor, there is no record and recited numerous allegations of politically connected Judges and Asst States Attys. signing court orders appearing on behalf of the woman who is a Police Officer, court orders signed he never seen and that he had been locked up 5 times for allegedly owing child support” she appeared shocked and flushed as Plaintiff argued his case, she said, “their has to be a judgment somewhere otherwise we would not be here” Tyler did not say a word; Plaintiff said, “no it’s not”!

4D.) The Hearing seemed to have reached an impasse at this point, the Judge dismissed the Default Petition, Petition to Supplement Rule to Show Cause et al and Plaintiff’s Response Request to Admit the Genuineness et al., seemingly the only presumption was that it was premature even though counsel did not respond or object, she ordered the Chicago Volunteer Legal Services to represent the Plaintiff it was convoluted, the case advanced so far without a record was mind boggling;

3.) FACT Feb. 28, 2011, CVL DECLINED to represent the Plaintiff, Judge asked the Plaintiff, “if he had anything to add or he wanted to say”, his reply, “your honor it is not surprising this law firm is refusing this case nobody in this City wants to go up against the “Good ol boys” the men that are politically connected to City Hall, unfortunately, I have had several lawyers who have been either intimidated or threatened off this case where some of the lawyers gave me back my retainer, legal Aid refused this case, so I am in a position where I have to represent myself.”

4.) FACT Judge Mikva reiterated the fact Plaintiff’s response must be limited to the record when he prepares his brief, Plaintiff reminded the Judge, “he has no record” no Judge ever had a record even when he was locked up unlawfully all of the documents have been prepared off my memory of what has transpired in the courts and at the hearing”, she asked Tyler, Do you have the record? “When is he going to receive a copy of the record”? Tyler’s response, “by the end of this week no later than the 7^th”;

5.) FACT AAG Tyler Roland never answered Plaintiff’s complaint, which places him in DEFAULT!!!!!

A- He never asked leave of the court to file an answer late;

B- Judge Mikva never Ordered him to file an answer;

a. Pursuant to 735 ILCS 5/2-610 where allegations of complaint are not denied, there is admission of all facts well-pleaded by adversary, and such admission, drawn from failure to plead, may be considered as evidence. Hecht v. Hecht, App. 1 Dist. 1977, 7 Ill. Dec. 169, 49 Ill. App. 3d 334, 364 N.E. 2d 330.

b. Pursuant to 735 ILCS 5/2-612 Counsel never Objected to the sufficiency of Petitioners pleadings, Objections to sufficiency of pleadings either in form or substance must be made In trial court, and if not so made, they will be considered waived and cannot be raised for the first time on appeal. People ex rel. Deynes v. Harris, App. 1948, 77 N.E. 2d 439, 333 Ill. App. 280.

C- He Induced Reliance upon the court when he noted in the court order Respondent shall file the answer on or before March 7, 2011;

6.) FACT AAG Tyler Roland filed an answer to the Plaintiff’s complaint Feb. 28, 2011, demonstrates Plaintiff’s Default Motion and Motion to Supplement Petition for Rule to Show Cause et al was in fact timely and properly presented in accordance to Illinois Supreme Court Rules and Rules of Illinois Civil Procedure;

7.) FACT AAG Tyler Roland contemptuously with vexatious arrogance “Perjured” himself before the court knowing “DAM” well Plaintiff did not owe any child support, hereto attached, Ex 16, Line 1-17 from court transcript demonstrates Plaintiff had no knowledge of the illegal court proceedings had against him;

8.) FACT AAG Tyler Roland was aware the Hearing Officer Angelia Young, Sec. of State Atty. Edmund Michalowski was acting in concert in said conspiracy, both of them was aware from the record everything asserted was alleged, hereto attached, Ex. 17 Line 15- 23, establishes veracity to the above;

A-FACT Plaintiff properly filed the Rule to Show Cause on the above named individuals and said summons was properly served on them in a timely manner;

9.) FACT AAG Tyler Roland was aware and conspired in Terrorist actions against the Plaintiff by violating his Civil Rights, in that, Ex 22, hereto attached, filed March 8, 2010, reflects “ALLEGED ARREARAGE” of $49670.66, said court order was not certified had no signature on it;

A- That Pursuant to Sup Ct. Rule 272 “if at the time of announcing final judgment the judge requires the submission of a form of written judgment to be signed by the judge et al” the judgment becomes final only when the signed judgment is filed—there is no signed COURT ORDER from the FINAL JUDGMENT!

B- Where the trial court requests that a written judgment be prepared, and where the attorney who obtains the judgment prepares it and submits it to the judge for approval and entry, the judge’s oral announcement of his decision and the reasons thereof have no effect; the judgment is not the act of the court until it is signed or approved and entered of record. In re Marriage of Dwan, App 1^st Dist. 1982, 64 Ill. Dec 340, 108 Ill. App 3d 808, 439 N. E. 2d 1005. That the Judges in the Appellate Court, Supreme Court, States Attorneys, Attorney Generals and a host of Public Officials never followed the law or rules of Illinois Civil Procedure or the laws of the United States Constitution, they DENIED everything he presented establishing his innocence due to him being non-white;

10.)FACT AAG Tyler Roland was aware and conspired with other Terrorists against the Plaintiff using their positions and authorities violating his Civil Rights, hereto attached, Ex 27, Letter falsified and prepared by an alleged IDHFS authorized representative;

11.)FACT AAG Tyler Roland was aware but ignored Ex 33, hereto attached, dated 8-16-92, Accts Rec. Summary ZERO BALANCE;

A- Aurelia Pucinski as clerk of the Circuit Court ordered her clerks to give to the Plaintiff anything he requested relating to this paternity matter because he was a Pauper, it was brought to his attention he was up against the “Good ol boys” and that they were not going to let him defeat them in any court” the May 18, 1988 court order kept coming up missing in the court files along with a court order ordering him not to have any visitation of the child;

B- He was instructed to stay on top of the case because “those guys are not to be underestimated, they are capable of anything”—during this period Aurelia was a smooth sweet white woman, Plaintiff never dated her;

12.)FACT AAG Tyler Roland was aware but ignored Ex. 34, hereto attached, an Acct statement, 1-26-2004, Bal. ZERO;

13.)FACT AAG Tyler Roland was aware but ignored Ex. 36, hereto attached, complete history was done on the Paternity case (June 16, 2004);

A- Ex. 35, hereto attached, from Dorothy Browns Child Support, “According to our records, no payments have been received under this case number”;

14.)FACT AAG Tyler Roland was aware but ignored General Counsel Elena Demo’s letter hereto attached, Ex 37, sent to Plaintiff (May 29, 2008) “Your complaints revolve around issues, which I observe should be appropriately handled in the first instance in the civil courts, or through State Adm. Agencies appointed to investigate charges of civil rights violations, discrimination and corruption claims”;

15.)FACT AAG was aware States Attorney Anita Alvarez through her Chief General Litigation Division, hereto attached, as Ex 39 forwarded a letter pursuant to a court subpoena certifying Ex. 60 -61, May 18, 1988 Court Order; Finding the Plaintiff to be the father of the child by DEFAULT, the record is clear, he was never served, never had any paternity tests, but most importantly, he was never ordered to pay child support;

16.)FACT AAG Tyler Roland was aware former States Atty. Richard Devine and Judge Murphy received a Certified letter, Ref as Ex 40, hereto attached, detailing ASA Carolyn Kennedy falsifying everything necessary in Judge Murphy’s court as she aided and assisted other Terrorists as they acted in concert violating Plaintiff’s Civil Rights in the court room, she was a black woman;

17.)FACT AAG Tyler Roland was aware most importantly, a Notarized Chronology of Unlawful Contempt Charges w/Affidavit was sent to Attorney General Lisa Madigan, Ref as Ex. 42, she ignored all Civil Rights Violations perpetrated at the Plaintiff because she is a co conspirator;

18.)FACT when allegations of Torture was had on black men in custody, Lisa Madigan did not prosecute John Burge, or anyone else involved in that matter, the Federal Govt. came after and prosecuted him;

A- FACT That on Sun. Mar. 6^th , 2011, Sun Times Columnist Mary Mitchell, page 10A, records that a Police Officer murdered an innocent bystander claiming he was struggling for his gun, CTA’s video camera revealed officer Weems lied, --“showed little regard for Pleasance’s life”

B- Former Police Supt. Phil Cline rejected that the officer be fired gave him a 30 day suspension and rewarded him a promotion to Detective;

C- That in 2004, another Police Sergeant raped a woman described as a crack addict, after a bench trial John Hermann was sentenced to 25 years in prison by the judge, The Illinois Appellate Court reversed the conviction;

19.)Hereto attached, Group Ex. A, Motion for Reconsideration/Vacate Order Due to Judges Corroboration in an Organized Chain Conspiracy Civil Rights Violations and other Irregularities;

A- That said Motion is unchallenged it details how Judges in the Appellate Court intercept cases unlawfully to “fix” them for their buddies as they engage in Criminal Civil Rights Violations against a Mexican American;

20.)FACT That State Officials like Lisa Madigan and every other Racist Terrorist have closed their eyes to the heinous atrocities lodged at blacks and Hispanics, they have installed the necessary blacks with no back bone, no voice who would “lie” “cheat” for the Political Machine commit any unlawful criminal act, so as to protect the actual Racist Terrorists who are in charge of running this City as demonstrated entirely through out all legal documents;

21.)That every person who participated in this conspiracy against the plaintiff have committed Treason like Offenses, nobody took the initiative to demonstrate some level of integrity by refusing to follow the directives of the “Gate keeper”

A- The person at City Hall obviously promised them immortality in the after life, they are a part of his ARMY, he is likened to Pharaoh, everybody does what they are told, and nobody refuses his Directive;

B- That the “Political Machine” is nothing more than a recycled action of “JIM CROWISM” these Racist practices have been outlawed by the United States Supreme Court, Like Pharaoh’s army who was swallowed up in the red sea while they were many, the Ten Commandments provided a visual of the Political Machines fate here in this State City of Chicago;

Scripture records the fate of greed in Luke 12: 15-31;

That when the Plaintiff informed Public Aid he needed an increase in food stamps and cash because he was being forced to pay child support for a child that did not belong to him, they looked him up in the computer and saw no evidence of what was being asserted, even after trying to present documents where it was alleged he owed child support, he was Ordered to take a drug test and see a psychiatrist if he refused they were going to remove him from the welfare grant as head of the household;

That a psychiatrist (Traci Powell MD) told the plaintiff what he was asserting was impossible part of what he was asserting was real and the other was a part of some type of delusion and wanted to prescribe pills for his delusion, said there is no such thing as being in contempt of court for allegedly owing child support and the papers, he had in his possession could have been something he made up as a part of some type of grandiose seeking attention;

Plaintiff had to attend weekly therapy sessions with Bipolar and Schizophrenic patients at the mental health clinic so as to remain compliant with public aids directive all tests were retuned on him as negative, no person was experiencing anything similar to what he was going through and everyone was taking medicine, they were all good people;

The therapists he had were great they explained to him as a black man when you make assertions white men are doing something wrong, they will term you crazy (the politically correct term is mentally ill) because a black man is not suppose to talk back or question what a white man does, that statement drew an interesting parallel; a Judge, William Maddux told the Plaintiff in the year of 1993, “he admired what he had done in the courts trying to return back to work with the CTA”, Plaintiff explained to him, “he followed the laws in the books did everything correctly”, Judge reply, “yes you did, but up here things are done differently your Union is suppose to have you reinstated” Plaintiff explained, “nobody wants to go up against the CTA, I am a CTA employee”, his reply, “I understand that, but you are out of your league you are a bright kid take it back to the union”

22.)Finally, hereto attached, Ex B, a Certified Court Order from Hon. Lester Bonoguru ordering the Plaintiff to continue his efforts to be reinstated to the CTA, the Amalgamated Transit Union never had the Plaintiff reinstated even though he is a certified CTA employee;

The Law is CLEAR: Properly alleged facts within an affidavit that are not contradicted by counter affidavit are taken as true, despite the existence of contrary averments in the adverse party’s pleadings. Professional Group Travel, Ltd. v. Professional Seminar Consultants Inc., 136 ILL App 3d 1084, 483 N.E. 2d 1291; Buzzard v. Bolger, 117 ILL App 3d 887, 453 N.E. 2d 1129 et al.

The Law is clear: The purpose of a Motion to Vacate is to alert the trial court to errors it has made and to afford an opportunity for their correction. In re Marriage of King, App. 1 Dist. 2002, 270 Ill. Dec. 540, 336 Ill. App. 3d 83, 783 N.E. 2d 115, rehearing denied pending appeal; et al.

The Law is clear: Motions for Reconsideration are designed to bring to the court’s attention newly discovered evidence that was unavailable at time of original hearing, changes in existing law, or errors in court’s application of law. Continental Cas. Co. v. Security Ins. Co. of Hartford, App. 1 Dist. 1996, 216 Ill. Dec. 314, 279 Ill. App. 3d 815, 665 N.E. 2d 374, appeal dismissed, et al.;

Supreme Court Rule [137] provides in pertinent part:

If a pleading, motion, or other paper is signed in violation of this Rule, the court, upon motion or upon its own initiative, may impose upon the person who signed it , a represented party, or both, an appropriate sanction, which may include an order to pay to the other party or parties the amount of reasonable expenses incurred because of the filling of the pleading, motion, or other paper, including a reasonable attorney fee. Not only will the courts consider an award of sanctions for active false statements: failures to disclose material facts to the court can also justify an award of sanctions.

BRUBAKKEN v. Morrison, No. 1-9-1670, 1992 Ill App. LEXIS 2144 (1^st Dist. Dec. 30, 1992). Additionally, the fact that a false statement or omission is the result of an honest mistake is no defense to entry of a sanction. ID. To the extent that an individual lawyer has engaged in sanction able conduct, that lawyer’s firm can also be jointly and severally liable with the lawyer.

23.) That because AAG Tyler Roland and a plethora of other Terrorist conspirators are exercising laws outside of their immunity and jurisdiction and in accordance to other Political/Fraternal laws makes the Court order signed by Judge Mary L. Mikva a Void Order;

That because of the above; Fraud admissibility great latitude is permitted in proving fraud C.J.S. Fraud 104 ET Seg. Fraud 51-57. where a question of fraud and deceit is the issue involved in a case, great latitude is ordinarily permitted in the introduction of evidence, and courts allow the greatest liberality in the method of examination and in the scope of inquiry Vigus V. O’Bannon, 1886 8 N.E 788, 118 ILL 334. Hazelton V. Carolus, 1907 132 ILL. App. 512.

INDUCING RELIANCE

To prevail in a cause of action for fraud, plaintiff must prove that defendant made statement of material nature which was relied on by victim and was made for purposes of inducing reliance, and that victim’s reliance led to his injury. Parsons V. Winter, 1986, 1 Dist., 491 N.E. 2d 1236, 96 ILL Dec. 776, 142 ILL App 3d 354, Appeal Denied.

In Carter V. Mueller 457 N.E. 2d 1335 ILL. App. 1 Dist. 1983 The Supreme Court has held that: “The elements of a cause of action for fraudulent misrepresentation (sometimes referred to as “fraud and deceit” or deceit) are: (1) False statement of material fact; (2) known or believed to be false by the party making it; (3) intent to induce the other party to act; (4) action by the other party in reliance on the truth of the statement; and (5) damage to the other party resulting from such reliance.

24.) That AAG Tyler Roland have corroborated/admitted beyond all legal standards of the law engaging in a criminal conspiracy and implicating the Attorney General’s office covering up for the Political machine operatives; and how the office uses inferior ethnic groups outside their ethnicity to enforce their doctrines on innocent non-white men like the Plaintiff as noted throughout all documents;

A- That their has not been a single person to stand up against the Racist Atrocities lodged at the Plaintiff in every layer of this conspiracy ILL. App. (1^st Dist. 2000). A “VOID JUDGEMENT OR ORDER” is one that is entered by a court lacking jurisdiction over the parties or the subject matter, or lacking the inherent power to enter the particular order of judgment, or where the order was procured by FRAUD- in re Adoption of E.L., 248 ILL. Dec. 171, 733 N.E. 2d 846, 315 ILL. App. 3d 137- Judgm 7, 16, 375.

B- U.S 2003. Essence of a conspiracy is an agreement to commit an unlawful act.-U.S. v. Jimenez Recio; 123 SCt. 819, 537 U.S. 270, 154, L. Ed.2d 744, on remand 371 F.3d 1093;

Agreement to commit an unlawful act, which constitutes the essence of a conspiracy, is a distinct evil that exist and be punished whether or not the substantive crime ensues,-id.

C Section 1983 of U.S.C.S. contemplates the depravation of Civil Rights through the Unconstitutional Application of a Law by conspiracy or otherwise. Mansell v. Saunders (CA 5 F 1A) 372 F 573, especially if the conspiracy was actually carried into effect, where an action is for a conspiracy to interfere with Civil Rights under 42 U.S.C.S. 1985 (3), or for the depravation of such rights under 42 U.S.C.S. 1983, if the conspiracy was actually carried into effect and plaintiff was thereby deprived of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the United States Constitution and Laws, the gist of the action maybe treated as one for the depravation of rights under 42 U.S.C.S. 1983, Lewis v. Brautigam (CA 5 F 1a) 227 F 2d 124, 55 Alr 2d 505, John W. Strong, 185, 777-78 (4th ed. 1992).

25.)REPORTING JUDICIAL MISCONDUCT

CANON 3D (1)

“Appropriate action” may include direct communication with the judge who has committed the violation and reporting the violation to the appropriate or other agency or body. See Commentary to Canon 3D (1). “Appropriate authority” is the authority with responsibility for initiation of disciplinary proceedings with respect to the violation reported. Some jurisdictions’ rules specify to whom a judge must report misconduct. For instance, Massachusetts Rule 3D (1) provides that if a judge becomes aware of another judge’s unprofessional conduct he must report his knowledge to the Chief Justice of the Massachusetts Supreme Court and the court of which the judge in question is a member.

Note that the term “knowledge”, as defined in the Terminology Section, denotes actual knowledge of the fact in question and as such, a person’s knowledge may be inferred from circumstances. In drafting Section 3D (1), the Committee rejected the suggestion that the criteria of raising substantial question as to honesty or trustworthiness be applied in the context of reporting judicial misconduct as well, on the grounds that those criteria are implicit in the present criterion of raising a substantial question as to a judge’s fitness for office.

Under Section 4 of the Ku Klux Klan Act of 1871:

The President had additional power in case of rebellion within a state to suspend the writ of habeas corpus and to declare and enforce marital law. Cong. Globe, supra note 1, at 317. With respect to a definition of rebellion, Section 4 provided;

“Whenever in any State or part of a State……unlawful combinations……..shall be organized and armed, and so numerous and powerful as to be able, by violence, to either overthrow or set at defiance the constituted authorities of such State, or when the constituted authorities are in complicity with or shall connive at the unlawful purposes of such powerful and armed combinations; and whenever, by reason of either or all of the causes aforesaid, the conviction of such offenders and the preservation of the public safety shall become…. Impracticable, in every such case such combinations shall be deemed a rebellion against the Government of the United States….”

Corruption is so widespread in this State the Clerk in the Illinois Supreme Court sent a letter and Court Order (Feb. 7, 2011) stating he owed to them a debt, hereto attached, Court Order from Supreme Court Justice Freeman allowing him to proceed informa pauperis, Plaintiff is still on Public Aid where the Racist Conspirators placed him, keeping him from being reinstated to the CTA in an attempt to cover-up the theft of his wages and unlawful withholdings of child support garneesheed from his wages ;

FURTHER AFFIANTH SAYETH NOT

Under penalties as provided by law pursuant to 735 1265 5/1 -109, the undersigned certifies that the statements set forth in this instrument are true and correct, except as to matters therein stated to be on information and belief and as to such matters, the undersigned certifies as aforesaid that he verily believe the same to be true.

Respectfully submitted,

Joe Louis Lawrence

Counsel Pro Se

Name Joe Louis Lawrence

Attorney for Pro Se

Address P.O. 490075

City, State Chicago, Illinois 60649-0075

Phone (312) 927- 4210

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY ILLINOIS

CHANCERY DIVISION

Joe Louis Lawrence Case # 10 CH 23588

Plaintiff

Hon. Mary L. Mikva

Jesse White, Secretary of State Room 2508

Et al

Defendants

NOTICE OF

MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION/VACATE(JAN. 20, 2011) ORDER DUE TO “FRAUD” ON COURT “PERJURY” JUDGES CORROBBORATION IN AN ORGANIZED CHAIN CONSPIRACY “CIVIL RIGHTS VIOLATIONS” & OTHER IRREGULARITIESw/AFFIDAVIT

TO: Dir. Mueller FBI Washington D.C.

Robert Grant/James Chatto FBI 2111 West Roosevelt Road, Chicago, Ill. 60612

U.S. Atty. Patrick Fitzgerald, 219 S. Dearborn, Suite 500

AAG Tyler Roland Chief Judge Timothy Evans, Daley Center, Chg. Ill. 60601

100 West Randolph, 13^th floor Presiding Judge Jacobius, Daley Center, Chg. Ill. 60601

Chicago, Ill. 60601 Clerk of Circuit Court, Dorothy Brown, Suite 1001

Hearing Officer, Angelia L. Young, 17 N. State, Suite 1200, Chg. Ill. 60602

Secretary of State Atty. Edmund Michalowski, 17 N. State, Suite 1200

Please be advised that on March 8^th, 2011 Plaintiff has filed before this Circuit Court, Motion et al; and will present said legally sufficient instrument before the Honorable Mary L. Mikva, March 14, 2011, @9:00am in room 2508.

Respectfully Submitted,

Joe Louis Lawrence

Petitioner

PO Box 490075

Chicago, Illinois 60649-0075

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned hereby certifies that the above notice and all attachments were caused to be personally delivered, or via facsimile or deposited in the U.S. mail to the above parties at the addresses provided before 5:00 pm on March 8, 2011.

___________________________

Joe Louis Lawrence

Counsel Pro Se

In The

Circuit Court of Cook County, Illinois

Chancery

Division

(

Joe Louis Lawrence (

( Case # 10 CH 23588

PLANTIFF (

(

-VS- (

(

Jesse White, Secretary of State ( Hon. Judge Mary Lane Mikva

Et al ( Room 2508

DEFENDANTS (

ORDER

This cause coming before the Court on Plaintiff’s Motion for Reconsideration/Vacate (Jan. 20, 2011) Order due to Corroboration of Perjury/Criminal Mail Fraud Civil Rights Violations/Contempt of Court other Irregularities Remand/Body Attachment Instanter Impose Sanctions

Plaintiff appearing Attorney Pro Se and the Court being duly advised in the premises, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:

(1) Plaintiff’s Motion to Supplement Petition for Rule to Show Cause et al. Motion for Default et al & Plaintiff’s Response Request to admit the Genuineness et al, is GRANTED;

(2) Defendant’s shall be REMANDED INTO CUSTODY FOR CONTEMPT OF COURT;

(3) Defendant’s shall appear before this court on the Merits of Sanctions and other noted Punitive Damages ($200,000) a month for Irregularities mentioned in Plaintiffs Petition and Affidavits without further notice, by separate order of this court..

ENTERED:

Joe Louis Lawrence

P. O. Box 490075

Chicago, Illinois 60649-0075

312 927-4210

Atty. No 99500

_______________________

Hon. Mary Lane Mikva

_______________________

Date

In The

Circuit Court of Cook County, Illinois

Chancery

Division

(

Joe Louis Lawrence (

( Case # 10 CH 23588

PLANTIFF (

(

-VS- (

(

Jesse White, Secretary of State ( Hon. Judge Mary L. Mikva

Et al ( Room 2508

DEFENDANTS (

ORDER

This cause coming before the Court on Plaintiff’s Motion for Reconsideration/Vacate (Jan. 20, 2011) Orders Due to “Fraud” on Court “Perjury” Judges Corroboration in an Organized Chain Conspiracy, “Civil Rights Violations” & other Irregularities with Affidavit

Plaintiff appearing Attorney Pro Se and the Court being duly advised in the premises, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:

(1) Plaintiff’s Motion for Reconsideration due to “Fraud” on Court Perjury Criminal Chain Conspiracy, “Corruption” and other Civil Rights Violations is GRANTED Instanter;

ENTERED:

Joe Louis Lawrence

P. O. Box 490075

Chicago, Illinois 60649-0075

312 927-4210

Atty. No 99500

_______________________

Hon. Mary L. Mikva

_______________________

Date

#JudicialCorruption in Chicago, Illinois how to fix cases

Wikipedia Racial Injustice in Chicago Courts

Thursday, April 26, 2012

No comments:

Post a Comment

About Me